►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
So
this
is
the
june
29th
meeting
of
the
joint
north
side
and
south
side
green
zone,
and
we
do
not
have
quorum
yet,
but
we
are
going
to
jump
into
the
topics
for
the
evening.
Our
main
topic
tonight
is
air
pollution
and
we
have
a
number
of
guests
whom
you
can
many
of
you
can
see
from
minnesota
pollution
control
agency.
A
A
So,
as
I
mentioned,
this
is
a
joint
green
zone,
meeting
north
side
and
south
side.
This
is
something
we've
started
doing
quarterly,
because
both
north
side
and
south
state
green
zone
have
adopted
their
work
plans
as
of
the
end
of
2019
early
2020,
and
there
are
many
initiatives
that
are
cross-cutting
amongst
them,
and
one
of
those
is
air.
Pollution
has
been
a
a
priority
topic
for
both
groups,
so
we
are
coming
together
for
these
conversations
so
that
we
can
collaborate.
A
I
want
to
set
some
context
before
I
hand
it
over
to
our
guests
to
share
what
they
have
to
share,
and
that
is
these
conversations
have
been
ongoing
for
a
number
of
years,
but
I
think
what
it
really
started
to
gain
momentum
last
fall
when
the
mpca
and
the
state
health
department
and
the
city
health
department
came
together
and
created
a
presentation
on
air
pollution
and
covid19,
and
they
gave
this
presentation
both
to
the
northside
green
zone
and
to
the
minneapolis
city
council,
and
it
was,
I
think,
telling
in
both
that
there
is
still
disproportionate
air
impacts
in
the
city
of
minneapolis
in
our
green
zones,
and
there
are
there's
a
there's,
also
a
correlation
between
where
there's
been
long-term
air
pollution
and
the
rates
of
covet
19
mortality.
A
In
fact-
and
there
are
things
that
we
can
do
to
mitigate
our
air
pollution-
to
reduce
some
of
those
disparities.
So
in
in
the
meeting
with
the
northside
green
zone
last
fall
task
force.
Members
raised
a
number
of
requests
recommendations.
A
However,
you
might
want
to
think
about
it
and
noted
that
they
they
wanted
to
see
the
same
level
of
urgency
at
the
agency
city
county
state
level
that
they
felt
for
their
community
and
some
of
the
recommendations
included.
Increasing
error,
monitors
in
the
green
zones,
identifying
sources
of
pollution
and
then
creating
strategies
to
address
those
sources
specifically.
A
A
So
these
are
some
of
the
recommendations
coming
from
the
northside
green
zone
just
shy
of
a
year
ago,
maybe
about
nine
months
ago,
out
of
the
september
meeting,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
say.
I
really
appreciate
that
so
many
folks
from
mpca
in
the
city
have
shown
up
tonight
to
have
this
conversation.
I
think
it
does
show
how
serious
the
state
is
taking
this
and
desire
to
work
with
community
on
these
issues.
So
with
that,
I
want
to
hand
it
over
to
folks
from
the
state
and
jenny.
A
I
also
want
to
note
you're
here
and
if
there's
at
any
point,
you
want
to
jump
in
and
share.
You
know
if
there's
like
the
city's
collaborating
on
anything
with
the
state
or,
if
there's
something
the
state
mentions
where
you're
like.
Oh
the
city's,
been
thinking
about
doing
that.
This
can
be
more,
I
think,
about
like
a
discussion
format
and
as
there's
things
that
are
sort
of
action
items
coming
forward.
A
Let's
note
those
and
we're
gonna
break
out
into
breakout
rooms
later,
where
community
members
and
agency
staff
can
like
really
start
getting
into
strategizing
about
what
are
the
next
steps?
Who
else
do
we
need
to
bring
in
these
conversations,
and
how
do
we
continue
this
collaboration?
A
B
Yeah,
I
just
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
having
us
here
today
and
we're
really
excited
for
his
conversation,
this
dialogue
and
and
also
in
the
fact
that
this
is
not
an
end-all
and
that
we're
gonna
have
this,
be
an
opportunity
to
continue
to
have
a
dialogue
in
conversation
with
community
members
on
the
south
side
and
north
side.
B
Again,
my
name
is
jose
luis
biasino,
I'm
the
environmental
justice
outreach
coordinator
in
the
commissioner's
office
with
the
within
our
engagement
environmental
justice
unit,
and
as
I
just
before
I
begin.
I
just
want
to
say
that
that
today
we
have
in
front
of
you
a
team
from
the
npca
that
are
tirelessly
working
to
fulfill
our
mission
of
protecting
the
environment,
human
health.
B
We
understand
and
acknowledge
that
the
disproportionate
exposure
to
pollution
that
indigenous
communities
and
communities
of
color
and
low-income
low-wealth
communities
are
experiencing
is
something
that
didn't
happen
in
the
vacuum
as
an
agency.
We're
learning
and
unlearning
the
way
that
communities
and
neighborhoods
look
and
function
are
due
to
structural
racism,
redlining,
racial
covenants
and
historical
disinvestments
of
indigenous
and
communities
of
color,
low
wealth
communities
that
we
continue
to.
B
That
continue
to
impact
our
communities
to
today,
and
so
I
just
want
to
make
that
acknowledgement
as
we
go
into
a
really
hard
conversation
and
I'll
share
with
you
what
we
know
and
what
we've
been
gathering
on
the
environmental
impacts
folks
are
experiencing,
like
in
my
neighborhood
in
south
minneapolis,
and
some
of
you
all
that
live
in
the
north
side
for
themselves.
So
I'll
just
head
it
over
to
helen
or
to
craig.
C
You
think
jose,
like
said
I'll,
just
share
a
little
bit
more.
You
know
we're
just
really
appreciative
that
we're
here
in
this
space
with
you
and
definitely
there
are
challenges
that
we
know
we
have
limitations
on
as
a
government.
You
know
state
government,
but
at
the
same
time
there
are
lots
of
opportunities
that
we
want
to
be
able
to
work
together
on
and
just
want
to
acknowledge
that
we
we
know
that
the
questions
that
were
raised
at
the
last
meeting
are
very
important,
and
so
I
kind
of
wanted
just
to
touch
on.
C
You
know
some
of
that,
especially
the
first
one.
Mostly
you
know,
as
far
as
the
question
about
bringing
permitted
facilities
into
the
room
with
impacted
residents
and
community
members,
I
really
want
to
know
you
know.
That
is
something
that
we've
heard
from
this
group
and
community
members,
and
I
think
that
is
something
that
we
can
definitely
work
towards
and
understand.
You
know
together
what
the
purpose
and
goals
of
of
that
kind
of
meeting
would
be.
C
You
know
because
it
would
be
one
thing
for
us
to
assume
what
that
conversation
would
need
to
entail,
but
it
would
really
be
helpful
to
hear
directly
from
the
community
in
this
group
what
would
be
the
expected
outcomes
from
that
so
that
we
could
help?
You
know
make
sure
that
the
right
folks
are
in
the
room
to
help
get
the
right
framing
together,
even
prior
to
the
meeting
as
much
as
that
is
helpful
with
our
connections
there.
C
So
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
that
is
something
that
we
aren't
able
to
kind
of
require
right
now,
but
something
we're
working
on
and
have
heard
as
an
important
piece
of
that.
So
I
just
wanted
to
touch
on
that
first
bullet.
I
know
we're
going
to
go
into
breakout
sessions
and
dive
in
a
bit
more
and
and
so
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
craig
to
kind
of
go
into
the
other
questions
that
were
brought
up
at
the
last
meeting
related
to
the
specific
asks
on.
C
D
Thanks
helen,
my
name
is
craig
mcdonnell
and
I
serve
as
an
assistant
commissioner
for
air
and
climate
policy
at
the
pca,
and
just
I'm
grateful
to
be
in
this
room
tonight
with
all
of
you
and
really
kind
of
as
jose
luis
and
helen
said
to
be
in
that
listen
and
learn
mode
and
look
at
those
opportunities
to
collaborate.
I
think
it's
really
important.
D
Just
to
reiterate
what
jose
luis
said
that
you
know
we
see
this
as
part
of
an
ongoing
conversation
there,
and
we
hope
that
you
know
that
is
the
case
where
it
will
be
ongoing
and
we
can
continue
to
discuss
this
these
issues.
Air
quality,
is
something
that
we
know
is
felt
differently
in
local
communities
as
a
state.
I
think
we've
presented
data
before
that
shows
that
we're
meeting,
federal
and
state
air
quality
measures
across
the
state,
but
communities
are
experiencing
them
much
differently.
Not
all
communities
have
access
to
good
quality
air
right.
D
We
know
that
black
communities,
indigenous
communities,
communities
of
color
have
air
quality
that
is
worse
off
as
a
whole,
and
that
is
something
that
is
concerning
to
us
as
an
agency.
I
think
it's
important
to
note
one
of
our
long-term
or
forever
goals
is
addressing
disproportionate
impacts
and
we
view
that
as
kind
of
that
long-term
or
forever
goal,
because
the
work
is
so
complex,
it
is
so
challenging,
but
it
is
so
so
important
and
we
hear
urgency
in
your
voice.
D
We
feel
that
urgency
and
we're
going
to
continue
to
be
here
and
be
in
community
conversations
like
this
to
continue
to
feel
that
urgency.
So
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
that
from
the
start,
I
will
say
that
some
of
the
challenges
with
air
quality,
I
think,
is
what
we
know
is
the
complexity
of
it
and
the
different
sources.
D
D
One
is
what
we
call
our
neighborhood
sources
and
those
are
unpermitted
sources.
Sometimes
it
can
be
things
like
backyard
fires,
maybe
a
small
business
that
doesn't
require
an
air
permit,
because
of
just
the
way
our
permitting
process
is
set
up
with
emissions.
That
could
be
something
like
a
gas
station
right.
It
could
be
your
neighbor
using
an
internal
combustion
engine
in
their
lawnmower.
