►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
So
can
we
do
role,
we
don't
necessarily
do
royal
public.
Should
we
do
introductions.
A
A
A
B
What
let's
do
first
name
pronouns
and
something
about
spring
and
walking
and
I'll
start
us
off.
I'm
julia
committee,
member
and
co-chair
of
this
committee
and
she
he
they
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
watching
the
trees
start
to
make
little
flowers
and
unfurl
their
leaves.
While
I'm
on
my
walks,
let's
see
emma,
would
you.
A
B
F
Going
hi,
I'm
a
patrida,
she
her
minneapolis
park
board
and
I've
been
really
enjoying
the
spring
flowers.
So
far,
I've
seen
snowdrops
and
crocus,
so
nothing
native
yet,
but
we're
close.
B
F
Hi,
yes,
sarah
goodell,
she
her
and,
I
think,
just
kind
of
the
disappearance
of
the
snow.
I
can't
believe
it's
already
gone.
I
don't
want
to
jinx
it,
but
yeah.
It's
been
lovely.
B
E
Hello
matthew,
deardahl,
bikepad
coordinator,
he
him
his
I'm
excited
for
the
background
that
you
see,
which
you'll
see
more
often
when
I'm
not
in
a
leading
role,
which,
basically,
what
I'm
saying
is
I
like
to
do
walking
meetings
on
my
cell
phone,
where.
H
E
J
A
K
Hi
everyone
tomtow
here
is
with
the
minneapolis
health
department
and
I'm
excited
to
go
on.
Some
bike
rides
with
my
dog.
I
L
Hi
there
matt
steinrich,
he
him,
I
am
very
excited
to
be
outside
walk
around
the
lake
play
some
tennis
as
well.
I
apologize
I'm
trying
to
finish
up
a
work
meeting
and
my
camera
is
not
functioning
well
on
two
meetings.
L
B
That's
that's
quite
bad
world
tasking
your
internet
working
well
enough.
M
Let's
see
yeah
peter
vader
co-chair
of
this
committee,
pac
member,
I
he
him
his
and
my
favorite
part
of
this
time.
I
really
like
this
having
here
almost
better
than
any
time
of
year.
People
have
to
have
dry
pavement
and
then
like
no
foliage
yet
so
you
just
like
take
your
time.
Take
a
long,
walk,
see,
see
forever
and
see
angles
across
lakes
and
up
the
streets
across
lakes
that
you
don't
see
another
time
of
year.
It's
just
like
it's.
I
love
it.
A
D
Hi
chris
carthaiser
minneapolis
public
works.
He
him.
I
have
a
five-month-old
puppy
who
is
starting
to
enjoy
the
water,
but
I'm
excited
as
things
melt,
to
get
him
swimming
more.
N
I'm
barb
a
pack
member,
he
she
her
and
what
I
like
is
the
birds
we've
we've
been.
I
was
noticing
peter's
birds,
but
in
the
my
backyard
there's
lots
of
birds
when
we
walk
I'm
hearing
so
many
different
birds.
So
I'm
loving
that
awesome.
A
C
Oh
yeah
today
I
was
over
at
bancroft
school
just
now
pulling
out
of
their
garage
or
someplace
three
enormous
beds
for
the
gardens,
they're
gonna
plant
sign
of
spring
and
looking
forward
to
seeing
the
girls
in
the
in
the
garden
across
the
alley
too.
B
O
I'll
jump
in
christopher,
no
that's
right:
hi,
hi
there!
He
him-
and
today
I
was
stoked
that
I
took
off
the
rubber
pavement
tips
off
my
walking
poles
and
I
screwed
in
the
off-roading
metal
tips.
So
like
I'm
ready,
I'm
ready
now.
I
M
O
O
D
B
Okay,
so
basically
we're
in
month
two
of
the
capital
improvement
project
planning,
hopefully
with
everyone's
brainstorms
and
ideas
on
it,
because
we're
trying
to
get
something
finished
up
enough
to
bring
it
to
the
full
pac
at
the
beginning
of
april.
D
And
I'll
clarify
we
are
definitely
bringing
it
to
the
pac
at
the
next
full
one
so
like
this
is.
This
is
like
last
last
chance.
There's
been
input
input
in
a
variety
of
ways
and
like
it's,
it's
pretty.
D
It's
pretty
well
put
together
already
partially
just
because,
like
last
year,
we're
using
last
year's
format
and
then
folks
did
some
other
work.
It
has
been
updated
slightly
since
it
it
was
sent
out.
Since
this
is
a
working
draft
and
we'll
be
making
edits
today,
I'm
just
going
with
the
most
recent
one
I
have
so
if
anyone
needs
me
to
kind
of
like
go
over
anything
that
they
don't
recognize,
I'm
I'm
happy
to
do
that,
but
yeah
basically
planning
to
just
go
through
kind
of
like
piece
by
piece.
D
If
there's
word
smithing
that
folks
want
to
do
like,
let's
get
into
it
now,
we
we've
got
about
a
full
hour,
a
little,
maybe
a
little
less.
Now
we'll
we'll
try
to
end
this
by
five,
we'll
see
where
we're
at
at
five,
so
that
we
can
actually
get
out
of
this
meeting
in
an
hour
and
a
half
today.
But
if
we
need
a
little
more
time,
we'll
just
see
what
we
need,
since
this
is
the
last
one
anything
else
to
add,
then
julia
before
I
share
my
screen
and
dig
in.
B
B
D
D
Cool
all
right
and
a
little
tip
if
you're
on
a
computer,
you
should
be
able
to
zoom
in.
If
you
hit
control
and
use
scroll,
you
can
zoom
in
more
to
kind
of
adjust
the
size
on
your
own
screen,
I'll
I'll,
try
to
zoom
it
in
a
good
amount,
but
I
want
to
also
make
sure
people
can
kind
of
like
see
a
whole
section
at
once.
So
that's
how
you
can
make
it
tailor
it
a
little
bit
to
to
yours.
D
So,
all
right
so
again,
just
jumping
back
real,
quick,
there's
been
some
of
this,
especially
kind
of
the
first
half
is
taken
from
last
year's
work
that
was
done
to
create
some
like
the
high
level
vision
goals.
I
think
we'll
read
through
that
quickly.
If
you
have
anything
you
want
to
change
on
this
language
shout
out
and
propose
that
change.
D
We
can
talk
about
it
and
then
decide
if
we
want
to
keep
it
or
not,
and
then
we'll
move
on
and
then
in
the
second
part,
is
kind
of
like
the
the
new
program
recommendations,
basically
and
and
we'll
just
go
through
all
that
so
I'll.
