►
From YouTube: October 20, 2021 Redistricting Group
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
Good
afternoon
welcome
to
this
live
broadcast
of
our
virtual
meeting.
This
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statutes,
section
13d
.021,
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic.
The
city
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency.
B
D
A
B
C
F
B
A
G
A
C
B
That
motion
passes
and
the
minutes
are
approved.
Next
is
the
chairs
report
and
I
have
nothing
to
report
except,
as
is
in
our
agenda
already
so
we'll
go
on
to
item
five,
which
is
a
presentation
on
the
redistrict
r
mapping
tool
group.
Member
kim
has
generously
agreed
he's
already
an
expert
at
this
and
he's
generally
agreed
to
present
questions
are
welcome
during
the
presentation.
If
you
have
questions,
if
they're
just
general
questions,
you
can
put
them
in
the
chat
and
we
can
answer
them
at
the
end.
B
My
my
goal
for
tonight
is
that
we
all
come
away
with
a
working
knowledge
of
how
to
use
redistrict
r
so
that,
as
we
begin
drawing
maps,
we
have
a
knowledge
of
how
to
use
that
tool
and
make
our
own
maps,
hopefully
between
now
and
the
next
meeting,
all
of
us
will
get
on
to
the
website
and
play
with
redistrict
r.
So
we
know
how
to
use
it
and
and
perhaps
come
up
with
our
own
ideas,
for
what
a
map
might
look
like.
B
H
Awesome,
thank
you,
chair
clegg
and
thank
you
everyone
for
allowing
me
to
present
today.
I
know
we
haven't
really
had
a
chance
to
do
formal
introductions
so
just
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
brief
information
about
myself,
I'm
a
fourth
year
graduate
student
at
the
university
of
minnesota,
I'm
working
on
my
phd
in
biostatistics,
which
is
just
statistics
applied
to
medical
or
public
health
data,
it's
very
collaborative
in
nature.
My
research
has
involved
helping
cardiologists
and
microbiologists
on
their
research
and
that's
kind
of
what
drew
me
to
be
on
the
registration
group.
H
H
H
H
Now.
If
we
look
up
here,
we've
got
these
circles
which
indicate
the
different
tools
that
you
can
use
by
default.
It
selects
this
pointer
tool,
and
this
is
what
you
can
use
to
sort
of
click
and
drag
if
you
want
to
move
the
map
around.
So
if
you
wanted
to
zoom
in
on,
say,
ward
3,
you
could
kind
of
hit
this
zoom
button
in
the
upper
left
hand
corner,
and
then
you
can
click,
press
and
click
and
then
kind
of
drag
it
around.
H
So
you
can
get
where
you're
trying
to
go
the
other
tools
I'll
be
getting
into
in
a
second.
I
also
wanted
to
draw
your
attention
to
this
data
layers.
Tab
which
can
it
has
several
different
options.
I
know
at
the
last
meeting
I
believe
there
was
a
question
of
someone
wanting
to
know
how
you
could
see
the
overlay
of
neighborhoods
that's
going
to
be
under
this
data
layers,
tab
and
under
boundaries.
You
can
select
neighborhoods
and
that
will
show
you
all
of
the
neighborhoods.
H
You
can
uncheck
that
you
can
also
check
the
current
city
council
wards
which,
as
you
can
see,
it
already
follows
the
current
boundaries
and
colors,
but
this
is
also
a
nice
tool.
If
you
want
to
look
at
a
new
map
that
maybe
someone
has
submitted-
and
you
want
to
compare
what
the
old
boundaries
were,
this
is
a
nice
way
to
do
that.
H
So
if
I,
for
example,
wanted
to
see
where
other
asians
in
the
city
lived,
I
could
select
that
and
that
doesn't
do
anything
by
itself.
You'll
also
need
to
check
the
show
population,
and
then
that
will
allow
you
to
display
as
a
shaded
region
where
the
asian
population
is,
if
you
wanted
to
check
it
as
sized
circles,
that's
also
an
option.
