►
From YouTube: July 2, 2021 City Council
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Thank
you
good
morning,
I'm
lisa
bender,
I'm
the
president
of
the
minneapolis
city
council.
I'm
going
to
call
to
order
this
regular
meeting
for
friday
july
2nd
before
we
proceed
I'll
note
that
we
have
remote
participation
by
council
members
and
city
staff
as
authorized
under
the
provisions
of
open
meeting
law.
Section
13d
0.021
due
to
the
declared
state
of
local
public
health
emergency.
A
A
A
B
D
D
D
A
A
F
C
B
D
A
G
D
D
A
Carries
and
those
matters
are
referred,
our
first
item
under
new
business
is
the
mayor's
regular
covent
status
report.
The
report
is
circulated
to
all
council
members
and
is
included
for
public
access
in
the
lims
online
staff
are
available
to
respond
to
any
questions
from
council
members.
Are
there
any
questions
on
this
report.
A
C
C
Three
is
a
land
sale
for
the
satori
apartment
project
on
west
broadway
item
four
is
a
large
number
of
land
sales
and
financing
assistance
for
the
minneapolis
homes
project,
we're
financing
and
partnering,
with
62
different
developers
actually
62
homes
about
that
many
developers
to
build
housing
throughout
the
primarily
the
north
side,
but
also
the
south
side
item
five
are
liquor
license
approvals
and
six
are
the
renewals
item.
Seven.
Are
the
gambling
license
approvals?
Item?
8
is
extending
our
minneapolis
workforce
development
to
area
10.
C
item
9
is
a
contract
with
minnesota
valley
action
network
for
virtual
workforce
services.
Item
10
is
our
tod
applications.
11
are
appointments
to
the
workforce
development
board
item
12
are
the
summer
2021
summer
grant
applications
to
the
livable
communities
program
and
the
lcda
program
item
13?
Is
a
rental
license
reinstatement,
as
is
item
14,
and
our
remaining
item
is
rezoning
at
on
lindale
avenue
north
with
that?
Madam
president,
I'll
move
items
1-15
for
approval
this
morning.
C
B
Yeah,
I
was
just
trying
to
check
in
council
members
to
see
if
the
council
president
was
in
fact
frozen.
It
looks
like
her.
Computer
has
frozen
and
she's
not
available.
So
I
think
at
this
point
we
would
ask
the
council
vice
president
to
entertain
the
motion.
That's
been
offered
by
the
chair
of
the
business
inspections,
housing
and
zoning
committee
to
approve
all
15
items
that
have
been
referred
and
if
there
are
no
questions,
then,
madam
vice
president,
it
would
certainly
be
in
order
for
us
to
call
the
role.
D
I
F
A
A
J
Thank
you.
Council
president
bender
committee
of
the
whole
has
one
item
with
two
parts
to
bring
forward
today.
It's
the
the
item
is
the
2021
city
budget
revisions.
The
american
recipe
plan
act
funding
item.
1-1
is
the
passage
of
a
resolution
amending
the
2021
general
appropriation
resolution
to
add
a
financial
schedule:
eight
outlining
expenses
by
department
in
the
american
rescue
plan,
act
fund
and
item.
J
One
two
is
considering
a
resolution
amending
the
2021
general
appropriation
resolution
to
add
language
to
the
section
titled
authority
of
the
finance
officer
related
to
contracts
to
delegate
authority
for
contract
approval,
and
I
believe
that,
with
all
of
this
discussion
that
we
had
around
item
one
two,
it's
it
warrants,
maybe
a
little
bit
of
overview
and
and
seeing
where
we're
at
with
that.
So
if
the,
if
the
author
or
if
the
clerk
would
like
to
make
some
comments,
I
would
I
would
invite
tomorrow.
I
Fletcher,
thank
you.
So
the
we've
had
an
opportunity
to
revise
the
language.
I
think
that's
before
everybody-
and
I
think
we've
been
intentional
in
this
case
about
creating
a
permissive
opportunity
to
help
the
city
get
these
funds
into
programs
quickly.
We're
approving
a
large
amount
of
money
with
urgency,
and
so
there
are
situations
where
waiting
on
the
city.
I
I
Some
of
us
have
raised
concerns
about
the
emergency
procurement
authority,
and
so
we're
being
careful,
I
think,
to
create
a
set
of
safeguards
that
allows
some
oversight
and
that
allows
council
to
still
perform
its
its
function
and
then
we're
very
specific
in
this
draft.
As
you'll
know,
the
the
thing
that's
different
from
what
we
put
briefly
on
the
screen
yesterday,
because
we're
very
specific
about
the
financial
items
that
are
included
in
this.
So
this
is
not
something
that
can
sprawl.
I
Creating
a
structure
for
us
to
move
those
items
and
those
items
only
on
a
more
expedited
timeline.
I'm
looking
forward
to
working
with
all
of
you
to
make
sure
that
you're
getting
a
chance
to
weigh
in
on
program
area
items
that
you
have
particular
expertise
in
and
I'm
happy
to
get
feedback
from
you
on
specific
program
areas
where
proposals
are
coming
forward
from
staff.
I
And
if
you
have
questions
or
concerns,
please
do
you
know,
keep
in
touch
with
councilmember,
paul
masano
and
I
throughout
the
implementation
of
this
process.
But
I
am
hopeful
that
we
can
move
this
forward
so
that
we
can
move
these
items
in
an
efficient
way
and
get
this
money
to
work
for
the
people
of
minneapolis.
J
J
G
A
We
have
oh
thank
you
counselors
president,
so
we
have
the
full
committee
of
the
whole
agenda
before
us.
We'll
take
just
one
vote.
As
always.
If
council
members
want
to
vote
in
different
ways
on
different
items,
you
can
call
that
out
in
the
roll
call.
So
with
that,
is
there
any
further
discussion?
Oh
councilmember
fletcher.
I
think
I
missed
you
before
in
the
middle
of
the
internet
issues
and
things.
So
I
don't
I'm
sorry
if
I
missed
you.
I
A
J
Thank
you,
council.
President
bender.
I
just
wanted
to
state
for
the
record.
You
know
why
I'm
opposing
that
we
passed
the
arpa
funding
now.
You
know.
Obviously,
we've
all
been
waiting
a
long
time
to
enter
into
this
phase
of
economic
recovery,
and
I
know
that
I'm
one
person
who's
been
really
excited
for
how
we
could
jump
into
this
phase
of
economic
recovery.
J
You
know-
and
I
just
wanted
to
be
able
to
give
just
a
brief
comment
for
the
public
to
know
why.
I
think
that
this
process
was
incredibly
fast,
and
I
think
that
this
issue
is
is
too
important
for
us
to
have
not
had
more
engagement
for
the
mayor's
office
to
not
have
had
more
of
a
public
process
for
engaging
with
people.
J
We
can't
have
a
system
where
our
very
methods
undermine
our
goals,
of
keeping
neighbors
safe,
and
I
feel
like
we've,
we've
gotten
there
with
the
with
this
amendment
and
so
well.
Those
are
some
of
the
reasons
that
I'll
be
voting
against
the
the
the
arp
funding.
I
would
have
loved
for
us
to
be
able
to
come
together
and
and
for
myself
to
be
included
in
that
as
a
day
of
celebration
where
we
rolled
out
our
first.
J
A
A
I'm
excited
to
see
you
know
here.
In
minneapolis
we
have
the
strongest
protections
for
renters
of
any
local
community
in
the
state.
