►
Description
View Marked Agenda
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/Board/MarkedAgenda/CLIC/2421
View Minutes
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/Download/CommitteeReport/1829/CLIC-04302021-Minutes.pdf
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
D
E
D
D
A
Eamon
gallagher,
here
dan.
F
With
that
I'd
like
to
ask
for
vice
chair,
willie
bridges,
assistants
as
we
go
through,
this
is
my
first
real
meeting
serving
as
as
chair.
I
had
served
as
vice
chair
last
year
and
as
well
as
the
city
staff
to
make
sure
that
we
cover
everything
we
need
to
cover
today
in.
F
In
summary,
what
we're
going
to
try
to
do
is
to
review
all
of
the
c
crps
that
the
not
crps,
yes,
the
crps
that
were
provided
to
us
as
the
human
development
task
force
and
give
ourselves
some
preliminary
ratings,
so
that
we
all
understand
what
the
consensus
is
within.
This
group
now
note
that
the
consensus
is
not
mandatory.
F
If
you
have
any
beliefs
or
you
want
to
rate
outside
of
the
range
that
we
discussed
today,
that
is
perfectly
fine.
I
would
ask
that
you
be
prepared
with
some
reasoning
for
your
going
going
out
on
into
another
range,
and
we
can
discuss
that
in
the
future
time.
F
So
with
that
clerk,
would
you
please
bring
up
the
the
spreadsheet
that
includes
the
ratings
from
last
year
as
a
starting.
F
Point:
okay,
so
what
we
have
here
is
a
pre-populated
scoring
ranking
sheet
from
last
year
and
it
it
shows
you
where
those
projects
that
we're
seeing
today
that
were
submitted
last
year,
where
the
the,
where
the
click
came
out,
consensus-wise
it's.
F
What
we
should
do
is
take
this
under
advisement
as
to
something
that
we've
done
in
the
past,
but
it
certainly
is
not
something
that
we
need
to
follow.
Let's
base
our
decisions,
our
our
preferences
on
what
we've
heard
from
the
presentations
and
any
new
information
that
the
the
submitters
have
provided.
F
Are
there
any
questions
before
we
proceed?
What
I'm
going
to
do
is
go
across
the
top
you'll
see
the
art
and
public
places
that
that
we're
going
to
go
down
that
that
column
to
clerk
you
will
scroll
down
so
that
people
can
see
the
entire
just
scroll
down
to
the
bottom
there.
So
you
can
see
what
we're
going
to
cover
we're
just
expanding
this
for
easier
readability.
F
In
the
end,
we
need
to
get
down
to
the
grand
total
okay,
so
any
questions.
Otherwise
we're
going
to
start
with
art
and
public
places.
B
I
I
just
had
a
quick
comment.
You
could
hide
some
of
the
rows
to
show
more
of
it
more
of
that
column.
That
looks
like
we're
not
going
to
talk
about
rows.
13
through
19.
F
F
Okay,
so
when
we
get
started
art
in
public
places,
you
can
see
that
we
last
year's
rating-
and
this
goes
back
to
the
the
the
ranking
guidelines
we
ranked
it
as
important.
F
I'm
gonna
say:
okay,
kitty.
F
F
No,
the
the
the
informational
last
year
is
simply
what
we
came
up
with
last
year.
It's
it's
just
sort
of
a
good
benchmark
to
know
so
you
should
take
it,
make
your
arguments
based
entirely
on
what
you've
seen
this
year.
F
So
let
me
explain
a
good
perspective
is
that
in
the
ranking
process,
if
you
put
it
as
critical,
you're
saying
that's
comparable
it
would,
it
would
exceed
the
criticality
of
a
fire
station,
for
example,.
C
C
You
know
what
I
mean
when
mary
said
that
cities
have
been
putting
a
percentage
of
their
budget
towards
art
and
public
places
for
a
longer
a
lot
longer
period
of
time
than
minneapolis.
So
what
a
lot
of
the
research
that
I've
done
around
art
in
public
places,
because
I'll
I'll
be
really
truthful
at
first.
I
thought
this
was
a
lot
of
money
and
too
much
money
and
then
the
more
research
I
did
on
it
it
it
brings
in
a
lot
of
money.
C
It's
not
as
definitive
as
like
a
you
know,
charging
leasing,
space
at
the
farmer's
market
and
anything
like
that.
But
it's
it's
really
a
critical
component
of
a
city
being
a
world-class
city,
thus
bringing
in
more
businesses,
thus
bringing
in
more
revenue.
That's
why
I
put
it
as
critical
eric
that's
just
my
thingy.
F
Okay,
willie.
