►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
B
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
andrea
jenkins
and
I
am
the
chair
of
the
policy
and
government
oversight
committee
and
I'm
going
to
call
to
order
our
regular
committee
meeting
for
wednesday
september
22nd.
B
I
will
also
note
that
the
city
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency.
This
means
public
and
subject
to
minnesota
open
meeting
law.
At
this
time,
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll
to
verify
the
presence
of
a
quorum.
B
D
C
E
B
B
Let
the
record
reflect
that
we
do
have
a
quorum
and
I
will
apologize
to
the
public
and
to
my
colleagues
that
I
did
not
have
my
camera
on
initially,
but
I
think
I'm
visible.
Now.
Colleagues,
we
have
38
items
on
today's
agenda,
including
two
discussion
items
will
begin
with
the
consent
agenda.
B
Item
number
one
is
awaiting
the
residency
requirement
for
john
bernstein
serving
on
the
capital.
Long
range
improvement
committee
item
number
two
approves
the
appointment
of
representatives
to
the
metropolitan
airports.
Commission's
joint
airport
zoning
board
for
the
crystal
airport
item
number
three
approves
and
ranks
the
2022
capital
budget
request
and
authorizes
the
submittal
of
those
requests
to
the
commissioner
of
management
and
budget
item
number
four
designates
polling
places
for
the
2021
municipal
election
item
number
five
authorizes
contracts.
B
And
I'm
sorry
contracts
with
clear
housing
for
housing
opportunities
for
persons
living
with
aids
or
hopwa
programming.
Item
number:
six
is
a
right-of-way
of
re-conveyance
agreement
with
the
main
street
property
management
for
815
and
a
half
25th
avenue.
South
item
number:
seven
is
a
contract
with
miii
life
incorporated
doing
business
as
further.
B
For
health
reimbursement,
flexible
spending,
account
and
transportation
administration
services,
item
number
eight
authorizes
contract
negotiations
and
a
non-disclosure
agreement
with
the
u.s
with
u.s
solar
for
the
purchase
of
renewable
electricity
credits.
Item
number:
nine
is
a
contract
amendment
with
clearway
energy
llc
for
distribution
of
streamed
chilled
water.
B
Proposals
for
legal
services
panel
for
2022
through
2024
items
14
through
36,
are
legal
settlements,
and
I
will
note
that
for
the
record
at
future
policy
and
government
oversight
committee
meetings,
the
finance
department
will
be
presenting
with
us
a
presentation
on
the
overall
data
on
workers.
Compensation
claims.
B
Anyone
all
right
scene,
none.
I
will
go
ahead
and
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
room.
A
F
E
C
A
G
B
I
will
that
item
passes
and
I
will
know
for
the
record
that
we
have
been
joined
by
councilmember
osman.
However,
if
you
can
just
say
something
for
the
record,
so
we
can
record
your
presence.
B
Okay,
well,
we'll
just
continue
to
move
forward,
and
the
next
item
on
our
agenda
is.
B
Item
number
37:
it's
a
report
back
from
staff
on
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility,
campus
expansion
and
I
will
invite
interim
director
brett
jelly
to
begin
that
report.
Along
with
barbara
o'brien
director
of
property
services.
H
Thank
you,
chair
jenkins.
I
will
I
note
that
councilmember
cano
did
put
her
name
in
the.
B
Chat,
I
just
noticed
that
thank
you,
mr
jelly,
councilman
mcconnell.
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
I
I'd
be
happy
to
get
your
help
on
navigating
the
meeting
here.
I
do
have
a
motion
that
I
shared
with
colleagues
earlier
today,
and
my
motion
that
I
would
like
to
make
now
is
to
move
to
postpone
for
one
cycle
the
consideration
of
the
staff
direction
related
to
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility,
the
campus
expansion
to
the
next
regularly
scheduled
policy
and
government
oversight
committee,
which
is
scheduled
for
wednesday
october
6th.
A
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
cono.
We
do
have
a
motion
to
delay
to
postpone
this
item
for
one
cycle
and
a
proper
second.
Is
there
any
discussion.
J
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president,
knowing
that
the
nature
of
what
is
to
be
reported
to
us
would
not
in
any
way
change
in
form
or
substance,
I'm
not
really
seeing
the
merit
of
any
delay.
It's
not
like
when
we
usually
delay
it's
to
modify
a
project
or
discuss
some
nuance
to
a
policy
discussion.
This
is
actually
a
straightforward
report
that
we
instructed
staff
to
present,
and
so
I'd
like
to
present
a
substitute
motion
that
we
proceed
as
indicated
in
our
previous
direction.
B
K
L
Thanks,
madam
chair,
I
I
do
think
that,
at
the
very
least,
it's
beneficial
to
be
able
to
hear
from
staff,
given
that
they've
postponed
other
work
to
be
able
to
be
ready
to
present
today.
So
I
I
support
councilmember
mike's
motion
to
go
ahead
and
hear
from
staff
today.
M
Thank
you
adam
chair,
so
I
believe
the
intent
from
councilmember
cano's
motivation
is
it's.
There
is
as
one
of
the
authors
around
the
staff
direction.
There
is
ongoing
work
with
staff
at
at
the
request
of
staff
to
have
more
time
around
discussing
some
concerns
with
the
language
so
that
it
can
be
resolved.
M
So
I
don't
think
that
there's
necessarily
a
conflict
between
having
a
presentation
today
from
staff
but
still
taking
up
a
motion
to
hold
over
one
cycle
the
staff
direction,
so
that
language
can
be
improved,
that
the
authors
are
working
on,
and
so
I
would
say
maybe,
given
that
there's
a
substitute
here
on
holding
this
over
cycle,
there's
an
opportunity
to
kind
of
sort
this
out.
So
we
can
still
have
the
presentation
today
also
having
a
more
refined
staff
direction
that
is
sensitive
to
concerns
around
how
it
is
written.
M
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
johnson
council,
president
bender.
L
Yeah
thanks,
I
I
don't
know
if
members
of
the
public
who
may
be
watching
this
or
even
council
members
know
what's
going
on,
because
we
haven't
had
the
staff
presentation.
So
I
just
maybe
echoing
part
of
what
councilmember
johnson
says.
I
think
it
would
be
beneficial
to
hear
from
staff
who
are
responding
to
direction
from
council
to
come
and
present
so
that
we
may
then
decide
how
to
proceed
whether
it's
with
delay.
Our
decision
today.
M
What's
johnson,
thank
you,
madam
vice
president.
So
I
don't
know
if
the
two
different
folks
with
motions
are
willing
to
withdraw
them.
Council,
member
right,
gang
council
member
kano
so
that
we
can
hear
from
staff
and
then
there
can
be
an
opportunity
for
a
motion
around
postponing
a
cycle,
any
any
sort
of
staff
direction.
Thereafter.
That
would
be
one
potential
solution,
and
I
see
council
member
reich
in
queue.
B
J
J
Certainly
we
can
take
any
subsequent
actions
to
them,
but
to
preemptively
delay
is
exactly
the
nature
of
my
motion,
so
I
would
encourage
everyone
from
this
conversation
to
approve
what
I
submitted
and
we
can
hear
the
report
and
whatever
subsequent
actions
we
take.
We
take,
but
the
spirit
of
mind
is
let
the
staff
proceed
with
what
we
directed
them
to
do
today,
and
I
hope
I
have
support.
So
we
can
have
that
conversation
and
hear
the
report.
Thank
you.
I
Madam
chair,
so
I
guess
I
should
just
maybe
share
a
little
bit
more
details
about
the
legislative
process
that
we're
in
in
case
that
there's
questions
from
council
members
who
are
wanting
to
know
sort
of
where
this
item
lives
in
our
legislative
body.
So
you
might
remember
that
we
took
a
vote
to
suspend
the
the
public
works
expansion
and
to
authorize
specific,
I
guess
additions
to
the
existing
in
east
phillips.
I
I
I
guess
serve
our
employees
a
little
bit
better
and
then
the
other
piece
was,
I
think,
the
the
more
significant
piece
to
the
community,
which
is
to
to
suspend
the
expansion
of
of
the
hiawatha
campus
into
the
additional
seven
acres
that
are
located
in
the
arsenic
triangle
and
area
known
as
the
east,
phillips
neighborhood,
and
so
because
that
item
did
not
have
a
fiscal
note
and
a
racial
equity
impact
analysis.
I
The
item
stayed
alive
and
pogo
and
was
waiting
for
this
meeting
to
to
be
bundled
with
that
fiscal
note
and
the
racial
equity
impact
analysis.
I
I
The
the
building
of
a
parking
ramp
at
this
transit
oriented
development
site,
as
well
as
the
future
development
that
the
the
community
would
like
to
be
able
to
build
here.
So
we've
been
in
robust
conversations
with
city
staff,
elected
officials,
community
members,
the
union,
the
trades
union.
I
Excuse
me
to
try
to
figure
out
how
we
can
really
kind
of
couple
all
of
these
pieces
together
and
present
a
full
picture
of
the
conversation.
And
so
I
I'm
I'm
okay
with
us
hearing
from
staff
about
the
racial
equity
impact
analysis
and
the
fiscal
note
as
a
point
of
information.
I
But
I
wouldn't
want
us
to
approve
any
any
type
of
official
direction
on
those
pieces
until
we
have
the
complete
package
ready
and
so
in
conversations
with
the
city
attorney
and
other
internal
leaders.
I
On
this
you
know
it
became
clear
that
there's
some
sort
of
growing
conversations
about
partnerships
between
the
community,
the
city
and
the
labor
unions
around
some
of
these
issues
and
the
future
of
the
site
that
could
beneficially
improve
the
the
the
tone
of
the
conversation
that
we've
been
having
in
terms
of
the
the
legal
liability
the
city
might
face
with
this
and
and
some
other
pieces,
and
so
the
real
intent
here
is
not
nefarious,
which
I'm
I'm
kind
of
picking
that
up
from
some
of
the
conversation
from
other
colleagues.
