►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Hello
welcome
everyone.
This
meeting
may
involve
the
remote
participation
by
members,
either
by
telephone
or
other
electronic
gains
due
to
the
local
public
health
emergency,
noble
coronal
virus
pandemic.
Pursuant
to
the
provisions
of
minnesota
statutes,
sections
one
section,
one:
three
dot,
138.021.
A
Is
that
something
you'll
still
take
from
the
participant
list?.
A
C
A
Two
out
of
agenda
today
and
it
starts
we're
starting
off
with
the
do.
We
want
to
do
the
cip
first
to
see
your
ppm.
I
think
we're
starting
with
our
you
know
we're
going
in
orders
for
the
the
first
time
we've
done,
ipcc
report,
discussion
and
working
towards
a
solution
from
pack
on
that
that
is
referencing
the
the
intergovernmental
panel
on
climate
change
and
they're,
specifically
their
most
recent
report.
A
Report
number
takes
out
the
monday
before
last,
and
I
hope
some
people
got
a
chance
to
read
certain
segments
of
it.
It's
a
big
big
piece
of.
Do.
You
want
to
start
us
off
on
that.
C
Sure
so
I'm
I
think
the
plan
today
is
just
that
and.
D
C
Don't
know
if
you
can
yourself
I'm
getting
a
little
bit
more
noise
from
you,
but
thank
you.
The
plan
today
is
to
just
go
through
the
summary
for
policy
makers,
just
very
briefly
in
terms
of
what
we're
looking
at
in
our
region
and
in
cities
specifically,
so
that
we
can
be
thinking
about
our
role
as
pac
and
how,
in
this
particular
position,
we
approach
climate
breakdown
and
the
urgency
of
the
the
information
shared
in
the
latest
ipcc.
C
So,
firstly,
this
is
the
last
similar
report
was
in
2018.
The
pack
passed
a
resolution
december
of
that
year.
The
report
was
leaked
in
february
released
in
september,
and
then
we
passed
our
resolution
in
december.
I
believe
that
was
a
fairly
strongly
worded.
You
know
it
was
a
dire
report,
letting
us
know
that
we
essentially
by
2030,
really
need
to
be
very
well
on
the
way
to
zero
emissions,
and
this
report
is
an
update
to
that
one.
It
is
using.
E
C
C
What
is
the
level
of
confidence
in
those
predictions,
but
it
isn't
really
pulling
together
the
complexity
of
systems
or
giving
explicit
suggestions
it's
fairly
detached
in
that
emotional
kind
of
like
a
housing
inspection,
and
that's
only
looking
at
your
foundation,
it's
not
telling
you
how
these
structural
problems
impact,
your
plumbing
or
your
electric
or
whatever
the
other
systems
are
that
are
reliant
on
this
foundational
stability.
C
It's
also
consensus-based,
and
if
you
do
take
a
look
at
it,
I
would
just
urge
you
to
keep
in
mind
that
it
is
not
designed
as
a
climate
communication
piece.
It's
not
designed
to
convey
the
in
any
way
sort
of
that
urgency
in
the
emergency
that
we
face.
So
if
you
are
within
climate
fields,
it's
certainly
it's
certainly
extremely
distressing
to
read.
So
that
said,
I'll
just
sort
of
go
through
it
quickly.
C
The
at
the
high
level
overview
of
what
we're
what
we're
our
new
information
is,
which
is
basically
that
we
are.
C
Temperature
rise,
including
in
our
best
case
scenario,
that
that
is
looking
at
1.6
to
1.7
degrees
celsius
rise
by
sort
of
the
first
time
frame
that
the
report
looks
at
for
the
two
best
scenarios,
which
is
2041
to
2060
in
in
our
very
best
case
scenario,
that
would
be
where
we
would
peak,
and
then
we
would
go
down
again.
That
is
includes
net
zero
emissions
by
2050
and
negative
after
that.
C
So
so
these
two
best
analyses
rely
on
negative
emissions
as
well
as
getting
to
net
zero
extremely
quickly,
and
that
is
at
a
global
scale
for
global
equity
places
like
minneapolis
places
like
the
us,
where
we've
contributed
disproportionately
to
the
problem
and
have
reached
you
know:
economic,
whatever
kinds
of
benefits,
it's
incumbent
on
us
to
drop
more
drastically
and
first
because
of
the
the
level
of
global
global
inequity.
That
is
part
of
the
system
that
has
created
this
problem
and
us
as
the
benefactors
of
that.
C
So
the
big
takeaway,
which
isn't
really
new.
But
it's
it's
more,
it's
clear
now
how
lofted
in
it
is
for
our
future
regardless,
is
that
there
will
be
an
increasing
occurrence
of
some
extreme
events,
unprecedented
in
the
observational
record,
with
additional
global
warming,
even
at
1.5
degrees
celsius.
Projected
percentage
changes
in
frequency
are
higher
for
rarer
events
and
that's
high
confidence
prediction.
C
So
basically
we're
looking
at
what
we're
already
seeing
this
year,
droughts
that
are
getting
more
severe
fires
that
are
more
severe,
more
frequent,
high,
precipitation
events,
the
flooding
that
you
may
have
be
aware
of
in
tennessee,
where
meteorologists
were
forecasting
four
to
six
inches
on
saturday
and
they
received
17
inches
with
at
least
22
people
dead
in
the
town
of
1700
and
dozens
missing.
C
That
is
exactly
the
kind
of
event
that
we
expect
to
see
increasing
in
frequency
and
not
necessarily
at
a
linear
rate
as
we
go
into
climate
breakdown
with
all
the
associated
impacts,
so
specifically
we're
looking
at
precipitation
and
surface
water
flows
to
become
more
variable,
both
within
seasons
and
across
years,
especially
within
seasons.
C
So
just
this
intensification
of
our
global
ecosystem-
and
that
includes
in
minnesota,
that
the
report
does
not
take
into
consideration
the
tipping
points
like
the
atlantic
ocean
currents,
which
there
was
another
report
released
just
before
the
ipcc.
That
says
we're
much
closer
to
that
tipping
point
than
we
thought.
It
appears
that
it
is
extremely
urgent
to
drop
emissions
to
zero
as
fast,
if
possible,
to
avoid
the
change.
F
C
Atlantic
ocean
currents-
and
I
don't
want
to
get
into
that
too
much,
but
that
if
those
flip
and
we've
seen
it
happen
in
the
historical
record,
we're
looking
at
completely
different
predictions
because
of
how
it
changes,
weather
patterns
across
land
and,
specifically
we'd,
be
looking
at
massive
cooling
here,
heating
towards
the
equator
and
a
complete
shift
in
like
growing
season
and
everything
we've.
You
know
our
societies
have
developed
around
in
terms
of
food.
We
eat
trees.
We
you
know
that
protect
us.
All
of
that
would
be
massively
impacted.
C
That
is
not
considered
overall
within
this
technical
report,
aside
from
acknowledging
it
because
it's
considered
a
low
likelihood
or
uncertain
likelihood
events,
and
but
it's
an
extremely
high
impact
that
they
they
talk
about.
This
is
deep
uncertainty
for
this
one,
but
the
potential
impacts
on
society
and
ecosystems
could
be
high.
C
A
tipping
point
is
a
critical
threshold,
beyond
which
a
system
reorganizes,
often
abruptly
and
or
irreversibly
so
that
report
on
the
amoc
that
atlantic
hershey
current
is
not
factored
into
the
ipcc,
but
adds
to
the
urgency
of
emissions
reductions
and
immediacy
of
those.
C
C
All
of
that
said
the
they
additionally
point
out
the
ways
that
cities
function
specifically
and
we
are
looking
at
heat
waves-
are
intensified
within
cities,
especially
at
night,
which
proves
to
be
especially
deadly
because
you
know
we
might
be
able
to
handle
temperatures
that
are
pretty
hot
for
daytime
hours.
But
if
we
don't
have
a
relief
from
that,
where
we
look
at,
we
look
at
people
dying
pretty
quickly.
C
Heat
is
just
not
survivable
for
us
for
very
long
at
a
certain
point,
and
especially
without
respite
at
nighttime,
so
the
urban
heat
island,
where
asphalt
and
roads
and
bricks
and
different
materials,
asphalt,
attract
heat
and
then
you
know
stone
and
bricks
and
asphalt
all
hold
and
then
release
heat
during
the
night.
C
That
impacts
the
our
cities
and
sort
of
the
micro
climate
that
we
have
and
it
becomes
increasingly
critical
as
temperatures
rise
as
we
have
more
sustained
heat
waves,
as
we
have
more
intense
heat
waves
and
with
the
fragility
of
other
systems
where
we
may
not
have
reliable
power,
how
do
we
keep
ourselves
cooler
and
then
the
second
piece
is
that
cities
also
intensify
runoff
from
precipitation
events,
including
high
precipitation
events.
