►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
There
we
go
okay,
the
recording
for
today's
transgender
equity
council
policy
subcommittee
meeting
has
started.
I
does
anyone
have
any
edits
to
the
agenda.
I
stuck
the
agenda
in
the
calendar,
invite,
but
it's
basically
still
right
now,
just
updates
and
discussion
on
the
priority
areas
you
all
had
identified.
Is
there
anything
else
folks
want
to
check
in
about.
C
A
Oh
darn,
okay,
I'm
gonna
put
a
link
to
a
different
version
of
the
agenda
in
the
chat
that
should
work
for
you.
Thank
you
for
reminding
me
of
that.
Yeah.
A
A
E
A
We
can
jump
into
updates,
starting
with
community
safety
and
so
I'll
share
the
updates.
I
have
around
the
three
categories
here
and
we
can
talk
through
any
potential
next
steps
you
all
are
interested
in.
A
The
first
thing
I
wanted
to
share
is
just
I
know
we
had
talked
about
the
mental
health
crisis
response
team
that
the
city
is
working
on
funding
and
my
original
sense
of
the
timeline
there
should
be
like
they
should
have
at
this
point
received
all
the
applications
from
the
request
for
proposals
for
providers
who
can
do
that
work
and
selected
a
provider,
and
the
team
should
be
getting
going
shortly.
A
I'm
going
to
follow
up
later
this
week
with
the
office
of
performance
and
innovation
and
confirm
that
that's
the
case
and
confirm
if
there's
like
any
role
in
the
pilot
that
makes
sense
for
you
all
to
play,
but
basically
the
update
I
have
right
now
is.
I
think
the
pilot
is
actually
about
to
get
started.
A
Are
there
any
other
questions?
That
would
be
useful
for
me
to
ask
them
when
I
follow
up
about
timing
and
potential
roles
for
you
all.
A
If
not,
I
wanted
to
create
a
little
bit
of
time
if
we
wanted
it
to
talk
more
about,
while
I'm
reaching
out
to
the
office
of
performance
and
innovation.
The
traffic
traffic
safety
work
that
they've
also
been
staffed
with
leading
councilmember
cunningham
has
started
staff
direct,
a
staff
direction
for
them
to
look
into
what
it
would
look
like
to
create
an
unarmed
like
traffic
enforcement
division
within
the
city
and
essentially
take
a
lot
of
that
work
out
of
mpd.
A
I
know
we
had
a
conversation
last
time
about
folks
feeling,
like
that
was
kind
of
the
bare
minimum
in
terms
of
what
could
be
moved
from
mpd
and
what
could
be
done
in
an
unarmed
way,
and
since
I'm
going
to
be
reaching
out
to
the
office
of
performance
and
innovation,
I
just
wanted
to
check
if
there
were
any
other
questions.
You
all
wanted
me
asking
or
actions
you
wanted
to
take
in
any
form
around,
if
not
totally
fine,
but
I
know
we
hadn't
really
finished
that
conversation
so
wanted
to
check
back
in.
F
Track
this
is
billy.
I
was
just
wondering
if
there
is
like
an
outline
for
this
new
traffic
safety
department
that
is
made
public
yet
or
still
in
the
works
or
something
that
we
could
look
at.
A
That
is
a
great
question.
I
will,
when
I
send
out
the
minutes,
I'll
link
the
staff
direction
that
councilmember
cunningham
made,
but
his
staff
direction
is
essentially
for
them
to
work
with
other
departments
to
outline
what
that
division
could
look
like
so
like
their
project.
Right
now
is
literally
creating
what
you're
looking
for
to
the
most
part,
but
I
will
I
will
link
that
staff
direction
in
case
it
provides
more
detail,
that's
useful,
beyond
what
I've
summarized.
A
No,
the
staff
direction
is
the
only
public-facing
thing.
This
work
has
just
started
they're
supposed
to
present
back
to
city
council,
either
by
the
end
of
june
or
by
the
end
of
july.