I
Here,
it's
not
to
hide
information.
It's
not
to
be
preemptive,
it's
really
to
say.
We
have
a
really
good
level
of
work
happening
and
we
just
need
a
couple
of
more
days
to
really
land
it
and
be
able
to
offer
our
colleagues
and
the
public
a
full
package
of
information,
so
that
that
was
really
the
the
intent
of
the
motion
to
delay
by
one
cycle.
I
I
don't
think
anybody
feels
bad
about
having
a
little
bit
more
time
to
to
land
some
of
these
conversations,
I
think
many
staff
have
expressed
that
they're
working
under
multiple
heavy
deadlines
and
they
want
to
be
responsible
and
provide
information
when
we
can,
but
they
also
know
how
complicated
this
conversation
is
and
elected
officials.
I
I
And
then
you
know
we
we
were
able
to
reach
some
colleagues
on
this
on
monday
and
tuesday,
but
not
everyone,
so
we're
we're
trying
to
sort
of
thread
the
needle
of
just
being
able
to
to
have
a
complete
package
together.
Well
enough
baked
conversation
where
people
are
feeling
comfortable
about
their
questions
and
ideas.
I
So
I
I
guess
you
know,
that's
that's
just
kind
of
the
context
I
wanted
to
share
just
so
it's
not,
I
guess,
painted,
as
you
know
me
trying
to
be
shifty
or
you
know
lying
or
something
it's
really
just
to
try
to
get
more
information
to
the
table
in
one
fell
swoop,
so
that
we
can
look
at
the
entire
picture
and
not
have
to
make
decisions
in
in
a
siloed
way
around.
This
particular
very
complicated
and
high
profile
topic.
B
All
right,
thank
you.
Councilman
ricano,
councilmember
wright,.
J
Sorry,
just
these
buttons
seem
to
be
a
little
sticky
today.
Thank
you,
adam.
Vice
president,
the
intent
here
is
just
to,
as
many
people
seem
to
be
interested
in,
is
to
have
the
report
that
we
asked
for
there's
nothing
in
these
reports
that
will
change
with
any
subsequent
conversation.
Obviously,
what
we
do
moving
forward
on
the
broader
conversation
about
you
know
a
site
development.
I
definitely
want
to
not
curtail
that
conversation,
but
I
do
think
to
proceed.
J
We
just
move
forward,
have
the
presentation
as
directed,
and
we
can
talk
about
those
other
things
too.
Nothing
preclu,
nothing
about.
This
precludes
those
conversations
as
outlined
by
councilmember,
connor
or
others,
and
just
to
clarify
my
intent,
and
I
don't
think
I
said
anything
about
anyone
else's
intentions,
things
yeah.
B
Thank
you,
council
president
binder.
L
I
don't
think
I
have
anything
to
add.
Perhaps
it's
worth
just
noting
that
the
final
action
that
the
city
council
as
a
body
has
taken
on
this
was
in
2018
when
the
city,
council
and
mayor
unanimously
directed
staff
to
do
essentially
with
option
a,
and
so
there
have
been
many
many
conversations
using
an
enormous
amount
of
staff
time
to
try
to
change
that
decision
recently.
But
that
is
the
final
decision
that
the
city
council
has
made.
L
B
Thank
you
all
righty,
there's
no
further
discussion.
We
can
take
a
roll
call
on
the
substitute
motion
offered
by
councilmember
reich.
B
E
C
B
N
Share
jenkins
kendall
in
the
clerk's
office,
I
see
peggy
just
turned
her
camera
on
too,
but
I
I
my
understanding
is
it's
the
body's
intent
to
hear
the
presentation.
So
I
think
that
kind
of
negates
council
member
kano's
motion
at
this
point.
So
I
think
after
you
hear
the
presentation,
it
would
be
appropriate
for
her
to
make
the
motion
again
if
if
she
wants
to-
but
I
think
you
can
just
move
forward
with
the
presentation
at
this
point.
B
N
I,
I
think,
that's
fine,
if
you
want
to
just
hear
the
presentation
and
then
assume
that
her
motion
is
still
on
the
floor
and
take
it
up
as
soon
as
the
presentation
is
over.
I
think
that
would
be
appropriate.
B
All
right,
thank
you.
I
will
invite
interim
director
jelly
back
to
the
virtual
stage
to
present
the
presentation,
along
with
director
o'brien.
H
Thank
you,
chair
jenkins.
I
am
brett
jelly,
the
interim
director
of
public
works
and
the
debate
that
just
happened
actually
stepped
on
many
of
my
introductory
points.
So
I
will.
I
will
be
brief.
The
item
for
you
today
is
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility
campus
expansion.
I
am
joined
by
a
number
of
my
colleagues
who
are
here
to
answer
questions
if
needed.
H
This
has
been
a
team
effort
includes
heather
johnson
city
coordinator,
barbara
o'brien,
director
of
property
services,
eric
hanson,
director
of
economic
development,
kim
havey,
the
sustainability
director
and
finally,
eric
nelson
deputy
city
attorney,
as
we
have
pre
presented
the
project
recently
I'll
limit.
My
remarks
through
just
a
short
project
recap,
as
has
been
described,
the
purpose
of
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility.
H
But
there
was
not
a
racial
equity
impact
analysis
or
fiscal
note.
It
was
referred
to
staff
for
the
completion
of
those
two
items.
They
have
been
uploaded
and
attached
with
the
request
for
console
action
and
updated
requests
for
console
action,
and
I
would
like
to
the
in
particular
the
fiscal
note
is.
H
It
looks
a
little
bit
different
than
the
standard
fiscal
note.
So
I
am
going
to
introduce
city
coordinator
heather
johnston
and
then
eric
hanson
director
of
economic
development,
to
give
an
overview
of
that
document.
O
Madam
chair
members
of
the
council,
heather
johnston
interim
city
coordinator,
I'm
pensioning
for
dushani
dye,
who
is
out
of
the
office
today.
I
am
going
to
pick
the
I'm
going
to
take
the
big
piece
of
the
fiscal
note
and
then
I'm
going
to
turn
to
eric
hanson
to
discuss
all
of
the
holding
cost
pieces.
The
largest
portion
of
the
fiscal
impact
is
the
12.9
million
dollar
repayment
of
the
water
fund.
This
would
be
required
before
this
property
is
developed.
O
I
do
want
to
just
mention
that
number
has
increased
slightly
from
the
12.3
that
was
discussed
earlier,
and
that
is
primarily
due
to
the
design
work
that
began
back
in
after
this
project
was
approved
in
december
of
2018,
and
so
we've
gotten
the
final
bills
and
payment
for
that
design.
Work
and
barbara
o'brien
can
certainly
speak
to
that
in
more
detail
just
for
order
of
magnitude.
O
Folks,
if
folks
wanted
the
12.9
million
dollar
increase,
if
you
wanted
to
have
that
repaid
through
a
property
tax
levy,
it
would
be
at
an
increase
of
3.2
percent
3.25
percent
over
the
mayor's
budget
proposal
of
5.45
percent.
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
eric
hanson
and
then
we
will
both
be
available
for
questions.
P
Thank
you,
heather,
not
a
vice
president
members
of
the
community.
My
name
is
eric
hanson,
I'm,
the
director
of
economic
policy,
development
for
the
city
and
I'm
just
gonna
go
over
some
things.
P
We
talked
about
the
I
think
a
few
meetings
ago
about
what
your
options
would
be
with
the
property
if
we
were
to
as
a
city,
decide
not
to
use
the
roof
depot
properties,
you
have
about
four
options
in
front
of
you
and
they
have
different
price
tags
to
them
and
that's
in
detail
in
the
fiscal
note
most
notably
as
as
the
interim
coordinator
said
it,
we
would
need
the
12.9
million
dollars
paid
off
before
it
could
be
moved
from
a
public
facility
into
the
redevelopment
authority
that
cped
oversees
for
the
city,
and
then
you
have
four
options.
P
The
first
option
is
to
sell
it
as
surplus
property
and
that
would
be
sold
at
public
bid
and
that's
a
sealed
bid
and
the
drawbacks
to
a
public
bid
is,
is
that
the
city
would
have
limited
oversight
of
what
happens
to
the
property
afterwards
outside
of
its
land
use
controls,
but
it
would
cost.
You
know
it
would
net
out
a
cost
somewhere
between.
You
know
six
and
a
half
to
nine
million
dollars
of
total
costs.
It
would
bring
down
the
the
cost
of
the
water
fund
from
that
12.9
down.
P
The
other
option
is
three
redevelopment
options
and
those
range
in
prices
after
you
take
out
the
12.9
to
very
minimal
expenses
to
up
to
about
you
know
four
and
a
half
four
and
a
half
million
dollars
up
front
with
you
know
some
operating
expenses
over
time
and
those
three
are
a
low
maintenance
option
which
we
would
do
a
redevelopment.
We
just
let
the
property
sit
the
way
it
has
been
sitting
for
the
last
few
years.
P
That
would
you
know,
have
minimal
costs.
We
wouldn't
have
to
make
any
improvements
to
the
site
until
it's
redeveloped
and
then
and
then
we
would
do
things
like
you
know:
snow
removal
and
that
sort
of
thing
so
very
diminished
expenses
to
the
city.
P
The
second
is
to
just
clear
the
site:
remove
it
take
out
the
environmental
contamination,
that's
that
that's
at
the
site
and
encapsulate
the
site
that
would
cost
about
4.3
million
dollars
to
do
that
initial
work
and
then
about
a
hundred
and
twenty-five
thousand
dollars
over
time
just
to
oh
per
year,
just
to
maintain
it
and
then
the
third
one,
which
would
be
probably
the
most
expensive
because
of
ongoing
expenses,
would
be
to
preserve
the
building
and
that
would
be
making
some
envelope
improvements.
