►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Good
afternoon
welcome
to
the
regular
meeting
of
the
business
inspections,
housing
and
zoning
committee
for
today,
which
is
february
16
2021,
I'm
lisa
goodman
and
I'm
chair
of
the
committee.
As
we
begin
I'll
know
for
the
record,
this
meeting
has
remote
participation
by
members
of
the
city,
council
and
city
staff
is
authorized
under
minnesota
statute,
section
13d
.021
as
a
result
of
the
declared
local
public
health
emergency
at
this
time,
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role,
so
we
can
verify
that
there
is
a
quorum
today.
A
B
Let
the
record
reflect
we
have
a
quorum
in
recognition
of
february
as
black
history
month.
Fire
chief
tyner
has
challenged
city
council
members
to
open
each
public
meeting
with
a
historical
fact
tied
to
black
history
month.
In
that
spirit,
on
this
day
in
black
history,
in
1856,
frederick
douglass
was
elected
as
president
of
the
friedman
savings
and
trust
company,
a
secure
banking
institution
that
had
been
chartered
by
the
u.s
government
to
encourage
economic
development
among
among
newly
emancipated
communities
in
the
post-civil
war
period.
B
B
With
that
I'm
going
to
move
to
the
consent
agenda,
which
is
items
5-13
item
number
five
is
a
land
sale
for
the
west
broadway
curve,
affordable
housing
project.
This
would
be
setting
a
public
hearing
item.
Six
is
also
setting
a
public
hearing
for
a
land
sale
at
2837,
chicago
avenue
to
a
line
of
health
systems.
Item
7
is
passing
resolution
granting
approval
from
hennepin
county's
housing
and
redevelopment
authority
to
undertake
a
project
in
minneapolis
at
the
loring
towers,
which
is
15
east
grant.
Street
item
number.
B
Eight:
are
emergency
solution
grants
supplemental
funding,
I'll
just
read
the
names
of
the
organizations.
Aliveness
is
receiving
a
grant
for
rapid
rehousing,
as
is
housing
link,
vail
place,
youth
link
and
we're
also
authorizing
a
joint
powers
agreement
with
the
county
to
administer
the
esg
rapid
rehousing
funds.
Item
number
nine
is
an
extension
of
the
minneapolis
small
and
medium
size,
family
multi-family
loan
program.
This
is
a
five-year
extension
item.
B
E
C
F
G
B
Now
those
items
are
approved
with
that:
we'll
move
to
the
public
hearing
agenda
starting
with
item
number
one,
which
is
passage
of
an
ordinance
with
regard
to
elevators
and
conveyance
device,
ordinances
and
I'll
call
on
mr
poor.
I
believe
to
give
that.
H
Report
good
afternoon
good
afternoon,
chair
goodman
council
members,
the
ordinance
before
you
is
in
regards
to
the
elevator
program.
So
this
is
an
action
that
repeals
the
ordinance
requiring
the
city
to
perform
elevator
inspections.
This
action
is
the
final
step
in
transitioning.
This
work
from
the
city
to
the
state
of
minnesota.
H
The
city
adopted
the
2021
budget,
and
this
does
not
include
this
activity.
The
state
of
minnesota
began
exercising
full
permitting
and
inspections
authority
over
the
existing
and
newly
installed
elevators
within
the
city
of
minneapolis,
effective
january
1st
2021,
and
I'm
open
for
any
questions.
If
there
are
any.
B
I
Yes,
ma'am,
I
will
I
just
I
sent
a
letter
into
the
members
of
the
committee
as
well.
I
don't
want
to
belabor
the
point,
but
it
just
seems
to
me
that
we
went
down
this
path
with
electrical
inspections.
Several
years
ago,
we
had
to
put
language
back
into
the
stat
into
the
charter,
or
excuse
me
into
the
city
ordinance
to
allow
for
the
city
to
re-take
the
authority
in
case
of
a
state
shutdown.
I
I
think
that's
a
lesson
well
learned.
I
think
the
city
should
consider
doing
the
same
for
elevators,
and
I
also
laid
out
the
fact
that
there
are
some
unresolved
issues
around
this
that
just
requested
that
we
just
hold
out
of
this
for
a
couple
weeks
and
see
if
we
can't
get
everything
resolved
and
maybe
do
things
in
a
little
bit
better,
more
logical
fashion.
B
B
B
J
I
C
H
C
K
G
B
E
This
applicant
requests
an
on
sale,
liquor
with
sunday
sales
and
no
live
entertainment
license.
The
business
has
indoor
seating
for
86
with
no
outdoor
seating.
The
proposed
hours
of
operation
are
11
a.m
to
10
p.m.
Seven
days
a
week
on
january,
25th
public
hearing
notices
were
sent
to
residents
and
property
owners
within
600
feet
of
the
property
to
the
tangle
town,
neighborhood
association
and
to
council
member
schrader.
E
E
Three
response:
respondents
support
the
business
opening
and
also
express
general
concern
about
livability
traffic
congestion
and
parking,
and
then
there
were
two
additional
responses
that
ju
were
didn't,
provide
any
indication
on
whether
they
support
or
do
not
support
the
business,
but
just
had
general
concerns
about
some
of
those
items
of
parking
congestion.
E
E
The
concerns
mentioned
those
already,
so
we
have
been
in
contact
with
with
this
applicant
to
talk
through
some
of
these
different
concerns.
He's
already
expressed
that
he
will
increase
the
number
of
times
that
trash
and
recycling
will
be
picked
up
over
the
course
of
the
week
from
two
to
three
times
per
week.
We'll
make
an
effort
to
clean
out
the
enclosure
area
once
the
snow
melts
so
that
it
can
get
in
there,
and
we
do
have
that
letter
of
support
from
the
tangle
town,
neighborhood
association.
E
So
we
do
feel
fairly
confident
that
a
lot
of
these
different
issues
will
be
resolved,
and
this
licensee
also
or
this
applicant
rather
operated
a
another
restaurant
in
ward
10
that,
unfortunately,
recently
closed
or
closed
within
the
past
year.
We
had
no
reports
of
any
issues
with
how
that
business
or
how
that
restaurant
operated
in
the
time
that
it
was
open.
So,
at
this
point,
licensing
and
consumer
service
division,
we
recommend
approval
of
the
on
sale,
liquor
with
sunday
sales
and
no
entertainment
license.
This
concludes
my
presentation.
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
B
Thank
you
for
your
report,
mr
velasquez
I'll,
see.
If
there's
any
questions
on
item
number
two.
Thank
you
sing.
None
will
open
the
public
hearing
and
invite
mr
castaleon
to
speak.
Please
press
star
on
mute
star
six
to.
B
B
L
Hi
about
the
garbage
and
now
situation
is
like
the
traffic
and
and
that
kind
of
stuff.
I
basically,
I
call
the
company
already
for
being
three
times
a
week
for
the
garbage
and
and
right
now
the
is
a
winter
time,
but
my
plan
is
like
use
a
pressure
washer
to
clean
like
a
once
a
week
and
and
in
the
garbage
area.
J
L
I
take
a
charge
for
that
one
when
it's
open
in
the
restaurant,
so.
B
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I'm
happy
to
move
this
forward.
I
also
want
to
thank
well
congratulate
mr
castellon
for
moving
his
business
into
ward
11.
and
also
just
the
thoughtful
intention
of
thoughtfulness
with
neighbors.
He
is
inheriting
an
area
that
has
not
had
had
great
tenants
in
there,
and
so
the
garbage
has
been
a
big
issue,
so
I
really
appreciate
the
adding
another
time
and
really
listening
to
to
the
neighborhood.
I
know
a
lot
of
the
other
concerns
were
about
parking.
G
K
G
B
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
committee,
members,
enrique
velazquez
manager
of
licenses
and
consumer
services
once
again
presenting
an
entertainment,
upgrade
application
from
harry's
cedar,
inn,
inc,
doing
business
as
cedar
and
located
at
4155,
cedar
avenue
south
in
ward,
12.,
cedar
inn
currently
holds
an
on
sale.
