►
From YouTube: April 14, 2021 Policy & Government Oversight Committee
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Good
afternoon,
everyone,
my
name
is
angia
jenkins
and
I
am
the
chair
of
the
policy
and
governance
oversight
committee
and
I'm
going
to
call
to
order
the
regular
committee
meeting
for
wednesday
april
14th.
B
I
would
like
to
note
for
the
record
that
this
meeting
has
remote
participation
by
council
members
and
city
staff
as
authorized
under
the
minnesota
open
meeting
law.
Section
13
d
point:
zero:
two
one
due
to
the
declared
state
of
local
public
health
emergency.
I
will
also
note
that
the
city
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channels
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency,
and
so
this
meeting
is
public
and
subject
to
minnesota
open
meeting
law.
B
Before
I
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll,
I
do
want
to
acknowledge
that
I
have
a
very
no
annoying
beeping
smoke
alarm
system,
so
I
apologize
to
you
all
for
that
and
we'll
try
to
remain
muted
as
much
as
I
can
at
this
time.
I
would
like
to
ask
the
word
the
clerk
to
call
the
role
to
verify
the
presence
of
a
forum.
D
D
E
C
B
C
B
B
Let
the
record
reflect
that
we
do
have
a
quorum.
I
will
note
that
council
member
conor
alerted
me
that
she
had
other
city
business
to
attend
to
and
was
not
able
to
join
us
for
this
meeting.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
acknowledge
that
we
have
35
items
on
today's
agenda,
including
a
public
hearing
we'll
begin
with
item
number
one
on
the
agenda,
which
is
the
appointment
of
candice
faulk
to
the
civil
service
commission
for
a
three-year
term
that
would,
in
february
28
2024.
B
As
I
noted,
we
didn't
provide
an
opportunity
for
the
public
to
sign
up,
and
so
consequently
there
are
no
speakers
at
this
time,
and
so
I
will
move
to
continue
this
public
hearing
to
april
28th
and
to
give
the
public
enough
time
and
transparency
to
be
able
to
comment
on
this
item.
B
That
item
carries-
and
we
do
apologize
to
ms
faulk-
it's
just
going
to
take
a
little
bit
longer
to
get
this
appointment
underway,
but
we
will
get
it
accomplished
at
our
next
meeting
and
so
on
our
consent
agenda.
We
have
34
items
today
and
number
two
sets
the
public
hearing
for
the
appointment
of
ms
rebecca
mom
quiz
to
the
position
of
city,
assessor
and
number
three
is
a
update
to
the
city's
legal
level
of
budgetary
control.
B
Staff
has
requested
more
time
to
work
on
this
item,
so
I
will
move
to
refer
this
item
back
to
staff.
Item
number
four
is
a
passage
of
the
resolution
of
a
resolution
amending
the
2021.
A
B
Appropriation
related
to
rollover
funds
from
2020
item
number:
five
are
various
appointments
to
the
capital
long-range
improvements
committee
items
six
through
20
are
various
legal
settlements,
the
details
of
which
can
be
found
on
the
agenda.
Items
21
through
34
are
various
contract
amendments,
the
details
of
which
are
listed
on
the
agenda.
B
F
Thank
you
man
of
chair.
You
know
I
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
that
we
do
have
a
number
of
worker
compensation
claims
on
this
agenda
and
it
is
on
the
consent,
we're
pretty
constrained
in
what
we
can
say
publicly
about
issues
that
include.
You
know
private
information
from
city
employees,
but
I
I
didn't
want
just
since
it
was
on
the
consent
agenda.
I
just
wanted
to
simply
acknowledge
that
that
is
part
of
the
decisions
of
this
section
of
the
agenda.
Thanks.
B
Thank
you,
madam
president,
and
in
full
transparency
we
will
likely
have
more
of
these
on
future
agendas.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
that
item
to
light.
Is
there
any
other
discussion.
C
B
G
Thank
you,
chair
jenkins
and
committee
members.
I
am
here
to
give
an
update
on
behalf
of
the
renter
renter
eviction
protections
ordinance.
You
can
go
to
the
first
slide,
please
or
the
next
slide.
I
guess
so
today,
I'm
going
to
provide
an
update
on
a
stat
on
the
status
of
this
ordinance,
a
high
level
overview
of
what
will
be
included
in
it
and
then
an
anticipated
timeline
for
moving
this
ordinance
forward
for
a
public
hearing
and
adoption.