I
C
You
know
when
more
businesses
whoops
sorry
when
more
businesses
come
to
minneapolis
when
more
people
visit
minneapolis,
because
we
are
an
arts,
I
mean
a
center
for
artists.
It
benefits
everybody,
not
just
specifically
the
north
side,
but
I
also
believe
that
more
north
side,
artists
will
be
supported.
C
You
know,
that's
just
my
perspective
and
my
persp.
You
know
I've
it's
when
it's
when
you
don't
make
art
in
public
places
critical
that
I
think
cities
suffer
across
the
board
in
a
lot
of
aspects.
C
Hey
guys,
I'm
new
at
this,
you
guys
don't
have
to
listen.
You
don't
have
to
listen
to
me.
It's
because
you
know
it's
my
perspective
of
cities
and
critical
infrastructure
and,
as
you
can
tell
there's
so
many
people
that
don't
agree
with
that
across
the
board.
That's
why
arts
funding
has
been
cut
in
schools
and
it's
not
you
know
blah
blah
blah.
So
you
don't
have
to
listen
to
me.
F
I
don't
know
I
so
so
if
you
don't
mind,
I'd
like
to
read
the
definition
of
critical
for
project
priority
critical
describes
a
capital
proposal
as
indispensable
and
demanding
attention
doing
it
due
to
an
immediate
need
or
public
endangerment.
If
not
corrected,
few
projects
can
qualify
for
this
high
of
a
classification
failure.
F
F
E
F
And
I
I
recall
last
year
why
we
we
did
important.
It
really
was
because
many
of
our
many
of
the
proposals
sort
of
displaced.
F
The
need
for
art
and
public
places
as
being
significant,
let
let's
go
around
and
does
anyone
else
have
any
comments.
Otherwise
I
think
we
we
need
to
keep
moving
here.
Otherwise,
we're
going
to
be
here
all
day,
rich.
H
Yeah,
so
just
to
reiterate
what
you
said
here,
so
I
really
have
been
doing
this
project
based
on
precisely
what
I'm
reading
from
the
instructions
I'm
seeing.
My
role
is
really
not
to
promote
anything
specific
or
to
really
insert
my
own.
You
know
real
personal
point
of
view,
but
to
really
try
to
follow
the
information
we've
been
given,
follow
the
instructions
sort
of
as
they're
written,
and
certainly
you
know
I
have
my
preferences
about.
F
Exactly
that
that
makes
the
task
easier
being
given
these
guidelines.
Katrina
now.
C
I'm
trying
to
figure
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
put
my
hand
down.
I
understand
that
I
and
I
read
through
all
this,
and
I
really
really
understand
that
and
I'm
not
going
to
change
my
opinion
even
based
on
everything
and
it's
not
a
personal
opinion,
because
at
first
I
thought
it
was
way
too
much
money.
But
after
doing
a
lot
more
research,
so
hey
no
biggie.
F
Yeah,
I
so
so
I'm
I'm
gonna
repeat
it!
It's
really
important
for
people
to
score
things
based
on
on
your
beliefs.
What
we're
going
through
right
now
is
is
trying
to
understand
the
this
is
our
period
where
we
can
us
understand
each
other
and
and
have
a
common
place
to
start
so.
Okay,
what
we're
going
to
do
is
go
right
down
and
then
come
back
and
and
and
draw
some
consensus
each
of
these
scorings,
okay,
so
contribution
to
city
goals.
Last
year
you
saw
we
felt
strongly
that
oh
rich.
F
Okay,
okay,
so
the
next
one
is
contributing
to
city
goals
yeah.
You
know
what
I
think
it's
helpful
for
us
to
go
through
this
one
as
an
example
of
how
to
do
the
scoring
next
is
the
contribution
city
goals
and
that
one's
pretty
straightforward
qualitative
criteria.
This
is
this
is
where
most
of
us
spend
our
time,
and
that's
that's
at
the
very
bottom.
F
These
are
the
the
I
would
call
them
the
subjective,
the
the
values
criteria
and
there's
the
widest
range
of
scores:
possible:
okay,
so
art
in
public
places,
I'm
sorry
rich.
H
Yes,
sorry
so
I
the
question
is
about
contribution
to
city
goals.
I
looked
at
all
of
the
contribution
categories
and
split
those
out
and
gave
them
relative
rankings
to
each
other
sort
of
as
the
baseline
and
then
assigned
scores
to
each
of
these
projects.
Based
on
that,
what
it
looks
like
you've
done
here
instead
is
said,
like
art
in
public
places
like
that
exists
on
the
city
goals,
so
just
the
fact
that
it
exists
makes
it
a
strong
contribution.
