►
Description
View Marked Agenda
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/Board/MarkedAgenda/CLIC-T/2455
View Minutes
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/Download/CommitteeReport/1840/CLICT-05052021-Minutes.pdf
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
john
bernstein.
I
am
the
chair
of
the
capital
long-range
improvements
committee,
transportation
task
force
before
we
begin
I'd
like
to
note.
This
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statute,
section
13d
0.021,
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic.
I
will
now
call
this.
We
need
to
order
and
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
rule
so
that
we
may
verify
the
presence
of
a
quorum.
C
A
C
A
Hi,
goodness
dad
here
reset
houston.
B
D
D
B
A
Truman
here,
jeff
strand
here
vice
chair
katie
jones-
I
see
that
she
said
she
was
here
chair
john
bernstein
here
with
that
there's
12
members
and
a
quorum
is
established.
B
Thank
you
with
that.
We
will
proceed
to
our
agenda,
a
copy
of
which
was
posted
for
public
access
to
the
city's
legislative
information
management
system
available
at
limbs.minneapolis.mn.gov
all
right.
So,
let's
dive
in
our
agenda's
quite
simple:
we're
going
to
deal
with
comments
before
I
get
to
that.
As
always,
it
just
ask
that
you
raise
your
hand,
so
we
can
keep
order
going
here,
but
if
anybody
has
any
questions
that
they'd
like
to
ask
or
any
concerns
they'd
like
to
share,
let's
do
that.
B
E
Hey
this
isn't
really
a
question,
but
I
just
wanted
to
give
let
you
all
know
I
I
been
able
to
participate
in
last
week's
thing
or
the
second
half
of
the
I
haven't
reviewed
the
second
half
of
the
materials
because
had
a
family
emergency,
that
sort
of
just
took
up
the
last
week
and
a
half
so
I'm
gonna
be
playing
catch
up
and
I'll
probably
be
abstaining
from
things.
If
I
don't
feel
like
I'm
caught
up
yet
on
the
particular
discussion
at
hand.
So
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that.
F
But
ideally,
as
the
task
force
chair
said
during
our
group
session,
walking
through
the
past
year's
click
report
and
identifying
where
there
are
gaps
that
need
to
be
addressed
this
year
is
also
a
very
useful
tool
and
you
and
a
good
use
of
time.
In
my
opinion.
B
Yeah,
I
think
maybe
you
got
on
after
I
mentioned
that
jeff,
but
I
already
said
that
that's
the
way
we're
gonna
proceed
today.
Neil,
do
you
have
a
copy
handy
that
you
can
share
of
the
comments
that
were
in
the
file?
If
not,
I
can
email
you
right
now.
A
B
Screen,
if
you
have
what's
in
there
now,
that's
fine
can
you
when
at
the
not
yet,
but
at
the
at
the
appropriate
time,
can
you
just
share
your
screen
with
that
yep?
Absolutely,
okay,
let's
see,
let
me
get
back
to
the
participants
jeff
did
you
have
something
else
or
do
I
need
to
lower
your
hand.
B
Okay,
so
what
we're
going
to
do
today,
neil
you
can
go
ahead
and
share
that
screen.
We
have
a
few
comments
in
there.
Just
so
people
know
they
sort
of
fall
into
well.
They
fall
into
three
categories:
right
transportation,
comments,
hd
comments
and
general
comments
that
are
not
specific
to
a
project.
That's
that
falls
under
one
they're
they're
comments
that
are
broader
than
a
specific
task
force
or
project.
B
B
So
there's
been
some
confusion
with
this
thing
and
there's
some
hd
comments
that
are
in
here,
which
we'll
skip
over
there's,
also
a
general
comment
and
it
there's
whoever
wrote
it
didn't
write
their
name
next
to
it.
So
is
anybody
who's
on
the
call
today,
author,
this
general
comment.
G
B
Yeah,
okay,
so
for
the
future,
don't
don't
put
hd
comments
in
the
transportation
folder,
so
in
general
we
will
consider
because
it
would
the
way
that
works
is.
If
you
are
on
this
committee
and
you
author,
a
general
comment,
we'll
consider
it
and
and
if
it
passes,
push
it
through
to
the
full
committee,
so
our
process
for
today
will
be
we'll
consider,
since,
ideally,
what
we
would
do
is
have
all
reviewed
these
in
advance
and
be
able
to
move
quickly.
B
I'm
sure
that's
not
the
case,
since
this
stuff
has
been
hard
to
access,
so
I'm
gonna.
The
way
I
plan
to
go
forward
with
this
is
I'll.
Give
everybody
time
to
read
these
comments
on
the
screen
before
we'll
discuss
them
and
we'll
just
take
them
one
at
a
time
and
consider
them.
So
we'll
start
with
this
general
comment
which
to
now
understand
was
authored
by
steve,
so
just
take
a
minute
to
read
it
and
then
we'll
get.
F
B
B
Okay,
so
if
you've
all
had
time
to
read
that
comment,
sonia
go
ahead.
C
So
I
was
thinking
about
this
over
the
weekend
and
we
as
a
task
force,
are
given
the
entire
entirety
of
all
of
the
cbrs
for
the
transportation
task
force
and
it's
a
lot
to
go
through
as
we've
all
realized,
especially
the
newcomers.
C
C
To
summarize
and
present
comments
to
the
group
that
the
group
would
then
agree
upon
or
just
and
or
discuss
is
that
something
that
is
worth
looking
into.
B
I
mean
we're
always
open
to
considering
different
ways
to
do
the
process
for
the
future.
I
don't
think
I
think
it's
too
late
this
year
to
consider
something
like
that
and
I
think
the
best
way
to
proceed
with
something
like
that
would
be
to
at
the
end
of
our
process.
B
Each
year
we
have
discussions
about
whether
or
not
we
want
to
consider
any
changes
to
the
way
we
do
things
and
often
subcommittees
are
formed
to
consider
that
those
things
and
and
recommend
changes
to
the
group
once
we
get
through
this
intense
session
or
intense
period
of
time
between
march
and
june,
we're
trying
to
get
the
actual
work
done.
B
B
Let
me
let
me
just
back
up
for
a
second
and
give
some
process
about
sorry,
george.
This,
I
probably
should
have
shared
this
with
everybody,
so
we're
going
to
use
robert's
rules
in
a
very
loose
form.
So
that
means
before
we
start
discussing
this
general
comment,
I
need
a
motion
to
approve
it
or
some
other
kind
of
motion,
and
I
need
a
second
and
once
that
occurs,
then
we
can
open
it
discussion.
B
So
at
the
moment,
I'm
recognizing
people,
assuming
that
people
have
questions
that
are
off
of
this
comment,
specifically
okay,
once
we
get
through
that
I'll
entertain
a
motion
about
the
the
comment
specifically
and
then
we'll
move
forward.
So
again,
this
is
sort
of
modified
rubber
tool.
