►
From YouTube: October 27, 2021 Transportation & Public Works Committee
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
Good
afternoon,
this
is
the
regularly
scheduled
meeting
of
the
transportation
public
works
committee.
This
day
october,
27
2021,
I'm
council
member
reich-
and
I
am
chaired
chair
of
this
committee
and
I'm
joined
by
my
colleagues
as
we
begin
I'll
note
for
the
record
that
this
meeting
has
remote
participation
by
members
of
the
city
staff
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statute.
Section
13t
point
zero:
two
one
due
to
the
declared
local
public
health
emergency,
the
city
will
be
recording
and
posting.
B
D
B
That
carries
and
we
now
can
proceed
with
today's
agenda,
of
which
we
have
six
items.
I
will
go
through
the
consent
items
two
through
six.
Anyone
can
pull
any
item
for
further
discussion
as
they
wish
from
the
committee
item.
Two
is
the
cooperative
agreement
with
mndot
for
the
trunk
highway
55
project.
B
Three
is
the
contract
amendment
with
western
waterproofing
company
for
the
ramp
b,
helix
overlay
project
four
is
the
layout
approval
of
variance
requests
from
the
university
of
southeast
and
fourth
street
southeast
street
improvements.
Project
five
is
approving
the
city
of
minneapolis
comments
on
the
e-line
bus,
rapid
transit
draft
quarter
plan
and
six
is
the
consolidated
updating
the
public
works,
parking
service
fees
and
rate
schedule.
B
F
F
Sure
mr
chair
have
been
working
very
hard
with
city
staff
and
met
council
staff
on
the
e-line
proposed
route
schedule
and
concerned
property
owners
residents
on
the
13th
ward
part
of
of
the
e-line
project.
There
is
a
lot
of
feedback
that
we
are
fielding
and
we're
and
isn't
necessarily
appropriate
for
inclusion
in
this
specific
letter
back.
But
I've
been
trying
to
encourage
people
in
the
community
to
work
more
directly
with
metro
transit.
F
That
didn't
actually
happen
on
a
timeline
that
worked
and
so
in
reading
it
on
the
published
agenda,
I
would
like
to
suggest
that
we
add
in
and
ask
basically
for
metro
transit
to
continue
working
with
our
constituents.
F
In
local
businesses
that
are
in
this
already
built
space
to
include
the
goal
of
eliminating
as
little
parking
as
possible
without
impacting
the
efficiency
of
the
brt
line.
So
I
can.
I
guess
I
can
put
that
into
the
chat
here
and
I
can
explain
it.
You
know
a
lot
of
the
work
done
to
retrofit
in
a
bus,
rapid
transit
system
into
an
existing
space.
F
In
this
case,
the
existing
space
of
the
six
route
in
most
of
the
places
here
is
that
you're
literally
moving
the
bus
stops
that
used
to
be
on
two
different
corners
to
the
opposite:
two
corners
right
and
you're.
Doing
that,
as
I
understand
it
from
city
engineers
to
to
keep
the
efficiency
of
the
line
going
so
that
a
bus
when
it
comes
to
a
stop
is
not
stopped
at
a
stoplight
after
they
pick
people
up
and
drop
people
off,
I'm
not
trying
to
impact
that.
F
So
I
I
was
able
to
put
it
in
the
chat,
but
I
am
sorry
I'm
just
trying
to
get
everything
here.
I'd
like
to
add
this
as
a
bullet
point.
B
Okay,
I
see
that
in
the
chat
and
council
president
bender
wishes
to
comment
on
the
item
we're
discussing.
G
G
Actually,
ironically,
with
all
the
conversations
about
14
bosses
and
council
members,
just
kind
of
skirting
our
adopted
policy
to
go
around
that
and
direct
staff
outside
of
the
process.
I
actually
think
this
would
be
a
terrible
example
of
doing
just
that.
We
have
adopted
citywide
policy,
individual
city
council
members
may
not
support
our
policies
to
prioritize
transportation,
equity
and
access
and
the
sort
of
mode
prioritization
that
we
have
adopted
as
our
complete
streets
policy.
G
While
it
may
not
be
the
intention
of
this
action,
that
would
be
its
impact
as
proposed.
So
I
am
very
opposed
to
that.
Both
in
substance,
the
e-line
needs
to
be
prioritizing
not
just
transit
operations,
which,
of
course,
our
partners
at
metro
transit
are
focused
on,
but
also
access
to
stations,
the
pedestrian
realm
safe
functioning
for
all
of
the
road
users.