Wine
with
strong
beer
and
no
entertainment
license,
and
they
request
an
upgrade
to
limited
entertainment.
If
approved,
they
intend
to
add
karaoke
small
bands
and
live
music
indoors.
Only
no
entertainment
or
music
will
be
allowed
outdoors
on
their
sidewalk.
Cafe.
E
E
On
january,
25th
184
public
hearing
notices
were
sent
to
property
owners
within
600
feet
of
the
premises
to
the
standish
ericsson,
neighborhood
organization,
west,
of
the
rail
business
association
and
to
council
member
johnson.
We
received
one
response
from
the
community
in
support
of
the
upgrade
in
entertainment.
E
B
K
B
B
K
G
B
M
Please
good
afternoon,
council
members,
my
name
is
rob
skelecki,
I'm
a
city
planner
in
the
historic
preservation
section
of
cped.
Today,
I'm
presenting
an
appeal
application
submitted
by
ben
sandbig
who's,
the
applicant
and
the
appellant
of
the
january
19th
2021
heritage
preservation,
commission's
denial
of
the
certificate
of
appropriateness,
application
to
replace
garage
doors
at
the
property
located
at
408
first
street
north
in
the
warehouse
historic
district.
Next
slide.
Please.
M
M
The
current
doors
are
original
to
the
2001
design
and
they
functioned
as
such
for
20
years,
they're
highly
visible
from
the
first
street
north
public
right
away.
The
applicant
states
that
the
high
speed
springless
function
of
the
proposed
rubber
doors
will
be
more
resilient
to
damage
and
wear
than
the
existing
system.
M
M
The
applicant
cited
concerns
for
safety
regarding
the
current
the
current
system,
but
has
not
presented
information
that
clearly
details
that
the
proposed
replacement
would
increase,
perceived
safety
measures
at
the
property,
also
other
potential
safety
measure
measures
or
operability
measures
that
could
retain
the
original
door
system
had
not
been
explored
or
submitted
by
the
applicant
next
slide.
Please.
M
M
With
that
being
said,
the
appellant
has
submitted
additional
materials
with
the
appeal
application
that
do
attempt
to
address
some
of
the
hpc's
comments,
but
I
will
be
available
as
staff
to
address
any
questions
that
you
have
relating
to
the
hpc's
decision
and
the
appellant
is
also
here
and
would
like
to
speak.
If
I
understand
thank
you.
B
M
B
Okay,
thank
you
so
much
sir.
Are
there
any
other
questions
for
staff
on
item
number?
Four:
if
not
I'm
going
to
proceed
to
open
the
public
hearing
with
this
type
of
public
hearing,
we
give
the
appellant
an
opportunity
to
make
their
case
first
I'll,
invite
mr
ben
sanvig
or
his
representative
to
join
the
call.
Please
press
star,
6
to
unmute.
N
A
N
So
just
been
following
up
on
rob's
presentation:
again,
thanks
rob
for
the
information
we
submitted
an
appeal
to
the
decision
to
deny
this
application
for
certificate
of
appropriateness
at
408,
north
first
street,
known
as
lindsay
loft.
We've
supplied
additional
information
in
response
to
the
committee's
review
and
questions
and
ultimately
denial.
N
During
the
committee
meeting,
it
was
discussed
that
the
rubber
doors
were
proposed
by
the
owners
as
an
increased
safety
solution
to
due
to
the
existing
doors,
the
existing
doors,
as
rob
indicated,
a
little
bit
our
normal
garage
doors.
What
they're
looking
for
is
a
high
speed
garage
door.
The
high
speed
garage
doors
reduce
significantly
the
time
that
the
doors
are
open,
while
they're
being
operated,
so
it
can
reduce.
N
What's
called
you
know,
people
call
it
piggybacking
or
people
are
able
to
access
the
building
after
someone
opens
the
door,
the
high
speed
doors
close
quicker
to
prevent
those
kinds
of
access.
The
primary
concern
here.
The
owners
to
get
these
doors
is
for
safety.
They
want
to
improve
the
safety
of
the
garage
doors
because
they
do
not
feel
safe
with
the
current
doors
involved.
So
the
current
door
models
are
not
being
considered
for
repair
or
replacement
in
kind,
because
the
current
models
do
not
meet
their
requirements.
N
The
new
proposed
doors,
as
rob
indicated,
are
a
rubber
door
high
speed
door.
This
product
is
being
proposed,
essentially
as
the
only
solution-
that's
possible
at
this
building.
Due
to
the
physical
limitations
of
the
space
during
the
hpc
committee
meeting,
this
product
was
discussed,
and
the
committee
suggested
that
the
product
would
be
acceptable,
but
due
to
the
hpc
staff
findings
that
rubber
was
not
an
acceptable
material,
they
requested
a
definite
reason
to
use
the
rubber
doors
in
lieu
of
some
other
door.
N
There
are
other
high-speed
metal
door
products
that
exist
and
are
available,
and
the
committee
at
that
time
suggested
that
those
products
should
be
explored
or
could
be
used
and
would
only
approve
a
rubber
door
system
if,
if
no
other
option
were
available
because
they
would
need
that
requirement
to
go
against
the
rubber
door
material
issue.
So
this
appeal
does
include
that
information
that
shows
that
the
rubber
door
is
the
only
product
that
works
in
this
location
due
to
the
physical
dimensions
and
restrictions
of
this
building,
the
the
owners
had
looked
into
it.
K
N
During
the
committee
meeting,
the
committee
did
comment
that
the
tan
rubber
doors
would
not
adversely
affect
the
appearance
of
the
building
and
would
not
significantly
change
the
appearance
of
the
building.
The
issue
was
the
rubber
material
and
again,
the
rubber
material
product
that's
being
proposed
is
the
only
product
that
will
work
in
this
physical
space.
N
N
Of
the
metal
doors
that
do
not
work,
I've
also
included
some
essentially
testimony
from
some
of
the
current
owners
in
the
build
or
residents
of
the
building
expressing
their
concerns
for
safety
at
the
building.
N
It
was
not.
It
was
not
argued
that
safety
is
a
very
important
concern.
During
the
hpc
meeting,
the
committee
seemed
to
agree
very
much
that
that
security
and
safety
is
very
important
in
this
area
and
that
the
rubber
doors
would
improve
the
security
and
provide
a
more
secure
product
at
that
door.
Entrance
again,
the
the
primary
concern
and
issue
to
its
reason
to
install
these
doors
is
for
safety
and.
N
B
B
F
And
you
can
certainly
ask
questions
if
you
want
beforehand,
but
I
was
wondering-
and
maybe
staff
can
tell
us
this
if
the
current
metal
doors
are
broken
and
also
I'm
assuming
I'm
trying
to
remember
when
that
when
we
created
this
district-
and
I
think
it
was
before
this
building
was
built.
So
I'm
assuming
it
went
through
an
approval
process
and
had
these
doors
approved
the
first
time
saying
that
they
were
consistent
with
the
historic
district,
and
maybe
staff
could
confirm
that
something.
M
B
Rob
could
I
also
ask
you:
have
you
confirmed
that
this
is
the
only
product,
this
rubber
door?
I
mean
what
happens
with
all
of
the
other
contributing
and
non-contributing
buildings
in
the
city's,
probably
most
notable
historic
district.
Are
we
now
going
to
see
everybody
coming
through
and
saying
we
don't
have
to
follow
the
materials,
it's
a
safety
issue
or
there
is
no
material.
That's
consistent
with
the
entire
design
guidelines
within
the
historic
district.
B
So
I
mean
what
the
applicant
saying
is:
there
is
no
other
product
available,
it's
this
product
or
nothing,
and
I
find
that
hard
to
believe
and
I'm
worried
about
precedent
that
we
would
see
everybody
saying
that
and
again
this
is
one
of
the
most
renowned
districts
in
the
city.
I
I
would
beg
to
guess
that
others
would
then
replace
their
doors
with
a
different
product
that
if
there
isn't
one
so
the
applicant
sent
you
something.
