►
From YouTube: June 1, 2021 Northside Green Zone Task Force
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
B
Hey
y'all,
thanks
for
being
here,
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
quick
announcement
before
we
go
into
roll
call.
I'm
if
you
don't
know,
I
work
at
st
anthony
falls
lab
on
the
river
and
I'm
part
of
the
seminar
committee.
So
normally
we
have
research
seminars
every
couple
of
weeks
during
the
academic
year
and
I'm
trying
to
organize
in
environmental
justice
in
the
twin
cities
theme
seminar.
B
I
was
thinking
for
our
icebreaker
roll
call
question.
We
could
all
give
a
couple
sentences
on
what
we're
daydreaming
about
recently.
So
recently
I've
been
daydreaming
about
tearing
up
all
the
grass
in
my
yard
and
planting
a
nice
garden,
but
I'm
a
renter
so
it'll
stay
a
daydream
for
a
little
bit
longer.
A
C
A
D
E
F
H
I
A
K
L
H
O
F
A
E
A
F
B
E
A
G
A
O
F
C
A
G
Right
thanks
guys,
so
we
just
wanted
to
frame
the
presentation
a
little
bit
in
respect
to
the
letter
that
was
sent
as
a
group
from
the
northern
green
zones
work
plan.
So
I
wanted
to
run
through
a
few
items
in
and
highlight
a
few
pieces
of
that
letter
as
we
get
into
the
presentation.
So
we
we
strongly
feel
that
the
redevelopment
of
any
site
this
corridor,
particularly
a
publicly
owned
site,
must
be
consistent
with
the
northern
green
zones.
G
Work
plan,
recommendations
in
the
city's
climate
action
plan
and
there's
four
points
that
we
we
wanted
to
highlight:
assessment
and
reduction
of
cumulative
impacts,
we'd
like
to
know
all
the
cities
assessing
the
cumulative
impacts
of
this
development
and
ensuring
that
the
community
assuring
the
community
that
a
reduction
and
that
benefit
is
occurring
during
any
projects.
Construction,
remediation
and
operation,
also
like
people-centered
development
plans
for
the
site,
should
should
prioritize
healing
and
investing
in
people
in
the
surrounding
community
that
have
borne
the
legacy
of
the
upper
harbor
terminal
operations
along
a
heavily
industrial
corridor.
G
Three,
the
correlation
with
the
city's
state
and
climate
goals.
The
city
should
fully
assess
the
impacts
from
a
project's
construction
and
operation
on
energy
consumption
and
climate
change
and,
in
particular,
the
state
and
city's
climate
mitigation
goals.
Fourthly,
we'd
like
to
repair
the
ecosystem,
given
the
potential
for
soil
erosion
on
into
the
mississippi
river.
There
are
serious
concerns
about
the
contaminants
and
the
soil
being
released
into
the
water
and
air,
impacting
the
ecology
and
human
health.
G
In
addition
to
that,
we
have
some
response
to
the
alternative
urban
area-wide
review
scoping
document.
First,
the
mississippi
river
critical
area
overlay.
We
believe
the
city
should
comply
with
the
standard
set
by
the
mississippi
river
critical
area
overlay,
rather
than
apply
for
conditional
use
permits
regarding
contamination
of
the
site.
According
to
the
scoping
document,
the
massive
contamination
is
not
going
to
be
a
part
of
the
aur
and
we
want.
G
We
would
ask
why,
when
it
comes
to
unidentified
mitigation
strategies,
what
are
the
mitigation
strategies
for
protecting
the
impaired
waters,
one
mile
away
the
mississippi
river
and
the
shingle
creek?
What
are
the
mitigation
strategies
for
storm
water
impacts
getting
into
cumulative
impacts
where
what
are
the
cumulative
impacts
of
the
three
proposed
future
projects?
Neighborhoods
who
suffer
environmental
injustices
should
have
a
higher
set
of
standards
for
developers
to
meet
when
it
comes
to
stationary
source
emissions.
G
We
highly
recommend
completing
air
monitoring
at
gaf,
there's
still
a
proposal
for
housing
along
the
mississippi
river.
Then
we
must
guarantee
that
it's
safe
for
the
community
members
who
live
there
endangered
species,
how
the
auar
study
the
impacts
on
the
four
state
and
federalist
endangered
species
within
a
mile
of
the
site,
and
what
will
those
impacts
be
wetlands?
Where
are
the
wetlands
and
how
are
they
going
to
be
protected
and
the
auar
versus
eaw?
C
A
Hillary
and
hillary,
I
don't
know
which
one
of
you
is
going
to
present
first
or
if
you're,
going
to
have
one
of
the
guests
present
to
start
off
this
evening,
but
I
did
want
to
thank
you
both
of
you
and
everyone
else
who
is
joining
tonight.
We
really
appreciate
your
time
in
responding
to
the
questions
raised
by
the
task
force.
N
Hello
good
evening,
I
believe
it's
evening,
I'm
hilary
holmes
and
I
work
for
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
the
department
of
community
planning
economic
development,
and
I
also
staff
the
upper
harbor
terminal
collaborative
planning
committee.
I
also
serve
in
a
similar
capacity,
as
kelly
does
for
the
north
side,
green
zone
task
force
so.
P
N
Is
a
pleasure
to
be
here
tonight
and
thank
you
again
for
having
us,
as
you
have
seen,
a
number
of
materials
went
out
with
the
meeting
agenda,
including
some
more
general
project
update
info,
along
with
a
memo
describing
the
uhd
coordinated
plan
drafting
process
to
date,
and
so
I'm
happy
to
go
through
the
project.
Update
presentation
I
realize
not.
All
of
this
information
is
new
to
you,
and
so
I
can
make
it
as
brief
as
we
like
tonight.
So
there's
more
time
for
discussion
or
questions.
N
N
A
N
N
This
is
not
meant
to
be
at
all
an
exhaustive
list
of
landmarks,
but
again
just
to
give
some
people
that
may
be
less
familiar
with
it,
a
sense
of
where
we
are
the
current
redevelopment
planning
phase
we're
in
the
reason
that
we
are
where
we
are
today
didn't
just
start
in
2015.
Of
course,
there
were
decades
of
planning
and
visioning
prior
to
that,
but
the
current
phase
of
planning
we're
in
began
in
2015
when
the
city
released
a
request
for
qualifications
for
a
master
developer
of
the
site.
N
So
the
city
and
the
park
world
were
working
together
as
we
still
are
to
this
day
and
that
took
us
through
a
couple
of
years
of
visioning,
as
that
request
for
qualifications
was
released.
Some
more
engagement,
around
master
developer
selection
and
then
began
work
on
community
input
and
engagement
to
come
up
with
a
draft
concept
plan
for
the
site.
N
N
E
N
C
A
C
E
N
So
what
we
have
been
up
to
since
the
uhtcpc
convened
the
park
board
cac
convened
around
the
same
time,
and
I
understand
you
had
an
update
from
park
board
kate
lambert's
at
the
park
board
at
your
main
meeting,
and
so
the
park
board.
Cac
had
convened
summer
of
2019
as
well,
as
did
a
community
partner.
N
Community
engagement
events
called
the
learning
tables
and
those
were
brought
together
and
produced
by
the
public
policy
project
ejcc
and
with
support
from
pillsbury
united
communities
as
a
fiscal
sponsor
and
financial
support.
Through
the
mcknight
foundation,
the
development
team
and
city
staff
have
been
participating
in
those
events
to
date,
and
so
we're
present
at
at
those
monthly
engagement
events.
N
So
you
can
see
that
and,
as
you
have
experienced
as
a
committee
with
the
covid
19
pandemic,
we've
transitioned
to
online
meetings
and
all
of
those
groups
were
able
to
successfully
do
that
last
summer.
And
so
the
uhtcpc
had
their
last
meeting
in
january,
meaning
most
recent
meeting
in
january
and
will
be
reconvening
next
week.
Next
wednesday
for
a
regular
meeting.