Again
following
the
adopted
policy
in
our
complete
streets
policy,
so
all
of
that
will
be
worked
out
in
these
details.
B
Thank
you
for
that
comment.
Council
president.
I
believe
council
member
palmisano,
which
is
the
floor.
F
Thank
you.
I
do
just
take
objection
to
that.
I
am
not
directing
city
staff
behind
the
scenes
and
I
support
all
of
our
own
policies,
and
I
think
that
we've
made
that
pretty
clear
in
this
letter.
I
do
ask
that
we
consider
this
as
one
of
our
complete
streets
form
of
being
able
to
get
people
to
these
regional
to
these
regional
centers,
so
that
they
can
take
a
very
efficient
bus
system.
That's
carrying
more
than
one
passenger
to
wherever
they're
needing
to
go.
B
Anyone
else
wish
to
comment
on
this
item
so
that
edition,
I
think,
you're
suggesting
an
amendment
to
the
letter.
I
you
know,
I
might
suggest
that
that's
on
the
table
here-
oh
councilmember,
johnson,
I'll,
give
you
the
floor
before
I
get
into
my
thing.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
was
just
wondering
maybe
if
the
clerk's
office
would
be
able
to,
and
especially
I
know,
it's
tight
timing
here,
but
if
there's
some
additional
comments
be
able
to
get
the
letter
up
with
this
edition
kind
of
in
line
so
that
we
could
see
contextually.
H
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
for
council
members
in
the
public,
and
then
I
guess
this
is
maybe
more
of
just
a
question
as
I'm
thinking
about
this
issue,
is
you
know
the
way
that
this
is
phrased
from
council
member
palmisano
is
without
impacting
the
efficiency
of
the
brt
line?
H
So
I
guess
I'm
trying
to
think
about
that
in
the
context
of
if,
if
you
know
to
the
concerns
of
council
president
bender
that
this
would
conflict
with
policy,
I
guess,
if
there's
more
comments
or
thoughts
on
that,
you
know
with
somebody
considering
this
I'd
appreciate
that
from
both
councilmember
palmisano
and
council,
president
bender,
because
it
just
seems
to
me
like
by
stating
in
here
without
impacting
the
efficiency
of
the
brt
line.
I
guess
I
don't
know
what
the
trade-off
would
be
by
adding
this.
You
know
what
I
mean.
I
don't.
H
A
A
Can
you
is
that
right?
Mr
chair,
correct.
That's
the
theory,
because
I
do
know
that
later
it
says
the
city
remains
committed
to
partnering,
with
metro,
transit
and
hennepin
county,
to
evaluate
the
potential
to
implement
bus,
only
lanes
to
support
the
speed
and
reliability
of
the
e-line
and
I'd
be
inclined
to
say
no,
even
if
that
means
we
don't
provide
as
much
parking
as
some
people
would
want-
and
I
am
concerned
about
the
word-
efficiency,
of
course,
speed
and
reliability.
B
Thank
you,
consumer
gordon
councilmember,
fletcher.
I
Thank
you,
mr
chair
I'll,
also
be
voting
no
on
this.
I
I
think
that
it's
important
to
recognize
that
we
have
a
set
of
policies
holistically
for
designing
the
public
realm
and
calling
out
parking.
Specifically.
I
I
want
to
agree
with
council
president
bender
that
it
privileges
parking
over
other
considerations
and
I
think,
as
we're
thinking
about
these
designs,
we're
thinking
about
multiple
factors,
including
the
preservation
of
trees,
including
you
know
how
we're
how
we're
using
boulevard
space,
including
providing
wide
walkable
sidewalks
for
people,
including
providing
safe
crossing
spaces
where
we
might
use
bump
outs
and
other
things
that
also
take
space,
and
so
when
we're
considering.
I
Do
we
take
space
for
public
realm
amenities
that
we
have
called
out
in
our
transportation
action
plan
and
are
planning
for
the
public
realm,
or
do
we
sort
of
prioritized
parking?
I
In
those
conversations,
I
think
it's
very
important
that
we
stick
to
the
set
of
policy
guidelines
that
we've
all
adopted
together,
and
so
I
I
object
to
specifically
calling
out
parking
recognizing
that
it
is
one
of
the
many
considerations
that
goes
into
every
street
design
process
and
that
I
don't
think
that
we
should
be
deviating
from
this
letter.
