►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
B
This
meeting
will
be
recorded
and
posted
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency.
This
meeting
is
public
and
subject
to
minnesota's
open
meeting
law.
At
this
time,
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll,
so
we
can
verify
a
quorum
is
present
for
this
meeting.
B
Let
the
record
reflect
we
have
a
quorum
next,
we'll
proceed
to
the
adoption
of
both
our
agenda
and
the
meeting
minutes
from
august
23rd
2021.
May
I
have
a
motion
to
adopt
both
the
agenda
and
the
minutes.
A
C
B
Both
the
agenda
for
today's
meeting,
as
well
as
the
minutes
for
august
2021,
have
been
accepted
next
in
order
of
business
is
the
acceptance
of
public
comment.
I
will
open
the
floor
to
invite
comments
from
members
of
the
community.
Will
limit
public
comment
to
no
more
than
22
minutes
two
minutes
per
speaker
with
that?
Are
there
any
community
members
on
the
line
who
wish
to
address
the
subcommittee.
B
All
right
hearing,
none
we'll
move
on
to
our
next
item
of
business,
in
which
we
take
up
unfinished
business
from
our
august
meeting,
starting
with
item
5
on
our
agenda,
no
knock
warrants
and
I
do
believe
if
you
look
at
limbs,
we
do
have
a
few
items
attached
to
this
particular
item
in
our
agenda
that
I
do
believe
are
updates
from
last
month
and
if
it's
possible,
could
we
have
christopher
brand?
Give
us
you
know
any
sort
of
context
and
updates
in
terms
of
the
no
knock
warrant
study.
D
Yep,
so
the
the
study
is
preceding.
Some
of
the
questions
that
were
posed
as
part
of
the
study
are
a
little
bit
time
intensive
for
each
individual
case.
So
for
the
moment,
I'm
proceeding
with
what
we
talked
about
before.
D
As
far
as
you
know,
answering
those
questions
having
the
case
samples
from
the
dates
we
selected,
but
I'm
starting
with
a
a
smaller
poll
and
then
moving
out
if
that
makes
sense,
just
because
it's
taking
time
to
review
the
different
aspects,
sure
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
manual
review
of
it
and
then
some
of
the
reports
or
some
of
the
yeah.
Some
of
the
reports
don't
actually
have
the
search
warrant
attached,
which
means
then
to
get
that
we'd
have
to
go
to
court
records.
D
So
it's
kind
of
some
of
the
issues
we
talked
about
early
on
with
things
in
different
places,
but
as
far
as
being
able
to
to
identify
the
the
the
dates
and
the
data
you
know,
that's
all
set
and
we're
proceeding
with
that.
The
question
on
arrest
warrants,
that
is
a
is
a
bit
more
difficult
to
to
find
an
answer
to.
At
this
stage.
I
don't.
I
don't
have
one
yet
it's
just
to
do
with
the
way
in
which
you
know
there's
those.
D
As
far
as
I'm
aware,
there's
gonna
be
filed
with
the
court
in
quite
the
same
way,
so
just
finding
a
list
of
of
those.
There
are
dedicated
police
units
to
go
and
pick
people
up
on
warrants,
but
then
there
are
also
we-
and
we
talked
about
this
before
task
force-
is
made
up
of
metro
agencies
that
do
that
as
well.
So
I
think
finding
finding
the
information
specific
to
mpd
might
be
a
little
bit
difficult,
still
working
on
that
part.
B
Okay,
yeah,
I
am
looking
at
the
pdf
entitled
no
knox
search
warrant
sample
q1
2020.
I
do
have
a
few
questions
just
to
make
sure
you
know.
I
have
a
better
understanding
of
this
first
in
terms
of
terminology
totally
get
narcotics
and
firearms.
What
does
git
stand
for.
D
So
git
was
the
gang
interdiction
team.
D
Yep,
I
understand
that
shortening
that
probably
wasn't
wasn't
that
helpful.
