►
From YouTube: June 2, 2021 Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
C
Recording
has
started
hi
everybody
welcome
to
the
full
pedestrian
advisory
committee
meeting
of
june,
2nd
2021
and
just
to
notice.
This
meeting
may
involve
the
remote
participation
by
members,
either
by
telephone
or
other
electronic
means
due
to
the
local
public
health
emergency.
Pursuant
to
the
provisions
of
minnesota
statutes,
section
13d,
021.
D
E
B
I
got
it
matthew,
steinrich.
B
F
F
A
B
B
B
G
C
H
Okay,
we
have
some
discus
some
agenda
discussion.
I
think
I'm
not
sure
where,
where
it
fits,
but
we
have
a
potential
resolution
to
to
add
it.
I've
been
thinking
at
the
pnp
in
regards
to
the
pedestrian
automatic
recall
being
being
being
taken
away
across
the
city,
so
we
wanna
we
wanna
wrestle
with
for.
H
C
Yeah
thanks
for
bringing
it
up
so
we'll
remember
to
include
that
great.
So
now
I
think
melissa
and
you
can.
A
D
B
I
I
B
A
F
B
H
A
C
I
Wait
a
minute
we
didn't,
we
didn't
okay,
the
main
agenda
or
the
main
minutes.
Oh.
C
Yes,
so
what
we
just
voted
on
was
to
actually
the
acceptance
of
the
minutes
for
may
so
we.
C
K
The
items?
Okay,
okay,
so
we
had
five
projects
and
we
have
five
resolutions.
Would
it
be
easiest
to
hold
off
on
voting
on
the
resolutions
until
the
end,
or
should
we
vote
on
them
as
they
come
up.
C
E
I
say
let's
unless
there
seems
to
be
controversy
potentially
on
any
of
any
one
of
them.
Why
not?
Just
let's
just
take
them
all
as
a
as
a
slate.
K
Okay,
so
I
I
will
read
them
as
they
come
up
just
because
they're
then
conversation
can
happen
about
them
at
that
time
and
then
maybe
we
can
vote
on
them
as
they
arise,
okay
or
I'm
at
the
end.
K
So
our
first
project
was
a
safe
routes
to
schools
project
on
the
near
north
side
near
north
high
school
that
was
presented
by
forrest
hardy.
K
The
goal
of
that
project
is
to
connect
three
schools
and
three
parks
with
a
safe
route
for
the
most
vulnerable
road
users
and
address
safety
on
a
documented
crash
concentration
corridor
and
the
this
is
an
all
ages
and
abilities
bikeway
network.
They
have
introduced
several
treatments
along.
I
can't
remember
what
street
it
was.
16Th
avenue
north,
I
believe,
to
slow
traffic,
including
many
roundabouts
raised
crossings
and
speed
humps.
K
So
this
was
a
project
that
we
generally
supported
and
there's
a
I
will
read
the
proposed
resolution.
The
pedestrian
advisory
committee
supports
the
near
north,
safe
routes
to
school
project,
as
proposed
by
minneapolis
public
works.
We
appreciate
the
variety
of
traffic
calming
treatments
that
will
improve
safety
for
all
users
of
16th
avenue,
north.
L
Hi
everybody
I
just
wanted
to
add-
I
think
folks-
are-
are
excited
about
this
spike
way
on
16th
avenue
north.
It's
been
something
that
we
and
safe
routes
have
talked
about
for
a
long
time.
L
I
can
just
add
that
there
are
some
entrance
improvements
that
will
be
happening
at
north
high
school
and
I'm
just
happy
to
say
that
that
has
been
caught
kind
of
early
in
this
design,
and
so
the
folks
working
on
this
project
for
us
has
been
looped
in
with
folks
at
north
high
school
and,
if
there's
anything,
to
take
into
consideration,
knowing
that
these
improvements
are
coming
to
the
high
school,
I
think
there's
still
time
to
keep
that
kind
of
on
the
radar
and
the
only
other
piece
I'll
add.
L
I
know
that
there
are
several
track
traffic
circles,
as
you've
mentioned,
I'm
and
I'll
just
add,
I
think,
there's
some
interest
in
the
community
and
definitely
from
mpsa
routes
if
there's
room
as
those
get
developed
to
to
infuse
some
kind
of
school
spirit
with
them,
so
whether
like
one's
at
north
high
once
a
franklin
middle
school
kind
of
colors
flowers.
Just
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
that
there's
some
interest
in
that
as
well
but
excited
about
that.
L
E
Julie,
that's
that's
such
a
cool
idea
has
has.
Did
I
hear
you
say
that
forest
has
been
involved
in
in
the
specifically
the
traffic
circle
uniqueness.
L
C
A
K
Okay,
our
second
project:
what
is
the
2022
hennepin
county
hsip
safety
project,
which
is
a
highway
safety
improvement
program
that
was
presented
by
matthew
and
there
are
five
different
intersections
along
cedar
avenue
and
42nd
street
that
are
going
to
be
improved,
they'll,
be
doing
primarily
ada,
pedestrian
improvements
and
bump
outs
to
narrow
the
intersection
and
adding
a
dedicated
left
turn
lane
at
cedar,
avenue
and
42nd
street
as
there's
currently
a
lot
of
pressure
on
left
turning
vehicles
to
move
across
the
crosswalk
which
endangers
pedestrians
and
adding
a
protected
bicycle
crossing
at
42nd
street.
K
K
So
the
comments
that
we
had
primarily
supported
the
project
with
adding
the
goal
of
narrowing
the
crossing
of
cedar
avenue
at
lake
street,
which
is
currently
five
lanes.
So
I'm
going
to
read
the
resolution.
K
The
pedestrian
advisory
committee
supports
the
2022
hennepin
county
hsip
safety
project.
These
intersection
improvements
contribute
to
both
real
and
perceived
safety
for
pedestrians.
We
particularly
support
reducing
crossing
distances
for
all
intersections
and
for
that
reason,
ask
that
a
bump
out
be
added
at
cedar,
avenue
and
extended
at
lake
street
to
reduce
lane
widths
to
10
feet.
K
Project
all
right,
the
third
project
was
franklin
avenue
resurfacing
and
bikeway,
which
is
a
30
project
that
was
presented
by
amy
morgan
of
minneapolis.
Public
works,
franklin
avenue
is
being
resurfaced
between
penn
avenue
and
colfax
avenue
west
of
hennepin.
K
It
provides
an
opportunity
for
the
city
to
reevaluate
striping,
between
hennepin
and
penn,
and
to
add
safety
improvements
so
for
the
majority
of
the
street,
there's
room
for
10-foot
travel
lanes,
plus
a
standard
bike
lane,
except
for
in
two
locations
where
they're
going
to
do
advisory
bike
lanes
for
these
short
segments,
where
the
street
is
too
narrow,
which
will
cause
mixing
and
merging
and
yielding
to
happen
between
bicycles
and
cars.
K
But
a
very
high
priority
of
the
project
was
to
maintain
on-street
parking
for
the
businesses
and
high-density
residential
nearby,
and
then
they
are
able
to
still
provide
dedicated
space
for
cyclists
in
the
roadways.
K
So
there
was
some
conversation
about
whether
you
know
whether
the
advisory
bike
lanes
would
be
unpredictable,
but
they
thought
it
was
the
best
treatment
available
for
it.
