►
From YouTube: September 29, 2021 Bicycle Advisory Committee
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
A
This
meeting
may
involve
the
remote
participation
by
members,
either
by
telephone
or
other
electronic
means
due
to
the
local
public
health
emergency
novel
coronavirus
pandemic.
Pursuant
to
the
provisions
of
minnesota
state
statutes,
section
13
d
.021
welcome
everybody.
My
name
is
alyssa
schuffman.
I
am
the
chair
of
the
committee
and
I
am
going
to
start
us
off
by
turning
it
over
to
millicent
to
call
the
roll.
B
Hello,
everybody
aaron.
C
B
C
D
D
B
C
Jan,
did
you
say
janice
here
I
said
janice
yeah
yeah
your
voice
fades
out.
You
know,
like
I
hear
the
half
of
what
you're
saying
jennifer.
D
B
E
B
B
D
B
B
G
B
G
D
C
B
A
Thank
you
milson
and
then
I'll
just
before
we
move
on
note
that
there
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
background
noise
on
the
different
mics
today.
So
folks
could
make
a
point
of
being
on
mute
when
you
are
not
speaking
it's
I
want
to
make
sure
that
everybody
can
hear
us
all
so
would
entertain
a
motion
to
adjust,
adopt
the
agenda
and
accept
the
august
25th
bicycle
advisory
committee
minutes.
B
B
D
B
K
L
B
B
G
B
B
D
B
B
H
B
N
B
B
B
We
haven't
gotten
her
her
oath
yet
so
I
put
you
on
wesley
adrian
sorry,
I
took
your
vote
off.
No,
that's.
A
B
D
A
Great,
thank
you,
everyone
for
adopting
the
agenda
and
the
minutes
before
we
move
into
our
discussion.
I
just
wanted
to
give
adrian
a
second
to
introduce
themselves
and
say
hello.
We
will
at
our
at
future
meetings,
probably
with
the
role,
give
folks
different
like
affiliations
so
that
you
can
get
to
know
all
of
us
a
little
better,
but
I
wanted
to
just
take
a
minute
so
that
you
could
say
hello.
K
Yeah,
hey
thanks,
er,
thanks
for
having
me
everyone,
I'm
excited
to
join
the
group.
I
wes
has
moved
on
to
a
different
team
within
cped,
so
I
am
taking
his
place.
Big
shoes
to
fill
so
wes
has
kind
of
given
me
kind
of
the
updates
on
what
you
guys
have
been
working
on
and
I'm
been
with
the
city
for
about
four
years.
I'm
a
principal
city,
planner
and
designer
I've
been
doing
urban
planning
and
design
for
about
10
years
and
yeah.
I
think
that's
about
it.
Thanks
for
having.
C
A
Thanks
adrian
excited
to
have
you
and
excited
to
get
to
know
you
and
work
with
you
over
the
coming
months.
It'll
be
there's
a
there's
a
lot
on
our
plate
right
now,
as
I'm
sure
wes
has
told
you.
So
it's
very
exciting.
A
A
Great
thanks
with
that,
I
will
turn
it
over
to
bri
not
brie,
because
bree's
not
with
us
today,
but
heather
is
heather
here.
I'm
looking
through
the
wallet.
F
Alyssa,
I'm
not
sure
if
you
saw
the
email,
I'm
happy
to
jump
in
heather
also
isn't
going
to
be
here
today.
If
you
want
me
to
just
briefly
run
through
it
and
then
kind
of
pass
it
off
to
some
other
folks
for
the
complete
streets
part,
I'm
happy
to
do
that.
Unless
you
want
someone
else
to
handle
it.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that
sounds
fine.
If
I
know
phil,
you
gave
one
of
the
updates
at
five
e's,
and
so
maybe
if
you
want
to
jump
in
on
that
first
item
and
then
I
think
robin
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
complete
streets
and
I
don't
think
we
have
an
action
for
the
third
item.
But
chris
kick
us
off
and
we'll
go
from
there.
F
Cool
yeah
I
was
mostly
gonna-
see
if
phil
had
anything
to
add.
Phil
gave
us
a
brief
rundown
on
the
design
chapter
so
phil.
I
don't.
E
E
No,
no
but
I'll
take
it
60
seconds
to
say
it
was
certainly
a
useful
prompt
for
me
and
for
others
who
will
read
one
of
the
seven
topics
within
the
transportation
action
plan
and
summarize
it
so
of
those
seven
topics.
I
read
the
design
design
for
people
section
and
there
are
six
strategies
develop
street,
develop
street
design
guidelines,
foster
vibrant
public
spaces,
incorporate
carbon
direction,
design
elements
into
city
infrastructure
projects,
green
streets,
use
street
design
to
improve
trances
and
seek
design
exceptions
when
dealing
with
other
jurisdictions.
E
So
those
are
those
six
strategies
and
we
had
a
short
discussion.
I
presented
some
of
the
detailed
actions
between
three
and
seven
actions
under
each
strategy
and
for
me
it's
an
important
personally.
It
was
important
a
chapter
because
it
really
talks
about
using
sort
of
designing
streets
using
designs
as
a
platform
for
building
environmental
health,
sort
of
community
social,
health
and
wealth.
E
In
addition
to
simply
moving
people
and
stuff,
we
think
about
the
streets
as
a
way
to
move
people,
but
in
fact
what
you're
moving
through
is
essentially
and
you
want
to
improve
those
land
uses.
So
so
that
would
be
my
sort
of
quick
summary
of
that
chapter
and
we'll
hear
in
other
3e
subcommittee
meetings.
F
Yeah
thanks
and
maybe
just
a
quick
plug
for
anybody,
who's
interested
in
looking
through
one
of
the
chapters
for
another
month.
It's
a
really
just
kind
of
meant
to
read
through
and
see
what
jumps
out
at
you
see
what
you
think
might
be
good
for
the
bac
to
talk
about
or
focus
on
and
give
a
quick
kind
of
discussion
prompt.
I
guess
for
one
of
the
meetings.
F
So
if
you're
interested
in
that
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
myself
or
brie
or
heather
the
subcommittee
coaches,
thanks,
phil
and
then
alyssa,
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
do
the
complete
streets,
one
first,
if
you
or
I
think
you
said
robin-
might
have
something
to
take
over
for
that.
But
I
think
there's
a
little
bit
more
discussion
on
that
piece
in
particular.
So
I'll
mostly
just
hand
that
one
off
to
some
of
you.
A
I
can
queue
us
up
with
a
little
bit
context
before
I
turn
it
over
to
robin,
so
this
was
the
first
sort
of
formal
presentation
we've
had
from
the
internal
complete
streets
policy
team,
but
we
have
discussed
this
at
a
handful
of
meetings
in
the
last
at
this
point
almost
a
year.