So,
basically.
C
Water
seeks
the
path
of
least
resistance
as
it
flows
downhill
and
when
we
don't
provide
any
resistance,
it
picks
up
speed.
It
becomes
an
immensely
powerful
force
as
if
you've
seen
any
of
the
videos
that
have
circulated
of
various
roads
being
washed.
Out
of
you
know,.
D
G
C
In
germany,
the
the
floods
in
tennessee,
the
power
of
water
is
terrifying
and
just
you
know,
there's
little
rebuild
that
can
withstand
it
when
it
gets
going.
So
those
are
the
the
pieces
that
are
probably
most
relevant
for
cities
and
for
minneapolis
in
particular.
C
So
just
to
add
to
that
what
the
report
does
not
get
into
is
the
ways
that
all
of
this
intersects,
not
just
with
systems
like
what
what
happens
with
agriculture,
what
food
can
we
grow
and
where
what
happens
with
you
know
our
bodies.
What
can
we
sustain,
but
also
with
the
social
and
collective
systems
that
we
have
in
place?
C
And
if
you
think
about
covid,
I
think
that's
a
useful
framework
for
considering
the
urgency
of
what
we
face
and
how
we
might
want
to
think
about
preparing
and
responding
to
what
we
know
now.
One
of
the
goals,
as
social
assistance
was
starting
early
last
march,
was
to
reduce
the
immediacy
of
the
urgency
of
need
on
our
health
care
system.
It
was
not.
C
We
were
not
sure
how
much
we
could
protect
people
from
getting
sick,
but
we
knew
that
if
we
overwhelmed
the
capacity
of
a
system,
the
system
faced
collapse
and
we're
seeing
that
still
having
not
having
this
happen
again
and
seeing
healthcare
workers
quitting
their
job,
seeing
the
the
trauma
starting
to
catch
up
to
people
of
having
to
respond
to
crisis
after
crisis
after
crisis
and
facing
so
much
death.
Even
if
it's
you
know
what
you
feel
called
to
do,
there's
a
there's
a
limit
to
that
and
talking
to
friends
in
emergency
management.
C
C
But
no
one
quite
knew
how
to
get
some
of
these
things
to
people
whether
it
runs
on
things
all
of
those
come
together
and
make
it
so
that
our
mitigation
and
adaptation
efforts
are
both
reducing
emissions
to
zero
as
quickly
as
possible,
but
also
figuring
out
how
we
build
in
resiliency
in
our
system
and
build
in
whatever
we
can
in
terms
of
a
buffer
for
us,
as
we
start
facing
this.
So
I
think
I'll
go
into
peter.
C
C
I
can
repeat
it:
peter
was
suggesting.
Instead,
I
see
if
anyone
has
any
questions
or
needs
clarification
or.
C
C
We
do
not
have,
and
so
we're
at
the
point
where,
in
our
best
case,
scenarios
we're
kind
of
buying
time
and
reorient
reorienting
how
we
do
everything
in
the
way
that
we
try
to
with
cobid
and
that
we're
still
working
on
our
worst
case
scenarios
are
kind
of
like
well,
we
could
just
keep
doing
what
we're
doing
and
watch
it
all
collapse,
catastrophically
and
cataclysmically
and
with
massive
human
suffering.
So
those
are
those
are
the
paths
we're
on,
but
they're,
very,
very
different
paths.
A
Now,
let's
go
I'm
trying
to
sound
better
here.
I've
got
a
couple
of
microphone
options
to
test
here
and
move
into
that.
You
know,
especially
while
we're
all
we're
all
here
how
this
information
this
report
can
inform
our
work
and,
as
we
you
know,
advise
the
city,
transportation,
people
and
the
city
council
and
the
mayor
on
pedestrian
pedestrian
matters.
As
of
our
last,
as
of
our
last
resolution,
a
big
part
of
it
was
making
sure
we
all
agreed.
A
You
know
that
that
tax
voice
was
one
agreed
on
the
seriousness
of
the.
A
Ideas,
we
got
a
great
attendance
today
and
I'm
hoping
to
hear
from
people
about
their
thoughts
about
our
work.
We've
got
a
christopher
harper
has
raised
his
hand.
H
Yes,
I
first
of
all
think
that
that
was
that
was
very
well
said
julia,
I
think,
for
as
long
as
I've
been
on
the
pack,
only
julia
has
been
consistently
addressing
presenters
regarding
the
climate
crisis
implications
of
whatever
project,
no
matter
how
big
or
how
small.
H
I
think
it's
important
at
this
stage
that
we
have
to
speak
as
one
voice
and
speak
uniformly
on
it.
We
have
to,
I
think,
it's
appropriate
to
lead
with
this
question.
How
has
the
climate
crisis
informed
this
project?
What
decisions
have
you
made
specifically
to
address
the
climate
crisis
now
matthew
or
chris
or
millicent?
That
might
be
beyond
the
brief
initially
of
the
pack,
but
I
think
that
that
it
is
taking
over
the
brief.
Now
I
don't
think
they're
separable
anymore,
and
I
think,
because,
quite
frankly,
what
we
get
from
presenters
is.
H
H
You
know
when
it
comes
to
what
we
thought
about
the
you
know
the
turn
radii
or
we
thought
about
the
you
know
whatever,
but
I
don't
think
they
can
be
split
anymore
and
I'm
gonna
just
this
is
probably
more
than
really
where
the
scope
of
this
is.
But
you
know
right
now
it
seems
like
the
the
predominant
issue
in
minneapolis
is
public
safety.
H
But
to
me
this
is
a
more.
This
is
a
fundamental
public
safety
issue.
I
that
justice
used
to
do
absolutely
environmental
justice,
but
it
is
a
public
safety
issue
because
I
think
I'm
of
the
opinion
that
the
events
will
overtake
us
more
quickly
than
we
can
ever
imagine,
I
think
it's
geometric.
I
don't
think
it's
aramaic
aromatic
arrhythmic.
You
know
what
I'm
saying:
yes,
yes,
not
aramaic,
right,
yeah,
I'm
speaking
in
aramaic
now,
so
I
just
that
was
a
long
ramble
just
to
say.
H
I
think
we
should
be
uniform
in
addressing
every
presenter
regardless,
regardless
of
size
or
percent.
You
know
completion
or
anything,
and
I
think
we
should
do
it
as
one
I
think,
and
at
the
very
least
people
will
start
thinking
like
well.
I
know
they're
going
to
ask,
I
know
they're
going
to
ask
what
am
I
going
to
answer
and
maybe
just
maybe
that
will
trickle
upstream
into
whatever
discussion
they're
having
at
their
place
of
employment.
Like
you
know
what
what
am
I
going
to
say
might
transition
to?
H
What
are
we
going
to
do
about
the
climate
emergency
so
yeah?
I
I
agree
completely
with
julia.
I
think
she's
been
leading
this
charge
for
a
long
time.
I
think
we've
got
to
get
get
on
it
and
and
go
go
from
there.
So
I'll
be
quiet.
Now.
J
I've
got
something
if
that's
cool,
just
a
a
quick,
a
quick
response
to
chris
christopher.
I
totally
appreciate
the
fact
that
this
committee
should
be
addressing
climate
change,
and
I
I
just
want
to
bring
that
up,
because
you
said,
like
matthew
millicent,
I
might
think
it's
outside
the
scope.
J
I
I
personally
don't
think
that
at
all
I
think,
matthew's
on
the
same
page,
it's
one
of
our
goals
in
the
transportation
action
plan,
it's
something
that
should
be
at
the
forefront
of
our
work
and
so
absolutely,
and
I
also
think
it's
a
great
idea
to
come
up
with
like
I.
J
I
don't
know
if
this
is
exactly
what
you
were
saying,
but
like
some
sort
of
standardized
question,
that's
like
somewhat
succinct
has
like
maybe
a
little
bit
of
background
info
for
presenters
to
to
be
addressing
every
single
time,
one
so
that
they
know
it's
coming
so
that
they
can
prepare
for
it,
because
I
think,
if
they're
able
to
prepare
for
it,
that
will
also
mean
that
they
have
to
start
bringing
it
into
the
projects.
J
J
So
I
I
think
if
this
group
was
to
come
up
with
like
a
blurb
with
kind
of
an
ending
in
a
question,
that
would
be
a
really
good
outcome,
as
well
as
kind
of
other
steps
that
you
all
are
thinking
about.
Taking.