N
The
city's
division
of
race
and
equity
worked
with
the
uhtcpc
and
city
staff
and
the
development
team
to
develop
this
matrix,
and
this
is
to
support
the
uhdcpc
in
developing
the
draft
coordinated
plan
providing
guidance
for
the
coordinated
plan.
I
shouldn't
say
just
the
uhdcpc
but
of
course,
the
city
as
well,
and
that
is
organized
around
those
six
project
values
which
are
also
referred
to
as
six
key
values
and
again
you'll
see
that
those
are
the
topics
that
have
resonated.
N
And
you'll
see
on
this
next
slide
on
slide,
7
a
little
more
about
the
sources
and
references
used
to
develop
the
matrix,
in
particular,
a
number
of
city
policies
and
plans,
and
some
external
city
resources
as
well,
and
that,
of
course
includes
the
north
side
green
zone
goals.
I
know
we
refer
to
the
goals,
a
lot.
Of
course,
there's
also
the
north
side,
green
zone
work
plan,
and
so
that
takes
it
a
step.
N
N
N
N
The
coordinated
plan
itself
does
show
the
two
different
development
phases
and
again
this
is
more
by
the
numbers
to
show
the
use
is
being
proposed.
The
location
of
those
uses
the
park,
in
particular
the
alignment
of
the
new
north-south
parkway
through
the
site
and
and
again
some
more
information
or
details.
Sorry
about
the
the
real
estate
plan.
N
Of
course,
a
subsequent
presentation
from
city
staff
and
some
staff
from
kimley
horn
consulting
the
consultant
firm,
completing
the
auar
they'll
be
talking
more
about
the
next
steps
through
the
auar
process
itself.
This
shows
a
little
more
about
the
different
paths
or
the
kind
of
different
concurrent
paths
happening.
So
engagement
is
still
happening
on
the
public
realm
design
and
that's
being
led
by
city
of
minneapolis
public
works.
The
environmental
review
process
is
ongoing.
N
There
are
also
term
sheets
for
the
phase.
One
development
and
then
also
redevelopment
agreements
for
those
phase,
one
developments
that
would
need
to
be
approved
by
city
council
and
that
would
be
following
completion
of
the
auar,
and
so
that
would
be
estimated
to
be
later
this
year
and,
as
you
may
also
know,
from
your
presentation
and
discussion
from
the
park
board
at
your
main
meeting
that
the
engagement
engagement
on
the
park
and
park
design
will
continue
as
well
and
that's
according
to
and
that
would
be
mprb's
purview.
N
So
with
that
we
can
answer
any
questions.
There
are
some
other
project
team
members
here
and
I
say,
project
team
and
that's
not
just
city
project
team,
so
we're
happy
to
answer
questions
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
stop
sharing.
If
that's
okay,
if
you'd
like
me
to
continue
sharing,
I
can,
but
I
think
it's
usually
better
to
be
able
to
see
people.
L
L
L
Droplets
from
the
lips
of
the
developers
can't
be
owned
by
any
entity
but
by
the
public,
so
after
dana
frank
gorges
on
her
12
million
dollars
of
our
public
dollars
and
after
she
feeds
from
the
public
trough.
The
rest
of
us
are
left
with
the
slop.
So
that's
one
issue
that
I
have
that
that
it
is
once
again
we
never
seem
to
learn.
L
We
talk
about
redlining,
we
talk
about
covenants
land
covenants,
but
we
keep
on
building
entitlement
into
every
model
that
we
keep
passing
forward,
and
it's
interesting
that
the
university
of
minnesota
has
a
project
called
mapping
prejudice
I
would
in
if-
and
so
in.
The
latest
version
of
this
plan
is
no
different
than
any
other
plan.
That's
come
forward.
L
You
keep
on
bringing
the
same
old,
hackneyed
ideas
into
the
public
discussion
instead
of
welcome
wiping
the
slate
and
really
starting
forward
in
an
authentic,
truthful
manner
that
really
talks
about
designing
from
the
grassroots
up
rather
than
the
top
down.
So
I
see
this
plan
no
different
than
what
we've
seen
for
generation
after
generation.
It
just
reinforces
white
supremacy,
it
reinforces
institutional
racism
and,
at
a
time
when
I
hear
all
of
this
empty
rhetoric
about
about
equity
and
inclusion,
we're
still
stuck
on
stupid.
L
As
it's
been
since
day,
one
is
just
a
a
hollow
trojan
horse
that
had
brings
no
value
to
the
green
movement,
brings
no
value
to
north
minneapolis
and
the
residents
who
have
been
marginalized
for
400
years,
stolen
land,
stolen
labor,
reese,
refried
beans.
That's
going
to
give
12.5
million
dollars
in
ownership
to
dana
franks,
but
anybody
from
the
community
cannot
talk
about
ownership.
If
you
call
that
equity,
if,
if
you're
in
your
heart
of
hearts,
you
call
that
fair
addressing
the
wrongs
of
history,
then
I
would.
L
D
P
I
Proposed
public
ownership
of
the
of
the
site,
either
through
the
public
park
board
the
retention
of
right-of-way
or
the
long-term
ground
lease
one
place
where
we've
had
a
challenge
is
with
some
of
the
rules
in
the
state
with
respect
to
bonding
at
the
at
the
the
music
venue
site,
and
so
we
would
we
would
not.
We
would
control
that
site
until
the
state's
interest
that
63
years,
but
then,
after
that
it
would
collapse
down
and
a
community
entity
along
with
first
avenue
would
own
the
property.
I
So
there
would
be
a
community
ownership.
Now,
we've
learned
recently-
and
we
haven't-
talked
to
the
cpc
about
this-
that
those
rules
have
changed,
and
so
we
will
be
discussing
that
about
public
ownership
into
perpetuity
of
that
land.
So
that's
where
that
point
is
so
we
are
looking
at
that
from
that
fact,
but
this
is
similar
to
the
bonding
that
goes
into
all
the
other
cultural
institutions
in
this
in
the
city,
the
the
macphail,
the
guthrie,
the
orchestra
hall.
I
You
have
this:
what's
called
the
sandwich
where
the
the
properties
owned
by
the
entity,
the
city
controls
it
until
it's
the
the
state's
done
and
then
the
entity
operates
it.
So
this
is
a
little
bit
more
unique
when
we
talk
through
the
cpc
about
the
interest
for
community
ownership
and
that's
why
there
was
this
idea
of
having
a
community
entity
partner
with
first
avenue
and
as
far
as
the
land
proceeds
for
the
remaining
balance
of
the
land.
I
Look
at
that
and
we
figured
out
who
that
committee
will
be,
and
the
city
council
would
make
the
final
action
and
then
the
music
venue
itself
is
developing
a
community
benefits
agreement
to
have
a
surcharge
that
would
go
directly
to
a
community
group
and
that's
like
three
dollars
a
ticket
that
would
not
touch
the
city.
So
the
the
city
council
wouldn't
make
any
decisions
on
that.
But
that's
that's
the
other
funding
source
that
melissa
was
referring
to.
J
However,
the
northside
green
zone
green
zone
was
not
included
and
we're
the
ones
who
have
been
convened
for
exactly
the
purpose
to
confront
equity,
gentrification,
housing,
health,
so
much
falls
under
environmental
justice.
So
I'm
wondering
who
decided
not
to
include
the
northside
green
zone
and
all
the
members
who
are
here
into
the
creation
of
the
coordinated.
I
I
I
forget
time
kind
of
stands
still
over
the
last
year
for
me,
so
we've
been
working
with
them
over
the
last
few
years
to
develop
the
coordinated
plan
based
on
the
concept
plan
and
there
there
is
an
amendment
in
the
content
plan
for
coordination
with
the
green
zone
and
then
that
you
know
so.
We
made
sure
that
we
took
the
principles,
the
12
principles.
We
had
three
members
of
the
green
zone,
task
force
on
the
cpc
to
have
some
cross
pollination
and
then
and
then
coordination
through.
I
I
J
I
Yeah
many
people
spoke
up
about
the
green
zone.
