►
From YouTube: July 22, 2021 Committee of the Whole
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
B
Good
morning,
everyone,
my
name,
is
jeremiah
ellison,
I'm
the
chair
of
the
committee
of
the
whole
and
I'm
going
to
call
to
order
our
regular
committee
meeting
for
thursday
july
22nd.
I'd
like
to
note
for
the
record.
This
meeting
has
remote
participation
by
council
members
and
city
staff
as
authorized
under
the
minnesota
open
meeting
law,
section
13
d
.021
due
to
the
declared
state
of
local
public
health
emergency.
B
D
C
E
F
C
B
B
Okay,
great
great
we've
got
seven
members
present.
Let
the
record
reflect
we
have
a
quorum
narrowly,
but
I'm
sure
my
colleagues
will
be
will
be
joining
as
we
go
along
here.
We
have
two
items
on
our
agenda
for
discussion
today.
In
addition
to
reports
of
committees,
I'll
note
that
item
number
two
is
a
late
addition
to
the
agenda,
an
update
from
our
intergovernmental
relations
department.
That
was
referred
to
this
meeting
at
the
conclusion
of
yesterday's
meeting
of
the
policy
and
government
oversight
committee.
B
G
Thank
you,
chair
ellison
and
committee
members,
I'm
ryan,
patrick
the
internal
audit
director
and
we're
serving
as
an
internal
audit.
The
contract
managers
we're
an
independent
department
and
we
weren't
part
of
the
civil
response
to
the
civil
unrest
and
therefore
that's
why
we
were
selected
for
contract
management,
we're
assisting
the
team
in
the
sense
that
we're
a
conduit
for
access
to
the
city,
we're
remaining
at
arm's
length,
so
they
can
conduct
their
review
independent
of
any
city
officials
or
influence.
G
H
H
There's
a
couple
other
team
members
on
on
our
call,
but
our
team
is
much
larger,
we'll
I'll
describe
in
a
second
but
the
team
members
on
the
call
right
now
are
chad,
mcginty,
natalie
fountain,
as
well
as
sydney
roberts,
who's
brand
new
to
the
company
and
wanted
to
participate
in
this
this
conversation.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
taking
time
and
we're
going
to
give
you
a
progress
report
where
we,
what
we've
done
so
far
and
our
next
steps
and
talk
about
some
of
the.
H
Basically,
talk
about
the
next
step,
so
next
slide,
please,
just
by
way
of
background
we've
been
doing,
this
company
has
been
doing
security
risk
management
for
probably
15
years
or
more
we've
been
in
the
law
enforcement
space
for
about
10
years,
doing
assessments
of
police
departments
throughout
the
country.
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
those
in
a
second
just
to
get
an
idea
of
the
background
that
this
is
the
business
we're
in
security
risk
management.
Next
slide,
please.
H
And,
and
and
this
is
our
team
we've,
as
you
see-
we've
got
several
members
on
team
only
a
couple
on
the
call
right
now,
but
all
these
team
members
have
been
working
on
different
parts
of
the
project.
You
know
the
backgrounds
are:
are
varied
from
a
lot
of
law
enforcement
experience,
but
also
community
engagement,
fire
emergency
response,
protest
response.
So
so
it's
a
a
wide
variety
of
variety
of
backgrounds.
For
our
team
members
and
and
the
background
in
the
contract
documents,
the
bios
of
our
team
members
are
there
as
well.
H
H
B
H
Please
it
looks
like
we're
getting
not
getting
the
next
slide
or
okay.
Here
we
go
so
so
you
asked
us
to
do
an
indirect,
independent
after
action
report
of
the
entire
city
in
minneapolis
minneapolis's
response,
so
that
includes
the
police
department's
response
on
may
25th
and
and
the
week
thereafter,
as
well
as
all
the
other
city
entities
and
we're
we're
taking
a
look
at
it
from
the
perspective
of
what
are
some
of
the
lessons
learned.
H
So
what
went
well
from
a
cine
city
enterprise
point
of
view,
including
all
the
various
departments?
What
what
challenge
did
you
have?
What
did
not
go
so
well
and
what
are
the
lessons
learned
and
and
what
can
what
can
we
recommend
from
this
week,
of
of
some
moving
forward
recommendations,
how
to
improve
any
kind
of
responses?
If,
if
you're
unfortunate,
to
have
this
kind
of
incident
again
we're
also
the
you
also
asked
us
to
look
at
the
community
perspectives
on
this.
H
H
Please-
and
this
really
provides
you
all
an
opportunity
to
understand
what
happened,
why
it
happened
and
identify
the
strengths
and
the
weaknesses
in
the
city.
So
you
know
it
focuses.
You
see
the
four
bullet
points
in
there,
but
I
could
sum
them
up
by
looking
at
the
things
we're
looking
at
are
planning
what
kind
of
pre-planning
is
done
to
prepare
for
any
type
of
incidents,
command
and
control.
H
All
this
is
under
the
context
of
of
a
key
value
of
protecting
the
first
amendment
right.
So
how
do
you
balance?
How
did
the
department
balance
protecting
first
event
rights
against
the
issues
regarding
protecting
people
and
property?
So
those
are
the
types
of
things
that
you've
asked
us
to
look
at
next
slide,
please
and
and-
and
so
our
process
involves
document
review.
So
right
now
we're
at
the
point.
H
We
also
chad-
and
I
were
out
last
week
visiting
some
of
the
sites
just
to
kind
of
understand,
physically
what
things
look
like.
Obviously,
it's
a
year
later,
so
there
are
some
changes,
but
we
were
able
to
be
there
and
witness
some
of
the.
As
you
know,
some
of
the
sites
that
that
still
are
boarded
up
and
or
fenced
off
so
that
that's
how
helpful,
as
we
write
the
report
and
as
we
continue
to
ask
questions
to
see
those
types
of
things
as
well,
we
did
interviews
we.
H
Next
slide,
please.
So
today
you
know,
we've!
You
know
over
a
couple
hundred
documents,
but,
as
I
mentioned
just
last
week,
we
received
a
lot
of
documents
that
that
are
really
helpful
to
the
analysis
and
we're
in
the
middle
of
reviewing
those.
So
all
in
all,
we'll
probably
up
around
2400
documents
as
the
final
amount
of
review
we've
conducted
over
90
interviews
all
across
the
board.
H
We've
got
some
community
members,
but
as
I'll
talk
about
in
in
just
a
minute,
our
next
phase
is
going
to
dive
into
spending
more
time
listening
to
community
members
and
conducting
a
listening
session.
As
I
mentioned,
we
conducted
that
three-day
site
visit.
We
had
some
interviews
then,
but
part
of
it
was
just
meant.
H
Probably
in
about
three
weeks
from
now,
I
think
the
first
or
second
week
of
august
we'll
do
a
community
listening
session,
but
leading
up
to
that
we're
conducting
some
interviews
of
some
key
community
stakeholders.
Next
slide,
please
again
with
the
the
the
process
continues:
we're
interviewing
more
city,
personnel
and
committee
members.
H
The
listening
session,
as
I
mentioned,
we're
going
to
try
to
schedule
that
sometime
in
first
two
weeks
of
august,
we're
also
looking
at
body
cam
footage
to
to
get
some
various
points
of
view
from
from
the
body
camera
perspective,
we're
just
starting
that
project
to
take
a
look
at
that
and
we've
we've
been
asked
to
do
about
24
hours
of
footage,
so
we're
starting
to
organize
that
now
and
then
we'll
continue
to
review
the
documents
that
we've
seen
as
we
receive
them
next
slide.
Please.
H
So
from
a
timeline
point
of
view,
it's
still
a
work
in
progress,
we're
scheduled
to
submit
a
draft
report
to
the
city
by
mid
to
late
november
and
the
way
our
process
works.
Is
we
submit
a
draft
report
and
then
allow
the
the
city
to
review
it
from
the
perspective
of
of
reviewing
for
edits,
mostly
for
data
accuracy.
