►
From YouTube: June 10, 2021 Upper Harbor Terminal Open House
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
F
Minneapolis,
I'm
jonette
count
working
on
the
traffic
analysis
with
kim
lee
horn.
F
A
Next
slide,
please
so
the
presentation
tonight
will
last
maybe
not
quite
30
minutes,
maybe
more
15
to
20,
and
then
we
will
have
time
for
questions
and
answers.
At
the
end,
you
should
submit
your
questions
in
the
chat,
q,
a
and
we'll
we
will
respond
to
them
verbally
at
the
end
of
this
meeting
next
slide,
please.
A
So
these
are
the
instructions
for
how
to
ask
a
question.
You
would
click
ask
a
question.
Click
the
ask
the
question
button
to
submit
a
question
to
the
project
team.
At
any
point
during
the
presentation,
you
can
also
check
the
box
to
ask
anonymously
staff
will
publish
questions
and
answers,
and
you
can
like
a
comment
or
question
in
the
future.
Questions
tab
on
the
mobile
version
select
q,
a
on
the
upper
right
side
of
the
screen
to
view
the
question
box
and
then
follow
the
instructions
from
above
for
both
web
and
mobile
version.
A
A
A
A
Beginning
in
2019
the
city
of
minneapolis,
united
properties,
first
avenue
and
the
upper
harbor
terminal
collaborative
planning
committee,
a
community
advisory
committee
of
northside
residents
and
organizations
began
modifying
the
upper
harbor
terminal
concept
plan
into
the
draft
coordinated
plan
for
redevelopment
to
achieve
more
equitable
and
inclusive
outcomes
for
north
minneapolis.
Next
slide.
Please.
A
Next
slide,
please
united
properties
in
partnership
with
first
avenue
productions,
the
minneapolis
park
and
recreation
board,
and
the
city
of
minneapolis
is
proposing
to
redevelop
the
53-acre
upper
harbor
terminal
site.
A
proposed
19
and
a
half
acre
park.
Public
park
is
included
in
scenarios
one
and
two
and
includes
shared
use
paths
or
separated,
bikeways
and
pedestrian
circulation.
A
So
what
did
we
study
in
the
auar?
There
were
three
scenarios
studied.
The
first
scenario
is
a
no
build
scenario
scenario.
One
is
the
draft
coordinated
development
plan
and
scenario.
Two
is
the
maximum
density
allowed
under
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
you
can
see,
the
different
components
listed
on
the
left
hand,
side
of
the
screen,
including
residential
commercial,
non-commercial
office
and
industrial
space,
the
music
venue
and
recreation
and
then
industrial
storage.
A
There
are
different
scales
of
development
in
between
scenarios,
one
in
scenarios
two,
however,
two
aspects
of
the
development
remain
constant,
one
is
the
park
and
the
other
is
the
music
venue
next
slide,
please,
under
the
no
build
scenario,
nothing
would
change,
so
no
redevelopment
would
occur.
The
site
would
continue
to
be
used
as
it
is
currently
today,
as
you
would
see
in
the
mitigation
plan,
there
is
no
mitigation
required
for
this
scenario,
because
no
redevelopment
would
occur
next
slide.
A
Please
scenario:
one
is
inc,
reflects
the
draft
coordinated
plan
that
was
developed
with
the
collaborative
planning
committee
over
the
last
several
years.
Next
slide,
please
scenario:
2
is
the
maximum
density
allowed
under
the
comprehensive
plan?
This
development
scenario
represents
the
upper
limits
of
what
could
be
built
on
the
site
per
the
minneapolis
2040
comprehensive
plan
next
slide.
Please.
A
The
list
on
the
screen
are
the
topics
that
are
studied
in
the
auar
specific
to
an
auar
is
a
mitigation
plan.
The
draft
and
final
auar
documents
must
include
an
explicit
mitigation
plan.
The
mitigation
plan
is
based
on
the
findings
of
potential
impacts
in
the
resources
studied
in
the
auar
and
is
a
commitment
by
the
rgu
to
prevent,
potentially
significant
impacts
from
occurring.
A
Rgu
is
the
responsible
governmental
unit.
In
this
case
it
is
the
city
of
minneapolis
next
slide,
please,
the
next
set
of
slides
that
you
will
see
will
be
showing
the
potential
environmental
impacts
that
have
been
identified
and
then
the
mitigation
strategies
that
have
been
identified
for
those
potential
impacts.
A
A
The
potential
impacts
that
have
been
identified
are
scenarios
one
and
two
proposed
land
uses
that
are
inconsistent
with
current
zoning
proposed
outdoor
amphitheater
as
part
of
the
community
performing
arts
center
on
parcel
3
is
not
currently
a
recognized
use
in
the
minneapolis
zoning
code
and
scenarios.
One
and
two
proposed
building
heights
over
what
is
allowed
under
the
mississippi
river
corridor
critical
area
in
shoreland
overlay
districts.
A
A
A
A
Please
next
topic
is
water
resources.
The
potential
impacts
fall
into
three
different
categories:
surface
water,
so
upland
shoreline.
Grading
along
the
mississippi
river
is
proposed
within
the
park
area
for
restoration
under
storm
water
storm
water
management
would
be
required
for
new
development
and
under
waste
water
and
water
supply.
A
Existing
footings
foundation
and
utilities
may
encounter
some
groundwater
and
would
require
dewatering
during
construction.
Water-Related
infrastructure
will
need
to
be
extended
and
or
reconstructed
to
accommodate
development.
The
mitigation
strategies
for
these
potential
impacts
include
under
surface
water
re-grading.
The
shoreline
would
require
permitting,
with
the
minnesota
department
of
natural
resources
and
the
u.s
army
corps
of
engineers
under
storm
water,
stormwater
infrastructure
would
comply
with
city
of
minneapolis
code
of
ordinances,
chapter
four,
an
individual
in
district
system.
Stormwater
management
approaches
are
being
considered
for
wastewater
and
water
supply.
A
A
permit
will
be
required
from
the
metropolitan
council
for
a
sanitary
sewer
extension
and
permit
to
connect
a
permit
will
be
required
from
the
minnesota
department
of
health
for
water,
main
installation
and
a
temporary
water
appropriations.
