►
From YouTube: April 14, 2021 Capital Long Range Improvements Committee
Description
View Marked Agenda
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/Board/MarkedAgenda/CLIC/2368
View Minutes
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/Download/CommitteeReport/1783/CLIC-04142021-Minutes.pdf
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
All
right,
the
regular
meeting
of
the
capital
long
range
improvements
committee
will
now
begin.
B
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
jeffrey
strand,
I'm
the
chair
of
the
capital
long
range
improvements
committee.
Before
we
begin
I'd
like
to
note
that
this
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statute,
section
13d
.021,
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic.
I
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order
and
ask
the
clerk
to
call
a
role
so
that
we
may
verify
the
presence
of
a
quorum.
C
C
C
C
C
A
In
mcconnell
yep
dan
miller,
here,
george
montague.
F
C
E
C
C
F
A
B
B
Very
good,
so
with
with
unanimous
consent,
if
there's
no
objection
we'll
combine
adoption
of
the
agenda
acceptance
of
the
minutes
from
april
7th,
when
you
make
your
motion,
please
indicate
your
name
and
with
the
second.
Similarly
do
that
so
is
there
a
motion
to
adopt
the
agenda
and
minutes?
B
B
C
C
C
C
A
George
montague
hi
beth
toso.
C
G
A
Chair
jeff
strand
hi,
william.
A
Gullickson
that
there's
22
votes
or
22
eyes.
B
Very
good
that
is
adopted.
So
the
next
item
is
the
presentation
and
I'm,
on
behalf
of
the
click
committee,
please
to
welcome
mayor
jacob
fry
council,
president
lisa
bender
and
council
member
steve
fletcher
and
welcome
elected
officials,
and
we
would
very
much
enjoy
hearing
your
comments
and
priorities
for
the
2021
click
session.
H
Thank
you,
mr
strand,
and
and
thank
you
for
chairing
here
today.
First
want
to
just
start
out
by
thanking
the
entire
click
team
here.
The
work
that
you
do
is
really
about
the
nuts
and
bolts
of
city
operation.
It's
about
the
long-term
investments
that
we're
making
as
a
city
and
that
work
is
really
more
critical
right
now
than
ever.
I
myself
was
a
click
member.
My
wife
was
also
a
clique
member.
She
actually
took
my
spot
and
whether
you're
doing
transportation
or
hd
that
work.
H
It
really
charts
a
course
for
where
we're
gonna
go,
and
I
can't
think
of
a
more
important
time
than
doing
this
work
right
now,
for
a
number
of
reasons,
one
we
do
have
some
significant
budget
shortfalls.
Hopefully
those
budget
shortfalls
will
be
addressed
in
the
very
near
term,
so
they
don't
become
kind
of
capital,
long-term
issues
you
know
normally,
on
any
annual
basis.
We
receive
about
half
of
our
property
of
our
revenues
from
property
taxes,
the
other
half
we
get
from
other
sources.
H
You
know
parking
fees,
entertainment
taxes,
that
kind
of
thing
and,
in
large
part
those
numbers
have
been
decimated
over
this
last
year
and
so,
at
least
in
terms
of
our
annual
budget.
I
know
you
guys
can
at
times
operate
beyond
the
annual
budget,
but
at
least
in
cases
of
our
annual
budget,
we've
had
to
make
some
pretty
serious
reductions
across
our
city
just
to
combat
the
realities
that
we're
seeing
due
to
the
covet
19
pandemic
now.
Secondly,
as
we
recover
and
as
we
rebuild,
we
don't
want
to
go
back
to
normal.
H
We
fully
recognize
that
some
of
these
deep
and
systemic
inequities
these
deep
racial
inequities
that
have
been
seen
really
over
generations
for
for
hundreds
of
years.
They
are
in
large
part
due
to
decisions
that
we
collectively
have
made,
and
so
we
want
to
do
everything
possible
right
now,
not
to
return
to
that
old
normal,
but
to
do
this
necessary,
transformative
work
so
that
we're
you
know
placing
communities
of
color
not
just
at
the
table,
but
also
as
key
beneficiaries
in
the
process,
and
so
the
work
that
you
are
doing
is
is
just
so
important.
H
You
know
I'll
tell
you
that
when
we
get
click
recommendations
they
by
and
large,
are
adopted
with
very
few
modifications.
I
we
get
the
click
recommendations.
They
come
on
my
desk
those
recommendations.
In
most
cases,
I
hesitate
to
give
you
a
percentage,
but
I
would
venture
to
guess
that
probably
95
or
more
percent
of
what
you
provide
to
us
in
terms
of
rex
do
go
in
to
recommended
short
and
long-term
budgets,
and
so
I
apply
them.
H
The
council
adopts
them
and
they're
valued,
because
you
all
have
kind
of
that
that
that
very
micro
level
of
knowledge
from
from
doing
the
on
on
the
ground,
research
that
you
do
and
I'm
not
sure
I
know
there
have
been
some
modifications
as
to
how
you
do
your
work.
We
used
to
have
kind
of
this
ranking
scenario
and
there
would
be
parameters
from
which
you
could
rank
and
how
much
dollars
to
allocate
and
how
urgent
it
was.
H
I
assume
most
of
those
are,
is
still
in
place
in
some
form,
but
you
know
that
work
matters,
whether
it's
regarding
roads
or
a
sewer
system
or
the
human
development
work
that
you
are
always
doing
it.
It
really
matters,
you
know
nobody
is
better
at
doing
it
than
you
are
and-
and
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you.
H
I
Thanks
mayor
similarly
yeah,
I
just
want
to
thank
you
all
for
all
the
time
that
you
provide
to
our
city
and
your
volunteer
hours
and
the
leadership
that
you're
giving
our
community
in
in
constrained
budgets.
I
Your
voice
really
matters
more
than
ever,
and
I
also
think
the
policy
guidance-
and
you
know
the
kind
of
policy
approach
you
have
taken
to
recommendations-
is
really
important
during
a
time
where
we
have
a
federal
administration
that
is
now
interested
in
investing
in
infrastructure,
which
brings
a
lot
of
potential
opportunity
to
local
governments.
So
the
time
that
we
have
all
put
into
adopting
infrastructure
plans
everything
from
transportation,
which
is
much
more
visible
to
most
people
to
the
stormwater
system,
which
I
think
people
take
for
granted.
I
You
know
you
are
the
ones
who
really
get
into
the
details
and
weeds
and
see
the
full
picture
of
the
challenges
and
the
potential
to
implement
our
vision
for
a
more
sustainable
and
equitable
city
through
our
infrastructure
investments.
So
I
guess
I
do
want
to
emphasize
a
few
things
beyond
those
sort
of
general
thanks.
I
think,
as
the
mayor
said
often,
the
click
recommendations
are.
Are
you
know,
move
forward
without
much
change?
I
I
think
there
was
some
change
last
year
which
has
some
impacts
on
infrastructure
projects,
and
so
I'll
just
I've
been
on
the
council.
Almost
this
will
be
my
eighth
year.
This
will
be
eight,
the
last
budget
as
council
members
are
in
that,
so
I
mean
we.
We
see
the
mayor's
proposed
budget.
This
last
year
came
a
little
later,
but
you
know
august
through
september
time.
I
Then
we
have
a
lot
of
discussion
throughout
the
fall
and
then
all
of
a
sudden,
everyone
starts
paying
attention
to
the
budget
in
those
last
couple
months
which
become
very
busy
for
council
members
and
we're
just
inundated
with
requests
for
meetings
and
lots
of
communication
about
the
budget.
Often
you
know
in
a
billion,
but
you
know
much
bigger
than
a
billion
dollar
budget.
You
know
for
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
this
five
million
for
that
lots
of
feedback
about
things
that
are
generally
not
in
the
capital
budget.
I
So
I
actually
think
it's
really
valuable
and
important
when
click
members
reach
out
to
their
council
members
throughout
the
budget
process,
maybe
proactively
schedule
some
meetings,
especially
as
we
get
into
that
like
crunch
time
right
before
the
budget.
You
know
maybe
think
about
requesting
to
have
a
meeting
on
the
calendar,
for
you
know
november
or
something
just
so.
I
You
know
that
you
have
a
time
set
aside
to
check
in
with
your
council
member,
about
the
capital
recommendations
you've
made
versus
what
was
in
the
mayor's
budget
and
what
you
might
want
your
council
member
to
just
make
sure
they're
paying
attention
to
or
or
know
as
they're
getting
inundated
with
so
many
things
about
the
budget.
I
I
also
think
you
know,
I'm
sure,
you've
run
in
a
press
and
are
aware
that
there's
some
conversations
about
the
water
yard
project
that
has
been
going
through
this
body-
and
I
think
you
know
I
think,
if
members
of
this
committee
have
a
perspective
to
offer
on
decisions
that
are
coming
that
are
related
to
clicks
per
view,
that
that
is
also
valuable.
I
mean
you're
here
to
provide
you
know,
feedback
and
input
to
the
elected
officials,
and
so
I
guess
I
just
want
to
emphasize
that.
