►
From YouTube: August 4, 2021 Charter Commission
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
Good
afternoon
welcome
to
this
live
broadcast
of
our
virtual
meeting.
This
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statutes,
section
13d
.021,
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic.
The
city
will
be
reporting
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency.
B
E
B
B
G
E
F
E
C
E
B
B
G
E
C
E
C
And
I
believe
commissioner
cohen
just
entered
the
meeting.
A
B
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
the
chairs
report
and
I
have
nothing
to
report.
That's
not
on
our
published
agenda
and
item
five
on
the
agenda
is
receiving
and
filing
an
update
on
the
status
of
proposed
charter.
Amendments
referred
to
the
city
council
and
we'll
ask
city
clerk,
casey
carl,
for
an
update.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
there
is
a
powerpoint
presentation.
The
technical
team
will
bring
up.
We
literally
just
got
out
of
the
council's
policy
and
government
oversight
committee
meeting
where
these
issues
were
being
discussed
so
we'll
move
to
the
next
slide.
H
There
are,
as
you
know,
four
questions
on
the
ballot
potentially
on
the
ballot
for
this
year's
general
election
on
november,
2nd
from
the
charter
commission.
The
proposal
related
to
government
structure,
executive
mayor
legislative
council,
the
proposal
from
the
yes
for
minneapolis
petition
on
public
safety
department
and
then
two
questions
that
are
related
to
the
same
topic:
rent
stabilization,
both
initiated
by
the
city
council
next
slide.
H
So
the
proposal
of
course,
from
this
body
related
to
government
structure,
the
establishment
of
an
executive
mayor,
legislative
council
form
of
government
was
initiated
by
this
body
as
allowed
under
the
enabling
statutes
which
give
the
charter
commission
the
ability
to
submit
proposals
for
amendments
to
the
city
charter.
At
any
time,
details
about
this
proposal
can
be
found
in
limbs
under
file
number
ch
2021-12.
H
It's
also
linked
from
tonight's
agenda.
Next
slide.
The
major
elements
of
this
proposal,
as
this
body
wealth
knows,
are
highlighted
in
five
different
numbered
points
here
on
the
slide
very
quickly
to
review
them.
As
these
are
the
bullet
points
that
submit
the
question
to
the
voters.
H
The
proposal
would
establish
a
government
form
that's
based
on
a
separation
of
powers
that
builds
in
checks
and
balances
between
an
elected
chief
executive,
the
mayor
and
the
legislative
body,
the
council.
It
would
define
the
council
as
being
the
city's
legislative
body.
It
would
eliminate
the
executive
committee,
it
would
define
the
mayor
as
the
city's
chief
executive
officer
and
administrative
authority,
and
it
would
define
the
city's
administration
as
encompassing
all
operating
and
administrative
departments
under
the
mayor's
authority.
H
Draft
ballot
language
is
structured
as
follows.
With
a
ballot
title
that
says:
government
structure,
executive,
mayor
and
legislative
council,
the
base
question
drafted
by
our
assistant
city
attorney,
carolyn
buschin,
would
say:
shall
the
minneapolis
city
charter
be
amended
to
make
the
city
council
the
city's
legislative
body
to
remove
the
executive
committee
and
to
make
the
mayor
the
city's
executive
or
chief
executive
officer
and
administrative
authority?
So
those
are,
of
course,
the
base
changes
that
would
be
made
in
the
governance
structure.
H
As
you
are
aware,
we
also
have
put
together
a
explanatory
note
which
would
be
made
part
of
the
ballot
we'll
move
through
those
points
now
in
the
next
series
of
slides.
First,
the
amendment
would,
if
adopted,
divide
municipal
powers
and
functions
between
an
elected
executive,
the
mayor
and
an
elected
legislative
body.
The
council
next
slide
would
define
the
city
council
as
being
the
city's
legislative
body
and
give
the
city
council
full
legislative
policy
making
an
oversight
authority.
It
would
remove
from
the
charter
reference
to
the
city
council
as
the
city's
governing
body.