G
G
Staff
are
working
on
ordinance
drafts
that
will
be
modeled
very
closely
on
recently
adopted
ordinances
in
saint
paul
and
st
louis
park,
and
we
have
been
in
contact
with
staff
from
those
cities
to
help
inform
our
work.
The
city
staff
team
working
on
this
includes
a
number
of
staff
from
cped
regulatory
services
and
the
city's
city
attorney's
office
and
joel
fussey
from
the
city
attorney's
office
is
also
on
today
to
assist
with
questions
if
needed.
G
It
builds
on
the
city's
renter
first
policy,
which
was
also
adopted
in
2019
and
prioritizes
the
safety,
dignity,
stability
of
health
and
health
of
renters
and
regulatory
and
enforcement
decision
making,
and
this
ordinance
builds
off
of
work
that
was
done
by
the
city
through
the
anti-displacement
policy
network,
in
which
minneapolis
and
st
paul
city
staff,
elected
officials
and
community
organizations
worked
closely
together
to
identify
a
wide
range
of
anti-displacement
policy
options
and
specifically
identified
tenant
protections
as
a
key
strategy
to
reducing
involuntary
displacement.
G
G
Under
a
just
cause
ordinance,
it
will
require
that
a
property
owner
establish
a
just
cause
before
non-renewing
a
lease
and
that
they
must
provide
that
cause
in
writing
to
the
renter
and
saint
paul's.
Ordinance
includes
10
just
causes
that
one
of
which
must
be
identified
before
a
property
owner
can
determine
that
they're
not
going
to
renew
somebody's
lease
and
that
they
must
provide
this
in
writing
to
them.
G
Next
slide,
please,
the
other
major
component
of
this
ordinance
is
a
pair
quit
or
a
pre-eviction
filing
notice
and
again
here,
we're
modeling
our
ordinance
after
our
neighboring
jurisdiction.
In
this
case,
at
st
louis
park,
they
adopted
a
pre-filing
notice
ordinance
in
late
2020,
which
went
into
effect
in
february
of
this
year.
It
requires
that
rental
property
owners
provide
seven
days,
written
notice
to
renters
prior
to
initiating
an
eviction
action
for
non-payment
of
rent
or
other
financial
obligations.
G
And
I
can
pause
there.
Those
are.
This
is
an
overview
of
the
content
of
the
ordinances.
I
see
there
may
be
a
question,
so
I
can
pause
there
before
going
into
the
next
steps.
D
D
G
Councilmember
gordon,
the
14-day
recommendation
is,
is
based
on
a
combination
of
of
a
recommendation
from
the
city
attorney's
office
and
then
also
staff.
We
have
contacted
hennepin
county
staff
to
get
more
information
about
how
long
it
is
taking
for
emergency
rental
assistance
to
happen.
They
have
said
that
14
days
would
allow
people
to,
if
not
get
their
full
payment,
be
well
on
the
way
and
have
documentation
showing
that
they're
actively
working
to
get
emergency
rental
assistance,
and
so
so
we
have
had
those
conversations
it.
G
You
know
they
have
done
a
lot
to
speed
up
the
process
at
the
county
and
I
think
we
could,
as
we're
working
on
implementation,
certainly
work
with
them
to
figure
out
how
to
get
the
type
of
documentation
that
property
owners
would
need
to
show
if
they
don't
have
the
check
in
hand
that
they
will
have
it.
But
I
don't
know,
I
know,
there's
additional
advice
from
the
city
attorney's
office
around
this
as
well,
and
so
be
happy
to
talk
with
you
more
about
that.
G
I
don't
know
if
joel
fussy,
who's
on
the
line
has
anything
to
add
right
now,
but
that
is
in
the
the
drafts
that
staff
are
working
on.
That
is
the
amount
of
time
that
we
are
recommending
at
this
time.
D
I
can
appreciate
that,
and
maybe
that's
something
for
us
to
all
be
aware
of
and
think
about.
I
can
see
why
I'm
saying
louis
park
did
seven,
so
that
kind
of
sets
a
pretty
short
time
frame
and
I'm
sure
we're
balancing
concerns
about
a
landlord
and
their
income
and
how
you
know
long.