I
I
feel
it's
really
important
and
valuable
to
hear
from
you
throughout
the
year
on
issues
that
are
related
to
our
capital
infrastructure,
whatever
those
may
be,
whatever
your
perspective
might
be
on
the
decisions
that
are
coming
to
council.
I
So
those
are
some
of
the
thoughts
I
wanted
to
offer
and
again
just
appreciate
all
of
your
efforts
and
time-
and
I
know
we
have
councilman
fletcher.
We
have
reorganized
the
city
council
many
times
since
the
pandemic
hit
because
of
the
our
virtual
environment.
I
It's
one
of
the
ways
that
we've
adjusted
to
the
pandemic
and
council
member
fletcher
now
serves
and,
of
course,
councilman
rosami
resigned
and
there's
a
new
word
six
council
members,
so
he
was
previously
at
some
of
these
as
our
ways
of
needs
chair,
customer
fletcher
is
now
the
finance
subcommittee
chair
of
our
policy
and
government
oversight
committee,
so
he's
here
in
that
role.
He
now
serves
on
the
board
of
estimate
and
taxation
where
we
set
the
maximum
levy.
J
Thank
you,
council,
president
and
I'll
really
echo
the
gratitude
that
the
mayor
and
council
president
shared
you
know,
really
appreciate
the
work
that
everybody's
doing
and
I
just
want
to
add.
I
I
really
love
this
process,
because
you
know
we
we
talk
about
participatory
democracy
and
participatory
budgeting,
and
how
do
we
include
more
people
in
decision
making?
How
do
we
give
more
people
access
to
decision
making?
J
And
this
is
one
of
the
ways
that
our
city
does
it
really
well
that's
kind
of
innovative
and
and
interesting,
and
it's
really
a
mutual
investment
that
you
make
in
us
of
your
time
and
energy
and
that
we
make
and
you
to
really
help
you
become
experts
and
have
the
the
kind
of
deep
knowledge
of
these
infrastructure
projects
to
make
good
decisions
about
it,
and
this
is
really
a
valuable
exercise
in
in
democracy
that
that
we
do
every
year
and
that
I'm
always
grateful
for.
J
So
I'm
really
happy
to
see
this,
and
I
know
that
by
inviting
more
people
in
we
invite
in
the
values
of
our
city,
and
we
know
that
we're
making
infrastructure
decisions
that
will
last
us
for
many
generations.
So
we
know
we
have
to
take
seriously
our
commitment
to
a
future
that
is
more
equitable
than
our
city
is
today
our
commitment
to
a
future
infrastructure
that
is
more
climate
sustainable
than
our
infrastructure
is
today
we
know
we're
in
a
climate
emergency.
J
We
know
we
have
unresolved
inequities
in
our
community
that
we
have
to
address,
and
so
this
is
our
opportunity.
J
This
is
one
of
those
places
where
you
can
bring
your
experience
and
your
knowledge
of
the
way
those
issues
play
out
in
your
neighborhood
and
in
your
community
get
into
this
real
exchange
and
this
real
mutual
investment
between
the
city
and
and
all
of
you
and
come
out
with
some
really
great
decisions,
and
so
I
I'm
deeply
appreciative
of
your
work
really
excited
to
hear
about
the
recommendations
that
you'll
come
to
and
looking
forward
to,
keeping
in
touch
and
I'll.
J
Just
echo
do
keep
in
touch
with
your
council
members.
That's
something
I've
always
done
out
of
my
office,
and
I
think
it
really.
It
really
is
valuable
for
us
to
have
the
kind
of
informed
advice
that
you
all
are
able
to
offer.
As
you
come
through
this
quick
process-
and
I
know
that
the
whole
community
appreciates
your
work.
B
E
Okay,
then
I'll
go
through
the
big
question,
so
there's
there
is
envisioned
a
once-in-a-lifetime
infusion
of
funds
for
capital
investments
coming
from
washington
with
two
to
three
trillion
dollars
being
proposed
is:
is
there
a
design
right
now
for
how
the
public
can
be
engaged
and
talking
about
priorities
when
it
comes
to
infrastructure,
since
this
appears
to
be
the
mechanism
for
public
participation
and
in
those
sorts
of
spending?
That's
my
question.
H
Thank
you,
mr
one
answer
is
yes,
and
you
know
very,
thankfully,
to
our
federal
government.
We
are
now
getting
the
monies
that,
quite
frankly,
we
should
have
gotten
six
seven
eight
months
ago
in
terms
of
of
recovery
and
assistance
to
our
communities.
We're
looking
at,
I
think
it's
281
million
dollars
in
total.
Now
those
monies
are
divided.
The
way
we're
at
least
setting
up
the
framework
into
about
seven
different
areas.
H
The
the
two
main
areas
are
are
kind
of
like
immediate
and
emergency
needs,
and
then
more
recovery
needs
the
way
we're
working
through
the
process
which,
by
the
way,
is
still
morphing
as
we
speak,
is
we've
got
these
kind
of
seven
groups
that
are
working
together
to
provide
some
recommendation.
They'll
then
be
quite
a
bit
of
community
feedback,
make
a
recommendation.
The
council
then
reviews
and
makes
amendments,
and
then
ultimately
we
adopt
and
that's
the
general
framework.
H
Of
course,
the
parts
of
that
process
may
morph
and
change
over
the
coming
months.
One
of
the
issues
that
we're
experiencing
that
we're
getting
to
is
that
is
that
we
have
the
general
framework
as
to
what
these
dollars
are
to
be
used
for,
but
we
don't
have
specific
guidelines
yet
those
guidelines
will
be
issued.
H
I
believe
in
late
may
and
council
members
feel
free
to
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I
believe
late
may
is
when
we're
anticipating,
when
those
guidelines
will
be
issued
and
then
we'll
hopefully
be
able
to
get
the
dollars
out
as
soon
as
possible,
but
yeah
we,
we
really
do
value
the
community
community
input
in
this
in
it.
H
There
is
there's,
there's
quite
a
bit
of
money,
but
that
money
will
be
dramatically
diminished
when
you
see
some
of
the
obligations
that
we
have,
that
are
like
kind
of
not
optional,
and
but
no
yes,
the
answer
is
yes,
we
will
be
having
quite
a
bit
of
community
feedback.
E
Are
those
the
rescue
dollars
that
you're
talking
about,
or
is
that
the
infrastructure
dollars
that
that
p
footages
is
working
on
right?.
H
Now
so
I
was
talking
about
rescue
dollars
now
now
there
are
other
dollars
from
pete,
but
a
judge
that,
from
their
secretary
of
of
transportation
that
are
also
coming
in,
I
don't
have
the
exact
dollar
figure
on
that
pool
in
front
of
me
anyway.
I
don't
know
if
council
president
or
council
member
fletcher,
if
you
all
do.
K
Out
this
is
amelia
kruger
budget
director,
I'll
just
chime
in
and
say
we
know
much
less
even
than
we
do
about
the
rescue
plan
about
the
coming
infrastructure
plan.
So
we
mayor
frye,
did
a
great
job
of
summarizing
sort
of
our
plan
for
the
rescue
act
and
that
one
that's
one
where
the
bill's
actually
been
signed.
The.
K
Stuff
is
just
a
lot
further
down
the
road,
so
we
we're
further
away
from
having
a
plan
for
that
so
I'll,
just
chime
in
and
say
that
if
council,
president
and
council
member,
if
you
have
anything
to
add,
feel
free.
I
Yeah
I
mean
I'll
say
that
we
are
really
proactively
as
a
city
working
to
advocate
for
the
passage
of
infrastructure
investments
in
congress
and
we're
really
grateful.
I
mean
congresswoman
omar's
office
has
been
really
communicative
with
the
city
just
really
making
sure
to
highlight.
I
mean
we
do
have
a
little
in
now,
because
robin
hutchinson
abandoned
us
for
the
by
an
administration,
but
the
congresswoman
has
been
really
proactive
in
just
really
advocating
for
the
city.
There's
also
this
new.
This
new
earmark
situation
congress
has
reinstituted
earmarks.
I
So,
as
a
city
we
put
together
a
list
of
earmarks
kind
of
the
turnout.
Time
was
really
fast,
so
we
had
to
rely
on.
You
know
previous
kinds
of
engagement.
I
always
think
we
can
do
more
community
engagement
around
our
budget.
That
is
more
proactive.
Instead
of
the
two
hearings
that
come.
You
know
in
those
last
weeks
of
our
budget.
You
know-
and
I
think
I
I
think
there
is
a
it's-
a
great
idea-
to
think
about
the
role
that
click
could
play
in
proactively,
helping
think
about
priorities
for
future
federal
dollars.
I
The
earmark
program
is
anticipated
to
to
you
know,
be
a
regular
occurrence,
so
for
the
next
round
we
could
be
more
proactive
and
more
community
facing
and
prioritization
this
time
we
just
had
to
like
send
a
list
of
projects
to
illinois
and
try
to
get
things
that
we
thought
could
get
funded
and
then
there
was,
but
there
was
also
this
public
facing
you
know.
