►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
Meeting
of
the
charter
commission's
region's
redistricting
advisory
member
selection
work
group
will
now
begin
good
morning.
Welcome
to
this
virtual
meeting
of
the
charter
commission's
redistricting
advisory
member
selection
work
group.
This
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statute,
section
13
d
.021,
due
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic,
the
city
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
means
of
creating
public
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency.
B
The
meeting
is
public
and
subject
to
the
minnesota
open
meeting
law.
For
the
record,
my
name
is
jill
garcia
and
I
am
one
of
the
co-chairs
of
the
charter
commission's
redistricting
advisory
member
selection
work
group.
I
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order
and
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role
so
that
we
may
verify
the
presence
of
the
corn.
D
E
B
D
D
B
F
D
G
B
B
Okay,
this
is
the
process
for
conducting
interviews
and
recommending
members
for
the
advisory
group
that
this
group
had
worked
on
for
the
past
month
or
so.
This
is
the
draft
process
we
developed
and
parallel
to
this
is
a
interview
guide
adapted
from
the
city's
hr
department
for
us
to
use
when
we
meet
and
interview
candidates
for
the
advisory
group,
so
we're
having
a
quick
review
of
the
process
document.
B
D
G
B
And
does
the
purpose
for
which
they're
recorded
matter,
because
we're
thinking
that
there
should
be
about
three
of
us
in
on
each
interview.
So
perhaps
the
purpose
of
the
recording
could
be
for
the
advisory
group
member.
That
is
unable
to
be
there
so
number
one,
the
purpose
and
number
two
any
other
considerations.
We
need
to
take
into
account.
A
I
know
that
private
data
will
be
discussed
during
the
interviews
if
you
use
three
advisory
selection
work
group
members
that
is
a
quorum
of
your
work
group,
presuming
that
you
have
to
have
an
open
meeting.
If
you
have
a
quorum
of
your
work
group,
then
you
would
have
to
have
the
interviews
open
to
the
public.
A
So
if
you
would
say
have
only
two
of
your
work
group
members,
potentially
like
the
two
chairs
and
then
had
someone
else
like
maybe
a
city,
clerk
staff
or
nicole
or
or
somebody
from
hr,
be
on
that
panel,
then
you
would
not
have
to
open
it
up
to
the
public.
So
that's
one
issue
regarding
opening
it
up
to
the
public
or
not
with
respect
to
recording
the
interviews.
A
You
could
do
that
and
then
I
think
typically,
our
hr
department
does
not
do
that
for
interviews,
but
you
could
do
that.
The
only
thing
is
and
then
it
could
be
provided
to
the
other,
the
other
charter,
commissioners,
if
they
want
to
listen
to
the
interviews,
because,
ultimately,
this
work
group
is
going
to
make
a
recommendation
to
the
full
charter
commission
and
then
the
full
charter
commission
makes
a
determination
as
to
who
these
advisory
group
members
will
be.
A
The
other
issue
we'd
have
to
consider
is
if,
if
they
are
finalists
typically,
when
somebody's
interviewed,
they
are
finalists,
so
they
would
probably
their
names
probably
would
be
public.
Some
information
might
be
public
about
what
they
say,
which
may
include
their
background
and
wherever
they've
worked
before
so
those
are
those
are
issues.
Those
are
kind
of
sticky
issues.
Once
we
have
that
data,
can
we
withhold
it
all
as
private
personal
data,
or
would
we
have
to
go
through
and
pick
up
bits
and
pieces
that
are
public
and
provide
that
to
the
public
or
not?
E
Thank
you
I
tend
to.
I
would
tend
to
adopt
the
the
suggestion
made
by
ms
bushoon
and
that
we
have
two
commissioners
conduct
the
interviews
with
perhaps
a
member
of
the
clerk's
office
or
a
member
of
hr
joining
in,
and
that
we
not
record
the
interviews,
because
there
may
well
be
a
data
request
where
we
would
have
to
provide
it
or
we
would
have
to
either
sort
through
to
see
what
is
public
and
what
is
private,
and
that
could
be
a
long
process.