There
was
also
conversation
about
some
spaces
where
there's
a
westbound
stop
sign,
but
not
an
eastbound
stop
sign
along
franklin
avenue,
and
so
the
resolution
will
reflect
that
conversation
and
yeah
I'll
read
the
resolution,
and
then
we
can
have
any
discussion
if
necessary.
K
The
pedestrian
advisory
committee
supports
the
proposal
for
franklin
avenue
resurfacing.
We
request
signage,
be
added
to
alert
pedestrians
to
a
sidewalk
gap,
so
pedestrians
may
cross
earlier.
We
also
request
consideration
of
a
stop
sign
for
eastbound
traffic
at
the
intersection
with
south
logan
avenue.
Second,.
A
Where
is
the
where's
the
sidewalk
gap
on
this
kenwood
park
as
usual,.
M
K
M
Before
that,
it's
I
think,
serving
west
on
the
south
side
of
the
street,
where
it's
kind
of
it's
probably
falls
under
the
too
steep
to
easily
provide
given
the
slope,
but
it
just
kind
of
truncates
and
people
are
often
walking
from
sebastian
joe's
to
lake,
who
may
not
be
familiar
with
the
area.
M
Yeah,
it's.
I
think
it
was
a
bacon
house
that
the
last
one
kind
of
overlooking
the
lake,
but
also
on
franklin-
and
I
I
think
that
property
is
part
of
it.
It's
mostly.
A
M
A
K
Well,
unless
there's
any
other
comments,
the
fourth
project
was
bryant
avenue
reconstruction,
which
is
at
15
presented
by
liz
heyman
and
trey
joyner.
So
this
is
a
very
different
and
cool
design.
They're,
proposing
a
one-way
one-lane
street
for
cars
on
bryant,
to
reduce
conflict
between
pedestrians
and
bicyclists
on
a
shared
use
path
and
maintain
on-street
parking
at
business
nodes
along
bryant
avenue.
K
They
are
removing
transit
from
bryant
and
moving
it
to
lindale
avenue.
So
this
design
will
reduce
the
amount
of
traffic
on
bryant
and
likely
modestly
increase
traffic
on
adjacent
local
streets
with
minimal
spillover
onto
lindale
avenue.
K
K
They
haven't
done
that
kind
of
analysis
yet
or
it
mean
probably
will
not
do
that
kind
of
analysis
and
they're
gonna
be
able
to
do
some
traffic
calming
in
a
one-way
design,
including
like
chicanes
and
other
ways,
to
reduce
the
amount,
the
speed
that
cars
are
traveling
at.
So
our
resolution
was
the
pack
supports
the
proposed
one-way
design
for
the
bryant
avenue,
south
reconstruction
and
move
transit
to
lindale
avenue.
J
J
K
L
Julie,
this
is
really
just
a
comment
for
the
folks
from
the
city
that
worked
on
this
project.
I
just
appreciate
on
the
map
in
the
presentation
that
they
include
the
schools.
That's
not
typically,
what
you
see
like
even
the
one
pro
you
know
just
before,
with
franklin
didn't
have
kenwood
school
on
it.
So
I
just
just
to
comment
that
it
is
helpful
and
appreciative
to
see
the
schools
on
the
map.
K
K
More
resolution,
so
our
last
project
was
the
upper
harbor
terminal
project,
which
is
again
a
15
project
that
was
presented
by
alexander
cato
of
minneapolis
public
works.
K
So
there
is
a
specific
area
that
was
being
addressed
on
this
project,
where
there's
a
truck
facility
at
33rd,
avenue,
south
and
the
designers
were
trying
to
find
out
whether
we
would
support
a
modified
design
that
doesn't
include
a
sidewalk
on
one
side
of
the
street.
K
The
reason
was
that
there
is
currently
heavy
truck
traffic
crossing
that
boundary
between
the
street,
and
you
know
where
a
sidewalk
would
be
located
along
33rd
avenue
south,
and
so
they
felt
that
it
would
be
dangerous
to
encourage
people
to
walk
on
that
side
of
the
street
versus
having
a
path
on
the
other
side
and
and
that
there
were
grade
issues
that
would
perhaps
require
like
a
retention
wall
be
built
or
something
like
that
to
have
a
sidewalk
so
yeah
that
that
kind
of
covers
the
conversation.
K
So
we
passed
a
resolution
supporting
a
sidewalk
or
we
didn't
pass
it.
We
wrote
one
supporting
a
sidewalk
on
both
sides,
so
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee
supports
design
option
a
for
33rd
avenue
north,
which
is
the
only
complete
streets
option
presented
for
this
street.
The
city's
complete
streets
policy
is
unambiguous
about
the
need
to
prioritize
vulnerable
street
users
in
any
design.
Although
truck
movements
are
a
legitimate
safety
concern,
this
needs
to
be
solved
with
engineering
practices
rather
than
excluding
pedestrians
from
choosing
the
route
that
best
meets
their
needs.
K
H
M
Just
to
add
to
that
one,
I
went
up
there
three
times
following
that
meeting
and
only
one
of
them
one
of
them,
was
a
in
the
evening.
One
was
on
a
sunday,
and
one
was
during
the
time
that
the
planners
told
us
would
be
the
highest
truck
traffic
time.
There
was
absolutely
like.
I
saw
one
car
over
the
course
of
about
two
hours
in
total
on
the
low
volume
times
like
not
even
you
know,
it
was
beyond
low
traffic.
M
At
those
points,
and
even
during
the
point
where
we
were
told
that
there
would
be
a
high
volume
of
truck
traffic,
it
didn't
seem
to
meet
the
numbers
that
we
were
being
told
by
the
city
of
100
to
150
trucks,
a
fair
number.
I
took
pictures
of
almost
every
vehicle
for
about
two
and
a
half
to
three
hours.
M
I
haven't
done
a
count
of
them,
but
they're
not
like
if
they
don't
add
up
the
numbers
that
we
were
given,
which
they
may
not
be
representative,
who
knows,
but
a
fair
amount
of
the
vehicle
traffic
was
coming
out
of
the
north
side.
Parking
lot
at
flows
of
business
day
so
and
the
slope
is
like
I,
I
have
never
built
a
retaining
wall
and
I
would
feel
very
comfortable
bidding
on
building
the
retaining
wall
there.
It's
a
very,
very
minimal
slope
for
on
the
south
side
of
that
street.
M
So
just
as
sort
of
a
follow-up
for
that
I
know
both
christopher
and
peter
also
went
out
there
to
take
a
look.
So
the
what
we
were
hearing
for
the
reasoning
from
the
city
behind
why
they
were
not
following
their
own
policies
to
provide
cyborgs,
doesn't
seem
to
line
up
with
direct
observation
of
the
site.
M
I
was
very
cranky
about
what
we
saw.
It
makes
no
sense
to
me,
so
I
wanted
to
get
a
better
feel
and
I'm
glad
I
wasn't
the
only
one,
because
I
can
just
be
cranky
so
if
either
christopher
peter
want
to
weigh
in
on
what
they
observed
and
whether
what
I'm
reporting
is
what
they
noticed.
That
would
be
lovely
too.