I
think
the
letter
is
well
crafted
and
references
our
policies
in
a
way
that's
respectful
of
the
four
years
of
council
process
that
we've
gone
through
to
craft
those
policies.
G
Yeah
thanks
mr
chair,
I
think
the
others
covered.
The
clarifications
I
wanted
to
make
operating
in
a
a
transit
priority
system
is
not
just
about
the
the
lanes
and
the
right-of-way,
but
also
all
of
these
other
access
and
amenities
which
are
so
critically
important
to
providing
that
kind
of
elevated
transit
service
that
makes
it
a
bus,
rep
and
transit
line
and
again
part
of
our
regional
system.
G
I
think
you
know,
rather
than
adding
in
this
one
particular
use
of
on-street
parking
as
a
priority,
which
again
is
deeply
antithetical
to
all
of
our
adopted
policy
if
it
may
be
more
appropriate
for
the
city
simply
to
reference
our
our
own
adopted
policies,
which
I
think
I
mean,
I
think
the
the
rest
of
the
letter
already
already.
Does
that
so
to
be
clear,
the
planning
process
is
happening
now
to
do
these
detailed
station
designs,
both
in
line
with
metro
transits
system
plans,
as
well
as
the
city
of
indianapolis's,
adopted
transportation
plans
and
priorities.
G
Purpose
of
this
would
seem
to
be
to
undermine
undermine
those
and
to
to
make
a
different
statement
that
that
isn't
captured
in
our
adopted
policies.
B
Well,
this
seemed
to
be
a
discrepancy
from
the
stated
intent
and
and
what
people
feel
the
impact
would
be
visa
vr.
Our
policy,
communications,
council,
member,
paul
lozano.
F
Mr
chair
councilmember
johnson
was
in
cuba
for
me.
Oh.
B
So
thank
you
for
pointing
that
out.
Councilmember
johnson
pardon
pardon
my.
H
Oversight
no
worries,
mr
chair.
I
appreciate
it
I'll
keep
my
remarks
short
and
ultimately
deferred
to
councilmember
palmasana
on
this,
but
I'm
wondering
just
listening
to
what
colleagues
have
said
in
looking
at
this
proposed
language.
If
maybe
a
tweak
to
the
language
would
be
something
that
could
be
agreeable
to
kind
of
all
the
parties
involved
with
this
by
changing
that
last
line.
B
Well,
on
that
point,
if
I
may
add
before
I
call
on
council
member
palmisano
is
reflecting
in
a
similar
situation,
different
points
being
raised
in
a
you
know,
different
project,
but
we
were
communicating
through
this
vehicle
of
our
formal
letter
how
we
wanted
to
put
in
more
language
and,
of
course
there.
The
intent
was
to
further
enhance
what
we
felt
were
on
the
policy
books
on
our
end,
to
make
sure
that
was
very
crystal
clear
to
the
receiving
jurisdiction.
B
We
did
did
not
do
that
in
committee.
We
just
sort
of
said
all
right,
we're
going
to
work
on
that
and
we'll
come
back
with
some
modified
language
before
a
final
vote.
Maybe
that
would
be
something
similar
we
can
do
here.
B
In
particular,
I
like
to
know
the
involvement
of
staff
and
their
opinion
on
it
and
usually
have
it
crafted
through
through
their
work
hearing
our
issues
and
concerns
has
been
helpful
for
me
in
the
final
product
but
anyways.
Having
said
that,
councilmember
paul
melcano.
F
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I'm
glad
that
the
council
president
referenced
that
or
acknowledged
that
the
rest
of
the
letter
does
go
into
detail
and
certainly
is
going
to
lift
up
two
met.
Council
are
agreed
upon
policies
and
and
procedures.
F
You
know
yes,
trees,
end
up
getting
removed
in
places
because
of
this
project
because
they
were
mature
on
these
two
sides
of
the
street.
Now
they'll
be
on
the
opposite,
two
sides
of
the
street.
Yes,
there
will
be
difficulties
in
fitting
this
in
and
fitting
all
of
this
in
an
equitable
way
in
the
public.
Realm
is
really
important,
but
I
guess
I
question:
how
will
the
public
be
heard
in
this
process
if
all
of
their
feedback
is
just
ignored
and
we
have
sent
volumes
of
feedback
into
public
works?
F
We've
organized
it
for
them,
and
I
guess
what
you're
telling
me
from
this
committee
is
that
the
city
is
not.
The
city
is
not
willing
to
put
in
feedback
that
we
got
when
we
asked
for
significant
feedback,
and
we
worked
to
to
get
that.
