►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Okay,
welcome
to
the
bicycle
advisory
committee
engineering
subcommittee,
and
today
we
have
three
items
up:
I'm
going
to
read
and
know
this
real
quick
before
we
get
started.
Members
of
the
board
may
participate
remotely
by
telephone
or
other
electronic
means
due
to
the
local
public
health
emergency,
novel
corv,
corvant,
corva,
corro
nevarios
virus
pandemic.
Pursuant
to
the
provisions
of
minnesota
statues,
section
13d,
.021,.
A
All
right,
so
our
first
and
I
don't
know
the
people
are
here
yet
I
hope
that
they
are.
We
have
three
things
to
talk
about
on
our
agenda.
The
first
one
is
the
upper
harbor
turtle
terminal
is
alexander
here.
A
C
It's
interesting
when
I
put
it
in
slideshow
mode.
It
goes
to
my
other
screen,
which
you
know
up.
You
want
to
see
so
I'll
just
like
that.
Okay,
so
hi
everyone,
I'm
alexander,
cato,
I'm
a
transportation
planner
in
public
works,
the
public
realm
infrastructure
engagement
lead
for
harvard
terminal
with
me.
I
have
ahmed
omar
who's.
The
project
engineer,
nathan,
coster,
the
overall
elite
from
a
public
works
standpoint
for
the
infrastructure
and
then
chris
bower
from
tool
design
who's
been
helping
us
very
much.
So
with
a
lot
of
our
engineering
design,
work.
C
D
C
Lot
to
cover,
I
think
most
of
this
group
has
seen
some
of
our
previous
efforts
around
the
upper
harbor
terminal
and
the
concepts
I
would
say
not.
A
ton
has
really
changed.
We've
just
kind
of
further
evolved
those
designs
that
we've
showed
you
at
zero
percent
and
10
percent.
C
The
the
biggest
overall
change
is
33rd
avenue.
North
that's
changed
quite
a
bit
based
upon
the
feedback
feedback
we
received
from
the
bac
and
pac
when
we
engaged
with
you
all
earlier
this
spring
so
like
I
said,
we
have
a
lot
of
content
to
cover
I'll
try
to
go
through
this
quickly,
but
please
ask
questions
to
go
through
there's
about
there's
four
to
five
different
sections
of
roadway,
we're
reviewing
and
just
ask
questions
as
you
have
them.
So
this
is
the
overview
of
the
project
area.
C
Dowling
is
the
blue
line.
All
of
this
is
going
to
be
reconstructed.
The
bridge
will
not
be
formally
reconstructed.
We
are
doing
some
improvements
on
the
bridge
phase,
one
of
the
parkways
in
the
dark,
green
and
then
the
yellow
is
33rd
avenue.
North
construction
on
all
of
these
pieces
starts
in
2023,
so
just
under
two
years
away,
we've
done
a
quite
a
bit
of
engagement.
C
We
did
our
first
round
of
engagement
in
january
2021
and
have
been
doing
engagement
on
this
project
with
cpad
for
a
number
of
years,
starting
with
the
above,
the
false
master
plan
and
we've
hosted
a
variety
of
open
houses
and
events
that
I'm
sure
many
of
you
have
been
involved
in
some
of
those
in
some
capacity
to
really
highlight
what
we've
heard
you
know
from
from
engagement
when
it
comes
to
infrastructure
is
really
just
prioritizing
bicycle
and
pedestrian
movements.
C
Obviously
dowling
getting
over
I-94
is,
is
quite
a
challenge,
and
so
we
were
really
tasked
with.
How
do
we
really
accommodate
non-motorist
users
across
the
bridge
and
then
into
the
site?
Also,
we
were
able
to
work
on
some
of
the
public
art
pieces
as
well
and
did
a
lot
of
coordination
with
the
pork
board
around
the
park
as
well.
So
it's
just
a
really
exciting
project.
C
You
know
this
is
just
the
concerns.
Congestion
was
also
an
issue
that
was
voiced
by
some
folks,
as
well
as
bike
pet
safety.
C
You've
seen
people
can
do
it
to
show
you
up
or
down.
This
is
just
a
few
more
suggestions
around
improving
the
art,
improving
the
public
realm,
providing
these
mortgages
as
a
fyi
for
folks,
so
we're
just
going
to
hop
into
darwin.
So
this
is
upper
darwin.
C
We
call
it
upper
dowling
because
it's
at
a
higher
elevation.
This
is
on
the
western
side
of
the
bridge.
You
can
see.
This
is
on
linda
avenue,
north
right
here
and
then
this
is
sixth
street
north,
and
this
is
right
before
I-94
I
always
get
these
confused.
One
of
these
is
fourth,
and
one
of
these
is
six.
I
always
flip
them
around.
So
my
apologies
one
interesting
thing
to
note.
This
was
not
even
in
the
scope
of
the
ust
project.
C
When
nathan
and
I
got
on
board,
we
did
some
analysis
and
realized
that
you
know
obviously
dowling
being
the
primary
access
point
and
this
area
of
darwin
wasn't
in
was
it
was
didn't,
have
the
best
pavement
condition
had
on-street
bike
lanes.
You
know
no
boulevard
sidewalk
backer
curve,
so
just
a
lot
of
room
for
improvement,
so
we
added
it
to
the
scope
for
this
project
and
we're
glad
we
did
the
further
west
of
here
we're
going
to
be
planning
to
put
into
our
cip
and
future
year.
C
So
this
treatment
that
we
have
here
with
the
shareholders
path
on
the
south
side
will
likely
extend
all
the
way
to
theoworth
park,
but
that's
further
along
in
the
cip,
but
the
design
treatment
that
we're
doing
here
is
done
with
the
attention
of
kind
of
a
long-term
plan,
of
how
this
area
will
look
and
how
folks
will
travel
to
and
from
the
site.
C
So,
on
the
south
side,
we
have
a
shared
use
path,
10
feet.
On
the
north
side,
we
have
a
six
foot
sidewalk.
We
are
really
constrained
with
the
the
space
we
had.
We
wanted
to
definitely
provide
separated
facilities
for
cyclists
because,
as
of
now,
it's
a
bike
lane
on
the
street.
This
is
a
high
volume
street
15
000
vehicles
a
day
and
a
bike
ride
on
the
street
is
just
not
our
go-to
design
standard
move
forward.
C
So
we
went
with
the
shared
use
path
to
facilitate
those
movements,
understand
that
we
are
still
a
very
constrained
right-of-way,
we're
also
able
to
add
in
boulevard
spacing
you
know.
Some
sections
are
four
feet,
which
is
about
the
minimum
for
tree
plantings,
but
some
sections
are
upwards
of
seven
feet
like
here,
and
here
we
even
have
11
feet,
so
there
will
be
some
boulevard
plantings
and
improvements.
C
Also,
some
nice
improvements
on
the
south
side
will
have
some
raised
crossings
at
this
location
here
at
this
location.
Here,
I'm
sure
this
group
is
well
aware,
familiar
with
those,
but
those
just
provide
a
design
cue
to
motorists
that
they're
entering
a
space
with
cyclists
and
pedestrians
and
that
they
should
drive
at
a
safe
speed,
we're
also
including
a
trucked
apron
gear
for
motorists
coming
off
of
the
freeway.
It
helps
us
shorten.
The
crossing
distance
still
provides
the
turning
movements
needed
for
some
of
the
larger
vehicles.
C
I
ran
through
that
pretty
quickly
just
want
to
give
space
for
nathan,
ahmed
or
chris.
If
there's
any
other
design
details
that
I
missed
on
the
upper
dominant
section.
E
Thanks
alexander,
I
I
just
want
to
apologize
to
the
group,
given
the
timing
of
when
this
submittal
was
due
for
the
so
that
was
available
to
everyone
in
advance.
In
this
meeting
there
is
a
mislabeling,
so
the
travel
lanes
on
darwin
are
not
11
feet.