H
The
city
council
would
continue
to
appoint
and
discharge
the
city
clerk.
The
council
would
be
required
to
fund
a
non-partisan
administrative
staff
and
could
choose
to
fund
their
own
aids.
It
would
require
the
council
to
establish
an
independent
city
auditor's
office
in
charge
of
audit
services
and
to
also
assist
the
city
council
with
its
oversight
functions.
The
audit
committee
established
by
the
council
would
appoint
the
auditor
for
a
term
of
at
least
four
years.
The
council
could
remove
the
auditor
for
cause
next
slide.
H
As
I
mentioned,
it
eliminates
the
executive
committee
and
those
functions
related
to
the
appointment
suspension
of
discharge
of
city
officers.
Next
slide,
we
define
the
mayor
as
the
city's
chief
executive
officer.
This
means
that
the
mayor
would
appoint
with
council
consent,
the
heads
of
our
charter,
city
departments
and
other
appointed
officers
unless
provided
otherwise
by
the
charter
or
applicable
law.
H
All
employees
appointed
by
the
mayor
would
have
terms
that
run
consecutive
with
the
mayor's
elected
four-year
term
and
could
be
disciplined
and
discharged
by
the
mayor,
and
finally,
it
would
define
the
city's
administration
under
the
mayor,
as
encompassing
all
of
those
administrative
and
operating
departments
that
are
not
under
the
city,
council
or
another
border
commission
created
by
the
charter
or
by
applicable
law.
The
council's
committees
and
members
would
not
be
allowed
to
issue
orders
to
to
direct
or
to
supervise
the
departments
or
employees
under
the
administration,
nor
request
information
not
classified
as
public
data.
H
H
There
were
some
refinements
in
the
last
two
presentations
before
the
council's
pogo
committee
and
that's
the
current
draft
at
the
pogo
meeting
today,
the
council
was
expressing
concern
about
the
impact
of
the
lawsuit
that
is
pending
around
ballot
language,
on
the
proposal
from
yes
for
minneapolis,
on
public
safety
department,
and
so,
as
a
consequence.
H
They
have
delayed,
or
I
should
say
they
have
postponed
consideration
of
the
final
language
to
be
adopted,
whether
or
not
that
would
include
an
explanatory
note
to
the
next
pogo
committee
meeting,
which
is
set
for
wednesday
august
18th,
so
that
will
be
returned
to
pogo
for
consideration
on
august
18th.
H
The
next
action
that
they
took
was
related
to
the
public
safety
department.
This
is
the
yes
for
minneapolis
petition
was
presented
by
a
petitioner's
group
subject
to
the
statutory
authority
shown
on
this
slide
and
is
available
in
the
slide
next
slide.
H
This
proposal,
as
this
body
knows,
would
create
a
public
safety
department
and
it
would
consolidate
the
city's
public
safety
functions
through
a
comprehensive
public
health
approach,
including
peace
officers,
if
necessary,
it
would
establish
a
commissioner
as
the
lead
of
the
public
safety
department
and
that
commission
position
would
be
nominated
by
the
mayor
and
appointed
by
council.
It
would
remove
from
the
charter
the
stand-alone
police
department,
including
the
mayor's
complete
power
over
that
department
and
the
position
of
police
chief,
and
it
would
eliminate
the
minimum
funding
requirement.
H
H
The
mayor
did
not
sign
and
also
did
not
veto
the
language
approved
by
the
council,
which
means
under
4.4
c
3
of
the
charter
that
it's
deemed
approved
and,
as
I
mentioned
already,
a
suit
was
filed
against
the
city
because
of
the
ballot
language
by
the
petition
group,
and
we
are
waiting
to
hear
from
the
court
on
that.
I'm
not
going
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
going
through
the
language
it
is
available
in
the
powerpoint
which
will
be
posted
online.
H
Issue
so
the
next
proposal
are
the
two
questions
by
the
city
council
related
to
rent
stabilization.
