►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Yeah
jeff
strand
here
I
have
an
announcement,
my
camera,
my
camera
doesn't
seem
to
be
working.
I
think,
but
announcement
is
that,
based
on
a
very
short
notice
from
the
city
clerk
who
will
be
managing
the
joint
public
hearing
meeting
we've
been
informed.
A
Why
I'm
late
we've
been
informed
that
click
members
really
should
attend
the
6pm
joint
public
hearing
in
order
to
ensure
a
quorum
so
really
sorry
about
the
short
notice?
It's
contrary
in
the
past
to
what
our
former
executive
director
mike
abelin
just
had.
The
executive
committee
basically
attend
the
new.
A
B
B
Thanks
so
john,
could
you
make
it
I'll
just
quickly
go
through
it,
because
I
I
can't
see
everyone's
hands.
D
Is
that
neil
yeah
that's
the
deal?
Why
don't,
let's
formally
open
the
meeting
the
way
we
normally
do
and
then
we
can
address
this.
B
D
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
john
bernstein
and
I
am
the
chair
of
the
capital
long-range
improvements
committee
transportation
task
force
before
we
begin
I'd
like
to
note
that
this
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statute,
section
13
d
.021
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic.
I
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order
and
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
rule
so
that
we
may
verify
the
presence
of
a
quorum.
B
All
right,
john
bernstein,
here
steve
brandt.
E
F
G
G
B
Here,
todd
schuman
here
here-
jeff
strand.
A
B
Did
I
did
anyone
not
have
their
name
called?
I
feel
like
I'm
missing
someone.
B
B
Yeah,
I
believe
it
is
if
everyone
yeah
that's
100
attendance.
D
D
All
right,
so
with
that
we'll
start
the
meeting
jeff
I'll,
give
you
the
floor
in
a
second.
D
I
recognize
you're,
just
the
messenger,
but
I
find
this
to
be
patently
absurd
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
I'm
happy
to
go
on
record
publicly
with
this.
I
think
this
is
just
outrageous.
We've
been
I've
been
on
this
committee
for
15
years.
While
that
that
meeting
is
titled
a
joint
meeting,
it
has
never
been
run
by
click.
We
are
guests
there
at
that
meeting.
D
It's
a
public,
it's
a
meeting,
that's
run
by
by
the
the
planning
commission
and
so
that
the
notion
that
we
need
to
we,
I
don't
even
think
they've
called
a
role
for
us
in
the
past,
so
this
is
beyond
silly.
Somebody
needs
to
straighten
out,
in
my
view
with
that
I
know
you're
the
messenger
so
proceed
with
what
you
were
talking
about.
A
Thanks
sure,
john,
so
yes,
jeff
strand
here,
my
camera,
isn't
working
finance
and
property
services
staff
informed
us
that
the
city
clerk
indicated
the
planning
commission
committee
of
the
whole
and
click
will
both
need
to
do
a
roll
call
today
and
if
we
don't
have
a
quorum
of
click
members
planning
to
attend,
then
the
alternative
that
I'll
be
prepared
to
do
is
to
say
that
we
will
adjourn
to
our
next
regular
full-body
meeting
at
noon
on
may
26th.
So
that's
a
fairly
simple
work
around
and
then
we'll
continue.
A
Those
that
are
present
we'll
continue
to
listen
to
the
comments
and
the
meeting
recording
presumably
will
be
available
to
members.
So
it's
simply
trying
to
get
a
head
count
on
who
may
be
able
to
attend
the
6
pm
joint
public
hearing.
Usually
the
planning
commission
committee
of
the
whole
turns
over
the
public
hearing
session
to
the
click
chair
and
then
the
click
chair
opens
and
closes
the
public
hearing.
So
that's
the
ask-
and
I
agree
with
your
concerns.
D
Steve,
I
see
you
in
queue.
Just
hang
on
a
second.
I
want
to
address
one
other
thing.
That's
related
to
this.
This
is
probably
a
question
for
neil
and
neil
you.
D
If
you
don't
have
the
answer,
maybe
you
can
find
out
from
somebody
while
we're
on
the
call
today
there
are
I've
received
emails
from
at
least
three
citizens
of
the
city
who
want
to
submit
testimony
for
the
public
hearing
tonight,
but
cannot
attend
they're
out
of
town
or
otherwise
unavailable
so
they've
submitted
via
email
to
me
written
testimony
because
it's
unclear
how
to
go
about
getting
their
testimony
into
the
record
of
that
meeting.
So
could
you
confirm
how
we
go
about
doing
that?
B
D
D
E
I
have
two
questions.
One
is:
is
the
meeting
tonight
time
limited?
I
think
it
was
noticed
as
like
six
to
seven
o'clock,
and
the
second
is
I
just
wanted
to
make
people
aware
that
I
revised
the
general
comment
I
made
last
week
that
did
not
meet
me
with
much
favor
to
meet
some
of
the
objections.
E
I
don't
care
if
it
comes
up
today
or
if
it
comes
up
in
the
general
clip
meeting,
but
I
wasn't
sure-
and
I
posted
it
in
the
draft
comments
as
well.
I
just
wasn't
sure
which
one
it
was
appropriate
at
now
or
next
week.
A
Chair
yeah,
mr
chair,
the
my
understanding
is
this:
is
our
published
joint
public
hearing
this?
Is
it
and
so
then
the
meeting?
If
we
don't
have
a
click
member
quorum,
then
we
simply,
I
have
a
script
to
read.
You
know
blah
blah
blah.
We
will
adjourn
until
our
regular
meeting
on
may
26th
and
then
we'll
continue
the
the
public
hearing.
Those
present
will
listen
and
stay
on
and
and
then
presumably
the
recording
will
be
shared
with
the
click
members
and
the
public.
D
I'm
going
to
take
this
opportunity
once
again
to
make
more
public
comments
about
this,
because
we're
not
getting
much
traction
anywhere
else
and
I'm
finding
this
to
be
patently
absurd,
and
I
want
to
be
on
publicly
unwrecked
about
it.
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
full
employment
act
for
the
city
clerk's
office
or
what,
but
I'm
finding
this
to
be
ridiculous
on
so
many
levels,
it's
not
even
funny.
D
Yet
that
has
the
that
runs
the
risk
of
people
getting
emails
and
others
getting
upset
when
we
haven't
even
made
a
final
decision-
and
I
think
it's
ridiculous-
that
a
meeting
like
this
is
being
forced
to
be
made
public.
Furthermore,
in
15
years
these
meetings
have
never
been
public.
They
have
been
held
in
rooms
in
the
city
hall
that
city
staff
would
have
difficulty
fighting,
let
alone
the
public,
and
on
top
of
that,
my
prediction
is:
this:
will
return
to
a
non-public
meeting
next
year
once
covet
is
gone.
D
This
is
opportunistic
stuff
by
the
city
clerk's
office
during
covet,
because
they
can.
The
idea
that
we're
approving
minutes
when
this
meeting
is
being
recorded
is
ridiculous
right.