That
would
be
a
neighborhood
source,
and
that
is
one
of
the
drivers
of
poor
air
quality
here.
D
Another
one
is,
I
think,
what
we
all
know:
those
mobile
sources,
car
traffic,
diesel
emissions
from
buses
from
heavy
duty
vehicles,
those
things
and
there's
opportunities
for
the
state
and
the
federal
government
there
for
all
of
us
to
work
together
and
there's
opportunities
to
think
about
in
our
transportation
system
as
a
whole.
D
But
again
it
hasn't
addressed
the
disproportionate
impacts.
But
what
we've
seen
is
those
industrial
sources
are
less
of
a
contributor
than
they
used
to
be
at
times
to
our
poor
air
quality.
We've
seen
coal-fired
power
plants
retire
and
transition
away,
that's
benefited
everyone
and
that's
reduced
emissions
from
that
source,
but
again
there's
more
to
be
done
and
kind
of
that.
D
D
D
D
E
F
G
G
K
L
G
K
A
Okay,
well
for
for
those
of
you
who
I
mistakenly
sent
contact,
information
or
login
information
to
the
wrong
meeting,
we
I
I
gave
some
background
on
where
this
conversation
started.
Over
the
last
year
and
last
september,
when
mpca
and
the
state
health
department
and
city
health
department
gave
a
presentation
on
air
pollution
and
covid
and
then
kind
of
the
follow-up,
the
action
items
that
the
northside
green
zone
had
come
up
with
in
that
september
conversation
with
mpca.
A
So
we
were
starting
to
hear
from
folks
at
the
mpca
on
basically
responses
to
where
we're
at
with
those
action
items.
So
I
don't
think
we
need
to
go
back
and
repeat
everything
that
was
said
but
craig,
maybe
if
you
kind
of
want
to
give
a
little
recap
of
where
you
started.
D
Yeah
happy
too,
and
we
were
discussing
kind
of
the
sources
of
air
pollution
there
as
mpca
kind
of
categorizes
them,
and
we
talked
about
neighborhood
sources.
Being
you
know:
backyard
fires,
mowers,
lawn
equipment,
things
like
that
things
that
are
unregulated,
that
we
know
contribute
to
poor
air
quality.
D
It
was
talking
about
how
you
know
tackling
each
one
of
those
is
a
little
bit
complex,
but
we
have
seen
some
reductions
in
terms
of
different
buckets
of
there,
so
our
industrial
sources,
we
think
about
them.
Statewide
and
again
this
is
statewide
not
on
the
local,
not
necessarily
that
local
level,
but
our
coal-fired
power
plants
are
retiring
for
renewable
energy,
which
is
a
great
thing
and
that's
improving
air
quality
everywhere.
So
that's
a
start
right
and
we're
seeing
other
industrial
sources
start
to
clean
up
as
well.
But
that's
been
a
big
seas.
D
Is
the
power
generation
sector
getting
cleaner
so
we're
seeing
lower
emissions
of
different
pollutants
that
are
concerning
for
ground
level,
ozone
articulate
matter
those
things
that
really
drive
you
know,
asthma
rates
and
just
other
health
impacts
related
to
our
cardiovascular
systems
as
well
there,
and
so
recognizing
that
those
are.
D
D
So
when
a
facility
is
in
an
environmental
justice
area
of
concern,
it
comes
in
and
falls
in
through
our
environmental
justice
implementation
plan
for
a
permit
there,
which
focuses
on
increased
community
engagement,
additional
meetings
with
the
regulated
party
and
with
community
to
understand,
what's
going
on
and
to
see
the
impacts
that
are
there
through
that
kind
of
engagement
in
that
process.
In
some
ways
it's
formalized
as
like
it
is
for
the
phillips
community.
We
want
to
see
reductions
and
voluntary
reductions,
sometimes
from
regulated
parties.
D
There's
a
limitation
there
that
it
is
a
challenge,
because
it's
voluntary
for
some
of
them
if
they
are
underneath
those
state
and
federal
standards
to
get
them
to
do
more,
is
going
to
require
action
from
the
business.
Having
that
willingness
to
do
so,
and
some
businesses
have
shown
willingness,
others
haven't,
but
we
want
to
continue
that
to
do
that
work
and
to
do
that
engagement.
D
But
we
know
that's
not
enough,
and
so
we
do
have
a
focus
on
pushing
an
environmental
justice
package
at
the
legislature,
and
we
can
talk
about
that
more
in
some
detail.
We've
got
greta
goff
here
our
assistant
commissioner
for
government
relations
here,
which
would
help
give
us
some
more
teeth
to
do
more
through
our
permitting
process
there.
D
So
that's
one
aspect
is
you
know,
making
sure
to
seek
those
voluntary
reductions
in
prioritizing
the
work
that
we
do
based
on
facilities
that
we
know
are
driving
risk
and
that
are
located
within
or
contributing
to
environmental
justice
concerns
for
the
mobile
sources.
I'm
thinking
about
traffic,
I'm
taking
kind
of
a
multi-pronged
approach
there.
One
of
the
things
that
we
are
proud
of
is
we
have
undertaken
a
rulemaking
and
the
governor
has
approved
it
for
what's
called
clean
cars
minnesota
to
regulate
tail
pipe
emissions
for
passenger
duty
vehicles.
D
For
passenger
duty
vehicles
and
light
duty
trucks,
and
so
that
will
when
it
is
phased
in
in
2025,
which
is
an
immediate,
we
recognize
lower
some
of
those
harmful
emissions,
both
fighting
climate
change,
as
well
as
reducing
particulate
matter
and
some
ground
level.
Ozone
forming
compounds
as
well,
and
so
that's
been
one
aspect
in
the
regulatory
piece.
We've
also
dedicated
our
volkswagen
settlement,
which
is
47
million
dollars
that
the
state
received
through
the
volkswagen
emissions
scandal.
Volkswagen
was
having
their
cars,
cheat
the
system
essentially
and
say
they
were
less
polluting
than
they
actually
were.
D
Each
say
it
received
some
money
and
targeting
those
funds
towards
electric
vehicles,
so
electric
school
buses
is
one
pilot
that
we
have
there
we're
also
targeting
electric
heavy-duty
vehicles,
so
some
of
those
trucks,
mine
trucks,
other
things
like
that,
those
large
diesel
engines
that
are
just
so
dirty
and
contributing
to
poor
air
quality
in
a
number
of
places.
D
There
called
project
car
which
we
partner
with
garages
to
improve
some
of
the
emissions
control
equipment
on
cars
that
are
covering
coming
in
for
folks
who
need
it
at
no
cost
to
them.
There's
a
number
of
garages
there
we're
working
with
we're,
also
looking
at
how
we
can
project
stove,
swap
so
people
who
may
be
reliant
on
wood
heaters
and
other
types
of
stoves
for
their
heating
needs
how
we
can
get
them
efficient
stoves
that
improve
air
quality
as
well,
and
so
those
are
just
a
few
of
the
things
that
we
are
doing
here.
D
You
know
happy
to
kind
of
take
questions.
We've
got
a
number
of
folks
from
our
team
on
some
of
those
projects,
but
we
can
also
talk
about
some
of
the
work
at
the
legislature
because
we
do
see
that
as
one
of
those
opportunities
to
partner.
But
I
think
we
also
could
think
about
our
grant
making
authority
and
the
fact
that
we
do
provide
grants
to
small
business
assistants
and
other
folks
to
address
those
neighborhood
sources.
A
D
I
appreciate
that
comment,
marita
and
I
think
that's
some
information.
We
can
pull
together
some
examples
of
actual
reductions.
One
of
the
success
stories
that
we
talk
about
is
nico
plating
in
minneapolis.
It's
a
plater
and
working
with
them.
We
got
them
before
the
tce
ban.
D
Trichloroethylene
was
put
in
place
that
the
legislature
and
the
agency
banned
last
year
to
completely
switch
that
chemical
away
from
tce
to
a
less
harmful
chemical
tce
is
a
carcinogen
and
through
working
with
them
to
install
pollution,
control,
equipment,
they're
actually
below
a
permitted
threshold
for
needing
a
permit,
so
they
don't
need
a
permit,
but
we've
also
worked
with
them
to
ensure
that
some
of
their
pollution
control
equipment,
wet
scrubbers,
are
continuing
in
operation
there.
D
So
it's
one
example
of
some
of
the
voluntary
work
that
we've
done,
but
I
think
your
your
second
point
is
kind
of
the
key
there.
If
laws
and
regulations
permit
harm
you
know
what
can
we
do
and
that's
been
the
focus
of
working
with
representative
lee,
but
also
others
to
think
about
what
we
can
do
for
environmental
justice
and
seeing
those
changes
and
enhancing
npca's
authority
at
times
to
take
action.
B
Kelly,
can
I
jump
in
really
quick
and
just
just
think
of
time,
one
and
then
two
if
we
want
to
turn
it
over
to
the
city
and
or
think
about
breakout
rooms,
if
we're
still
going
to
do
that,
so
we
can
dive
a
little
deeper.
I
mean
that
question
that
we
just
read
we
would
cover.
Just
now
is
really
important.
It
could
be
a
pocket
or
a
bucket.
We
could
spend
some
time
on.
There
might
be
other
folks
or
other
questions
that
we
can
create
some
breakout
sessions.
B
We
can
dive
a
little
deeper
breakout
room.
Excuse
me,
so
I
just
wanted
to
see
if
we
still
want
to
do
that
or
hand
it
over
to
the
city
for
a
little
bit
or
do
you
want
us
to
continue?
What
do
you
think.
M
Thanks
so
I
just
have
a
couple
questions
one
is:
can
you
tell
me
if
you
advocate
for
karen
clark's
law?
That
is
just
right
now
in
the
east,
phillips
neighborhood,
and
if
that
is
something
that
could
be
for
either
the
entire
I
mean.
Obviously
it
would
be
for
the
entire
state
since
you're
at
the
state
level,
and
then
I
guess,
I'm
curious
like
where
the
stationary
sources
would
be
like
gaaf,
northern
northern
metals.