This
was
presented
tonight
for
the
first
time
with
draft
language,
both
with
and
without
an
explanatory
note,
as
directed
by
council
at
their
last
meeting
on
july
21st.
H
This
proposal
includes
two
questions.
One
is
to
create
by
initiative,
petition
a
process
for
voters
to
petition
to
impose
rent
control,
and
the
second
one
is
so
that
the
city
council,
through
ordinance,
could
impose
rent
control
or
rent
stabilization
policies,
and
here
again
this
was
initiated
by
the
city
council
and
the
final
reference
amendment
is
available
for
public
access
next
slide.
H
The
major
elements
here
on
the
first
question
are
that
would
create
a
limited
right
of
initiative
for
citizens
to
petition
for
a
rent
stabilization
policy.
It
would
require
a
minimum
of
five
percent
of
all
the
total
votes
cast
in
last
state
general
election
to
qualify,
and
it
could
be
referred
to
voters
as
a
valid
question
or
could
be
decided
by
vote
by
the
council
through
ordinance.
If
it's
referred
to
voters,
it
would
require
more
than
half
of
the
votes
cast
on
that
question
in
the
election
to
be
passed.
H
So
that's
the
amendment
to
section
1.4
of
the
charter,
the
language
that
was
approved
today
by
pogo
and
will
go
forward
to
the
council's
regular
meeting.
This
friday
august
6th
is
shown
on
this
slideshow.
The
minneapolis
city
charter
be
amended
to
add
authority
for
voters
to
propose
a
rent
control
ordinance
by
initiative
petition,
including
an
explanatory
note.
H
The
explanatory
note
follows
the
amendment:
would
authorize
voters
to
propose
a
rent
control
ordinance
by
initiative
petition
that
initiative
petition
must
be
signed
by
registered
voters
of
the
city
of
minneapolis,
constituting
at
least
five
percent
of
the
total
votes
cast
at
the
last
previous
state
general
election.
There
would
be
no
filing
fee
for
the
petition.
H
Once
that
validation
was
completed,
it
would
be
presented
in
two
different
ways.
Either
the
city
council
could
enact
the
initiative
through
an
ordinance
and
skip
referring
it
to
the
voters
or
the
council
could
refer
the
petition
directly
to
the
voters,
and
the
voters
then,
could
adopt
with
more
than
half
of
the
votes
cast
on
that
ballot
question
and
unless
a
later
effective
date
was
provided,
it
would
become
effective
within
30
days
of
the
election.
H
The
next
one
is
an
amendment,
as
you
know,
to
article
4.
This
deals
with
the
city
council
and
the
charter,
and
this
would
be
to
enact
a
rent
stabilization
policy
by
ordinance.
The
major
elements
here
are
that
the
council
would
have
the
authority.
If
voters
approved
this
question
in
november
this
year,
it
would
provide
a
permissive
process
whereby
council
could
enact
an
ordinance
and
thereby
impose
a
rent,
stabilization
policy
or
could
refer
the
proposed
policy
to
the
voters
as
a
ballot
question
next
slide.
H
So
here
we
would
have.
The
council
would
authorize
the
city
council
to
regulate
rents
on
private
residential
property.
The
explanatory
note
that
was
adopted
is
on
the
following
slides,
if
adopted,
this
would
authorize
the
city
council
to
regulate
rents
on
private
residential
property
in
minneapolis
by
ordinance,
and
the
final
part
provides
the
two-pronged
approach.
H
If
an
ordinance
was
developed,
the
council
could
go
ahead
and
enact
that
ordinance
or
they
could
refer
the
ordinance
as
a
ballot
question
to
voters
for
approval
at
an
election,
and
if
more
than
half
of
the
votes
cast
on
that
question
were
in
favor
its
adoption,
it
would
become
effective
at
least
30
days
after
the
election
or
at
a
later
date.
If
that
was
provided
in
the
ordinance.
I
believe
that
is
the
sum
total
of
my
very
very
rapid
review
of
the
total
status.