Just
I'll
just
read
this
out
loud
goals
of
the
pack
cip,
recommendations
for
minneapolis
to
meet
its
aggressive
vision,
zero
transportation
action
plan,
comprehensive
2040
playing
goals.
D
Given
the
city's
climate
emergency
and
racism,
public
health
crisis
declarations,
all
street
projects
must
prioritize
people-oriented,
walkable
spaces
defined
below
prioritizing
the
pedestrian
experience
for
all
projects
will
create
the
necessary
behavior
change
and
strengthen
our
communities
as
laid
out
in
the
transportation
action
plan.
Modeshare
needs
to
shift
rapidly.
Tap's
goal
is
60
of
all
trips
made
by
walk
bike
transit
by
2030..
D
Only
by
funding
capital
programs
that
are
systems
wide
and
scale
can
we
make
this
happen.
The
pac
recommends
the
cip
increase
funding
for
pedestrian
and
bike
infrastructure
to
align
with
the
prioritization
of
modes
as
per
the
complete
streets
policy,
increasing
funding
and
walk
and
bike
programs
now
will
lower
costs
for
road
maintenance
for
the
future
as
walking
and
biking
do
not
wear
out
streets
as
vehicles.
Do
any
comments
on
the
the
overall
goals,
paragraph.
D
And
I'll
just
say
this,
like
as
much
as
you
could
try
to
frame
your
comment
in
a
sentence
and
where
I
could
put
it
in.
I
think
that.
D
G
B
G
D
Okay
feel
free
to
come
back.
If
you
think
of
anything,
I
can
pop
back
up
there.
Pac
vision.
Minneapolis
is
the
best
walking
city
in
the
world
year
round
through
deliberate
collective
action.
Minneapolis
is
the
place
with
world-class
pedestrian
infrastructure,
connecting
people
and
places
with
a
safe
and
engaging
public
realm
places
where
people
want
to
be
and
where
walking
is
the
culture.
D
Okay,
I'll
I'll
quickly
go
through
this
piece
of
it
also
so
to
paint
a
picture
of
what
we
mean
by
walkable
spaces
and
prioritizing
pedestrians.
As
per
the
complete
streets
policy,
we
have
our
minimum
characteristic
characteristics
of
a
walkable
street.
I'm
maybe
I
won't
read
these
off
since
we
did
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
this
last
year.
If
is
there
anything
that
anyone's
been
thinking
about
that?
They
want
to
add
to
this
list.
G
B
Yeah,
I
think
so.
If
I
were
rephrasing,
it
would
be
removing
your
because
that's
really
the
only
place
it
appears
and
then,
like
I
didn't
realize
we
could
edit
this
one.
I
thought
it
was
tied
with
the
vision
like
if
it
goes
into
the
street
like
any
point
of
the
street,
not
just
because
I
don't,
I
feel
like
for
people
super
car
centric
in
their
views.
It
may
not.
It
may
be
so
gone
once
it's
in
the
streets
that
that
doesn't
even
enter
the.
D
D
I
D
Okay,
cool
so
getting
into
some
of
the
the
programs
and
program
recommendations
the
pac
advocates.
So
this
is
just
kind
of
like
a
high
level
overarching
thing
to
call
out
here.
The
pac
advocates
for
significant
increases
to
funding
for
safe
routes
to
school
safety
program,
defective
hazardous
sidewalks,
sidewalk,
apps
and
vision,
zero
program,
cutting
or
underfunding.
D
These
programs
in
any
way
will
derail
all
policy
goals,
as
well
as
create
higher
costs
in
funding
future
projects
or
programs
for
the
sidewalk
gaps
program
include
creating
temporary
protected
sidewalks
to
fill
gaps
by
taking
space
from
the
street.
Instead
of
laying
new
concrete,
you
see,
36,
leading
to
the
daimler
sky
as
a
an
example
anything
in
there.
D
D
He
did
point
out
that,
like
last
year,
we
did
add
more
money
to
some
of
these
categories,
including,
I
think
the
ped
safety
program
and,
like
obviously,
vision
zero,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
you,
I
guess,
I'm
putting
that
out
there
in
case.
You
want
to
like
reference
that
at
all
or
not,
but
just
putting
it
out
there
of
like
the
contacts.
The
context
in
which
you're
asking
for
more
again
is
that
last
year
it
was
bumped
up
in
in
several
of
these
categories,
so
so
maybe
just
putting
it
out
there.
B
D
We've
gone
down
that
rabbit
hole
before
and
I
think
have
have
it's
it's
kind
of
a
tough
one.
It
doesn't
really
translate
well
to
the
way
that
the
cip
is
set
up
and
how
our
funding
is
set
up,
and
I
kind
of
know
where
you're
getting
that,
but
I'm
not
necessarily
advocating
for
changing
the
language
of
what
you're
asking
for
here,
which
is
which
is
just
to
increase
funding.
D
M
D
Oh
no
right
cool.
I
think
that
does
kind
of
address
what
I
was
bringing
up
too.
So
I
let
from
the
staff,
okay.
I
D
Definitely
feel
free
to
come
back
to
that
area,
but
I'm
I'm
gonna
keep
marching
on
all
right,
new
program
recommendations,
and
I
think
we
can
just
take
these
one
at
a
time.
So
I'll
read
it
and
then
we
can
stop
on
it
see
if
people
have
anything
to
add
or
language
changes
or
anything
and.
G
One
thing
I
want
to
ask
is
we:
can
we
can
look
at
these
and
edit
them
and
then
maybe
after
we
do
like
just
word
editing,
we
might
want
to
talk
about
prioritizing
and
like
reordering,
because
these
are
kind
of
a
little
bit
reordered.
There's
some
new
ideas
down
below
and
then
we
also
want
to
talk
about
concision
and
how
many
we
want
on
there,
because
I
know
that
was
a
discussion
last
year
as
well.
So
I
think
maybe
we
can
do
the
small
stuff
and
then
get
back
into
the
big
reordering
decisions.
H
G
D
Yeah,
the
primary
audience,
I
would
say,
is
rcip
staff
who
come
to
this
committee
and
who
work
with
matthew
and
millicent
tonight.
They
they
put
together
the
cip
and
the
capital
budget
request,
and
they
they
send
off.
Basically,
public
works.
They
do
like
all
the
vetting
and
like
get
our
public
works
proposal
ready
for
click.