N
Yeah
thanks
craig
hi
everybody,
my
name
is
greta
gothier
and
I'm
an
assistant
commissioner
at
mpca
in
my
area,
is
government
relations,
legislative
and
congressional.
So
great
question
michelle.
Thank
you.
N
Yes,
we
have
been
working
on
expanding
the
current
statute
that
karen
clark
and
linda
berglin
put
in
place
what
14
years
ago,
now
to
a
wider
area
and
actually
statewide,
and
so
we
brought
a
bill
in
this
session.
There
were
other
bills.
Representative
fou
lee
had
a
bill
and
we
worked
with
him
very
intensely
over
the
course
of
the
session
to
kind
of
blend
our
two
bills
and
and
that
language
that
we
crafted
did
pass
off
of
the
house
floor
this
year,
and
so
that's
a
huge
step
forward.
N
So
we're
really
excited
about
that
and
we
want
to
build
on
that
next
session
and
try
to
figure
out
how
to
advance
it
further
this
year,
unfortunately,
in
the
minnesota
senate,
the
bills
could
not
even
get
hearings.
So
we
are,
you
know
our
legislatures
kind
of
represents
the
whole
country
and
the
divide.
N
You
know
between
weight,
the
ways
people
see
things,
so
we
did
get
a
really
good
bill
off
the
house
floor.
We
had
a
lot
of
good
discussions,
got
a
lot
of
issues
out
in
front
of
a
lot
of
legislators,
so
they
understand
better
and
I
wish
we
could
have
passed
it.
The
governor
was
ready
to
sign
it
very,
very
supportive
and
the
lieutenant
governor,
but
we
were
not
able
to
make
that
happen
this
year
because
of
the
leadership
of
the
senate
did
just
just
did
not
want
to
do
it
at
all.
N
So
we'd
like
to
talk
about
that
at
some
point
with
you
and
you
know,
how
can
we
move?
You
know
what
are
the
options
to
move
around
that
or
try
to
address
that,
maybe
bringing
in
other
partner
organizations
and
and
that
kind
of
thing,
but
this
year
we
we
did
make
some
success
and
I'm
very
happy
about
that.
D
Yeah-
and
I
can
touch
on
that-
it
was
kind
of
related
to
some
of
the
specific
facilities
in
north
minneapolis,
like
northern
metals
gaf
and
some
of
those
other
facilities,
and
I
will
tell
you
that's
another
part
that
we
worked
on
this
legislative
session
kind
of
when
it
relates
to
bad
actors,
was
being
able
to
reopen
permits.
D
I
know
this
group's
had
a
conversation
about
not
expiring
state
permits,
and
that
was
something
we
saw
in
statute-
was
the
ability,
when
you
have
non-compliance,
to
be
able
to
reopen
that
permit
for
a
clear
reason
and
to
compel
them
not
to
operate
until
we
can
be
assured
of
compliance
there.
D
Currently,
the
way
our
state
laws
and
regulations
are
set
up,
companies
that
are
out
of
compliance
do
have
that
opportunity
to
come
back
into
compliance,
so
we
wanted
to
just
seek
some
of
that
clarity
in
law
in
those
statutes
to
help
us
take
the
actions
that
we
know
you
know
so
many
of
you
want,
because
it
is
frustrating
to
see
bad
actors
continue
to
act
bad
at
times.
So
that's
one
of
the
things
that
we
looked
at
as
it
relates
to
gaf
and
some
of
the
other
facilities
kind
of
in
north
minneapolis.
D
They
are
part
of
that
pilot
project
that
we've
talked
about
at
times,
which
was
called
the
minneapolis
project.
We're
continuing
like
to
reach
out
to
them,
having
our
permit
engineers
reach
out
to
those
facilities
who
may
be
in
compliance
with
their
permit,
but
we
know
that
we
are
still
seeing
issues
with
dust
and
other
pollutants
in
that
corridor,
particularly
to
see
if
we
can
get
more
out
of
them.
It's
that
issue
for
voluntary
efforts.
D
We've
had
some
success
with
gaf
and
provo,
prompting
them
to
think
more
about
what
they
can
do.
One
of
those
things
is
to
install
what's
called
regenerative
thermal
oxidizer,
it's
a
piece
of
police
control,
equipment
that
burns
up
pollution
to
lower
their
voc
impacts
and
things
like
that.
But
it
is
voluntary
and
we've
heard
that
as
a
result
of
the
pandemic,
they
pushed
that
from
doing
that,
so
we're
actually
going
to
be
following
back
up
with
them
in
the
coming
days
to
see
where
that
has
been.
D
We
are
coming
out
of
a
pandemic,
we're
seeing
the
economy
pick
up
a
little
bit
for
some
not
for
all
and
where
they're
at
they'd
said
that
that's
something
they
want
to
do.
But
again
it's
one
of
those
issues
with
voluntary
compliance.
So
seeking
that
opportunity
through
statute
and
rule,
is
going
to
ask
questions.
J
Yo,
craig,
you
said
something
about
what
gaf
has
been
asking
or
has
been
saying
that
they're
going
to
put
this
filter
in
for
at
least
seven
years
now,
and
I
think
that
the
community
definitely
didn't
want
to
move
forward
with
anything
from
them,
because
once
you
accept
that,
then
you
have
to
accept
the
whole
facility
moving
forward
because
they
put
all
this
money
into
it,
and
I
think
it's
it
should
be
pointed
out
that
during
covet
the
industry,
wasn't
they
didn't
have
to
stop
working.
J
So
even
though
there
was
covet
was
happening,
I
don't
think
that
they,
I
don't
think
that
their
emissions
went
down
or
under
that
they
had
to
stop.
So
if,
if
their
emissions
didn't
change
or
go
down
or
their
business
didn't
go
down,
then
why
would
they
be
allowed
to
like
have
an
excuse
during
covet
to
not
put
whatever
filter
that
they
had
been
claiming
that
they
were
going
to
put
for
a
long
time?
J
And
I
also
have
an
issue
with
like
that
conversations
that
the
community
me
specifically
I've
been
asking
for
the
mpca
to
hold
conversations
between
community
or
at
least
set
them
up
for
community
and
these
facilities,
and
now
I'm
seeing
now,
I'm
seeing
folks
who
are
already
kind
of
in
cahoots
with
each
other
planning
these
meetings
and
I'm
kind
of
frustrated
a
little
bit
about
that,
because
when
you
I
said,
I
wasn't
going
to
really
do
talk.
What
about
it
today,
but
I
just
feel
like
it
should
be
noted
and
somebody
mute
their.
J
Phone,
I
guess
I'm
I'm
concerned
that
whenever
businesses
who
already
work
together
and
benefit
with
each
other
start
to
lead
these
conversations
together,
you're
it's
like
co-opting,
the
the
issues
that
the
community
has
raised
and
then
kind
of
still
like
kind
of
gatekeeping
around
the
conversation.
J
And
so
I
just
want
to
let
y'all
know
that
that
that's
moving
forward,
even
though
I've
been
requesting
that
for
a
long
time,
but
that's
moving
forward
and
with
people
who
are
benefiting
off
of
each
other,
and
I
just
think
that
that's
just
a
conflict
of
interest
like
we.
I
don't
want
to
be
led
by
by
organizations
that
are
already
benefiting
or
in
relationship
with
these
facilities
and
then
they're
leading
the
conversations
for
community.
It
doesn't
feel.
D
J
The
question
craig,
I'm
sorry,
I
gave
you
a
lot.
The
first
part
was
a
question
and
it
was
more
based
on
how
are
they
getting
away
with
not
getting
whatever
they
were
supposed
to
do
for
the
benefit
of
the
community
with
the
filter?
They
didn't
do
that,
but
there
was
no
like
regulation.
Stopping
of
facilities
during
coving.
D
Right
so
I
think
that's
one
of
those
issues
right.
We
operate
under
some
federal
and
state
air
quality
rules
and
regs,
and
so
that's
where
the
permits
are
at
where
companies
who
are
in
compliance
with
those
permits
are
allowed
to
operate,
which,
at
times
we
know,
there's
frustration
out
there
deep
frustration.
D
What
I
can
say
about
you
know
community
meetings,
I
think
jose
luis
and
helen
had
mentioned
something
earlier,
so
to
invite
them
to
jump
in
about
that.
It's
something
we
definitely
want
to
understand
more.
What
how
we
can
structure
that
and
how
we
can
play
a
role
there,
but
how
you
know
those
conversations
and
use
our
context
so
an
opportunity
for
collaboration
there.
J
Well,
in
the
meantime,
since
I've
been
asking
for
over
two
years,
can
somebody
just
send
me
the
emails
of
the
people
of
gaf
tag
me
on
it
and
tell
them
that
the
community's
been
asking
for
this
information
and
for
this
for
a
while
now
and
so
I'll
move
forward
with
it.
You
know
on
my
own,
since
I
can't
really
get
the
support.
So
can
somebody
send
me
the
emails
of
the
gaf
corporation,
so
that
community
will
we'll
figure
it
out
on
our
own?
If
we're
not
going
to
get
the
support.
B
No
roxanne
yeah.
I
can
work
on
that.
Try
to
get
you
all
those
emails,
I
think
for
us.
You
know
it
makes
more
sense
and
it
it
that
it
comes
from
you
all.
We
can
support
and
giving
you
the
information
being
in
the
room,
assisting
with
folks
that
can
have
some
data
and
information
to
help
you
all
to
have
a
conversation
with
the
facilities,
but
I
think
it's
like
you're
right.
B
I
think
it
makes
more
sense
and
it
looks
less
greenwashing
if
it's
us
convening
this
meeting
and
not
the
community
that
are
requesting
them
so
yeah.
We
definitely
can
assist
you
in
finding
that
information
who
you
should
talk
to.