A
A
The
bicycle
advisory
committee
was
invited
to
have
a
seat
on
there,
so
I
was
on
that
committee.
The
pedestrian
advisory
committee
other
folks
interested
in
all
different
kinds
of
transportation
from
from
freight
stuff
to
folks
representing
the
downtown
district
in
some
way,
so
that
group
of
folks
met
somewhat
regularly.
A
I
think
we
had
four
full
group
meetings
over
the
course
of
six
ish
months,
as
well
as
an
additional
small
group
meeting
that
was
asked
for
or
or
offered
in
response
to,
a
bunch
of
feedback
from
active
transportation
and
sustainable
transportation
advocates.
A
So
move
minneapolis
our
streets,
minneapolis,
the
pedestrian
and
bicycle
advisory
committees
had
some
additional
conversation
with
staff
about
some
concerns
about
updates
to
the
policy,
and
then
you
know
there,
the
staff
responded
to
a
fair
amount
of
those
concerns
and
integrated
a
lot
of
feedback
into
the
draft
complete
streets
policy,
but
not
all
of
the
feedback
that
that
we
shared
so
obviously,
then
katie
came
with
the
draft.
A
That
is
final
from
staff
to
share
at
our
five
e's
subcommittee
meeting,
and
it
will
be
going
to
council
for
approval.
I
think
their
goal
is
by
the
end
of
october.
A
So
if
we,
you
know
want
additional
changes,
now
is
sort
of
our
moment
to
weigh
in
on
that.
I
will
turn
it
over
to
robin
to
see
if
there's
any
additional
contacts
you
want
to
add
robin
about
the
last
time
we
went
through
complete
streets
or
sort
of
council's
role
in
the
approval
process.
H
H
That
kind
of
guided
the
process-
and
I
don't
I'm
not
saying
any
of
this
as
any
kind
of
a
critique
of
the
process
that
they've
done
today.
That
was
about
creating
something,
and
this
is
mostly
leaving
what
was
created
back
then
pretty
much
in
place
and
just
adding
to
it.
H
So
it
probably
doesn't
need
the
same
level
of
engagement
from
policy
makers,
but
it
is
just
to
say,
council
members
have
been
very
interested
in
the
complete
streets
policy
in
the
past
and
I
I
think
they
will
be
interested
in
this
update
as
well
and
especially
in
hearing
what
we
have
to
say
about
it.
So
maybe
chris
or
millicent.
If
you
would
be
willing
to
put
the
resolution
and
the
and
the
markup
up
on
the
screen.
F
Yeah
and
just
just
a
note
robin
so
since
these
didn't
go
out
with
the
agenda,
we'll
have
to
read
everything
that
goes
up
here
so,
but
I
will
pull
those
up.
Do
you
want
them
both
up?
At
the
same.
H
H
I
think
it
looks
okay,
so
this
is
an
edit
that
I
made
of
an
original
version
that
came
from
alyssa
and
I'll.
Just
I'll
read
it.
The
minneapolis
bicycle
advisory
committee
supports
improvements
to
the
complete
streets
policy
to
better
reflect
the
city's
commitment
to
safer
streets,
climate
action
and
livable
communities
as
a
critical
policy
document
guiding
our
transportation
decisions.
The
minneapolis
bicycle
advisory
committee
strongly
urges
public
works
to
make
changes
similar
to
the
suggestions
in
the
bac's
redlined
version.
H
I
I
get,
I
guess
I
have
a
question,
maybe
it's
for
alyssa.
I
really
do
do
we
feel
like.
Maybe
there
should
let
me
back
up,
I
feel
like
I
have.
I
have
an
understanding
that
a
significant
amount
of
the
changes
that
were
asked
for
by
that
group
were
indeed
included,
and
if
that
is
true
like
should
we
allude
to
that
a
little
bit
because
reading
is.
A
Yeah,
I
will
say
that
that
group
has
communicated
directly
appreciation
for
all
the
inclusion
of
the
and
like
response
to
the
feedback
that
has
been
given
so
folks
who,
folks,
who
are
part
of
those
conversations,
have
received
that
feedback
directly
already.
We
certainly
could
alert
allude
to
it,
but
like
we
we
have
said.
Thank
you.
I
H
It's
just
me
that
makes
some
sense
to
me
matthew
just
to
make
sure
that
that
it's
clear
to
folks
it's
clear
to
policymakers
that
that
there
was
a
process
and
that
for
the
most
part
we
think
it
won't.
Oh
okay,
at
least,
if
that's
what
we
think,
so
I
could
maybe
work
on
another
little
sentence
about
that
that
that
I
could
add
in
in
a
minute
after
we
go
through
the
red
line.
A
H
H
A
F
A
H
Thanks,
yes,
as
much
as
I
would
love
to
wow
everybody
with
the
dulcet
tones
of
me,
reading
the
entire
complete
streets
policy,
I'll
I'll
skip
it.
So
the
first
proposed
change
is
in
item
number
three
of
the
modal
priority.
It.
It
just
deletes
the
the
words
providing
access
for
so
that
it
will
read
driving
cars,
trucks
and
smaller
freight
vehicles,
and
how
about
we?
Do
it
like
this?
H
If
anybody
has
any
questions
about
any
of
this
until
we
get
to
the
the
more
major
chunk
just
pop
in
and
ask
otherwise
I'll
I'll
behave
as
if
nobody
has
any
questions.
The
second
changes
to
number
four.
It
just
removes
the
word
operating
so
that
large
freight
vehicles
is
a
standalone
seventh
fragment,
go
ahead
and
scroll.
H
Next
change
is
to
one
of
the
bullets
about
the
purpose
of
the
policy.
It
says
the
the
city
will
and
it
deletes
the
word
advance
and
in
inserts
the
word
achieve
its
goal
of
having
three
out
of
every
five
trips
by
walking
biking
or
transit
by
2030,
as
adopted
in
the
transit
action
plan.
H
The
next
change
is
in
this
paragraph
and
and
chris
help
me
see
what
the
paragraph
was
in
context
again
of
this.
It's
just
the
end
of
the
policy
framework
section.
H
And
it's
about
emergency
vehicles,
so
the
preceding
sentence
is,
although
not
identified
specifically.
Emergency
service
providers
are
unique
users
of
the
transportation
system
and
require
special
consideration
to
allow
for
the
reasonable
and
efficient
access
to
destinations
in
all
parts
of
the
city,
and
we
would
insert
the
sentence
fleet
turnover
in
emergency
vehicles,
especially
fire
trucks,
may
need
to
include
smaller
and
more
efficient
vehicles
to
accommodate
complete
street
design
features.
