►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
B
This
meeting
will
be
recorded
and
posted
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency.
This
meeting
is
public
and
subject
to
the
minnesota
open
meeting
law.
At
this
time,
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role,
so
we
can
verify
a
quorum
for
this
meeting.
B
C
B
B
That
motion
carries
both
today's
agenda
and
the
minutes
for
july
2021
meeting
are
accepted
next
order
of
business.
Is
the
acceptance
of
public
comments
I'll
open
the
floor
to
invite
comments
from
members
of
the
community
who
are
attending
this
meeting?
We'll
limit
public
comment
to
a
period
of
no
more
than
two
minutes
per
speaker,
and
with
that
in
mind,
are
there
any
members
of
the
community
present
to
address
the
commission.
E
B
E
So
I
I
looked
at
the
the
search
warrants
that
were
no
knock
search,
runs
that
were
conducted
in
the
first
quarter
of
2020
and
then
from
that
just
to
kind
of
make
the
data
more
manageable.
I
did
a
random
sampling
of
ten
of
those
search
warrants
and
then
I've
got
the
categories
which
I
believe
cover
the
questions
that
we
talked
about,
except
for
cost.
B
E
A
E
E
And
then
I
noted
down
the
justification
for
swat
team
unannounced
entry
in
all
cases,
apart
from
one
it
was
listed
as
safety
and
preservation
of
evidence.
In
one
case,
it
was
safety
only
out
of
this
random
sampling.
There
was
only
one
instance
where
the
named
target
of
the
warrant
was
not
in
the
house
in
all
of
those
samplings
evidence
was
recovered
and
no
injuries
were
reported.
E
Okay.
So
I
wanted
to
to
make
sure
that
these
are
covering
the
questions
that
you
thought
were
important
in
the
study,
and
then
I
will
increase
the
sampling
based
on
the
dates
that
we
discussed
in
the
initial
proposal,
and
then
we
had
talked
about
gathering
capturing
some
of
this
information
going
forward
to
see
if
any
policy
changes
that
had
occurred
in
2020
are
making
a
difference.
B
B
Thank
you
for
this.
I
really
do
appreciate
being
able
to
like
start
to
see
some
of
this
data
coalesce,
I'm
interested
in
you
said
you
pulled
10
random
search
warrants
from
a
total
universe
that
you
have
so
that
way,
we're
refreshed
on
it,
the
the
exact
source
of
the
data,
if
it's
not
already
obvious,
but
also
is
there
a
way
we
can
get.
B
E
Okay,
yeah,
I
mean
like,
I
could
certainly
express
the
the
data
I
had
in
the
excel
sheet
by
by
precinct,
and
you
know
making
some
some
pie
charts
for
a
large
sampling
of
the
data.
I
think
that
could
be
done
as
well,
so
just
to
take
you
through
from
the
beginning
there,
the
I
initially
gathered
the
data
using
vizinet,
which
is
the
dispatch
system
yep.
So
the
swat
team
has
a
particular
unit
number.
E
You
can
then
search
through
a
date
range
for
the
deployments
of
that
squad
or
that
unit,
and
then,
from
that
I
broke
down
the
cases
that
had
there
were
search
warrant
entries.
You
know
there
are
times
that
deployed
elsewhere
and
then
the
the
kind
of
universe
of
data
was
31
cases
and
that
was
reduced
down
to
10
using
the
randomizer
yep.
We've
mentioned
that
website
before
and,
as
I
said,
this
is
this
is
just
for
the
first
quarter
of
2020.
A
E
E
A
E
B
B
E
B
E
E
Something
else
that
we
had
discussed
before
would
be
to
take
an
earlier
sampling
because,
as
we
get
as
we
get
beyond
the
quarter,
one
of
2020,
with
the
pandemic,
hitting
with
the
murder
of
george
floyd,
you
know
those
really
changed
the
police
response,
so
I
think
we
have
to
look
at
earlier
data
yeah
to
get
to
get
a
more
accurate
picture.
Q.
E
E
So
we're
not
going
over
anything.
The
other
data
source
that
we
had
briefly
talked
about
is
the
is
getting
the
search
warrants
from
the
court
system.
Yep
talked
about
some
of
the
barriers
to
doing
that.
The
search
warrants
I
looked
at
here.
I
pulled
them
from
the
the
police
reporting
system,
which
is
why
I
can't
just
show
them
in
theory.