General
permit
for
construction
dewatering
will
be
required
from
the
dnr
next
slide.
Please.
A
The
next
topic
is
contamination
and
hazardous
waste.
The
potential
impacts
identified
are
demolition,
debris
and
earth
materials
will
be
generated
during
demolition
of
the
of
existing
structures
within
the
aur
study
area,
construction
of
either
development
scenario
would
generate
construction
related
waste
materials
such
as
wood,
packaging,
excess
materials
and
other
wastes,
and
scenarios.
One
and
two
would
generate
new
demands
on
solid
waste
management
and
sanitation
services
provided
in
the
project
area.
A
The
next
topic
studied
is
fish
wildlife
and
plant
communities.
The
potential
impacts
identified
are
the
aur
study
area,
provides
limited
and
low
quality
native
vegetation,
habitat
wildlife
that
can
be
found
within
the
study
area
include
birds
and
small
mammals
that
have
adapted
to
the
highly
disturbed
urban
environment.
A
A
The
mitigation
strategies
identified
are
the
dnr
concurred,
that
negative
impacts
to
known
occurrences
of
rare
features
are
not
anticipated.
Audubon
minnesota
bird,
safe
building
guidelines
will
be
used
to
develop
strategies
to
avoid
and
minimize
impacts
to
migrating
birds.
To
the
extent
practical
wildlife,
friendly
erosion
control
methods
will
be
used
within
the
study
area
to
minimize
impacts
to
land
and
aquatic
wildlife
using
the
site
during
construction
native
plantings
and
vegetation,
restoration
will
be
used
to
promote
pollinator
habitat
and
wildlife.
Habitat
and
shoreline
restoration
on
the
site
may
improve
ecological
functions
and
remove
invasive
species.
A
Minneapolis
historic
resource
mitigation
storages
include
consultation
with
the
state,
historic
preservation
preservation
office
under
section
106
of
the
historic
preservation
act
of
1966
when
acquiring
federal
funds
permits
or
authorizations,
and
a
federal
undertaking
evaluate
options
for
adaptive,
reuse,
preservation,
removal,
redevelopment
interim
stabilization
measures
for
existing
buildings
or
structures
explore
interpretive
planning
that
allows
for
phased
implementation
and
balances.
The
significance
of
the
site
through
time
and
across
cultures
and
combination
of
soil
cores,
ground,
penetrating
radar
and
shovel
testing
is
needed
to
identify
whether
historical
structures
remain
beneath
the
surface
next.
Thank
you.
A
The
next
topic
is
visual.
The
potential
impacts
include
scenarios
one
and
two
would
include
restoration
of
natural
vegetation,
structural
tearing
of
buildings
and
preservation
of
public
views.
The
proposed
community
performing
arts
center
will
include
outdoor
lighting
to
be
used
during
shows,
and
the
mitigation
strategies
include.
All
lighting
will
be
required
or
will
be
subject
to
the
merca
plan
requirements.
A
The
use
of
outdoor
lighting
for
the
community
performing
arts
center
is
subject
to
a
conditional
use
permit
and
lighting
and
visual
impacts
are
regulated
through
the
city
of
minneapolis's
development,
review,
site
plan
and
permitting
process
next
slide.
Please
for
noise
scenarios,
one
and
two
include
residential
buildings
and
planned
green
space
that
are
considered
sensitive
noise,
receptors
and
scenarios.
One
and
two
include
a
community
performing
arts
center
on
parcel
3,
which
will
result
in
elevated
noise
levels
during
major
events.
A
B
So
obviously,
with
the
upper
harbor
terminal
site,
you
know
there's
a
strong
need
for
ensuring
that
it
is
integrated
in
a
way
that
supports
transportation
within
the
site
and
within
that
system,
and
there's
really
two
ways
of
looking
at
the
aur
and
subsequent
mitigations.
B
With
the
developments
that
are
proposed
in
the
coordinated
plan
and
those
developments
are
the
performing
arts
center.
The
mixtures
developments
the
light
industrial
it
is
recommended.
It
is
estimated
that
there
will
be
a
generation
of
less
than
6
000
trips
per
day
and
that
the
intersection
of
washington
and
dowling
will
not
exceed
15
000
vehicles
a
day
and
with
that
subsequent
level
of
traffic
impact
on
next
slide
policy.
B
With
that
level
of
impact,
each
site
as
it
goes
through,
the
development
process
will
be
required
to
submit
a
tdmp.
B
That's
a
very
standard
process
that
the
city
does
for
any
development
and
the
tdmp
is
done
to
ensure
that
each
development
and
its
subsequent
generation
of
traffic,
as
well
as
pedestrian
bike,
trips
etc,
is
that
level
of
activity
is,
is
able
to
integrate
into
the
site.
So
we
assess
access
points,
volume,
peak
activity
etc
and
ensure
that
those
tdmp
plans
are
going
to
integrate
well
into
our
transportation
system.
So
we
require
that
of
every
development.
B
The
performing
arts
center
also
is
required
to
submit
a
event
management
plan
which
I'll
talk
about
in
a
subsequent
slide.
In
addition
to
that,
with
the
reconstruction
of
darling
avenue,
we
are
adding
in
a
westbound
right
turn
lane
extending
the
eastbound
left,
turn
lane
and
then
doing
some
signalization
improvements,
we're
also
adding
in
bike
and
pet
facilities
across
dowling.
B
The
primary
access
point
across
33rd
avenue
north
is
the
secondary
access
point,
as
well
as
the
parkway
as
well.
Next
slide,
please,
and
so.
B
In
addition
to
this,
there
is
a
phase
b
of
the
mitigation,
and
this
is
if
we
achieve
a
max
build,
which
is
what
is
allowed
in
the
comprehensive
2040
plan,
and
this
is
more
of
a
kind
of
longer
term
development
if,
if
that
were
to
occur
and
and
in
those
situation,
if
the
estimated
trips
on
the
site
were
to
generate
more
than
six
thousand
vehicles
a
day
and
or
at
the
intersection
of
washington
and
exceeded
fifteen
thousand
vehicles
a
day,
then
we
would
be
extending
the
eastbound
and
westbound
turn
lanes
on
the
darwin
bridge,
as
well
as
constructing
eastbound
right
turtle
lane
at
downing
in
washington.