H
H
So
is
so.
The
question
is:
if,
if
you
can
assign
it
to
even
one
category
strongly,
it
gets
a
strong
rating
or
do
you
make
them
relative
to
each
other
and
say
well,
this
one
contributes
here
and
that
contributes
there
and
then
the
ratings
are,
you
know
the
the
final
score
may
be
similar,
but
the
process
of
how
that
score
was
derived.
G
Yeah,
if
I,
if
I
could,
I
just
wanted
to
offer
one
basic-
I
don't
know
rubric-
is,
as
as
the
group
goes
through
the
scores,
and
I
think
it's
something
that
you
know
is
already
being
touched
upon
a
little
bit.
But
you
know
we
have
this
full
score
range
of
strong
contribution
to
little
to
no
contribution
and
in
an
area
here,
that's
somewhat
relative.
You
know.
G
One
thing
I
might
raise
for
the
group
is
just
the
benefit
of
using
the
full
extent
of
trying
to
use
the
full
extent
of
the
scores
if
that
makes
sense,
and
so
what
you
have
you're
going
to
have
some
projects
that
are
going
to
hit
stronger
across
across
those
city
goals,
especially
is
defined
and
you'll
have
some
projects
that
you
know
certainly
don't
hit
quite
as
well
across
all
those
city
goals,
and
one
thing
that
might
be
helpful
is
you
know,
kind
of
identifying
where,
where
these
projects
tend
to
be
landing
and
then
starting
to
really
utilize
the
full
extent.
G
So
if
you
have
a
project
that
we
know
just
hits
across
every
single
area,
you're
kind
of
using
that
to
establish
that
that
strong
contribution-
if
you
have
projects
that
you
know
really
don't
you
know,
stack
up
so
well,
starting
to
use
some
of
those
lower
scores
again
within
each
project,
using
those
scores
consistently,
so
that
you're
not
constantly
just
trying
to
rank
them
against
the
one
project
that
scores
really
well.
But
using
that
idea
to
kind
of
say:
okay,
here's
the
high
range,
here's,
the
low
range
and
here's,
what
here's?
H
We
have
an
example
of
anything
that
was
little
or
no
from
last
year.
G
I
can
scroll,
I
can
scroll
offline.
I
have
a
score
sheet
here
too,
and
I
can
see
if
I
can
put
one.
F
Yeah
robert,
while
you're
doing
that,
I'd
like
to
let
luke
luke,
you
have
a
comment.
J
Yeah,
I
was
just
hoping
that
you
could
speak
a
little
bit
about
the
next
line
which,
under
contribution
to
city
goals,
the
operating
costs
and
and
just
clarify
like
what
would
get
a
negative
30.
What
would
get
a
positive
30
and
how
to
think
about
those
and
the
range
in
between.
F
Thanks
thanks
willie,
okay,
so
let
me
try
to
get
to
that.
One
right.
D
A
F
We
can't
make
out
what
you're
saying
we
can
hear,
but
it's
just
it's
yeah,
it's
unstable.
G
Hey
this
is,
this
is
robert.
I
think
I
I
think
I
could
make
out
some
of
the
point
that
justin
was
making
and
that's
that
you
know
for
for
today's
effort.
You
know
we're
really
trying
to
pull
together
that
project
priority,
ranking
and
then
the
contribution
to
city
goals,
so
we
can
provide
some
general
guidance
to
everybody
else
on
click,
just
where
the
task
force
is
ranking.
G
These
projects,
that's
a
great
question
on
how
the
operating
cost
implications
is
scored,
and
we,
I
think
we
can
probably
address
that
separately
and
provide
some
more
guidance
on
that
offline.
If
that
makes
sense
just
for
the
good
of
today's
meeting,
so
that
we
can
make
some
some
forward
progress
on
these
ratings
luke.
I
did
want
to
note
that
that
question
was
was
raised
and
I
think
we
could
follow
up
timely
so
that
it
doesn't
delay
scoring
on
that.
One.
J
And
I
just
quickly,
I
I
do
see
that
it's
addressed
on
page
six
of
the
the
guidelines
so
I'll
read
that
more
thoroughly
and
it
might
help.
I
must
have
glossed
over
it.
Sorry,
okay,.
F
It's
okay,
all
right,
robert.
I
think
we
should
get
started
on
these
scores,
something
you
just
noted.
F
So
if
you
look
at
the
point,
ranges
if
you
feel
strongly
about
something
within
the
point
range
that
that
the
range
that
we
identify
as
being
the
consensus
I
I
would
suggest
that
you
go
to
the
very
top
of
that
range
and
that
would
be
the
most
effective
way
of
of
of
impacting
the
outcome
in
the
end.