E
F
F
D
D
It's
well
will
it
or
I
guess
the
you're
kind
of
saying
clarifying
question
would
be
you
you're
kind
of
saying
that
the
police
report
is
kind
of
where
we
get
the
correlation
on
like
the
human
piece
of
like
what
actually
happened
so
we'll
be
looking
at
both
like
this
data
and
the
single
police
reports
that
go
with
them.
Is
that
kind
of
what
we're.
E
E
The
the
the
additional
questions
that
I
think
the
the
committee
was
something
he
was
focused
on
was:
are
people
injured
during
this
because
often
the
you
know,
the
justification
is
safety,
so
is
that
panning
out
that
would
that
would
all
be
contained
in
the
police
report?
The
the
search
warrant
return
does
not
say
if
people
were
injured
during
the
search
warrant
or
what
kind
of
use
of
force
there
was.
B
All
right-
and
I
think
it's
probably
important
for
us
to
constantly
be
going
back
to
you-
know
those
goals
like
we
were
talking
about
and
just
making
sure
were.
You
know
the
types
of
information
that
were
being
presented
even
in
this.
This
draft
form
are
reflecting
the
questions
that
we
want
answered
right,
so
I
am
going
to
copy
and
paste
the
exact
study
goals
from
the
draft
pcoc
research
and
study
proposal
that
we
had
submitted
in
our
agenda
from
last
week.
B
B
A
E
So
the
law
enforcement
success
perspective,
I
think,
is
going
to
be
there's
a
few
different
ways
that
could
be
quantified,
one
of
which
kind
of
goes
beyond
what
we
were
looking
at.
What
we
are
looking
at,
but
I
just
think
it's
worth
mentioning.
You
know
there
are
times
where
search
warrants,
recover
items
which
would
be
illegal,
whether
that's
stolen
firearms
or
in
the
possession
of
someone
who
shouldn't
have
firearms
or
narcotics
that
doesn't
always
result
in
charges.
E
It
has
to
be
tied
to
an
individual
so
that
it's
just
something
to
be
aware
of
the
other
thing
is
that
there
are.
There
are
some
times
where
now
this
is
not
in
the
ones
that
I
found,
but
not
all
drug
crimes
are
necessarily
families,
so
you
know,
trace
amounts
of
certain
drugs
are
not
felonies.
Small
amounts
of
marijuana
or
not
drug
paraphernalia
is
not
so
there
is
there.
E
Is
that
kind
of
context
to
you
know
what
would
count
as
success
that
we
could
think
about
the
one
other
thing
is
that
for
cost
to
the
property
owner,
that
data
might
be
a
little
bit
more
difficult
to
to
gather
my
thought
process
there
is
that
the
the
city?
Probably
isn't
you
know
if
a
search
warrant
is
is
executed
where
it
should
be,
and
evidence
is
recovered.
E
B
B
The
reason
why
we're
even
entering
a
building-
or
you
know,
trying
to
execute
a
search
warrant.
Yeah,
that's
correct.
Would
that
be
narrow
enough
in
most
instances
to
be
able
to
say
the
achievement
of
success
is
whether
or
not
the
objective
of
the
the
purpose
of
the
search
warrant
has
been
achieved.
E
I
think
I
think
it's
possible.
There
might
be
some
examples
that
I
would
have
to
flag
for
further
discussion.
I'm
just
thinking
about
you
know
that
that
does
leave
a
little
bit
of
a
gray
area.
Sometimes
you
know
if
if
the
search
warrant
is
for
narcotics
and
only
drug
drug
paraphernalia
is
found,
that's
not
quite
quite
the
same
level,
but
it's
indicative
of
them.
You
know
the
war
and
being
correct.
Yeah
they're.
A
A
E
B
E
B
E
E
B
Yeah
to
me,
I
see
that
as
lack
of
a
success,
you
know-
and
that
seems
fairly
clear
in
in
my
mind,
from
trying
to
view
the
law
enforcement
perspective
of
this.
If
we
want
to
go
and
get
this
person
and
d
at
least
detain,
if
not
arrest
this
person
and
then
that
person
is
not
there
that
to
me,
that's
a
clear,
you
know
not
able
you
were
not
able
to
achieve
the
intent
of
the
search
warrant.