What
do
you
get
for?
What's
better
for
minutes
than
an
actual
live
recording
of
a
meeting
that
people
can
go
back
and
review
the
notion
that
we're
wasting
time
taking
minutes
or
recording
minutes
is
just
another
example
of
the
absurdity
of
this.
If
I
sound
frustrated,
I
am
and
I'll
I'll
leave
it
there,
and
I
hope
the
right
people
hear
this
all
right
with
that.
D
So
we'll
hear
back
from
neil
about
what
I
need
to
do
just
for
so
people
know,
there's
a
a
a
dead
end.
Water
main
issue
that
several
of
us
raised
during
the
public
or
during
our
the
presentations
from
water
works
and
there's
a
I've
seen
the
map
you'd,
be
amazed.
How
many
areas
of
the
city
are
impacted
by
this
steve
help
me
out,
I
think,
is
it?
D
Is
it
500
dead,
end
water
mains,
around
the
city,
yeah
he's
nodding
his
head,
he's,
muted
and
they're
all
over
the
city
and
geographically
there's
not
any
one
area.
It
happens
that
the
people
have
been
that
have
been
pretty
vocal
about
this.
That
I'm
aware
of
and
have
contacted
us
live
over
near
the
river.
I'm
not
I've
forgotten
steve.
Do
you
know
what
the
neighborhood
is
and
mute
yourself.
D
Thank
you,
so
they've
been
dealing
with
this
for
a
long
time.
To
me
this
is
an
equity
issue.
It
might
be
a
different
equity
issue
from
the
way
you
think
about
it,
but
the
reality
is
everybody
in
the
city
is
paying
the
same
rate
for
water
use
and
everybody
ought
to
be
getting
the
same
quality
water,
water.
And
if
you
look
at
this
stuff,
they
clearly
are
not
anyways.
D
Three
different
people
have
have
sent
me
information
that
they
would
like
made
part
of
a
pub
the
public
record
tonight
and
moving
into
the
comment
stuff
steve-
and
I
are
gonna
author-
a
comment
on
this-
that
we'll
present
next
week.
We
wanted
to
wait
until
after
we
see
the
testimony
that
these
people
submit
and
as
most
of
you
probably
know
some
of
you
may
not.
The
minutes
of
the
meeting
tonight
become
part
of
the
click
report
they
become
an
appendix
to
it.
D
So
it'll
enable
us
to
write
this
comment
and
refer
to
that
information
without
having
to
go
into
a
lot
of
detail
in
the
comment
itself
about
all
the
technicalities
around
this
problem,
all
right
so
with
that
before
we
dive
into
comments,
does
anybody
have
any
questions
or
concerns
they
want
to
raise?
If
so,
please
raise
your
hand
and
I'll
recognize
you.
B
John,
we
still
do
need
to
adopt
the
agenda
and
the
median
minutes.
D
You
know-
and
you
don't
need
to
respond
to
this.
I
do
recognize
that
the
city
clerk's
office
has
the
right
to
force
us
and
other
committees
to
do
above
and
beyond
the
open
meeting
law,
but
that
is
in
fact
what
this
is.
This
is
myth
and
the
notion
that
we
need
to
approve
an
agenda
which
there's
one
item
on
the
agenda
or
minutes
when
these
are
publicly
posted.
Recordings
of
these
meetings
is
absolutely
ridiculous.
B
All
right,
so
I'm
gonna
call
the
roll,
so
it
would
be
john
bernstein
hi,
steve
brandt.
I.
G
B
F
B
H
B
H
H
D
A
Yeah
thanks
john,
I
guess
I
still
didn't
feel
like
we
had
a
indication
of
who
could
not
attend.
So
maybe
could
I
ask
a
point
of
privilege
to
say
if
anybody
can't
attend
at
6
pm
to
just
let
the
clerk
know
now.
D
Go
ahead
actually
before
I
recognize
other
people
jeff
how
about?
If
we
just
do
a
roll
call
vote,
this
is
not
anything
official
just
so
that,
or
let's
have
neil
just
call
the
role
and
see
who
can
attend
tonight.
D
B
H
F
I
J
D
A
And
mr
chair
john,
to
answer
steve
brandt's
question
earlier
that
wasn't
answered
the
time
certain
is
for
the
beginning.
I
do
not
believe
there
is
a
time
delimited
recall
one
time
we
did
have
about
75
people
from
east
phillips
at
a
meeting,
and
I
think
everybody
got
a
chance
to
talk
for
a
minute
or
two.
D
All
right
scene,
so
I
emailed
this
out
around.
I
think
it
was
about
9
30
this
morning.
Sorry,
that
I
didn't
get
that
out
a
little
bit
earlier.
Hopefully
you
at
least
had
a
chance
to
see
that
you
got
the
email
and
maybe
at
least
some
of
you
were
able
to
go
through
the
document
and
read
the
ones
that
were
pertinent.
D
Okay,
good
assume,
that
means
we've
all
got
it
so
working
from
page
one
there's
nothing
to
do
there.
Those
are
the
comments
that
we've
passed,
but
just
for
the
record,
I
want
to
keep
us
on
track
with
that
and
as
new
comments
get
added,
sometimes
there's
overlap,
so
we
just
want
to
keep
track
of
what
we've
already
done
so
moving
to
page
two,
I
think
that's
probably
the
best
place
to
start.
D
These
were
comments
that
were
tabled
last
week,
so
I
would
propose
that
we
just
go
through
them
in
order
and
to
to
be
clear
going
forward
unless
there's
some
reason
why
you
can't,
I
think
it's
going
to
be
easiest.
If
you
just
email
comments
directly
to
me
and
I'll
circulate
like
this,
instead
of
using
the
the
online
sharepoint,
I
know
that
steve
had
some
technical
difficulties
last
week
and
may
not
have
heard
me
say
that
and
he
he
did.
D
I
just
noticed
it
about
five
minutes
before
the
meeting
he
did
submit
a
different
draft
of
this
comment
that
was
tabled.
His
general
comment
in
in
in
sharepoint,
which
I
didn't
after
I
distributed
this
so
I'll.
Let
him
talk
to
that.
I
I
don't
feel
a
need
for
us
to
get
formal
about
voting
things
off
the
table,
because
this
was
done
mostly
just
to
give
people
time
to
come
back
and
talk
about
it,
and
it
wasn't
really
a
strategy
to
try
to
derail
something.
E
John
first
page,
I
didn't
realize
it
was
on
the
first
page,
but
I
would
like
to
withdraw
the
comment
that
I
authored
last
time.
If
it's
agreeable
to
the
group
for
paving
122
bowling
avenue,
the
city
staff
has
responded
and,
as
I
assumed
there
were
some
very
good
reasons
that
this
project
is
more
expensive
on
a
per
mile
basis
than
other
reconstruction
projects,
and
that
is,
I
believe,
posted
in
the
sharepoint
site
under
the
inquiries.