I
I
What
is
an
answer
to
that
question
like
I
know,
you're,
asking
project
managers,
but
in
your
mind,
what
is
that
and
like
what
specific
pieces
are
on
a
capital
project
are
the
most
climate
and
before
you
answer
that,
like
there's
there's
we
we
we
have
a
lot
of
climate
goals
in
our
in
our
policies
and
our
plans,
climate
emergency,
very
much.
Theoretically.
The
work
that
we're
doing
right
now
should
be
addressing
climate
change
in
our
capital
projects.
So
like
what
does
that
look
like
and
does
it
range
from?
I
You
know,
we
hear
things
like
car
free
streets,
completely
parking
issues.
I
think
I
could
see
related
to
climate
change
and
decisions
around
that
you
know
mode
share
like
equity,
I
mean
so
like
I'm
just
curious
like
what.
What
might
that
look
like
if
you
were
a
project
manager,
I
think
that's
a
brainstorm.
B
H
Well,
for
me,
I
would
start
with
the
answer
to
the
question
and
I
think
that
we
should
hope
for
or
maybe
even
expect,
that
the
answer
to
the
question
of
what
did
the
climate
emergency
inform
specifically
about
this
project
and
the
answer
could
include
the
existence
of
the
project.
I
think
a
threshold
issue
of
you
know
adding
a
adding
a
lane
to
I-94
right
there.
It
says
we
don't
care
about
it.
H
I
mean
that
there
is
no
way
to
get
from
adding
a
lane
on
an
interstate
to
abiding
by
the
climate
emergency
as
as
passed
by
the
the
city
council.
So
there
can
be
threshold
things,
just
the
existence
of
the
project
and
the
specific
scopes
and
items
within
the
project.
Well,
we
you
know,
we
didn't
really
think
about
it
or
we
disregarded
the
climate
emergency
in
making
lanes
12
feet,
because
our
existing
modes
of
transportation
are
so
wide
and
so
oversized
for
what
we
need.
H
You
know
semis
in
the
city
or
large
fire
trucks.
I
mean
we
have
built
our
city
around
the
size
of
motor
vehicles
as
in,
for
example,
tokyo.
They
have
much
smaller
public
vehicles
because
they
they
they
scale
the
size
of
the
vehicles
to
the
city,
and
so
I
just
think
getting
getting
public
works
or
getting
you
know,
consultants
to
start
thinking.
H
Like
oh
yeah,
I
mean
we
have
disregarded
climate
change
because
we
just
rubber
stamped
the
size
of
the
streets,
and
we
have
to
do
that
because
the
the
it's
a
requirement,
either
a
municipal
body
or
a
best
practices
engineering
group
to
have
everything
scaled
up.
So
big
I
mean
just
at
each
level.
I
think
it
should
be
addressed
in
the
issue
of
how
it
addresses
public
safety,
but
also
what
decisions
were
made
regarding
climate
change.
I
just
think
everybody's
getting
a
pass
on
this
and-
and
I
haven't
done
anything
to
change
that.
H
H
I
don't
think
there
may
may
be
a
straight
answer
for
everything
because
people
you
know
if
you're
working
on
a
project.
Well,
you
know,
look
at
the
you
know
the
development
on
the
on
the
riverfront.
H
Is
a
specific
decision
not
to
coordinate
not
to
ensure
that,
if
we're
going
to
spend
that
much
public
money
that
people
can
get
there,
I
mean
the
presenter
said.
Well,
you
know
people
are
gonna,
be
able
to
get
there,
not
just
cars,
but
what
are
they
gonna?
Be
I
mean
if
you
don't
walk
or
bike
or
take
public
transport?
There
is
no
other
thing.
An
uber
is
a
car.
H
You
know
so
I
think
it
depends
on
the
project
and
I
think
we've
got
to
get
specific
about
it,
but
and
but
to
chris's
point,
it's
only
fair
that
people
get
a
heads
up
on
that.
I
don't
want
to
ambush
anybody
on
it.
So
is
there
something
that
can
be
sent
to
them,
they
them
being
the
presenters
to
to
give
them
a
heads
up
anytime,
they're,
going
to
be
on
the
agenda
and
I've
over
talked
so
I'll,
be
quiet.
Now.
I
I
just
want
to
respond
to
one
thing
before
the
hands,
because
I
think
I
think
it's
important.
You
notice,
like
the
existence
of
the
project,
specific
items
in
the
layout,
you
know
connecting
to
goals.
Mold
shifts
materials,
things
like
that,
but
another
thing
they
said
that
I
think
is
really
interesting
that
you
all
have
talked
about
before,
but
specifically
like
what
are
our
standards
and
guides
telling
us
and
and
like
how
can
we
like?
So
you
know,
state
aid
standards
and
other
our
design
guide
and
things
like
that
like?
I
What
are
they
telling
us
lane?
Width
should
be,
and
why
so?
I
just
think
that
that
part
of
that
should
be
part
of
it
as
well.
Stop
there.
B
Well,
that's
what
I
was
gonna
say
that
I
think
I
think
there
has
to
be
a
shift
from
places
like
mndot
and
hennepin
county
and
certainly
minneapolis
public
works
in
how
they
see
projects
like
what
they
said
about
the
riverfront
was
we
have
certain
standards
for
trucks
to
come
through?
B
We
have
certain
requirements
and
we
don't
start
transportation
until
people
are
there
instead,
they're
still
stuck
in
looking
at
the
world
in
a
different
way
and
the
world
has
changed
and
they
aren't-
and
I
don't
know
what
we
can
say
about
that,
except
for
in
our
resolution
to
talk
about
that.
There
has
to
be
dramatic
system,
alter
alterations.
B
People
have
to
start
looking
at
what
they're
doing,
with
an
understanding
that
it's
critical,
not
oh,
design
wise.
This
is
cute.
We
like
this
or
we
have
to
make
sure
we
have
room
for
this.
It
has
to
be
critical
and
it
has
to
be
critically
connected
to
this
impact,
and
we
have
to
say
that
in
our
resolution-
and
I
think
the
words
that
we
use
when
we
address
people
when
they
come
to
ine
is
you
know
asking.
I
think
your
question
is
a
good
one.
A
Yeah
thanks
barb,
I
see
your
hands
here
too
julia.
I
was
just
just
on
that
on
that
point,
what
are
we
asking?
The
presenters?
The
city
has
this:
yes,
as
an
official
policy
officially
passed,
a
you
know,
has
declared
engagement
of
the
climate
emergency
and
to
draw
a
line
between
that
declaration,
and
every
project
that
was
brought
before
us
by
the
city
of
minneapolis
would
be
would
be,
would
be
a
good
place.
This
would
be
a
good
place
to
start
and
on
the
other
side
of
it,
I
think
for
the.
C
C
One
is
we're
responding
to
what
is
essentially
an
exponential
and
spiraling
problem
with
linear
thinking,
and
I
just
don't
see
how
that
that
isn't
going
to
work-
and
I
you
know
I'm
thinking
about
different
projects
that
we've
seen
and
watching
it
watching
the
responses
from
the
city
so
far
have
not
been
at
the
scope
of
the
crisis.
So
we're
not.
You
know
we're.
C
There's
some
cities
around
the
globe
that
are
looking
at
transformational,
changes
to
public
right-of-way
that
are
at
getting
closer
to
the
scale
of
what
we're
facing
and
meanwhile
we're
seeing
full
reconstruction
still
we're
seeing
treating
every
mode
as
if
it
will
continue
to
exist
in
a
recognizable
form
in
you
know,
20
years,
even
when
we
see
you
know
reports
that
are
saying
in
20
years
that
just
that
isn't
going
to
happen
it
it.
It
is
that
option
that
door
has
closed
and
we're
planning
for
a
reality
that
has
passed
us
by.
C
It's
some
other
world
that
does
not
include
the
iccuc
report
and
the
implications
therein,
and
how
do
we
I'm
curious,
how
we
help
shift
into
the
level
of
planning
that
we
need,
which
is
not
just
project
by
project,
but
it's
an
entire
mental
shift
to
say:
okay,
if
in
the
way
that
we
saw
public
works
step
up
with
covid
and
going,
how
do
we
healthy
streets?
What
what
can
we
do
as
this
new
thing
is
happening
and
we're
not
seeing
that
thinking
yet
from
public
works?
C
And
I
don't
want
this
to
be
something
where
we
don't?
I
don't
want
to
play
in
the
field
that
they
set
out.
We
know
it's
false.
That's
me
personally,
I
know
there
might
be
reasons
to,
but
how
do
we,
if
there,
if
there's
disinformation
misinformation
non-information
whatever
is
going
on
that
sets
the
assumptive
basis
for
the
project?