The
capital
long
range
improvement
committee
secondary
audiences
are
the
council,
I
think,
probably
just
like
the
general
public,
as
they
interface
with
the
cip
process.
D
If
they
happen
to
come
across
this
or
something
and
then
click
which
I
mentioned,
the
capital
long-range
improvement
committee,
which
they
kind
of
take
our
requests,
and
I
don't
know
that
they
specifically
get
this
resolution
like
delivered
to
them,
but
it'd
be
good
to
just
kind
of
keep
them
in
mind
as
the
next
step
of
the
process.
I
think.
H
C
No,
I'm
not
anymore,
I
think
three
or
four
years.
C
Scott,
I
think
scott's
on
it.
C
I
C
And
what
do
you
call
guys
under
josh
josh
has
been
on
for
a
long
time.
D
Cool
so
yeah
that
I
think
that's
good
good
context
so
getting
into
the
fri,
and
I
like
what
abigail
said
about
going
through
these
and
then
kind
of
coming
back
and
doing
ordering
and
prioritization
and
stuff
so
number
one
create
a
program
to
add
benches
public
restrooms
drinking
fountains
and
electric
wheelchair
charging
stations
in
busy
walking
areas
also
include
these
as
standard
features
on
all
standalone
reconstruction
projects.
D
M
It's
more
people,
people
more
comfortable
going
out
of
this
thing
than
driving.
That's
what
all
the
here's
why
I
don't
want?
Here's
why
I
drive,
because
I
don't
want
to.
I
don't
know
where
I
can
stop.
I
don't
know
where
I
can
go
to
the
bathroom.
I
don't
know
where
I
can
charge
my
disc
charge,
my
my
my
device
and
all
that.
M
D
Once
you
come
up
with
that
bullet,
just
just
interrupt
me
and
we
can
go
back
to
it.
I
just
want
to
remind
folks
that
we
can't
use
the
chat
function
for
substance.
I
think.
M
H
M
D
All
right
number
two
create
a
program
to
install
curb
ramps
and
crosswalk
striping
at
signalized
intersections,
where
one
leg
or
more
is
missing.
This
takes
action
to
support
the
city's
approved,
complete
streets.
D
B
E
Sorry,
what
that
would
functionally
change
in
my
mind,
as
I
read
that
is,
you
would
add,
hundreds
of
park
board
or
park
intersections
connecting
to
neighborhood
streets
that,
where
there
is
not,
there
are
not
curb
ramps
and
so
that
that
feels
like
the
biggest
change.
In
my
mind
for
what
I
know
of
the
city,
because
there's
a
lot
of
misalignment
between
of
this
the
city
streets
and
and
where
the
park
board
has,
you
know,
curb
cuts.
A
E
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
it's
it's
it's
just
what
came
to
my
mind
as,
like
I
immediately
thought
like
well,
where
are
those
you
know
like?
Where
are
the
unsignalized
places
where
there
aren't
curb
ramps
and
the
parks
jump
to
my
jumped?
You
know
I'm
in
a
park
right
now,
so
it's
just
it's
the
top
of
mind.
B
E
Internal,
that
is
a
good
secondary
one
julia
where,
where
there's
like
strange,
you
know
strange
or
atypical
streets
coming
into
other
streets.
That's
a
good
point.
B
Choice,
but
if
it's,
if
the
audience
is
people
who
are
in
decision
making
like
it
reinforces
that
this
is
a
default
and
when
it
doesn't
happen,
we
have
to
go
back
and
fix
it.
But
I
don't
want
to
get
us
that
I
don't
want
to
go
down
a
path,
we're
at
almost
five
o'clock,
so
whatever
other
people
are
comfortable
with.
N
G
D
You
can
vote
on
it
at
the
full
if
it
comes
to
that
yeah.
Okay,
three
create
a
program
to
improve
pedestrian
safety
and
experience
several
blocks
around
freeway
on
and
off
ramps
traffic.
Calming
measures
will
support
division,
zero
goals.
This
will
create
a
more
comfortable,
walking
and
biking
experience
near
freeways.
This
will
support
the
transportation
action
plan's
goal
of
having
60
percent
of
all
city
trips
be
made
by
transit,
walking,
rolling
and.
O
D
Number
four
create
a
program
in
the
cip
to
fund
neighborhood
greenways
neighborhood
greenways
are
routes
that
enhance
local
low-volume
streets
and
give
priority
to
people
walking,
biking
and
rolling
and
should
significantly
limit
motor
vehicles
along
sections
of
the
street.
The
city's
neighborhood
greenway
study
covers
the
benefits
of
this
program
and
neighborhood
greenways
are
included
in
the
transportation
action
plan
for
minneapolis.
D
D
Yep
create
a
formal
program
for
crisis
response,
identifying
and
immediately
implementing
pedestrian
improvements,
using
low-cost
materials
that
are
community
driven,
adaptable
and
resilient
projects
like
stay
healthy
streets.
D
These
improvements
must
prioritize
projects
that
grow
out
of
the
impacts
of
interrelated
crises
like
police
brutality
and
the
global
pandemic
projects
must
center
racial
justice
and
seek
to
address
or
repair
systemic
harm
against
marginalized
or
oppressed
community
members.
The
aim
is
to
specifically
meet
mode
share,
shift
and
community-led
changes
to
uses
of
right-of-way.
This
will
support
the
city's
declared
climate
emergency
goals
and
reduce
carbon
emissions.
D
D
I
B
Yeah
I
just
I
wanted
to
give
chances,
is
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
of
adding
something
in
to
make
sure
that
it
isn't
the
thing
that
public
works
does
where
it
just
puts
everything
on
side
streets
and
keeps
really
high
volumes
like
with
on
38th
in
chicago
with
the
city,
have
been
like
we're
gonna,
just
shove,
everything
over
by
a
block.
B
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
the
this
includes
looking
at
community
corridors,
but
I
don't
know
if
there's
an
easy
way
of
doing
that,
and
I
defer
to
others.
B
A
lot
of
times
like
the
neighborhood
greenways,
there's
a
tendency
to
decide
to
just
keep
increasing
pollution
vis-a-vis
side
streets
on
what
we
call
arterials,
instead
of
addressing
the
inherent
problems
of
those
and
instead
of
like
community
gathering
spaces,
are
community
corridors.
If
we're
looking
at
where
people
should
be
responsive
in
geography
to
where
it
needs
to
be
not
where
the
city
finds
it
convenient
because
it
doesn't
inconvenience
too
many
drivers,
that's.
G
I
G
E
Can
I
can
I
clarify
something
I
I
brought.