P
Putting
in
a
heating
plant
fixing
some
things
in
the
roof,
it'd
be
about
four
million
dollars,
and
then
that
has
a
longer
and
more
expensive
tail
to
it,
because
it's
about
two
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars
per
year
in
annual
expenses,
because
we'd
have
to
heat
cool
the
building,
provide
some
additional
security
measures
and
some
other
property
maintenance.
P
So
that's
that's
your
more
expensive
and
that's
just
getting
you
to
the
end
of
the
development
process.
We
have
not
quantified
staff
time
to
do
the
process,
nor
have
we
estimated
how
much
of
a
subsidy
or
public
investment
that
would
be
needed
in
the
ultimate
redevelopment
project.
So
those
would
still
be
costs
and,
as
we
said
in
the
last
few
meetings
that
is
based
on
this
kind
of
property,
it's
going
to
take
a
while
for
the
redevelopment
to
occur,
and
we
expect
that
it's
going
to
be
pretty
expensive
from
a
city
standpoint
for
investment.
P
B
Thanks
everyone
for
that
presentation.
Are
there
any
questions
for
mr
hansen
or
ms
o'brien.
H
I
just
would
like
to
note,
and
as
my
understanding
when
other
items
have
been
directed
to
come
back
for
the
completion
of
area,
racial
equity,
impact,
analysis
and
fiscal
note,
they've
been
done
and
we've
staff
has
come
back
and,
and
they
were
attached
noted
when
the
agenda
was
posted
for
public
review,
kim
havey
sustainability.
Director
is
and
can
answer
questions
or
also
provide
some
high
points.
H
B
I
would,
I
think,
would
like
to
hear
from
you,
mr
havey,
but
prior
to
that
there's
a
comment.
Question
from
council
president
bender.
L
Thanks
man,
I'm
sure
it's
pausing,
because
I
think
my
question
may
have
some
sort
of
legal
implications,
and
I
I
know
we
have
you
know
it's
a
bit
difficult,
sometimes
for
us
to
talk
through
legal
risk
to
the
city
in
a
public
forum.
You
know
to
your
point:
we
heard
a
lot
of
information
verbally.
L
You
know,
I
think,
there's
this
piece
in
the
fiscal
impact
analysis
that
is
worth
noting,
which
is
that
the-
and
so
maybe
this
is
a
way
to
ask
this
question
right
now.
The
fiscal
impact
analysis
indicates
that
the
way
to
close
the
funding
gap
that
was
identified
by
staff
if
the
option
c
was
was
the
final
decision.
So
this
12.9
million
dollar
gap,
the
the
identified
way
to
do
that
here
is
a
an
8.7
tax
levy
in
2022..
L
But
my
understanding
is
that
we
can't
be
certain
that
that
would
allow
us
to
so.
So
that
is
how
we
are
complying
with,
showing
that
we
would
be
paying
back
the
fund,
but
the
fiscal
impact
analysis
also,
you
know,
notes
the
sort
of
different
customer
bases
that
the
waterworks
fund
both
collects
fees
from
as
well
as
serves,
which
includes
all
of
minneapolis,
but
also
22
percent
of
those
sales
go
to
suburban
customers.
L
So
we
know
that
there's
there
is
some
legal
risk
to
the
city
related
to
the
the
speed
with
which
we
would
be
paying
back.
The
water
fund
is
so,
I
guess
the
question
to
staff.
Maybe
ms
johnston
is
the
best
person
or
the
city
attorney's
office
to
just
clarify
that.
L
The
fiscal
impact
analysis
outlines
a
way
that
we
can
pay
back
the
water
fund,
which
would
be
in
an
8.6
percent
levy
and
8.7.
Let
me
increase
in
2022.,
I
won't
be
in
office.
Then
I
it's
hard
for
me
to
imagine
this.
A
city,
council
and
mayor
approving
an
8.7
levy
increase
in
2022,
so.
B
To
that-
and
we
have
assistant
city
attorney
available
to
address
that
issue.
Q
Sure,
thank
you,
council.
Vice
president
jenkins,
council,
president
bender
eric
nelson
deputy
city
attorney,
the
council
president
accurately
stated
at
least
the
legal
perspective
on
the
issue
of
replenishment
of
the
water
fund.
Q
In
terms
of
the
mechanics
and
the
method
for
how
the
fund
is
replenished,
I
I
would
need
to
defer
to
finance
and
or
the
city
coordinator,
but
the
advice
from
the
city
attorney's
office.
Our
advice
is
that,
if
it
is
the
will
of
the
city
to
walk
from
a
city
facilities,
project
or
a
water
project,
the
there
is
a
corresponding
need
to
replenish
the
water
fund
as
soon
as
possible
to
minimize
legal
risk
and
exposure,
and
in
our
discussions
the
the
method
identified.
Q
I
I
think
that
that
some
of
these
you
know,
suggestions
and
and
conversations
coming
from
council
member
bender
are
premature
and-
and
we
don't
have
to
be
reminded
100
times
about
the
vote
that
the
city
council
took
on
this
project.
Everyone
can
read,
we
can
all
pull
up
the
old
records
and
understand
that
for
ourselves.
I
I
You
know
the
the
current
action
that
we
have
right
now
is
to
suspend
the
project
that
can
be
interpreted
as
we
need
some
time
to
figure
out
what
we
want
to
do
with
the
future
of
this
project
and
what
I
was
trying
to
explain
earlier
today
that
perhaps
that
I
failed
at
explaining
is
that
we
are
trying
to
figure
that
out
and
we
need
a
few
more
days
to
be
able
to
bring
a
full
package
to
our
colleagues
here.
I
It
is
not
a
true
reflection
of
the
conversations
we're
having
right
now
and
that's
why
I
think
it's
important
that
this
particular
discussion
be
tabled
and
be
brought
up
in
full
light
at
the
next
pogo
meeting
on
wednesday
october
6th,
because
the
current
conversation
that
has
been-
I
guess
I
don't
know,
captured
in
the
ria
and
the
fiscal
note-
are
only
reflecting
one-third
of
the
pieces
of
the
pie
here,
and
so
I
I
think
that
it
would
be
wrong
to
assume
that
there's
a
levy
increase
conversation
on
the
table.
I
That
is
not
anything
the
co-authors
are
talking
about,
that
that
engage
the
staff
direction,
nor
the
colleagues
who
are
considering
supporting
this
effort,
I
think
that's
a
premature
proposition,
and
it
is
an
incomplete
analysis
of
the
situation
that
we
have
before
us.
And
so,
once
again,
I
would.
I
I
would
love
to
be
able
to
table
this
motion,
and
will
you
know
I
it's
unclear
to
me
if
this
presentation
is
over
or
not,
I
want
to
be
respectful
of
the
people
who
wanted
to
get
the
incomplete
information
today
and
you
can
keep
having
this
in
complete
discussion,
but
but
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
make
a
motion
to
to
delay
and
be
able
to
get
all
the
pieces
together
for
the
october
6th
meeting.
That
is
already
slated
on
the
books
for
our
next
pogo
conversation.
B
Thank
you,
councilman
mcconnell,
interim
director
jelly
is:
are
we
complete
with
the
presentation.
H
Yes,
council,
vice
president
jenkins,
we
we
can
wrap
up
I'll
note.
I
think
I
mean.
H
Yes-
and
I
want
to
clarify
one
thing:
we,
the
pogo
committee,
passed
two
actions
and,
and
so
that
is
what
was
referred
to
staff
and
what
we
completed
the
racial
equity
impact
analysis
on,
in
the
fiscal
note,
of
course,
if
the
council,
if
the
committee
takes
other
actions
moving
forward
and
those
documents
are
required,
we
of
course
will
will
do
that.
But
we
did.
H
We
did
complete
these
two
items
based
on
what,
when
what
was
approved
by
poco
committee,
I
will
I'll
introduce
kim
havey
sustainability
director
to
give
a
couple
of
some
highlights
from
the
racial
equity
impact
analysis
document,
and
then
that
will
conclude
our
presentation.
B
Thank
you
interim
director
jelly,
and
I
will
con
confirm
your
association
that
we
that
this
report
is
based
on
the
directions
given
by
the
members
of
this
committee
and
so
you're
absolutely
accurate.
We
did
not
ask
for
anything
beyond
that
and
you
staff
has
has
delivered
mr
havey.
R
Thank
you,
council.
Vice
president
jenkins,
my
name
is
kim
havey,
I'm
director
of
sustainability
and
myself,
kelly
mullman
and
the
other
directors
who
are
on
this
call
related
to
this
project
all
participated
in
developing
a
racial
equity
impact
analysis
and
which
has
been
stated.
We
looked
at
two
aspects
of
the
project.
One
was
implementing
the
option
c2,
which
included
the
construction
of
an
office
edition
shop,
base,
a
modified
parking
structure
that
we
looked
at.
R
What
impacts
might
be
of
suspending
the
city's
work
to
expand
the
hiawatha
facility
and
then
the
fiscal
note,
of
course,
providing
one-time
versus
annual
activities
of
cost
of
maintaining
the
city-owned
property.
So
I
just
wanted
to
quickly
kind
of
walk
through
some
of
the
findings.
This
is
has
been
included
in
your
packet,
for
the
hiawatha
project,
as
you
can
see,
are
just
walking
through
the
forum
our
policy
goals
on
this
public
services.
Obviously,
this
is
very
related
to
the
support
of
a
lot
of
work
that
our
public
works.
R
This
also
has
a
designated
environmental
justice
zone
green
zone
that
does
encompass
the
entire
project
site,
and
so
it
requires
us
to
really
take
a
much
closer
look
at
to
what
the
the
impacts
may
be
to
the
community
and
in
this
area
also
what
the
cumulative
impacts
will
be
in
this
community
and
how
it
affects
people
of
color
and
others
who
have
already
borne
a
significant
impact
of
pollution
in
the
past,
from
from
decisions
that
were
made
and
and
continue
to
be
made
around
the
project
site
operational
goals.