H
So
in
conclusion,
the
public
safety
proposal
was
approved,
the
language
with
a
ballot
explanatory
note,
that
is
in
court
right
now
for
decision
on
the
language
and
the
proposals
related
to
rent
stabilization
move
forward
to
the
full
council
this
friday
for
potential
final
action.
The
proposal
from
this
body
related
to
government
structure
is
postponed
until
the
next
meeting
of
the
policy
and
government
oversight
committee,
which
is
set
for
wednesday
august
18th
at
1
30.,
I'm
happy
to
stand
for
any
questions.
Mr
chair.
B
Thank
you
before
questions.
I
I
just
have
to
say
that
I
am
quite
concerned
about
the
council's
treatment
of
the
government
structure:
amendment
the
public
safety
charter,
amendment
language
and
the
council.
A
majority
of
the
council
supports
the
public
safety.
Amendment
was
passed
with
explanatory
notes,
then,
because
of
a
lawsuit,
the
charter
commission's
proposal
on
government
structure
is
deferred
until
it
can
get
court
direction
on
explanatory
notes,
then
after
that
happens,
the
rent
control
provisions
which
the
council
majority
supports,
are
passed,
including
explanatory
notes,
explanatory
notes
are
clearly
not
the
issue
here.
B
At
our
last
meeting,
the
body
authorized
me
and
the
other
officers
of
the
charter
commission
to
retain
and
consult
with
council,
and
we
will
certainly
do
so
to
determine
what
our
best
options
are
to
ensure
that
there
is
a
fair,
accurate
and
timely
ballot
question
before
the
voters
in
september,
which
is
when
early
voting
starts
I'll
now.
Are
there
any
questions
for
mr
carl.
G
Yes,
commissioner,
abbott
here,
I've
got
a
question
go
ahead,
commissioner,
so
the
the
when
is
the
earliest
that
we
could
get
final
draft
language
on
the
government
structure.
Proposal
from
the
city
council
is
that
august
18th
or
their
where
the
council
meeting
as
a
whole.
After
that
meeting.
B
G
Which
is
incredibly
unacceptable,
I
would
so
we,
the
the
the
deadline,
the
time
frame
set
forth
by
the
city
council,
gives
basically
would
cut
the
the
charter
commission
completely
out
of
any
role
in
setting
the
ballot
language
as
it
stands.
Is
that
an
accurate
assessment.
B
The
charter
commission
doesn't
have
a
role
in
drafting
a
ballot.
Question
well
accepted,
certainly
make
a
recommendation
as
we
did,
but
it's
statutorily
it's
it's
the
council's
duty
to
do
so
and
duty
to
do
so
in
a
fair
and
accurate
manner
and
on
a
timely
basis.
G
And
and
the
drop
dead
deadline
for
getting
the
ballot
language
finalized
is
august,
20th
correct
correct.
So
if
we
waited
until
august
20th
until
the
council
acted,
we
probably
could
not
file
suit
in
time
in
order
to
actually
have
any
judicial
remedy
at
all.
If,
in
fact,
the
language
they
adopted
was
inadequate
or
we
opposed
it.
Is
that
correct.
B
I
don't
believe
that
is
correct.
I
think
there
is
you
know,
that's
the
hennepin
county
deadline.
If
the
council
declined
to
propose
ballot
question
language,
where
the
language
proposed
was
clearly
inaccurate
or
misleading,
there
would
still
be
an
opportunity
on
a
fast
track
status
for
us
to
take
legal
action.
G
Okay,
what
I'm
getting
at
I'm
wondering
if
we
should,
you
know
basically
preemptively
file,
an
action
in
order
to
basically
you
know,
I
mean
if
we
have
to
file
quickly
in
order
to
get
judicial
action.
In
time
I
mean
I,
I
would
hate
to
wait
and
then
find
out
that
we
are
unable
to
act
because
the
deadline
is
passed.
G
I
Thank
you.
My
question
is
about
the
rent
stabilization
ballot
questions.
If
I
was
understanding
correctly,
your
presentation,
mr
carl,
the
city
council,
has
retained
the
language.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
right
that
says
that
the
city
council
can
enact
an
ordinance
without
sending
it
to
the
voters,
even.