That
was
the
only
one
from
from
that
group
that
I
could
find
the
other
ones
all
listed
as
firearms
narcotics
investigations.
B
Yeah
totally
makes
sense,
but
as
long
as
long
as
I
know
what
it
means
also,
you
know
you
were
kind
of
talking
about
this
and
I'd
love
to
hear.
You
know
you
elaborate
a
little
bit
more
on.
You
know
pragmatic
view
of
doing
this
study
in
a
timely
way.
Like
first
thing
when
I
look
at
when
I
see
this
first
page
is
like
oh,
that's,
a
real
small
sample
size,
yeah.
B
D
Was
just
to
get
us
some
graphs
and
some
data,
so
we
could
check
the
methodologies
we
wanted
to
pursue
the
the
final
final
totals.
We
should
look
at
a
much
larger
amount.
I
was
thinking
more
in
the
range
of
25
to
100.
B
B
31
in
q1
is
what
I
have
written
down
here,
which
makes
sense.
Okay,
and
I
think
that's
is
terms
in
terms
of
sample
size
that
I
don't
think
we'll
have
a
problem
there,
especially
in
a
full
year,
if
we
get
over
150.
That
seems
great,
but
as
far
as
time
intensiveness.
B
What
do
you
think,
given
the
you
know,
10
samples
you
have
here
versus
ideally
getting
through
like
a
whole
composite
year?
Obviously,
because
2020
was
weird
four
quarters
worth
of
data.
Is
that
gonna
be
more
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
time?
Is
that
going
to
be
something
that
will
take
weeks
months?
I
think
I
think
it
would.
D
I
think
it
would
definitely
be
possible
to
have
the
to
have
our
data
kind
of
on
a
pool
isn't
quite
the
correct
term,
but
have
our
data
set,
completed
and
reviewed
within
a
month
or
two
okay,
as
far
as
having
the
report
itself
finalized,
you
know
I
would,
I
still
think
we'd
be
on
track
to
have
that
done
by
the
end
of
the
year.
Obviously,
any
draft
data
we
could
certainly
get
something
together
to
have
published
before
then.
B
Yeah,
okay,
I'm
just
yeah
trying
to
think
about
how
this
self.
That
piece,
obviously,
is
you
know
it's
the
momentum
builder
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
are
able
to
not
have
that
prevent
us
from
moving
forward,
and
I
assume
you
know-
you
talked
about
joint
tasks
for
task
forces-
is
the
final
sample
here
at
the
bottom
precinct
number
non-mpls?
B
D
There
are
various
reasons
why
that
why
that
might
occur,
but
mostly
it'd,
be
you
know,
they're
following
an
investigation,
that's
outside
the
city
and
maybe
that
jurisdiction
doesn't
have
a
swat
team
yeah
a
lot
of
it.
Once
you
get
into
the
suburban
areas,
they
often
share
a
swat
team
between
a
numerous
jurisdictions.
C
B
Does
anybody
have
questions
I
mean
for
christopher
in
terms
of
either
the
data
or
the
timeline
just
to
make
sure
that
you
know
we
feel
comfortable
about
the
speed
of
this
you
know
and
how
you
know.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
it
is.
You
know,
we're
heading
in
the
right
direction
in
terms
of
pace.
C
I
think
it
sounds
okay
personally,
as
long
as
chris
is
willing
to
put
in
the
work
it's
unfortunate
that
there's
so
much
manual
effort
involved.
We
appreciate
you
doing
that
and
kind
of
explaining
it
to
us,
but
I
think
we
maybe
expected
it
was
going
to
be
more
challenging
in.
D
That
regard
so
for
for
timeline
to
get
your
thoughts
on
this.
I'm
thinking
have
a
have
the
draft
data
set
compiled
and
really
to
be
reviewed
by
see
the
october
meeting
draft
report
by
the
november
meeting
and
then
aim
to
have
the
finalized
report
by
december.
Would
that
be
a
good
timeline
for
you.