I
should
double
check
on
the
outline
they've
created
and
anything
that's
presented.
The
city
council
will
be
public
facing,
like
both
the
presentation
will
be
viewable
on
youtube
and
all
the
documents
will
be
public
facing
and
I
can
share
those
once
they're
out
but
yeah.
The
process
itself
is
happening
internally.
Right
now,
to
my
understanding.
B
I
think,
having
just
a
basic
outline
of
what
they're
thinking
so
yeah,
just
so
some
sort
of
proposal
to
look
at
because
right
now
I
you
know
we
don't
really
have
any
information
other
than
the
fact
that
they're,
unarmed,
so
yeah
I'd
love
a
baseline
before
we
really
kind
of
dig
in
but
yeah,
I'm
very
interested
to
see
what
that
would
look
like,
but
yeah.
No,
no
other
pressing
questions
for
me
at
the
moment.
A
And
the
other
update
I
wanted
to
give
you
all
related
to
community
safety
was
around
the
charter
amendment.
I
know
in
the
tec
recommendations
to
city
council
in
march.
You
all
said
that
you
supported
a
charter
amendment
to
remove
the
requirement
that
the
city
has
a
police
department
and
replace
it
with
a
department
of
public
safety.
There
are
right
now
a
couple
proposed
charter
amendments
that
exist
they're
still
in
the
process
of
getting
formalized.
A
So
a
couple
weeks
ago,
a
few
city
council
members
presented
a
charter
amendment,
I
believe,
council
member
cunningham,
council,
member
fletcher
and
council
member
schroeder.
That
would
do
this
and
would
create
a
division
of
law
enforcement
within
this
department
of
public
safety.
I
can
link
the
documents
in
their
longer
presentation.
A
They
also
committed
to
a
community
engagement
process
that
would
allow
community
members
to
flesh
out,
like
the
actual
shape
of
this
ordinance.
That
would
create
this
department
that
in
the
last
few
days,
the
city
has
also
started
moving
forward.
The
community
proposal
that
would
similarly
create
this
department
but
doesn't
explicitly
require
a
division
of
law
enforcement
and
there
has
not
been
a
super
clear
answer
from
the
council
members
on
okay.
If
this
community
proposal
is
on
the
ballot,
will
they
withdraw
their
proposals?
A
So
there's
not
two
competing
amendments
on
the
ballot.
I
will
keep
you
all
updated
as
that
conversation
continues,
since
the
community
amendment
hasn't
technically
made
it
through
city
council,
yet
they
wouldn't
be
at
the
point
where
they
would
need
to
do
that,
but
so
the
update
I
have
is
basically
just
there
are
a
lot
of
charter
amendments
about
reshaping,
reshaping
and
or
removing
the
police
department
that
are
on
their
way
through
the
city
council
process
right
now
to
make
it
onto
the
ballot.
A
I
do
not
have
an
update
on
whether
the
council
members
are
removing
their
amendment
to
just
let
the
community
amendment
go
forward,
there's
also
an
amendment
from
the
charter
commission
that
would
give
the
restructure
the
city
government
to
give
the
mayor
more
control
and
the
city
council
less
control
over
some
of
the
things
that
are
currently
split
differently,
and
so
that's
about
to
go
through
city
council
to
be
on
the
ballot
as
well.
A
That
was
maybe
too
vague,
because
it
was
a
high
level
overview
and
I
will
keep
you
all
posted
as
we
know
exactly,
what's
going
to
be
on
the
ballot
but
curious.
If
anyone
has
any
questions,
reflections,
thoughts
or
if
it's
useful
for
me
to
go
into
more
detail
about
any
of
those
pieces.
G
Hey
track,
this
is
emma:
can
you
just
kind
of
outline
what
the
next
steps
would
be
for
that?
So,
if
it
gets
on
the
ballot,
then
it
would
go
into
the
general
election
and
then
and
then
what
happens
like?
How
does
does
it
just
pass
like
by
a
majority
vote
or
and
then
and
then
what's
the
next
step
after
that.