H
Peter
yeah,
for
sure
julia
saw
the
same
thing:
the
the
driveways
that
they
that
we,
the
two
driveways
that
were
that
we
were
shown
at
the
by
the
presenters
being
in
play,
got
next
to
no
traffic
at
all.
While
we
were,
you
know,
over
the
two
hours
plus
we
were
there.
The
trucks
like,
like
julia,
said,
came
from
across
the
came
across
the
tracks:
no
conflict,
no
other
conflicts,
no
other.
You
know
no
other
cars,
cars
or
trucks
going
even
two
ways
at
once.
H
It
was
just
that
it
was
just
that
intermittent
again,
right,
limited
sample,
size,
etc,
but
just
in
general,
you
know
what
we
haven't.
This
project
presented
to
us
is
just
this
segment.
You
know
separate
from
the
whole
idea
of
how
people
get
in
get
out
or
you
know
the
whole
the
whole
flow,
the
whole
systems
approach
to
how
we
should
be
looking
at
this
massively
funded
massive
dollar
project
and
well
I
just
I
don't
know,
that's
all.
H
I
guess
if,
if
anybody
tells
you
that
pedestrians
that
we're
fighting
for
scraps,
don't
show
them
this
project
as
a
as
a
counter
argument,
it's
it
it.
H
This
one
did
this
one
didn't
set:
well,
it
didn't
sit
well
at
all
for
how
where
we
were
given
this
choice.
You
know
like
well.
You
know
this
this
this,
this
alternative,
close
sales,
school
101.
Where
they're
you
know
they
there's
no
other
option
just
where,
but
but
here
we're
going
to
give
you
the
choice
between
between
lousy
and
just
and
unacceptable,
especially
being
on
site.
You
know:
there's
there's
room
there
to
you
know
to
get
creative,
so
yeah,
that's
all
and.
M
It's
also
a
site
where
they
have
a
lot
of
signs
that
already
indicate
to
drivers
that
this
needs
to
be
an
area
where
you're
driving
with
care.
So
peter
brought
up
during
the
ime
meeting
that
this
commercial
drivers,
who
have
as
much
training
and
incentive
to
be
cautious,
around
people,
biking
and
and
walking,
and
using
wheelchairs
as
anywhere
and
there's
additional
signage.
Like
not.
You
know
that
lets
them
know
about
the
railroad
track
about
forklift
driving
the
speed
limits.
I
M
The
sites
are
at
like
five
to
ten
miles
an
hour.
It's
just
absolutely
one
of
the
places
where
you
would
expect
truck
drivers
to
already
be
the
most
cautious
possible.
So
it's
just
very,
very
very
odd.
The
reasoning
we
were
given
by
city
staff-
and
I
don't
know.
I
M
F
D
And
if
I'm
just
may
interject,
I
just
want
to
underscore
what
peter
and
julie
have
said
when
I
went
out
there.
Yes,
there
is
the
freight
center
with
the
truck.
There
are
the
train
tracks,
it
is
a
it
is
a
you
know,
a
venue
or
location:
that's
really
going
to
have
to
take
some
engineering
solutions.
To
put
it,
I
think,
into
an
attractive
and
a
safe
place
to
walk.
D
I
I
did
not
see
particularly
heavy
truck
volumes.
In
my
opinion,
when
I
was
out
there-
and
I
saw
no
trains,
of
course,
as
peter
said,
that's
a
small
sample
size,
but
the
thing
that
bothered
me
about
this
was
that
I
think
two
things
one.
We
were
told
that
the
possible
cost
of
a
retaining
wall-
the
city
didn't
really
relish
that
I
looked
later
in
the
and
the
the
financial
costs
of
this
project
I
read
are
quote
north
of
300
million
and
up
to
385
million.
D
So
if
a
retaining
wall
for
pedestrian
convenience
and
safety
is
not
included
in
the
385
million
scope
of
this
plan,
I
would
want
to
go
back
to
my
earlier
point
at
another
meeting
that
we
get.
These
things,
when
they're
99,
if
a
retaining
wall,
is
considered
out
of
scope
of
a
385,
a
third
of
a
billion
dollar
project,
particularly
when
this
was
sold
to
the
community
as
a
multi-modal
attraction
that
would
not
be
auto-centric
and
they,
I
think
they
have
developed
this
in
the
exact
backwards
matter.
D
Okay,
we'll
first
focus
on
getting
people
multimodally
into
the
facility
and
then
do
this
sexy
and
fun
stuff,
like
you
know,
planting
along
the
river
and
and
the
amphitheater,
and
that
kind
of
thing,
but
do
the
hard
stuff
first
and
it's
an
afterthought.
I
was,
I
was
kind
of
flabbergasted,
but
now
I'll
be
quiet.
K
E
I
have
one
very,
very
slight
thought
that
I
just
want
to
raise
is
that
I
I
appreciate
the
observations
about
the
number
of
trucks
and
and
even
even
if
there
are
a
lot
more
trucks.
Oh
god,
I'm
sorry,
even
if
there
are
a
lot
more
chucks
than
were
observed,
it's
still
not
a
reason
to
remove
the
sidewalk
right.
So
it's
like
absolutely
yeah.
E
I
just
want
to
make
that
clear
as
that,
because
because
I
could
see
somebody's
honking
on
my
door,
I
I
could
see
a
response
being
like
no
really,
there
are
trucks,
they're
just
different.
You
know
different
times
of
the
day,
but
but
I
still
think
I
heard
the
pack
say.
Even
if
there
are
trucks,
that's
not
a
valid
excuse
to
remove
the
sidewalk.
J
E
J
F
I
have
a
quick
question.
I
wasn't
able
to
make
the
ine
meeting,
but
at
there's
you
know
three
railroad
crossings
along
the
corridor.
Are
there
gonna,
be
gates
railroad
gates
across
all
three
crossings
and
with
the
gates
also
come
down
and
stop
pedestrians
and
bicyclists
coming
going
crossing
the
tracks
at
the
time?
There's
a
train
train
coming.
D
They
stated
there
would
be,
but
there
would
not
be-
and
I
forget
the
proper
name
with
those
those
z
shoots,
like
you
see
some
time
to
make
people
look
both
ways
what
was
said
they
were
just
gonna.
Do
yeah
pedestrian
looked
like
crossing
arm
kind
of
things,
so,
okay,
yes,
good.
A
M
D
And
they
were
going
to
try
to
do
some
curving
with
the
the
approach
sidewalks
and
bath
bike
paths,
so
that
cyclists
particularly
could
do
perpendicular
crossing
of
the.
D
K
Unless
there
is
other
discussion,
we're
ready
to
vote
on
the
resolutions,
which
I
think
we
should
vote
on
as
a
package.
C
I
E
B
Okay,
you
guys
are
ready
to
vote
on
the
package
of
resolutions.
K
D
F
B
I
F
B
B
B
H
J
C
Yeah
awesome
great
so
in
record
time
we're
moving
on
to
programs
and
policies.
You.
H
Report
all
right,
we've
got
a
few
items
and
a
a
resolution
that
was
built
into
the
agenda
and
we'll
take
up
the
the
signalization
one
at
the
after
everything
else.
Okay.
Well,
that's
what
I
understand.