H
H
Mr
chair
commissioner,
rubenstein
you're
correct.
H
The
council
did
discuss
the
report
from
the
charter
commission
and
understood
the
concerns
that
were
put
forward
in
the
report
and
the
city
attorney's
response
to
that,
and
there
was
a
very
robust
discussion
at
the
july
21st
meeting
where
they
discussed
their
options
and
in
the
end
the
vote
was
to
retain
the
original
language
on
both
the
first
question
related
to
initiative,
petition
and
the
second
question
related
to
enactment
by
ordinance
and
those
those
ballot
language
or
those
amendments
will
go
forward
with
the
language
that
was
approved
today.
H
J
Commissioner
clegg,
commissioner
sandberg
go
ahead.
Commissioner,
sandberg,
okay,.
J
Biomute
again,
okay,
thank
you.
I
think
that
the
explanatory
note
for
rent
stabilization,
though,
will
in
no
way
reference
the
charter
commission's
concerns.
It
goes
back
to
their
original
language,
as
if
state
law
does
not
exist,
an
interesting
discussion
that
they
had
on
the
21st
about
how,
of
course,
it
is
in
violation,
but
they
wouldn't
really
do
that,
which
I
thought
was
pretty
interesting.
J
H
H
The
council,
when
proposals
to
him
in
the
charter,
are
initiated
either
by
this
body,
which
is
the
I
like
to
refer
to
it
as
the
constitutional
convention
of
the
city
and
owns
the
charter
on
behalf
of
its
people
or
holds
I
shouldn't
say
on
up,
holds
the
charter
on
behalf
of
the
people
of
minneapolis
or
when
the
people
of
minneapolis
themselves
through
petition,
initiate
a
proposal
for
amendment
the
council.
I
should
say
the
city
because
it
takes
the
council
when
you're
acting
together.
They
don't
have
really
the
ability
to
stop
that.
H
At
least
it's
not
anticipated
under
the
construct
and
statute
that
they
could
stop
that
their
role
is
ministerial.
It's
to
accurately
and
fairly
put
together
language.
That
summarizes
the
intent
of
that
proposal
for
the
ballot,
and
so,
as
I've
indicated
many
times
in
those
public
meetings,
we
are
presenting
that
as
their
duty
to
do.
H
I'm
not
certain
what
would
happen
if
they
failed
to
take
up
that
duty.
I
think
at
that
point.
It
does
become
a
legal
question.
I
think
one
remedy,
of
course,
that
could
be
opened
either
as
directed
by
the
court
or
by
the
council
if
they
can't
get
language
in
time
for
this
year's
general
election.
Of
course,
they
could
direct
that
this
be
added
to
a
special
election
on
one
of
the
special
election
days
allowed
under
the
municipal
uniform
election
dates
statute.
J
Okay-
and
I
will
only
add,
as
an
extra
note,
listening
to
those
conversations,
it's
absolutely
fascinating
because
one
of
the
ballot
questions
I
think
the
mayor
might
or
might
not
veto
the
other
one,
not
so
much
so
that
seems
to
be
affecting
this
whole
process
and
it's
very
frustrating
anyway,
just
very
frustrating.
So
I
won't
say
anything
else
are.
B
There
any
other
questions
mr
chair.
This
is
commissioner,.
A
Perry
go
ahead,
commissioner,
this
isn't
a
question,
but
I
want
to
agree
with
commissioner
abbott
and
I
would
urge
the
officers
to
move
full
speed
ahead
with
action
as
quickly
as
possible.
Thank
you.
B
K
Ahead,
commissioner,
the
question
I
have
is
there
any
way
we
can
help
the
city
council,
so
they
don't
go
ahead
and
violate
the
law.
I
mean
there's
any
weight
thing.
The
security
commission
can
do
to
to
make
sure
the
council
doesn't
violate
the
law.
