►
Description
View Marked Agenda
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/Board/MarkedAgenda/CLIC-HD/2454
View Minutes
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/Download/CommitteeReport/1835/CLICHD-05052021-Minutes.pdf
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
C
E
B
I'm
going
to
also
call
the
names
of
members
who
are
going
through
the
approval
process.
Eamonn
gallagher.
E
A
A
Okay,
today,
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
continue
with
the
process
that
we
began
with
last
last
week.
We're
we're
rating
these
various
projects.
Let
me
get
to
that
spreadsheet.
A
A
clerk
robert.
H
F
H
A
Okay,
hearing
no
objection,
let's
move
on
okay,
so
we're
on
the
fourth
police
precinct
before
we
jump
in
here.
I
I
just
want
to
make
the
point
that
today
we're
going
to
get
through
all
of
all
of
the
projects
that
are
before
us,
so
we're
going
to
have
to
move
at
a
clip
in
order
to
to
meet
our
deadlines.
A
So
what
I'm
gonna
suggest
is
to
the
extent
that
we
can
live
with
the
discussion
that
was
held
last
year
and
probably
the
last
three
or
four
years
for
the
individual
projects.
Let's
do
so,
if
you
have
any
major
concerns,
please
bring
them
up.
Remember
that
this
is
just
a
preliminary
rating
to
to
provide
guidance
to
to
the
rest
of
the
clique,
which
means
also
the
transportation
task
force.
A
I
A
You'll
get
this
that's
correct.
Robert.
H
A
Okay,
great,
thank
you.
Why
don't
we
get
started?
Okay,
mpd05,
the
fourth
police
precinct.
Let's
start
at
the
beginning
again,
so
we
did
change
it
from
desirable
to
important
and
we
were
at
the
point
of
deciding
whether
it
contributes
to
city
goals,
to
have
a
police.
Fourth
police
precinct,
rich.
J
For
this
and
anything
really
it's
too
bad
to
start
it
with
this
one.
If
you
could
just
call
out
why,
oh
am
I
a
mute?
No,
no
you're
good.
Do
we
hear
you
just
explain
why
this
gets
a
little
or
no
contribution.
A
The
reason
this
is
from
last
year,
so
what
you're
looking
at
is
last
year's
rating.
The
reason
it
was
put
at
little
or
no
contribution
was
because
we
were
unsure,
since
there
was
little
guidance
from
the
from
the
council
or
the
mayor
as
to
what
the
new
configuration
of
policing
might
be,
whether
it
was
going
to
be
a
decentralized
policing
force,
in
other
words
having
substations
everywhere.
So
this
was
not
a
rating
of
the
project
itself
per
se
was
due
to
the
lack
of
policy
guidance.
J
Okay,
I
saw
a
few
of
those
in
other
projects
as
well.
It
looks
like
they've
just
submitted
them
as
placeholders
are
those
just
dismissed
somehow
by
these
rankings.
A
They
are
not
dismissed
the
these.
The
the
rankings
are
all
it's
a
public
record
of
how
every
single
one
of
these
is
ranked,
so
it
doesn't
disappear.
It
just
appears
as
a
low
score
later.
If
we,
we
are
not
locked
into
what
was
done
last
year,
I
think.
Last
year
we
were
in
the
middle
of
a
lot
of
uncertainty
at
this
time
of
the
year.
Yep,
that's
clear,
we
just
didn't
know
what
to
do.
A
There's
probably
more
clarity
now
than
there
was
last
year
for
some
people,
and
if,
if
you
want
to
change
the
contribution
city
goals,
it
makes
sense
we're
in
the
learning
process,
thor.
K
Thor
yep
yeah.
Thank
you.
I
was
wondering
as
far
as
a
comment
you
know,
I
know
we're
policing.
I
don't
want
to
go
too
far
down
that
I
had
an
autom
automatic
rifle
file
fired
on
my
block
this
past
friday,
so
those
things
are
of
concern
for
me.
The
one
thing
I
was
wondering
as
far
as
comments
is:
can
we
encourage
the
the
city
council
with
buildings
and
whatnot
to
look
at
kind
of
that
public
safety
model
as
they
do
designs
for
the
building
of
saying
this?
K
A
Absolutely
and
robert,
could
we
make
a
note
of
that
and
or
I'd
like
to
get
back
to
you
about
possibly
helping
us
draft
that
comment
that
that
will
state
that
I'm
sure
there'll
be
other
people
also
engaged
in
this,
because
it's
one
of
the
more
important
issues
faced
by
our
city
right
now:
okay,
so
great
kitty.
A
I
When
the
city
decides
being
an
architecture,
I
know
that's
part
of
the
programming,
because
you
can't
design
a
building
unless
you
know
who's
going
to
well,
you
can,
but
you
have
to
know
who's
going
in
there,
because
each
section
has
a
different
square
footage
need
and
bathroom
need,
so
all
that'll
be
programmed
in
when
they
decide
who's
going
to
be
in
there.
So
us
making
comments
about
it
is
somewhat
redundant.
I
mean,
if
there's
going
to
be
mental
health
care
workers
or
or
facilities
for
mental
health
care
people.
A
They
really
need
to
come
up
with
a
solid
proposal
and
right
now
it
what
you
see
in
the
the
c,
the
in
the
capital
request
is
about
all
the
information
we
have.
So
what
we'd
be
doing
is
giving
them
permission
to
explore,
explore
coming
up
with
an
alternative
to
the
fourth
precinct.
A
Correct,
okay,
with
that,
I
think
we
need
to
move
on
robert
if
we
could
get
back
to
that
do.
Do
we
have
someone
who
would
like
to
make
a
motion
as
to
how
we
should
rate
this
as
contribution
city
goals
for
2020
to
2027?
C
A
Okay,
if
not
robert,
I
think
we
have
this
to
moderate.
A
Okay,
let's
move
on
to
the
next
one,
which
is
traffic
traffic
maintenance,
facility,
improvement.
A
Are
there
any
comments,
any
thoughts,
what
I'm
going
to
recommend
if
there
aren't
any
significant
comments,
thoughts
or
concerns
that
we
leave
it
at
the
score
it
was
last
year.
A
A
Any
comments,
thoughts.
Okay
with
that
I
we're
going
to
maintain
the
rating
from
last
year.
Let's
go
to
psd
16
farmers,
market
improvements.
I
You
know
that
market
is
really
important
to
a
whole
lot
of
things
and
the
fact
that
it's
reven
revenue
generating
so
it's
I
mean,
even
though
they
need
the
money.
It's
also
gonna
rev
generate
revenue.
I
So
I
think
it
really
should
be
moved
up
to
important
it's
a
very
important
aspect
for
quite
a
few
people.
I
don't
know
if
you've
all
been
there,
but
it's,
I
think,
a
centerpiece
of
the
city,
an
important
centerpiece
of
the
city.
A
Right,
that's
where
I
get
my
christmas
tree.
So
any
other
comments
us
too.
I
A
So
kitty,
would
you
like
to
make
that
emotion?
Can
I
absolutely.
I
A
Okay,
any
discussion
here.
