►
From YouTube: April 19, 2021 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
The
city
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency.
This
meeting
is
public
and
subject
to
the
minnesota
open
meeting
law.
For
the
record,
my
name
is
jackie
hansen.
I'm
an
assistant
city
clerk
with
the
office
of
city
clerk.
B
B
And
form
will
be
completed
for
each
local
board
meeting.
This
initial
roll
call
will
allow
the
city
assessor
to
complete
the
certification
form
on
behalf
of
the
board
members
with
a
verbal
signature,
I
will
also
note
for
the
record
that
three
of
the
four
board
members
have
completed
the
required
training
from
the
minnesota
department
of
revenue.
D
E
B
A
D
B
E
B
D
B
A
E
D
E
B
A
D
B
G
G
G
You
can
vote
on
them
once
I
have
read
them
all.
If
there
are
particular
cases
that
you
would
like
more
information
on,
if
you
have
a
question
on,
you
can
always
pull
them
and
we
can
provide
information
to
you
at
our
next
meeting
and
that
will
conclude
our
business
for
today.
You
will
recess
and
reconvene
on
wednesday
april
21st
at
9
00
a.m.
G
These
cases
came
in
after
that
10-day
or
when
that
10-day
window
passed
before
the
board
convenes.
So
each
property
owner
will
be
scheduled
time
to
present
to
you
and
you
will
be
able
to
decide
those
cases,
and
then
that
is
really
where
our
draft
agenda
right
now
ends.
We
know
that
we
will
need
additional
time.
We
are
tentatively
scheduled
time
for
friday
morning
and
afternoon,
and
we
will
have
to
have
conversations
then
about
a
potential
session
on
thursday,
so
more
to
come
on
that.
A
B
G
G
We
are
all
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have
or
ride
supporting
documentation.
I
would
also
like
to
recognize
that
we
have
members
of
the
hennepin
county,
assessor's
office
staff
with
us
here
today.
I
believe
we
have.
I
didn't
confirm
this,
but
we
were
tempted
really
tentatively
scheduled
to
have
coney
assessor
jim
atchison
assistant,
coney,
assessor
josh,
hoagland,
and
then
also,
I
believe,
kim
jensen
is
with
us
today
and
they
do
attend
all
or
a
portion
of
the
local
board
meetings
so
welcome
to
them
as
well.
A
F
E
D
B
A
Microphone
and
wait
for
the
pre-record
message
before
speaking,
we
ask
that
they
state
their
name
and
address
for
the
record
then
present
their
appeal
to
the
board.
We
will
then
call
on
the
assessor
staff
and
they
will
be
given
five
minutes
to
present
their
report
to
the
board.
Finally,
the
board
will
have
five
minutes
for
questions
on
the
case,
and
the
board
will
consider
and
take
action
on
each
case
as
they
are
presented.
B
Mr
chair,
I
might
he's
it
does
not
look
that
the
speaker
is
available
online.
Yet
I
might
ask
the
rebecca
malmquist
to
maybe
do
another
little
overview
and
then,
if
we
need
to,
we
could
always
go
to
our
next
item
on
the
agenda,
which
is
reviewing
the
valuation
changes
being
brought
by
the
city
assessor.
So.
A
G
G
G
G
G
Two
hundred
fifty
five
thousand
dollars
property
id;
two;
seven:
zero:
two,
nine
two:
four:
four:
four:
zero:
two:
six
three
original
value:
three
hundred
eighteen
thousand
dollars
and
I'm
going
to
have
our
team.
Take
a
look
at
this
one.
There's
some
confusion
about
the
indicated
value.
So
assessor
team.
Can
you
please
take
a
look
at
case?
21-0154
property
id
four,
four
2702-9244
zero.
Two
six
three
next
case
is
zero.
Four
zero.
Two,
eight
two,
four,
two:
two:
zero
zero
one:
seven
original
value:
five
hundred
thirteen
thousand
dollars,
indicated
value
four
hundred.
G
Seventy
five
thousand
dollars
one
four:
zero:
two,
eight
two,
four,
two:
two:
zero
one:
three
six
original
value
again,
if
our
team
assessors
team,
can
take
a
look
at
this
case,
it's
just
some
confusion
between
the
original
and
indicated
values,
so
assessor
team
case
21.01666
property
14028-24220136.
Please
take
a
look
at
the
original
and
indicated
values
case.
G
29029-244034
original
value,
553
000,
indicated
value,
475
thousand
dollars,
property
id
two;
seven,
zero,
two,
nine
two,
four:
three:
four:
zero
one:
zero,
zero
original
value;
four
hundred
forty
five
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
Four
hundred
and
four
thousand
five
hundred
dollars;
two:
two:
zero:
two:
nine
two,
four
one:
three:
zero:
seven:
six:
nine
original
value.