Public
work
springs
in
front
of
us
is
completely
out
of
alignment
with
reality.
So
how
do
we
work
with
people
who
are
not
presenting
things
that
are
actually
physically
like
they're,
not
based
in
the
physical
world?.
H
Just
just
briefly,
you
know,
julia's
question,
I
think,
is
important,
but
I
have
no
basis
to
answer
it
because
I
honestly
don't
know
what
happens
in
a
public
works
meeting
or
a
meeting
with
public
works
in
mndot
or
hennepin
county.
I
have
no
idea
of
the
dynamics
in
there.
I
don't
know
if
it's
very
authoritarian,
if
it's
very
democratic,
if
it's
all
guided
by
the
engineering
manuals
and
sort
of
a
you
know,
I
just
have
no
idea
what
it
what
it
takes,
and
you
know
I
think
I've
used
this
analogy
before.
H
That's
a
lot
of
maybes
in
those
assumptions,
but
it
starts
at
the
point
is
I
have
no
idea
how
an
a
project
like
these
are
put
together
and
really
what's
are
the
dynamics
and
who
controls
the
levers.
H
B
My
point
was
that
in
in
answering
well,
I
don't
know
whose
questions
but
there's
a
lot
going
on,
but
I
think
there's
an
enormous
level
of
denial.
People
have
heard
about
the
ipcc,
they
hear
about
it
on
the
news,
but
I
think
they
say.
Oh,
it's
sort
of
like
a
covet.
It's
not
going
to
affect
me.
It's
not
going
to
have
an
impact
on
our
city,
they
they
lie
to
themselves
and
I
don't
think
we
can
challenge
that.
I
think
all
we
can
do
is
build
alliances.
Like
you
said
chris.
B
I
I
think
it
happened
when
we
saw
the
bryant
avenue
thing
and
we
were
very
positive
in
responding
to
the
kinds
of
good
work
they
did
on
bryant
avenue.
We
didn't
all
like
everything.
The
transportation
thing
was
an
issue
for
for
peter
and
maybe
a
couple
other
people,
but
the
way
that
they
reconstructed
that
street
they
made
it
a
two-lane
street.
One
way
a
convergent.
It
just
really
seemed
to
solve
some
problems,
it
doesn't
say
no
more
cars
and
I
I
don't
know
how
we're
gonna
get
to
that.
B
Although
I
think
that
has
to
happen
at
some
point.
I
I
worry
about
the
infrastructure
and
the
systems
underneath
that
for
people
that
have
handicaps
for
really
elderly
people
who
rely
on
vehicles
to
get
around,
who
can't
walk
at
any
length
of
time
who
can't
who
are
lost
or
confused
and
don't
know
how
to
take
public
transit.
We
I
don't
know
how
we
solve
those
problems
when
we're
not
even
looking
at
solving
some
of
the
basic
problems.
B
B
Really
important
resolution
for
us
or
in
addition
to
the
original
resolution,
I
don't
have
any
great
ideas
to
how
to
implement
this,
but
I
think
we
are
moving
towards
a
place
where
semis
aren't
going
to
work
in
the
city
where
we
can't
have
people
driving
as
much
as
they're
driving
when
transit
has
to
step
up
and
be
more
available
to
people,
and
some
people
have
been
pushing
that
for
a
long
time
with
light
rail
and
stuff,
but
there's
a
lot
of
resistance
because
people
don't
want
to
change
they.
Just
you
know.
B
B
C
I'd
like
to,
I
really
appreciate
what
you
said:
barb
and
I
think,
there's
two
pieces
that
I
want
to
highlight.
The
first
is
one
of
the
wonderful
things
about
bryant
avenue.
Is
that
they're
trying
something
different,
and
that
is
something
like
there's.
C
We
so
rarely
see
that
so
seeing
seeing
these
things
come
together
to
say,
okay,
so
we're
we
are
trying,
because
we
know,
as
you
said,
it's
overwhelming
to
think
about
this.
No
one
of
us,
no
one
department
will
ever
have
all
the
answers,
but
what
we
do
have
is
hopefully
more
and
more
people
and
across
you
know
we
can
see
so
much
more
easily
than
30
years
ago.
How
is
how
is
paris
dealing
with
this?
How
is
soul
dealing
with
this?
C
How
is
winnipeg
dealing
with
this
and
learn
from
each
other
and
by
leapfrog,
other
cities,
mistakes
and
then
the
sort
of
parallel
with
that
is.
How
do
we
plan
for
where
we're
at
now,
where
there
is
that
resistance,
but
the
resistance
is
falling
away
as
we
see
more
and
more
fires.
So
how
do
we
design
streets
that
say:
here's
where
we're
at
politically?
Maybe
that
can
flux
or
flex
or
whatever
into
where
our
reality
is
going.
How
do
we
start?
C
Abigail
brought
this
up
in
one
of
the
first
conversations
I
had
with
her,
I
think,
walking
somewhere
after
a
pack
meeting
when
she
was
first
on
the
path,
but
the
almost
a
triage
thinking
of
what
is
it
that
we
need
to
do
to
get
to
where
we
need
to
be,
how
do
we
do
it
as
fast
as
possible,
and
then
what
are
the
barriers
like?
We
don't
start
with
what
are
the
barriers
and
let
that
limit
what
we
do
but
say
what
is
it
that
we
need
to
do
what's
our
physical
reality?
C
C
How
do
we
shift
everything
as
fast
as
possible
within
the
reality
right
now,
knowing
that
we
are
facing
something
we've
collectively,
never
faced
with
advantages,
we've
never
had
so
right
now.
What
can
we
do
towards
this
goal?
Instead
of
towards
what
you
know,
how
will
the
city
council
vote?
Let's
start
with
the,
I
don't
know
how
we
get
there,
because
it's
yeah,
so
thank
you
for
everything.
You're,
sharing.
A
We've
had
a
good
round
of
comments
and
conversation,
and
it's
45
minutes
into
our
meeting.
It
may
not
be
premature
to
to
see
where
we
want
to
go
next
with
this
in
terms
of
a
resolution
specific
to
this
event
of
the
ipcc
or.
C
C
Be
highly
interested
in
that
awesome,
I
don't
know
for
sure.
If
I'm
seeing
everyone's
names,
let
alone,
let's
see,
yeah,
I'm
not
getting
names
when
I
hover
over
them.
I
don't
know
if
you
have
a
better
list,
I
don't
have
to.
A
I
do
I
do
fairly
so
abigail.
D
Yeah
largely
the
same,
this
is
a
really
important
conversation.
I
just
don't
know
if
I
have
anything
special
to
add
at
this
point.
K
No,
I
don't.
I
don't
have
anything
to
add.
I
just
well
in
one
comment.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that,
while
we're
discussing
this
we're,
we
are
focusing
on
on
some
of
this
the
ways
that
we
can
tie,
impacts
of
climate
and
safety
together
as
we're
pushing
some
of
these
presentations
to
keep
some
of
the
stuff.
K
In
the
report
in
mind
and
yeah
just
I
think
there
are
probably
a
really
effective
way
if
we
are
worried
at
some
point
that
it's
not
the
role
of
the
pack
to
tie
most
of
these
issues
to
directly
to
other
other
aspects
that
we've
been
bringing
up.
K
I
you
know
I
was
I'm
thinking
more
on
some
of
like,
like
the
the
bryant
avenue
project,
that
bart
brought
up
just
that
you
know,
there's
the
added
green
space
and
tree
cover.
The
reduction
of
asphalt
on
that
project
is
something
that
just
ties
directly
to
both
issues
and
yeah.
I
just
really
appreciated
that
aspect
of
that.
A
Sure
gotcha,
thank
you
matt.
Next
I
see
austin.
F
Hey
yeah,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
yeah.
I
really
just
don't
have
anything
else
to
add,
except
for
that,
like
I
don't
think
we
like
don't
get
discouraged
in
this.
I
feel
like
that
report
and
everything
we
talk
about
is
so
discouraging,
like
our
planet's
literally
on
fire,
but
I
mean
we
can
do
this.
We
just
need
to
get
more
people
organized,
and
I
think
we
do
this
through
just
like
consistent
messaging.
F
So
if
almost
anything,
this
really
should
be
part
of
the
packs,
like
almost
every
day
or
at
least
monthly
agenda,
to
have
something
standing
on
like
hey.
How
can
we
push
for
and
promote
projects
that
do
climate
justice?
I
mean
I'm
totally
on
board
for
all
that.
So
thank
you
all
for
the
work
on
that
and
I
guess
I
have
any
other
ideas
of
having.
E
Hey
everybody
yeah.