A
H
Oh,
I'm
sorry
eric
just
a
quick
point
of
clarification
are
we?
Is
it
staying
the
same
on
contribution
to
city
goals
as
well?
I
I
was
trying
to
bring
up
the
project
on
a
separate
screen
and
I
may
have
missed
if
it
stayed
the
same
or
if
it
was
going
to
change.
H
I
have
it
as
a
moderate
contribution
to
to
city
goals
based
on
last
year.
A
A
Okay,
there
we
go
last
year
was
moderate
contribution.
A
So
we're
moving
it
from
project
priority
is
up
to
to
the
proposal
was
significant.
A
And
contribution
city
goals
kitty
go
ahead.
A
Okay,
any
discussion
here
at
rich.
J
I
think
we
should
decide
whether
we
either
raise
the
priority
or
the
goals,
but
not
both.
Okay.
A
It's
fair
to
say,
kitty.
I
J
J
I
Okay-
and
I
believe
it
does-
I've
done
a
lot
of
research
on
it
and
it's
a
center
point
where
a
lot
of
people
get
their
food.
A
lot
of
people
make
their
living
and
it's
also
revenue
generating.
It
generates
revenue
for
the
city,
and
I
don't
think-
and
it's
not
like
one
project's
gonna,
go
on
another
project.
Isn't
I
like
to
look
at
these
as
individual
contributors
to
a
city
rather
than
one
beats
out
the
other?
Well
I
mean.
A
In
the
end,
it
will
rank,
I
mean
they'll,
be
in
an
overarching
ranking
of
everything,
so
something
will
be
over
the
other,
which
is
one
reason
to
reserve
some
space
above
this
project.
G
Yeah,
I'm
just
maybe
curious
in
terms
of
grounding
it
in
the
enumerated
city
goals,
which
I
guess
I
can
see
the
economic
development
and
the
kind
of
environmental
and
the
revenue
generating
impact,
but
as
compared
to
other
projects,
I'm
having
maybe
a
tough
time,
seeing
how
it
fits
into
those
that
are
listed
in
in
a
strong
way.
Rather
than
moderate.
I
Sorry
I
was
looking
for
my
sheet
on
all
of
that
and
it's
eluding
me.
So
you
know
when
I
look
at
city
goals,
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
them.
Some
of
them
are
soft
goals
and
you
know,
as
as
you
guys
would
probably
say,
soft
feeling
goals,
but
they're
all
but
they're,
just
as
important
as
buildings,
I
mean
you
guys
believe
that
we
need
a
new
fourth
precinct.
I
don't
because
I've
been
to
the
fourth
precinct,
it's
my
precinct.
I
So
when,
when
I
look
at
the
city
goals
in
its
entirety,
the
farmers
market
is
really
quite
a.
A
We
need
to
keep
moving
here,
so
I'm
going
to.
Let's
do
two
two
more
comments:
luke
and
then,
and
then
robert
luke.
L
Yeah
eamon
essentially
addressed
what
I
wanted
to
say,
but
I
would
just
add
that
I
also
agree
with
rich
that
we
should
choose
one
or
the
other,
and
I
would
like
to
suggest
that
we,
if
it
you
know,
it
seems
like
it's
very
important
to
katrina,
that
we
move
it
up
in
at
least
one,
if
not
both.
So
maybe
we
move
it
up
on
the
contribution
city
goals,
because
that
has
a
wider
points
range,
and
so
it
would
allow
you
to
add
more
points
to
it.
H
I
was
just
jumping
in
to
check
in
with
with
justin,
actually
and
see
whether
whether
at
this
point
after
enough
discussion,
a
roll
call
vote
or
something
might
might
be
helpful.
I
don't
know
if
we
can
do
that.
B
Yeah
and
eric
just
I'll
defer
to
your
guidance
as
chair,
but
an
option
would
be
given
the
great
discussion
around
this.
If
someone
does
want
to
make
a
motion
to
list
this
as
either
important
or
significant
and
either
moderate
or
strong
get
a
second
and
then
we
can
have
some
discussion,
a
roll
call
vote,
and
if
that
receives
a
majority
vote,
then
that's
where
it's
set
and
if
not,
we
can
go
with
another
motion.
A
Okay,
so
I'm
gonna
go
in
a
different
direction:
justin
I'm
going
to
take
kitties
kitties
motion,
which
is
to
up
up
the
project
priority
to
significant
and
the
contribution
to
strong,
and
then
we'll
do
a
second
vote.
If
there
is
a
second
vote
to
what
luke
recommended,
I
believe
that's
a
the
concrete
alternative.
A
Okay
without
objection.
Let's
take.
This
is
just
just
raise
your
hands.
Okay,
so
kitty's
suggestion
which
is
up
to
significance
for
project
priority
and
up
it's
a
strong
contribution
for
city
goals.
Just
raise
oh
gosh
they're
people
who
I
can't
see
here.
B
A
Okay,
so
let's
go
to
luke's
option,
which
is
leave
it
as
important
for
project
priority
and
strong
contribution
on
city
goals.
Is
that
accurate,
luke.
L
G
A
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
and
it's
been
seconded
robert,
your
hands
up.
A
Okay,
I'll
take
it
back
all
right:
let's
do
a
quick
roll
call.
B
Not
part
of
that
that's
fine
luke
cunningham.
L
F
A
B
A
Okay,
let's
move
on
to
the
next
one
city
hall
and
new
public
service
center,
okay,
so
a
little
history
on
why
it's
desirable.
A
I
think
this
was
a
little
bit
of
passive
aggressive
on
our
part,
because
we
did
not
receive
the
the
proposal
in
first
place
and
they
introduced
us
as
the
project
was
90
complete.
So
we
have
consistently
said
it.
It's
it's
not
a
high
priority,
any
questions,
any
statements.
A
M
I'll
just
say,
I
think
you
know
the
city
of
minneapolis,
really,
you
know
providing
good
workspace
for
the
city.
Employees,
I
think,
is
one
of
the
you
know
one
of
the
responsibilities
of
any
employer,
especially
the
city
and
consolidating
people
into
the
public
service
center
and
reconfiguring.
Folks,
I
think,
makes
a
lot
of
sense
from
an
operational
standpoint,
so
I
would
say
we
need
to
get
past
our
our
own
ego
and
maybe
rate
it
appropriately.
G
I
was
wondering
if
this
would
maybe
be
a
point
that
could
be
made
more.
I
I
didn't
look
specifically
at
the
comments
from
last
year,
but
is
this
something
that
we
could
transfer?
Maybe
some
of
that
critique
to
the
comments
and
maybe
move
the
priority
up
this
year.
A
That
that's
a
good
suggestion.
The
project
is
almost
over.
It's
almost
complete
and,
however,
I
think
we
can
use
the
comment
process
to
to
speak
to
some
of
the
current
concerns
we
may
have,
for
example,
37
million
dollars
cost
overrun.
A
I
mean
that's,
certainly
something
that
we
may
want
to
raise
in
a
comment
so
ayman,
if
you're
willing
to
work
on
that
I'll
work
with
you
and
anyone
else
who
wants
to
work
on
that
comment.
