►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
well
welcome
everyone
glad
to
see
you
at
the
ina
meeting
this
month.
We
have
a
couple
items
on
the
agenda,
so
first,
let's
take
a
roll
call.
Do
we
need
to
do
that
through
you
or
or
not?
I
can't.
A
A
A
So
let's
get
off
and
start
we
have
forest
party
with
near
north
side
of
the
school.
A
D
Okay,
this
is
near
north,
safe
routes
to
the
school,
it's
a
2022
project
and
it's
from
16th
heavenly
north
from
queen
to
aldrich
and
near
north.
Our
project
staff
is
myself
as
transportation,
planner
and
then
nathan.
Kimmer
is
also
with
us
tonight.
He's
the
project
engineer
like
I
said
it's
a
2022
construction
project
right
now
in
spring
fall
winter
and
spring
of
21,
we'll
be
doing
concept,
design
and
preliminary
engagement
and
then
doing
final
design
later
this
year
to
hopefully
get
to
a
2022
construction
start
date.
D
D
The
safe
routes
to
school
map,
which
was
first
initiated
in
2014,
it
also
indicates
this-
is
a
walking
route
for
youth
from
16th
north
between
queen
and
aldrich,
and
then
the
all
ages
and
abilities.
Bikeway
also
has
this
indicated
as
a
aaa
bikeway
network.
D
And
the
pet
crash
concentration
corridor
map
shows
this
as
one
of
those
corridors
as
well,
at
least
to
the
west
of
north
commons
park
and
digging
in
a
little
bit
deeper
on
those
peg
crash
numbers.
There's
four
peg
crashes:
in
a
study
period
from
twenty
thousand
2011
to
2015.
D
I
just
want
to
touch
on
some
of
the
bike
boulevard
treatments
that
we
usually
utilize
on
a
triple
a
bike
network
bike
boulevards
are
striped
facilities
that
they're
shared
with
motor
vehicles,
so
motor
vehicles
are
allowed
to
drive
and
park
on
bike
boulevards
for
the
most
part,
speed
humps
are
used
to
keep
those
vehicle
speeds
well
below
the
posted
speed
limit,
which
is
now
20
miles
an
hour
in
residential
streets
in
minneapolis.
D
D
D
And
then
traffic
diversion
is
sometimes
used
to
lower
vehicle
volumes
or
deter
traffic
from
using
the
street
in
general,
and
all
of
these
things
have
a
great
impact
on
not
only
bicycle
safety,
but
also
pedestrian
safety
as
well
by
lowering
vehicle
speeds
and
reducing
traffic
along
the
primary
route.
D
D
So
this
is
just
showing
existing
conditions
showing
stop
sign
locations
and
there's
quite
a
bit
of
stops
along
the
corridor
which,
on
bike
boulevards,
we
typically
try
to
remove
and
replace
with
addition
like
traffic
circles
or
a
different
type
of
traffic
calling
device
than
stop
signs.
D
And
this
is
what
concept
a
looks
like
showing
a
couple
of
traffic
circles
near
the
center
of
the
project
and
then
showing
curb
extensions
at
several
locations
as
well,
and
I'm
just
going
to
touch
on
these
briefly.
D
Concept
b
has
speed
humps
near
north
commons
park,
where
we
see
less
traffic
or
less
parking
and
more
wide
open
spaces
near
north
commons
and
north
high
as
well,
which
is
across
the
street
and
also
uses
traffic
circles
and
then
also
initiates
a
rapid
flash
beacon
at
fremont
avenue
to
help
people
across
the
street.
There.
D
Concept
c
kind
of
takes
some
of
these
same
ideas
along
the
outer
fringes,
but
then
along
north
commons
park,
where
it's
connected
with
north
high
school
there's
a
landscaped
connection
that
diverts
traffic
and
really
would
take
the
form
of
more
like
a
trail
like
facility
between
knox
and
james.