While
we
were
doing
the
process,
we
incorporated
the
12
principles
into
our
planning
process,
and
so
the
green
zone
is
always
it's
always
the
climate
action
plan
other
than
the
you
know,
historic
preservation,
commission
city
plans,
minra,
you
know,
there's
a
ton
of
other
things
that
apply
to
the
planning
of
the.
F
O
Go
ahead
vanessa,
so,
during
that,
during
that
time
we
were
operating
as
cpc
members
when
we
was
putting
this
plan
together
on
several
occasions,
we
did
bring
up
of
the
northern
green
zones.
We
also
brought
up
a
meeting
with
northern
green
zone,
those
all
those
questions
were
posed
in
those
meetings.
O
We
did
not
solely
pick
the
green
zone,
things
to
be
in
the
plan
we
went,
they
went
by
the
plans
that
they
had.
We
we
asked
more
than
once
to
meet
with
the
green
zone
people.
So,
let's
clarify
that
cause.
It's
been
for
some
reason.
People
think
that
I
have
been
deceitful
and
have
not
talked
to
you
guys
or
came
to
you
guys
about
me
with
the
green
zone.
Please
clarify
that
that
did
happen
with
those
members
of
us
that
was
on
the
green
zone
force.
N
Hi
everybody,
this
is
hillary
again,
so
as
staffed
to
the
tcbc,
I
can
confirm
that
some
of
the
members
that
overlapped
with
the
green
zone,
in
particular
in
this
case
vanessa,
had
asked
about
coordination
with
the
green
zone.
Kelly
and
I
do
coordinate
at
a
staff
level
which
isn't
everything
of
course,
but
that
is
some
ongoing
communication
that
we
have
when
there
were
requests
to
meet
with
the
green
zone.
N
The
cpc
as
a
whole
did
discuss
it
and
when
there
were
some
other
requests
for
joint
meetings,
the
cpc
typically
discussed
what
the
purpose
of
those
meetings
would
be,
and
also
some
committee
members
expressed
concern
that
they
would
not
be
able
to
spend
enough
time
attending
to
the
work.
The
committee
work
that
they
needed
to
ask
the
cpc
those
conversations
continued
around
what
a
purpose
of
a
meeting
like
that
would
be,
and
we
did
on
all
sides.
A
I
know
over
the
last
see
through
all
of
2020.
We
had
new
leadership
step
up
and
it
was
my
responsibility
to
to
help
support
that
capacity,
building
and
the
agenda
setting
and
following
up
with
requests
for
different
staff
presentations
and
done
different
topics
that
were
a
concern.
I
know
we
we
definitely
had.
Everyone
had
some
challenges
with
covid,
the
murder
of
george
floyd,
and
there
were
a
lot
of
agenda
items
shifted
and
we
prioritized
some
conversations
with
the
state
around
air
pollution
and
covid
last
fall.
A
But
if
I'm
sure
this
was
an
item
that
I
could
have
been
more
on
top
of
in
terms
of
getting
more
regular
presentations
and
updates
to
the
task
force,
so
I
want
to
own
my
responsibility
in
this
and
just
apologize
for
that.
I
think
there's
definitely
more
that
we
could
have
done
and
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
partly
acknowledge
that
and
and
see
what
can
we
do
going
forward
with
the
remaining
decision-making
opportunities?
A
There
are
whether
it's
with
the
environmental
review-
and
I
know
hillary
deborah-
is
here
to
speak
to
the
environmental
review
process
as
well
and
and
other
decisions
yet
to
be
made
on
the
coordinated
plan.
So
I'm
wondering,
are
there
additional
questions?
I
see
michelle
still.
Has
your
still
your
hand
up.
Leslie
has
her
hand
up
and.
E
Yes,
first
of
all,
I'm
a
paul
and
I
like
to
apologize
to
vanessa,
and
I
don't
know
mr
hansen
and
everybody
else
with
the
cpc
just
ignore
the
green
zone.
Like
our
opinion,
doesn't
matter,
and
we
live
here
and
that's
what's
wrong
with
the
situation
as
michael
pointed
out,
you're
not
including
us
of
anything.
E
E
I
asked
the
park
board,
everybody,
oh
the
city,
oh
this,
and
that
you
people
need
to
get
it
together
about
the
management
of
how
you're
doing
things
and
the
lack
of
communication
and
respect
for
other
people
that
have
concerns
who
live
in
this
community.
You
got
a
music
thing
going
on,
we
don't
have
any
police
and
that
venue
is
going
to
bring
all
kinds
of
entities
into
our
community.
We
already
have
drive-by
shootings
and
who
knows
who's
doing
what
and
then
we
have.
Then
I
have
to
worry
about
this
going
on.
E
These
are
things
that
needed
to
be
addressed
without
the
poor
man
getting
killed
and
for
the
reformery
we
don't
have
any
police
over
in
north
minneapolis.
We
don't
have
any
inspectors
to
control
what
our
pollution
that's
killing
us.
So
you
know
it's
it's
a
vicious
cycle
and
just
because
you
don't
live
over
north,
don't
think
you're
not
being
affected.
I'm
just
appalled
of
the
lack
of
respect
that
you've
shown
this
organization,
the
city,
people
and
then
having
the
nerve
to
bypass
one
of
the
north
north
green
zone,
participants.
B
Yeah,
I
was
just
wondering
if
either
of
these
presentations
would
address
the
comments
that
we
made
about
the
auar
in
our
letter
they
both
just
partnered
with
them.
Jackie,
thank
you
both
just
seem
like
you
guys,
are
talking
at
us
about
what
you're
already
doing,
and
then
I
was
looking
over
the
auar
presentation
and
there
was
information
on
how
to
submit
feedback,
but
we've
already
done
that,
and
I
was
under
the
impression
that
this
would
be
your
chance
to
respond
to
our
feedback.
L
Yeah,
well,
I
want
to.
I
want
to
interject
something.
Why
are
all
of
us
acting
as
if
we're
surprised
that
the
green
zone
task
force
wasn't
listened
to
asked
michelle
shaw?
She
was
part
of
an
environmental
group
who
raised
these
same
valid
concerns
that
I've
heard
all
of
you.
They
weren't
listened
to
ask
paul
bach
knight,
who
is
an
architect
and
was
part
of
the
cpt
or
whatever
they
called
the
bogus
kangaroo
court.
That
formulated
that
who
resigned
in
protest
because
he
wasn't
being
listened
to.
L
That
is
the
premise
of
white
supremacy
that
the
city
staff
and
eric
hanson
and
whoever
else
when
we
fir
again,
you
haven't
listened.
You
refused
to
listen.
Fortunately
enough,
there's
been
a
a
pleasant
turnaround,
I
must
say-
and
that
is
what's
happening
on
the
south
side.
Finally,
there's
a
movement
on
the
south
side
that
maybe
the
thing
that
they
tried
to
force
down
the
throat
of
the
roof
depot
that
it's
maybe
now
that
those
people
down
there
might
be
able
to
take
their
life
and
their
future
their
community
and
back
from
the
power
brokers.
L
L
In
this
dimwitted
idea
of
an
amphitheater
that
has
not
only
divided
our
community
lied
to
our
community
continues
to
lie
to
our
community
steals
the
very
funds
that
I
personally
went
to.
The
minneapolis
found
the
mcknight
foundation
to
get
250
000
to
reimagine
north
minneapolis
and
those
funds
got
squandered
and
turned
around.
We
wouldn't
be
at
this
juncture
today.
L
It
would
already
been
signed,
sealed
and
delivered
if
it
wasn't
for
the
brave
individuals
like
michelle
shaw
and
a
few
other
people
from
upper
harbor
folks
who
fought
back
viciously
the
minneapolis
of
the
mississippi
folks,
who
said
this
is
absurd.
This
is
nonsense.
This
is
a
perpetuation
of
white
supremacy.
F
Hey
on
that
note,
I
really
wanted
to
hear
a
response
from
jackie's
question
and
since
we
constantly
get
our
time
wasted
when
we
come
to
these
meetings
as
far
as
like
follow-up
michael,
I
also
was
waiting
to
talk.