So
I
would
be
very
open
to
hearing
what
you
have
all
just
said
and
and
changing
this
motion
to
be,
as
council
member
johnson
suggests,
in
a
way
that
I
think
maybe
helps
us.
F
I
think
that
peace
is
important
to
put
in
about
the
efficiency
of
the
line,
but
I
also
appreciate
and
and
want
to
be
consistent
with
all
of
our
city's
adopted
policies.
F
So
I
I
also
know
that
we
can't
wait
on
this
any
longer.
We
do
need
to
get
this
in
because
the
feedback
that
I've
been
coaching
constituents
and
property
owners
in
the
space
to
get
in
knowing
that
there
would
never
be
room
to
include
their
feedback
in
the
city's
official
letter
needs
to
be
into
metro
transit
by
october
31st.
So
we
don't.
We
can't
bring
this
back
to
committee
and
that's
kind
of
the
difficulty
here
in
the
moment.
B
G
Thanks,
mr
chair,
I
think
one
thing
that's
happening
is
that
councilmember
palmisano
has
a
lot
of
detailed
knowledge
and
information
about
these
specific
stations
and
the
rest
of
us.
Don't
so
perhaps
it'd
be
helpful
to
hear
from
staff
about
you
know.
I
mean
I
don't
want
to
take
up
a
ton
of
time
in
designing
this
project
committee
right
now,
which
is
a
little
bit
of
my
concern
about
adding
this
very
specific
language
again
about
one
very
specific
use
of
space,
which
is
parking
when
we're
not
referencing
pedestrian
safety.
Greenery
storm
water
management.
G
G
So
it'd
be
maybe
helpful
since
we're
spending
so
much
time
on
this
to
hear
from
staff
about
what's
what's
the
process
of
station
design?
Is
there
anything
you
want
to
address
councilman
councilmember
palmerston?
It
was
concerns
about
her
constituents
feedback.
G
You
know
kind
of
what
level
of
planning
is
this
at
now?
Are
there
specific
stations
we're
talking
about
and
what
are
the
trade-offs?
Is
it
greenery
and
stormwater,
or
pedestrian
bulb
outs,
or
what
is
the
trade-off
for
space.
D
D
Katie,
white
transportation
planner,
where
transportation
planning
and
programming
is
available,
just
asked
her
to
kind
of
give
an
overview
of
the
process,
including
the
fact
that
there
is
a
second
round
of
public
comment
available
in
february
of
22.,
so
I
will
have
katie
give
an
overview.
Thank
you.
J
J
This
is
essentially
the
midpoint
of
a
very
long
process,
the
e-line
station
planning
started
in
maybe
even
2017,
but
certainly
2018
and
2019.
There
was
public
comment
about
the
future
of
a
potential
e-line
station.
There
was
question
at
the
time
whether
the
e-line
should
use
all
of
route
6
as
it
exists
today
and
stretch
from
southdale
to
the
university
of
minnesota
area
or
if
the
e-line
would
stop
and
be
terminate
downtown,
and
so
there
was
a
lengthy
engagement
process
at
the
time.
J
Part
of
the
discussion
was
also
whether
the
new
e-line
should
use
france
avenue
or
xerxes
avenue.
Both
of
those
are
used
today
on
the
route
six,
and
so
there
was
an
engagement
period
of
which
what
should
happen
along
those
legs
eventually
at
the
end
of
2019.
Actually,
I
believe
it
was
january
of
2020.
J
The
metropolitan
council
formally
selected
the
alignment
along
france
avenue,
as
opposed
to
xerxes
and
concurred
with
the
public
feedback
to
move
the
e-line
across
the
river
into
southeast
and
northeast
minneapolis,
and
so
that's
where
the
last
council
action
before
this
process
started
up
again
in
the
last
since
that
action
in
2020
in
january,
of
2020
metro
transit
staff
has
been
working
with
public
works,
to
identify
which
station
locations
and
where,
in
the
intersection,
the
station
location
should
fall,
and
so
that
was
happening
at
the
staff
level
in
2020
and
2021
and
then
in
the
spring
of
2021,
when
the
state
legislature
fully
funded
the
e-line
as
a
future
project.
J
Metro
transit
was
able
to
continue
and
move
into
the
project
and
the
corridor
plan
phase,
which
is
what
we
are
in
right
now.
This
is
the
recommended
corridor
plan
up
for
public
comment
through
the
end
of
october,
and
then
there
will
be
a
second
public
comment
period
in
february
of
2022
on
a
draft.