And
so
I
would
move
to
withdraw
this
as
a
comment.
D
G
Yeah,
so
I
was
trying
to
look
for
those
comments,
steve
and
are
they
in
the
sharepoint?
I
don't
see
them
under
departmental
responses.
E
E
There
it
is
yes,
it's
in
inquiries,
which
is
where
we
posed
our
questions.
It's
line
12
and
the
departmental
response
is,
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
the
page.
I
can
read
it
if
you'd
like.
E
This
estimate
includes
reconstruction
of
0.3
miles
of
dowling
avenue,
north
reconstruction
of
0.1
miles
of
33rd
avenue,
north
construction
of
0.9
miles
of
parkway,
both
dowling
avenue,
north
and
33rd
avenue
north
have
expensive
elements
that
are
not
included
in
the
broad
other
project's
reference.
These
improvements
include
marine
excuse
me
mainline
and
spur
railroad
tracks
that
will
all
be
improved
with
active
warning
devices
for
both
motorized
and
non-motorized
traffic.
E
The
section
of
downwind
avenue
north
has
a
greater
density
of
traffic
signals
included
in
the
construction
four
traffic
signals,
two
of
which
are
for
the
I-94
off-ramp
on
off-ramps,
which
adds
to
the
per
mile
cost.
The
estimate
also
includes
the
improvements
of
existing
utilities
on
existing
roadways
and
the
construction
of
you
new
utilities
in
the
undeveloped
site,
along
the
proposed
parkway.
These
utilities
include
water,
sanitary,
storm,
water
as
well
as
green
infrastructure.
A
So
I
think
it
might
be
wise
to
actually
rewrite
withdraw
this
comment,
but
rewrite
for
the
next
meeting,
a
comment
that
explains
the
higher
costs
and
the
rationale
for
same
so
I'll
vote
for
this
motion
today.
But
I
would
like
to
see
a
comment
I
think
we
had
contemplated
something
last
year
didn't
get
it
done,
but
we
had
comments,
I
believe
in
2018
and
2019
click
reports.
G
G
B
D
Okay
with
that,
if
there's
nothing
else,
let's
take
a
vote
on
the
motion
which
is
to
withdraw
this
comment.
B
Okay,
john
bernstein
hi,
steve
brandt,
hi,
garmilov.
H
G
B
Hi
erica
melter.
F
K
B
D
The
motion
passes
and
that
comment
is
withdrawn.
Okay,
so
moving
back
to
page
two
again,
I'm
going
to
dispense
with
going
through
the
effort
of
pulling
things
off
the
table.
We
use
a
very
loose
modified
robert's
rules,
mostly
just
to
make
sure
everybody
gets
heard.
So
I'll
just
entertain
a
motion
on
that.
First
general
comment
that
was
disabled
last
week.
D
E
Are
you
talking
about
the
comment
that
last
week
or
the
comment
that
I
rewrote
and
sent
out
shortly
before
the
meeting.
E
J
D
E
E
Okay,
this
is
to
try
and
make
it
a
more
positive
comment.
This
is
a
general
comment.
E
Click
members,
pride
themselves
on
giving
capital
budget
requests
through
thorough
scrutiny,
collect
recognizes
that
the
conditions
imposed
by
the
covid
pandemic
and
the
turnover
of
city
staff
assisting
click
affected
the
schedule
that
click
was
presented
for
its
deliberations
this
year
as
the
city
and
click
meetings,
return
to
normal
click
asks
that
it
in
the
future,
its
members
be
given
a
two,
a
full
two
weeks
between
the
release
of
cbrs
and
the
first
of
the
two
sessions
at
which
department
representatives
present
their
proposals
and
answer
questions
about
them.
E
E
A
So
if
brandt
has
not
done
so,
I
would
move
the
brand
substitute
or
second
it
and
then
I'd
like
to
speak
to
it.
D
A
I
support
steve's
substitute
comment.
I
think
it
is
important
and
while
with
full
transparency,
it
is
somewhat
the
prerogative
of
the
click
executive
committee
and
I
will
accept
full
responsibility
with
others
for
any
further
compression
of
the
schedule
this
year,
due
to
covid
and
other
happenings.
We
we
are
not
paid
city
staff.
A
We
do
not
have
full
control
of
the
process,
we
are
all
volunteers,
so
that
said,
I
think
it
is
important
to
pass
this
for
our
appointing
authorities
to
recognize
that
we're
doing
our
you
know,
darndest,
to
get
this
process
done
in
a
very
thorough,
thoughtful,
diligent
manner.
D
D
We
comment
on
process
to
my
to
my
my
sense
of
this.
We
comment
on
process
when
we
feel
the
need
to
have
the
appointees
political
appointees
put
pressure
on
staff
to
make
things
happen
because
we're
not
getting
a
response,
and
that's
not
the
case
here.
This
is
a
one-off
thing.
It's
never
happened
before
it's
a
result
of
several
things.
Coming
together,
number
one:
the
pandemic
number
two,
a
bunch
of
new
staff
turnover
we've
already
gotten
a
commitment
from
emilia
that
this
won't
happen
again.
She's
already
taken
responsibility
as
the
person
that
did
this
unwittingly
right.
D
D
So
to
me,
this
is
not
something
where
we
need
to
be
putting
pressure
on
staff.
Via
a
comment
in
the
report,
I
would
say
that
this
is
something
that
belongs
in
something
we've
talked
about
doing
for
quite
a
while
that
either
didn't
get
done
or
if
it's
gotten
done,
it's
gotten
lost,
and
that
is
a
sort
of
a
procedures
manual
which
would
be
very
helpful
going
forward.
D
So
the
next
time,
whether
that's
in
one
year
or
10
years,
there's
a
lot
of
turnover,
there's
an
institutional
record
of
how
things
ought
to
work
so
that
things
stay
on
track,
and
I
think
that
would
be
a
more
appropriate
place
for
this
and
reserve
comments
for
things
where
we're
not
getting
a
response,
which
is
not
the
case
with
this.
So
I'm
voting.
No.
D
E
D
F
C
J
E
K
B
B
D
A
Click
adopted
a
policies
and
procedures,
manual,
yeah
and
the
bylaws
revisions,
both.
D
So
here's
what
I
would
suggest
to
answer
amity's
question
directly
that
at
the
end
of
this
click
session,
if
jeff's
willing,
he
has
the
power
as
the
chair
to
appoint
a
subcommittee
that
can
review
that
policies
and
procedures
manual
and
make
any
updates
or
changes
that
are
necessary,
including
one
that
addresses
this.
D
D
Jeff,
I
I,
since
this
came
up
here,
I
don't
think
I
just
want
you
to
either
agree
or
disagree
with
what
I'm
about
to
say.
I
had
a
lot
of
sten
abstentions
on
that
one,
and
my
understanding
of
how
you
should
use
an
abstention
is,
if
you
feel
you
have
some
kind
of
a
conflict
of
interest,
if
it,
if
it's
anything
other
than
that,
unless
I'm
missing
it,
I
don't.