If
we
call
the
department
of
division,
it
should
have
been
a
should
have
been
called
the
department
things
like
that.
H
We
want
to
make
sure
that
that
some
of
those
details
are
all
the
details
are
accurate.
So
that
gives
an
opportunity
for
a
department
to
take
a
review
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
missing
anything
that
that's
important
to
the
process
and
then
with
that
process.
The
final
report
is
scheduled
to
be
submitted
to
the
city
by
mid-january
of
next
year
we're
on
track.
I
I
think
we're
perfectly
on
track
to
be
able
to
deliver
by
those
time
frames
and
we
wanted
to
get
this
brief
overview
but
open
up
for
questions.
H
B
E
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
Thank
you
very
much
for
this
presentation.
Just
I
saw
a
number
of
the
cities
you
worked
with,
have
also
gotten
consent,
decrees
from
the
department
of
justice,
and
we
are
currently
being
investigated
by
the
department
of
justice.
I
want
to
know
like
a
couple
things:
how
have
kind
of
has
your
work
and
kind
of
kind
of
your
reports
kind
of
been
used
on
two
fronts?
E
H
Yeah
yeah,
that's
a
good
question,
so
we
haven't
on
the
cities
that
I've
mentioned.
You
know,
for
example,
two
of
them
that
we
know
are
under
the
department
of
justice
scrutiny
right
now.
For
consent,
decrees
are
louisville
and
minneapolis
and
they're
in
the
process
of
we
know.
I
don't
know
where
the
department
of
justice
is
in
in
their
process.
H
We
expect
that
that,
for
example,
in
louisville
it's
been
a
public
report.
Some
of
you
may
have
seen
it
that
we
expect
that,
as
the
department
of
justice
is
considering
how
they're
going
to
handle
the
consent
decree
that
they're
taking
a
look
at
that
report,
because
we
have
some
significant
findings
and
recommendations
there.
We
have
not
had
contact
with
department
of
justice
regarding
their
work
in
minneapolis.
H
I
Thanks,
mr
chair,
I
think
my
first
comment
is
more
directed
to
the
city.
The
staff
who've
who've
drafted
the
contract,
or
you
know
all
of
us
here
as
elected
leaders.
I
think
it's
unfortunate
that
the
after
action
report
won't
be
completed
for
such
a
long
time
after
the
protests
and
the
and
the
response
and
all
of
the
things
that
followed.
I
It
seems
that
there
has
been
some
shift
in
some
other
areas
where
there
really
hasn't
been
improvement.
So
I
think
every
day
that
goes
by
that
we
haven't
completed
this
work
and
and
come
to
a
common
understanding,
we're
at
risk
for
a
repeat
of
some
of
the
things
that
happened
after
mpd
killed,
george
floyd
after
the
city's
response
to
the
protests
and
all
that
followed.
I
So
I
guess
I
just
wanted
to
state
on
the
record
that
I
think
there's
obviously
a
balance
between
doing
a
really
thorough
job
of
analyzing.
All
of
the
work
the
consultants
are
operating
on
the
timeline
that
the
city
contacted
them
to
do
so
again.
This
is
not
directed
to
the
consultants,
but
it
is
the
decisions
that
are
being
made
by
the
city,
and
if
anyone
wants
to
comment
on
that,
especially
from
the
staff
side,
I
think
it'd
be
helpful
to
understand
how
that
timeline
was
determined
and
it
actually,
it
seems
to
have
shifted
now.
I
I
H
H
Most
of
you,
one
of
the
questions
we
ask
is
what
kind
of
community
groups
community
members
or
associations
whatever
it
might
be.
Do
you
think
that
would
be
helpful
for
us
to
reach
out
to
to
get
the
word
about
about
creating
these
community
engagement
listening
sessions?
So
we've
collected
a
lot
of
those
we're
in
the
process
of
contacting
some
of
the.
H
We
also
work
with
a
little
bit
with
the
office
of
neighborhood
and
community
relations
to
talk
about
who
their
contacts
were
and
we're
reaching
out
to
some
of
those
contacts
to
start
building
that
that
list
of
invites
and
we're
hoping
we're,
depending
on
some
of
those
key
community
leaders
and
organizations
to
spread
the
word
for
us
as
well
as
you
once
we
have
some
more
specific
dates.
We
can
share
those
with
the
entire
council
to
help
spread
the
word
and
we'll
do
this
in
a
virtual
environment.
H
We'll
probably,
we
expect
it
to
be
a
big
response
and
we'll
do
in
a
virtual
environment
where
we
have
multiple
breakout
rooms
depending
on
who
we
have,
we
might
break
them
out
by
different
various
kind
of
interest
groups,
but
the
same
token
hearing
each
other,
but
for
a
mixed
group
on
each
session
is
helpful
too.
So
we're
working
through
that.
H
We
want
to
hear
not
only
from
community
members
that
were
there
experienced
it,
but
also
business
community
members
and
and
what
their
experience
were
and
some
of
the
things
that
happened
with
their
businesses.
So
so
it's
multifaceted
and
it's
about
just
continuing
to
reach
out
and
find
just
different
ways
of
people
to
connect
with
the
groups
they're
associated
with
to
get
the
word
out
that
we're
doing
this
said
respond
to
man.
B
J
Thank
you
very
much
appreciate
it
and
appreciate
having
you
here
before
us
now
and,
and
it
looks
like
you've
done
some
extensive
work.
It
looked
like
there's
over
90
interviews
and
thousands
of
documents
that
you
have
reviewed.
What
kind
of
impressions
can
you
share
with
us
right
now?
Our
findings.
Do
you
think
we
handled
it
well?
H
Well,
you
know,
you
know,
probably
the
the
biggest
thing
which
which
you've
all
heard
is
is
that
this
was
an
unprecedented
event,
not
not
many
cities
or
anybody
has
to
have
they
had
to
deal
with
this
kind
of
issue
and
and
their
strug
struggles
on
being
able
to
respond
to
that
it
was
unprecedented.
So
what
kind
of
the
planning
was
done?
Even
though
it's
unprecedented?
There
can
be
planning
efforts
that
are
done,
that
that
help
make
it
a
little
bit
easier,
not
perfect.
J
I
could
mr
chair,
there
was
certainly
you
talked
about
communication,
and
you
talked
about
planning,
there's
a
lot
of
interactions
that
we
have
with
other
levels
of
government.
Are
you
also
going
to
be
doing
some
interviews
at
the
state
level,
I'm
particularly
thinking
of
immediately
after
some
of
the
worst
trauma
and
people
wondering
about
where,
as
national
guard?
Where
do
we
have
extra
support?
Obviously
what
cities
overwhelmed
here
and
it
seemed
like
we
didn't
really
have
that
in
place.
H
Yeah
we're
reaching
outside
so
we're
aware
of
various
communications
that
have
been
made
and
we're
taking
a
look
at
those
we're
also
trying
to
reach
out.
We
don't
necessarily
get
a
response.
You
know,
because
it's
it's
looking
at
minneapolis,
not
the
state.
We
don't
necessarily
get
a
response
from
everybody
from
from
the
state,
but
we
are
trying
to
reach
out
on
some
of
those
to
get
some
of
those
perspectives.
J
Well,
you
should
certainly,
I
think,
develop
yourself
of
council
members
who
are
involved
in
this
and
the
mayor
in
terms
of
getting
responses
and
communication
assistance
elsewhere
and
with
others.
I
can't
imagine
that
the
public
safety
commissioner
at
the
state
wouldn't
be
happy
to
sit
down
and
talk
with
you
and
discuss
it
in
some
detail,
because
that
kind
of
information
could
really
be
helpful
to
us,
especially
looking
ahead
to
the
future,
to
make
sure
that
we
are
don't
get
in
the
same
situation
again.
H
J
Thank
you
well,
thank
you
and
I'll,
just
kind
of
share
my
disappointment
with
how
long
it's
taking-
and
I
don't
know
what
we
could
do
to
speed
up
the
process
at
all,
but
it
does
seem
like
not
having
a
final
report
a
year
and
a
half
later
makes
it
more
difficult
and
there's
lots
of
questions
that
aren't
answered
so
maybe
even
some
more
preliminary
check-ins.