A
Yeah
totally
so
my
understanding
is
things
right
now
are
going
through
city
council
to
then
go
through
the
charter
commission.
They
are
getting
to
the
charter
commission
in
enough
time
that
they
would
be
able
to
go
on
to
the
ballot.
They
would
then
go
on
to
the
ballot
be
voted
on
in
the
general
election
if
they
pass.
A
I
do
believe
it's
just
a
simple
majority
vote,
so,
whichever
one
passes,
the
city
would
then
be
in
charge
of
figuring
out
how
to
implement,
which
is
where,
like
that,
council
member
community
engagement
process
around
like
what
should
the
actual
details
of
this
ordinance
and
department
be,
would
be
one
of
the
things
that
would
contribute
to
implementation.
A
A
Disagree
in
terms
of
whether
the
mayor
or
city
council
has
authority
over
certain
things.
I
don't
have
a
super
clear
answer,
but
what
happened
both
of
those
got
majority
vote
and
in
some
way
I
will
get
that
in
the
physique
clerk's
office
and
can
let
you
all
know
when
I
know,
but
yes,
it
would
be
majority
vote
and
then
the
city
would
have
to
actually
sit
down
and
figure
out
how
to
implement
it.
Essentially.
G
And
if
just
one
more
thing,
if
the
charter
amendment
to
give
the
mayor
more
control
passed,
then
I
assume
it
would
mean
that
getting
charter
amendments
to
basically
dissolve
the
police
department.
That
would
be
much
harder
or,
if
not
impossible,
in
the
future.
From
a
city
council
perspective.
A
This
is
not
a
legal
perspective,
so
I
could
be
wrong,
but
from
my
understanding,
if
that
passed
this
year
in
a
future
year's
election,
a
different
charter
amendment
could
be
proposed
which
would
strike
that
language
move
things
back
to
being
more
collectively
controlled
and
do
something
like
creating
a
department
of
public
safety
that
is
accountable
to
both
the
city
council
and
the
mayor.
The
way
this
charter
amendment
is.
A
G
A
Yeah,
I
think
the
big
question
that
I'm
still
looking
for
an
answer
to
is
what
happens
if
both
amendments
pass
right,
how
much
of
it
like?
Where
does
that
go?
But,
yes,
city
council,
cannot
do
much
with
the
police
department,
both
under
the
current
structure
and
under
a
structure
where
the
mayor
had
authority
over
even
more.
A
Totally
does
anyone
else
have
questions
around
the
charter
amendment
or
anything
else
they
want
to
share.
A
D
A
And
for
folks
who
are
following
along
in
the
sharepoint
agenda,
doc
right
now,
I
will
actually
turn
this
into
a
minute
stock.
I
can't
take
minutes
successfully
when
I'm
tight
when
I'm
sharing
things,
but
I
know
the
things
I'm
sharing
and
they
will
end
up
in
here
with
notes
in
more
detail
and
for
now
you're.
Just
watching
me
take
notes
to
myself
of
next
steps
on
here
and
apologies
for
that,
but
in
terms
of
housing.
A
The
only
update
I
have
around
the
recommendations
you
all
made
is
that
the
rent
stabilization
amendment,
which
is
another
thing,
another
charter
amendment
that
would
be
on
the
ballot.
This
fall
just
to
add
to
the
list
of
charter
amendments
is
in
the
process
of
moving
through
the
charter
commission,
so
that,
if
you
get
to
the
ballot,
it
has
also
gotten
to
the
charter
commission
with
enough
time
that
they
can't
just
delay
it
to
prevent
it
from
being
on
the
ballot.
A
So
I
they
did
not
post
minutes
from
their
meetings,
so
I
wasn't
able
to
see
anything
other
than
that
they
have
looked
at
the
rent
stabilization
amendment,
but
I
can
let
you
know
that
that's
at
that
point
moving
through
the
process
and
if
I
hear
things
on
that,
I
will
keep
you
posted.