D
So
vehicles
wouldn't
be
able
to
use
16th
avenue
in
that
one
block
stretch
they
would
have
to
detour
and
use
another
facility,
but
bicycles
would
be
able
to
pass
through
and,
of
course,
pedestrians
would
be
able
to
pass
through
as
well.
D
So
that's
kind
of
the
big
idea
for
this
concept.
C,
there's
also
landscaped
landscape
curve,
extensions
throughout
the
project
as
well
on
landscapes
on
concept
c.
D
So
right
now
we
have
an
online
survey
up
it's
more
of
an
existing
condition
survey,
but
on
february
23rd
we'll
be
switching
that
out
to
a
survey
of
the
three
concepts
that
you
see
here.
You
can
make
comments
on
the
map
of
the
three
concepts,
and
so,
if
you
you
can
access
the
public
the
project
website
to
gain
access
to
either
of
those
online
surveys.
D
Reports
of
really
high
vehicle
speeds
like
well
over
the
residential
posted
speed
limit
on
certain
segments
of
16th
avenue,
north
and
some
of
the
cross
streets
and
a
general
support
for
traffic
traffic.
Homing
elements
in
the
neighborhood.
D
A
Have
you
be,
will
you
be
wanting
a
resolution
from
us
forest
for
this
project
right
now
or
do
you
will
be
coming
back?
I'm
assuming.
D
Well,
this
is
the
second
visit,
so
I
would
hope
to
get
a
resolution
today
unless
there's
a
need
to
come
back
at
a
later
date.
A
F
E
You
talked
about
the
speeds
on
the
street,
so
the
speed
limit
is
20
miles
an
hour
on
the
street,
based
on
the
city-wide
residential
speed
limit.
C
E
Look
looked
at
all
at
putting
speed
limit
signs
up
on
streets
where
you
do
see
a
you
know,
some
speeding
problems
to
remind
folks.
The
speed
limit
is
20
miles
an
hour
yeah.
That's.
D
A
good
idea
I'd
have
to
take
that
back
to
our
vision,
zero
folks
and
our
traffic
folks
see
if
we
could
do
some
spot
signing
as
part
of
this.
E
Okay
and
then
also,
what
do
you
know
what
the
average
daily
traffic
count
is
on
16th.
D
E
Okay,
yeah,
I'm
just
curious.
If
you
put
that
diverter
and
like
you've
shown
concept,
see
what
what
kind
of
traffic
would
get
you
know
diverted
off
of
16th
onto
joining,
you
know
neighborhood
streets.
G
I
I
just
have
a
question:
just
mainly
curiosity,
can
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
funding
like
where
it
comes
from?
Is
there
federal
money
in
this
because
it's
the
safe
streets
or
safe
streets
routes
to
school
and
then
also
do
you
have
an
idea
that
if,
if
your
professional
judgment
is
such
that
I
want
roundabouts
on
every
intersection,
is
there
the
financial
resources
to
make
that
happen?
Or
do
you
have
to
trim
back
the
wish
list?
D
Yeah,
certainly
this
is
a
federal
aid
project,
so
the
majority
of
the
funding
would
be
coming
from
federal
sources.
The
rest
of
it
will
be
coming
from
our
capital,
safer
office
to
school
capital
fund.
D
We
are
going
to
have
to
do
a
little
bit
of
well
I'd,
say
it's
a
pretty
big
budget
for
what
given
what
it
is
residential
street
and
neighborhood
traffic
coming,
it
kind
of
depends
on
how
we
spend
those
funds,
something
like
that.
Landscaped
connection,
that
traffic
diverter
would
be
almost
like
a
full
reconstruction
for
a
block,
so
that
could
eat
up
a
lot
of
the
resources
and
maybe
have
to
do
trimming
back
on
other
things.
D
D
That's
often
the
question:
we
have
a
adopt-a-median
program
where
we
tend
to
try
to
get
neighborhood
support
to
get
someone
to
get
a
group
of
people
to
maintain
those
and
they
they
tend
to
sign,
waivers
and
stuff
that
they'd
be
out
and
be
out
in
the
street
out
in
the
median.
Maintaining
those.