I
just
think
it's
it's
very.
You
know
it
would
be
fair
to
hear
the
answer
to
jackie's
question
and
then
to
move
to
the
next
person,
because
I
think
we
got
like
three
people
who
still
want
to
talk,
and
I
think
you
had
an
opportunity
already
well.
L
O
F
It
wasn't
answered
because
michael
kind
of
was
like:
why
are
you
shocked
that
they're
not
answering
questions?
That's
why
I
told
him
it's
a
good
idea
for
him
to
let
other
people
go
and
for
her
question
to
be
answered,
because
I
still
would
like
to
speak
as
well.
So
can
her?
Can
her
question
be
answered?
F
O
N
Hi,
this
is
hilary.
I
just
had
my
hand
up,
but
I'm
just
gonna
speak.
If
there's
someone
else
ahead
of
me.
Please
tell
me
sorry
about
that.
So
I
was
just
going
to
note
that
the
reason
we
thought
tonight
would
be
a
good
meeting
and
especially
following
the
scoping
order
letter
that
the
green
zone
submitted
is
that
this
is
during
the
public
comment
period
for
the
draft
aur
and
mitigation
plan,
and
so
it
is
during
a
public
comment
period
right
now
during
the
environmental
review
process.
N
That
is
not
something
that
I'm
working
on
directly,
but
my
colleague
hilary
dvorak
is,
which
is
why
she's
at
this
meeting
tonight
and
will
be
able
to
speak
to
that.
So
I
am
we'll
still
be
on
on
the
meeting,
but
I
think
this
might
be
a
good
time
to
turn
it
over
unless
there
were
other
comments
from
task
force.
Members
related
to
the
overall
project
update.
F
Yeah
I
had
I
had
a
few
things
to
say
so,
hopefully
I'm
gonna
say
it
in
about.
I
don't
know
three
minutes
or
less
one,
I'm
very
disappointed
because
constantly
you
know
millionaires
and
just
people
with
money
in
general
they
divide
and
conquer
our
community
with
philanthropy
with
with
you
know
their
money
they
come
in
here
and
then
you
know
you
got
community
members
kind
of
just
running
around
stressed
out.
F
You
know
pennies
and
you
know
they
got
millions
of
dollars
on
their
mind,
they're,
not
even
really
thinking
about
what
we
are
saying
but
more
like
what
do
they
want?
Let
me
just
give
them
what
they
want
and
you
know
a
little
bit
of
what
they
they
want,
and
you
know
like:
let's
hurry
this
up
and
it's
the
process
is
really
just
foul.
F
You
know
it's
been
foul
from
the
beginning,
those
who
had
opinions,
that
of
concerns
have
been
quieted
and
or
paid,
and
so
it
feels
like
well
just
let
me
stay
to
my
point,
so
I
don't
go
over.
I
will
say
that
it
fills
a
lot
of
buying
buying
of
people
instead
of
doing
the
real
work
with
community.
First
to
see
what
we
wanted.
F
The
green
industry
is
actually
what
we
need
in
that
in
that
area,
and
I
don't
you
know,
I've
tried
to
work
with
dana
and
brandon
to
talk
about.
You
know
how
they
could
do
better,
or
you
know
just
to
come
up
with
different
things,
instead
of
just
their
own
ideas,
and
I
felt
like
that
was
on
deaf
ears
and
because
I
left
the
group
I
feel
like
there
was
also
reasons
that
I
left
the
group
like
feeling
like
overworked
and
ignored.
F
As
far
as,
like
my
my
work
with
being
a
part
of
the
group,
the
co-creation
group,
the
co-creation
group,
that
made
a
lot
of
those
demands
and
pushed
a
lot
of
that
work
forward.
You
know
there
was
it's
like.
We
did
a
lot
of
that
work.
It's
not
like
you
guys
did
that
work.
It's
like
that
list
of
things
was
given
to
you
guys.
You
guys
adopted
it.
It
moved
forward,
but
then
you
still
like
silenced
the
voices
that
talked
about
the
concerns
overall
holistically
about
the
situation.
F
Another
thing
the
job:
every
time
we
talk
about
the
jobs
and
the
money
to
the
neighborhood,
it's
a
little
fuzzy
to
me.
It's
all.
It's
like
we're.
Gonna
pay
people
livable
wage
jobs.
It's
like
well,
what's
livable
wage,
you
know
what
I
mean,
because
the
cost
of
living
keeps
going
up.
The
cost
of
living
will
keep
going
up.
The
prices
of
housing
will
go
up
so
like
what
that's
never
been
clear.
It's
always
kind
of.
F
But
we
didn't
know,
you
know
that
we
could
have
got
some
state
bonding
to
do
something
you
know
different,
so
I
just
feel
like
the
process
was
bad,
because
it's
supposed
to
be
we're
supposed
to
have
some
options
here.
Not
just
here's
one
option
it
moves
forward.
You
know
we
kept
being
lied
to
until
well,
it's
not
set
in
stone.
F
You
know
we
have
a
chance
to
like
have
other
options
or
options,
but
right
now
there's
an
exclusive
rights
agreement,
and
you
know
we've
got
to
honor
that
we
can't
work
with
anybody
else
until
this
you
know,
while
the
exclusive
rights
agreement
is,
you
know
true
or
whatever
set
in
stone,
but
then
the
exclusive
rights
agreement
was
like
extended
and
definitely
because
of
covet.
You
know
and
that
yes,
that's
an
unforeseen
kind
of
public
health
issue,
but
I
also
think
that
it's
inconsiderate
that
it
was
just
kind
of
like
it
was.
F
It
was
moved
to
be
indefinite
without
the
public's
notice,
like
nothing.
There
was
no
conversation
about
it.
Somebody
just
made
that
decision.
Another
thing
the
housing
has
always
been
questionable
to
me.
I
really
don't
like
it.
I
do
not
like
you
know
people
getting
a
lot
of
money
to
to
build
something.
You
know
for
a
community
that
they
are
not
from
that.
They
don't
live
in
and
you
get
to
make
the
decision
around
who
gets
to
live
in
these
buildings
or
who
this
lives
in
its
housing.
F
F
That's
what
it
is,
but
instead
we
constantly
live
in
a
society
and
the
government
tells
us
it's
our
fault,
it's
our
fault
for
our
oppression.
It's
our
fault
that
the
river
was
bought
by
gaf
for
a
dollar.
It's
our
fault
that
northern
metals
is
on
there.
We
should
have
moved
to
a
better,
more
richer,
neighborhood
and
now
you're
coming
over
here
with
all
your
money
dangling
in
front
of
us
and
telling
us
how
much
money
you've
put
into
this.
F
This
work
and
we've
been
here
before
you
putting
in
work
spiritually,
like
I
told
brandon
like
he
said
something
one
day
like
well,
we've
put
all
this
money
into
it.
It's
like
hold
on
that's
white
people's
problem.
In
the
first
place,
you
come
over
to
a
piece
of
land
and
you
think
that
you
can
buy
it,
but
you
can't
your
money
is
not
worth
what
our
land
is.
F
Your
money
is
not
worth
what
what
you're
sacrificing
you
know-
and
this
is
bigger
than
the
north
side
honestly
like
what
we
do
up
here
affects
everybody
at
the
bottom
of
the
river.
So
this
is
something
crucial
and
urgent
in
time.
Right
now,
like
we
have
a
moment
here
to
do
something
amazing
and
instead
we're
going
for
mediocre
once
again,
whose
decision
was
that-
and
you
know
I'm
just
pushing
on
y'all,
because
I've
been
a
part
of
all
of
it
from
justice
stuff
to
trying
to
talk
with
dana
privately
trying
to
talk
with
brandon.
F
F
F
We
were
told
if
the
community
kept
saying
no
dana.
You
said
this
on
your
own.
I
know
you're
on
the
call
you
told
me
if
the
community
kept
saying,
no,
that
you
would
back
off,
you
didn't
keep
that
promise
and
you're
just
going
along
with
whoever
is
going
to
allow
you
to
do
what
you
need
to
do
now.