They
are
10
feet,
so
there
is
an
instance
on
a
couple
sections
just
giving
the
versioning
control.
So
if
you
see
the
materials
at
the
open
houses
and
are
open
events
that
we
have
in
the
coming
weeks,
just
there
will
be
a
difference
there.
F
One
other
thing
I
just
wanted
to
mention
briefly
we're
working
through
the
design
of
the
raised
crosswalks
at
the
I-94
ramps
with
mndot.
These
would
very
possibly
be
the
first
race
crosswalks
mndot
has
ever
done
on
the
trunk
highway
system.
F
So
we
really
want
to
make
sure
we
get
those
details
right
and
that's
a
necessary
detail
to
make
sure
that
these
happen
so
just
be
aware
that
we're
having
those
conversations
still
with
mndot
in
terms
of
what
that
looks
like
and
how
we
can
make
that
work,
because
this
would
this
would
again
be
the
first
time
midnight
has
ever
done.
Anything
like
this.
C
I'm
going
to
keep
moving
along
because
we're
already
10
minutes
in
so
you'll
see
the
shared
use
path
on
the
south
side
that
continues
once
we
cross
on
the
I-94
entrance
ramp
you'll
see
that
it
actually
transitions
into
a
two-way
cycle
track
and
then
a
sidewalk
I'll
show
you
this
slide.
So
this
is
the
dowling
bridge.
So
you'll
see
this
two-way
cycle
track.
C
The
width
of
that
cycle
track
is
12
feet
and
then
we're
gonna
have
adjacent
to
that.
A
seven
foot
sidewalk
that's
existing
and
then
to
the
north.
We'll
have
that
seven
foot
sidewalk.
So
you
know
this
is
a
section
where
the
bike
and
pedestrian
facilities
are
separated,
because
we
have
the
space
to
accommodate
that
this
facility
transition
continues
pretty
much
all
the
way
into
the
site.
C
You'll
see
once
we
get
to
this
intersection
crossing,
there's
another
race
crossing,
some
green
marking
for
motorists
and
then
you'll
see
that
continuation
of
the
separated
sidewalk
and
the
separated
two-way
cycle
track.
C
A
few
other
things
to
note
here
we
did
quite
a
bit
of
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
technical
term,
but
re-skewing
of
the
intersection
to
just
to
organize
a
little
better.
If
you've
been
out
to
that
area.
Before
you
can
see
the
the
vehicle
lane
alignments
and
just
the
intersection
in
general
is
a
little
problematic.
The
crossing
distances
are
a
little
tricky,
so
we
are
are
realigning
that
intersections
just
aid
in
movement
for
all
users,
motorists,
cyclists,
pedestrians,
etc,
we're
also
adding
in
some
north
and
south,
by
facilities
as
well.
C
These
will
connect
into
the
weber
canadian
44
project.
That's
further
north.
I
think
the
construction
of
that
is
going
on
next
year,
if
I'm
correct
and
then
to
the
south,
we
have
the
the
cycle
facility
as
well.
That'll
extend
in
the
second
street
on
the
north.
I
know
I
went
really
quick.
I'm
gonna
give
space
to
the
rest
of
my
team.
If
they
have
any
comments
on
this
piece.
E
So
I'll
just
clarify
a
couple
things
that
I
think
this
group
may
find
interesting,
so
we
are
bringing
that
two-way
bike.
Bicycle
trail
separated
from
the
sidewalk
at
the
bridge.
We
are
constrained
with
an
existing
bridge,
we're
talking
millions
and
millions
of
dollars
to
rebuild
that
that
would
be
on
solely
the
city's
cost,
so
we're
trying
to
do
our
best
with
that
space
of
the
existing
bridge
deck.
The
one
thing
we
are
pushing
with
mndot
to
try
to
get
is,
unlike
striping
sticks
with
a
over
the
bridge.
E
We
are
trying
to
get
a
vertical
curb
in
there
on
the
bridge
deck,
so
we
have
more
protection
over
this
busy
bridge,
while
also
separating
it
from
people
walking.
One
other
thing
that
did
come
up
is
the
inside
pedestrian
ramp
crossing.
Looking
typically
we'd
want
to
try
to
push
for
that
on
both
sides
of
the
bridge,
where
there'd
be
pedestrian
crossings
at
all
four
legs.
However,
on
we're
right
where
his
curse,
alexander's
cursor,
is
on
that
east
side
of
the
bridge,
we
were
unable
to
fit
pedestrian
crossing
because
of
the
grades.
E
Basically,
if
we
tried
to
create
a
ped
ramp,
there
it'd
basically
be
the
low
point
and
pool
all
the
water,
and
you
get
a
lot
of
snow
ice
debris
accumulation
there.
So
we
tried
our
best
to
try
to
fit
that
in
the
pedestrian
crossing
at
all
four
legs,
but
we
were
just
unable
to
get
it
due
to
the
physical
location
and
grades
with
the
bridge
right
there.
E
We
really
would
like
that,
but
just
without
rebuilding
the
bridge,
we
were
unable
to
get
that
crossing
right
there.
Chris,
I
captured
that
correctly.
F
C
I'm
going
to
keep
speeding
through
because
we
saw
quite
a
bit
to
cover
next
section
is
lower
doweling,
like
I
said
we
call
it
lower
down
because
it's
at
a
lower
grade
than
the
west
side
of
dowling.
You
can
see
this
intersection.
That
was
in
the
last
slide.
You
also
see
that
a
two-way
bike
facility
continuing
east
into
the
site.
You
see
the
separated
sidewalk
more
boulevard,
spacing
here
for
some
nice
plantings.
C
I
think
this
illustration
on
the
bottom
relatively
accurately
captures
what
this
space
could
look
like
when
it's
developed.
We
do
have.
You
know
two
active
real
crossings
here,
the
inventory
we
did
it's
about
a
maximum
of
five
crossings
a
week,
so
pretty
low
volume,
but
still
by
mndot
standards.
We
have
to
put
in
active
gate
guards
and
warning
devices
here,
so
we're
doing
those
in
appliance
with
mndot
rail
to
ensure
that
you
know
everyone
using
these
facilities
is
safe.
C
That's
why
you
also
see
these
medians
here
as
well,
so
that
vehicles
would
not
try
to
do
something
dangerous,
like
drive
around
the
gates
and
weaving
the
traffic
to
get
past
the
train,
so
just
ensuring
that
all
we
have
all
the
you
know
necessary
safety
features
here
for
those
events,
when
do
when
trains
do
arrive,
like
I
said
roughly
five
times
a
week
at
the
most
and
then
from
here
you'll
see
that
the
dowling
transitions
into
the
uhd
parkway.
C
F
Yeah
the
goal
with
the
raised
intersection-
you
don't
see
it
on
this
driveway
but
envision
a
park
on
the
other
side
of
that
intersection,
and
we
want
to
try
and
convey
some
design
continuity.
Thank
you.
You
know
kind
of
into
that
park
and
show
that
this
is
all
connected
and
make
this
feel
more
linear.
F
The
idea
with
the
raised
intersection
is
to
make
that
entire
area
walkable
and
be
kind
of
a
gateway
into
the
park
is
kind
of
the
design
intent
with
that.
C
Keep
cruising
through
this
is
so
in
the
package.
This
is
actually
the
next
slide,
I'm
going
to
skip
this
one
and
go
to
the
parkway
and
then
we'll
come
back
to
33rd
just
from
a
logical
standpoint.
So
this
is
you
know
where
chris
was
talking
about
their
raised
intersection
and
then
you'll
see
phase
one
of
the
uhd
parkway
in
red.
I
realize
this
color
is
a
little
darker
than
the
parkways
typically
are,
but
just
know
that
the
parkway
will
have
that
red
granite
chip
seal
that
you're
very
familiar
with
around
the
city.
C
It'll
travel
north
over
here
and
end
in
the
cul-de-sac.
This
is
where
parcels
one
one
a
and
one
b
will
be.
So
that's
a
private
development.
The
park
will
be
here.