R
Workforce,
obviously,
is
a
huge
part
of
this.
There
are
hundreds
of
employees.
The
city
has
here
and,
of
course,
there's
the
intent
to
have
a
workforce
training
center
and
that
kind
of
thing,
but
depending
on
how
the
project
moves
forward,
what
will
happen
with
that
is
uncertain?
R
So
one
of
the
things
that
should
be
noted
is
that
this
particular
area
when
it
comes
down
to
the
racial
breakdown
of
the
community.
We
looked
at
east
phillips
and
then
as
minneapolis
as
a
whole.
The
racial
breakdown
here
shows
that
71.2
percent
of
the
residents
in
east
phillips
are
people
of
color
in
minneapolis.
That's
36.4
on
an
average
basis.
R
We
also
have
38
percent
being
hispanic
or
latino
compared
to
the
city
of
9.6
percent,
and
30
percent
of
the
residents
are
foreign-born
as
compared
to
the
city
at
15.6
percent.
We
also
have
a
higher
unemployment
rate
in
this
area
and
a
lower
median
income.
R
So
median
income
is
at
30,
39,
000
271
for
the
east
phillips
median
income
in
the
city
on
average
as
a
whole,
is
62
583..
R
One
of
the
things
that
we
did
provide
in
here
is
also
to
take
a
look
at
what
is
a
what
we
consider
a
proxy
for
air
quality
and
environmental
health,
which
is
asthma
levels.
These
asthma
levels
can
be
very
easily
not
easily
but
can
be
obtained
through
a
regular
data
sources
that
track
this.
R
But
what
we
find
is
that
you
know
asthma
levels
in
amongst
the
55404
zip
code
are
307
emergency
visits
per
10
000
as
compared
to
the
average
for
minnesota
119.
R
and
for
all
ages.
In
the
metropolitan
area,
we've
got
40.9
visits
compared
to
176.5
visits
and
554
55404
area
code.
So
you
can
see
that
the
amount
of
emergency
visits
related
to
asthma
are
four
times
higher
in
this
zip
code
than
they
are
in
the
southern
county
metro
area
and
more
than
four
times
higher
than
what
is
average
for
the
entire
state.
R
There
have
been
specific
air
quality
monitoring
that
has
gone
on,
focusing
on
benzene
formaldehyde
particulate
matter.
2.5
I'll
just
quickly
highlight
that
this
census
block
area
has
the
highest
amount
of
pm
2.5
levels
or
highest
10
percent
of
pm25
2.5
levels
in
the
entire
state,
so
90
of
the
state
has
lower
pm
2.5
levels
and
that
a
lot
of
this
is
contributing
from
traffic,
but
there's
also
permitted
facilities
that
make
up
around
20
of
those
particular
emissions
areas
as
well
too.
R
I
guess
I'll
just
talk
briefly
about
there's
quite
a
bit
of
work
that
has
been
done
on
community
engagement,
there's
a
list
of
kind
of
the
engagements
and
learnings
that
have
been
happening
between
2016
and
2018..
There
has
also
been
two
advisory
committees
that
have
been
set
up
and
have
had
met.
One
was
site
guideline
advisory
committee
in
2017
and
the
hiawatha
advisory
committee
in
2019.
R
R
Preference
for
the
city's
engagement
with
the
community
have
started
sooner
concerns
about
increasing
traffic
and
traffic
related
pollution,
a
community
that
already
has
some
of
the
highest
levels,
as
I
mentioned,
of
pollution
in
minneapolis
and
minnesota,
a
vision
for
de-industrializing
the
neighborhood
opportunities
for
youth
recreation,
activating
a
job,
training,
employment
and
entrepreneurship,
opportunities
for
bipac
residents,
an
interest
in
solar,
sustainable
energy
to
reduce
residents,
energy
burden
and
create
green
career
pathways,
creating
a
community
designation
with
connections
to
history,
culture
and
connectivity
to
the
greenway
and
light
rail
transit
and
to
access
healthy
food,
gardens
and
cultivation.
R
As
you
know,
you've
also
been
receiving
a
lot
of
emails.
I
know
I
received
those
emails
as
well
too
from
community
residents
and
others
in
regards
to
this.
So
there's
been
quite
a
few
residents
who
have
voiced
their
opinions
on
this
in
support
of
epic's
projects
and
others,
and
then
I'll
just
touch
on
sort
of
the
analysis
piece
where
we
looked
at
the
various
different
components
of
what
would
be
considered
sort
of
a
positive
impact,
a
negative
impact
and
an
unknown
impact
on
those
changes,
and
rather
than
go
through.
R
All
of
those
specifically
in
detail.
I'd
just
like
to
encourage
you
to
take
a
look
at
that
because
we
did
break
it
down
into
the
development
on-site,
which
include
buildings
a
b
and
c,
which
are
those
service
bays.
The
office
expansion
parking
lot
kind
of
what
the
the
positives
and
negatives
of
those
are.
R
And
then
we
also
looked
at
what
the
impacts
might
be
in
delaying
the
financial
hiawatha
maintenance
facility
and
what
the
impact
would
be
in
regards
to
those
changes
that
were
made
or
additions
and
then
really
just
taking
a
look
at
the
impact
of
retaining
the
roof
depot
structure
as
it
is,
but
not
doing
any
development
of
it.
R
But
in
regards
to
the
either
restoration
of
contaminated
soils,
those
that
that
would
not
happen
and
then
also
the
improvements
to
the
area
around
there,
with
additional
green
space
and
additional
infrastructure
and
spreading
out
the
traffic
flow
amongst
the
the
overall
large
site.
But
again
we
didn't
look
into
anything
comparable
to
what
epic
has
proposed.
R
We
didn't
have
that
in
a
staff
direction,
so
this
is
really
just
looking
at
the
parts
that
were
proved
to
go
forward
and
what
the
impact
would
be
on
the
community
of
not
moving
forward
with
the
site
and
having
it
stay,
as
is
so
that's
how
we
looked
at
it.
I
think
this
is
a
pretty
comprehensive
review
of
it.
Obviously,
this
is
is
a
one
where
there
is
not
a
conclusion
or
support
one
way
or
another
on
how
this
goes.
R
R
Knowing
what
the
other
policies
that
we
have
in
place
are
such
as
our
environmental
justice,
green
zones
and
our
declarations
around
rape,
racial
or
racism,
as
a
public
health
issue,
those
kind
of
things
that
needs
to
be
taken
and
consider
consideration
when
deciding
how
to
proceed
with
whatever
proposal
might
come
forward,
but
this
provides
at
least
an
overview
of
what
the
what
what
is
there
in
the
community
today
and
what
we
see
is
potential
impacts
based
on
the
previous
council
direction
to
staff,
so
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
on
on
the
area.
B
Great,
are
there
any
questions
for
director
haiti.
L
Thanks,
madam
chair,
I
think
this
may
be
one
of
the
first
presentations
we've
had
in
detail
of
one
of
the
rias.
I
really
appreciated
the
level
of
detail
here.
I
did
want
to
note
that
one
thing
I
think,
has
been
a
kind
of
topic
of
conversation
over
the
years
of
this
project.
Is
that
certainly
we
know
this
part
of
the
city
is
a
place
where
there
are
concentrated
impacts
of
air
quality
issues.
L
It's
harder,
as
the
ria
notes,
to
determine
the
impact
of
of
not
doing
this
project
here,
because.
L
It's
because
it
would
need
to
be
compared
to
what
else
would
be
there
instead,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
highlight-
highlight
that
part
of
the
rhea,
because
it's
been
such
a
focus
of
a
lot
of
the
constituent
comments
and
communications.
That
we've
gotten
is
that
you
know
a
side
by
side.
Comparison
of
this
use
versus
other
uses
has
a
isn't
really
part
of
this
analysis
and
that
would
need
to
be
done
in
comparison
with
other
uses.
L
So,
for
example,
apartment
buildings
have
emissions
impacts,
commercial
buildings
have
emissions
impacts,
office,
buildings
have
emissions
impacts.
You
know
any
kind
of
use
that
would
have
people
coming
and
going
have.
Emissions
impacts
from
transportation
uses
at
the
very
least,
and
then
certainly
the
building
energy
things
would
need
to
be
evaluated
based
on
specific
proposals.
L
So
anyway,
I
I
know
I
am
talking
about
a
very
specific
detail,
but
it
is
the
subject
I
I
just
want
to
say
I
take
to
heart
the
communications
we're
getting,
and
I
really
appreciate
the
work
that
staff
has
done
to
try
to
answer
some
of
these
questions.
L
I
don't
want
to
just
ignore
the
substance
of
this
issue
and
wanted
to
just
highlight
that
piece
of
it
and,
of
course
my
colleagues
of
course,
have
the
very
detailed
notes,
but
as
staff
noted,
there's,
there's
very
specific
kind
of
plus
minus
question
marks
about
all
of
these
different
issues.
That's
in
the
written
version
that's
available
through
the
limb
system
on
our
agenda
as
well
as
that
was
circulated
to
council
offices.
B
Thanks
thanks,
madam
president,
councilmember
mcconnell.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Just
wanted
to
check
in
is
the
presentation
complete
now.
E
E
R
Council
vice
president
jenkins
council
member
cano,
I
I
don't
believe
we
have
any
more
as
a
team
to
be
delivering,
but
if,
if
we
do
I'll
defer
to
interim
director
brett
jelly,
if
there
is
anything
else,
but
I
am
completed
with
my
presentation.
B
I
guess
I
would
ask
mr
havey:
is
there
because
a
num
a
lot
of
the
communication
that
we
have
been
receiving
characterizes
an
expansion
of
the
water
maintenance
facility,
as
extraordinarily
toxic
is?
Is
that
the
findings
of
the
rhea
and
or-
and
I
know
you
didn't
exactly
look
at
you
only
looked
at
expanding
partially
but
is?
