►
From YouTube: June 9, 2021 Capital Long Range Improvements Committee
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
All
right,
as
a
reminder,
this
meeting
will
be
recorded.
Please
limit
use
of
the
chat,
as
those
comments
are
not
visible
to
the
public
and
we
do
not
want
a
conversation
going
on
separate
from
what
is
verbalized
in
the
meeting.
If
you
get
disconnected
or
have
tech
issues,
please
use
the
dial-in
feature
with
that.
The
regular
meeting
of
the
capital
long-range
improvements
committee
will
now
begin.
B
Before
we
begin
I'd
like
to
note
that
this
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statutes,
section
13d
.021,
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic.
I
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order
and
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role
so
that
we
may
verify
the
presence
of
a
quorum.
It
is
1202
pm
on
june
9,
2021.
C
D
D
E
F
G
H
F
A
B
B
B
Remember
the
committee
discussion
that
we
referenced
previously
and
the
final
statement
in
that
paragraph
is
click's
role
as
a
community
voice
is
strongest
when
members
voice
their
diverse
perspectives.
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
and
ahead
of
our
debate
today,
on
the
comments,
I
want
to
preface
saying
that
we
do
need
to
listen
to
all
the
voices
of
click
members.
B
B
I
would
entertain
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda
and
accept
the
last
meeting
minutes
and
when
members
are
moving
an
item.
Please
state
your
name
for
the
motion
and
for
the
second,
so
adoption
of
the
agenda
for
june
9th
2021
and
approval
of
the
meeting
minutes
from
june
2nd
2021.
Is
there
a
motion.
This
is
the.
J
B
I
B
Okay,
whatever
the
secretary
will
clerk
will
record
it
before
we
proceed
to
vote
katrina.
Was
there
a
question.
C
B
No
then
the
clerk
will
please
call
a
roll
on
adoption
of
the
agenda
and
the
prior
meeting
minutes.
Thank
you.
I
K
H
F
A
B
Thanks
robert
katrina.
B
E
B
Second,
by
I'll
take
jocelyn,
so
then
katrina
will.
The
understanding
is
that
the
motion
to
reconsider
has
to
be
moved
by
someone
who
is
on
the
prevailing
side.
B
F
So
we
need
to
discuss
this
further
and
I
apologize
that
I
didn't
know
the
full
extent
of
this
project.
The
comment
was
written
actually
was
written,
I'm
how
I
read.
It
meant
something
different
than
what
it
really
was
perceived
to
me.
So
we've
received
written
confirmation
of
the
federal
funding
situation
from
public
works,
so
that
no
longer
applies,
and
I
don't
think
we
fully
discuss
the
community
engagement
completed
today,
of
which
there's
been
a
lot
of
unique
things
done
for
this
project.
O
I
agree
with
katrina,
I
don't
have
anything
to
add.
I
think
that
we
should
go
back
to
discussions
specifically
because
of
the
the
information
and
knowledge
around
the
community
engagement
that
has
already
happened
around
this
project.
B
M
B
M
M
M
No
no
problem
implementation.
This
is
the
pv
158
hennepin
avenue
project
was
added
following
our
may
26
meeting
and
adopted
last
week.
Implementation
of
this
project
has
been
delayed
from
23
to
2024,
but
the
project
description
indicates
that
seven
million
five
hundred
fifty
thousand
of
federal
funding
has
been
awarded
for
construction
in
2023
click
recommends
that
the
city
confirm
and
clarify
that
this
federal
funding
will
still
be
available
for
construction
in
2024..
M
D
Sean
thanks,
I
I'm
going
to
make
two
points
on
this
one.
One
point
is
operational
and
the
other
is
about
the
comments
specifically.
D
As
I
understand
it,
there
was
an
orchestrated
effort
offline
between
meetings
to
bring
this
comment
back
where
most,
if
not
all
the
committee
members
were
lobbied
about
this,
we
don't
have
any
rules
that
specifically
prohibit
that
it
just
something
about
that,
doesn't
feel
quite
right
to
me,
but
I
just
want
to
put
that
out
there
and
then.
Secondly,
on
the
comment,
I
just
I
it's
great
that
we've
gotten
written
confirmation
from
public
works
that
the
funding
is,
there's
no
risk
to
the
funding.
I
guess
if
we
want
to
remove
that
we
can.
D
I
don't
have
a
huge
issue
with
that,
although
I
really
don't
see,
I
just
don't
see
this
comment
as
controversial
in
any
way,
shape
or
form
and
just
having
it,
while
we've
gotten
that
written
confirmation
from
them
having
it
in
the
report
and
we're
not
calling
anybody
out.
We're
just
saying
be
sure
about
this.
D
I
don't
think
it
does
any
harm
there
and
if
you
read
the
rest
of
the
comment,
it's
saying
take
into
consideration
anything
you
may
have
learned
through
the
pandemic,
whatever
public
outreach
they've
done
to
on
this
project
to
date
certainly
does
not
include
that
we're
barely
we're
not
even
fully
out
of
the
pandemic
yet.
So
I
just
think
the
comment
is
perfectly
fine,
as
it
is,
and
there's
no
reason
to
reconsider
this
voting
no
on
reconsideration.
B
P
Sorry
about
that
yeah
having
trouble
with
my
with
my
me,
but
I
just
I
I
did
receive
the
email
string
as
well
and
concern.
P
It
does
not
provide
any
confirmation
that
the
federal
you
know
that
that
the
federal
funder
concurs
or
that
it
has
been
confirmed
that
the
funding
will
be
available
in
2024.
So
that's
all
that
this
is
trying
to
seek,
and
I
think
it's
you
know,
our
responsibility
is
folks
reviewing
this
to
to
ensure
that,
what's
you
know,
written
is
is
consistent
and
just
pointing
out
right.
You
know,
noticing
that
discrepancy,
we're
trying
to
see
clarification.
So
if
it,
if
that
in
fact
has
been
confirmed,
maybe
we
can
modify
the
the
actual
proposal.
P
If
not,
I
think
we
do
need
to
indicate
that
that
discrepancy
between,
what's
being
anticipated
and
what's
been
confirmed,
still
exists
and
then,
similarly
the
comment
about
community
engagement,
the
proposal
actually
doesn't
mention
anything
about
community
engagement,
just
making
sure
it
wants
to
make
sure
that
we
are
using
the
the
best
data
to
to
make
this
important
decision-
and
I
have
read
about
about
how
other
cities
have
modified
their
their
their
plans
based
on
new
traffic
patterns
post
pandemic.
And
I
think
it's
it's.
B
All
right
next
katie
jones
and
scott
engel.
G
Yeah,
so
I'd
like
to
speak
to
this
with
regards
to
the
confirmation
of
of
funding.
This
is
not
something
that
we
have
typically
done,
and
this
is
something
that
is
typically
an
email.
So
it
does
just
seem
odd
to
me
that
for
this
particular
project,
where
this
is
something
we
can
just
get
resolved
via
an
email
that
we
need
that
it's
it's
being
put
in
the
in
the
click
comments.
G
Secondly,
and
and
the
fact
that
we
do
have
we-
we
got
some
confirmation
via
email
from
public
works
about
this,
and
they
are
committed
to
keeping
this
funding
this.
This
project
just
cannot
happen
without
that
public,
that
federal
funding-
and
I
know
that
the
city
is
committed
to
seeing
this
project
through.
Secondly,
the
community
engagement
is
the
critical
piece
here.
G
I've
I've
been
following
this
this
project
ever
since
it
came
to
click
and
actually
authored,
multiple
comments
over
the
over
the
years
to
get
specifically
at
community
engagement,
knowing
that
this
is
a
critical
corridor,
as
it
was
pointed
out
by
this
comment
that
we
needed
to
be
thoughtful
about
that
and
and
public
works
has
they
created
a
a
community
advisory
committee
that
is
specifically
focused
on
engagement.
I
don't
know
of
any
other
project
that
had
that
type
of
committee
and
that
committee
was
well
representative.