If
you
already
have
a
map
colored
in,
I
find
that
the
sized
circles
is
a
little
bit
easier
to
see.
H
H
But
I
think
for
now
we're
going
to
be.
I
wanted
to
start
my
demonstration
on
the
actual
sort
of
changing
of
the
boundaries
now,
as
chair
clegg
said
we're
not
going
to
be
drawing
an
official
map,
but
just
for
illustration
purposes.
I
thought
we
could
start
with
the
first
comment
that
we
received
back
at
our
first
listening
session.
H
I
believe
the
commenter
was
julie
iverson,
but
the
comment
was
in
reference
to
the
downtown
portion
of
ward
3
and
if
it
would
be
possible
to
remove
that
since
ward
3
has
such
a
large
population,
so
I
thought
I
would
start
my
demonstration
by
showing
kind
of
what
my
thought
process
is.
If
I
hear
a
comment
like
that
and
how
I
go
about
sort
of
trying
to
see
what
it
would
be
like
to
implement
that
sort
of
suggestion.
H
So,
since
we're
starting
with
the
map
already
colored
in
the
first
tool
that
I
will
be
demonstrating,
is
actually
the
eraser
tool
and
the
reason
why
I'll
be
doing
that
is
because
we
could
simply
color
over
current
parts
of
ward
three
and
show
what
it
would
be
like
if
we
reassign
them
to
a
different
ward.
But
certainly
that
then
raises
questions
of
well,
which
word
do
we
want
to
put
it
into,
and
I
find
that
it's
probably
simpler
to
just
start
off
by
taking
it
off
the
board.
H
It
looks
like
a
little
eraser
and
if
you
hover
over
the
map,
you
can
see
that
it'll
have
your
cursor
will
kind
of
have
several
little
blocks
shaded
and
if
you
were
to
click
with
them,
then
using
the
eraser
tool
it
will
erase
the
color
and
it
will
go
back
to
just
regular
white
and
if
we
go
over
to
this
population
tab.
What
you'll
see
is
that
now
the
unassigned
population
which
had
been
zero,
has
now
gone
up.
H
There
were
about
2
000
people
in
this
area
that
I
had
selected
and
now
they
have
been
unassigned
from
ward
3.,
and
so
you
can
kind
of
continue
along
kind
of
hovering
over
different
areas
and
clicking.
And
if
you
find
that
to
be
a
little
tedious,
you
can
also
press
and
hold
your
touchpad
or
mouse
and
you
can
drag
along
and
that
will
also
have
the
effect
of
erasing
blocks
from
their
current
color.
H
H
So
that's
where
I
would
go
over
to
the
data
layers
tab
and
I
can
select
the
neighborhoods
button,
because
the
neighborhood
boundaries
kind
of
start
and
end
at
the
river,
at
least
for
some
of
these
downtown
neighborhoods,
and
so
that's
an
easy
way
that
I
can
see
the
boundary
where
I
want
my
erasing
to
end
now.
You'll
notice
that
my
cursor
covers
over
multiple
blocks,
which
can
be
very
convenient
if
you're
trying
to
erase
a
large
area.
H
But
as
you
start
getting
closer
to
the
edges,
you
realize
that
it's
kind
of
hard
to
erase
exactly
what
you
want.
You
kind
of
want
it
to
be
a
little
bit
more
precise,
and
so
that's,
where
I'm
going
to
go
over
to
this
upper
right
hand
portion
where
it
says
eraser
size
right
now.
It's
set
to
20,
but
you
can
sort
of
drag
this
little
tool
here.
H
You
can
also
have
these
arrows
and
you
can
make
it
larger
or
smaller,
so
by
making
it
the
smallest
number
possible
you'll
notice
that,
instead
of
shading
multiple
blocks,
my
cursor
is
only
shading
over
like
one
or
two
at
a
time,
and
so
this
can
allow
for
a
little
bit
more
precision.