That
said
there
were
no
other
products
available.
Is
that
true,
based
on
your
expertise,.
M
We
were
not
able
to
confirm
that,
based
on
what
they
were
submitted
or
what
had
been
submitted
by
them.
I
should
say,
but
we
are,
as
as
the
hpc
commented,
that
they
believe
that
other
products
were
available
that
were
metal
that
could
fit
this
system.
B
N
B
Seeing
none,
I
will
move
to
deny
the
appeal.
I
have
not
been
convinced,
there's
no
other
such
product
that
could
be
used.
That
would
fit
the
design
guidelines.
There
are
many
many
buildings
in
the
historic
district.
I
would
guess
most
of
them
have
doors
and
they
both
probably
have
fairly
significant
doors.
B
Given
these
old
warehouses-
and
I
would
guess
that
another
product
is
available,
I
don't
discount
the
security
issue
in
any
way,
shape
or
form,
but
believe
that
whatever
replacement
needs
to
be
made
with
the
design
guidelines
in
place,
we'll
see
if
anyone
agrees
with
me,
since
no
one
wanted
to
say
anything.
Is
there
anyone
else
who'd
like
to
speak
to
this
issue,
seeing
none
we'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
F
B
That
appeal
is
denied
with
that
we
will
move
to
our
discussion
item.
This
is
a
discussion
item
with
no
action
to
be
taken.
This
will
simply
be
a
receive
and
file,
but
we
are
very
interested
and
excited
to
have
this
item
in
front
of
us.
This
would
be
looking
at
the
coordinated
plan
for
the
upper
harbor
terminal
without
preempting
or
prescribing
any
future
consideration
of
any
land,
use,
zoning
preservation
or
other
action.
B
This
is
simply
an
update
by
staff,
as
well
as
members
of
the
upper
harbor
turbo
collaborative
planning
committee,
and
I
also
want
to
note
that
council
member
cunningham
has
taken
time
out
of
his
schedule
to
be
here
today
and
I
greatly
appreciate
it.
I
have
allocated
about
30
minutes
for
this
presentation
and
so
I'd
like
to
turn
it
over
to
staff
to
utilize
the
time.
However,
they
would
choose.
O
Madam
chair,
thank
you
so
much
members
of
the
committee,
other
council,
members
and
attendants
and
community
members.
My
name
is
eric
hanson,
I'm
the
director
of
economic
policy
and
development
for
the
city,
and
I
have
the
good
fortune
of
speaking
to
you
about
an
update
on
the
upper
harbor
terminal
and
the
long
planning
process
next
slide.
Please.
O
O
That's
been
working
with
us
over
the
last
two
years
to
go
from
the
concept
plan
to
this
point
in
time
in
the
planning
process,
and
we
also
have
our
partner
brandon
champo,
who
is
the
lead
development
partner
from
united
properties
and
the
way
this
will
go
out.
We'll
do
project
background
I'll.
Give
that
up
to
you,
then
we'll
have
the
draft
coordinated
plan
process
given
by
markela
and
then
brandon
will
get
into
the
the
nuts
and
bolts
and
then
we'll
talk
about
implementations
and
next
steps
around
this.
O
O
The
upper
can,
I
have
the
next
slide.
Please.
O
There
we
go.
Oh,
oh,
stop
right
there
we'll
go
right
there.
The
upper
harbor
terminal
is
a
48-acre
site
that
the
city
has
owned
for
a
number
of
decades
about
three
miles
north
of
downtown
right
on
the
river,
at
about
the
dowling
avenue
exit
right
off
of
I-94.
O
What
is
a
barging
terminal
for
a
number
of
decades
and
and
that
ceased
when
the
locks
at
st
anthony
were
closed
in
2014
and
we've
been
currently
using-
is
for
storage,
we're
now
just
at
outdoor
storage,
as
we
close
the
indoor
warehouse
at
the
end
of
last
year,
and
it
is
the
largest
single
ownership
development
opportunity
along
the
mississippi
river
in
the
country.
O
Next
slide,
please,
as
far
as
context
is
concerned,
this
project
is
actually
something
that's
been
looked
at
by
the
city
for
more
than
three
decades,
but
in
this
last
iteration
of
planning,
we
started
back
in
updates
to
plans
back
about
nine
years
ago,
eight
nine
years
ago,
and
you
see
the
number
of
plans
that
impact
the
upper
harbor
terminal,
as
this
is
a
very
important
project
for
the
city
and
the
region.
O
Next
slide,
please,
this
most
recent
effort
started
in
2017
when
we
selected
the
development
team.
The
development
teams
were
working
collaboratively
with
the
city
and
the
park
board
to
deliver
a
concept
and
then
a
coordinated
plan
which
we
will
discuss
its
draft
today.
The
concept
plan
was
approved
by
this
city
council
and
and
the
mayor
back
in
march
of
2019,
so
we're
about
two
years
out.
O
You
can
see
a
number
of
of
touch
points
with
the
community
or
with
our
legislative
partners
and
and
a
little
bit
of
a
break
for
the
pandemic,
but
a
lot
of
work
that
has
been
done
through
the
last
four
years
now
next
slide.
Please.
O
During
this
time,
we've
had
about
three
main
components
of
planning
and
engagement
with
with
the
community
from
2015
to
2017.
When
we
before
we
selected
the
developer,
we
engaged
in
a
lot
of
visioning
with
community
and
then
issued
a
request
for
qualification
to
find
a
development
partner.
United
properties
will
introduce
themselves
and
and
their
partners
when
we
selected
them.
We
went
into
land
uses
and
concept
planning
that
took
about
two
years,
and
that
culminated
with
the
concept
plan
that
is
now
kind
of
our
guiding
our
guide
for
the
coordinated
plan.
O
And
then
since
then,
we've
been
working
on
that
coordinated
plan
and
that's
had
some
additional
components
to
it.
With
the
collaborative
planning
committee
which
the
the
council
created
back
in
2019,
we
also
working
with
our
park
board
colleagues.
They
created
their
own
advisory
committee
to
work
on
the
park
elements
and
then
the
learning
tables
which
were
monthly
convenings
of
four
hours,
usually
about
four
hours,
a
piece
which
went
into
deep
details
about
a
specific
component
of
the
plan,
whether
that
be
housing
or
entrepreneurship
or
community
benefits
realized.
O
And
then
that
culminated
with
a
draft
of
the
plan
which
was
written
and
released
december
of
last
year
and
we
went
through
about
a
45-day
comment
period
and
outreach
and
that
culminates
now
with
this
presentation
to
you
next
slide.
Please
and
now
I
will
pass
it
off
to
markela
and
then
she'll
pass
it
off
to
brandon
and
then
we'll
be
back
so
markela.
P
Hello,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
today.
I
am
going
to
go
over
the
process
a
little
bit
about
the
cpc
committee
and
the
definition
of
community
and
also
the
summary
of
community
benefits.
P
Again.
I
just
really
appreciate
the
opportunity
the
opportunity
to
speak.
This
has
been
quite
a
process,
quite
a
learning
process
for
me
in
particular.
So
with
that
I
will
just
get
into
it
alright.
So,
as
you
know,
the
concept
plan
for
redevelopment
was
approved
by
city
council
in
march
2019
and
then
the
upper
harbor
terminal
collaborative
planning
committee
was
established
by
the
city
council
in
march
2019,
and
it
was
established
to
work
with
the
city
and
the
developer
on
refining
this
concept
plan
into
a
coordinated
plan
for
redevelopment.
P
P
P
The
learning
tables
community
engagement
events,
convened
by
public
policy
project
environment
in
the
environmental
justice
coordinating
council,
along
with
pillsbury
united
communities
and
partnership
with
the
city
and
so
was
supported
through
a
grant
from
the
mcknight
foundation's
mcknight
foundation.
The
learning
tables
met
july
2019
through
december
2020.
P
I
will
also
say
that
these
three
different
entities
so
to
speak,
have
collaborated
as
well.
