►
From YouTube: August 26, 2021 Public Health & Safety Committee
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
C
Good
afternoon,
everyone
and
welcome
to
this
regularly
scheduled
meeting
of
the
public
health
and
safety
committee
for
august
26
2021.
My
name
is
philly
cunningham
and
I
am
chair
of
this
committee.
As
we
begin,
I
will
note
for
the
record
that
this
meeting
has
remote
participation
by
members
of
the
minneapolis
city,
council
and
city
staff
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statutes,
section
13d.021
due
to
the
declared
public
local
public
health
emergency.
C
The
city
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency.
This
meeting
is
public
and
subject
to
the
open,
minnesota
open
meeting
law.
At
this
time,
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
please
call
the
role,
so
we
can
verify
a
quorum
for
this
meeting.
F
C
C
There
are
four
consent:
agendas,
consent
items
on
our
agenda
and
two
discussion
items,
so
we
will
first
begin
with
our
consent
agenda.
So
item
number
one
is
authorizing
the
minneapolis
police
department
to
enter
into
a
memorandum
of
understanding
with
matt
bostrom
for
research,
development
and
implementation
of
shared
community
values
for
policing
and
officers
and
item
number.
C
Two
or
1.2
is
accepting
a
donation
from
the
minneapolis
chamber
of
commerce
for
the
for
the
services
related
to
this
values
based
initiative
that
will
be
valued
around
one
250
000
item
number
two
is
authorizing
a
grant
application
to
the
us
department
of
housing
and
urban
development
in
the
amount
of
2
million
for
a
3.5
year
period
from
january
1st
2022
through
june
30th
2025
to
correct
housing
based
health
hazards
in
minneapolis
residential
units
for
income,
qualified
property
hazards.
C
C
Forty
seven
thousand
nine
hundred
sixty
five
dollars
item
number
four
and
item
number
four
is
authorizing
a
contract
with
steven
square
community
organization
in
the
amount
of
fifteen
thousand
dollars
to
provide
administrative
support
and
oversight
of
the
excuse
me
for
the
work
related
to
shared
resources
and
collaborations
fund
through
the
neighborhoods
2020
to
work
with
them,
with
the
oversight
of
the
stephen
squares
community
organization
and
phillips
west
neighborhood
organization,
as
well
as
authorizing
a
second
contract
with
lindale
neighborhood
association
for
the
same
amount
to
provide
a
shared
resource
staff.
C
C
All
right,
so
I
will
amend
my
motion
and
move
items
two
through
two
three
and
four
for
approval.
Are
there
any
discussion
on
those
items
all
right,
seeing
none?
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll
on
items.
One,
I'm
sorry,
two
three
and
four.
F
F
H
C
Thank
you
and
those
items
are
approved.
So
council
member
allison,
has
pulled
item
number
one,
which
is
a
gift
acceptance
from
the
minneapolis
chamber
of
commerce
for
services
from
matt
ostrom
related
to
a
values-based
initiatives
project
with
the
minneapolis
police
department,
councilmember
allison
did
you
want
to
speak
further
to
this
item.
G
Yes
first,
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
appreciate
this
item
coming
forward.
It
seems
like
work.
That's
really
needed.
I
did
have
some
questions
about
where
this
work
is
being
housed,
and
I
also
thought
it
could.
Maybe,
given
that
I
myself
didn't,
have
a
briefing
on
this
item.
Thought
could
be
good
for
us
to
get
a
short
recap
of
this
item.
If
there
are
any
staff
to
here
to
speak
on
it,
my
questions
are
pretty
limited.
G
I
think
I
myself
understand
the
item
pretty
well,
and
am
I
reading
it
correctly
that
there's
not
gonna
actually
be
any
money
exchanged
between
mpd
and
the
chamber
of
commerce?
It
seemed
to
be
the
value
of
the
of
the
of
the
services.
Am
I
reading
that
correctly.
C
Thank
you
for
those
questions.
So
I
see
deputy
chief
emilia
huffman
is
here
to
be
able
to
speak
to
that
as
well
as
dr
matt
bostrom,
who
will
be
leading
the
project
from
that
side
of
the
work
so,
deputy
chief,
would
you
like
to
be
able
to
maybe
dive
into
some
of
the
more
logistical
components?
And
then
we
can
maybe
turn
over
to
dr
bostrom
to
talk
about
the
background
of
the
project
itself
and
what
it
will
be.
I
Thank
you
very
much
chair
cunningham
and
council
member
ellison.
Thank
you
for
the
questions.
So
you
are
exactly
correct
that
there
is
no
money
changing
hands
in
this
project
between
the
chamber
of
commerce
and
the
city
of
minneapolis.
I
The
chamber
has
stepped
forward
very
graciously
with
support
for
this
project
that
I've
been
working
on
since
earlier
this
spring.
In
discussions
with
dr
bostrom
as
some
really
foundational
work
here
in
the
city
of
minneapolis
over
the
course
of
my
career
we've
had
you
know
great
chiefs,
who
had
really
important
visions
for
the
department
and
important
professional
values
for
our
officers.