H
How
we'll
do
it
so
and
I
will
do
the
resolution
last
I'll,
take
it
from
the
bottom,
where
we
talked
with
that
complete
streets
policy,
update
abigail
handled
that
on
behalf
of
james
walsh's,
walsh,
welsh's
participation
in
that
in
that
work
group
on
complete
streets,
and
there
was
not
much
to
no.
H
No,
not
there
was
a
it
progresses
right,
abigail,
they're,
looking
at
changes
and
we're
keeping
a
vigil
an
eye
for
any
potential
watering
down
of
of
the
of
of
a
complete
streets
policy
that
we
that
we
were
involved
in
going
years
back
and
are
largely
largely
happy
with
that's
that
you
can
refer
to
the
minutes
on
that.
H
Of
these
and
we
had
a
continuing
discussion
on
a
evolving
rules,
I'm
going
to
turn
my
camera
off.
I've
got
a
new
feature
here.
That's
really
dizzying.
H
The
subcommittee
quorum
rules
so,
and
chris
chris
carthaizer
led
us
through
that,
and
that
is
an
evolving
topic
about
how
many,
how
we
need
to
arrange
our
subcommittees
in
terms
of
attendance
membership
and
fixing
a
membership
return
for
purposes
of
of
quorum,
and
I
were
afraid
people
in
minutes
on
that
where
or
the
minimum
members
could
be
four
or
could
be
five
and
making
a
quorum
of
of
three.
Has
there
been
any?
Is
there
any
evolut,
any
evolving
of
thought
or
or
process
or
anything?
E
Hey
this
is
this
is
matthew,
so
we
actually
kind
of
bumped
out
that
one
under
discussion
for
this
agenda,
so
I'll
kind
of
give
a
little
more
detail
on
that
in.
H
And
the
pack
effectiveness
topic
with
my
name
on
it:
it
came
out
a
a
stem
from
a
the
cip
cycle
and,
if
engendered
foam
ended,
started
the
conversation
about
measuring
pack
effectiveness.
We,
we
talked
a
lot,
a
a
wide-ranging
discussion
that
neil
effectively
captures
in
in
the
minutes.
The
upshot
of
that
is
a
one
one
of
a
beginning
approach
to
or
a
sample
task
to
measure
effectiveness
is
to
take
a
set
of
ine
resolutions
and
then
compare
them
with
the
with
the
results.
H
That's
going
to
involve
some
staff
work
to
show
what
to
to
recover
or
to
to
produce
what
the
city
council
eventually
approved
and
compare
that
to
three
resolutions,
I'm
charged
with
those
three
resolution
finding
those
three
resolutions-
that's
underway
any,
but
he
wants
to
contribute
to
that
any
projects
on
the
that
stick
in
his
or
her
their
craw.
H
That
they'd
like
to
attention
paid
to
I'm
I
am
ollyerson-
would
love
to
would
love
to
hear
from
anyone,
otherwise
I'll
I'll
present
a
few
choices
more
than
three
back
to
the
back
to
the
group.
To
pick
from.
H
We
discussed
and
then
dispensed
with.
They
discussed
a
discussion
of
moving
the
date
of
I
and
e.
We
did,
I
don't
that's
all
covered
in
the
minute,
so
nothing,
no,
that
is
a
moot
or
whatever
a
julia,
handled,
a
discussion
of
new
member
orientation.
H
The
episode
of
that
we're
gonna
return
to
that
in
august
or
september
after
the
new
after
the
new
members
are
seated.
H
Yeah
and
what
I
heard
separate
from
the
minutes
here,
is
that
there's
really
no
discussion
or
hint
or
even
whisper,
of
returning
to
in-person
meetings
for
purposes
of
our
group
before
next
year.
If
then,
as
that's
what
I
I
guess,
I
took.
H
Finally,
under
the
20-year
streets
funding
plan,
abigail
led
a
discussion
and
brought
a
a
draft
resolution
that
will
that
I
will
read
momentarily
and
leading
the
discussion
and
acknowledging
that
we
are
standing
on
the
shoulders
and
the
handlebars
of
the
bac
and
bringing
this
bringing
our
version
of
their
of
their
strong
resolution,
addressing
20-year
funding
plan
and
and
and
its
impact
and
his
influence
and
its
imp
importance
to
to
honor
the
transportation
action
plan
and
its
and
its
goals,
and
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up
and
I'm
going
to
read
the
the
proposed
resolution
and
under
call
the
20-year
streets
funding
plan
and
where
the
minnesota
minneapolis
pedestrian
advisory
committee
asks.
H
Minneapolis
public
works
to
commit
to
amending
the
20-year
streets
funding
plan
to
align
with
the
transportation
action
plan,
aka
tap.
The
tap
calls
for
transformative
changes
within
the
same
time
frame
as
the
20-year
streets
funding
plan
and
should
directly
influence
all
plans
for
uses
of
transportation.
Funding
next
paragraph
so
mending
the
plan
must
be
a
rapid
and
strategic
priority
for
public
works.
The
minneapolis
pedestrian
advisory
committee
requests
that
public
works
come
to
our
meeting
in
july
2021
to
present
on
the
20-year
streets
funding
plan
as
it
exists
in
its
current
form.
H
Any
discussion
edits
feelings.
A
J
Here
I
just
had
a
phone
call
I
had
to
answer,
but
I
I
approve.
I
say
I
for
this
as
well:
okay,
christopher.
B
D
A
A
A
H
Terrific
thanks
everyone,
thanks
for
that,
bringing
that
resolution
discussion.
F
C
Thanks
and
I
just
want
to
cover
the
yeah
signalization
discussion
right
now,.
H
M
I
have
the
draft
I
shared
with
you.
Initially,
I
don't
have
access
to
google
docs
so
I'll
give
the
overview,
and
then
maybe
peter
can
take.
I
M
It
came
to
our
attention
that
so
in
last
year,
in
march
or
april,
the
city
moved
most
actuated
buttons,
which
are
the
ones
where
you
have
to
push
a
button
in
order
to
get
a
green
light
or
a
walk
sign
as
a
pedestrian
from
being
actuated
to
be
an
automatic
recall,
which
is
where
the
lead
just
gives
the
pedestrian
cycle.
M
No
matter
what
and
that's
something
that
we
passed
a
resolution
in
support
of
in
august
of
last
year,
affirming
that
that
that's
what
we
want
that
we
want
to
see
at
more
places
that
we
would
like
to
not
see
the
exceptions
that
exist
for
it.
And
within
this
past
week
it
appears
that
the
city
has
been
rolling,
that
back
cars
over
people
walking
using
wheelchairs
and
biking
around
the
city
without
notice,
and
without
even
removing
the
signs
that
assure
pedestrians
that
we
do
not
need
to
push
buttons
in
order
to
cross
the
street.
M
So,
in
light
of
this
peter-
and
I
were
double
checking
to
see
you.
F
M
If
this
was
happening,
how
widespread
it
was
it's
just
something
that
came
up
today,
so
sort
of
brief
information
that
we
have
on
it,
aside
from
whatever
you
all
may
have
observed,
but
we
we've
confirmed
that
it
is
not
every
light
that
that
was
formerly
actuated.
M
Not
every
light
that
was
firmly
activated
has
been
returned
to
needing
to
be
actuated,
but
there
are
definitely
are
lights
that
were
removed
from
actuation
to
automatic
recall
that
are
now
actuated
again,
and
this
goes
against
the
last
sentence
of
our
august
resolution,
which
explicitly
asks
the
city
to
speak
with
us
around
this
to
consult
with
us,
so
that
we
can
help
guide
that,
and
it
certainly
seems
to
go
against
basic
safety
practices,
which
would
be
to
maybe
remove
the
signs.