Four
hundred
seven
hundred
forty
five
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
Six
hundred
thirty,
eight
thousand
five
hundred
dollars;
zero,
eight
zero,
two,
eight
two,
four:
four
one:
zero:
zero,
zero:
four
original
value.
Nine
hundred
eighty
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
G
Eight
hundred
sixty
sixty-five
thousand
dollars;
three
one:
zero:
two,
nine
two,
three
one:
four:
zero
zero:
two
one
original
value:
two
hundred
thirty
three
thousand
dollars,
indicated
value.
Fifty
thousand
dollars:
zero,
eight
zero;
two,
eight
two,
four:
two:
four:
zero
one:
five:
zero
original
value:
one
million
sixty
five
thousand
dollars
indicated
value;
one
million
forty
five
thousand
dollars,
and
I
believe
I
will
pause
there.
That
was
leaving
off
at
case
21-0198.
G
A
We
ask
that
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
present
your
appeal
to
the
board.
Next,
we
will
call
in
the
assessor
staff
they'll
be
given
five
minutes
to
present
their
report
to
the
board.
And,
finally,
the
board
will
have
five
minutes
for
questions
on
the
case,
and
the
board
will
consider
and
take
action
on
each
case
as
they
are
presented.
B
H
A
H
H
My
property
is
being
evaluated
higher
than
exact,
that's
even
similar,
exact,
same
property
but
the
same
neighborhood,
and
I
don't
think
that's
illegal,
that's
of
course
not
right
and-
and
I
will
and
and
I'm
again
appealing
to
this,
but
to
do
the
right
thing
and
correct
this
injustice.
I
don't
know
if
I
need
to
go
through
my
my
explanation.
I
mean
he
submitted,
so
you
guys
cannot
chance
to
read
it.
I
was
here
last
year
and.
H
H
Okay,
so
anyway,
so
as
I
said,
the
the
the
there
are
three
properties
I
I
presented
two
last
year
and
one
this
year.
That
was
the
same.
I
guess
because
the
neighborhood
was
built
the
same
in
time,
the
same
exact
copy
you
take
what
I
just
say:
you
blindfolded
some
person,
you
put
them
in
one
unit,
you
go
into
the
next
one.
I
visited
them
to
know.
So
I
did
not
come
here
in
the.
B
H
Like
expedition
here-
and
you
would
not
tell-
and
it
was
even
funny
this
year-
because
one
of
my
tenants
is
just
leaving
me
to
go
to
to
the
next
property-
and
I
can
understand-
and
that's
nicer
flooring
than
I
do-
but
anyway
so
and
just
as
I
said
as
simple
as
that
is
now
like
hey.
This
is
two
fifty
square
foot
minus
one.
This
is
three:
you
need
minus
two.
All
that
is
just
and
I
mean
incorrect
wrong
lie
anyway.
H
You
want
to
put
that
I
mean
exactly
so
this
one,
as
I
said,
3605
and
3609
clinton
avenue.
It's
the
exact
same
building
model
plane
floor
number
of
unit
number
floor
square
footage,
exact,
so
and
mine
is
being
evaluated
at
25
or
26.
There
is
270
or
whatever
the
number
is
mine
is
390,
something
so
20,
20,
plus
thousand
dollar
more,
which
is
wrong
again.
H
As
I
say
this,
the
money
hurts,
but
the
fact
that
it
is
being
done,
which
I
suspect,
because
of
some
practice
in
this
county
racially
modified,
is
what
hurts
most
the
fact
that
they're
still
trying
to
make
your
taxi
more
cheat.
You
more
likely
more
exploit
you
more
steal
from
you
more
kill.
You
do
all
this
crazy
thing.
H
This
count
is
doing.
Is
just
this
clickable.
It
hurts.
It
hurts,
as
you
say,
finances
practice.
It
500
300
200
marks
yeah,
but
the
fact
is
that
they're
just
evil
and
doing
this
hurtful
again,
as
I
say,
disrespectful
taking
your
humanity,
your
stability,
your
rights
from
it's
just
painful.
It's
hurt
it's
wrong.
H
H
It's
best
on
the
property.
Two
identical
property
cannot
have
any
justification
to
have
different
taxation.
I
don't
care
how
much
you
do
funny
life
when
you
sell
you
can
find
in
the
street
and
okay.
This
is
comparable.
That's
bs!
We
are
not
selling,
we
are
not
listing
for
sale,
we
are
talking
about
taxes.
A
I
The
analysis
of
the
subject
indicates
a
value
of
four
hundred
five
thousand
dollars.