G
It
had
business
owners,
it
had
property
owners,
it
had
renters
and
homeowners
all
along
the
corridor.
So
I
think
that
was
well
representative
and
it,
and
that
group
was
really
good
at
making
sure
that
people's
interests
were
that
those
gaps
in
engagement
were
being
were
being
filled
where,
when
it
came
to
signage
in
certain
areas
in
the
neighborhood
or
what
have
you?
G
And
so
that's
been
a
lot
of
work
that
the
neighborhoods
and
the
community
members
have
done,
and
there
was
a
process
that
was
put
in
place
and
there
was
a
you
know.
Basically,
community
was
told
that
there
would
be
a
decision
this
year
and
to
not
follow
through
on.
That
is
a
disrespect
to
this
process.
G
It's
disrespectful
to
continue
to
ask
the
community
to
be
to
further
go
through
these
processes,
it's
good
governance,
to
set
a
process
and
make
a
decision.
I
understand
that
the
the
pandemic
has
been
a
component
of
this
and
that
has
been
actually
very
well
addressed
through
the
engagement
process.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
we
have
a
transportation
advisory
transportation
action
plan
that
sets
our
high-level
holistic
view
and
policy
on
our
our
transportation
networks,
whether
it's
busing
or
it's
driving
or
it's
freight
or
it's
biking.
G
We
want
to
be
planning
holistically
and
not
in
like
mile
and
a
quarter
segments,
and
I
think
that's
what
this
comment
is
trying
to
get
at
here
is:
we
need
to
study
the
the
actual
traffic
counts
and
how
they're
going
to
be
changing
over
the
next
year
and
honestly.
Is
that
really?
No
one
knows
if
that's
going
to
be
representative
of
what
is
going
to
be
needed,
we
need
to
be.
G
We
need
to
trust
public
works
to
to
set
our
guidance
for
our
city,
based
on
the
policies
that
have
been
adopted,
our
policies
for
equity,
our
policies
for
sustainability,
and
therefore,
I
hope
we
can
bring
this
back
up
for
reconsideration.
Thank
you.
E
Yeah,
I
have
a
question
before
my
comment:
can
somebody
clarify
when
the
clickbook
that
this
comment
would
would
come
out
is
that
december
or
january.
B
E
Starting
okay,
that's
fine,
so
my
comment
is
that
it
just
seems
that
this
is
unusual
for
the
clique
to
take
a
position
to
delay
a
project
based
on
design
and
I've.
Never-
and
I
don't
feel
like
this
group
has
been
informed
enough,
especially
based
on
what
is
provided
through
the
cbrs,
that
we
should
be
asking
for
this,
and
it
seems
more
like
a
political
move
to
push
it
into
a
another
calendar
year
for
a
maybe
a
perhaps
more
favorable
political
thing
to
to
change
the
design.
That's
being
proposed.
B
Okay
and
then
I
see
amity,
and
then
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
anyone
who
has
not
yet
spoken
raise
your
hand
if
you
wish
to
do
so
before
we
move
to
people
members
who
wish
to
speak
a
second
time
on
the
same
issue.
Amity.
K
Thank
you.
I'd
also
like
to
speak
to
bring
this
back
up
for
discussion.
I
think
what
katie
laid
out.
I
didn't
fully
understand
the
depth
of
the
community
engagement
that
has
already
happened
around
this
project.
So
I'd
like
to
hear
more
about
that
vote,
I
agree
with
everything
that
scott
and
laid
out.
D
Thanks,
I
just
want
to
clarify.
I
think
people
are
misreading
this
unless
I
miss
reading
it,
but
george
can
speak
to
it
after
me.
Nobody,
this
comment
does
not
request
a
delay.
This
comment
identifies
that
public
works
has
delayed
the
project
by
a
year
nobody's
asking
for
a
delay.
It
says
it
has
been
delayed.
That's
that's
the
way
public
works
has
requested
funding
for
the
project,
so
we're
not
asking
for
a
delay
we're
asking
them
for
to
use
the
time
that
they
have
as
a
result
of
that
delay.
B
P
So
sorry
yeah,
so
just
to
clarify
what
john
said
that
the
project
has
submitted
was
was
moved
from
2023
to
2024
and
not
this
does
not
propose
making
that
delay.
That
was
what
was
submitted
and
that's
why
I
identified
that.
You
know
if,
with
that,
being
the
the
project,
timing
being
changed
by
the
city,
that
we
just
confirmed
that
the
funding
availability
was
there
and
I'm
not
sure
if
it
needs
to
be
made
as
part
of
the
public
record
but
again
to
quote
it
from
from
becca
hughes.
P
The
note
says
our
intent
is
to
ensure
that
whatever
schedule
adjustments
have
occurred
or
may
occur
that
the
federal
funding
is
maintained,
it
actually
does
not
confirm
that
that
that
the
federal
funding
will
be
available
in
2024.
Maybe
there's
other
information
that
does
that.
But
this
is
an
important
enough
point
if,
as
it
was
stated,
if
the
projects
it
depends
on
that
funding,
it's
something
that
we
should
clarify
to
to.
You
know
to
the
city
council,
as
they
say,
consider
this
and
then.
Secondly,
there's
really
no
mention
of
the
community
engagement.
P
I'm
I'm
concerned
more
and
the
spirit
of
the
comment
was
in
understanding
understanding
the
data
and,
to
the
extent
that
the
data
has
materially
changed.
You
know
such
that
a
sub-optimal
decision
might
result.
I
do
think
it's
important
given
the
enduring
nature
of
this
investment
and
the
magnitude
of
the
investment
that
we
take
it
into
consideration.
You
know
just
like
we
are
with
some
of
the
other
proposals,
given
you
know
given
given
changes
in
the
economy
and
and
the
city
since,
since
some
of
the
initial
proposals
were
developed
and
that's
why.
N
B
G
My
concern
is
that
there
is
a
constituency
that
has
been
pushing
for
a
delay
and
a
delay
in
the
decision,
and
so
language
like
this
can
add
fuel
to
the
fire
essentially,
and
that
is
why
I
am
not
in
favor
of
this
and
that
really
that
we
should
be
falling
back
on
what
is
the
vision
of
the
city
that
we
want,
and
not
that
I
mean,
even
if
we
do
collect
data
over
the
next
year.
B
F
H
B
B
H
H
Two
years
ago,
the
nature
and
the
energy
of
hennepin
avenue
was
significantly
different
than
it
is
today
and
I
think
will
be
over
the
next
year
and
I
think
it
would
be.
It
would
be
unfortunate
if
we
ignored
that.
So
you
know
a
year
from
now.
Maybe
things
will
be
the
same
and
we'll
be
all
back
to
normal,
and
the
plans
that
were
put
in
a
year
ago
will
be
perfectly
appropriate
for
next
year,
but
maybe
they
won't.
H
So
I
for
one
would
like
to
see
that
somebody's
looking
at
this,
given
the
time
we
have
and
not
just
you
know,
put
a
period
on
it
and
say
you
know
nothing
else
to
see
here,
move
along,
so
I
I
would
support
leaving
the
comment
in
as
in
as
is
thank
you.
B
A
A
I
E
G
H
C
H
F
F
L
B
We
will
then
call
the
vote
on
reconsidering
no
further
debate.
A
I
B
Q
E
A
E
L
H
I
H
E
F
L
B
Is
there
any
further
discussion
on
the
so
the
question
would
be
on
on
to
adopt
or
not
adopt
a
comment
unless
dan
miller
had
a
quote
unquote
friendly
amendment
earlier.
H
Yeah,
I
I
just
wanted
to
I
appreciate
the
author's
attempt
to
you
know,
discuss
something
that
that
is
still
in
process
and
if
I
could
possibly
have
the
person
controlling
the
screen,
maybe
highlight
the
things
which
I
would
delete.
Maybe
that
would
be
the
best
way
to
do
it
or
strike
through
it
sure,
but
I
would
offer
this
a
friendly
amendment
to
try
to
keep
part
of
what
the
author
is
trying
to
do
here.