I
understand:
we've
had
conversations
about
business
and
how
you
were
taught
different
things
than
I
was
right.
F
I'm
an
organizer
you're,
a
business
woman,
but
I
will
just
say:
cpc
wasn't
set
up
to
say
no
cpc
was
set
up
to
keep
the
plan
moving.
I
might
be
saying
it
wrong.
Cpec
cpcp,
forgive
me
for
all
these
acronyms,
and
I
think
the
last
thing
I
wanted
to
say
was
kelly.
I'm
just
kind
of
like
frustrated
because
we
did
say
we
did
put
out
a
development
criteria
and
that
should
have
been
sent.
That's
been
sent
off.
I
know,
cpad
has
gotten
what
we
said
about
the
development
criteria.
F
Now,
whether
or
not
it
was
solidified
or
any
of
that
we
finished
that
language.
We
wrote
what
our
principles
were.
That
was
finished.
They
saw
that
that
was
not
included
and
anything
that
they
talked
about
yeah,
so
I
think
yeah.
I
think
I
hate
all
the
things
at
least
that
I
can
remember
at
this
moment.
E
What
I
want
to
say
all
this
is
called:
is
environmental
injustice.
It's
the
inequalities
and
keeping
us
down.
It's
keeping
us
included.
It's
it's
setting
boundaries,
it's
giving
us
a
disadvantage.
What
jobs
we
gonna
go
into
the
the
stadium
and
work
as
ushers
and
things
in
our
own
neighborhood.
You
know.
E
Yep
and
see
you're
keeping
you
you're
talking
in
sugar
coat
and
using
words
and
re
reusing,
different
definitions.
When
it
comes
to
our
lives,
you
don't
live
over
north
you,
you
will
be
affected
by
the
effects
and,
like
I
said,
we
only
have
you.
I
don't
see
no
plans
of
of
really
starting
of
any
of
these,
not
just
this
project,
but
any
of
the
city
projects
and
you're
still
opening
up
this.
The
earth
and
you're
constantly
not
just
killing
the
north
side
and
there's
white
people
that
live
over
there
and
travel
over
there.
E
It's
not
just
these
black
people,
but
we're
educated.
You
know,
and
we
understand
the
terminologies
and
you
keep
us
at
a
disadvantage,
and
you
come
in
here.
Sugar
coating,
everything
without
anything
to
give
and
you're
not
taking
care
of
what
you
already
have
in
our
community
and
if
I
have
to
get
a
sign
and
walk
up
and
down
the
streets
everywhere.
E
F
So
leslie
on
that
note
that
last
thing
that
you
just
said
is
real:
you
guys
are
ready
to
move
forward
within
the
with
with
the
vote,
without
even
doing
the
environmental
impact
study.
So
how
did
you
have
anything
green
zones
going
on?
How
did
you
miss
that
part
and
who's
to
say
you're
not
missing
way,
much
more.
If
you
missed
that
part
and
you
were
ready
to
do
something
illegal.
F
O
E
O
E
I
went
through
a
whole
lot
to
get
this
knowledge
and
there
was
a
reason
why
I
went
through
what
I
did
after
you.
Okay,
it's
a
reason
why
you
know
if
I
have
to
stand
alone
and
say
this
is
my
mission
and
and
people
can't
say
things
that
no
is
wrong
because
that's
their
paycheck,
that's
their
vacation.
O
O
O
G
P
A
B
A
Q
Q
P
Q
There,
okay,
sorry,
okay,
I'm
hilary
dvarak,
I'm
with
the
city
of
minneapolis,
I'm
in
community
planning
and
economic
development.
I
work
on
environmental
reviews
for
the
city
of
minneapolis,
so
this
presentation
is
specific
to
the
auar.
The
draft
aur
mitigation
plan
that
is
out
there
right
now
for
30
day
comment.
Q
The
letter
that
we
received
from
the
northside
green
zone
task
force
was
responding
to
the
scoping
document
for
the
auar,
so
that
portion
of
the
process
was
making
sure
that
we
are
studying
the
right
things.
So
we
were
asking.
Do
we
have
the
right
things
being
studied?
We
received
all
of
the
comment.
Letters
northside
green
zone
task
force
was
won.
P
Q
Give
you
information
on
about
how
to
comment
on
the
auar
again,
I'm
hilary
dvorak.
We
also
have
alexander
cato
from
the
city,
minneapolis
transportation
or
public
works
department.
Excuse
me
is
the
transportation
planner
kate
lammers
from
the
minneapolis
park
and
record
brandon
shampoo
and
tom
strohm
from
united
properties
and
then
dana
frank
from
first
avenue.
Q
Q
Q
There
are
three
scenarios
that
are
studied
in
the
auar.
One
is
a
no
build
scenario
and
then
scenario,
one
in
scenario:
two,
both
the
no
build
scenario,
nothing
would
change,
so
the
site
would
stay
as
it
is.
Things
would
continue
to
go
on
as
they
currently
do
for
scenarios
one
and
two.
That
is
where
we
pick
up
development
scenarios
both
of
them
exceed
the
minimum
thresholds
that
are
required
for
an
eaw
to
be
done.
Q
Q
Q
So
what
did
we
study?
So
three
scenarios
were
studied.
The
first
was
the
no
build
scenario
again,
nothing
would
change
under
this
scenario
scenario.
One
then
represents
what
is
shown
in
the
draft,
coordinated
development
plan
and
scenario.
Two,
then,
is
the
maximum
density
allowed
under
the
comprehensive
plan
and
scenario,
two
must
be
studied
for
the
environmental
review.
You
must
study
the
maximum
that's
allowed
under
the
city's
comprehensive
plan.
Q
So
again,
the
first
scenario
that
was
studied
was
the
no
build
scenario.
You
will
not
see
any
reference
to
the
no
build
scenario
in
the
mitigation
plan,
which
is
that
last
part
of
the
document
that
you
received.
There
is
no
mitigation
required
for
this
development
scenario,
because
nothing
would
change
the
scenario.
One
then,
is
the
draft
coordinated
development
plan,
so
this
is
another
graphic
representation
that
was
shown
earlier
tonight.
That
shows
what
is
being
studied
and
then
the
second
scenario
was
the
maximum
density
allowed
under
the
comprehensive
plan.
Q
Q
Obviously,
in
the
document
that
goes
through
all
of
these
different
topic
areas,
one
aspect
of
the
auar
that
must
be
done
is
a
mitigation
plan,
so
the
draft
and
the
final
aur
documents
must
include
an
explicit
mitigation
plan
and
that's
based
on
the
findings
of
potential
impacts
in
the
resources
studied
in
the
auar
and
is
a
commitment
by
the
rgu
or
the
responsible
governmental
unit.
In
this
case,
that
is
the
city
of
minneapolis,
to
prevent,
potentially
significant
impacts
from
occurring.
Q
The
proposed
outdoor
amphitheater
is
part
of
the
community
performing
arts
center
on
parcel
3
is
not
currently
a
recognized
use
in
the
minneapolis
zoning
code
and
scenarios.
One
and
two
proposed
building
heights
over
what
is
allowed
under
the
mississippi
river
corridor
critical
area
and
the
shoreland
over
lake
district,
so
mitigation
strategies
to
address
these
potential
impacts
are
that
all
parcels
would
require
zoning
change.
Currently,
the
site
is
all
medium
and
general
industrial,
and
so
they
need
to
be
rezoned
to
allow
housing
commercial,
a
park.
Things
like
that
on
the
site.
Q
Q
Specifically,
that
is
for
parcel
seven
a
and
then
a
conditional
use
permit
height
premiums
to
allow
additional
filling
height
would
also
be
needed
and
conditional
use
permits
and
height
premium
premiums
would
be
addressed
during
the
land
use
review
for
each
individual
site,
so
site
1a
is
housing.
It
would
still
need
to
go
through
planning
commission
and
be
reviewed
for
compliance
with
all
of
the
zoning
code
rules.