Work
on
your
erasing
or
shading,
which
I
find
to
be
a
little
bit
more
convenient.
H
H
Alrighty,
so
you'll
see
that
now
I
have
erased
all
of
the
downtown
portions
of
ward
3.
So
if
I
wanted
to
see
what
the
effect
of
that
is
on
the
population,
I
would
go
over
to
the
population.
Tab
and
you'll
see
that
it
has
reduced
ward
3.
It
had
been
quite
a
bit
over
this
ideal
population,
and
now
it
is
in
fact,
under
the
ideal
population.
H
H
It
will
not
be
so
simple
to
simply
shave
off
the
downtown
portions
of
ward
3
without
having
to
make
some
other
adjustments
elsewhere,
but
this
is
just
kind
of
a
demonstration
of
sort
of
when
I
get
a
suggestion
like
that
kind
of
how
I
like
to
start,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
pause
here.
Does
anybody
have
any
questions
for
anything
that
I've
demonstrated
so
far.
E
B
I
H
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question
and
I'll
just
I'll
go
ahead
and
pause
and
say
if
any
other
redistricting
group
members
who
have
experience
using
district
r
have
any
additional
points
to
raise
that.
I
maybe
I'm
not
aware
of
please
feel
free
to
chime
in
to
your
question
group
member
carrie.
I
don't.
I
don't
know
of
a
way
to
do
that.
H
I
think
the
closest
I
can
come
up
with
is
that
when
you
finish
working
on
a
map,
you
can
save
it
at
any
time.
Doing
so
will
if
you're
going
through
the
city's
website,
doing
so
will
bring
up
this
window
and
you're
if
you're
not
finished,
you're
gonna
have
to
be
careful
not
to
accidentally
click
proceed
to
submit
map,
but
what
you
can
do
is
it
will
generate
a
you
know,
unique
url.
H
So,
for
example,
this
plan,
where
I
have
just
erased
the
downtown
portion
of
word
three-
it
will
show
you
know
it-
has
district
r
dot.
Org
plan
slash
this
number
and
I
can
you
know
either
copy
it
to
my
clipboard
or
write
it
down,
and
then
I
could
email
text
whatever
send
that
url
with
this
number
to
a
friend
of
mine
and
they
can
basically
pick
up
where
I
left
off
and
then
any
changes
that
they
make.
H
H
Let's
see
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge-
and
I
so
I
will
admit,
I
have
not
attempted
to
submit
a
map
to
the
city's
portal,
so
I
actually
don't
know
if
it
will
warn
you
yeah.
The
the
way
that
I
have
checked
is
that
this
unassigned
population
section
and
just
making
sure
that
that
is
zero.
I
am
not
aware
of
a
way
sort
of
like
a
mechanism
for
the
system
to
catch.
If
you
have
unallocated
population.
B
H
H
It
might
have
been
the
most
recent
one
under
the
anonymous
minneapolis
resident,
but
I
believe
that
it
had
a
section
that
they
had.
It
was
a
one,
little
block
that
had
been
part
of
ward
2,
that
they
it
looked
like
they
meant
to
allocate
to
ward
9,
but
I
guess
their
painter
just
missed
over
it,
because
if
you
look
closely,
there's
like
a
little
splash
of
yellow
amidst
the
ward,
9,
reddish
orange,
and
so
but
that
map
was
still
submitted
and
I'm
sure
the
person
probably
just
wasn't
aware
of
that.
H
A
H
Yeah
great
question
and,
like
I
said,
I
think,
the
best.
The
only
way
that
I
know
of
to
do
that
is
you're
gonna
have
to
you,
know,
save
it.
You
know
hit
the
save
button
and
it
will
bring
up
that
sort
of
the
unique
url
and
you
will
have
to
write
it
down
or
keep
track
of
it
like
I
said,
I
know
that
that's
a
big
limitation.