Cpc
members
attended
the
learning
tables
on
a
regular
basis,
while
the
learning
tables
were
once
a
month.
That
meant
cpc.
Members
were
meeting
three
times
a
month
between
our
own
meetings
twice
a
month
in
the
learning
table
meetings.
P
So
cpc
members
met
at
the
learning
tables
a
number
of
cpc
members
either
attended
the
camp
committee
meetings
or
were
briefed
about
them,
and
then
we
had
the
cac
chair
at
one
of
our
meetings
and
then
I
presented
at
the
cac
meeting
as
well,
and
so
I
say
that
to
just
let
you
know
that
there
has
definitely
been
communication
acro
across
these
different
groups,
and
we've
worked
together
to
come
up
with
the
things
that
are
presented
in
the
draft
coordinated
plan.
P
All
right,
so
the
upper
harbor
terminal,
collat
collaborative
planning
committee,
known
as
the
cpc,
was
again
established
in
march
2019.
P
P
I
grew
up
here
right
on
42nd
and
queen
I've
been
here
all
my
life,
and
there
are
other
members
on
the
cpc
who
have
that
same
story
who
have
been
here
for
years
who
have
family
here
who
go
to
school
here
who
have
kids
here
who
have
businesses
here,
and
so
the
members
of
the
cpc
have
a
huge
vested
interest
in
seeing
the
north
minneapolis
community
improve,
but
also
not
lose,
who
it
is.
Who
and
what
it
is.
I
would
say,
the
culture
that
represents
north
minneapolis
that
we're
so
proud
of.
P
We
don't
want
to
see
that
get
lost
in
this
development
or
any
other
development.
So
we
brought
that
our
history
our
long
time
commitment
our
long
time
living
here.
We
brought
all
that
to
the
table
when
we
met
as
a
cpc
since
june
2019,
the
uhdcpc
has
met
34
times
again
34
times.
I
think
our
initial
meeting
schedule
was
not
nearly
that.
I
can't
remember
how
many
maybe
12.,
but
we
collaborated
with
city
staff
and
the
development
team.
P
P
From
these
meetings,
when
we
started
the
definition
of
community
didn't
really
sit
well
with
us,
we
felt
like
there
needed
to
be
more
more
detail
to
be
a
lot
more
specific
about
what
we're
asking
and
what
we're
seeking.
So
for
the
purposes
of
this
project,
the
uht
cpc
adopted
the
following
definition
of
community.
P
The
north
side
community
is
defined
as
people
who
have
a
vested
stake
in
the
outcomes
of
the
development
of
the
upper
harbor,
specifically
american
descendants
of
slavery,
adolf
and
black
indigenous
and
people
of
color
bypac
individuals,
those
living
nearest
to
the
project
site,
those
in
historically
marginalized
communities
who
typically
experience
displacement
due
to
unfair
banking
practices
and
we're
talking
about
predatory
lending
and
redlining
low
and
medium
income.
Individuals
who
have
been
forced
out
due
to
increased
rents.
P
So,
as
you
read
this
plan
throughout
this
whole
plan,
when
you
think
about
the
word
community,
it's
capitalized
throughout
the
whole
plan.
It
refers
back
to
this
definition
that
the
cpc
members
adopted,
because
we
feel
like
it,
encompasses
what
we
want
to
focus
on
who
we
want
to
benefit
from
this
project.
We
want
everyone
to
benefit,
but
specifically
those
outlined
in
that
definition,
all
right
next
slide.
Please.
P
All
right,
a
community
focused
vision.
The
redevelopment
of
the
upper
harbor
terminal
provides
a
once
in
a
generation
opportunity
to
create
a
large-scale
community
building
asset
in
north
minneapolis.
That's
grounded
in
restorative
approach
towards
racial,
just
justice
that
meets
the
needs,
aspirations
and
priorities
of
the
nearby
residents.
P
Now
I've
said
from
the
very
beginning
of
these
meetings.
I
am
a
long-time
proud
north
minneapolis
resident,
and
I've
also
said
that
I
want
this
development
to
be
something
that
my
kids,
my
three
boys
can
go
to
and
feel
welcome,
feel
like
it
represents
them
and
feel
like
they
have
a
piece
of
ownership
in
you
know.
P
And
so
with
that,
I
just
want
to
talk
about
the
summary
of
community
benefits,
real
quick.
It
will
connect
north
minneapolis
to
the
mississippi
river.
The
city
will
retain.
It
will
retain
public
ownership
of
the
land,
sustainable
revenue
streams
back
to
the
north
side.
That
will
create
those.
It
creates
a
19
acre,
northside
riverfront
park
in
trails.
P
It
builds
a
community
performing
arts
center
in
a
community
health
and
wellness
hub.
It
will
provide
rental
and
ownership
housing
affordable
to
current
northside
residents,
north
minneapolis,
I
call
it
northside
provide
opportunities
for
community
ownership
and
will
it
will
also
bring
300
living
wage
jobs
to
the
north
side,
also,
economic
inclusion
through
professional
contracts
and
workforce
inclusion.
P
So
this
is
just
a
summary
of
it
when
you
go,
it
goes
into
depth
as
part
of
the
plan,
but
this
is
we've
come
a
long
way
and
I
will
also
say
that
the
reason
we
have
the
plan
that
we
do
is
because
community
went
way
above
and
beyond
the
initial
ask,
and
we
brought
our
hearts
and
our
backgrounds
and
our
experiences
to
the
table
to
map
out
what
you
have
before
you.
So,
that's
all
that
I
have
next
slide
all
right
and
now
we
have
brandon
champo
with
the
united
properties.
P
Q
Thank
you,
markella
and
just
to
repeat
again,
brandon
champo
here
with
united
properties.
We
also
have
dana
frank,
who
is
with
first
avenue,
and
our
partner
has
been
our
partner
on
this
project
from
day
one
and
just
to
kind
of
quickly
reiterate
our
our
thanks
to
the
city
for
the
opportunity
to
present
on
our
progress
today,
as
well
as
for
the
work
of
the
cpc
and
markella's
leadership
and
the
learning
table
engagement
teams.
Q
This
this
project
has
come
a
long
way
since
early
2019
and
it's
it
survived
a
lot
of
different
inflection
points
and
we're
just
incredibly
thankful
for
everybody's
time
here
and
thankful
to
city
staff
for
working
so
diligently
with
us
and
being
innovative
and
creative
in
in
implementing
some
of
the
community
requests.
Here
that
we
are.
We
are
attempting
to
do
here,
so
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
but
we're
we're
really
excited
to
start
this
next
chapter
and
and
really
get
get
moving
here.
Q
Hopefully,
once
all
of
our
technical
studies
are
done-
and
you
know,
since
early
2019,
when
we,
when
we
received
concept,
plan
approval,
we've,
we've
really
been
operating
with
just
two-thirds
of
our
original
team.
If
you
recall
it
at
one
time,
there
was
a
thor
logo
on
this
slide,
and
you
know
we
were.
Q
We
were
very
excited
about
that
team
and
about
how
we
were
being
represented
and
and
who
was
representing
us
with
with
you
know,
thor
having
their
headquarters
in
north
and,
obviously
just
being
the
the
top
or
the
number
one
minority
owned
company
in
the
state
and
unfortunately,
as
we
all
know,
they
went
through
a
bankruptcy
and
so
we've
since
that
time
have
been
working
to
change
that
and
and
really
fill
a
slot.
Q
That
was
that
was
incredibly
important
and
over
the
last
12
months
we
have
really
ramped
up
discussions
with
devin
george
to
join
our
our
partnership
here
as
a
co-developer,
particularly
focused
on
the
affordable
housing.
Q
Where
he's
got
a
lot
of
history
and
leadership
on
the
north
side
and
just
experience
the
credentials
to
really
execute
successfully
on
this
part
of
the
plan
for
us,
and
so
we're
very
excited
about
the
synergies
that
he
brings
to
this
team
and
about
his
vision
and
ideas
that
he
has
particularly
around
the
housing
and
the
health
and
wellness
hub
that
we'll
talk
about
here
in
a
second.
