►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
B
B
A
A
Alrighty,
in
that
case,
I
will
start
with
just
a
little
bit
of
update
on
recommendations,
progress
as
I've
been
consistently
doing.
I
don't
have
much
that
has
changed
since
the
last
time.
I
gave
you
all
an
update.
I
just
wanted
to
give
an
update
on
the
charter
amendment
situations
because
those
are
finalized
and
have
moved
a
little
bit.
A
I
know
you
all
wrote
in
a
letter
in
support
of
the
rent
control
charter
amendment
the
there
were
two
possible
versions
of
the
rent
control
charter
amendment
that
could
be
on
the
ballot,
one
that
was
city,
council,
kind
of
shapes,
the
rent
control
policy
and
one
that
was
a
more
community-shaped
rent
control
policy.
The
city,
council-shaped,
rent
control
charter
amendment
will
be
on
the
ballot
is
moving
forward.
You
will
see
it
in
november.
The
community-shaped
one
will
not
be
on
the
ballot.
A
The
mayor
vetoed
it
and
the
council
did
not
have
a
veto
proof
majority
to
veto
his
veto.
However,
there
will
be
a
rent
control
charter
amendment
on
the
ballot
and
the
department
of
public
safety
charter
amendment
that
removes
mpd
as
a
charter
department
and
replaced
it
with
the
department
of
public
safety.
The
community
drafted
one
will
be
a
charter
amendment
on
the
ballot
in
november.
A
The
city
had
originally
written
a
like
explanatory
note,
next
to
the
ballot
question,
explaining
going
into
more
detail
about
what
it
meant
and
yes
for
minneapolis
the
campaign
and
coalition
that
brought
this
charter
amendment
forward
sued
the
city
saying
that
the
explanatory
note
was
biased
they
did
win.
The
explanatory
note
has
been
removed.
A
The
mayor
vetoed
the
removal
of
some
of
the
explanatory
language
and
the
city
council
had
enough
votes
to
veto
his
veto.
So
the
simple
ballot
question
with
no
additional
city
language
will
be
on
the
chart
or
will
be
on
the
ballot
in
november.
You
don't
objectively
need
all
of
those
details,
but
in
case
you
had
heard
some
of
that
we're
trying
to
wrap
your
head
around
what
the
multiple
rounds
of
vetoes
meant
wanted
to
provide
that
context.
In
case
it's
useful,
so
hey
davis.
C
C
D
D
A
A
Oh
and
then
one
other
update
from
the
recommendations
I
was
following
up
on
some
of
the
other
housing
recommendations
you
all
talked
about.
There
had
initially
been
two
types
of
eviction
protections
city
council
was
hoping
to
pass
and
that
you
all
had
written
in
support
of
in
the
recommendations
you
made
last
march,
one
the
first
piece
of
it
they
already
passed.
A
The
second
piece
which
had
been
passed
in
st
paul
and
minneapolis,
was
going
to
model
our
legislation
off
saint
paul,
st
paul
got
sued
by
a
group
of
landlords
about
that
legislation
and
the
landlords
won,
and
the
city
had
to
repeal
the
ordinance.
So
the
minneapolis
city
attorney's
office
strongly
advised
against
us
trying
to
pass
it
in
minneapolis
because
it
seems
incredibly
likely.
The
same
thing
would
happen
here
that
their
that
ordinance,
they
don't
yet
have
a
way
to
do
it.
That
would
hold
up
in
court
in
a
lawsuit.
A
So
that
is
the
only
other
piece.
Is
that
of
the
just
cause
and
pay
to
quit
eviction
protections
that
you
all
asked
for
essentially
like
pay
to
quit.
Being
enough
warning
before
an
eviction
notice
and
just
cause
being
a
limit
to
the
reasons
for
which
someone
can
be
evicted,
pay
to
quit
has
been
passed
in
minneapolis
and
just
cause
is
no
longer
something
they're
working
on
because
it
lost
in
court
in
st
paul.
A
That's
what
I've
got
on
updates
then,
so
we
can
move
on
to
the
bulk
of
today's
meeting,
which
is
just
really
kind
of
working
through
what
you
all
want
out
of
the
council
recommendations
and
the
three
kind
of
questions
I
came
up
with
to
shape.
This
were
like:
how
do
you
feel
about
the
content
that's
drafted
in
there?
So
far,
what
feels
like
it's
missing,
and
how
do
you
want
to
structure
the
recommendations?