H
Next,
we
change
some
text
in
the
modal
priority
framework
number
two:
it
deletes
the
words,
improve
the
quality
of
life
related
to
trip,
time
and
congestion,
and
instead
inserts
to
significantly
reduce
space
for
cars
as
a
key
to
making
walking
biking
and
transit,
competitive
and
attractive
options.
H
The
next
is
in
a
set
of
comments
about
how
to
interpret
the
modal
hierarchy
in
number
two,
it
it
adds.
So,
at
the
the
sentence
originally
said,
as
the
city
implements
projects,
it
will
prioritize
the
allocation
of
space
for
walking,
rolling
biking
and
transit.
We
would
add
the
words
while
actively
reducing
space
for
cars,
trucks
and
parking.
Additionally,
the
city
will
ensure
project
designs
include
the
walking
biking
and
transit
facilities
identified
in
the
transportation
action
plan.
D
H
So
here
we're
getting
into,
I
think,
the
the
more
at
least
the
the
longer
chunk
of
text.
So
this
is
in
the
implementation
section.
Second
to
last,
we
would
put
in
a
new
second
to
last
sentence
that
reads
in
the
case.
More
than
one
design
is
brought
forth.
All
designs
must
follow
the
complete
streets
policy
or
seek
a
modal
exemption,
and
then
we
would
insert
a
new
paragraph
essentially
and
I'll.
H
Just
read
that
so
it
starts
with
public
works,
will
share
the
complete
streets
checklist
for
each
project
with
the
public,
including
advisory
committees,
and
identify
any
modal
exemptions
being
sought.
Reasons
for
modal
exemptions
could
include-
and
this
is
a
bulleted
list-
sidewalks-
are
proposed
for
less
than
the
width
recommended
in
the
design,
guidance
or
opportunities
are
missed
to
narrow
pedestrian
crossing
distances
streets
on
the
all
ages
and
abilities
network,
lack
or
have
a
lesser
quality
bicycle
facility
than
is
than
what
is
identified
in
the
transportation
action
plan.
H
Street
design
does
not
plan
for
a
20
to
60
reduction
in
vehicle
trips.
For
the
mode
shift
goals
in
the
transportation
action
plan
and
shift
space
from
vehicular
traffic
and
parking
to
other
modes,
that
was
the
last
bullet
and
now
there's
an
one
more
little
paragraph
public
works
will
develop
a
process
for
stakeholders
to
give
feedback
to
the
city
council
that
a
modal
exemption
should
be
should
have
been
required
for
a
particular
project.
H
In
the
case,
the
public
works
staff
do
not
believe
that
one
is
warranted,
and
maybe
before
I
go
on
to
other
things,
we
could
have
just
like
a
little
bit
of
an
explanation
about
this.
So
in
the
existing
complete
streets
policy,
there
is
a
a
process
for
talking
about
exemptions.
H
There
have
not
really
been
any
exemptions
that
have
ever
come
forward.
I,
my
understanding,
is
that
public
works
staff
would
prefer
not
to
have
a
specifically
called
out
exemption
process,
although
somebody
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
about
that,
my
understanding
is
from
elissa
that
others
were
really
interested
in
in
seeing
that
exemption
process
continued
and
maybe
be
improved
and
made
more
objective
and
specific,
and
so
this
is
an
attempt
to
kind
of
like
meet
in
the
middle.
H
A
little
bit
so
I
I
personally
think
that
we
can't
put
all
of
the
detail
that
we
might
want
about
how
complete
streets
will
be
used
on
a
particular
project
in
the
complete
streets
policy,
because
it
just
it
covers
so
many
types
of
projects
in
so
many
different
locations,
and
it
I
don't
think
we
can
probably
put
all
of
the
detail
that
we
might
want
into
this
document.
H
But
that
said,
I
think
that
there
should
be
a
process
for
all
of
us
to
sort
of
publicly
talk
about,
and
maybe
disagree
about.
Does
this
particular
project
as
proposed,
or
does
this
option
for
this
project
as
proposed,
meet
or
not
meet
our
complete
streets
principles
and
have
just
an
open
conversation
or
debate
about
that?
H
So
this
is
an
attempt
to
kind
of
tee
that
up
in
a
way
that
will
be
maybe
a
little
bit
more
transparent
and
a
little
bit
more
understandable
for
folks,
I
I
do
want
to
say
I
don't
view
those
four
bullet
points
as
being
inclu.
You
know
all
inclusive
or
anything
like
that.
Those
are
just
kind
of
like
ideas
for
reference.
It's
sort
of
the
kind
of
thing
that
would
trigger
an
exemption
per
mode,
and
so
maybe
with
that
I'll
open
it
up
to
see.
If
anybody
has
questions
about
this
particular
text.
E
Robin
this
is
philip,
I
would
just
say
I
I
like
the
approach.
I
think
it
gives
leeway,
but
it
puts
some
boundaries
on
what
public
work
staff
may
or
may
not
do
so.
I
think,
and
it
and
it
definitely
is,
it
makes
it
very
clear
that
engagement
and
advisory
committees
can
should
our
are
totally
legitimized
in
weighing
in
if
public
works
tries
to
sort
of
move
through
quickly,
a
facility
where
it
looks
like.
E
F
Hey
robin
just
one
quick
thing
from
a
staff
perspective.
I
just
want
to
share
this
as
a
non-voting
member
in
the
first
sentence,
saying
that
the
complete
streets
checklist
would
be
shared
with
the
public,
including
advisory
committees
as
staff.
F
I
read
that
and
say
that
we
already
do
that
because
we
put
our
complete
streets
with
all
layouts,
so
I
just
wanna
if
it's
meant
to
just
kind
of
like
confirm
that
practice
or
something
that's
cool,
if
it's
meant
to
like
ask
for
it
to
be
shared
in
a
different
way
and
call
that
out,
I
just
want
to
flag
that
there
could
be
more
detail
there.
If
you
want
that.
H
No,
I
that's
a
that's
a
good
comment.
I
am
definitely
not
trying
to
say
that
that's
not
happening
now,
so
we
could
maybe
add
the
words
continue
to,
but
everything
else
in
the
document
is
like
forward
looking
about
the
stuff
we're
going
to
do
so.
Yes,
I
don't
want
people
to
read
that
and
and
think
wait
a
minute.
Do
they
not
know
that
we
do
this
now
cool.
D
J
Yes,
hello,
I
I
agree
with
phil.
I
like
what
you're
doing
here,
a
question
which
I
don't
know
the
this
policy
or
this
complete
streets
policy
well
enough,
but
things
like
the
the
complete
or
the
the
complete
streets
checklist
sometimes
can
be
found
by
the
public.