I
brought
up
that
to
me
that
the
change
that
was
brought
up
like
park
crossings
might
be
one
of
the
main
places
that
that
takes
effect.
I
I
didn't
necessarily
hear
reaction
like
do
people
think
is
that
what
people
want?
I
wasn't
necessarily
saying
like
we
should
do
that.
I
was
so
I
was
wondering
like.
Was
there
a
positive
reaction
to
that
idea
of
like
parks?
Park
connections
should
be
a
top
priority.
I
guess
is
my
question.
G
M
Just
a
priority
I
brought,
I
brought
it
up,
I
I
I
was
one
person
and
I
and
I
have
something
I
can
share
real
quick
to
the
screen,
and
I
can
give
an
example
what
I'm
talking
about
and
then
I
have
some
verbage
to
to
to
just
that.
I
wrote
out
and
see
if
that
fits
in,
so
I
do
have
something
specific
to
present
for
a
minute.
If
somebody
wants
to.
Let
me
have
control
of
this
stream.
D
I
I
hate
to
be
a
stickler,
but
I
don't
think
we
want
to
set
that
precedent
of
like
showing
something
that
wasn't
on
the
agenda.
So
I
I
don't
think
that
we
should
do
that.
Just
because,
like
if
someone
was
here
who
could
like
couldn't
see
it,
then
okay,
we're
just
not
supposed
to
that's
like
the
clerk's
office
rules.
D
H
M
Start
from
that,
so
you
know
it's
my
same
same
premise
as
some
of
the
other
elements
where,
when
we,
when
we
encourage
something
we
discourage
another,
when
we
discourage
things,
we
encourage
other
things.
When
we
limit
comfortable
access
to
parks
for
people,
we
encourage,
you
know
automobile
use.
So
my
my
specific
beginning,
draft
of
a
bullet
item
would
be
asking
for
a
program
to
enhance
street
crossings
to
parks
so
providing
crosswalks
at
park
corners
where
streets,
where
street
speeds
are
25
miles
per
hour
or
greater.
D
Can
you
say
that
one
more
time
peter
the
the
bullet
point.
M
M
E
E
Peter
can
I
can.
I
share
my
thought
on
that
one.
So,
overall,
I
am
just
it's
fine,
but
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
just
how
many
just
specific
programs
we
have
so
maybe
this
is
one
instance
where,
instead
of
like
a
sub
bullet,
say
in
a
program
to
create
enhanced
crossing
parks,
could
you
say,
like
an
example,
could
be
crossings
at
parks.
B
What
if
we
said
that
it's
at
intersections,
where
one
leg
or
more,
is
missing,
I
guess
we
get
rid
of
signalized
if
we're
folding
this
in
prioritizing
street
speeds
of
25
miles
per
hour,
greater
particularly
park
access.
D
B
G
I
I
I
D
Cool
okay,
so
before
we
go
into
like
prioritizing,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
like
there's.
No,
no
other
ideas
out
there
or
like
this
is
maybe
like
a
last
call
for
potential
new
ideas
to
discuss,
don't
feel
like
you
have
to
reach.
I
think
we
have
a
pretty
good
list
here
but
like
if
there's
anything
that
you
feel
has
gone
unsaid
now
would
be
the
time
to
say
it
before
we
just
kind
of
focus
on
how
we
present
these
things.
D
D
Yeah,
so
these
are
just
some
good
kind
of
things
that
I
think
we
all
kind
of
agreed
on
from
last
go
around
talking
about
this,
so
notes
on
program
recommendations
be
concise.
This
year.
Stress
that
urgency
stress
not
to
cut
from
existing
programs.
Funds
should
increase
for
current
programs
and
expand
into
new
programs,
especially
given
that
cuts
are
possible
for
coming
years.
D
G
And
then,
if
we
can
just
remember
to
be
concise
and
stress
urgency,
then
we
can
probably
delete
all
these
notes
so
that
we
can
have
like
a
very
clean
resolution
when
we
come
out.
The
other
end
of
this.
D
E
G
D
I
D
I
G
O
I
like
this,
the
that
change
and
I
think
this
order
I
I
wouldn't
suggest
I
don't-
have
any
suggestions
to
change
the
order.
I
think
it's,
I
think
it's
good
right
now.
You
know
one
I
agree.
Abigail
one
is
one
should
be
one
I
think
and
two
which
just
sort
of
sets
the
tone
really.
What
we're
talking
about
is
trying
to
be
nimble
and
responsive,
not
kind
of
like
hennepin,
county
and
lindale,
not
to
bring
up
anything
recently.
I
A
E
G
B
E
I
want
to
say
I'm
again,
I
think
we're
on
the
same
page,
because
I
said
I'm
not
going
to
fight
that,
but
I
will
know
if
they
weren't
really
a
public
works
invention.
It
was
a
lot
of
advocacy
from
north
siders
and
you
know
community
demand
for
them
around
the
north
side
greenway
and
then
we
kind
of
built
from
there.
But
anyway,
how
many
it's
on
the
list.
B
D
I
don't,
I
don't
know
that
I
don't
think
that's
really
how
it
would
work.
I
think
this
is
this.
N
D
I
think
so
we
managed
to
finish
it
earlier
too
good
work.
Everybody
thanks
for
thanks
for
putting
the
effort
in
out
in
these
meetings
and
outside
of
these
meetings
too,
for
those
of
you
who
helped
outside
of
it.
D
Yeah
yeah.
Actually,
since
we
have
some
time,
maybe
it's
good
to
just
talk
about
this
here
too,
like
the
function
of
bringing
this
to
the
full,
so
I
will
make
sure
it's
included
in
that
agenda
technically,
like
any
given
motion,
you
could
just
make
a
motion
at
any
time
so,
like
somebody
still
needs
to
move
this,
so
the
way
functionally
it
will
work
is
like
some
pac
member,
any
one
of
you
that
wants.
D
You
can
move
this
at
the
full
committee
and
then
we'll
go
into
a
vote
and
well
obviously,
there's
discussion
first,
but
just
a
reminder
that
someone
will
need
to
kind
of
formally
oh.
G
O
Let
me
ask,
let
me
ask
a
quick
question.
A
little
while
ago,
members
on
the
click
were
identified
was
the
reason
for
that
to
submit
this
to
public
works,
but
to
also
submit
it
sort
of
as
a
work
around
like,
for
example,
on
abigail
signature
email
it
to
a
couple
of
members.
So
they
have
it
in
his.
The
form
that
we
ultimately
pass
was
that
the
I
kind
of
missed
the
thread
there
a
little
bit
on
what
we
were
doing.