B
This
would
be
done
to
improve
the
vehicle
operations
on
the
site.
This
is
much
more
of
a
long-term
strategy.
We
have
a
lot
of
access
policies
in
our
transportation
action
plan
around
reducing
vehicle
or
single
occupancy
vehicle
trips,
encouraging
transportation
and
active
travel.
So
we
plan
to
implement
a
lot
of
those
policies
and
procedures
as
well
through
the
implementation
of
this
project.
B
That
is
it
for
the
transportation
piece
at
the
end,
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
about
this.
B
I
missed
there's
one
more
slide.
I
apologize
for
that.
So
this
is
the
event
transportation
management
framework,
and
so
every
large
venue
in
the
city,
whether
that's
u.s,
bank,
stadium,
tcf
bank,
target
field,
etc,
submits
an
event
management
plan
similar
to
the
tdmp
I
discussed
in
the
last
slide,
and
this
is
done
to
ensure
that
these
large-scale
activities
when
they
occur
that
they
that
the
transportation
system
in
the
city
is
able
to
support
them
without
significant
delays
or
discomforts
for
other
users
adjacent
to
the
area.
B
Typically,
these
are
done
after
we
have
a
finalized
construction
plan
and
sometimes
even
during
construction
of
the
actual
site.
In
this
situation,
there's
been
a
lot
of
public
comment
around
better
understanding
how
the
event
met
the
event
center
will
perform
from
a
traffic
standpoint,
so
we've
been
working
with
the
developer
and
some
transportation
consultants
to
explore
potential
strategies
around
this
event:
transformation
management
framework.
So
these
are
just
ideas.
This
is
still
a
framework.
B
Also
looking
at
a
shuttle
in
tnc
staging
area,
so
shuttle
would
be
similar
to
a
coach
bus
that
would
pick
up
concert
goers,
you
know,
maybe
in
downtown
or
another
location
away
from
uhd
and
shuttle
them
to
the
site
also
would
allow
some
type
of
area
for
tnc's.
Those
are
transportation
network
companies
that
uber
and
lyft's
we'd
be
providing
some
place
for
them
to
drop
off
patrons
that
are
going
to
the
site.
B
This
would
be,
you
know
a
little
away
from
the
concert
venue
so
as
to
not
get
we
don't
want
to.
We
don't
we
want
to
kind
of
minimize
vehicle
activity
going
into
the
actual
site,
so
that
would
be
an
all
off
site
location.
These
are
just
some
of
the
examples
we're
exploring.
This
is
still
evolving,
but
just
wanted
to
share
this
with
you
now,
I'm
done.
A
So
this
is
a
schedule
that
shows
where
we've
been
and
where
we're
heading.
In
february
of
this
year,
we,
the
city
of
minneapolis,
published
the
draft
aur
order
and
the
scoping
ew.
There
was
a
30-day
public
comment
period
for
that
portion
of
this
of
the
auar
that
went
from
february
16th
to
march
18th
february.
Through
may
the
city
of
minneapolis
prepared
the
draft
aur
in
may
of
this
year.
The
city
of
minneapolis
publishes
or
published
the
draft
aur
and
where
we're
at
now
is.
A
We
are
in
the
middle
of
our
public
comment
period
on
the
aur,
which
runs
until
june
24th
in
july.
The
city
of
minneapolis
will
publish
the
final
aur
and
then
in
september
it
is
anticipated
that
the
city
council
will
approve
the
final
aur
and
then
construction
would
is
anticipated
to
start
in
2022
or
2023.
A
So
how
can
you
comment
on
the
aur?
All
comments
need
to
come
in
in
writing.
You
can
send
the
comments
to
me.
I
am
the
point
of
contact
for
the
aur
for
the
city
of
minneapolis,
as
the
rgu
we've
provided
links
on
this
page
to
our
to
the
upper
harbor
terminal
website
and
the
city's
environmental
review
page.
Both
of
those
websites
contain
all
of
this
information
that
you
can
review.
A
A
F
And
we
received
questions
in
the
chat,
so
we
appreciate
everyone
dropping
those
questions
in.
We
will
start
answering
them
as
they've
been
received.
F
The
first
one
is
related
to
land
use,
and
so
the
question
is:
why
doesn't
the
plan
change
to
fit
within
zoning
laws
instead
of
deciding
you
should
amend
the
laws
so
hillary?
Could
you
take
that
question.
A
Thank
you
ashley,
so
the
zoning
of
the
site
is
currently
zoned
industrial,
either
i2
or
i3,
and
to
which
only
allows
industrial
uses
and
so
to
to
allow
the
uses
that
are
proposed.
We
do
need
to
rezone
the
site.
A
The
site
is
proposed
to
be
rezoned
to
an
i1
industrial
zoning,
which
is
our
least
intensive
rezoning
which
matches
the
production
and
processing
land
use
guidance
and
then
also
a
commercial
zoning
classification
will
be
selected
for
those
sites
that
have
a
future
land
use
category
of
park
and
for
parks
and
open
space
and
then
quarter
mixed
use.
F
Okay,
the
next
question
that
was
received
is
also
related
to
the
land
use.
The
upper
harbor
terminal
is
governed
by
the
mississippi
river
critical
corridor
area
ordinance
since
the
two
hair,
nookeries
and
the
river
are
primary
conservation
areas.
Will
upper
harbor
turmoil
follow
the
merka
restrictions
on
constructing
construction
affecting
pcas
during
bird
nesting
and.
D
I
mean
any
ordinance,
that's
in
place
that
that
requires,
I
mean
any.
You
know
for
us
to
pull
any
sort
of
construction
permits
or
anything
we
would
have
to
follow
any
ordinance,
that's
in
place,
so
I'm
to
be
honest,
I
don't
I'm
not
normally
involved
in
actually
pulling
the
permits
so
with
that.