So
with
that,
can
we
get
started
art
in
public
places,
so
we've
heard
from
from
katrina
and
and
we've
also
heard
from
rich.
F
We
also
know
that
last
year
we
rated
it
as
important
I'd
like
to.
F
How
would
you
like
to
proceed
can
should
we
maintain
that
important
from
last
year
or
does
is?
Are
there
a
number
of
voices
to
say
we
should
raise
it
to
significant
or.
F
F
Okay,
anyone
else.
B
This
is
beth.
Sorry,
I
thought
I
raised
my
hand,
I'm
I
had
it
either
important
or
significant.
I'm
fine
with
important.
F
Okay,
I'm
hearing
we're
leaning
towards
important.
So
let's
leave
it
important
if
you,
if
you're
outside
of
that
range,
please
feel
free
to
to
score
it
as
as
you
believe,
it
should
be
and
we'll
discuss
it
when
we
go
through
this
over
the
next
couple
of
meetings.
Okay,
contribution
to
city
goals,
remembering
this
is
about
connection
to
the
to
the
copper
city's
comprehensive
plan.
H
Yeah,
so
I
don't
think
my
question
was
answered
the
first
round,
I'm
still
struggling
to
understand
whether
these
ranges
reflect
a
contribution
to
at
least
one
goal,
or
are
we
supposed
to
spread
them
out
amongst
the
I
think,
there's
eight
separate
categories
for
those
goals:
do
we
do
we
spread
those
scores
out
and
then
rank
them
that
way,
because
this
is
getting
a
strong
and
I
don't
think
you
can
reach
a
strong
with
applying
that
to
all
the
categories.
F
Robert,
do
you
recall
what
I
I
know
what
I
did
last
year.
F
F
They're
gonna
be
very
few
projects
that
are
going
to
score
in
the
moderate
or
strong
category.
If
it's
just
going
to
be,
if
it's
going
to
be
across
all
eight
categories,
because.
H
G
Yes,
there
was
one,
there
was
the
fourth
police
precinct
project
that
received
a
little
to
no
contribution,
ranking
and.
F
And
you
know
the
reason
we
we
had
that
discussion
in
the
comments
was
it
wasn't
because
there
wasn't
any
intrinsic
value
to
it
or
that
it
didn't
contribute
to
goals.
We
just
didn't
have
enough
information
to
know
if
it
would
fit
into
the
future
vision
of
policing
in
minneapolis.
H
H
I
And
let
me
just
jump
here
for
a
quick
second,
you
know
you
get
to
have
make
that
decision
on
your
individual
and
we
get
back
to
the
larger
group
to
talk
about
this
again
too,
and
that's
the
purpose
of
the
smaller
group
that
we're
here
to
you
know
to
have
those
kind
of
discussions.
If
there's
a
comment,
you
can
write
the
comments
about
something
a
year
name,
why
something
should
or
should
not
be
so
you
do
have
that
opportunity
to
do
exactly
what
you're
saying.
J
F
So
I
think
we're
we
need
to
move
forward.
I
acknowledge
rich
that
that's
a
little
ambiguity
there,
but
I
can
tell
you
how
most
of
us
thought
through
it
last
year,
mm-hmm.
If
it
was
strong
and
supported
any
of
the
the
the
primary
goals
of
the
city,
then
we
went
ahead
and
gave
it
a
strong
score.
F
Yeah,
I
think
it
might
simplify
things
a
bit
for
everyone.
Okay,
so
strong
contribution
is
what
we
gave
it
last
year.
Any
discussion.
J
F
There
it's
down:
okay,
let's
move
on,
so
I
think
we
have
those
two
robert
we're
going
to
move
on
to
the
next
one
new
fire
station
number
11.
F
Okay,
if
not,
we
scored
it
as
significant
last
year.
Again.
Remember
that
you
can
score
when
you
do
your
own
sheets,
you
can
give
any
number
of
points
between
41
and
50
if
it's
a
significant
category.
F
I
think
the
argument
we
used
last
year
was:
it
supported
safety
for
our
community.
F
Okay,
if
no
comments,
let's
move
over
to
fire
14.,
that's
the
new
fire
station
number.
F
So
you
will
notice
here
that
this
is
interesting
because
we
went
down
we
it's
desirable
now
and
the
reason
for
that
was
there's
no
urgency
here.
It's
on
the
university
campus,
it's
fully
functional.
F
This
is
desirable,
okay
and
moderate
contribution.
F
H
General
question:
when
we're
all
done
here:
do
we
each
of
us
submit
our
own
rankings
and
then
they
get
summarized
or
are
averaged
and
forwarded,
or
do
we
just
write
one
report?