The
music
concert
venue
will
be
here
and
then
some
of
the
other
developments
will
be
here
as
well,
and
then
you
can
still
see
the
biking,
pet
facilities
continuing
north
and
south
along
the
parkway.
C
These
are
10
foot
travel
lanes
as
well.
You
know
a
10
to
12
foot
two-way
bike
facility.
There
will
be
some
parking
in
these
little
cutout
sections
here
along
the
parkway,
in
line
with
the
way
the
park
typically
designs,
their
parking
facilities
on
the
parkway.
You
know
we,
it's
still.
C
Of
parking
we
do
understand,
there's
a
need
to
provide
access
to
all
types
of
modes
and
users,
but
we
are
being
respectful
and
trying
to
prioritize
bikes
and
pets,
and
I
think
one
other
thing
just
to
add
along
the
parkway.
This
is
the
visualization
visualization,
but
it
kind
of
shows
you
the
priority.
You
know
pedestrians
have
the
really
nice
views
then
followed
by
the
cyclists
and
those
rolling,
and
then
the
motorists
are
a
bit
further
away
and
see
the
vehicle
driving
there.
C
So
it
really
does
show
kind
of
that
prioritization
of
of
the
parkway.
We
didn't
indicate
the
design
of
the
bikeway
and
pedestrian
facility
within
the
park.
That's
going
to
be
further
defined
by
the
park
board,
so
we
did
not
include
that
in
this
visualization.
C
I'm
going
to
the
next
slide,
which
is
33rd
avenue,
so
this
is
33rd
avenue.
We
went
to
the
bac
and
pac.
I
think
that
was
in.
C
One
concept
had
a
wider
shared
used
path
on
the
north
and
with
some
boulevard,
but
did
not
have
a
sidewalk,
and
I
would
say,
the
eac
and
pac
were
pretty
unanimous
and
that
they
they
unanimously
supported
that
a
sidewalk
on
the
south
side
was
essentially
a
requirement
in
that
they
wanted
to
have
pedestrian
facilities
on
both
sides
of
the
road.
So
we
went
back
to
the
drawing
board,
worked
things
out
with
the
design
team
engage
with
the
stakeholders
here,
which
are
heavy
the
light
industrial
manufacturers.
C
I
mean
we're
able
to
add
in
the
sidewalk
on
the
south
side.
You'll
see
it
here.
The
width
varies,
but
you
know,
does
at
a
minimum,
meet
that
six
foot,
pedestrian,
that
six
foot
par
and
then
also
a
few
extra
feet
for
signage
and
lighting
to
the
north.
We
do
have
the
share
use
path
for
10
feet.
Both
of
these
connect
into
the
roundabout.
C
We
have
two
10-foot
travel
lanes
and
an
eight-foot
median.
The
eight-foot
median
is
a
new
addition
on
33rd.
We
originally
had
a
much
narrower
roadway
width
and
when
we
went
out
onto
the
site
to
test
it
out,
it
just
didn't
work.
There's
a
lot
of
truck
activity
on
this
street.
When
we
were
out
there,
there
was
even
that
sometimes
a
dozen
trucks.
You
know
large
53-foot
trucks
navigating
through
this
space
accessing
this
driveway.
This
driveway,
these
driveways
as
well.
C
We
just
didn't
really
feel
that
there
was
a
safe
way
to
design
the
street
without
providing
that
medium.
So
what
you're
seeing
here
is
a
larger
roadway
with
vehicles
than
we
had
previously
shown
like,
like
I
said
we
went
out,
did
field
tests
chalked
up
the
streets,
we're
out
there
with
trucks
seeing
the
turning
movements,
and
this
is
the
best
way
we
could
accommodate
all
modal
users
to
this
area.
C
So
I'm
sure
there's
a
lot
of
questions
on
that.
We,
we
also
did
include
a
roundabout
which
is
relatively
similar
to
what
you've
seen
in
the
past.
This
is
to
facilitate
vehicle
turning
movements,
especially
this
roadway
here,
does
connect
into
the
private
development
into
the
light
industrial
facility,
so
they'll
be
using
this
on
this
road
to
perform
returning
movements
and
then
to
get
out
on
the
avenue
chris
nathan.
I
need
anything
else
to
add
on
that
before
we
open
it
up
to
questions
from
the
group.
F
From
a
bicycle's
perspective,
one
of
the
key
things
we
wanted
to
watch
out
for
was
the
skew
angle
with
the
railroad
tracks.
These
have
a
pretty
high
skew
angle.
All
the
bicycle:
crossings
of
the
railroad
are
60
degrees
or
sharper,
which
is
what
ashtow
recommends
to
avoid
slipping
into
the
flange
ways
on
the
railroad.
So
that's
something
we
we
watched
out
for
when
we're
designing
this.
C
We
have
a
few
more
slides
on
green
storm
water
infrastructure,
but
I
I'd
rather
like
to
pivot
and
just
see
if
folks
have
comments
or
questions
and
then,
if
we
have
more
time,
we
can
cover
those
they're
important.
But
I
I
want
to
you
know,
prioritize
this
group's
desire
to
talk
about
some
of
the
bicycle
facilities
and
see
if
they
have
questions
on
that.
A
D
Just
a
quick
question:
I
remember
this
is
back
to
upper
dowling,
so
it's
a
10
foot
shared
used
path
with
the
on
the
south
side
of
dowling,
with
the
divider
at
the
five
in
the
middle.
Is
that
the
is
that
the
plan.
D
A
way
west
of
the
west
dowling
as
far
west
as
the
project
goes
over
to.
D
C
Yeah,
so
this
would
be
a
10
foot
chair,
use
path,
I'm
not
certain
nathan,
where
we're
at
now
on
striping.
Are
we
center
line
striking
to
share
these
paths?
Are
we
just
leaving
them
unmarked?
I
know
I
know.
That's
been
a
bit
of
there's
been
a
bit
of
back
and
forth
on.
You
know
what
our
new
policy
or
our
approach
around
that
is.
E
Yeah
we'd
have
to
double
check
with
traffic
because
we
are
looking
at
best
practices
from
not
only
locally
regionally
across
the
country
of
how
to
best
design
stripe.
E
What
have
you
for
these
currently
on
the
johnson
project
in
northeast,
it's
being
built
as
a
shared
use
path,
we're
taking
the
approach
of
having
us
having
it
signed
with
biking
and
walking
signage
on
the
gateway
to
each
block
and
we'd,
be
looking
at
that
on
this
project
too,
but
just
have
to
confirm
that
detail
with
our
traffic
staff,
but
as
of
now
we'd
be
looking
to
have
signage
as
compared
to
striping.
C
Yeah,
it's
definitely
up
for
more
discussion
internally
but
like
the
jazz
history
project
is
going
in
right
now,
it'll
be
done
this
summer,
so
we'll
definitely
have
some
lessons
learned
from
that
implementation.
That'll
help
guide
this
future
reconstruction,
which
would
be
two
years
out
from
now.
A
G
You
had
a
question
about
washington
avenue
there
right
on
the
east
side
of
the
94
bridge.
It
looked
like
there
is
a
sorry
get
it
for
a
second,
no
problem.
G
So
it
looks
like
there's
a
two-way
bike,
lane
continuing
north
on
washington
and
it's
only
separated
for
a
little
bit.
Does
that?
Would
that
then
be
painted
as
a
two-way,
even
just
paint
protected
all
the
way,
all
the
way
up
to
where
washington
crosses
94
again
or
is
there
going
to
be
a
rough
transition
for
self-pound
bikers.
E
The
intent
would
be
to
have
stripes
and
with
delineators
up
to
the
lindale
41st
intersection
we'd
likely
be
doing
a
sealcoat
project
to
get
rid
of
any
lane
scarring
for
this
for
the
striping,
we
did
do
a
change
order
with
hennepin
county
on
the
weber
44
project
they
in
the
previous
layout.