It's
been
a
good
discussion
as
being
a
former
city
employee
in
st
paul.
I
think
one
of
the
big
things
is
the
you
know:
the
city
staff,
all
the
policies
have
been
approved
by
the
city
council
and
mayor.
So
like
the
climate
climate
resilience
plan,
the
city
has
you
know
street
design
standards
the
city's
improved.
So
you
know
we
can
attack
at
one
project
at
a
time
which
is
good,
but
you
know
the
bigger
issue.
Is
you
know
if
the
pack
wants
the
city
to
again
re?
E
Take
another
look
at
the
climate
resilience
plan,
their
their
standards,
etc.
The
city
staff
they're
relying
on
those
city
standards
they're
using
now,
and
I
think
they
can
feel
comfortable
proposing
projects
that
are
you
know.
Some
are
good
like
the
bryant
project,
where
city
staff
kind
of
goes
out
of
the
box
a
little
bit,
but
I
think
they're
still
following
their
their
city,
design,
standards
and
the
plan.
So
I
guess
you
know
I
agree.
E
G
Here
I
am,
you
know,
I
have
to
say
that
my
thinking
about
this
stuff
always
goes
back
to
public
opinion,
which
is
obviously
not
even
close
to
taking
the
climate
crisis
seriously,
especially
the
blabbermouths
that
come
to
the
meetings
and
hate
all
the
projects,
and
I
don't
know
what
the
answer
to
that
is.
Except
you
know
the
city
might
ramp
up
a
public
relations
campaign.
G
That
says
this
is
serious
and
don't
even
pretend
you're,
not
scared,
shitless
about
this
stuff
and
we're
gonna
get
pushed
back
like
crazy
from
the
west
of
the
lake
crowd,
especially
for
any
project.
That's
radical,
I
mean
brian,
I
know
damn
well,
they
got
the
everybody
I
talked
to,
except
one
with
the
tiny
diamond
the
other
day
hated
that
project.
G
Of
course,
that's
all
they're
going
to
hear
because
they
don't
give
a
damn
for
the
climate
impact
all
they
care
about.
Is
they
can't
drive
down
bryant
the
same
way
if
the
city
doesn't
address
this
thing
with
it
absolutely
flat
out
we're
gonna
die
in
50
years,
public
relations
campaign
we'll
hear
from
the
rest
of
the
lakes
crowd,
especially
every
single
project,
about
how
god-awful
it
is
because
we
can't
drive
our
car
at
least
that's
what
I
see
and
they've
got
to
perk
up.
But
how
are
you
going
to
do
that?
G
I
mean
nobody
really,
nobody
does
take
it
seriously
and
but,
as
far
as
the
the
ideas
for
moving
staff
yeah,
those
are
spot
on
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
then,
don't
don't
push
that
that
our
what
we
say
and
we
ask
them-
they'll-
have
to
ask
the
engineers
what
the
hell
to
do
about
it
and
that's
great
that'll
work,
but
it
won't,
but
we
will
never
hear
the
end
of
this
stuff
and
we'll
fail.
I
think
if
we
don't
convince
the
public
that
this
is
serious
stuff.
G
A
Yeah
thanks
neil,
for
that
you
know,
I
think,
I'm
glad
I'm
glad
we
went
around
because
there's
a
lot
of
really
good.
Everybody
said
that
didn't
have
anything
to
add
added
some
really
good
stuff,
so
that
that
will
inform
will
inform
our
work.
You
know
I,
like
I
thought
on
consistent
messaging,
and
I
think
you
know
what
you
know
paul
st
martin's
point
about.
A
You
know
the
you
know
the
real
change
can
be
needs
to
be
driven
from
the
policy
and
design
standards
in
and
and
and
I
think,
yeah
you
speak
to
a
certain-
certainly
an
elephant
in
the
room
too
neil.
As
far
as
you
know,
where
the
where
real
power
lies
and
what
we're,
what
we're
up
against
there.
You
know,
and
I
and
I'm
I'm
I'm
hoping
bryant
avenue
since
we're
all
talking
about
it-
is
the
fate
of
completing
that
we
that
we
believe
it
to
be.
A
I'm
not
I'm
not
so
sure
it
is
but
moving
on
and
I
think
I've
gone
around.
I
feel
confident.
I've
talked
to
I've
talked
to
everybody
all
participating
pac
members.
We've
hit
everybody.
A
So
we're
at
the
what
next
cip
we're
at
the
what
next
point
in
terms
of
a
specific
resolution
today
or
for
this
month
I
should
say
or
and
then
ongoing
ongoing
efforts.
As
regards
climate,
I
think
I'm
on
the
record
as
before
you
know,
speaking
to
speaking
to
climate
everywhere
everywhere
we
can,
whether
or
not
it's
an
agenda
belongs,
there's
always
a
relevant
climate
component
to
every
ie
project
and
certainly
a
lot
a
lot,
if
not
all
the
programs,
the
policies
and
agenda.
H
H
So
I
think
that's
something
that
we
can
start
doing
immediately.
I
mean,
I
don't
think,
there's
any
reason
to
to
wait
on
that.
At
least
it
just
sets
in
expectations
and
whether
it's
followed,
whether
they
they
come
prepared
or
to
what
degree
yeah
we'll
just
have
to
see
so,
but
I
think
that's
a
place
to
start.
I
Can
I
ask
a
question
about
that?
Christopher?
Did
I
understand
you
did
I
understand
you
to
say
or
or
may
I
suggest
this
this
paragraph
would,
if
the
pack
created
it,
is
that
something
that
staff,
so
me,
chris
or
milson,
could
just
send
to
all
of
our
tpp
folks.
You
know
those
are
the
main
people
that
come
to
you
and
and
then
that'll
be
one
way
to
let
them
know,
and
then
we
can
also
make
sure
to
you
know
let
any
other
agency
staff
know
when
they
come
as
well.
I
H
If
you
think
the
former
is
sufficient,
I
would
think
that
would
be
the
most
simple
way
to
do
it
and
maybe
just
see
seeing
the
the
agency
representatives
on
the
staff.
So
just
the
representatives
are
at
least
aware
of
it.
If
something
they
can
it's
in
back
of
their
mind.
If
one
of
their
colleagues
comes
in
to
present
at
least
there
might
be
a
another
avenue
to
have
them
get
that
message
I
think,
that's
I
think
that
will
be
sufficient.
I
So
I
think
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
I
think
the
the
tpp
email
will
cover
most
people
and
then,
if
we
can
catch
it,
the
staff
can
catch
it
every
time
an
agency
rep
comes
we'll
also
we'll
also
send
it
to
our
our
sitting,
members
that
makes
sense,
and
then
the
the
last
thing
is
like.
If,
if
somebody
shows
up
at
the
meeting
and
they
have
a
project,
you
know,
I
think
it
is
reasonable
to
ask
about
the
climate
emergency,
because
it's
not
like
people
are
unaware.
I
So
anyway,
I
think
that's.
This
is
a
good
plan.
A
Thanks
matthew:
is
there
anything
the
so
what
should
be
the
product
of
this
meeting
towards
making
that
towards
affecting
that?
Should
we
do
we
need
to
do?
We
need
to
make
some
separate
some
specific
requests
here,
or
are
we
going?
Are
we
going
for
it
based
on
this
discussion
right
now,.
J
Chris,
I
think
the
language
should
be
drafted
by
you
all,
because
I
don't
want
to
put
those
words
in
your
mouth
that
or
like
as
staff.
I
could
probably
get
a
pretty
decent
guess
at
what
some
of
it
would
be,
but
I
think
it
makes
more
sense
coming
from
you
and
then
we
can
add
it
to
whether
we
do
it
as
like
a
separate
attachment,
or
we
also
have
those
like
what
to
expect
at
zero
percent
and
30.
J
Maybe
we
think
about
adding
it
to
that
and
like
making
sure
it's
highlighted
as
like
a
very
important
piece
of
that
within
there,
but
that's
something
that
we're
probably
due
to
it's
good,
to
send
out
to
staff
like
every
once
in
a
while,
like
at
least
once
a
year
or
twice
a
year
or
something
so
either
way,
we'll
send
that
stuff
too.
J
But
whether
you
all
want
to
like
taken
like
someone
wants
to
take
a
stab
at
that
between
now
and
the
next
subcommittee,
and
then
I
don't
think
it
needs
to
be
like
formally
voted
on
at
a
full
committee.
I
guess
you
all
can
decide
how
you
want
to
create
that
buy-in
across
the
full
pack.
C
I
think
I
was
picturing
it
going
with
that
one
pager,
which
I
guess
I
wasn't
familiar
with-
how
often
we're
sending
it
out.