Q
So
that's
where
you
would
be
asked
to
like
comment
on
a
conditional
use
permit
or
the
height
premiums
to
allow
that
additional
height
for
impacts,
the
mitigation
for
geology
and
soils.
Grading
activities
are
anticipated
to
begin
in
late
22,
early
23
and
the
mitigation
strategies
are
that
the
appropriate
permits
from
the
different
city,
state
or
federal
level
permitting
agencies
would
be
needed
to
be
obtained
by
the
developer.
The
construction
company,
what
not
to
move
forward
for
water
resources
under
surface
water
potential
impacts
are
upland.
Q
The
shoreline
would
require
permitting,
with
the
minnesota
department
of
natural
resources
and
the
us
army
corps
of
engineers
and
for
stormwater,
then
stormwater
infrastructure
would
comply
with
the
city
of
minneapolis
code
of
ordinances,
chapter
54
and
then
individual
and
district
system.
Stormwater
management
approaches
are
being
considered,
so
we
are
working
with
mwmo
or
we're
in
conversations
with
mwmo
about
doing
a
district-wide
stormwater
approach
to
the
site
instead
of
each
individual
site
meeting
its
own
stormwater
in
either
scenario.
Q
At
the
end,
all
sites
will
meet
the
stormwater
requirements
of
the
city
and
then
for
wastewater
and
water
supply.
A
permit
will
be
required
from
the
metropolitan
council
for
sanitary
sewer
extension
and
permit
to
connect
a
permit
will
be
required
from
the
minnesota
department
of
health
for
water
main
installations
and
a
temporary
water
appropriations
journal
permit
for
construction.
Dewatering
will
be
required
from
the
dnr.
Q
Our
next
topic,
then,
is
contamination
and
hazardous
waste,
so
the
potential
impacts
that
have
been
identified,
demolition,
debris,
debris
and
earth
materials
will
be
generated
during
demolition
of
existing
structures
within
the
study
area,
construction
of
either
development
scenario
would
generate
construction,
related
waste
and
scenarios.
One
and
two
would
generate
new
demands
in
solid
waste
management
and
sanitation
services
provided
in
the
project
area,
and
then
the
mitigation
strategies
ensure
compliance
with
applicable
laws,
rules
and
ordinances
related
to
the
management
of
solid
and
hazardous
waste,
as
required
by
minnesota
statute.
Q
Sorry,
I
live
in
the
airport
flyover
zone,
so
I
apologize
if
you
can
hear
those
I
coordinate
with
the
mpca
regarding
the
required
plans,
material
handling
and
disposal,
notice
of
intent
of
demolition
for
removal
of
buildings
and
then
a
construction
contingency
plan.
A
response
action
plan
for
the
mpca
approval
will
be
needed
to
document
plans
for
handling
unknown
materials
during
contamination.
Q
Q
There
are
no
records
of
state,
listed,
threatened,
endangered
and
special
concerned
species
within
the
auar
study
area.
However,
black
sand,
shell
muscle,
the
rusty
patch
bumblebee
peregrine
falcon
and
a
great
blue
hair
and
nesting
site
are
found
within
one
mile
of
the
auar
study
area
mitigation
strategies
for
this
topic.
Dnr
concur
that
native
excuse
me.
Dnr
concurred
that
negative
impacts
to
known
occurrences
of
rare
features
are
not
anticipated.
Q
We
did
receive
a
letter
from
them
and
that
is
in
the
auar
document
that
was
just
released.
The
end
of
may
minnesota
bird
safe
building
guidelines
will
be
used
to
develop
strategies
to
avoid
and
minimize
impacts
to
migrating
birds.
To
the
extent
practical
wildlife,
friendly
erosion
control
methods
will
be
used
within
the
study
area
to
minimize
impacts
to
land
and
aquatic
wildlife
using
the
site
during
construction
native
plantings
and
vegetation,
restoration
will
be
used
to
promote
pollinator
habitat
and
wildlife.
Habitat
and
shoreline
restoration
on
the
site
may
improve
ecological
functions
and
remove
invasive
species.
Q
The
mitigation
strategies
that
have
been
identified
are
consult
with
the
state
historic
preservation
office
under
section
106
of
the
historic
preservation
act
of
1966
when
acquiring
federal
funds
permits
or
authorizations
in
a
federal
undertaking,
evaluate
options
for
adaptive,
reuse,
preservation,
removal,
redevelopment,
in-room
stabilization
measures
for
existing
buildings
and
structures
explore
interpretive
planning
that
allows
for
phased
implementation
and
balances.
The
significance
of
the
site
through
time
and
across
cultures
and
combination
of
soil
cores,
ground,
penetrating
radar
and
shovel
testing
is
needed
to
identify
whether
historical
structures
remain
beneath
the
surface.
Q
The
use
of
outdoor
lighting
for
the
community
performance
arts
center
is
subject
to
a
conditional
use
permit
and
then
lighting
and
visual
impacts
are
regulated
through
the
city
of
minneapolis's
development,
review,
site
plan
and
permitting
process
for
noise
potential
impacts.
Are
scenarios
wanted
to
include
residential
buildings
and
plan
green
space
that
are
considered
sensitive
noise
receptors
scenarios?
Q
One
and
two
include
a
community
performing
arts
center
and
parcel
3,
which
will
will
result
in
elevated
noise
levels
during
major
events,
the
mitigation
strategies
for
noise
are
that
construction
activities
will
be
conducted
to
minimize
noise
levels
and
nighttime
construction
activities
and
permits
related
to
construction.
Noise
will
be
obtained
from
the
city
if
needed.
Q
An
outdoor
noise
permit
will
be
required
before
operating
the
community
performing
arts
center
for
events
and
installation
of
appropriate
noise,
attenuation
features
and
residential
buildings,
and
the
community
performing
arts
center
will
be
needed
and
these
could
be
incorporated
into
the
site
or
the
buildings
themselves,
and
I
am
going
to
turn
over
the
powerpoint
presentation
to
alexander
from
the
city
of
minneapolis
public
works
department
and
alexander.
I
can
flip
the
slides
if
you
want
to
just
tell
me
when,
before.
M
F
Oh
wow,
I
don't
know
what
that
is,
I'm
sorry,
dude
does
community
get
a
chance
to
ask
for
an
extension
on
the
environmental
review.
Public
response
period
like
who
at
cpad
or
the
city,
has
the
ability
to
extend
the
period
deadline.
Currently
it's
june
24th
and
I
think
we
need
at
least
two
months
to
be
able
to
process
to
be
able
to.
F
F
Q
Q
F
Q
Q
M
Okay,
I'll
hop
in
I'll
be
really
quick,
because
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
questions.
I
just
have
a
few
slides.
I'm
alexander
kato
I've
been
working
in
the
public
realm
space,
so
the
roadways
and
utilities
for
this
project
with
the
aur.
Obviously
transportation
you
know,
is
a
really
big
impact
right.
You
know,
there's
congestion,
there's
a
desire
for
multimodal
facilities,
so
my
work
is
really
focused
on.
How
do
I
get
people
safely
to
and
from
the
site?
And
how
do
we
minimize
impacts
on
the
transportation
system?
So
there.
M
Two
scenarios
phase
one,
which
is
the
the
method
that
we're
moving
forward
based
on
the
development
for
units
on
site,
is
estimated
to
be
less
than
six
thousand
trips
a
day
to
and
from
the
site
and
then
on
dalvin
in
washington,
estimated
to
be
less
than
fifteen
thousand
vehicles
a
day
for
the
second
phase
or
scenario:
two.
It
would
be
more
than
six
thousand
trips
a
day
at
the
site
and
then
more
than
fifteen
thousand
vehicles
per
day
on
darwin
and
washington.
M
Could
you
move
to
the
next
slide?
Please
so
with
the
phase
one?
These
are
the
pieces
that
we
are
implementing
in
our
design,
so
we're
developing
a
robust
tdmp.
The
developer
will
be
responsible
for
doing
that
for
each
of
the
developer
units
on
the
site
that
is
forthcoming
in
our
site
review
plan
process.
