►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
C
D
F
C
And
I'll
note
for
the
record
that
council
member
gordon
did
reach
out
to
us
and
let
us
know
he
was
unable
to
make
the
meeting
today,
he
might
be
able
to
join
by
phone,
but
he
did
call
in
in
advance
I'll
start
with
the
consent
agenda
today,
which
is
items
five
through
twenty
item.
Five
is
the
liquor
license
approvals
and
item?
Six?
Are
the
renewals
item
number
seven
is
an
auar
an
alternative
area
wide
review
for
the
upper
harbor
terminal
item
number.
Eight
is
hennepin
county's
redevelopment
authority.
C
This
is
financial
assistance
from
their
housing
incentive
fund
for
a
project
in
the
city
item
number:
nine
is
a
grant
application
to
deed
for
a
project
at
malcolm
yards
item
number
10,
our
cultural
district's
interior
improvements
pilot
program.
These
will
be
going
to
the
african
economic
development
services,
lake
street
council,
northeast
chamber
and
west
bank
business
association.
C
Item
number
11
are
the
great
streets,
facade
improvement
program
grants
and
the
total
of
450
000.
These
will
be
going
to
the
african
economic
development
services
lake
street
council,
northeast
minneapolis
chamber
of
commerce,
the
nakomis
east
neighborhood,
association's
standish,
erickson,
neighborhood
association,
seward
redesign
southwest
business
association,
the
victory
neighborhood
association,
weber,
camden
neighborhood
association
and
the
west
bank
business
association
item.
C
12
is
a
commercial
property
development
front
loan
for
split
rock
properties
for
a
property
at
3745
minnehaha
avenue
item
13
is
a
bond
issuance
for
stone
house
square
apartments
at
215,
broadway
avenue
item
14
is
a
bond
issuance
for
peregrine
at
2025
west
river
road.
This
is
granting
approval
for
the
county
and
their
redevelopment
authority
to
work
on
a
project
in
that
location.
C
Item
15
is
a
contingency
trust
fund
loan
for
3301
nicolette
item
16
is
acquisitions
of
easements
for
the
border
avenue
extension
project
item
17
is
a
nuisance
condition:
property
waiver
at
2029,
willow
avenue
north
item
18
is
a
right-of-way
vacation
for
mark
lucas
on
behalf
of
van
wyk
holdings
at
1207
glenwood
item
19
is
referring
to
staff.
The
subject
matter
of
a
seasonal
of
seasonal
outdoor,
permit,
ordinance,
changes
and
item
20
is
referring
to
staff.
The
subject
matter
of
the
third
party
delivery
fees-
ordinance
item
21-
is
a
receive
and
file.
C
C
F
C
Those
items
are
approved
will
then
move
on
to
our
public
hearing
agenda.
There
are
four
public
hearings
this
afternoon,
starting
with
item
number
one,
which
is
the
breakfast
bar
of
minnesota,
because,
however,
the
applicant
has
withdrawn
their
application,
because
the
hearing
has
already
been
publicly
noticed
I'll
proceed
to
open
the
public
hearing
and
ask
the
clerk.
If
there's
anyone
in
queue
to
speak
to
this
item-
and
it
looks
like
there
is
someone
in
queue.
So
perhaps
mr
velasquez
can
explain
what
is
happening.
E
Thank
you
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
committee
members.
The
applicant
breakfast
bar
of
minnesota
has
submitted
three
different
applications,
two
of
which
were
already
approved
as
the
electoral
license
approvals
and
the
consent
agenda
just
moments
ago.
The
third
item
is
the
exterior
upgrade
that
would
allow
for
live
general
entertainment
in
the
outdoor
space.
The
applicant
has
chosen
to
withdraw
that
specific
application,
while
moving
forward
with
the
other
two
items
at
this
time.
C
I'm
noting
that
the
clerk
has
noted
that
the
person
who
signed
up
to
speak
on
item
number
on
is
not
on
the
call.