I
don't
have
updates
on
any
of
the
other
housing
related
things
that
we
all
have
discussed,
but
I'm
curious.
If
anyone
has
questions
or
things
they
wanted
to
share.
A
A
If
not,
I
got
updates
around
the
sex
worthy
criminalization,
work
kenzie
and
I
were
both
at
the
last
decrim
coalition
meeting
and
essentially
they
are
continuing
to
move
forward
with
trying
to
get
the
loitering
ordinance
which-
and
I
I
will
finish
this
sentence-
then
I'll-
give
quick
contacts
on
it
for
folks.
Who've
missed
these
updates
in
the
past,
but
trying
to
get
the
loitering
ordinance
repealed
this
like
late
summer
or
early
fall.
A
The
loitering
ordinance
makes
it
illegal
for
anyone
to
loiter
with
what
the
police
perceive,
as
quote
like
intent
to
sell
narcotics
or
intent
to
commit.
Prostitution,
I
believe,
is
the
language
so
solely
around,
like
perceived
intent.
Someone
standing
in
a
public
space.
E
A
As
we
get
closer
and
there
is
more
of
a
work
of
act
and
the
coalition
is
focusing
more
on
like
connecting
with
council
members
and
has
like
proposed
dates
around
legislation,
I
will
keep
you
all
posted
on
all
of
that,
because
that
feels
like
the
clearest
place
for
the
tec
to
fit
in
specifically
in
your
tec
role
and
whether
you
all
want
to
write
a
letter
and
support
or
reach
out
individually
to
council
members
or
meet
with
them
or
anything
else
other
than
that
I've
continued
to
send
out
and
we'll
send
out
in
the
minutes
from
this
as
well
information
about
or
not
in
the
minutes,
but
in
a
follow-up
email
from
this,
as
well.
A
Just
information
about
upcoming
events,
they're
having
that
are
just
kind
of
like
spread.
The
word
at
public
education
around
the
loitering
ordinance
and
what
it
is,
and
I
will
continue
to
share
those
as
I
have
that
information
kenzie.
Are
there
other
things
that
you
think
are
important
for
folks
to
know
that
I'm
missing
since
you
were
in
the
last
meeting
and
if
you
can't
think
of
anything,
that's
fine.
Sorry
to
put
you
on
the
spot.
B
What
I
am
gonna
say,
isn't
super
pertinent
to
understanding
the
ordinance.
However,
there
was
a
very
interesting
point
brought
up
at
the
decrim
meeting
that.
B
I
don't
know
how
everything
is
tied
into
itself
and
I
think
target
was
mentioned
specifically.
Unfortunately,
I
did
not
save
the
article
that
somebody
sent
in
the
chat,
but
yeah
target
has
like
a
big
hand
in
keeping
the
loitering
like
ordinance
afloat.
So
I
don't
know
just
interesting
things
to
think
about.
While
we
consider
moving
forward.
E
E
E
A
The
last
thing
I
had
was
just
that.
Unfortunately,
we
don't
have
any
more
updates
around
banning
the
transpanic
defense,
because
the
proposed
legislation
did
not
make
it
in
on
a
state
level,
and
so
that's
not
moving
forward
this
year.
But
it's
a
thing
that
you
all
can
get
the
city
to
again
try
to
lobby
for
at
the
state
level
next
year,
but
that
because
we
can't
do
it
on
a
city
level
that
is
about
what
we've
got
on
while
we're
all
here
and
have
a
little
bit
of
time.
A
I
did
want
to
pose
a
question
just
around.
I
think
in
past
years,
we've
scrambled
a
little
bit
to
prepare
end
of
year
recommendations
last
year.
Clearly
I
did
not
get
that
process
moving
in
time,
because
our
end
of
year
recommendations
came
in
march,
which
is
the
next
year,
and
so
I
would
propose,
maybe
starting
even
at
the
next
policy
meeting,
starting
to
kind
of
look
at
the
recommendations
you
all
made
last
year
and
try
to
pull
together.