I
As
we
look
to
recruit,
particularly
over
the
next
few
years,
where
we
are
really
doing
some,
you
know
very
important
work
to
regrow
the
department
and
to
really
invest
in
the
future
of
what
public
safety
looks
like
in
minneapolis.
G
I
Yeah,
so
this
is
an
mpd
project
working
with
dr
bostrom.
I
First
phase
of
the
project,
of
course,
will
be
the
community
engagement
piece
of
it,
but
then,
beyond
that,
he
will
be
working
in
an
ongoing
way,
with
our
staff
internally
in
the
police
department,
to
really
look
at
all
of
our
operations
and
make
sure
that
we're
weaving
those
values
through
everything
from
our
recruiting
materials
and
recruiting
processes
through
hiring
our
pre-service
training,
in-service
training,
evaluations
and
promotional
processes,
so
that
internally,
all
of
our
work
streams
are
really
reflective
of
what
we
discern
from
this
work
with
community
engagement.
G
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
I
do
have
some
not
concerns
about
the
work.
I
think
the
work
is
incredible.
I
think
it's
very
needed,
and
I'm
I'm
really
happy
to
see
this
us
leading
into
this.
I
do
feel
like
with
a
lot
of
questions
up
in
the
air
around
public
safety
and
around
you
know,
the
police
department
itself
mpd
is
under
investigation
from
the
doj
and
the
state
around
a
pattern
of
practice
of
discrimination.
I
feel
like
this.
G
Could
this
work
if
we're
just
deciding
where
it's
housed
out
of
this
gift?
Acceptance
feels
like
it
could
potentially
start
us
off
on
a
wrong
foot
of
eroding
trust
before
we
really
get
started,
meaning
that
the
department
that
is
sort
of
being
looked
at
to
to
be
helped
in
in
building
trust
with
community
is
also
going
to
be
sort
of
the
lead
and
point
person
with
that
work.
G
I
feel
like
this
work
could
be
better
housed
and
still
have
everybody
involved
if
it
was
to
be
housed
out
of
the
coordinator's
office
or
civil
rights.
It's
not
uncommon
for
us
to
house
work,
that's
related
to
housing,
for
example,
out
of
the
coordinator's
office.
I
know
that
we
did
that
with
regards
to
tenant
protections.
G
We
did
that
with
regards
to
rent
stabilization
as
well,
and
so
I
you
know,
I
say
that
to
just
say
you
know
it
feels
like
for
the
sake
of
trust
and
getting
this
work
off
on
on
a
good
foot,
it
might
be
better
to
have
a
different
department,
be
that
point
of
contact,
but
in
a
way
that
doesn't
disrupt
the
work,
but
in
a
way
that
allows
us
to
still
conduct
it
and
and
have
you,
as
in
a
leadership
role
and
have
dr
bosh
from
being
able
to.
G
You
know,
proceed
accordingly
with
the
work
in
a
smooth
way,
and
so
I'm
just
gonna
offer
that
I'm
not
gonna
make
a
motion.
I
may
make
a
motion
before
the
before
the
discussion
is
done
here,
but
I
just
wanted
to
offer
those
observations
and
and
say
that
it
really
feels
like
this
work
could
be
having
a
different
department.
As
the
point
of
contact
for
this
gift,
acceptance
could
be,
could
really
help
the
work
get
off
on
a
good
foot,
so
I'll
leave
it
there.
For
now.
Mr
chair.
C
Thank
you,
councilmember
allison,
and
thank
you
dc
hoffman
for
that
additional
information.
I
will.
C
I
know
that
dr
bostrom
is
also
on
the
line,
so
I
have
a
few
other
council
members
in
colley
in
queue
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
pause
with
dr
bostrom
and
maybe
circle
back
if
some
of
the
questions
aren't
answered
or
if
anyway,
we'll
circle
back
to
that
council
member
fletcher,
followed
by
councilmember
palmisano.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I'm
feeling
really
torn
about
how
to
vote
on
this,
because,
on
the
one
hand,
I
actually
really
like
the
content.
It's
a
good
research
question.
I
had
a
chance
to
be
briefed
by
dr
vostrum
and
I
I
actually
think
that
this
is
something
that
should
be
on
our
research
agenda.
H
I
think
that
the
the
the
problem
that
I
have-
and
I
actually
did
a
little
work
to
try
to
talk
to
the
coordinator
and
and
sort
of
raise
this
in
agenda
setting
to
get
to
a
place
where
we
could,
you
know,
bring
this
forward
in
a
different
way.
That
was
more
coordinated
with
the
rest
of
our
city's
research
agenda,
and
I
think
this
is
not
actually
a
criticism
of
mpd
by
the
way.
H
This
is
a
criticism
of
the
way
our
city
is
coordinating
our
research
agenda
and
I
think
it's
something
that
we
need
to
work
on
in
the
coordinator's
office.
But
I
I
think
this
is
a
worthy
question
for
research.
H
I
am
not
sure
it
is
more
worthy
than
things
that
we
have
been
asking
for
and
providing
staff
directions
on
and
even
allocating
funding
to
that
haven't
been
getting
done.
Outreach
and
engagement
that
hasn't
happened
around
a
lot
of
the
questions
around
public
safety
that
the
community's
been
raising.