D
Typically,
is
our
construction,
our
contractor's
role,
so
I'm
I'm
not
familiar
with
every
single
permit,
that's
in
place,
but
if,
if
they're,
I'm
sorry
with
every
single
ordinance,
that's
in
in
place
that
that
impacts
permitting
process,
but
if
there
are
ordinances
that
do
that
or
that
are
in
place.
Yes,
we
would
have
to
follow
that.
F
Thanks
brandon,
the
next
question
that
was
asked
was
climate
change
considered
in
relation
to
the
site:
I.e,
heat
island
creation
for
amount
of
concrete,
etc.
I
can
actually
respond
to
that
one.
So,
the
two
scenarios
that
are
presented
scenario
one
and
scenario,
two
one
being
the
draft
coordinated
plan
and
the
other
one
being
the
2040
comprehensive
plan
actually
show
a
reduction
in
impervious
surfaces
across
the
site
compared
to
the
existing
condition.
F
D
Orton
yeah,
we
will
certainly
I
I
don't.
We
haven't
gotten
this
this
far
in
design,
yet
to
I
mean,
as
far
as
specifying
glass
or
even
where
the
glass
will
be
in
the
building.
So
I
will
take
note
of
this
question
and
when
we
do
get
to
that
point
with
our
architect
I'll
ask
or
we'll
make
sure
that
it's
it's
certainly
considered,
and
I'm
not
sure
if,
like
normal
glass,
that's
used
on
the
products
that
we're
considering
is
considered
bird
safe,
but
but
understanding
that
that's
a
concern
here.
D
That's
that's
something
that
we
will
definitely
take
into
account
and
and
when
we
get
to
the
design
process
and
are
back
in
front
of
the
community
talking
about
specific
design
options
we'll
be
able
to
answer
that
question
specifically.
E
Yeah,
thank
you.
So
the
noise
study
that
was
completed
that
is
publicly
available
on
the
website
showed
that
there
would
be
no
adverse
effect
to
the
birds,
the
hair
and
mercury
or
other
bird
wildlife
in
the
area,
and
that
was
actually
shown
it
would
have
no
effect
even
before
any
noise
mitigation.
So
our
noise
mitigation
strategy
would
be
you
know,
top
of
the
line.
E
Acoustic
engineering
delay
speaker
so
not
just
like
two
arrays
or
x-rays
coming
out
of
the
stage,
but
actually
directed
pointed
speakers
throughout
the
crowd,
including
perhaps
some
ribboning,
above
the
crowd
that
you've
seen
on,
like
you,
know,
priscilla
pavilion
and
to
really
contain
the
noise
in
the
area
as
much
as
possible,
but
even
without
any
acoustic
treatment.
The
noise
was
shown
to
have
no
effect
on
on
wildlife
and
also
just
another
statement
that
noise
study
is
publicly
available
on
the
website.
So
for
anyone
to
be
able
to
read.
F
Okay,
next
question:
have
you
hired
a
tribal
specialist
to
discover
the
true
history
and
rights
to
the
lands
where
the
upper
harbor
terminal
site
is
located?
Kate,.
C
C
I
know
that
there's
been
a
lot
of
studies
done
of
this
entire
area
in
the
past
that
you
know
we
partly
looked
at
and
then
we've
certainly
hired
cultural
resource
consultants
who
can
and
archaeologists
who
can
understand
kind
of
the
history
of
the
land
and
the
potential
for
you
know
you
know
sacred
places
and
pathways
and
things
like
that
and
then
also,
I
guess,
I'm
just
kind
of
wondering
with
the
question
also,
we
certainly
have
reached
out
to
the
tippo's
with
the
information
about
the
project
and
like
mayak
and
other
or
indigenous
organizations.
F
Okay,
moving
on
to
the
next
question,
have
you
talked
to
the
northside
residents
about
having
event
parking
in
their
neighborhood
and
how
is
this
received?
So
this
is
related
to
the
event
management
plan.
So,
alexander,
could
you
answer
this
one.
B
Yeah
glad
so,
you
know
great
question.
There
has
been
obviously
a
lot
of
concern
raised
around
traffic
impacts
with
the
large
scale
events
specifically
parking
on
slide.
22
of
the
presentation.
I
did
briefly
talk
about
the
event
transportation
management
framework.
This
is
still
a
draft
that
we're
working
on
one
of
the
pieces
in
there
near
the
top
of
that
slide,
says
and
I'll
just
voted,
monitor
event
parking
in
neighborhoods
within
a
three-quarter
mile
of
the
event
venue.
So
this
is
on
the
west
side
of
I-94.
It's
a
three-quarter
mile
area.
B
The
reason
we're
looking
at
a
three-quarter
mile
three-fourths
of
a
mile
distance
is
because
typically
that's
the
amount
that
people
are
willing
to
park
and
walk
is
around
three
quarters
of
a
mile.
So
we're
going
to
be
we're
proposing
to
monitor
the
area
and
assess
impacts
on
so
it's
part
of
the
framework.
So
to
summarize,
we
are
aware
it's
a
concern.
It's
something
we're
laying
on
the
framework,
something
that
we'll
be.
We
will
be
evaluating
and
then
making
recommendations
based
on
that.
F
Moving
on
to
the
next
comment.
This
is
a
long
comment,
but
I'm
gonna
paraphrase
a
little
bit
is
how
will
the
review
process
ensure
that
the
the
merka
ordinance
defines
the
mississippi
flyway
as
the
flyways
and
major
north
american
bird
migration
quarter
for
more
than
325
bird
species
that
make
the
round
trip
each
year
from
their
breeding
grounds
in
canada
and
the
northern
united
states
to
their
wintering
grounds
along
the
gulf
of
mexico
and
the
central
america?
F
So
how
will
the
review
process
ensure
that
this
critical
natural
resource
is
protected
for
current
and
future
generations?
For
example,
how
will
the
project
be
structured
to
ensure
that
light
pollution
is
not
increased
and
the
lights
are
out
during
the
bird
migration
in
the
spring
and
fall?