Thanks
to
the
work
of
all
of
us
as
policy
makers
and
the
innovation
that
we've
seen
from
our
staff,
I'm
concerned
and
worried
that
we're
still
going
to
see
a
lot
of
displacement
as
the
state's
off-ramp
for
the
eviction
moratorium
takes
place
together
with
other
local
communities
and
leaders
at
the
state.
A
We
were
able
to
get
an
off-ramp
through
the
legislature
with
huge
appreciation
and
thanks
to
our
legislative
leaders,
who
pushed
so
hard
for
that.
So
I
think
that
will
help.
I
think
we
also
need
every
single
support
that
we
can
possibly
have
both
for
homeowners
facing
foreclosure
and
renters
facing
eviction,
and
I'm
really
proud
that
the
city
of
minneapolis
is
leading
in
this
issue
of
housing.
A
Stability
and
our
partnership
with
hennepin
county
to
do
better
by
folks
who
are
experiencing
homelessness
is
having
significant
impacts,
getting
record
numbers
of
people
into
stable
housing,
so
that
combination
of
having
the
prevention
of
displacement
in
the
first
place
and
helping
people
get
back
into
housing.
If
it
does
happen
again,
we
have
the
best
best
system
in
the
state,
and
I
think
we
need
to
keep
working
together.
Ramsey
county,
I
think,
is
giving
us
a
run
for
our
money
in
a
good
way,
so
I
think
there's
great
progress
and
much
more
to
do.
A
I
know
that
our
workers
and
businesses
have
been
going
through
so
much
and
there's
a
robust
package
of
investments.
You
know
in
the
economic
development
we
have
secured
some
funding
to
help
support
workers
who
sacrificed
a
lot
last
year
is
probably
just
one
of
many
steps
that
we
will
take
to
ensure
that
our
workforce
is
recovering.
A
So
many
of
our
staff
worked
extra
hours
worked
additional
responsibilities
in
addition
to
their
normal
jobs,
and
as
we
get
back
to
this,
the
system
reopening
we
know
that
those
pandemic
impacts
on
our
staff
will
persist.
So
I'm
glad
that
this
package
has
a
first
round
of
commitment
to
supporting
our
own
workforce
as
we
look
toward
the
future.
A
Of
course,
we
still
have
a
lot
of
staff
vacancies
that
are
creating
additional
work
for
the
remaining
workforce
that
we'll
have
to
sort
out
together
and
then
you
know,
I
think
the
public
safety
investments
represent
a
compromise
of
investing
in
violence
prevention.
I'm
really
appreciative
of
the
council
members
who
brought
forward
additional
funding
for
youth
investment.
I
think
that
will
make
a
huge
difference
for
the
young
people
who
are
have
gone
through
so
much
for
this
past
year.
H
Gordon
thank
you
very
much,
and
I
think
you
highlighted
some
of
the
things
that
I
also
was
interested
in
highlighting.
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
see
this
as
a
compromise,
but
I
also
appreciate
that
there's
a
number
of
very
good
things
in
here.
I
also
really
appreciate
the
response
to
homelessness
that
is
listed
the
opportunity
for
economic
recovery.
I
think
it's
critically
important
that
we
get
this
money
out
the
door
and
in
circulation.
H
I
have
concerns,
and
I
appreciate
council
member
ellison
raising
those,
but
I'm
going
to
support
this
and
I'm
going
to
support
it,
because
I
think
it's
critically
important
that
we
get
this
money
into
circulation
and
I'm
going
to
support
it
with
gratitude
for
the
amendments
that
were
made
by
my
colleagues.
I
especially
appreciative
of
a
focus
on
youth
and
violence
prevention
that
I
see
coming
through
in
some
of
our
amendments,
but
also
appreciation
for
all
the
staff
and
the
mayor's
office
and
the
process
they
went
through.
H
The
sro
rooming
house
single
room,
occupancy
amendment
that
I've
been
working
on
with
my
colleagues
that
I
think
is
going
to
come
up
through
the
next
cycle
for
approval
and
now
we're
going
to
have
some
funds
supporting
it
so
that
we
can
implement
that
and
also
with
when
you
consider
all
the
economic
hardship
that
our
businesses
have
gone
through,
and
now
we
have
some
relief,
that's
coming
to
help
some
of
them
suffered
most
from
the
pandemic.
So
I
appreciate
this
as
a
compromise.
H
I
Thank
you.
Council
president.
I
think
there's
a
lot
to
celebrate
in
this
proposal
that
we're
passing
today,
especially
thanks
to
the
amendments
yesterday
that
added
what
I
thought
was
a
gap
in
in
youth
funding.
So
thank
you
to
council
members,
cunningham
and
osman
for
working
together
on
that,
and
you
know.
I
think
that
this
is
something
that
none
of
us,
probably
none
of
the
13
of
us,
would
have
generated
this
document.
I
Had
we
been
given
a
blank
page
and
and
asked
to
draft
it,
this
document
is
a
reflection
of
compromise.
It's
a
reflection
of
us
working
together
to
make
some
really
critical
investments
in
helping
our
city
recover
from
a
terrible
pandemic
that
we've
been
through,
and
it
has
incredibly
important
investments
in
food
security.
I
We
are
investing
literally,
we
know
from
the
question
and
answer
around
this,
the
absolute
most
that
city
staff
thought
they
could
implement
on
unsheltered
homelessness.
When
we
asked
the
question,
could
we
invest
more?
They
said
we
actually
couldn't
spend
it.
If
you
did
so,
we
are
maxing
out
on
some
of
the
most
important
issues
that
our
community
is
facing,
and
I
think
that
it's
very
important
that
we're
working
together
on
that.
I
I
F
F
You
know
this,
I
think,
is
a
first
step
towards
meeting
some
of
the
deep
and
significant
needs
in
our
communities.
It's
an
opportunity
and
we
still
have
opportunities
to
really
engage
community
and
and
and
really
target
these
remaining
resources
in
in
new
and
innovative
ways
and
supporting
work
that
has
already
been
initiated.
F
More
broadly,
so
for
for
those
reasons,
I
am
proud
to
be
able
to
to
sign
my
name
onto
this,
this
document
as
well.
This,
I
would
call
it
an
historic
document
and
thank
all
the
staff
and
and
my
colleagues
who
brought
forth
amendments
to
improve
the
mayor's
proposal,
and
I
hope
that
we
continue
to
do
that
in
the
future.
Thank
you,
council
president.
D
E
D
A
A
F
F
Item
five
is
a
legal
services
contract
with
the
department
of
justice
item
number:
six:
is
the
contract
amendment
with
riverview
window
inc
for
la
lead,
hazard
control
item?
Seven?
Is
the
contract
with
canopy
mental
health
and
consulting
to
provide
professional
services
to
operate
24
7
mobile
behavioral
health
crisis
response
teams,
which
I
am
so
glad
we're
finally
getting
to
approving
this
contract?
I
item
number
eight
authorizes
a
grant
acceptance
from
the
graves
foundation.
F
Item
number:
nine
authorizes:
a
memorandum
of
understanding
with
hennepin
county
human
services
and
the
public
health
department
item
number
10,
directs
the
division
of
race
and
equity
to
work
across
city
departments
to
implement
a
truth
and
reconciliation.
Commission
item
number
11
is
a
grant
acceptance
from
the
metropolitan
emergency
board.
Item
number
12
returns
to
the
author
and
ordinance
related
to
public
safety
charter.
Amendment
id
number
13
is
a
resolution
opposing
the
mbridge
energy
line.
3
tar
sands
oil
pipeline
imove
approval
of
the
policy
government
oversight
committee.
A
H
Thank
you.
I
just
wanted
a
small
bit
of
discussion
because
I
think
there's
some
significant
things
in
this
and
I'd
like
to
comment
on.