Nonprofits
could
apply
for
earmarks
for
specific
things,
so
I
think
the
federal
I
mean
the
the
way
that
the
federal
government
is
moving.
I
I
will
say
that
all
of
the
planning
work
that
has
been
happening
for
these
last
years
puts
us
in
such
a
stronger
position
to
be
ready
to
implement
infrastructure,
our
transportation
action
plan,
the
vision,
zero
plan,
the
stormwater
planning
work
that
public
works
has
done,
and
all
of
it
has
been
so
data
driven
that
it
really
puts
us
in
a
great
position.
I
mean
for
the
first
time
ever
we
have
the
city's
transit
priority
map
adopted.
That's
our
own
thing.
It's
not
some
negotiated
sad
compromise
with
the
metropolitan
council.
I
It's
our
own
vision
for
transit
and,
of
course,
people
have
to
compromise
and,
of
course,
we're
still
part
of
the
region
and
the
state,
but
it's
our
vision
for
how
we
can
advance.
You
know,
transit
for
the
city.
You
know,
like
I
said,
the
stormwater
management
planning
was
so
detailed
and
focused
on
the
potential.
You
know:
mapping
of
climate
change
impacts
and
how
we
can
do
flood
mitigation
so
we're,
I
think,
more
ready
than
we've
ever
been.
I
But
to
your
point,
there's
a
big
question
about
prioritization
and
especially
with
questions
around
you
know
what
is
the
city's
role
in
in
financing
or
supporting
reconstruction
of
private
properties
that
have
been
damaged
and
unrest
and
and
then
kind
of,
as
along
with
all
of
the
other
things
that
we
typically
do
with
infrastructure,
investments
and
capital?
That's
just
a
capital
investments
happy
days
or
follow-ups.
I
can
stop
talking.
B
L
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
address
something
that
both
the
mayor
and
I
think
lisa
bender,
just
stated
that
I
think
in
past
years
and
recent
experience
it
has
been
accurate.
It
was
not
accurate
this
past
year
and
I
want
to
identify
it
for
a
specific
reason,
and
that
is
the
amount
of
the
percentage
of
our
recommendations
that
the
council
actually
adopts.
It
was
way
off
this
past
year
way
off
I'll,
give
you
some
numbers.
L
These
are
dollar
numbers
over
the
five
year,
sorry,
over
the
six
year
period,
2021
to
2026,
you
guys
funded
26
more
dollars
than
we
recommended,
so
we
recommended
just
over
a
billion.
You
adopted
almost
a
billion
three
and
that
ring,
if
you
look
at
that
by
year,
that
range
from
under
funding
in
2022.
That's
the
only
year
that
you
underfunded
to
over
funding
as
much
as
84
in
2026,
so
you
almost
double
what
we
recommended
in
2026..
L
So
I
point
that
out.
For
this
reason,
we
try
to
stay
very
close
to
what
you
guys
adopt
for
net
debt
bond
funding,
which
is
sort
of
what
guides
all
of
this
everything
flows.
Down
from
that,
we,
our
recommendation
last
year,
was
within
10
of
what
you
guys
adopted
back
in
february,
and
we
recognized
that
that
number
might
have
become
inaccurate
as
the
year
went
on,
although,
ironically,
our
assumption
is,
it
might
have
gone
down
and
it
actually
went
up
dramatically.
L
So
my
request
is
that
whatever
you
guys
adopt
is
realistic
in
terms
of
whatever
you
guys
set
for
net
debt
bond
funding
over
the
six
year
period.
Stick
to
that,
so
that
when
we
make
a
recommendation
to
you,
it
makes
sense.
I
mean
this.
You
guys
went
way
over
way
over
what
we
what
you
had
recommended
to
us
and
it
makes
our
work
less
useful.
If
you
do
that.
J
Yeah,
I
I
I
appreciate
that,
and
I
think
in
in
retrospect-
and
this
is
sort
of
speaking
to
the
compressed
you
know,
timeline
that
we
had
is.
I
think
that
there
is
there
were
changes
in
the
mayor's
recommendations
that,
frankly,
ended
up
not
being
part
of
the
budget
process.
You
know
in
a
way
that
got
presented
to
us
in
a
lot
of
detail,
and
I
I
think
that
points
to
an
opportunity
for
us
to
work
more
closely
with
the
clique.
J
I
think
there
actually
might
be
a
value
in
in
sort
of
adding
a
meeting
or
adding
a
component
to
a
meeting
to
have
a
more
detailed
click
presentation
to
the
full
council,
because
I
I
don't
think
in
the
in
the
overviews
that
we
got
from
the
budget
director
and
the
overviews
that
we
got.
You
know
from
from
staff
related
to
the
mayor's
recommendations
that
was
never
sort
of
highlighted
to
us.
J
It
was
something
that
we
noticed
kind
of
towards
the
end
and-
and
you
know
kind
of
didn't
address,
knowing
that
it
was
more
a
future
year
problem,
but
I,
but
I
do
think
that
it's
something
that
we
can
do
better
at
and
and
be
more
intentional
in
the
process
about.
J
So
I
I
would
be
interested
in
some
follow-up
conversations
to
think
about
how
how
we
can
best
do
that
to
make
sure
that
we're
getting
a
really
clear
presentation
from
from
the
clique
about
what
what
their
recommendation
to
council
is.
I
I've
found
those
meetings
very
valuable
in
the
past
and
yeah.
I
just
want
to
encourage
folks
to
we
pay
attention
when
you
contact
us
so
and
and
you're
you
know
really.
You
are
kind
of
like
the
only
people
who
generally
contact
us
about
capital
programming
at
budget
time,
so
even
just
for
highlighting
the
the
important
role
this
group.
B
G
I
I
don't
know
what
the
mayor
meant,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
as
a
as
a
city
we
have
adopted.
So
I
actually
don't.
Do
you
remember
exactly
what
he
I
don't
remember
exactly
what
he
said
even.
G
H
Well,
it's
a
really
good
question.
You
know.
I
think
this
was
to
counsel
president
bender's
point
earlier
much
of
what
we
hear
during
these
budget
cycles.
Don't
really
focus
on
click,
recommendations
or
capital
long-range
improvement
projects
at
all.
A
lot
of
them
are
more
programmatic
in
terms
of
the
feedback.
H
Now
that
doesn't
mean
that
the
programmatic
changes
exclusively
impact
issues
of
of
racial
justice
and
some
of
the
deep
systemic
inequities
we've
seen.
There
are
systemic
inequities
based
on
where
and
how
capital
long-range
improvement
projects
are
centered.
What
neighborhoods
they're
located
in
you
know
are
we
are,
we
are
we
making
sure
to
value?
You
know
communities
of
color
and
make
investments
there
and
in
terms
of
the
prioritization
itself,
and
that's
one
of
the
more
difficult
things
to
do.
H
Is
you
know
you
know
you
look
acro,
you
look
across
the
city,
you,
of
course
you
want
to
make
sure
that
those,
for
instance
roads
that
need
repair,
get
repaired,
but
you
also
want
to
make
sure
that
communities
that
have
systemically
been
underserved
and
left
behind
don't
get
left
behind
going
forward,
and
so
that
applies
to
human
development
projects.
That
applies
to
playgrounds.
H
That
applies
to
to
I
mean
that
applies
to
even
you
know,
sewers
and
how
we
deal
with
our
water,
and
so
I
think,
there's
a
broad
range
in
terms
of
what
I
mean,
I
don't
there's
not
one
specific
thing,
but
I
I
think
really
apply.
That
lens
is
what
I
would
ask,
and
I
think
that
would
would
certainly
benefit.
B
I
Oh
and
just
quickly,
sorry,
I
did
have
a
couple
additional
thoughts.
I
think
we're
one
of
the
first
cities
in
the
country
to
use
race,
equity
and
economic
equity
criteria
in
our
capital
programming
for
transportation,
and
we
followed
the
example
of
the
park
board,
which
was
using
this
strategy
for
parks
capital,
and
I
think
it's
helpful
to
always
just
check
in
and
make
sure
that
that's
working,
so
we
know
our
intention
is
to
make
sure
that
our
capital
investments
are
using
race,
equity
and
economic
equity
as
a
criteria
for
project
selection.
I
I
So
I
think
that's
an
important
question,
because
you
see
the
projects
in
front
of
you
more
than
anyone
else
in
the
city
really
except
for
the
staff,
and
then
I
think
you
know
so,
if
we're
both
on
a
project
by
project
basis,
you
know
each
year,
I
guess
like
for
each
year's
capital
budget,
but
then
also
over
time
is
the
formula
working
the
way
we
want
it
to
at
a
policy
level
we've
also
adopted.
I
I
think
you
probably
are
aware
of
these
different
geographic
areas
of
the
city,
green
zones
and
cultural
districts,
where
our
intention
is
to
focus
resources.
Some
programmatic,
like
the
mayor,
talked
about,
but
others
infrastructure.
So
it's
another
place
where
I
think
it's
helpful
to
see.
Is
that
strategy
working?