So
what
I
would
do
would
be
to
eliminate
the
first
two
sentences,
which
would
be
element.
H
Implementation
of
this
project
has
been
delayed
from
2023
to
2024,
but
the
project
description
indicates
that
seven
million
five
hundred
fifty
thousand
of
federal
funding
has
been
awarded.
Construction
in
2023
click
recommends
that
the
city
confirm
and
clarify
that
this
federal
finding
will
still
be
available
for
construction
in
2024.
H
So
I
would
delete
that
whole
those
two
sentences,
the
following
sentence,
I
would
put
in
click
and
then
strike
also
so
it
would
read.
Click
recommends
that
the
city
used
the
extra
year
to
consider
how
the
pandemic
and
other
significant
changes
affect
transportation
needs
in
this
vital
quarter
period
and
now
we're
going
to
strike
the
following
language,
which
is
compared
to
the
2018
data
used
in
developing
the
project
and
funding
request.
B
H
I
was
just
trying
to
honor
a
person
that
that
is
a
new
member
to
click
that
has
concerns
about
this
area,
and
I
I
realize
that
this
is
a
there's,
a
lot
of
good
work.
That's
been
done
on
this
and
I
think
a
lot
of
good
work
will
continue
and
I
don't
want
to.
H
I
just
think
that
he
he
had
some
comments
and
if
a
friendly
amendment
isn't
in
order,
he
has
to
approve
it
or
I
guess
it's
been
seconded
so.
G
I
would
just
say
I
would
be
okay
with
this.
If
we
strike
the
words
extra
year.
B
Okay,
so
technically
amendment
to
the
amendment,
but
I
don't
want
to
get
into
too
many
roll
calls.
If
there's
no,
if
there's
no
objection,
that'll
be
included
in
the
maker's
amendment
discussion
on
the
amendment,
seeing
none,
the
clerk
will
call
a
roll
on
the
amendment
that
is
shown.
Do
you
need
to
have
that
anyone
need
to
have
it?
Re-Read
it
it's
it's!
No,
I'm
saying
no!
So
let's
call
a
roll
on
the
amendment.
Please.
E
H
I
I
R
I
I
E
F
B
Amendment
is
carried.
Is
there
any
further
discussion
on
the
motion
as
amended
any
further
discussion,
seeing
no
hands
raised,
we'll
just
redo
that
clerco
caller
roll
on
the
adoption
of
the
amended
comment.
Q
I
A
G
I
I
I
B
M
A
M
Me
bring,
let
me
bring
the
first.
Let
me
bring
the
document
up
to
the
first
comment
that
we
have
it's
not
adopted.
If
that
makes
sense,.
H
I
think
the
agenda
had
us
looking
at
the
task
force
comments.
First,.
H
Yeah,
I
move
that
we
continue
discussion
on
art,
101
art
in
public
places
and
I'd
like
to
lead
off
with
the
question
to
eric
juan.
B
Is
there
a
second
on
that
and
are
you
moving
it
as
the
dot
as
presented.
D
B
I
B
H
Okay,
to
start
off
with
the
question
based
on
my
notes
and
my
recollection
eric
this
was
never
approved
out
of
the
out
of
our
task
force.
This
was
tabled
directly
to
general
discussion.
Is
that
true.
C
That's
correct
it's
so
it
was
never
passed.
It
was
tabled
in
our
in
our
in
our
task
force.
Okay,
so
so
it's
it's
here.
I
see
it
table
262
and
but
we
did
not
discuss
it
on
6-2.
H
Right,
so
the
discussion
implied
that
we
were
making
motions
to
remove
it,
but
I
think
that
we
never
added
it
officially
in
the
first
place.
H
So
I
don't
know
whether
that
makes
a
difference
at
this
point,
but
we
were
discussing
this
last
time
not
last
week
but
two
weeks
ago,
as
if
it
were
approved
and
in
place
and
we
were
discussing
whether
it
be
removed.
H
C
If
I
might
share,
I
think
the
question
is
so
this
moved
forward,
despite
it
being
tabled
at
the
task
force
level.
C
D
Thank
you,
so
I'm
going
to
state
facts
that
I
don't
know
to
make
sure
that
I
have
them
correct,
so
this
was
not
passed
by
the
the
human
development
task
force.
However,
it
was
forwarded
as
part
of
the
consent
agenda
which,
to
my
mind,
the
only
things
that
should
have
been
forwarded
as
part
of
the
consent
agenda
is
comments
that
were
passed
by
each
task
force.
M
Yep
and
that's
where
that's
why
I
jumped
in
queue
as
the
staffer
for
the
task
force,
my
understanding
and
it's
obviously
bears
correction
now.
My
understanding
is
that
the
comment
headings
actually
been
adopted,
along
with
all
the
other
comments
that
have
been
discussed
with
the
task
force
and
then
rolled
out
to
the
larger
committee
for
consideration,
and
then
it
was
pulled
off
of
the
consent
agenda
for
consideration
by
the
larger
community.
That
had
been
my
understanding.
M
That's
why
it
was
rolled
out
to
the
larger
committee
right
and
that's
my
understanding
is
it
had
been
then
pulled
off
and
again
that
certainly
bears
correction.
Now,
if
that
wasn't
actually
the
case-
and
this
was
not
fully
considered
by
the
task
force,
but
I
had
understood
it
to
be
passed
by
the
human
development
task
force
and
advanced.
H
I
think
we
had
at
least
two
possibly
three
items
that
we
never
completed
votes
on
in
the
human
development
task
force,
and
this
was
certainly
one
of
them.
I
believe
there
was
one
more
for
sure.
I
don't
recall
the
third.
I
tried
to
go
back
to
look
at
the
meetings
on
video
and
those
are
not
yet
available.
E
D
B
You
know
upon
further
reflection
and
further
clarification.
I
would
agree
that
it
was
not
clear
when
this
was
being
moved
for.
Discussion
was
what
was
stated
so.
H
B
So,
okay,
so
we
can
so
a
motion
to
actually
remove
this
from
consideration
was
properly
made
and
seconded.
Is
there
any
discussion.
B
Seeing
no
further
discussion,
then
we
should
the
clerk
will
call
a
role
on
the
motion
to
remove
this
jeff.
L
C
Yeah
I
I'd
like
to
see
if
we
could
offer
the
author
of
that,
that
that
section,
an
opportunity
to
say
something
if
she
wishes
to
before
we
move
on
and
now
katrina.
F
Well,
you
know
when
we
were
discussing
this
the
last
time
and
somebody
said
that
no
matter
what
I
said
or
no
matter
what
kind
of
data
I
showed
them,
they
wouldn't
change
their
mind.
I'm
going
to
be
back
around
next
year.
I
mean
I
have
a
whole
list
of
data
and
stuff
I
can
read,
but
the
the
resistance
is.
You
know.
After
the
last
four
years,
I've
learned
to
go
ahead,
so
you
can
remove
it.
M
Very
gladly
this
is
art
01
art
in
public
places
was
tabled
to
the
june
2nd
meeting
and
not
taken
up
at
that
time.
The
comment
reads
to
date:
the
city
of
minneapolis
is
underinvested
in
its
public
arts
program
and
fallen
short
of
its
contemporary
peers,
including
philadelphia,
chattanooga,
austin
and
fort
collins,
all
of
which
started
their
aipp
programs
many
years
earlier.
They
have
all
achieved
national
and
global
recognition.
B
I
I
K
E
I
I
F
F
A
B
K
B
M
This
is
water,
35,
renewable
energy
at
water,
treatment,
campuses
and
psd,
24
solar
at
various
locations,
and
this
was
submitted
on
june
6th
to
replace
the
original
comment.
This
comment
reads:
according
to
the
purpose
and
justification
section
of
cbr
water,
35,
mayor
frye
and
the
city
council
made
goals
in
2018
quote,
to
move
to
100
renewable
energy
for
municipal
facilities
and
operations
by
2022,
and
quote
quick
wishes
to
emphasize
the
importance
of
sticking
to
aggressive
goals
in
the
face
of
climate
change.