I
guess
seven
and
ten,
so
we're
very
busy,
and
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
time,
sometimes
to
dig
into
all
of
these
things,
but
as
council
vice
president
mentioned
item
number.
H
Seven
is
the
contract
for
our
24
7
behavioral
crisis
response
effort,
and
this
is
a
significant
step,
I'm
very
hopeful
that
our
staff
and
everyone
has
has
found
the
right
organization
to
do
this
work,
and
I
think
that
we
want
all
eyes
on
this
to
see
how
well
it
goes
and
to
monitor
this
carefully.
And
this
is
a
piece
of
a
much
bigger
project
where
there's
other
initiatives
and
pilots
coming
in
we'll
have
experts
embedded
in
911
and
all
of
those
things.
H
H
People
see
this
alternative
response
is
critically
important
to
a
new
way
of
doing
public
safety
and
I'm
enthusiastically
supportive,
and
maybe
this
is
a
significant
item,
but
I
think
it
could
pale
in
when
it's
compared
to
what
we're
doing
in
item
number
10,
which
is
really,
I
think,
taking
the
next
big
step
to
our
truth
and
reconciliation
process,
and
I
really
appreciate
all
the
work
that's
gone
into
this.
I
think
this
is
something
minneapolis
is
leading
on.
H
I
think
we
have
the
potential,
as
we
always
do
with
these
things,
that
it
could
potentially
fizzle
and
become
a
report
and
something
that
goes
on
the
shelf
and
okay.
We,
you
know,
did
that
and
we
tried
and
it
didn't
really
get
anywhere,
but
it
also
has
the
potential
I
think,
to
help
be
a
wedge
to
help
the
city,
the
state,
the
country
probably
deal
with
what
is
the
most
important
thing
that
we
have
to
deal
with
in
this
generation,
and
that
is
repairing
our
historical
harms
and
making
our
country
whole
again.
H
So
let's
take
this
truth
and
reconciliation
process
seriously,
because
this
is
serious
and
I
appreciate
how
it
is
targeted,
focusing
in
on
where
the
greatest
harms
have
been
done
historically,
and
I
believe
we
have
an
earnest,
a
sincere
and
deep
commitment
from
the
city
government
and
from
the
people
of
minneapolis
to
look
at
this
and
really
make
a
difference,
and
I'm
proud
to
be
part
of
this
next
small
step,
which
I
believe
could
turn
out
to
be
significantly
historic
for
our
city
and
our
state
and
more
so.
So.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
Thank
you,
council
president.
I
want
to
thank
councilmember
gordon
for
his
comments
and
just
note
that
we
are
anticipating
a
presentation
from
the
vendor.
Who's
been
selected
at
the
next
public
health
and
safety
committee
meeting.
So
we
certainly
know
that
there
is
a
lot
of
interest
in
this
process
and
I
am
extremely
excited
to
see
it
on
the
agenda.
We're
moving
it
through
on
consent
so
that
we
can
get
the
contract
in
motion.
I
But
we
do
want
to
make
sure
that
everybody
has
a
chance
to
hear
from
the
program
developers
and
the
selected
vendor
about
the
service
that
we
will
be
rolling
out.
So
I
would
encourage
everybody
to
tune
into
that
and
I'll
just
take
the
opportunity
to
thank
everyone
in
the
office
of
performance
and
innovation,
especially
brian
smith
and
andrea
larson,
for
their
incredible
work
over
a
period
of
years
now
in
developing
prototyping,
pre-planning
planning
and
now
finally,
this
summer
implementing
this
incredibly
important
mobile
behavioral
health
crisis
response.
F
Yeah,
thank
you,
madam
president,
and
I
I
do
apologize
to
you
all.
I
just
wanted
to
circle
back
and
just
comment
a
little
bit
around
the
the
passage
of
this
truth
and
reconciliation
work,
work
group
moving
forward.
I
would
have
commented
more
during
my
presentation,
but
I
had
to
go
to
the
bathroom
really
bad.
F
Just
a
tremendous
effort.
Up
to
this
point
and
to
council
member
gordon's
comments.
Certainly
we
can
not
allow
whatever
work
emerges
from
this
to
just
become
a
dusty
report
that
sits
on
the
shelf.
The
uni,
the
u.n,
has
declared
racism
across
the
globe
as
a
public
health
crisis
and
calls
for
reparations
for
the
harms
that
have
been
done
to
black
and
brown
and
indigenous
communities
all
over
the
planet.
F
And
so
we
are
doing
our
part
here
in
minneapolis,
to
I
think,
to
to
to
reconcile
with
our
dark
past
and
to
repair
harms
done
by
our
nation's
founders,
our
city
founders,
and
continuing
to
perpetuate
those
oppressions
to
this
day.
And
this
is
a
step
in
the
direction
of
repairing
those
harms
so
very
thrilled
that
this
work
is
moving
forward
and
just
wanted
to
express
my
deep
gratitude
and
appreciation
for
everyone
who
has
been
involved.
Thank
you.
So
much.
A
Thank
you,
council.
Vice
president,
I
put
myself
in
queue
to
thank
you
for
your
leadership
in
bringing
the
truth
and
reconciliation
process
forward
along
with
other
council
members,
council
members,
ellison
and
cunningham,
I
know
have
been
involved
as
well
in
talking
about
reparations
and
reconciliation
and
acknowledgement
of
our
past.
A
K
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
actually
wanted
to
talk
about
another
different
issue
number
13
on
here.
I
wanted
to
kind
of
thank
all
of
my
colleagues
for
their
support.
That's
the
resolution
opposing
line
three
and
just
didn't,
want
it
to
get
missed
in
all
the
important
things
that
we're
doing
this
time,
but
again
it's
critical
that
we
make
sure
we're
really
holding
ourselves
accountable
to
doing
everything
we
can
to
stop
climate
change,
and
this
is
such
a
critical
project
to
to
stop.
K
A
I
don't
want
to
take
too
much
time
because
I
know
we've
discussed
this
a
number
of
times,
but
I
did
just
also
want
to
note
that
this
agenda
includes
returning
to
author,
the
public
safety
amendment
that
was
authored
by
the
three
council
members,
cunningham
fletcher
and
traitor,
and
mr
clerk,
do
you
have
a
very
brief
update
for
us
about
the
next
steps
for
the
similar
amendment?
That's
related
to
public
safety.
B
Madam
president,
paulie
the
amendment
that
was
submitted
by
petition
the
yes
for
minneapolis
committee
was
postponed
at
the
last
policy
and
government
oversight
committee
in
one
cycle,
so
both
that
proposal
and
the
charter
commission
proposal
and
government
structure
are
slated
to
return
to
the
july
21st
meeting
regular
meeting
of
the
policy
and
government
oversight
committee.
The
attorneys
will
bring
forward
some
amended
draft
ballot
language
for
consideration
at
that
meeting.
A
E
G
G
A
E
A
A
L
Thank
you.
Madam
president.
I
am
trying
a
different
approach
today.
Is
it
possible
I
used
to
do
it
over
the
phone
because
I'm
having
some
internet
challenges,
but
if
this
works
we
will
go
ahead
and
move
forward.
So
the
public
health
and
safety
committee
is
bringing
forward
three
items
for
approval
today.
The
first
is
accepting
a
grant
from
the
cdc
for
kovid
19
response
to
help
address
disparities
among
high
risk
and
underserved
populations.
L
D
G
D
A
A
M
Thank
you,
madam
president.
The
committee
for
its
21
items
today
for
full
council
consideration
item.
One
is
the
storm
water
management
program.