Are
they
organized
in
the
right
categories,
etc?
But
that
does
not
have
to
be
how
we
shape
this
conversation.
A
A
If
not,
let's
start
with
just
and
the
recommendations
of
course
are
linked
in
the
limbs
document,
or
you
are
welcome
to
use
that
the
version
linked
in
the
limbs
document
is
a
word
doc.
You
all
are
also
welcome
to
look
at
the
live
sharepoint
doc,
whichever
is
easier
for
you
technologically,
but
I'm
just
curious
how
folks
are
feeling
about
what's
already
in
there.
I
know
I
have
left
a
bunch
of
comments
in
the
margins,
as
I
tried
to
get
a
bunch
more
detail
on.
A
A
A
Yeah,
the
current
categories
are
copy
paste
from
last
march
and,
as
you
can
see,
this
is
still
a
pretty
rough
dock
and
there
are
things
that,
like
other
things,
are
not
fully
worded
into
recommendations
yet.
But
things
that
have
come
up
in
the
past
year
are
just
like
thrown
into
their
relevant
category
and
need
to
be
worded
into
recommendations.
C
A
I
guess
I
will
start
with
because
it's
at
the
top,
the
eviction
prevention
stuff
was
left
in
there.
Pay
to
quit
has
passed
again,
as
I
just
said,
just
cause
the
city
attorney's
office
recommended
against
because
they
would
lose
it
and
have
to
repeal
it
most
likely.
I'm
curious
if
anyone
still
wants
to
keep
any
of
that
bullet
point
or
if
it
feels
worth
just
striking
that.
D
A
There's
also
a
couple
in
here
that
are
more
vague
that
have
our
echoes
from
other
places
like
create
and
preserve
deeply
affordable
housing
and
improve
quality
of
rental
properties.
And
I'm
curious
for
you
all
if
the
like,
more
vague
but
still,
definitely
like
conceptually
aligned
recommendations
feel
useful
or
if
it
feels
better.
In
the
interest
of
brevity
and
council
member
attention
to
like
cut
the
things
that
you
don't
have
very
specific
asks
around.
D
D
Whatever
do
you
mean
by
that
like
that
could
be
a
million
things,
but
maybe
there
is
a
place
for
like
these
are
overarching
things
that
we
think
the
city
tour
should
be
moving
towards,
and
then
these
are
the
specific
ways
we
think
you
could
reach
some
of
them
kind
of
like
how
the
2040
document
was
was
built
where
it
was
like
we're.
Gonna
do
all
these
great
things
and
then
there
was
like
substance
put
in
underneath
I
don't
know,
that's
just
one.
E
Yeah,
I
second
that
I
think
that,
just
because
we
have
quite
a
lot
to
to
recommend,
we
could
even
maybe
just
put
them
like
separate
them
on
this
document.
If
we
want
to
flush
them
out
later
or
you
know
something
to
work
towards,
but
keeping
them
separate
and
keeping
the
more
specific
asks
up
front,
I
think,
would
be
wise.
A
Continuing
to
go
through
comments,
I
have
also
just
kind
of
pulled
out
places
where
I
think
it
would
be
worth
highlighting
the
work
that
tec
has
done
in
the
past
year.
I
think
part
of
what
council
has
asked
for
that
asked
for
out
of
this
in
the
past
is
kind
of
like
what
do
you
want
us
to
do,
but
also
like
what
are
you
working
on
and
so
the
other
restructure
that
I
and
you
all
can
work
on
if
you
feel
good
with
it,
it's
a
kind
of
like
here's.
A
A
Okay
in
the
training
section,
I'm
just
going
down
my
quest,
my
comments,
the
ones
that
actually
have
questions
to
you
all
in
them.
In
the
training
session
section,
there's
an
ask
for
more
trend,
more
funding
to
cover
both
the
like
intro
level,
gender
inclusivity,
101
training
and
a
like
deep
dive.
201
here
are
concrete
steps
to
improve
your
department's
training.
Currently,
there
is
proposed
2022
funding
for
the
101
training
in
hr's
learning
and
development
budget.
A
A
Unless
hr
happens
to
promise
it's
you
you,
it
is
not
promised
that
that
funding
would
go
towards
this
specifically,
so
wanted
to
kind
of
clarify
like
what
logistically
that
ask,
would
look
like
and
make
sure
it
still
felt
good
with
you
all
or
hear.