M
The
city
finds
itself
at
a
moment
of
opportunity
to
expand
on
existing
goals
for
renewable
energy.
Both
water,
35
and
psd
24
incorporate
sustainability
planning
into
ongoing
city
services.
The
american
rescue
plant
act,
passed
in
january
of
2021,
includes
approximately
45.6
billion
dollars
to
be
allocated
to
metropolitan
cities.
Click
urges
the
city
to
consider
using
this
grant
to
either
expand
these
projects
and
or
identify
new
projects
that
move
the
city
towards
its
renewable
energy
goals.
M
B
I
I
E
I
H
E
F
L
B
Motion
adopted
well,
it's
12
58,
I
think,
to
honor
the
spirit
of
our
agenda.
We
have
a
time
certain
one
o'clock
discussion
that
was
table
from
the
last
meeting
on
the
strategic
and
racial
equity
action
plan
you
want
to
so
members
unless
there's
any
action
to
the
contrary,
we
will
move
to
that
discussion
item
please
picking
up
from
the
last
meeting.
M
Yeah
jeff
and-
and
if
I
recall
correctly,
the
item
was
was
tabled
for
additional
consideration
to
today's
meeting.
Without,
I
would
argue,
substantial
discussion
at
last
week's
meeting.
I
can
bring
up
the
presentation
that
we
brought
forward
last
week.
If
that
makes
sense.
M
Second,
okay,
so
it
should
be
up
for
members
to
view,
and
I
think
folks
will
recall
last
week
we
kind
of
you
know
touched
on
where
click
was
in
its
process.
You
know
not.
Not
very
long
ago
we
moved
from
our
task
force
discussions
to
broader
group
discussion.
M
I
think
we
noted
that
you
know
click
was
starting
to
touch
upon.
You
know
some
some
major
potential
comments
and
discussion,
particularly
around
racial
equity
within
the
city
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
and
staff.
You
know
following
that
discussion
and
just
where
I
think
we're
where
we
were
in
the
process
brought
forward.
M
You
know
some,
I
think
some
resources
and
a
status
update
of
where
the
city
is
on
some
of
these
larger
processes.
I
think
confirming
that
you
know
this
is
a
a
major
body
of
work
and
clicks
recommendation
integrates
into
you
know
the
city's
larger
larger
budget
processes
and
larger
work
plans
for
the
year.
So
we
wanted
to
provide
that
update
with
the
last
meeting
confirm
certain
work
that
click
is
currently
already
doing.
M
Around
equity,
particularly
equity
criteria
that
are
included
in
its
project
rankings
and
differentiating
equity
from
racial
equity,
and
then
we
concluded
last
week's
presentation.
I
think,
with
more
of
an
open-ended
question.
Per
click
is
a
self-governing,
relatively
self-governing
body
that
adheres
to
rules
applied
by
the
you
know,
state
of
minnesota
and
the
city
clerk.
M
You
know
we
wanted
to
bring
forward
these
questions
to
click
as
a
relatively
self-governing
body,
and
I
think
open
that
up
and
preserve
some
space
for
some
larger
conversations
about.
You
know
the
click
process.
M
You
know,
while
we're
you
know
currently
mid
stream
on
some
of
the
process
and
also
in
time,
for
I
think,
the
conclusion
of
this
year
and
looking
forward
to
to
next
year's
process
as
well,
and
if
I
recall
correctly
and
others
may
you
know-
may
very
well
jump
in
and
correct
me.
That
was
where
we
had
ended.
Last
week's
discussion
before
before
it
was
decided
to
table
table
all
further
discussion
to
today's
meeting.
D
D
One
thing
we
don't
do
is
change
the
guidelines
or
rating
system
that
we
use
midstream,
which
is
what
anything
like
that
would
be,
and
just
for
members
that
are
new,
we
actually
did
change
the
guidelines
between
last
year's
click
session
and
this
year's
click
session
and
the
most
meaningful
change.
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that
the
most
meaningful
change
we
made
was
in
fact
around
equity,
which
was
adding
equity
to
the
qualitative
criteria
and
giving
it
more
points
than
any
other
of
the
qualitative
criteria.
D
M
So
I
I
wanted
to
note
that
director
kruger
is
on
the
call
with
us
and
and
also
has
her
her
hand
raised
as
part
of
the
discussion.
Okay.
R
Thank
you
so
much
and
sorry
for
my
tardiness.
I
just
got
done
with
a
very
long
cow
meeting,
but
I'm
here
now-
and
I
think
that
john
raises
a
good
point-
and
I
my
answer,
based
on
conversations
we've
had
with
staff
trying
to
frame
up
this
conversation-
is
that
this
is
not
a
conversation.
R
We
have
an
explicit
goal
for
we
we're
really
just
trying
to
hold
space
to
make
sure
that
these
conversations
aren't
happening
only
at
the
tail
end
in
like
a
follow-up
meeting
or
only
sort
of
as
we're
doing
a
step
back
at
the
at
the
end,
in
preparation
for
next
year.
We're
trying
to
change
the
pattern
a
little
bit
and
make
sure
we're
talking
midstream
to
start
the
conversation
about
how
we're
doing
racial
equity
analysis
so
that
we
can
build
on
and
have
a
more
fruitful
conversation.
R
When
we
talk
about
those
specific
changes
that
you've
identified
john,
how
do
we
want
to
change
the
criteria?
Do
we
want
to
do
xyz
differently
next
year?
This
is
perhaps
a
bit
of
an
uncomfortable
request
to
just
sort
of
hold
the
space
for
a
discussion
so
that
we
can
do
higher
quality
work
later
on
in
the
year.
B
While
I
I
would
have
had
the
conversation
and
the
presentation
been
earlier
in
our
process
in
a
perfect
world
and
would
have
allotted
much
more
time
for
the
members
to
thoughtfully,
consider
and
have
a
very
deep
discussion
coming
in
the
position
of
our
our
click
process.
At
this
point,
I
am
feeling
pressured
as
your
chair
to
finish
the
deliverable
that
we
are
called
upon
to
finish.
B
So
I
will.
I
will
acknowledge
that
if
you
are-
and
yet
I
am
certainly
respectful
of
all
members
and
wanting
to
make
sure
that
all
voices
are
heard,
I
did
recently
myself
complete
training
on
racial
equity
impact
tool,
and
so
I
think
that,
as
click
goes
through
its
process,
I
there's
information
from
the
reit
tool
that
I
would
bring
to
the
process
myself.
And
that
is
just
answering
questions.
You
know
how
have
communities
been
engaged?
Are
there
opportunities
to
expand
engagement?
B
Who
will
who
will
be
benefited
from
or
be
burdened
by
a
proposal,
and
then
the
government
alliance
on
race
and
equity
gar,
I
believe,
is
the
overarching
entity
that
both
city,
minneapolis
and
hennepin
county
use.
So
I
think
that
this
is
appropriate.
Timing
and
members
should
take
this
information
and
use
it,
and
we
should.
We
should
examine,
also
examine
potential
unintended
consequences
and
you
know
develop
mechanisms
to
track
and
report
on
progress
and
impacts,
including
disaggregated
data.
B
B
I
think
that
this
is
excellent,
that
the
staff
has
brought
this
to
our
attention.
B
And
that's
why
the
time
certain
and
we
have
an
opportunity
for
a
dialogue
today.
So
that's
that's
the
goal
if
the
member
john
is
that
we
have
a
dialogue
and
that
we
continue
to
be
mindful
of
this,
this
information
and
how
it
impacts
our
by
poc
communities
and
and
and
all
residents,
robert.
K
Thank
you.
Sorry.
It's
really
noisy
in
my
apartment
around
me,
so
I
I
guess
I
have
two
questions.
One
is
for
robert
and
staff,
so
the
reia
tool
that
we
went
over
last
week,
so
I
tried
to
access
that
and
it's
not
granted
access.
So
my
question
is:
like
do:
does
public
works
and
everybody
create
cdrs,
do
they
have
to
use
that
for
their
projects
and
then
is
there
a
way
for
clicks
members
to
actually
get
access
to
it?