I
think
it's
best
that
everybody
vote
is
that
seem
fair
jeff.
A
D
That's
kind
of
my
point
is
I
don't.
I
don't
want,
because
that
was
a
little
bit
controversial
in
terms
of
where
we
were
all.
I
don't
want
people
to
abstain.
For
that
reason,
this
is
people
should
all
voice
their
opinion.
If
you
have
a
real
conflict,
absolutely
use
an
abstention,
but
you
know
please
use
that
sparingly.
D
I
mean
that
that
that
was
a
pretty
good
example
right.
We
had
as
many
abstentions
as
we
had
no
votes,
which
is
what
carried
it
so
all
right.
So
moving
on
from
that
that
one
does
not
pass
the
comment
on
water.
12
will
that's
something
that
steve
and
I
are
going
to
work
on,
as
I
mentioned,
we'll
bring
that
something
to
the
committee
or
to
the
task
force
next
week
to
vote
on.
D
So
moving
to
the
parkway
paving
comment:
what
I've
done
here
is
the
first
comment
you
see
at
the
bottom
of
page:
two
is
the
one
that
dan
submitted
last
week
that
we
tabled
and
the
comment
that
you
see
at
the
top
of
page
three
is
the
edited
version
that
he
submitted
for
consideration
this
week,
and
I
just
put
them
both
there.
So
people
were
able
to
compare
them
if
they
wanted
to,
but
the
one
that
we're
addressing
is
the
second
one
that
says
reviewed
may
6th.
D
D
K
I'm
wondering
if
it's
worth
reviewing,
I
mean
reading
this,
just
so
it's
red
and
I'm
willing
to
do
that,
to
save
your
voice,
john,
if
that's
okay,.
D
K
K
K
A
complete
streets
approach
to
encouraging
pedestrian
access
across
parkways
and
making
drivers
aware
of
pedestrians
is
to
include
crossing
enhancements
during
parkway,
paving
projects
in
2020,
2021
theater
worth
parkway,
paving
plymouth
to
29th
four
intersections
at
plymouth.
Mcnair,
26th
and
29th
should
be
given
consideration
for
similar
pedestrian
crossing
signs
and
pavement
markings
to
connect
neighborhoods
to
park
amenities.
K
Likewise,
saint
anthony
parkway
university
to
stinson
program
for
2023-24
is
in
need
of
crossing
enhancements
observations
driving
the
grand
rounds
reveal
a
significant
difference
in
use
of
pedestrian
crossings
on
either
side
of
ninety
four
three
three:
ninety
four
four
click
encourages
a
city
review
of
records
on
enhanced
crossing
locations
to
determine.
If
these
observations
are
true
and
to
report
how
to
address
the
discrepancy,
if
found.
A
All
right
thanks
thanks
sure.
I
support
the
comment.
My
my
only
addition
is,
I
did
draw
attention
to
the
2020
collect
report,
comment
where
the
committee
was
questioning
the
adequate
or
inadequate
level
of
funding,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
the
author
would
take
that
as
a
adding
a
sentence
in
there.
Just
to
reiterate
that
I
feel
as
if
I
don't
recall
getting
the
answer
to
that
question
and
I
think
we
even
had
a
park
official
comment,
either
in
2019
or
2020,
about
the
inadequacy
of
the
funding
overall.
D
C
Yeah
I
generally
support
this.
I
just
have
a
piece
of
information
that
when
I
served
on
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee,
this
was
a
frustration
that
we
had.
C
I
think
one
of
the
the
main
issue
here
is
that
public
works
perceives
repaving
projects
as
solely
dedicated
to
the
pavement,
and
they
do
not
put
money
towards
pedestrian
crossings
using
paving
money,
and
so
this
is
a
that's
why
there
are
new
programs
in
the
cip
like
pedestrian
improvements,
so
it
I'm
not
sure
I
don't
know
the
the
part
about
the
between
the
north
and
south
sides,
the
pedestrian
crossings,
but
it's
it's
just
that
public
works
perceives
repaving
projects
says
solely
for
the
pavement.
E
I
was
going
to
address
the
financial
side
of
this
as
well.
It
seems
to
me
that,
if
we're
asking
them
to
add
to
the
scope
of
what
they
do,
when
they
repave
a
section
of
parkway
by
adding
these
markings,
we
need
to
think
about
supporting
an
increase
in
the
budget.
I
don't
know
whether
it
would
be
50,
000
or
100,
000
or
whatever,
because
otherwise,
the
impact
if
they
implemented
this,
would
be
to
pave
fewer
miles
of
parkway.
D
G
Yeah,
I
guess
I
would
like
to
suggest
one
alteration
to
the
comment,
because
I
do
support
it
and
I
think
we
can
make
it
stronger
by
removing
the
last
sentence
of
the
first
paragraph
and
instead
inserting
click,
encourages
a
redefinition
of
the
park
paving
program
to
include
simple
or
pedestrian
crossing
improvements
in
order
to
address
complete
street
schools
or
something
to
that
effect.
D
I'm
going
to
take
the
opportunity
to
piggyback
off
of
what
katie
said.
I
I
support
the
concept
of
this
comment
fully.
It's
just
no
excuse
for
repaving
these
things
and
not
addressing
pedestrian
crossings
when
they're
there
that
they
need
to
do
that.
But
I
feel
like
this
comment
could
be
dramatically
strengthened
several
ways
one
is
I
don't?
Did
we
get
answers
dan
to
your
questions
that
you
submitted?
I
didn't
see
them.
K
There
may
be
a
delay,
but
I
think
some
parts
of
this
are
going
to
be
difficult
for
them
to
answer.
I
don't
I
don't
hold
out
much
hope
for
it.
D
So
I
I
that's
a
big
if
whether
we
can
get
those
answers-
and
I
and
I'm
happy
to
help
work
on
this,
but
you
know
I
think,
finding
out
whether
they,
in
fact
they
have
any
projects
that
include
enhanced
pedestrian
crossings.
I
think
our
general
belief
is
they
do
not,
but
let's
confirm
that,
let's
let
them
say
that
instead
of
having
to
wait
a
full
year
for
them
to
respond
in
a
comment,
and
then
I
I
think
this
can
be
strengthened
and
just
say
very
directly.
D
You
know
whether
you
need
more
funding
in
pv-001
or
you
need
to
create
a
traffic
cbr
that
works
in
combination
with
these
kinds
of
resurfacing
projects
that
scott
mentioned,
where
they
don't
address.
This
kind
of
thing,
so
they've
got
a
pot
of
money
where
they
that
they
can
go
to
when
they're,
when
they're
they're
doing
any
kind
of
repaving
that
you
know
allows
them
just.
It
would
be
a
similar
program
to
the
asphalt
resurfacing
program
and
the
concrete
resurfacing
program.
D
It's
just
a
pedestrian
crossings,
pool
of
money
that
they
can
access
whenever
they're
doing
any
kind
of
repaving,
because
that's
just
a
ridiculous
excuse,
in
my
view,
and
on
the
inequity
part
of
it.