G
F
A
E
I
think
it
could
lead
to
a
wider
policy
discussion
once
we
have
the
full
data,
and
you
know
you
are
making
recommendations,
because
the
scenario
I'm
thinking
of
is,
if
the
reason
that
it
was
no
knock
is
because
of
the
criminal
history
or
behavior
of
this
particular
suspect
and
they're.
Not
there
did
it
have
to
be
no
knock
yeah
so
that
that
kind
of
situation
is
something.
I
think
it
would
be
interesting
to
know
how
much
data
we
have
that
supports.
That.
B
Could
we
break
these
variables
up
and
have
one
that
of
you
know
there
is
unintended
individual
and
then
success
of
detaining
or
apprehending
that
individual
and
then
one
about
intent
for
some
non?
You
know
human
related
intent
like
paraphernalia
drugs,
whatever
and
then
success
of
obtaining
those
tangible
items.
A
E
A
E
E
C
E
Then
people
inside
are
found
in
there
and
you
know
constructive
possession
is
proven.
I'm
sure
there's
plenty
of
examples
of
that.
The
the
examples
I
was
thinking
of,
where
maybe
wouldn't
be
counted
so
much
as
success,
is,
you
know
we're
going
to
this
house
because
of
this
identified
individual
who,
we
believe
has
narcotics
or
firearms
they
go
to
the
address
and
then
that
person
isn't
there
and
maybe
they
find
some
stuff
but
yeah
yeah.
If
especially,
that
doesn't
especially
if
that
doesn't
result
in
in
that
named
person
being
arrested
later.
E
B
Yeah,
I
think
I
was
just
getting
tripped
up
with
the
idea
of
like.
Sometimes
the
intent
is
a
human.
Sometimes
the
intent
is
some
item.
Is
it
possible
or
do
you
think
it
would
be
useful
or
not
useful,
to
have
like
a
categorical
variable
to
just
simply
say
at
this
point?
The
target,
as
identified
in
the
search
warrant,
is
an
individual
or
is
an
item
so.
E
A
B
B
Do
you
guys
have
any
other
questions
regarding
this?
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that,
like
we
have
a
firm
understanding
of
you
know
one
the
differences
in
in
this
scenario,
because,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we're
creating
these
variables
to
have
chris
do
all
this
work
on
and
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
getting
the
results
that
we
want
out
of
this.
F
I
I'm
following
okay,
I
don't
really
have
anything
to
add
it.
I
kind
of
figured
it
would
get
a
little
tricky
and
a
little
more
complex
than
we'd
hoped.
That's,
probably
true
of
everything.
So
I'm
I'm
all
right
with
it
and
then,
as
chris
gathers
more
data,
we
can
kind
of
process
that
and
think
about
how
how
we
want
to
define
success.
We
might.
G
F
D
Yeah
yeah,
just
so
just
just
about
the
same
I'll.
Definitely
I'll
definitely
have
a
few
questions
here
there,
but
I
I
think
it's
been
a
really
good
kind
of
discussion,
navigating
what
success
looks
like
and
how
we
can
have
it
articulated
in
the
data.
So
it's
been,
it's
been
really
good.
Is
there
and
this
might
be
a
question.
D
I
guess
when
we
get
to
the
point
of
the
more
of
the
reports
part,
but
is
there
a
way
to
see
whether
you
know
what
what
happened
in
the
I
guess
not
see,
but
a
way
to
get
information
of?
You
know
whether
somebody
you
know
whether
somebody
did
get
hurt
while
doing
the
arrest
or
whatnot
would
that
be
in,
like
the
police
report
or.
B
B
And
and
while
you're
bringing
that
spreadsheet
up,
I
think
you
you
step.
You
mentioned
an
intricacy
that
I
really
didn't
think
about
before
and
I
feel
like.
We've
just
been
running
with
the
assumption
of
search
warrants
and
not
arrest
warrants,
and
now
that
we've
we've
talked
about
the
distinction
between
the
two
are
the
sample
of
warrants
that
you've
looked
at
all
search
warrants.
E
They
so
by
their
very
nature,
you
know,
and
a
restaurant
is
different-
is
very
different
to
a
search
warrant.
Yes,
I
think,
if
we
wanted
to
explore
that
as
a
possibility,
then
I
would
have
to
research
more
into
how
often
that's
done
you
know.
What
I'm
thinking
in
my
mind
is
that
quite
often,
arrests
are
done
on
a
what
it's
called
a
pc
pickup,
not
not
a
warrant
to
reach
a
specific
place.