So
there
is
actually
a
lighting
ordinance
identified
in
the
merca
plan,
and
so
the
the
project
would
need
to
be
in
compliance
with
that
and
that
was
taken
into
consideration.
F
A
A
F
Thank
you,
hillary.
The
next
comment
is:
why
is
the
city
not
honoring
the
green
zone,
commitments
it
made
to
us
since
2013
and
even
now,
there's
no
real
commitment
in
this
plan
to
honor
what
the
city
is
committed
to
brandon?
Could
you
brandon
or
tom?
Would
you
like
to
take
that
one
or
somebody
from
the
city.
D
Yeah,
I'm,
let
me
just
kind
of
re-read
the
question
here:
why
is
the
city
not
honoring
green
zone
commitments
made
even
now,
there's
no
commitment
in
this
bantu
what
this
city
committed
to
I
I
mean
I
guess
I
I
disagree
with
at
least
disagree
with
the
second
part
of
this
question.
D
As
far
as
the
the
commitment.
D
Well,
I
mean-
I
guess
I
I
can't
answer
on
behalf
of
the
city
references
here,
but
what
I
can
answer
on
is
that,
if,
if
you
do
read
the
coordinated
plan,
there
is
a
significant
amount
of
overlap
between
the
green
zone
goals
and
these
plans
goals
and
many
of
the
many
of
the
the
objectives
and
the
outcomes
that
the
community.
D
The
cpc
gave
us
during
this
process,
particularly
in
the
equitable
and
resilient
inclusive
development,
matrix
overlaps
with
it,
incorporates
northern
the
northside
green
zone
goals,
and
so
we,
you
know
we
do
have
a
lot
of
work
ahead
of
us
as
far
as
getting
to
specifics
and
showing
how
how
the
you
know
actual
projects
themselves
and
the
development
of
the
projects
will
will
align
with
that
and
that's
you
know
that
is
part
of
the
next
step
of
design
and
the
engineering
work
that
we
have
to
do,
but
I'm
very
confident
that
we
will
be
when
we
get
to
that
point,
we'll
be
able
to
show
the
specifics
of
how
we
are
working
to
achieve
the
north
side,
the
north
side,
green
zone
zones
or
green
zone
goals.
F
Thank
you
brandon
the
next.
The
next
question
is
the
river
provides
critical
habitat
for
many
kinds
of
wildlife
who
live
there
or
migrate
through
the
mississippi
flyway.
How
will
all
wildlife
and
their
habitat
be
protected
along
the
river
during
and
after
construction?
How
will
impacts
the
wildlife
be
assessed
and
mitigated?
F
I
will
start
I'll
provide
some
of
a
response
and
then
I'll
pass
it
over
to
kate
as
they
are
as
identified
in
the
eyr.
They
are
proposing
some
shoreland
restoration
as
part
of
the
the
park
plan
so
as
far
as
wildlife
and
how
it
will
be
protected
along
the
river
during
and
after
construction.
F
Also
in
looking
at
that,
there
will
be
a
park
created
on
the
site
which
will
improve
green
space,
they're,
proposing
some
upland
restoration
area,
so
native
plantings
and
kind
of
upland
restorations
to
promote
you,
know,
pollinator
species
and
other
potential
wildlife
that
would
utilize
an
urban
setting
such
as
this
kate.
Do
you
want
to
provide
a
little
more
detail
on
some
of
the
potential
shoreline
restoration
that
you
all
are
considering
at
this
time.
C
I
don't
know
how
much
more
detail
I
can
really
get
into
at
this
point,
but
you
know
when
it
comes
to
restoring
industrialized
shoreline.
The
park
board
definitely
does
have
a
lot
of
experience
and
works
with
a
lot
of
experienced
partners.
So
we're
certainly
well
familiar
with
like
how
to
kind
of
delicately
handle
it.
C
A
slope
that
has
been
you
know,
kind
of
built
up
to
be
steeper
than
natural
and
definitely
is
an
erosion
issue
to
keep
you
know
any
of
that
soil
or
anything
falling
into
the
river
kind
of
the
timing
of
construction,
how
to
get
native
plants
sort
of
delicately
established
on
that
slope
so
that
it
doesn't
have
erosion
and
how
to
build
a
lot
of
habitat
in
you
know
in
different
ways
along
the
river
there's,
everything
from
you
know,
turtles
and
brush
nesting
species
and
certainly
pollinators
and
insects
and
things.
F
Thank
you,
kate.
The
next
question
is:
didn't
you
base
the
finding
that
noise
wouldn't
hurt
birds
on
a
california
road
construction
study?
How
is
that
real
relevant
to
the
concert
venue?
I'm
just
wondering
if
dina
or
andy,
could
provide
a
little
more
detail
on
the
noise
study
that
was
completed
for
the
the
music
venue
being
proposed
on
the
site.
F
No
you're
good,
it
says:
didn't
you
base
the
findings
that
noise
wouldn't
hurt
birds
on
a
california
road
construction
study?
How
is
that
relevant
to
the
concert
venue?
So
just
more,
I
guess
detail
on
the
the
noise
study
that
was
completed.
E
Yeah,
the
noise
study
was
it.
It
was
based
on
a
noise
review
that
was
done
specifically
looking
at
this
site
and
what
the
decibel
limits
would
be
on
the
as
the
noise
expanded
out
of
the
parcel
itself
at
the
current
minnesota
minneapolis
noise
limits,
and
so
it
you
know
it
found
that
the
limit
would
be
like
around
70
db
at
the
river's
edge
and
as
noise
goes
down,
every
10
decibels.
That
decreases
is
about
half
the
level
of
noise.
E
It's
not
like
10
dbs
doesn't
equal,
like
you
know
one,
it's
not
like
a
finite,
it's
a
it's
a
percentage
basis.
So
as
the
noise
decreases,
it
it
dissipates
by
half
almost,
and
so
you
know
they
took
a
look
at
what
the
noise
would.
The
noise
limits
would
be
at
the
rookery
and
at
the
surrounding
areas
and
then
the
impact
on
wildlife.
So
it
wasn't
based
on
anything
other
than
the
noise
study
done
at
this
particular
site.