J
This
is
commissioner
sandberg,
yes
hi.
As
far
as
I'm
aware
from
the
few
maps
that
have
been
submitted,
the
redistricter
software
does
nothing
to
check
on
anything
about
compliance,
not
in
terms
of
population,
not
in
terms
of
contiguous,
not
in
terms
of
compact
length
and
width.
I
mean
that's
all
up
to
the
submitter
and
I
think
we
had
some
early
maps
submitted
that
clearly
violated
a
lot
of
the
requirements,
so
don't
count
on
it
to
help
you
out.
That's
not
going
to
happen.
J
I
think
when
we
first
before
the
city
actually
incorporated
it
into
the
website,
a
few
of
us
were
playing
around
with
redistricter
and
you
could
go
into
their
program
and
they
had
an
option
for
cities.
I
think
they
started
with
rochester,
but
I
think
they
eventually
added
minneapolis
and
you
could
get
to
the
wards
and
park
districts
that
way,
but
it's
clunky
and
you
would
always
want
to
start
with
the
minneapolis
website.
It
just
makes
it
a
lot
easier.
J
F
Jonathan,
this
is
greg
munson.
I
just
wanted
to
encourage
you
to
to
check
that
highlight
unassigned
units.
I
I
found
that
when
I
was
playing
around
with
the
maps,
I
missed
a
couple
of
small
census
blocks
here
and
there,
and
if
you
check
that
box,
it
will
highlight
them
and
show
you
where,
where
you
might
be
missing
something.
H
Yeah,
thank
you
so
he's
referring
to
this
under
max
population
deviation
here
on
the
bottom
right.
There's
a
highlight,
unassigned
units
option.
If
you
check
the
box,
it
will
highlight
all
of
the
census
blocks,
so
you
can
see
all
of
the
downtown
which
I
have
unassigned
is
highlighted,
and
so,
even
if
we
were
zoomed
out,
it's
still
pretty
apparent.
H
K
H
Yeah,
thank
you.
That's
a
good
point
and
yeah.
I
believe
the
city
website
does
have
an
option
if
you
just
wanted
to
submit
a
community
of
interest,
but
certainly
there
could
be
residents
who
maybe
aren't
aware
of
that
or
are
very
eager
to
get
in,
and
they
just
do
that
sort
of
adjustment
to
the
whole
city
map,
and
so
in
that
case,
hopefully
they
would
be
checking
on
the
comments.
And
if
anybody
had
any
questions,
perhaps
they
could
clarify
that
they
were
only
focusing
on
one
particular
ward
or
neighborhood.
L
Member
kim
this
is
a
member
mogan.
I
just
had
a
statement
I
just
wanted
to
make
yeah
go
for
it,
so
I
could.
I
was
playing
around
with
the
maps
and
looked
at
some
of
the
submitted
maps
proposals,
proposals
for
awards
and
on
there
you
can
see
the
different
neighborhoods
and
sometimes
people
just
think
of
community
interests,
as
just
neighborhoods
and
they're
able
to
see
that
and
paint
it.
But
the
other
thing
is
on
there.
L
You
know
they
looked
at
it
as
just
the
neighborhood
as
the
only
interest
group,
but
when
you
look
at
it
ward
6
is
now
majority
white,
whereas
it
was
50
black
in
the
last.
You
know
in
the
current
situation,
so
just
to
let
people
know
you
know
the
there's.
Also
the
voting
interests
or
the
communities
of
interest
also
includes
people
who
are
different
racial
groups
and
the
way
to
check
that
is
under
the
evaluation.
L
And
then,
even
if
you
want
to
look
deeper
into
that,
you
can
look
at
the
voting
age
population
to
see
okay,
like
forward
six
now
for
the
map
that
was
presented
by
one
of
them,
one
of
the
residents.
It
was
44,
white
and
36
black,
which
is
totally
different
than
what
it
is
so
that
map
on
the
on
the
outs
just
from
looking
at
it.