But
we
don't
have
any
in-house
resources
to
maintain
these.
E
Okay,
yeah
that
that's
somewhere,
we
did
in
st
paul,
and
sometimes
it's
tough
to
you
know
initially,
when
you
put
them
in
you
get
some
neighbors
that
are
interested
in
maintaining
and
kind
of
leading
the
effort.
But
you
know
if
they
move
what
way
or
move
out
of
the
neighborhood,
then
it's
kind
of
tough
to
keep
those
maintained.
So
that's
an
ongoing
issue.
I
can
see
that.
A
F
Just
knowing
that
this
is
a
street
that
sounds
like
it
seems
scary,
especially
if
you
were
sending
kids
along
it,
do
you
have
you
any
sense
of
the
vehicle
traffic
that
is
associated
with
the
school?
How
much
of
that
is
because
people
don't
feel
comfortable
and
can't
imagine
sending
their
kids
to
school
aside
from
in
a
vehicle
because
of
like
is
there?
How
much
do
you
expect
that
to
shift?
Have
you
had
conversations
around
that?
Are
there
studies
from
elsewhere?
D
I
don't
have
an
exact
percentage,
we've
done,
some
surveying
of
north
high
school
students
and
how
they
get
around
today
and
how
they
might
get
around
a
traffic
calmed
16th
avenue
north,
and
we
got
pretty
good
feedback
from
them
that
if
there
were
improvements
out
there
they
would
maybe
adjust
their
behaviors,
but
then
again
they
also
had
things
to
say
about
personal
safety
and
using
the
street.
So
it's
not
a
it's,
not
all
or
nothing
treatment
that
we're
expecting
out
here.
I
guess.
F
Is
that
something
that
you'll
be
tracking
to
see,
as
this
project
goes
forward,
how
it
has
impacted
or
following
up
with,
if
not
those
students
than
kids
of
a
similar
age,
to
see
how
it
changes
over
time
for
learning
from
in
the
future?.
D
Yeah,
I
think
that
would
be
something
that
it
would
be
warranted
following
up
with
them
at
a
later
date
and
seeing
how
things
change
and
behaviors
change.
H
Just
for
me
drafting
a
resolution
is
there?
Are
there
any
specific
elements
that
you
would
like
to
see
reflected
in
the
resolution.
D
H
So
I
have
written
and
just
for
everybody's,
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee
supports
efforts
to
reduce
vehicular
speed
and
increase
comfort
for
pedestrians
in
the
near
north,
safe
routes
to
school
project.
We
favor
the
installation
of
the
best
available
traffic
calming
devices
for
accomplishing
these
goals.
F
Yes,
they
they
shift
through
traffic
onto
our
rental
corridors,
higher
density
residential
corridors.
F
So
I
think
that
the
goal
is
best
served
by
not
prohibiting
through
traffic
but
reducing
speeds,
rather
than
forcing
more
pollution
onto
community
corridors
that
might
run
parallel
and
just
seeing
how
they've
worked
out
in
like
south
minneapolis,
I
think
that
they
kind
of
are:
they
reinforce
geographic
inequity
in
who's
exposed
to
air
pollution,
who's
exposed
to
high-speed
vehicles.
F
H
No,
no,
no
problem,
I
mean
I
don't
have
any
problem
with,
including
that
does
anybody
feel
strongly
one
way
or
the
other,
because.
E
Yeah,
I
guess
I
think
we
should
leave
the
option
of
the
diverter
in
just
so.
The
community
can
have
more
input
on
it
and
you
know
one
thing
that
could
be
done
is
this:
if
the
diver's
installed,
you
know
the
city
could
do
a
study
to
determine
where
that
you
know
1
000
cars
a
day
what
streets
of
those
cars
going
to
be
diverted
to,
and
then
then
the
community
can
make
a
more
educated
decision
on
whether
they
want
the
diverter
or
not.
F
Based
on
how
that
functions
like
I
am
in
an
area
that
has
divergent
traffic
diversion
that's
happening
based
on
one
ways
and
turn
restrictions
and
the
community
that
speaks
is
the
people
who
own
homes
on
the
the
res.