I
spoke
briefly
with
the
property
owner
via
telephone
and
completed
a
desktop
review
of
this
property.
On
april
8
2021,
he
stated
that
nothing
had
changed
with
the
property
and
expressed
his
desire
to
present
directly
to
the
board.
I
The
subject
is
a
two
and
a
half
story:
triplex,
it
is
surrounded
by
a
mix
of
single-family
and
multi-family
dwellings
across
the
street.
Is
a
library
directly
adjacent
to
the
north?
Is
a
community
garden.
The
subject
property
was
built
in
1915
and
has
3969
square
feet
above
grade.
The
three
units
are
separated
by
floor
with
the
first
two
units
having
three
bedrooms
and
one
bathroom.
Each.
The
sun
rooms
in
each
of
these
units
have
been
determined
by
previous
physical
inspection
and
by
last
year's
local
and
county
boards.
I
To
be
qualified
as
bedrooms,
they
are
currently
rented
out
as
such.
The
third
floor
unit
has
two
bedrooms
and
a
bathroom
all
three
kitchens
in
the
subject.
Property
are
in
fair
condition.
The
basement
is
one
thousand
five
hundred
seventy
four
square
feet
and
is
unfinished
there's
a.
There
is
a
three
stall
garage
at
the
rear
of
the
property
on
the
alley.
It
is
used
as
a
two
cell
garage
and
is
rented
out
to
the
first
two
units.
This
is
due
to
limited
access
from
the
alley.
I
Overall,
the
property
is
in
below
average
condition.
I
relied
on
both
the
sales
comparison
approach
and
income
approach.
For
this
analysis
of
value
for
the
sales
comparison,
a
thorough
search
was
made
for
triplex
properties
with
similar
characteristics
to
the
subject.
There
are
a
few
sales
that
are
both
as
large
as
the
subject
and
are
in
similar
condition.
I
I
Comparable
one
is
located
at
3033
park,
avenue
and
sold
for
397
thousand
dollars
in
december.
2020,
it
is
in
superior
condition
of
the
subject
and
has
one
additional
bathroom.
It
is
more
than
1
200
square
feet
smaller
than
the
subject
comparable.
Two
is
at
thirty
two:
twenty
two
fifteenth
avenue
south
and
sold
for
four
hundred
twenty
five
thousand
eight
hundred
thirty
dollars
in
november
of
twenty
twenty.
It
is
also
in
superior
condition
of
the
subject
and
is
significantly
smaller.
I
I
I
The
sale
is
more
dated
than
other
comparables
and
the
property
is
in
superior
condition
of
the
subject,
but
the
square
footage
is
more
similar
being
only
237
square
feet
smaller
after
the
adjustments
were
made
on
the
comparable
sales.
The
values
ranged
from
three
hundred
ninety
four
thousand
two
hundred
fifty
dollars
to
four
hundred
thirty,
eight
thousand
five
hundred
dollars.
The
value
indicated
by
the
sales
comparison
approach
is
four
hundred
two
thousand
dollars
in
the
income
approach.
Market
assumptions
for
rental
rates
were
derived
from
rental
comparables.
I
Four
thousand
dollars
per
month
was
used
for
the
subject's
market
rent
with
an
annual
income
of
48
000,
the
gross
income
multiplier
was
determined
to
be
8.5
and
when
multiplied
by
the
potential
gross
income,
the
indicated
value
is
408
thousand
dollars
from
the
two
approaches
to
value
analyzed.
The
indicated
values
range
from
400
2
000
to
408
thousand
dollars.
I
A
I
I
Chair
anderson,
that
could
be
the
case,
I'm
not
certain.
Due
to
the
briefness
of
our
conversation,
I
wasn't
given
any
information
as
to
what
his
rental
situation
is.
Lower
rents
could
be
indicated,
an
indication
of
a
lower
property
condition.
He
could
also
have
long-term
tenants
that
could
be
at
the
same
rate,
but
this
is
at
this
point.
It's
just
speculation,
and
I
haven't
confirmed
any
of
that.
I
E
I
I
It
is
a
similar
two
and
a
half
story
building
it
has
about
3
500
square
feet
above
grade
the
2021
estimated
market
value
for
this
property,
noting
that
it
did
not
sell
and
it
can't
be
used
as
a
sales
comparable.
The
estimated
market
value
of
this
property
for
2021
is
415
thousand
dollars.
Thank
you.
F
I
would
also
note
that,
with
regard
to
the
property
on
clinton
that
from
what
I
could
tell,
it
has
a
a
one
car
garage
as
opposed
to
a
two
or
three
car
garage
on
the
subject:
property.