A
A
A
A
If
not,
let's
move
on
to
the
next
we're
going
to
leave
it
at
last
year's
rating
regulator,
services,
psd,
22.,
any
comments.
A
A
Okay:
let's
go
to
psd23,
that's
the
mpd
training
and
wellness.
H
It
was
new
last
year
and
it's
it's
for
various
solar
project
improvements
on
city,
city-owned,
property.
I
Should
be
a
strong
contribution
and
in
there
he's
asking
for
a
hundred
two
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars
more
to
hire
project
managers.
This
is
actually
revenue.
It's
going
to
save
money
in
the
long
run.
This
is
definitely
one
of
those
well-spent
projects
and
they're
ahead
of
goals,
and
it
should
be
done
as
soon
as
possible.
I
Well,
given
so
this,
these
projects
can
be
shovel
ready
per
se
as
soon
if,
depending
on
what's
in
the
budget,
and
if
brian
has
everybody
lined
up
to
do
them
right
away,
we'll
be
first
in
line
for
the
solo
projects,
any
additional
money
with
the
government
and
one
of
the
things,
because
so
many
people
are
doing
solar.
Now,
it's
wrangling,
everybody
together
and
I
don't
know
if
anybody
believes
in
the
climate
crisis,
but
this
is
one
of
the
ways
that
we're
going
to
get
out
of
it.
That's
why
it's
significant
it's
critical.
A
Okay,
thank
you
I'd
like
to
let
let's
see,
let's
go
to
eamon
and
then
rich,
amen,
yeah.
G
Just
to
expand
on
what
katrina
was
saying,
I
would
agree
with
her
assessment
that
it's
a
strong
contribution
then
also
maybe
say
that
this
is
something
we
could
put
into
the
comments
of
given
that
the
potential
influx
of
federal
money
that
more
projects
like
this
could
be
kind
of
encouraged
because
it'll
be
a
greater
total
amount
and
kind
of
moving
more
in
this
direction.
Given
the
the
contribution
of
city
goals,
so
I'd
volunteer,
I
guess
to
help
with
the
comments
for
that
as.
J
Rich,
my
comment
is
again:
the
definition
of
critical
is
quite
clear,
impeding
current
services,
something
that's
broken
that
needs
fixed
asap.
J
A
I
I
emotion
that
we
put
into
critical
because
it
is
broken
as
if
we
continue
to
pay
for
and
use
the
services
from
excel
as
more
co2
goes
into
the
environment.
That's
critical!
C
A
Okay,
I
think
we're
we'll,
let's,
let's
call
a
roll
call
on
this
vote
for
on
kitty's,
critical
and
strong
contribution
and
after
that,
if
it
doesn't
pass
and
we'll
ask
for
a
friendly
amendment
from
rich's
richard's
suggestion
that
we
take
it
down
to
significant
okay
roll
call.
A
L
Yeah,
I
just
had
a
question
before
we
do
this
in
all
of
these
projects
really,
and
for
me,
I'm
new.
I
think
a
lot
of
us
on
this
committee
are,
if
it's
not
listed
at
critical,
that
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
the
council
won't
adopt
it
and
take
action
right
like
so.
It
doesn't
need
to
be
critical
in
order
to
get
correct
through.
A
A
L
So
we
can
still
could
we
author,
a
comment
that
expresses
our
I
mean
as
a
millennial
as
someone
with
a
young
daughter
like
I
feel
this
similar,
but
based
on
the
definition
that
rich
pointed
out.
I
also
feel
that
it
doesn't
meet
the
criteria
of
critical,
and
so
you
know
that's,
naturally,
that's
sort
of
a
point
of
tension,
but
if
we
are
to
do
our
jobs
as
it
stated
we
we
should
acknowledge
these
definitions
and
work
within
them.
I
think.
F
A
A
Okay,
jocelyn
and
then
we're
gonna
go
back
to
the
vote.
F
Understood
so
what
I
would
say
is
is
that
we
are
trying
to
come
to
a
consensus
on
this,
but
if
you
on
your
individual
sheet
want
to
rate
things
as
strong
contribution
and
critical,
you
have
that
opportunity
if
we
are
just
trying
to
get
through
what
we,
as
the
hd
committee,
are
yeah
as
the
hd
committee
are.
Are
these
are
proposals?
This
is
not.
This
is
not
concrete.
So
if,
in
some
places
you
disagree,
you
can
disagree
on
as
you
score.
A
So
so
understood
my
kitty,
may
I
make
a
alternative
motion,
which
is
to
go
with
significant
and
strong
contribution,
but
have
a
well
well-written
comment
expressing
the
sentiment
of
click
that
this
is
a
high
priority
that
affects
so
many
other
programs,
be
besides
this
one.
I
Yeah,
of
course,
eric
that's
really
great,
but
you
know
me
I'm
going
to
the
re
the
way
I
read
definitions
and
the
way
I
understand
them
in
the
real
world
may
be
different
from
others.
So,
in
order
not
to
do
a
whole
voting
thing
sure
that's
fine.
A
Okay,
great
thank
you
kitty,
so
luke
I
hear
you
signing
up
to
help
us
write
author.
That
comment.
A
Okay
and
kitty,
if
you
you're
on
three
others,
so
it
would
be
great
if
you
could
also
help
with
this
one.
Anyone
else
want
to
volunteer
just
send
me
a
note
and
we'll
put
you
on
with
that
degree,
to
write
that
comment.
Okay,
let's
move
on
to
the
new
one,
which
is
the
911
psd25.
A
H
A
Significant
and
strong
contribution-
okay,
that's
silver,
okay,
9-1-1
any
discussion
here.
A
Year,
kitty.
I
I
have
a
question
if
there,
if
this
wasn't
on
last
year
and
then
for
next
year,
they
need
70,
you
know
7.2
million
dollars
already
this.
This
was
kind.
How
did
it
move
move
in
so
quick,
or
is
that
typical.
C
C
I
C
A
C
A
This
is
to
help
people
recall
what
this
was
about.
H
And,
and
to
I
think,
related
to
the
point-
that's
before
the
group
right
now,
this
project
receives
no
points
for
being
in
the
six-year
consecutive
request
category
right.
I've
got
that
kind
of
hidden
on
the
sheet
that
we
have
right
now,
but.
A
So
fundamentally,
what
they're
saying
is
that
the
current
facility
that
is
not
adequate
for
the
current
services
and
the
staffing
that
that
they
are
supporting,
could
you
go
down
a
bit
more,
so
you
can
see
the
cost
breakdown.
H
Oh
sure
yeah.
No,
I
absolutely
can't
this
is
going
to
be
a
project.
That's
going
to
that
will
be
competing
with
others
for
the
city's
limited
amount
of
you
know
what
are
essentially
general
obligation,
property
tax,
supported
bonds
that
are
available
through
this
capital
programming
process,
and
so,
if
this
project
is
determined
to
score
really
really
well,
it
will
likely
displace
another
project.
That's
competing
for
these
sorts
of
bonds.
If
this
project
does
not
score
particularly
well,
it
will
be
one
of
the
unfunded
unfunded
projects.