I
Is
it
really
meeting
the
goals
that
we
wanted
to
and
how
could
are
there
new
ways
that
we
could
leverage
those
existing
designations
from
a
capital
perspective,
and
then
I
think
the
other
thing
is
in
this.
Might
you
know
this
might
expand
a
bit
beyond?
Like
the
you
know,
the
click
process,
but
in
order
to
do
a
function,
government
needs
to
staff
that
thing
appropriately
and,
and
we
staff
things
some
things
much
better
than
other
things.
M
I
Our
public
works
department
has
a
lot
more
resources
per
item
that
they
are
doing
than
the
health
department.
Does
that's
just
the
fact,
and
so
you
know,
there's
a
relationship
here.
So
you
know,
for
example,
if
we
cancel
the
water
yard
project
and
reinitiate
a
process
to
locate
a
water
yard
in
a
different
location
and
also
commit
to
doing
a
redevelopment
project
at
the
city
owned
site
that
takes
staff
resources
and
we
either
have
to
add
staff
resources
or
other
projects
will
not.
I
You
know,
will
be
delayed
and
and
right
now
we're
very
compartmentalized,
so
that
would
likely
mean
it
would
affect
projects
like
upper
harbor
terminal
and
reopening
nikola
avenue
or
other
like
type
things
that
are
like
redevelopment,
I'm
just
using
that
as
an
example,
because
it's
timely,
but
generally
speaking,
you
know
as
we
look
to
like
the
infrastructure
opportunities
in
the
binary
administration,
I
mean
we
also
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
appropriately
staffed
for
the
functions
that
we're
trying
to
do,
and
so
I
think
it's
another
place
where
your
recommendations
about
what
to
prioritize
are
important.
I
So,
for
example,
if
we
started
to
think
about
taking
a
more
of
a
interest
in
financing
redevelopment
for
some
reason
than
the
city
has
for
most
of
recent
years,
that
would
require
you
know
some
restructuring
of
how
staff
is
oriented
in
the
city.
So
it's
not
as
simple
as
just
moving
capital
money
around.
We
also
have
to
make
sure
that
we
are
staffed
appropriately
to
meet
the
goals
that
we're
trying
to
achieve,
in
particular
around
race,
equity
and
and
a
part
of
the
reason
I
use.
I
That
example
was
because
the
worst
case
scenario
is
we
have
projects
or
functions
that
are
intended
to
correct
for
race
equity
over
time
that
are
putting
like
sort
of
pitting
that
work
against
each
other.
Instead
of
fully
investing
in
that
in
the
things
that
are
getting
us
to
to
raise
equity
and
economic
equity.
I
B
Thank
you,
katie
jones,.
M
Yeah
hi,
council,
members
and
mayor,
I
just
wanted
to
respond
to
the
point
about
more
infrastructure
funding
coming
to
the
city
and
how
this
you
know
how
this
body
can
be
helpful.
In
that
way,
I
mean
we've
had
kind
of
the
same.
M
I
mean
I've
been
on
click
for
four
or
five
years
now,
and
you
know
we
kind
of
have
a
set
report
style
and
wondering,
and
to
date
you
know,
new
projects
have
kind
of
come
through
us,
because
people
will
show
up
at
the
public
hearing
and
we'll
hear
about
things
like
sidewalk
gaps.
M
M
That
has
been
the
only
pathway,
I've
understood
as
a
way
to
get
for
the
community
to
recommend
that
a
project
become
a
project
to
public
works
and,
if
they're,
especially
given
this
the
new
opportunity
or
potential
opportunity
for
funding,
should
we
be
adding
a
an
additional
section,
or
or
at
least
a
part
of
our
comments
that
are
like
these.
Are
the
projects
that
we're
hearing
about
listed,
like
and
and
with
the
kind
of
level
of
support
that
we're
hearing
about
them
and
making
space
for
that
can
in
a
more
formal
way.
J
I
I
think
yes,
I
mean
I,
I
think
that
there's
some
you
know
potentially
some
value
for
that.
I
also
think
you
know:
we've
we've
been
challenging,
you
know,
through
our
finance
staff
and
and
program
staff,
to
think
about
putting
more
options
in
front
of
you
all
right.
J
The
I
think,
the
feedback
that
we
got
at
least
a
couple
of
years
ago
was
that
there
was
almost
just
about
the
amount
of
projects
proposed
that
we
had
bonding
money
for,
and
so
there
wasn't,
as
it
wasn't
as
as
useful,
a
democratic
exercise
if
you're
not
making
priorities
and
choices
right,
and
so
I
think,
in
a
lot
of
cases,
the
projects
that
you
might
be
thinking
of
proposing
are
things
that
we
don't
have
developed
enough,
yet
that
we
would
have
put
on
that
short
list,
but
but
hopefully
they're
at
least
sort
of
in
the
hopper,
or
at
least
in
a
sort
of
you
know,
broader
to-do
list
and
so
putting
them
in
you
know
putting
in
your
suggestions
and
adding
to
that,
I
think
is
helpful
and
I
think
in
general
we
want
to
put
more
options
in
front
of
you
so
that
you
all
can
see
what
the
city
is
thinking
about.
J
That
might
not
be
fully
cooked
enough
yet
for
capital
investment,
but
that
at
least
you
could
could
help
you
start
to
flag
for
priorities.
So
I
know
I
know
some
of
that
work
is
ongoing.
I
don't
think
we've
got
it
perfect
yet
so
I
think,
let's
you
know,
keep
getting
feedback
on
how
that's
going,
but
I
know
there
were
some
steps
in
the
right
direction
towards
this
year,
so
I'm
hoping
that
this
process
feels
a
little
more.
You
know
like,
like
your
role,
is
valuable.
I
Yeah-
and
I
think
I
think
it'll
be
important
for
us
to
flag
that
as
we
get
more
information,
particularly
about
the
any
infrastructure
investments
that
we
stay
in
touch
about
adding
an
additional
hearing.
Or
you
know,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
anything
that
you
take
the
time
to
do
is
is
able
to
be
used
and
informed
decisions.
And
so,
like
customer
fletcher,
said,
I
think,
generally
speaking,
that
that
is
very
valuable
and
we'll
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
all
and
have
the
right
information
to.
I
You
know
about
the
timelines
of
process
and
exemptions
and
all
the
things
to
make
sure
that
your
time
is
used,
that
the
recommendations
are
used
and
all
you
know,
and
to
also
just
think
about
any
more
broadly
public
facing
engagement.
That
might
make
sense.
B
C
E
Okay,
council
president
bender,
you
mentioned
earlier
impacts
of
of
spending
and
in
in
the
particular
area
of
equity,
I've
been
trying
my
darndest
to
find
impact
studies
to
demonstrate
their
their
benefits
and
measurable
impacts
for
investments
that
we're
making
as
a
city-
and
I
found
nothing
it's
you
know,
someone
may
have
something
on
a
shelf
somewhere,
but
they're
other
than
what
the
public
school
system
does
in
terms
of
impact
studies.
E
It
doesn't
look
like
minneapolis
follows
up
on
whether
spending
has
impacts
or
that
it's
going
in
the
direction
that
they
want
it
to
go
in.
So
equity
is
a
difficult
question
to
address.
If
you
don't
do
impact
studies,
is
there
a
movement
perhaps
to
start
seeing
if
our
dollars
are
resulting
in
anything.
I
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
a
great
comment
and
you
know
I
mean
like
not
to
sound
like
a
jaded.
I
Official,
but
I
mean
any
any,
a
new
work
like
that
will
would
require
resources,
and
you
know
and
planning
for
that,
but
I
think
it's
a
great
point,
especially
as
you
think
about
we've
made.
I
think,
over
time.
Communities
have
made
a
lot
of
assumptions
about
projects
and
and-
and
I
think
we're
not.
I
think
the
lieutenant
governor
talks
about
this
a
lot.
You
collect
data
for
things
that
you
care
about,
and
it
really
shows
you
know
if
you
don't.
You
know.
I
If,
if
you
say
you
care
about
something,
you
don't
have
any
data
about
it,
you're
really
telling
on
yourself
right,
and
so
we
talked
a
lot
about
the
displacement
impacts
of
infrastructure
investment,
but
we
don't
really
measure
it.
We
have
so.
Let's
say
this:
we
have,
I
think,
over
time.
My
time
in
office
tried
to
invest
in
more
sort
of
open
data.
We've
started
tracking
our
housing
market
with
much
more
reliable
data
than
we
had
you
know
early
on,
although
it
only
applies
to
it
leaves
some
some.
I
The
data
is
not
comprehensive,
but
we
are
tracking
our
housing
market.
You
could
do
that
in
particular
geographic
areas
of
the
city,
so
I
think
that
there
is
more,
I
think,
we're
tracking
our
transportation
data
much
more
robustly,
not
just
focusing
on
car
travel
but
on
all
modes.
So
I
think
there's
more
raw
data
there
than
there
has
been
in
the
past
that
you
could
use
to
put
together.
You
know
tracking
of
progress.