So
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
on
item
number
one
as
that
is
required
under
our
notice
proceedings
and
see
if
there's
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue,
anyone
seeing
none,
I'm
going
to
close
the
public
hearing,
I
will
move
to
withdraw
this
item
at
staff's
recommendation.
Are
there
any
comments
or
questions
about
that?
If
not
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role
on
the
motion
to
withdraw.
B
F
C
C
B
B
So
the
applicant
is
looking
to
establish
an
interim
use
for
five
years
to
allow
for
an
80
space.
Temporary
surface
parking
lodge
next
slide.
Please
that
timing
of
five
years
will
will
allow
for
the
applicant
and
the
for
the
city
of
minneapolis
to
complete
a
new
request
for
proposal
for
development
of
the
surface
parking
lot.
However,
in
the
in
the
meantime,
the
city
is
looking
to
improve
the
current
conditions
of
the
surface
parking
lot
by
repaving
by
striping
and
landscaping.
B
The
perimeter
of
the
of
the
parking
lot
and
staff
finds
that
this
interim
use
permit
meets
the
findings
needed,
including
not
being
detrimental
to
or
injurious
to,
the
public,
health,
safety
and
comfort
of
those
in
the
area
and
to
help
reduce
traffic
congestion.
In
the
meantime,
while
a
new
development
proposal
comes
comes
to
fruition,
sas
recommending
approval
of
the
interim
use
permit
with
the
one
that
can
do
with
the
main
condition
being
that
it
shall
expire
by
august,
24th
2026..
C
C
C
Council,
member
allison
has
moved
approval
of
item
number
two.
I
do
want
to
note.
This
is
in
the
fifth
ward,
and
so
many
good
things
are
happening
at
the
capri
theater.
Congratulations
to
you,
council,
member
ellison,
on
and
everyone
on
the
capri
team
for
getting
this
far.
It's
been
a
long
time
in
coming
on
the
motion
to
approve
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
please
call
the
role.
F
C
D
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
committee
next
slide,
please,
the
2020
caper
is
the
report
on
city's
performance
on
its
community
development
block,
grant
home
funds,
emergency
solutions
grant
and
hop
up
programming
is
a
report
made
to
the
u.s
department
of
housing
and
urban
development.
That's
due
at
the
end
of
the
month.
D
The
draft
caper
was
made
available
on
the
city's
consolidated
plan
website
and
staff
requests
that
as
a
receive
and
file
item,
that
items
receive
or
comments
received
at
this
hearing
or
otherwise
provided
in
written
format
during
the
comment
period
be
included
in
the
final
report
submitted
to
hud
on
august
27th.
This
friday.
C
C
A
C
That
item
is
approved,
we'll
move
on
to
our
last
public
hearing
item,
which
is
item
number
four.
This
is
the
tax
increment
financing
plan
for
worth
on
the
woods,
I
will
note
that
this
public
hearing
will
be
open,
but
due
to
a
noticing
area
era
error,
it
will
be
continued
into
the
business
meeting
of
september
14th.
But
I'd
like
to
invite
staff
to
give
the
presentation
now
and
I
believe,
we've
been
joined
by
emily
carr.
G
Hello
good
afternoon,
chair
goodman
members
of
the
committee,
I'm
emily
carr
and
I'm
a
senior
project
coordinator
in
cped.
I
am
before
you
today
requesting
two
pieces
of
financing
for
the
worth
on
the
woods.
Theodore
senior,
affordable
project
worth
on
the
woods
is
a
six-story
new
construction
project
project
proposed
in
the
bryn
mawr
neighborhood.
G
Actually
today
the
first
involves
tactical
financing,
which
is
the
subject
of
the
public
hearing,
and
the
second
is
an
additional,
affordable,
housing
trust
fund
award
I'll
describe
the
project
now
regarding
both
worth
on
the
woods
will
include.