So
if
you
don't
know
robert,
don't
worry
about
it
and
just
sort
of
I
I
don't
know
it
perfectly
by
any
stretch,
we're
just
sort
of
loosely
using
it
to
try
to
keep
order
with
the
way
we're
doing
things
here.
Okay,
katie.
I
Yeah
I'll
move
this
project
for
approval
or
some
project.
The
comment.
B
So
there's
a
motion
on
the
floor.
Is
there
a
second?
Second
all
right,
so
the
comment
has
been
moved
for
approval.
Is
there
discussion
on
the
comment.
I
Oh,
oh,
okay,
sorry
yeah.
I
actually
just
wanted
to
respond
to
the
idea
of
having
a
like
a
sub
task
force
and
just
do
want
to
recognize
that
yeah
in
the
first
year.
I
This
is
a
lot
of
projects
for
sure
and
that,
as
you
do
go
through
them,
especially
on
the
transportation
side,
though,
you
will
find
that
there's
a
lot
of
repetition,
and
so
I
I
do
I
mean
I
like
this
general
comment,
because
it
like
we
do
need
that
time
frame,
especially
if
you're
new
to
have
sufficient
time
to
go
through
it
and
that
just
kind
of
gives
some
some
comfort
that
it
does
get
better.
It
does
get
easier
and
that
a
lot
of
the
comments
are
at
least
on
transportation.
I
They're
they're
our
comments
for
transportation
projects
are
usually
in
individual
and
they're,
not
on
the
60
or
70
road
projects.
So
I
guess
that's
all
to
say
I
don't
know
that
there'd
be
a
high
value
in
having
subtests
or
some
test
forces.
H
It
keeps
re-muting
me
so
sorry
about
that.
So
my
my
comment
or
concern
about
the
comment.
H
Well,
I
should
say
I
agree
in
principle
with
with
what
the
comment
states,
but
my
concern
relates
to
the
statement
that
it
relaxed
if
the
committee
lasts
sufficient
time
for
the
thoughtful
deliberation,
because
I
worry
that
that
well,
if
you
know,
if
you
didn't
have
sufficient
time
for
to
think
about
it,
should
I
value
your
input
right
and
it
may
be
better
phrased
to
say
that
you
know
the
value
provided
by
the
committee
and
the
the
value
of
insights
provided
by
the
committee
would
increase
if
it
had
more
time,
as
you
know,
suggested
in
the
next
paragraph.
J
I
think
the
content
of
this
comment
is
important
feedback
for
staff
and,
probably
not
anything
they
don't
know.
I
don't
think
it
makes
sense
in
the
report,
though,.
F
Okay,
all
right,
I
support
the
comment.
I
think
it
is
good
for
the
policymakers,
the
elected
policymakers,
the
mayor
and
the
council
members
to
see
what
their
dedicated
volunteers
are
facing
in
this.
As
one
of
our
I
think
one
of
our
electeds
may
have
commented
about
the
heavy
lifting
involved
with
click.
F
I
do
have
a
couple
of
suggestions
friendly
amendments.
If
you
will,
if,
if
we're
operating
in
that
mode,
covid
19
I'd
like
to
see
the
you
know
all
caps
covered
hyphen
19
and
then
I
think
the
last
the
last
second
sentence
in
the
first
paragraph,
it
needs
to
say,
like
analyze
more
than
a
hundred
or
something
it's
not
quite
complete,
and
then
I
agree
with
the
with
george's
suggestion
about
wordsmithing,
which
I
think
as
long
as
we
don't
change
the
meaning.
F
B
All
right,
I'm
going
to
recognize
myself.
I
100
agree
with
erica
on
this
one.
I
I
don't
disagree
with
any.
I
hate
that
term.
I
agree
with
everything
that
steve
says
in
this
comment:
it's
all
absolutely
accurate,
although
I
I
will
take
issue
with
the
last
sentence
of
the
last
paragraph.
I
don't
believe
that
we
lack
sufficient
time.
We
lack
sufficient
time.
B
The
cbrs
came
to
us
too
late,
so
we
went
into
the
presentation
days
not
as
prepared
as
we
should
have
been,
but
the
way
the
sentence
is
written
it
it
could
be
interpreted
as
we
lack
sufficient
time
over
the
course
of
the
whole
process.
So
I
think
george's
point
there
isn't
important
and
should
this
comment
pass,
which
I
hope
it
does
not
that
that
would
be
fixed.
I,
this
has
been
a
one-off
year.
B
We've
never
had
this
problem
before
in
every
other
year,
we've
gotten
cbrs
at
the
end
of
march,
and
we've
had
something
close
to
a
month
to
analyze
it.
It
was
this
together
of
forces,
coveted
19,
all
this
turnover
in
staff
that
caused
this
this
year.
If
this
were
a
repeated
problem,
then
I
would
say:
yep
you
put
a
comment
in
the
report
to
get
people's
attention.
It's
not
a
repeated
problem.
As
erica
pointed
out,
staff
is
well
aware
of
this
staff
has
been
at
this.
B
The
new
staff
this
year,
I
would
say,
has
been
as
capable
and
as
responsive,
possibly
more
than
any
we've
ever
had
in
the
15
years
have
been
on
this
committee
and
there's
no
reason
not
to
believe
that
this
won't
be
fixed
for
next
year.
I
believe
this
is
an
internal
thing
and
something
that
just
doesn't
need
to
be
aired
in
in
the
public
report.
B
K
Thank
you
yeah,
so
I
I
will
say
that
the
the
push
back
to
the
beginning
of
the
cbr,
which
is
just
what
you
noted
john
bernstein,
was
really
a
one-off
thing.
We
didn't.
I
wasn't
in
my
current
position
and
staff
was
still
the
staff
that
need
to
complete
the
cbrs
were
struggling
to
meet
it.
K
K
So
that
would
just
be
what
I
would
offer
thinking
about
the
overall
budget
process,
but
I
absolutely
will
commit
to
not
not
scooting
back
that
deadline
next
year
that
that's
a
doable
thing
for
sure.
F
Okay,
I
would
move
to
table
this
in
order
to
have
the
author
and
others
look
at
it
and
and
see
if
it
can't
be
tweaked
to
make
something
that
is
meaningful,
but
not
critical.
F
J
B
A
I
scott
engel
hi
amity,
foster
hi.
G
D
Sorry,
I
couldn't
find
the
unmute.
I
don't
know
that
it
really
matters
right
now,
but
I
would
just
I
think
I
agree
with
erica
and
john
on
this
one.
I
do
also
think
that,
in
terms
of
process,
there
could
be
better
work
on,
like
existing
click
members,
to
actually
be
explicit
with
newer
members
about
how
much
time
we
have
actually
put
into
this
process
like.
Does
it
take
a
full
two
weeks?
D
B
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
fair
point.
I
I
in
in
the
defense
of
some
of
us
that
have
been
in
leadership.
I
would
also
I
would
say
that
we've
made
myself
personally
and
I
know
jeff
as
well-
have
offered
ourselves
up
with
my
personal
phone
number
emails
and
I've
never
been
taken
up
on
it.