I
think
you're,
probably
thinking
of
this
as
well,
not
only
as
community
members
but
to
see,
if
maybe
like
alliance
or
nexus
or
other
folks
that
maybe
folks
have
been
in
concert
with
to
help
kind
of
either
facilitate
and
or
bring
some.
I
don't
know
some.
C
D
C
Goals
that
they're
working
to
achieve
that
would
be
helpful
to
help
bring
everyone
together
and
I'm
not
sure
if
we
haven't
done
that.
Yet
because
we
haven't
had
this
conversation.
So
I'm
not
sure
what
other
meetings
are
being
planned.
But
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
that
was
a
piece
of
the
conversation
that
the
rest
of
the
group
that
was
in
the
other
meeting,
missed
some
things.
J
I
believe
those
pillsbury
united
communities,
I'm
thinking,
but
maybe
it's
not
maybe
it's
just
ppp
and
environmental
initiative,
and
I
don't
really
care
that
environmental
initiative
is
involved,
but
I
do
have
some
issues
with
like
co-opting
and
people
coming
in
and
all
of
a
sudden
they're
taking
communities
requests
and
turning
it
into
their
own
meetings
and
the
city
is
even
like
not
respecting
like,
like
I
don't
know
how
many
times
I've
asked
patrick
to
do
it.
I
mean
I
keep
emailing
about
it.
J
O
P
Okay,
great
I'm
sorry,
I
missed
the
first
part
of
the
presentation
I
think
maybe
craig
was
making
it.
I've
been
back
and
forth
several
ways
to
get
in.
So
thank
you
all
for
being
here
and
greta.
I
wanted
to
just
say
it's
great
to
see
you
again,
even
virtually.
I
wanted
to
ask
you
to
if
you
would
send
that
the
language
of
that
final
bill
that
passed
the
house
to
all
of
the
folks
here,
so
that
we're
all
kind
of
up
to
date
on
that.
P
So
that
was
one
thing
and
maybe,
if
you
get
into
kelly,
we
can
all
then
look
at
it
and
begin
the
fight
for
it
or
maybe
even
make
it
better.
I'm
not
sure
what
all
it
says.
I
didn't
see
a
final
version
myself.
P
The
second
thing
I
think
I
wanted
to
ask-
I
think
craig
you
were
talking
about
reopening
permits
only
if
there's
non-compliance,
you
know
our
one
of
our
situations
in
east
phillips
is
that
we
have
two
long-term
industries
whose
permit,
as
far
as
I
understand,
are
about
20
years
old
and
have
not
been
updated
and
there's
been
all
kinds
of
discussion
about
this.
P
For
several
years
and
certain
kinds
of
promises
that
you
know,
yes,
they
were
going
to
be
updated
and
so
on,
and
then
we
also
have
a
grandfathering
issue
with
those
two
industries.
The
two
industries
I'm
talking
about
are
smith,
foundry
and
bituminous
roadways,
and
you
know
I
live
fairly
near
there,
as
does
jose
luis
and
and
others
on
this
call,
so
it's
frustrating
not
to
have
that
updated.
P
So
that's
one
second
thing
to
ask
about,
and
then
the
third
one
is
the
those
industries
and
others
the
kind
of
monitoring
that's
going
on.
P
You
know
we're
supposed
to
be
happy
with
2.5
being
in
one
place
in
the
whole
community,
and
even
that
does
not
help
us
understand
smaller
nanoparticles
getting
into
our
our
bodies
and
causing
this
disproportionate
racial
disparities,
a
health
burden
within
these
philips,
and
so
I'm
just
wondering-
and
again
maybe
you
talked
about
some
of
this
one
before
I
get
on,
but
I'm
wondering
when
we're
going
to
get
better
monitoring
in
you
know,
especially
in
the
green
zones,
something
that
really
will
help
our
people
understand.
P
D
Yeah
great
questions
karen
and
nice
to
see
you
again,
maybe
I'll
start
with
the
last
one
first
representative
clark
and
I
have
worked
on
some
issues
related
to
water,
gremlin
too,
so
there
so
on
the
monitoring
piece,
and
I
might
invite
patrick
or
todd
b
and
my
colleagues
to
jump
in.
D
So
we've
been
talking
and
just
initial
conversations
about
you
know
what
we
think
we
might
be
able
to
have
for
resources
for
to
use
some
sensors
sensors
are
some
of
those
things
called
like
purple,
air
or
other
qualities,
right
other
monitors
to
look
at
fine
particles,
because
that
is
one
pollutant
of
concern,
and
there
is,
the
sensor
is
small.
It's
portable.
The
technology
has
been
vetted,
so
that
could
be
an
opportunity
to
look
at.
D
You
know
some
of
those
local
impacts
to
address
those
neighborhood
sources
like
are
we
seeing
if
your
neighbor
is
out
mowing
their
grass
four
times
a
day
or
four
times
a
week?
Rather?
Is
that
going
to
be
contributing
to
worse
air
quality
and
some
things
like
that?
So
we
want
to
consider
that
we
also
as
part
of
our
monitoring
plan
the
pca
operates.
56
monitors
across
the
state
are
putting
a
new
monitor
for
fine
particles
in
north
minneapolis.
D
E
Yeah
thanks
craig.
We
have
jenny
lansing
on
the
line
here
too,
who
is
our
senior
environmental
specialist
who
is
putting
together
a
lot
of
the
monitoring
at
the
city
of
minneapolis,
and
you
know
we're
really
in
initial
stages
of
talking
about
what
are
what
are
the
best
tools
to
use?
You
know
you
talked
about
purple
air
there's
a
lot
of
other
every
year.
It
seems
like
there's
another
round
of
different
technologies
that
come
out
and
there's
real
accuracy
concerns
with
those
different
technologies.
E
So
looking
at
what
are
the
best
types
of
technology
to
use
in
terms
of
monitoring
and
then,
like
craig,
said
working
with
folks
in
the
community
to
come
up
with.
You
know
where
to
where
we
could
locate
those
around
minneapolis.
E
E
What
are
the
air
quality
concerns
around
specific
areas
and
how
we
can
use
some
of
those
tools.
So
if
anyone
is
interested
in
in
being
involved
with
that,
we'd
love
to
have
community
involvement
in
those
conversations
and
where
to
locate
those
monitors
and
and
how
best
to
use
the
monitors,
so
we're
really
putting
that
plan
together.
Right
now
of
how
can
we
combine
resources
between
the
mpca
and
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
others?
You
know,
as
the
npca
coordinates
some
of
that
work,
to
look
at
local
air.
P
D
Yes,
I
can
provide
a
little
bit
of
an
update
there,
so
smith
and
bituminous
are
two
that
we're
in
the
process
of
updating
and
they're
right
now
in
the
modeling
phase
of
the
project.
They
are,
as
you
know,
in
that
east
phillips
neighborhood,
so
they
are
subject
to
the
cumulative
impacts
analysis
there
and
I
think
it's
one
of
those
things
that
we'd
be
happy
to
talk
more
about
and
bring
some
of
our
technical
staff
in
if
that's
of
interest
for
the
group
but
they're
in
the
modeling
phase.
D
P
Can
I
just
oh
sorry,
can
I
just
say
I
think
we've
been
told
that
for
several
years
and
years
and
years
now
so
what
said
end
date
here.
D
It's
an
iterative
process
and
I'd
have
to
go
back
to
the
team
to
kind
of
understand
exactly
where
it
is
in
that
modeling.
But,
like
we
said,
we'd,
be
happy
to
come
back
and
pull
the
right
folks
into
the
room
for
kind
of
a
deeper
dive
into
where
we're
at
the
status.
G
B
Okay,
can
I
jump
in
really
quick
karen
clark,
real
quick
just
to
give
everyone
just
an
update
to
as
well
abbott
northwest
is
also
in
the
process
of
updating
their
permit,
and
so
we
are
calling
for
community
conversations
with
folks
in
the
phillips
wide
neighborhood.
So
please,
those
that
are
on
the
meeting
today.
B
Please
we'll
be
in
contact
with
you
or
to
figure
out
if
we
could
come
out
and
have
our
team
talk
about
the
updates
and
changes
happening
in
their
permit
and
then
other
opportunities
where
communities
can
engage
on
the
the
permit
itself.
So
that's
just
to
add
on
top
of
the
other
kind
of
interest
rate
of
air
based
on
potential
smith.
But
now
we
have
also
the
permit
of
abbott
northwest
that
we
are
looking
to
make
sure
to
engage
communities
about.
K
O
E
Sure
jenny,
you
can
go
into
further
detail
on
on
some
of
the
sampling
as
you're
looking
at
developing
some
of
that
methodology.
E
But
we,
you
know,
like
craig,
talked
about
some
of
the
voluntary
efforts
in
terms
of
working
with
small
businesses
like
we
were
done,
working
with
dry
cleaners,
but
now,
looking
at
automotive
shops,
there
are
around
50
tons
of
pollution
going
into
the
air
from
automotive
shops
around
minneapolis,
and
you
know,
is
that
as
we'll
have
to
bring
forward
rules
around
that
for
getting
people
to
switch
from
high
volatile
organic
compound,
so
high
solvent
paints
to
what's
called
waterborne
paints
in
the
automotive
in
automotive
shops
around
minneapolis.
E
So
we
could
use
support
with
that
and,
like
I
said,
that's
around
50
tons
of
emissions
of
organic
emissions
in
the
city
of
minneapolis
that
that
is
more
than
you
know
these
industrial
facilities
that
we're
talking
about
that's
more
than
a
few
of
them
put
together.
So
if
we
could
get
that
rule
passed,
that
would
help
in
terms
of
getting
support
when
we're
ready
to
write
that
up,
looking
at
probably
not
until
2022
to
get
that
rule
in
place.
E
Just
with
everything
going
on
in
minneapolis
to
be
able
to
get
that
brought
forward,
but
then
they
are
also
quintessential
small
businesses.
So
we
would
have
funding
to
help
them
make
that
conversion
as
well
jenny's
doing
a
lot
of
work
with
nail
salons
with
the
chemical
exposure
that
workers
in
those
facilities
are
facing
every
day.