So
it's
sounding
to
me
like
we
want
to
have
something
that
goes
out
as
sort
of
an
email,
maybe
with
the
resolution
attached,
but
the
resolution
plus
whatever
we
passed.
You
know
at
the
next
full
committee,
plus
this
paragraph
of
questions
that
presenters
can
expect
to
answer.
C
Have
it
also
for
reference
on
the
one
pager
and,
and
I'm
wondering
if
we
also
you
know,
our
committee
chairs
may
be
in
the
same
way
that
we
say
are
you
looking
for
a
resolution
from
us
like
adding
something
in
in
the
in-person
part
as
a
reminder
and
to
kind
of
ground
us
in
this?
C
In
our
discussions
as
we
go
forward,
because
I
feel
like
it's
really
easy,
even
for
me
to
get
caught
up
in
the
reality
as
it
gets
presented,
which
is
you
know,
sort
of
the
the
lovely
fantasy
that
we're
in
a
stable
world
and
what
the
past
has
been
is
what
the
future
will
be.
So
that
would
be
nice.
I
think
the
three
places
I
would
like
to
see
something
similar
to
that
where
it
seems
relevant
to
bring
that
up
to
me.
J
That
that
makes
sense
to
me
julia
yeah,
and
I
do
think
it's
good
to
have
like
a
like.
Just
because
we
send
it
out
to
everybody
doesn't
mean
every
single
person
is
going
to
come
with,
like
it
on
a
slide,
so
have
it
having
it
prepped.
For
you
all
to
be
able
to
ask
the
question
in
a
relatively
uniform
way
as
well,
I
think
is,
is
a
smart
idea.
B
I
think
it
would
be
one
of
you
go
ahead.
I
think
it
would
be
a
good
way
to
start
the
ina
meeting
after
we
read
the
coronavirus
thing
to
say
to
whatever
that
paragraph
is
to
start
with
that
and
and
say
please
all
senators.
These
are
questions
that
we
feel
need
to
be
addressed
during
this
meeting
and
and
then
follow
it
up
with
other
questions
as
the
presentations
go
on,
I
agree
julia.
I
think
that's,
that's
a
good
idea.
C
One
other
thing
that
I
want
to
give
for
context
is
that
this
is
the
report
from
the
ipcc,
but
there's
also
like
a
more
of
a
recommendation
piece
that
will
follow,
I
believe,
in
the
beginning
of
next
year,
so
we'll
have
a
chance
to
be
revisiting
the
specifics
as
well.
So
this
is
kind
of
our
intro
piece
and
it
might
get
it
might
shift
and
maybe
it'll
shift
as
our
strategy
as
we
learn
more
so
this
doesn't
have
to
be
a
forever
thing.
H
Christopher
yeah,
just
I'm
just
sort
of
thinking,
and
try
to
organize
my
thoughts.
I
think
so
what
I'm
hearing
is
maybe
there's
like
five
things.
We
can
do
one
we
can
send
out
this
expectation,
paragraph
as
matthew
suggested.
You
know,
do
it.
Do
it
once
and
see
see
some
people
and,
if
necessary,
you
know
pick
up
some
some
stragglers
or
unique
people
that
aren't
on
it.
That's
one.
The
second
thing
is,
as
barb
said,
sort
of
stated
again
at
the
beginning
of
the
subcommittee
meetings.
H
The
third
thing
is
to
do
it
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
the
questioning
and
and
our
responses
to
each
presentation.
The
fourth
thing
this
one
cannot
be
uniform.
H
I
think,
but
it
has
to
be
specific,
as
I
think
paul
st
martin
stated,
that
we
should
in
our
motions
we
should
absolutely
address
climate
change
and
how
this
helps
or
hinders
or
doesn't
address
or,
however,
but
make
it
specific
and
then
the
final
thing,
which
I
I
think
definitely
is
what
paul
st
martin
said,
is
that
you
know
we
we're
living
in
a
world
where
they're
they're
bound
by
the
city
policies-
or
you
know
at
this
time
and
that
kind
of
thing
and
those
have
to
be
changed.
H
But
that's
something
you
know
quite
distinct
from
the
first
four,
but
I
think
you
know,
I
think
I
don't
know,
as
chris
or
matthew
talked
about.
You
know
what's
to
come
out
of
this,
and
I
think
it's
those
four
things
one
we
sent
out
the
letter
two.
We
we
replicate
the
paragraph
at
the
start
of
each
sub-committee
meeting
three.
We
have
meaningful
conversation
with
the
presenters
and
then
four
we
we
codify
that
in
the
motions
that
we
do
send
out
is
that
what
people
are
thinking.
C
That
sounds
good
to
me.
What
I
would
add
to
that
is
so
the
city
policy,
which
was
five,
I
think,
is
important,
but
then
it
kind
of
drops
from
that
list,
and
I'm
wondering
if
that
becomes
part
of
our
resolution
to
say
the
city
policies
while
us
starts,
are
not
they're
now
out
of
alignment
we
need
those
revisited
and
wherever
the
city
is
bound
by
other
constraints,
we
urge
those
those,
I
don't
know,
entities
to
push
upwards
we're
pushing
up
as
the
pack
as
the
pack
we're
saying:
hey:
what's
you
know?
C
What
can
you
do
and
then
we
need
you
if
you
can't
do
things
if
you're
constrained,
how
do
you
push
back
against
those
constraints
using
whatever
you
know,
your
union
power,
your
department
power,
wherever
those
those
pieces
are
and
the
kind
of
tangential
would
be?
How
do
we
scale
each
of
these,
like?
Is
this
something
that
we
can
share
with
the
back
with
the
community
environmental
advisory
committee?
Are
there
things
that
we
can
be
doing
here
that
we
can
amplify
that?
C
H
No,
no,
I
mean
I
was
just
trying
to
get
my
thoughts
in
order.
I
think
I
mean
you're
exactly
right
about
pulling
in
as
many
you
know,
scaling
it
up
or
allies,
as
we
can
do.
H
I
think
there's
some
natural
allies
in
the
back
and
that
kind
of
thing,
and
on
the
the
fifth
point
you
know
I
sort
of
envisioned
that
the
the
motion,
language,
which
is
specific
to
each
project
if
we
hear
things
like
well,
this
is
a
federally
funded
project
that
requires
x,
y
and
z
and
those
three
things
are
against.
I
mean
you
know
harm
the
climate
more
then
that
has
to
be
addressed
in
the
motion.
H
I
think
that's
going
to
be
on
a
case-by-case
basis
and
just
to
note
that
this
you
know
I
mean
I
don't
know
what
the
language
would
be,
but
just
say
that
you
know
there
are
the
fiscal
requirements
of
this
policy
from
the
federal
government
prohibit
following
the
you
know,
climate
declaration
emergency
by
the
city
of
minneapolis.
H
You
know
I
mean
just
to
state
these
kind
of
things
just
to
say
like
well.
You
know
this.
Doesn't
this
doesn't
work
for
the
city?
I
mean
you're,
just
because
I
have
a
feeling
that
between
the
strings
attached
to
the
money
and
the
engineering
policies
and
procedures
or
practices
that
constitutes
90
of
a
project
and
we're
just
dealing
around
10
percent,
that's
just
speculation,
my
part,
but
I
suspect
that's
how
it
is
so
you're
right.
I
mean
those
two
things
that
make
up
the
bulk
of
things
have
to
be
addressed.
H
A
Okay,
well,
let's
at
5
35,
let's
land,
this
glider,
and
so
we
can
get
to
our
next
agenda
item
and
I
think,
we're
a
good
place
to
sum
it
up
and
which,
however,
did
did
really
well-
and
I
could
I
could
divvy
up
this
these
items
with
some
dispatching.
Then
we
can
get
on
to
cip.
A
Take
it
from
item
one
pnp
has
a
someone
in
the
pack
has
to
write
that
expectation
paragraph
for
for
for,
for
chris
and
matthew
to
to
promulgate.
Is
anybody
volunteering
to
do
that.
H
So
julia
barb
and
christopher
can
take
a
stab
at
that.
A
Okay,
terrific
thank
you.
I
and
I
say
number
two
barb's
idea
to
to
announce
to
kick
off
each
ine
meeting
with
with
that
with
a
statement.
I
think
that
is
that,
if
we
could
just
consider
that
a
done
deal
or
do
we
have
to
make
that
official
in
some
some
further
way
I'll
say
no,
no
way
you
go
barb.
Thank
you.
It
was
a
great
idea.
A
And
a
good
follow-on
suggestion
to
make
sure
we're
that
we're
we're
asking
the
asking
the
climate
pointed
questions
of
each
project
of
each
presenter
project
by
project
ditto.