K
B
K
F
I
just
want
to
go
on
record,
supporting
you
100
and
expressing
my
serious
concern
about
the
actions
or
lack
thereof
here.
It's
it's
very
disappointing
to
know
that
our
action
was
approved
in
may
and
now
we're
in
the
end
of
august,
and
it's
still
sitting
there.
It's
just
really
disappointing.
So
thank
you,
chair
clegg,
for
for
looking
out
and
for
getting
counsel
and
for
following
this
so
closely.
B
Thank
you,
commissioner.
I
would
I
would
point
out
that
the
council
looked
at
our
proposed
amendment
and
considered
ballot
language
in
may
june
july
and
now
august
today
they
saw
the
proposed
rent
stabilization
ballot
question
language
for
the
first
time
and
passed
it
after
a
short
discussion
yep
any
other
questions
for
clerk
casey
carl.
B
Thank
you,
mr
clerk.
Moving
on
to
our
redistricting
agenda
item
six
is
receiving
and
filing
reports
of
the
redistricting
work
groups.
First,
we'll
get
an
update
from
mr
munson,
the
redistricting
project
manager.
B
D
This
just
to
summarize,
our
report
will
be
to
provide
an
overview
as
to
how
that
will
precede
agenda
item
seven,
which
is
the
nine
people
that
we
recommend
to
serve
in
the
advisory
group.
D
They
in
answering
those
questions
they
did
not
pass
and
were
ineligible
from
those
31,
as
described
in
last
month's
meeting.
The
process
to
select
candidates
for
interviews
was
the
clerk's
office
prepared
an
evaluation
spreadsheet
of
all
32
applicants
asking
work
group
members
to
rank
them
and
upon
doing
so,
the
clerk's
office
tabulated
these
scores
in
anticipation
of
allotting
time
to
interview
14
candidates
upon
review
of
these
scores,
17
were
selected
for
interviews.
D
Identifying
the
recommended
nine
consisted
of
work
group
members
using
the
interview
guide,
which
was
discussed
extensively
at
our
work
group
meetings,
and
these
responses
were
each
assigned
points
in
the
clerk's
office
tabulated
each
candidate's
score
the
determination
that
only
work
group
members
would
conduct
the
evaluations
was
made
in
a
work
group
meeting.
D
D
According
to
the
charter
and
redistricting
principles,
due
regard
for
diversity
must
be
considered.
We
did
look
at
wards
at
the
time
of
the
interviews
in
relationship
towards
not
represented
or
underrepresented
by
charter.
Commissioners,
to
the
extent
we
could,
however,
imperfectly
deduce
gender
and
other
diversity
considerations
from
the
presented
by
the
app
candidates
in
the
application,
or
at
the
time
of
interview,
we
did
consider
how
diversity
was
represented
or
underrepresented,
as
it
relates
to
the
current
charter.
Commissioners.
A
I
I
just
want
to
take
a
moment
to
say
that
I
participated
in
many
of
these
meetings,
even
though
I
was
not
part
of
the
work
group,
and
I
want
to
say
the
process
that
commissioner
garcia
and
commissioner
kozak
went
through
was
one
that
I
thought
was
very
open,
very
transparent.
A
F
I
also
participated
in
several
of
the
meetings,
even
though
I
was
not
on
the
committee
and
observed
the
processes,
and
I
thought
they
to
be
very
complete
and
involved
and
thorough
and
a
good
model
for
all
of
us
to
use,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
give
my
thanks
to
the
co-chairs
and
to
the
work
group,
because
I
think
you
did
a
great
job.
L
You
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
underscore
what
commissioner
garcia
said
about
thanking
the
staff
and
particularly,
of
course,
enter
and
our
city
clerk
kate,
mr
casey,
for
sending
us
a
superb
staff,
greg
munson,
matty
norgaard,
and
before
that
we
got
a
start
of
nicole
and
our
co
are
always
available
and
helpful
city
attorney
carol.
L
Thank
you
to
she's
my
co-chair,
but
she
did.