D
There
was
some
julia
brought
up
his
like
context
that
that's
another
audience
of
this.
I
mean
you
definitely
could
send
it
to
like
those
bac
members
they're,
obviously
aware
that
the
bac
is
also
putting
a
resolution
together
now,
so
I
don't
see
harm
in
like
sending
it
to
alyssa
if
she's
not
already
aware
of
it.
D
Yeah,
so
I
I
don't
think
it's
like
formally
delivered
with,
like
the
public
works
cbrs.
The
capital
budget
request
like
like
the
things
that
public
works
formally
delivers,
don't
go
to
click,
so
so
the
formal
audience
of
this
resolution
is
public
works.
Who
then
takes
that
into
account
for
the
the
recommendations
we
send
along?
So
it
was
more
just
that,
like
okay,
okay,
that's
not
sent,
but
but
you
definitely
yeah.
B
Christopher
I
mean
maybe
that's
what
you
were
bringing
but
we'll
talk
about
it
in
the
past
and
I
think
would
be
awesome
to
do
because
that's
where
it
seems
like
they're
able
to
push
like
the
click
members
are
theoretically
responsible
for
advising
the
city
on
it.
So
we
I
think
we
tailored
the
what
we
value
and
what
makes
a
walkable
street
hoping
that
they
would
read
it.
So
is
that
something
we
want
to
talk
about
right
now,
in
our
bonus
time
or.
D
D
B
All
time
bonus
time,
okay,
then,
let's
switch
over
to
hennepin
avenue
if
people
are
ready,
we,
this
is
a
a
new
thing
that
we're
trying
with
hennepin
avenue
it's
a
big
project
in
a
couple
of
ways.
It's
one
of
the
first,
probably
the
biggest
project
that
we
see
in
the
city
advisory
committee
tasked
from
the
city
of
minneapolis.
Specifically,
we
have
very
few
big
streets,
big
community
corridors,
that
the
city
has
control
over
and
hennepin
avenue
is
one
of
those
the
handful
that
exists.
B
So
this
is
a
major
redo
and
we
wanted
to
use
the
time
in
ine
to
focus
on
the
specifics
for
the
point
that
the
project
was
at
when
it
came
in
there,
but
we
also
have
known
that
in
the
past.
Sometimes
these
projects
that
come
to
us
don't
live
up
to
the
city's
ideals
or
we
have
other
broader
feedback
we
want
to
give.
B
So
the
thinking
was
that
we
could
get
the
specifics
down
in
ine
and
then
use
this
meeting
to
talk
through
whether
or
not
we
feel
the
city's
proposed
options
are
meeting
the
goals
that
they
espouse.
All
of
that
stuff.
If
that
makes
sense-
and
it's
possible
that
what
comes
out
of
this
looks
like
essentially
the
preamble
to
our
resolution,
so
our
resolution
will
have
that
like
we,
we
want
this
and
this
in
the
layout,
but
the
first
part
might
say
more,
as
we
did
in
the
cip.
G
Yes-
and
I
wanna
just
add-
I
think
we
haven't
written
yet
if,
if
we
haven't
written
yet
the
hennepin,
so
I
can't
stay
to
the
end
of
this
meeting,
but
I
wouldn't
mind
taking
a
crack
at
the
the
part
of
the
hennepin
resolution.
That
is
the
ine
part
just
based
on
you
know,
peter's
notes
and
being
at
the
meeting.
G
If
that
works
for
everybody,
as
like
a
working,
okay
and
I'll,
send,
of
course,
the
resolution
I
get
together
from
the
notes
and
remembering
the
meeting
to
everybody
once
I
have
it
this
week,.
B
Do
you
wanna
if
you
have
to
leave
early,
do
you
wanna
start
us
off
with
thoughts
or
does
anybody
else
want
to
start
us
off
with
things
that
you
noticed,
didn't
notice,
we're
glad
to
see
were
surprised
not
to
see
on
what
was
presented
to
us
in
ine,
which
is
also
attached
for
this
meeting
in
our
agenda.
B
I
have
infinite
rants
on
hennepin
avenue,
including
this
project,
so
I'm
really
like
doing
my
very
best
to
keep
it
zipped.
So
I
really
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
sure
I
haven't
exhausted
the
possibilities
that
are
out
there.
I
want
to
hear
everyone's
voices
on
it.
G
I
just
like
the
phrasing
you
use
when
you
said
that
this
is
a
policy.
This
is
a
policy
making
street,
and
so
I
think,
when
you
say
like
our
policies
will
live
or
die
by
what
we
choose
to
do
on
hennepin,
and
I
think
that's
just
like
a
great
way
to
it,
to
couch
in
how
we're
going
to
talk
about
comparing
your
policies
and
even
the
bike
master
plan
and
just
all
that
stuff.
So
that's
just
all
I
have
to
say,
but.
O
I'll
just
say
that
the
the
thing
that
first
came
to
my
mind,
was
with
the
option
that
did
not
include
a
bicycle
bicycle
infrastructure
on
hennepin.
O
Coordinating
that
with
the
ostensible
pyramid
of
users
bicyclist,
it's
like
it's,
it
just
reminded
me
of
separate
but
equal
schools
that
well
they're
they're
off
in
you
know
I'm
bryant,
and
so
they
miss
all
the
stores
and
the
shops
in
the
restaurant
that
they
might
want
to
visit
that
I
just
I
can't
get
it
to
in
no
way
did.
I
think
it
was
consistent
with
the
the
pyramid
of
of
users
that
the
city
ostensibly
wanted.
I
just
think
offering
that
up
was
something
I
don't
know
that
that
was
the.
O
That
was
the
most
troublesome
thing
for
me
that
I
think
it
unders
undercuts
the
the
city's
stated
priorities
of
users.
N
I
was
going
to
say
I
felt
the
same
thing
was
true
about
the
point
that
abigail
brought
up
at
the
meeting
regarding
the
absence
of
a
transportation
lane
on
between
lagoon
and
31st.
I
think
that's
how
far
it
goes.
Maybe
it's
three
blocks,
but
I
thought
that
was
crazy.
I
mean
let's,
let's
get
cars
down
to
two
lanes
and
have
a
lane
for
transportation.
N
If
we're,
if
we're
encouraging
people
to
take
transit
and
bike
and
walk,
then
we
should
have
those
facilities
along
the
whole
street,
not
break
them
up,
because
there's
a
business
section
in
there
and
they
want
people
to
be
able
to
park
and
deliver
their
goods
and
stuff
and
go
to
the
back.