M
That
say,
you
don't
need
to
push
a
button
and
let
people
know
so.
This
is
something
that
we've
got
a
resolution
drafted.
I
don't
know
peter
if
you
might
have
an
updated
one.
The
language
that
I
initially
drafted
for
this
might
be
a
little
oh.
I
actually
did
not
copy
that
over.
Apparently,
the
language
might
be
a
bit
stronger
when
I
drafted
it.
M
My
understanding
was
that
it
might
have
been
a
complete
reversal
of
the
changes
that
we
saw
last
march
april,
but
it
isn't
a
complete
reversal,
so
we
might
want
to
shift
language
around
that.
If
that
hasn't
already
been
reflected
in
the
draft.
C
E
Yeah,
so
I
I
think
I
have
an
important
clarification
that
I
don't
think
is
gonna.
You
know
it
it's
somewhere
between
like
what
we
initially
thought
it
might
be
and
nothing.
You
know
what
I
mean
so
to
clarify
what
I
mean.
There
hasn't
been
a
decision
to
like
systematically
make
a
change
back
to
the
proportion
of
push
button,
actuation
versus
automatic
recall
what
what
has
happened,
which,
which
I
I
didn't
know
until
this
sort
of
came
up
today-
is
that
there
have
been
a
small
handful
like
a
few,
maybe
like
10.
E
I
don't
know
what
the
number
is
but
of
specific
changes
based
on
some
observations
or
complaints
across
the
city,
and
I
think
that
number
is
relatively
small
now
you
know
what
you
all
think
of
that
as
a
as
a
body
as
a
committee
is,
is
totally
appropriate
in
my
mind.
E
E
So
I
just
wanted
to
to
note
that
I
did
talk
to
our
traffic
team
on
that
and
that's
what
has
happened
and
then
also
I,
the
the
traffic
staff
that
I
did
talk
to
said
that,
like
pretty
soon,
we
should
start
talking
about
what
happens
now
that
the
pandemic
is
is
shifting
in
a
way
where,
where
you
know
things
are
shifting
mass
requirements,
you
know
things
like
that.
E
So
I
think
now
is
a
good
time,
and
this
came
up
with
the
executive
committee
to
to
at
least
invite
traffic
staff
to
come,
probably
to
a
pmp
meeting.
Maybe
the
next
one
and
just
talk
through
what
the
thinking
might
be
and
I'm
I'm
happy
to
extend
that
invite,
if
that's
the
wishes
of
the
committee.
Thank
you.
M
One
is
that
it
seems
like
there
is
no
level
of
pedestrian
or
bicyclist
complaint
that
changes,
traffic
signals
and
one
of
the
things
that
is
part
of
traffic
signals
like
the
pedestrian
bicycle
intersection,
is
that
people
on
bikes,
when
we
have
a
side
street,
with
a
signal
crossing
a
main
line,
the
main
line
stays
green
unless
in
an
actuated
situation,
unless
the
side
street
is
triggered,
which
is
either
by
a
driver
going
over
a
signal
like
sensor
thing
under
the
pavement
or
someone
pushing
the
button
and
those
buttons
are
often
inaccessible
in
winter.
M
Even
to
you
know
somebody
using
a
wheelchair
somebody
using
a
walker,
they
get
blocked
by
snow.
To
the
point
you
can't
even
see
if
there's
one,
but
it
would
require
somebody
who's
biking.
Who
does
not
trigger
that?
You
know
if
they're
biking
not
on
the
sidewalk,
they
have
to
somehow
they
don't
trigger
it
and
there's
nothing
letting
them
know.
M
So
this
seems
to
me
to
be
a
kind
of
there's
a
high
urgency
to
to
pointing
this
out
and
when
the
city
is
not
removing
the
signage,
letting
people
know
they
don't
need
to
push
this
button.
I'm
looking
at
somebody
who's
looking
to
cross
one
of
these
where
they've
changed
it.
The
sign
is
still
up.
The
person
is
not
pushing
the
button
and
they
will
not
get
a
light,
and
that's
literally
happening
right
now
around
the
city,
including
in
front
of
me,
so.
I
I
M
And
can
I
finish:
yeah?
Okay.
I
just
want
to
call
out
that
this
is
an
urgent
request
that
I
don't
think
can
be
delayed
until
pnp,
because
of
how
it's
been
implemented,
showing
zero
regard
for
the
implications.
E
Yes
right,
I
said
that
that's
a
good
question.
I
don't
have
the
answer.
C
I
I
would
really
like
to
formally
invite
someone
to
come
so
that
julia
can,
like
the
what
you
said,
julia
I
think
is
like
pertinent,
and
I
really
would
like
someone
in
signals
to
like
hear
that
and
then
I'd
like
to
pass
a
resolution
based
on
that
conversation
with
that
signalization
person,
when
we've
all
had
the
chance
to
like
fully
get
the
city's
take
on
it
and
then
talk
to
someone
who's
kind
of
like
in
charge
of
that
stuff.
C
So
my
thoughts
on
it
is
that
that
we
do
have
that
time
and
then
we
can
actually
have
that
in,
like
that,
you
know
face-to-face.
I
guess
online
conversation
with
someone
who
can
give
us
the
full
background
and
then
take
that
information
back
and
then
have
we'll
have
a
resolution
to
back
the
conversation
we
had.
So
that's
my
take
on
it
I
I
know
people
probably
have
differing
opinions,
so
I
guess,
if
other
people
want
to
talk
about
how
they
feel
about
earning
questions
too,.
A
I'd
love
to
know
what
streets
what
intersections,
just
because
it
would
set
up
in
franklin.
That's
one
thing:
if
it's
more
like
you
know
irving
and
31st,
which
of
course
doesn't
exist,
not
a
big
concern
of
mine,
but
obviously
in
theory
it's
a
big
deal,
but
clearly,
if
we're
going
to
break
our
fell,
our
friends
in
traffic
over
the
coals
for
signs
that
six
people
use
in
a
month
and
that
somebody
complained
about
we
don't
know,
of
course,
whether
the
complaint
was
by
auto
bike
or
pedestrian
or
neighbor.
A
For
that
matter,
looking
out
the
window,
I'd
be
curious
to
see
who
actually
complained
about
him.
K
A
Always
they
respond
to
drivers
pretty
pretty
quick.
F
Yeah,
I
guess
I
agree
with
abigail
that
I'd
like
to
hear
from
the
city's
traffic
folks
at
the
next
planning
and
programming
meeting.
You
know
the
only
reason
they
turned
off
the
or
put
the
signals
on
recall.
It
was
a
big
because
of
kovitz.
E
Once
I
enjoy,
I
want
to
respond
to
paul,
because
I
this
is
actually
a
case
where
I
remember
the
phone
call
where
julia
and
abigail
and
others
like
asked
for
it,
and
so
I
I
called
the
traffic
team
and
so
like
that
as
a
very
direct
like
pack
asked
for
it
and
then
traffic
considered
it
and
then
made
it
happen.