It
takes
for
them
to
be
able
to
take
some
action
and
operate
and
function
and-
and
maybe
there's
if
joel
wants
to
weigh
in
that's
great
to
hear
that
too.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
committee
members,
joel
fussy
from
the
from
the
city
attorney's
office.
I
would
basically
echo
what
what
you
said
there
council,
member
gordon
those
are
some
of
the
considerations.
That's
the
recommendation.
That's
coming
from
our
office
at
this
point
and
it's
based
upon
largely
based
upon
legal
risk
analysis
also,
some
consistency
considerations.
E
But
again
you
know
we're
in
the
process
of
drafting
and
finalizing
these
ordinances,
and
things
can
still
be
discussed,
but
it
definitely
is
our
intention-
and
I
think
our
best
advice
from
risk
risk
analysis
standpoint
to
heal
as
closely
as
possible
to
the
examples
that
we
have
that
have
already
been
adopted.
Thank
you.
D
Thank
you.
15
days
is
even
kind
of
nice
because
that's
half
of
30,
which
is
a
typical
month,
but
let's
just
chances
are
I'll,
come
in
asking
for
a
bigger
than
one
day
but
we'll
see
where.
Where
this
goes,
and
I
would
like
be
happy
to
hear
from
my
colleagues
and
what
they
think
as
well.
B
F
Thanks
coach
president,
I
would
have
been
happy
to
wait.
I
I
did
put
myself
in
cue
as
I
was
listening
to
mr
fussy
speak.
I
I
do
think,
and
you
kind
of
did
this
at
the
end.
I
do
think
it
is
always
helpful
when
council
members
can
be
clear
as
if
we're
getting
a
legal
recommendation
or
when
we
are
getting
a
legal
recommendation
from
the
city
attorney's
office.
F
Obviously
you
are
also
involved
in
the
policy
development
pieces
and
considerations
related
to
policy
recommendations,
and
I
just
wanted
to
flag
if
there
is
a
need
to
have
any
kind
of
attorney,
client
privilege,
type
communications
with
council
members
to
share
legal
advice
related
to
this
issue,
but
I
hope
we
can
bake
that
in
to
this
process
here
as
we're
getting
the
receive
and
file
report
today.
I
think
the
plan
is
then
to
have
this
go
to
biz
to
set
a
public
hearing.
F
So
there
is
time
here
so
that
we
can
make
sure
that
when
council
members
are
weighing
the
various
considerations,
we
know
which
things
are
the
legal
advice
and
which
things
may
be
more
policy
trade-off
type
considerations.
E
If
I
might
counsel
or
madam
chair.
B
E
Please,
mr
fussy,
thank
you.
I
I
would
concur
with
the
sentiments
that
the
council
president
made
there
largely,
I
think
it
there
it
does
come
from.
It
is
at
least
the
recommendations
that
we've
made
to
hue
as
closely
as
possible
to
the
existing
ordinances
from
saint
paul
and
st
louis
park.
That
is
largely
based
upon
a
legal
analysis.
I
know
that
our
office
has,
over
the
past
months,
provided
some
privileged
advice
regarding
these
sorts
of
ordinances,
and
so
we
certainly
can
revisit
that
and
provide.
E
You
know
review
that
and
look
at
more
of
that,
but
certainly
our
I
would
characterize
our
advice
to
stay
as
close
as
possible
to
the
existing
ordinances
as
as
a
legal
recommendation
and
not
necessarily
a
policy
recommendation.
I
think
mr
pinka
has
spoken
also.
You
know
with
regard
to
the
policy
considerations.
B
Thanks.
Thank
you,
mr
fussy.
My
question
is
for
mr
pinka
and
I'm
just
curious:
have
is
there
recommendations
around
the
enforcement
process
or
how
is
that
working
in
st
goes
park,
and
what
are
we
thinking?
Do
we
need
more
staff?
I
see
that
it
says
it's
complaint
driven,
so
that
puts
the
onus.
I
guess
on
the
tenant
to
make
that
complaint.
Can
you
speak
to
that.
G
Sure,
chair
jenkins,
I
can
speak
briefly
to
it.
I
may
ask
joel
to
weigh
in
here
as
well
the
enforcement,
because
I
don't
believe
any
of
my
colleagues
from
regulatory
services
are
on
the
call.