You
can
go
next
slide.
Q
So
when
the
when
the
concept
plan
was
approved
in
2019,
there
were
really
a
couple
of
pieces
that
just
weren't
fully
settled
and
really
hadn't
hadn't.
We
hadn't
spent
the
proper
amount
of
time,
even
though
we'd
done
two
years
of
engagement
up
to
that
point,
hadn't
spent
the
proper
amount
of
time
really
focused
on
and
that's
primarily
around
defining
who
the
community
is
and
who's
who's
the
primary
beneficiary
of
this
project
and
then
also
the
the
values
and
the
priorities
of
that
primary
beneficiary.
Q
And-
and
this
was
a
really
important
milestone
for
us
in
our
work
with
the
cpc
over
the
last
two
years
was
to
was
to
get
to
these
first
two
pieces
here.
The
definition
of
the
community,
as
well
as
the
project
values
we
you
know
we
had
the
framework
of
a
real
estate
plan
that
we
were
we
felt
good
in,
but
but
to
really
start
to
bring
detail
and
vision
to
that
plan.
Q
We
really
needed
to
to
work
on
the
first
two
pieces
here
and
again
thankful
to
the
cpc
for
all
their
work
in
in
helping
us
get
to
this
point,
because
it
really
started
to
frame
up
how
to
make
the
real
estate
projects
fit
with
and
match
what
the
community
was
really
looking
for,
and
we
feel
like
we're
getting
to
that
point
now.
You
can
go
next
slide.
Q
What
what
has
really
changed
here
is
again.
As
I
mentioned
the
concept
plan
it
was,
it
was
more
of
a
development
framework
than
anything.
It
wasn't
a
truly
kind
of
thought
out
vision.
It
gave
ranges
of
of
what
the
different
components
of
the
plan
could
be.
There
were
a
lot
of
different
ideas
that
needed
to
be
more
vetted
and
it,
but
it
was
an
important
step
in
just
helping
us
kind
of
get
to
this
next
level
of
planning,
and
we
we
do
summarize
some
of
the
changes
here.
Q
Q
Which,
here
I'll,
just
I'm,
going
to
point
out
a
couple
of
the
kind
of
major
changes
so
starting
first
off
with
the
the
cpac,
the
community
performing
arts
center,
when
we
were
getting
concept
plan
approval,
the
cpac
was
shown
as
part
of
the
park
land
and
that
that
caused
significant
angst
for
for
many
people.
So
we've
moved
the
sea
pack
out
of
the
park
land
onto
its
own
parcel
separated
from
the
park,
and
so
you
see
where
it
says
a
on
both
of
these
plans.
Q
That
shows
that
the
change
in
location
there
at
the
time
of
concept,
plan
approval.
We
were
actually
really
excited
about.
The
idea
of
a
of
a
north
side.
Riverfront
hotel
that
did
not
most
of
the
community
did
not
share
that
same
excitement
with
us,
and
so
we've
decided
to
remove
the
riverfront
hotel,
actually
remove
hospitality
entirely
from
the
plan
and
and
that
has
been
replaced
with
a
mixed
income.
Q
Affordable
housing
project,
as
well
as
some
for
sale,
home
ownership
opportunities,
and
then
we
also
back
in
2019,
didn't
really
know
what
to
do.
On
the
south
end
of
the
site.
Q
There
were
still
a
lot
of
questions
about
the
future
of
gaf
and
maybe
whether
they
would
be
staying
or
leaving,
and
but
you
know,
they're
a
private
property
owner
we've
heard
no
indication
that
they
intend
to
leave,
and
so
we
we've
that's
allowed
us
to
start
to
shift
the
focus
to
more
detail
about
what
could
happen
there
and
and
our
focus
is
primarily
on
creating
job
opportunities,
attainable
living
wage
job
opportunities
and
then
also,
we've
brought
some
more
definition
to
the
community
hub
concept
which
we'll
talk
about
in
a
second
and
then
the
public
ownership
of
land
which
I'll
get
into
more
detail
here
as
well
in
a
minute
next
slide,
please.
Q
So.
The
the
development
plan
here
is
really
broken
up
into
three
primary
land
use
components.
There
is
a
residential
component
which
is
shown
in
yellow
and
primarily
focused
on
the
north
end
of
the
site,
which
is
really
the
furthest
from
the
heavy
industry
that
that
you
start
to
see
more
of
on
the
south
end
of
the
site,
particularly
gaf,
and
some
of
the
uses
south
of
lowry.
Q
We
wanted
to
keep
the
residential
as
far
away
from
that
as
possible,
and,
and
so
that's
focused
primarily
on
the
north
end
and
the
the
vision
here
is
for
a
mixed
income,
attainable
and
affordable
housing
project.
Q
But
you
know
one
that
that,
especially
in
the
first
phase,
delivers
truly
affordable,
produ
housing
for
the
north
side,
we
have
places
for
jobs,
that's
shown
in
the
purple
on
this
plan,
which
is
really
on
the
south
end
of
the
site
and
again
kind
of
provides
an
opportunity
for
living
wage,
attainable
jobs,
but
also
a
bit
of
a
buffer
between
the
rest
of
the
project
and
the
the
more
heavy
industry
on
the
south
end
of
the
site.
Q
Q
And
really
these
are
you
know:
they're
they're
kind
of
sprinkled
throughout
this
plan,
but
they're
the
they're,
the
areas
that
will
be
most
publicly
accessible,
whether
it's
ground
floor,
commercial
space,
the
park,
the
community
performing
arts
center,
the
health
and
wellness
hub-
and
you
know
the
places-
will
be
most
public
interaction.
We
really
want
these
to
be
heavily
focused
on
community
programming.
Next
slide.
Please.
Q
So,
just
to
talk
in
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
each
of
these,
the
housing
which
we
are
showing
here.
It's
about
520,
total
housing
units.
You
can
see
a
heavy
emphasis
in
phase
one
on
affordability,
particularly
delivering,
affordable
housing
on
the
riverfront.
Really,
we
think
the
two,
the
two
prime
affordable
or
the
two
prime
residential
parcels
which
are
bordering
the
park
as
well
as
the
river
will
in
phase
one
will
be,
will
be
entirely
affordable
and
we're
excited
about
that.
Q
You
know
giving
giving
northside
residents
attainable
rents
on
the
riverfront,
which
are
typically,
you
know,
reserved
for
more
luxury
rental
opportunities.
We
also
are
are
proposing
a
mix
of
affordable
town
homes,
ownership
opportunities
that
could
be
in
a
sort
of
limited
equity
structure
or
potentially
some
market
rate
housing.
Q
But
but
the
idea
being
that
we
are
not
intending
to
just
create
opportunities
to
rent
here
we
want
to
create
opportunities
for
home
ownership
and
for
equity
building
and-
and
you
know,
really
a
primary
source
of
generational
wealth,
which
you
know
many
of
us
who
do
own
a
home
are
able
to
to
take
advantage
of.
But
the
goal
here
is
really
a
mixed
income:
affordable,
housing
community
next
slide,
please
these
places
for
jobs.
Q
As
I
mentioned,
a
heavy
focus
on
living
wage,
attainable,
job
creation,
really
with
a
you
know
what
we
would
call
a
new
age
manufacturing
in
production.
This
is
not
manufacturing
of
of
yesterday.
This
is
not
smokestack
industrial.
This
is
these.
Are
you
know,
buildings
that
will
truly
be
constructed
in
an
attractive
manner?
They
will
honor
the
riverfront
and
honor
the
opportunity
that
they're
being
given,
because
it's
very
difficult
in
today's
world
to
get
any
sort
of
manufacturing
space
really
developed.
This
close
to
the
city.
Q
These
do
provide
very
high
quality,
attainable
living
wage
job
opportunities
and
we're
excited
about
really
finding
future
focused
industries
that
that
will
occupy
these
buildings
and
then
the
cpac
we've
included
it
as
a
jobs
piece
here
you
know
it's
it
really.