That's
got
a
number
on
it.
G
Rich
yeah
yeah,
yeah
yeah.
These
will
eventually
be
we're
going
to
grab
all
these.
Like
assignments,
the
strong
contributions
and
the
the
project
priority
put
them
into
one
sheet,
so
that
everybody
has
guidance
on
everything
and
then
you'll
be
able
to
submit
your
own
sheet.
That's
been
informed
by
the
the
guidance
from
the
human
development
and
the
transportation
shares
and
those
will
be
we'll
be
averaging
all
the
scores
together.
F
Okay,
so
with
that
okay,
that,
which
is
why,
if
you
feel
strongly
about
something,
put
it
to
the
top
of
the
range.
H
Yeah
that
causes
a
statistical
problem.
I
think,
if
you
just
get
summaries,
then
one
person
has.
H
I'll
have
to
go
back
and
look
at
my
numbers,
but
pretty
good.
If
you
just
submit
totals
then
then
you
have
a
problem
with
sort
of
the
will
of
the
committee.
I
And
again,
we're
going
to
have
a
discussion
with
a
lot,
the
larger
group
in
all
of
this
right.
So
when
we
come
together
as
a
group,
we
have
a
discussion
and
someone
might
say
why
or
yes,
they
can
support
your
position
and
that
would
rank
higher.
So
that's
important
when
you
do
your
individual.
However,
you
choose
to
rate
it,
but
it
does
come
back
and
that
makes
it
different
and
I
don't
think
one
person
has
more
of
the
other,
because
it's
a
cumulative
of
all
of
our
numbers.
I
L
Hey
everyone.
I
I
actually
agree
with
rich
that
there's
a
fiscal
issue
with
the
way
this
is
could
be
tabulated,
and
I
guess
I
would
suggest
that
instead
of
using
scores
that
a
ranking
of
every
of
with
within
any
individual
people's
sheets
is
used,
so
your
highest
ranking
score
is
ranked
one.
Your
next
highest
ranking
score
is
rank
two
and
so
forth.
F
So
I
I
don't
believe
we're
at
that
point
right
now
where
we
can
change
the
scoring.
The
transportation
group
has
already
completed
this
and
I
think
there
will
be
a
time
after
this
budget
season
is
done
where
we
can
go
back
and
and
consider
changes
to
the
scoring
procedure.
F
F
So
if
you
don't
mind
we're
going
to
make
a
note
of
that
and
probably
pull
both
of
you
in
later
to
figure
out
how
we
can
come
up
with
a
more
statistically
supportable
method,
okay,
so
so
le.
If
you
don't
mind,
let's
move
on
police
first
precinct,
mpd04
and
and
you'll
see
last
year,
and
it
was
because
the
first
police
precinct
actually
needs
that.
There's
a
need
there.
F
They've
got
to
build
a
new
building.
Thus
it
was
made
important,
but
we
also
acknowledged
that
it
was
not
the
time
to
be
making
major
decisions
on
any
of
the
police
facilities.
F
So
mpd04
do
we
want
to
stick
with
the
scoring
from
last
year
or
does
anyone
have
a
reason
to
to
offer
a
higher
or
lower.
K
So
so
the
only
thing
that
I
was
intriguing
that
project
is
like
in
talking
about
the
potential
partnering
with
housing
that
would
go
above
it
it
just.
K
I
know
the
fire
station
also
was
looking
at
combining,
so
I'm
not
sure
in
the
whole
scheme
of
things
wanting
to
make
sure
that
this
has
a
priority
and
doesn't
miss
out
on
any
development
opportunities
that
could
be
beneficial
on
multiple
multiple
levels
for
the
city,
not
only
just
the
the
added
precinct
and
that
the
place
the
precinct
placement
to
me
just
looked
very
inadequate
and
needs
to
be
addressed
sooner
than
later.
F
Okay,
so
your
would
you,
how
would
you
change
the
rating.
K
I
guess
I
would
I
I
personally
would
possibly
bump
it
to
significant,
but
that's
just
my
opinion.
H
Yeah,
so
this
was
an
example
where
on
mute,
sorry,
this
was
an
example
where
I
captured
that.
So
I
like,
I
left
it
as
important,
I
think,
but
due
to
the
housing
and
due
to
the
fact
that
it
covers
more
than
one
thing
that
got
picked
up
in
the
contribution
by
city
goals.
H
So,
rather
than
giving
it
a
double
score
where
I
bump
both
of
those
up.
You
know
we
rate
it
on
its
priority,
based
on
sort
of
the
need,
but
then
contribution
to
city
goals.