With
these
particular
conditions.
F
F
There
was
a
bottling
point
or
a
collection
point
on
the
heron
rookery,
as
you'll
note
in
the
the
figures
and
graphics
included
in
the
the
noise
report
that
do
show
and
some
a
text
to
include
in
that
that
do
show
that,
based
on
the
modeling
for
the
concert,
venue
or
the
music
venue,
the
noise
at
the
heron
rookery
would
be
similar
to
the
current
noise
for
the
industrial
area.
So
the
traffic,
the
current
industrial
noise
for
the
area,
so
it
would
be
similar
levels
at
that
point.
F
Okay,
moving
on
to
the
next
question,
the
question
or
the
comments
is:
where
is
the
racial
equity
anti-gentrification
plan,
environmental
justice?
How
is
this
not
a
repeat
of
white
supremacy
and
how
it
has
always
operated,
and
where
is
the
real
community
ownership?
Not
public
ownership?
That's
not
real
racial
equity
brandon.
Would
you
like
to
take
that
question.
D
Well
I
I
mean,
I
think,
that
if
you
or
for
anybody
that
actually
reads
this
plan,
that
I
mean
really
starting
from
the
from
the
project
vision
from
the
community's
values,
the
definition
of
community,
you
know
just
even
just
starting
there
I
mean
this
is.
D
This
is
a
project
that
I
will
say
when
we
started
down
this
path.
Nearly
five
years
ago
is
not
close
to
where
we
are
right
now,
and
you
know
the
work
that
we've
put
in
here
over
the
last
few
years
in
in
shaping
the
the
plan
and
where
we're
at
right
now
has
been
provided,
has
been,
or
has
includes
significant
input
from
northside
residents
from
people
that
do
not
look
like
me
from.
D
You
know
cultural
leaders
in
the
north
side
and
others
who
we've
been
working
with
to
shape
everything
that
that
we're,
showing
here
and
understanding
that
there
is
a
significant
amount
of
trauma
that
has
occurred
in
this
area
for
decades
and
and
centuries,
and
that
you
know
one
project
is
not
going
to
be
able
to.
You
know
to
to
undo
all
of
that.
D
But,
but
if
you,
if
you
do
read
the
plan
and
you
do
try
to
understand
what
we're
hoping
to
accomplish
here,
you
know
we're
trying
to
take
a
significant
first
step
in
that
and
it's
it's
the
ways
that
we're
doing
it.
You
know
start
with
reconnecting
people
to
reconnecting
the
north
side
to
the
river.
D
The
partners
that
we're
choosing
to
bring
into
this
and
making
sure
that
they,
you
know,
have
north
side
connections
and
and
can
speak
on
behalf,
can
can
provide
us
perspectives
on
behalf
of
community
outside
of
whatever
their
expertise
is
or
why
they're
partnering
with
us
on
the
project,
the
consultants
that
we
are
choosing
for
this
project
again
the
values
that
the
community
gave
us
through
the
process,
which
you
know
effectively
become
the
report
card
that
we're
going
to
be
held
to
in
every
decision
that
we
make
here
and
then
the
list
of
you
know
the
community
benefits
and
and
really
how
those
benefits
align
with
what
the
community
told
us.
D
Our
priorities
were
opening
or
leading
this
with
affordable
housing.
We're
turning
is
a
you
know,
a
site
today
that
is
almost
entirely
impervious
concrete
into.
You
know
more
than
half
of
it
as
a
new
park
for
the
north
side
and
another
high
quality
development
that
will
bring
affordable
housing
that
will
bring
people
to
the
river
that
will
bring
commercial
space
that
will
be
owned
or
operated
and
programmed
by
a
community
partner
and
then
and
then
you
know
how
we
are
attempting,
I
think,
to
to
address.
D
You
know
displacement
and
gentrification
issues,
which
is
an
incredibly
challenging
feat
for
one
project
to
do
and-
and
you
know
believe
me,
this
is
how
we
can
find
the
the
right
solutions
here
is
is
what
we're
trying
to
get
to,
but
I
think
that
a
really
kind
of
innovative
step
that
we're
we're
pursuing
here
is
one
the
first
avenue
ticket
fee
that
will
be
charged
to
all
of
first
avenues:
ticketed
events
and
with
that
fee,
going
100
or
the
revenue
from
that
fee,
going
100
back
to
the
north
side
community.
D
You
know
that's
going
to
generate
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars
a
year
and
then,
through
the
cpc
process,
we
got
the
cpc
to
recommend
that
I
shouldn't
say
we
got
them,
but
the
cpc
recommended
that
all
the
ground
lease
payments
that
will
be
made
to
the
city,
which
would
normally
go
into
the
city's
general
fund.
D
These
groundless
payments
are
also
going
to
be
directed
back
to
the
community
and
I'm
not
aware
of
another
project
in
the
country
that
has
a
similar
setup
for
that,
and
so
what
happens
with
those
funds
will
not
be
up
to
us
that
will
be
up
to
a
community
organization
to
determine
what
the
right
thing
is
to
do.
We've
talked
about
ideas
through
the
cpc
process
as
far
as
property,
tax
relief
or
foreclosure
relief,
but
you
know
again,
when
you
add
those
funds
on
top
of
the
ticket
fee.
D
E
I
can
add:
oh
if
I
can
just
add
from
the
amphitheater's
perspective,
you
know
what
we
did
is
we
looked
at
every
single
dollar
that
was
either
dollar
revenue
that
was
coming
in
or
dollar
of
expense
that
was
getting
paid
and
said.
Okay,
how
can
we
direct
this
to
north
side
and
northside
residents,
north
side,
businesses,
and
so,
starting
with
you,
know
the
ticket?
E
Okay,
so
every
dollar
every
ticket
that
is
sold
you
know
three
dollars
is
gonna,
go
directly
back
to
the
community
for
that
for
the
community
to
spend,
as
they
see
fit,
there's
no
like
restrictions
or
designated
spend
on
that,
and
then
when
people
come
through
the
door
and
they
buy
food
and
beverage
okay.