It
really
blends
between
jobs
and
community
focus
spaces,
but
because
there's
a
significant
amount
of
operation
jobs
that
will
come
from
this.
That
dana
can
speak
more
on.
Q
If
you
guys
have
questions
next
slide,
please
the
the
community
spaces
again,
you
know
focused
on
these
places
of
high
interaction
with
the
public,
particularly
the
ground,
floor,
commercial
space
that
we
think
there
could
be
a
lot
of
opportunities
for
north
side
entrepreneurs
to
occupy
these
spaces.
Q
There
could
be
some
opportunities
for
a
riverfront
restaurant,
the
health
and
wellness
hub
that
we
have
to
really
start
to
dive
into
and
bring
some
detail
to,
but
devin
george
and
his
team
will
be
leading
the
visioning
of
that
and
and
helping
us
bring
partners
to
the
table,
but
but
creating
a
place
that
the
north
side
can
congregate
for
after
school
programming
for
preventable
preventative
health
services
and
other
health
services.
Q
We
think
this
could
be
an
event
center
for
the
community,
so
we're
excited
about
about
what
that
can
bring
and
then
obviously
the
park
and
the
cpac
in
and
of
itself
will
will
bring
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
visitors
to
the
site
that
we
intend
to
try
to
leverage
as
much
as
possible
and
take
advantage
of
with
these
other
spaces.
Q
Next
slide,
please
mark
hilla
did
did
mention
briefly
some
of
the
community
benefits
or
summarize
some
of
the
community
benefits,
but
we
really
want
to
just
speak
on
two
of
these
that
we're
really
excited
about.
Q
We
think
these
are
these
are
incredibly
innovative
ideas
here
and
ones
that
we
think
will
be
will
really
put
the
city
minneapolis
on
the
map
as
far
as
ways,
other
communities
will
look
to
replicate
what
we're
proposing
here,
but
you
know
we
had
heard
loud
and
clear
through
the
engagement
process
that
that
the
community
did
not
support
the
idea
of
public
land
being
transferred
to
private
development,
and
so
what
we're
proposing
here
is
a
structure
where
the
city
will
maintain
long-term
ownership
of
the
land,
except
for
the
park
and
the
cpac,
which
are
which
come
with
their
own
bonding
restrictions,
but
that
all
the
other
private
development
land
will
be
will
continue
to
be
owned
publicly.
Q
Our
hope
is
that
you
know
anti-displacement
efforts
such
as
property,
tax
relief
or
foreclosure
relief
for
nearby
property
owners
could
be.
You
know
that
could
be
a
source
of
of
revenue
to
help
that
there's
a
lot
of
concern
about
what
large-scale
development
does
to
property
values,
particularly
in
low-income
areas,
and
you
know
quite
frankly,
most
of
the
time
there
aren't
a
lot
of
great
solutions
other
than
other
than
just
seeing
residents
get
displaced,
and
we
think
that
these
funds
can
be
used
in
an
innovative
way
to
help
with
that.
Q
In
extra
three
dollars
on
all
their
paid
ticket
fees,
which
they're
calling
a
paid
ticket
fee
that
could
also
be
utilized
or
redistributed
back
into
a
community
focused
fund,
and
here
those
you
know,
those
sources
of
revenue
could
be
used
for
subsidizing
space
in
the
project.
You
know
for
north
side
entrepreneurs,
it
could
be
used
to
enhance
the
community
programming
in
the
venue,
music
venue
or
elsewhere
on
the
site.
Q
Yep,
perfect
we've
gone
a
step
further
here
and
really,
as
I
mentioned,
these
community,
the
community
spaces,
the
community
real
estate
opportunities.
Q
You
know
we
think,
would
best
be
suited
if
they
are,
you
know,
really
owned
and
operated
by
a
community
entity,
and
so
our
goal
is:
we've
identified
a
number
of
these
opportunities
that
we
are
hoping
to
find
a
community
partner
to
work
with
us
either.
Q
As
you
know,
an
advisor
as
a
joint
venture
partner
as
a
outright
owner
of
these
spaces,
and
we
will
be
seeking
this
community
partner
through
an
rfq
process
that
we
intend
to
start
in
march
and
yeah
really
with
the
primary
goal
of
identifying
a
partner
to
fill
the
role
of
landowner
with
first
avenue
on
the
cpac
community
fund
or
social
fund.
A
social
enterprise
fund
manager,
or
you
know,
recommending
recommend
recommender
of
where
those
funds
go
and
then
also
as
either
advisor
or
joint
venture
partner
or
outright
owner
of
these.
Q
These
community
focused
spaces,
the
ground
floor,
commercial,
the
health
and
wellness
hub,
the
parking
and
mobility
hub,
the
places
where
the
public
will
interact.
Q
We
think
having
a
community
partner
at
the
table
with
us
will
make
sure
that
those
places
stay
focused
on
the
right
community
programming
not
only
from
day
one
but
also
you
know
ten
years
from
now,
and
so
that
it's
our
goal
to
to
identify
that
partner
to
work
with
us
and
then
next
slide.
Q
So
this
just
gives
a
couple
of
of
examples
of
some
of
the
kind
of
scenes
future
scenes
here,
there's
obviously
a
lot
of
work
that
needs
to
happen
on
the
design,
but
we're
excited
about
the
status
of
the
plan.
The
progress
that's
been
made
and
the
outcomes
that
we
think
this
will
generate
for
the
north
side
community.
Thank
you.
O
Thank
you.
Brandon
we've
got
a
few
more
slides
in
the
nest
for
some
questions.
If
you
go
to
the
next
slide
talk
about,
we
wanted
to
give
you
an
update.
From
the
last
time
we
talked
to
you
about
the
infrastructure
planning
you'll,
see
on
the
map
that
will
hopefully
come
up
in
a
second
we've
advanced
the
concept
planning
around
the
infrastructure
that
will
be
needed
at
this
site.
You
see
it
depicted
here.
We
have
nathan
koster
from
our
public
works.
O
Team
has
worked
very
closely
with
us
and
we're
very
appreciative
of
public
works
and
and
the
finance
department
and
other
departments
ncr
et
cetera
around
the
enterprise,
because
this
is
a
truly
a
city
efforts
to
do
such
an
enormous
project.
But
I
just
want
to
point
out
two
things:
one,
you
see
the
the
extension
of
of
improvements
up,
dowling
avenue
to
make
a
better
connection
into
the
neighborhood
up
to
lindale
and
also
at
the
south
of
the
site,
33rd
avenue,
which
was
not
part
of
the
first.
O
That
means
we've
also
been
doing
some
refinement
of
how
much
it's
cost
now
we're
doing
more
infrastructure
in
phase
one
than
we
thought
we
could
do
in
phase
or
in
the
concept
plan
and
we're
finding
a
more
refined
costs
where,
where
we're
being
successful
in
grants
for
this-
and
it
looks
like
there's-
we-
we
had
about
a
12
and
a
half
to
13
million
dollar
gap.
When
we
talked
about
the
concept
plan
that
has
come
down
a
little
bit,
we
see
we
need
about
three
million
dollars
here
for
the
infrastructure.
O
We
do
have
some
costs
from
power
line,
relocation,
some
site,
prep
and
site
prep's,
a
a
new
number
that
we
didn't
talk
about
much
in
in
the
concept
plan,
so
all
told
that's
still
lower
than
the
12
12
to
13
million
dollars.
We
thought
about
in
in
the
concept
plan
next
slide.
Please,
however,
we're
expecting
that
there,
the
city
is
going
to
have
to
make
some
community
investments.
O
The
cpc
actually
made
a
motion
and
asked
for
a
million
dollars
for
support
into
the
community
entity
the
city's
prohibited
from
making
direct
contributions
to
to
entities,
but
we
have
a
history
from
a
redevelopment
authority
from
investing
in
commercial
retail
developments,
and
we
expect
that,
as
we
continue
to
refine
this
plan,
you're
going
to
have
recommendations
that
come
back
from
staff
around
direct
investments
to
make
sure
that
the
community
entity
and
the
commercial
components
of
this
this
site
are
successful.