H
That's
recommended
to
the
mayor's
office
and
another
project
will
essentially
receive
the
programming
for
our
limited
pool
of
bonds
and
we'll
get
into.
I
think
a
lot
of
these
details
once
we
get
into
programming
which
starts
in
june,
you
know,
but
the
city
only
has
50
55
million
dollars
of
of
these
sorts
of
bonds
available
for
projects,
and
this
is
where
the
capital
long-range
improvement
committee's
rankings
really
do
result
in
meaningful
programming
decisions,
projects.
C
Second,
I've
been
down
into
the
space
I've
seen
this
space.
The
space
is
very
tight.
They
need
to
do
something
with
it.
It's
not.
I
don't
want
to
be
working
there
personally,
because
everything's,
it's
just.
It
needs
to
be
redone
that
space
is
not
a
good
space
for
working
for
the
employees
down
there.
It's
down
in
the
basement,
in
the
bowels
of
the
city
of
the
city,
hall,
okay,.
I
Yeah,
I
was
just
the
reason
for
my
question
is
because,
as
a
master
plan
study
was
conducted
in
2017
and
that's
why
I
asked
the
question
is:
how
come
it
wasn't
put
in
until
now,
and
then
they
need
the
money
next
next
year.
That
was
just
the
only
reason
for
the
question.
I
would
have
thought
that
they
would
have
put
it
in
sooner
so
did
they
wait
till
it's
like
critical.
C
I
think
I
think
some
I
think
the
new
building
has
impacted
all
of
this.
I
think
there's
some
impact
there
with
this
new
building
with
staff
moving
around
and
seeing
that
space
like
I
said,
it's
not
a
good
space,
so
I
think
that
had
some
impact
on
that
building
period,
okay,.
A
So
we
need
to
move
on
I'd
like
to
entertain
a
motion
to
for
a
couple
of
rankings
here:
project,
priority
and
contribution
city
goals.
A
K
A
E
I'll,
second,
that
that's,
I
agree
with.
A
A
Great,
thank
you.
We
have
a.
We
have
a
motion
and
it's
been
seconded
that
we
psd
25
the
911
space,
be
ranked
as
significant
with
a
strong
contribution.
A
Are
there
I'm
going
to
put
this
out
on
the
floor?
Are
there
any
objections.
J
In
my
sheet
that
whole
page
was
blank,
there
was
nothing
in
it.
I
gave
everything
a
zero
okay.
H
M
H
Yes,
rodney
olsen
did
respond
and
we
actually
have
that
that
google
sheet,
where
we're
trying
to
capture
a
lot
of
the
back
and
forth,
and
we
have
some
responses
that
have
been
put
into
that
sheet
too.
A
H
Okay,
here
we
go,
it
was
we
have
information,
that's
been
published
in
the
story.
Now
it
looks
like
it.
Just
wasn't,
wasn't
actually
published
out.
J
H
Folks,
this
is
robert.
It
sounds
like
the
idea
is
to
table
this.
One,
I'm
assuming
nobody's,
had
a
chance
to
review
any
information
related
to
this
project,
and
so
that
certainly
sounds
like
the
idea
looks
like
eric
dropped
out
of
the
meeting
for
a
second,
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm.
A
Thank
you,
I'm
not
touching
anything.
Okay,
so
did
we
did
anyone
have
a
look
at
that
red
the
new
or
is
it
not
loaded
yet.
B
A
A
You
know
what
I'm
going
to
table
it.
Let's
move
on
to
the
next
one
and
we'll
deal
with
the
with
rad02
at
the
next
meeting:
okay,
water,
35,
renewable
energy
at
water
treatment.
A
Okay,
one
second
kitty.
I
So
you
know
what
I'm
gonna
say.
So
you
know
under
the
critical
definition
it
says
public
endangerment,
if
not
corrected,
I'm
just
going
to
reiterate
as
long
as
they're
buying
energy
from
excel
that's
putting
co2
in
the
atmosphere.
That's
public
endangerment,
one
of
the
other
aspects
of
this
project
is,
it
will
save.
It
will
reduce
electricity
charges
between
sixty
five
thousand
and
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
a
year.
I
So
I
would
suggest
moving
it
to
critical
and
having
it
ready
that
right
now
they
have
it
listed
for
2024,
but
I
really
think
they
should
look
at
this
of
having
this
ready
to
proceed
where
funds
become
available,
but
it
I
mean
as
long
as
they're
buying
energy
from
excel
there's
co2
growing
in
the
atmosphere.
A
G
Eamonn,
I
would
I
I
agree
with
katrina
that
it's
an
important
issue
that
maybe
much
like
the
solar
issue.
There
could
be
maybe
a
broader
discussion
of
the
comments
about
the
importance
of
this
and
maybe
other
opportunities
for
energy
heavy
utilities
within
the
city
to
to
look
into
renewable
energy
with
that
influx
of
federal
money.
So
I
just
volunteered
to
help
the
comment
on
that
great.
C
We
have
just
interject
with
chris
christina
said
we
have
in
the
past.
We
have
up
projects
to
a
future
year
to
sooner
rather
than
later.
So
what
you're
saying
that
can't
happen?
We've
done
it
in
the
past.
You
made
the
recommendation
that
the
24
is
not
good,
let's
bring
it
to
22
or
21
or
whatever.
So
that
has
been
done.
A
Okay,
I'd
like
a
motion,
please!
Oh
I'm
sorry,
luke.
L
C
A
Great
great,
we
might
be
able
to
consolidate
all
those
comments
into
a
section
on
environmental
energy
and
perhaps
climate
change.
Okay,
that
said,
any
objections
to
leaving
it
where
it
is
a
significant
and
strong
contribution.
A
Okay
with
that,
let's
move
on.
A
If
no
objections,
let
me
see
all
of
these,
I'm
gonna
suggest
we.
We
look
at
all
seven
of
these
as
one
package,
it's
pretty
much
all
about
public
about
the
buildings.
Let
me
see
here.
J
I
F
I
I
A
Any
discussion
rich.
J
Were
those
improvements
called
out
in
the
proposal?
I
didn't
see
that.
A
It
was
during
the
the
presentation:
what
were
they?
They
were.
A
J
Didn't
see
those
in
the
written
in
the
written
document,
but
I
trust
you
on
that.
A
Yeah
there
was
a
drawing
of
the
fourth
street
entrance,
as
well
as
the
planters,
and
I
believe,
kitty
suggested
that
they
be
integrated
as
artwork
kitty.
Am
I
correct?
Is
that.
I
G
Right:
okay,
ayman:
I
was
just
a
little
curious
how
this
might
interact
with
the
the
9-1-1
of
operations
that
are
currently
taking
place
in
that
building.
If
a
lot
of
the
needs
that
they
have
for
their
operations
are
covered,
maybe
by
I'm
just
not
sure
the
extent
to
which
that
could
maybe
delay
that
project
or
be
taken
into
account.
The
comment,
because
there
are
significant
electrical
changes.
It
looks
like
in
the
proposal.
A
Okay,
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that
question
dan,
we'll
we'll
come
back
eamon.