It
looks
like
oh,
it
keeps
neighborhoods
together,
but
you
know
people
might
be
upset
just
because
the
demographics
don't
reflect
what
it
used
to
be.
H
Yeah,
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up.
That
is
a
very
good
point.
Certainly,
as
we
all
recall
from
the
training.
The
voting
rights
act
protects
minority
racial
communities
of
interest
and
if
you
wanted
to
double
check
that,
that
would
be
this
evaluations
tab,
as
was
mentioned,
and
you
can
look
at
population
by
race
or
voting
age
population
by
race,
and
it
will
break
it
down
by
ward
for
you.
So
I
think
it
can
only
show
you
three
racial
groups
at
a
time.
H
So
if
you
wanted
to
change
those,
you
can
see
your
options
here.
So
if
you
wanted
to
compare
the
asian
in
this
case
voting
age
population
with
the
black
and
hispanic
voting
age
populations,
it
would
do
that
for
you
yeah
and
another
point
to
keep
in
mind.
I
don't
know
of
a
way
to
compare
what
the
current
ward
map
population
or
voting
age
population
by
race
is.
So
this
is
another
thing
that
I
keep
kind
of
in
my
little
notebook
by
my
laptop.
H
H
I'm
hearing
none,
so
in
that
case
I
will,
I
realize
I
have
not
formally
introduced
the
paintbrush
tool,
which
might
be
the
one
that
we
will
all
be
using
the
most.
So
the
paintbrush
tool
is
up
here,
it's
in
between
the
pointer
and
the
eraser
tool.
So
if
we
select
that
it
gives
us
all
the
different
colors
and
if
you
like
me
have
difficulty
telling
colors
apart,
you
can
kind
of
hover
over
your
cursor
over
it
and
it
will
show
you
the
number
that
it
is
associated
with
that
color.
H
H
H
H
Not
hearing
anything,
so
I
think
at
that
point
I've
demonstrated
all
of
the
main
features.
I
guess
the
last
tool
to
show
is
this
little
magnifying
glass
up
here,
the
inspect
tool.
I
truth
be
told
I
don't
use
it
very
much.
It
allows
you
to
look
kind
of
at
this
little
spotlight
and
I'll.
Show
you
a
very
specific,
like
population
or
voting
population
by
race
at
a
very
granular
level,
which
you
know
could
be
useful,
but
I
find
that
you
know
just
looking
at
individual
blocks.
H
Can
it
can
be
very
difficult
to
zoom
in
on
a
very
particular
area
that
you
want,
even
if
you
were
to
increase
the
spotlight
size,
it
would
allow
you
to
highlight
a
larger
area,
but
it's
not
very
precise,
with
highlighting
the
maybe
the
exact
area
that
you
want.
So
I
personally
don't
use
the
spotlight
tool,
but
it
is
there
if
you
have
a
desire
to
use
it.
L
L
H
Is
correct:
okay,
yeah!
So
let's
see
my
understanding
as
to
how
this
works
is.
If
I
wanted
to
make
a
let's
say
a
coalition
of
black
hispanic
and
asian,
for
example,
you
could
select
those
three
and
then
that
would
allow
you
to.
If
you
go
also
under
the
data
layers,
tab
in
the
population
by
race
section,
you
can
select
the
coalition
population
option
and
so
then,
by
doing
show
population
that
will
show
you
either
by
sized
circles
or
you
can
select
shaded
regions.
H
That
would
show
you
the
like,
I
said
the
coalition,
so
previously
it
would
only
show
you
a
single
race,
but
if
you
use
the
coalition
builder,
that
will
allow
you
to
look
at
the
population
percentage
levels
of
multiple
races.
So
if
there
was
a
you
know,
coalition
that
were
believed
to
be
aligned
as
a
community
of
interest,
then
that's.
This
is
the
way
that
you
could
look
at
multiple,
the
distribution
of
multiple
races
across
the
city
at
one
time.