J
Sometimes
cannot-
and
I
am
wondering
if
in
this
moment
or
if
it's
worth
adding
something
of
the
community
engagement
and
robotic
engagement,
of
which
these
checklists
may
be
part
of
along
with
other
stuff,
it's
just
a
question:
it's
it's
not
a
one
way
or
another.
It's
I
don't
know
if
it
is
included
in
there
if
it's
even
needed,
but
I
thought
I'd
just
bring
it
up.
H
So
that's
kind
of
what
I
was
going
for
with
the
we'll
share
the
checklist
with
the
public
yep
I
mean
we
could
say
as
part
of
stakeholder
engagement
for
projects
or
something
like
that,
just
to
be
specific
about
it
right
to
chris's
point.
I
think,
that's
what
folks
are
trying
to
do
now
so
anyway,
I
would
be
okay
with
a
little
change.
There.
F
J
I
Yeah
lower
my
hand,
I
think
I
think
the
the
conversation
around
the
complete
streets
policy
is
for
a
checklist
is
interesting,
but
I
don't
think
it's
the
big
part
of
that
sentence.
I
think
the
big
part
of
the
sentence
is
identify
any
modal
exemptions
and
then
the
bullets
after
that.
So
I
think
I
think
the
point
of
like
sharing
the
complete
stress
checklist
like
chris
was
saying
like
yeah.
A
I'll
just
respond
to
that
a
little
bit
and
and
sort
of
also
emphasize
the
last
sentence,
robin
read
around
developing
a
process
for
stakeholders
to
give
feedback
that
a
modal
exemption
rob,
and
I
wonder
if
this
should
be-
should
be
required.
Rather
than
should
have
been.
A
That
always
puts
us
in
the
position
of
like
the
project's
already
over
because,
like
we
have
as
a
committee
over
and
over
and
over
again
pointed
out
that
projects
do
not
follow
the
complete
streets
policy
and
have
had
that
feedback
not
really
be
able
to
be
funneled
anywhere
effective.
And
so
that
to
me
is
actually
the
most
exciting
part
of
this
paragraph.
To
say,
like
we
have
feedback
around
that
we're
going
to
continue
to
have
feedback
around
it
and
you
need
to
figure
out
how
to
account
for
it.
E
Phil,
well
I
mean
knowing
that
that
every
street
segment,
every
complete
street
is
not
able
to
accommodate
all
modes.
Maybe
I
don't
quite
understand.
Matthew's
comment.
So
are
what
we
are
saying
here
when
we
say
identify
any
modal
exemptions.
E
Are
we
saying
that
if
a
street
segment
straight
project
facility
does
not
include
all
modes,
there
will
be
identification
of
those?
I
don't
I
mean
we.
I
mean
we
just
know
that
sometimes
we're
not
going
to
have
freight,
for
example,
that
that
mode
will
not
be
accommodated
because
it's
a
tertiary
street.
So
maybe
I'm
a
little
unclear
about
what's
being
said
here.
E
A
It
does
say
elsewhere
in
the
policy,
not
all
modes
can
be
put
on
all
streets.
I
think
the
intent
behind
this
is
to
avoid
a
situation
like
we
are
currently
facing
on
hennepin
avenue,
where
there's
sort
of
a
decision
being
we
have
like
the
transportation
action
plan
says
there
should
be
a
bike
lane.
A
The
transportation
action
plan
identifies
it
as
a
corridor
where
transit
is
really
really
important
and
we're
considering
not
only
not
having
24-hour
bus
lanes
but
not
having
any
bike
facility
on
on
the
corridor
at
all,
and
so
you
know
we
have
policy
guidance.
That
says
we
should
do
these
things,
and
this
would
that
would
be
a
situation
in
which
I
would
expect
that
public
works
would
have
to
apply
for
a
modal
exemption
as
opposed
to
just
bringing
forth
a
project
design
that
doesn't
include
a
bike
lane
robin
or
matthew.
I
I
I
I
think
what
I
was
saying
is
you
know
the
the
original
and
robin
touched
on
this,
but
the
original
complete
series
policy
that
we
put
together
had
an
exemptions,
paragraph
that
that
said,
similar
things,
but
a
little
different
right
that
we
would
ask
for
ask
for
an
exemption
if
certain
things
weren't
present
in
a
layout
in
this
proven
this
update
process,
the
the
steering
committee
or
the
the
committee
of
folks
looking
at
it
had
some
deliberate
conversations
of
do.
We
have
exemptions
or
not,
and
I
think
public
works.
I
So
when
I
say
like
the
big
part,
is
after
the
first
comma
or
the
you
know
after
the
complete
streets
checklist
piece,
that's
kind
of
what
I
mean
is
we're
asking
for
a
much
different
thing
than
than
what
I
think
public
works
is
prepared
to
propose
to
council
and-
and
I
think
that
that's
fine-
if
that's
always
fine,
if
you
all
want
to
recommend
that
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
that
that's
the
major
component
to
this.
H
I
think
that
it's
got
to
be
project
by
project
a
little
bit,
so
as
I've
been
trying
to
think
about
the
kinds
of
projects
that
we've
seen
come
forward.
If
it's
a
new,
you
know
transit.
If
it's
the
arterial
brt
plan
for
lake,
I
think
we're
going
to
be
applying
the
the
third
bullet
in
a
different
way
than
we
would
if
it
was
a
protected
bikeway.
That's
not
changing
curb
lines
on
a
street
that
doesn't
have
high
frequency
transit
on.
H
H
Unfortunately,
I
think
it
kind
of
has
to
be
a
little
bit
of
a
a
value
judgment
by
different
people.
Looking
at
our
plans
and
looking
at
the
proposed
project
and
saying,
does
that
get
close
enough
to
that?
And
so
that's
I.
I
agree
with
alyssa
that
the
the
coming
up
with
some
way
for
the
bacpac
and
other
stakeholders
to
say
in
a
meaningful
way.
H
We
we
think
that
the
complete
streets
policy
has
been
given
an
exemption
here,
and
we
would
like
that
sort
of,
like
understood
as
part
of
this
process,
will
be
more
effective
than
what's
happening
now.
E
C
I
I
What
I'm
just
what
I'm
just
noting
is
that
the
change
that
was
that
public
works
has
proposed
was
to
essentially
not
have
an
exemptions
process
because
we
follow
complete
streets
and
then
what
this,
what
this
resolution
is
shaping
up
to
be
would
would
be
to
recommend
putting
keeping
exemptions
in
and
changing
it
a
little
bit
so
that
that's
what
I
want
us
to
know.
I
don't
want
to
say
what
you
know
what
my
bosses
in
the
city
council
would
approve
right
now.