So
you're
right,
it
was
because
of
covet,
but
it
was
the
pack
that
initially
suggested
hey.
We
should
do
this
and
then
then
they
looked
at
it
and
did
it.
E
M
Here's
my
concern
is
that
the
city
is
not
doing
due
diligence,
so
there
are
signs
up
that
say
you
do
not
need
to
push
this
button,
but
you
literally
don't
get
a
light
if
you
don't
push
the
button
at
some
of
these
intersections.
So
the
fact
that
the
city
is
not
communicating
this
in
any
way
and,
in
fact,
is
leading
up
what
is
now
misinformation
to
me
makes
this
urgent
in
terms
of
doing
you
know,
raising
it
to
public
works
before
the
next
pmp.
M
I
think
that
there's
we
could
have
passed
a
thousand
resolutions
on
signalization
alone,
given
how
it
impacts
walkability
and
given
how
timing
is
100
car
centric,
except
for
at
train
intersections
and
the
fact
that
there's
like
no
auditory
signals
at
the
train
intersections
for
the
signals
there.
M
It
blows
my
mind.
I
know
that's
something
that
don
and
scott,
both
both
have
brought
up
four
years.
So
I
don't
see
a
need
to
wait
for
more
information
to
pass
a
resolution
when
we
were
clearing
our
august
resolution.
Please
come
talk
to
us
about
exceptions
to
this,
because
it
never
was
all
of
the
signals
and
when
the
city
has
not
done
it's
very
basic
responsibility
of
removing
signs.
That
say
you
don't
need
to
push
this.
K
C
F
I
M
So
so
my
understanding
is
that
the
signs
were
not.
They
didn't
need
to
put
them
in
braille,
because
the
button
still
fulfills
the
auditory
information
aspect
even
during
the
pandemic.
Oh
okay,.
I
M
So
the
bush,
the
button
was,
you
could
still
push
it
like.
So
there's
plenty
of
places
where
there
is
a
button
that
is
not
actuated
and
never
has
been
actuated,
but
it's
there
for
people
with
impaired
vision
to
be
able
to
cross
safely
and
to
get
that
the
information
you
need,
so
the
the
that
the
sign
has
not
been
translated
into
braille
things
a
little
bit
separate
in
this
case.
E
M
Signs
or
check
that
the
signs
are
not
there
at
the
very
least,
that
would
be
the
minimal
effort.
I
think
that's
also
clarifying
to
people
who
have
come
to
expect
that
they
will
not
need
to
push
a
button
that
some
of
these
now
are.
It
would
also,
via
any
of
the
city's
social
media
or
in
other
ways,
would
be
a
basic
responsibility,
but,
at
the
very
least,
removing
this
information
that
they
themselves
put
up.
E
E
A
C
And-
and
my
question
to
you
matthew
was
too
is
like
the
pack
had
influence
in
the
signalization
department
via
phone
call
from
you.
So
I'm
wondering
if,
if
when
you
call
them
tomorrow
and
say,
hey,
can
I
can?
Can
you
come
and
speak
at
the
you
know
at
the
pmp
subcommittee?
Also
by
the
way,
those
few
signals
that
you
did
change.
A
C
I
mean
we
should
we
should
admonish
the
city
for
like
leaving
false
information
because
julia's
right,
that's
like
really
problematic,
but
I
don't
know
it's
like
that's
something
that
a
resolution
needed
or
matthew
you're
already
in
touch
with
someone
who
gave
you
some
information
today.
So
I
don't
know
if
it
would
be
a
big
ask
to
be
like
hey
by
the
way
you
need
to
remove
those
signs
and
also
then
come
in
at
the
june
pnb.
C
D
I
think
that
just
the
expedient
way
of
doing
it,
it
gets
the
acute
time-sensitive
matter
that
julie
is
addressed,
taken
care
of,
quite
frankly
in
the
fastest
amount
of
time,
matthew
just
picks
up
the
phone
tomorrow
and
and
we're
off
and
running.
D
E
I'm
typing
down
all
of
the
questions
to
make
sure
that
I
hit
him
also.
M
But
I'm
a
little
concerned,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
isn't
taken
as
any
passive
approval
as
well
like
that
they're,
not
I
mean
they've
been
so
reticent
to
discuss
with
us
how
this
works
or
to
even
consider
you
know
at
one
of
the
meetings
they
talked
about,
how
they
could
instantly
change
the
system,
and
they
do
that
downtown
for
when
people
are
getting
out
sports
events
in
order
to
get
them
out
of
the
city
and
pass
all
of
our
restaurants
and
bars
and
everything
as
fast
as
possible.
M
But
they
can't
they
don't
do
this
for
us
in
winter.
Even
I
I
I
just
feel
like
there's,
not
a
ton
of
regard
for
pedestrian
needs,
and
I
want
to
not
let
this
one
go.
So
if
it,
if
the
same
message
is
conveyed
with
matthew's
call
and
with
them
coming
to
pnp,
I'm
all
for
that.
But
if
there's
any
value
to
us
passing
a
formal
resolution
about
this
and
and
that
they're
not
following
our
requests
just
to
talk
to
us
even
I
would
appreciate
that
as.
D
Well,
if,
if
I
could
just
jump
in,
I
think
the
best
motion
is
the
most
well-informed
motion
and
I
think
it
should
be
drafted
after
we
hear
from
the
representative
from
public
works.
But
I
think
in
the
interim
we
would
leave
it
to
matthew,
conveying
the
general
disapproval
of
the
switch
with
switch
over
without
any
outreach
or
notification
to
us,
but
I'm
confident
matthew
can
handle
that.
I
just
think
we
should
take
that
action
and
then
move
on.
H
H
H
M
E
M
They've
been
very
reticent
to
share
that
information
in
the
past,
so
I
guess
I
didn't
realize
that
we
would
be
able
to
get
information
from
them.
H
All
right,
okay,
thank
you,
matthew
thanks
everyone,
everyone's
input,
discussion,
and
I
and
if
that's
still
pnp,
then
that
concludes
pnp,
plus
all
right.
C
Yeah,
thank
you
thanks
julia
yeah
and
thanks
for
bringing
that
forward
because
you're
right
it
is
it's
disconcerting
that
they're
just
kind
of
doing
it
ad
hoc.
When
usually
when
we
complain
the
3-1-1,
nothing
happens.
So
it's
like
well
what
the
heck.
So
I
look
forward
to
learning
more
at
the
june
pnp,
that's
going
to
be
great,
and
so
to
that
we
can
move
to
the
sub
committee
quorum
rules,
the
most
exciting
thing
on
the
agenda.
Oh.
E
My
gosh
yeah
all
right,
so
I
think
we've
all
heard
about
this,
but
I'll
give
a
basic
overview.
The
clerk's
office
is
asking
us,
as
a
committee,
to
identify
a
subset
of
the
full
committee
membership
for
each
subcommittee
and
like
so
that
subset
the
number
could
be
five
or
seven
or
whatever
we
want
that's.
That
is
not
the
full
15.
E
like.
So
we
need
to
do
that
for
each
subcommittee
and
then
that
will
have
an
actual
quorum,
whereas
in
the
past
we
haven't
had,
we
haven't
had
quorum
issues
with
subcommittees,
because
this
is
more
of
a
casual
meeting.
So
I'm
just
going
to
stop
the
context
there.