In
my
opinion,.
N
M
Ended
up
at
bar
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting,
or
we
to
focus
on
the
design
option
that
we
had,
that
the
package
expressed
preferences
for
including
the
bike
lane
and
all
that
stuff,
and
so
with
this
was
so
much,
and
I
it's
with
so
much
time
to
go
between
now
and
final
design
or
final
choices
and
all
that
stuff
it
can
go.
M
It
can
go
sideways
anytime
if
pro
parking
forces
rule
the
day,
for
instance,
and
so
I
I
just
speaking,
I
guess
I'll
just
speak
up
speaking
my
own
thoughts
as
I
hear
them
is
that
there
was
so
much
positive.
We
ended
up
talking
about
so
many
positive
things
like
surprising
to
me
how
much
we
like
that?
M
How
much
there
was
a
design
that
we
like
so
much
and
that
we
focus
on
it
at
ine,
and
I
guess,
if
you
want
to
be
to
the
extent
policies
involved,
it's
like
how
much
be
aware
of
how
much
it
could
it
could
change
or
it
could
not
be
like
that
design
that
we
preferred.
B
I
hear
you
peter,
I
think
part
of
it
was
splitting
up
the
two
different
sections
like
bringing
some
of
this,
the
things
that
we
we
bring
up
into
this
portion,
and
I
hate
the
way
like
that.
The
city
even
presented
option
two
is
ludicrous
beyond
absurd
option.
One
doesn't
even
have
bike
lanes
the
full
length
of
hennepin
there's
nothing.
It
goes
from
two
lanes
to
one
lane
to
two
lanes
to
one
lane
in
between
douglas
and
22nd,
just
sort
of
at
random.
B
As
far
as
I
can
tell-
and
that
seems
like
the
main
thing
is
to
prevent
them
from
being
a
bike
lane
or
dedicated
transit
on
that
stretch.
Up
until
you
hit
franklin,
it's
I'm
hoping
our
resolution
strengthens
what
comes
after
and
makes
it
clear
that,
at
least
from
my
perspective
option
one
is
lower
than
the
bare
minimum
acceptable
option.
One
with
some
major
adjustments
may
meet
the
bare
minimum.
B
We
see
happening
within
city
frameworks
currently
because
it
doesn't
like
we
still
don't
get
benches
on
a
street
like
kenneth
ben
we're,
23
million
dollars
for
downtown
and
all
the
benches
are
being
taken
away.
So
it's.
O
To
be
so,
the
idea
being
that
option
one
is
a
foundation
and
which
can
be
built
a
project
that
is
conforms
with
the
city's
stated
goals,
but
option
two
be
improved
to
the
point
that
it
meets
the
city's
stated
goals
or
something
like
that.
B
Yes,
and
especially,
if
we
can
mention
that
city
stated
goals
are
not
they
are,
they
have
not
yet
met
our
bare
minimums
of
like.
Can
you
sit
down
with
your
groceries
when
you
need
to
rest,
like
the
city's
state
of
goals?
Are
so
far
below
the
bare
minimum
pedestrian
needs,
and
we
didn't
even
reach
that
there,
but
there
is
that
potential
yeah.
I
like
the
way
you
said
it.
B
B
There's
there's
none
right
now.
The
the
project
ends
at
lake
street.
B
Know
I'm
concerned
too
about
vision,
zero
and
seeing
what
what
we
know
that
some
of
these
intersections
are
our
deadliest
in
the
entire
city
and
they're
among
the
handful
of
extremely
deadly
and
dangerous
intersections
that
the
city
has
control
over,
unlike
our
county
roads.
So
to
see
the
the
crossing
distances
and
number
of
lanes
remain.
Almost
unchanged
is
extremely
disappointing
if
we
actually
believe
in
vision,
zero
just
to
list
more
of
those.
Those
policies
where
what's
designed
seems
to
undercut
priorities.
L
Add
this
is
matt,
I
just
just
following
up
from
my
question
last
week.
I
I
didn't
really
find
the
explanation
as
to
why
there's
five
lanes
of
traffic
and
no
transportation
lanes,
especially
for
one
of
those
two
blocks.
I
I
would
at
least
like
an
explanation
on
that.
I
think
it's
it's
from
uptown
transit
to
lagoon
going
southbound.
It
goes
from
one
lane
of
traffic
to
three,
but
it's
only
gonna
be
one
lane
of
traffic.
L
B
B
I
think
it's
kind
of
it's
disturbing
to
see
in
one
of
our
densest
commercial
and
entertainment
nodes
that
it
we
essentially
just
make
sure
it's
a
it's
a
you
know
highways
bisecting,
each
other,
rather
than
a
place
where
people
can
be
out
and
gathering.
B
B
Vehicles,
so
do
we
have
a
sense
of
maybe
how
we
would
want
to
order
this?
If
there's
specific
things
to
highlight,
like
whatever
teeth
we
can
give,
this
would
be
great.
B
We
know
that
abigail's
and
eliza
will
be
addressing
it
somewhat
in
their
presentation
in
at
the
end
of
march,
but
the
key
point
of
of
this
this
segment,
the
tone
for
everything
that
we
see
coming
forward
and
for
what
what
will
execute
via
the
new
transportation
action
plan,
and
so
many
other
policies
seems
key,
but
I
don't
really
have
a
sense
of
how
we.
H
O
Take
us
just
a
stab,
and
I'm
I'm
not
wedded
to
this,
but
first
I
think
it
should
be
as
you've
described
a
preamble
to
state
that
hennepin
county
is
an
historic
and
storied
street
in
minneapolis,
and
it
should
be
the
crown
jewel
that
represents
the
city's
vision
and,
and
you
know,
actuality
going
forward
for
multimodal
transportation.
O
Then
I
think
talk
about
that
option.
One
is
a
foundation
that,
with
sufficient
change
can
be
built
a
reality
that
reflects
what
we
talk
about
in
number
one
and
then
in
number
three.
Maybe
talk
about
the
specifics
that
we've
sort
of
enunciated
so
far
a
few
of
them,
maybe
that
general
structure
of
a
document.
B
Does
that
allow
us
to
call
out?
I
think
the
pressure
here
needs
to
include
whatever
happens
here
is
what
the
county
will
take
as
the
best
possible
that
they
will
do.
This
is
this
is
what
the
city
says:
hey
county.
We
keep
telling
you.
We
want
slower
speeds,
we
keep
saying
oh
you're,
killing
people.
Do
we
care
on
the
street.