A
Try
to
start
thinking
about
where
how
you
want
to
make
recommendations
and
get
them
heard
by
council
members
this
year,
so
that
they
can
maybe
be
presented
even
like
earlier
in
the
fall
before
the
budget
process
really
gets
going
and
influence
the
budget
process
more.
I'm
curious
how
that
feels,
and
then
I'm
curious
other
than
like
me
trying
to
pull
together
like
here's,
your
past
recommendations
and
here's,
some
things
we
know
are
coming
up.
If
there's
other
things
that
would
be
useful
for
starting
that
conversation.
A
Past
tc
recommendations
should
be
on
limbs.
Although
the
limb
search
function
has
been
improved,
I
still
find
that
it
doesn't
always
pull
up.
What
I
want,
but
like
trying
to
search
transgender
equity
council
should
get
you
there.
The
past
tec
recommendations
are
also
on
the
tec
sharepoint
I
believe,
but
I
know
the
tec.
Sharepoint
is
sometimes
a
bit
of
a
mess
and
maybe
not
organized
in
a
way.
That's
super
intuitive.
So
I'm
I'm
also
happy
to
send
things
back
out,
but,
yes,
they
should
be
in
both
of
those
places.
B
Sure
I
just
I
never
want
to
create
more
work
for
you
track.
So
if
I
can
find
the
the
past
recommendations,
I'd
love
to
look
those
over,
I
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
yeah
just
keep
in
mind
that
we
don't
want
to
scramble
with
this
year's
recommendations,
so
yeah
I'll.
Keep
that
in
the
back
of
my
mind,.
H
One
of
the
things
I
was
going
to
mention
this
isn't
necessarily
super
helpful
in
the
moment,
but
maybe
help
brainstorm
how
we
could
get
this
sort
of
information.
I
really
wish
we
had.
You
know
a
way
to
pay
like
a
researcher
to
actually
look
at.
You
know
municipal,
like
policies
and
other
stuff
about
around
trans
and
gender
non-conforming
folks,
like
nationwide,
so
that
we
could
pull
from
that
sort
of
report,
and
it
could
be
that
a
report
like
this
already
exists
and
I'm
just
not
aware
of
it.
H
But
maybe,
if
that's
the
case,
we
can
look
to
see
if
there's
any
sort
of
report
on
trans-inclusive
policies
at
the
municipal
level
nationwide,
and
then
we
can
go
from
there
to
see
if
there's
anything
in
there,
we
want
to
pull
out
of
it
because
I
feel
like
so
much
of
the
policy
game
is
someone
has
a
really
good
idea
and
it's
you
know
someone
in
new
hampshire
had
this
really
great
idea
to
do
this.
H
You
know
such-and-such
thing:
oh,
we
should
do
that
here
and
then,
like
you,
know,
kind
of
cribbing
from
it
and
then
pushing
locally.
A
Gulen,
I
really
appreciate
that.
I
don't
know
if
something
exists,
I
can
do
a
little
bit
of
digging
just
to
see
if
I
can
find
something,
although
I
doubt
it
because
I
feel
like
I
might
have
found
it
by
this
point
if
it
did.
But
I
am
both
through
the
government
alliance
on
race
and
equity
and
through
a
like
very
informal
network
of
lg,
like
folks,
with
lgbtq
equity
roles
in
government
around
the
nation,
like
in
contact
with
folks,
where
I
could
even
just
put
out
a
call
for
like.
A
Has
anyone
passed
anything
that
they
think
is
great,
and
can
we
see
what
it
is,
and
it
would
definitely
not
reach
municipalities
that
have
passed
stuff,
but
don't
have
like
someone
officially
in
a
role
like
that,
but
would
start
to
get
us
some
ideas
anyway.
So
I
can
see
if
I
can
get
anything
and
we'll
send
along
what
I
can
find.
H
That
would
be
really
rad
and
then
also
perhaps
failing.
You
know
any
sort
of
comprehensive
study
being
done.