I
will
acknowledge
she
did
most
of
the
heavy
lifting
in
this
thing,
and
I
want
to
thank
chair
garcia
so
before
we
get
to
the
actual
substance
of
what
we're
going
to
recommend
in
item
seven.
I
wanted
to
thank
everyone
that
this
was
a
we
spent
most
of
the
summer
on
this
project.
We
spent
a
lot
of
time
and
I
think
the
the
outcome
will
will
justify
our
hard
work.
B
Thank
you
any
other
questions
for
co-chair
garcia.
Mr
chair
go
ahead,
commissioner.
Schwartz
comics.
K
K
I
Thank
you.
I
just
had
a
question,
and
that
was
you
described
quite
thoroughly
the
process
you
used
to
select
the
final
slate
from
the
interviews,
but
was
a
similar
process
used
to
eliminate
those
applicants
who
did
not
receive
an
interview
or
what
was
the
process
as.
D
I
mentioned
oh,
I
could
co-chair
clay
or
chair
clegg.
I'm
sorry,
as
I
mentioned,
and
as
described
in
last
month's
meeting
by
clerk
carl.
D
The
process
to
select
candidates
for
interviews
was
that
the
clerk's
office
prepared
an
evaluation
spreadsheet
of
all
31
applicants
asking
work
group
members
to
rank
according
to
high
low
or
do
not
interview
assign
points
for
each
one
of
those
three.
The
clerk's
office
tabulated
those
scores
in
anticipation
of
allotting
time
to
interview
14
candidates
upon
review
of
those
scores.
D
D
J
Commissioner
sandberg,
actually
I
had
a
different
question,
but
I'll
follow
up
now.
Yes,
you
use
this
spreadsheet
to
rank,
but
based
on
what
criteria
where
the
rankings
made
just
someone
you
felt
overall
would
be
a
good
advisory
group
member.
Were
there
other
factors
considered.
J
Okay,
okay,
my
other
comment
is,
I
certainly
understand
how
much
work
went
into
this
process
by
the
work
group
and
it's
never
easy.
I
just
hope
that
we
have
moving
forward
for
next
time,
10
years
from
now,
which
I
won't
be
involved
with,
we've
documented
well,
whatever
glitches,
we
found
possible
hurdles
whatever
to
me,
it
seems.
The
issue
that
we
want
to
have
diversity
represented
is
really
tough,
given
the
circumstances
on
data
practices
and
privacy
and
so
forth,
there
must
be
a
way
of
getting
around
that
a
bit.
J
I
it's
something
to
work
for
for
the
future,
but
but
anyway,
that
was
my
comment.
Thank
you.
J
I
have
a
very
brief
report.
It
was
attached
a
much
larger
report
was
attached
to
the
agenda
which
greg
munson
kindly
sent
out
to
the
work
group
members.
Thank
you
very
much
just
general
summary
that
we've
had
discussions
with
staff
over
the
last
few
weeks
about
thoughts
about
who
leads
the
redistricting
and
education
work.
What's
the
role
of
the
work
group?
What's
the
role
the
redistricting
group
and
the
timeline
and
essentially
specific
to
the
work
group,
it's
understood.
The
clerk's
office
is
working
with
ncr
and
communications
and
overseeing
education
and
outreach
work.
J
Group
co-chairs
will
coordinate
with
the
redistricting
manager.
That's
mr
munson
and
other
city
staff,
as
they
request
for
city,
coordinated
education,
outreach
work
and
individual
members
of
the
out
of
the
work
group
and
the
work
group
as
a
whole
will
assist
the
redistricting
group
in
promoting
individual
outreach
efforts
and
outreach
in
this
education
is
obviously
what
is
redistributing.
J
Outreach
is
getting
people
to
our
six
meetings
and
the
six
meetings
are
two
listening
sessions
coming
up
fairly
soon
and
then
the
four
public
hearings,
because
we
want
people
involved
and
they're
not
only
going
to
get
involved.
If
we
can,
let
them
know
what's
going
on
and
make
sure
they
understand
why
it's
important.
A
This
is
commissioner,
perry,
commissioner.