I'm
sorry
a
recommended
corridor
plan
and
then
metro
transit
will
release
a
final
corridor
plan
in
20
summer
of
2022
and
that
will
not
have
a
public
comment
period
associated
with
it.
J
I
know
that
council,
president
bender
had
a
lot
of
questions
wrapped
up
in
her
request,
and
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
nothing
that
I'm
missing
here.
G
I
think
that's
helpful,
I
mean
again,
I
think
the
comment
that's
being
proposed
to
be
added
as
a
specific
bullet
seems
to
be
intended
to
achieve
a
specific
outcome
at
specific
stations,
and
we
don't
know
what
the
trade-offs
are
at
those
stations.
It
sounds
like.
Maybe
the
planning
isn't
quite
to
that
phase
here,
but
I
guess
I'll
just
restate
that
as
a
challenge,
I
think
the
rest
of
the
policy
makers
would
have
in
in
call
it
calling
this
out
in
this
way.
B
Yeah,
so
you
know,
maybe
if
we
could
just
you
know,
move
this
without
recommendation
and
have
council
member
palmisano
work
with
katie
white
and
and
team
to
see
what
what
input
points
would
be
meaningful
per
the
public
input
that
counselor
palm
sound
was
referring
to
you
know.
Obviously,
we
care
about
process.
We
want
to
make
sure
people
think
the
process
is
meaningful.
There
might
be
other
touch
points.
B
If,
if
that's
agreeable
to
the
committee,
we
can
maybe
allow
us
to
move
on,
and
we
have
a
few
days
to
between
now
in
the
council
meeting
to
have
the
parties
work
through
those
details.
Maybe
come
up
with
something
or
not.
B
Okay,
so
I'm
going
to
move
everything
the
whole
consent
item
with
that
notation-
and
I
do
know
that
council
member
fletcher
way
early
on
wanted
to
talk
about
item
form.
I
Yes,
mr
joe,
thank
you.
I
don't
need
to
pull
this,
but
I
do
just
want
to
thank
everybody
who
worked
on
it.
The
county
has
done
really
terrific
work
working
with
the
city
on
our
priorities,
really
using
our
policy
documents
as
a
guide
and
we've
gotten
to
a
pretty
terrific
layout.
I
It
doesn't
get
probably
anybody
everything
that
they
wanted,
because
we're
always
going
to
be
working
with
limited
space,
but-
and
there
are
a
couple
of
places
where
it
probably
doesn't
narrow
traffic
as
much
as
some
would
have
liked
and
a
couple
of
places
where
it
takes
a
few
parking
spaces.
But
honestly
we
got
to
something
really
good.
I
That's
got
protected
bike
lanes
two
directions
along
university,
so
the
people
biking
around
campus
have
a
great
safe
way
to
get
around,
as
well
as
bike
lane
on
fourth
and
stronger
throughput
in
support
of
this
light
rail
transit
project
throughout.
So
I
wanna
really
thank
the
university
for
digging
in
and
working
with
us
on
their
objections
and
getting
to
a
place
that
they
could
support
it
and
wanna.
I
Thank
the
neighborhood
association
for
their
engagement
on
this
there's
been
just
a
lot
of
really
good
local
work
to
get
to
a
place
where
I
think
we
have
a
good
layout.
That's
really
gonna
improve
safety
for
all
users,
so
thank
you
and
I
just
want
to
help
everybody
feel
really
good
about
voting.
Yes,
on
this
consent
item.
B
Thank
you,
for
you
know
that
outline
of
all
the
participation
you
know
in
my
briefings.
I
was
very
impressed
with
the
different
competing
interests,
but
to
get
resolution
was
no
small
feat
but,
as
customer
fletcher
suggests,
consensus
was
hammered
out
and-
and
I
have
to
admit
from
afar
it
looks
pretty
pretty
spectacular
and
proposed.
B
So
thanks
for
highlighting
that
councilman
fletcher
and
just
making
sure
everyone's
in
line.
So
with
that,
if
there's
no
further
conversation
and
I
didn't
miss
anything
in
queue,
I'll
move
all
items
forward
to
full
council,
noting
some
additional
work
may
be
had
for
item
regarding
the
e-line
and
I'll.
Ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
C
Mr
chair,
can
I
just
clarify
that
item
five
will
be
moved
as
sent
forward
without
recommendation.
B
A
D
K
Thank
you,
director,
jelly
and
good
afternoon.