So
you
know
I
know
people
are
busy.
That's
I
don't.
I
don't
say
that
as
a
criticism,
but
rather
just
you
know,
people
are
busy
and
this
is
time
consuming.
B
The
last
thing
I
would
note
on
all
this
is
that
you
know
there's
time
constraints
on
both
sides
of
this
right.
I
mean
so
you're
talking
about
a
budget
in
a
given
year.
Departments
start
on
this
stuff
in
january,
if
not
before,
and
have
until
the
end
of
march,
to
get
to
get
all
of
their
different
budget
requests
in
order
and
submitted.
B
So
that's
the
upfront
thing
and
then
you've
got
the
mayor.
Who's
got
to
present
a
budget
in
august
right.
So
that's
why
this
thing
has
always
been
sandwiched
between
the
end
of
march
and
the
end
of
june.
This
thing
being
the
click
process
between
the
end
of
march
and
the
end
of
june,
and
I
I
don't
think,
there's
any
wiggle
room
there.
B
You
know,
because
of
covet-
and
we've
already
heard
that
that
won't
be
the
case
next
year-
that
these
cbrs
get
submitted
at
the
end
of
march,
and
we
should
have
them
shortly
thereafter
and
pretty
much
have
the
month
of
april
before
we
start
having
to
hear
presentations
from
staff
all
right.
So
I
think
we
can
move
on
from
this
one
neil.
Can
you
scroll
up
a
little
bit?
B
B
Bit
perfect
so
water
12
reads:
click
recommends
that
the
water
treatment
and
distribution
services
develop
and
implement
on
an
expedited
schedule,
a
proactive
plan
to
address
the
water
quality
issues
of
customers
residing
or
doing
business
on
streets
with
dead-end
water
mains
priorities
should
be
given
to
re-lining
these
mains
to
address
tubercular
corrosion,
that
infill
infiltrates
the
homes
and
businesses
of
customers.
When
these
mains
are
flushed,
causing
damage
to
appliances
and
discoloration
of
fixtures.
F
B
I'm
guessing
steve
authored
this
just
for
background
for
people
there's
a
guy
named
jim
hagen,
who
is
a
minneapolis
city
resident
lives
over
near
the
river
and
lives
on
a
street
that
has
a
dead
end
water
main
he
because
of
these
public
meetings
this
year
has
able
been
able
to
contact
a
number
of
us
myself
included
and
has
very
respectfully
alerted
us
to
this
problem
that
he
specifically
has,
and
that
actually
exists
in
a
surprising
number
of
places
around
the
city
he's
probably
been
working
on
this
for
something
like
six
years
and
is
actually
an
incredibly
patient
guy
about
this.
B
He
has
a
big
picture
view
of
this
that
this
is
a
problem.
That's
not
just
his
own
personal
problem
and
his
neighbors,
but
is
a
problem
in
a
bunch
of
places
around
the
city,
and
he
recognizes
that
his
street
might
not
be
the
first
to
have
it
fixed
and
he'd
be
happy
if
he
knew
that
the
city
was
had
a
plan
to
address
this
problem
broadly
and
at
some
point
his
street
would
get
it
fixed.
Even
if
that
means
it's
a
couple
years
from
now
he's
incredibly
reasonable
about
this.
B
That
having
been
said,
I
was
planning
on
writing
a
comment
about
this
might
have
been
a
little
bit
different
than
this
one,
and
I
was
waiting
to
do
that
because
I
had
asked
some
pretty
direct
questions
of
the
water
department
at
our
meeting
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
and
I
wanted
to
give
them
a
chance
to
respond
before
I
authored
a
comment.
I
B
B
Okay,
thank
you.
I
haven't
seen
that
yet.
So
I
I
I
was
hoping
we
could
say.
I
don't
want
to
make
the
motion,
but
I
was
hoping
we
could
table
this
one
or,
if
steve
is
well,
I
was
going
to
just
ask
steve
if
we
could
work
on
it
together,
but
he's
not
here
at
the
moment
so
he's
back
now.
B
Yeah
not
so
much
that
I've
been
involved,
but
that
I
had
asked
some
specific
questions
of
the
water
department,
which
I
understand
from
katie
they've
answered
and
I'd
like
I
didn't
realize,
they'd
done
so
I
want
to
take
a
look
at
those
answers.
So
if
it's
amenable
to
you,
could
we
unofficially?
I
don't
even
think
we
need
to
take
a
vote
because,
since
you're
the
author,
if
you're,
okay
with
it,
could
we
you-
and
I
work
on
this
one
and
come
back
next
week
with
it?
Absolutely
okay.
B
B
This
reconstruction
project
is
necessary
for
the
significant
redevelopment
of
the
upper
harbor
terminal
site.
However,
city
staff
have
failed
to
explain
why
this
half-mile
project
cost
19.6
million
dollars
when
other
reconstruction
projects
of
comparable
length,
pv
150,
140
160
cost.
As
little
as
6.9
million,
there
are
likely
good
reasons
for
the
cost
differential,
but
public
works
needed
to
explain
why
this
project
will
consume
money
that
otherwise
could
be
allocated
to
other
projects
that
have
been
deferred
due
to
tightening
paving
resources.
B
A
M
B
B
B
G
A
E
A
C
B
B
B
Yep,
okay,
all
right,
so
this
is
a
longer
comment.
I'll
read
it.
This
is
for
pv001,
which
is
the
parkway
paving
project.
This
is
authored
by
dan
miller,
thanks
for
claiming
it
as
yours.
Dan,
that's
helpful
here
we
go.
This
program
is
greatly
appreciated
by
parkway
users,
who
have
had
to
put
up
with
badly
degraded
conditions
which
are
a
safety
hazard
to
users
and
their
vehicles,
while
typically
not
replacing
curbs
and
gutter.
B
The
paving
program
is
often
a
significant
roadway
reconstruction,
as
is
theodore
worth
parkway
from
plymouth
to
29th
and
2020
to
2021,
where
the
entire
road
base
was
replaced.
Unfortunately,
this
new
roadway
encourages
speeding
and
increases
the
barrier
and
invisibility
of
minneapolis
pedestrians
trying
to
access
the
grand
rounds
trail
system.
B
I
Yeah,
I'm
moving
primarily
to
to
be
able
to
discuss.
I
like
what
this
this
comment
is
trying
to
bring
up
and
I'm
wondering
if
it
should
honestly
be
a
little
bit
broad.
I
mean
use
this
as
an
example,
but
a
broader
discussion
point
knowing
that
the
city
just
developed
so
the
transportation
action
plan
and
that
there
are
design
guidelines.
I
You
know,
I
think
the
question
is:
why
aren't
the
design
guidelines
being
used
for
parkways
and
this
that
that
plan
may
have
been
passed
after
this
upgrade
was
made,
so
that
may
be
the
answer
and
yeah.