We
have
policy
directed
resolution
language
that
will
be
on
for
each
for
each
resolution
three
to
each
year.
Each
project
describing
hits
and
misses.
A
We've
discussed
that
you
can
consider
that
to
consider
that
what
we'll
be
doing
going
forward
a
detestable
phrase
and
finally,
and
in
five
five
and
resolution
writing
or
some
some
help
in
directing
a
resolution
towards
asking
for
better,
you
know
better
design
standards,
certainly
from
better
design
standards,
more
stronger
policy
that
that
aligns
with
our
well,
I
should
say,
for
lack
of
a
better
term,
our
our
new
reality,
our
our
accident
conditions,
and
that
are
now
you
know
that
are
now.
Certainly
we
can.
A
We
are
out
of
alignment,
and
that
will
be
a
that
will
be.
I
will
put
that
for
ongoing
work.
A
That's
some
language
to
write
that
that
I
think
I
will
I'm
gonna
volunteer
julia
and
me
to
start
on
that.
C
Will
that
be
the
resolution
we
bring
forward
at
for
the
september
meeting.
A
I
don't
have
a
resolution
to
bring
forward
the
seminar
meeting.
If
that's
it
sounds
like
a
big
all,
I'm
saying
the
reason
I'm
stammering
is
that
it
sounds
like
it
sounds
like
we're.
Gonna
write,
a
we're
gonna,
be
writing
something
big,
so
if
we
can,
if
we
can
get
to
it,
I
think
you
know
I
I'm
committed
to
getting
to
it.
If,
if
everyone
else
is.
C
I
my
preference
would
be
to
because
in
part
to
communicate
the
urgency
that
we
passed
some
sort
of
resolution
in
september,
which
is
our
first
meeting
after
the
release
of
the
ipcc
and
whether
that's
the
hey,
the
things
we
said
in
december
2018.
We
are
here's
the
megaphone
we're
putting
it
all
in
all
caps
now
whatever,
and
then
I
mean.
Maybe
that
includes
what
you're
discussing.
A
A
B
K
A
Well,
really
great,
really
good
discussion
on
a
really
tough
topic:
everyone
kudos
to
everyone
here
we
got
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
work
to
do,
and
you
know
we
could
we
you
can
see
we
can.
We
can
take
some.
You
know
as
as
dispiriting
as
the
reports
are,
as
like
also
pointed
out.
A
Just
it's
just
just
like
it's
like
a
punch
in
the
nose
working
doing
this
kind
of
work
certainly
helps
give
some
hope
that
isn't
always
you
know
always
foremost,
speaking
for
myself
for
most
of
my
mind,
so
thanks
thanks
for
everyone
for
that
that
we'll
call
that
a
wrap
on
kind
of
one
foot,
julia.
C
Can
I
I
just
want
to
add
two
things
I
think
to
that.
One
is
that
I
know
I
mean
this
is
something
that's
been
I've.
I've
struggled
with
the
reality
of
the
climate
breakdown
of
where
we're
at
and
compared
to
get
all
of
that
for
a
very
long
time,
and
I
know
that
it
can
be
hard
and
it
can
be
hard
intermittently,
and
I
just
want
to
put
it
out
there
that
whatever
contact
information
you
have
with
mine-
I
am
very-
I
don't
want
this
to
be
something
that
makes
it
harder.
C
C
I
find
a
lot
of
hope
in
in
that
those
of
us
on
the
path
are
already
seeing
the
benefits
of
walking
we're
already
we're
seeing
that
better
future
that
we
need
to
build
towards,
and
we
have
every
time
we're
out
in
our
neighborhoods
we're
kind
of
embodying
that
hopeful
future.
In
a
very
real
concrete
way,
so
I
I.
C
If
you
need
me
I'm
here
for
you,
however,
I
can
be,
and
I
if
you
need
me
to
hold
hope
or
or
share
hope
I'm
also
here
for
that
and
I'm
my
guess
as
others
are
as
well.
But
I
want
to
be
explicit
about
that
for
today,
thanks
peter.
A
Thank
you
julia.
You
know
by
word
indeed,
and.
A
Next,
up
on
our
agenda
is
we
have
a
cip
discussion
that
which
is
the
capital
improvement
projects
and
which
is
goes
on
throughout
the
year
and
we're
going
to
talk
about
the?
How
we
talk
about
cfp
right
chris.
J
I
think
julia
was
actually
going
to
kick
this
off.
Is
that
right,
julia?
Otherwise,
I'm
I'm
happy
to,
but.
C
Right
sorry,
I
stepped
outside,
for
I
was
gonna
grab
my
sewing,
but
I'm
not
at
that
point.
Yet
I
forgot
about
that
chris.
So
this
we,
if
I
remember
correctly,
the
plan
was
because
we
had
the
climate
discussion
to
sort
of
use
that
to
segue
into
capital
improvement
projects
and
starting
to
look
at
how
we
really
influence
that
within
the
context
of
this,
is
that
what
you're,
remembering.
J
Yeah
yeah,
I
think
that
was
part
of
the
segway
that
you
came
up
with
that,
I
think,
makes
a
lot
of
sense
if
you,
if
you
want
me
to
ramble
for
a
little
bit
while
you
collect
some
thoughts,
I'm
happy
to
do
that
or
I
can
pull
up.
However,
you
want
to
handle
it.
C
That
would
be
great.
I'm
sorry.
J
J
Yeah
so,
as
julia
said,
I
think
the
idea
here
was
that
hopefully,
this
conversation
can
kind
of
flow.
Well.
From
the
previous
conversation,
we
were
just
having
about
the
ipcc
report
and
climate
change
and
just
some
kind
of
like
bigger
picture.
Looking
thinking
about
the
cip
in
the
past,
for
those
of
you
who
aren't
familiar
with
this
process,
actually,
I
should
probably
start
there,
so
the
the
capital,
improvement,
project
or
cip
is
where
all
the
projects
are
listed
for
the
next
six
years.
J
I
believe
it
is
now
so
all
are
like
big
reconstructions.
J
The
funding
for
different
programs
like
safe
routes
to
school
program
or
sidewalk
gap
program,
where
we
don't
list
specific
projects,
but
we
just
are
allowed
as
staff
to
use
that
amount
of
money
for
a
given
time
period
for
a
year
or
so
those
are
all
included
in
that.
So
so
all
our
work,
that's
funded
in
terms
of
the
capital
side
of
things
is
in
here
in
in
previous
years,
both
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee
and
the
bicycle
advisory
committee
have
been
relatively
focused
on
specific
projects
and
specific
locations
in
the
city.
J
That's
already
started
to
change
in
the
last
couple
years.
Last
few
years,
we've
started
shifting
away
from
saying:
hey
fill
that
gap
on
hiawatha
bike,
ped
trail
or
or
things
like
that
and
started
to
move
a
little
more
into
sort
of
systems.
J
Thinking
still
within
the
cip
of,
like
hey,
add
this
program
so
that
we
can
start
thinking
about
how
to
just
get
a
pot
of
money
to
generally
make
sidewalks
safer
or
safe
routes
to
school,
safer
or
our
vision,
zero
program
or
different
things
like
that,
and
so
that
the
pac
and
bac
have
kind
of
both
pushed
and
then
also
like,
as
public
works,
has
kind
of
changed.
The
way
that
they've
done
things.
J
J
We
have
the
vision,
zero,
high
injury
network
and
things
like
that.
So
as
we
start
to
kind
of
move
beyond
thinking
about
specific
places
and
specific
spaces,
I
think
part
of
where
julia
and
peter
want
to
go
as
well
as
where
I
think
it
makes
sense.
Matthew
and
myself
have
had
conversations
about
this
as
well.
It's
like
how
does
the
the
pack
start,
inter
interacting
with
the
ca
cip
at
a
higher
level.
So
this
conversation
it's
august
right
now.
J
This
is
maybe
a
couple
months
earlier
than
we've
gotten
started
in
the
past,
and
I
think
the
purpose
of
that
is
to
be
able
to
have
higher
level
conversations
so
and
actually
maybe
it
gets
back
to
what
paul
was
saying
earlier,
like
it's
one
thing
to
say
on
a
specific
project
like
how
are
you
addressing
the
reality
of
climate
change?
J
It's
another
thing
to
say:
okay,
how
are
we
funding
our
entire
system
on
a
year-to-year
basis
and
where
can
the
pac
push
or
advocate
to
change
that
in
a
way
that
also
like,
like
we
have
the
time
to
figure
out
how
to
make
that
make
sense
to
public
work
staff?
Who
are
coming
and
working
on
the
cip
as
well,
and
that's
that's
like
more
a
written
like
that's,
not
meant
to
be
a
a
slight
in
any
way.