At
the
moment
the
enforcement
will
be
let
handle
so
these
ordinances
would
be
part
of
the
housing
code
chapter
244,
which
is
a
part
of
regulatory
services
enforcement
responsibilities
for
rental
licensing
and
so
similar
to
other
renter
protection
ordinances.
We've
adopted
it
would
be
based.
They
would
look
into
complaints
filed
by
tenants.
G
But
but
again
it
will
be
led
by
regulatory
services
through
complaints
as
part
of
the
housing
maintenance
code.
And
if
mr
fussy
has
anything
else
to
add,
I'd.
Welcome
that.
But
that's,
but
we
are
having
those
conversations
with
our
neighboring
jurisdictions
as
well.
E
Very
quickly,
I
wouldn't
have
anything
to
add
to
katie's
thoughts
there
other
than
say
I
wouldn't
speak
for
director
keller,
but
many
of
their
tenant
protection
ordinances
or
a
lot
of
their
enforcement
work
is
complaint
based
and
they
are
in
consultation
with
the
jurisdictions
that
are
enforcing
these
already,
and
certainly,
I
think,
they'll
continuously
kind
of
examine
what
the
best
method
of
enforcement
would
be
and
would
be
able
to
transition,
and
if
there
is
an
ask
or
a
need
for
additional
resources,
I'm
sure
that
director
keller
would
be
more
than
happy
to
communicate.
E
B
Any
other
questions,
thank
you
so
much
for
that
presentation.
G
And
sharon
jenkins,
if
I
may,
I
just
had
two
just
a
couple:
two
very
short
slides
to
just
round.
B
G
Yeah,
no,
that's!
Okay.
So,
just
to
reiterate,
the
staff
team
is
working
on
draft
ordinance
language
now
and
supporting
materials
for
a
public
hearing
and
council
consideration,
with
the
goal
of
having
having
all
of
that
ready
for
consideration
in
may,
and
part
of.
The
reason
that
we
are
recommending
consideration
shortly
upcoming
in
may
is
that
we
do.
We
are
keeping
in
mind
that
eviction
moratoriums
that
are
currently
in
place
due
to
the
pandemic,
may
be
expiring.
G
The
federal
moratorium
currently
expires
at
the
end
of
june.
The
state's
eviction
moratorium
was
extended
today
through
the
middle
of
may,
but
we
do
anticipate
it
will
expire.
G
You
know
at
some
point
in
the
near
future,
and
so
we
are
working
to
move
these
ordinances
relatively
quickly
in
anticipation
of
the
end
of
the
eviction
moratorium,
and
then
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that,
in
addition
to
these
this
policy
work,
we
are,
as
we
have
shared
with
this
committee
in
the
past
and
with
the
biz
committee,
working
with
the
state
to
roll
out
federal
emergency
rental
assistance
that
will
be
available
in
the
coming
days,
and
we
have
previously.
G
The
council
approved
additional
funding
to
legal
aid
for
eviction
prevention
services
using
some
of
our
covid
response
dollars
and
again.
That
was
in
anticipation
of
the
eviction
moratorium,
expiring,
and
so
those
are
just
some
of
the
additional
eviction
preventions.
We
are
working
on
and
then
I'll
just
wrap
up
here
with
the
last
slide.
That's
the
next
slide
please.
G
So
this
is
an
anticipated
timeline.
We
are
potentially
setting
the
public
hearing
at
the
biz
meeting
on
may
4th,
having
discussion
on
the
ordinances
at
the
may
6th
advisory
committee
on
housing,
and
then
a
public
hearing
and
presentation
at
the
biz
meeting
on
may
18th,
and
that
would
the
earliest
then
for
full
consideration
by
the
council
would
be
may
28th
and
then
just
a
note
here
if
this
ended
up
being
delayed
a
cycle
that
would
push
us
back
to
public
hearing
in
june
with
the
council
consideration
in
june.
D
Yeah-
and
this
maybe
is
more
of
a
comment-
and
I
really
appreciate
this
report
coming
in
here
and
I
do
think
it's
right-
that
we
fast
track
this,
and
I
guess
that
I
have
a
concern
and
I'm
hearing
from
folks
who
aren't
necessarily
in
having
trouble
paying
their
rents
also
concerned
about.
What's
going
to
happen
when
the
eviction
moratoriums
are
lifted,
do
we
have
any
idea
how
many
people
are
going
to
be
and
how
far
behind
on
their
rents
they're
going
to
be
and
what
kind
of
trouble
will
there
be?