E
You
know
for
the
people
going
into
the
facilities,
it's
not
that
big
of
a
deal
10
20
minutes,
but
for
someone
that's
working
there,
8
10
12
hours
a
day
that
we
have
concerns
about
the
exposures
to
the
chemicals
that
they
have
so
jenny's,
been
putting
together
a
program
around
that
we're
partnering
on
the
cars
program
that
was
mentioned
earlier
on
on
some
incentives
that
we
can
have
for
people
getting
their
cars
repaired
and
partnering
with
environmental
initiative,
the
mpca
and
other
folks.
E
I
know
there's
folks
on
here
that
have
actually
been
a
big
part
of
getting
that
work
brought
forward
for
people
in
low-income
situations
and
getting
their
their
car
fixed
and
and
more
efficient.
E
We're
always
looking
for
ways
that
we
can
get
more
voluntary
projects
done,
and
you
know
when
I
say
that
it's
it's
working
with
businesses
and
overcoming
some
of
the
financial
challenges
that
they
have
and
pulling
together
resources
and
in
doing
that,
we've
we've
already
reduced
60
tons
of
emissions
around
minneapolis
and
so
going
through
and
finding
places
and
some
of
that
with
businesses
on
the
north
side.
You
know
where
they're
they
may
be
following
rules
and
we've
got
to
stay
within
those
rules,
and
so
how?
E
Within
those
rules,
can
we
get
emission
reductions
and
reduce
exposures
that
people
have
in
the
neighborhood
under
the
existing
rules?
And
then
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
concern
about
northern
metals
with
the
the
fire
that
happened
there.
Recently
we
had
concerns,
and
I'm
saying
we
I'm
kind
of
talking
with
the
about
the
fire
department
and
wrecked
services.
Here
in
the
city
of
minneapolis.
E
We
had
concerns
about
fires
at
that
facility
back
when
there
was
a
huge
fire
at
becker
that
burned
for
three
days
and
they
started
to
stockpile
material
in
north
minneapolis.
So
the
fire
department
had
been
out
there
on
a
weekly
bi-weekly
basis,
making
sure
that
the
piles
were
reduced
and
that
that
fire
was
as
small
as
it
was.
E
That
being
said,
that's
not
consolation
for
that
there
was
a
fire,
so
we
are
working
with
our
fire
department,
with
the
mpca,
with
hennepin
county
reg
services,
their
fire
inspection
teams
and,
looking
at
what
ability
do
we
have?
You
know,
within
the
city
of
minneapolis,
within
the
different
organizations,
to
look
at
what
further
restrictions
can
be
placed
on
a
the
tool.
We're
looking
at
at
the
city
of
minneapolis
right
now
is
a
business
license.
So
what
tools
can
we
apply
to
a
business
license
and
again
we
might
need
support
for
that.
E
If
we
need,
if
we
need
ordinance
change,
we
might
need
support
for
that
in
in
making
those
changes,
and
so
that
would
be
you
know
getting
out
to
the
facilities
more
often
street
sweeping
you
know,
I
don't
we'd
have
to
look
at
what
our
ability
our
regulatory
ability
is,
and
it's
you
know
it's.
It's
not
a
a
very
powerful
regulatory
tool
in
terms
of
between
state,
federal
and
and
city
level,
but
we're
looking
at
what
tools
we
have
at
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
then
you
know.
E
One
thing
I
just
want
to
say
too:
is
you
know
in
looking
at
using
these
regulations
the
reason
that
we
go
into
these
somewhat
cautious
in
in
really
making
sure
that
we
have
the
legal
ability?
Is
cities
and
the
state,
as
well
as
there's
lots
of
parameters
that
are
put
on
the
restrictions
and
where
we
can
act,
and
if
you
overstep
those
boundaries
you
do
chants.
E
In
fact,
I
came
into
the
city
of
minneapolis
right
after
we
in
my
our
unit,
we
lost
a
legal
lawsuit
for
three
million
dollars
over
a
noise
violation
and
our
whole
team
got.
I
mean
we
were
regulated
to
looking
at
garbage
in
back
alleys
from
from
then
on,
and
so
it
can
really
restrict
what
you're
allowed
to
do.
If
you
overstep
those
bounds,
and
so
you
know
we
look
at
what
our
ability
is.
E
That's
how
we
go
into
these
conversations
is:
what
is
our
ability
to
address
the
hazard
and
and
what
might
be
a
public
health,
what
might
be
affecting
public
health
and
we're
looking
at
what
our
ability
is
going
into
these
conversations?
And
so
you
know,
we've
got
to
pass
that
through
legal
teams
and
I'm
sure
the
mpca
is
in
in
the
same
boat
as
well
as
being
able
to.
You
know
to
know
that
where
we
can,
we
can
move,
because
we
always
step
that
balance.
E
I
know
we're
not
always
on
the
same
page,
but
to
be
you
know,
looking
at
these
issues
together
and
getting
support
so
yeah,
I
don't
know
if
that
covered
it
all
right.
J
Q
Northern
metals-
I
I
just
had
a
question
and
I
have
my
hand
up,
but
not
to
cut
you
off
roxanne.
I
know
you're
passionate
about
northern
metals
girl,
but
I
have
a
question
about
this
new
project
that
you're
talking
about
when
it
comes
to
these
auto
shops
and
switching
out
the
paints.
And
I
commend
you
for
the
dry
cleaners-
and
I
can't
I'm
kind
of
geeked
about
looking
at
this
machine
that
you
use
to
show
these
shop
owners
about
the
emissions
in
their
shops.
Q
But
I'm
curious
about
this
paint
and
where
are
you
going
to
dispose
of
it
and
do
you
have
a
plan
and
is
it
going
to
be
in
a
landfill
or
what
for
the
people
that
already
have
it
and
from
the
plant
itself
and
where
it's
coming
from
and
ours?
Are
you
going
to
look
at
different
regulations
of
monitoring
it
coming
into
our
city
or
state
again
and
what's
going
to
do
with
the
stuff
that
we
already
have?
Q
And
I'm
timing
in
and
I'm
sorry
was
on
the
green,
the
green
line
and
it
got
chaotic
and
so
I
kind
of
had
to
get
off
there
because
it
was
too
much
drama
for
me
but
anyway.
So
I'm
coming
in
and
asking
that
question
and
I
know
I
missed
a
lot,
but
I
can
listen
to
the
tapes
in
future
and
sorry
again
roxanne
for
cutting
you
off.
But
I
just
had
a
curiosity
about
the
you.
Don't.
E
Yeah
so
leslie,
we
that
that's
a
great
question-
and
I
think
that's
something
we
learned
in
the
dry
cleaning
program-
is
making
sure
that
when
we
have
these
programs
and
these
requirements
for
changeouts
that
they
have
they're
dealing
with
the
waste
in
a
proper
manner,
so
that's
going
to
hennepin
county
hazardous
waste
and
we
get
receipts
and
proof
of
that.
You
know
these
auto
body
shops
are
rolling
through
large
amounts
of
of
paint.
E
So
it's
really
once
once
they
switch
over
to
waterborne
paint,
you're,
really
reducing
the
overall
paint
that
they're
ordering
on
a
consistent
basis,
so
you're
stopping
that
paint
from
coming
into
the
city
and
then
when
we
get
them
to
convert
out,
it's
making
sure
that
they,
you
know
to
they,
take
their
own
solvents
and
that
that's
properly
disposed
of.
So
that's
a
great
question.
A
I
see
joe
has
your
hand
raised.
If
you
have
a
question
go
ahead
and
then
I
think
we
do
want
to
get
into
breakout
rooms.
R
A
Maybe
I'll
just
share
that
at
a
high
level
for
this
doorside
and
southside
green
zone,
we
don't
have
a
report
that
tracks
pollution
specifically
in
these
two
geographies
over
time.
What
we've
done
is
started
annual
reporting
on
actions
that
the
group
is
taking,
but
no,
we
don't
specifically
have
reports.
I
think,
on
what
you're
talking
about
and
craig
then
I'll
hand
it
over
to
you
to
talk
more
generally
about
the
reporting
that
npc
does.
D
That
really
helpful
kelly
for
this
group
say
pca
has
a
couple
of
regular
reports
that
are
required
by
the
legislature.
One
is
called
the
air
we
breathe
and
that's
a
look
at
air
quality
in
minnesota
as
a
whole,
but
then
we
do
do
some
deeper
dives
into
some
of
the
areas
that
we've
seen
environmental
justice
communities.
So
it
talks
about
just
kind
of
where
we're
at
meeting
federal
regulations
and
work.
That
needs
to
be
done.
That's
one
report
that
we
have.
D
We
have
a
greenhouse
gas
emissions
report
which
is
done
every
two
years
that
looks
at
greenhouse
gas
emissions
broken
out
by
sector
specifically
related
to
climate
change
there,
and
then
the
third
report
that
we
do
at
a
regular
basis
here
is
what
we
call
life
and
breath,
and
that
is
actually
a
report.
D
Andrea
just
entered
some
of
that
into
the
chat
where
you
can
find
some
of
those
reports,
our
life
and
breath
report
dives
into
health
impacts
and
specifically
the
impacts
of
ground
level,
ozone
and
fine
particles
on
human
health
and
breaks
it
down
by
geography
and
that's
done
in
partnership
with
mdh
as
well.
So
there
is
some
regular
reporting,
but
it's
not
the
granularity
of
the
green
zone.
S
And
so
even
though
the
numbers
we're
getting
are
like.
Okay,
overall,
maybe
pollution
is
decreasing
in
minneapolis
or
the
state
of
minnesota
in
these
areas
that
are
disproportionately
infected.
People
are
getting
sicker
and
sicker,
and
there
isn't
data
to
track
that.
So
the
data
we're
getting
is
a
little
bit
skewed
by
these
healthier
neighborhoods
and
that's
disturbing.