E
I
think
that-
and
you
know
I
I
would
have
to
look
at
the
data
more
to
know
this,
but
I'm
also
thinking
that
a
lot
of
the
time
warrants
are
kind
of
go
to
a
fugitive
task
force
and
those
are
often
collaborations
between
federal
and
state
agencies.
You
know
it's
not
a
minneapolis,
it's
not
minneapolis
police,
so
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
that
data
would
be
reflected
of
what
was
available
to
us.
B
And
I-
and
I
just
know,
if
we're
asking
the
question
eventually,
someone
will
ask
the
question
as
well.
I
want
to
make
sure
that,
if,
if
it
is
opening
up
a
can
of
worms,
that
is
not
within
our
scope
of
what
we're
interested
in,
we
label
that
appropriately
of
making
sure
that
people
will
will
have
the
same
concern
of
well.
What
about
what
about
when
you're
going
to
you
know,
go
arrest,
somebody
and
that
sort
of
explanation
definitely
needs
to
be
part
of
our
limiting
our
scope
down
to
just
search
warrants.
I'm
fine!
B
E
I
think
we
should
we
should
look
to
see
what
data
might
be
available
on
that
I'll.
I
can
look
into
that,
but
I
completely
agree
with
you
that
that
yeah,
that's
you
know
it's
been
raised
at
this
point.
If
the
report
is
published
and
doesn't
even
say
we
have
not,
you
know
we
are
only
looking
at
search
warrants
or
you
know
it
doesn't
specify
that,
and
that
is
a
question.
That's
going
to
come
up
so
yeah.
E
B
E
Yeah
and
andrew
was
going
to
look
into
setting
up
a
meeting
with
mpd
about
the
costs
part.
You
know
the
basis
of
going
through
getting
a
search
warrant
and
then
I
think
that
is
also
a
good
time
where,
where
we
could,
you
know
pose
that
question
of
people
who
probably
know
more
about
how
the
search
warrant
process
well.
Yeah.
Sorry,
the
arrest
warrant
process
works.
F
B
I'm
just
looking
through
the
goals
that
we
put
into
the
chat,
making
sure
that
each
of
those
sorry
to
have
you
do
it
again,
I'm
just
I
want
to
be
able
to
compare
them
visually.
Do
you
mind,
throwing
that
spreadsheet
up
there
again,
one
more
time,
just
seeing
that
each
variable
has
a
reason
for
being
there.
You
know
obviously
unannounced
entry
and
night
capped
those
are
self-explanatory.
B
Target
of
war
at
home,
we
were
talking
about
that
in
terms
of
effectiveness
and
then
civilian
and
law
enforcement
injuries
definitely
touches
on
health
and
safety
aspects,
and
I
know
you
don't
have
that
data
right
now,
but
just
so
that
way
we
can
have
a
conversation
about
it.
Should
we
add
in
a
variable
here
and
just
leave
it
blank
of
like?
B
E
E
You
know
that
would
be
like
property
costs.
I
can
think
of
is
looking
at
those,
but
then,
if
it
was
like
the
the
deployment
of
you
know,
unannounced
requires
a
swat
team.
Swat
team
has
x
number
of
officers
earning
so
much
per
hour
with
equipment,
and
you
know
there
could
also
be
a
financial
cost
of
deploying
the
swat
team
calculated.
B
I'm
just
thinking
each
of
them.
You
know
in
my
head
that
spreadsheet
should
have
a
variable
that
says
you
know
public
or
taxpayer
cost
if
we
want
to
say
it
like
in
a
and
a
more
sleek
way.
But
you
know
public
public
costs
such
as
deployment
and
then
you
would
have
property
costs,
but
obviously
again
that
starts
to
get
a
little
bit
more
gray.
We
have
to
think
about
what
the
average
cost
of
a
door
frame
is
essentially
and
then.
B
It
out
as
long
as
as
long
as
we
have
a
justification
as
to
why
we
come
up
with
the
number
that
we
come
up.
I
think
that's
fair
enough
and
obviously
it's.
It
is
an
element
to
the
understanding
of
where
we're
at
with
this.
It's
you
know,
the
entire
study
is
not
gonna,
be
based
off
of
you
know,
going
to
lowe's
or
other
home
supply
stores
and
understanding
the
cost
of
a
door
frame.