E
They
had
it
transitioning
to
directional
on-street
lanes
at
lindale
and
41st,
but
for
those
of
you
familiar
with
that
project
that
went
through
this
committee
a
couple
of
years
ago,
it
will
now
stay
on
the
west
side
of
lindale
at
41st
as
a
two-way
bikeway,
come
around
the
corner
on
the
bridge
and
then
tie
into
this
project.
So
there
will
now
be
a
continuous
path.
Once
this
project
is
done
from
dowling,
I
think
nine
miles
connecting
way
into
brooklyn
center.
A
C
Absolutely
so
this
is,
you
know,
like
I
said,
there's
a
lot
of
pieces
to
upper
harbor
terminal.
One
of
the
most
critical
ones
is
the
green
storm
water
infrastructure
component.
C
We've
been,
you
know,
designing
and
working
around.
You
know
what
that
will
be
for
this
site
and
we've
done
a
lot
of
work
with
the
mississippi
watershed
management
organization,
the
park
board
and
also
private
development
to
reach
a
district
system
to
help
clean
to
help
clean
tree
and
re
potentially
use
our
runoff
from
the
site
before
it
enters
the
mississippi
river.
So
this
is
a
50
acre
site
and
we
are
using
the
water
to
infiltrate
into
the
underground,
mississippi
river.
C
You
know
some
of
some
of
the
water
here
may
receive
a
higher
level
of
treatment
than
others,
we're
still
exploring
that,
but
we
are
proposing
a
district
system
within
here
which
includes
a
variety
of
treatments
such
as
rain
garden,
swells,
storm
water,
wetlands
streamlight
channels
and
underground
filtration
systems
to
handle
all
the
storm
water
from
a
surface
level.
C
C
You
know
it's
adjacent
to
the
right-of-way,
a
variety
of
different
treatments,
so
I
would
say
the
takeaway
to
this
group
is
just
knowing
that
there's
going
to
be
a
district-wide
stormwater
system
to
treat
the
stormwater
runoff,
it's
still
in
the
design
stages.
We've
been
working
with,
like
I
said,
mwmo
the
park
board
and
the
mississippi
watershed
management
organization
to
really
deliver
a
really
exciting
system
for
the
public.
E
C
E
A
really
innovative
public-private
partnership
through
a
combination
of
easements
and
design
to
more
holistically
treat
storm
water
in
the
area.
As
alexander
said,
50
acres,
the
only
local
precedent
we
have
of
something
like
this
would
be
in
the
tower
side
district
over
by
the
u
of
m.
So
this
is
a
very
strong
collaboration
where
we're
able
to
say
private
water
park,
water
city,
water
and
better
utilize,
the
space.
E
So,
typically,
this
is
a
pretty
detailed
element
that
you
know
follows
through
before
construction,
but
we
thought
it
was
such
a
innovative
idea
that
this
group
would
be
interested
in
understanding
how
that
comes
together
for
cohesive
design
and
aesthetic
for
the
broader
site,
while
advancing
a
lot
of
environmental
goals
that
we
have
for
upper
harbor
and
the
city
as
a
whole.
C
And
then,
to
conclude
so
round,
two
engagement
is
starting.
This
month
we
have
an
open
house
on
august
24th
on
tuesday
we're
targeting
layout
approval
in
october,
and
then
construction
starting
in
2023
and
and
the
infrastructure
construction
will
start
in
2023.
The
private
development
will
likely
start.
You
know
shortly
after
that
and
continue
for
the
following
years,
so
yeah
two
years
from
now
you'll
start
seeing
a
lot
of
activity
at
that
area.
C
This
is
this:
is
it
this?
Is
our
30
we're
going
to
be
using
our
round
2
engagement
and
open
house
to
get
additional
feedback
and
incorporate
any
additional
tweaks
into
the
design,
but
we
are
not
anticipating
them
to
return
to
this
group,
unless
there
are
significant
changes.
Okay,.
H
Yep
hi
yeah,
going
back
to
the
dowling
avenue
over
94,
photo
there
or
illustration
just
a
question
regarding
mndot
and
what
they're
doing
with
252.,
I'm
not
sure
how
far
they're
going
down
but
is
mndot
involved
at
all.
With
any
of
these
improvements
on
dowling.
E
They're
a
project
partner,
but
given
the
current
timeline
for
the
environmental
review
on
252.94,
they
haven't
advanced
any
new
bridge
or
design
elements
that
would
currently
impact
what
we're
planning
here.
If
that
does
happen
or
those
plans
change
in
the
future,
we'd
be
more
than
happy
to
work
with
them
to
either
bring
their
funding
or
new
designs
here
to
you
know
further
transit
or
whatever
they
may
do
in
the
corridor,
but
right
now,
they're
mainly
reviewing
our
designs
and
our
strong
partner
in
helping
us
achieve
the
goals
that
we
want
along
dowling.
H
Yeah,
I
guess
my
question
with
mndot
maybe
refers
to
some
of
the
other
bridge
crossings.
53Rd,
I
think,
is
going
to
be
looked
at
for
bike
improvements
that,
of
course,
all
the
way
from
53rd
down
to
plymouth.
Some
of
those
crossings
are
41st
and
26th.
That
are,
you
know,
not
not
the
nicest
crossings
and
if
there
was
a
way
that
mndot
could
be
involved,
perhaps
in
some
similar
way
how
they've
done
94
and
35
w
south.
H
I
know
those
were
total
replacements,
but
I
just
was
wondering
if
they
might,
there
might
be
a
chance
that
they
could
be
involved
with
improving
any
of
that.
So
it's
more
of
a
question
for
you.
If
you've
heard
anything.
E
Yeah
we've
been
working
with
them
for
quite
a
few
years.
Now
they
don't
have
any
maintenance
plan
for
this
bridge
for
15
years,
give
or
take
10
to
15
years
for
maintenance
and
then
beyond
that,
a
replace
they
had
said
30
40
years
out
in
the
future.
So
from
a
pure
maintenance
perspective,
we'd
asked
that's
not
on
the
table,
but
if
something
comes
out
of
252.94,
that
would
change
that
we're
all
ears
and
we're
ready
to
work
with
them.
But
as
of
now,
the
questions
been
asked
and
they
said
no.
H
Okay
and
then
about
the
public
art
coordination
on
this.
Are
there
any
thoughts?
What
would
go
on
here.
C
Yeah,
so
I
can
so
I
didn't
put
that
slide
in
this
deck.
You
know
I
should
have
been
hindsight
or
included
as
an
appendix,
because
it
is
a
big
piece,
so
we've
been
working
around
we've
been
working
with
mary,
altman
and
cpad,
and
it
was
juxtaposition
arts
to
develop
art
concepts.
C
We
don't
have
anything
for
the
bridge.
There
just
wasn't
a
real
opportunity
to
provide
any
art
on
the
bridge
without
replacing
the
railing
and
then
replacing
the
railing
will
require
us
to
replace
most
of
the
structures,
so
it
ended
up
almost
becoming
a
bridge
rebuild
and
just
wasn't
really
practical,
but
we
are
proposing
some
art
along
dowling
closer
to
this
parking
lot
area
over
here
along
this
railing,
some
concrete
sketchings
along
dowling
and
then
a
lot
of
different
art
within
the
site.
C
A
D
Yeah,
you
know,
speaking
of
just
thinking,
about
the
infrastructure
work.
I
I
just
wanted
to
compliment
you
you
all
the
city
on
that
eighth
riverside
avenue
at
eighth
street,
quite
a
significant
storage
facility
for
water.
It
took
a
couple
years
to
look
for
it
really
to
grow
out.
So
I
think
people
so
I
I
passed
it
pretty
much
every
weekend
over
the
first
two
years,
you
know
looked
a
little
rangy
and
scruffy
and
you
kind
of
wondered
these
trees.
Gonna
live.
D
You
know,
as
the
picture
shows,
it's
really
come
along
well
and
the
stores
it
stores
a
heck
of
a
lot
of
for
a
big
rainfall.