You
know
we
can
address
that.
I
I
think
that
could
be
strengthened
too.
I
don't
know
the
answers
to
this,
but
my
guess
is
that
what
they've
done
is
based
on
traffic
counts
and
in
the
process
of
doing
that
there
is
a
correlation
between
the
now
that
not
necessarily
a
causation,
but
a
correlation
between
the
north
side
and
the
south
side.
D
So
if
we
can
find
that
out
and
acknowledge
that
and
say,
look
okay,
it
makes
sense
to
do
things
on
traffic
count,
but
you
may
also
want
to
consider
overall
equity
and
balance
that
against
traffic
counts,
because
it
looks
like
most
of
this
work
has
been
done
on
the
south
side
of
the
city
and
not
the
north
side.
I
just
think
we
should
be
much
more
direct
about
this
and
likely
to
get
better
answers
and
better
responses,
and
or
at
least
you
know,
put
them
on
the
spot
without
all
recognize.
Katie.
G
Yeah,
so
to
just
address
your
first
part,
john,
I
I
think
yeah
it
may
be
so
even
changing
whatever
I
had
been
saying
there
to
either
provide
that
we
need
to
redefine
the
parkway
paving
program
or
ask
them
to
partner
with
or
it
to
be,
links
to
a
a
pedestrian
project
or
program
makes
sense,
and
I
think
we
can
also
just
mention
that
public
works
does
this
already
with
like
sewer
projects.
G
G
I
I've
been
trying
to
follow
a
number
of
transportation,
oriented
organizations
more
recently
and
there's
a
kind
of
a
philosophical
approach
that
one
could
take
here
that
really,
if
we're
trying
to
create
a
more
pedestrian-
and
you
know,
bicycle
friendly
city,
then
we
can't
have
that
based
on
existing
counts.
We
have
to
just
build
to
build
it,
so
they
will
come
type
of
thing,
and
so
I
guess.
For
that
reason,
I
would
almost
shy
away
from
add
any
adding
to
anything
about
counts.
E
I
would
just
I
support
the
comment.
First
of
all,
I
think
it's
appropriate.
My
thinking
of
as
an
observer
of
the
south
side
park
system
is
that
the
major
improvements
would
have
really
enhanced.
E
Pedestrian
crossings
have
come
at
the
chain
of
lakes
on
the
northeast
corner
of
bidet
macaska
and
the
southeast
corner
of
harriet,
and
there
are
lots
of
bells
and
whistles
there
that
have
been
added,
but
those
came
not
as
part
of
the
parkway
paving
program
but
as
part
of
the
regional
park.
Funding
in
implementation
of
approved
master
plans,
and
sometimes
it's
the
cycle.
E
The
part
of
the
cycle
that
you're
in,
but
it
might
as
long
as
it
looks
like
this
comment,
might
be
reworked
a
bit
to
suggest
that
we
devote
that
the
park
board
devote
some
of
its
regional
park.
Funding
to
these
improved
crossings
as
each
regional
park,
of
which
the
grand
rounds
is
one
comes
up
in
the
metro
funding
cycle.
D
Okay,
so
there's
nobody
else
in
queue.
I
want
to
respond
to
what
katie
just
said
about
counts
and
then
I'm
going
to
make
a
suggestion
for
how
we
proceed
on
this
comment.
So
my
point
with
counts
is
that
my
guess
is
they're,
probably
relying
on
that
more
heavily
than
they
ought
to.
So
I
think
we're
kind
of
in
agreement
there,
but
I
don't
think
counts,
is
totally
useless
right.
I
mean
to
a
certain
extent.
D
It
applies
to
equity
in
terms
of
it's
a
way
to
to
to
try
to
prioritize
spending
the
dollars
on
the
largest
number
of
people
that
are
going
to
be
impacted,
but
you
can't
do
that
in
a
black
box.
They
got
to
look
at
other
stuff
too,
like
what
part
of
the
city
is.
It
is
doing
it
if
they
only
do
that.
If
all
that's
going
to
do
is
fix
the
area
around
the
lakes,
that's
a
problem
right,
but
all
else
equal
in
in
balancing
everything.
It's
a
useful
piece
of
information
as
well.
D
I
I
believe,
anyway,
here's
what
I
would
suggest
we
do.
There
seems
to
be
pretty
broad
agreement
about
the
the
importance
of
this
comment.
I
would
suggest
we
take
a
vote
on
this
comment
and
pass
it
as
is,
and
hopefully
we'll
get
some
answers,
and
I
or
someone
else
will
come
up
with
a
another
version
of
this
that
we'll
just
offer
as
a
substitute,
but
so
we
have
something
that
can
go
in
the
report.
I'm
gonna
suggest
that
we
go
ahead
and
pass
this
one.
D
A
Okay,
I'm
supportive
of
that
action.
I
just
would
like
to
see
one
sentence
added
to
indicate
the
need
for
additional
funding,
as
I
think
steve
brant
concurred
and
I'm
also
supportive
of
the
amendment
to
the
final
sentence
that
katie
indicated
so
I'll
put
that
in
the
chat
just
for
ease
of
memory.
D
Thanks
for
bringing
that
up,
I
meant
to
address
that
if
you're
talking
about
750
000
a
year
that
that
this
program
gets
and
comment
we've
made
in
the
past
about
you
know
the
fact
that
that
doesn't
do
very
much
year
to
year,
particularly
given
that
the
cut
the
condition
of
the
parkways
around
the
city,
I
feel
like
that
might
be
more
effective
in
a
different
comment,
because
it's
really
a
different
issue
right.
D
D
K
Well,
first
of
all,
I
appreciate
the
time
that
people
spent
helping
me
think
about
this
at
the
last
meeting,
and
I
think
that
it
takes
me
several
right
several
revisions
to
get
things
down
to,
as
simply
as
I
can,
in
other
words,
not
to
make
a
long
document,
but
to
make
one
that
is,
as
short
as
can
be
and
will
be
read
and
hits
that
a
couple
points.
So
this
is
my
latest
version
of
that
I've
listened
to
people.
K
I
I
see
merit
in
trying
to
do
some
of
these
things,
but
I
also
question
how
I
can
keep
this
tight
and
kind
of
contained.
So
I
would
I
would
back
voting
on
this
and
you
know
passing
it
and
then
trying
to
add
in
some
of
this
stuff
just
to
kind
of
get
it
to
the
next
step.
C
D
So
I'll
just
respond
to
that
I
mean
I
think
this
potentially
could
be
a
final
version.
That
doesn't
mean
we
couldn't
do
a
stronger
final
version,
but
that
relies
on
getting
some
information
from
public
works
in
a
timely
manner
and
all
the
rest
of
it.
So
just
so
that
we
have
something
remember.
This
has
got
to
pass
the
full
committee.
That's
why
I
feel
like
it's
useful,
to
go
ahead
and
pass
this
now
with
the
understanding
that,
with
more
information,
we're
going
to
try
to
create
a
substitute
for
it.