You
know
side
streets,
the
quote,
unquote
residential
corridors
and
it's
renters
who
pay
the
cost
of
it,
who
are
along
the
quote-unquote
arterial.
So
I
I
appreciate
the
goals
of
this,
but
I
worry
that
that
particular
tool
to
achieve
the
goals
is
reinforces
inequity
and
leaving
it
to
community.
F
We
don't
actually
have
systems
for
making
sure
that
things
are
equitable
within
minneapolis,
so
it
just
doesn't
seem
like
an
appropriate
tool
to
me
to
have
that's
one
of
the
options,
and
maybe
it's
a
separate
discussion
that
we
have
later.
We
just
don't
mention
it
one
way
or
the
other
in
this,
but
I
would
like
to
talk
through
that
issue
on
the
pack
at
some
point,
if
it's
more
controversial
than
for
today,.
H
I
just
don't
I
just
don't
have
I
mean
I
haven't
thought
about
the
issue
that
much
so
I
don't
have
a
strong
feeling
about
it.
Would
this
be
something
that
would
be
good
to
talk
about
it
like
pnp
meeting.
F
Yeah,
I
can
put
it
on
that
list,
or
I
mean
I
just
saw
that
we.
We
only
have
the
two
topics
for
today,
so
I
thought
I
wouldn't
have
brought
it
up
if
we
had
packed
agenda
so.
F
G
I
would
like
to
make
a
suggestion.
I
think
we
should
adopt
what
aaron
has
drafted
and
then
place
an
agenda
item
to
discuss
this
more
fully,
so
everyone's
kind
of
aware
that
they
want
to
weigh
in
on
it
and
think
about
it
a
bit.
I
think
that
might
be
the
best
way
to
handle
it
going
forward.
I
julie,
I
agree
with
you
that
we
should
put
it
on
and
then
as
an
agenda
item
and
and
then
I'd
leave
it
to
people
to
decide
whether
it's
p
and
p
or
ine.
C
And
you
know
actually,
since
forest
is
here,
I
think
it
might
be
a
good.
It
might
be
good
to
to
revisit
a
similar
treatment
that
he
worked
on
years
ago,
which
was
a
test
closure
of
a
street
in
ward,
2
and
seward
neighborhood,
which
is
very
similar
in
the
project,
and
he
did
evaluation
on
it
and
kind
of
looked
at
where
traffic
went
and-
and
I
don't
know,
we
should
look
at
the
results
because
and
I'll-
maybe
I'll
wait
for
the
pnp
conversation.
C
But
I
this
conversation
makes
me
kind
of
nervous,
and
I
don't
know
that
I
agree
with
some
of
the
points
that
you
know
that
I've
heard
so
far
and
happy
to
always
happy
to
wrestle
with
those
issues.
But
anyway,
I
think
my
main
point
that
I
was
bringing
up
was.
We
should
look
at
some
of
the
other
study
that
we've
done
on
these
type
of
treatments.
F
Have
we
looked
at
it
from
the
perspective
of
population
density
and
air
quality
equity
across
like
at
the
street
street
level,
because
I
don't
see
the
city
of
having
much
data
or
information
and
being
primarily
responsive
to
property
owners.
So.
H
G
F
I
appreciate
that
and
I
clarify
for
us-
this
is
not
about
this
project,
in
particular
anything
that
you're
presenting
to
us
so
much
as
bad
as
one
of
the
broader
city
tools
that
has
historically
been
used.
A
We'll
we'll
agree
that
that's
the
the
resolution
that
you
created
aaron
is
the
one
that
will
give
to
forest
for
this
project.
A
Good
all
right
anything
else
or
otherwise
I'm
going
to
move
this
to
the
next
agenda.
C
G
A
H
We
typically
don't
do
that.
We
don't
need
to
do
that.
G
A
A
I
Hi
everyone
thanks
for
having
me
my
name,
is
amy
morgan
associate
transportation
planner
with
our
transportation
planning
and
programming
division.