But
as
long
as
we
know
at
some
point,
those
types
of
variables
are
going
to
be
in
there.
A
F
B
Along
with
the
search
the
discussions
you
were
going
to
have
about
the
fiscal
impacts
from
the
city's
perspective,
also
looking
at
the
sample
size
that
we
have
you
mentioned
q1,
and
that
would
probably
be
better
if
we
wanted
to
expand
this
to
go
backwards
instead
of
forwards
and
I
think
getting
a
sense
of
what
q2
and
q3
would
look
like.
So
that
way
we
can
have
a
comparison
is
definitely
a
a
good
idea.
B
Further
along
the
process,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
get
this
side
of
the
the
no
knock
understanding
underway
and
we
get
some
like
summary
data
around
that
first
before
we
get
into
the
comparison
aspect
of
it.
But
that's
that's
the
pathway
that
I
see
us
going
down.
Does
that
make
sense
for
the
the
other
commissioners
as
well
as
for
chris.
B
G
I'm
really
glad
you're
doing
this
with
the
no
knock
warrants
and
it's
probably
beyond
the
scope
of
the
pcoc
to
order
something
more
comprehensive,
but
we've
been
concerned
about
search
warrants
and
feel
that
the
police
department
needs
to
keep
probably
contemporaneous
records.
Rather
than
go
back
and
look
like
this
at
the
justifications
for
the
search
warrant.
How
often
the
search
warrants
are
approved
by
judges?
G
A
G
G
The
confidential
reliance
and
reliable
informants
are
not
the
confidential
informants
less
so,
and
the
officers
themselves
oftentimes,
we
believe,
are
not
entirely
truthful
in
applying
for
these
search
warrants.
It
would
be
good
to
know
how
often
the
search
warrants
don't
reveal
what
the
officer
said
they
had
probable
cause,
because
that's
the
standard
probable
cause
to
believe
that
was
there.
I
think
you
might
be
able
to
identify
some
problem
officers,
some
problem
units-
maybe
even
a
problem
precinct
in
that
way.
G
So
that's
something
we've
been
suggesting
for
a
long
time
after
you
do
this
with
just
the
no
knock
search
warrants.
Depending
on
what
you
find,
you
may
have
reason
to
contact
the
audit
committee,
which
has
done
some
excellent
audits
of
the
police
department,
and
this
is
an
area
we
feel
very
strongly
needs
to
be
audited.
G
Just
a
quick
note
on
the
cost.
Actually,
you
can
find
out
some
of
that
from
the
police
department
because
after
they
use
a
battering
ram
or
whatever
they
bring
in
a
locksmith
or
boarding
people
or
something
like
that
to
to
secure
the
property
and
the
property
owner
is
charged
for
that,
so
the
police
department
regularly
bills
people
for
the
damage
that
they
did,
which
you
know
may
be
legitimate
if
the
search
warrant
itself
is
legitimate,
but
those
figures
are
there,
at
least
as
a
minimum
cost
of
of
the
of
the
damage.
G
That's
done
in
terms
of
the
search
warrant,
sometimes
quite
unnecessarily
my
daughter's
house,
they
battered
through
a
door
that
was
unlocked,
you
know,
and
that
kind
of
stuff
that
goes
on
and
then
called
people
in
to
board
up
the
whole
house
at
you
know
exorbitant
costs.
So
that's
quite
in
quite
an
important
area
as
well.
B
E
Yeah,
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
that
spreadsheet
I
will.
I
will
turn
into
something
a
bit
more
presentable
to
send
you
this
this
week
in
advance
of
the
domain
committee
meeting
and
then
to
what
mr
mr
picking
touched
on.
You
know.
I
I
think
we
could
certainly
look
at
doing
a
data
request
to
the
courts
about
the
number
of
warrants
that
are
approved,
yeah
versus
not
approved.
E
I
think
that's
a
great
question
and
then,
as
far
as
the
cost
goes,
that
might
open
up
another
avenue
to
research
that
I
am
making
the
assumption
that
those
bills
go
onto
someone's
property
taxes
as
a
special
assessment.
I
could
be
wrong
there,
but
that
would
certainly
be
a
data
pool
that
we
could
access.