An
annual
report
item
two
is
the
truck
ordinance
truck
parking
ordinance
item.
Three
is
the
2021
alley
renovation
program?
Four?
Is
the
contract
amendment
with
thomas
and
sons,
construction
for
the
eighth
street
south
reconstruction
project?
M
M
Seven
is
the
agreement
with
med
council
for
reconstruction
of
the
stormwater
shaft
eight
is
the
agreement
with
hennepin
county
for
road
maintenance.
Nine
is
a
cooperative
agreement
with
basset
creek
watershed
management,
commission
and
the
minneapolis
park
and
rec
board
for
storm
water
quality
improvements
at
bryn
mawr
park.
M
10
is
an
easement
agreement
with
center
point
energy
for
new
water
services
to
the
lower
saint
anthony
falls
lock
and
dam
building.
11
is
the
easement
agreement
with
minnesota
ballpark
authority
for
the
fourth
street
bridge
12?
Is
the
temporary
construction
easement
agreement
amendment
with
the
university
of
minnesota
for
the
10th
avenue
southeast
bridge
project?
13?
M
Is
a
temporary
construction,
easement
agreement,
a
member
of
the
university
of
minnesota
for
the
construction
of
the
new
water
main
near
that
same
bridge
14,
is
the
lease
agreement
with
the
minnesota
department
of
transportation
for
rampant
b
15
is
the
national
association
of
transportation
officials
pandemic
response
recovery
grant
and
that
will
benefit
the
18th
avenue
south
little
earth
transportation.
Study
16
is
the
minnesota
green
corps
program
and
it's
an
application
to
host
a
green
core
member
for
2021-2022
program
year.
M
17
is
sent
forward
without
recommendation,
but
that
was
the
environmental
impact
statement,
draft
purpose
and
need
statement,
and
I
believe
there
will
be
an
amendment
coming
forward
after
we
go
through
the
other
items.
18
is
the
bicycle
advisory
committee.
Appointments
19
is
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee.
Appointments
20
is
the
skate
skate
day.
Block
event.
Permit
21
is
the
bid
for
the
downtown
east
street
reconstruction
project
and
I
believe
there
are
amendments
not
only
for
item
17
but
also
for
item
two.
J
J
You
know
I
encourage
my
colleagues
to
read
through
it.
It's
really
putting
some
just
adding
a
little
bit
of
emphasis
on
to
you
know
what
constitutes
walkability
to
transit
and
and
a
few
other
things
and
and
to
you
know,
encouraging
men
not
to
see
vehicle
safety,
metrics,
that's
more
than
just
crashes,
but
also
as
pedestrian
safety
and
and
all
of
the
above,
so
so
yeah.
So
I'm
gonna.
M
Thank
you,
madam
president.
So
if
the
clerk
says
it's
okay,
maybe
we
should
just
take
the
amendments
and
then
we
can
move
all
21
items
since
we
do
have
them
before
us,
and
I
will
concur
with
council
member
ellison's
suggestion
that
this
is
additive
but
consistent
with
the
overall
document.
That's
being
amended,
staff
has
vetted
it.
I've
looked
it
over
and
pretty
much
appreciate
the
added
attention
from
the
council
member,
whose
impact
of
this
project
was
probably
greatest
so.
A
L
L
L
We
have
to
be
intentional
about
not
increasing
environmental
injustice,
and
so
I
really
appreciate
these
additional
comments
because
they
really
do
reflect
the
necessity
and
the
the
need
for
this
standard
that
we
need
to
set
for
this
project.
So
thank
you
to
councilmember
ellison,
thank
you
to
his
staff,
as
well
as
city
staff
for
bringing
this
forward.
Thank
you.
A
K
D
K
Know
they
have
the
similar
choice
here
on
the
north
side,
northside
residents
need
other
options
besides
cars
I'll.
Let
my
northside
colleagues
talk
more
about
that,
but
it
is
something
that
it's
not
just
about
our
communities
but
our
environment
and
what
our
future
city
is
going
to
be.
So
I
really
want
to
thank
council
member
ellison
for
all
of
his
work
on
this.
I
hope
that
the
state
takes
us
seriously
and
heeds
you
know
our
advice.
F
F
Vice
president
council
members,
liligrin
and
and
clinton
fought
to
make
that
a
transportation
project
as
opposed
to
an
expansion
project,
and
I
think
that's
the
same
level
of
of
concern
that
we
need
to
bring
to
this
proposed
expansion
project
and
really
shift
those
intentions
to
something
that
is
going
to
be
beneficial
to
our
communities,
not
add
further
environmental
harms
and
or
injustices
to
our
community.
So
I
support
this
issue
wholeheartedly.
F
A
Thank
you.
I
see
councilmember,
awesome
and
q
for
the
next
item.
I
I
want
to
add
myself
briefly
too,
and
I
I
also
just
want
to
say
that
you
know
we
have
a
really
great
staff
team
that
is
working
on
this
there's
been
a
ton
of
evolution
from
transportation
agencies
like
mndot
and
the
county
and
our
own
as
well,
and
and
this
motion
by
councilman
olsen
goes
farther
and
has
stronger,
more
clear
language
than
the
draft
that
was
brought
by
staff,
and
I
think
that
kind
of
policy
leadership
is
really
important.
A
That
is
our
job
as
policy
makers
to
make
sure
that
we
are
giving
the
right
direction
and
being
clear
about
the
priorities
and
how
the
implementation
of
projects,
especially
those
that
are
not
in
our
control,
align
with
the
adopted
policies
that
are
now
called
out
and
noted
very
clearly.
Here,
the
transportation
action
plan,
the
climate
action
plan,
minneapolis
2040.
A
We
have
made
very
clear
policy
commitments.
We
have
very
clear
priorities,
city-wide
and,
as
so
many
have
noted,
that
has
to
truly
mean
city-wide.
We
had
to
fight
as
a
city
a
lot
of
it
was
before
my
time.
I
picked
up
the
raids
from
council
member
lilligren,
who
used
to
represent
whittier
with
a
35w
project,
and
we
have
to
bring
that
same
level
of
commitment
to
prioritizing
city
health
city
equity
as
we're
working
with
our
partners,
as
all
of
those
agencies
evolve.
A
G
L
D
A
G
G
G
All
the
trucks,
all
the
truck
stops
and
all
the
truck
parking
that
you
see
in
our
community.
It's
not
a
truck,
stop
it's
a
resident!
It's
a
family
that
live
here
in
the
community,
and
I
know
this
work
has
been
in
discussion
and
council
member
vice
president
jenkins
and
kenny
ham,
and
I
believe
allison
also
have
been
working
on
talking
to
the
community
and
trying
to
find
a
solution
for
this
issue.
G
So
I
just
wanted
to
bring
something
to
to
get
your
help
and
support
and
leadership.
So
this
is
my
attempt
to
find
a
solution
and
first,
to
give
some
relief
to
small
business
owners.
We
are
charging.
We
are
changing
the
schedule
on
the
fees
in
the
audience,
100
dollars
first
year,
150
second
year
and
250
dollars.
G
G
A
F
Thank
you,
madam
president,
and
thank
you
councilmember
asman
for
for
bringing
forth
this
amendment
that
you
know,
I
think,
really
does
help
to
to
move
this
conversation
forward.
You
know,
certainly
myself
and
and
council,
member
cunningham
and
and
gordon
have
have
really
thought
through
many
of
these
issues,
but
this
just
illustrates
and
highlights
the
need
for
for
all
of
us
to
continue
to
be
engaged
like
the
amendment
before.
I
think
this
in
improves
this
effort.