Are
you
able
to
comment
on
that
at
all.
R
Again,
it's
sort
of
council
vice
president
jenkins,
it's
it's
difficult
to
to
do
that
without
having
some
comparison
to
it,
I
will
say
that
there
isn't
anything
in
here
that
in
maybe
a
different
location
would
not
be
considered
to
be
adding
to
the
problem.
The
issue
that
we
have
here
is
that
we're
already
in
this
in
a
in
a
location
that
has
significant
impacts
from
air
pollution,
air
quality,
much
of
would
cause
from
traffic,
but
anything.
R
In
addition,
that
would
add
additional
to
the
cumulative
level
of
pollution,
which
almost
any
project
would
in
this
area
that
contains
a
you
know:
high
level
of
additional
traffic,
for
example,
or
the
use
of
additional
diesel
equipment
or
trucks,
or
things
like
that
makes
the
situation
worse
and
part
of
our
goal.
Is
this
to
reduce
the
overall
harm,
so,
ideally,
you'd
like
to
reduce
the
overall
pollution
effects.
R
What
project
will
do
that,
or
will
any
project
be
able
to
sort
of
reduce
the
impacts
that
is
yet
to
be
sort
of
assessed,
but
nonetheless,
that
this
is
a
location
for
many
reasons,
including
vulnerability.
Assessment
to
heat,
high
heat
are
to
heat
extremes
to
localize
flooding,
as
well
as
much
more
air
quality
than
the
city
and
and
metropolitan
and
state
as
a
whole
means
that
we
do
need
to
take
extra
care,
and
hence
why
the
racial
equity
impact
analysis
has
been
done.
R
It's
not
determining
a
recommendation
in
one
way
or
another.
It's
just
giving
you
the
base
objective
facts,
and
that
is
that
this
area
does
have
a
high
high
population
of
pipe
people
who
also
have
endured,
both
in
long
term
and
short
term,
much
higher
levels
than
an
average
of
of
air
pollution.
So
anything
we
do
here
that
doesn't
reduce
that.
You
know
needs
to
be
compared
to
to
what
it
needs
to
have
a
comparison
to
something
if
nothing's
happening
compared
to
something
that
does
happen.
B
S
Thank
you,
council.
Vice
president,
I
I
mostly
just
wanted
to
compliment
mr
havey
and
and
interim
director
jelly
and
everybody
on
the
this
work.
I
think
it's
really
valuable
and
it's
a
good
example
of
the
complexity
of
doing
race
equity
work
right,
because
when
we
do
this
work,
a
lot
of
the
things
that
we
do
are
going
to
have
both
positive
and
negative
impacts,
and
I
think,
presenting
those
things
together,
so
that
we
as
policymakers,
can
weigh
the
various
impacts
of
different
paths.
S
Is,
is
really
valuable
and
this
is
the
first
time
I
think
that
we've
seen
really
written
down
clearly
a
point
that
I
think
continues
to
be
very,
very
important-
that
a
part
of
the
water
yard
proposal
was
contamination,
cleanup
and
removal
of
arsenic
from
the
soil
and
groundwater,
and
that
we
have
to
weigh
the
significant
cleanup
benefit
of
a
proposed
project
against.
You
know
the
the
effects
of
of
some
increased
traffic
that
would
probably
come
from
as
council
president
bender
and
and
council.
S
Vice
president
jenkins,
both
noted
any
kind
of
project
would
generate
some
amount
of
of
of
traffic
and
and
that
the
stormwater
filtration
question,
especially
at
a
time
when
we
are
seeing
more
and
more
intense
storms
as
a
result
of
climate
change.
The
combination
of
an
area
that's
susceptible
to
flooding
and
an
area
that
has
substantial
arsenic
in
the
groundwater
is
really
dangerous
for
communities
and
something
that
we
have
to
take
seriously
alongside
air
quality
concerns
and
everything
else.
S
And
so
I
I
really
appreciate
having
this
level
of
detail
so
that
the
public
and
everybody
can,
you
know,
really
wrestle
with
a
sometimes
contradictory
set
of
facts
where
there
are
aspects
of
this
project
that,
even
even
as
it's
as
council,
vice
president
jenkins
said
being
portrayed
as
toxic
actually
had
substantial
environmental
benefit,
and
I
think
that
that's
you
know
worth
noting.
Alongside
the
air
quality
concerns.
B
Thank
you
councilmember
letter
and,
and
thank
you
again,
mr
havey,
and
to
all
the
staff
interim
director
jelly.
Is
there
more
do
you
need
you
want
to
present
as
a
part
of
this
presentation.
B
So
we
are,
I
believe,
back
to
the
original
motion,
which
I
I
think
the
intent
was
to
postpone
action
today,
not
necessarily
the
presentation,
but
if,
if
I
am
mistaken,
then
councilman
ricano,
please
please
correct
me
and
I
would
just
ask
for
a
little
more
assistance
from
the
clerk
are
we
do.
We
need
to
bring
forward
a
new
motion
or
are
we
able
to
discuss
and
vote
on
the
original
motion.
C
B
Thank
you.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
that
item
issue
councilmember
reich.
J
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president
and
again,
as
my
colleague
just
stayed
very
appreciative
of
the
report
that
was
requested
of
staff
and
the
information
that
it
entailed
and
given
the
level
of
discussion
that
we've
had
on
the
different
proposals
and
a
lot
of
the
citizen
input
that
has
preceded
today's
conversation.
J
I'm
going
to
offer
an
alternative
motion
that
accepts
the
report
that
we
requested
today
and
then
further
instruct
staff
with
a
motion
staff
direction
that
I
believe
I've
submitted
previously
to
the
clerk
and
hopefully
got
distributed,
thereby
in
terms
of
the
high
wealth
of
maintenance
facility
and
campus
expansion.
J
And,
if
I
may,
it's
basically
direct
staff
in
finance
property
services.
Public
works,
community
planning
and
economic
development
in
the
office
of
sustainability,
in
alignment
with
the
city,
south
side,
green
zones,
policy
and
city
resolutions
declared
racism,
a
public
health
emergency
and
the
city's
resolution
establishing
a
truth
and
reconciliation
process
to
one
implement
option
b,
presented
at
the
city
council
committee
of
the
whole
meeting
on
august
5th
2021
by
continuing
with
the
hiawatha
campus
expansion,
with
the
exception
of
the
outreach
and
training
facility
and
new
central
business.
J
J
This
report
will
include
the
process
on
how
to
achieve
the
following
components,
with
a
a
community
engagement
plan
to
be
developed
with
input
from
the
community
stakeholders,
including
east
phillips,
neighborhood
association
institute.
Rather
the
south
side,
green
zones,
task
force
native
american-led,
community
organizations
and
other
community-based
organizations
and
residents
and
be
establishing
the
development
objectives
and
goals
for
requests
for
proposals
to
solicit
redevelopment
proposals
to
include
significant
involvement
from
the
community
stakeholders.
J
J
And
if
I
can
once
that
that's
been
confirmed
for
submittal
and
review,
I
would
like
to
briefly
speak
to
to
the
motion.
J
F
J
And,
madam
vice
president,
if
I
may,
as
folks
peruse
the
verbiage,
if
I
just
briefly
want
to
outline
a
few
comments.
J
Please,
thank
you,
madam
vice
president.
You
know
here,
I
believe
you
know,
based
on
all
the
communication
that
we've
had
in
terms
of
the
merit
of
the
proposed
hiawatha
facility
and
all
the
purposes
entailed
in
such
a
project.
I
think
the
merits
of
it
are
pretty
clear,
well
established
and
have
been
voted
on
affirmatively
through
many
many
stages
over
many
many
years.
So
I
won't
really
comment
so
much
on
that
or
believer
those
points.
J
But
I
do
think
that
strikes
a
balance
based
on
the
moment
that
we
took
as
a
community
and
as
a
body
to
reflect
once
again
on
the
community
perspective
on
this
and
the
broader
goals
of
our
environmental
objectives.
J
And
so
I
think
we
all
unanimously
welcomed
this
extra
step,
and-
and
I
think
this
is
a
sort
of
nod
to
all
of
the
work
that
went
into
this
additional
evaluation,
some
of
it
technical
and
staff,
as
was
presented
today
and
somewhat
in
terms
of
community
aspirations,
but
also
in
terms
of
our
collective
will
as
a
as
a
body
to
deliver
on
our
values
as
an
enterprise
internally
and
to
do
things
that
are
measurably
valuable
to
the
city
of
minneapolis
externally,
and
I
think
here
we,
we
embed
a
commitment
to
continue
working
with
the
community
members,
as
outlined
the
key
stakeholders
who
stepped
up
with
a
certain
vision
for
additional
benefits.
J
J
We
get
an
absolute
certainty
that
our
goals
in
terms
of
our
operations
are
tops
in
terms
of
the
style
of
the
building
and
its
environmental
impact,
given
that
we
have
to
have
a
minimum
lead,
certified
buildings
and
the
fact
that
we
have
fleet
commitments,
knowing
that
all
enterprises
have
some
level
of
coming
and
going
that
ours
will,
if
not
now
be
best
in
line
for
commercial
reuse.
It
is
going
to
be
continue
to
be
so
by
our
own
staff
directions
and
our
own
objectives
and
our
own
actions
of
today
in
terms
of
modifying
our
fleet.
J
So
on
that
note,
we're
advancing
community
goals
and
objectives,
we're
managing
city
objectives,
and
I
think
this
is
really
the
ultimate
in
taking
in
new
considerations
and
moving
forward
with
a
past
commitment
to
deliver
for
our
city.
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president.
B
J
It
would
initially,
but
that
would
be
subject
to
the
community
and
stakeholder
input
process,
of
which
I
know,
there's
been
recent
communications
of
how
those
two
values
and
proposals
might
overlap.