I
We
also
have
the
results
minneapolis
program,
which
keeps
getting
redesigned
that
is
intended
to
be
tracking
our
city's
progress
towards
stated
and
adopted
goals
and,
like
I
said,
we
keep
redoing
it
because
I
think
it's
hard
at
a
city
level
to
identify
the
things
that
are
measurable,
that
we
have
data
for.
I
But
I
think
that
I
think
that
the
results
minneapolis
program
is
the
best
existing
tracking
that
the
city
does,
and
then
you
know
for
each
individual
kind
of
investment.
There
I
mean,
especially
for
public
works,
I
think
probably
tracks
its
projects,
much
more
than
other
departments
do
and
immediately
just
turn
on
our
camera.
Finance
has
been
talking
about
this
and
working
on
it
and
trying
to
figure
out
how
we
can
align
our
budget
to
results
and
our
results
to
budget.
J
Yeah,
I
agree,
I
think,
there's
a
specifically.
J
You
know
there
are
specific
kinds
of
investments,
so
we
have,
for
example,
really
good
crash
data
right,
like
we
were
doing
a
much
better
job
at
tracking,
a
car
accidents
and
pedestrian
accidents,
accidents
and
bicycle
accidents,
and
so
specific
investments
that
are
designed
to
create
safety
towards
our
vision.
Zero
goals
are
much
more
trackable
than
other
things.
You
know.
I
think
that
the
it
has
been
a
frustration
and
a
conversation
that
we've
been
starting
around.
J
How
do
we
track,
for
example,
the
impact
on
affordable
housing
of
investments
that
we're
making
and
there's
always
this
tension
about?
If
you
invest
in
new
infrastructure,
does
that
create
gentrification
and
raise
housing
values
and
in
a
way
that
pushes
people
out
and-
and
I
I
think,
we're
not
as
good
at
tracking
that
as
we
should
be
and
there's
some
really.
J
You
know
tricky
practical
reasons
that
that's
the
case
that
that
I
think
we
need
to
overcome
over
time,
but
there's
there's
things
we're
better
at
tracking
than
others,
but
I
think
it's
worth
us
always
thinking
about
that
and
and
and
would
be
worth
if,
if,
if
you
all
as
you're
contemplating
this
question
as
you're
digging
into
specific
projects,
if
there
are
things
that
you
would
want
to
see,
reported
back
or
tracked,
if
there's
a
metric
that
feels
meaningful
to
you,
I'd
be
interested
in
hearing
about
that
to
see
if
we
could
track
it.
B
Very
good:
well,
it's
we've
heard
45
minutes
and
I
really
appreciate
the
city
elected
officials
meeting
with
click
today
providing
guidance
and
priorities.
B
I
hesitate
to
cut
the
conversation
short,
but
we
do
have
a
fair
amount
of
material
to
go
over
to
help
with
onboarding
new
click
members,
and
I
would
just
like
to
thank
council
member
president
vendor
and
council
member
chair
fletcher
and
mayor
frye
for
attending
so
virtual.
B
C
B
And
fantastic
dialogue.
B
N
To
item
four
for
the
for
the
good
of
the
order
I
can,
I
can
definitely
call
those
out
if
needed.
You
know
we
had
one
comment
that
was
asking
about
when
I
believe
the
best
time
might
be
to
connect
with
council
members.
That
probably
depends
on
a
couple
of
things,
including
when
the
bulk
of
the
programming
is
going
to
be
occurring
this
year
and
possibly
you
know
any
additional
guidance
that
might
come
out
of
you
know
an
infrastructure
bill.
N
I
think
we
can
follow
up
on
that,
and
that
might
be
something
also
that
depends
on
individual
clip
members.
You
know
ongoing
communications,
I
guess
and
norms
with
their
council
members,
but
we
can
definitely
follow
up.
I
think,
with
some
guidance
on
that,
I
see
a
hand
raised
from
amelia.
I'm
gonna
call
that.
K
Out
too
I
I
would
just
add
to
that.
I
think
council
president
bender
said
like
november
and
I
think
that's
a
great
recommendation.
K
Council
members
will
start
hearing
presentations
from
departments
on
their
recommended
budget
about
the
very
end
of
september,
so
really
october
and
november.
So
that's
really
when,
when
council
members
will
start
digesting
the
mayor's
recommended
budget,
I
think
that
that
that
would
be
my
recommendation
for
a
timeline
and
we
can
certainly
follow
up
and
see
if
there's
anything
more
precise
from
electeds.
B
Shall
we
move
to
the
click
schedule
review
for
2021.
A
I
was
going
to
walk
us
through
the
the
next
couple
of
events
for
the
2021
click
schedule.
Justin,
do
you
want
to
share
the
full.
A
There
we
go
so
tomorrow
is
when
the
capital
budget
requests
are
due
from
the
submitting
agencies.
A
So
that
means
robert
justin
and
I
will
be
putting
these
together
onto
our
opengov
website
and
then
later
on,
to
our
click
sharepoint
site
on
thursday
and
friday
and
justin
is
going
to
walk
us
through
later
how
to
access
that
click
sharepoint
site,
and
so
that
leads
us
to
the
first
public
input
session,
which
jeff
mentioned
earlier.
That's
on
wednesday
april
21st
and
it
starts
at
5
30
pm
a
communication
is
going
to
go
out
through
the
neighborhood
community
relations
department.
A
I
think
at
some
point
in
the
next
couple
days
with
information
on
how
the
public
can
attend
that
session.
Please,
I
think
we're
going
to
also
send
an
email
to
click
members,
so
they
can
share
that
link
with
throughout
their
network
network.
So
please
feel
free
to
invite
people.
A
The
sessions
are
planned
to
go
on
as
long
as
there's
questions
so
5
30
is
like
the
start
time.
So,
if
the
more
questions
we
have
the
longer
it
goes
so
if
there's
people
attending
them,
we
actually
have
some
time
to
discuss.
A
So
that's
the
first
public
input
session,
that's
on
the
21st
and
then
the
second
one
is
on
thursday
may
6th.
Also
with
a
5,
30
p.m,
start
time,
and
so
the
the
next
item,
which
would
be
the
first
presentation
session,
will
look
a
little
bit
more
like
last
year
since
we're
still
doing
remote.
These
are
going
to
be
they're
not
going
to
be
full
day
sessions,
they're
only
going
to
be
half
day
from
8
to
1
p.m.
A
These
sessions
are
going
to
be
the
each
submitting
agency
has
is
preparing
a
presentation
before
they're
they're
submitting
a
presentation
on
the
same
day,
their
capital
budget
requests
are
due
and
so
we're
hoping
to
get
those
posted
to
the
website
and
we'll
send
that
out
their
presentations
out
with
our
link
to
the
presentations
out
to
all
click
members,
let's
see
and
then
for
the
actual
presentation
day.
These
are
gonna,
look
like
question
and
answer
sessions.
A
Let's
see,
I
think,
justin
was
gonna,
pull
up
the
agenda
for
the
there
we
go,
so
this
is
tentative
for
right
now,
but
it's
an
8
a.m.
Roll
call
and
then
we'll
go
through
agenda
and
then
do
some
open
discussion
and
questions
and
then
8
30
departments
will
start
presenting
or
excuse
me
they'll
briefly
summarize
each
of
their
projects
and
then
they
will
resp
they'll
be
available
for
questions
and
answers.
So
that
means
that
click
members
do
need
to
do
some
pre-work
before
these
half
day
sessions.
L
L
A
So
we
still
need
to
finalize
this
this
agenda
with
the
executive
committee,
so
we
will.
I
think
this
is
just
tentative
for
at
the
moment,
but
plan
on
eight
to
one
or
I
think
138.
It
sounds
like
john.
L
Yeah,
I
I
mean
it's
very
possible.
We
can
get
it
done
in
a
half
an
hour,
it's
just
it's
very
unpredictable,
and
so
I
just
it's
best.
If
we
don't
assume
a
half
an
hour,
maybe
it'll
be
a
half
an
hour.
Maybe
it'll
be
an
hour.
It's
just
hard
to
know
again.
It
depends
on
how
the
the
workload
as
it
breaks
out
there
might
be
one
day.
That's
more
transportation,
heavy
and
one
day,
that's
more
hd
heavy,
just
as
the
way
the
presentations
fall.
L
In
addition,
you
know
if
they're
new
projects,
that
slows
it
and
and
beyond
that,
if
there's
people
that
have,
we
have
a
lot
of
new
people.
If
people
have
different
opinions
about
what
we've
done
in
the
past
could
be
more
discussion
than
in
the
past
and
that
can
slow
things
down
too.
So
it's
just
it's
very
unpredictable.
As
my
point
and
people
shouldn't
assume
that
that
we're
going
to
be
done
exactly
at
one
to
the
extent,
you
can't
keep
your
schedule
flexible.
That
day.
B
We
have
we
have
a
comment
from
dan
miller
in
the
chat
that
we
should
call
out
and
then
george
montague.
N
Yeah
this
is
robert.
I
can
do
that
so
dan
has
a
question
about
whether
written
comments
can
be
submitted
at
the
public
input
sessions
and
who
should
they
be
addressed
to
jeff?
I
might
turn
this
one
back
to
you.