If
we
could
try
to
get
some
more
information
sooner
would
be
helpful.
J
But
I
know
the
government
moves
at
a
snail's
pace
too
often,
and
that
should
be
pretty
unacceptable
to
a
lot
of
people
and
we
need
to
be
able
to
respond
more
quickly
to
these
issues
and
understand
and
learn
from
these
things.
Blank
we're
still
waiting
for
other
reports
too
about
what
can
we
learn
lessons
from
other
police
killings
and
those
things?
So,
hopefully
we
can
get
information
a
little
bit
sooner.
Thank
you.
B
G
Thank
you,
chair
ellison.
I
know
part
of
the
delay
after
the
civil
unrest,
the
city
requested
assistance
from
the
justice
department
under
the
former
administration.
After
a
period
of
time,
the
justice
department
declined
to
provide
assistance
to
the
city.
They
would
have
been
her
first
contact
for
an
after
action
review
and
that
put
some
extra
months
in
between
when
civil
unrest
occurred
when
the
city
determined
that
we
would
have
to
conduct
our
own
after
action
review
and
seek
a
vendor
for
that
project.
G
It's
by
that
point
adding
budget
funds
for
the
the
project
looked
like
it
would
happen
in
the
2821
budget
and
that's
what
occurred
so.
Contract
negotiations
and
selection
of
a
vendor
began
in
2021
kind
of
in
consultation
with
staff
and
and
the
other
things
that
were
going
on
around
the
city
at
the
time
was
determined
that
this
this
timeline
would
have
been
adequate.
Had
we
been
able
to
start
the
project
earlier?
G
K
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and,
and
that
I
I'll
I'll
just
name
that
I'm
very
interested
as
as
many
people
are
in
seeing
this
report.
I
don't
want
to
put
pressure
on
the
timing
of
this
report.
I
think
that
ship
has
sailed,
but
I
I
do
think
to
director
patrick's
point.
We
need
to
look
at
how,
as
a
city,
we
can
move
more
quickly
to
start
these
processes
so
that
we're
not
constantly
feeling
frustrated
about
the
length
of
time
it
takes
for
us
to
to
get
reports
and
to
learn.
K
I
know
that
many
other
cities
have
received
their
after-action
reports
and
and
are
are
already
implementing
recommendations
from
a
process
that
we
just
took
a
long
time
to
start,
and
you
know
I
think
that
that's
that's
something
in
our
in
our
procedures
that
we
might
need
to
look
at
at
sort
of
city
staff
capacity
to
to
drive
some
of
these
projects.
We
might
need
to
look
at.
You
know
different
ways
of
doing
this,
but
I
appreciate
the
effort
underway.
B
B
I
know
that
you're
not
looking
at
the
state,
but
the
state
was
involved
intimately
and
what
was
going
on
in
minneapolis
and
they
were,
and
they
were,
their
relationship
with
with
mpd
at
the
time
was
was
was
pretty
intertwined.
So
I
think
it
could
be
a
healthy
perspective,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
that,
and
I
also
want
to
say
you
know
in
the
effort
of
not
duplicating
work.
You
know
any
any
plan
is
going
to
have
to
take
into
account
the
full
picture.
B
I
know
that
the
u
of
m
did
a
report
of
some
of
the
of
of
of
the
misuse
of
less
than
lethal
rounds.
You
know,
obviously
having
you
know
having
having
that
report.
Didn't
it
didn't
necessarily
look
great
for
the
city,
but
could
offer
a
really
good
learning
opportunity
for
how
we
engage
in
the
past
and
how
we
make
sure
we're
not
inflaming.
Tensions
are
how
the
police
make
sure
they're,
not
intentions,
and-
and
so
you
know
the,
u
of
m-
did
their
report.
You
know.
B
Obviously
the
you
know,
minnesota
department
of
human
rights
is
doing
their
investigation.
The
doj
is
doing
their
investigation,
and
so
I
think
that
those
you
know
to
the
extent
that
we
cannot
duplicate,
work
and
and
that
these
you
know
these.
These
different
investigations
and
reports
into
what
happened
in
minneapolis
last
year
can
really
help
inform
yours
and
and
and
potentially
take
take
a
little
bit
of
take
a
little
bit
of
work
off
your
plate
as
well,
so
that
you
can
get
the
full
picture
while
also
still
pursuing.
B
I
I
I
When
we
don't
have
a
clear
you
know,
communication
structure
internally
to
get
us
the
information
we
need
and
my
experience
in
participating
with
state
incident
command
calls
is
very
different
than
my
experience
as
an
elected
official
in
the
city
getting
information
from
city
staff.
So
when
the
state
convenes,
an
incident
command
call,
there's
a
set
schedule
for
information
to
elected
officials.
I
The
police
kill
people
in
our
city
with
some
frequency,
and
so
it's
possible
that
between
now
and
the
end
of
the
report,
a
person
will
be
killed
by
our
police
department
and
I'm
not
convinced
that
we
have
the
tools
in
place
to
do
a
better
job
of
responding
as
a
city.
So
you
know
just
as
one
example,
even
in
the
in
the
instance
of
the
heat
emergency.
I
So
I
guess
I
just
want
to
offer
my
support
to
figure
out
some
short-term
strategies
to
improve
some
of
those
problems.
I,
if
other
council
members
are
interested,
I
know
we
have
a
group
of
us
who
is
helping
advise
kind
of
from
a
distance,
as
staff
said
just
on
the
process
piece.
That's
partly
why
I
requested
having
this
public
report
so
that
there
wasn't
a
sense
that
only
some
of
us
were
getting
information
more
than
on
others,
and
that
we
were
sharing
all
the
information
that
we
have
with
the
public.
I
B
A
B
Okay,
yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
You
are
noted
for
the
record,
we'll
see
no
further
discussion,
I'll
direct
the
clerk
to
file
this
report,
and
and
thank
you
for
this
presentation
and
and
we
look
forward
to
further
updates
in
the
future.
Thank
you
thanks
for
your
time,
all
right.
The
second
item
on
our
agenda
is
an
update
on
the
2021
legislative
session
and
special
session.
This
item
was
referred
from
yesterday's
policy
and
government
oversight
committee
meeting.
B
L
L
No
problem
at
all
cheri
listen.
We
will
be
presenting
some
highlights
on
things
that
transpired
during
the
regular
2021
session
at
the
legislature
and
then
the
first
special
session
that
took
place
as
a
result
of
lack
of
budget
agreement
during
the
regular
session.
So
clerks.
Could
you
go
to
the
next
slide?
Please.
L
Great
thank
you.
What
we
will
be
discussing
will
be
items
that
are
explicit
policy
positions
on
the
city's
2021
legislative
agenda
and
policy
positions,
we'll
be
overviewing,
some
outstanding
issues
that
we
expect
the
legislature
to
address
either
in
future
special
sessions
in
2021
yet,
and
then
what
2022
could
essentially
look
like
as
well.
L
L
Great,
thank
you.
So,
as
we
prepared
for
the
2021
session,
several
things
were
happening
with
the
city
with
the
state's
financial
outlook.
When
we
entered
into
session
there
was
a
proposed
1.3
billion
dollar
deficit
at
the
state
level.
As
session
progressed,
many
things
happen.
Sales
for
the
most
part
continue
to
climb
within
the
state
of
minnesota.
L
As
the
legislature
entered
their
work,
they
had
a
really
important
thing
to
to
essentially
come
to
agreement,
and
that
was
agreeing
to
the
state's
budget
for
the
next
finding
the
2020
to
2023
years.
So
the
budget
deficit
that
was
proposed
previously
and
then
a
suspected
surplus
became
a
pretty
hot
button
issue.
L
L
The
american
rescue
plan
act
very
fittingly,
added
close
to
3
billion
to
the
state's
coffers,
as
the
state
would
be
getting
its
share
of
the
arp
dollars.