Probably
in
a
couple
of
years,
that's
typical
to
how
we
do
all
our
tdmp's
throughout
the
city
and
when
a
developer
comes
with
a
proposed
site
plan
that
has
vehicle
access
points
etc.
M
Primarily
if
you've
driven
on
this
section
of
washington
endowment,
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
vehicle
cueing
that
occurs,
so
these
improvements
are
meant
to
help
mitigate
those
impacts,
as
well
as
installing
some
permissive
left
turn
and
so
just
trying
to
ease
some
of
the
vehicle
movements
at
this
area.
We
also
are
providing
a
bunch
of
multimodal
improvements
as
well,
but
just
from
the
aur
mitigation
standpoint,
I'm
just
focusing
on
these
vehicle
pieces
next
slide.
Please
tell
me.
M
And
so
this
is
with
phase
two,
and
these
are
much
more
intensive
recommendations,
and
this
is
if
we
exceeded
the
6
000
trips
per
day
on
site
exceeded
the
15
000
vehicles
a
day
on
washington
and
darwin,
based
on
the
the
comprehensive
and
the
coordinated
plans.
We
would
not
be
exceeding
these
thresholds.
If
we
did,
we
would
be
extending
the
east
and
west
now
left
turns
on
dalwin.
We
would
be
constructing
an
eastbound
right
turn
at
darling.
M
If
we
went
into
that
realm,
we
would
either
need
to
widen
the
bridge
or
add
in
a
separate
biped
bridge,
which
has
been
a
topical
popular
topic
in
all
of
our
engagement.
But
it's
not
something
that
we
have
the
funds
to
provide
at
this
point
in
time,
not
to
say
could
not
happen
in
the
future.
Next
slide.
Hillary.
M
So
this
this
is
the
event
management
transportation
framework.
This
is
still
very
conceptual.
I
know
through
a
lot
of
the
engagement
we've
done,
there's
been
a
lot
of
concerns
around
how
much
traffic
the
concert
venue
will
generate
with
any
development-
the
ones
I
alluded
to
in
the
past
and
with
any
development
for
that
matter.
It's
very
standard
city
process
to
go
to
go
through
a
tdmp
which
is
a
traffic
map
or
tmp
traffic
management
plan
similar
the
armory.
Did
it
usb
stadium?
Did
it
target
center?
M
Did
it
as
well
in
which
the
developer
puts
forth
a
framework
and
develop
some
strategies
around
how
to
mitigate
traffic
impacts?
These
on
the
screen
are
just
examples
of
what
could
be
done.
This
for
this
actual
tmp
has
not
started
yet
it
will
be
coming
out
in
future
years
with
with
the
actual
development,
but
we
put
together
this
framework
to
help
highlight
some
of
the
potential
considerations
that
are
going
into
play
here,
just
sharing
this
on
the
screen.
M
M
Q
Q
So
for
commenting
on
environmental
review,
we
do
need
written
comments
submitted
because
we
do
reply
to
those
comments,
and
that
is
the
rules
that
the
state
has
established
is
to.
You
know
to
provide
written
comments,
so
we
can
provide
written
comments
back
so
this
is,
you
would
send
those
comments
to
me
and
I
will
then
the
kinley
horne
and
myself,
and
the
development
team
will
take
those
comments
and
formulate
responses
to
them
and
then
publish
that
with
the
final
aur
that
is
published
later
this
fall.
A
Q
I
guess
the
best
way
to
answer
that
is
yes,
those
are
the
rules
under
under
the
market
plan.
I
believe,
is
how
you
say:
the
acronym
we're
not
changing
the
rules,
the
development,
each
phase
of
development,
if
exceeds
the
height
limitations
within
the
market
plan,
then
the
conditional
use
perimeter
variants
would
need
to
be
applied
for,
and
that
would
be
part
of
the
land
use
review
or
the
land
use
entitlement
process
that
any
development
in
the
city
would
go
through.
Q
So
it's
not
a
it's,
not
a
guarantee
or
a
given
anything
in
this
document.
Maybe
I
should
say
this
from
the
beginning,
like
the
the
aur
does
not
approve
the
development
plan,
each
phase
of
development
will
have
to
still
go
through
the
standard
land
use
review
process
that
any
development
goes
through
in
the
city,
and
so
we're
not
we're
not
proposing
to
change
the
rules
in
height.
We're
just
saying
that
if
you
exceed
the
65
feet,
you
need
a
conditional
use
permit.
Q
Q
F
Our
mitigation
strategy
is
supposed
to
decrease
pollution
because
I'm
not
understanding
how
changing
zoning,
which
I
think
is
kind
of
interesting.
So
so
companies
can
change
zoning
if
when
they
want
so
we
can
make
things
happen
for
housing
when
corporations
want
to
do
it,
but
we
can't
change
zoning
in
our
own
community
in
an
industrial
neighborhood
to
get
polluters
out
are
y'all
serious,
so
this
stuff
only
works
for
the
rich.
Q
No,
not
at
all
I
mean
the
site
is
zoned
industrial.
It
allows.
What
is
there
right
now
to
put
housing
to
put
commercial
to
put
a
park?
We
need
to
rezone
the
site
away
from
i2
and
i3
zoning
to
zoning
classifications
that
allow
for
mixed-use
buildings
that
allow
for
production
and
facilities
that
allow
for
the
park.
Q
So
the
site
needs
to
be
rezoned
for
any
of
the
potential
uses
to
happen
and
i2
and
i3
are
i3
specifically,
is
our.
Is
our
general
industrial
district
so
today
anything
really
big,
bad
and
ugly?
You
can
probably
do
it
in
the
i3
zone.
You
could
do
it
along
the
river
today,
but
that's
not
what
we
want
to
see
in
the
future.
So
we
want
to
rezone
this
site.
I
think
I
would
think
the
community
would
want
us
to
rezone
the
site
and
would
want
the
site
rezoned.
F
But
why
do
we
have
to
always
like
why
do
rich
people
get
to
benefit
off
of
this?
Why
couldn't
we
benefit
off
of
that?
Why
now
can
we
rezone
for
other
folks
to
make
money
off
of
the
land
that
we
needed
housing
on
in
the
first
place
like?
How
is
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
hillary?
Does
it
make
sense
to
you.
F
Coming
from
my
perspective,
as
a
community
member,
would
that
seem
fair
to
you
that
you,
the
community's,
been
fighting
to
clean
this
area
up
and
as
soon
as
we
get
a
little
bit
of
you
know
success
with
like
moving
the
shredder
out
and
like
all
of
a
sudden.
Now
the
land
is
for
sale,
the
only
developers
who
who
the
city
adopted
it
was
one
plan.
We
didn't
get
another
one
and
boom
we're
here.
F
Six,
seven
years
later,
with
the
same
plan
and
community
is
fighting
back
and
you're
telling
me
that
maybe
just
tell
me
that
it
seems
fair
to
you
that
that
a
company
could
come
in
get
changed
zoning
for
their
business
and
for
housing
for
people,
not
that
that
can't
afford
it.
In
my
neighborhood
tell
me
somebody
tell
me,
I'm
not
crazy.
A
F
Pushing
so
residents
and
community
members
have
been
pushing
for
these
changes,
not
the
rich,
not
the
people
coming
and
trying
to
buy
it.
So
I
just
want
to
be
clear
because
you
said
something
that
kind
of
like
hurts
my
soul,
hillary.
How
can
you
say
to
me
that
you
would
think
that
community
members
would
appreciate
this?
It's
almost
like
throwing
something
at
my
face
like
well.
You
know
at
least
it's
not
another
northern
metals
or
a
gaf.
We
thought
this
is
what
you
wanted
like.
F
F
G
Question
for
the
group
this
is,
this
is
andrew
here
and
apologize
computer
diets.
Now,
I'm
here
on
phone
and-
and
maybe
some
of
the
of
the
presenters
can
can
help
in
this
regard.
Is
there
a
specific
area
where
some
of
these
things
haven't
been
decided?