B
Yes,
they
have
been
presented
in
the
past,
I'm
happy
to
have
them
directed
to
the
city
care
of
the
click
committee,
care
of
myself
as
chair
with
the
finance
and
property
facility
services
department
referenced
if
they're
electronic
mail.
F
Yeah,
so
just
a
question
as
a
new
member,
can
you
review
what
we
should
plan
to
do
prior
to
the
meeting
on
the
the
half
day
meeting
so
that
we
make
the
best
use
of
our
time.
A
So
we're
gonna,
I
think
justin
will
go
through
the
click
sharepoint.
That's
that's
the
best
place
to
see,
but
we're
also
gonna
send
an
email
out
with
a
guidance
for
all
the
things
that
you
should
be
reviewing
beforehand
and
like
all
the
resources
as
well.
F
O
Yeah
this
is
this
is
beth
toso,
and
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
have
an
idea
of
how,
how
much
time
these
videos
are
going
to
take.
To
view
I
mean,
is
this
like
a
couple
hours
of
presentations
or
six
hours
or
just
so
that
in
terms
of
planning
or
if
you
know
that
at
this
point.
N
Yeah
I
mean
it
was.
It
was
at
least
a
couple
of
hours
of
presentations.
I
I
mean
I
would
hesitate
to
say
whether
it's
three
hours
or
six
hours,
looking
at
those
videos
and
reviewing
those
in
conjunction
with
the
the
the
capital
budget
request,
I
might
turn
that
back
actually
to
the
membership,
especially
those
who
went
through
the
session
last
year.
G
E
I
would
concentrate
on
those
those
projects
that
are
in
your
task
group
in
your
task
force
because,
like
you
do
want
to
see
them
all,
you
do
want
to
see
them
all,
but
if,
if
you
need
to
go
into,
you
really
want
to
go
through
them
slowly
and
perhaps
look
look
at
them
twice.
I
would
do
that
on
those
that
are
in
your
task
force.
E
G
C
L
L
Maybe
he's
just
suggesting
that
initially
for
that
day,
you
need
to
make
sure
that
you're
well
aware
of
the
ones
that
are
on
your
task
force,
but
I
would,
I
would
apply
equal
attention
to
all
of
them
and
as
far
as
the
videos
go,
I
would
just
suggest
this.
We
all
have
different
learning
styles,
some
people
taking
information
better
reading
it
other
people
taking
information
better
by
hearing
it.
L
While
other
spots
is
very
helpful
and
you
may
find
that
you
only
need
to
use
the
videos
to
add
color
where
something's
not
clear,
if
the,
if
you've
read
through
a
bunch
of
these
already
and
the
description
of
the
project
is
clear
and
you've
read
it
and
you
have
no
questions.
You
may
not
need
to
view
the
video,
whereas,
on
the
other
hand,
if
you
view
one
and
it's
not
clear,
you
may
want
to
actually
look
at
the
video.
E
Okay,
I
agree
with
john
in
principle,
but
I
know
that
many
of
us
are
going
to
say
I
can't
take
six
hours
of
this,
which
is
why
I,
I
always
put
those
that
I
need
to
be
discussing
in
in
in
a
group.
Do
those
first
to
make
sure
that
we
don't.
We
don't
delay
any
of
the
group
discussion
and
that's
all
I'm
saying.
B
Okay,
individual
style,
so
members,
I
I
think.
Last
year
we
took
email
questions
in
advance,
so
I
would
anticipate
that
the
staff
will
have
that
capacity
for
efficiency
for
the
q,
a
sessions
that
we
can
maybe
use
the
sharepoint
and
then
again,
if
new
members,
especially
if
you
need
to
reach
out
you
know
that
I
sure
I'm
sure
that
all
the
executive
committee
members
are
hereby
volunteering
to
be
a
resource
and
you
have
our
roster.
You
have
our
contact
information.
B
Please
don't
hesitate
to
reach
out,
so
I
am
going
to
just
let
the
executive
committee
members
know
that
we
thought
next
week
was
our
week
off,
except
for
the
public
input
and
on
the
24th,
but
we'll
need
an
executive
committee
meeting
on
the
21st
say
at
noon
or
sometime
midday
only
about
an
hour
of
your
time
and
then
we
should
move
the
agenda
because
we
do
have
a
couple
of
other
sessions.
We
have
the
capital
budget
request
and
scorecard
review
and
click
sharepoint
review.
E
Okay,
jeff:
are
you
ready
for
me
to
jump
in
here
ready.
E
Great,
thank
you
and
and
john
feel
free
to
jump
in
as
I
go
through
this.
By
way
of
background
this
past
winter,
a
team
led
by
willie
did
some
revisions.
We
spent
a
little
time
with
the
capital
guidelines,
so
those
of
you
who
are
new
to
this
process
won't
know
that
there
were
previous
guidelines,
but
those
who
are
returnees
there
is
a
version
which
shows
the
changes
between
what
we
did
last
year
and
what
we're
doing
this
year
so
that
you
can
reorient
yourself
and
justin.
E
Great,
so
those
of
us
who
were
here
last
year,
if
you,
if
you
want
to
see
what's
changed,
go
to
the
the
track,
change
version,
that's
on
sharepoint
and
you'll,
see
that
it's
streamlined.
There
are
some
fundamental
changes
that
occurred,
but
nothing
too
large.
Okay,
so
for
for
those
who
are
new,
I'm
I'm
sharing
what
I
do
and
we
all
we
all
have
different
approaches.
E
I
for
me,
the
most
important
tool
is
to
go
back
to
the
old
click
reports
that
that
sort
of
gives
you
a
little
history
about
many,
if
not
most,
of
the
projects
that
are
being
proposed
this
year
and
that
in
the
show
that
they'll
all
be
located
there.
E
Second
of
all,
there'll
be
presentations
by
the
department,
along
with
the
videos
and
as
I
again
there
are
different
approaches
here.
I
prioritize
with
those
that
I
have
to
be
able
to
talk
to
within
our
test
group
and
then
I
go
and
and
look
at
all
the
others
just
to
make
sure
that
I
can
be
contributing
during
the
discussions.
E
E
So
there
are
other
sources
which
which
I
access-
and
I
mentioned
one
earlier,
which
is
impact
studies.
There
are
a
lot
of
impact
studies
and
other
references.
If
you,
if
you
just
google
some
of
these
projects,
I
won't
give
any
examples,
but
some
of
you,
some
of
us
who
are
doing
the
the
park
review
for
the
the
the
minneapolis
park
system.
It
helps
if
you
just
google
that
park
and
see
what
the
issues
are
around
there.
E
The
types
of
concerns
people
may
have
expressed
in
the
past
and
if
you
have
a
chance
and
and
robert
and
I
work
on
this
right
now-
a
chance
to
see
these
sites.
One
of
the
things
we're
definitely
gonna
do
is
create
a
map,
so
you
can
see
where
all
these
projects
are
located
around
the
city.
So
you
can
sort
of
you
know,
create
your
own
path.
E
If
you
want
to
go
on
your
own
you're,
not
it's
not
recommended
that
you
go
on
the
site,
but
you
know
we
it
there
may
be
a
chance.
E
So
the
second
part
is:
we've
got
we're
going
to
ask
the
department
the
submitters
to
offer
to
give
us
tours,
or
at
least
access
to
to
some
of
these
facilities,
one
one
that
we're
working
on
is
the
new
public
service
building,
while
it's
not
going
to
officially
open
until
this
fall,
we
we
might
be
able
to
get
in
there
for
a
a
an
actual
customized
tour
of
the
new
building,
and
I'm
working
on
that
right
now
and
everyone
will
be
invited.
E
E
Okay,
so
this
is
the
new
capital
guidelines
document
that
you
will
all
be
using.
This
is
sort
of
the
the
touchstone
for
our
analysis
of
the
projects
being
submitted,
and
what
I
would
do
is
read
through
this
and
and
recognize
after
you
look
at
the
example,
I'm
about
to
provide
just
start,
putting
information
that
you're
gathering
by
reviewing
these
projects
into
little
buckets
and
the
most
important
on
this
page.
What
you're
gonna
find
is
at
the
bottom.
There
you
see
goals
there.
E
There
are
total
of
eight
goals
that
you're
gonna
have
to
be
ranking
things
on
so
and
try
to
study
those
eight
goals
very
carefully,
because
in
the
end
there
the
projects
are
gonna,
be
able
to
earn
points
based
on
these
goals.
E
Okay,
then
we
get
to
the
operational
goals.
One
of
the
changes
that
we
made
this
year
is
to
to
infuse
the
the
the
equity
the
equity
concerns
within
each
of
these
goals.
So
the
first
one
is
something
that
that
we
need
to
understand
a
little
further
and
spend
diversity
means
that
we're
we're
using
locally
sourced,
diverse
suppliers
to
to
to
to
deliver
whatever
we're
going
to
be
spending
on
I'll
give
you
an
example.
There
are
construction
projects
going
on
and
by
doing
spend
diversity.