D
Having
said
that,
if
there's
no
further
comments,
we'll
we'll
call
the
roll
so
we're
voting
on
whether
to
pass
the
amendment
that
appears.
Excuse
me
the
comment
that
appears
at
the
top
of
page
three
and
then,
if
I
understood
dan
correctly,
we're
going
to
take
it
as
it
is
without
any
of
the
further
suggestions
that
were
made.
K
I'm
fine
either
way
I
just
think
getting
something
down.
I
think
john
is
good
and
again
based
upon.
If
katie
can
get
me
her
comments
on
that
and
other
you
know,
I've
been
taking
notes
here.
As
to
what
everyone
has
said,
I've
got
jeff's
comment.
I
can
try
to
work
this
stuff
in
I
just
it's
one
o'clock.
I
think
there's
some
merit
to
kind
of
not
making
this
any
too
much
bigger.
So
thank
you.
D
C
H
G
B
D
So
that
passes,
but
we're
going
to
try
to
revisit
that
one
all
right.
The
next
one,
similar
to
the
one
above
the
comment
shows
twice
the
original
one
that
was
tabled
in
the
middle
of
page
three
and
then
at
the
bottom
of
page
three,
the
edited
version,
so
we're
gonna
deal
with
the
edited
version.
The
other
one
is
there
just
for
comparison
purposes
and
I'll
entertain
a
motion
on
this
one.
I
D
37Th
avenue
is
part
of
the
minneapolis
all
ages
and
abilities
network
extending
over
two
miles
from
main
street
northeast
to
stinson
boulevard.
It's
an
important
east
and
west
route
for
accessing
recreation
shopping
and
work.
Centers
in
2018,
the
minneapolis
37th
avenue
northeast
main
street
to
university
asphalt
resurfacing,
did
not
include
a
striped
parking
lane.
D
This
could
have
been.
This
could
have
added
additional
safety
for
pedestrians
and
bicyclists,
where
there
is
an
existing
four
foot
sidewalk
on
the
minneapolis
side,
none
on
the
columbia
heights
side
and
an
overly
wide
unmarked
street.
The
2019-2020
minneapolis
37th
avenue
northeast
university
to
central
asphalt.
Surface
senior
project
project
was
done
in
conjunction
with
a
new
columbia
heights
multi-use
path.
This
path
is
substandard
in
width,
pavement
markings
way,
finding
and
lighting
minneapolis
and
columbia
heights
missed
opportunities.
D
With
these
past
projects
to
strengthen
the
shared
multi-modal
route,
pv
127
is
an
opportunity
to
do
more
than
the
bare
minimum
for
multi-use
trail
facilities,
which
is
the
last
segment
of
the
37th
avenue
corridor.
The
pro
proposed
10-foot
multi-use
trail,
has
available
street
right-of-way
to
easily
increase
this
width
to
reduce
user
conflicts.
D
Its
regional
solicitation
grant
has
a
significant
budget
line
item
for
pedestrian
lighting,
which
both
minneapolis
and
columbia
heights
planners
have
not
acknowledged.
Minneapolis
needs
to
be
more
involved
in
this
shared
municipal
project
and
not
allow
it
to
fall
short
of
its
complete
streets,
transportation,
action
plan
and
street
design
guidelines.
D
D
E
B
Scott
amity
foster.
F
D
D
D
H
D
All
city
plans
references
prioritization,
including
the
minneapolis
2040,
comprehensive
plan,
complete
streets
and
vision,
zero
policies
and
transportation
action
plan
if
levered
outside
funding
is
necessary
to
fill
this
program.
Click
would
like
to
know
what
that
looks
like
and
I'll
entertain
a
motion.
E
G
Yeah,
I
I
also
wanted
to
voice
my
strong
support
of
this
and
just
a
couple
of
minimal
typing
changes.
I
think.
Typically
we
say
we
try
to
say,
like
click
is
disappointed.
Instead
of
we
just
a
kind
of
a
stylistic
thing
and
then
the
word
city
needed
to
be
capitalized
in
a
couple
of
places.
D
Yeah,
I
consider
that
kind
of
stuff
to
be
the
sort
of
cleanup
that'll
happen
at
the
end,
but
we
can
make
some
of
those
changes
as
we're
going
to
I'd
like
to
see.
I'm
supportive
of
the
comment
I'd
like
to
see
a
strength
in
the
last
sentence.
I
think
it's
too
soft.
I
think
we
need
to
say
fun
the
damn
project,
not
in
those
exact
words,
but
basically.
D
F
J
Yeah,
I
would
just
say
I
think
that
the
last
sentence
too,
I
think
it
could
be
strengthened
simply
by
saying
clicker,
just
the
city
to
reincorporate
funding
for
this
program
and
leverage
outside
funding,
if
necessary.
D
Let's
do
some
editing
on
the
fly
on
this
one
did
what
matt
said
just
said:
sound
good
amity,
all
right.
Let's,
let's
try
to
do
that
right
now,.
D
All
right,
so
this
is
my
proposal
to
replace
the
last
sentence.
It's
going
to
be
two
sentences.
Click
urges
the
city
to
reinstate
funding
for
this
program
with
no
delays.
Additionally,
we
encourage
the
city
to
seek
outside
funding
as
an
increase
too,
and
not
a
replacement
for
previous
funding
levels.
A
D
All
right
so
matt,
do
you
have
your
hand
up,
or
did
I
just
forget
to
lower
it?
Okay,
I
got
it.
H
B
Erica
mounter
dan
miller,
hi
george
montague
hi.
B
A
chair,
jeff
strand,
hi,
that's
13
eyes,.
D
D
Click
is
appreciative
that
pv-122
will
address
pedestrian
safety
and
aesthetic
issues
over
the
I-94
overpass
by
coordinating
improvements
with
art.
0-1
similar
conditions
exist
over
I-94
overpass
on
26th
avenue,
north
separating
the
hawthorne
and
jordan
neighborhoods
from
the
great
northern
greenway
river.
Overlook.
D
K
I
believe
that
there
are
two
projects
on
dowling
avenue
and
the
one
that
I
believe
this
is
the
correct
one
that
references
this
section
of
daling
avenue
between
that
basically
is
I-94
to
first
street
and
there's
another
section
that
there's
another
pbe
of
whatever
that
goes
farther
west.
D
So
the
way
it
reads
now
you
know
it
says
in
the
first
paragraph
we're
glad
you're
doing
this
and
then
in
the
second
paragraph
it
says:
please
do
this,
so
it's
the
same
project.
One
of
them
needs
to
be
something
different.
I'm
assuming
122
is
where
you
want
them
to
do
it.
So
that's
correct
in
the
second
paragraph,
but
it's
a
different
project.
You're
referencing
in
the
first
paragraph.