A
H
I'll
just
note
janice
that
that
it's
the
council
that
would
adopt
this
and
so.
H
I
A
H
In
planning
second
paragraph
second
to
last
sentence,
we
would
just
erase
so
that
sentence
is,
for
example,
a
design
feature
may
be
modified
to
come
to
accommodate
emergency.
H
I
think
I
think
you
may
have
skipped
past
the
thing
up
there,
possibly
yeah,
adding
something
at
the
at
the
last
in
the
last
sentence
of
the
last
paragraph
under
design
so
that
it
will
say
the
city
supports
opportunities
to
incorporate
sustainable
alternatives
and
place
making
elements
within
the
public
right-of-way,
which
may
include
urban
landscaping,
green
spaces,
public
art
or
storm
water
management
elements.
When
designing
a
street.
The
city
will
consider
and
evaluate
metrics
for
and
we
would
strike
all
modes
and
insert
primarily
walking
bicycling
rolling
and
transit
within
the
right-of-way.
N
Yeah,
just
a
quick
question
on
that.
I
re
like
I,
I
understand
where
that
change
might
be
coming
from
and
I
like.
I
also
see
that
there's
a
difference
between
having
a
metric
for
auto
travel
and
prioritizing
or
deprioritizing
auto
travel,
and
I
read
this
as
say:
well,
I
guess
the
word
consider
and
evaluate
yeah.
I
don't
I
I
might
maybe
I
was
reading
it
fast.
A
The
entire
of
the
paragraph
above
it
really
walks
through
in
detail
the
sort
of
thing
that
we
have
heard
a
lot
about,
which
is
that,
like
many
of
the
city's
partners,
require
that
we
talk
through,
like
that,
we
measure
things
to
do
with
vehicle
like
speeds
of
vehicles
and
vehicle,
reliability
and
level
of
service
through
intersections.
So
it
feels
like
that
is
very
explicitly
called
out,
and
I
don't
think
this
sentence
needs
to
account
for
that.
J
Yeah
just
slight
one,
which
may
have
a
little
bit
of
middle
ground
and
basically
to
strike
primarily
and
replace
it
with
to
prioritize,
and
it's
just
it's
just
a
suggestion
that
I
think
might
provide
it
yeah
it
just
there
are.
There
are
other
uses
for
streets,
but
we
really
want
to
pray.
We
want
to
prioritize,
which,
hopefully
is
it's
different
than
primarily
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
A
E
F
Sorry
here
wait,
let
me
so
it
could
either
be
metrics
for
prioritizing
walking,
biking,
rolling
in
transit
or
phil.
I
heard
phil
just
say
to
prioritize,
which
would
mean
striking
before
and
primarily
so
it
would
read
when
designing
a
street.
The
city
will
consider
and
evaluate
metrics
to
prioritize
walking
bicycling
rolling
in
transit
within
the
right
of
way.
Is
that
what
we
want.
H
Okay,
so
this
is
the
latter
half
a
new
end
to
the
first
paragraph
under
operation,
so
it's
to
increase
to
an
increasing
extent.
Parking
must
be
actively
and
efficiently
managed
by
one
wayfinding,
two
time
limits
and
three
dynamic
pricing
to
both
minimize
the
parking
right-of-way
footprint
along
specific
corridors
and
to
assure
close
street
parking
spots
for
those
most
in
need.
For
example,
those.
H
H
So
I
didn't
write
the
new
little.
Thank
you
chunk
for
the
resolution,
but
does
anybody
have
any
other
questions
about
any
of
any
of
this
redline.
A
N
Oh
unmuted,
there
we
go
in
relate
so
up
at
the
bullet
points
that
were
up
a
little
bit
higher.
I
probably
should
have
said
this
comment
earlier,
but
where
there
were
the
kind
of
the
different
examples
of
why
an
exemption
might
be
sought,
I
was
just
thinking
like,
and
this
is
like,
I
think,
I'm
in
agreeance
generally
with
the
idea
that,
like
we
need
a
way
out
of
these
situations
that
we're
kind
of
in
with
hennepin
and
everything
I
read.
N
Some
of
these
bullet
points
a
little
bit
differently
and
I'm
trying
to
think
of
like
how
staff
would
approach
them
in
that
kind
of
thing,
and
so,
like
some
of
these
to
me,
seem
very
obvious
and
some
don't
as
much
in
terms
of
how
you
like
kind
of
sort
through
things
so
like,
for
example,
which
one
was
it
so
like
a
missed
opportunity
to
narrow
a
pedestrian
crossing
district
distance.
And
maybe
this
is
the
intent
here,
but
like
any
time
a
street
doesn't
have
a
bump
out.
N
That
is
technically
a
missed
opportunity
to
narrow
a
pedestrian
crossing
distance.
So
I'm
just
like
thinking
about
how
do
you
read
that
and
like
with
some
of
the
points
here
that
are
a
little
less
overt
in
some
of
the
planning
documents
that
we
have?
How
should
folks
be
sorting
through
that?
I
think
the
same
thing
goes
a
little
bit
for
like
opportunities
to
introduce.
N
I
mean
I
guess
if,
if
you're
like,
I
don't
know,
if
you're
the
the
opportunity
to
introduce
transit
advantages,
in
particular
around
like
signal
priority
like
any
time,
a
new
signal
is
going
up.
How
how
are
we,
how
are
we
supposed
to
think
about
it
or
interpret
that
so
yeah
just
wanted
to
kind
of
put
that
thought
out
there.
H
Yeah,
so
maybe
I'll
respond
just
a
little
bit.
I
struggled
with
this
because
if
we
have
a,
for
instance,
if
we
said
we,
we
just
have
to
have
bus
priority
lanes
on
every
high
frequency
transit
route.
H
G
H
My
mind
a
major
missed
opportunity
as
part
of
that
project.
If
we,
on
the
other
hand,
didn't
do
such
a
thing
where
we,
where
we
kind
of
can't
just
due
to
the
way
that
that
street
functions,
I
see
it
differently.
H
I
also
am
trying
to
account
for
the
fact
that
some
of
our
projects
are
some
of
our
projects
are
just
a
protected
bikeway
and
we're
not
touching
the
sidewalks.
We're
not
touching
the
curb
lines,
we're
not
impacting
transit
operations,
or
at
least
not
much
so
so
trying
to
make
it
so
that
those
projects
which
are
doing
good
things
that
we
want
don't
have
to
go,
get
an
exemption
because
they're
not
doing
everything
that
we
might
want
on
that
same
street
is
the
thing
that
I'm
trying
to
get
at
here
and
it's.
I
agree.