100
units
of
senior
housing,
affordable
at
50,
mi
or
below
all
units
are
one
or
two
bedrooms
will
be
affordable.
G
The
worth
on
the
woods
theodore
is
part
of
a
multi-phase
redevelopment
on
the
nine
acre
former
centurylink
site
in
the
bryn
mawr
neighborhood
phase.
One
of
the
redevelopment
includes
the
senior
four
building
adjacent
right
right
basis
of
the
redevelopment
is
expected:
renovation
of
the
existing
centurylink
office
into
approximately
100
to
150
market
rate
units
phase
3
is
planned
as
60
for
sale,
town
homes,
the
market
rate
senior
building
and
the
other
phases
are
not
subject
to
the
project
financing
before
you
today.
G
G
G
The
pay,
as
you
go
note,
does
not
obligate
the
city
to
make
any
payments
to
the
note
holder
beyond
the
payment
of
ninety
percent
of
the
tax
increment
generated
by
the
development.
The
attached
worth
on
the
woods
tax
increment
financing
plan
provides
a
detailed
breakdown
of
how
the
increment
will
be
distributed
and
used.
G
The
work
tax,
increment
financing
plan
was
transmitted
for
the
required
45-day
review
to
hennepin
county
county,
the
minneapolis
school
board,
the
city
planning,
commission,
the
bryn
mawr
neighborhood
association
and
other
interested
parties
unlocked
2021.
No
public
comments
were
received
about
the
plan.
The
tiff
redevelopment
con
terms
require
the
developer
to
deliver
100
units
of
affordable
senior
housing
within
18
months
of
closing,
with
the
additional
provisions
outlined
in
the
report,
the
developer
has
agreed
to
the
city's
recapture
provisions.
G
The
increased
property
value
resulting
from
the
construction
of
this
housing
project
will
not
be
included
in
the
city's
general
tax
base
until
the
tif's
tiff
district
is
de-certified,
which
is
anticipated
to
occur
in
approximately
26
years.
The
city
will
retain
10
of
the
tax
increment
generated
each
year
for
the
payment
of
tif
administrative
costs.
G
The
last
action
before
you
today
is
regarding
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
The
project
was
awarded
an
affordable
housing
trust
fund
award
of
two
million
dollars
in
2019
and
staff
is
recommending
an
additional
award
in
an
amount
not
to
exceed
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
cover
a
financing
gap
created
by
increased
labor
and
material
costs.
Under
the
trust
fund
guidelines.
The
project
is
eligible
to
receive
this
500
000
on
a
pipeline
basis.
G
G
C
It
does
not
appear
that
anyone
is
here
for
the
call.
So
as
a
result
of
that,
I'm
going
to
close
the
public
hearing,
I'm
going
to
move
to
postpone
item
four
sections,
one
two
and
three
one
and
two
and
move
forward
items
three
and
four,
and
I
certainly
will
rely
on
staff
to
tell
me
if
that
has
not
been
noticed
correctly.
But
it
sounds
like
we
can
authorize
the
redevelopment
contract
as
well
as
the
additional
trust
fund
allocation
today
and
take
up
the
tax
increment
in
at
the
next
meeting.
H
B
F
C
That
item
on
the
trust
fund
allocation
has
been
approved
and
the
tax
increment
plan
will
move
forward
to
september
14th.
Our
last
item
on
the
agenda
today
is
a
discussion
item.
This
is
receiving
and
filing
via
a
presentation.
The
2020
inclusionary
zoning
annual
report
councilmember
schroeder,
and
I
got
a
brief
look
at
the
powerpoint,
which
is
really
incredibly
well
done,
and
so
we
thought
everyone
would
like
to
see
it.
So
I'm
going
to
turn
this
over
to
back
over
to
emily
carr
so
that
she
can
give
the
presentation
on
item
number
22..