In
addition
to
that,
the
subject:
property
has
a
double
lot
80
wide,
instead
of
40
wide,
both
of
which
would
indicate
a
higher
value
for
the
subject.
Property.
H
H
H
I
I
A
I
D
E
A
G
Board
fair
anderson
and
board
members.
Thank
you
for
that.
I
am
going
to
begin
with
case
number
21-0202
property
id
number
is
27029
two
four,
three,
four
zero
one:
two
three
original
value:
four
hundred
sixty
five
thousand
dollars,
indicated
value.
Four
hundred
thirty
thousand
dollars:
zero;
four
zero;
two,
eight
two,
four,
four:
four:
zero
one:
four,
five
original
value:
three
hundred:
seventy
nine
thousand
dollars,
indicated
value
three
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
dollars.
G
Next
is
two
three:
zero:
two,
nine
two,
four
two
one:
zero
four:
nine
seven
original
value:
six
hundred
thirteen
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
Five
hundred
and
twenty
five
thousand
dollars,
one
two:
zero:
two,
nine
two,
four
one:
one:
zero:
zero:
three:
three
original
value:
three
hundred
seventeen
thousand
dollars,
indicated
value
three
hundred
thousand
dollars:
zero;
six,
zero;
two,
eight
two:
three:
four:
four:
zero:
zero:
two
eight
original
value,
two
hundred
and
nine
thousand
dollars,
indicated
value.
G
G
Next
is
two
three
zero:
two
nine
two,
four
two
one:
zero
five,
two
one
original
value:
one
million
nine
hundred
fifty
three
thousand
dollars
indicated
value:
one
million
seven
hundred
seventy
five
thousand
five
hundred
dollars.
The
next
item.
We
are
pulling
from
this
week's
agenda.
That's
case
two
one:
zero,
two
one
six
next
case
is
property
id
number,
two:
zero,
zero;
two,
eight
two,
four
one:
two:
zero
one:
zero,
seven
original
value:
three
hundred
forty
two
thousand
dollars
indicated
value
three
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars.
G
Next
is
one
four
zero:
two
eight
two,
four
two:
four:
zero:
zero:
nine
nine
original
six
hundred
and
six
six
hundred
forty
six
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
Five
hundred
ninety
five
thousand
dollars,
one
five:
zero:
two,
eight
two,
four:
two:
three:
zero:
zero:
three:
four
original
value:
nine
hundred
fifty
five
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
Seven
hundred
sixty-five
thousand
dollars,
one
more
zero.
G
G
Two
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars,
one
six,
zero;
two,
eight
two,
four
one:
one:
zero
one:
five,
nine
original
value:
four
hundred
eighty
five
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
Four
hundred
sixty
five
thousand
dollars;
three:
three:
zero:
two,
nine
two,
four
one:
two:
zero
one:
six,
three
original
value:
seven
hundred
eighty
eight
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
Six
hundred.
Ninety
thousand
dollars
two
eight
zero:
two,
nine
two,
four:
three:
three:
zero:
zero:
zero:
five
original
value:
one
million
one
hundred
nine
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
G
Two:
three:
zero:
two:
nine
two,
four
three:
four
zero
one:
eight
seven
original
value:
eight
hundred
sixty
six
thousand
dollars,
indicated
value.
Seven
hundred
and
four
seven
700
700
4
700
0702
82313012
original
value;
342
000
indicated
value;
300,
000.,
zero;
two,
eight,
two,
three:
two:
four:
zero:
zero:
five,
zero
original
value;
three
hundred
and
twenty
eight
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
G
G
G
240292420157
original
value,
one
million
eight
hundred
and
eight
thousand
dollars
indicated
value,
one
million
four
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
two
seven
zero.
Two
nine
two,
four,
two:
four:
zero:
six
one:
three
original
value:
four
hundred
fifty
one
thousand
dollars
indicated
value
of
three
hundred
and
eighty
five
thousand
dollars:
two:
seven:
zero:
two,
nine
two,
four
four:
three:
zero:
two
one:
nine
original
value,
one
hundred
and
six
thousand
dollars
recommended
value.
Ninety
nine
000.
G
That
concludes
the
list.
I
did
just
want
to
again
remove
the
following
agenda
items:
these
are
the
case
numbers
from
today's
agenda
and
they
will
appear
on
a
future
agenda
case
two
one:
zero
one:
five
four
case:
two
one
dash
zero
one:
six
six
case:
two
one
dash
zero
two
one
six
case,
21-0235
case
21-0249
and
case
21-0293,
chair
anderson
and
board
members.
That
concludes
the
valuation
changes
that
we
are
bringing
before
you
today
and
yes,
we
do
just
need
a
vote
for
those.