K
So
if
we
wanted
to,
we
could
use
it
or
use
it,
as
I
don't
know
like
to
push
ourselves
on
how
we
evaluate
process
projects.
M
Yes,
amity,
thank
you
for
the
question,
so
there's
a
there's
currently
a
a
form,
that's
available
that
is
used
it.
It's
especially
used
for
requests
for
committee
or
council
action.
M
You
know,
especially
where
it
informs
areas,
informs
decisions
that
are
directly
addressed
by
the
strategic
race
and
equity
action
plan
and
and
that
form
is
particularly
useful.
I
think,
especially
to
the
extent
that
staff
are
trained
in
on
that
form
and
understand
that
it
I
can,
I
think
we
can
share
out
the
form.
M
I
don't
think
it's
a
big
issue,
but
I
think
that
what
a
lot
of
members
here
would
appreciate
is
that
the
forum
you
know
asks
you
to
really
utilize
everything
that
is,
you
know,
embedded
in
the
strategic
race
and
equity
action
plan
and
the
race
equity
impact
analysis
guidelines
that
are
there
because
the
form
itself
you
it
almost
feels
like
you
could
answer
it
pretty
quickly
in
a
lot
of
ways.
It's
a
pretty
brief.
M
It's
a
pretty
brief
tool,
and
I
think
that
was
that
explains,
I
think,
some
of
the
delay
in
sharing
out
that
form
in
favor
of
focusing
a
little
more
on
a
lot
of
the
content
that
is
currently
published
out
on
the
city
website.
But
we
do
have
that
we
can
do
one
last
double
check,
but
I
don't
think
there's
any
issue
at
all
in
sharing
out
that
form,
just
as
a
matter
of
just
a
matter
of
process
to
my
knowledge,
department
supply
may
be
applying
that
form
internally
in
different
ways.
M
I
do
not
know
that
it's
currently
being
applied
on
a
project
by
project
basis
or
not,
and
we
need
to
follow
up
to
confirm
if
individual,
if,
if
departments
are
going
through
individual
cbrs
and
applying
a
race,
equity
impact
analysis
to
individual
cbrs
or
if
they're,
applying
it
at
different
stages
in
their
process.
O
Thank
you
chair,
so
I
just
want
to
make
a
general
comment
and
first
say
thank
you
to
the
chair
for
sharing
the
some
of
the
thoughts
after
participating
in
the
training
that
you've
participated
in
what
I
want
to
challenge
this
committee.
To
is
to
realize
that
intention
versus
impact
are
two
different
things
and
as
we
talk
about
the
the
budget
and
talk
about
how
funds
are
being
allocated
and
as
the
chair
and
others
have
said,
there's
we
have
a
our
recommendations.
Have
a
have
great
weight.
O
So
when
we
have
conversations
about
what's
one-sided,
what
one
ward
is
able
to
do
versus
another
war,
let's
take
into
let's
take
into
consideration
that
the
intention
of
the
cbr
and
the
intention
of
the
folks
may
be
good,
but
that
the
impact
may
be
that
may
be
different
and
as
a
woman
of
color,
I'm
just
gonna
put
it
out
that
it's
never
a
good
time
to
talk
about
race.
O
But
I
walk
around
in
the
intersections
that
I
am
every
day,
and
so
we
should
take
into
consideration
that
we
all
in
the
different
ways
that
we
present
are
have
intersections,
and
so
we
should
be
considering
as
we
are
considering
those
that
we
represent
and
that
we
are
having
voice
for
that
that
sometimes
the
that
everything
isn't
everything
is
in
black
and
white.
There
is
always
shades
of
grey
and
so
just
wanted.
M
B
Hey,
I
see
john
william.
S
Thank
you
chair.
I
guess,
there's
a
general
comment
partially
reiterating
the
comments
of
jocelyn
and
also
to
encourage
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
this
committee
as
well
to
learn
more
about
minneapolis
public
schools,
edia
committee
and
its
charges
to
both
audit.
After
the
fact,
the
impact
of
the
district's
decisions
from
an
equity
and
diversity
perspective,
as
well
as
inform
decisions
that
are
up
for
consideration
of
the
board
itself.
I
think
that
that
is
a
more
robust
and
meaningful
utilization
of
the
principles
that
are
allied
here.
Thank
you.
B
All
right,
thank
you.
I'm
seeing
hands
raised
later,
apparently,
for
some
reason,
I
have
john
and
amity.
D
Thank
you.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
jocelyn
for
her
comments
and
what
you
just
said
about
impact
and
intent
really
struck
a
chord
with
me,
and
I
just
wanted
to
share
a
challenge
that
I
found
this
year,
scoring
that
I
just
for
purpose
of
discussion,
I
don't
know,
maybe
somebody
else
will
agree
or
disagree
or,
but
when
I
was
trying
to
rate
projects
around
the
equity
category,
I
found
that
challenging
in
a
lot
of
cases.
D
D
You
know
whether
it's
a
paving
program,
that's
being
done
all
over
the
city,
so
I
just
found
it
that
to
me
made
it
hard
to
score
them
on
that,
because
we
don't
know
much
about
how
they're
going
to
execute
right
unless
it's
a
project,
that's
got
a
long
history
already
and
even
in
that
case,
you're
kind
of
if
you're
rating
it
on
its
execution,
you're
rating
it
on
what
it's
what's
happened
in
the
past.
Not
what
may
or
may
not
happen
in
the
future.
F
Yeah,
I
have
a
couple
questions
one's
for
staff
so
a
couple
years
ago,
if
I
would
have
read
these
statements,
I
would
have
read
and
even
though
the
words
are
same,
I
would
have
read
them
differently
than
how
I
read
them
now.
F
F
You
know
when
somebody
says
traditionally
we
do
this
to
me.
That's
just
supporting
white
supremacy
policies,
because
that's
what
tradition
is
when
I
hear
well,
we
you
know,
that's
not
the
way.
We
do
things.
Well,
that's
supporting
white
supremacy
policy,
in
my
view,
so
even
this
I
got
really
curious
about
this.
Even
robert's
rules
of
orders
are
part
of
the
white
supremacy
structure
to
oppress
and
suppress
opinion,
and
that's
you
know.
As
I've
been
in
this
group,
I've
been
feeling
these
really
weird
things.
F
I'm
so
you
know
harvard
has
a
you
know
in
the
upcoming
future.
Harvard
has
a
really
good
five-point
way
of
handling
meetings,
but
so
there's
a
lot
of
subtlety
in
the
comments
and
the
prb's
and
in
the
committees
that
I
don't
think
we
all
realize.
So
what
I'm
asking
for
from
staff
is
some
common
training
that
we
all
do
so
at
least
we
get
in
the
same
book.
We
don't
have
to
be
on
the
same
page,
but
we
get
in
the
same
book.
F
L
One
of
the
art
projects,
for
example
that's
on
plymouth
and
pen,
and
that
big
flower
that's
over
there,
well
learning
that
no
one
had
communication
with
the
community
about
putting
that
art
piece
there.
Someone
made
that
decision
without
input
from
the
community
and
the
community
saw
themselves
differently,
as
the
person
who
put
the
flower.
That's
one
example
when
they're
talking
about
we've
had
conversation
about
where
the
bike
space
should
go
a
long
time
ago
there
was
a
person
on
the
board
and
said:
well.
Why
should
north
minneapolis
have
a
bike
pad?
L
That
was
part
of
our
conversation,
so
I
think
it
really
helps
when
they
are
presenting
asking
us
to
consider
do
something.
What
area
of
the
city
are
you
talking
about,
and
how
does
this
impact
that
specific
area,
whether
it's
north
side,
northeast
south
minneapolis
or
whatever,
because
they're
able
to
tell
us
where
they're
doing
the
work-
and
I
think
it's
up
to
us
to
ask
the
question?
L
L
G
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
add
on
to
katrina's
point
about
training,
to
just
put
it
in
the
notes
that
we
should
also
have
in
there
comment
writing,
because
I
know,
especially
for
new
folks.