It
stores
a
lot
of
water
and
really
that's
one
of
the
predictions
that
we
will
see
these
larger
rain
events.
So
this
was
a
great
great
example
and
it
appears
to
be
working
well
from
from
my
you
know,
biking
past.
It.
C
Brought
up,
you
know
we're
using
a
lot
of
those
same
same
folks
that
were
involved
in
the
design
of
that
system
with
this
situation
with
upper
harbor
terminal.
So
we're
really
excited
I'm
glad
you
enjoyed
that
and
are
really
optimistic
about
what
will
happen
at
the
uht
site.
A
Well,
unless
there's
someone
else,
I
want
to
thank
you
great
presentation
and
thank
you
for
having
the
pet
and
the
the
bikers
involved
in
the
planning
and
the
watershed
is
like
all
coming
together.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Any
more
people
have
any
questions.
H
H
Say
something
now
or
marty
and
myself
can
start
to
put
some
stuff
together
for
the
general
meeting.
A
A
J
Hello,
hello,
hi
and
joining
me
with
the
presentation
is
jody
raider
and
then
carol
helstone,
I'm
sorry,
I'm
probably
not
getting
your
last
name
quite
yet.
So
I
I'm
madeline
hudec.
I
work
at
the
park
board
in
the
planning
division
and
I
am
the
project
manager
for
the
kind
of
startup
and
community
engagement
portion
of
the
phase.
One
implementation
project
of
the
minnehaha
creek
master
plan.
K
You,
maybe
we'll
just
do
introductions
now
carol.
Do
you
want
to
go
next.
B
Sure
I'm
carol
hailstone
with
minneapolis
park
and
recreation
board
I'll,
be
project
managing
this.
This
effort,
once
it's
nearing
construction
through
construction.
K
Awesome
and
I'm
jody
rader
landscape,
architect
with
hkgi,
and
we
are
working
with
stantec
on
the
design
and
engineering
for
the
implementation
projects,
and
we
also
worked
together
with
the
park
board
on
the
master
plan
effort.
So
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
and
I'll
be
doing
the
majority
of
the
presenting,
but
carol
and
madeline.
Please
interrupt
if
I
forget
something.
K
K
So
minnehaha
parkway
regional
trail
underwent
a
master
planning
process
beginning
in
2018
and
that
master
plan
process
spanned
about
two
years
and
culminated
in
the
adoption
by
the
park
board
in
november
of
2020,
we
had
a
very
robust
community
engagement
process.
Throughout
that
time,
we
engaged
with
a
community
advisory
committee
had
a
dozen
meetings
with
them.
K
We
anticipate
the
horizon
for
this
master
plan
to
be
20
to
30
years
with
we
knew
going
into
the
master
plan
process
that
there
would
be
some
funding
available
at
the
completion
of
the
project
to
do
some
initial
projects,
and
so
that
is
what
we
are
working
on
right
now,
identifying
and
scoping
and
then
working
on
the
design
for
some
of
these
initial
projects.
K
With
the
master
plan
process,
this
was
kind
of
a
three-part
or
three.
K
There
were
three
entities
that
had
a
lot
of
involvement
in
the
master
plan,
not
just
the
park
board,
but
also
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
minnehaha
creek
watershed
district,
and
there
was
a
mou
that
was
signed
at
the
beginning
of
the
project,
acknowledging
that
the
three
partner
organizations
would
be
engaged
throughout
the
planning
process
and
then
also
through
implementation,
trying
to
identify
projects
that
can
be
completed
together
and
in
cooperation
with
each
other.
K
K
You'll
notice
that
the
study
area
did
not
include
the
segment
of
the
parkway
that
crosses
through
hiawatha
and
nokomis.
This
is
because
these
parks
were
master
planned
in
2000.
K
I
believe
that
plan
was
completed
and
so,
though,
that
portion
of
the
parkway
already
had
recommendations
and
some
of
those
recommendations
have
been
implemented
already
today,
we're
going
to
focus
on
the
recommendations
that
were
gathered
in
segment
3
around
portland
avenue
park,
avenue
50th
street
during
the
master
planning
process.
We
heard
quite
a
bit
about
this
area.
K
Through
the
master
planning
process,
it
seemed
apparent
that
we
needed
to
take
a
little
pause
and
address
some
of
the
the
issues
that
were
coming
up
through
engagement
and
with
our
cac
regarding
some
of
the
traffic
and
some
of
the
recommendations
throughout
the
parkway,
and
so
we
we
put
a
little
pause
on
the
master
plan
process
and
commissioned
a
traffic
study
with
spac
in
2019.
K
We
looked
at
the
conditions
around
this
particular
intersection
at
50th
street
and
minnehaha
parkway,
and
this
diagram
is
demonstrating
some
of
the
anticipated
outcomes.
If
this
intersection
were
to
be
converted
into
a
three-way
stop
today,
there
is
there's
only
a
stop
sign
for
the
eastbound
traffic
on
50th
street
and
the
parkway
traffic
does
not
have
any
control.
Today.
K
This
is
a
diagram
of
the
master
plan,
focus
area,
recommendations
for
this
area,
and
you
can
see
that
our
our
focus
or
our
primary
project
area
is
kind
of
one
of
many
many
recommendations
that
came
out
of
the
planning
process
for
this
area,
but
with
the
community
advisory
committee
and
mprb
staff
and
community
feedback.
We
identified
this
intersection
as
the
highest
priority
for
immediate
implementation
throughout
the
entire
creek
corridor.
K
Some
of
the
other
projects
that
might
might
become
part
of
this
scope,
depending
on
funding
availability,
might
be
looking
at
one-way
conversion
or
opposing
one-way
conversions
along
the
north
leg
of
manyhaw
parkway.
Here,
potentially,
some
upgrades
for
the
area
around
the
bunny
sculpture
and
looking
at
potentially
some
of
the
medians
to
restrict
some
of
the
turning
movements
around
the
trails.
K
This
project
schedule.
Right
now
we
are
at
the
30
percent
review
with
you
all
we'll
be
meeting
with
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee
next
week
and
then
I
believe
the
following
week,
we'll
be
actually
reviewing
with
the
cptf
group
with
the
city
of
minneapolis,
and
then
we
will
be
doing
some
community
engagement
with
neighborhood
groups
and
then
taking
all
the
feedback
and
working
on
construction
documents
planning
to
return
back
to
the
bicycle
advisory
committee
at
60
percent
and
90,
I
believe-
or
maybe
I'm
misspeaking
here.
K
I
threw
in
a
a
couple
slides
here
just
for
reference
if
we
need
to
come
back
to
them
in
our
discussion,
but
this
is
the
project
area
aerial
view
50th
street
minnehaha
parkway.
This
is
actually
mislabeled
from
google,
but
this
is
also
minnehaha
parkway
here
and
then
this
is
that
north
leg
of
minnehaha
parkway,
as
well
street
view
you
can
see,
there's
quite
a
bit
of
traffic
at
this
intersection.
This
is
there's
a
sign
today
that
says
signal
your
turn.
K
You
know
this
is
a
pretty
confusing
intersection.
I
think
for
most
users,
drivers,
pedestrians
and
bicyclists.
The
trail
crossing
is
back
here
and
there-
yes,
I
think
for
for
drivers,
it's
not
clear-
or
it's
maybe
not
so
apparent
that
they
will
be
crossing
a
trail
as
soon
as
they
kind
of
get
past.
This
intersection
there's
some
other
issues
that
we're
looking
at
alongside
the
primary
project
area
kind
of
looking
at
some
of
the
erosion
issues
and
potentially
adding
a
sidewalk
along
the
north
side
of
the
parkway.
K
The
shared
use
trail
is
here
and
then
crosses
the
roadway
and
then
the
trail
actually
splits
bikers
go
south
and
pedestrians
continue
across
the
bridge
and
then
go
south
along
the
parkway
on
the
other
side
of
the
creek
another
view
a
little
bit
further
south
along
minnehaha
parkway
from
that
intersection,
you
can
see
the
bike.