I
am
happy
to
support
it.
F
I
would
in
fact,
if,
if
you
are
amenable
council
member
have
my
name
listed
as
a
co-author.
It
is
really
important
that
we
find
or
help
to
find
opportunities
for
these
small
business
owners
to
be
able
to
continue
to
operate
in
our
city.
That
has
been
our
intent
from
the
very
beginning
of
this
entire
process,
and
so
I
think
this
helps
to
to
bring
that
to
the
forefront
and
engages
cpit
and
our
igr
team
in
this
work
moving
forward.
L
Thank
you,
madam
president,
and
thank
you
to
councilmember
osman
for
bringing
this
forward
this
process
of
bringing
of
going
through
and
writing
out.
This
legislation
has
been
very
complex.
I
think
a
little
bit
surprisingly
so
for
me,
because
I'm
not
on
tpw,
so
I
don't
necessarily
get
in
a
ton
of
those
details,
but
this
was
definitely
a
really
eye-opening
learning
experience
about
the
nuance
of
an
industry.
I
did
not
know.
I
was
going
to
learn
so
much
about,
while
being
a
council
member.
L
This
issue
became
introduced
to
me
because
there
is
about
a
mile,
if
not
more,
of
back-to-back
semi-trucks
down
washington
avenue
north
in
north
minneapolis,
through
wards,
four
and
five,
a
small
business
owners
on
both
sides
of
the
street
and
and
business
owners
in
that
area.
Small
business
owners
have
been
very
frustrated.
There's
been
severe
accidents,
car
accidents,
that's
some
that
have
actually
led
to
fatalities,
but
one
of
the
things
that's
also
kind
of
uniquely
a
challenge
is
that
essentially,
that
area
is
treated
as
a
truck.
L
Stop
it's
not
just
the
industry.
That's
parking
is
treated
as
a
truck
stop.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
environmental
issues
and
and
other
consequences,
and
so
this
this
is-
and
we
also
have
you
know,
semis
that
are
idling
for
very
long
periods
of
time
near
a
community
in
which
we
already
have
disproportionately
high
rates
of
asthma
from
other
environmental
injustices.
So
this
is
a
a
complex
issue.
L
I
too
actually
would
like
to
be
listed
as
a
co-author
of
this
amendment.
To
be
able
to
demonstrate
my
support
for
it,
I
think
that
it
is
a
very
welcome
addition
to
the
work
that
we've
been
doing
now
for
a
few
years,
so
thank
you
to
my
co-author
council
member
council,
vice
president
jenkins,
as
well
as
council
members,
gordon
and
schroeder,
and
and
now
council,
member
austin.
L
K
Thank
you
president.
I
will
be
not
supporting
the
change
in
fees,
but
I'm
I'm
happy
to
support
the
the
staff
direction.
The
reason
for
that
is
steph
did
an
analysis
of
what
what
level
of
fee
is
going
to
be
needed
to
actually
have
this
ordinance
work
and
with
it
being
lower
the
the
issue
was
that
truck
drivers
will
have
to
pay
to
park
their
truck
somewhere
else,
so
that's
a
fee
they
already
have,
and
if
our
city
fee
is
not
is
not
more,
it's
not
punitive.
N
Thank
you,
madam
president,
and
I
appreciate
council
member
osman
working
on
this
and
bringing
forward
this
item.
This
is
one
at
committee
I
mentioned
that
I
was
struggling
with
because
I
see
the
problem
around
block
sight
lines
around
obstructions
and
bike
lanes,
a
number
of
other
different
issues,
and
I
think
we
need
to
act
on
resolving
those,
and
I
also
question
if
this
was
the
right
approach
or
strategy,
and
so
you
know,
councilmember
osman,
has
been
leading
on
these
issues
and
really
appreciate
the
thought
that
went
into
this.
N
I
do
have
a
question
or
a
point
of
clarification
on
this,
as
I
understand
it
around
the
staff
direction
I
checked
in
with
staff,
and
it
sounds
like
they
had
not
had
a
chance
to
review
any
of
this
language,
and
so
I
know
there
were
some
just
kind
of
general
higher
level
conversations
they
had
yesterday
with
councilman
rosman's
office,
but
hadn't
seen
the
language
itself.
So
I
was
wondering
if
we
have
director
brennan
on
the
line.
Specifically,
I
think
that's
probably
my
area
of
interest.
N
The
most
is
around
this
portion
of
the
staff
direction
as
it
relates
to
cpad
it
and
actually
working
to
realize
and
develop
off-street
parking
solutions
in
our
city
for
truckers
and
for
these
trucks,
and
so
I
wanted
to
hear
an
update
from
cped
around
that
and
how
they're
thinking
about
this
work
and
what?
What
should
we
expect
and
especially
as
we
are
as
a
council,
we
have
a
responsibility
to
around
resourcing.
I'm
curious
around
thoughts
of
you
know
what
this
will
look
like
both
in
terms
of
staff
time.
D
Speak,
thank
you,
madam
president.
Councilmember
johnson,
I'm
andrea
brennan,
director
of
cped,
and
I
just
I'm
seeing
this
language
for
the
first
time
this
morning,
just
before
the
the
meeting,
my
understanding
of
the
staff
direction
is
that
it
it
directs
for
the
cped
portion
that
it
directs
cped
to
identify
sites
where
this
is
allowed,
and
if
that
is
the,
if
that
is
the
the
staff
direction,
I
think
that
we've
already
done
that
work
and
and
to
come
could
be
prepared
to
report
back
in
short
order.
N
G
I
think
the
reality
is
that
a
large
percent
of
the
truck
drivers
are
papa
community
and
there's
absolutely
no
location
close
to
anywhere,
as
I
talk
to
the
drivers
and
and
community
here,
the
places
that
are
far
away
like
shakopee
and
places
like
that
there's
a
waiting
list
for
it.
So
the
need
is
here
and
the
need.
G
The
community
need
we're,
trying
to
make
sure
that
we're
creating
easier
process
for
for
businesses
to
start
and
have
you
know,
outsource,
even
the
county
or
the
state
trying
to
create
a
way
to
have
that.
You
know
opportunity
and
and
basically
find
an
alternative
way
of
parking.
We
don't
want
families
to
be
parking
in
saying
cloud
and
driving
here
to
to
the
city,
because
that's
what
we
bring
forward,
bringing
this
ban
to
the
community
and
you
will
hurt
the
community
and
so
yeah.
G
N
Thank
you
and
thank
you
councilman
browsman
on
that
as
well,
and
as
I
I
read
the
language
I
know
it
says
in
here,
especially
that
second
line
of
the
or
the
last
line
of
the
first
paragraph,
that
you
know,
staff
should
endeavor
to
develop
as
many
parking
spaces
as
feasible
in
the
city,
and
so
I
think
you
know
it
might
be
helpful
it.
So
it
sounds
like
director,
brennan
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
that
your
interpretation
has
been
that
this
is
about
just
identifying
potential
sites.
N
I
guess
I'll
throw
this
out
here
as
just
kind
of
a
friendly
thought
on
this,
that
it
might
make
sense
potentially
to
have
some
more
conversation
around
this
before
the
council
takes
it
up
just
so.
We
have
more
clarity
around
the
actual
deliverable
and
output,
I'm
not
quite
sure
still
if
this
is,
if
we're
working
towards
like
a
municipally
owned
truck
parking
facility.
N
If
we
are,
if
we
can
really
deliver
on
that
creation
of
additional
truck
parking
spaces,
which
seems
to
be
kind
of
implied
or
stated
in
this,
but
you
know
I
wanted
to
throw
that
out
there
and
then
you
know
see
what
other
council
members
think
on
this.