A
Yeah,
I
think
christina
that's
a
great
point
and
that's
something
that,
like
as
staff
for
the
green
zones,
I
can
work
on
doing
and
building
into
the
annual
reporting.
So
it's
not
just
about
actions
taken,
but
it's
about
you
know
number
of
air
quality
alert
days.
It
could
be
tracking
the
annual
air
pollution
data
annually.
A
You
know
it's
most
of
the
information
is
from
state
monitors
and
then,
if
you
know
for
folks
who
are
interested
in
going
into
the
breakout
room
on
monitoring
and
sampling,
there's
additional
work
that
we
can
do
to
get
much
more
localized
data
and
not
just
relying
on
one
or
two
monitors
in
each
of
the
green
zones,
which
only
gives
you
kind
of
that
very
specific
location
and
not
kind
of
the
community.
Overall.
Q
I
got
I
got
a
quick
question:
how
come
we
have
this
meeting?
The
last
time
we
met
and
roxanne
brought
us
together
with
the
community
and
justice
people
and
the
pollution
control
that
the
county's?
Not
here
all
the
waste
is
going
to
the
county
and
they're
over
it.
But
we
don't
hear
from
them
they're
not
in
these
groups.
Q
They
don't
participate,
but
this
is
where
our
waste
goes
and
they're
one
of
the
bigger
polluters
and
they're
not
trying
to
cut
down
emissions
or
try
to
help
our
well-being
as
citizens
of
the
city
and
as
residents
of
the
county,
and
you
want
to
decipher
county
from
city.
But
the
county
is
the
polluters
and
they're
not
doing
any
incentives
or
anything
to
cut
down
waste
in
our
community,
and
it's
just
unbearable
just
like
I'm
sorry,
but
I
just
see
harlan.
Q
A
Yeah
I
mean
my
only
thought
leslie
on
that
is
it
they're,
not
a
party
that
I've
engaged
with
on
this
work?
Patrick,
were
you
gonna
jump
in.
E
Oh,
I
was
just
gonna
say
I
mean
I
think
that's
right
on
like
I
think
the
county
needs
to
be.
It
would
combining
the
the
funding
and
work
that
the
mpca
is
doing
with
the
work
that
we're
doing
if
the
county
stepped
into
this,
we
can
make
short
work
of
a
lot
of
issues.
So
I
think
that's
right
on
is
to
to
get
some.
E
You
know
pressure,
but
to
get
the
involvement
of
of
the
county
into
these
into
these
programs
and
to
get
some
funding
and
investment
into
these
communities
would
be
great.
A
Right
and
so
I
know,
we
only
have
40
minutes
left
in
our
meeting
and
I
think
we
could
dive
deeper
into
next
steps
on
collaborating
on
some
of
these
issues
if
we
get
into
our
breakout
rooms.
So
right
now,
I've
put
into
the
chat
like
five
different
rooms
and
now
there's
my
list.
Okay,
so
air
monitoring
and
sampling,
jenny,
lansing,
I'm
thinking
will
probably
be
the
lead
for
that
one
permitting
and
licensing
patrick.
G
Does
todd
b,
one
here
at
mpc
I
I
would
like
to
go
into
the
air
monitoring
group
all.
A
Pig
and
then
kelly,
yep
yeah,
I'm
getting
to
you
james.
A
So
and
then
there
was
a
group
that
had
met
a
north
side.
A
few
northside
members
at
their
may
meeting
had
met
on
like
legislation
issues
as
well.
So
I'm
wondering
if
there's
still
a
group
interested
in
that
and
I'm
guessing
that
would
be
greta,
and
I
don't
know
if
who
else
from
mpca
would
want
to
jump
into
that
group.
A
And
then
we
have
meetings
with
facilities,
so
james
trice
who's,
gonna
kind
of
give
a
little
preview
of
that
one
james.
I
would
assume
you'd
be
in
that
meeting
and
then
christina
you
added
a
fifth:
how
to
engage
with
community
to
make
meaningful
improvements.
A
B
If
we
can
and
the
way
that
I
would
word
it
just
kind
of
like
power
building,
if
we
can,
you
know
internally
and
also
external,
so
we
can
combine
those
if
people
are
okay.
A
Great
okay,
so
if
those
sound
like
the
right
breakout
groups,
I
will
assign
people
based
on
their
interest.
A
So
again,
five
groups,
air
monitoring
and
sampling,
permitting
and
licensing
legislation
or
policies,
meeting
with
facilities,
power,
building,
slash
how
to
community
and
agencies
work
together
and
so
james
did
you
have
something
that
you
wanted
to
say
to
give
a
little
promo
for
the
meeting
with
facilities,
breakout,
yeah.
T
Real,
quick
and-
and
this
is-
and
I
want
to
say
well,
first
of
all,
thank
you
all
and
great
work.
Green
zones
doing
wonderful
work,
change
agents,
so
I
appreciate
all
of
you
and
all
the
work
you're
doing
this
important
work,
ejcc
public
policy
project
partnered
with
environmental
initiatives
in
the
city
of
minneapolis
to
have
citizens
us
community
resident
stakeholders,
engage
the
local
businesses
and
facilities
around
lowering
their
emissions
and
lowering
their
their
pollution.
T
Output
partnering
with
with
ei
ei,
will
support
our
work
and
what
ajccc
members
will
be
doing,
and
also
I
invite
greensboro
members
who
want
to
be
a
part
of
this
is
to
be
able
to
contact
these
businesses
meet
with
these
businesses.
Talk
to
them
about.
You
know
their
effect
on
our
community
and
then
also
connecting
those
businesses,
if
necessary,
with
a
program.
T
The
companies
to
begin
to
lower
their
their
pollution
output-
I
we
have
some
dollars
to
pay
people
stipends
to
do
this,
so
I'm
not
asking
people
to
do
this
for
free,
so
we're
asking
if
people
want
to
be
a
part,
let
me
know,
and
then
we
can
begin
to
bring
people
in
to
do
this
and
again
we
have
limited
funds
right
now,
I'm
able
to
give
some
stipends
out
to
individuals
that
we
can
discuss
that
as
people
call
and
people
show
their
interests,
but
let
me
share
the
most
important
part
of
this.
T
Work
is
going
to
be
at
the
beginning
before
we
send
community
residents
out
before
ejcc
members
go
out
to
these
businesses,
they
would
get
a
really
crash
course
on
environmental
hazards,
pollutants
and
different
emissions
that
companies
are
doing
and
they
would
get
a
crash
course
on
who
are
the
top
individual
polluters.
We
understand.
We
all
agree
that
and
none
of
them
have
violated
are
in
violation
of
federal
air
quality
standards,
but
you
know
roxanna
and
her
work
has
pointed
out
the
accumulative
effects
of
them
that
they,
together
all
13
or
14.
U
T
Polluting
the
air
in
north
minneapolis
and
how
do
we?
How
do
we
deal
with
that?
But
this
will
give
again
individuals
who
want
to
be
apart
a
deep
training.
I
don't
know
how
long
it's
going
to
be
we're
putting
that
together
now
we're
planning
that,
what's
going
to
be
in
the
training,
but
really
a
clear
understanding
of
actually
how
this
is
working,
how
our
communities
are
being
affected
by
the
pollutants,
and
so
you
will
go
in
with
with
understanding
and
education
on
what
exactly
is
going
on
so
now.
T
Let
me
also
say
this,
and
I'm
done
is
the
individuals
who
want
just
the
training,
that's
fine,
you
can
come
in
and
be
a
part
of
that
training.
You
don't
have
to
be
one
of
the
engagers
community.
Engagers
engage
in
these
these
businesses,
if
you
don't
want
to
so
I
welcome
people
and
invite
people
who
want
to
be
a
part
of
the
training
itself
to
participate
in
the
training
along
with
individuals
who
say
they
want
to
be
a
part
of
this
work.
T
So
if
anybody
has
any
questions,
I
don't
know.
If
we
have
time
to
take
those
now
you
can.
I
can
be
reached.
People
know
my
number
six
612-702-9769.
I
think
people
have
my
email
address.
James
underscore
public
policy
project
at
msn.com.
A
All
right
so
now
I'm
gonna
go
person
by
person
on
the
list
and
ask
which
breakout
group
you'd
like
like
to
join
and
add
you
to
that.
So
I
will
start
with
andrew.
N
A
E
G
G
A
H
J
V
G
J
I'm
about
to
head
out
to
this
comedy
show,
but
I
appreciate
y'all.
Okay,
I
won't
be
joining
the
room.
G
K
G
K
G
All
right,
let's
see
some
of
these
don't
seem
sticky.
Oh.
K
A
F
G
F
A
G
A
Right,
yes,
and
because
james
is
on
the
phone,
and
I
can't
move
people
on
the
phone-
we're
gonna
stay
in
this
room.
So
if
you're
interested
in
that
one
we'll
stay
here,
okay,
helen.
C
Now
I'm
turning
between
this
one
and
policy,
but
I'll
sounds
like
there's
plenty
of
folks
in
policy.
So
you
stay
here,
stay.
A
A
L
Thought
you
were
unmuting
people
policy,
please,
okay,.
A
Great
so
then,
everyone
else
who
is
here
has
either
chosen
to
have
conversation
about
permitted
facilities
or
is
has
logged
in
to
the
meeting
in
such
a
way
that
I
can't
move
you
so
you're
stuck
in
this
conversation.
A
I
am
gonna
quick,
send
a
message
to
everyone
about
note-taking,
and
the
thing
I
was
gonna
mention
is
the
kind
of
the
primary
questions
are.
How
do
we
collaborate
on
this
who's
missing
from
the
conversation
and
what's
at
least
one
next
step
between
now
and
october
or
september,
that
we
can
take
so
james
if
you
are
still
on
I'll?
Let
you
kind
of
take
this
away.
U
T
Yeah
I've
been
driving
so
the
whole
time,
so
I
just
pulled
over
so
I
have
no
pencil
paper
not
like
that.