Trail
is
really
it's
right.
K
At
the
back
of
the
curb
along
the
roadway,
some
trees
have
kind
of
made
it
so
that
the
the
path
is
narrowed
here
and
not
very
consistent
and
then
sidewalk
on
the
east
side
of
the
road
and
then
one
more
photo,
maybe
for
reference
later.
If
it
comes
up,
but
this
is
actually
a
little
bit
further
east
from
the
project
area
closer
to
the
bunny
and
just
showing
the
the
parkway
trail
along
the
south
side
of
the
road
and
then
the
north
side
of
the
road
there's.
K
K
Some
of
the
components
that
we
are
looking
at
realigning
the
south
leg
of
the
intersection
to
a
t,
no
I'll
be
pulling
up
a
diagram
in
a
second
designed
for
a
future
three-way,
stop
controlled
intersection,
expanding
the
pedestrian
curb
ramp
areas
at
the
crosswalks.
K
We
want
to
use
those
green
and
white
multi-modal,
continental
style,
crosswalk
markings
and
then
we'll
be
looking
at
widening
the
trail
segments
to
match
the
master
plan.
Recommendations
for
the
parkway,
which
would
be
increasing
to
12
foot
minimum
for
shared
use,
trails
14,
would
be
preferred
and
then
10
foot
minimum
for
the
bicycle
trail.
K
K
If
we
can
we'd
like
to
maintain
the
existing
on-street
parking
in
the
area
and
try
to
limit
disturbance
of
adjacent
front
yards,
this
is
one
section
of
minnehaha
parkway,
where
the
the
the
trail
is
directly
in
front
of
people's
homes.
K
K
The
geometry
today
of
the
roadway,
is
not
conducive
to
communicating
to
drivers
that
they
need
to
stop
and
yield
for
pedestrians
and
bicyclists
at
this
crossing,
which
is
kind
of
the
biggest
biggest
design
move
we're
looking
at.
So
we
are
again
looking
at
teeing
up
this
intersection
realigning
the
south
leg
so
that
it
meets
the
intersection
as
close
to
a
90
degree
angle
as
possible.
K
K
If
we
can
can
do
all
of
this
work
without
removing
any
trees.
We
that
probably
isn't
possible
and
right
now
we're
in
we're
with
the
assistance
of
nprb
staff,
taking
a
closer
look
at
some
of
those
trees.
K
Let's
see
here,
another
sort
of
component
to
the
project
would
be
moving
some
of
the
existing
storm
water
infrastructure
in
with
the
roadway
realignment,
so
there's
movement
of
a
few
catch
basins
that
would
have
to
happen,
and
then
that
would
need
to
be
coordinated
with
this
crosswalk
as
well
to
make
sure
that
everything
is
maintained,
ada
accessible
and
try
to
try
to
eliminate
obstructions
in
the
pathway.
K
We
are
working
through
a
preliminary
cost
estimate
right
now
and
then,
as
I
mentioned,
I
think
some
of
these
issues
we're
looking
at
tree
preservation
tree
removal
trail
winding
on
street
parking,
and
you
know
I
think
today
what
we'd
be
looking
for
are
any
recommendations
or
preferred
facilities
that
we
should
be
exploring
maybe
further
in
depth
at
this
in
this
area
and
then
our
next
steps.
Let's
see
this
meeting
was
actually
rescheduled.
This
will.
K
L
Yeah
marty-
this
is
chris
okay
chris,
so
I
just
wanted
to
jump
in
quick
as
both
the
staff
of
the
bac
and
also
the
liaison
for
this
project
for
the
city
of
minneapolis.
I
think
I
heard
jody
you
questioning
if
you
would
be
coming
back
to
this
group,
and
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
this
would
be
the
like
final
time
for
that.
L
So
for
anyone
on
the
bac,
I
think
tonight
would
be
the
time
for
a
resolution
of
support
or
whatever
you
all
feel
on
this
and
then
of
course,
jody
madeline
project
team
like
if
you
feel
the
need
or
desire
to
come
back,
you're,
always
welcome
to
come
back
at
a
later
date.
But
typically
30
is
kind
of
the
latest
stage
that
this
group
will
comment
on.
I
Sure
yeah,
that's
one.
Okay,
hi
jody
was
looking
at
the
the
layout
that
was
attached
to
the
meeting
here
today.
A
couple
things
wondering
if
the
the
trail
on
the
south
side
of
the
roadway
is
going
to
have
markings
for
bicycle
traffic
each
way
and
then
also
separated
pedestrian
markings
and
part
of
the
reason
why
I
asked
that
is
because
I'm
seeing
the
crosswalk
markings
at
the
intersection
are
split
out
for
bikes
and
for
peds
and
the
bikes
one
is
kind
of
on
the
opposite
side.
I
You,
you
typically
expect,
but
I
could
kind
of
see
it
here
if,
if
that,
if
there
was
markings
on
the
south
portion
of
that
trail,
there
that
we're
kind
of
keeping
bicyclists
on
this
on
the
south
side
of
the
trail
so
wondering
if
there's
markings
on
the
trail.
K
K
There's
some
inconsistencies
in
the
width
of
this
trail
along
between
the
intersections,
and
I
think
we
need
to
do
a
little
bit
more
study
with
the
trees
and
the
existing
yards
to
figure
out
what
that
width
will
ultimately
be
if
it's
remain
existing
bump
it
up
to
12
feet
or
if
we
can
bump
it
up
to
14
feet
and
with
the
bicyclists,
because
the
bicyclists
are
splitting
off
of
the
shared
use
trail
here
and
going
south.
K
A
Anyone
with
any
recommendation,
matt
matthew.
M
Yeah,
that's
a
good
catch
jesse
and
I
am
like
okay,
so
my
my
take
is,
if
it's
shared,
it
should
typically
be
white.
Only
if
it's,
if
it's
separated
the
bike
part
should
be
green
and
the
pad
should
be
white,
because
I
think
what
would
be
confusing
here
is,
I
think,
from
a
traffic
operation.
M
Shared
means
you're
supposed
to
whether
you're,
walking
or
biking
and
be
on
the
right
side
as
you're
going
in
the
direction
you're
going,
and
so
here
it
would
sort
of
require
bikes
going
westbound
to
take
a
left,
and
you
know
northbound
sega,
right
kind
of
in
the
same
like,
like
head-on
in
in
a
fairly
maybe
confusing
way.
So
that's
my
take
I'm
curious
jesse,
since
you
brought
that
up.
What
do
you
think
about
that
and
and
then
I
guess,
mprb
after
hearing
this,
what
do
you
think
as
well.
I
I
mean
I,
I
think
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
have
the
the
bike
and
the
ped
crossing
technically
bicycle
extension
lines
and
then
the
pedestrian
crossing
separate,
if
the
the
trail
on
the
south
is
marked
as
having
the
pedestrian
travel
way
on
the
north
side
of
it,
and
then
the
bicycle
travel
way
on
the
south
side
of
it.
But
if
it's
really
a
just
a
truly
going
to
be
a
shared
use
facility,
then
yeah
just
to
having
a
fully
white
painted
crosswalk
would
be
good.
There.
I
Also,
I
mean,
I,
I
think,
there's
a
there's,
the
other
consideration.
Could
this
crosswalk
be
raised
if
there's
accessibility
issues
with
trying
to
get
ramped
down
with
that
wide
of
a
trail
too.
I
M
L
I
The
parking
bay,
that's
on
the
south,
yeah
right
there,
it's
getting
pretty
close
to
the
sidewalk
and
there's.
It
looks
like
there's
a
pinch
point
there,
so
in
the
in
the
winter
that
sidewalk
might
be
covered
with
snow
so
either
if
the
sidewalk
can
take
more
advantage
of
the
right-of-way
at
that
location
or
the
parking
bay
kind
of
gets
like
cut
off
a
little
bit
more.