B
With
that
in
mind,
we're
going
to
move
on
to
our
second
discussion
item
on
coaching
and
I
do
believe
the
end
result
of
our
last
meeting
was
we
wanted
to
see
a
update
of
the
the
coaching
dashboard
or
a
dashboard
that
includes
coaching
as
a
response
to
complaints
against
officers,
and
I
was
wondering
either
chris.
I
don't
know
if
andrew's
on
chris
do
you
have
a
an
update
for
us
on
that
dashboard.
E
E
B
B
Is
there
I
guess
I'll
open
the
floor
up
to
either
one
of
the
commissioners
talk
about,
given
the
the
conversation
that
we
just
heard
from
chris,
but
the
dashboard
is
that
it's
close
to
being
developed-
it's
obviously
not
here
yet,
but
even
when
it
is
presented,
it's
probably
not
going
to
be.
You
know
this
year's
information.
B
F
Yeah,
I
don't
know,
I
feel,
like
the
lawsuit
has
created
a
big
roadblock
for
that
I'm
having
a
hard
time.
Thinking
of
ways
to
it
almost
just
seems
like
a
non-starter
unless
I've
missed
something,
because
if
they
can't,
if
we
can't
disclose
to
the
public
that
data
between
I,
it
must
be
such
and
such
a
date
that
that's
kind
of
it
right
and
that's.
B
Well,
I
think
it's
important
to
know
what
that
cutoff
date
is
right.
So
it's
definitely
a
big
question
that
we'll
have
for
for
andrew
when
he
is
available
to
speak
with
us
on
that
and
again,
I
can
only
see
the
reason
why
andrew
would
not
be
here
is
because
he's
having
that
meeting
right
now
on
our
behalf
to
make
sure
that
we
are
trying
to
get
that
data.
It's
been
very
clear,
he's
expressed
as
much
to
us
in
previous
meetings,
so.
B
F
We'll
see
what
comes
from
it,
you
know,
because
it
could
be
interesting.
Let's
say
right:
if
2017
is
the
cut
off
okay,
maybe
we
can
get
some
data
leading
up
to
2017
and
then,
when
that
lawsuit
is
resolved
eventually,
that
data
will
be
available
available
for
public
consumption,
then
we
can
take
it
up
again
and
get
something
more
more
recent.
So
it's
not
like
a
lost
cause
or
anything.
B
B
What
would
we
like
to
see
in
it,
and
I
know
again,
the
the
updated
version
is
not
there
right
now,
but
then
it'll
be
fresh
in
our
heads
based
off
of
the
the
dashboard
update
that
we
will
get
hopefully
next
time
around
chris.
Do
you
have
a
quick
link
to
the
the
current
dashboard
of
where,
where
that's
available,
I
know
it's
somewhere
in
my
bookmarks,
but.
B
B
B
B
B
And
as
we
can
see
and
we've
talked
about
this
in
previous
meetings,
there
is-
and
I
think
you
guys
are
seeing
the
same
thing-
I'm
saying,
there's
a
pie
chart
like
a
blue
and
orange
pie,
chart
off
on
the
right
and
then
there's
a
a
line
graph
of
total
cases
over
time
that
were
sent
to
coaching.
Are
you
guys,
seeing
the
same
thing
that
I
am.
B
B
D
B
B
Yeah,
it
would
be
good
to
see.
I
think
another
point
in
that
is,
you
know
not
coached
is
vague,
and
so
you
know,
even
if
you
know,
given
the
terminology,
that
it
is
discipline,
you
know
like
how,
if,
if
discipline
is
within
that
pie,
chart
of
officer
not
coached,
I
would
love
to
see
a
share
that
is
disciplined.
You
know,
yeah.
E
And
I
I
think
that
is
something
that
should
be
better
reflected
in
any
new
dashboards
going
forwards
is
to
better
explain
that
you
know
this
is
one
where
a
problem
was
identified
and
it
was
cursed
or
it
wasn't
coached
or
you
know
this
th
this
pie
chart
here
doesn't
really
go
into
any
details.
As
you
say,.
B
And
unless
we
don't
have
any
other
recommendations
or
considerations
based
off
of
the
visuals
that
we
have
right
now,
I
think
the
only
thing
we
can
do
now
that
we're
one
minute
after
the
hour
is
table
this
discussion
for
next
time.
Now
that
we've
had
the
chance
to
look
at
the
the
current
visual
we'll
be
able
to
freshly,
compare
it
to
the
new
one
once
we're
looking
at
it
next
time.
This
audit
subcommittee
meets.