Let
me
know
if
you
have
questions,
but
what
I
think
we
need
to
do
just
for
expediency.
E
Is
it's
it's
my
goal
and
then
let
me
know
what
you
think
about
this:
to
try
to
get
this
settled
by
the
july
full
committee
meeting
and
we
were
working
with
the
bac
and
I
think,
an
approach
that
I
want
to
propose
is
that
staff,
meaning
me
milson
and
chris.
E
The
combination
will
send
out
an
email
outlining
a
little
bit
of
the
context
and
we'll
do
some
of
the
the
research
on
who
like
who
just
so
much
regularly
attends
each
subcommittee
to
hopefully
get
a
list
of
people
that
might
be
good
candidates
for
like
a
five
person.
You
know
membership
and
then
talk
about
it
at
the
pmp
coming
up
in
june
and
then
try
to
like
formalize
it
in
july.
So
does
that
make
sense,
and
if
there
are
people
that
that
weren't
on
the
previous
times
we've
talked
about
it.
E
The
implications
of
that
can
be
a
little
frustrating
because,
like
right
now
subcommittees
are
just
very
casual.
We
don't
pass
formal
resolutions,
things
like
that.
We
just
show
up
and
go,
but
what
what
this
will
mean
is
if
we
have
a
five
percent
quorum
and
it's
abigail
paul,
neil
peter
and
christopher.
I
just
that's
what
I
see
on
the
screen
right.
E
So
if
it's
you
five
three
of
you
have
to
attend
and
be
present
in
order
to
be
able
to
have
the
meeting,
and
so
if,
if
three
of
those
five
don't
aren't
able
to
show
up
only
two,
but
the
other
pac
members
show
up.
We
still
wouldn't
be
able
to
have
the
meeting,
and
so
that's
where
it's
kind
of
confusing,
as
opposed
to
just
like
a
subset
or
as
opposed
to
just
having
the
way
it
is
now.
E
So
that's
the
situation.
Thoughts
does
that
make
sense,
we'll
we'll
send
a
clear,
hopefully
very
clear,
like
you
know,
concise,
email
context,
here's
the
proposal,
here's
kind
of
like
some
numbers,
but
we'll
we'll.
Let's
try
to
land
on
a
recommended
list
of
of
subcommittee
members
for
each
subcommittee
at
the
pmp
and
formalize
it
at
the
full
peter.
H
Yeah
thanks
I'm
doing
the.
I
remember
one
time
thing.
I
remember
one
time
at
least
one
time
we've
had:
we've
had
full
pack
meetings
lacking
quorum.
We
proceeded
with
discussion
and
topics
and
all
that
stuff
just
simply
did
not
act,
but
we
we
proceeded
through
parts
of
parts
of
the
agenda
or
presentations
or
whatever.
So,
if
that's
something
that
would
not
happen
in
the
future
anymore,
I
don't
know
how
that
would.
E
So
so
peter
that
that's
how
we
rolled
back
in
the
day-
and
I
missed
those
times
you
know,
but.
A
No,
we
can't
do
that
anymore.
All
right.
E
E
J
Is
there
a
time
limit
like
if
we
meet
the
subcommittee
starts
at
4
30
and
there
isn't
a
quorum
there
can
we
say
we
won't
start
the
meeting
until
4
40
and
see
if
people
show
up
by
the
time.
Can
we
do
that
in
a
subcommittee.
E
I
I
I'll
say:
let's:
let's
make
that
executive
decision
and
say
yeah,
we
could
do
that
and
if
we
find
out
that's
problematic
down
the
road
we
could
you
know
and
then
there's
the
I
think
we
we've
interpreted
that
we're
trying
to
interpret
that
you
know
if
you
have
a
quorum
at
the
start.
You
have
a
quorum
throughout,
especially
the
subcommittee
because
we're
not
voting
and
taking
formal
action.
E
So
that's
another
way
is
like
if
we
can
just
get
people
to
you
know
like
if
you
can
just
show
up
you
know
like
at
the
beginning.
If
you
have
to
go
or
something
that's
fine,
because
we'll
still
have
enough
people
on
the
media.
You
know
we
we
haven't
had
like
attendance
problems
since
we
started
up
remote.
You
know
I
mean
we
have
good
membership,
so
I
don't
know
that
this
is
going
to
be
a
problem.
J
I
think
the
only
time
it
could
be
a
problem
is
in
the
summer
when
people
go
on
vacation
and
then
I
think
right.
If
we
let
people
know
ahead
of
time,
then
we
can
ask
somebody
else
to
make
sure
they'll
be
there,
because
I
think
there's
room
to
if
you're
gonna
be
gone
to
say
I'm
not
gonna.
I
mean
I
usually
go
to
both
and
I
don't
usually
let
people
know
because
we
haven't
had
a
quorum,
but
I
would
be
glad
to
do
that.
G
Right,
yeah
barb:
this
is
chris
and
I
think
that's
a
really
good
point
of
like
we'll
definitely
want
to
do
some
sort
of
notification
system
beforehand,
so
that
we
can
avoid
as
much
as
possible
like
the
random
meeting
getting
cancelled
and
if,
for
some
reason
nobody
can
make
it
then
we
might
just
have
to
cancel
in
advance,
but
more.
We
can
do
like
the
day
before.
So
the
better.
D
D
We
can
get
together
and
we
can
talk
about
things
and
we
could
have
a
public
works
person
talk
to
us
about
a
street
project
that
they
can't
prohibit
that
this
is
our
community
advisory
group
as
much
as
the
the
cities,
and
I
I
would.
I
would
hope
that
they
would
send
somebody
some
way.
I
can
better
understand
this,
because
this
is
just.
This
is
a
lot
of
rigmarole
that
just
gets
in
the
way
of
citizens,
volunteering
and
trying
to
do
a
good
thing.
This
is
not
appropriate.
D
A
I
agree,
of
course
I
said
that
last
time,
but
this
is
for
their
convenience
strictly
speaking,
that's
it
absolutely
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
facilitate
the
business
and
it
sure,
as
hell,
doesn't
make
public
participation,
which
is
of
course
mandated
under
our
rules
possible
or
easier
anyway.
D
D
A
M
Okay,
it
seems
like
we
could
theoretically
like
if
we
don't
make
quorum,
have
somebody
who's
got
another
meeting
type
setup
everyone
shift
over
there.
We
don't
then
have
to
record
it.
We
don't
have
to
make
it
public.
We
can
invite
anyone
else,
who's
shown
up
shift
a
different
thing
and
because
we're
not
meeting
quorum
like
in
the
official
things
where
a
conversation
among
a
quorum
of
pac
members
is
official
business.
We
are
we're
technically
not
hitting
that.
So
then
we're
all
in
the
clear
plus
we
can
get
more
honest
responses
from
city
staff.
I
E
I
have
a
professional
responsibility
to
try
to
make
this
happen.
I'm
also
appreciating
and
understanding
christopher
neal
and
others
frustrations
with
the
process
so
I'll
just.
A
A
K
Yeah
I
apologize
if
I
I
missed
this,
but
like
does
the
subset
of
people
have
to
be
non-inclusive
with
the
entire
pack
roster?
Could
you
say
any
three
of
like
everybody?
It.