K
K
Several
years
ago,
the
in
2017
they
did
a
project
on
26th
avenue
north
and
once
it
gets
past
north
minneapolis
up
to
the
overpass,
it
becomes
a
barrier,
it's
just
it's
kind
of
an
industrial
desert,
and
if
you
would
have
read
in
the
paper
this
morning,
the
up
the
great
great
northern
greenway
river
overlook
was
featured
as
being
a
brand
new
facility.
K
So
the
idea
behind
this
thing
is
just
boy
is:
is
there
some
economy
and
volume
that
you
could
you're
hiring
an
artist,
you're
you're,
looking
at
doing
an
art
treatment
on
dowling
that
will
both
improve
the
aesthetics
as
well
as
the
safety?
Is
there
a
chance
that
you
could
somehow
find
the
money
within
this
project
at
the
same
time
to
consider
26th
avenue
so
26th
avenue
is
not
in
any
program
at
all.
It
is
just
it's
a
a
problem
of
crossing
94
in
a
different
location.
D
E
E
If
the
suggestion
is
that
the
arts
be
placed
essentially
on
the
freeway
overpass
for
a
couple
reasons,
one
is
the
potential
interference
with
walking
and
cycling
traffic
and
the
other
is
that
it
strikes
me
that
art
is
best
appreciated
when
it's
not
overwhelmed
by
freeway
noise,
for
example
up
the
hill
at
the
corner
of
lindale
on
26,
there's
a
nice
piece
of
art
from
art
and
public
places.
That
is,
you
know
it's
a
relatively
quiet
corner
of
a
park.
E
I
would
prefer
that
we
suggest
you
know
somewhere
from
that
last
section
of
26th
avenue
north
as
it
approaches
the
river
a
location,
be
found
and
it's
a
hard
place
to
site
a
piece
of
art
because
there's
private
property
and
there's
there's
the
freeway
bridge
and
then
there's
the
very
dusty
conditions
that
have
joined
the
the
various
trucking
facilities
and
gravels
and
gravel
yards.
E
But
I'm
not
sure
that
this
is
the
best
place,
but
if
we
have
gave
more
latitude
and
where
it
was
placed
it
might
satisfy
my
issue,
maybe
go
ahead.
G
Yeah
I
was
just
trying
to
to
understand
like
the
placement
of
these
and
then
and
where
the
ask
is
so,
it
seems
to
be
that
pv
122,
it's
an
existing
project
and
we're
stating
that
there
are
these
conditions
at
this
project
and
this
this
project
is
getting
art
to
be
added
to
it
and
it
almost
sounds
like
there's
a
and
ask
for
a
new
project
at
north
26
avenue,
and
so
I,
but
I
do
I've-
only
teased
that
out
through
this
conversation-
and
it
did.
G
It
wasn't
clear
to
me
while
reading
the
the
comment,
so
I
guess
I
would
say
that
the
second
paragraph
should
be
revised
to
make
it
very
clear
that
we
would
like
a
new
project
in
you
know
at
26th
avenue
somewhere
to
to
have
you
know,
art
as
a
part
of
it.
D
F
A
Maybe
we'll
work
together
on
that
and
then
I
think
you're
right
on
that
the
bridge
treatment
in
north
minneapolis
is
woefully
inadequate,
even
with
the
camden
bridge
notwithstanding
so,
rather
than
spending
all
of
our
meeting
time
wordsmithing.
If
we
could
voluntarily
table
this
and
then
work
on
it,
bring
it
back
either
next
week
or
to
the
hd
as
appropriate.
D
K
Yeah,
I
would
just
like
to
say
that
it
it
does
impact
transportation,
because
it
this
is
specifically
a
bridge
improvement
and
and
what
what
is
on
26
is
bollards
and
a
little
that
cars
overrun
often.
So
this
is
more
like
what
is
going
on
what
mndot
did
on
42nd
avenue
and
they're
doing
on
oh
twenty,
twenty
sixth
on
the
22nd
on
the
south
side
on
fifth
in
northeast
southeast.
K
It's
making
something
that
again
is
an
improvement
physically
but
they're,
including
some
artwork,
whether
that
is
just
getting
rid
of
the
chain
link
fence
or
adding
something
to
the
chain
like
that
to
soften
it,
and
I'm
more
than
welcome
to
work
with
jeff
on
this
to
keep
going
and
submit
it
back
to
hd.
And
I
think
it
also
should
go
here
too.
But
you
know.
D
Actually,
as
you
continue
to
clarify
this,
I
think
it's
okay,
I'm
understanding
this
better,
that
this
is
they're
really
just
working
in
conjunction
with
the
arts,
taxation
stuff.
So
I'll
talk
to
eric
and
just
from
courtesy,
heads
up
that
we're
gonna
address
this
one
because
it
sort
of
falls
in
the
middle
and
you
could
argue
either
way
but
we'll.
Let's
you
work
with
jeff
and
bring
it
back
to
this
committee
next
week,
katie
go
ahead.
G
Yeah
just
a
quick
question:
there
isn't
a
an
existing
project
at
26.
Is
there.
K
G
K
It
was
improved
in
19,
it
was
improved
in
2017
with
some
bollards
and
some
striping,
and
that's
that's.
What's
on
the
bridge
today,.
D
So
to
katie's
point
when
you,
when
you
revise
this
comment,
you
may
want
to
start
with
addressing
it
that
way
that
that
you're
also
requesting
that
they
do
these
and
they
create
another
tv
project
to
improve
that
that
bridge
and
then,
in
addition,
you
want
these
aesthetics
as
well.
D
Thank
you,
okay,
we're
I'm
just
watching
the
clock
here.
Let's
see
if
we
can
at
least
get
started
on
one
more
before
we
have
to
adjourn
for
the
day
so
that
tv
137.
That
starts
at
the
bottom
of
page
four
and
I'll
read
that
one
first.
So
this
is
pb
137,
29th
avenue
northeast
from
central
avenue
northeast
to
stinson.
D
It
was
a
surprising
and
significant
disappointment
to
have
this
cbr
delayed
three
years
from
a
2024
to
a
2027
proposed
installation,
29th
and
johnson
street
is
the
heart
of
this
vibrant
neighborhood
business,
node,
audubon
park
and
northeast
middle
school
are
a
few
blocks
in
either
direction
of
this
intersection.
On
29th,
a
new
unannounced
cp
railyard
entrance
was
recently
created
at
central
on
29th
to
increase
freight
transportation
in
and
out
of
a
newly
expanded
freight
container
depot.
D
A
reconstructed,
29th
avenue
will
discourage
its
youth
as
a
commercial
freight
route.
Our
reconstructed
29th
avenue
is
included
in
the
audubon
park,
neighborhood
small
area
plan
and
a
separate
29th
avenue
study
in
existence
for
over
a
decade.
This
past
year,
the
neighborhood
organization
has
been
doing
visioning
discussions
in
advance
of
the
now
delayed
2020
2024
reconstruction.
E
Dan,
I
was
brought
up
short
by
your
sentence
that
a
reconstructed,
29th
avenue
will
discourage
its
use
as
a
commercial
freight
deep
as
a
commercial
freight
route.