So
how
are
we
gonna
have
those
dollars
spent
at
food
members,
so
we
said:
okay,
north
side,
vendors,
north
side,
food,
vendors,
beverage,
vendors,
you're
gonna,
have
priority
and
we're
gonna
design.
E
You
know
the
the
program
and
the
space
so
that
it's
accessible
and
amenable
to
north
side,
entrepreneurs
and
then
okay,
so
all
the
staff.
E
How
are
we
gonna
make
sure
that
it's
staffed
by
the
north
side
we're
going
to
do
a
youth
training
program,
we're
going
to
work
with
step
up
to
fill
every
entry
level
job
with
north
side,
youth
we're
going
to
all
the
stagehands
jobs,
we're
going
to
start
a
capacity
building
program
where
you
know
it's
not
just
like
we
open
the
doors
and
expect
to
be
able
to
fill
those
jobs
with
north
side
residents,
we're
going
to
start
training
and
building
capacity
and
a
career
pathways
program,
starting
hopefully
in
2022
to
to
get
them
ready,
and
we
said
okay,
it
can't
just
be.
E
You
know,
ticketed
shows
for
outsiders,
we're
also
going
to
do.
You
know
40
to
60
days
of
programming.
Not
that's
not.
You
know
programmed
by
first
avenue,
but
that's
programmed
by
the
north
side,
so
that
it's
it's
rel,
it's
culturally
relevant
and
accessible
and
amenable
to
current
northside
residents.
So
that's
that
was
the
process
we
used
with
the
amphitheater
every
dollar
coming
in,
and
every
dollar
going
out
was.
You
know,
evaluated
to
go
directly
back
into
north
side
residents
and
north
side,
pockets.
F
Thank
you
dana
another
question
was
air
pollution
impact
considered,
so
air
quality
was
reviewed
as
part
of
the
aur.
It
was
read
in
a
qualitative
perspective.
F
The
the
one
that
is
typically
reviewed
for
air
quality
is
a
co
or
hotspot
analysis,
and
so
mndot
has
worked
with
epa
to
identify
a
screening
method
for
doing
a
hotspot
analysis
and
look
at
the
top
10
intersections
in
the
twin
cities
metro
area
and
require
a
hotspot
analysis
for
those
these
intersections
around
in
the
area
were
not
are
not
on
the
hot
spot
analysis
or
the
top
10
intersections
for
co.
So
it
was
not
reviewed.
F
From
that
perspective,
we
did
look
at.
There
are
multiple
air
quality
monitors
within
the
upper
harbor
terminal
area.
We
did
review
the
information
or
the
data
that
is
collected
as
part
of
those
air
quality
monitors
and
during
the
the
collection
or
during
the
the
time
of
the
preparation
of
the
aur
equality
was
considered
good
within
the
area
for
particulate
matter,
and
I
think
ozone
for
that.
So
it
was
reviewed.
F
There
is
a
section
in
the
aoar
that
does
address
additional
information
about
the
screening
and
kind
of
the
qualitative
analysis
that
was
completed
for
air
quality
in
the
project.
F
Area
is
there
any
other
questions
that.
F
G
I'm
on
the
phone,
so
I'm
trying
to
know
how
to
operate
so,
please,
forgive
me.
I'm
trying
to
comment.
Is
that
possible.
G
Very
great,
so
you
know
this
is
james
trice
from
public
policy
project
and
environmental
justice
coordinating
council,
and
so
for
those
of
you
most
of
people.
Probably
on
this
call,
I
don't
even
know
who's.
G
I'm
on
the
phone,
so
I
can't
tell
who's
here
who's
not,
but
I
would
assume
most
of
the
people
who
are
on
the
call
in
this
meeting
know
are
aware
of
several.
You
know
we
conducted
several
learning
table
meetings
throughout
last
year,
probably
about
15
of
them.
Every
month,
four
hours,
each
the
developers
brandon
dana
the
city
with
eric
hillary,
the
parks
you
know
were
with
us
and
all
those
meetings
really
to
hear
what
the
community
has
to
say
and
help.
G
Can
we
understand
what
it
is
they're
trying
to
do?
I
tend
to
test
to
that
fact
that
each
the
developer
and
all
the
names
I
just
mentioned
were
present
at
every
single
one
of
our
learning
tables.
The
learning
tables
was
created
to
make
sure
that
community
has
a
voice
in
the
development
that's
happening
on
the
upper
harbor
terminal.
G
I
can't
I
can.
I
can
say
that
I
I
understand
the
nearly
the
distrust
understand
the
history
of
trauma
that
black
and
brown
communities
face
when
it
comes
down
to
development.
I
I
can
understand-
and
I
I
I
know
all
too
well
about
what
happens
with
communities
around
the
country.
I
understand
what
happened
with
rondo,
I
even
understand-
and
you
know
just
recently,
we
just
celebrated.
G
We
celebrated
recognized
the
100
year
anniversary
of
the
slaughter
at
the
you
know
in
tulsa
oklahoma,
when
they
destroyed
30,
something
38,
almost
40
blocks
of
of
land
and
businesses
that
are
owned
by
black
folks.
I
understand
that
that's
really
clear
and
and
coming
into
this-
I
can
just
say
too,
that
I
came
in
with
the
same
skepticism
about.
Is
the
city
really
serious
about
making
sure
that
we
benefit
from
this
project
that
black
and
brown
communities
in
north
minneapolis
benefit
from
this
project?
G
And
you
know
we
were
at
several
meetings
and
it
took
a
while
for
us
to
begin
to
see
that
they
were
that
they
were
serious
about
making
sure
that
our
communities
benefit.
I
can
also
say
that
our
community
members,
who
are
holding
them
accountable
to
make
sure
that
this
is
true,
and
so,
unlike
you
know,
in
past,
I've
been
in
meetings
with
developers
and
they
have
not
made
as
much
movement
on
anything
for
communities
and
I'd
say
this
was
a
different
process.
G
G
They
are
doing
that
work
when,
when
united
property
got
to
bid,
they
called
in
for
everybody
knows
what
happened
with
thor
brandon
reached
out
to
reach
out
to
other
black
and
brown
developers
around
the
country,
brought
in
othello
metals
from
omaha
nebraska.