Chair
reich
and
committee
members,
I'm
dylan,
fried
I'm
the
assistant
parking
systems
manager
assigned
to
art
on
street
parking
and
public
works
today
we're
bringing
forward
this
ordinance
amendment.
It
addresses
chapter
478
of
code
relating
to
parking
standing
and
stop,
and
stopping
the
amendment
is
part
of
a
broader
effort
within
public
works
to
modernize
ordinance
in
titles
17
and
18
that
address
street
sidewalks
and
traffic
code.
K
K
The
overall
goal
of
this
specific
amendment
in
parking
standing
stopping
is
really
to
modernize
the
language
for
current
conditions
and
situations.
Generally
speaking,
the
updates
to
ordinance
kind
of
alter
the
ordinance
to
reflect
the
current
conditions
and
practices
with
it
that
we're
doing
today.
K
K
One
of
the
notable
changes
you'll
see
from
each
article
is
removing
all
the
fee
and
rate
values
from
ordinance.
They
were
often
directly
written
into
the
ordinance
and
have
been
updated
subsequently
by
resolution.
So
we're
striking
all
that
language
and
replacing
it
by
language
just
clarifying
that
the
fees
are
set
by
council
resolution
and
then.
K
But
then
the
we
as
a
companion
item
to
this,
we
have
a
parking
services
fee
and
rate
schedule.
That
is
also
being
passed
on
the
consent
agenda
today.
So
I'm
going
to
spend
just
a
couple
minutes
going
through
the
changes
specific
to
each
article,
so
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide
thanks.
K
Article
2
on
parking
is
about
parking
meters,
we're
generally
shifting
the
language
in
the
past.
A
lot
of
the
language
refers
to
parking
meters,
specifically
as
individual
devices
and
as
we've
gone
to
multi-space
pay
stations,
we're
just
kind
of
altering
the
language
to
refer
to
metered
parking
areas
more
as
zones
rather
than
specific
devices.
K
We're
also
removing
the
formula
that
we
use
to
calculate
meter,
hooding
fees
and
again
just
replacing
that
by
language
stating
that
the
fees
are
set
by
council
resolution
and
then
there
is
free
parking
at
meters
on
all
city
holidays
and
since
we
added
juneteenth
as
a
holiday,
just
this
last
year,
we're
formally
incorporating
that
as
one
of
the
holidays
that
people
are
excused
from
paying
parking
leaders
next
slide.
Please.
K
One
of
the
notable
or
noticeable
changes
in
this
is
a
pretty
large
reformatting
of
the
ordinance
relating
to
critical
parking
areas,
our
resident
permit
program.
It
had
been
modified
at
several
different
points
in
the
past,
and
so
we
are
kind
of
reformatted
that
again
to
be
consistent
with
clerk's
office
standards.
For
writing
ordinance.
K
It
does
explicitly
state
you
need
a
bumper
sticker
on
your
car
and
we
have
shifted
to
having
the
permit
assigned
to
the
license
plate
virtually
instead
we're
removing
a
section
on
painting
curb
clearances,
given
that
our
curbs
are
covered
by
snow
half
the
year.
We
discontinued
that
practice
many
years
ago
and
we
are
adding
a
new
section
within
this
area
to
establish
electric
vehicle-only
zones
to
be
in
support
of
the
city's
eb
charging
station
network
that
we're
working
on
with
st
paul
next
slide.
Please.
K
Then
finally,
article
6
same
thing:
we're
removing
all
fee
and
rate
values
and
passing
those
by
council
resolution
standardizing
language
around
commercial
loading
zones.
In
the
past
they
were
often
referred
to
as
truck
zones,
but
we
have
shifted
to
refer
to
all
commercial
loading
zones
as
commercial
rather
than
calling
them
truck
zones.
We're
striking
language
about
a
review
committee
for
commercial
vehicle
permits.
Many
years
ago.
K
There
were
changes
with
with
with
state
registration
and
so
supersede
a
lot
of
the
past
ordinance
around
commercial
vehicles
and
then
we're
changing
I'll
mention
of
handicap
zones
to
be
disability
zones
consistent
with
the
americans
with
disabilities
act
and
change
there.
So
that
is
it
for
the
summary
of
the
overviews
and
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
B
B
I
E
B
That
carries
and
will
proceed
to
full
council.
That
is
the
end
of
our
agenda,
and
if
there
is
no
objection
from
committee,
I
will
call
this
meeting
adjourned.
Thank
you.
Everyone.