So
actually,
maybe
it's
worth
asking
public
works
about
that
before
making
a
comment,
because
there
may
be
a
clarification
for
the
specific
one
and
to
note
whether
or
not
those
design
guidelines
with
those
pedestrian
like
advanced
pedestrian
improvements
will
be
in
projects
going
forward.
G
I
I
would
like
to
suggest
that
we
delete
the
comment
about
the
south
city
of
lakes
and
I'm
sorry
chain
of
lakes
in
the
grand
round.
I
just
looked
at
google
maps
for
several
well-used
crossings
at
lake
harriet
for
pedestrians
and
cyclists
and
found
no
pavement
markings.
There
might
be
a
pedestrian
crossing
sign,
but
that's
it
so
I
I
think
that
those
of
us
on
the
south
side
do
have
a
couple
of
good
crossings,
the
one
on
southeast
harriet
and
the
one
at
northeast
bidet
makaska.
G
But
I
don't
think
it's
generally
true
that
we
have
the
kind
of
enhanced
pedestrian
crossings
that
dan
is
hoping
for
here.
B
Yeah,
I'm
going
to
dovetail
off
of
what
steve
just
said
and
recognize
myself
here.
I
agree
with
the
general
message
that
dan
or
the
request
that
dan
is
placing
here,
but
I
think
both
katie
and
steve's
observations
are
good
ones
and,
broadly
speaking,
about
the
tone
of
the
comment
I
feel
like
it,
you
could
address
this.
Without
I
mean
I
wouldn't
go,
there's
nothing
in
here.
That's
inflammatory,
but
it's
just
worded
in
a
way
that
I
don't
know
that
I
would
say
that.
B
B
You
should
be,
and
it's
as
simple
as
that,
and
they
should
be
doing
that
all
over
the
city
and
even
if
katie's,
right,
that
the
theater
worth
part
project
was
before
that,
there's
a
if,
if
dan,
what
dan
says
here
is
accurate,
there's
a
project
in
the
future
that
does
not
contemplate
that
at
saint
anthony
parkway.
So
the
issue
still
is
an
issue
that
I
think
needs
to
be
addressed.
But
I
recognize
george
and
then
dan.
H
H
I
think
it'd
be
helpful
to
understand
you
know
what
are
the
criteria
that
the
city
uses
to
determine
whether
to
have
these
enhancements
and
then
and
then
you
know,
apply
them
consistently
right,
because
it
we
shouldn't
be
having
to
say
they
carry
it
bees,
one
methodology
at
worth
parts
we
use
a
different
one
or
or
you
know,
try
to
enforce
that
methodology.
H
M
Yeah,
I
I
can't
disagree
with
any
of
the
folks
in
the
rational
thoughts
about
try
to
approach
this
other
than
to
say
I
have,
and
what
I
have
gotten
is
mixed
messages
continuously
and
done
a
lot
of
research
on
this.
I
have
done
a
significant
amount
of
research
driving
this
writing
it
observing
it,
and
let
me
tell
you
it's
an
act.
It's
a
huge
inequity,
it's
a
huge
inequity
south
of
394
compared
to
north
of
394..
M
All
you
got
to
do
is
drive
and
think
about
it,
and,
quite
frankly
I
mean
the
if
you're
going
to
make
a
comment
to
to
these
folks
and
it
would
be
to
our
traffic
department
as
if
they
actually
have
a
record
of
you
know
how
many,
how
many
pavement
markings
do
you
have
out
there?
How
many
signs
do
you
have
out
there
and
and
you'd
be
just
surprised?
It's
it's
scary.
It's
scary,
the
difference.
M
M
You'll
just
be
blown
away,
and
so
that's
why
I
mention
it
it's
I
just
I've
done
my
research
on
this
one.
I
I'm
what
I'm
trying
to
shoot
for
is:
go,
look
in
the
records
and
and
look
at
the
count
and
you're
going
to
give
me
a
number
of
reasons
why
this
is
put
here
and
why
this
isn't
there.
B
I'm
going
to
make
a
suggestion
here
and
then
I'll
recognize,
steve
and
then
katie,
I
don't
know
whether
they're
in
equities
or
not.
I
I
don't
wait
this
because
to
me
we're
talking
about
the
ground
grand
rounds
and
clearly
they
should
be
addressing
the
grand
rounds.
The
same
way
all
the
way
around.
They
may
come
back
and
say:
well
the
reason
that
the
area
around
the
chain
of
lakes
has
got
more
of
it
is
because
the
counts
are
higher
there.
But
that's
not
to
me,
that's
not
relevant
right.
B
I
mean
if
it's
all
the
grand
rounds
and
it
should
be
treated
the
same
way.
So
my
proposal
would
be
this
let's.
B
If,
if
katie's
amenable,
maybe
she
could
work
with
dan
and
maybe
let's
go
back
to
public
works
and
ask
them
a
couple
of
pointed
questions
and
then
draft
the
comment
based
on
the
answers
we
get
from
them,
and
I
think
that
will
strengthen
the
comment
instead
of
putting
a
comment
out
like
this,
and
they
can
just
sort
of
come
back
and
give
some
kind
of
one-off
answer.
Let's
get
those
answers
first,
so
we
can
address
that
in
the
comment
and
just
say
you
need
to
address
this
all
right.
G
I
think
john's
suggestion
is
a
good
one
and
I
do
not
disagree
with
dan's
knowledge
of
the
parkway
system.
Second
to
none,
but
I
think
volume
is
one
one
reason
that
certain
places
get
priority.
I
don't
think
anybody
can
dispute
that
the
northeast
corner
of
the
democracy
gets
more
pedestrian
use
than
the
26th
and
29th
crossings
on
worth
parkway,
both
of
which
I
have
used
several
times
this
past
summer.
G
I
think
beyond
volume,
it's
also
a
matter
of
timing.
I
mean
these
projects
involving
regional
parks,
come
up
on
a
cycle
through
the
metro
process,
metro
parks
and
open
space
funding-
and
you
know
bidet,
mccoska
and
harriet,
just
got
done
a
couple
of
years
ago.
G
Frankly,
I
would
have
spent
the
money
fixing
the
existing
trails
before
I
added
the
bells
and
whistles,
but
they
got
the
bells
and
whistles,
presumably
because
they
had
a
recently
completed
master
plan
that
called
for
pedestrian
improvements,
and
we
should
also
maybe
be
aware
of
whether
there's
a
master
plan
for
the
grand
rounds
and
what
it
says
for
the
areas
that
dan
is
concerned
about
and
look
at,
maybe
whether
that
master
plan
needs
to
be
updated.
And
but
I
agree,
the
general
approach
of
let's
have
standardization
all
throughout
the
system
is
a
good
one.
I
Yeah,
I
think
it's
a
good
plan
dan
I'd
love
to
work
with
you
more
on
this,
and
I
think
there's
a
way
to
talk
about
both
standardization,
as
well
as
addressing
the
specific
concur,
concerns
around
pedestrian
crossings
here,
and
that
we
might
even
suggest
that
be
addressed
like
since
this.