That
would
not
be
precluded
in
any
way
shape
or
form,
and
I
would
hope
that
those
conversations
would
continue,
but
that
would
be
subject
to
work
with
staff
and
the
stakeholders
as
identified.
M
Thank
you,
madam
vice
chair.
This
is
really
a
point
of
order
question.
So
I
looked
at
council
member
reich's
motion.
I
thought
geez.
This
looks
familiar
and
turns
out
on
august
18th
at
our
pogo
committee,
which
this
is
continued
from.
M
But
I
will
note
that
the
motion
from
that
committee
includes
the
same
language,
about
the
three
acres
implementing
option
b,
directing
staff,
and
so
I'm
curious
at
least
procedurally
how
that
works,
and
so
maybe
that's
something
that
the
clerk
could
clarify
as
well.
Thank
you.
N
Chair
jenkins
and
and
council
member
johnson,
I,
along
with
everyone
else,
I'm
just
just
reviewing
this
motion
live.
So
I
haven't
seen
this
before
I'm
looking
back
at
the
committee
report
from
that
meeting,
and
it
does
appear,
the
motion
is
not
exactly
the
same,
and
and
considering
that
that
was
you
know,
considering
that
the
body
has
not
yet
taken
final
action
on
this
item
and
has
new
information
before
it.
Considering
what
staff
has
submitted,
I
I
think
it
would
be
appropriate
to
be
take
it
as
a
new
motion.
M
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
it's
good
to
get
the
clarification
and
I'll
be
just
note
that
I'll
be
consistent
in
voting
against
this
motion.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
johnson,
councillor,
palmisano.
K
B
Certainly
councilmember
wright.
J
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president,
I
was
just
going
to
comment
on
my
impression
of
the
motion.
I
will
note
that
the
one
substantial
difference
is
the
taking
away
any
sort
of
extraordinary
effort
to
have
an
exclusive
rights
agreement,
which
clearly
was
not
the
intention
of
the
body
at
that
time.
K
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Well,
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
this
potential
direction.
Coming
back
with
that
slight
modification,
it
is
rather
complex
council
member
reich,
as
he
goes
into
his
explanation.
K
K
Coming
up
with
this
new
information,
you
know:
we've
the
council,
member,
whose
ward
it's
in
has
asked
for
just
a
bit
more
time,
and
this
has
been
ongoing
for
more
than
three
years,
and
I
just
don't
understand
why
then,
at
this
point,
we
need
to
rush
this
decision
now
why
we
can't
give
the
person
whose
word
it's
in
the
honor
of
one
more
cycle
of
time
to
get
whatever
that
might
be,
that
needs
to
be
pieced
together,
some
new
dots
connected
or
partners
or
whatever.
That
is
so.
K
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out.
It's
not
that
I
necessarily
oppose
council
member
reich's
direction,
but
I
do
think
this
is
a
bit
stepping
on
the
toes
of
some
of
the
people
that
are
doing
the
really
hard
work
here.
Thank
you.
L
Thanks,
madam
chair,
so
the
reason
that
I
do
remind
us
that
we
made
a
decision
on
this
project
is
that
that
decision
then
directed
our
city
staff
in
across
the
city
enterprise
in
many
city
departments,
to
do
work
on
the
project
as
directed
unanimously
by
the
13
city,
council,
members
and
the
mayor
at
the
time,
the
same
people
who
are
in
office
today
and
every
time
there
is
so
what
has
hap
has
been
happening
recently
is
notwithstanding
the
council's
decision
to
move
forward
with
a
version
of
this
project
which
is
the
city
council's
final
decision.
L
A
group
of
council
members
has
been
meeting
with
staff
and
asking
for
an
enormous
amount
of
staff
time
to
be
devoted
to
changing
the
direction
of
that
decision.
So
every
cycle
every
month
every
year
that
this
is
delayed,
more
staff
time
is
going
into
this
doing
something
that
has
not
been
approved
by
council.
That
is
different
from
what
the
council
approved.
L
So
I
so
and
for
a
very
long
time.
L
L
So
the
answer
to
the
question:
what's
the
big
deal
about
just
waiting
two
weeks?
Is
it's
two
more
weeks
where
our
cpa
director
is
working
on
this?
Our
public
works
director
is
working
on
this.
Our
city
attorney's
office
has
been
spending
significant
time.
Our
finance
office
is
working
on
this.
Our
sustainability
office
is
working
on
this
and
those
are
all
departments
that
are
both
short
staffed
and
have
significantly
more
work
because
we
are
in
a
pandemic
and
an
economic
crisis.
L
We
are
approaching
budget
season,
they're
preparing
their
budget
amendments,
I'm
sure
in
the
back
of
their
heads,
is
what's
going
to
get
cut
from
my
department.
If
the
city
council
has
to
close
a
12.9
million
dollar
budget
hole
because
the
maximum
levy
is
going
to
get
set
very
soon,
so
that
will
be
the
only
choice
we
won't
be
able
to
raise
property
taxes
more
than
the
mayor
has
proposed
after
the
board
of
estimate
and
taxation.
L
So
that's
the
maximum
levy
for
this
cycle,
so
there
are
numerous
reasons
to
make
a
decision
and
to
give
clear
direction
to
the
dozens
of
city
staff
who
repeatedly
drop
everything
to
work
on
this
project
over
and
over
and
over
again
and
on
their
behalf.
I
feel
very
compelled
to
say
that
that
what
I'm
hearing
here
is
different
than
what
I
hear
from
staff
when
they
contact
me
about
this
project
and
that
there
is
significant
concern
from
multiple
departments
about
the
idea
of
moving
forward
with
the
prod
the
canceling
this
project.
L
So
the
reason
to
make
a
decision
today
is
to
be
clear
in
in
our
decision-making
to
be
responsible
in
our
budgeting
and
to
be
able
to
find
a
way
to
move
forward.
One
that
sets
aside
a
significant
amount
of
land
for
community
use,
one
that
honors
future
input
of
community
in
developing.
What
would
happen
in
that
site
and
does
not
create
a
whole
new
set
of
both
financial
and
environmental
trade-offs,
including
a
site
filled
with
asbestos.
I
Madam
chair,
I
will
not
be
supporting
the
kevin
reich
motion.
I've
never
seen
it
before.
You
know
the
the
taxpayers
that
are
actively
involved
in
these
conversations,
who
are
living
and
working
in
the
ninth
ward,
haven't
seen
this
language.
I
This
would
probably
be
one
of
the
the
worst
government
processes
taken
up
by
the
city,
if
approved
today,
for
the
the
high
gap
in
transparency
and
public
due
process.
So
I
don't
I
don't,
ethically
or
professionally.
I
couldn't
support
this
motion
in
any
way.
I
do.
I
do
think
that
you
know
postponement
of
this
conversation
for
another
two
weeks
is
not
as
insurmountable
as
councilmember
bender
describes.
I
You
know
the
I
guess
the
inequity
in
this
whole
conversation
is
really
triggering
for
me.
Just
because
I
see
just
how
the
the
weight
of
the
of
the
white
supremacy
of
the
entire
city
of
minneapolis
is
being
weaponized
to
shut
down
conversations
with
a
community
who's,
real
who's,
trying
to
figure
out
the
future
of
their
own
vision
and
and
needs
and
desires
in
in
a
very
transformative
moment
for
the
city
of
minneapolis.
I
And
so
I
I
don't
think
that
that
two
weeks
is
as
a
huge
of
the
problem
as
what's
been
presented
today
and
and
if
we're
not
here
to
do
the
work
that
is
being
asked
by
our
constituents,
our
taxpayers,
our
residents,
then
we
shouldn't
be
here
and-
and
this
is
part
of
the
work
and
and
we
get
paid
to
do.
I
This
work
and
city
staff
get
paid
to
ask
these
questions
and
we
haven't
fully
or
thoroughly
answered
the
question
of
how
this
project
aligns
supports
or
expands
our
goals
around
racial
equity
or
the
truth
and
reconciliation
process
that
we
all
supported.
That
is
supposed
to
center,
the
voices
of
american
indian
people
and
african
american
community
members.
So
I
think
that
there's
still
a
lot
of
things
to
unpack
and
to
dig
into
in
this
conversation.
I
I
also
feel
very,
I
don't
know
just
very
disrespected
by
the
way
that
this
work
has
been
folded
out
by
councilmember
reich,
because
I
would
never
under
any
circumstance,
go
to
his
board
and
tell
him
how
to
do
a
project
or
go
to
council
member.
You
know
x,
y
and
z's
board
and
tell
them.
This
is
how
you
do
upper
harbor
terminal,
or
this
is
how
you
do
northern
and
and
trust
me.
I
get
people
coming
to
me
all
the
time
saying.
Can
you
do
something?
I
Can
you
please
make
this
happen
and
I
always
say
no.
I
have
to
defer
to
the
council.
Member
of
that
area.
I
cannot
take
leadership
on
an
issue
that
is
not
what
I
represent
or
that
I've
been
voted
to
to
address,
and
so
I
I
would
just
like
to
express
just
severe
concern
with
that
type
of
precedent
being
laid
out
before
us
and
just
to
go
back
a
little
bit
to
some
of
the
conversations
with
our
interim
public
works
director.
I
Mr
brett
jelly,
my
my
comments
regarding
the
incompleteness
of
this
conversation
is
related
to
the
fact
that
many
of
us
know
that
there's
ongoing
negotiations
and
discussions
around
this
topic.
I
It's
not
about
a
discrete
memo
that
we
asked
to
be
delivered
today,
but
it
is
about
the
bigger
picture
that
we're
trying
to
address
here,
which
is,
as
somebody
mentioned
decades
and
decades
worth
of
you
know:
racist
urban
planning
that
has
created
the
concentration
of
urban
pollution
in
very
specific
neighborhoods
and
not
by
accident
and
and
by
really
clear
actions
and
directions
and
patterns
of
local
city,
making
that
that
we
get
the
honor
and
the
privilege
to
rectify
and
to
correct.