So
as
we
progress
toward
the
end
of
session,
what
was
the
budget
surplus
became?
What
was
a
budget
deficit
became
a
budget
surplus
as
the
influx
of
federal
dollars
were
suspected
to
be
coming
in.
L
L
L
This
slide
on
and
the
next
slide
will
focus
on
the
public
finance
related
provisions
that
were
passed
at
the
legislature,
and
I
will
note
that
all
of
the
budget
bills
have
been
signed
by
the
governor
and
are
now
law.
The
staff
at
the
legislature
drafted
these
these
bills
and
relatively
quick
time
frame
and
for
the
most
part,
we've
we've
looked
through
all
of
them,
but
the
the
chapters
have
not
been
released
from
the
revisers
office
at
the
legislature.
Yet
all
of
the
chapters
have
not
been
released.
L
The
tax
bill
that
was
passed
produces
about
49.1
billion
dollar
in
revenue
and
then
provides
4.2
billion
in
refunds
through
aids
and
credit,
including
the
760
1
million
in
new
tax
cuts
and
credit,
which
was
another
big
point
of
contention
between
dfl
members
and
gop
members
at
the
legislature.
Exactly
how
exactly?
How
was
the
state
going
to
pay
for
all
of
the
funding
bills
that
was
passed
at
the
end
of
session
included
in
the
tax
bill
is
on
a
paycheck
protection
conformity.
L
So
if
you
recall
the
cares
act
bill
that
was
a
version
of
the
covet
responsible
from
the
federal
government
included
a
paycheck
protection
program
and
the
state
of
minnesota
was
not
in
compliance.
So
there
were
individuals
who
would
have
to
be
taxed
on
those
dollars
that
they
received
from
the
federal
government.
While
there
is
full
conformity
in
the
tax
bill
as
well
as
benefits,
individuals
would
not
be
tax
on
benefits
up
to
ten
thousand
four
hundred
dollars
that
they
received
through
copit,
related
unemployment.
L
L
If
the,
if
the
law
had
not
changed,
the
city
would
have
seen
a
decrease
in
our
lga
amount,
and
so
we
were
advocating
for
either
a
formula
change
which
would
be
a
robust
process
or
that
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
essentially
other
cities
who
would
see
a
loss
or
reduction
in
their
lga
amount
in
2022,
that
their
amounts
would
stay
the
same.
So
this
provision
was
included
in
the
in
the
tax
bill
and
the
city
of
minneapolis
will
maintain
its
lga
amount
that
it
received
in
2021.
L
Regarding
the
robust
conversation
that
needs
to
happen
around
lga,
the
tax
chairs,
both
in
the
house
and
the
senate,
have
expressed
interest
in
having
that
conversation.
The
last
time
that
the
lga
formula
was
was
changed.
It
took
several
months.
It
took
input
from
associations
like
the
league
of
minnesota
cities,
metro
cities,
greater
minnesota
cities,
representatives
throughout
the
entire
state,
to
ensure
that
the
formula
that
was
ultimately
decided
upon
was
as
equitable
as
possible.
L
So
if
and
when
there
will
be
conversations
during
the
interim
months
on
an
lga
formula
change,
we
will
be
participating
and
working
closely
with
some
of
our
associations
and
partners
on
that
issue,
as
well
included
in
the
finance
bill
is
some
flexibility
around
tax
increment
financing.
What
was
passed
are
two
really
important
things.
L
L
L
Great
so
staying
on
again
with
public
finance,
the
there
is
that
the
working
family
credit,
not
a
new
credit
at
all
to
the
state
of
minnesota.
There
is
an
expansion
of
this
credit
for
households
that
have
19
to
20
year
olds.
Initially
they
would
not.
Families
would
not
be
eligible
to
receive
a
credit
for
these.
L
L
Typically,
the
there
have
been
several
attempts
to
work
on
a
housing
tax
credit
contribution
fund
and
to
have
it
included
in
the
tax
bill
and
successfully.
We
were
able
to
get
this
included
in
the
tax
bill
this
year.
So
there's
a
new
housing
tax
credit
contribution
fund
individuals
can
provide
funds
to
specific
projects
that
they
are
supporting
and
they
will
get
up
to
85
percent
credit
on
their
tax
revenues
toward
the
end
of
the
year.
L
There
are
some
requirements
and
and
guard
rails
that
are
placed
on
this
new
policy
and
it
will
and
is
intended
to
help
with
the
affordable
housing
crisis
that
we
have
in
the
entire
state
of
minnesota
included
in
the
tax
bill
is
a
targeted
community
capital
grant
program.
This
is
a
grant
program
that
is
going
to
be
overseen
by
by
deed,
and
it
is
to
support
non-profits,
who
typically
find
it
very
difficult
to
access
bonding
dollars
through
the
the
regular
bonding
process.
L
This
creates
a
targeted
program
and
24
million
dollar
is
set
aside
for
that
there
was
an
extension
of
the
historic
tax
credit
program
for
one
more
year.
That
program
was
set
to
expire
in
2021..
Immense
advocacy
was
really
directed
toward
this.
It's
unfortunate
that
it's
only
extended
from
one
more
year,
because
it's
a
very
beneficial
program,
it's
utilized
a
lot
in
the
state
of
minneapolis
and
there's
there
are
staff
in
our
cpeg
department
that
work
closely
to
put
together
projects
using
this.
L
This
program,
as
well
so
we'll
we'll
be
working,
we'll
be
continuing
to
work
to
ensure
that
it's
not
sunsetted
and
that
it
can
go
into
future
years.
As
well
beyond
just
this
one
year,
there
is
a
a
new
program,
a
local
housing
trust
fund
program
for
cities
that
have
local
housing,
trust
funds
or
that
want
to
develop
local
housing
trust
funds.
10
million
dollars
will
be
set
aside
for
that,
and
essentially,
cities
can
apply
for
matching
dollars.
L
Ultimately,
we
were
able
to
work
again
with
the
legislature
and
colleagues
to
ensure
that
the
4d
tax
classification
rate
is
not
changed
permanently,
without
truly
understanding
the
implications
of
any
tax
classification
rate
change.
And
so
a
study
is
what
was
passed
for
this
particular
program
and
a
temporary
change
of
the
value
amount
in
the
program
we'll
be
working
with
the
league
of
minnesota
cities
and
again
other
partners
to
ensure
that
we
weigh
in
on
relevant
information.
L
E
Thank
you,
charleston
director,
moore,
just
wanted
to
get
a
little
more
information
on
the
4d
program
like
if
there
is
anything
the
city
needs
to
be
doing.
In
light
of
the
study,
this
has
been
a
really
beneficial
program,
thanks
in
a
large
part,
just
from
the
dedicated
staff.
We
have
it'd
just
be
helpful
to
hear
kind
of
where,
where
it's
going,
what
what
the
concerns
are
in
the
state
and
kind
of
what
we
can
be
doing
locally.
L
L
What
was
sought
at
the
legislature
and
what
wasn't
ultimately
passed
was
that
the
for
the
first
tier
properties
for
the
4d
program
it's
currently
set
at
7.75
percent
and
then
anything
at
the
second
tier
and
below,
goes
to
point
two.
Five
percent
there
were,
and
there
were
groups
who
were
seeking
to
have
the
tax
classification
rate
change
across
the
board
abroad
across
the
board
to
0.25
instead
and
the
justification
for
for
for
for
wanting.
L
We
worked
really
closely
with
our
staff
in
cped
on
this
to
ensure
that
we
we
understood
what
a
0.25
classification
rate
would
what
would
mean
what
the
implications
of
that
would
be
and
what
what
we,
what
we
gathered
was
that
we
would
see
really
a
disapparent
impact
on
fixed
income,
property,
home
owners
and
essentially
a
lot
of
our
our
seniors,
who
are
on
a
fixed
income
and
really
can't
see
fluctuations
or
an
increase.
Drastic
increases
in
their
tax
classification
rates.
L
So
as
far
as
what
we
need
to
do
right
now,
we
are
awaiting
the
process.