The
parkway
has
already
been
addressed
that
then
we
suggest
that
these
these
particular
crossings
be
addressed
with
a
different
project
or
program
through,
like
the
the
the
pk
projects.
J
Just
so,
everyone
in
the
group
is
hearing
from
everyone
in
the
group.
I
just
want
to
affirm
I'm
inclined
to
trust
dan's
research
here,
and
I
think
we
have
enough
knowledge
to
ask
some
very
specific
questions
of
public
works.
So
I
just
want
to
affirm
I'm
supportive
of
the
plan
for
proceeding
that
john
laid
out.
B
So
dan,
it's
your
comment.
So
it's
kind
of
point
of
privilege
to
you.
If
we're
going
to
do
this
without
any
votes,
is
that
plan
that
I
suggested
that
katie
would
work
on
with
you
amenable
to
you?
Yes,
okay!
So
again,
I
don't
think
this
one
requires
a
vote.
We'll
just
come
back.
We've
got
two
weeks
on
this,
so
I
think
the
first
thing
is
to
work
with
staff.
B
M
M
Just
tell
you
that
I'll
just
tell
you
that
I've
made
those
pointed
questions
in
more
than
one
occasion
to
both
minneapolis
staff
and
parts
staff,
and
it's
been
a
lot
of
finger
pointing
pointing
and
it
all
points
back
to
the
parkway
bathing
project.
That's
all
the
money
we
got.
We
don't
want
to
give
the
parkways
any
more
money
and
the
park
board
says
the
city
takes
care
of
it.
So
I've
heard
that
as
a
citizen
enough
to
be
somewhat
yeah,
I've
spent
some
time
writing
this.
M
I've
spent
a
lot
of
time
thinking
and
trying
to
do
something
about
it,
and
I
I
don't
know
how
much
more
eloquently
I'll
be
looking
at
katie
to
to
help
me
with
this
and
I'm
willing
to
let
this
go,
but
I'm
I'm
not
I'm
pessimistic
as
to
see
it
any
better.
Thanks.
B
F
B
Yeah
to
be
clear
on
on
my
comment
about
the
inequities
you
know,
I
meant
that
in
a
strategic
sense,
if
they
can
come
back
and
say
well,
we
do
this
based
on
counts
it
just
you
know
yeah.
I
I
I
think
it's
best
to
come
at
this.
The
strongest
way
possible
and
I
th
there
could
be
an
easy
out
for
them
on
that.
One
was
all
my
pointless
jeff.
Do
you
want
to
be
recognized
again,
or
did
I
just
forget
to
take
your
hand
down.
B
Okay,
neil:
can
you
scroll
up
to
pv127,
please?
So
here
just
go
back
to
the
title.
Let
me
read
that
and
then
we'll
I'll
read
this
one.
This
is
pv
127,
that's
37th
avenue
northeast
from
central
avenue
to
stinson
boulevard.
This
is
another
one
drafted
by
yo.
Can
you
scroll
up
just
a
little
bit
more,
so
I
can
see
the
whole
text
perfect.
B
This
combined
minneapolis
and
columbia
heights
project
is
an
opportunity
to
bridge
these
communities
and
expand
user
options.
This
is
part
of
the
minneapolis
all
ages
and
abilities
network
extending
from
main
street
northeast
to
stinson
boulevard.
Unfortunately,
the
2018
main
street
to
university
asphalt
resurfacing
did
not
include
bike
facility.
Striping,
the
2019
to
2020
university
to
central
asphalt
resurfacing
was
done
in
combination
with
the
columbia
heights
multi-use
path.
Unfortunately,
this
path
is
substandard.
In
width,
pavement
markings
way
finding
and
lighting
pv
127
is
an
opportunity
to
do
more
than
the
minimum.
B
B
B
M
Yeah
again,
I
am
putting
these
out
in
drafts.
They
all
need
a
little
bit
of
wordsmithing
and
kind
of
cleaning
up,
but
again,
this
is
a
project
that
is
frustrating
to
see
how
it's
kind
of
getting
fast-tracked
without
the
standard
engagements
that
goes
on
in
minneapolis
projects
and
what
is
being
proposed
was
outdated
to
begin
with,
and
I'm
just
astounded
that
minneapolis
is
going
along
with
it.
F
Thanks
chair,
my
point
is
just
what
the
author
said
that
maybe
maybe
in
a
wordsmithing
sense,
not
repeating,
unfortunately,
and
putting
in
a
comma
here
there
would
be
make
that
impactful.
So
I
think
that
is
assumed
by
the
task
force
when
these
are
are
finished
and
approved.
B
I
Yeah,
so
this
is-
and
maybe
this
is
worth
a
comment-
that's
separate,
but,
like
I
hear
what
you're
saying
on
this,
and
I
have
actually
a
similar
concern
about
another
street
project
that
is,
you
know
supposed
to
have
like,
given
the
transportation
action
plan,
it's
supposed
to
have
a
bike
facility,
it's
not
it's
not
planned,
and
so
to
me
it's
part
of
these
projects
are
that
the
city
isn't
following
its
own
policy
and
it's
not
advocating
for
its
own
policy.
I
So
yeah,
I'm
definitely
in
favor
of
this.
At
this
comment
and
thinking
if
there
may
be
a
bigger
one
that
goes
along
with
it.
B
I'm
gonna
recognize
myself
for
a
second
yeah.
I
would
piggyback
on
what
katie
just
said.
I
I
don't
know
any
of
the
specifics
like
dan
clearly
does
on
this.
I
have
a
and
I'd
like
to
see
some
of
this
fleshed
out,
especially
the
sentence
about
the
regional
solicitation
grant,
and
this
thing
that
they're
not
addressing
with
pedestrian
lighting
a
little
bit
of
concern
with
the
last
sentence.
B
Just
because,
that's
to
a
certain
extent
getting
you
know,
I
think
we
need
to
be
careful
about
how
we
say
that
last
thing
and
that
you
know
I'm
not
somebody
who's
one.
You
know
to
mince
words
if,
if
stuff
is
accurate,
I'm
fine
with
being
quite
direct
but
the
way
that's
worded,
it's
a
bit
argumentative,
I
think,
and
to
katie's
point.
Maybe
we
need
to
just
have
a
broader
comment
that
says:
listen.
You
got
a
plan
you're
not
following
it
and
we
can
list
all
it
doesn't
have
to
be
a
general
comment.
I
B
Okay,
so
we'll
lump
this
one
in
with
the
previous
comment
and
wait
for
you
guys
to
come
back
to
us
on
both
of
them
and
I'd
just
like
to
say
thank
you
to
dan,
I
mean
clearly
you've
done
quite
a
bit
of
work
on
some
of
these
comments
from
a
research
perspective,
all
right
so
we'll
move
to
pv
178,
also
drafted
by
dan.
This
is
johnson
street
at
north
johnson
street
northeast
at
I-35,
in
2017
minneapolis
participation
in
vision,
zero
was
announced
at
the
intersection
of
18th
and
johnson
street
northeast
ev.