O
We
also
are
looking
at
best
practices
around
stormwater
and
then
and
then
potentially
looking
at
some
phase
two
infrastructure,
but
all
told
it
could
be
around
15
to
20
million
dollars
of
city
investment
into
all
the
components
with
affordable
housing
aside,
affordable
housing
would
be
in
line
with
the
traditional
programs
that
you,
as
this
committee,
are
well
aware
of
and
they'd
be
competitive
through
those
processes
next
slide
and
the
final
slide.
What
gives
you
kind
of
the
project
implementation
today?
O
Just
an
update
on
the
work
we've
been
doing
over
the
last
two
years,
as
of
today,
we've
announced
the
scoping
of
the
aur.
The
alternative
urban
area-wide
review,
which
is
the
environmental
review
and
that
process
will
go
on
through
the
summer.
We
will
be
looking
at
how
a
number
of
scenarios,
including
the
one
we
see
in
the
coordinated
the
draft
coordinated
plan,
will
impact
the
environment
and
what
mitigation
strategies
we
might
have.
O
We
will
be
working
with
the
developers
as
they
kind
of
go
through
their
process
around
the
community
entity
and
then
back
in
the
end
of
the
year.
Third
quarter
and
fourth
quarter
is
when
we're
going
to
see
a
lot
more
specific
actions
that
we're
going
to
ask
the
city
council
to
take
and
that
will
include
in
layouts
for
public
work
or
for
the
infrastructure,
the
approval
of
the
aur,
as
well
as
as
the
first
term
sheets
that
will,
we
will
see
and
we're
hopeful
to
see.
You
know,
work
start
in
2022.
O
Finally,
on
moving
some
earth
and
we
have
kind
of
a
deadline
with
the
state
around
the
15
million
dollars
in
bond
funding
that
comes
next
year,
so
we're
on
a
tight
timeline.
But
there's
a
lot
of
work.
O
That's
going
to
continue
over
the
summer
and
we'll
probably
be
back
to
the
city
council
with
an
update
on
on
the
coordinate
plan
after
we
understand
what
comes
out
of
the
auar
and
what
changes,
if
any,
we
need
to
make,
and
hopefully
we'll
have
some
more
information
about
the
community
entity,
the
community
funds
that
could
come
off
of
this
development,
the
actual
costs
of
investment
and
some
exciting
term
sheets.
So
with
that,
I
will
let's
stand
for
questions.
O
B
B
These
are
people
who
are
volunteers
in
the
general
public,
live
work
and
play
on
the
north
and
near
north
side.
It's
a
massive
commitment
of
major
civic
leadership
to
participate
in
this
way,
and
I
just
want
you
to
know
if
any
of
you
are
listening,
that
the
city
and
its
elected
leadership
are
very
grateful
for
the
work
that
you
have
done
and
how
you've
gotten
just
a
tiny
idea.
B
This
far,
and
so
I
want
to
thank
you
as
well
as
everyone
on
the
project
team
before
we
open
it
up
for
questions,
and
I
would
ask
members
of
the
committee
to
get
ready
with
questions.
If
you
have
any,
I'm
really
happy
that
councilmember
cunningham
has
taken
time
out
of
his
schedule,
although
he
does
not
serve
on
this
committee
to
join
us,
which
is
not
super
common
for
us
to
go
to
other
things.
And
so
I
want
to
thank
him
and
invite
him
to
say
a
few
words.
Please.
R
R
I
just
wanted
to
add
a
few
words
that
this
project,
the
upper
harbor
terminal
project,
was
a
project
that
I
inherited
when
I
was
elected
in
2017
when
I
came
into
office.
This
was
a
very
common
topic,
frequent
issue
that
folks
brought
up
for
us
to
talk
about.
R
I
felt
very
fortunate
because
city
staff
and
the
private
development
team
were
like
heck
yeah.
Let's
do
this,
and
so
you
know
we
got
together
and
began
the
process
of
really
reorienting
with
that
explicit
goal
in
mind
of
how
we're
going
to
leverage
this
development
as
opportunity
to
benefit
legacy
north
side
residents.
R
For
you
know,
as
for
my
role
as
the
council
member,
all
48
acres
of
upper
harbor
terminal
fall
within
the
fourth
ward.
It
was
a
lot.
I
worked
very
hard
to
be
able
to
carry
the
concept
through
a
concept
plan
through
the
council
process
and
really
incorporate
community
feedback.
R
I'm
very
proud
of
that
plan
that
we
brought
forward
because
it
really
created
the
skeleton
for
the
work
to
then
be
to
put
the
meat
on
those
bones.
I
heard
quite
frequently
from
community
members
during
the
concept
plan
approval
phase.
A
lot
of
folks
were
saying
there
wasn't
enough
community
engagement,
there
wasn't
enough
community
engagement,
and
but
when
I
looked
at
the
list
of
community
engagement,
I
was
like
there's
like
180
different
opportunities.
R
So
what?
If?
What
does
that
actually
mean
and
what
it
was?
How
I
translated
that
as
a
council
member
was
that
it
wasn't.
The
right
kind
of
engagement
folks
wanted
to
be
able
to
be
more
deeply
involved
in
actually
a
collaborative,
empowered
level
of
engagement,
so
that
was
why
I
brought
forward
the
resolution
that
created
the
collaborative
planning
committee,
I'm
very
grateful
for
everyone
who
said
yes
to
being
a
part
of
this
work.
R
Seeing
this
coordinated
plan
is
a
dream,
come
true
for
me
as
a
north
side,
elected
representative,
and
I
am
so
proud
of
the
hard
work
that
the
cpc
members
have
put
in.
I
will
just
say,
as
a
quick
aside
that
what
we
saw
here
today,
the
work
that
they
put
in
is
remarkable
a
remarkable
level
of
work,
and
I
stand
by
that.
We
should
pay
folks
a
stipend
for
their
time
to
do
this
kind
of
in-depth
work,
particularly
when
we're
asking
black
folks
to
help
us
solve
racial
equity
issues.
R
Without
their
level
of
this
level
of
commitment
that
they
put
in
this
plan
would
have
never
been
as
strong
as
it
is,
and
as
beneficial
for
the
north
side
as
it
is,
but
staying
on
topic
with
the
coordinated
plan,
I
am
eager
for
the
steps
ahead
and
ultimately
bringing
this
project
to
fruition
following
all
of
the
necessary
steps
of
due
diligence
that
eric
brought
to
mind.
So
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you,
everybody
for
all
of
your
hard
work
and
thank
you,
madam
chair.
B
F
Thank
you
very
much
chair
goodman,
and
I
also
want
to
appreciate
the
good
report
that
we
got
from
people
involved
staff
and
community
members
and
really
thank
the
community
members
for
their
involvement
also
really
want
to
thank
councilmember
cunningham
for
taking
this
on
and
helping
to
be
a
lead
on
it.
I
really
appreciate
some
of
the
changes
that
I
saw
actually
opening
up
some
more
park.
It
looks
like,
and
some
of
those
things
and
some
focus
and
I'm
excited
to
hear
about
a
new
development
partner
coming
on
board.
F
I
also
wanted
to
ask
about-
and
I
know
there
may
be-
no
decision
so
at
least
have
an
opportunity
to
speak
about
sustainability
efforts
here
and
also
what
we're
going
to
do
to
help
make
this
address
issues
about
climate
change.
This
is
just
an
enormous
development
opportunity
and
I
would
really
encourage
folks
to
look
at
options
for
district
energy
geothermal,
some
way
that
we
might
be
able
to
heat
these
buildings
without
relying
on
fossil
fuels
in
particular.
F
So
if
there's
any
progress
made
in
that
area
right
now,
it
will
be
interesting
to
hear.
I
will
also
note
that
I
sit
on
the
city's
clean
energy
partnership
with
the
utility
companies
and
we
have
a
sustainability
office.