Given
the
number
of
interviews
that
we
may
end
up,
conducting.
B
H
Thank
you
so
right,
right
away.
I
remember
when
there
was
a
conversation
about
the
ability
for
applicants
to
submit
video.
The
decision
was
to
not
do
that
due
to
exactly
what
we're
talking
about
so
for
consistency.
I
would
like
to
just
for
me
personally
recommend
that
we
do
not
record,
because
it
would
we
would.
H
We
would
be
contradicting
the
decision
to
not
allow
video
submission
for
an
application.
Secondly,
I
also
agree
about
the
two
advisory
selection
work
group
members.
I
would
even
think
of
reaching
beyond
hr
and
thinking
of
seeing
if
either
anyone
has
the
capacity
in
our
division
of
race
and
equity,
or
even
my
colleagues
at
ncr,
to
have
to
to
just
be
considered
as
part
of
the
interview
panel
and
those
are
the
those
are
the
two
new
things
I'm
thinking
of,
and
I'm
also
pretty
concerned
about
data
privacy
too.
H
D
Yeah,
so
I
guess
I
would
agree
about
not
recording
the
interviews.
I
think
that
if
there's
a
data
request,
then
you
get
into
a
whole
area
of
trying
to
redact,
perhaps
private
data,
but
I
think
I
would
be
in
favor
of
not
restricting
just
the
two
interviewers.
It
kind
of
seems
to
me
that
you're
almost
trying
to
avoid
the
open
media
law
by
saying
we're
just
going
to
have
two
people
from
the
committee,
and
perhaps
you
could
rotate
the
two
people,
but
it's
not
always
the
same
two
people.
D
If
we
get
a
number
of
applicants,
I
mean
that
could
create
a
lot
of
work,
but
also,
I
think,
just
as
part
of
the
selection
committee.
I
think
that
I
guess
I
would
hope
to
participate,
hopefully
in
all
the
interviews.
If,
if
I
can
and
in
terms
of
evaluating
the
applicants,
I
think
it
would
be
important
to
get
in
on
those
interviews,
as
opposed
to
just
maybe
reading
someone
else's
summary,
and
I
guess
I'm
not
really
concerned
about
private
data.
D
B
A
If,
if,
in
fact,
let
me
just
say,
I
know
that
these
work
groups
have
been
open
to
the
public,
I'm
not
a
hundred
percent
sure
that
they're
required
to
be
open
to
the
public
under
the
open
meeting
law,
but
let's
assume
that
they
are
required
to
be
open
to
the
public
under
the
open
meeting
law
under
the
open
meeting
law.
Yes,
you
would
do
your
normal
notice
of
the
meetings,
which
would
be
at
least
three
day
notice,
and
then
they
would
be
open
to
the
public.
A
You
can
discuss
private
data
during
the
meetings,
but
any
kind
of
recording
we'd
have
to
kind.
We
we'd
have
to
look
at
what
we
do
with
the
recording,
because
any
kind
of
documentation
like
any
kind
of
written
documentation
or
any
kind
of
recording
that
is
not
necessarily
available
to
the
public.
After
the
fact,
it's
just
the
the
so
we'd
have
to
look
at
those
issues,
because
the
general
rule
is,
you
can
discuss
at
an
open
meeting.
That's
required
to
be
open
under
the
open
meeting
law.
A
If
it's
necessary
to
do
the
business
of
that
group,
then
you
can
discuss
private
personnel
data,
but
at
typically
at
those
meetings
we
provide
documentation
out
to
the
public,
but
they
don't
get
documentation.
They
don't
get
private
personal
documentation
in
physical
written
form.
We
do
not
provide
that
to
the
public,
but
we
can
discuss
things
that
are
private
during
a
meeting.
A
G
I
I
guess
in
thinking
it
through.