E
E
C
C
E
C
E
C
C
Keep
that
in
mind
so
that
at
the
next
pnp
we
can
formalize
a
resolution
that
we've
all
been
stewing
on,
obviously
for
the
last
month,
just
hearing
this
nonsense.
So
with
that,
then
why
don't
we
move
on
to
elections
next
month,
which
is
awesome?
Okay,.
E
So
I
think,
I'm
very
excited
about
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee.
I
don't.
I
forgot
that
name.
The
pack
appointments,
I'm
gonna
bring
them
through
the
recommendations
for
appointments
on
june
23rd
to
team
pw,
and
if
you,
if
you
applied,
I'm
recommending
that
your
appointment,
I
don't
know
if
I
said
that
to
everyone,
but
so
there's
five
members
that
reapplied
and
then
three
new
members
that
I'm
very
excited
about,
and
so
so
with
that
we're
we're
planning.
E
Well
we'll
talk
about
it
at
pmp
as
well,
but
playing
in
a
similar
orientation
style
get
to
know
a
meeting.
We
can
look
at
that
and
then
also
in
talking
to
the
executive
committee,
we
thought
it
would
be
helpful
to
add
a
little
bit
more
clarity
and
specificity
in
roles,
and
I
think
a
classic
example
is
just
adding
some
more
specifics
about
what
the
chair
either
either
should
do
or
gets
to
do
as
a
go-to.
E
So
team
pw
presentation,
like
a
you,
know,
point
person
if
there's
communications
or
point
person,
if
there's
a
you,
know
an
advisory
committee
that
pops
up
like
a
like
a
complete
streets,
technical
advisory
committee,
where
we
need
a
person.
E
Usually
I
go
to
the
chair,
and
so
there's
that
you
know
extra
extra
duties
and
whatever
and
and
just
kind
of
just
make
sure
that
those
things
are
are
really
clear
and
then
also
just
structuring
the
elections
around
that
and
so
not
having
them
right
away,
but
have
have
sort
of
some
of
that
introduction.
Discussion
hear
the
roles
you
know
all
of
that
and
then
have
and
then
sort
of
have
the
elections
for
the
for
the
new
executive
committee
and
all
the
officers.
E
I
think
that's
mostly
it
also
just
everybody
on
the
call.
Like
start
thinking
about
the
roles
that
you
may
or
may
not
want.
So
you
know
again
chair
vice
chair
secretary
and
then
two
subcommittee
chairs
co-chairs
for
each
of
the
each
of
the
subcommittees.
C
Yes,
and
if
you
are
not
on
the
exec
committee
and
you're
interested
in
any
of
the
roles
or
learning
more,
if
you
know
a
role,
you're
interested
in
you
can
reach
out
to
the
person
who's
currently
in
that
role
or
you
could
reach
out
to
me
just
for
just
general
conversation
having
that's,
I'm
totally
open
to
that.
So
that's
kind
of
exciting
for
that's
all
next
month,
when
we
have
some
new
members
and
elections
so.
E
No
we'll
we'll
still
do
it
within
the
four
to
six
time
frame.
Yeah
and
it's
it's
been
done
in
the
past.
What
will
happen
is
it's
like
you
know
this.
This
will
take
an
hour
so
four
to
five
o'clock,
probably
and
then
we'll
probably
have
the
subcommittee
reports
and
and
minimize
other
items.
E
E
E
M
C
Maybe
we,
I
know
it
sounds
no
fun.
Maybe
we
just
skipped
the
icebreaker
and
we
say
who
we
are
and
what
role
we
play
on
the
pac
sure.
E
Okay
and
we'll
talk
about
that
as
an
existing
executive
committee,
creating
that
agenda.
C
L
I
guess
just
along
with
that
I
mean
not
directly
related,
but
mailbox
pickup
will
continue
through
the
summer.
There
will
be
an
adjustment
to
locations
that
will
start
on
june
14th,
but
we're
believe
it
or
not
still
finalizing
those
details,
and
those
should
be
done
tomorrow,
but
mailbox
pickup
will
continue,
and
next
school
year
will
bring
lots
of
changes
from
any
of
our
students,
as
the
comprehensive
district
design
is
implemented,
and
so
there'll
be
some
shifts
in
our
magnet
schools
and
where
those
are
located
throughout
the
city.
L
They'll
be
kind
of
more
centrally
located
in
the
core
and
some
shifts
in
attendance
areas
and
such
so
so
next
year
will
be
be
a
big
year.
The
last
day
of
school
is
friday.
The
11th.
I
A
L
I
mean
we've
been
involved
in
some
conversations,
both
around
bus,
stop
kind
of
some
bus,
stop
work
through
our
operations
division
and
we
and
we've
also
discussed
the
topic
at
our
monthly,
safe
routes
to
school
work
group
meeting
that
includes
folks
from
public
works
and
then
various
the
health
department
and
then
other
folks
within
our
within
the
district
and
so
yep.
I
L
There's
quite
an
increase
in
the
opportunities
for
kids
to
do
in-person
learning
this
summer
I
can
speak
personally
from
a
parent
of
a
special
ed
student
they've,
adjusted
the
criteria
for
what
they
call
extended
school
year.
So
they're
I
mean
more
kids
are
eligible
for
in-person
learning,
both
through
special
ed,
regular
summer
school
there's.
Also
they
just
announced.
Yesterday
a
art
focused
program
that'll
be
downtown
at
fair,
high
school.
L
That
will
be
in
partnership
with,
like
the
cowell
center
for
arts
macphail
and
a
couple
other
art
institutes
kind
of
downtown,
so
that
so
they
really
are
hoping
to
increase
the
number
of
kids
that
ex
that
continue
learning
and
have
in-person
opportunities.
This
summer
will.
C
Filled
all
the
kiddie
pools
at
all
the
parks.
I
think
they
didn't
last
year.
L
A
A
I
J
I
just
want
to
say
I'm
sorry,
I
had
my
phone
on
do
not
disturb,
but
my
doctor,
who
is
one
of
my
favorites,
had
to
call
me
and
I'm
sorry
for
that
noise.
I
thought
I
was
muted,
but
I
wasn't
and
I
it
just
makes
everybody
crazy.
So
I
apologize
for
that.
A
N
I
have
a
quick
project
update
if
that
is
that's.
A
N
So
the
park
board
is
starting
on
in
on
the
design
process
for
graco
park,
which
is
the
park
in
northeast
right
off
of
like
plymouth
avenue,
and
there
will
be
some
bike,
walk
improvements
as
part
of
that
design,
and
so
carrie
will
be
sending
along
some
more
information.
Once
the
engagement
launch
starts,
and
I
think
that
this
summer
will
be
kind
of
strong
engagement
around
that
project.
N
So
I'll
post
the
project
link
in
the
in
the
chat
box
too.
N
It's
do
you
know
hall's
island
where
that
new
island
was
built
a
couple
years
ago
off
like
near
boone's
island,
it's
right
over
there,
it's
kind
of
like
an
empty.
I
don't
know
if
anyone
knows
it's
sort
of
this
like
empty
grass
area
and
there's
like
a
bike,
walk
connection
that
kind
of
goes
through
it
and
the
plan
was
always
to
develop
it
into
more
of,
like
kind
of
I
don't
want
to
say,
like
a
destination
park,
but
there's
going
to
be
more
amenities.
There.