H
It's
a
it's
a
it's
a
complicated
needle
to
try
to
thread
to
say
you
know,
don't
deviate
so
much
from
adopted
plans
or
don't
even
really
like
consider
deviating
from
adapted
plans
when
it's.
So
when
there's
so
many
different
permutations
of
what
that
could
mean.
H
N
I
I
think
in
my
mind,
I'm
thinking
of
smaller
projects
in
particular
and
just
kind
of
yeah
and
smaller
projects
and
prioritization,
as
relates
to
I
yeah.
I
don't
know,
there's
not
a
there's,
not
a
perfect
way
to
do
it,
but
that
makes
sense.
N
H
A
Thanks
robin
any
last
comments
before
we
call
the
call
the
roll
on
this
and
then
robin,
do
you
want
to
read
the
robin?
Why
don't
you
read
the
full
motion?
I
think
we
we
did
have
a
someone
moved
and
seconded.
I
don't
recall
who.
H
Sure
so
the
motion
is
the
minneapolis
bicycle
advisory
committee
supports
improvements
to
the
complete
streets
policy
to
better
reflect
the
city's
commitment
to
safer
streets,
climate
action
and
livable
communities,
and
then
chris
here's
where
I
would
insert
the
bac
appreciates
being
included
in
the
stakeholder
process
for
developing
this
complete
streets,
update
as
a
critical
policy
document
guiding
our
transportation
decisions.
The
minneapolis
bicycle
bicycle
advisory
committee
strongly
urges
public
works
to
make
changes
similar
to
the
suggestions
in
the
bac's
redlined
version.
A
A
B
You
got
it:
okay,
aaron.
D
B
C
D
J
B
L
D
D
J
Yes,
I
abstain.
B
N
B
A
A
Thank
you
and
thank
you
again
to
robin
and
everybody
who
has
provided.
I
mean
both
the
explicit
feedback
on
the
complete
streets
policy,
but
I
mean
every
piece
of
feedback
that
we
have
provided
and
that
you
have
provided,
as
a
committee
over
the
years
really
continues
to
shape
our
perspective
on
what
is
important
to
highlight
in
the
complete
streets
policy.
And
what
do
we
want
to
see
from
public
works
and
from
council
members
and
moving
this
policy
forward?
A
F
Sure,
just
briefly
so
we
talked
about
the
cip
and
equity
engagement,
specifically
how
that
relates
to
the
cip
and
we're
starting
the
process
a
little
bit
earlier.
This
year
is
the
intent
at
least
to
give
a
little
more
space
to
kind
of
understanding,
the
cip
and
how
the
cip
can
interact
with
things
that
maybe
we
haven't
thought
of
as
directly
in
the
in
the
past,
such
as
equity
and
engagement.
F
So
we
had
some
good
conversation
went
through
some
of
the
resources
that
were
shared,
including
the
resolution
from
last
year,
and
then
the
cip
budget
requests
information
which
is
online
as
well
as
some
budget
planning
steps
to
sort
of
prep
for
a
conversation
this
coming
month,
where
mike
samuelson
and
I
believe,
trey
joiner
as
well,
will
be
coming
to
introduce
the
cip.
F
Some
of
you
have
been
on
the
committee
before
will
have
seen
parts
of
this
type
of
they
do
this
every
year
where
they
come
and
just
explain
what
the
cip
is,
how
we
interact
with
the
cip,
the
different
steps.
It's
basically
a
year-long
cycle
that
repeats
every
year.
They'll
go
over.
Some
of
the
highlights
that
have
happened
from
this
past
year
and
what's
in
the
mayor's
budget
and
also
the
group,
gave
some
kind
of
guiding
questions
and
comments
as
to
what
they
would
like
to
see.
F
What
would
be
helpful
to
hear
from
mike
and
trey
in
terms
of
things
that
are
maybe
more
visual
or
show
kind
of
the
breakdown
of
overall
budget
and
how
much
we
spend
on
on
bicycling
specific
programs
or
initiatives
compared
to
other
things.
That
may
be
a
little
more
car
centric
and
things
like
that.
So
I'll
be
passing
on
that
feedback.
I've
got
more
detailed
notes
on
that
that
I'm
giving
to
them.
F
If
anybody
else
has
anything
else,
they
want
to
learn
specifically
from
them
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
me,
and
I
can
get
those
comments
to
them
as
well
as
they
prepare
for
the
presentation
and
then
last
thing
is
just
a
plug
for
the
coming.
F
A
Great
thanks
chris
and
then
I'll
also
note
that
sort
of
as
a
follow-up
to
the
cip
right
like
the
capital
portion
of
the
budget.
You
know
that
discussion
that
we're
going
to
have
in
october.
We
will
also
probably
have
a
little
bit
more
discussion
about
the
operating
portion
of
the
budget
more
broadly
in
november.
So
that'll
just
be
something
we'll
try
to
do
is
a
little
bit
of
a
follow-up.
A
J
Okay,
good
afternoon,
I
wanted
to
just
relay
to
you
all
that
the
lims
agenda
has
both
the
engineering
subcommittee
minutes
as
well
as
at
the
bottom
of
the
page,
the
the
project
sheets
that
came
with
that
were
presented
with
the
projects
and
a
resolution
that
will
be
submitted
on
one
of
them.
J
I'm
very
appreciative
that,
let
me
just
get
here,
I'm
gonna
go
through
now,
just
a
briefly
the
minutes
that
were
put
together-
and
I
want
to
start
by
just
thanking
the
the
10
members
that
joined
us
at
this
engineering
subcommittee
meeting
and
being
able
to
respond
to
draft
minutes
and
the
resolution,
and
if
there
are
I'm
going
to
go
through
this
rather
quickly
and
if
there
are
comments
that
members
from
engineering
or
the
group
in
general
want
to
ask
afterwards
we'll
have
time
for
that.
J
So
the
first
project
that
was
discussed
was
the
58th
sunrise
bikeway
at
zero
percent
presented
by
christian
zimmerman
the
minneapolis
public
works.
This
is
planned
for
2022
2022.
It's
an
asphalt
resurfacing
from
lindale
to
60th
and
is
considering
adding
on
street
buffered
bike
facilities
as
part
of
the
project.
If
you
recall
resurfacings
do
not
do
anything
with
curbs,
they
work
within
the
the
boundaries
that
are
there
and
if
it's
on
a
triple-a
network,
they
consider
whether
they
can
put
a
bikeway
on
it.
J
So
it
will
not
be
a
separated
bikeway,
but
it
would
be
a
some
kind
of
a
striped
bikeway
on
the
existing
road.
The
project
is,
will
include,
reducing
and
eliminating
some
parking,
as
well
as
reducing
drive
lane
widths
transit
service
has
been
discontinued
during
the
pandemic,
but
may
be
re-established
afterwards.