I
was
going
to
suggest
that,
because
I
kind
of
agree
with
commissioner
smith
that
you
know
put
putting
the
burden
of
of
the
interviews
these
all
these
interviews
on
just
two
people
is,
might
be
a
bit
much
and
but
and
I'm
saying
why.
Why
can't
we
just
open
it
up
to
the
to
the
public
so
that
everybody
can
participate,
but
that
those
meetings
would
be
recorded
right?
They
have
to
be
if
they're
open
meeting.
G
If
we're
operating
as
we
are
now,
those
meetings
would
be
recorded
and,
as
I
recall
back
in
the
old
days
when
they
had
the
the
old
reapportionment
commission,
those
of
us
who
applied
just
had
to
show
up
and
everything
was
in
public.
It
was
a
public
hearing,
so
we
were
all
interviewed
under
under
that
in
an
open
in
an
open
meeting
is,
are
we
required
to
I?
I
I
guess
it's
open
for
to
me
for
a
discussion
whether
or
not
we
should
open
the
meeting
up
to
everyone.
B
B
B
As
an
aside,
I
would
suggest
that
we
make
it
known
that
the
interviews
would
be
an
open
meeting
for
the
the
candidates
we
are
interviewing
if
they,
so
they
have
just
disclosed
that,
so
they
know
what
they're
going
into
so.
Would
an
open
meeting
be
let
me
review
so
for
this.
For
this
work
group,
the
meeting
will
be
on
the
website
and
youtube
youtube
channel,
so
it
is
open
to
the
public
and,
as
such,
the
the
the
public
can
access.
B
B
A
Sorry
about
the
delay
chair,
garcia,
I
was
just
looking
at
the
opening
open
meeting
law
under
under
the
statute
that
we're
using
now
and
the
and
one
that
we
could
use
in
the
future.
I
have
to
double
check,
but
it
doesn't
appear
like
we
do
need
to
record
it.
I
don't
know
if
the
city
council
has
rules
that
require
recording
of
these
of
meetings,
but
I
don't.
I
haven't,
checked
the
charter
commission
rules
to
see
if
you
have
anything
regarding
recording.
A
A
A
B
I
Thanks
chair,
garcia,
yeah,
I
want
to
address
again
something
that
was
mentioned
earlier.
Would
you
also
want
a
staff
member
in
on
the
panel
for
each
interview,
so
it
would
be
three
advisory
selection,
work,
group
members
and
one
staff
member
from
either
the
city
clerk's
office
or
neighborhood
and
community
relations
as
christina
kendrick
mentioned,
you
know
an
affiliated
staff
member
to
be
on
the
panel
as
well,
or
do
we
just
want
to
have
three
work
group
members.
B
B
I
B
H
H
Also,
I
understand
that
the
charge
of
the
work
group
of
the
subcommittee
is
to
select
the
candidates,
but
I
feel
that
there
is
flexibility
where
you
can
extend
that
charge
to
give
the
same
voice
just
as
you're
doing
to
the
advisory
group,
where
they
would
be
able
to
weigh
in
as
an
equal
voice,
who
also
would
have
a
lot
of
context
of
the
diverse
communities
throughout
our
city.
That's
why
I
recommended
race
and
equity
or
ncr.
A
I
I
If
one
person
being
interviewed
had
four
people
on
their
panel
and
one
person
had
three,
you
know,
I
think
we
need
to
be
consistent
and
maybe
take
out
that
wording
a
panel
of
three
or,
if
we
want
to
say
all
four
members
would
be
available
for
every
interview
and
make
it
all
four,
then
that's.
I
think
we
need
to
be
consistent
with
the
number
of
of
people
actually
on
the
panel
for
each
interview.
A
I
I
do
agree
with
nicole.
I
think
we
need
to
be
consistent.
I
have
served
on
quite
a
few
panels,
myself
interview
panels
and
sometimes
there's
an
hr
person
there.