E
E
Okay,
so
you'll
want
to
look
at
these
four
operational
goals
because
they
will
come
back
to
you
a
little
later
now
at
the
bottom,
you'll
see
priorities
2019
priorities,
those
are
not
priorities
for
the
year
2019.
E
Rather,
these
are
the
parties
that
we
established
in
2019,
so
you're
going
to
want
to
you're
going
to
want
to
see
these
three
priorities
because
they're
going
to
you're
going
to
have
to
be
rating
the
projects
on
them
a
little
later
as
well
on
the
next
page,
the
the
key
there
is
that
link
at
the
bottom
minneapolis
2040,
the
2040
plan,
is
approved
and
its
policy
for
us
at
the
moment.
So
I
I
would
go
ahead
and
review
the
minneapolis
2040
plan.
E
Okay,
some
point
allocations
this.
This
is
the
goal
here,
so
the
the
maximum
that
any
project
can
get
is
300
points
and
that
that's
each
of
us
is
going
to
be
rating
each
project
along
those
lines.
So
when
you
get
this
document,
you
see
project
priority
and
there's
section
one
on
project
priorities,
the
three,
the
the
four
classifications
you
can
give
points
on
and
just
give
an
example.
For
example,
critical.
E
E
E
Okay,
so
so
there's
something
new
here
next
page,
please
one
of
the
one
of
the
allocations
of
points
that
we're
giving
is
the
number
of
years
that
a
project
has
been
submitted
for
funding.
So
I,
basically
you
get
credit
for
persistence.
E
So
if,
if
you're
persistent,
it
must
mean
it's
a
high
priority
to
your
department
and
that
thus
the
escalation
of
points
there,
if,
if
something's
been
submitted
for
six
years,
a
project
or
a
program
leader
must
have
determined
that
that
they
really
need
this,
and
that's
why
we
start
increasing
the
number
of
points
to
get
okay.
E
Let's,
let's
go
to
the
next
page
page:
seven,
please:
okay,
qualitative
criteria.
This
is
where
you
have
the
most
flexibility,
because
this
is
all
you
it
that
there's
there's
no
real
guidelines
early
on
in
the
first
three
pages
of
this
document.
This
is
where
the
I
find
the
greatest,
the
greatest
flexibility
for
you
to
to
evaluate
how
this
project
contributes
to
the
city
and
there
there
are.
Each
of
these
has
been
reconfigured
from
from
previous
years.
So
you'll
see
six
of
these.
These
qualitative
criteria.
E
There
there
there's
a
section
there,
which
is
you'll,
see
intent
which
is
italicized.
That's
that's.
To
give
you
a
deeper
understanding
of
what
is
meant
with
by
the
the
words
next
to
the
bullet,
and
if
it's
still
unclear,
it
would
be
useful
to
contact
your
your
chair
or
vice
chair
for
your
task
group
and
then
on.
The
last
page
is
the
click
rating
summary.
So
you
can
see
the
relationship,
how
the
points
all
add
up
to
300
at
the
bottom.
E
All
right,
so
this
is
what
you'll
see
for
for
a
typical
project
and
the
the
in
this
particular
case.
It's
the
mprb's
request
for
a
a
a
project.
That's
been
on
been
around
for
a
little
while
and
if
you
read
a
little
further
you'll
see
that
they're
saying
this
is
the.
I
believe
that
this
is
the
lat
in
the
last
year.
E
Could
you
scroll
down
please
justin
yeah
there
we
go
okay,
so
there's
a
project,
description,
purpose
of
justification
and,
let's
keep
scrolling
down.
I
want
to
get
to
the
very
bottom
where,
where
we
get
to
the
okay,
let's
stop
there
for
a
second
you'll
see
some
some
of
these
projects
will
have
visuals
like
this,
and
I
would
use
this
if
you
want
to
visit
the
site
to
have
a
look,
because
this
is
the
planet
and
it
means
it
may
not
look
like
what
it
really
is
right
now.
E
Okay,
further
down
so
use
next,
please,
okay,
this
work!
This
is
where
we
get
to.
E
Okay,
let's
go
a
little
further
here.
We
go
public
safety,
so
right
here
these
are
the
the
city
goals
that
each
of
that
each
of
the
budget
budget
submitters
needs
to
explain.
E
So
if
you
go
to
the
front
of
the
guidelines
on
page
two
you'll
see
all
of
the
the
the
city's
goals
identified,
public
safety
being
the
first
ones,
housing
being
the
second
and
you
you'll,
find
all
of
the
yeah
scroll
down
you'll,
see
all
of
the
city
group
the
city's
goals,
along
with
us,
a
summary
which
is
in
bold-
and
I
think
that's
that's
about
all
the
information
you'll
be
getting.
B
Thank
you.
Eric
john
has
hand
raised,
probably
wants
to
comment.
C
L
Justin,
can
you
put
the
the
rating
summary
back
up?
I
just
want
to
go
through
that
really
really
quickly.
L
While
he's
doing
that,
I
would
just
also
comment
on
where
and
the
last
part
that
eric
showed
where
this
the
the
cbr
is
comment
on
how
each
project
contributes
to
city
goals.
I
would
just
caution
everyone
that,
not
surprisingly,
when
a
department
is
putting
together
these
cbrs,
you
know
they
adopt
sort
of
used
car
salesmen
type
tactics
right.
It's
amazing
how,
as
you
read
through
these,
every
project
contributes
to
every
single
one
of
those
city
goals,
so
take
it
with
a
grain
of
salt.
I
personally
find
it
to
be
kind
of
boilerplate.
L
Most
of
this.
For
the
most
part,
I
think
you'll
find
that
you
can
assess
for
yourself
how
much
it
meets
city
goals
or
does
not
meet
city
goals
and
where
there
are
areas
that
are
not
clear.
That's
where
that's
what
the
q
a
is
for.
That's
where
you
can
specifically
ask
about
a
specific
project
and
how
it's
a
meeting,
a
certain
aspect
of
a
city
goal.
L
If
it's
not
clear
from
what
what's
given
in
in
the
cbr
and
again,
I
would
say
that
the
product
you'll
probably
be
able
to
discern
that
information
better
from
the
private
project.
Description
than
from
how
they
address
it
under
city
goals,
all
right
so
quickly
on
this
page
just
point
out
a
couple
of
things
again.
The
task
forces
will
rate
each
of
these
projects
on
project
priority.
So
that's
that
level
of
need
critical,
significant,
important
or
desirable.
L
So
from
that
point
all
you
need
to
do
is
give
it
points
within
the
range
that
it's
given.
So
if
a
project
is
rated
significant
by
hd,
then
the
idea
is
to
stay
within
that
41
to
50
points.
You
are
not
required
to
do
that
years
ago.
You
did
have
that
was
required.
Now
you
can
go
outside
of
that
if
you
have
strong
feelings,
but
the
idea
is
generally,
you
stay
within
the
recommendations
of
the
task.
L
L
Just
to
be
clear
on
this
thing
up
here
where
it
says
consecutive
years
and
budget
requests,
there
is
nothing
we
have
to
do
as
scorers
on
that
the
city
department,
the
city
staff,
will
take
care
of
us
that,
for
us,
that's
just
factual
either
it's
been
in
for
one
year
or
it's
been
in
for
four
years,
whatever
that
is,
that
will
be
pre-filled
out
for
you.
You
have
nothing.
L
You
need
to
do
there
other
than
if
you're
questioning,
whether
it's
factually
accurate,
but
beyond
that
there
should
be
nothing
to
do
there
operating
costs
city
staff
on
this
one.
I
don't
know
if
we
can
get
this
change
made
to
the
cbrs,
but
we're
now
trying
to
look
at
this
as
a
percent
of
total
investment
and
not
just
absolute
dollars.
L
Many
of
us
can
make
that
calculation.
It
might
be
challenging
for
some
people
in
the
committee
we're
a
very
diverse
group.
Some
people
are
numbers
oriented.
Some
are
not.
If
there's
not
a
way
to
get
that
changed
on
the
cbrs,
maybe
a
sheet
could
be
distributed.
That
gives
that
information
to
people
and
then
finally,
I
I
don't
have
anything
to
add
on
what
eric
said
about
qualitative
criteria.
G
I
think
one
of
the
things
that's
important.
What
eric
and
john
are
saying
about
the
scoring
you
have
to
ask
questions
sometime.
What
has
happened
is
there's
money,
that's
there
already
and
they
haven't
spent
it
and
they're
asking
for
more
feel
free
to
ask
questions,
because
if
you
don't
ask
those
questions
when
you're
looking
at
scoring
you're
not
going
to
understand
it
because
sometimes
they'll
come
back
and
it
keeps
building
up
and
we
wonder
what
what
are
you
doing
with
this
project
so
so
feel
free
to
ask
those
questions.
G
E
So
to
follow
the
process,
a
couple
more
steps
after
you
fill
in
after
you
score
things,
that's
not
the
end
of
the
story.
Well,
what
happens?
Is
we
meet
together
as
a
task
force
and
we
sort
of
distill
the
sentiment
of
our
task
force
on
each
of
these
projects?