So
I'm
sure
there
are
some
more
resources
that
we
can
bring
to
bear
on
this
as
we
need
to,
and
I
think
it
would
be
wonderful
if
we
were
able
to
do
a
development
project
this
large
and
not
have
to
pipe
it
for
natural
gas.
B
S
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
greatly
appreciate
the
presentation
by
both
the
staff
and
the
development
represent
development
team
representative.
You
can
just
see
the
enormity
of
work.
That's
gone
into
a
two
day,
and
it's
quite
impressive.
S
Also,
of
course,
as
councilmember
cunningham
has
shared
the
extensive
amount
of
participation
and
the
variety
of
participation
also
quite
impressive,
and
it's
good
to
get
that
update
though
I've
been
following
it
rather
closely,
but
sometimes
could
hear
it
in
some
nation
juxtaposed
with
the
other
elements
of
the
project,
both
the
participation
and
the
evolution
of
the
proposal.
I
think
councilmember
gordon
did
touch
on
the
opportunities
that
lie
ahead.
S
Public
works,
that's
the
stuff
I
watch
most
closely
and
I
think
from
that
work.
The
integrated
utility
concepts
that
I
think
gordon.
S
How
the
river
is
honored
over
the
long
term,
and
here
we
have
the
opportunity
to
do
a
big
chunk
of
development
that
actually
would,
in
and
of
itself
from
its
very
day
one
meet
our
sustainability
goals
versus
adding
to
the
challenges
of
those
goals
that
have
been
elusive
to
date.
So
I
say
all
that,
with
both
promise
and
looking
forward
to
doing
the
work
ahead.
B
Thank
you,
council
member
reich,
we'll
see
if
there's
anyone
else
on
the
committee
or
staff
that
have
anything
they'd
like
to
add
to
the
conversation,
if
not
I'm
going
to
direct
the
clerk
to
receive
and
file.
This
update
and
thank
everyone.
Who's
participated
on
the
call,
including
all
of
the
staff
and
private
sector
collaborative
planning
committee
and
everyone
else
who
has
been
working
so
hard
on
this.
I
thank
you
very
much,
mr
hanson,
for
your.
J
B
O
B
We'll
then,
move
on
to
the
last
item,
which
is
an
item
number
15..
This
is
also
something
that
we
will
take
action
on.
So
I
would
ask
mister
friends
or
councilmember
cunningham
our
council
member,
gordon,
to
speak.
First,
please.
T
Good
afternoon,
chair,
goodman
and
committee
members
before
you
today
is
a
zoning
code
text
amendment
to
modify
the
owner
occupancy
requirements
for
accessory
dwelling
units.
This
proposed
amendment
is
being
brought
forward
by
council
member
gordon
and
would
remove
the
owner
occupancy
requirement
for
attached
and
detached
adus
does
the
does
it
have
the
presentation,
the
slides.
T
I'll
just
go
ahead
without
them,
so
as
you're
aware
minneapolis
established
its
current
system
of
regulating
adus
in
2014,
we
have
three
categories
of
edus
internal
adus,
which
are
located
within
the
principal
structure
and
most
often
take
the
form
of
a
finished
basement
or
attic
space
attached,
adus,
which
are
most
often
a
rear
addition
to
an
existing
structure
and
detached
adus,
which
are
located
in
a
separate
structure,
most
commonly
replacing
a
detached
garage.
Oh
graham
thanks,
if
you
could
go
two
slides
ahead
from
here.
T
Currently
adus
are
permitted
accessory
to
owner-occupied,
conforming
single-family
homes
and
duplexes
city-wide.
The
ordinance
requires
that
a
property
owner
reside
in
one
of
the
units
on
the
property,
and
this
requirement
is
enforced
through
the
recording
of
a
covenant
of
owner
occupancy
on
the
property,
and
that
runs
with
the
property
through
a
potential
change
in
ownership.
Next
slide,
please,
with
the
adoption
of
minneapolis
2040,
there
was
an
included
action
step
under
policy
35,
which
calls
explicitly
for
the
elimination
of
the
existing
owner
occupancy
requirement
for
adus.
T
This
proposed
amendment
is
intended
to
directly
implement
a
portion
of
this
policy
from
the
comp
plan.
Next
slide,
please,
as
I
mentioned
before,
the
proposed
amendment
would
eliminate
the
existing
owner
occupancy
requirement
for
attached
and
detached
adus,
allowing
them
accessory
to
all
conforming
single-family
homes
and
duplexes
in
the
city
regardless
of
owner
occupancy,
and
would
retain
the
owner
occupancy
requirement
for
internal
edu's.
T
This
amendment
will
allow
a
greater
number
of
properties
across
the
city
the
opportunity
to
pursue
the
establishment
of
an
adu,
while
also
preserving
existing
flexibility
under
the
building
code
that
is
currently
afforded
to
owner
occupants.
Looking
to
establish
internally
to
use,
the
planning
commission
held
a
public
hearing
on
the
proposed
amendment
last
month
and
the
commission
did
vote
to
recommend
that
the
council
adopt
the
ordinance
text
as
presented.
This
concludes
my
presentation
and
I'm
happy
to
address
any
questions
you
might
have.
Thank
you.
B
F
Thank
you
very
much
and
I
don't
have
any
questions
I
just
wanted
to
move
this
forward.
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
it
actually
took
a
lot
of
work
and
we
had
to
divide
it
up
a
little
bit
like
this
because
of
building
code
standards
and
fire
code
standards,
but
it
was
exciting
to
see
that
we
were
able
to
implement
this
part
of
the
comp
plan
and
this
strategy
and
that
it
was
unanimously
supported
at
the
planning
commission.
F
So
I
think,
thanks
in
large
measure,
to
staff
meeting
with
one
another
repeatedly,
I'm
really
delighted
that
we
were
able
to
come
up
with
this
compromise
and
this
win-win
so
that
we
can
open
up
and
I'm
not
expecting
a
whole
bunch
more
edu's
to
get
created
out
of
this
they're
expensive.
But
this
is
another
way
we
can
have
some
more
innovative
housing
types
in
our
city
that
can
hopefully
help
us
address.
Our
housing
needs
into
the
future.
B
F
B
Okay,
thank
you.
I
will
note-
and
I
was
one
of
the
people
who
had
questions
every
lot
in
the
city
can
have
as
many
as
three
units
and
there's
no
occupant
owner
occupancy
requirement.
So
this
would
be
very
consistent
with
what
we've
already
decided
in
2040,
and
so
I'm
supporting
it,
because
I
don't
think
it
makes
sense
to
have
adus
be
owner
occupied,
but
a
general
triplex
in
one
building
or
two
wouldn't
have
to
be.
B
I
think
we
need
to
be
consistent
and
we've
seen
since
they've
been
implemented,
that
having
an
owner,
occupant
or
not,
is
not
really
a
critical
factor,
and
I'm
supporting
councilman
gordon's
motion
in
this,
because
I
think
it
makes
sense.
Are
there
any
other
further
comments
or
questions?
If
not
I'll,
ask
to
call
the
clerk
to
call
the
role
on
item
number
15.
E
G
B
That
item
is
approved,
and
I
do
want
to
note
that
I
noticed
a
while
back
council
member
ellison
has
been
on
the
call,
but
was
gracious
and
did
not
interrupt
as
a
result
of
that,
I
would
guess
that
council
member
ellison
would
like
to
be
recorded
as
voting
eye
on
all
items.
He
was
in
attendance
for
so
I'll
call
on
him
to
see
what
he'd
like
to
say
about
that.
U
B
Thank
you,
and
he
was
just
quiet
and
polite
and
didn't
note
that
he
was
there,
but
I
saw
him
sign
on
when
I
was
looking
at
the
participants.
So
I'd
prefer,
if
you
could
record
him
as
present
for
all
items
that
required
to
vote
today
with
that
seeing
no
further
business
before
us
and
without
objection
I'll
declare
this
meeting
adjourned.
Thank
you
all
for
your.