B
G
I
would
move
the
comment.
I
would
also
an
addition,
but
I'll
let
this
be
seconded
first
they're.
G
Okay,
my
proposal
is
to
add
this
language.
At
the
end,
click
encourages
public
works
to
work
with
hennepin
county
to
develop
similar,
appropriate
vision,
zero
improvements
for
pedestrians,
cyclists
and
motorists
at
the
other
end
of
this
segment
of
18th
avenue,
where
two
city
streets,
a
county
highway
and
a
regional
recreational
trail
all
intersect
at
conflicting
angles.
G
I
think
that
what
this
tries
to
do
is
say.
Yes,
you
took
care
of
one
end
of
this
segment
of
18th,
but
there's
another
high
traffic
end,
that's
as
or
more
complicated
at
the
other
end
of
this
segment
of
18th,
and
it
needs
some
attention.
M
I
consider
that
friendly
and
steve,
if
you
could,
just
if
this
passes,
you
can
send
me
that
information
I'll
I'll
get.
This
worked
up.
Yeah
great.
B
Is
there
any
further
discussion
on
this
one
I
proposed
by
steve,
but
I'm
gonna
suggest,
if
steve
what
I'm
gonna
suggest
if
steve's
willing
is
to
read
the
entire
comment
with
what
you
can
see
on
the
screen,
in
addition
to
what
steve
added
and
we'll
actually
vote
on
it?
If
that's
amenable
to
everybody,.
B
Any
further
discussion
before
we
do
that
steve.
Could
you
do
that?
Read
it
again,
yeah
start
with
what's
on
the
screen
and
then
and
then
continue
with
what
you've
got
so
it
reads
and
then
we'll
vote
on
it.
G
Great
in
2017
minneapolis
participation
in
vision,
zero
was
announced
at
the
intersection
of
18th
and
johnson
street
northeast
pv
178
is
the
final
step
in
addressing
this
dangerous
18
000
aadt
intersection
since
2017
18th
avenue
has
been
construct.
Reconstructed
and
pv156
johnson
street
18th
to
lowry
will
happen
in
2021.
G
This
will
bring.
This
all
will
bring
profound
improvements
on
this
important
street
and
intersection.
Thank
you.
B
E
I
I
I
like
the
addition
there
on
the
end,
but
I
guess
maybe
me
not
being
as
familiar
with
the
area.
I
don't
know
what
is
meant
by
the
other
end
of
18th,
and
I
don't
know
if
that'll
be
entirely
clear,
we
may
want
to
name
a
specific
intersection
or
a
specific
point
of
what
the
other
end
is.
B
A
G
H
A
I'm
todd
truman,
hi,
jeff,
strander
hi
vice
chair
katie
jones.
I
B
So
this
is
for,
do
you
mind
muting
again,
there's
some
there
we
go.
This
is
for
bp006,
which
is
18th
avenue
northeast
trail
gap
from
marshall
to
california.
Again
this
is
drafted
by
dan.
This
trail
gap
will
connect
the
east
bank
trail
along
the
river
to
the
18th
avenue
trail,
creating
a
contiguous
multi-use
trail
from
the
river
to
washington
street.
B
B
The
18th
avenue
trail
route
has
been
constructed
in
segments
over
time
in
1997,
2012
and
2018,
and
has
sometimes
been
referred
to
as
the
trail
to
nowhere
due
to
several
street
detours
upon
the
completion
of
bp006.
There
is
one
remaining
detour
between
washington
and
monroe
streets.
This
route
runs
from
two
blocks
along
the
south
side
of
the
old
east
side,
maintenance
garage
which
is
being
decommissioned.
B
I
B
Okay,
hearing,
none
we'll
call
a
roll
on
this
one
steve
brandt,.
L
A
Okay,
goodness
ted
hi,
risa,
hustad,
matt,
kazinka.
G
A
G
A
Hi
vice
chair
katie
jones.
I
B
Eyes
and
that
motion
passes
okay,
so
the
next
comment
is
on
fleet
001,
which
is
the
fueling
and
charging
stations
and
jeff.
Maybe
you
can
help
me
out
here.
I
believe
that
is
an
hd
project.
B
B
We,
the
executive
committee,
made
the
decision
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
to
give
all
the
fleet
projects
to
hd
it's
a
little
bit.
You
could
argue
it
either
way,
because
these
are
facilities
that
clearly
are
surround
transportation,
but
they
are
facilities.
So
in
that
sense
those
tend
to
be
things
that
go
to
an
example
of
that
would
be
water
18..
B
We
do
all
of
the
water
projects,
with
the
exception
of
18,
which
is
actually
a
building
that
you
know
is
for
the
water
department,
so
in
in
that,
so
that,
along
with
the
fact
that
we
have
far
more
projects
than
hd
was
the
reasoning
why
these
went
to
them
all
right.
So
with
that,
can
you
looks
like
there's
one
more
general
comment
for
us
to
consider?
Can
you
scroll
up
neil?
B
Oh,
this
is
what
we
were
talking
about
right,
so
so
we'll
this
will
come
back
next
week.
So
that
gets
us
through
all
of
the
comments
for
today.
I
want
to
open
it
up
again
to
ask
for
questions
and
comments
from
people,
so
I've
got
katie
and
then
steven
q
go
ahead.
Katie.
I
Yeah
thanks,
I
am
just
wanting
to
let
everyone
know
that
I'm
planning
to
write
a
comment
regarding
nearside
signals.
So
we
had
someone
come
to
our
meeting
our
public
meeting
about
that
and
that
there
are
potential
pedestrian
improvements
that
could
be
found
with
piloting
near
side,
intersection
signals.
G
G
I
had
not
gotten
out
of
the
incorrect
link
I
was
in
before,
and
I
could
hear
you,
but
you
couldn't
hear
me
so
that's
why
I
didn't
offer
any
counter
arguments
and
I
I
will
save
them
for
next
week,
because
my
understanding
is
the
matter
is
tabled
and
so
I'll
I'll
just
save
my
counter
arguments,
but
I
you
know,
I
would
like
to
offer
some
other
perspectives
for
people
to
consider.
Next
time.
We
discuss
comments
about
that
particular
comment.
Thank
you.
B
I'm
going
to
jump
in
here
for
a
second
jeff.
I
I
might
solicit
a
comment
from
you
on
this,
given
that
we
had
a
technology
issue
with
that.
I
don't
want
to
reopen
this
to
a
vote,
but
I
would
take
privilege
to
allow
steve
to
make
those
comments
now.
So
people
have
time
to
think
about
that,
since
you
know
he
should
have
had
that
chance
earlier
on.
Do
you
think
that's
reasonable
jeff.
F
B
So,
let's
just
hold
the
queue
everybody
stay
where
you
are
and
steve
I'll
recognize
you
to
comment
on
that,
since
that
we
had
a
technology
issue
around
that
earlier.