Minnesota
housing,
finance
agency
and
the
department
of
revenue
will
be
the
ones
who
will
be
conducting
this
study,
in
addition
to
staff
at
the
legislature,
and
so
we'll
be
working
closely
with
them
to
see
what
information
they're
looking
for.
We
do
have
a
large,
the
largest
pool
of
4d
properties
and
so
want
to
ensure
that,
as
the
study
begins
and
progresses
that
we
are
weighing
in
in
a
meaningful
way,
because,
ultimately,
we
would
want.
L
L
There
were
proposed
policies
and
and
bills
that
would
have
impacted
the
city
of
minneapolis,
but
for
the
most
part
we
were
able
to
stave
off
what
was
then
what
was
going
to
be
a
cut
to
our
murph
pension
plan.
There
was
a
proposal
that
was
moved
on
the
senate
side.
There
was
not
a
house
companion
for
this,
but
there
was
a
proposal
that
was
moved
on
the
senate
side.
That
would
reduce
the
state's
share
to
the
mark,
the
murph
fund
from
16
million
to
6
million
to
a
10
million
cut.
L
Essentially,
we
worked
with
our
delegation,
members
and
other
legislators
as
well
to
ensure
that
the
murph
agreement
that
was
passed
previously
was
protected
and
and
continued
and
I'm
glad
to
say
that
we
did
not
have.
We
did
not
see
this
build
included
in
the
final
agreement
for
the
pension
bill
related
to
911.
L
There
was
a
working
group
that
was
established
in
the
pension
bill
and
they
will
be
looking
and
making
recommendations
to
the
pension
commission
about
changes
that
are
needed
for
the
9-1-1
telecommunicators
pension
plan
and
we'll
be
following
that
closely
and
then.
Lastly,
there
was
a
supplemental
state
aid
work
group
that
was
also
established.
That
would
provide
some
recommendations
to
the
commission
on
changing
methods
for
allocating
firefighter
supplemental
state
aid
related
to
firefighters,
also
not
included
in
the
final
agreement,
was
some
firefighter
presumption
policies
that
were
discussed
and
it
was.
L
It
was
looking
at
the
firefighter
cancer
presumptions.
It's
it's
likely
that
that
that
conversation
will
continue,
even
as
we
go
into
the
2022
legislative
session
as
we
are
seeing
growing
issues
around
exposures
of
firefighters
to
some
carcinogens,
based
on
their
line
of
work.
So
we'll
we'll
continue
tracking
that
this
bill
was
signed
by
the
by
the
governor
on
july
21..
L
Thank
you
next
slide.
Please
next
up
was
is
the
net
the
legacy
finance
bill.
It
is
chapter
one
of
the
bill.
It
totals
382.5
million
dollars
and,
as
you
are
all
likely
aware,
this
was
a
an
amendment
that
was
agreed
to
by
voters
as
to
how
as
to
how
much
money
would
go
to
the
legacy
fund
and
then
the
legislature
essentially
then
decides
how
to
dole
out
those
dollars
to
these
different
funds.
So
all
the
funds
that
are
included,
127.8
million,
went
out
to
the
outdoor
heritage
fund.
L
L
L
L
In
addition
to
that,
800
000
went
for
innovation
in
safety
in
community
safety
grants.
This
would
just
the
funding
goes
to
the
department
of
public
safety
and
grants
will
be
made
to
organizations
and
will
be
targeting
areas
with
high
rates
of
violent
crime.
Local
government
are
allowed
to
work
with
grant
recipients.
L
However,
it's
not
explicitly
stated
that
local
governments
can
apply
for
these
funds
and
we
are
therefore
not
eligible
for
it.
The
focus
is
on
youth
family
and
highlights
the
african-american
and
african,
the
african,
immigrant
and
african-american
communities
as
well,
so
a
really
targeted
program
to
help
with
the
increase
in
violent
crimes
from
that
from
a
community
centric
perspective.
L
There
was
a
regulation
of
the
use
of
no
knock
warrant,
which
was
essentially
mirroring
what
the
city
of
minneapolis
passed
earlier
in
the
year.
I
believe,
and
then
there
was
there,
are
changes
to
sign
and
release
warrant.
So
the
change
to
sign
and
release
warrants
will
allow
for
non-violent
offenders
to
receive
and
sign
a
release
warrant
and
will
set
up
a
system
to
inform
police
officers
of
the
types
of
laws
a
person
has
been
cited
with
and
provide
those
offenders
with
an
opportunity
to
reschedule
their
court
dates
as
opposed
to
simply
arresting
individuals.
L
There
is
a
75,
sir
charge
fee
change.
This
is
a
piece
of
legislation
which
is
it's
actually
quite
exciting
that
it
was
finally
passed.
It's
been
on
the
city
of
minneapolis
legislative
agenda
for
at
least
three
sessions
now
in
a
previous
session,
made
it
in
the
final
bill
that
was
ultimately
vetoed
by
the
governor.
This
is
the
governor
dayton
back
then
for
good
reasons,
but
excitedly
this.
L
This
piece
of
legislation
is
included
and
essentially
allows
the
court
to
waive
the
75
surcharge
fee
that
you
would
see
when
you
go
to
court
and
then
also
allows
the
courts
to
offer
community
service
in
lieu
of
paying
the
fee.
This
is
a
part
of
the
fines
and
fees
legislation
that
essentially
intends
to
ensure
that
people
who
are
under
resourced
and
that
they're
not
further
harmed
and
that
they're
not
put
in
further
financial
constraints.
L
There
is
also
a
reform
with
civil
asset
forfeiture
laws,
the
change
it
simply
includes
not
taking
property
for
from
an
innocent
owner
in
vehicle
forfeiture
cases.
If
they're
able
to
apply
within
60
days,
it
makes
other
recommended
changes
to
ensure
that
all
people
with
ownership
stakes
in
a
forfeiture
and
they
forfeited
property,
are
notified
and
they're
allowed
to
petition
for
the
return
of
their
property.
L
So
what
we
will
see
relatively
soon
is
that
what
was
coined
as
the
whiskey
plates,
the
w
that
you
see
on
individuals
who
have
been
driving
under
the
influence
you
will
see
that
gone
and
instead
there
will
be
an
interlock
system
that
is
instituted
then.
Lastly,
the
legislation
also
creates
a
task
force
on
missing
and
murdered.
L
L
Next
is
the
health
and
human
services
chapter,
which
is
chapter
seven.
The
total
fund
for
this
chapter
was
18.8
billion
dollars
of
the
funding.
We
saw
a
drastic
increase
to
local
public
health
grants.
15
million
was
allocated
to
the
program,
as
is
the
case
we,
as
we've
seen
with
the
case
of
kovid.
Local
public
health,
is
on
the
front
line
of
responding
to
the
pandemic,
and
so
there
was
a
huge
advocacy
to
ensure
that
adequate
funding
was
given
to
local
public
health
to
support
the
work
that
that
they
do.
L
There
was
an
enhancement
of
the
asthma
medical
system
benefits
to
cover
a
lot
more
asthma,
asthma,
work,
asthma
support,
and
so
that
was
included,
and
then
there
was
12
million
for
the
emergency
services
grant
program.
This
is
related
to
homelessness.
It's
essentially
the
supports
the
the
street
outreach,
the
relationship,
building,
etc.
That
helps
to
ensure
that
people
have
access
to
shelters
when
they
are
available.
L
So
a
massive
increase
in
this
program,
actually,
which
is
really
exciting
to
see
and
then
a
new
funding
opportunity
is
one
million
dollars
was
set
aside
to
help
with
shelter
capital
current.
Prior
to
this,
there
was
no
dedicated
funding
source
to
help
with
capital
improvement
needs
for
shelters,
and
so
this
is
instrumental
1
million
was
set
aside,
and
now
we
can
continue
working
to
see
that
funding
increase
again
at
the
department
of
health.
L
L
I
will
note
that
the
omnibus
state
gov
bill
did
not
have
a
local
government
article
included,
and
so
many
of
the
many
of
the
provisions
that
were
considered
in
the
local
government
committee.