D
I
think
we've
you
know
this
is
going
to
be
happening
right
when
summer
is
coming
and
we
saw
people
needing
to
camp
outside
before
and
homelessness
is
such
a
big
concern
and
I'm
not
sure
if
the
federal
government
or
the
state
government
is
providing
enough
assistance
for
those
who
are
unable
to
pay
their
rent
or
even
the
right
and
easiest
mechanisms
for
landlords
to
access
those
rents
so
that
they
don't
start
evicting
folks.
D
I
think
it's
great
that
we're
taking
these
protections,
but
this
isn't
going
to
mean
if
you're
not
paying
rent,
you
can't
be
evicted
because
you
still
can
be
and
there's
some
time
to
get
assistance.
But
what,
if
that
assistance,
isn't
even
available?
D
And
there
isn't
enough
money,
I'm
wondering
I
guess
my
one
question
is:
how
worried
should
I
be
about
what
we
don't
know
or
do
we
actually
have
any
awareness
at
all
of
how
many
people
may
be
behind
in
their
rents
right
now
and
are
only
safe
in
their
housing
because
of
this
eviction
moratorium
and
once
it's
lifted?
How
many
are
going
to
be
out
on
this
potentially
out
on
the
streets
in
30
days
or
less.
G
Council,
member
gordon,
I
a
couple
things
I
can
share.
You
know
I
don't.
I
don't
know
that
we
know
an
exact
number.
We
do
have
emergency
rental
assistance
that
is
becoming
available
this
month,
through
both
the
state
and
minneapolis
as
direct
allocation.
G
Their
average
assistance
that
they
were
providing
to
households
who
were
for
back
rent
was
about
four
thousand
dollars,
so
you
know,
I
think
you
can
conclude
that
people
were
at
least
a
few
months
behind
and
it's
possible
that
they
had.
You
know,
received
assistance
through
some
programs
last
year
and
then
fell
behind
again
and
this
new
program
got
them
caught
up,
and
I
think
another
thing
we
know
from
our
colleagues
at
hennepin
county
is
that
well
certainly,
we
have
seen
an
increase
in
in
some
increase
in
homelessness
in
our
community
family
homelessness.
G
The
the
number
of
people
using
family
shelters
is
way
down
and
they
are
attributing
that
to
the
eviction
moratorium,
so
the
eviction
moratorium
certainly
is
providing
some
protection
to
people,
and
so
that's
just
really.
I
think
the
importance
of
getting
this
federal
money
to
people
who
are
behind
in
rent
and
the
federal
money
can
also
pay
perspective
rent
for
up
to
three
months.
G
So
there
is
assistance
that
is
going
to
be
available
very
shortly
and-
and
there
is
quite
a
bit,
the
state
received
375
million
dollars
in
total
rental
assistance
from
the
federal
government
from
the
the
covid
relief
package
that
was
passed
late
last
year
and
then
with
the
american
rescue
plan,
act,
there's
more
federal
rental
assistance
coming.
So
I'm
not
trying
to
say
that
that
there
won't
be
people
who
are
experiencing
housing
instability.
But
I
there
is
a
fair
amount
of
federal
rental
assistance
that
will
be
getting
out
into
the
community.
B
Again,
thank
you,
mr
pika,
for
this
presentation,
and
you
know
we
we've
been
working
together
on
this
issue
for
quite
some
time,
so
really
appreciate
all
of
the
the
energy
and
effort
that
you
and
my
colleagues
have
put
in
to
develop
this.
This
policy,
along
with
all
the
other
staff
that
I
know,
have
been
involved
in
this
as
well,
so
really
appreciate
it
and
is:
are
you
on
cue
council
president
bender.
C
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
did.
I
also
just
wanted
to
thank
staff
and
just
note
that
this
is
coming
in
this
timeline,
because
staff
have
been
advocating
for
us
to
get
this
in
place
in
time
for
the
summer
and
to
make
sure
that
we
are
preparing
for
an
eventual
transition
or
lifting
of
the
statewide
eviction
moratorium.
That's
protecting
so
many
renters
in
minneapolis.
So
just
thanks
to
staff
for
your
diligence
and
really
advocating
for
this.