So
it's
it's
something
I
want
to
raise
for
discussion
and
I
appreciate
the
conversation
here.
H
H
I
think
with
the
proper
enforcement
and
efforts
done
lowering
the
fee,
something
that
we
can
work
with,
and
it
still
puts
us
on
track,
but
just
at
a
slower
pace
to
get
to
what
staff
recommended.
I
also
think
that
the
staff
direction
is
flexible
enough.
I
mean
even
that
sentence
that
council
member
johnson
is
as
worrying
about,
and
I
really
appreciate
your
ability
to
focus
in
on
wording
and
look
for
unintended
consequences,
but
it
says
endeavor
to
develop
and
as
feasible.
H
I
think
I
will
also
note
that
actually
planning
staff
has
already
done
a
lot
of
this
work,
because
in
the
process
of
working
on
this
ordinance,
we
asked
them
to
help
us
identify
what
would
constitute
a
actual
legal
commercial
parking
lot
for
trucks,
and
so
we
have
a
list
of
those
already
that
were
done
by
jason
wittenberg,
I
believe,
or
his
staff.
So
some
of
this
work
has
already
been
done.
We've
also
had
some
conversations
with
economic
development
about
numb.
H
What,
if
any
programs
we
might
have
to
support
this
and
we've
even
had
people
looking
to
the
state
already
about?
How
can
we
work
better
with
department
of
transportation,
but
also
economic
development,
deed
employment,
economic
development?
To
look
at
is
this
something
that
there
could
be
state
support
for,
and
I
think
there
easily
could
be
and
as
we
see
the
report
back,
isn't
until
the
fourth
quarter
of
2022.
A
C
Goodman,
thank
you,
madam
president.
I
am
somewhat
reluctant
to
weigh
in
but
since
councilmember
johnson
asked,
I
think
this
has
all
of
the
clarity
of
mud.
I
don't
understand.
Are
we
actually
asking
our
cped
folks
to
build
a
parking
lot
or
to
find
a
parking
lot?
That
seems
to
me
to
be
a
transportation.
Public
works
issue,
not
a
cped
issue.
C
I
just
can't
see
us
directing
staff
to
figure
out
where,
in
the
city
we
own
land,
where
we
could
park
several
hundred
trucks
other
than
the
upper
harbor
terminal,
another
area
of
concentrated
poverty
or
somewhere
south
another
area
of
concentrated
poverty.
Where
is
this
going
to
go?
I
feel
like
you're
setting
them
up
for
a
task.
They
just
simply
cannot
succeed
in
the
problem
we
have
is
that
other
jurisdictions
around
the
area
have
outright
banned
these
trucks,
so
they're
congregating
in
minneapolis.
C
Our
reaction
is
to
also
ban
them
and
control
them,
but
are
we
simply
saying,
find
a
truck
parking
lot
space
and
make
it
happen?
I
think
councilmember
gordon's
point
about.
I
like
this,
because
it's
open-ended
is
what
I
don't
like,
which
is
there's
no
clarity
for
any
kind
of
outcome
here.
I
I
feel
like
all
we
ever
talk
about
is
parking
colleagues
parking.
C
It's
like
this
ongoing
drama
and
now
we're
talking
about
figuring
out
finding
land,
very
valuable,
limited
land
in
the
city
to
park,
trucks
on
and
who's
going
to
be
in
charge
of
that.
I
don't
see
anywhere
within
our
goals
where
it
tells
cpad
to
find
truck
parking
in
the
city.
This
is
a
multi-jurisdictional
problem
that
needs
a
multi-jurisdictional
response,
not
a
kind
of
half-hearted
intel
cped
to
build
a
parking
lot
kind
of
thing.
C
All
we're
doing
is
setting
them
up
for
failure
and
aggravation
when
they
come
back
and
say
well,
no
one
wants
this
in
their
neighborhood.
No
one
wants
it
in
their
ward
and
breaking
it
up
and
having
a
couple
hundred
trucks
in
one
location
or
dozens
in
another.
It's
going
to
be
impossible
to
find
a
spot
like
that.
So
I
would
just
urge
us
to
remember
that,
by
giving
direction
like
this,
that's
so
open-ended,
the
outcome
will
end
up
being
nothing
other
than
the
fines
and
fees.
C
If
we
don't
take
a
much
more
broad
multi-jurisdictional
approach
bring
in
mndot
other
cities
around
us
to
determine
where
we
think
this
is
needed.
I'm
not
saying
it's
not
important.
These
are
small
businesses,
but
I'm
saying
as
a
land
use
that
we
would
like
to
use
for
economic
development
in
the
city.
Parking
trucks
is
not
going
to
be
something
most
neighborhoods
are
not
are
going
to
agree
on.
So
please
be
more
specific
if
you're
asking
cped
to
do
something,
because
at
this
point
I
don't
really
understand
what
you're
asking
them
to
do.
F
F
Partners
and
other
jurisdictions
is
a
part
of
the
staff
direction,
so
we
certainly
are
not
advocating
trying
to
find
a
regional
solution
to
this.
I
think
that
the
inclusion
of
cpad
allows
us
to
to
help
entrepreneurs,
maybe
other
you
know.
Small
business
minded
folks
to
think
about
how
they
can
help
us
accomplish
these
goals.
I
think
we
have
to
be
really
creative.
F
Maybe
cpad
can
talk
to
some
of
these
vacant
parking
lots
that
we
have
all
over
the
city
all
night
that
have
no
body
parking
there.
Maybe
that
can
become
some
kind
of
liability.
I
I
don't.
I
don't
know
we
need
to
really
be
able
to
explore
this,
and-
and
hopefully
you
know-
I
really
apologize
that
we
weren't
able
to
talk
to
staff
earlier.
F
I
absolutely
agree
that
that
would
have
been
the
preferred
route
to
go,
though
I
did
have
a
conversation
with
mr
hansen
and,
and
he
indicated
that
that
they
would
be
willing
to
to
help
us
think
through
these
things,
and
so
it
is
not
a
mandate
for
cped
to
build
a
parking
lot
in
the
city.
We
we
don't
want
to
we're
getting
out
of
the
parking
lot
business,
not
adding
ourselves
to
that.
F
A
A
But
I
also
agree
with
some
of
the
comments
that,
as
you
read,
the
staff
direction
itself,
even
if
it
wasn't
intended
that
way,
it
does
sound
a
bit
like
this
is
directing
staff.
To
I
mean
it
literally
says:
directing
staff
to
develop
commercial
truck
parking
in
the
city
of
minneapolis,
and
I
think
maybe
it
means
develop.
Solutions
related
to
commercial
talk
parking.
But
I
wonder
I
can
certainly
appreciate
the
desire
to
bring
this
concurrent
with
the
ordinance
passing.
A
I
can
certainly
commit
to
helping
make
sure
that
that
happens,
and
you
know
making
sure
that
stays
on
track.
I'm
a
little
worried
that
adopting
this
in
its
current
form,
it
might
lead
to
some
of
the
confusion
that
we're
hearing
and
that
by
waiting
just
a
little
bit
that
we
could
come
back
together
with
a
more
specific
plan
and
timeline.
That
might
be
more
clear,
so
I'll
offer
that
I
see
a
lot
of
folks
in
queue.
I
I
The
reason
that
I
think
cped
belongs
in
this
conversation
is
that
at
some
point
we
have
to
take
responsibility
for
the
fact
that,
as
a
city,
we
want
a
functioning
economy.