That's
just
it's
a
weird
way
that
we
create
words
and
put
them
together,
and
it
might
be
helpful
to
have
some
guidance
on
that.
B
Yes,
all
right,
I'm
still
seeing
katrina
but
I'll
okay.
So
I
would
like
to
just
add
from
a
personal
perspective,
I
was
in
a
neighborhood
board
meeting
last
night
with
public
works
staff
talking
about
the
bike
trail
on
53rd
avenue,
north
and
kind
of
coming
full
circle.
In
my
personal
volunteer
career,
if
you
will
with
the
city,
I
first
got
involved
with
the
neighborhood
board,
dealing
with
an
equity
issue
for
disability
community
of
connecting
a
600
yard
wood
chip
trail.
That
connected
quote
unquote
connected
the
hennepin
county
trail
with
the
minneapolis
system.
B
So
can
you
imagine
a
person
with
disabilities
or
elderly,
or
you
know
other
different
abilities,
maneuvering,
a
wood
chip
trail
between
two
major
systems,
and
so
that
was
one
of
the
first
accomplishments
of
shingle
creek
neighborhood
association.
When
I
became
involved
and
now
we're
looking
at
adding
for
the
first
time
bike
lanes,
striped
lanes
in
the
in
the
roadway
on
53rd
avenue
north,
which
connects
is
divided
between
brooklyn
center
and
minneapolis,
but
in
terms
of
having
worked
downtown
and
been
near
the
commons
to
see
the
level
of
you
know.
B
B
It
seems-
and
so
I
think
that
is
really
something
we
have
to
work
through
as
click
members
who
are
committed
to
overarching
equity
as
well
as
racial
equity.
I
have,
I
think,
katrina
katie
and
robert
air
can
was
up
next.
Okay,
eric.
C
C
I
would
propose
that
that
methodology
or
that
approach
be
shared
with
all
the
other
city
agencies
to
as
an
example
of
what
you
can
do
to
to
prioritize
and
and
to
acknowledge
that
they're
different
they're,
different
distributions
of
of
livability
and
and
other
city
resources
across
the
city,
and
if
there's
a
way
to
do
that
before
the
next
budget
cycle,
so
that
they
can
see
hey.
This
is
something
you
two
can
adopt.
That
would
be
really
beneficial
for
next
year.
C
B
Thanks
here
so
noted,
I
may
be
seeing
delayed
hand
raised,
but
I
see
katie
robert
and
katrina
and
then
I
wonder
if
we
should
have
the
remaining
30
minutes
to
do
more
of
our
business.
Other
business.
M
M
You
know,
there's
there's
just
ideas
you
know
already
out
there.
You
know
we've
heard
mention
of
you
know:
potential
training
or
resources
that
would
help
click.
Looking
to
you
know,
other
organizations
around
the
twin
cities
that
have
processes
that
are
in
place
that
work
very
well
or
would
represent
an
improvement
over.
You
know
our
own
current
processes.
M
You
know
from
willie's
comment
about
just
asking
where
projects
are
occurring
comments
on
how
robert's
rules
works
for
the
committee.
You
know
we're
kind
of
cutting
across
all
of
these
different
areas
that
you
know
describe
how
click
does
its
work.
I
wanted
to
recognize
some
of
that
and
also
call
out
you
know.
Click
has
a
you
know.
Click
has
a
work
plan
every
single
year
and
that
work
plan
has
a
couple
of
main
components.
You
know
there's
the
early
introduction
and
orientation
there's
the
ranking
process
that
occurs.
M
Hopefully
that
rings
true
to
a
lot
of
the
returning
members,
but
those
are
the
major
pieces
of
work
that
click
does
each
year
and
I
wanted
to
you,
know
kind
of
call
those
out,
as
we
have
you
know,
continued
discussions
about
clicks
process,
because
those
are
you
know
those
themselves
are.
M
You
know,
I
think
some
of
the
some
of
the
things
that
we're
talking
about
you
know,
in
addition
to
the
the
capital
projects,
I
wanted
to
kind
of
bring
those
different
elements
of
our
work
plan
up,
for
I
don't
know
just
consideration
or
up
for
reflection
too,
as
we
as
we
look
at
the
work
that
we
do.
You
know,
as
john
mentioned
the
you
know,
it
would
be
a
real
challenge.
I
think,
to
change
any
guidelines
right
now
as
part
of
our
process.
M
But
you
know
we
do
have
these
guidelines
that
enact
you
know
our
investment
scheme
across
the
city.
You
know
every
single
year
we're.
I
don't
think
we're
at
the
point
where
we're
you
know
where
anybody's
being
asked
for
recommendations
either,
but
you
know
the
race
equity
impact
analysis
can
be
applied
at
multiple
levels
too.
You
can
look
at
an
individual
project.
M
You
can
look
at
a
global
process
as
well
using
that
tool.
It's
really
versatile
and
it's
really
meant
to
peel
the
process
apart
and
really
take
a
look
at
at
the
outcomes
that
a
process
is
generating.
K
Yeah,
thank
you.
Everyone,
who's
spoken.
I
agree
with
everyone.
Who's
talked
about
more
trainings
and
I
think
there's
plenty
of
places
to
go
city
and
external
sources,
and
I
I
think
there
would
be
during
our
orientation
doing
like
a
half
hour
45,
whatever
the
time
frame
is
focused,
training
on
equity,
racial
equity
across
the
city
and
like
how
different
organizations
use
it,
how
we
should
use
it
as
click,
but
I
think
there's
also
like
we're
having
this
conversation,
and
I
just
want
to
go
back
to
what
john
said
about
scoring
specific
projects.
K
K
That's
holding
a
racial
equity
analysis
on
public
works
projects,
so
I
am
interested
in
how
those
things
could
connect
and
then,
finally,
sorry,
this
is
a
little
bit
long-winded.
I
do
think
there's
a
lot
of
members
on
click
who
have
been
here
for
a
long
time
and
I
don't
know
how
we
all
intersect
like
how
we
all
connect
outside
of
click,
the
smaller
meetings
that
we
have
as
groups
and
how
we
talk
about
equity
with
each
other
beyond
transportation
and
hd
and
the
times
when
we're
all
together.
K
B
Yeah,
thank
you.
Clerk
can
note
that
katrina
and
then
I'm
not
seeing
any
other
hands
and
if
there's
no
objection,
we
may
want
to
wrap
up.
B
B
J
Yeah
real,
what
amity
said
too
is,
I
think,
really
important
on,
as
the
reports
come
in
as
much
information
that
they
can
present.
You
know
as
we
try
to
come
from
all
angles,
but
I
did
as
I
would
search
through
the
reports.
I
didn't
have
a
lot
of
direction
on
what
how
that
project
they
felt
that
project
was
being
impacted.
So
I
think
that's
a
very
important.
I
I
agree
with
that
statement.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
that's
heard
I
will
do.
I
will
do
my
part.
J
I
M
Yeah
and
so
to,
I
think
you
know
that,
there's
a
lot
that
that
can
be
done.
I
think,
to
the
extent
that
click
can
help
to
you
know,
provide.
I
don't
know,
ideas
options.
I
think,
laying
out
things
like
eliciting
better
information
via
the
capital
budget
requests
is
great,
but
I
think
really
exploring
how
to
do
that
or
taking
the
next
steps
to
explore
how
to
do.
That
will
be
really
important
to
continuing
improvement
of
the
of
the
process,
and
I
think
there
are
a
few
things
that
were
raised
today
too.
M
That
really
just
merit.
You
know
to
me
they
feel
like
they
merit
some
additional
steps,
especially
if
they
at
some
point
want
to
translate
that
into
staff
action.
I
just
want
to
name
that
and
highlight
it
so
that
you
know,
if
we're
looking
for
responses
from
either
you
know
support
staff
or
from
departments
that
are
submitting
information
or,
if
we're
looking
for
additional
training.
Just
helping
us
translate
these
general.