So
thank
you
or
no
way
to
type
it
in
I'm
on
my
laptop
or
nothing
like
that
with
me.
G
V
Can
start
this
is
cassandra
meyer.
I
live
in
south
minneapolis,
just
outside
of
the
green
zones
and
I
also
work
at
the
mpca
end
air
permitting,
but
I'm
here
as
a
community
member
tonight.
U
U
T
We
talked
about
this
project,
I'm
sure
some
of
you
I've
heard
of
environmental
justice
coordinating
council
right.
Do
I
need
to
give
a
description
of
ejcc.
T
T
My
name
is
james
trice.
I
am
the
founder
and
ceo
of
public
policy
project.
Primarily
our
work
has
been
around
leadership
developments:
civic
engagement,
community,
organizing
registered
lobbyists
around
industries
that
impact
communities.
T
We
do
a
community
and
community
engagement
around
issues
that
impact
communities,
and
so
we
are
leading
in
the
community
engagement
aspect
around
the
up,
harbor
terminal.
We
the
last
two
years
we
conducted
like
14
learning
tables
where
we
brought
the
developer,
the
city,
the
parks,
the
community
together
really
just
to
plan
on.
What's
going
to
be
developed
at
the
of
harvard
terminal,
so
we're
leading
in
that
community
engagement
aspect,
we
call
it
again
the
learning
tables
we
did
that
over
the
last
year
and
a
half
support.
T
The
leaders
were
like
once
a
month
every
month,
four
hours,
each
and
each
time
the
developer
over
there.
The
products
are
there,
the
city's
there.
So
I
don't
want
to
get
too
much
into
that,
but
this
that's
part
of
my
work.
Prior
to
that,
we
we
was
approached
by
a
foundation
asking
you
know.
How
can
they
invest
in
addressing
environmental
concerns
in
in
north
minneapolis,
and
I
brought
a
team
of
people
together?
We
sat
down
and
we
kind
of
just
racked
our
brain
kind
of
think.
Through
it.
T
We
sent
this
funder
like
six
different
proposals.
The
one
they
chose
is
one
to
really
bring
people
together
and
allow
community
residents
to
address
environmental
issues
with
support,
and
so
therefore
we
brought
a
group.
What
my
company
did
is
did
a
series
of
listening
sessions
where
we
talked
with
community
activists,
community
change
agents,
african-american
leaders,
african-american
change
agents
in
north
minneapolis,
around
environment
and
environmental
justice.
T
After
a
series
of
those
conversations,
we
we
brought
individuals
who
participated
in
those
conversations
on
a
boat
ride
on
the
cruise
on
the
mississippi
river,
with
this
particular
funder,
and
so
they
could
engage
this
funder
in
what
they
actually
wanted.
Now,
prior
to
that,
my
company,
we
wrote
the
report
of
the
synopsis
of
of
the
conversations
we
have
community
residents
and
overwhelmingly.
They
said
they
wanted
to
participate
and
address
environmental
concerns
again.
T
So
then,
fast
forward
to
on
the
trip
the
boat
trip
with
the
the
foundation,
the
foundation
was
was
impressed,
so
they
invested
in
us
creating
an
environmental
justice
coordinating
council,
a
group
of
african-american
change
agents,
organizers
in
north
minneapolis,
focused
on
addressing
environmental
concerns.
T
When
we
first
started
our
very
first
meeting,
we
had.
We
quickly
realized
that
that
environmental
justice-
just
it's
not
just
about
air
water
and
soil,
but
it's
about
so
much
so
much
more-
that
black
and
brown
communities
suffer
unemployment.
T
You
know,
food
deserts
are
our
environmental
issues
over
policing,
police
brutality,
drive-by
shootings
unemployment
and
all
of
those
things
are
we
considered
and
they
consider
environmental
issues.
So
we
stuck
with
the
slogan.
T
All
issues
are
environmental
issues
and
all
environmental
issues
are
ours,
and,
and
so
we
created
this
council
and
they
met,
and
when
we
created
the
council,
we
also
created
an
environmental
justice
partnership
and
that
partnership
was
created
to
change
dynamics
of
how
environmental
issues
are
addressed
and
who
leads.
In
that
conversation,
and
as
you
know,
that
mainstream
environmental
organizations
are
primarily
led
by
white
people.
T
And
so
we
created
this
environmental
justice
partnership.
We
met
with
several
neos
from
around
the
state,
mainstream
environment
organizations,
again
all
white
and
a
group
of
african-american
change
agents,
a
grassroots
organizer
called
themselves.
The
environment
of
the
justice.
Coordinating
council
met
at
this
foundation's
headquarters
and
did
a
whole
day
of
learning.
How
to
how
meos
should
be
able
to
should
and
must
engage
communities
of
color
as
leaders
in
their
organization
supporting
black
and
brown
communities
and
really
being
on
the
forefront
of
addressing
environmental
concerns,
and
so
that
so
to
the
environmental
structures.
T
Partnership
meo's,
committed
to
partnering
with
grassroots
organizations
and
community
organizers,
around
environmental
justice,
and
so
I'm
the
first
group
to
really
dive
in
with
us
has
been
environmental
initiative.
T
And
so
we
just
formed
a
partnership
by
which
environmental
initiative
is
going
to
work
with
ejcc
give
them
the
support
they
need
to
help
them
continue
to
move
and
continue
to
do
the
things
they're
doing
work
with
us.
If
we
want
polluters
out
of
the
community,
they
will
bring
their
social
capital,
their
political
capital,
of
course,
their
their
money
capital
to
the
table
to
support
our
communities,
and
so
recently
we
we
engaged
the
city
minneapolis
around
the
program
that
city
minneapolis
has
around.
T
You
know
approaching
these
polluters
with
programs
that
the
city
has
to
encourage
these
business
owners
to
reduce
their
pollutants,
and
so
environmental
initiatives
called
us
in
to
work
with
them
on
it,
and
so
now,
what
we're
going
to
be
doing
is,
first
of
all,
a
training
of
of
those
who
want
to
be
a
part
of
of
this
engagement
and
around
you
know
again.
Environmental
injustice
and.
Q
T
We're
going
to
work
with
these
community
members
with
ejcc
members
to
engage
and
lead
in
that
engagement
with
these
you
businesses,
they
just
just
convinced
them.
I
somebody
in
a
meeting
that
was
that-
or
I
was
on
an
ad
a
few
weeks
ago-
talked
about
how
to
get
you
know
how
to
get
people
to
join
you
and
be
on
your
side
how
to
get
polluters
or
people
who
are
perceived.
T
You
know
enemies
to
our
community
to
seduce
them
into
supporting
the
work
that
we
do.
I
wouldn't
go
as
far
as
they
produce,
but
to
convince
them
that
it's
in
their
best
interest
to
really
lower
their
emissions,
and
so,
and
so
we
haven't
begun.
Yet
we
actually
just
we're
just
in
the
process
of
creating
the
actual
curriculum
for
the
training.
T
We
will
be
in
that
training
who
will
be
a
part
of
that
training,
and
how
long
is
that
training
going
to
be
we're
just
finalizing
those
details?
We
should
know
more
by
the
end
of
this
week.
We
have
ejcc
members,
I
think
each
and
every
one
of
the
right.
T
Now,
president
six
ejcc
members
have
said
they
want
to
be
a
part,
at
least
of
the
training
and
have
at
least
two
or
three
that
have
committed
to
being
one
of
the
community
engagers
to
meet
with
and
talk
with
these
these
companies
in
the
community.
I
have
a
few
dollars
that
you
know
I
want
to
give
people
I'll
pay
people
for
their
time.
If
anybody
knows
me,
they
know
that
I
am
a
stickler
or
paying
people
for
their
time.
T
I
don't
know
I
like
to
ask
people
to
do
anything
voluntarily,
and
particularly
black
and
brown
people,
because
we've
always
been
asked
to
give
away
our
intellectual
property,
and
then
we
never
get
compensated
for
it.
So
I
believe
100
in
in
compensating
people
for
the
time
so
work
the
engagers.
T
They
will
be
compensated,
they
will
get
a
stipend
and
then
and
then
the
whole
point
is
to
get
these
companies
these
these
facilities
to
apply
for
the
services
that
the
city
have
to
help
them
reduce
again
their
their
pollutants,
and
that's
what
we're
trying
to
just
you
know
we're
trying
to
make
that
happen.
We
felt
like
it'd,
be
it
would
it
would
be
more
advantageous
for
community
residents
to
empower
themselves
by
educating
themselves
on
what
really
is
going
on
with
all
these.
T
What
do
all
these
terms
mean
o2,
emissions
and,
and
all
of
that,
what
does
that
mean
to
people
right?
What
does
it
mean?
You
know
you
know
to
have
these
shops
and
understand
what
these
shops
are
dealing
with
and
and
know
the
harm
that
is
called
to
our
community
to
actually
know
that
information,
so
they
could
speak
intelligently
to
these
business
owners,
these
facility
managers
and
decision
makers
around
these
facilities.
T
T
So
I
don't
know,
I
think
I
shared
shared
enough,
but
I'd
be
open
to
questions
and
again
I
invite
you
to
to
visit
the
website.
It'll
tell
you,
I
tell
you
a
lot
much
a
lot
more
information
than
what
I'm
giving
you
right
now
and
I
apologize
kind
of
scratchy
during
this
time
of
year.
Give
me
give
me
one.
Second,
I
gotta
get
some
water.
A
Thanks
james,
I
know
helen,
you
were
kind
of
talking
a
little
bit
about
it.
It
made
it
sound
like
earlier
you'd,
been
thinking
about
kind
of
next
steps
on
what
meetings
with
facilities
could
be.
Like
I'm
curious
what
your
initial
thoughts
or
reactions
are
to
what
james
shared.
C
N
E
C
Remember
you
and
I'm
familiar
with
your
group
yeah
the
meeting
I
was
bringing
up.
You
know.