If
there's
a
different
way,
you
wanted
to
go
forward
with
it
or
questions.
You
wanted
me
to
ask
of
hr
in
advance
or
anything
like
that.
E
A
So
I
think
hr
is
very
down
to
work
with
the
tec
on
vetting
a
trainer.
The
issue
is
just
that
the
funding
asks
specifically
like
the
city
council
when
they
do
their
budget
for
the
year,
can't
does
not
put
like
does
not
designate
specific
contracts.
It
just
says
like
there
is
more
money
in
x
budget,
in
this
case
case
hr's
learning
and
development
budget.
So
to
my
understanding,
unless
anyone
knows
anything
different,
I
don't
think
that
would
be
possible.
E
A
Yeah
and
I'm
not
saying
that
they
would
necessarily.
I
just
want
to
be
clear
that,
like
the
language
in
here,
I
think
pulled
from
past
recommendations
where
we
thought
this
would
be
housed
financially
in
race.
Equity
was
trans
equity
funding.
And
what
at
this
point,
because
it's
housed
in
hr,
what
you
all
would
actually
need
to
ask
for
is
more
funding
for
them
and
so
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
still
felt
good,
because
it's
different
than
what
we
thought
it
would
look
like
last
year.
A
So
putting
this
ask
into
council
basically
means
it
would
be
an
especially
good
idea
for
destiny,
and
I,
when
we're
in
conversation
with
the
head
of
learning
and
development
for
anyone
else
who
wants
to
to
kind
of
be
pushing
the
like.
We
really
need
this
piece
and
we
ask
for
you
all
to
get
more
money
if
they
do.
C
C
A
I
would
say
I'm
confident
that
if
hr
feels
like
they
have
the
capacity
to
move
forward
with
a
201
training,
they
will
work
with
the
tec
on
it.
I
am
not
a
100,
I'm
not
100,
confident
that
hr
will
feel
like
they
have
the
capacity
to
move
forward
with
a
201
training,
the
chances
of
city
council
giving
them
the
funding
are
also
pretty
slim,
so
it
feels
like
maybe
fine,
either
way
but
yeah.
That's
the
that's
the
barrier
I'm
potentially
seeing
and
that
with.
A
I
don't
even
think
us
trying
to
like
get
a
promise
is
going
to
be
fully
effective,
just
in
that
as
the
like
return
to
work
shifts
a
million
times,
and
things
like
that.
Folks
in
hr
have
had
to
change
everything
they're
doing
a
bunch,
so
if
it
would
be
beyond
just
them
being
like
yes,
okay,
we
will
commit
to
you
that
this
is
a
priority.
A
A
E
A
A
I'm
gonna
find
out
on
thursday,
theoretically
more
of
where
that
conversation's,
at
about
turning
the
division
of
race
and
equity
into
its
own
department,
instead
of
housing
it
as
a
division
within
the
city
coordinator's
office
that
would
theoretically
provide
more
authority
and
just
the
capacity
to
be
involved
in
different
things.
That
would
hopefully
also
come
with
more
funding
the
piece
around
insert
number
here.
A
The
piece
around
the
trans
equity
funding
here
that
has
the
insert
number
comes
partially
from
a
lot
of
conversations,
I've
been
having
recently
around
the
fact
that
the
summit
itself
alone
costs
far
more
than
the
fifteen
thousand
dollars
of
annual
trans
equity
funding.
You
all
get.
The
summit
is
primarily
funded
by
the
fact
that
we
charge
for
tabling
at
the
career
and
resource
fair
and
the
large
majority
of
our
tablers
pay
some
amount
for
that,
and
that
covers
the
rest
of
the
cost
of
the
summit.
A
But
that's
not
generally
how
we
run
city,
programming
and
most
council
members,
probably
don't
know
that
the
trans
equity
work
actually
costs
far
more
than
the
budget.
They
give
it
each
year.
So
it
is
truly
up
to
you
all
what
number
you
would
want
to
ask
for
there.
I
don't
have
a
concrete
vision
because
for
two
reasons,
one
because
we
are
funding
the
summit
successfully
right
now
on
tabling
fees.
So
it's
not
like.
I
have
like.
A
I
am
one
of
two
people
in
my
division
right
now.
Everyone
else
has
left
a
lot
is
up
in
the
air.
It
feels
very
hard
to
predict
the
work
long
term
enough
to
be
like.