The
session
just
essentially
didn't
make
it
into
the
final
bill.
So
therefore
there
isn't
an
article
election
policy
was
debated
in
both
the
house
and
the
senate,
but
ultimately
to
reach
a
compromise.
Many
proposals
were
left
out
of
the
bill.
The
bill
contains
does
contain
several
million
dollars
in
election
grants
to
local
government
and
I'll
go
through
that.
L
Again,
if
you
recall
toward
the
beginning
of
the
presentation,
I
noted
that
as
one
of
those
sticking
points
that
the
legislature
needed
to
addre
to
address
and
so
toward
the
end
of
the
special
the
first
special
session,
there
was
an
agreement
to
have
the
governor
forego
his
peace,
some
emergency
powers
and
instead
the
commissioner
of
health
at
the
department
of
human
services
and
the
commissioner
of
deed,
have
some
expanded
ability
to
work
and
call
a
pandemic
response.
If,
if
needed,
included
in
the
state
gov
bill
is
a
covet
19
workers,
compensation
extension.
L
This
was
a
part
of
a
previous
federal
covet,
19
legislation
and
so
to
again
be
in
compliance.
There
is
an
extension
to
that
until
december,
21
of
2021
market
box
actually
ended
up
in
the
state
gov
bill
market
bucks
was
previously
held
in
the
ag
bill,
the
agriculture
bill,
and
it
was
left
out
of
the
ag
final
agreement.
L
There
was
a
lot
of
advocacy
both
at
the
local
level
from
non-nonprofits
who
work
on
food
access,
including
staff
in
the
city
of
minneapolis,
to
ensure
that
this
funding
was
included
in
this
in
the
state
gov
bill,
as
it
provides
an
opportunity
for
individuals
to
gain
access
to
fresh
fruits
and
vegetables,
especially
through
farmer
markets,
and
so
this
was
included.
The
funding
for
the
biennium
is
650k
really
great
to
see
this
programming
included
as
access
to
fresh
fruits
and
vegetables
is
just
fundamental.
L
Now
move
on
now
to
the
elections
provision
in
the
bill
again
elections,
elections
was
debated
a
lot.
There
were
many
attempts
to
preempt
cities
from
doing
several
things
and
ultimately
those
preemptions
were
not
included
in
the
elections
provision
in
the
bill.
The
legislature
did
establish
absentee
ballot
dropbox
that
municipalities
can
use
for
elections.
L
L
The
there
was
also
an
establishment
of
new
rules
for
determining
polling
place,
locations
and
standards
as
well
for
the
use
of
these
ballot
drop
boxes
again
explicitly
stated
in
the
legislation
and
then
to
help
fund
elections.
Statewide
4.25
million
was
allocated
to
the
secretary
of
state
for
local
election
grants
of
that
amount.
750K
could
is
set
aside
for
election
equipment
and
then
1
million
for
these
new
ballot
drop
boxes,
provisions
that
were
previously
noted
I'll
pause
there.
L
L
F
F
I
just
want
to
just
wanted
to
comment
that
as
states
all
over,
the
country
are
really
trying
to
suppress
and
limit
people's
ability
to
vote,
particularly
african
americans
and
other
communities
of
color,
that
it
is
encouraging
to
see
our
state
actually
investing
in
making
voting
more
accessible
and
and
supporting
the
the
expensive
nature
of
elections
as
we
move
forward,
particularly
since
minneapolis
is
having
multiple
elections
in
the
next
couple
of
years.
To
know
that
we
are
getting
some
support
in
that
arena.
Is
it's
just
really
important,
so
yeah?
F
F
L
Next
slide,
please,
so
I
will
note
what
wasn't
included,
or
at
least
some
other
things
that
were
not
included
in
the
state
gov
bill
and
to
your
point,
come
to
vice
president.
There
are,
while
there
were
many
provisions
that
were
fought
against,
that
would
have
really
disproportionately
impacted
people's
ability
to
vote
gladly.
They
were
not
included,
and
one
of
those
that
was
not
included
was
a
ranked
choice.
L
L
Another
thing
that
was
not
included
that
relates
to
race
equity
was
a
racial
equity
impact.
Note
in
an
attempt
to
ensure
that
any
piece
of
legislation
that
is
proposed
at
the
legislature
takes
into
account
very
similar
to
how
the
city
of
minneapolis
we
have
our
ria
that
we
are
looking
at
analyzing
proposed
legislation
in
a
meaningful
way
to
understand
what
the
implications
will
be
on
all
communities,
local
communities,
committees
of
color,
etc.
L
L
Moving
on
now
to
housing,
the
housing
bill,
totaled,
125.6
million
dollars
included
in
the
housing
bill,
was
housing
infrastructure
bond
dollars,
and
that
is
included
because
this
year,
while
there
were
there,
was
an
attempt
to
get
a
bonding
bill
passed.
Ultimately,
there
wasn't
a
new
bonding
bill
passed.
There
were
technical
fixes
to
previously
passed
bonding
bills,
but
not
new
funding
allocated
essentially
through
a
binding
bill.
A
hundred
million
dollars
again
was
set
aside
for
housing
infrastructure
bonds
to
build
and
preserve
to
build
new,
affordable
housing
or
preserve
existing
affordable
housing
statewide.
L
In
addition
to
that,
3.5
3.25
million
dollars
was
also
set
aside
for
home
ownership
opportunities
to
increase
the
number
of
people
who
have
the
ability
to
buy
affordable
homes,
some
started
homes,
etc.
2.8
million
dollars
was
set
aside
for
the
housing
challenge
program.
This
is
a
very
flexible
funding
tool
that
is
used
even
by
our
cped
department
to
complete
funding
packages.
L
Housing
challenge
dollars
could
be
have
a
slew
of
different
uses,
and
so
it's
a
it's
typically
included
in
the
housing
project.
To
close
up
a
housing
project,
1.75
million
was
set
aside
for
manufacture
home
park
grants
a
new
provision
there.
A
million
dollars
was
set
aside
for
homeowner
home
ownership
assistance
fund,
so
things
like
down
payment
assistance,
things
like
home
ownership,
buying
classes,
etc.
These
dollars
can
be
used
for
that.
L
In
addition
to
address
the
increase
in
the
number
of
people
who
are
experiencing
homelessness,
there
was
a
housing
task
force
that
was
developed
through
the
housing
bill
and
200k
was
set
aside
to
help
support
that
task
force.
I
will
note
that
the
city
of
minneapolis
hennepin
county,
and
perhaps
our
sister
city,
st
paul
and
ramsey
county,
are
they
are
considering
and
perhaps
will
be
applying.
I
know
that
we
will
be
applying
as
a
city
to
have
a
representative
sit
on
this
housing
task
force.
L
Some
other
policies
that
were
passed
that
relates
to
tenant
protections
is
a
15-day.
Pre-Filing
notice
was
codified
into
law.
This
was
a
part
that
was
included
in
the
governor's
eviction
moratorium
policy,
and
so
the
15
pre-filing
notice
was
pulled
out
of
that
pulled
out
of
that
eviction.
Moratorium
and
now
has
become
law,
so
this
is
going
to
be
law
going
forward.
L
L
It's
a
this
loan
program
is
a
program
that
the
city
of
minneapolis
also
utilizes,
and
we
were
seeking
an
elimination
of
of
this
extension
for
a
percent
beyond
110,
and
so
that
was
passed
into
the
bill
and
then,
lastly,
there
is
now
federally
recognized
american
indian
tribes
in
minnesota
and
tribal
housing.
Corporations
are
now
eligible
for
a
list
of
affordable
housing
grants
that
are
held
at
minnesota,
housing
planning,
jason
c.
E
Thank
you,
chair,
ellison,
director.
More
just
had
a
question
on
the
one
million
dollars
for
the
local
match
for
the
state
house,
the
housing
trust
fund.
I
want
to
see
if
minneapolis
would
qualify.
I
know.