That
just
is
there
to
maybe
take
the
time
or
to
assist
with
any
issues
and
they
don't
score,
sometimes
they're
not
there,
but
you
can
have
more
than
three
people
on
the
panel.
The
only
thing
is,
you
know
the
more
people
you
have
on
the
panel,
the
more
you
have
to
schedule.
A
You
know
you
have
a
scheduling
issue
because
you
got
to
get
get
them
all
together,
but
I
would
say:
not
only
do
you
need
the
number
consistent,
the
I
would
say
the
individuals
just
to
clarify
the
individuals
should
be
consistent
too,
because
different
people
score
differently.
I
mean
I
might
score
higher
in
general
for
everybody
where
another
person
might
go
scored
lower
in
general
for
everybody.
So
we
don't
want
to
mix
people.
A
B
You
and
I
know
that
we
have
solution
with
that
in
mind.
We
have
solicited
very
good
feedback
from
hr
about
how
to
normalize
data
when
it
comes
to,
which
means
english.
How
to
make
sure
that
the
interview
guide
is,
is
structured,
structured
such
that
it
provides
as
much
guidance
on
how
everybody
on
the
panel
looks
at
the
information.
B
B
D
I
guess
I'm
not
concerned
about
the
number
of
people
that
are
interviewing.
I
think
I
would
be
in
favor
of
just
removing
the
number
and
say
the
panel
will
consist
of
the
advisory
selection
work
group
and
you
know,
hopefully
most
of
the
work
group
can
attend
most
of
the
interviews.
But
if
we're
interviewing
20
or
30
people,
I
think
it's
expected
that
certainly
people
have
other
obligations
that
may
not
be
able
to
attend
all
of
them.
D
D
I
think
it's
just
be
the
entire
selection
work
group-
and
I
see
just
in
the
comments
that
there
are
at
least
a
couple
commissioners
that
said
they'd
like
to
listen
in
and
they
wouldn't
be
participating,
but
they
could
certainly
listen
in
and
when
it
comes
before
the
full
committee,
they
might
have
some
opinions
about
people
as
well.
So
I
would
suggest
just
striking
the
number
a
number
from
there
and
just
saying
that
it'll
be
a
panel
of
the
advisors
collection,
work
group.
B
D
And
then
I
guess,
there's
still
kind
of
a
question.
Do
we
want
you
know
someone
else
from
the
city.
You
know
hr
to
sit
in.
I
think
sometimes
you
know.
If
we
stick
to
our
that
list
of
set
lists
of
questions.
That
may
not
be
an
issue.
Sometimes
you
know
an
hr
person
might
be
able
to
say
that's
an
inappropriate
question.
They
ask
if
someone
is
is
doing
that.
But
if
we
just
pretty
much
stick
to
our
questions,
I
don't.
I
don't
think
that's
as
big
a
big
of
a
concern.
G
I
I
agree
with
commissioner
smith
again,
I
think
that's
a
that's
a
sensible
way
to
put
it,
and
you
know
if
some,
if,
if
some
applicant
only
has
two
members
there
or
maybe
four,
I'm
not
sure
it's
going
to
make
that
that
big,
a
difference,
and
I
just
so
that
the
people
know
that
there's
a
chance
that
it's
hope
the
panel
is
going
to
be
there
us
and
they
can.
You
can
tell
that
there's
four
members
of
the
panel,
but
I
don't
think
we
have
to
go
much
beyond
that.
B
B
And
and
if
both
of
us
can
be
there
great,
but
that
we
at
least
put
that
forth
as
a
baseline,
I
notice
that
the
city
clerk
supports
having
another
staff
member
on
the
panel,
but
that
they
serve
as
the
advisory
and
consultants
with
regard
to
any
issues
or
questions
that
may
come
up,
but
that
the
vote
and
the
evaluation
be
done
by
the
advisory
selection.
Work.
F
Group
this
is
commissioner
hawkins.