B
We
actually
control,
because,
if
not
that's
the
clear
message
of
hypocrisy
that
our
county
engineers
in
medina
are
going
to
get
from
our
you
know
great
city
engineers
like
we
have
to
give
them
the
highest
possible
bar
that
we
can
get
built
here.
If
we
want
to
see
any
improvements
on
lowry
on
broadway
on
franklin
lake
street
central
university.
Like
that,
that's
I
think
one
of
the
for
me
it's
one
of
the
key
pieces.
I
live
on
hennepin,
but
it's
that
it
is,
is
the
system
catalyst
and
it
must
be
treated
with
that
gravity.
O
I
completely
agree
with
that.
I
think
it
could
probably
go
into
section
one
or
two
as
we
as
I
just
identified
them.
You
know
that
it
is.
It
is
not
only
of
great
import
for
decades
to
come
to
this
city
and
citizens
or
residents
of
minneapolis,
but
also
for
the
city's
partners
and
other
you
know,
entities
or
something.
You
know
something
like
that,
but
yeah,
I
think
you're
right
I
mean
it's
not
just
I
mean
it's
setting
example,
for
you
know,
ostensibly
the
state.
O
Well,
that
was
it
was,
I
mean
I
would
say,
number
three
might
be
where
we
talk
about
this
more
specific
items
that
we've
identified.
H
O
G
I
N
I
E
Had
enough
I'll
admit,
I
was
eating
carrots
and
you
have
to
like
finish
anyway.
Sorry,
what
do
I
think
about
the
third?
The
third
paragraph
of
specifics.
O
I
O
E
I'll
I'll
answer,
the
that
jokingly
question
with
a
serious
thought.
I
I
think
like
to
me.
I
think
the
the
very
most
absolute
important
thing
right
now
is
that
you
prefer
option
one
and
the
way
the
way
you've
described
it.
I
heard-
and
I
I
I
love
that
that
seems
to
be
like
the
main
outcome
to
me,
because
we're.
H
E
One
second:
we
have
two
options.
We
are
gonna
pick
one
and
there's
opportunity
to
change
and
make
it
better,
but
like
there's
a
real,
a
real
choice
between
option,
one
and
two,
I
think,
there's
power
behind
you
know
different
different.
You
know.
Different
power
sources
are
behind
different
options,
so
I
guess
what
I'm
what
I'm
taking
from
this
is
option.
One
everything
else
to
me
is
is
very
important
context
and
and
helps
helps
me
and
my
my
co-workers
understand
your
perspective,
but
it's
very
simple
option.
B
This
so
that
that,
like
some
of
this,
we
can
capture,
we
can
save
anger.
If
our
requests
are
not,
you
know,
taken
with
legitimacy
or
some
level.
E
Of
it,
I
I
think
I
think
that's
that's
an
interesting
way
to
look
at
it,
because
I
think
the
the
thing
is
like
I
said:
there's
gonna
be
a
decision.
You
know
we're
going
to
like
move
forward
and
you
know
the
team's
going
to
refine
it
going
to
30
and
what
comes
back
could
either
just
be
glorious,
and
your
resolution
at
that
point
will
will
just
be
very
simple
that
you
support
and
appreciate
all
the
changes
or
something
different
than
that.
So
so,
yes,
you'll,
have
the
opportunity
to
review
and
comment
on
the
next
iteration.
B
I
mean
I'm
just
thinking
like.
I
know
that
a
lot
of
us
on
the
path
were
hennepin
downtown
is
also
under
city
control,
and
so
it
had
a
lot
of
the
same
things
going
into
it
and
there
was
a
ton
of
we
put
in.
I
think
I
counted
at
some
point
we
put
in
hundreds
of
hours
among
the
official
capacity,
pac
representation
committees
and
subcommittees
and
working
groups.
B
We
all
did-
and
I
know
that
there
were
at
least
some
of
us
who
who
considered
resigning
because
of
what
ended
up
being
passed
and
seeing
how
it
doesn't
meet
with
what
the
city
continues
to
say
it
values,
and
if
that
kind
of
conversation
were
to
to
be
on
the
table,
it
seems
like
that
would
be
a
later
conversation.
This
is
still
in
the
like
we're
just
driving
home
the
point
driving
home
of
the
importance
of
this
corridor
and
of
the
need
for
option
one
and
the
changes
to
happen.
B
B
So
it's
really
obvious
what
we
do,
which
is
bike
lanes
along
the
whole
corridor
and
oh,
the
other
thing
that
we
brought
up
in
irony
and
I'm
changing
the
topic,
so
bring
me
back
to
the
first
one
if
that
makes
sense,
or
we
can
go
with
the
second
one-
is
mndot
getting
the
city
to
talk
to
mndot
about
removing
that
on
the
on
off
ramps
on
hennepin,
since
they
seem
like
the
good
candidates
for
the
10
billion
dollars
at
the
federal
level.
Maybe
so
those
are
the
two
points.
B
One
is
delaying
the
strongest
language
and
sentiments,
maybe,
and
then
the
other
one
is
any
thoughts
on
how
we
integrate
pushing
for
public
works,
to
approach
mndot
about
this.
O
Julie,
I
completely
agree
with
your
point
that
I
think
the
tone
and
word
choice
of
this
at
this
time
should
be
measured
but
appropriate.
You
know,
and
I
think
I
think
that's
I
just
want
to
say
I
agree,
you
know
if
if
they
come
back
with
six
lanes
of
traffic
and
nothing
else
well,
then
you
know
things
can
change
and
and
tone
and
and
word
choice,
but
I
completely
agree
with
you.
O
I
think
I
think,
reasoned
and
and
a
in
a
in
a
upbeat
and
supportive
tone
about
the
possibilities
from
option
one
and
the
changes
that
can
be
made
to
make
it
really
something
of
value
for
decades
to
come.
For
the
cities
vitally
important-
and
I
think
you
know
I
take
matthew's
council
pretty
seriously
that
you
know
I
think
a
win
out
of
this
is
a
better
option.
One
I
think.
If
we
get
to
blue
sky,
we
lose
some
effectiveness
to
get
a
better
option
one.
A
N
I
liked
what
you
said
in
the
beginning
about
sitting
this
bar
has
to
be
set
high,
and
the
communication
with
partners
has
to
be
clear
about
what
we
really
value
and
what
we
really
want
to
see
in
our
city
streets
and,
I
think,
that's
a
strong
statement.
It's
not
an
angry
statement
necessarily,
but
it's
a
strong
statement.