It
gets
a
higher
score
because
it
contributes
to
more
than
one
aspect
of
the
goals.
F
H
G
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
do
a
quick,
quick
time
check.
It's
one
o'clock.
I
think
the
meeting
is
technically
planned
to
end
right
now.
I,
as
staff,
I'm
able
to
you,
know
kind
of
stick
on
for
a
little
bit,
but
I
do
have
a
hard
stop
coming
up.
I
just
wanted
to
confirm
what
the
and
what
the
group
might
be
thinking
about
for
the
rest
of
this
meeting.
H
I'd
like
to
move
that
we
finish
the
meeting,
I
I
need
to
leave
in
10
minutes.
F
Okay,
I'll
make
a
suggestion:
how
about
we
just
go
through
two
more
because
I
think
what's
happening
is
we're
we're
learning
how
to
work
with
each
other
and
and
sort
of
normalizing
our
thought
processes
and-
and
that's
probably
the
most
important
thing
we
can
accomplish
today.
So
if
that's
okay
with
you
robert,
I
I
think
we
can.
We
can
get
this
the
next
two
columns
done
in
due
time.
F
So
the
the
discussion
I'm
hearing
is
that
this
is
important
and
there
are
two
ways
to
express
that
one
is
in
terms
of
keeping
it
as
important,
however,
boosting
it
up
as
a
strong
contribution
based
on
city
citywide
goals
and
the
the
other
is
to
bump
it
up
as
a
project
priority
and
leaving
it
as
a
moderate
contribution
and
there's
always
the
third
option,
which
is
moving
them
up
moving
it
up
on
both
accounts.
B
Yes,
I
am
on
my
scoring
that
I
did
before
this.
I
actually
had
it
as
I
agree
with
the
question,
and
I
had
it
as
significant
and
moderate
because
it
felt
like
the
need
was
higher
than
important,
but
it
that
it
makes
a
moderate
contribution
to
the
various
city
goals.
F
K
Yep
sorry
kept
in
mind.
Yes,
I'm
comfortable
with
either
suggestion.
I
just
want
to
elevate
it
a
little
bit
but
rich
made
a
strong
argument
also
on
how
he
saw
things
so.
F
F
Rich,
can
you
live
with
it
going
up
to
significant
and
leaving
it
that
modern
contribution,
or
would
you
like
them?
I
mean
there's
also
possibility
of
elevating
both
of
them.
H
I
apologize
I
I
guess
what
I'm
hearing
is
we're
deciding
that
it's
important
that
not
just
our
totals
more
or
less
are
in
consensus,
but
that
we're
reaching
a
consensus
on
each
and
every
one
of
these
categories.
F
Okay,
robert,
do
you
have
that
we're
moving
it
up
to
significant.
F
Okay,
so
so
recognize
that
the
range
of
points
that
you
can
allocate
now
someone
who
once
gave
it
26
can
now
give
it
50..
So
that's
a
tremendous
impact
that
that's
a
lot
of
points
that
you
can
redistribute
by
moving
at
one
category:
okay,
let's
move
to
the
fourth
police
precinct.
This
is
actually
building
a
new
precinct
on
on
the
north
side
in
the
I
guess
that
would
be
the
fifth
and
the
the
fourth
and
fifth
wards.
H
So
when
I
read
through
this,
it
looked
like
I
don't
recall
now
the
detail,
but
I
think
this
was
the
one
where
the
current
precinct
was
quite
new,
and
this
looked
like
sort
of
a
remodeling
effort
I
see
here
it
was
just
put
as
desirable
am
I
am
I
misremembering
which
which
one
we're
looking
at
or
maybe
that
was
a
fire
station.
F
This
this
is
actually
the
relocation
of
the
fourth
precinct
from
the
current
building
to
one
that
is
closer
to
embedded
closer
to
to
where
activities
are
on
the
north
side
and
robert
correct
me
once
upon
a
time.
This
was
a
project
to
to
expand
to
to
modify
the
existing
building,
but
the
current
proposal
is
to
move
it
to
a
new
location,
so
it
would
be
a
new
building.
F
F
It
was
because
last
year
that
the
the
consensus
last
year
was
that
there
was
an
insufficient
guidance
from
the
city
on
what
they
were
going
to
do
with
the
police,
with
the
police
function
and
there
were
thoughts
about
well.
Maybe
we
need
to
decentralize
and
not
have
precincts
of
these
large
precincts
anymore
and
have
smaller.
F
What
are
those
offices
substations
located
around
the
the
the
area
instead
of
having
a
single
structure?
So
we
didn't
have
enough
guidance.