F
H
M
No,
it's
not
I'll
ask
it.
Thank
you,
okay.
So
question
it's
mostly
about
the
program
itself.
When
I
look
at
district
r,
I
see
the
lines
drawn
for
neighborhoods
and
some
of
the
other
demographic
lines,
and
you
know
boundaries
that
it
includes.
It
doesn't
always
match
up
with
the
the
colors.
The
painting
for
the
wards,
and
I'm
just
wondering,
is
that
actually
real
or
is
that
a
feature
of
the
you
know
less
sophistication
of
the
graphics
for
the
program.
H
Yeah,
that's
a
good
question.
I
maybe
I'm
not
the.
I
don't
know
if
I
know
exactly
how
I
think
I
I
think
that's
just
kind
of
the
nature
of
the
program.
I
I
believe
that
when
it
comes
time
for
the
final
map
adoption
the
sort
of
boundaries
that
are
drawn
through
district
r,
that
data
will
be
sent
over
to
esri
and
I
believe
the
exact
more
maybe
more
precise
boundaries
can
be
handled
in
esri.
B
B
B
F
I
I
I'm
also
thinking
that
the
the
bleed
and
the
colors
there
on
the
boundaries
has
to
do
with
the
river.
I
think
probably
the
center
of
the
river
is
the
the
boundaries
for
the
the
wards
there
and
that
that's
why
it
looks
the
way
it
does
so
I
I
think
it's
actually
where
four
is
on
one
side
of
the
river
and
ward
three
ends
on
the
other
side
of
the
river.
Just
my
speculation
and
remember
kim.
F
N
H
F
B
B
B
O
H
O
O
H
H
Ideally,
we
would
want
to
split
this
sort
of
right
hand
section
into
word
three
and
then
this
tiny
little
section
on
the
other
side
of
this
black
line
into
ward
five.
But
the
software
does
not
allow
us
to
do
that,
because
this
whole
thing
is
considered.
One
block
quote
unquote,
even
though
it's
just
water.
B
H
G
Amber
garcia
here,
yes,
one
thing
we
did
have
a
problem
with
last
time
was
along
hiawatha,
where
the
old
grain
elevators
were
so
there's
like,
maybe
two
or
three
blocks,
but
they
may
have
apartment
buildings
now
but
years
ago
they
were
that
was
that
same
issue
where
they
were
land,
but
they
were
not
inhabited
as
well
as
cemeteries,
which
you
know
not
being
chicago.
We
prefer
not
to
count
those
people.
G
D
Have
a
question:
yes,
of
course,
davis
carter.
I
had
an
opportunity
to
play
with
the
the
map
and
I
had
a
great
time
with
it.
I
know
I
wasn't
in
the
boundaries,
but
when
I
submitted
that
information,
it
was
just
because
I
thought
that
was
just
a
tool
just
to
play
with
it
didn't
really
go
anywhere.
Did
it.
H
H
H
If
we
want
to
see
the
maps
that
have
already
been
submitted,
we
can
go
to
map
your
district
once
again,
but
we
will
not
be
mapping
anything.
We
want
to
check
the
submitted
maps.
So
if
you
scroll
all
the
way
down
to
this
review
and
comment
area,
you
can
check
go
to
the
third
party
website
and
if
you
click
on
that
it
will
open
a
new
tab
and
it
will
show
you
the
public
comment
portal,
and
so
this
will
show
you
the
submission
gallery.
H
If
you
scroll
down,
you
can
see
feedback
that
people
such
as
myself
have
left,
and
then,
if
you
wanted
to
examine
a
map
more
closely,
you
can
click
on
view
in
district
r,
and
this
will
open
up
district
r
in
a
new
tab
and
that
way
you
can
kind
of
zoom
in
a
little
bit
more.
You
can
verify
you
know
this
max
population
deviation,
we
can
double
check.