C
G
I
am
emily
carr
senior
project
coordinator
in
residential
finance.
Can
I
get
the
next
slide
please.
Today,
I'm
going
to
give
a
brief
overview
of
the
inclusionary
zoning
policy
and
the
results
from
2020.
Then
I
will
share
our
new
online
inclusionary
zoning
dashboard
that
launched
last
week.
The
staff
review
of
the
policy
which
results
in
one
recommended
action
for
the
committee
today
and
then
finally,
some
next
steps
for
the
program
next
slide.
Please.
G
The
permanent
inclusionary
zoning
policy
went
into
effect
january
1,
2020.,
inclusionary
zoning
applies
to
new
residential
projects
with
20
or
more
units
that
submitted
a
completed
land
use
application
after
january
1
2020..
It
requires
that
new
projects
provide
some
level
of
affordable
housing
on
site
or
another
public
benefit,
such
as
paying
a
fee
that
goes
into
the
city's,
affordable,
housing,
trust
fund
or
the
minneapolis
homes
program.
G
This
program
is
just
one
of
our
many
affordable
housing
tools.
Inclusionary
zoning
applies
to
both
rental
and
ownership
projects.
There
are
currently
two
temporary
exemptions
related
to
ownership
units
and
another
related
to
small
scale
buildings,
and
I
will
give
an
update
on
those
later
in.
The
presentation
known
at
lost
applies
to
new
construction
projects
with
100
or
more
units
that
demolish
existing
units
that
are
50
years
old
or
older
next
slide.
Please.
G
The
rental
and
inclusionary
zoning
requirements
include
both
on-site
compliance
options,
as
well
as
alternative
compliance
options.
On-Site
options
include
providing
eight
percent
of
the
units
on-site,
four
percent
of
the
units,
on-site
or
revenue
loss,
offset
financial
assistance
which
is
subject
to
city
council
approval.
Alternative
options
include
paying
a
cash
fee,
producing
the
required
units
offsite
or
donating
land
to
the
city.
Those
last
two
options
are
subject
to
city
council
approval
next
slide.
Please
so
attached
to
the
rca
today
is
the
2020
inclusionary
zoning
annual
report,
which
I
will
give
a
brief
overview
of
report.
G
The
report
also
includes
a
summary
of
development
projects
currently
in
the
pipeline.
These
are
projects
that
have
completed
a
land,
use
application
and
have
city
planning
commission
approval,
but
they
are
somewhere
in
the
permit
review
process
and
have
not
yet
been
issued.
A
building
permit
once
they
are
issued,
a
building
permit
their
inclusionary
zoning
selection
will
be
counted
and
finalized.
G
G
Okay,
so
some
highlights
of
the
outcomes
in
2020.
nine
projects,
with
a
total
of
742
units
received
building
permits
and
were
subject
to
inclusionary
zoning.
Two
of
the
projects
were
market
rate
projects.
One
chose
to
provide
the
units
on
site
and
will
be
providing
18
units
at
60
ami.
The
other
project
shows
the
off-site
option
and
will
produce
affordable
housing
units
at
an
adjacent
site.
G
Two
small
scale
projects
with
a
total
of
79
units
were
permitted
in
the
20
to
49
unit
range,
which
is
that
small
scale
exemption
area
and
then
five
projects
with
a
total
of
306
units
were
permitted
but
exempt
because
they
were
regulated,
affordable
housing
such
as
tax
credit
or
our
affordable
housing
projects,
trust
fund
projects.
Excuse
me,
I
wish
I
had
more
data
to
report
on
in
2020,
but
with
covid
and
the
new
challenges
related
to
materials
and
labor
market
made
this
process
slower
than
staff
initially
anticipated
next
slide.
Please.
G
G
So
this
is
the
inclusionary
zoning
tracker.
That's
currently
on
the
city's
data
page
webpage,
it's
the
featured
dashboard,
it's
organized
in
three
sections,
the
blue
section.