I
F
That's
what
the
not
it's,
not
that
it's
undesirable!
It's
just
that
we
didn't
have
enough
information
to
be
able
to
to
to
support
support
this
project.
H
I
That's
a
good
yes,
it's
that's
how
it's
okay!
You
know,
I
think,
with
all
the
policies
we've
got
to
look
at
everything,
what
they're
going
to
do,
how
they're
going
to
what
is
it
that
they're
going
to
change?
No
one
really
knows
as
far
as
the
buildings
and
because
you've
got
the
ones
that
burn
down
that's
going
to
replace
and
so
forth.
So
it
really
is
still
open
for
discussion.
F
And,
and
also
by
the
definitions
that
they
do
have
a
building
that
they're
working
out
of
that
is
clearly
sufficient,
so
the
criticality
is,
is
not
there
based
on
the
criteria
that
we
we've
used.
I
H
So
I
agree,
I
think
we
should
leave
it
just
just
as
we
see
it
here,
both
desirable
and
little
or
no
contribution.
Is
there
any
reason
to
change
that.
F
B
I
just
I
wanted
to
kind
of
check
in
about
the
definitions,
because,
to
me
desirable
means
it's
a
project,
that's
going
to
improve
something
but
doesn't
really
make.
I
don't
know
I'm
not
saying
this
correctly,
but
but
a
but
an
important
project.
B
Is
required
to
maintain
service
a
standard
of
service,
maintain
an
existing
standard.
So
to
me
this
seems
like
something
that
is
important
versus
desirable,
like
desirable
as
an
enhancement
to
the
current
service.
B
The
building
is
out
of
ada
compliance,
there's
a
lot
of
structural
issues
with
the
building.
I
don't
know
if
that
means
there
needs
to
be
a
new
building.
I
mean
maybe
that
just
needs
to
remodel,
but
it
seems
it
seems
a
little
bit
higher
than
desirable,
given
all
of
the
issues
that
you
are
bringing
up,
which
I
I
totally
agree,
are
issues
I
just
I'm
trying
to
follow
the
definitions.
B
F
So
so,
after
beth's
comments,
what
we
have
is
raising
it
from
desirable
to
important.
Does
anyone
feel
strongly
about
not
coming
in
as
important.
F
F
E
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think
one
thing
that's
you
know
I've
been
thinking
about.
Is
you
know
these
projects
are
years
away
and
I
think
I'm
hoping
the
city
can
find
a
way
to
fix
the
police
where
they
will
contribute,
and
then
we
wouldn't
want
to
have
three
years
from
now
trying
to
you
know
three
years
later
then
trying
to
get
allocation
for
a
right.
You
know
this
is
a
precinct
on
the
north
side.
Where
there's
a
lot
of
crime,
I
mean
it'd
be
great.
E
F
E
F
I
think
you
hit
it,
you
hit
it
on
the
nail
when
we
this
was
a
year
ago
and
we
were
in
a
different
place,
we're
in
the
middle
of
a
frenzy.
So
I
think
we've
had
a
bit
more
time
to
be
to
think
about
it
as
you
have.
So
what
would
you
propose
here.
E
F
Great
great
great,
so
would
you
would
you
mind
signing
up
to
be
one
of
the
contributors
to
writing
that
comment?
Yes,
super!
Okay,
so
would
you
like
to
make
a
proposal?
Do
we
raise
it
to
moderate
or
strong
contribution.
E
F
E
C
So
if
say
for
instance,
example
they
come
up
with
a
department
of
public
safety
and
there's
a
you
know,
like
eight
different
departments.
I
I
think
to
to
put
money
in
and
make
it
important
it
still
doesn't.
You
know
they
already,
I'm
sorry.
They
have
a
program
right.
They've
already
have
a
program
of
who's
going
to
be
in
there
and
what
everybody's
going
to
be
doing
in
the
and
and
that
coordinated,
but
that's
not
based
on
anything
so
to
move
it
up.
I
mean
maybe
they'll
find
that
they
need
something
completely
different.
C
So
again,
like
last
year,
there
wasn't
enough
information.
I
still
don't
think,
there's
enough
information
they're
asking
for
money
based
on
a
big
question
mark,
so
I
don't
think
last
year's
rating
was.
C
Can't
be
moved
forward
because
it's
still
based
on
the
same
question
mark
does
that
make
sense.
Eric.
C
I
just
want.
I
just
need
to
know
if
that
makes
sense,
because
it's
still
a
question
mark
to
me,
even
though
they
have
programming
and
by
programming
I
mean
like
in
an
architectural
language.
You
know
you
need
this
much
for
say
mental
health
care.
You
need
this
much
for
crime
prevention.