B
O
F
B
I
I
would
like
to
make,
I
think
the
mndot
thing
will
end
up
in
the
ime
portion
of
the
resolution,
but
I'm
that
one.
I
was
surprised
and
heartened
to
hear
becca
shared
that
they
had
talked
about
that
initially
and
I
got,
but
I
might
read
too
much
into
the
language,
but
the
fact
that
it
was
sort
of
we
got
some
more
context.
B
It
didn't
sound
like
it
was
a
definite,
no
and
I
feel
like
so
much
of
what
we're
asking
for
becomes
so
much
easier
for
to
be
delivered
with
that
that
there's
a
value,
even
if
we
don't
think
it's
very
feasible.
It's
so
much
more
feasible
now
than
it
was
a
few
months
ago
for
us
to
make
this
request
and
to
get
the
city
to,
at
the
very
least
in
this
project
start
figuring
out
what
their
processes
are.
B
Maybe
it
doesn't
happen
here,
but
there's
so
many
parts
of
the
city
that
are
facing
the
just
all
the
aggression
like
as
we
have
in
our
cip.
It's
a
much
worse
experience
for
pedestrians
blocks
from
highway
on
and
off
ramps.
So
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
separate
resolution
for
this,
if
like,
if
this
muddies
it
to
have
that
piece
in
it
or
if
we
make
that
a
piece,
but
I'm
curious
other
people's
thoughts
on
it
or
it's.
When
I
thought
about
calling
becca
to
try
and
get
more
details.
O
I
think
we
should
do
our
best
to
focus
on
getting
the
best
option
one
possible
and
why
it's
necessary
for
the
city
of
minneapolis,
its
agencies,
its
partners
for
decades
to
come,
and
that
issue
is
important
and
maybe
we
could
put
in
a
line
that
every
enhancement
that
the
city
is
going
to
make
for
hennepin
can
be
even
greater
enhanced
if
and
then
just
put
in.
You
know
something
like
that,
but
I'm
not
even
sure
that
would
be
the
best
idea,
but
could
I
I
want
to
think
about
that.
Some.
B
What
you
say
to
me,
what
makes
it
sensible
to
separate
is
that
if
we
make
it,
we
know
how
much
easier
it
is
if
the
highway
on
off
get
removed,
but
therefore
it
almost
ties
it
so
that
well,
if
we
can't
do
that,
we
can't
make
it
better
like
that.
There's
a
reverse
false
logic
that
I
feel
like
could
pop
in,
because
that
we
that
everything
we
need
is
regardless
of
the
on
off
ramp.
O
B
B
B
All
you
gotta
do
is
throw
up
some
barricades
and
we're
at
5
48,
and
I
got
put
in
charge
at
the
time
and
have
remembered
to
look
at
it
twice.
So
I
feel
like
it
we're
winning
right
now,
at
least
from
my
usual
skills,
let's,
if,
let's
figure
out
how
we're
drafting
this
and
if
anyone's
interested
in
working
to
draft
the
separate
mndot
resolution.
O
Julie,
if
you,
if
you
would
like,
I
would
be
more
than
happy
to
give
my
thoughts
and
to
whatever
your
first
draft
is.
M
It
sounds
like
this:
our
preamble,
our
p
p
portion
of
this
resolution,
can
be
pretty
succinct,
that
is
the
foundational
stuff.
The
policies,
the
the
policy
reasoning,
isn't
necessarily
relevant
for
this
for
this
resolution
and
that
it's
it
is,
and
that
is
just
part
of
it.
Just
for
that
is
that
that's
an
iteration
to
a
public
works
planning
component.
M
M
But
I
sound
like
we
have
some
guidance
on
how
how
important
that
is
at
this
stage
or
how
what
it's
counter
productive
or
peter,
are.
H
B
B
I,
in
a
little
my
gut
based
on
nothing
and
often
wrong,
is
that
we
do
want
to
cite
the
policies,
especially
then,
since
this
is
like
the
first
debut
of
the
transportation
action
plan
on
such
a
major
level.
But
I
don't
know
that
what
you're
saying
about
it
also
makes
some
sense
to
me.
I
don't
know
if
we
have
I'll
start.
M
B
Awesome
so
I
have
peter
christopher
and
myself
for
the
mndot
thingy.
I
have
peter
for
the
preamble
I'm
interested
in
in
helping
out
with
that.
Is
anybody
else
interested?
I
don't
was
abigail,
saying
she's
interested
in
the
ine
portion,
so
we'll
probably
put
her
bring
her
in
since
they
got
attacked
together.
B
Okay,
don't
look
real
to
me,
I'm
not
sure
if
maybe
it
was
something
else.
Okay,
so
we
have
peter
abigail
barb
and
on
the
preamble,
christopher
you're
not
aiming
to
get
in
on
that
one.
O
To
weigh
in
I
mean,
if
I
I
would
suggest,
like
a
couple,
people
work
more
closely
together,
get
a
first
draft
and
then
send
it
out
to
basically
everyone
on
this
call
and
they
can,
and
they
can
weigh
in.
I
think
just
the
first.
The
kitchen
shouldn't
have
too
many
cooks
for
the
first
draft.
B
I
I
B
Yeah
and
since
there's
a
little
bit
of
stuff
going
on
outside
of
this
one,
please
feel
free
to,
I
think,
reach
out
to
me
or
peter
or
probably
abigail
or
christopher,
or
anybody
any
members
of
any
type
who
want
to
talk
about
this
or
get
clarity
on
this.
B
I
will
throw
up
for
an
announcement
that
we
do
have.
As
far
as
I
know,
we
still
have
the
pacbac
presentation
to
the
city
at
the
end
of
march.
I
don't
have
the
date
and
time
handy.
E
March
31st
at
1,
30
p.m.
The
microsoft
teams
I'll
send
an
email
out
to
everybody
with
a
reminder
and
a
link
and
then
also
in
the
email
I'll
ask
people
to
tell
me
if
you
actually
are
going
to
attend,
so
I
can
give
the
typical
shout
out
to
those
in
you
know
in
attendance.
E
B
If
anybody
wanted
to
do
find
someplace,
that's
dark
enough
to
set
up
a
projection
screen,
but
also
outside,
because
kovid
and
do
a
viewing
party
for
this.
I
would
be
for
seeing
what
I
could
pull
together,
because
that
sounds
kind
of
fun,
but
otherwise
it's
it
would
be
awesome
to
have
people
attend
and
know
we're
viewing
it
together
and
supporting
what
sounds
like
an
awesome
presentation
from
alyssa
and
abigail.