I
mean,
is
there
an
opportunity
for
us
as
green
zone
and
community
members
to
to
still
get
a
say
in
something
I
mean?
Is
there,
can
you
highlight
any
areas
where
assessment
is
still
ongoing
and
we
can
focus
our
attention
to
get
some
of
these
things
addressed.
F
P
I
So
the
exclusive
rights
agreement
just
basically
sets
out
the
rules
for
the
three
parties
that
are
participating
in
the
planning
of
this
project,
which
is
the
developer,
the
park
board
and
the
city,
and
that
goes
until
the
end
of
this
year
and
as
far
as
advice
on
this
project.
What
I
would
say
is
to
take
time
with
the
aur
take
time
with
the
the
collaborative
or
the
coordinated
plan
we
haven't,
unfortunately
had
a
chance
to
talk
about.
I
I
You
can
build
to
write
something
pretty
dirty
on
the
upper
harbor
based
on
its
current
zoning,
and
we
want
to
get
in
front
of
that.
So
you
can't
do
that.
So
we're
not
in
a
situation
like
a
northern
metals,
where
we
have
very
limited
ability
to
close
that
that
down,
and
even
if
we
did
rezone
it
they'd
still
have
to
kelly's
point
that
grandfather,
let
rights
and
they
would
continue
to
operate
or
have
as
long
as
they
didn't
do
it
a
year
and
a
day.
I
F
Know
that
no
ain't,
nothing
coming
up
in
here,
no
more!
Nothing
more
is
coming
in
here.
So
that's
a
lot.
That's
not
true
that
we
would
have
another
facility
coming
up
in
here.
You
know
what
that's
not
going
down,
and
and
just
because
and
just
because
y'all
are
in
a
pollutant
facility-
doesn't
mean
you
don't
have
meetings
with
them
and
keep
community
members
out
of
those
meetings.
Who
knows
what
y'all
talked
about
with
gaf?
F
E
E
I
just
got
a
question.
My
thing
is
about
inspectors
everybody's
making
plans,
but
I
don't
see
any
I'm
just
concerned
about
the
management
and
all
the
soil,
stuff
and
and
and
the
waste,
and
we
don't
have
that
many
inspectors
and-
and
I
don't
know
if
you're
going
to
increase
it,
because
we're
constantly
opening
the
soil
in
the
suburbs
all
over
the
whole
metro
area
all
over
everywhere,
and
I
just
want
to
know
about
the
management.
That's
my
whole.
I
E
I
So
there
was
phase
one
investigation
on
the
on
the
land
and
there
will
be
additional
investigation
to
find
if
there
is
any
contamination
and
there's
also
a
response
action
plan,
if
you
find
it
and
everything
has
to
be
managed
according
to
the
mpca's
guidelines
about
contaminated
materials.
So
if
it
goes
into
a
contaminated
landfill,
it's
got
to
be
transported
in
a
certain
way
by
a
certain
company,
and
so
there's
there's
regulations
around
that.
As
far
as
inspectors
from
a
city
standpoint,
we
unfortunately
laid
off
people
last
year
and
so
we're
we're.
I
We
have
fewer
people
working
for
the
city
in
2021
than
we
had
in
2020.
Now
it's
possible
that
changes
over
the
next
few
months
with
the
american
rescue
plan
funding
that's
coming
to
the
city,
but
we
have
a
number
of
of
inspectors,
either
environmental
health
or
building
inspectors
or
licensing
inspectors
that
are
coordinating
on
larger
projects.
You
know
I
hate
to
bring
northern
metals
back
in,
but
that's
another,
that's
a
one
that
we're
looking
at.
I
It
is
from
a
team
effort,
fire
inspections
as
well
around
how
to
coordinate
the
you
know
that
stewardship,
and
you
know
we're
mindful
of
of
the
fact
that
we
have
something
like
northern
metals
in
north
minneapolis,
and
what
do
we
do
in
advance
to
make
sure
that
that
doesn't
happen?
So
the
you
know
the
building
materials
we
use
the
environmental.
I
You
know
the
environmental
certification,
the
type
of
businesses
that
are
there
to.
I
think
I
heard
a
point
earlier
about
you
know
what
is
a
living
wage
job.
A
living
wage
job
is
exactly
what
you
said.
It
is
always
changing,
and
so
we
need
to
put
jobs
in
there
that
make
more
than
15
bucks
an
hour.
We're
talking
like
you
know,.
F
I
E
It
has
besides
the
covet
and
the
events
of
the
riot
and
are
these
things
being
reconsidered
into
this
area
that
is
being
traumatized
by
the
violence
that
is
plagued
in
this
north
side
and
all
I'm
asking
is
you
have
to
reconsider
about
the
the
humans
that
live
there,
and,
and
is
this
going
to
be
a
consideration
and
a
play
in
the
future
planning
of
this?
Besides
the
inspectors
and
me
and
my
soil
issue
here,.
I
I
You
know
number
a
few
members
are
on
here
tonight
and
and
making
sure
that
we,
we
think
about
housing,
that's
affordable
to
current
north
side
residents,
jobs
that
are
accessible
to
current
north
side
residents,
a
sense
of
belonging
in
the
design,
a
sense
of
understanding
how
you
know
water.
You
know
in
interacts
in
this
site,
but
also
with
the
river,
I
think,
about
the
green
jobs
that
have
been
pushed
by
the
cpc.
I
think
about
the.
F
E
C
C
C
F
F
F
C
A
A
document
in
the
chat,
if
you
have
additional
questions
I'll,
be
sharing
those
with
staff
and
I
think
it's
a
good
starting
place
to
develop
a
comment
letter
for
the
northside
green
zone.
I
think
we
can
talk
more
offline
about
the
request
to
extend
the
comment
period
because
we
won't
have
another
northside
green
zone
meeting
before
that
date
of
june
24th,
and
so
even
having
another
two
weeks
would
be
really
helpful
to
for
the
north
side
green
zone
be
able
to
reconvene
and
approve
a
letter.
A
E
I
got
a
quick
question:
can
is
there
possible,
I
don't
know
who
did
the
auiw
could?
Could
I
go
out
there
with
them
to
re-look
at
that
and
evaluate
it?
I'm
just
interested
I'm
interested,
because
that
was
my
core
study
and
I
really
want
to
see
how
the
whole
layout
is
with
somebody
that
did
that
environmental
report.
A
R
I
just
want
I
just
this
is
devon.
Nolan
again,
I
want.
I
want
to
apologize,
because
this
is
important
work
and
I
want
to
be
really
clear
about
why
I
even
decided
to
interject
is
because
I
don't
want
anybody
who's
put
blood
sweats
into
I'm,
not
apologizing
for
anything
who
put
blood,
sweat
into
t
and
tears
into
laying
out
a
foundation,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
you
all
like
if
you
don't
feel
the
sincerity
in
that,
I
won't
apologize
for
that
either,
because
all
our
trauma
is
very
real.
R
I
live
in
an
environmental
overburdened
community.
This
is
what
it
does
to
our
psyche.
It's
really
hard
to
be
well
when
you
feel
like
everything
around
you
is
trying
to
kill
you,
so
I'm
not
apologizing.
I
just
really
want
to
be
clear
about
the
passion
and
that
there
are
people
on
this
call.
Who
are
the
very
reason
why
I
even
knew
there
was
a
fight
to
be
had
we
all
get
to
resist
in
whatever
way
we
see
fit
for
ourselves,
there's
all
forms
of
resistance
and
we
need
all
of
it.
O
I'm
not
here
to
be
nobody's
boss,
but
I
will
ask
you
before
you
make
a
statement
about
me
or
to
me
that
you've
gotten
from
someone
else,
please
go
back
and
check
the
minutes
of
each
minute
of
each
committee
that
I've
been
on
and
see
and
the
only
of
payment
that
anybody
leslie
you
me
roxanne
has
gotten
is
leadership
for
this
committee,
so
let's
be
respectful
and
stay
in
a
higher
person.
When
it
comes
to
these
meetings,
we
all
have
a
common
goal
here.