M
This
general
discussion
into
next
steps
in
action
will
be
will
be
tremendously
helpful
at
subsequent
meetings,
especially
as
we
look
forward
to
next
year,
and
I
think
we'll
try
and
follow
up
to
the
extent
that
we
can
on
items
that
we
note
today,
but
again,
to
the
extent
that
we
can
get
those
into
really
firm
recommendations
or
requests
will
be
really
helpful.
I
B
Other,
like
reits
reat
reit
willy.
L
All
right
just
make
this
real
quick.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we
follow
up
what
amity's,
saying
and
johnson
was
saying
earlier
that
we
actually
have
time
slot
as
we
begin.
No,
not
this
this
phase,
but
the
next
phase
that
we
would
have
done
some
of
the
things
and
talk
more
about
that.
I
just
don't
want
to
talk
about
it
and
it's
out
there,
but
I
want
us
to
have
on
our
agenda.
You
know
after
we
get
through
all
this,
for
go
the
second
time
around
that
we
have
those
conversation.
L
B
So
I
know
that
other
members,
like
john,
for
example,
were
interested
in
in
tweaking
the
software
that
the
staff
use.
So
what
we
see
is
probably
largely
a
result
of
what
options
the
city
staff
have
with
the
cbr
tool.
You
know,
so
we,
if
we
don't
have
that
question
in
there
we're
not
going
to
see
it.
B
So
I
want
to
segue
back
to
our
unfinished
business.
If
there's
no
objection
to
page
six
of
our,
I
believe
we
have
two
remaining
task
force
reports.
E
B
M
B
M
Click
urges
that
nbc
undertake
further
study
before
implementing
any
security
upgrades
to
city
hall
that
restrict
public
entry
to
the
building
through
general
screening
nbc
should
perform
a
building
security
analysis
that
indicates
the
level
of
perceived
threat
wherein
the
building
the
perceived
threat
is
greatest
and
any
techniques
short
of
general
screening
that
would
mitigate
perceived
threat
and
report.
Its
conclusions
to
click
before
proceeding
with
any
security
improvements
and
comment.
B
I
I
Right,
this
is
an
attempt
to
balance
the
needs
of
security
for
the
city,
employee
workforce,
with
the
presumption
that
we
have
in
a
democracy
of
openness
and
access
to
a
building.
It's
just
basically
saying
be
sure
before
you
go
ahead
on
restricting
public
entry,
that
you
have
a
good
sense
of
where
it's
needed.
If
it's
needed
there
are
already.
I
I
think
history
around
the
country
has
shown
that,
generally,
it's
elected
officials
who
tend
to
be
targeted
by
security
threats,
and
there
are
already
a
number
of
security
measures
that
are
in
play
for
the
city,
council
and
people
that
meet
in
its
chamber,
ranging
from
the
presence
of
security
during
meetings
to
some
things
that
I'm
aware
of
but
haven't
been
fully
disclosed
to
the
public
as
well
as
I
think
that
we
should
think
about.
I
I
E
I
B
Q
They
had
a
study
already
done
by
homeland
security,
which
presented
to
the
board
back
in
july
of
last
year,
so
this
might
be
a
little
bit
moot,
but
you
know
steve-
and
I
disagree
on
on
this-
I
think
some
degree,
but
I
think
we
we
ourselves,
you
know
in
city
hall,
I
represent
employees
in
city
hall,
they'll
have
people,
we
know
that
are
there
I
don't
want
to
get.
Q
You
know.
I
think
I
use
the
analogy
of
using
a
mask
during
culvert.
You
know
the
criticism
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
a
little
bit
of
an
inconvenience,
but
if
we're
gonna
keep
other
people
safe,
there
are
inconveniences.
We
have
to
do.
Saint
paul
city
hall
has
in
place
henry
county
government
center.
Has
this
in
place?
Q
You
go
over
to
the
new
building
the
public
service
center.
They
have
counters
that
are
made
of
bulletproof
kevlar
so
that
staff
can
duck
behind
them.
In
case
an
active
shooter
comes
in
and
starts
shooting
I
mean
this
is
a
society
we
live
in.
I
think
the
last
time
we
talked
about
this
literally
while
I
was
discussing
this,
the
shooting
occurred
in
the
bus
garage
in
california.
So
I
mean
it's
a
fact
of
life.
D
I
don't
know
so
those
of
you
that
know
me
may
think
that
an
alien
from
that
universe,
jeff,
is
in
his
occupying
body
and
speaking
for
me,
but
I'm
thinking
and
I'm
not
going
to
hold
up
the
comment
over
this.
Maybe
I'm
just
it's
the
way
I
read
it,
but
I
guess
I'd
offer
this
as
a
friendly
amendment
and
if,
if
it's
not
taken,
that's
fine
I'll,
just
drop
it.
That
last
sentence
is
feel
I
feel
like
we
maybe
want
to
soften
that
language.
D
D
B
Okay,
unless
there's
objection
we'll
just
take
that
as
a
the
minimus
change
not
requiring
a
vote
thanks
john
eric
and
willie.
C
Thank
you
so
for
for
context.
I
spent
virtually
all
my
career
in.
E
C
C
C
L
Willie
I
do
agree.
You
know
I've
been
in
a
building
a
lot
and
there
are
some
of
you
may
not
be
aware
the
entrance
on
the
third.
That's
an
entrance.
That's
over
there,
that's
not
secure
at
all
and
on
the
back
end
facing
northeast.
They
have
a
guard
there,
but
the
front
end:
there's
no
one
there.
They
do
need
to
do
an
analysis
of
that
building
of
security
because
it's
really
open.
L
You
know
and
that's
why
the
government
center
would
put
their
secure
thing.
They
can
lock
those
doors
between
the
government
center
and
city
hall,
so
I
think
they
need
to
look
at
have
an
analysis
of
it
and
figure
out
how
to
secure
that
building
more
than
what
it
is,
because
there's
three
inches
but
one
entrance
you
would
never
know
anyone
came
into
that
building.
B
All
right,
I'm
saying
john,
are
you
still
in
queue.
B
I
see
okay,
I
put
my
hand
in
queue
and
I'll
just
say
briefly
that
I
think,
since
it
is
lgbtq
pride
month,
hearkening
back
a
long
time
ago
to
the
assassination
of
harvey
milk,
that
I
don't
think
we
can
say,
because
security,
police
or
other
sheriffs
or
other
uniformed
public
safety
officers
office
in
a
building
that
it
is
necessarily
safe
for
public
or
public
officials.
B
B
Q
I
E
A
H
I
F
B
M
Jones
all
right,
this
is
pv.
This
robert
this
is
pv-006.
It
was
submitted
june,
2nd
for
inclusion.
This
comment
reads:
click
commends
the
city
on
seeking
to
provide
good
infrastructure
service
city
streets
and
alleys,
give
us
access
to
a
variety
of
destinations,
including
private
property.
M
As
the
city
evaluates
alleys
for
reconstruction,
slash
pavement,
it
should
consider
not
only
the
current
alley,
pavement
condition,
but
also
the
drainage
patterns
that
are
negatively
affecting
adjacent
residences.
As
on
the
block
of
3500
to
3600
fremont
avenue,
south
poor
drainage
that
causes
water,
cooling,
brings
winter
ice
buildup
and
prevents
access
to
properties
and
comment.
J
J
I
wouldn't
move
this
comment.
This
is
thor.
K
D
So
I
I
had
my
hand
up
previously.
I
was
going
to
move
the
comment
with
one
one
change
to
it.
I
I
I'm
supportive
of
the
comment
and
I'm
not
suggesting
this
was
katie's
intent,
but
having
that
specific
block
addressed
in
there,
I
I
assume
her
intent
is
to
use
that
as
an
example.
But
it
has
a
it
reads
a
bit
like
it's
saying:
please
fix
this
block,
which
is
something
we
typically
don't
do
with.
That
would
call
out
a
specific
thing.
J
Yeah,
I
do
the
question
to
john.
Is
it?
Is
it
helpful
for
examples,
because
I
know
of
several
other
blocks
also,
I
don't
want
the
city
to
not
understand
what
we're
referring
to,
but
how
do
we
get
that
clarity
without
an
example.