That
functioning
economy
requires
things
to
get
shipped
to
us
and
people
to
be
able
to
do
that
and
it,
I
think,
there's
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
pick,
your
poison
about
about
which,
which
staff
are
being
given
an
impossible
task,
because
if
we
don't
address
this
regulatory
services
is
being
given
an
impossible
task.
I
They're
going
to
be
asked
to
enforce
this,
but
if
there's
nowhere
to
park
trucks
legally,
they
will
constantly
get
parked
illegally
and
we
will
be
creating
an
enforcement
environment
that
is
not
tenable
and
that
we
will
not
have
capacity
to
actually
manage.
And
so
I
think
it's
very
important
that
we
that
we
do
engage
everybody
if
that
hasn't
been
done
at
a
level
that
we
think
we
could
achieve.
If
we
gave
this
an
extra
cycle.
Maybe
that's
worth
thinking
about
it.
H
H
H
So
that's
pretty
clear
and
then
there's
ask
for
outreach,
but
it
seems
like
the
last
sentence
raised
the
most
concerns
I
it
would
probably
be
most
appropriate
if
it
came
from
one
of
the
authors,
but
removing
that
third
sentence,
I
think,
would
still
give
us
the
opportunity
to
work
on
this
and
to
see
what
we
can
find
and
working
with
proper.
You
know
commercial
property
owners
to
find
potential
sites
for
parking
on
their
property.
That
would
be
parking
lots
that
they
would
manage.
H
I
think,
is
the
idea
there
I
mean,
so
this
fear
that
we're
going
to
build
some
kind
of
a
ramp.
I
don't
think,
was
the
intention
of
the
authors,
I'm
not
one
of
the
authors.
I'm
tempted
to
make
that
motion,
but
I
don't
necessarily
want
to
get
us
all
held
up
and
having
to
take
the
vote
and
see
if
there's
a
second.
So
I
guess
I'll
put
that
out
there
as
an
idea
and
see
if
there's
any
interest
in
that,
and
then
we
could.
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Okay.
Okay,
thanks!
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
I
just
wanted
to
well.
First,
I
would
love
to
hear
from
councilmember
osman
if
he
would
be
supportive
of
the
changes
that
councilmember
gordon
would
like
to
make
as
well
as
the
changes
you
would
like
to
make.
I
just
wanted
to
share
a
little
bit.
I've
been
struggling
a
lot
with
this
ordinance.
I
I
don't
think
that
it
was
ready
to
come
forward.
E
It
feels
a
lot
like
a
rubik's
cube
and-
and
we
really
need
to
take
more
time,
to
really
look
at
all
the
pieces
of
it
and
councilmember
goodman's
comments
today,
I
think,
hinted
at
just
a
small
portion
of
what
that
rubik
rubik's
cube
holds.
So
I
personally
was
not
interested
in
supporting
the
ordinance
in
general
and
I
had
been
really
actively
in
conversation
with
councilmember
osmond,
because
we
were
getting
so
many
messages
from
our
area.
E
Residents
from
african-american
communities,
east
african
communities,
saying
hey:
this
is
my
only
source
of
a
job.
This
is
where
I
live.
Where
am
I
supposed
to
park
my
my
trunk,
and
so
you
know
I.
I
support
council
member
osman's
motion
today.
As
is
again
I'd
refer
to
him.
If
he's
willing
to
take
any
amendments
to
his
motion,
but
in
general
you
know,
I
think
this
has
been.
E
You
know
one
of
those
issues
where
we
try
to
address
one
racial
inequity
and
then
end
up
creating
another,
and
I
think
that
we,
as
policy
makers,
owe
it
to
our
communities
to
put
forward
work
that
is
really
cognizant
and
responsive
to
all
those
pieces,
because
we
know
that
the
problem
is
coming.
We
can
see
it,
we've
been
hearing
about
it,
we're
gonna
vote
for
it,
we're
gonna
vote
to
create
it
and
then
we're
gonna
have
to
be
stuck.
E
You
know
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
solve
that
problem
without
initially
tackling
this
from
a
cohesive,
comprehensive
approach,
which
I
know
we
have
the
bandwidth
to
do
and
and
would
have
hoped
that
the
authors
of
this
ordinance
would
have
chosen
to
do
that
instead.
But
here
we
are
today
and
I'm
happy
to
support
the
osmond
amendment
and
would
like
to
hear
from
him
if
he
agrees
to
some
of
the
changes
being
discussed
right
now,.
A
M
Thank
you,
madam
president,
it
seems
like
we're
doing
a
lot
of
clarification
of
this
amendment
on
the
fly
here.
You
know
if
we
can
achieve
some
clarity
by
scraping
out
some
of
the
language
that
is
most
ambiguous.
It
would
be
helpful.
It
also
be
very
open
to
your
suggestion
of
maybe
tabling
this
amendment
moving
the
main
body
and
knowing
that
we
can
always
come
back
and
amend
the
overarching.
A
Thank
you
councilmember
osman,
okay,
so
I
just
want
to
note
that
the
clerk
has
placed
into
the
chat
a
summary
of
the
suggested
amendments
I
so
technically
part
of
them
are
properly
before
us.
The
clerk
also
included
the
statement
that
I
had
verbally
made
that
is
it
properly
before
us,
so
we'll
have
to
rectify
that,
but
so
that
would
have
added
the
words
solutions
to
in
the
first
sentence.
A
So
it
says
direct
cped
to
work
with
all
interested
parties
to
develop
solutions
to
commercial
truck
parking
in
the
city
of
minneapolis.
Then
the
second
sentence
stays
complete
and
it
deletes
the
third
sentence
which
talks
about
the
adopted,
minneapolis
2040
plan,
and
then
the
rest
would
remain
the
same
and
council
member
osman.
G
Yes,
oh
well,
thank
you,
council
members,
those
that
speak
up
on
on
how
important
this
is
to
our
community
and
we're
trying
to
find
a
solution.
We're
not
trying
to
create
any
problem
or
anything
make
make
this
type
job
a
lot
easier,
but
we
do
have
obligation
to
who
to
really.
You
know,
look
out
for
communities
that
bring
a
lot
to
our
community
our
city
ten
years
ago.
We
didn't
have
all
this
problem
as
we
look
at
the
presentation
and
saw
the
presentation.
G
I
think
that
we
owe
to
the
community
to
to
find
a
solution,
and
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
do
here.
So
I
appreciate
all
your
input,
but
I
would
I'm
okay
with
delaying
it
and
coming
back
with
something
that
we
can
all
can
all
agree
with.
We
definitely
agree
the
issue,
which
is
we
can't
just
abandon
and
forget
about
it.
We
have
hundreds
of
people
that
live
in
my
community
and
surrounding
community.
G
N
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
I
really
appreciate
that
from
council
member
osman,
because
you
know
I
was
looking
at
some
other
pieces
of
the
staff
direction
too-
that
I
think
could
use
some
tweaking
and
to
get
better
outcomes,
because
this
council
member
osman,
said
you
know
this
is
about
trying
to
address
real
problems
happening
in
the
city
without
also
creating
additional
problems
as
well.
N
And
so
I
appreciate
the
council
members
speaking
up
on
this
and
talking
about
this
and
sharing
their
thoughts,
both
in
in
support
and
also
for
how
we
can
address
some
of
these
potential
unintended
consequences
and
so
in
the
spirit
of
councilmember
osman
being
open
to
delay.
I
guess
I
would
move
that
we
at
this
point
delay
this
item.
N
So
I'd
move
that
we
send
back
tpw
item
number
two
in
the
staff
direction
as
well
to
committee.
I
personally
see
them
as
a
package
if
folks
want
to
split
them
up
and
take
a
vote
today.