You
know
one
of
the
things
that
we
can
try
and
recommend
is
that
we
do
that
sort
of
you
know
that
that's
a
recommendation
that
we
like
actually
set
aside
time
and
maybe
a
little
bit
of
money
to
put
towards
researching
trans
inclusion
policies
in
other
cities
for
us
to
review
as
a
city
right,
because
if
it's
not
happening,
you
know
it
seems
certainly
like
a
thing
that
could
happen.
H
H
A
Not
do
other
folks
have
things
that
would
be
useful
in
order
to
start
doing
some
of
this
brainstorming.
F
A
Yeah
great
question
I
can
do
my
best
and
anyone
else
who
was
who
was
here
feel
free
to
jump
in,
but
I
would
say
it
was
personally
just
literally
on
me
being
like.
Oh,
I
forgot
that
you
have
to
schedule
getting
it
in
front
of
council
like
a
month
and
a
half
in
advance
to
actually
fit
yourself
on
the
agenda,
and
so
dates
kept
getting
shifted
and
yeah.
Just
not
leaving
enough
time.
A
Folks
didn't
have
a
ton
of
capacity
to
do.
Document.
Drafting
ac
played
a
really
big
role
in
that,
but
many
folks
for
a
lot
of
good
reasons,
did
not,
and
so
like
yeah,
just
not
giving
ourselves
enough
time
to
try
to
pull
the
document
together
and
therefore
folks
not
having
time
to
really
look
at
it
and
I
think,
struggling
with
the
balance
between
like
shoot
for
the
moon
and
list
everything
we
want
in
priority
orders.
A
So
we
at
least
get
some
things
and
list
few
enough
recommendations
that
maybe
people
are
more
likely
to
take
them
on
and
leaned
more
towards
like
shoot
for
the
moon.
Here's
everything
and
I'm
not
I'm
still
not
sure.
What's
the
best
answer
and
like
you
all,
can
work
together
to
decide
this
here?
What
makes
the
most
sense,
but
I
think
that
was
the
other
struggle
was
figuring
out
how
to
call
it
down
and
like
should.
F
Example:
okay,
yeah,
that
that's
what
I
figured
so
I
think
maybe
and
the
folks
who
were
here
last
year,
maybe
come
up
with
like
a
number
and
see
if
it
could
be
like
more
palatable
this
year
and
like
have
kind
of
like
a
goal
around
that,
as
far
as
like
drafting
recommendations
and
getting
all
of
that,
if
shooting
for
the
moon
did
not
work
last
year.
If
we
want
to,
I
don't
know,
continue
that
this
year
kind
of
cull
it
down
a
little
bit
earlier.
A
A
I
think
we
had
more
intention
around
like
getting
them
sent
individually
to
each
council
office
and
following
up
with
each
council
office
and
following
up
with
the
staff
involved
and
kind
of
being
like
okay,
we
told
council
that
this
office
should
do
it
and
if
council
doesn't
turn
around
and
tell
the
office
to
do
it.
That
doesn't
mean
that
I
can't
reach
out
to
that
office
and
be
like
hey
the
tec
recommended
this.
A
Would
you
be
interested
in
moving
forward
on
it,
and
so
in
some
ways
this
year
has
been
the
most
effective,
because
there
was
more
kind
of
reach
out
from
every
angle.
But
I
think
we
could
do
that
better
and
earlier
this
year
and
set
up
more
of
you
to
reach
out
to
your
council
members
and
things
like
that
as
well.
A
If
no
one
else
has
other
questions
or
needs
on
that
front,
I
will
just
say
like
this
is
probably
going
to
involve
me,
sending
you
like
a
few
somewhat
longer
documents
to
read
more
so
than
I
generally
try
to
send.
So
if
you
have
questions
about
things
and
want
to
go
through
documents
together,
one-on-one
or
there's
like
a
way,
I
can
support
you
in
finding
time
to
do
it
and
making
sense
of
them.
Please
let
me
know
I
don't.