Nathan
kemmer
is
also
on
this
call
and
he's
the
project
engineer
for
this
project,
specifically
so
zoom
in
a
little
closer
here.
I
So
this
project
is
looking
to
do
pedestrian
safety
improvements
at
the
intersection
of
lasalle
and
west
14th
street
in
the
loring
park.
Neighborhood.
I
We
have
heard
from
both
the
council,
member
and
community
members
that
this
is
a
really
important
and
high
priority
intersection
that
needs
safety
improvements.
So
we
are,
we
had
the
opportunity
to
move
this
up
in
our
cip
by
a
couple
of
years,
and
so
we
are
working
to
get
this
implemented
this
year.
I
For
those
who
may
not
be
as
familiar
with
the
area.
Lasalle
is
a
two-lane,
one-way,
southbound,
roadway,
again
two
lanes
with
a
bike
lane
and
two
parking
lanes.
There
there's
also
a
number
of
uses
that
are
surrounding
there
that
create
a
lot
of
pedestrian
traffic
as
well
as
as
well
as
bikes
and
motor
vehicles.
I
If
you
look
towards
the
daily
users,
there's
just
about
1
500
pedestrians
that
use
this
intersection
every
day
about
400
cyclists
and
about
5600
vehicles.
So
there's
a
lot
a
lot
of
people
using
this
intersection
in
many
different
modes
which
can
cause
some
safety
issues
at
this
intersection,
which
we
have
seen
and
heard
from
community
members.
I
Looking
at
the
reported
crashes
over
the
last
three
years,
there's
been
a
total
of
29
crashes
at
this
intersection
over
a
quarter
of
which
resulted
in
injury.
So
both
the
data
and
again
community
members
are
telling
us
that
there's
a
safety
problem
here
and
we're
looking
to
address
that
with
this
with
this
project.
I
So
the
goal
of
this
project,
just
to
kind
of
summarize,
is
really
to
improve
and
enhance
the
comfort
and
predictability
of
the
intersection
for
all
users,
doing
that
by
cross
reducing
the
crossing
distance
for
pedestrians,
improving
the
sight
lines,
upgrading
the
curb
ramps
to
be
ada
compliant,
really
just
making
it
a
more
comfortable
intersection
for
everyone
and,
most
specifically
for
pedestrians.
I
We
are
in
early
stages
of
doing
data
collection
and
early
concept
development,
beginning
to
reach
out
to
stakeholders
near
this
intersection
to
hear
their
input
and
kind
of
bring
those
initial
ideas
out
to
them.
Our
goal
is
to
have
a
30
design
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
with
the
ability
to
then
go
into
more
detailed
engineering
with
a
hopeful
late
summer
fall
construction.
I
So
currently,
as
this
robot
exists,
a
little
too
far
there
to
cross
the
sail
here,
it's
about
40
feet
curved
to
curb.
14Th
is
31
feet
on
the
west
and
36
feet
curved
curb
on
the
east
side
of
that.
So
really,
the
goal
is
to
narrow
that
crossing
distance
as
much
as
possible,
and
so
we
are
looking
at
proposing
curve
extensions
at
each
of
the
corners
to
tighten
up
that
crossing
distance
as
much
as
possible
on
here.
We're
looking
at
seven
foot
curve
extensions
on
that
western
side.
I
G
I
have
a
couple
of
comments
looking
at
the
proposed
revision,
particularly
on
the
north
side
of
the
intersection,
it
looks
like
they're
still
maintaining
the
two
parking
lanes
and
they
go
quite
a
bit
south.
That,
I
think,
is
the
most
dangerous
thing
about
that
intersection
both
from
a
pedestrian
bicyclist
and
a
motor
vehicle
point
of
view
is
that
people
crossing
14th
or
attempting
to
cross
is
it's
just.