Oh
I'm
forecasting
our
budget
for
the
next
three
years,
and
I
can
tell
you
that
we
need
x.
I
understand
that
all
of
those
would
be
useful.
A
I
really
don't
have
hard
numbers
for
both
of
these
reasons,
but
it
is
very
possible
that
if
city
council
heard
that
the
budget
they
are
giving
the
trans
equity
work
actually
fully
does
not
cover
the
trans
equity
work
at
all.
They
would
be
open
to
increasing
that
budget
by
at
least
another
five
or
ten
thousand
dollars.
A
This
is
really
small
amounts
of
money
in
the
scale
of
the
city's
budget,
and
so,
if
you
all
either
have
a
like,
we
want
to
be
able
to
build
out
a
part
of
the
summit
that
doesn't
yet
exist
or
run
programming
a
couple
more
times
a
year
and
we
think
another
five
or
ten
thousand
dollars
would
cover
presenters
and
practitioners
for
more
year-round
programming.
Or
you
know
there
are
funds
we
need
for
need
for
the
outreach
we
do
at
tabling,
etc.
A
This
is
the
place
where
some
of
that
ass
could
go
and
I'm
tossing
it
partially
to
you
all
to
hear.
If
there
are
things
you
would
want
to
see,
even
if
you
don't
have
a
hard
number
you
would
attach
to
those,
because
enough
is
in
flux
right
now
that
I
don't
have
like
a
really
detailed
plan
that
I
can
present
to
you
all
of
what
I'm
trying
to
do,
I
do
and
why
we
can't
afford
it.
That
was
a
really
long
answer,
but
hopefully
helped.
E
No,
that
was
helpful.
Thank
you.
I
think
that,
like
format
wise,
that
might
be
a
good
place
to
like
insert
the
cool
things
that
the
tec
has
accomplished
and
like
getting
a
full-time
person
on
board,
and
you
know
the
recommendations
that
we've
made
previously
to
kind
of,
I
don't
know
champion
the
cause
if
we
do
ask
for
a
certain
amount
of
money-
and
I
have
I'm
terrible
at
money,
so
I
don't
know
like
exactly
what
number
to
insert
either,
but
if
somebody
is
financially
savvy
and
wants
to,
I
don't
know,
run
some
numbers.
E
A
And
I
will
also
say,
like
it
is
objectively
my
job
to
run
the
numbers
I
just
have
not
felt
like.
I
had
enough
information
to
run
them
on
so
also,
if
you
all
have
like
this
is
these
are
the
things
we
would
want
to
be
doing
also
feel
free
to
throw
that
out,
and
I
can
try
to
attach
numbers
to
it.
I
have
just
not
taken
a
shot
at
this
number
yet.
B
Do
you
guys
think
that
the
tabling
at
these
events
like
we
did
saturday
and
pride,
help
in
the
overall
scheme,
even
though
we're
mainly
minneapolis-based?
Do
you
think
it
can
help
like
the
state
and
the
county
as
a
whole?
It's
like
we
lead
the
way
to
start
attending.
Do
we
how
many
events
have
do
we
attend?
Do
we
attend
any
other
kind
of
events?
Stc.
A
I
feel
like
we're
generally
tabling
at
like
two
to
four
events
per
year
right
now,
which
is
not
to
say
that
we
couldn't
do
outreach
more.
It's
partially
been
like
trying
to
figure
out
what
are
the
best
priorities.
My
experience
tabling
has
been
that
we
connect
with
folks
from
outside
of
the
city
as
well
who
get
ideas
to
bring
back
to
where
they
live,
but
that
the
biggest
impact
is
definitely
around
getting
more
minneapolis
residents
connected.
B
A
B
Yeah,
because
both
that
pride
and
that
last
last
saturday
is
like
it
was
very
minneapolis,
centric
and-
and
I
think
most
most
of
the
people
that
came
here-
aren't
even
actually
people
that
live
in
minneapolis
anymore.
So
it
was
like
how
could
how
can
we
be
relevant
to
everybody
else,
or
do
we
just
kind
of
stick
our
focus
into
minneapolis,
but
I
think
the
work
we
do
will
trickle
out.
This
may
actually
be
the
one
trickle-down
thing
that
works,
because,
as
we're
the
biggest
in
the
state,
we
kind
of
start
setting
policy.