E
So
please
come
prepared
to
discuss
these
projects
one
by
one
with
your
task
force,
and
then
we
circle
back
and
we
we
meet
in
plenary
with
the
entire
click
to
to
to
validate
what
we've
done
within
our
password
john,
do
you
have
anything
else
there.
L
No,
I
don't
think
so.
I
just
would
reiterate,
since
we
have
more
new
people,
that,
despite
the
fact
that
we're
divided
into
separate
task
forces,
you
we
each
individually
rate
all
of
the
projects,
and
you
have
equal
opportunity
to
make
a
comment
on
any
project.
Just
because
you're
on
the
transportation
task
force
does
not
mean
you
submit
a
comment
on
an
hd
project.
It
just
means
you're
not
in
that
meeting
where
they're
discussing
it,
but
you
just
have
to
forward
it
via
email
to
the
appropriate
people.
E
I'm
going
to
add
one
more
thing:
john
used.
A
really
important
word
comment
as
you're
doing
this.
Remember
that
we
have
an
opportunity
to
write
comments
within
the
click
report
which
express
some
broader
policy
or
or
a
request
for
more
studies
into
the
future.
So
if
you
have
any
questions,
you
have
any
thoughts
that
are
of
a
higher
a
higher
level,
keep
them
on
a
notepad
and
we'll
circle
back
later
to
talk
about
which
should
be
turned
into
narrative.
As
a
comment
within
the
quick
report.
L
I
would
just
add
one
more
thing.
I
just
want
to
reiterate
what
jeff
said.
I
am
more
than
happy
to
walk
anybody
through
any
confusion
or
questions
they
may
have.
My
contact
information
is
on
the
roster
you're
free
to
email.
Me.
You
can
text
me,
you
can
call
me,
I'm
happy
to
help
anybody.
That's
got
any
questions.
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
john.
Thank
you
eric
thank
you,
willie
and
I
just
for
the
public,
I'm
just
requesting
an
executive
committee
meeting
on
the
wednesday,
the
21st
to
do
a
final
review
on
our
public
info
session
on
that
evening
and
the
click
committee,
member
presentation,
q,
a
on
the
24th.
B
So
now
we
want
to
take
item
number
seven
review.
Our
click
sharepoint.
B
D
Yeah
happy
to
just
quickly
cover
this
in
the
interest
of
time.
If
you
have
not
been
able
to
access
the
sharepoint
site,
please
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
any
of
us
board
staff
directly
we're
happy
to
walk
you
through
it.
This
is
an
internal
page
within
the
city
of
minneapolis
network,
so
you
do
need
a
username
and
a
password
to
access
the
page.
D
So
if
you're
coming
up
to
that
user
name
and
password
and
you're
unsure
what
to
use,
it
does
require
a
microsoft
account
and
that
account
is
set
up
based
on
the
email
address
that
you
are
receiving.
Your
teams
meeting
invites
what's
on
the
roster,
whichever
email
we
have
on
file,
that's
the
one
that
gives
you
access
to
this
page.
That
will
be
your
username
and
then
you
create
a
password
based
on
that
with
a
microsoft
account.
D
We
have
quick
links.
A
lot
of
the
information
for
click
is
on
different
pages.
Some
of
it's
in
limbs.
Our
committee
page,
is
right
here.
If
you
want
to
go
access.
Previous
reports
for
click,
look
at
the
adopted
budget.
What
did
the
mayor
recommend
in
relation
to
what
click
recommended
and
then
the
council
adopted
you
can
get
to
all
city
of
minneapolis
recordings.
So
a
lot
of
just
helpful
links
there,
2020,
cbrs
and
presentations-
are
all
linked
here
as
well.
So
if
you
were
to
click
into
this
link,
you
can
see
the
cbr
requests.
D
D
This
one
had
multiple
presentations
and
then
you
can
see
the
cbrs
related
to
each
presentation
under
that
presentation
as
well.
We
do
have
one
department
or
project
that
is
already
submitted
for
2021.
So
if
you
go
on
the
sharepoint
page,
you
can
view
that
it
is
art
and
public
places.
The
presentation
is
uploaded
here
and
then
you
can
click
into
the
cbr
here.
So
review
on
these
presentations
and
cbrs
can
really
begin
at
your
leisure.
We
will
continue
to
update
this
page
with
the
presentations
and
the
cbrs
as
we
get
them.
D
If
you
have
specific
documents,
you
want
to
share
with
click
and
we
can
add
those
there-
that's
also
accessible
through
the
teams
app
and
then
our
meeting
recordings,
if
you're
unable
to
attend
a
meeting
and
want
to
go
back,
those
are
posted
to
the
city
of
minneapolis
youtube
page
and
you
can
click
here
so
just
kind
of
a
one.
Stop
shop
again,
like
I
said,
to
get
the
information
that
you
need.
L
L
This
one
might
be
directed
more
to
robert
robert.
Can
you
make
sure
that
the
pdfs
of
the
cbrs
boy-
that's
a
lot
of
acronyms,
don't
require
us
to
drill
in
further.
We
had
this
problem
at
the
beginning
of
last
year,
if
you
could
upload
them
in
a
way
so
that
all
of
the
details
of
the
funding
sources
etc
are
available
without
having
to
click
in
further
on
each
one.
With
120
of
these
every
click
you
know,
if
you
multiply
by
120,
it
really
slows
down
the
process.
N
L
L
B
Thanks
john
eric
and
then
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
also
have
all
accessibility
options
available
this
year.
Eric
and
robert.
E
Okay
yeah,
I
just
have
a
quick
suggestion.
Many
of
these
these
presentations
have
contact
numbers
and
email
addresses
for
questions.
I
I
would
suggest
if
you
can
hold
those
questions
for
the
presentations
rather
than
contacting
them
individually.
That
will
be
to
the
benefit
of
the
entire
task
force.
Well,
the
entire
click.
So
you
know,
unless
there's
a
really
pressing
question
you
need
answered,
I
would
hold
back
until
we
get
our
presentation
thanks.
N
Robert,
so
I
had
two
quick
follow-ups:
one
was
related
to
the
actual
cbr
forums
this
year,
we're
planning
on
publishing
the
link
that
takes
it
to
each
of
those
individual
web
pages
for
each
of
those
cbrs.
I
think
in
years
past
we've
like
assembled
a
giant
pdf
folio
and
saved
that
out
to
our
website.
N
I
think
we
still
have
to
do
that
for
posterity,
so
we
can
document
the
cbrs
that
we
have
this
year,
but,
right
now
the
plan
is
to
simply
post
this
page,
which
takes
you
to
each
of
those
individual
landing
pages
for
the
cbrs
and
then
with
the
videos
we'll
be
posting
the
videos,
along
with
the
links
to
the
cbrs
that
are
covered
in
the
videos
you're
just
for
ease
of
navigation
and
so
click
members
can
kind
of
like
click
through
everything.
N
We
definitely
received
feedback
and
heard
feedback
that
the
pdf
is
largely
unnavigable
unless
you're
planning
on
scrolling
back
and
forth
through
the
document,
whereas
the
the
the
source
documents
which
are
already
in
opening
up
are
certainly
much
easier
to
use
at
a
second
follow-up
jeff-
and
this
is
more
related
to
you
know-
we've
got
a
potential
wednesday
meeting
ahead
of
the
public
input
session
next
week.
N
I
think
we'll
we'll
review
some
of
the
details
for
the
meeting
at
that
time,
but
I
just
want
to
be
really
clear
for
the
written
comments,
since
we
didn't
do
this
last
year,
and
I
wasn't
involved
in
2019-
I
just
want
to
be
extra
explicit
is
the
idea
that
we
would
collect
written
responses
from
the
public
for
that
meeting
and
then
forward
those
on
to
you
as
click
chair,
for
I
guess
management
during
the
meeting,
or
is
there
another
approach
that
we've
been
thinking
of?
For
that.
N
Just
because
we
gotta,
if
we're
gonna
like
post
stuff
and
like
post
notices,
we
gotta
tell
them.
Okay,
I'm
gonna
actually
get
those
written
comments
and
we
can
follow
up
later.
I
don't
need
to
do
it
with
you.
B
G
Well,
you
know
one
of
the
things
I
would
suggest
the
look
at
some
of
the
past
reports.
It's
on
that
page.
Look
at
some
of
the
history.
Give
you
an
idea
what
what
has
been
done
in
the
past.
That's
really
important,
and
I
think
that
would
help
the
new
people
to
understand.
You
know
you
got
the
committee
reports,
you
got
the
budget
requests
everything's
there,
so
I
would
suggest
look
at
that.
B
I
think
we're
good
I'll
read
the
closing
remarks
in
that
case,
so
just
again
for
the
taxpayers
who
may
be
watching
this
later.
The
click
agenda
and
documents
are
in
the
city's
legislative
information
management
system,
lims.
B
No
hands
raised,
if
not
and
without
objection,
I'll
declare
this
meeting
adjourned.
Our
next
meeting
will
be
the
public
info
session
at
5,
30
p.m.
On
april
21st,
I'm
sorry
april,
yeah
april
21st
2021.