F
We
added
this
extra
step
of
a
receive
and
file
presentation
to
make
sure
that
council
members
and
the
public
had
time
to
review
the
ordinance
components
as
they're
conceived
now
as
the
city
you
know,
while
the
city
attorney's
office
is
in
the
process
of
drafting
it
in
order
to
give
a
little
more
time.
F
So
I
would
just
really
encourage
city
council
members
to
think
about
any
stakeholders
that
you
feel
may
need
to
be
engaged
or
any
kind
of
engagement
that
you
anticipate
needing
in
your
award,
so
that
you
can
do
that
in
the
time
frame
that
staff
has
proposed
here.
I
think
a
delay
would
be
unfortunate,
given
the
urgency
of
the
issues
facing
our
renters
and
just
appreciate
staff.
Adding
this
extra
step
here.
You
know
we
had
talked
about.
F
You
know,
bring
it
to
biz,
setting
a
public
hearing
and
then
but
then
we
would
be
getting
a
presentation
like
this
at
the
same
time
as
the
public
hearing.
So
this
was
added
to
give
more
heads
up
in
time
for
for
feedback.
F
So
thanks
again-
and
I
just
did-
I
mean
it-
hasn't
been
that
long-
I
don't
think
since
we
got
a
our
last
presentation
on
kind
of
like
the
whole
package
of
strategies,
some
of
which
mr
pinka
was
just
outlining,
but
I
don't
think
it
would
hurt,
especially
now
that
we
have
a
pal
committee
to
get
another
update
from
you
about
just
the
strategies
that
you're
pursuing
and
you
know
whatever
kind
of
data
you
might
have
about
the
scope
of
the
problem.
F
I
know
that
our
region
has
some
of
the
lowest
evictions
during
the
pandemic,
because
we
have
such
a
strong
renter
or
such
a
strong
statewide
eviction
moratorium
in
place,
but
I
think
all
of
us
are
concerned
about
what
happens
if
that
lifts.
You
know.
Is
it
just
a
tsunami
of
evictions
that
have
built
up
over
time
and
that's
what
we
are
all
working
so
hard
to
avoid
so,
and
I
you
know,
was
I'm
glad.
F
I
was
also
put
myself
in
cue
to
mention
the
head
of
hennepin
county
information
that
we
got
at
heading
home
hennepin
the
other
day
it
I'll
just
emphasize
that
the
numbers
really
really
demonstrated
a
huge
pent-up
need
for
rental
assistance
in
the
community
that
we
will
anticipate.
I
think,
seeing
as
more
of
these
resources
become
available.
B
Thank
you,
madam
president,
and
I
don't
see
any
more
discussion
and
so
once
again
we
really
appreciate
that
presentation
and
seeing
no
further
discussion.
I
will
direct
the
clerk
to
file
that
report
with
that
we
have
concluded
the
business
to
come
before
this
committee
today.
I
will
note
that,
in
an
effort
for
efficiency,
we
have
reinstated
our
committee
of
the
whole
that
committee
will
meet
tomorrow
at
10.
10
30
am,
I
believe,
and
we
will
hear
reports
from
our
standing
committees
as
well
as
other
presentations
council
member
bender.
F
Thanks,
madam
chair,
I
just
wanted
to
know
for
the
council
members
that
I
have
requested
that
mayor,
frye
and
or
staff
add
to
the
city
council
meeting
a
presentation
on
the
emergency
declaration
that
was
in
place
earlier
this
week.
That
is
now
expiring.
F
I
think
you
know
we're
getting
a
lot
of
questions
from
constituents
about
the
emergency
emergency
declaration
and
the
curfew.
You
know
the
impacts
of
property
damage
in
the
city,
the
you
know
the
operations,
safety
net
and
its
command
structure,
and
I
so
I've
requested
that
the
clerk
add
to
our
agenda
for
friday,
a
report
on
that
emergency
declaration.
In
addition
to
the
one
that
we
have
in
place
ongoing
for
the
public
health
emergency,
I
it's
you
know.
I
just
did
that
today.
So
I
know
the
time
is
very
busy.
F
B
Thank
you
for
your
leadership
on
that,
madam
president,
and
I
do
want
to
just
note
I
mistakenly
said
our
committee
of
the
whole
meets
at
10
30
a.m.
Tomorrow,
the
actual
time
is
10
00
a.m
tomorrow
and
subsequently,
following
the
polo
committee
meetings
every
other
thursday.
So
with
that
we
are
adjourned.