C
C
You
know
to
bring
facilities
to
the
table
along
with
community
or
just
invite
facilities
to
a
room
and
have
a
community
there,
and
so
even
embracing
that
role
as
a
you
know,
the
agency
being
seen.
As
you
know,
we
have
contacts
and
an
ability
to
ask
people
to
be
there.
C
We
can't
require
facilities
yet,
which
is
something
we're
hoping
to
accomplish
via
legislation
to
require
engagement.
Even
if
we
can't
require
facilities
to
do
that
now,
we
we
know
we
could
ask
and
they
may
come
so.
My
question
at
the
beginning
of
the
main
meeting
was
what
what
are
the
goals
and
purposes
of
that
meeting
like
because
I'm
just
assuming
and
thinking
you
know,
if
we
send
an
invitation
to
a
facility,
come
sit
at
the
table
with
the
community.
They're
gonna
ask
us:
well:
what
are
we
gonna?
What
are
we
accomplishing
here.
D
C
Just
gonna
yell
at
us
or
they're,
just
wanting
us
to
leave
and
we're
not
gonna
leave.
You
know
so
thinking
about
how
to
make
that
a
meaningful
conversation
of
you
know
between
the
two
and
not
just
hope
that
people
show
up
and
and
then
you
know
if
they
do
show
up
that
the
right
people
do
come.
You
know
it's
not
just
lawyers
showing
up
and
decide.
Okay,
we're
done
here.
You
know
just
kind
of
I
really
wanted
to
understand
in
in
setting
up
for
that.
C
How
can
we
help
make
that
meaningful,
rather
than
just
send
an
email
and
say?
Please
come
that's
kind
of
what
I
was
bringing
up
at
the
beginning
and
sharing
and
yeah.
I
wasn't
aware
that
these
other
meetings
that
you
just
mentioned
were
already
being
planned
and
I'm
not
sure
how
involved
the
north
and
south
green
zone
are
in
those
so
also
just
understand.
U
T
I
hope
you
can
hear
me
better
because
you're
kind
of
choppy-
and
that's
maybe
because
I'm
in
my
car,
so
I
apologize,
but
I
did
hear
most
of
the
the
question
and
thank
you
so
much
for
asking.
I
think
it
was
a
great
great
question
to
find
out
what
the
what
the
purpose
is.
I
think
you
know
our
ultimate
purpose
for
for
this
community
engagement
process
that
we're
undertaking,
I
think,
number
one
to
me.
T
The
most
important
piece
for
me
is
to
get
community
members
to
really
really
understand
these
environmental
issues
understand
what
these
pollutants
are
and
where
they
are
and
what
communities
are
more
polluted
and
what
companies
and
groups
or
facilities
are
causing
some
of
this
and
really
understand
what
these
terms
mean
and
really
getting
that
understanding.
So
then
we
can
improv,
and
so
that's
the
to
me
the
most
important
piece.
T
The
second
piece
is
to
approach
them
with
a
different
strategy,
and
that
strategy
is
to
invite
them
to
take
advantage
of
the
incentives
that
the
city
has
for
them
if
they
would
begin
to
lower
their
mission
to
approach
them
in
that
kind
of
way.
I
think
if
we
approach
them
in
in
that
kind
of
way
to
say
look,
we
want
to
work
with
you,
but
yet
they
see
community,
and
these
are
the
the
community
members
that
are
going
to
be
in
front
of
them.
T
You
know
it's
not
going
to
be
the
typical
it's
not
going
to
be.
You
know
you
guys
in
the
minneapolis
cluster
control
agency
or
our
minneapolis
health
department.
You
know
a
bunch
of
suits
that
they
see.
We
want
to
see,
I
think
the
place
in
front
of
them
community
residents
who
understand
really
what's
going
on
and
say,
please
reduce
this
and
and
asking
them
to
reduce
this
at
first
and
advertise
around
this.
They
look
and
if
they
do
like
hey,
this
company
has
agreed
to
put
x
amount
of
filters
on
their.
T
You
know
on
their
plant
or
whatever
else,
whatever
they
begin
to.
So
I
think
that
would
open
the
door
for
them,
then
to
have
a
larger
community
meeting
that
I
think
they'll
be
willing
to
come
to
like,
because
I
think
it's
going
to
depend
upon
our
approach
and
if
we
approach
it
from
a
standpoint
of
partnership
and
that
work
in
partnership
with
these
communities
and
and
and
begin
to
lower
this,
because
it's
for
the
life
of
all
of
us.
So
I
think
that
that's
the
main
purpose.
T
I
do
think
that
that
we
can
have
a
successful
meeting
and
create
some
goals
about
what
we
want
out
of
that.
That
would
be
beneficial
for
all.
You
know:
you're
right,
there's,
no
law,
that's
going
to
force
them
to
meet
with
us,
but
I
do
think
we
approach
them
in
a
different
way
and
they
hear
from
really
community
members
themselves,
not
just
in
front
of
their
doors
and
saying
you
got
to
get
the
hell
out
of
north
minneapolis.
T
But
to
say
look
we
understand
you
running
the
business
here,
but
your
business
is
killing
us.
What
can
we
do
to
help
you
stop
killing
us
right
and
and
see
these
faces?
You
know
I'm
assuming
that.
I'm
going
to
we're
going
to
appeal
to
their.
You
know
their
human
side
right,
that
they
wouldn't
want
their
kids
living
in
the
environments
that
they
are
creating
for
black
and
brown
communities,
and
so
to
do
that.
Yes,.
A
A
So
I'm
wondering
if
in
the
next
couple
seconds,
if
maybe
ellen,
andrea,
cassandra
and
james,
you
could
all
think
of
like
what
would
be
a
good
next
step
and
maybe
drop
it
in
the
chat
james.
I
know
you
can't
drop
it
in
the
chat,
but
maybe
the
folks
who
are
on
teams.
T
K
A
Did
everyone
identify
a
next
step?
If
you
did?
Please
drop
that
into
the
chat,
but
we
don't
have
time
right
now
to
go
around
verbally,
unfortunately,
but
it
would
be
great
to
just
sort
of
see
those
come
in.
I
know
the
group
that
I
was
in
was
just
identifying
it
right
at
the
end
that
we
need
to
meet
soon
to
keep
talking.
T
Together
now,
yes,
okay,
so
I
just
want
to
remind
the
group
that
you
all
have
six
thousand
dollars
that
I'm
holding
for
you
and
I
don't
know
how
many
you
knew
that
and
that's
money
that
you
all
can
decide
you
want
to
use
and
in
whatever
way
you
want
to
use
it,
and
then
you
know
you
may
be
willing
to
use
part
of
that
to
you
know:
pay
stipends
to
people
who
engages
businesses
these
facilities
who
reach
out
to
them
and
talk
with
them,
have
meetings
with
them
to
talk
about
their
facts.
T
P
A
P
A
clarification
on
that
last
comment:
were
you
talking
about
just
the
north
side
green
zone?
Is
that
what
you
said
kelly.
A
Had
one-time
funding
in
2019
that
we
put
out
through
for
the
community
projects,
do
you
remember
when
alejandra
and
shelly
helped
with
that?
So
northside
had
some
money
as
well
and
there's
still
six
thousand
remaining
of
that
to
be.
K
K
I
We
I
I
think
we
were
on
the
same
page.
I
and
yolanda
was
kind
of
mid-sentence
right
when
it
cut
out,
but
we
definitely,
I
think,
would
love
to
have
the
input
from
the
progress
or
the
work
that
you
put
in
yolanda
and
vanessa.
I
A
We
are
now
at
seven
o'clock.
I
want
to
thank
everyone
so
much
for
your
time
and
deeply
apologize
for
the
error
in
sending
out
the
wrong
link
so
that
12
of
you
ended
up
in
the
wrong
meeting.
I
am
I'm
embarrassed
and
I
will
I
won't
do
it
again.
You
know
you
kind
of
have
to
learn
from
your
mistakes
right,
so
our
we
will
have
another
joint
meeting
of
the
north
side,
south
side
green
zone
in
a
few
months.
In
the
meantime,
I
hope
we
can
take
action
on
some
of
these
next
steps.
A
I
will
be
taking
note
of
all
these
julian
will
be
helping
me
make
sure
that
we
follow
up
and
we
are
accountable
to
this
work.
I'm
super
excited
for
these
conversations
and
unless
anybody
has
any
quick
announcements,
I
would
say
we
could
move
to
adjourn.
A
A
Q
K
K
P
Okay,
can
you
hear
me
now
yeah
yeah?
Okay,
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
sent
a
resolution
just
before
the
meeting
to
kellya
that
I
would
ask
at
this
point
could
be
distributed
for
everybody
to
look
at
for
another
meeting
where
we
actually
have
a
quorum.
What
the
resolution
was
was
to
support
the
south
side.
Green
zones
work
right
now
and
I
don't
know
if
that's
been
sent
out
yet
kelly.
Did
you
get
to
send
it
out
or
no.
P
P
P
G
Q
Taking
our
meeting
and
the
city
of
minneapolis
we're
appreciative,
thank
you
for
joining
us
and
all
the
information
that
you
provide,
and
hopefully
in
the
future,
we
can
continue
to
work
together
and
bring
these
talks
that
not
only
talk
about
it.
Let's
do
about
it
be
about
it.
This
is
our
city.
This
is
where
we
live.
We
got
to
breed
this
crap.
K
H
I
can
say
that
patrick
and
craig
were
in
the
permitting
group
that
I
was
in,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
talked
about
was
to
create
a
relationship
between
the
city
and
the
pca,
with
our
r2,
our
green
zones,
the
south
side
north
side
and
continue
on
meeting
with
them
present
and,
like
I
said,
creating
that
relationship
so
that
we
all,
we
all
have
other
interests
and
groups
that
we
work
with.
And
so
we
can
take
that
and
spread
that
even
further.
H
H
Would
say
rosemary
lavin
would
be
the
one
who
could
probably
appoint
somebody
to
come.
Yeah.