Historically,
they
define
a
trust
fund
as
something
that's
dedicated
funds
and
while
we're
historically,
we
give
money
to
our
affordable
housing
trust
fund,
it's
not
a
dedicated
fund
and
so
just
want
to
make
sure
that's
something
we
could
qualify
for.
L
Chair
ellison
and
council
member
schrader,
we
would
have
to
get
back
to
you
on
that,
because
this
legislation
just
passed.
We
have
to
we're
waiting
to
see
how
mhfa
is
essentially
going
to
be
interpreting
this.
And
so,
if
it's,
okay
with
you,
we'll
do
some
some
follow-up
we'll
check
in
with
mhfa
and
see
how
they're
they're
interpreting
it
based
on
especially
what
our
programming
language
says
and
let
you
know
what
that
qualification
looks
like
like.
L
I
Thanks,
mr
chair,
I
wonder
I
think
the
next
slide
is
about
the
eviction
phase
out,
but
my
understanding
of
some
of
these
well,
especially
the
15-day
pre-filing
notice
that
that's
that
will
essentially
expire
in
early
october,
because
it's
tied
into
the
moratorium
phase-out
this
105-day
period.
I
just
wondered.
I
know
it's
hard
to
predict.
I
wondered
if
there's
any
chance
in
in
special
session,
or
I
mean
the
next
session
would
be
late.
If
there's
talk
about
making
some
of
these
phase-out
protections
more
permanent,
I
know
it's
been
a
priority
in
our
legislative
agenda.
I
L
Yes,
chair,
allison
and
come
to
president
bender
they're
they're
there
has
there
was
a
yes.
There
was
an
attempt
during
the
regular
session,
to
pull
out
portions
of
the
eviction
moratorium
that
we
know
work
that
we
know
would
decrease
the
frequency
in
which
people
are
evicted
from
their
homes
and
there
will
continue
to
be
an
attempt
to
codify
those
important
policies
into
law,
even
in
future
sessions.
You
know.
L
L
L
L
That
is
available
to
help
them
pay
their
rent
and
15
days
is
what
was
ultimately
agreed
to
the.
The
policy
also
prohibits
a
landlord
for
evicting
for
non-payment
of
rent
against
attendance,
who
has
a
pending
application
through
the
state's
rent,
help
program
or
the
city's
program
as
well,
because
there
are
many
people
who
are
applying
for
assistance,
and
so
if
they
have
an
application
that
is
pending
and
they
can
provide
documentation,
documentation
could
look
like
a
photo
of
their
application
once
they've
submitted
it
on
their
phones.
L
And
I'll
move
on
to
the
next
slide
now
and
very
briefly,
we'll
go
over
what
was
not
included
in
the
housing
bill
that
really
preempted
cities,
authorities
to
achieve
the
goals
and
and
things
that
we
know
our
residents
are
asking
for.
There
were
a
lot
of
preemptive
housing
policies
that
were
included
on
the
senate
side
from
preempting
some
zoning
and
conditional
use
approvals.
L
L
M
Hi
good
almost
afternoon,
everyone
allison
nessie
with
intergovernmental
relations,
so
chair
ellison
committee
members
we'll
be
walking
through
the
remaining
issues,
so
climate
and
energy,
which
was
session
law,
chapter
4,
a
total
budget
of
84.9
million,
which
sets
the
budget
for
the
department
of
commerce
and
the
public
utilities
commission
in
that
included,
2.5
million
for
the
north
minneapolis
clean
energy
training
center,
which
has
getting
off
the
ground
with
multiple
sources
of
funding.
But
it
was
great
to
see
the
state
investing
in
that
work.
M
It
included
language
to
develop
a
statewide
energy
transition
plan.
Work
group
singularly
mostly
the
first
task
is
to
focus
on
facilities
that
will
be
retiring
from
you,
starting
with
prairie
island,
but
also
setting
a
comprehensive
statewide
framework
as
other
non-renewable
energy
facilities
retire
over
the
next
few
decades.
The
cold
weather
rule
was
extended
for
two
weeks,
so
it
was
extended
on
the
front
and
the
back
end
the
front
end
in
october
and
the
back
end
in
april.
M
Please
the
environment
and
natural
resources
session
law,
chapter
6
on
the
total
budget
is
1.6
billion.
It
includes
3.4
million
for
emerald
ash
borer
mitigation
funding,
specifically
to
local
governments,
to
remove
and
replace
trees
and
includes
1.99
million
for
local
government
water
infrastructure
grant
program
which
is
funded
through
the
mpca.
M
M
It
also
includes
included
a
prohibition
on
the
manufacture
and
sale
of
food
packaging
containing
p-facets
and
then
1.2
million
to
again
to
local
governments
to
address
emerald
ash.
Borer
and
then
3.5
million
to
provide
surveys,
assessments,
trainings
and
assistance
and
grants
to
to
manage
emerald
ash
borer
as
we're
seeing
warmer
climates
and
the
issue
growing
in
the
state
of
minnesota.
M
Absolutely
so,
admittedly,
we
are
missing.
We
are
missing
a
team
member
who
had
a
pre-planned
vacation
today,
steve
huser,
and
he
has
been
covering
that
issue
closely.
So
I'll
do
my
best
as
we've
been
tangentially.
We
all
you
know
talk
to
each
other
about
these
things,
but
the
biggest
barrier
right
now
is:
is
the
senate
and
the
various
inter
interest
groups
that
still
have
apprehension
about
this
and
are
not
comfortable
yet
with
either
a
statewide
or
even
a
local?
M
M
Oh
can
we
go
back
to
the
capital
investment
site?
Thank
you.
So
real
quick.
As
director
moore
mentioned,
there
was
not
a
capital
investment,
also
known
as
bonding
bill
this
year,
but
there
were
technical
modifications
and
three
minneapolis
projects
were
included.
The
upper
harbor
terminal
infrastructure
bonds,
which
need
to
be
encumbered
by
the
end
of
2022
due
to
covid
and
the
pause
of
the
engagement
and
planning
around
the
final
plan
for
upper
harbor
terminal.
We
needed
to
extend
that
so
we
it's
now
extended
through
2024.
M
pioneers
and
soldiers,
bonding
project
which
was
awarded
to
the
city
in
the
2017
bonding
bill.
We
narrowed
the
scope
due
to
the
cost
of
steel.
In
the
last
year.
We
did
not
have
enough
funds
to
do
the
project
that
we
proposed
in
2017.,
the
norway
house
bonds
were
extended
through
2026,
while
that
is
a
non-profit.
The
cities
does
serve
as
the
fiscal
agent
and,
as
director
moore
also
mentioned,
there
was
24
million
in
capital
grants
through
the
jobs
bill.
M
Next
slide,
please
all
right
the
jobs
and
economic
development
bill.
Our
team
worked
really
closely
and
hard
on
going
getting
funds
to
assist
businesses
and
property
owners
that
faced
damage
during
the
unrest
events
of
last
summer,
so
that
effort
would
be
reflected
in
in
the
jobs
and
economic
development
bill,
which
is
session
law
chapter
10..
The
total
budget
of
the
bill
is
1.6
billion
for
state
agencies
of
deed,
the
department
of
economic.
M
M
Businesses
that
have
under
200
full-time
workers
will
be
given
priority
to
receive
grants
up
to
25
000
if
they
have
yet
to
receive
assistance
from
other
levels
of
government.
The
bill
also
includes
35
million
in
funds
to
businesses
surrounding
organizations
in
the
metro.
So
that's
a
lot
of
technical
assistant
dollars
for
our
nonprofit
partners.
M
And
this
is
the
last.
This
is
the
last
one,
so
transportation,
the
total
budget
was
7.27
billion,
and
this
is
a
budget
for
mndot
department
of
public
safety
as
they
run,
division
of
vehicle
services
and
then
metro
transit.
This
is
a
220.4
million
dollar
increase
over
the
base
budget,
so
transportation
has
had
a
significant
change
in
funding
since
2008
with
the
increase
of
the
gas
tax.
M
Slide,
please
all
right.