J
That's
that's
more
a
reality
of
the
changing
kind
of
nature
of
of
what
we're
suggesting
and
just
that
it's
both
kind
of
a
new
direction
in
some
ways
or
an
expanded
direction
for
the
path
as
well
as
kind
of
a
different
way
of
thinking
and
addressing
those
concerns
from
public
works.
So
I
I
have
last
year's
resolution.
The
only
reason
I
think
to
go
through
that,
if
we
wanted
to
at
all
is
is
maybe
to
see
the
types
of
things
we've
done
in
the
past
I'll
I'll.
J
Maybe
leave
that
to
you
julia
and
let
you
jump
in
before.
I
do
that
because
I
don't
know
if
that's
where
you
want
to
take
it,
I
think
the
only
reason
to
do
that
would
just
be
to
kind
of
like
look
at
what
we've
done
in
the
past
and
then
think
of
how
we
want
to
shift
but
yeah.
I
guess
I'll
stop
there
and
julia
feel
free
to
jump
in
and
then
questions
or
wherever
you
want
to
take
it.
C
I
think
so
the
cip
has
been
one
of
those
things
that
has
confused
me
most
of
the
time
that
I've
been
on
the
pack
just
just
to
let
you
all
know,
and
also
in
case
any
of
the
newer
members
are
equally
confused
by
its
cycles
and
exactly
how
it
functions.
I
think
that
one
of
the
things
that
has
come
up
is
how
is
this?
There's
click
makes
recommend
recommendations
on
cip,
but
those
do
not
necessarily
have
to
be
followed.
C
So
if
there's
a
little
bit
that
has
come
up
in
the
last
year
about
as
we're
making
recommendations,
how
do
we
also
in
increase
the
impact
and
communicate
the
motivations
behind
those
two
members
on
click
or
kind
of
more
broadly,
and
I
know
neil
has
served
on
click.
Are
you
still
on
click.
C
Okay,
scott
angle
is
a
former
pac
member
who
remembers
like
he's.
Yeah
he's
great,
so
that's
excellent
and
I
think
we
have
a
couple
of
other
people
that
people
here
might
know
in
other
ways.
So.
C
Twofold
one
direction
we
might
go
is
how
we
use
our
recommendations
for
cip
to
communicate
urgency
to
provide
to
provide
paths
towards
the
kinds
of
infrastructure
that
we
need
without
being
the
engineers
within
that,
and
then
the
second
piece
might
be
how
we
increase
the
impact
of
those
of
what
we
pulled
together
for
those
recommendations.
H
Yes
and
abigail
correct
me
if
I'm
misremembering,
but
before
things
kind
of
got
overtaken
by
covid
and
that
I
think
abigail
and
or
I
were
going
to
at
least
offer
to
make
a
presentation
to
click,
even
if
that's
not
traditionally
done
but
sort
of
bring
it
bring
our
thoughts
more
directly
to
the
click
and
if
that's
not
permitted,
you
know,
I
think
it's
important
to
informally
do
that
through
you
know,
scott
or
whoever,
whoever
would
be
sort
of
our
voice
back
in
the
jury
room.
H
You
know,
but
I
think
I
think
making
that
formal
offer
maybe
abigail
and
reina.
Could
you
know
if
my
zoom
or
something
you
know
just
to
just
say
you
know
you've
received
our
our
thoughts,
we're
here
to
answer
any
questions.
You
know
that
kind
of
thing
and
have
done
our
well.
Then
it's
not
much
time
lost
so.
G
H
J
I
think,
maybe
if
I
could
jump
in,
I
think
one
thing
that
would
be
helpful
and
I
don't
know
that
we
have
enough
time
today
would
just
be
to
kind
of
get
a
sense
for
for
like
what
everybody
wants
like
where
the
direction
for
this
is
going
and
and
it
doesn't
have
to
be
like
finalized
next
month.
But
I
think
the
earlier
we
can
do
that.
J
The
more
that
gives
us
the
opportunity
to
interact
with
the
cip
team
as
desired
like
as
you
all
desire
to
be
able
to
kind
of
bring
questions
of
like
hey.
Is
this
like?
Is
this
all
right
like
the
right
place
in
your
mind,
to
push
on
this
certain
thing
or
like
or
like?
How
do
we
do
this,
or
how
do
we
bring
climate
change
in?
J
But
I
guess
from
my
perspective,
in
terms
of
like
thinking
that,
ultimately
this
is
an
assumption,
but
we've
always
done
a
resolution
on
the
cip
in
the
past
in
like
march
or
april,
or
something
before
things
go
to
click.
I'm
assuming
you'll
all
want
to
have
one,
whether
or
not
that
looks
a
little
different
than
previous
years
or
not
that
climate
change.
J
Perhaps
it's
kind
of
expanding
on
what
what
matt
was
saying
earlier
about,
like
the
connection
between
climate
change
and
safety,
or
just
different
things
like
that?
I
don't
know
if
some
of
that
work
happens
outside
of
these
meetings
or
or
if
we
should
have
like
a
working
item
on
this
next
month
or
something.
C
One
of
the
things
that's
been
on
my
mind
since
reading
the
policy
maker
summary
for
the
ipcc
is
that
there's
a
siloing
of
thought,
that's
going
into
how
we,
how
we're
how
public
works,
how
all
of
us
are
considering
our
public
right-of-way
and
it's
it's
like
it's
a
it's,
a
reorienting
of
how
we're
thinking
about
streets.
C
I
think
that
that
is
kind
of
called
out
in
the
ipcc
when
we're
when
we're
looking
at
mitigation,
which
is
reducing
our
emissions
and
also
adaptation,
which
is
reducing
our
urban
heat
island
effect
and
reducing
runoff
and
those
can
work
together.
But
up
to
this
point,
we've
been
seeing
that
what
we
do
for
mitigation
is
often
just
pave
more
and
more
and
more
especially
when
we're
not
at
a
political
place
to
be
removing
vehicle
space
that
we're
in
you
know
we're
adding
bike
lanes,
we're
not
looking
at
pushing
things
together.
C
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
cip
or
that
kind
of
or
if
it
even
comes
from
us,
but
how
we
make
sure
that
our
recommendations
are
themselves
not
best.
We
can
hope
for,
but
what
is
actually
necessary.
J
Because
I
think
I
think
you
just
summarized
a
message
that
I
think
most
or
many
of
many
of
you
want
to
get
across,
which
is
that
like?
It
might
be
hard
to
fit
some
of
that
in
into
the
cip?
And
that's
maybe
some
of
the
like
struggle
here.
So
but
I
don't
know
if
that
made
complete
sense.
But
I
I
think
what
you
were
saying
is
a
good
direction.
Juliet.
C
I
also
appreciate
the
idea
that
we're
maybe
having
more
conversations
around
this
and
whether
or
not
it's
after
we
pull
together
our
recommendations
or
if
we
start
it
before
the
I
forget
who
was
saying
it
towards
the
beginning
of
our
conversation
around
climate,
but
but
that
we
need
to
have
expectations.
C
People
need
to
be
expecting
that
they're
going
to
be
hearing
about
this
and
that
this
is
going
to
be
part
of
conversation
and
if
we
start
reaching
out
to
click
members
that
we
might
know
or
and
sitting
down
just
to
talk
about,
where
the
packs
at
on
this
as
a
prelude
to
what
the
kinds
of
recommendations
are
that
we
bring
forward,
it
seems
like
that
might
do
double
duty
for
what
we're
aiming
for,
especially
given
that
these
are
appointed
positions.
So
this
might
be
conversation
across
networks
too.
A
Well,
that's
well
summed
up
as
far
as
I'm
concerned
julia
you
know,
and
I
think
chris
is
right,
it'll
be
an
ongoing
effort
towards
you
know
our
what
the
combined
resolution
recommendations
that
we
have
for
come
come
march
march
and
april,
and
you
know
the
opportunities
for
more
pointed
language
and
more
pointed
input
on.
A
Anything
else
on
that
subject
or
where
we
can
we'll
be
coming
back
to
it
for
sure
in
the
near
term.
Is
there
any
any
other
anybody
else
like
to
like
to
chime
in
because
we're
coming
up
on
6
p.m?
So,
where
we'll
adjourn.
A
A
A
And
if
I
I
don't
see
a
hand
so
pipe
in
pipe
up
if
the
hand's
not
working
okay,
five,
four
three
two
one
was
a
good
good,
strong
meeting.
I
really
appreciate
everybody's
participation,
everybody's
a
tennis
today
and
thanks
one
and
all
and
I'm
calling
us
adjourned
thanks.