G
G
You
know
I
don't
know
if,
if
they're
wedded
to
those
parking
spots,
but
it
seems
like
backing
up
the
the
proposed
parking
by
you
know,
at
least
two
vehicles
gives
a
fighting
chance
for
a
pedestrian
to
cross
or
a
motor
vehicle
crossing
14th
that
the
the
the
sight
lines
are
so
poor
there
and
the
speeds
are
so
fast
on
lasalle
going
south
that
I
I
just
think
you
can't
make
it
more
safe
without
addressing
parking
on
the
north
side
of
the
intersection.
I
G
Yeah
I
mean
stop,
stop
parking
anywhere
in
close
to
the
intersection,
as
people
are
coming
by,
because
a
car
you
know
trying
to
trying
to
cross
east
west
on
14th
has
to
go
out
so
far
in
order
to
see
if
cars
are
coming
and
by
that
time
you
know
less
optimal,
things
can
happen,
and
it's
the
same
thing
I
think,
with
bicyclists,
particularly
trying
to
cross
on
14th
and,
of
course,
emerson,
schools
right
there,
so
that
that's
to
be
expected
that
there
will
be,
you
know,
cyclists,
and
that
kind
of
thing
I
just
think
you
know
pushing
the
parking
back
at
least
a
couple
of
spots
to
open
up
the
sight
lines
a
bit
is
is
warranted.
I
Yep,
so
I'm
you
may
be
familiar
with
this
back
in,
I
believe
it
was
2018.
There
was
a
push
from
the
community
to
pull
back
those
parking
spaces,
so
they
are
currently
30
feet
from
the
intersection.
We
don't
have
the
exact
dimensions
of
what
length
these
would
be.
I
There's
still
some
of
that
survey
work
that
needs
to
be
done
to
truly
understand
what
what
can
work
there,
but
it
is
a
definite
balance,
obviously
with
safety,
but
we
know
that
this
is
a
very
high
demand
parking
area
as
well,
so
just
trying
to
be
respectful
of
that
for
the
businesses,
but
also
prioritizing
pedestrian
safety.
Here
so
appreciate
that
comment.
G
Yeah
and
and
30
feet
is
nowhere
near
enough
because
you
know,
let's
say
an
suv
parks
in
the
in
the
closest
to
this
body.
Intersection.
That's
probably
18
feet,
and
you
know
it's
one
that
one
vehicle
parking
there
can
just
obscure
the
sight
lines
of
anyone
crossing
east,
west
and
14th.
I
think
30
feet
is
really
nominal
at
best.
G
I
Do
you
mean
for
the
bikeway?
It
is
not
in
the
new
transportation
action
plan
it's
identified
as
a
connector
rod.
It's
not
identified
as
the
as
a
triple
a
network
so
as
for
now,
there's
no
plans
for
any
improvements
to
that.
F
And
do
you
know
what
the
and
you
may
have
said
this
I'm
a
little
foggy-headed
today,
so
I
apologize
if
I'm
asking
you
to
repeat
yourself,
but
what?
What
are
the
speeds
and
what
are
the
bike
volumes
along
here?
I
it
is
so
miserable
across
that
it
just
feels
like
it
would
be
so
intimidating
to
be
biking
with
walls.
I
Yep,
so
we
so
we
don't
have
a
speed
study
done
on
this.
We
typically
would,
but
given
the
fact
that
this
project
moved
up,
we
can't
do
speed,
can't
get
speeds
during
winter,
and
so
we
don't
have
the
actual
data
for
that.
It
is
a
25
posted
speed
limit
on
this
roadway.
F
F
If
there's
any
way
of
doing
essentially
like
behind
the
curb
bike,
lane
thing
to
get
the
pedestrian
curve
further
and
reduce
the
crossing
distance
by
another
six
feet
or
anything
that
can
continue
to
narrow
that,
given
how
fast
vehicles
go
and
maybe
find
more
creative
solutions,
since
it's
not
uploading
a
protected
bike,
lane.
I
Yep
so
with
this
project,
we're
not
looking
at
changing
this
from
a
one-way
to
a
two-way.
As
far
as
I
know,
that
has
not
been
a
discussion
on
this
street.