A
I
don't
want
to
just
throw
documents
at
you
and
I'm
happy
to
support,
however
possible,
but
want
to
make
sure
that
you
all
are
able
to
like
review
the
relevant
things
so
that
future
policy
meetings
you
kind
of
have
the
context
and
can
brainstorm
based
on
past
recommendations,
so
please
reach
out
so
that
I
can
offer
support
in
whatever
way
and
jay
and
nadia
are
like
tec
friends,
please
still
like.
We
want
you
as
much
a
part
of
this
as
you
want
to
be.
A
I
want
to
make
it
clear
that,
like
attending
meetings
and
drafting
recommendations
are
both
things
that
non-official
members
are
welcome
to
be
a
part
of
as
much
as.
Obviously
you
want
to
and
are
able
to.
G
Can
I
ask
this
is
emma?
Can
I
just
ask
what
happened
with
the
transpanic
defense
and
why
that
wasn't
like
pushed
forward
with
the
decision-making
process,
was
around
that
or
like
if
it
was
a
budget
issue
or
like
just
kind
of
what
what
the
issue
was
with
that.
A
Totally,
I
am
less
versed
in
the
state
legislative
process
than
city,
so
I
don't
know
if
I'm
going
to
use
all
the
best
words
to
explain
this,
but
from
what
I
heard
from
our
intergovernmental
relations
director
who's,
the
one
tracking
state
level
bills
like
the
bill
was
proposed,
but
it
just
was
not
picked
up,
did
not
get
a
hearing
and
was
not
put
into
like
the
omnibus
bill
or
anything
that
would
that
gets
voted
on
at
the
end
of
the
legislative
session.
A
H
So
so
it's
actually
my
understanding
is
it's
the
same
thing
that
happened
to
the
more
transphobic
bill
that
did
not
go
through
recently
in
was
it
alabama
or
arkansas
one
of
the
two,
the
a
a
states?
H
What
are
a
states?
I
don't
know
what
they
are,
but
basically
it
just
it
just
didn't
get
assigned
a
hearing
it
didn't
get
taken
up.
There
was
enough
time
on
the
schedule
not
enough
time
on
the
schedule,
so
it
wasn't
prioritized
and
just
got
left,
so
it's
effectively
dead.
They
can
reintroduce
it
next
year
if
they
want
to
pursue
it
but
yeah.
Otherwise
it
just
kind
of
like
dies,
and
no
one
touched
it.
A
H
Kind
of
a
bummer,
but
it's
also
a
thing
that
you
know
a
lot
of
people
will
like
prioritize,
which
bills
get
get
actually
slated
on
the
schedule
to
be
heard
in
committee
in
part
based
on
what
they
expect
the
outcome
to
be,
and
so
sometimes
they
will
not
prioritize
a
thing
that
they
know
will
not
pass
in
order
to
prioritize
something
that
they
think
they
might
be
able
to
get
done.
But
it's
all
you
know
a
game
of
how
much
time
the
legislative
session
lasts
and
what
what
else
is
on
the
agenda.
H
Sorry
I
I
was
saying
I
hung
out
with
too
many
state
lobbyists
in
colorado,
so.
D
Appalling,
but
I
was
going
to
say
this,
unfortunately,
it's
one
of
those
things
that,
even
even
if
you
oppose
it,
you
wouldn't
get
any
type
of
political
clout
or
capital
out
of
it.
So
you
there
it's
it's!
It's
not
valuable
to
people
enough
to
say
yay
or
nay.
So
this
is
truly
the
matter
of
it's
so
benign.
In
some
cases,
it's
not
even
to
be
bothered
with.
H
Yeah
I
mean
it
is:
it
is
for
sure
a
huge
disappointment
that
they
didn't
decide
that
it
was
a
priority
to
ban
the
transpanic
defense
right.
That's
always
a
bummer
when
there's
an
opportunity
there,
and
then
they
don't
take
it
like
this
sort
of
bill
in
in
colorado
did
the
same
thing
for
multiple
years,
and
then
you
know
it.