J
Safe
routes
to
school
markings
will
be
maintained
at
the
park
into
schools.
They
are
working
with
both
the
county
and
mndot
to
resolve
safety
issues
at
58th
and
highway
121
on
the
east
side
of
this
project.
J
There's
that's
that's
a
busy
corner
and
there
are
improvements
being
planned
that
may
be
fairly
limited
for
this
project,
but
maybe
followed
through
later
with
mndot,
so
they're
working
in
tandem
there
to
get
people
over
to
lindale
and
make
a
safer
crossing
so
far,
there's
strong
neighborhood
support
for
the
bikeway
they're
going
to
continue
community
engagement.
J
No
action
is
requested
at
this
time
and
they
will
return
at
the
end
of
this
year
with
thirty
percent.
I
think
it's
pretty
exciting
materials
and
it
was
a
great
presentation.
Does
the
anybody
in
the
engineering
that
attended?
Do
you
have
any
other
comments
or
general
group.
J
Okay,
we're
going
to
move
on
to
the
graco
park
trail.
This
is
a
zero
to
15
percent
review
from
with
carrie
christensen
the
minneapolis
park
board
and
she
could
not
make
it
that
day,
but
she
had
a
terrific
presentation
that
was
recorded.
That
went
along
with
the
program
and
chris,
thankfully
took
notes
and
filled
in
where
carrie
was
not
there.
So
that's
great.
J
The
presentation
is
a
round
two
engagement,
they've
had
initial
engagement
and
it's
about
project
concepts.
Three
of
them
were
presented
round.
Three
is
going
to
narrow
that
down
into
a
preferred
concept
and
that
begins
in
november
2021,
but
it's
a
short
process
where
they're
going
to
approve
the
concept
in
january
2022.
J
So
it's
coming
up,
quick
construction
begins,
fall,
2022
through
2023
and
the
park
bombings
roughly
are
the
river
and
halls
island
on
the
west
side,
plymouth,
bridge
eighth
avenue
northeast
on
the
south
side,
sibley
street,
northeast
on
the
east
and
a
future
building
site
for
greco
company.
On
the
north
side
survey,
participants
have
shown
high
interest
in
nature
and
active
living.
J
Three
conceptual
plans
were
presented.
Final
outcome
will
include
will
likely
include
parts
of
all
three
rather
than
picking
one
particular
design
over.
The
other
two
plans
include
a
trail
underpass
beneath
the
plymouth
avenue
bridge
would
which
would
be
in
addition
to
the
the
street
crossing.
That's
near,
that's
not
that's
the
sibley
intersection,
it
would
go
underneath
the
plymouth,
and
so
an
enhanced
intersection
at
sibley
is
being
studied
to
improve
crossing
and
turning
over
onto
the
east
bank
trail
graco
and
boom
island
parks.
J
This
is
the
major
intersection
that
connects
the
east
bank
over
plymouth
avenue
to
west
river
road,
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
crossover
traffic
that
comes
both
from
commuting
and
recreation
committee,
discussed
tunnel
option
and
plymouth,
avenue,
bridge
user
access
to
east
bank
trail
and
future
park.
J
Preference
for
active
living
uses,
natural
habitat
features
in
limited
parking
comments
about
the
plan
can
be
made
in
an
online
survey,
and
I
had
a
an
address
there
for
you.
That's
kirby
closes
october
1st
I
was
I
have
to
say
I
was
very
delighted
about
how
they
put
together
the
survey,
because
it
really
asked
you
to
point
out
the
what
you
liked
about
each
of
the.
J
I
suppose
you
could
do
the
top
ten,
but
you
you
verbalized
about
it
and
then
you
rated
it
on
funding,
but
it
really
made
you
look
at
the
three
drawings
and
to
me
it
really
pointed
out
that
yeah
there's
three
there's
things
about
all
three
that
I
really
liked.
J
So
is
there
any
comments
added
comments
that
the
group
that
attended
engineering
have
or
general
group.
P
J
So
we're
gonna
move
on
marty
is
going
to
take
this
from
here.
I
was
the
the
primary
author
or
collaborator
to
put
together
this
draft
resolution
and
I'd
like
marty
to
read
that
resolution
and
then
take
over
the
meeting
and
just
kind
of
run
the
rest
of
it.
So
if
I
need
to
speak
to
what's
in
it,
I'm
not
managing
a
meeting
so.
G
Marty:
okay:
this
is
a
greco-park
trail
draft
resolution
and
dan
wrote
this
with
probably
some
help
too.
I'm
not
sure
the
minneapolis
bicycle
advisory
committee
supports
a
shared
use,
trail
underpass,
in
addition
to
an
enhanced
intersection
crossing
exit,
an
entrance
at
sibley
street
to
better
connect
right,
real
park
boom
island,
the
east
bay
in
the
road.
J
I
think
you've
got
the
wrong
document
right
yeah.
So
what
I'll
tell
you
what
I
will
read
it
and
this
is
on
limbs
and
that.
G
Is
everybody?
Okay
with
this
resolution,
anybody
in
the
committee
anybody.
A
L
Hi,
this
is
jenny
borden,
I
would
just
say
hi,
marty
too.
How
are
you.
M
G
J
I
think
it
relates
to
what
I
heard
in
the
meeting
and
leaves
open
the
opportunity
for
individuals
to
go
back
and
do
their
own
survey
if
they
so
do
I
tried
to
keep
this
specific
to
kind
of
what
I
think
our
our
purpose
is
as
the
bac.
So
there
you
go.
That's
it.
E
No
just
a
comment
that,
as
as
I
recall
in
the
presentation
somebody
said,
and
maybe
it
was
on
the
part
board
that
they
had
looked
at
parking
utilization,
or
maybe
it
was
just
someone
on
the
committee
who
knows
the
area.
Maybe
it
was
udan
and-
and
I
I
just
wanted
to
point
out-
it's
really
always
important
for
someone
to
actually
do
some
qualitative
or
quantitative
observations
and
reporting
back
on
the
usage
of
parking
because,
as
we
all
know,
the
standard
line
is.
Oh,
my
god.
Where
do
I
park?
E
E
I
P
G
P
Yeah,
I
actually
I
went
over
there
today
about
two
o'clock
in
the
afternoon.
I
guess-
and
I
can
honestly
tell
you
that
there
was
an
empty,
completely
empty
parking
lot.
In
fact,
there
were
multiple
empty
parking
lots,
and,
but
I
also
I
had
the
opportunity
to
also
see
a
bike.