If
I
may
make
a
comment,
please,
yes,
I
I
just
you
know
I
kind
of
agree,
but
I'm
thinking,
if
you
get
five
or
six
people
in
this
interview,
real
this
person's
gonna
walk
in
there
and
they're
gonna
be
scared
to
death.
It's
like
wow.
I
gotta
answer
to
all
these
people.
Are
they
gonna
ask
me
all
these
questions,
so
I
mean
I
do
agree.
You
have
to
be
an
ncr
person,
a
person
from
the
city
and,
like
you
said,
maybe
two
or
three
people
from
the.
B
H
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
when
I
was
in
first
came
in
and
started
to
be
involved.
It
was
my
understanding
that
both
ncr
and
the
division
of
race
and
equity
have
made
some
recommendations
about
the
process
etc,
and
one
of
the
recommendations
that
I'm
remembering
is
each
of
our
communities
was
was
interested
in
having
their
own.
If
you
will
selection
group
and
then
putting
forward
a
candidate
like
having
way
more
of
a
public
process
which
you
know
has
pros
and
cons,
etc.
B
With
their
questions
on
the
application
and
keeping
the
confidential
data
confidential
and
being
so
precise,
I
mean
we've
done
numerous
revisions
and
had
numerous
eyes
look
at
at
these
documents
that
anything
hr
related
ought
to
have
been
accounted
for
by
now
and
that
we
would
not.
We
would
be
prudent
enough
to
not
go
down
that
that
path
which,
as
a
result,
leads
me
to
think
that
somebody
from
hr
or
I'm
sorry,
somebody
from
ncr
would
be
most
appropriate.
Ms
kendrick.
B
I
Yes,
I
have
every
intention
of
attending
every
interview.
I
I
guess
it's
up
to
to
this
moment
now
for
the
decision
to
be
made,
if
I
should
just
attend
as
a
member
of
the
public
and
be
in
the
background
and
doing
what
I
need
to
do
for
you
know
to
be
involved
or
if
you
need
me
on
the
panel
to
actually
be
present
and
asking
questions,
I
would
attend
the
interviews.
B
I
would
like
to,
I
would
see
you
attending
as
staff
to
the
advisory
group
selection
process,
which
would
be
not
evaluating
and
not
asking
questions,
but
also
being
having
the
opportunity
to
be
more
present
than
simply
an
observer.
If
something
comes
up
or
we
have
questions
or
we
need
help
with
something
if
that
makes
sense.
B
B
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I'm
sorry
I
couldn't
be
here
earlier.
I
was
also
virtually
attending
the
council's
committee
of
the
whole
meeting
and
monitoring
the
chat.
So
I
saw
I'm
sorry
that
my
comments
have
been
disruptive
in
the
chat,
but
I
I
was
simply
going
to
suggest
to
nicole
or
whoever
is
typing
this
up
under
number
three.
I
think
it
should
say
a
panel
composed
of
advisory
selection
group
members
shall
conduct
the
interview
staff
assistants
will
be
provided
by
the
project
coordinator,
and
you
know,
representatives
of
the
neighborhood
and
community
relations
department.
J
The
staff
are
not
there
to
vote
to
cast
any
kind
of
decision-making
function
as
part
of
selecting
candidates
will
be
forwarded
to
the
full
charter
commission
for
a
selection
they're
simply
there
to
advise,
provide
technical
logistical
support
and
help
the
work
group
with
its
work
and
so
to
be
very
clear.
The
panel
will
be
composed
of
advisory
selection
group,
workgroup
members
who
will
conduct
the
interview.
The
project
coordinator
and
representatives
from
the
neighborhood
and
community
relations
department
will
provide.
E
G
F
F
G
B
G
B
E
I
E
D
B
D
I
just
kind
of
had
a
question
about
the
process.
I
see
that
we've
deleted
the
language
where
it
says
the
remaining
x
minutes
will
be
used
for
the
interview
panel
to
review
and
just
stop.