D
Yeah-
and
I
think
that
that's
that's
the
goal
to
work
towards,
if
anything,
delays
that
in
any
way,
then
you
know
communicate
about
that.
But
I
think
that's
the
that's
a
realistic
goal
to
work
towards.
B
Now
one
thing
that
I
want
to
just
throw
out
there,
because
we've
been
kind
of
touching
on
it
all
of
these-
that
you're
looking
at
right
now
are
in
the
no
knock
warrant
category
and
how?
B
How
are
we
going
to
incorporate
because
that
the
crux
of
this
entire
evaluation
right
now
is
a
comparison
between
no
knock
and
knocked
warrants?
Announced
unannounced
right
when
you
get
the
draft
data
together,
will
we
be
looking
at
announced
and
unannounced
in
the
same
data
set?
So
that
way
we
can
compare
at
least
summary
statistics
between
those
two
groups.
D
Yes
yeah,
so
these
are
these,
are
all
these
ones
were
pulled
from
1280
deployments,
which
is
swat.
We
would
expect
them
to
only
really
be
unannounced
works,
but
yeah
we
there
are.
There
are
other
specialist
units,
so
we
might
not
have
a
a
city-wide
pool
of
all
unannounced,
but
I
think
you
know
what
we're
seeing
here.
Looking
at
this
data
is
that
it
is
pretty
heavily
focused
on
narcotics
firearms,
a
little
bit
of
gang
team.
B
Yeah,
no,
I
I
I
get
it
it's.
You
know
they're
labeled,
as
you
know,
high
risk
that
that's
the
you
know
justification
that
they
use.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
it
when
we
come
down
to
the
end
of
this
study
that
we
are
trying
to
compare
apples
to
apples
as
much
as
we
can.
You
know,
and
some
components
constructively
will
show
that
you
know
no
knock
warrants
are
employed
in
more
dangerous
scenarios.
B
You
know-
and
we
just
need
to
be
aware
of
that
when
we're
making
these
assessments,
I
don't
want
us
to
you,
know,
go
in
and
say
you
know,
no
knock
warrants
have
x
sort
of
impact
where
the
announced
warrants
don't
have
x,
sort
of
impact
and
then
not
also
highlight
the
fact
that
the
context
by
which
these
two
are
being
applied
might
differ
in
some
ways.
A
B
D
I
I'm
afraid
I
do
not
know.
Okay
yeah
he's
not
in
the
meeting.
B
If
we
don't
have
any
other
points
to
bring
up
regarding
item
five
on
our
agenda,
we
can
move
on
to
a
discussion
on
coaching
any
suggestions
to
stay
here.
If
not
we'll
move
on
all
right,
we'll
move
to
item
six,
our
discussion
on
coaching
last
time
we
did
have
mr
hawkins
here
he
did
give
us
a
you
know
a
one
month
update
as
best
as
he
could
regarding
that
there
is
ongoing
investigations
into
the
coaching
matter.
B
Overall,
that
has
an
ability
to
impact
our
exploration
if
you
will,
which
has
prevented
him
from
being
able
to
be
at
this
meeting
last
month,
because
he
was
in
a
meeting.
At
the
same
time,
I
haven't
been
able
to
get
in
touch
with
him
since
so
I
don't
have
a
report
to
this
subcommittee
on
coaching
since
he
presented
to
us
two
months
ago
now,
last
month,.
B
We
did
have
a
a
shorter
conversation
with
just
the
three
of
us
on
really
the
direction
that
we
want
to
see
this
going
in.
B
We
were
talking
about
how
we
want
to
be
able
to
evaluate
the
practice
of
coaching
and
find
areas
where
the
policy
and
the
practice
might
differ,
acknowledge
areas
where
policy
or
practice
reflects
policy
and
be
able
to
at
at
some
point
consider
what
mechanically
would
change
if
we
were
to
have
changes
to
coaching
at
the
city
level
that
still
comply
with
the
minnesota
data
practices
act,
because
that
is
an
inherent
aspect
of
this
that
tends
to
work
its
way
in
to
these
conversations,
the
idea
that
you
know
full
transparency
from
some
people's
minds
comes
at
the
cost
of
privacy
of
civil
servants.