So
we
have
a
little
bit
more
space
between
the
the
sidewalk
and
the
the
the
parking
bays.
K
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
good
point.
The
this
parking
bay
is
probably
going
to
go
away
in
the
next
stage
of
design,
mostly
because
these
trees
will
not
survive
this
such
little
room.
So
we
had.
We
have
put
this
in
here
to
sort
of
explore
if
it's
possible
trying
to.
I
don't
know
if
you
can
see
the
underlay
of
the
existing
trying
to
maintain
about
the
same
distance
today
for
the
residents
here.
But
we
are
we
we're
going
to
have
to
weigh
that
with
maintaining
the
existing
trees.
N
I
I
had
a
couple
of
questions,
or
I
guess,
thoughts
for
that
western
side
of
the
bike
path,
yeah
and
then
up
to
the
southwest
corner.
One
thing
I
I
use
the
material
relatively
frequently,
and
one
thing
I
noticed
is
a
lot
of
pedestrians
end
up
sharing
that
path
with
cyclists,
for
whatever
reason,
and
so
so
considering
that,
like
the
the
space,
the
available
space
between
the
creek
and
the
road
obviously
narrows
right
there.
If
there's.
I
N
To
kind
of
make
that
more
of
that
small
set,
maybe
the
12
foot
mixed
use
path.
You
mentioned
as
a
minimum
for
the
master
plan,
even
though
it's
not
technically
a
misu
mixed
use
path.
So
and
then
the
other
thing
I
was
thinking
about
too,
was
at
that
curb
ramp
on
the
southwest
corner.
N
If
there's
and
maybe
my
first
comment
will
negate
the
ability
to
do
this,
but
kind
of
trying
to
figure
out
a
way
to
kind
of
rotate
that
a
little
bit
that
that
bike
path
intersection
with
that
corner,
rather
than
being
a
direct,
90
degree
angle,
which
could
be
tough
for
someone
in
motion
on
a
bicycle,
seeing
if
there's
just
some
way,
just
to
get
a
little
bit
of
a
decrease
in
that
angle,.
N
A
Yeah,
I
agree
anyone
else
going
once
going
twice.
D
Oh
yeah
yeah,
philip
here,
okay,
it's
no!
It's
really
great
to
see
these
suggested
improvements
because
people
come
along.
You
know
a
pretty
good
clip.
You've
got
all
of
a
sudden
pedestrians
and
you're
wondering.
Should
I
go
across
the
bridge?
Do
I
do
I
use
the
goat
pad?
I
mean
if
you're
a
pedestrian
right.
I
can
see
why
you're
suggesting,
on
the
north
side,
minnehaha
to
put
a
sidewalk
but
yeah
signage
and
wave
finding,
and
probably
probably
some
slowing
down
bikes
as
they
get
to
this
intersections.
D
Some
visual
physical
cues
would
be
really
helpful
because
I
can,
I
can
remember
a
couple
of
times
feeling
like
whoa,
I'd,
better
stop,
because
pedestrians
have
stopped
to
kind
of
look
around
and
figure
out
what
to
do
where
bicyclists
stop
and
they've
got
bicycle
trailer
and
they're
not
sure
what
to
do
so.
It
isn't
confusing.
I'm
almost
imagining
a
a
big
map,
a
kiosk,
but
that
it
doesn't
work
that
much
but
signage
and
wayfinding
are
going
to
be
part.
Q's,
visual.
A
O
O
M
O
O
O
O
There
we
go
so
we've
got
a
great
project
team
working
on
this.
We've
got
several
offices
and
people
representing
mndot
that
you
can
see
on
the
left,
including
the
metro
district,
the
cultural
resources
unit
here
at
mndot,
since
the
bridge
is
historic,
the
bridge
office-
and
we
have
an
architectural
historian
through
mcdonald
and
mac
architects
that
are
is
included
in
our
project
team
and
then
the
bridge
engineer
is
lhb,
incorporated
they're
based
out
of
duluth
and
they've
done,
a
lot
of
bridge
repair,
work
and
design
for
mndot
over
the
years.
O
Excuse
me,
the
mortar,
that
is
on
the
structure,
and
that
is
including
the
entire
bridge
so
all
faces
and
underneath
the
arch
spans
as
well
we're
going
to
be
doing
some
repairs
to
the
stone
cracking
the
miner
stone
cracking
that
we
am
are
seeing
in
some
locations.
We
are
going
to
replace
severely
deteriorated
stone.
O
The
metal
tie
rods
we're
going
to
repair
some
of
those
and
clean
them
up
and
restore
them
at
least
on
the
outside,
and
then
we're
also
going
to
repair
and
install
a
scour
monitoring
system
and
some
peer
protection
at
the
base
of
the
piers.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
repair
work
that
we're
going
to
be
doing
throughout
the
entire
bridge,
but
most
of
the
work
is
going
to
be
with
regard
to
that
full
repointing
and
the
stone
replacement.
O
So
what
I'm
here
today
to
talk
to
you
about
and
get
some
feedback
on,
is
access
and
staging
you
all
know.
This
is
a
really
unique
area
with
between
the
two
locks
and
the
horseshoe
dam
there
as
well,
and
so
access
is
an
issue
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
our
contractor
has
the
best
options
and
that
are
cost
effective
for
us
as
well,
so
with
that
we're
recommending
staging
half
at
a
time.
O
So
this
depiction
that
you
see
here
is
what
we
would
have
for
our
first
stage
and
basically
to
describe
this
a
little
bit.
Hopefully
you
can
see
my
cursor
here.
What
we
would
do
is
we
would
basically
split
the
bridge
somewhere,
not
quite
in
the
middle,
but
it
looks
like
right
now
we're
kind
of
targeting
where
the
trust
span
is
or
starts,
and
what
we
would
do
is
we
would
close
off
the
bridge
to
bikes
and
peds
and
work
at
on
one
side
of
the
bridge,
so
we're
proposing
to
do
the
east
side
first.
O
O
So
we
we
thought
timing.
That
would
be
really
good
as
well.
As
I
know,
the
city
has
some
public
works
projects
going
on
this
fall
and
next
fall
for
some
sewer
line,
storm
sewer
that
is
taking
place
on
the
west
side
on
the
west
bank
at
the
same
time.
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
had
enough
access
for
that
work,
to
get
underneath
the
bridge
over
here
and
to
coordinate
the
closure
of
cons
for
construction
of
the
father
hennepin
park
on
the
east
side.
O
So
what
we
would
do
and
before
I
go
there
really
some
of
the
reasons
that
we
decided
to
do
this.
Is
it
really
lets
the
contractor
work
in
an
efficient
manner
and
does
have
some
possible
cost
reduction?
For
us.
This
project
is
extremely
difficult
to
fund
because
it
is
not
on
the
trunk
highway,
so
we
had
to
find
some
very
special
funds
to
use
that
were
not
trunk
highway
funds.
In
order
to
do
the
repair
work
on
this
project,
so
we
do
have
a
budget,
it
is
15
million.
O
We
did
get
a
million
dollars
from
the
legislature
in
2018
and
we're
using
much
of
that
to
do
the
design
and
engineering
work
to
get
ready
to
go,
and
then
we
also
have
two
million
dollars
that
we
are
using
from
our
minnesota
rail
bank
fund,
as
well
as
some
federal
funding,
which
is
the
13
million.
So
excuse
me,
12
million,
so
that
rounds
into
our
15
million
budget
and
all
of
my
salary
working
on
this
and
our
construction
inspection.
Our
design
and
inspection
work.
O
Our
design
contract
with
our
consultants
all
have
to
come
from
those
three
pots
of
mon
money.
Another
reason
we
decided
to
go
this
route
is:
we
are
looking
at
a
way
to
get
a
more
secure
work
area.
O
We
I
will
point
out
that
we
will
still
have
full
access
for
the
public
to
part
of
the
bridge,
so
in
this
first
stage
the
public
will
be
able
to
come
from
the
west
bank
on
the
west.