I
guess
I'm
wondering
after
the
interview
are
we
going
to
discuss
people
I
see
under
the
interview,
logistics
that
says
that
ratings
will
be
recorded
and
then
we
sell
spreadsheets
for
overall
comparisons.
I
guess
I'm
wondering.
Are
we
going
to
talk
about
people?
B
E
I
think
I
agree
with
commissioner
smith
on
how
we
would
conduct
the
discussion,
because,
if
we're
discussing
each
candidate
immediately
after
the
interview
and
people
are
watching
our
open
meeting,
it's
going
to
be
apparent
that
we
might
have
just
said.
We
didn't
think
somebody
was
as
good
as
somebody
else
and
they
would
know
immediately
who
we
were
referring
to.
Whereas
if,
if
we
had
the
data
compiled
and
submitted
to
us,
we
could
then
sort
of
anonymize
it
in
our
discussion
and
say
well.
G
G
Because
I,
what
I,
what
I'm
hearing
is
that
the
maybe
I
should
have
paid
attention
at
an
earlier
meeting
to
this.
But
what
I'm
hearing
is
that
these
evaluation
criteria-
they're
not
just
for
our
own
personal
use,
to
to
compare
candidates
but
they're,
going
to
go
into
a
they're
going
to
get
aggregated.
Is
that
the
idea.
I
Yes,
I
we
might
have
discussed
some
prior
co-chairs
where
I
had
said
that
we
could
have
those
who
are
completing
the
sheets
return
them
to
me.
I
would
collect
them
and
file
them
and
that
I
would
put
the
ratings
in
a
spreadsheet
so
that
they
were
all
in
one
cohesive
place
where
you
could
see
and
that.
But
that's
up
for
discussion.
B
B
B
H
So
again,
I'm
just
thinking
for
fairness
and
consistency,
maybe
making
a
decision.
I
know
the
city
is
able
to
accommodate
those
who
would
need
internet
access,
etc.
We
at
our
department
have
access
to
technology
hot
spots,
the
whole
situation,
so
it
would,
it
would
be
not.
It
would
not
be
difficult
to
put
in
that
request
for
a
particular
applicant
if
needed.
B
D
D
You
can
participate
remotely
through
interactive
television,
but
that
place
has
to
be
open
to
the
public
unless
it's
less
than
three
times.
I'm
not
sure
someone
wants
to
open
up
their
home
to
the
public
if
they're
participating
from
there.
So
I
think
it's
maybe
just
a
little
bit
early.
I
don't
remember
exactly
what
the
what
the
interview
schedule
is,
but
it
might
be
a
situation.
D
I
think,
and
I
guess
we
would
certainly
look
to
the
city
attorney's
office,
but
we
may
have
to
do
these
in
person
and
if
the
panel's
in
person,
I
guess,
I'm
not
sure
exactly
how
that
works
for
the
candidate
if
the
candidate
could
participate
remotely
or
if
the
candidate
would
have
to
be
there
in
person
too.
I'm
not
sure
about
that.
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
These
are
very
interesting
discussions,
but,
as
we
are
all
aware,
subject
to
a
lot
of
change
and
potentially
change
yet
to
come,
I
know
that
the
period
assigned
for
this
group
to
complete
its
work
and
submit
a
panel
of
recommended
candidates
to
be
decided
by
the
charter
commission
will
probably
happen
before
decisions
about
returning
to
in-person
meetings
is
done.
J
J
Obviously,
in
the
clerk's
office
we
are
already
preparing
for
if
the
city
council
and
our
boards
and
commissions,
which
would
include
the
charter
commission,
need
to
come
back
before
that
time
or
at
that
time
or
sometime
in
between.
So
a
lot
of
those
are
decisions
yet
to
be
made,
but
just
to
give
assurances
to
the
group
that
we
are
working
in
the
clerk's
office
with
our
communications
and
information,
technology,
partners
and
others,
including
ncr,
in
terms
of
what
those
plans
will
be
for
public
meetings,
public
hearings
and
public
events.