Yes,
this
is
less
than
five
percent,
so
it's
good
there.
D
Okay,
this
is
davis
carter
again,
sir.
Maybe
I
should
be
more
clear,
but
it's
not
going
into
that
map
that
that
young
lady
was
talking
about
it's
not
like
a
a.
How
can
I
official
submission
I
to
my
understanding,
we
were
supposed
to
go
on
and
play
with
the
tour
and
I'm
in
fact,
but
it's
not
official
submission
for
the
bounty,
because
she
was
talking
about
a
map
that
that
we'll
be
entering
this
data
into
these
ones
that
we
submitted
didn't
get
entered
to
that
map
correct.
D
H
H
H
The
ward,
9
color
and
I
can
fix
that
there
and
then,
since,
even
though
this
was
a
very
minor
change,
I
can
it
still
a
change,
and
so
I
can
hit
the
save
button
and
once
again
I
will
have
the
option
to
either
simply
save
you
know
write
down
a
copy
to
my
clipboard,
whatever
this
url.
If
I
wanted
to
come
back
and
keep
working
on
it
or
if
I
was
done,
I
could
simply
proceed
to
submit
the
map.
B
H
So,
in
fact,
if
I
were
to
go
ahead
and
submit,
I
could
proceed
to
submit
this
map.
It
will
open
a
new
window
and
I
can
add
you
know
so.
This
will
give
you
the
option
to
add
a
submission
title.
Also,
if
you
accidentally
clicked
proceed
to
submit,
I
believe
it
will
bring
you
to
this
window.
It
will
not
have
officially
submitted
anything
yet
so
you
can
x
out
of
here.
If
you
believe
you
made
a
mistake,
but
this
is
where
you
can
add
a
submission
title.
H
H
B
B
F
K
Or
comment
I
did
thanks
and
I
think
the
one
question
I
have
is
more
what
the
logistics
look
like
for
this
meeting
next
week
I
mean
we've,
you
know,
talked
to
individually
how
to
make
maps
you
know
do.
Is
there
a
request
for
all
of
us
to
submit
a
proposed
map?
Should
we
collectively
come
together
and
we're
going
to
have
someone
screen
share
and
then
talk
through
it
sort
of
what
is
it
going
to
look
like
for
that
session
next
week?
Just
so,
we
can
prepare.
B
That
that's
a
good
question.
I
would
love
to
have
as
many
of
us
as
possible
submit
maps
and
if,
if
we
could
look
at
them
and
come
to
consensus
or
or
make
some
modifications
during
the
meeting
I
mean
these
are
mapping
meetings.
Somebody
might
say:
well
what
is
it?
What
does
it
do
if
we
slice
off
this
neighborhood
and
move
it
to
or
slice
off
this
few
blocks?
B
B
We've
had
redistricting
listening
sessions
and
very
few
people
have
attended
once
we
publish
a
map,
even
if
it's
only
a
very
preliminary
one.
I'm
pretty
sure
we
will
have
lots
more
comment.
So
the
the
goal
of
the
first
map
is
to
draw
a
compliant
map
a
minimum
change
map
and
to
generate
comment
and
from
the
community.
So
that's
what
we're
going
to
be
working
on
a
week
from
tonight,
but
again
the
more
solutions,
the
more
proposals
we
have
from
redistricting
group
members,
the
better.
L
F
So
chair
clegg,
I
would
like
to
add.
Our
goal
is
going
to
be
to
have
a
draft
map
ready
for
our
first
public
hearing,
which
is
on
november
17th.
So
we've
got
two
mapping
sessions,
one
next
wednesday,
the
27th
and
then
november
10th
and
at
the
end
of
the
november
10th
meeting.
We
really
should
have
a
draft
map
ready
to
be
published
for
our
first
public
hearing,
which
will
be
on
november
17th,
which
I
am
really
trying
to
promote
heavily
so
that
we
will
get
as
much
resident
input
as
we
possibly
can.