K
Because
they,
basically
it's
a
wide
two
lane
with
two
parking
lanes
stretching
from
central
avenue
to
highway
88
and
you
will
get
freight
traffic
up.
The
freight
can
move
there,
but
they
will
shrink
the
width
of
that
street
and
make
it
more
of
a
complete
street.
So
that's
the
the
reasoning
to
get
people
to
that
parks
to
get
to
the
johnson
intersection
and
to
get
to
the
school
yeah.
E
K
I
I
might
add
that
the
the
railroad
expansion
was
done
by
surprise
and
what
they
do
now
or
it
used
to
go
up
and
down
university
and
37th,
and
that's
still
a
primary
route
or
or
to
lowry
and
those
are
still
primary
routes.
But
being
that
that
entrance
was
added
to
29th
it.
It
looks
like
a
very
possible
way
where
freight
traffic
could
increase
and
that's
something
that
one
would
like
to
discourage.
G
Oh
sorry,
I
was
trying
to
take
down
my
hand,
shoot
what
was
my
question?
Oh,
have
we
asked
public
works?
Why
they've
delayed
it.
K
It
was
an
msa
street
in
the
the
gas
tax
that
supports
msa
has
been
reduced
during
the
the
funds
from
the
gas
tax
have
been
reduced,
so
the
msa
funds
are
reduced,
and
this
was
a
project
that
was
selected
because
it
had
a
fair
amount
of
msa
funds
behind
it.
G
D
So
I'm
going
to
put
myself
in
queue
here
and
start
by
just
acknowledging
that
I'm
I
know
the
area,
but
I'm
not
intimately
familiar
with
these
details,
so
my
comment
has
nothing
to
do
with
that.
I
would
just
broadly
say
that
we're
in
a
period
of
time
where
we
all
know
the
city
does
need
to
cut
back
right,
I
mean
there's
a
shortage
of
funds
and
they
need
to
something
has
to
be
cut
somewhere
or
delayed
or
whatever
it
is.
D
D
This
is
a
big
one
and
and,
like
I
said,
something
has
to
be
delayed,
so
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
right
one
or
not,
but
I
think
we
need
to
be
careful
about
saying,
move
this
up,
move
that
up
move
this
up,
not
to
suggest
that
that's
what
everybody's
doing,
but
I
think
we
want
to
be
very
mindful
of
that,
because
we're
also
probably
going
to
have
comments
saying
you
guys
need
to
watch
your
spending
go
ahead.
Steve.
E
D
D
Right
so
that
we
can
keep
well
we're
at
128.,
so
let's
propose:
let's,
let's
revisit
this
one
next
week,
I'll
I'll
work
with
you
dan
to
see.
If
we
can
introduce
that
language
and
make
that
a
little
bit
more
clear
in
it.
I
don't
think
we
want
to
try
to
tackle
anything
else
today,
but
I
would
just
highlight
that
we
got
several
more
to
get
through
here
and
the
next
one.
Pb
157
is
another
one.
That's
it's
the
same
theme
that
I
just
mentioned
right.
D
I
mean
it's
a
project
where
the
citizen
is
very
frustrated
with
the
fact
that
it's
been
delayed
and
if
I
were
in
there,
I'd
probably
be
equally
frustrated
or
more.
At
the
same
time,
it's
an
expensive
project
and
the
traffic
counts
in
that
area
aren't
very
high.
So
there's
a
lot
of
things
to
balance,
and
we
need
to
keep
in
mind
that
this
is
a
period
of
time
when
we're
telling
them
you
need
to
watch
your
dollars,
so
we
can't
be
telling
them
watch
your
dollars
and
accelerate
all
these
projects
at
the
same
time.
C
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
mention
it's
a
follow-up
to
last
week,
nicolette
avenue
and
at
lake
and
across
the
greenway
bridge.
I
did
send
a
request
for
information
about
the
lack
of
a
cbr
for
the
project.
I
sent
it
to
robert
and
justin,
maybe
neil-
I
don't
remember,
but
I
haven't
heard
back.
D
I
Sure
yeah,
I
can
speak
to
that.
I
know.
That's
that
that
question
has
been
her.
Inquiry
has
been
forwarded
on
to
public
works.
We
can
follow
up
on
the
status
of
it
and
sure
we
know
when
a
a
response
is
coming
back.
I
know
they
have
it
and
they
are
addressing
additional
questions
and
comments.
Right
now
and
I
did
have
a
a
last
item-
I
didn't
want
to
just
tack
on
to
the
end
of
this
meeting.
I
You
know
for
those
folks
who
are
able
and
interested
to
join
this
evening's
call
with
the
planning
commission.
I
just
wanted
to
say
thanks.
This
has
not
been
a
requirement
in
past
years
for
quick
members
and
it's
been
a,
I
think,
a
late.
I
know
a
late
notice
this
year,
but
thank
you
for
those
who
are
able
to
to
join
us
at
six
o'clock.
I
We
will
forward
out
the
call-in
details
and
I
just
wanted
to
note
for
the
benefit
of
the
the
click
chairs
and
executive
committee,
who
will
also
be
on
the
fall
that
you
know
in
order
to
attend
then
and
just
be
counted
for
local
as
well.
I
think
it's
star
six
to
to
unmute
for
this
meeting
as
well,
so
just
wanted
to
know
we'll
be
sending
out
that
invite
shortly
after
this
task
force
meeting
is
concluded.
D
So
I'm
gonna
piggyback
with
some
more
comments
about
this
issue,
because
I
think
it's
relevant
and
I
want
to
be
on
record
with
this.
D
I
I
think
that
city
clerk's
office
is
making
a
big
mistake
in
this
case
and
they
seem
at
least
from
my
perspective,
I'd
love
to
hear
a
response
from
them,
but
they
seem
to
be
focused
on
nothing
other
than
complying
with
every
last
letter
of
their
interpretation
of
open
meeting
law
which,
by
my
own
read,
is
well
beyond
what
the
state
requires,
and
this
particular
meeting
has
one
sole
purpose,
and
that
is
for
citizens
of
the
city
of
minneapolis
to
voice
concerns
about
existing
projects
projects
they
need
it's
public
input.
D
Click
as
a
committee
does
not
vote
at
that
mini
meeting.
We
gather
information
so
in
in
the
city
clerk's
office,
zealotry
to
make
sure
that
they're
crossing
the
teeth
and
dotting
the
eyes
if
they
decide
that
this
meeting
isn't
valid.
For
some
reason,
the
only
people
they're
hurting
are
the
citizens
of
the
city
who
are
trying
to
get
public
input
as
it
is.
Click
is
a
mysterious
body,
it's
hard
for
the
average
citizen.
B
Yeah
one
last
thing,
so
the
three
comments
that
you
receive
from
the
public
you
can
forward
those
on
robert
and
I,
and
we
can
make
sure
that
those
are
addressed
in
the
hearing
tonight.