M
Well,
I
think
in
the
past
my
my
understanding
of
this
project
was
that
they're
gonna
put
up
some
new
street
lights
and
new
sidewalk
and
I
think
they've
upgraded
it
to
a
little
bit
more
on
building
safety,
and
you
know
I
don't
think
it
really
answered
the
previous
question.
I
don't
think
it
really
impacts
the
911
center,
it's
a
big
building
on
the
other
side
of
the
building.
D
I
If
you
look
at
federal
buildings,
they've
all
instituted
those-
I
don't
know
what
they're
called
eric
those
big
concrete
abutments.
So
you
can't
run
into
the
building.
N
A
M
And
I'd
like
to
include
in
the
comment
about
you
know
looking
at
screening
security
screening
entering
the
building
as
well.
I
think
it's
ridiculous
that
that's
the
one
public
building
downtown
that
doesn't
have
that.
You
know
someone
could
walk
in
there
and
you
see
mass
shootings
on
a
daily
basis
basis
right.
A
Right
so
dan,
I
hear
you
volunteering
to
work
with
someone
else
to
come
with
some
comments
for
the
click
report:
yeah.
Okay,
robert.
Would
you
take
that
down?
Please.
A
So
I
I
I
need
to
revise
what
I
was
saying.
We
can
only
do
that
on
the
first
five,
then
the
second
two,
the
last
two
are
new,
so
we're
gonna
have
to
come
up
with
ratings
for
the
last
two,
so
kitty's
motion
is
still
on
the
floor
regarding
moving
it
up
to
critical.
A
A
Okay,
I'm
going
to
call
the
question
all
those
in
and
I
don't
want
to
do
this.
Are
there
any
objections?
A
C
These
have
been
ongoing
projects
that
has
been
needed,
so
they
have
been
working
on
this.
For
you
know,
they've
moderate
they've
done
some
of
the
elephants.
They've
done
some
of
the
electricity.
It's
an
ongoing
project,
it's
an
old
building
to
give
you
that.
So
we've
had
conversation
about
those
projects,
elevators
and
electricity,
and
everything
in
that
building.
So.
A
So
willie
is
this:
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
this
is
the
last
elevator
that
needs
to
be
modernized.
Yeah,
all
the
other
elevators
in
the
building.
A
M
And
I'll,
just
I'm
just
going
to
add
that
you
know
everything
else
is
done.
This
is
kind
of
one
that
was
used
for
by
property
and
evidence.
It's
not
in
use
anymore
or
not.
I
don't
see
it
as
a
critical
need
at
all.
I
see
it
as
more
like
a
desirable
okay.
As
far
as
that
goes,
I
mean,
I
think
they
should
obviously
upgrade
the
elevators,
but
I
don't
think
it's.
I
think
this
is
an
ad
that
I
mean
they've
operated
the
building
without
this
elevator
for
public
operations
for
a
long
time.
A
A
Okay,
moderate
okay:
we
have
a
motion
here,
desirable
and
moderate.
A
Are
there
any?
Is
there
a
second.
A
Okay,
okay,
amen;
second,
did
it?
Are
there
any
objections?
C
A
Okay,
kitty.
I
I
actually
move
this
to
critical,
because
when
you
re
we
see
if
you,
when
you
look
at
the
report,
I
can't
imagine
that
this
building
is
functioning
the
way
it
is
and
if
there's
something
if
something
goes
wrong,
it's
it
would
be
disastrous
for
the
city
and
not
to
mention
embarrassing.
A
Okay,
would
you
like
to
would
you
like
to
move
a
project
priority
and
a
contribution
city
goals
rating?
This
is
a
new
project.
I
A
Okay,
as
a
side
note,
the
city
city
hall
is
not
exactly
all
in
within
code,
so
that's
something
we've
known
for
a
while.
Okay,
so
we
have
a
motion
here.
Is
there
a
second
critical
and
strong
contribution.
A
Following
for
a
second
jake
beckham,
okay,
we
have
a
motion
and
seconded
any
objections.
A
J
No
objection
per
se,
but
I
think
this
might
be
the
opportunity
to
circle
back
to
the
critical
and
strong
contribution
for
the
farmers
market
and
how
you
would
compare
this
against
upgrades
to.
You
know
a
public
building
of
critical
facility.
J
I
think
this
underlines
the
example
of
why
it
is
important
to
sort
of
stick
to
these
from
a
practical
and
needful
sense.
As
opposed
to
you
know
what
looks
good
you
know
in
the
newspaper.
A
Point
well
taken
and
just
a
reminder
to
everyone
and
kitty
I'll
get
to
you
in
a
second,
I
reminded
to
everyone
that
these
are
just
recommendations.
So
when
you
do
your
individual
rankings,
you
don't
have
to
stick
with
what
we
come
up
with
here.
It's
just
a
sort
of
an
expression
of
consensus
here
and
it
provides
guidance
to
the
transportation
task
force
as
they
do
their
rankings
kitty.
I
I
guess
we
all
have
our
opinions
and
priorities
and
ideas,
what
public
endangerment,
if
not
correct
means-
and
there
are
a
lot
of
things
that,
if
aren't
corrected
our
public
endangerment,
it
goes
well
beyond
just
the
safety
of
a
building
being
a
you
know,
being
a
building
code
person
myself,
there's
a
lot
more
to
life
than
just
you
know,.
A
Okay,
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
call
this
question.
We
have
a
motion
on
the
floor,
which
is
kitties
to
to
rank
it
as
critical
and
with
strong
contribution,
and
we
have
a
second
from
jake.
I
believe
with
that
said,
are
there
any
objections
to
this.
A
Ranking,
if
not
justin,
you
have
been
waiting
patiently.
Are
you
reminding
us
about
time.
B
A
Okay,
let's
get
moving
okay,
so
so
in
the
past,
we're
moving
to
the
parks
right
now
so
park.
020304.
A
J
Again,
sorry,
no
specific
question
about
the
proposals.
I'd
like
a
quick
review
on
this
overall,
it
seems
like
there
were
two
or
three
major
funding
requests
that
covered
everything,
and
it
wasn't
clear
to
me
whether
those
cover
the
individual
parks
and
part.
Two
of
my
question
is:
what
were
there
like
22
separate
parks
proposed
how
how
in
the
past
do
we
prioritize
them
between
each
other
they're,
all
about
the
same
price
about
a
million
dollars
per
park?
Some
of
them
have
been
requested
sooner
some
later.
J
Do
we
round
robin
per
neighborhood
and
try
to
make
it
fair
across
the
cities?
Do
we
just
come
in
as
first
ask
first
served?
What's
the
guidance
here.
A
Okay,
I'm
gonna
make
a
quick
comment
in
the
robert
and
then
we're
gonna
go
to
to
bill
graves.
My
quick
comment
is
that
the
priorities
are
set
by
the
the
by
the
poor
park
board
based
on
equity.
A
So
if,
if
you're
wondering
what
the
criteria
are
a
few
years
ago,
the
click
asked
the
the
park
board
to
come
up
with
a
methodology
to
to
rank
their
projects
through
a
lens
of
equity.