So,
as
director
moore
also
mentioned
september,
there's
anticipated
to
be
a
special
session
to
include
work
around
pandemic
pay
for
frontline
workers
using
american
rescue
plan
dollars
and
there's
also
possibly
a
bonding
bill,
but
we
never
know
until
it's
done
when
it
comes
to
bonding
and
the
2022
regular
session.
Looking
ahead,
the
2022
special
session
is
a
is
a
policy
year,
so
it
will
be
hard
to
get
new
money
for
anything.
That
being
said,
there's
still
a
lot
of
decisions
around
american
rescue
plan
dollars.
M
B
J
M
Chair
allison,
council
member
gordon
a
lot
of
discussion,
but
not
a
lot
of
action.
A
lot
of
discussion
in
the
house.
This
is
representative,
mary
murphy,
who's.
One
of
the
longest
serving
legislators
in
the
state
of
minnesota
is
pushing
this
heart
and
she
is.
It
will
mostly
be
another
requested
again
in
the
2022
bonding
bill.
There
was
three
million
dollars:
three
million
dollars
in
the
2020
bonding
bill.
To
I'm
sorry,
my
puppy
acquire
some
land
that
would
be
necessary
for
the
project
to
move
forward.
J
J
I
think
council
members
typically
appreciate-
and
I
can
certainly
I
iger
chair-
can
help
us
maybe
see
and
understand
how
we
can
get
better
involved
and
coordinated,
going
forward
to
influence
that
agenda.
I
think
you
all
have
done
just
a
fantastic
job,
communicating
the
work
but
also
being
there
and
advocating
for
us
and
also
dealing
with
us
throughout
the
session,
as
we
have
this
idea,
and
this
idea,
let's
make
this
change,
and
how
can
we
get
that
in?
Does
it
go
on
our
agenda?
Can
we
pass
a
resolution?
J
A
A
The
aid
alone
from
the
arpa
that
was
secured,
proved
critical
to
the
financial
well-being
of
our
city,
enabled
us
to
really
step
up
and
help
our
community
even
more
at
a
time
when
it
was
so
needed,
and
these
results,
though,
go
as
you've
seen
way
beyond
the
arpa,
which
includes
rebuilding
from
civil
unrest,
affordable
housing
and
homelessness.
Transit
workers
supports
the
economy,
so
many
different
things
and
this
work
is
highly
technical.
A
It's
highly
detailed
and
I
think
just
the
success
that
we've
seen
coming
out
of
this
special
session
and
even
all
the
details
in
this
presentation
really
speaks
to
this
team's
competence
and
strengths
and
performance
they've
done
an
outstanding
job,
we're
so
grateful
for
the
critical
role
that
they
play
in
in
our
city's
operations
and
really
benefiting
the
people
of
minneapolis,
so
I
just
want
to
commend
them
for
their
work.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
so
much
and
really
appreciate
the
presentation.
F
You
councilmember
ellison,
and
I
was
trying
to
go
before
councilmember
johnson
because
he
stole
all
of
my
talking
points.
No
I'm
I
yeah
17
straight
months
of
session
and
it's
just
incredible
and
and
the
increased
activity
at
the
federal
level,
which
has
been
pretty
unprecedented
in
recent
years
as
well,
yeah
everything
that
that
council
member
johnson
said
and
and
more
kudos.
F
M
Sure
ellison
council
vice
president
jenkins.
They
have
not
yet
they
are
starting
with
the
main
street
revitalization
program.
So
for
private
development,
which
they'll
release
august
3rd,
then
they'll
move
on
to
the
the
cash
grants.
If
you
will
for
nonprofits,
indeed
has
historically
not
been
real,
doesn't
do
a
lot
of
bonding
per
se,
so
they're
they're.
M
M
F
M
Yes,
yes,
it
will
so
it
will.
You
know
it.
It
will
be
very
similar.
I
believe
my
understanding
thus
far.
It
will
be
very
similar
to
the
state's
you
know:
capital
investment
process
existing
the
just
the
fund
source
is
different,
so
it
doesn't
if
it
goes
to
a
nonprofit.
The
city
does
not
need
to
be
the
fiscal
agent
owner
of
the
property,
since
it's
a
cash
grant,
but
the
vetting
and
the
requirements
around
the
building
and
will
be
similar
to
to
the
existing
bonding
application
process.
F
B
B
Seeing
no
further
discussion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
file
that
report
all
right.
Next,
we
will
receive
reports
from
the
standing
committees
on
matters
to
be
considered
by
the
full
council
this
friday,
and
so
we
will
begin
with
the
business
inspections,
housing
and
zoning
committee
chaired
by
councilmember
goodman.
E
You
go
fantastic
thanks
so
much
the
biz
committee
will
be
reporting,
13
items
for
approval
tomorrow.
The
first
is
the
passes
of
a
resolution
authoring
the
authorizing
the
land
sale
at
3601
east
44th
street.
The
second
is
the
passage
of
approving
the
tax
increment
financing
for
the
stelling
yard,
senior
housing
project
number
three
and
number
four
both
deal
with
the
single
room
occupancy.
The
one
number
three
is
passing
of
the
housing
code,
ordinances
and
number
four
is
passing
the
zoning
code.
E
For
that
number
five
is
the
granting
of
an
appeal
for
a
property
at
3415,
two
and
a
half
street
northeast.
We
will
be
granting
that
appeal
and
also
adopting
findings
that
have
been
submitted
to
all
of
you.
Number
six
is
also
granting
an
appeal
for
the
property
at
216,
7th
street
south
subject
to
conditions
and
number
seven
is
the
approval
of
the
gans
gambling
license.
Approvals.
Number
eight
is
the
approval
of
a
new
appointment
to
the
minneapolis
arts.
E
Commission
number
four:
is
the
rental
dwelling
license
reinstatement
for
the
property
at
2934
colfax
avenue.
North
number
10
is
some
the
authorizing
the
submittal
of
grant
approve
applications
to
for
the
2021
metropolitan
council.
Livable
communities
demonstration
account
as
well
as
the
livable
communities
demonstration
account
transit
oriented
development.
E
Number
11
is
the
contract
with
hennepin
county
for
emergency
rental
assistance
program.
Processing.
Support
number
12
is
the
denial
of
a
local
historical
landmark
designation
at
10,
35
14th
avenue
southeast
and
number
13
is
their
approval
of
a
rezoning
at
224,
cedar
lake
road,
south
and
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
D
F
F
Ordinance
item
number
two
authorizes:
the
name
change
of
the
echo
neighborhood
to
the
east
bidet
makaska
neighborhood
item
number:
three
is
a
resolution
recognizing
the
confederate
flag
as
a
symbol
of
hate
items.
Four
and
five
are
legal
settlements,
item
six
authorizes
the
city
to
submit
and
amicus
brief
and
number
seven
accepts
the
low
bid
of
morkon
construction
inc
item
number.
F
Item
number
15
items
number
15-29
are
various
contract
amendments
related
to
the
new
public
service
building
project,
many
of
which
are
closing
out
those
contracts.
Item
number
30
is
a
resolution
adopting
title
and
balance
ballot
language
for
the
proposed
public
safety
charter
amendment
and
I
will
stand
for
any
question.
B
E
K
Apologies,
the
public
health
and
safety
committee
is
bringing
forward
three
items
for
the
cycles
council
meeting.
The
first
is
the
minneapolis
advisory
committee
on
people
with
disabilities,
new
appointments
confirming
those
appointments.
The
second
is
a
grant
from
the
united
states
department
of
health
and
human
services
for
advancing
health
literacy.
K
B
B
I
Thanks,
mr
chair,
the
executive
committee
had
two
items
both
were:
appointments
of
interim
positions,
the
director
of
regulatory
services,
as
well
as
the
interim
director
or
excuse
me,
the
interim
city
coordinator,
happy
to
answer
any
questions
about
that.
We
we
had
a
little
bit
of
discussion,
we're
able
to
hear
about
about
the
two
women
who
are
stepping
into
those
interim
roles
thanks.