G
Actually,
john,
I
think
I'll
defer
to
the
next
meeting
simply
because
I'd
like
to
do
some
more
research
on
some
of
the
points
that
were
raised
now
that
I
have
the
chance-
and
I
appreciate
jeff
your
preservation
of
this
future
discussion.
Thank.
F
Thank
you,
and
I
I
just
want
to
say
that
when
the
when
the
people
work
on
the
dead
end
water
beans-
that
I
hope
I
hope
the
the
authors
in
rewriting
it
will
acknowledge
the
mr
hagen
coming
through
the
public
input
session,
because
I
will
explain
that
once
again,
click
is
not
getting
extreme
support
from
neighborhood
and
community
engagement.
F
My
other
point
that
I
just
want
to
mention
is
I
I
do
look
forward
to
having
some
comment
about
the
I
think
it's
water
18
and
the
the
hiawatha
campus
that
in
observing
an
update
from
one
of
the
council
members,
I
believe,
from
ward
8,
and
I
have
to
research
this
further
about
a
council
action
that
may
have
put
a
footnote
for
staff
direction
as
to
those
projects,
and
it
really
has
implications
for
the
entire
city.
Thank
you.
B
L
Yeah,
so
I've
had
technical
problems
getting
into
this
meeting.
So
I'm
not
clear
at
a
previous
transportation
committee
we
someone
and
I
don't
remember
her
name
mentioned
she
was
going
to
write
a
comment
about
sidewalk
gaps.
Is
that
has
that
been
done
and.
D
D
L
Then
the
other
piece
was.
I
was
in
a
meeting
with
council
president
bender
yesterday
and
she
was
talking
about
nicolette
avenue
and
the
kmart
site,
and
it
just
hit
me
that
it
seems
so
odd
that
we
are
using
click
or
going
through
this
click
process
and
there's
no
bridge
or
road
construction
project
a
cbr
for
that.
L
G
B
Say
before
you
even
get
to
a
comment,
I
would
like
you
to
work
through
staff
and
and
send
a
pointed
question
to
public
works,
asking
why
we
haven't
seen
it.
There
might
be
an
explanation,
that's
reasonable,
and
there
might
not
be,
but
I
would
start
with
that,
because
if
there
is
a
reasonable
explanation
or
an
explanation,
that's
half
reasonable
it'll
make
the
comment
more
powerful.
If
you
have
that
information
first.
G
B
L
And
that's
what
council
president
bender
talked
about.
It
is
a
transportation
project
in
the
they
do
have
funding
through
this
value
of
capture.
It's
so
and
it's
related
to
sort
of
the
streetcar
at
this
point.
But
it's
you
know,
you'd
have
to
fix
the
bridge
to
get
the
streetcar
over
and
the
city
is
working
with
the
legislature
to
try
to
broaden
that
to
transit
generally,
but
still
it
is
a
transportation
project.
B
G
I
would
just
suggest
you
know
far
be
it
for
me
to
try
and
not
expand
the
role
of
click
in
in
projects
like
these,
but
it's
entirely
possible
that
the
city
is
planning
to
finance
some
of
these
improvements
through
tax,
increment
financing
or
the
streetcar
project,
which
is
like
tax
increment
financing,
and
we
typically
don't
review
those
sorts
of
projects.
L
So,
just
to
clarify
council
president
bender
felt
like
there
should
have
been
a
click
project
because
she
considered
it
a
transportation
project
and
that
there
would
be
also
a
redevelopment
thing
that
cped
would
work
on,
but
there
should
be
a
public
works
project.
So
that's
what
I
was
told
by
the
council
president.
B
So
I
would
make
two
points
one.
I
would
reiterate
what
I
said.
I
would
encourage
strongly
encourage
you
to
ask
the
question,
through
staff
directly
to
public
works,
with
a
request
that
you
get
an
answer
in
seven
days
or
less
so
that
we
can
active
as
a
task
force
if
we
want
to
also
I'm
wondering
if,
if
you
asked
council
president
bender,
if
she
was
following
up
with
public
works
herself,
it
seems
like
she
ought
to
be,
or
a
staff
ought
to
be.
L
She
said:
she's
been
working
on
it,
but
she's
going
to
leave
office
soon
and
she
was
talking
about
it
as
a
an
issue
coming
up
into
the
future
for
a
future
council
person.
So
but
yes,
I
hear
you
that
she's,
the
council
president.
B
All
right
so
moving
forward
steve
did
you
want
to
be
recognized,
or
I
just
forgot
to
keep
it
down?
No
okay,
anything
else
at
this
point
any
any
can
goddamn,
but
just
a
second
any
concerns
of
any
sort.
Before
we
adjourn
here
I'll
recognize
dan
and
jeff.
M
Yeah,
this
is
a
point
of
inquiry
to
you,
I
think
john
and
to
katie.
Is
that
there's
a
couple
of
things
that
I
propose
that
we
need
to
work
on
with
katie,
so
we
should
get
together
afterwards
and
figure
out
those
next
steps
and
the
the
piece
about
asking
the
question
to
the
public
works
regarding
these
are
those
made
to
our
staff
and
the
staff
then
present
them
to
public
works,
and
what
type
of
how
fast
do
you
need
to
turn
this
stuff
around?
That's.
B
B
I
I
think
the
best
way
to
proceed
with
this
is
to
I
think
you,
the
most
effective
way
to
get
answers
would
be
to
go
through
staff
and
make
a
point
of
saying
that
this
is
time
sensitive,
that
you're
we're
drafting
comments
around
these
issues
and
that
you
have
a
deadline
of
next
tuesday
to
get
the
comment
drafted
not
to
hear
from
them,
so
that
they
are
well
aware
that
we're
we're
on
a
time
constraint
here,
so
that
if
they
don't
respond,
we
can
get
pointed
in
the
answer
in
the
comment,
knowing
that
we
made
it
clear
to
them
that
this
was
time
sensitive.
M
And
staff
member
who
would
that
be
justin.
A
You
can
email
justin,
myself
or
robert
and
then
also
so.
There
is
a
a
shared
like
google
doc
on
the
sharepoint
site
that
you
can
put
those
questions
into,
but
I
think
either
these
two
routes
would
be
good
for
getting
that
question
submitted
to
public
works.
H
B
All
right,
very
good.
Thank
you,
I'm
process
on
that.
I
think
it's
fine.
If
people
want
to
put
something
in
sharepoint,
but
I
would
also
email
directly.
The
idea
with
sharepoint
is
so
questions
don't
get
repeated.
These
questions
are
so
pointed
and
they're
for
our
and
they're
task
force
specific
and
we're
all
on
this
call.
So
I
don't
think,
there's
much
of
a
concern
that
somebody
else
is
going
to
separately.
Ask
these
same
questions
all
right,
I'll
go
to
jeff
and
then
matt.
F
My
only
last
question
is
just
to
confirm
through
the
chair
that
we
will.