I
And
so
if
this
feels
like
a
really
big
conversation,
that's
requiring
a
lot
of
attention.
It's
because
it
is.
We
are
asking
ourselves
really
big
questions
and
we
are
really
trying
to
figure
out.
How
do
we
stop
a
neighborhood
who
has
been
you
know
functioning
as
the
industrial
dumping
ground
of
the
city
for
decades?
To
not
be
that
anymore,
and
you
know
I
can
already
hear
interim
director
ben
jelly,
say
yeah,
but
our
you
know
our
center
is
not
polluting
anything.
That's
not
the
point
here.
I
I
That's
going
to
shove,
hundreds
of
operating
vehicles
into
the
area,
increasing
the
dangerous
levels
of
pollution
in
an
already
overburdened
neighborhood,
as
identified
by
our
south
side,
green
zones
policy
and
and
how
we
can
actually
solve
that
problem,
and-
and
we
did
try
to
have
this
conversation
four
years
ago
and
we
didn't
have
the
votes
we
wanted
to
have
that
conversation
again,
because
there
was
new
leadership
provided
by
council,
vice
president
jenkins
as
a
true
racial
equity
ally.
I
In
this
conversation
to
open
it
up
again
and
to
re-examine
this
work
through
again,
a
deeply
transformative
process
that
the
city
is
going
through.
The
city
of
minneapolis
20
years
ago
is
not
the
city
of
minneapolis.
Today
I
mean
we,
we
all
experience
that
we
all
live
that,
and
so
I
just
I
just
want
to
share
just
the
many
layers
of
concerns
that
I
have
for
what's
happening
here
in
this
conversation
and
how
it
continues.
I
So
it's
it's
it's
it's
very
incongruent.
I
You
know
it
doesn't
seem
consistent
and,
and
you
know
we
can't
be
a
city-
that's
just
super
progressive
on
one
issue
and
then
completely
conservative
on
another
that
that
to
me,
just
feels
really
strange,
but
we
can
you
know
we
can
have
these
conversations
and-
and
I
think
that
again
by
having
this
delayed
by
one
cycle,
we
can
bring
forward
a
fuller
picture
with
many
more
voices
included
and
clearly,
you
know
not
supporting
this.
I
This
particular
staff
direction
because
of
the
lack
of
transparency
engagement
input
not
only
by
the
council
member
who
represents
the
area
where
this
project
is,
but
also
because
of
the
many
taxpayers
from
all
across
the
city
that
have
been
engaging
on
this.
We
received
over
a
thousand
comments
on
the
environmental
assessment
worksheet
for
this
project
over
time.
I've
personally
counted
800
emails
on
this
topic
alone,
and
I
had
to
stop
counting
because
it
was
too
much.
I
I
couldn't
keep
up
with
the
volume
of
people
engaging
with
us
on
this
topic,
so
I
think
we
can
at
least
give
those
people
just
two
more
weeks
to
make
sure
that
their
voice
is
heard
and
that
the
conversations
that
we're
having
can
be
completed
and
finalized
with
the
fully
and
due
attention
of
our
very
very
well-resourced
and
supported
staff
members
who
get
paid
to
do
this
really
hard
work
for
a
city
that
is
struggling
and
that
wants
to
change
and
that
doesn't
want
to
have
the
same
racial
inequities
that
we've
had
for
the
last
30
years.
I
B
Thank
you
and
I
did
put
myself
in
queue.
I
I
just
want
to.
First
of
all,
I
guess
I'll
preface
my
comments
by
just
saying
that
you
know
I
think
this
motion
that
is
on
the
floor
actually
brings
forth
a
compromise,
and
I
I
really
wish
we
could
get
to
some
kind
of
compromise
with
the
community
to
be
able
to
bring
forward
a
water
maintenance
facility
that
we
all
benefit
from
and
also
offer
an
opportunity
for.
B
The
community
members
in
the
east
phillips
neighborhood
to
be
able
to
realize
a
community
project
to
bring
forward
urban
farming
ideas
and
job
opportunities
and
other
processes
it.
It
seems
like
that,
would
be
the
optimal
solution.
B
I
I
wanted
to
just
come
in
a
little
bit
to
council
president
bender's,
you
know
consistent
reminders
that
we
we
made
a
decision
on
this
issue
and
as
council
member
connell
noted
we're
not
the
same
city
as
we
were
20
years
ago.
I
would,
I
would
add,
we're
not
the
same
city.
We
were
in
2018
when
we
made
that
decision
and
which
prompted
me
for
that
very
reason
to
to
to
re-examine
this
issue,
and
that
is
this
terrible
virus.
That
is
impacting
people's
abilities
to
breathe
and
one
of
the.
B
Represents
that
and
literally
it
will
potentially
have
impacts
on
people's
abilities
to
breathe,
and
so
I
I
I
do
think
that
you
know
we
didn't
have
a
resolution
declaring
racism
as
a
public
health
crisis
in
2018.
When
we
made
this
decision,
we
we
we
weren't
grappling
with
the
vagaries
of
a
global
pandemic
that
impacts
people's
respiratory
systems,
and
so
I
I
thought
this
issue
deserved
a
a
closer
re-examination.
B
S
Thank
you
vice
president
jenkins.
In
that
spirit,
I
just
I
just
want
to
express
what
a
good
compromise
I
think
this
is
that
I
think
this
option
b
gives
three
acres
to
community
to
determine
the
fate
of
to
really
create
opportunities
to
imagine
what
we
want
to
do
with
a
significant
piece
of
urban
land.
At
the
same
time,
it
also
shows
respect
for
our
workers,
not
only
the
workers
who
would
be
doing
the
work
to
explore
extensive.
S
You
know
potential
new
scenarios,
but
also
the
workers
who
are
currently
working
in
an
inadequate
facility,
and
I
think,
there's
good
evidence
that
many
of
them
are
feeling
disrespected
by
our
city
right
now.
Many
of
them
have
been
working
under
very
difficult
conditions
during
the
pandemic.
S
This
is
one
way
that
we
can
show
respect
to
the
workers
of
our
city
by
investing
in
the
conditions
of
their
work,
at
the
same
time
that
we
create
space
for
community,
and
I'm
I'm
very
supportive
of
that
compromise,
which
had
been
well
discussed
in
many
previous
council
meetings.
B
B
O
C
B
B
N
B
That
has
been
distributed
to
the
clerk
and
to
our
individual
inboxes
as
well.
Our
next
item
on
our
agenda
that
direction
is
approved
for
today
and
will
be
forwarded
to
the
fellow
city
council
on
friday.
G
Thank
you,
chair
jenkins,
and
thank
you
council.
My
name
is
track
and
I'm
actually
going
to
turn
it
straight
over
to
the
transgender
equity
council
co-chairs
to
introduce
their
work.
G
B
You
track,
can
you
introduce
the
co-chairs.
G
Yes,
absolutely
sorry,
they
were
going
to
introduce
themselves,
but
I'm
happy
to
kenzie
and
hunter
are
the
two
co-chairs
for
the
transgender
equity
council.
Thank
you.
So
much.
B
And
mackenzie
and
hunter,
if
you
don't
mind
for
the
edification
of
myself
and
my
colleagues
can,
can
you
just
please
share
your
pronouns
so
that
we
can
be
able
to
respectfully
address
that
concern.
T
U
Hi
everyone-
I
am
kenzie,
I
use
they
them
pronouns
and
I
am
the
other
co-chair
for
the
trans
equity
council,
so,
let's
just
get
into
it.
First
of
all,
thank
you
for
having
us
today.
U
U
U
We
are
presenting
them
earlier
in
the
year
this
time,
and
some
of
them
include
small
asks
around
the
2022
budget
wanted
to
get
them
to
you
before
mark-up
season
got
too
busy.
Our
recommendations
encompass
housing,
community
safety
and
healing
training,
restrooms
and
the
general
role
of
city
appointed
boards.
T
T
T
U
We
further
highlight
the
continued
growth
of
the
trans
equity
summit.
The
summit
attracts
hundreds
of
attendees
each
year
from
both
within
and
outside
of
minneapolis,
and
provides
opportunities
for
healing
learning
and
connection
for
all
attendees
next
slide.
Please
moving
forward.
We
echo
our
high
level
asks
for
funding
to
be
moved
from
mpd
towards
resources
for
bypoc
trans
gnc
community
members,
especially
those
who
are
currently
are
formerly
incarcerated.
U
B
U
All
right
so
getting
in
right
into
the
recommendations.
We
recommend
that
the
city
council
expand
the
mobile
behavioral
health
crisis
response
pilot
as
sufficient
funding
would
help
ensure
faster
response
times
for
mental
health
crisis.
Calls
the
city
council
fund
the
exploration
of
alternatives
to
police
response
for
other
problem
nature
codes
that
do
not
statutorily
require
a
police
response.
U
This
should
include
increased
funding
for
the
trans
equity
programming,
as
the
summit
currently
costs
thirty
thousand
dollars
at
minimum,
not
counting
other
programming
throughout
the
year
and
is
being
funded
primarily
by
the
contributions
of
organizations
tabling
at
the
career
and
resource
fair.
In
addition,
increased
trans
equity
funding
could
cover
the
cost
of
an
urban
scholar
or
step
up
intern
to
develop
a
local
resource
list
for
trans
residents,
which
we
are
regularly
asked
for.
U
We
ask
for
the
trans
equity
budget
to
be
increased
from
fifteen
thousand
to
thirty
thousand
dollars
ongoing
plus
funding
for
one
summer
intern
roll
the
city
council
instruct
the
city
attorney's
office
to
look
into
the
possibility
of
safe
use
sites
in
minneapolis.
U
This
is
direct
feedback
from
a
community
listening
session
on
the
trans-equity
work
city,
council,
direct
contract
managers
and
attorneys
for
social
services
contracts
over
100,
000
or
175
000,
if
not
ongoing,
to
incorporate
trans
equity
requirements
in
their
future
requests
for
proposals.