The
top
section
is
permitted
projects
for
both
2020
and
2021..
You
can
see
a
list
of
these
projects,
the
inclusionary
zoning
option.
They
chose
a
number
of
units.
You
can
see
so
far
that
the
projects
that
have
been
permitted-
I've
chosen
a
variety
of
options.
G
This
is
also
where
we
track
progress
to
the
500
unit
exemption
for
small
scale
developments.
You
can
see
right
now.
We
have
202
units
permitted
in
that
project
category,
so
we're
about
halfway
to
the
500
unit,
count
and
scroll
further
down
to
the
purple
section.
These
are
projects
that
are
in
the
development
pipeline.
These
projects
have
city
planning,
commission
approval,
but
not
do
not
yet
have
a
building
permit
issued,
so
we
do
not
yet
know
how
they
plan
to
comply
with
inclusionary
zoning.
G
So
the
geographic
summary
page
just
shows
the
number
of
projects
by
warden
by
neighborhood.
You
can
also
see
the
geographic
distribution
of
projects
permitted
or
in
the
pipeline,
so
the
permitted
projects
are
the
blue
star
and
then
the
pipeline
projects
are
the
circles,
and
can
you
switch
back?
Please.
G
G
The
city's
unified
housing
policy
that
was
adopted
in
2019
with
inclusionary
zoning
also
requires
that
cped
staff
review
the
inclusionary
zoning
policy
and
bring
any
recommended
updates
or
changes
to
the
city
council
after
18
months
and
again,
every
three
to
five
years
thereafter,
staff
from
multiple
city
work
units
met
and
reviewed
the
full
policy
and
outcomes
to
date,
and
we
have
one
recommended
clarification
at
this
time.
Staff
recommends
updating
the
unified
housing
policy
to
clarify
the
definitions
between
a
multi-phase
development
and
a
building
site
for
which
a
building
permit
is
issued.
G
Earlier
this
year,
the
city
conducted
a
request
for
proposals
for
an
inclusionary
zoning
certifying
entity
to
verify
eligibility
and
monitor
projects
on
an
ongoing
basis,
a
request
to
approve
this
contract,
as
well
as
updates
to
the
inclusionary
zoning
fees,
and
the
ordinance
will
be
coming
to
the
city
council
in
the
next
few
months.
So
stay
tuned
for
that
staff
is
also
working
to
establish
an
inclusionary
zoning
housing
opportunity
interest
list.
This
is
basically
an
email
list
that
will
make
interested
people
aware
of
new
inclusionary
zoning
housing
opportunities,
annual
reports.
G
G
C
You
so
much
emily
for
that
terrific
presentation
and
all
the
work
that
went
into
that
public
dashboard.
I
think
everyone
would
say
they
think
it's
really
great
work
and
is
very
much
appreciated
I'll
see.
If
anyone
on
the
committee
has
any
comments
or
questions
or
would
like
to
move
approval
council,
member
schrader.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
wanted
to
you
know,
express
my
thanks
to
staff.
This
was
a
very
complex
policy
and
it
is
amazing
that
you
kicked
it
off
last
year
with
all
the
challenges,
and
so
I'm
I'm
very
proud
that
we
have
this
and
I'm
really
proud
of
kind
of
all
the
work
that
that
staff
has
done
to
make
make
this
a
success,
and
I
really
appreciate
the
the
transparency
that
we're
showing
folks
that
you
know
when
new
buildings
are
going
up.
Affordability
is
something
we're
dedicated
to
here
in
the
city.
C
Great
councilmember
schrader
has
moved
to
receive
and
file
the
annual
report,
as
well
as
the
motion
adopting
an
amendment
and
restating
the
unified
housing
policy
to
include
the
clarifications.
As
noted
by
staff,
are
there
further
comments
and
questions
on
council
member
schroeder's
motion
seeing
none?
I
would
please
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll
council.