I
As
for
the
bikeway,
that
is
a
question
that
got
brought
up
actually
the
other
day
and
it's
something
that
I'm
going
to
bring
back
to
the
our
project
team
to
see
if,
if
it's
feasible,
to
bring
it
behind
the
curb
kind
of
given
given
the
timeline
of
this
project
and
the
fact
that
this
is
not
on
a
triple
a
network,
I'm
not
sure
where
that
will
go,
but
I'm
definitely
open
to
exploring
that
option
and
seeing
what's
possible.
There.
A
A
So
would
you
like
a
resolution
from
us
today,
if
possible,.
E
I
have
one
more
question:
do
you
plan
on
putting
in
any
marked
crosswalks
in
as
part
of
the
project.
I
I
We
are
kind
of
looking
at
this
as
a
incremental
approach,
which
I
think
is
pretty
typical
for
our
projects
and
so
really
the
goal
here:
narrowing
that
roadway
increasing
the
safety
by
the
geometry
of
the
intersection,
with
the
intent
to
continue
to
evaluate
this,
and
if
we're
seeing
continued
safety
concerns,
then
looking
at
what
are
some
next
options
of
in
putting
in
a
crosswalk
or
what
have
you.
H
So
I
could
just
tell
you
what
I
have
so
far
and
you
could
tell
me
what
you'd
like
me
to
add,
especially
looking
for
input
from
people
who
are
familiar
with
this
intersection.
I
said
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee
supports
efforts
to
reduce
crossing
distances
at
lasell
avenue
and
west
14th
street.
We
asked
that
parking
be
taken
further
than
30
feet
from
the
intersection
anything
else
that
you'd
like
me
to
add.
F
H
So
we
asked
the
city
to
explore
a
curb
protected
intersection
for
the
bike
lane
to
further
narrow
crossing
distance.
H
G
And
I
would
perhaps
consider
adding
a
final
sentence
to
it.
Just
saying
that
opening
and
maintaining
sight
lines
is
vital
to
the
safety
for
all
modes
of
user.
For
this
intersection.
H
I
will
put
that
sentence
after
the
parking
sentence.
H
H
And
I
will
email
the
resolution
out
again
to
the
executive
committee
when
I'm
when
I'm
done
writing.
Okay,.
F
I'm
just
curious,
if
there's
anything
that
maybe
can
be
done
in
tangent,
with
this,
like
under
the
bridge,
to
remind
people
to
be
looking
out
for
people
walking
or
anything
like
that.
It
seems
like
something
about
that
going
under
the
lauren
greenway
just
makes
people
forget
that
they're
gonna
be
makes
drivers,
forget
that
there's
gonna
be
people
nearby
and
yeah
other
cues
for
drivers
to
be
slower.
F
Julia
julian,
I
mean
I'm
not
sure
what
it
could
be,
but
that
that
space
is
so
desolate
and
kind
of
feels
like
a
highway
thing,
and
I
feel,
like
that's
part
of
there's,
like
a
mindset
shift
that
is
maybe
happening
through
there.
There's
something
about
it
that
feels
inhuman
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
there's
people
again
and
drivers
are
already
flooring
it.
I
So
we
don't
have
that
as
part
of
this
project.
Realistically,
that's
outside
the
scope
of
this,
but
I
think
it
is
a
valid
point
just
having
those
some
sort
of
reminder
for
people
driving
whatever
it
may
be,
but
I
think,
as
we
start
doing,
infrastructure
like
this,
I
think
it
helps
provide
that
understanding
that
we
are.
I
This
is
a
pedestrian
environment,
trying
to
narrow
that
visually
for
drivers
to
help
improve
that
safety,
but
yeah.
Thank.
B
A
All
right
are
there
any
any
announcements
or
anybody
have
anything
they
want
to
share
before
we
close
this
meeting,
I
don't
think
so.
Okay
glad
to
see
matt
and-
and
I
saw
somebody
else
and
one
of
the
new
members
here
but
anyway
glad
to
have
you
here
glad
to
see
you
coming
to
the
ind
meeting
thanks
man.