And
much
of
this
reflects
that
prioritization
robert.
Do
you
have
anything
to
add
there.
H
No
not
not
to
that
portion,
I'm
actually
not
familiar
with
the
the
story
of
how
the
park
board
has
come,
come
forward
with
changes
in
response
to
click,
except
to
you
know,
I
do
recognize
that
they
have,
but
there
is
that
split,
I
think
in
their
submittals
between
programmatic
type
projects
and
larger
discrete
implementations.
I
know
that
that's
been
a
subject
of
review
and
discussion
amongst
click
members
in
the
past.
You
know
what
are
their,
what
are
their
ongoing
programs
and
then
what
are
their
specific
projects
that
are
being
proposed.
H
Yeah
yeah,
that's
right.
Some
of
these
are
more
ongoing
costs
associated
with
you
know,
maintaining
conditions
of
of
parks.
If
I
could
describe
them
that
way.
Some
are
you
know
on
ongoing
improvements
and
then
again
you
know
we
have
specific
instances
of
of
parks
that
are
being
brought
forward
as
well
for
consideration
by
click.
C
C
Of
like
I
mean
park
is
like
an
interesting
part.
They
have
their
own
funding
that
I
do.
They
get
some
money
from
click,
but
they
also
get
money
from
other
entities
their
own
budget,
and
when
they
came
to
us,
it
was
interesting
because
we
were
we
had
to
do
x,
number
of
dollars
and
now
they're
back
to
us
and
as
everyone's
been
saying,
it
depends
upon.
A
See,
okay
and
rich
the
one
of
the
gray
areas
is,
I
don't
think
the
park
board
does
a
good
job
of
separating
capital
from
operating
costs.
So
it's
it's!
It's
they're,
getting
better
that
that's
about
all!
I
can
say
right
now,
rich.
You
have
a
comment.
A
J
This
on
the
first
round,
I
I
noticed
the
level
of
need
for
each
park
was
listed
as
high,
and
that
was
part
of
my
confusion
about
how
I
was
expected
to
distinguish
between
them,
but
then
there's
also
another
line
called
prior
or
I'm
sorry.
The
term
is
department
priority
and
that's
where
each
park
is
listed.
Numerically,
it
looks
like
the
order
of
this
list
is
the
order
of
the
priority,
so
I
think
it
seems
reasonable
to
just
simply
rank
these.
A
Okay,
we
can
do
that
with
the
exception
of
of
the
new
projects,
we'll
we'll
come
back
to
the
new
ones,
okay,
bill.
O
O
Just
I
think,
as
additional
information
and
particularly
from
an
equity,
if
one
park
has
a
capacity
to
raise
a
million
dollars
in
private
funding.
I
think
that's
important
consideration
when
public
policy
makers
are
are
investing
in
parks.
A
So
so
bill
I'm
going
to
suggest,
if
I
I
know,
you're
you're
busy,
we
we
could
definitely
use
a
comment
to
that
effect,
one
that
that
is
far
more
probing
than
it
has
been
in
the
past
more
than
a
suggestion
actually
set
up
the
question
that
they
need
to
answer
next
year.
A
Great,
could
we
get
a
another
couple
volunteers
who
may
be
interested
in
helping
to
develop
that
comment
thor.
I
can
help
william
great.
Thank
you.
K
A
Great
jake.
A
Great
here
robert,
you
got
the
three
people
on
the
comment:
silver,
okay,
great
taking
thor's
recommendation,
ranking
these
all
as
significant
and
strong
contributions,
as
recommended
by
mprb.
Is
there
a
second
second.
A
Thank
you.
So,
let's
see
are
there
any
any?
Is
there
any
discussion
or
anyone
would
like
to
object
to
that?
Otherwise,
I'm
going
to
call
the
question
and
move
it.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Let's
move
on
to
the
next
justin
you
feeling
better
about
the
time.
H
I'm
just
gonna
scan
through
this
transportation
page
to
make
sure
we
don't
have
a
random
human
development
project.
H
So
right
so
now
we
have
we're
on
the
utilities
page
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
the
you
know.
The
first
group
of
projects
here
are
the
sanitary
sewer
projects.
The
second
group
are
stormwater
sewer
projects
and
those
were
presented
on
by
director
johnson,
the
other
day
at
q.
A
and
then
we've
got
our
water
treatment
projects
on
the
next
section,
and
then
our
fleet
and
yeah,
and
our
fleet
projects
on
this
page
as
well.
A
Okay,
so
there
are
three
clusters
here:
we
have
to
work
through
in
this
first
cluster.
The
reason
the
reimbursable
sanitary
sewer
projects
isn't
going
to
be
ranked
is
because
it's
a
pass-through
is
that
correct,
robert.
A
Okay,
opening
the
floor
now
to
any
discussion
about
the
the
sanitary
tunnel
and
sewage
sewer
projects
here,
sa001036
and
vr
sap
3.
A
Nope:
okay:
we
have
a
motion
that
we
stick
to
last
year's
ratings.
A
Thank
you,
rich
okay,
any
discussion
or
objections,
otherwise
we're
gonna
move
to
the
next
set.
Okay,
seeing
no
objections.
A
J
I
believe
that,
based
on
the
presentation,
sw040
city
center,
parallel
storm
tunnel
was
bumped
up
from
important
to
significant
or
maybe
even
critical,
because
we've
now
reached
a
capacity
where
the
high
capacity
is
caused,
causing
damage
to
the
current
tunnel.
Current
tunnel.
A
Great
that
that,
in
fact,
I
think
I
believe,
that's
new
information
that
we
didn't
have
last
year
right
that
that's
an
excellent
point.
A
So
may
I
take
that
as
a
motion
that
we
increase
that
to
critical
and
leave
everything
else.
As
is
I
support
that
motion.
It
is
your
emotion,
sir.
Maybe
we.
A
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
on
the
floor.
It's
been
seconded
to
to
to
just
move
the
central
city,
parallel
storm
tunnel,
up
to
critical
and
maintain
last
year's
ratings
for
everything
else.
Any
discussion.
A
Yeah
please,
so
this
is
a
unique
one
in
that
we,
this
is
the
only
wattage
in
the
water
project
we
have
here.
I
just
want
to
remind
people
because
we
always
have
to
remember
to
come
back.
H
A
So
robert,
would
you
like
to
discuss?
Would
you
like
to
review
this
one
you,
you
probably
know
this
project
from
being
in
the
newspapers
recently.
H
Right
yeah,
so
just
at
a
at
a
high
level
again,
this
is
the
this.
Is
the
water
facility
that's
being
proposed
for
the
roof
depot
site?
You
know,
as
has
recently
been,
I
think,
very
recently
been
presented
on
to
to
council.
You
know
the
city
has
acquired
the
property
and
has
been
you
know,
working
toward
design
work.
I'm
not
sure
whether
or
not
this
project
is
currently
under
construction
or
not,
but
it's
tapping
a
number
of
different
sources
of
revenue
for
the
city.
H
You
know
we
have
bond
activity
but
because
of
the
different
activities
that
we're
going
to
have
on
the
site.