It
often
times
happens
where
it
will
be
created
like
three
four
years
in
a
row
and
then
it'll
finally
get
heard
when
they
feel
like
they
can
actually
push
it
through.
H
A
Yeah,
thank
you
for
that
context.
Does
anyone
else
have
any
other
questions
or
things
they
wanted
to
check
in
about?
Oh
seeing
the
question
in
the
chat
about
the
date
of
the
summit,
it
is
october,
3rd
and
4th
and
we
are
getting
save
the
dates
made
through
our
communications
department
right
now
and
we'll
send
those
out
as
soon
as
we
have
them.
C
Cool
this
is
jay
and
then
another
thing.
Sorry,
I'm
like
looking
at
my
notes,
so
it's
october
3rd
and
4th
is
that
a
full
day
event.
It's.
C
Okay,
I
will
probably
be
sending
you
and
may
an
email
about
the
update
for
what
we've
been
planning
with
amir
for
this
storytelling
tip
into
policy,
project
or
workshop,
but
I
feel
like
I,
I
might
have
more
questions
nadia.
Do
you
have
any
questions
like
calling
you
out
on
the
spot.
E
No,
it's
okay!
I
was
just
it's
yeah
october.
Third,
through
the
fourth
evening
session,
do
you
have
like
how
many
hours
it's
gonna
be.
A
A
A
We
have
moved
doing
more
like
outside
of
the
workday
times,
so
it
accommodates
both
like
folks,
work
schedules
and
youth
who
are
in
school,
but
I
also
know
that
it
also
makes
it
difficult
for
people
who
don't
want
to
put
in
evening
hours.
We've
never
been
able
to
figure
out
a
really
good,
perfect
way
to
work
for
everyone's
schedules.
D
A
B
I
have
a
quick
question:
what
does
the
city
look
like
in
terms
of
you
know
the
pandemic
and
in
person
meetings
so
kind
of
what
I'm
getting
at?
Will
we
be
meeting
in
person
in
the
foreseeable
future?
A
Great
question:
thank
you
for
that.
I
have
not
gotten
a
final
call
on
what
that
looks
like
for
appointed
boards.
I
know
that
employees
are
supposed
to
be
back
to
our
like
new
normal
is
what
they're
saying
by
labor
day,
so
that
won't
necessarily
mean
in
the
office
five
days
a
week,
but
that'll
mean
like
whatever.
A
A
My
guess
is,
and
that's
essentially
going
to
be
whenever
I
think
I'm
getting
more
updates
on
this
on
wednesday
in
the
meeting
for
all
the
staff
of
appointed
boards.
So
I
will
update
you
all
on
the
details
of
that
after
that,
essentially,
whenever
the
state
of
minnesota
changes
their
open
meeting
law
to
no
longer
allow
virtual
meetings
as
a
form
of
open
meetings,
both
city
council
and
appointed
boards,
like
you
all,
will
have
to
go
back
to
in
person
unless
we
can
lobby
for
any
sort
of
edit.
A
That
like
allows
both
in-person
and
virtual
options
for
accessibility.
I
don't
know
how
high
the
chances
of
that
are,
but
that
is
has
been
the
city's
stated
goal
from
what
I've
heard.
So
I
don't
have
a
date,
but
my
guess
is
sometime
sometime
this
year
you
all
will
be
required
to
go
back
to
in
person
and
I'm
gonna
keep
you
updated
as
soon
as
I
get
more
information
on
what
that
actually
looks
like,
which
will
probably
be
wednesday.
A
Totally-
and
hopefully
this
goes
without
saying,
but
obviously
particularly
at
any
point
that
there's
a
requirement
to
go
back
to
in
person
like
I
am
happy
to
work
with
you
all
to
figure
out
how
to
make
it
feel
as
safe
as
accessible
as
kovid's
safe
for
you
all
as
possible
in
terms
of
the
size
and
type
of
space
or
wherever
that
we
meet
and
happy
to
talk
one-on-one
or
in
groups
about
any
of
that.