You
need
this
much
space
for
the
police.
You
need
this
much
for
a
lot
of
different
things
and
it
sounds
like
they've
I
mean
when
I
read
it
and
watch
the
proposal.
C
F
Okay,
james.
F
Okay,
james
and
kitty
kitty
hand
down
robert
yeah,
so.
G
I
would
I
would
throw
out
there
too,
just
as
a
general
point
of
process.
You
know
I.
I
don't
think
it's
unusual
for
the
group
to
sometimes
find
these
projects
that
are
worth
discussing
in
a
lot
more
detail,
great
detail
and
then,
once
the
once,
the
conversation
gets
to
a
certain
point.
You
know
sometimes
what
happens?
I
believe
happened
last
year.
Is
we
just
take
it
to
a
motion
and
say:
okay?
Well,
you
know,
we've
got
this
range
of
opinions
on
it.
How
you
know
where
do
we?
G
Where
do
we
want
to
land
this
project
and
just
kind
of
go
through
it?
That
way,
and
another
option
might
even
be
to
kind
of
park
this
one
and
move
on
to
other
projects,
whereas
there's
a
lot
clearer,
unanimous
consent
on
it
and
kind
of
returned
to
the
ones
that
had
some
question
marks
for
the
group
just
as
a
way
to
keep
things
moving.
I
did
also
want
to
call
out.
I
think,
at
this
point.
G
Members
are
dropping
off
too,
if
it
made
sense,
and
you
know,
depending
on
how
we
wanted
to
end
today,
we
we
can
always
put
a
plug
in
for
wherever,
wherever
the
group
decides
to
end
the
conversation
today
and
and
pick
it
up
for
the
task
force
meeting
next
week,.
G
Sure
yeah
we're
entirely
capable
of
just
noting
where
we
ended
the
conversation
and
then
leaving
it
to
the
group
to
decide
how
to
work
through
it.
Next
week,.
F
Great
kitty
is
that,
okay,
with
you
we'll
hold
on
this
okay
folks,
luke.
J
Yeah,
sorry,
just
quickly
and
after
the
last
meeting
last
saturday,
it
was
my
understanding
that
we
were
supposed
to
go
through
these
rank
ratings
on
our
own,
and
I
think
he
was
mentioned
that
we
should
be
finished
by
may
5th,
and
now
it
seems
after
going
through
this
today,
it's
much
more
clear
that
we
need
to
fall
within.
J
G
Just
a
quick
note
on
the
schedule:
I'm
sorry
is
it?
Okay,
if
I
jump
in
on
that
yeah
yeah,
so
the
schedule
has
ratings.
Due
to
the
executive
secretary
on
may
20th,
I
missed
the
may
5th
deadline.
For
I
don't
know
if
there
was
some
some.
D
F
Two
more
days
doing
this
may
5th
and
may
12th.
Oh
yeah.
J
G
Yeah
your
ratings
are
due
may
20th.
I
think
the
only
thing
that's
helpful
is
as
soon
as
this
gets
done.
This
group
can
provide
guidance
to
everybody
else
in
the
committee
on
how
how
the
human
development
projects
probably
should
be
scored,
and
it
helps
expedite
their
scoring.
F
Okay,
so
so
my
closing
comment
is
something
I've
been
saying
just
about
every
meeting.
Think
about
comments
that
that's
really
that's,
that's
the
the
biggest
gift
we
give
to
the
city.
Those
comments
are
really
important.
D
Thank
you
before
we
adjourn
eric.
I
have
a
quick
sort
of
administrative
question
for
you,
robert,
which
is
when
we,
when
we
want
to
do
these
ranking
forms
each
of
us.
Do
we
do
that
in
that
new
information
site
that
you
guys
that
you
and
neil
sent
out
or
do
we
do
it
the
more
historical
way
with
the
with
this,
with
the
where
we
email
them
back
into
you?
How
how
do
you
want
us
to
proceed
with
the
actual
ranking.
G
In
in
the
past,
we've
just
received
all
the
spreadsheets
from
everybody
that
way,
we
have
a
record
you
know
of
individual
members
scores
so
that
we
have
something:
that's
that's
on
file
from
people
and
then
we
we
compile
the
scores
just
using
those
spreadsheets.
Okay,.
I
Yeah,
a
quick
suggestion,
I
think
before
we
come
back,
I
think
someone
said
earlier
look
at
what
you
score
and
bring
that
back
for
the
discussion,
and
then
I
move
it
faster
too.
You
can
write
down
why
you
want
it
to
be
moderate
or
whatever,
but
do
that
and
that
will
move
that
this
discussion
a
lot
faster.