I
I'm
seeing
the
the
committee
chair
shaking
his
head
on
this,
so
I
think
I'll
keep
my
motion
at
sending
this
back
to
tpw
item
number
two,
along
with
the
staff
direction
as
well,
and
I'm
happy
to
work
with
colleagues
on
this.
F
F
F
F
Fly
by
night,
ordinance
that
we
are
bringing
forward
is
is
a
bit
offensive,
but
I'm
willing
to
work
with
everybody
to
get
this
right
so
that
we
can
continue
to
have
the
economic
development
and
and
support
these
small
business
owners
in
our
community,
while
making
sure
that
our
streets
are
safe
and
our
communities
are
not
being
unduly
polluted,
particularly
it's
low
income
communities
that
are
experiencing
the
majority
of
these
issues.
So
we
we
can.
F
We
can
come
back
to
this
at
the
next
cycle
and
try
to
get
this
resolution
right.
But
this
is
a
real
issue
and
we
have
to
deal
with
it.
It's
un,
it's
gonna,
be
painful,
and-
and
that
is
you
know,
we
we
have
to
make
tough
decisions
on
this
on
this
body
and
that's
what
we
were
elected
to
do
and
you
know
there
there's
no
easy
solutions
to
this,
and
so
I'm
I'm
looking
forward
to
continuing
to
work
with
staff
to
come
up
with
a
better.
A
A
H
Yeah
I
would
like
to
request
that
we
separate
that
I
I
am
fine,
sending
the
staff
direction
back
to
committee.
I
think
that's
where
we
were
having
issues.
That's
where
we
were
having
problems.
I
think
we
all
were
accepting
the
amendment
to
lower
the
fee.
There
was
never
any
controversy
about
that
and
my
constituents
have
been
waiting
years
to
get
this
problem
resolved,
and
I
would
like
us
to
approve
the
ordinance
itself
today,
because
it's
the
staff
direction
that
we
needed
to
work
on.
H
So
I'm
happy
to
vote
in
favor
of
sending
the
staff
direction
back
to
committee
to
to
get
some
work,
and
then
I
would
be
delighted
to
vote
on
approving
the
ordinance
amendment
and
the
ordinance
going
forward.
So
I
would
encourage
my
colleagues
to
recognize
in
this
discussion.
It
was
the
staff
direction
that
we
were
hung
up
on
that
we
thought
needed
more
work.
If
we
don't
want
to
do
that,
work
at
the
council,
which
is
fine-
we
can
send
that
back
to
committee.
H
M
M
There
might
be
some
explanation
from
his
perspective
that
could
illuminate
as
to
why
I
could
kind
of
divine
what
I
would
think
would
be
the
reason
why,
but
maybe
if
it's
the
clerk's
recommendation
that
could
be
expounded
upon,
but
I'm
certainly
in
favor
of
doing
the
work
to
get.
What
I
think
councilmember
osman
is
really
trying
to
do
is
to
recognize.
M
We
have
two
imperatives
here.
We
have
two,
you
know
an
impact
that
we're
trying
to
address
and
then
we're
trying
to
anticipate
the
impacts
of
that
of
that
policy
and
trying
to
give
some
direction
as
to
getting
into
that
space
where
we
actually
try
to
own
the
subsequent
impacts.
So
you
know
any
clarity
to
that
next
step,
I
think,
will
be
of
value
moving
forward
and
worthy
of
the
time
to
do
that.
Clarity,
work.
K
K
I
think
that
the
authors
as
well
as
staff,
have,
at
this
point,
worked
on
this
for
years.
So
I'd
like
to
pass
this
today,
I
think
to
council
member
gordon's
points.
The
issue
is
really
the
staff
direction
needs
a
little
more
work.
I
do
really
appreciate
the
work
that
council
member
osman
is
now
we're
trying
to
do,
but
I
do
think
it
needs
more
work
than
just
adding
it
on
at
this.
N
So,
council
president,
I
guess
what
I
would
just
say
in
response
to
the
interest
to
move
this
today.
Is
that
for
some
of
us
you
know
who
have
been
wrestling
with
the
underlying
ordinance.
It
does
matter
the
staff
direction
and
what
ultimately
we
come
to
there,
and
if
we
feel
that
that
combined
with
the
ordinance
is
enough
to
support
the
ordinance
and
the
staff
direction.
N
So
to
me,
they
are
connected,
and
it
is
important
is
in
terms
of
how
I
think
about
the
ordinance
and
whether
I
can
support
the
ordinance.
It
also
matters
what
we're
doing
to
address
the
unintended
consequences
related
to
this.
So
personally,
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
send
both
back
to
committee
and
I'm
guessing
there's
just
going
to
be
a
difference
of
opinion
on
this,
but
I'm
also
suspecting,
though
I'm
not
sure
that
I
might
not
be
the
only
one
that
would
also
like
to
see.
A
My
opinion
is
not
alone
on
this.
Thank
you
councilmember.
I
think
that
is
reasonable,
so
I
will
suggest
in
the
interest
of
time
that
now
I
think
we
just
need
to
sort
of
vote
on
the
various
scenarios
and,
if
there's
a
difference
of
opinion,
that's
okay.
We
will
work
it
out.
So
the
motion
before
us
is
to
send
the
entire
item
back
to
committee
and
I
will
go
ahead
and
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role
on
that
item.
Depending
on
the
outcome,
we
will
proceed
from
there
clerk.
Please
call
the
role.
E
B
G
D
L
F
L
A
That
passes
so
this
will
return
back
to
committee.
I
know
the
authors
have
worked
on
this
for
a
very
long
time,
so
I
can
appreciate
some
disappointment
in
how
this
conversation
has
gone.
I
I'm
happy
to
follow
up
with
the
authors
as
well
as
councilmember
osman,
to
see
how
we
can
kind
of
reconvene
and
get
something
ready
to
come
back
through
committee.
A
H
B
B
H
E
G
C
H
A
That
carries
and
report
is
adopted.
The
next
order
of
business
is
notice
of
ordinance
introductions.
We
have
one
notice
this
morning,
which
is
council
member
goodman
related
to
amending
title
17
of
the
code
streets
and
sidewalks
to
renew
the
downtown
business
improvement
district
special
service
district
for
an
additional
five-year
period.
A
See
non-notice
is
given.
No
further
action
is
required.
Next
is
the
introduction
and
referral
calendar.
We
have
one
item
today
that
was
noticed
at
the
last
meeting.
That
is
a
motion
from
councilmember
schrader
to
give
to
introduce
gift
first
reading
to
and
refer
to
the
business
inspections,
housing
and
zoning
committee,
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
inclusionary
zoning
administration
and
monitoring
fees.
L
L
D
A
F
F
Country,
holes
and
and
they're
two
distinctly
yet
pertinent
realities,
and
that
is
that
we
are
a
experiment
in
democracy
that
has
lasted
for
well
over
250
years,
and
we
also
have
really
failed
in
many
ways
and
living
up
to
that
democracy.
But
I
think
that
this
body
has
taken
one
step
to
help
our
city
move
forward
and,
and
consequently,
as
it's
been
noted,
potentially
help
our
country
continue
to
live
out
the
true
meaning
of
his
creed
as
well.
L
A
Seeing
none
we
have
completed
all
of
the
items
on
our
agenda
with
nothing
further
for
the
council
and
without
objection.
I
will
declare
this
meeting
adjourned.
We
do
have
a
city
holiday
on
monday
and
observance
of
independence
day,
so
I
hope
everyone
enjoys
some
peace
and
has
a
safe
and
restful
long
weekend.
Thank
you.
Everyone.