B
That's
about
all!
I
have
here
on
my
notes
and
the
the
recollection
that
I
have
of
this,
and
there
really
isn't
an
item.
You
know
a
discussion
item
or
a
document
attached
to
this
in
our
agenda,
because
we
haven't
gotten
an
update
from
staff.
B
The
only
thing
I
can
think
to
do
is
you
know
formally
just
have
it
directed
by
the
subcommittee
to
say:
staff
needs
an
update
and
we
need,
or,
as
in
the
subcommittee
needs
an
update,
and
we
would
like
staff
to
provide
us
with
an
update
as
to
where
this
investigation
or
this
exploration
into
coaching
is
going
and
are
we
able
to
move
forward
on
a
full
audit
and
evaluation
or
not?
B
But
I
don't
have
the
answers
for
you,
I'm
not
either
on
staff
or
you
know
the
city
attorney's
office.
So
that's
about
what
I
have
there
for
the
three
of
us.
Any
thoughts
or
questions
regarding
the
idea
of
just
you
know
have
the
clerk
directing
staff
to
provide
us
with
a
a
summary,
an
update
from
a
you
know,
pragmatic
step
forward
in
this
evaluation.
C
Yeah,
I
think,
asking
staff
to
provide
an
update
like
directing
the
clerk
to
ask
staff
sounds
like
a
good
idea
to
me.
I'm
not
sure
where
else
to
go
in
normal
work
circumstances
you
just
reach
out
to
somebody
directly
or
email
them,
but
privacy
laws.
B
C
Preclude
us
from
doing
that,
it's
not
as
easy
as
calling
someone
or
sending
an
email
and
just
relaying
the
update.
We
have
to
do
it
as
part
of
the
team
effort,
so
I
I
don't
have
any
other
ideas.
B
And
I
apologize
guys-
I
I
took
it
as
a
given
that,
because
staff
was
regularly
coming
to
this
meetings
and
I'm
sure
there's
no
ill
intent
here,
there
might
just
be
a
logistics
issue.
You
know
like
a
new
meeting,
came
up
or
something-
and
so
maybe
this
extra
formal
step
of
just
saying
hey,
we
do
need
a
staff
update
on
this
at
every
meeting.
We
need
someone
who
is
on
staff
working
on
this
to
to
speak
on
it
to
be
there
at
these
meetings.
B
Otherwise,
it's
an
item
on
our
agenda
that
isn't
moving
forward
and
we
at
least
need
to
move
forward
in
a
way
that
shows
that
we
are
doing
the
work
that
the
greater
commission
has
asked
of
us.
This
has
been
referred
to
us,
so
we
need
to
be
working
on
it.
A
B
B
B
Yes,
as
moderator
of
this
meeting,
I
I
I
will
leave
it
to
someone.
I
know
it's
probably
a
formality
just
want
to
have
someone
else
read
it
so
that
way,
it's
not
just
me.
You
know
from
on
high
saying
this,
but
yeah.
C
Fun,
unless
you
want
to
call
the
roll,
I
mean
it's
fine
with
me.
B
Okay,
everything's
good,
then
yeah.
I
am
seeing
general
consensus
from
the
subcommittee
that
we
would
direct
staff
to
provide
an
update
on
the
status
of
coaching
at
the
october
audit
subcommittee
meeting,
specifically
including
the
ability
or
inability
for
us
to
continue
moving
forward.
In
the
greater
context
of.
B
Yes,
I
think
that's
fine
great
and
thank
you
very
much
with
no
other
items
on
our
agenda
and
unless
I
hear
something
from
members
of
our
subcommittee,
I
believe
we've
included
all
items
that
we
wanted
to
talk
about
for
this
meeting
and
seeing
no
further
business
before
us
and
without
objection.
I'll
declare
this
meeting
adjourned.