This
work
is
already
in
process,
but
requires
council
support
for
staff
to
prioritize
it
program.
Managers
should
report
back
to
council
by
the
end
of
2022,
with
updates
on
the
project's
progress.
U
The
city
council
and
relevant
departments,
use
city
property
and
or
funding
to
provide
a
location
for
a
queer
and
trans
community
center
community
center
would
provide
positive
youth
development
opportunities
and
accesses
to
resources
in
line
with
the
city's
violence,
prevention
goals
and
the
public
safety.
Strategic
and
racial
equity
action
plan
priorities.
U
The
city
council
supports
sunu
shrestha's
blueprint
to
end
human
trafficking,
specifically
the
recommendations
around
decriminalizing
sex
work,
cannabis,
slash,
addiction,
homelessness,
poverty
and
mental
illness
immediately.
We
recommend
that
the
city
council
repeal
the
loitering
ordinance,
which
disproportionately
targets
bypoc
and
trans
residents
and
uses
a
significant
amount
of
police
time
to
answer
calls
where
the
person
in
question
is
often
gone
by
the
time
that
the
cops
arrive.
U
U
U
This
would
free
up
valuable
staff
time
to
develop
the
new
sexual
assault
and
domestic
violence
response
role,
which
ovp
staff
intend
to
collaborate
with
the
tc
on
the
city.
Council
could
also
increase
funding
to
the
ovp
fund,
as
that
is
ovp's.
Most
flexible
funding
source
for
community
programming
city
council
continued
to
encourage
hr
to
distribute
the
city's
trans
equity
in
the
workplace
survey
as
soon
as
possible.
U
This
will
help
create
a
better
work
environment
for
trans
and
gnc
employees.
Therefore,
improving
the
city's
work
on
all
of
the
previously
mentioned
outcomes.
The
city
council
commissioned
a
study
of
best
practices
in
city
government
policy
for
trans
equity.
In
developing
these
recommendations,
we
searched
for
a
compilation
of
best
policies
from
other
jurisdictions,
but
found
that
no
such
compilation
exists,
so
we
would
love
for
it
to
come
from
minneapolis
next
slide.
Please.
T
Broadly,
we
recommend
an
expansion
of
the
training
opportunities
that
exist
for
both
city
staff
and
those
we
contract
with.
Specifically,
we
recommend
three
things:
the
city
council
increased
the
hr
learning
and
development
budget
by
ten
thousand
dollars
with
the
specific
purpose
of
funding
not
only
an
introductory
level:
trans
equity
training,
but
also
a
deeper
dive
follow-up.
T
U
All
right,
every
trans
person,
favorite
their
favorite
topic,
is
bathrooms.
So
over
the
last
six
months,
the
tec
has
worked
with
cped
and
council
staff
to
add
language,
encouraging
all
gender
restroom
construction
and
equitable
bathroom
access
to
the
city's
single
room.
Occupancy
ordinance
we'd
like
to
thank
all
council
offices
that
were
involved
in
making
that
happen.
U
We
also
had
conversations
with
cped
around
how
they
could
more
effectively
encourage
all
gender
bathroom
construction
on
new
builds,
but
we
have
not
reached
actionable
next
steps.
Overall,
we
seek
to
create
a
minneapolis
with
more
all-gender
restrooms
and
more
confirmation
of
equitable
and
safe
restroom
access
for
residents
using
gendered
bathrooms
as
well.
So
specifically,
we
recommend
that
city
council
encourage
equitable
bathroom
access
in
non-city
buildings
by
directing
civil
rights
staff
to
promote,
know
your
rights
type
materials
on
the
topic.
U
The
city
council
instruct
community
planning
and
economic
development
staff
to
recommend
all
gender
bathroom
construction
on
new
builds
when
meeting
with
business
owners
and
architects
requesting
permits
from
the
city.
Cped
staff
can
also
determine
which
other
licensing
or
permitting
meetings
should
involve
a
conversation
about
gender
neutral
bathrooms
as
well.
U
Following
the
example
set
in
philadelphia,
which
has
required
all
single
stall,
restrooms
and
city
retail
establishments
to
be
gender
neutral,
the
city
council
should
instruct
the
attorney's
office
to
research
the
legal
parameters
for
adopting
this
or
a
similar
policy
here,
and
we're
excited
to
see
that
council
member
schroeder
is
already
working
on
this
next
slide.
Please.
T
Just
wanted
to
add
that
kenzie,
do
you
have
anything
you'd
like
to
add.
B
They're
very
well
thought
out
and
very
much
aligns
with
many
of
the
thoughts
and
ideas
that
are
that
I
know
are
present
here
on
the
council.
B
I
certainly
support
many
of
the
proposals
brought
forth
here
or
ideas
brought
forth
within
this
proposal
and
appreciate
the
work
that
track
does
to
support
the
trans
equity
council
and
all
of
all
of
its
members
for
for
bringing
these
ideas
forward
to
the
city
council.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you
both
and
I
guess
I
would
just
ask
if
you
can
just
mention
a
little
bit
about
the
trans
equity
summit.
That's
coming
up
in
a
couple
of
weeks.
B
B
G
Thank
you,
kenzie
yep.
We
were
just
coordinating
for
a
second
who
was
gonna.
Take
that,
but
thank
you
cvp
jenkins
and
thank
you
all
yep.
The
trans
equity
summit
is
this
year.
Is
our
eighth
annual
summit
and
it's
gonna
be
sunday
october,
3rd
and
monday
october,
4th
both
virtually
and
in
person
with
ways
to
participate
both
ways
depending
on
folks,
coveted
comfort
and
in-person
programming
is
happening
at
the
minneapolis
institute
of
art.
G
V
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
track
kenzie
and
hunter
for
this
report
and
especially
for
your
comments.
At
the
end,
I
think
we
really
try
to
hold
our
city
and
ourselves
accountable
to
the
you
know
the
good
intentions
we
have
around
equity
and
that
includes
being
accessible
to
to
anyone
in
the
public.
V
I
also
want
to
thank
you
very
much
for
all
of
these
recommendations
for
the
future,
as
well
as
what
we
can
do
right
now
and
in
that
spirit,
I'd
like
to
bring
forward
a
staff
direction
if
the
clerk
can
put
that
up
on
the
screen
sure.
V
Steps
involved
with
it
with
a
city
requirement
that
in
all
single
stall,
restrooms
in
this
in
city,
owned,
operated,
buildings
and
city
license
buildings
to
be
gender
neutral,
and
the
work
group
shall
report
back
on
the
to
the
biz
committee
or
its
successor
committee,
depending
on
where
we
are
in
our
covid
recovery.
In
the
first
quarter
of
2022.
B
Councilmember
cunningham,
thank
you.
So
we
do
have
a
motion
before
us:
the
staff
direction
offered
by
councilmember
schrader.
Fortunately,
council,
members
trader,
we
we
actually
have
a
team
that
is
already
formulated
and
to
and
they
can
take
up
this
issue.
I
think
the
only.
B
Member
of
that
of
the
trans
gender
work
group
that
we
would
have
to
add
would
be
potentially
cpad.
I
just
can't
remember
what
the
formulation
is,
and
maybe
someone
from
finance
and
property
services,
but
I
I
do
believe
that
that
work
can
get
done.
So
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role
on
this
unless
there's
any
further
discussion.
E
C
B
B
That
item
carries-
and
I
will
just
note
to
your
point
hunter-
you
know
the
sort
of
order
of
our
agendas
are
challenging
and
and
the
discussions
that
we
frequently
have
can
be
long,
and
so
several
colleagues
had
indicated
that
they
had
they
needed
to
leave
for
for
other
obligations
of
the
meetings
etc,
and
so
consequently
you
know
people
have
left.
B
It
is
a
challenge
to
you
know,
have
these
conversations
in
a
timely
manner
and
your
point
is
very,
very
well
taken
and
will
be
very
much
considered
in
the
future
council
member
cunningham.
Thank.
D
You,
madam
chair,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
to
say
a
big
thank
you
to
the
trans
transgender
equity
council
members
every
year
that
you
all
come
and
do
a
presentation
to
the
city
council.
It's
always
thorough,
there's
always
a
great
analysis
behind
it
always
very
well
presented.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
to
raise
and
praise
the
work
that
you
all
put
in
to
this.
These
are
really
good,
concrete
recommendations.
D
That's
I'll
just
say
that
you
know
as
a
council
member.
This
is
the
best
kind
of
work
that
can
come
out
of
an
advisory
committee,
because
we
love
very
clear
guidance
as
policy
makers.
It
makes
our
job
a
lot
easier
than
having
to
try
to
guess
and
so
being
able
to
hear
directly
from
folks
in
the
community.
What
are
the
best
things
for
us
to
focus
on
and
I'm
grateful
to
councilmember
schroeder
for
bringing
this
forward,
although
he
beat
me
to
it,
because
I
was
going
to
be
bringing
it
forward.
D
So
thank
you
for
your
leadership
for
that
council
member
schrader,
but
there
are
lots
and
lots
of
other
good
recommendations
that
I
look
forward
to
working
with.
You
all
on
so
thank
you
for
your
leadership.
Thank
you
for
holding
us
accountable,
and
I
look
forward
to
partnering
with
you
in
the
work.
Thank
you.
B
This
is
a
model
of
how
advisory
committees
can
and
and
should,
function
in
the
city
of
minneapolis,
and
so
I
echo
all
of
councilmember
cunningham's
praise
and
with
that
we
have
concluded
all
the
business
to
come
before
our
committee
today
and
if
there
are
no
objections,
I
will
declare
this
meeting
adjourned
and
I
just
want
to
thank
you
all
all
of
my
colleagues
and
the
presenters
for
a
really
great
meeting,
discussion
and
and
outcomes
so
have
a
great
rest
of
the
day.
Everyone.