End,
go
to
the
trust,
span,
look
around
and
then
turn
around
and
come
back,
and
there
also
will
be
an
allotment
for
emergency
vehicles
to
turn
around
in
that
same
area.
O
So
there
is
still
full
access
to
at
least
part
of
the
bridge
during
construction
and
then,
of
course,
safety
of
the
traveling
public
is
on
our
minds
as
well,
and
we-
and
we
feel
this
is
a
safe
staging
scheme
that
will
make
sure
that
both
the
contractors,
personnel
and
the
traveling
public
are
safe
during
construction.
O
So
I
wanted
to
show
you
here
the
second
stage
on
right
as
on
the
right
side
here.
The
second
stage
is
really
just
the
opposite
of
the
first
stage.
It
would
include
the
work
on
the
west
side
and
actually
more
of
the
bridge
would
be
accessible
to
the
public
during
the
second
stage,
as
they
come
from
the
east
here
and
really
have
access
all
the
way
to
the
trust
span.
O
So,
like
I
said,
this
is
a
short
presentation
really.
Our
next
steps
include
the
following,
so
we
we
did
have
30
plans
and
special
provisions
that
were
provided
in
june,
so
that
is
complete.
O
On
that
scenario,
and
then
in
december
we
have
our
section
106
consulting
party
meeting
again
as
well
as
our
90
plan
deliverable
and
then
in
february
we
will
be
submitting
all
the
project
information
to
get
ready
for
bid
to
get
the
contractor
on
board.
We
have
a
more
lengthy
ad
time
because
we're
doing
a
special
best
value
or
pre-qualification
of
our
contractors,
since
we
don't
normally
do
mason
restructure
repair
all
the
time.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
get
the
right
contractor
to
do
the
work.
O
Well,
we
are
going
to
then
receive
bids
from
contractors
in
august
august,
10th
we're
actually
exactly
a
year
away
from
receiving
those
bids,
and
then
sometime
in
september
or
october,
it
usually
takes
anywhere
from
four
to
six
weeks
for
the
award
of
the
contract
to
go
to
the
contractor.
So
we're
somewhere
in
the
range
of
september
october
of
next
year
is
when
construction
will
begin
now.
O
But
if
there
are
any
that
arise,
we'll
we'll
make
sure
to
kind
of
cross
that
bridge
pun
intended
when
we
get
there.
So
we're
not
anticipating
anything
but
as
of
right
now
there
could
be
a
schedule
risk
there.
But
we'll
we'll
see
how
things
go
on
third
avenue
as
we
get
to
that
point.
O
So
really
at
this
point,
that's
all
the
information
I
have.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I'd
be
happy
to
take
them,
but
again,
I'm
just
looking
for
some
feedback
on
what
you
think
about
the
staging
considerations
here.
H
O
Yep,
yes,
right
now
we're
anticipating
two
two
years,
so
at
least
two
construction
seasons.
The
unfortunate
part
is
the
amount
of
time
it's
going
to
take
for
the
construction
is
really
based
off
of
the
repointing
of
the
mortar,
because
we're
reporting
the
entire
bridge
and
that
activity
is
very
labor
intensive.
O
H
O
You
know
that's
a
good
question.
We
right
now
we're
anticipating
that
it
would
be
closed
the
entire
time.
We
can
take
a
look
at
that
and
see
if
there
are
any
possibilities
of
opening
it
up.
O
At
any
point,
the
the
staging
areas
that
we
have
available
to
the
contractor
for
storing
and
materials
is
pretty
limited
as
well
based
on
the
location
surrounding
the
bridge
itself,
and
so
we
are
anticipating
that,
even
though
we're
probably
not
going
to
have
a
crane
or
anything
out
there,
we'll
still
have
some
equipment
out
there
as
well.
That
could
utilize
a
lot
or
take
up
a
lot
of
room.
So
at
this
point,
we're
we're
just
thinking
that
it'll
be
closed
completely,
but
we
can
certainly
look
into
that.
H
And
I'm
not
sure
what
the
schedule
on
the
10th
avenue
bridge
is
10th
street
10th
avenue.
What
will
you
be
involved
with
being
able
to?
I
mean
people
need
to
get
detoured
around
this
thing.
Will
you
have
a
a
detour
plan.
O
Yes,
we
will
have
a
detour
plan,
yep,
that's
in
the
works
right
now.
We
should
be
getting
it
for
the
60
submittal,
although
I
have
not
seen
it
yet
and
likely.
The
detour
will
will
be
third
avenue
for
the
most
part,
but
we
have
not
put
that
together
yet
so
that
is
forthcoming,
correct.
A
D
Wow
two
years
is
a
long
time.
I
mean
it's
such
a
oh,
you
know,
there's
just
a
lot
of
traffic,
although
I
don't
know
the
actual
counts
com
compared
to
other
places
like
the
greenway,
but
my
mind
just
goes
to
my.
Might
there
be
times
where
staging
area
materials
storage
could
be
done
at
the
river
level
down
where
the
you
know
the
breakwaters
are
so
that
there
could
be
periods.
You
know,
pre-announced
periods
where
people
can
plan
to
you
know
bring
their.
You
know
friends,
neighbors
visitors
over
the
bridge.
D
O
Sure,
no,
that
that's
a
good
point
yeah
one
of
the
things
we're
doing
is
we're
gonna,
have
access
from
barges
underneath
the
bridge
and
from
above
as
well.
So
it's
going
to
be
kind
of
a
two-pronged
approach,
so
we
will
definitely
look
into
that
and
see
if
there
are
any
times
where
we
can,
you
know,
maybe
we
can
prioritize
getting
some
of
the
work
done
from
the
bridge
itself
on
the
deck
to
below
done
right
away
so
that
maybe
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
or
wouldn't
have
to
keep
it
closed
for
that
long.
A
D
I
I
think
it
wouldn't
hurt
to
have
a
resolution
just
so
that
you
know
just
so
mndot
and
you
know
others
sort
of
know
that
it's
it
it's
concerning,
and
obviously
the
15
million
is
a
hard
stop,
but
to
the
extent
possible
for
any
times
to
open
up
the
full
bridge.
I
think
just
a
resolution
around
that
would
be
good.
A
M
H
I'm
hi
marty.
This
is
dan,
just
a
question
since
we're
focusing
on
third
avenue
as
the
the
detour
is
there
any.
I
don't
know
where
10th
street's
at
or
bridge
number
nine,
but
definitely
people
are
going
both
directions
when
they
go
over
and
it
seems
that
if,
if
this
thing
is
going
to
be
closed
for
a
length
of
time
that
we
really
need
to
be
looking
at
detours
going
both
sides-
and
I
think
that
that's
something
that
we
could
put
into
our
resolution
and
just
comment
on
that
as
well.
A
Okay
group,
so
I
think
I
missed
a
resolution
on
the
second
item
that
we
had
on.
We
were
going
to
make
a
resolution
on
the
minnehaha
50
50th.
Did
we
make
a
resolution
on
that
at
30
percent.
H
We
could
make
we
could
work
on
some
drafts,
and
I
know
that
aaron
had
some
thoughts
on
this.
H
What
I
prefer
to
do
is
if
the
group
feels
that
we
should
be
doing
resolution
on
this,
we'll
marty
it'd
be
nice
to
get
something
put
together
this
week
that
we
can
put
out
to
the
people
that
attended
this
meeting,
just
to
make
sure
that
we've
captured
the
the
spirit
of
the
conversation
and
and
then
be
able
to
work
that
into
the
for
the
full
bac
the
following
and
the
third
week.
A
Thank
you,
that'd
be
great,
okay,
dude!
Is
there
anything
else?
I
guess
that
we
need
to
talk
about.
I
know
we'll
work
on
the
notes,
so
we'll
get
the
notes
out.
Please
make
sure
you
take
a
look
at
it
and
make
sure
we're
not
missing
anything.
So
we'll
try
to
send
something
out.
Other
than
that.
I
don't
have
anything
else.