Come
down
plymouth
avenue
cut
diagonally
across
plymouth
to
get
over
to
make
the
left
hand
turn
onto
the
bike
trail,
which
is
one
of
the
things
that
came
up
in
the
committee,
was
how
dangerous
that
particular
move
is.
P
It
was
the
middle
of
the
day.
Fortunately,
and
there
was
not
a
lot
of
traffic
on
plymouth,
but
but
otherwise
it
would
be
without
it
without
a
signal
there
almost
impossible
for
somebody
to
actually
make
that
that
move,
but
the
other
thing
I
also
did
is,
I
tried
looked
it
over
how
a
underpass
might
actually
happen
over
there.
I
don't
know
if
anybody
has
ever
gone
back
over
there
there's
actually
a
few
people
living
over
there
underneath
of
the
bridge.
The
bridge
is
low.
P
O
Yes,
hi
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
share
from
my
own
observations
about
the
parking
in
this
area.
The
only
time
that
I've
ever
seen
the
boom
island
parking
filled
is
when
there's
been
an
event
in
boom
island,
but
for
the
most
part,
sibley
is
incredibly
wide,
there's
more
than
enough
room
for
two
lanes
of
traffic
to
go
through
and
cars
to
park
on
either
side,
and
this
was
a
new
bit
of
information
that
wasn't
available
at
the
engineering
subcommittee
meeting.
O
But
we
had
the
fulton
grand
fondo
last
weekend,
which
is
located
just
a
block
north
of
of
lowery
and
the
reason
why
it's
relevant
is
we
have
a
lot
of
people
drive
in,
like
you
know,
1500
to
2
000
people
who
want
to
drive
to
the
event
to
ride
their
bike
for
the
event
and
ask
about
parking
and
all
of
the
overflow
parking
was
sent
down
to
greco
area.
So
there
is
a
lot
of
parking
capacity.
O
G
D
D
B
P
B
I
N
B
P
E
B
B
B
J
B
J
A
A
Awesome.
Thank
you
anything
else
on
the
engineering
subcommittee
report
before
we
conclude
that.
A
A
This
this
fall
we're
doing
very
efficient
meetings,
even
if
we
spend
45
minutes
talking
about
one
resolution.
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
make
some
time
for
announcements.
I
I
A
H
Yeah
so
folks
get
to
tell
me
if
we
have
heard
about
this-
and
I
just
didn't
track
it,
but
staff
have
brought
forward
something
starting
a
process
on
changing
the
way
that
we
do
traffic
calming
projects,
and
it
is,
I
think,
pretty
cool
and
it's
definitely
not
finished
it's
just
starting.
So
I
expect
that
we
are
going
to
hear
more
about
that
here.
H
We
got
a
a
presentation
about
it,
just
for
cam
and
me,
and
I
am
actually
pretty
excited
it-
sort
of
formalizes
the
way
that
we
have
traffic
coming
conversations
and-
and
I
would
say
it
makes
them
more
sort
of
transparent,
understandable,
expectable,
equitable.
So
anyway,
I
look
forward
to
having
more
conversations
about
that.
I'm
pretty
sure
they're
going
to
bring
it
to
us,
but
anyway
I've.
I
tossed
the
limbs
link
into
the
chat.
If
anybody
wants
to
take
a
look
at
what
came
through
committee
yesterday,.
A
Thanks
robin,
I
don't
think
I
recall
having
heard
about
that
either,
if,
if
we
did,
it
was
in
passing
so
similarly
looking
forward
to
it.
Chris
announcement
from
you.
F
Yes,
sorry
really
quickly,
so
mike
samuelson
asked
me
to
share
some
information
about
the
whittier
lindale
bikeway,
which
work
on
that
has
started,
and
the
few
points
he
wanted
me
to
share
is
one
that
this
will
be
mostly
just
reminders.
This
will
be
a
two-year
construction
project,
so
north
of
lake
this
year
and
south
of
lake
next
year,
and
then
that
there
are
a
few
locations
that
won't
include
the
concrete
separated
bikeways.
One
of
those
is
first
half
south
because
of
the
upcoming
reconstruction
project.
F
Another
is
29th
and
blaisdell,
because
the
signal
will
be
rebuilt
next
year,
which
will
provide
more
permanent
separation
and
then
the
third
and
last
one
is
29th
street
between
the
greenway
and
blaisdell,
and
the
nicolette
at
lake
project
will
consider
a
more
permanent
solution
there.
So
if
you
want
any
more
information
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
mike
directly
or
we
can
connect.
You.
O
Yes,
just
as
a
reminder,
since
we
get
to
do
very
little,
in-person
mingling,
open
streets,
lindell
is
october,
10th
and
open
streets.
Minnehaha
is
october.
24Th
come
find
me
on
the
10th.
Please
thanks.
A
A
Thanks,
I
will
make
one
announcement,
which
is
that
I
believe
the
fall
appointment
cycle
for
city
boards
and
commissions
is
happening
right
now,
with
an
october
1st
deadline,
there
are
going
to
be
some
open
seats
on
the
minneapolis
planning
commission,
if
you
or
anyone
you
know,
is
interested
in
serving
on
the
minneapolis
planning
commission
as
a
body
that
has
a
lot
of
direct
impacts
on
our
streetscape
and
the
decisions
that
are
made
around
different
site-specific
infrastructure,
so
applications
for
that
are
due
october
1st,
if
you
or
anyone
you
know,
are
interested
in
that
or
any
other
city
openings
for
the
fall
appointment
cycle.
N
I'll
just
offer
a
quick
thanks
to
everyone
in
this
group,
those
who
are
new
and
those
who
have
been
in
it.
As
long
as
I
have
this
point,
which
is
feeling
like
a
long
while
but
kind
of
anticlimactic
to
have
a
last
meeting
virtual
and
all,
but
I'm
not
going
anywhere
and
stuff's
still
working
for
the
city
and
everything.
So
I'm
sure
I'll
see
you
all
around.
A
Thanks
wes,
it's
been
great
having
you
here.
I
hope
that
if
you
decide
at
any
point,
you're
comfortable
with
an
in-person
happy
hour
for
us
to
wish
you
well
that
you
feel
free
to
send
all
of
us
an
email
I
for
one
will
will
show
up
and
yeah
best
of
luck
to
you
in
your
new
position
and
thank
you
so
much
for
your
many
years
of
service.
It's
been
really
great
and
we
will
miss
you
a
lot.
A
All
right,
I'm
not
seeing
anybody
else
come
off
mute,
so
I
think
we
should
all
wish
wes
well
done.
Twister
and
call
the
meeting
adjourned
have
a
lovely
rest
of
your
wednesday
folks,
happy
west
that
we
could
gift
you
with
a
half
hour
of
your
time.
Back
for
your
last
meeting,
you.