You
know
these
bonds
are
comprised
of
you
know
both
general
obligation,
debt
as
well
as
bonds,
backed
by
you,
know,
enterprise
revenue,
sanitary
and
storm
water,
sewer
revenues.
I
believe,
there's
some
internal
service
funds
as
well
that
are
supporting
this
project
due
to
the
various
activities
that
are
being
planned
for
the
site.
H
It's
a
very
comprehensive
planning
process
and
it's
been
going
on
for
for
a
little
while
not
going
to
be
able
to
certainly
not
be
able
to
do
this
project.
The
justice
that
bob
frittle
did
the
other
day
as
he
stepped
through
it,
but
this
is
this:
is
that
project.
H
That's
correct
yeah.
This
has
been.
This
project
has
been
subject
to
significant.
I
I
don't
know
just
involvement,
although
I
think
there's
been
some
debate
around
the
use
of
that
word.
But
this
this
project
has
been
the
subject
of
a
a
lot
of
discussion
at
council
and
amongst
the
community
as
well,
but
I
think
some
of
that
was
highlighted
during
the
q,
a
process
and
some
of
the
questions
that
were
submitted
to
departments.
C
They've
had
since
we've
been
involved,
they've
been
involved.
The
community's
been
involved
with
discussion
discussion
about
the
traffic,
the
floor
traffic,
the
building
the
land,
the
exchange.
This
is
an
ongoing
discussion
with
the
community
over
there.
No
one's
never
going
to
be
happy,
you
know,
and
the
city
has
all
this
land.
That's
that's
the
reality.
I've
come
to.
They
have
the
land,
they
need.
The
new
construction
building.
C
A
K
K
Maybe
that
has
come
out
because
the
neighborhood
has
been
so
opposed
to
this
here.
But
that
to
me
was
a
a
positive
thing
rather
than
just
these
stinky
trucks
that
are
coming
in.
It
seemed
that
they're
trying
to
have
some
positive
things
there.
So.
A
Kade
dan.
M
Sorry,
thanks
yeah
and
it
was
at
the
council
last
week
and
then
again
this
week,
and
you
know
I
think
I
thought
councilmember
fletcher
said
it
best.
You
know
like
he
has
the
existing
facility
in
his
ward
there's
no
complaints
from
the
neighborhood
about
traffic
or
pollution.
It's
literally
like
a
storage
yard
for
pipes,
you
know
and
water
infrastructure
and
there's
a
machine
shop
or
welding
shop
as
part
of
it
and
my
understanding
I
think
steve
brandt
shared
the
article
with
some
of
us
there's
literally
holes
on
the
floor.
M
I
A
So
I
kitty
I'm
taking
putting
my
hat
taking
the
hat
off
the
the
there's,
a
problem
being
encountered
right
now,
which
is
that
this
project
was
acquired
out
of
the
water
fund,
which
means
that
the
city
will
have
to
reimburse
the
that
water
fund
for
any
property.
That's
used
for
other
purposes,
and
I
think
that's
one
of
the
issues
being
dealt
with
right
now.
I'm
I'm
gonna!
Let
dan
go
ahead
because
you
probably
want
to
answer
kitty's
question
and
then
bill.
M
I
think
they
post,
I
think
they
postponed
that
the
next
vote
is
going
to
be
in
august
as
far
as
what
they
the
action
they
took
yesterday.
I
think
it
was
to
postpone
the
environmental
worksheet
review
until
august
until
they
can
maybe
try
and
come
to
some
kind
of
consensus
at
the
council
level.
On
this.
M
No,
they
never
had
to
do
an
environmental
worksheet.
The
project
isn't
big
enough
to
require
an
environmental
assessment.
They
did
it
voluntarily
and
now
people
are
asking
for
a
a
full
environmental
study,
which
is
more
obviously
more
than
is
required.
They
didn't
even
have
to
do
the
worksheet
and
move
minnesota
started
a
petition
drive
about
it,
because
they'd
objected
to
the
amount
of
parking
that
was
included
in
the
project
and
that
a
lot
of
comments
from
a
lot
of
the
opponents
jumped
onto
that
which
is
yeah.
M
A
So
I
have
to
apologize
dan,
we
we
got
to
keep
moving
here,
sorry
titty
amelia,
and
then
we
go
to
bill
yeah.
N
I
think
all
good
questions-
and
you
guys
have
done
a
really
good
job
of
summarizing
the
the
back
and
forth
and
discussion
going
around
around
this
project,
you're
right
that
the
last
vote
was
to
push
back
decision
making
till
august
5th.
I
will
just
say
this
project
as
you've
noted
the
we
need
a
new
facility
for
these
people,
for
this
purpose,
so
they'll
be
moving
forward,
no
matter
what
I
think
public
works
has
stated
that
they
will,
they
would
need
to
pivot
and
look
for
or
and
build
the
space
in.
N
Fridley,
I
believe,
is
the
latest
if,
if
things
change-
and
we
can't-
and
they
can't
move
forward
with
this
place-
and
the
water
fund
issue
is
tied
up.
So
your
comments
are
really
important,
because
this
is
a
project
that
will
continue
moving
forward
because
it
is
such
a
needed
thing.
You're
right,
there's
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
going
on
right
now,
but
I
would
say
it's
still
really
worth
your
time
to
give
this
one
a
ranking,
even
though
it's
a
little
bit
uncertain
about
the
timing
right
now,.
A
Okay,
I'm
sorry
I'm
going
to
have
to
break
in
here
bill
graves.
Are
you
still
here.
A
A
So
all
right
great
thank
you
justin
and
then
we
need
to
call
the
question.
B
Yep,
echoing
and
amelia's
comments,
and
then
also
noting
that
we're
simply
saying
the
ranges.
The
comments,
I
think
are
going
to
be
a
better
venue
for
the
opinions
of
the
quick
members
on
this
project.
A
Okay,
could
we,
who
else
commented
here
would
be
able
to
help.
A
Thor
and
bill.
A
Great
and
kitty
did,
I
see
your
hand,
come
up?
Yes,
so
you're
volunteering
to
also
help
yeah
great
team
of
four
there.
Okay,
so
let's
do
the
rating
right
now,
it's
it
as
as
emilia
was
saying
it's
important
that
we
rate
it.
Do.
I
have
a
motion
here
on
how
we
should
rate
it.
A
Okay,
a
second.
A
Okay,
we
have
a
motion,
it's
been
seconded,
let's
see,
I'm
get,
I'm
just
gonna,
let's
see,
there's
a
hand
up,
but
you're
not
showing
up
on
my
screen.
Whoever
had
their
hand
up.
Please
speak.
C
A
A
Came
back
down
it's
okay,
so
without
objection
are
there
any
objections
to
moving
forward
with
it
project
priority
being
significant
and
contribution
being
strong?
Any
objections?
A
Okay,
if
not
the
comment
we'll
we'll
have
the
group
get
together.
Dan
will
call
the
group
together
for
comment.
Okay,
now,
the
last
is
this:
the
last
group,
robert.
A
Okay,
okay,
folks,
we
have
five
minutes
before
and
there
are
three
new
ones
here.