A
B
C
C
C
So
what
I
was
going
to
suggest
is,
if
you
wanted
to
run
the
numbers
on
something,
why
wouldn't
you
run
the
numbers
on
someone
who
could
perhaps
set
up
kind
of
an
a
website
or
an
all-inclusive
for
lack
of
a
better
phrase
like
repository
of
information
and
resources
that
this
council
has
touched
of
those
organizations,
something
that,
in
the
event
that
somebody
wanted
to
go?
Or
you
wanted
to
go
to
the
next
table
event?
C
And
you
wanted
to
have
resources
you
wouldn't
whoever
was
there
could
go
to
said
repository
via
app
and
be
able
to
at
least
start
the
search
or
give
that
person
some
ideas
without
anyone
necessarily
being
on
the
spot.
It's
kind
of
like
you
would
be
the
google
source
so
to
speak,
but
if
you
could
find
someone
who
could
set
something
up
like
that,
that
would
be
kind
of
nice.
I
think
where
you
would
get
credit
for
it.
The
council
would
get
credit
for
it.
C
You
know
for
having
that
information
or
knowing
about
that
information
and
then
re-funneling
that
some
place
that
would
be
kind
of
nice
and
see
that's
something
that
you
could
come
up
with
numbers.
I
can
see
that
being
a
great
project
for
a
person
who
is
in
graduate
school,
you
could
fund
it
for
their
big
senior
project
and
then
they'd
get
a
product
and
you
get
a
product
at
the
end
of
it.
A
That's
an
awesome
idea
and
the
city
has
summer
internship
programs
that
work
with
high
school
students,
undergrad
students
and
grad
students
that
often
are
around
projects
like
that.
So
funding
an
intern
from
one
of
those
programs
to
do
that
kind
of
work
could
definitely
be
an
avenue
and
an
ask,
and
would
requires
me
finding
out
more
about
what's
happening
with
staffing
in
our
office,
which
I
will
hopefully
find
out
thursday
to
figure
out
what
conversations
we've
had
around
summer.
If
any.
E
I
think
that's
a
really
good
idea.
May
I
also
think
that
the
city
specifically
is
so
big
on
data
and
like
just
having
data
that
that's
such
a
good
thing
to
bring
up
if
we
ever
need
to,
like
you
know
in
terms
of
applications
or
requesting
something
like
we
have
something
in
our
back
pocket
that
we
can
just
pull
out
like
statistics.
Take
you
so
far
nowadays
to
have
like
a
record
of
anything
would
be,
and
also
just
visibility,
wise.
A
A
Is,
oh,
may
I
think,
I'm
echoing
out
of
your
device
for
some
reason
when
you're
unmuted.
Thank
you
sorry
about
that.
If
not,
I
think
the
next
question
is:
is
there
anything
that
feels
missing
in
here
either
like
a
specific
policy
or
just
a
big
kind
of
area,
of
focus
that
even
if
you're
not
sure
how
to
language
it
into
policy?
D
A
E
E
E
A
And
the
last
conversation
I
have
for
you
all:
if
no
one
else
has
anything
else,
that's
missing
is
so.
I
know
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
like
let's
highlight
t
c
wins
and
then
within
each
category
kind
of
frame,
an
overarching
ask
and
then
specifics
from
there
which
are
edits.
I
can
work
to
make
at
some
point
soon
and
if
anyone
beats
me
to
reformatting
any
of
that,
please
please
please
please
do.
I
would
love
that
and
beyond
that.
A
I
will
go
through
as
soon
as
I
can
and
start
to
make
some
of
the
changes
you
all
talked
about
and
also
start
to
accept
the
things
and
track
changes
now,
so
that
this
is
an
easier
document
to
kind
of
read
through
and
we'll
continue
to.
I
will
send
it
back
out
to
you
all
once
I've
done
that
and
please
please
continue
to
take
a
look,
and
particularly,
if
you're,
something
who's,
someone
who's
really
good
at
like
saying
things
concisely,
please
feel
free
to
reformat
anything
in
here.
A
I
have
done
a
lot
of
language
support
on
here
and
I'm
not
usually
good
at
saying
things
concisely
on
the
first
try
and
know
that
this
document
would
benefit
from
that.
So
take
a
step
at
it
in
whatever
way
works
well
for
you,
but
that
is
all
that
we
had
on
the
agenda
for
today.
Does
anyone
have
any
other
questions
about
the
recommendations
or
anything
else.