D
I
guess
my
public
works
is,
will
understand
exactly
what
you're
talking
about
and
that
they're
aware
of
this.
So
to
me
I
don't
think
it's
necessary
to
have
an
example.
If
we
are
going
to
do
it
that
way,
then
there
should
be
multiple
ones,
and
maybe
I
don't
know
I
I'd
feel
better.
If
we
didn't
do
it,
I
just
think
it
can
be
read
incorrectly,
like
it's
sort
of
trying
to
say.
Please
go
fix.
That
block,
which
I
know
is
not
your
intent,
but
it
can
be
read
that
way.
H
H
B
Well,
if
there's
objections
so
katrina,
you
object.
Okay,
so
then
we
we
can't
really
just
do
it
without
an
amendment.
John,
did
you
want
to
make
an
amendment
to
strike
the
language.
D
F
Yeah,
I
have
a
discussion,
I've
had
my
hand
up,
and
I
don't
think,
okay
katrina,
so
this
was
in
this.
This
person-
specifically,
I
thought,
mentioned
this
during
one
of
the
public
comments,
because
he
gets
18
inches
of
ice
and
he
has
called
the
city
what
over
three
or
four
years,
and
it
still
hasn't,
been
taken
care
of.
So
this
was,
I
think,
a
specific
place
from
one
of
the
public
comment
periods.
B
B
Discussion
on
the
amendment,
so
the
if
not
the
amendment
is
to
just
strike
that,
as
on
the
block
of
3536
fremont
avenue,
south
the
clerk
can
call
a
roll.
Q
I
Q
I
E
E
A
B
Hi,
so
the
amendment
passes
21
eyes.
Did
anyone
need
to
have
the
final
wording
read.
B
In
there,
whoever
is
editing
it's
that
was
chair's
suggestion,
but
the
amendment
was
removing
there.
You
go
yeah.
E
Q
I
H
E
F
B
B
However,
robert,
do
you
have
the
ability
to
show
and
and
look
at
the
two
if
we
have
the
ratings
of
projects
cbrs
by
top
to
bottom
and
then
by
program.
M
Yeah,
let
me
see
if,
if
we
have
neil
young
hands
on
the
call
still
staff
may
have
been
called
away.
M
Yeah
neil
actually
has
some
some
summary
information
as
well
on
the
on
the
rankings,
which
may
be
really
helpful.
I
recall
last
year
they
were
some
summary
information
was
asked
for,
and
it
was
actually
managed
to
find
the
time
to
pull
something
together
this
year
as
well.
N
E
N
So
there
were
129
cbr
projects
to
a
rate:
six.
Those
were
unranked
reimbursement
projects.
The
sanitary
sewers
was
actually
the
top
top
ranked
project
with
an
average
score
of
238.
N
And
so
we
broke
this
down
into
three
different
tiers,
just
based
on
the
just
on
the
number
of
cbrs,
because
there's
not
like
a
really
accurate,
like
cut
off
in
any
way
until
you
start
getting
over
here
into
this
nbc
12
and
then
there's
some
fleet
projects
that
kind
of
taper
off
down
here
in
the
tier
three
projects,
I
can
walk
through
the
top
10
ranked
projects,
it's
easiest,
so
our
top
10
projects
were
sanitary,
sewers,
the
sidewalk
one,
defective
hazardous
sidewalks
infiltration
and
inflow
removal
program,
neighborhood
parks,
capital
infrastructure,
storm
drains
and
tunnels,
rehab
program,
water,
23
treatment,
infrastructure
improvements,
diseased
tree
removal,
city
street
light
renovation
and
then
playground
and
site
improvements
program.
N
So
these
were
in
the
top
10
projects
and
you'll
note
here.
So
we
have
a
standard
deviation
to
show
kind
of
the
variability
in
people's
scoring
of
these
projects,
and
the
average
standard
deviation
for
all
these
projects
was
about
30,
30.6,
and
so
just
as
a
measure
of
how
wide
the
variations
were
between
people,
you
can
see
that
a
lot
of
these
projects
are
fairly
banded,
close
together.
N
So
I'll
walk
on
down
to
the
bottom.
10
ranked
projects-
and
you
can
see
a
little
bit
more
variability
with
that
standard
deviation,
so
technology
drive,
mpd
training
and
wellness
facility
fleet
maintenance
system,
the
fourth
police
precinct
vehicle,
hoists
tire,
advancing
equipment
for
curry,
fuel
icu,
upgrade
the
new
fire
station
number
19
and
track
a
key
and
then
the
of
the
elevator
12
modernization.
M
Yeah
jeff
we'll
be
ready
with
that.
Next
week
we
have
a
few
materials
that
we're
already
queuing
up.
B
For
that
review,
so
I
would
ask
respect
respectfully
and
I'll
get
to
john
in
a
second
respectfully
ask
that
members,
if
you
have
any
other
comments,
you
know
the
process
at
some
point
has
to
has
to
wind
up
and
we
do
have
financial
recommendations
to
make
on
the
capital
budget
capital
improvement
program,
and
we
have
meetings
next
week
on
the
23rd
and
30th
and
I
believe
the
30th
is
our
final
scheduled
meeting.
B
B
D
Just
really
quickly,
I
was
going
to
request
that,
in
addition
to
this
powerpoint
being
sent
out,
we
also
distributed
to
all
members,
be
the
ranking
that
ranks
all
of
the
projects
by
score
and
also
the
one
that
orders
them
alphabetically.
So
you
can
find
a
specific
project
easily
to
see
how
it
was
ranked
and
then
the
final
thing
I
want
to
point
out
jeff
on
your.
D
What
you
just
said
about
comments
is,
I
do
intend
to
offer
another
comment,
but
it
it's
the
comment
that
we've
put
in
past
reports
about
how
funding
is
impacted
by
the
streets
and
parks
ordinance
and
that
comment
can't
be
finalized
until
we
do
the
funding.
So
I
just
want
to
point
that
out.
B
Yes
and
john
and
members
if,
if
the
recommendations,
financial
recommendations
cause
a
conflict
with
the
comment,
you
know
we
we
just
adore
project
xyz,
but
then,
when
it
comes
to
funding
the
group
doesn't
fund
it.
We
normally
will
go
back
and
look
at
comments
that
are
inconsistent
with
recommendations
or
vice
versa.
Amelia.
R
Yes,
thank
you
for
the
reminder
about
some
meeting
types
moving
forward.
R
So
we've
done
a
little
bit
of
of
thinking
about
the
situation
talking
with
the
mayor's
team,
because
I
know
that's
like
the
final
meeting
you
guys
have
and
we
feel
confident
in
our
ability
to
host
an
entirely
online
meeting
or
an
entirely
in-person
meeting
what
we
don't
know
about
and
feel
we
would
just
run
into
a
lot
of
problems
because
we
haven't
tried
it
out
is
a
hybrid
meeting,
there's
just
not
very
many
meeting
rooms
at
the
city
set
up
to
do
that.
R
So
I
don't
want
to
put
that
one
on
the
table
because
I
just
think
the
likelihood
of
a
lot
of
problems
is
high,
but
I
have
spoken
with
the
mayor's
staff
and
and
if
there
is
interest
in
an
entirely
in-person
meeting,
they
they
are
fine
with
that.
Otherwise
I
would
recommend
sticking
with
entirely
virtual
just
so
we
don't
run
into
technical
problems
here
at
the
tail
end,.
R
B
Okay,
well
because
we're
past
time,
I
thank
you
emilia
for
investigating
that
and
letting
us
know,
and
then
I
think
members
should
just
contemplate
that
and
if
we
can
take
maybe
five
minutes
of
our
valuable
time
at
the
next
meeting
to
discuss
that
final
meeting,
because
remember
you're
going
to
be
having
financial
spreadsheets
and
a
lot
of
give
and
take
on
recommendations.
So,
but
with
that
apologize,
we
are
over
time.
I
don't
see
any
other
questions
coming
forward,
so
I'll
go
through
our
standard
reading.