I
will
certainly
try
to
use
sharepoint
like
I
had
access
problems
this
week,
and
so
will
we
will
the
chair
be
able
to
provide
us
an
email
of
newly
incoming
draft
comments
before
the
may
12th
meeting,
and
then
did
we
get
a
secretary
pro
tem
appointed?
While
I
was
trying
to
log
on.
B
B
I
will
operate
as
secretary
this
year.
If
you
have
a
comment
that
you
would
like
considered
at
our
next
meeting-
email
it
to
me-
and
I
will
put
them
all
together
and
email
them
to
our
task
force,
hopefully
the
day
before
the
our
meeting
or
the
morning
of
but
ideally
the
day
before
so
late
on
tuesday.
So
people
have
a
chance
to
hopefully
read
them
before
we
convene
next
wednesday.
Does
that
sound,
reasonable.
E
Thank
you
so
I,
as
mentioned
in
the
beginning
meeting
I
I
need
to
play
catch-up
both
as
a
first-time
member
trying
to
work
my
way
through
this
and
also
had
some
things
outside
of
my
control.
That
meant,
I
missed
last
friday's
meeting
and
some
other
things
I
just
want
to
ask.
We
don't
need
to
do
this
now,
but
I
would
love
to
get
sort
of
an
overview
of
really.
What
should
I
be
focusing
on?
When
are
my
deadlines?
I'm
just
a
bit
confused
about
all
of
it.
Is
there?
B
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question
and
I
think
this
is
a
good
time
to
address
that.
I'm
gonna
just
grab
my
schedule
here,
so
I
can
answer
part
of
that.
So
the
primary
focus
right
now
for
everybody
should
be
the
comments,
drafting
comments,
and
this
goes
back
to
what
sonya
suggested
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting
that
you
know.
B
That's
something
it's
kind
of
late
to
make
any
changes
for
this
year,
but,
as
I
mentioned,
we're
always
open
to
considering
anything,
but
just
as
a
way
to
kind
of
try
to
help
you
with
this
here's.
What
I
would
suggest
as
a
first
year
member
with
respect
to
comments,
think
about
think
back
on
projects
that
you
heard
about
or
that
you
read
about
that
that
strike
a
chord
with
you
whatever.
It
is
whether
it's
a
theme
that
you're
concerned
about
I
mean
dan
clearly
has
a
theme.
That's
fine!
That's
great!
B
B
Why
are
they
doing
this
this
way,
instead
of
trying
to
go
through
every
single
comment
and
figure
out
whether
just
pick
the
things
that
you're
passionate
about
and
let
that
guide
you
on
comments
for
now
so
for
the
next
two
weeks
now
for
our
meeting
on
the
12th
in
our
meeting
on
on
the
19th,
that's
the
focus.
B
Hd
is
a
little
bit
behind
us.
They're
finishing
up
those
categorizations
of
the
point
ranges
for
hd
projects
today,
once
they
do
that.
I
anticipate
that
sometime
in
the
next
few
days,
you
will
get
a
rating
sheet,
an
excel
rating
sheet
that
has
all
of
those
ranges
pre-filled
out
on
it.
So
you
know
what
those
ranges
are
again:
you're
allowed
to
go
outside
of
the
range,
but
you're
encouraged
to
stay
in
them
unless
you
really
feel
passionate
about
a
particular
project
and
want
to
rate
outside
of
that.
B
So
that's
the
other
thing
that
you
kind
of
need
to
start
on
in
parallel,
and
that
requires
you
know
considering
each
and
every
project-
and
I
would
say
there
as
you
go
through
these
cbrs
you'll,
find
that
you
know
they're
all
structured
the
same
way
and
you
know
whatever
page
it
is.
You
know
they're
all
about
five
pages
and
page
three,
you
know
is
generally
I'm
making
this
up,
but
it's
the
same
idea
is
the
gobbledygook
where
they
tell
you
how
it
fits
every
city.
B
You
know
city
goal
and
it's
amazing
how
every
project
seems
to
fit
every
city
goal
right,
so
that
information
is
not
particularly
useful,
and
by
reading
the
project
purpose
up
front,
you
can
make
your
own
assessment
of
that
pretty
easily.
You
also
have
the
guidance
of
each
of
the
task
force
forces
based
on
the
range
that
we've
given.
B
What's
going
on
with
it
and
then
start
to
use
the
way
that
framework
that
you've
created
for
yourself
and
and
try
to
apply
that
consistently
across
all
of
the
projects,
as
you
start
rating
them
and
use
it
as
a
relative
thing,
you
know,
especially
when
you
get
down
to
the
qualitative
section,
and
I
wouldn't
get
too
worried
about
whether
on
a
15
point
scale,
something
is
a
seven
or
an
eight
right.
Maybe
you
move
it
in
two
point
increments
or
three
point
increments
or
five
point
increments.
It's
all
pretty!
It's
not
that
precise
right!
B
So
don't
don't
don't
make
this
harder
than
it
needs
to
be.
Some
of
it
is
just
going
to
be
your
own
personal
assessment
about
how
much
this
particular
project
contributes
to
neighborhood,
liver
ability
or
not,
and
whether
that's
a
5
or
a
10
or
15
might
be
easier
than
trying
to
worry
about
a
15
point.
Scale
literally
point
by
point:
that's
kind
of
how
I
approach
things.
I'm
sure
others
could
give
you
a
different
way.
B
I
would,
I
don't
think
it
matters
too
much
what
your
specific
approach
is
other
than
trying
to
come
up
with
something
that
you
can
apply
consistently
across
all
the
projects
that
you
rate
so
and
that's
the
next
deadline
will
be
on
on
draft
com
or
those
ratings
will
be
due,
may
20th.
No
sorry,
yes
may
20th.
B
G
Decisions
we
made
and
the
and
the
level
of
need
decisions
that
we
made
number
one
and
then
secondly,
I
found
as
a
new
member,
and
still
I
do
spend
most
of
my
time
on
the
on
the
specific
qualitative
criteria.
I
find
that
filling
in
the
number
of
points
for
level
of
need
and
the
number
of
points
per
contribution
of
city
goals
goes
much
faster.
A
I
think
I
I
mean
the
rating
sheets
are
dependent
on
when
the
other
task
force
is
done
with
their
rating.
So
I
don't-
I
don't
know
where
they're
at
with
that
today,
but
it
won't
take.
I
don't
think
it'll
take
too
long
to
put
that
together
and
send
out
to
members.
So,
but
I
I
guess,
that's
just
a
question
mark.
B
H
B
Yeah,
sorry
before
we
get
to
that,
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
if,
if
anybody
has
you
know
additional
concerns
or
wants
some
help
or
guidance,
if
you
reach
out
to
me
via
email
or
phone,
I'm
more
than
happy
to
try
to
help,
don't
be
shy
about
that
and
I'm
I
know
I
I'm
sure,
I'm
confident
I
can
speak
for
jeff
in
the
same
way
and
there's
probably
others
as
well.
Who
would
be
more
than
happy
to
help
neil?
Can
you
put
the
script
up?