Yes,
commissioner
sandberg,
I
have
a
question
about
I
I
didn't
see
in
the
timeline-
and
I
forgive
me
for
this-
for
when
those
listening
sessions
start,
but
I
was
wondering
if
there
were
any
anything
inhibiting
your
ability
to
have
these
in
person
because
of
covet
19.
or.
J
J
I
don't
know
if
the
city
will
be
up
to
full
in-person
meetings.
I
think
hybrid
meetings
would
be
wonderful.
I
thought
they
worked
well
for
the
interviews,
but
again
the
clerk's
office
and
their
I.t
people
will
be
letting
us
know
what
they
think
will
work.
I
like
hybrid
frankly,
because
I
think
we
get
better
participation
of
people
who
couldn't
can
be
at
home
but
can
still
participate,
and
we
saw
that
at
the
public
hearings.
J
I
think
it
would
be
great
but
they'll.
Let
us
know:
okay
thanks.
B
J
My
understanding
is
that
we
are
intending
to
record
those
meetings.
I
think
they
would.
I
will
defer
to
clerk
carl.
I
believe
they
would
be
considered
public
because
we
may
well
have
a
quorum
of
the
charter
commission
there,
but
I'm
not
sure,
but
I
would
if
we
could
record
them
and
distribute
them
absolutely
that
would
be,
and
oh,
yes,
look
at
the
big
head
nod:
yep,
it's
happening,
okay!
No.
I
would
hope
so
that
all
and
public
hearings
not
just
listening
sessions.
Public
hearings
too
definitely
should
be
public.
B
B
L
Co-Chair
kozak
I
would
like
to
I
know
it
doesn't
need
a
second,
but
I
would
like
to
affirm
my
my
support
for
commissioner
garcia's
motion.
L
I
think
that
the
list
will
speak
for
itself
and
I
think
we've
selected
nine
nine
people
who
will
be
a
a
superb
compliment
to
the
15
members
of
the
charter
commission
itself
and
I
think,
taken
together.
All
24
of
us
will
reflect
the
city's
geography
and
growing
diversity
in
a
very
sincere
and
intelligent
fashion.
L
L
But
we
had
to
make
decisions
and
I
think
there
was
a
consensus
on
most
almost
everyone,
but
there
are
obviously
people
that
might
have
would
have
done
a
great
job
and
they
didn't
make
it
because
that's
just
the
way
the
numbers
worked
out
as
we
independently
evaluated
each
of
the
of
the
finalists
of
the
interviewees.
L
So
I
just
want
to
support
what
commissioner
garcia
moved
and
I
I
would
urge
our
colleagues
on
the
commission
to
support
to
support
the
motion.
G
C
F
C
E
B
C
L
And
mr
chair,
this
is
commissioner
kozak,
commissioner
hawkins,
who
was
a
member
of
our
committee
or
my
working
group.
I
think
she's
been
trying
to
get
in
and
I
didn't
hear.
I
didn't
hear
her
respond
and
now
she's
been
on
here
since,
since
the
first
minute.
B
H
I
just
very
quickly
many
people
said
great
things,
but
now
that
those
names
have
been
posted
and
they're
public
and
the
appointments
have
been
made.
I
have
had
the
briefest
opportunity
to
look
at
this,
of
probably
everyone
participating
in
the
process,
and
I
wanted
to
say
how
impressed
I
was
by
the
credentials
and
resumes
and
backgrounds
and
experiences
that
all
of
the
applicants
brought.
It
was
a
very
difficult
decision
for
the
group
to
make.
H
We
would
have
been
well
served
by
any
of
those
who
had
applied.
It
was
a
stellar
group,
and
so
congratulations
to
those
who
have
received
the
appointment-
and
I
know
mr
munson
will
be
communicating
with
them
very
quickly.
But
I
just
wanted
to
share
with
those
of
you
who
didn't
have
a
chance
to
look
at
the
resumes
or
see
the
applications
that
they
were
all
of
a
very,
very
high
caliber.