Who
was
a
consultant
on
the
project
for
a
while
he's
brought
in
devin
george,
who
was
a
life-long,
born
and
bred
minnesota
north
minneapolis
resident?
Who,
who
played
for
the
l.a
lakers.
B
G
Made
and
made
made
money
doing
that
and
came
back
and
wanted
to
invest
in
this
community
and
building
housing
all
over
north
minneapolis
and
other
other
things,
and
he
is
a
consultant
on
this
project.
So
what
I
can
say
is
that
they
are
making
an
effort
to
change
the
previous
trajectory
that
developers
and
and
and
cities
and
government
usually
do
when
it
comes
down
to
black
and
brown
communities.
G
They
usually
overlook
us,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
this
group,
that's
here
at
the
table
with
united
properties,
development
team,
the
city
with
eric
and
hillary,
the
parks
and
and
and
all
the
folks
involved,
are
making
a
concerted
effort
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
have
the
same
old
same
old,
where
developer
wants
to
make
sure
that
they've
developed
something
but
don't
have
community
in
mind.
Obviously,
that's
not
the
case
in
this.
In
this
situation
they
are
making
every
effort,
but
I
do
want
to
find
lies
by
saying
this.
G
By
no
means
is
this
project
going
to
solve
all
the
historic
trauma
that's
caused
by
previous
development
in
black
and
rock
community.
It's
just
not
going
to
do
that.
It's
not
going
to
answer
all
of
the
affordable
housing
issues.
It's
not
going
to
answer
all
of
the
transportation
issues.
It's
not
going
to
answer
all
of
the
other
issues
that
black
and
broad
communities
are
concerned
about.
G
It's
not,
but
it's
the
beginning,
and
I
think
this
could
be
a
model
moving
forward
for
cities
to
begin
to
adopt
how
to
connect
with
communities
and
worker
communities
to
develop
something
that
communities
benefit
from.
They
are
making
every
effort
to
do
so,
and
I'm
partnering
with
them
to
make
sure
that
communities
get
what
it
is.
They
want.
G
What
I
mean
by
partnering
with
them
is
making
sure
that
they
actually
listen
to
what
community
residents
are
saying,
making
sure
that
they
hear
what's
happening
and
making
sure
they
know
that
that
this
development
must
be
a
development,
that's
tailored
to
and
cater
to
black
and
brown
communities
in
north
minneapolis,
and
so
that's
why
they're
going
through
this
process
and
they
didn't
have
to-
and
so
I
just
want
to.
I
just
want
to
say
that
I'm
finishing
anybody-
I
have
any
questions
they
can.
They
can.
G
F
Thank
you
for
that
comment.
We
did
receive
a
couple
of
additional
comments
in
the
chat,
so
one
of
them
is
how
does
this
project
plan
to
ensure
inclusive
development
practices
are
executed
throughout
the
development
process?
Unsustained
once
built
and
becomes
redeveloped
into
a
new
neighborhood.
D
I'm
I'm
happy
to
take
it,
so
this
is,
I
mean
the
basis,
for
this
will
be
the
community
benefits
agreement.
I
mean,
as
far
as
the
the
I
guess,
legal
agreement
for
for
the
different
components
that
we'll
be
adding
here
the
I
mean
the
goal,
and
this
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
we've
started
this
well.
One
reason
why
we
started
this
community
entity
expression
of
interest
as
well
as
picking
you
know,
a
partner
like
devin
george,
to
to
develop
a
major
com.
D
You
know,
keep
a
developer
at
their
word
is
is
not
required,
not
saying
that
that
won't
be
the
case,
but
the
you
know
we
we've
agreed
in
our
working
on
a
community
benefits
agreement
that
will
stipulate
what
what
we
need
to
do
and
and
the
you
know
those
things
will
run
with
with
the
projects,
whether
united
properties
is
an
owner
or
not,
or
a
developer
or
not,
and
then,
on
top
of
that
five
ten
years
down,
the
line
is
again
as
these
assets
are
are
operated
likely
by
others,
not
by
united
properties
per
se.
D
You
know
the
the
intent
here
is
to
turn
the
ownership
over
as
soon
as
possible
to
organizations
that
that
represent
the
north
side
and
and
we'll
you
know
we'll
we'll
do
what
the
north
side
residents
are
are
looking
to
do
and
and
if
that's
not
enough,
that's
a
major
reason
why
the
public
land
ownership
is
a
key
component
here,
because
then,
if
the
north
side
doesn't
feel
like
it's
being
represented,
the
public
ownership
gives,
you
know,
gives
another
option
to
to
go
talk
to
elected
officials,
about
what
needs
to
change
and,
and
that
won't
be
possible
if
this
was
on
private
owned
land.
D
So
you
know
we
are
we're
doing
everything
that
we
can
up
front
and
it
it
certainly
will
be
more
challenging
as
you
get
into
the
operations,
because
there
will
be
more,
you
know,
potentially
more
owners
introduced
or
more
businesses
or
operators,
and
you
know
we
will
be
asking
all
of
them
to
to
read
the
community
benefits
agreement
and
agree
to
to
do
the
things
that
that
agreement
says
they
have
to
do
so.
F
A
Sorry,
I'm
having
difficult
technical
difficulties
here.
Yes,
so
an
aur
is
updated
every
five
years
or
until
all
development
scenarios
or
all
development
parcels
are
redeveloped.
A
A
We
will
do
a
archaeological
investigation
on
the
site.
We
will
do
a
local
designation
study
for
the
site
and
there
will
be
a
phase.
Two
environmental
study
done
for
the
site
as
development
prepares
to
move
forward.
F
F
The
contact
information
is
hillary,
dvorak
principal
planner
at
the
city
which
is
listed
on
the
screen.
So
if
you
have
formal
written
comments
that
you
would
like
to
provide
on
the
aur
and
draft
mitigation
plan
at
this
time,
you
can
send
those
to
hillary
at
her
email
address,
listed
on
the
screen
and
then
those
will
be
included
in
the
record
for
the
auar.