So,
let's,
let's
very
quickly,
fleet
0-1!
Last
year
we
had
a
comment
on
that
to
ask
them
to
separate
fuel
from
charging
stations,
and
I
believe
the
speaker
said
I
would
I
would
like
there
to
be
a.
I
will
write
the
comment
to
make
sure
that
they
separate
it
next
time.
A
Okay,
any
discussion
for
flito,
102
or
803.
A
I
When
you
write
the
comments,
can
you
put
some
stuff
in
there
because
you
know
toyota
is
now
selling
a
hydrogen
car
and
they're
looking
at
putting
hydrogen
stations
in,
and
I
know,
minneapolis
has
been
waiting
until
it's
kind
of
the
thing
to
do,
but
it'd
be
nice
to
also
include
in
there
some.
Maybe
there's
going
to
be
money
to
put
in
some
a
hydrogen
station,
especially
since
toyota
is
pushing
that
car
pretty
heavily.
A
Okay,
any
other
comments.
Otherwise,
kitty
your
hand
is
still
up
okay.
Otherwise,
I'm
would
someone
make
a
motion
to
maintain
the
same
ratings
we
had
last
time
or
to
amend
those
ratings.
A
A
Okay,
otherwise,
let's
move
these
okay.
Now
we
have
the
final
four
here:
multiple
management
systems,
fuel
icu,
upgrade
tire
balancing
equipment
and
track
a
key
which
I
still
don't
know
where
that
word
came
from
any
discussion
here.
A
Okay,
no
discussion:
would
someone
like
to
make
a
motion
if
you'd
like
to,
if
you'd
like,
to
make
a
motion
to
cover
all
four
of
these?
At
the
same
time,
that
would
be
totally
acceptable.
Significant,
moderate,
okay,
we
have
a
motion
was
that
dan.
D
A
Okay,
significant
moderate
across
the
board,
any
discussion.
A
A
If
not,
then
it
is
adopted
okay,
so
we
have
one
outstanding
that
I'd
like
to
hold
till
there.
We
go
radio
improvements.
How
would
you
like
to
anyone
have
any
feelings
on
how
we
should
proceed
with
this,
or
should
we
just
give
it
the
same
reading
as
the
other
others?
The
other
projects
in
this
cluster.
A
I
When
he
gave
that
presentation,
it
was
all
about
after
the
events
last
year
how
critical
all
of
this
equipment
was
yeah.
So
if
you
want
to
wait,
that's
fine,
but
I
mean
I
would
think
that
some
other
people
would
think
this
is
pretty
critical
too,
to
be
able
to
have
a
more
cohesive
kind
of
system
than
what
they
found
out
that
we
had
okay,
eamonn.
G
I
would
maybe
comment
that,
since
this
is
a
new
project-
and
I
I
still-
and
I
might
be
wrong
in
this-
that
we
haven't
gotten
a
whole
lot
of
guidance
about
strategies
and
policing
and
kind
of
how
that's
going
to
be
envisioned
in
the
future
that
this
could
accommodate
that
same
kind
of
a
comment
that
the
fourth
precinct
previously
had
that
that
there
really
should
be
some
more
guidance
before
something
like.
G
This
can
really
be
ranked
as
the
city
goals,
and
I
would
I
would
volunteer
to
write
that
comment
too
or
to
work
on
that
comment.
M
I
would
agree
that
it's
a
critical
need,
whether
or
not
what
no
matter
what
the
the
public
safety
function
in
our
city
looks
like
they
need
to
communicate.
They
need
to
be
able
to
respond
to
citizens
needs
similar
to
what
the
911,
at
least,
if
not
more.
I
guess
I
would
move
it
the
same
as
the
911
center.
A
Okay,
so
is
that
a
motion
dan.
M
K
This
is
thor.
I
just
want
to
clarify,
though,
that
the
911
center
looks
like
it's
significant
and
strong
and
not
critical,
so
just
want
a
clarification.
A
M
A
Okay,
dan,
so
your
motion
now
is
that
it'd
be
significant
and
strong.
Do
we
have
a
second.
A
Okay,
we
have
emotions,
been
seconded,
significant
and
strong
contribution.
Any
further
discussion,
besides
eamonn,
has
agreed
to
to
include
some
discussion
of
this.
This
emergency
management
response
any
discussion
or.
A
Objections
I
seeing
none.
I
believe
we
have
accomplished
our
task,
we're
just
two
minutes
over
and
I
I
can't
thank
you
all
enough
for
for
being
patient
with
me.
I'm
I'm
sorry
that
I
I
can't
be
as
democratic
as
I
my
instincts
drive
me
to
be,
but
we've
accomplished
our
task.
Let's
make
sure
robert
have
we
finished.
H
Eric
that's
right:
we've
gone
through
all
these
projects
per
my
notes.
You
know
each
of
these
projects.
We
follow
the
same
process
of
identifying
emotion,
finding
a
second
and
then
calling
for
any
objections,
and
we've
done
that
for
each
of
these
pros
each
of
these
projects.
Until
to
this
point,
we
have,
you
know
essentially
a
bundle
of
projects,
and
we
have
group
ratings
for
each
of
these
projects
that
can
be
moved
toward
move
to
the
the
larger
click
committee.
Now.
A
Great,
so
the
next
two
steps,
the
the
first
step,
is
that
you
will
support
this
to
me
to
forward
to
the
task
force
members
and
number
two
is
within
within
that
transmittal.
Could
we
have
a
summary
of
the
comments
that
we've
agreed
to
prepare,
as
well
as
who
is
on
each
of
those
who's
on
to
each
of
those
comments?.
H
Yes,
I've
noted,
which,
which
projects
we
had
some
pending
comments
and
the
the
folks
that
wanted
to
participate
in
developing
those
comments.
A
Great
great
and
if,
if
there
is
no
a
clear
leader
for
each
any
of
those
you're
going
to
be
randomly
selected
for
that
assignment,
so
dan
mcconnell
your
hand
is
up.
A
Oh,
your
hand
is
down
so
justin
is:
are
we
done
here.
B
Yeah
great
job
task
force
and
chair
and
vice
chair
getting
through
all
of
those
again
a
reminder:
these
are
the
ranges
that
are
recommended
by
the
task
force.
Click
members
are
welcome
to
go
outside
of
those
ranges,
as
you
work
on
your
individual
scores
and
without
objection.
Our
next
meeting
will
be
the
public
input
session
tomorrow
evening
and
then
the
task
force
meeting
next
wednesday.
The
conversation
certainly
continues,
as
you
all
develop
your
comments.
A
So
I
would
encourage
everyone
to
attend
that
public
input
session
it
it's
interesting
to
hear
what
the
public
has
to
say.
Hopefully,
we'll
have
more
more
attendance
than
we
did
last
time
and
we're
working
on
that
right
now
through
the
I
believe,
the
neighborhood
associations,
if
we
can
get
the
messages
out
with
that
said,
I
am
going
to
oh
okay,
that's
kitty's
made
a
motion
to
adjourn
without
objection.
We
are
adjourned.
Thank
you.
Everyone.