H
That's
happened
at
a
much
slower
pace
with
far
fewer
resources,
and
so
I
have
real
concerns
about
the
chamber
of
commerce
being
able
to
set
our
research
agenda
priorities
for
us
by
putting
money
into
the
ones
that
they
support
in
a
way
that
that
moves
something
to
the
front
of
the
queue,
and
so
I
I
actually
do
think
that
this
is
something
that
it
is
research
that
should
happen.
It
is
research
that,
if
the
council
decides
to
support
it,
I
will
support
the
process
and
I
will
support
the
work
getting
done.
H
I'm
not
sure
that
I
can
support
this
vote
today,
though,
because
of
the
way
that
this
is
coming
through
and
the
way
that
it,
I
think,
has
a
really
kind
of
it'll
have
the
effect,
especially
with
the
people
we're
trying
to
like
win
back
trust
for
our
city
and
our
police
department
and
our
system
of
public
safety.
H
I
think
for
us
to
start
on
a
footing
of
saying
so
we're
kind
of
letting
the
business
community
jump
this
to
the
front
of
the
line
outside
of
any
democratic
decision-making
process
about
how
we
should
be
prioritizing.
Research
doesn't
feel
great
to
me,
and
so
I
I
think,
I'm
probably
a
no
vote
today
in
committee.
I
think
that
if
the
council
decides
that
we
want
to
move
this
research
forward,
I
do
think
it's
good
research.
H
I
so
I
want
to
just
name
that
I'm
I'm
I'm
trying
to
to
both
sort
of
situate.
My
my
concern
about
the
process
and
my
concern
about
the
structure
of
the
gift
and
separate
that,
from
you
know,
from
any
comments
on
the
content.
I'm
I'm
I'm
really
not
not
questioning
that
we
are
going
to
have
a
whatever
happens
in
in
the
public
safety
vote
and
everything
else
there's
going
to
be
law
enforcement.
H
We
need
to
be
recruiting
good
people
for
law
enforcement
and
creating
a
lot
of
community
outreach
and
buying
and
trust
around
that
law
enforcement
function,
and
this
is
good
research
towards
doing
that
work.
So
I
want
to
just
you
know,
validate
the
the
concept
at
the
same
time
that
I
have
real
concerns
about.
You
know
the
structure
of
the
gift
and
the
resources,
and
I
just
want
to
acknowledge.
H
I
know
it's
frustrating
that
this
wasn't
getting
done
and
and
I
kind
of
respect
that
mpd
went
out
and
found
money
for
it,
because
I
know
we
don't
have
it
in
the
budget
and
and
there's
a
lot
of
things
we
don't
have
in
the
budget,
but
there's
a
lot
of
really
worthy
projects
that
are
not
getting
done
right
now
that
the
answer
has
just
been
no
and
that
nobody's
stepped
up
to
fund,
and
so
I
I
I'm
I'm
struggling
to
see
this,
you
know
jump
the
queue
in
this
way.
H
I
don't
like
the
impression
that
that
gives
for
the
public,
and
I
hope
that
we
can
think
about
a
better
way
to
to
structure
and
sequence
and
supervise
research,
so
that
we're
doing
coordinated
outreach
across
departments
and
across
disciplines
in
a
way
that
that
helps
us
prioritize
it
in
a
in
a
clearer,
more
public
way.
J
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
You
know
I
this
isn't
money
being
given
to
the
city.
That
was
maybe
the
title
gets
a
little
bit
confusing,
but
my
full
understanding
of
this
is
that
this
is
between
matt
bostrom
and
the
chamber,
and
what
we
are
accepting
out
of
this
is
the
output.
Is
the
work
of
dr
bostrom
that
I
think
you're
about
to
hear
because
councilmember
gordon
said
suggested
that
he
go
first?
You
know,
I
think
that,
for
the
sake
of
trust
and
establishing
meaningful
dialogue,
it's
it's
important
that
it's,
the
mpd
conducting
this
effort.
J
That
would
be
the
most
authentic
here
not
to
go
through
some
kind
of
intermediary,
whatever
internal
intermediary.
That
is
this
isn't.
If
this
were
the
chamber
giving
the
city
money
and
the
city
deciding
what
to
do
with
it,
then
I
would
absolutely
agree
with
council
member
fletcher
that
it
would
need
to
have
some
kind
of
more
thoughtful
processing
as
to
what
should
really
be
done
first,
but
that's
not
what's
happening
here.
This
is
exactly
what
our
department
should
be
doing.
J
This
is
exactly
what
our
police
department
should
be
doing
and
exactly
how
we
should
be
doing
it
directly.
So
I
am
curious
what
deputy
chief
huffman
might
have
to
weigh
in
on
in
terms
of
the
importance
of
it
being
a
direct
relationship
with
mpd
or
not,
or
I
would
also
yield
to
dr
bostrom's
thoughts
on
the
matter.
Thank
you,
mr.
C
Chair
you
councilmember,
so
I
will
thank
you
councilmember,
gordon,
for
your
generosity.
I
do
want
to
pause
and
actually
do
give
dr
bostrom
some
space
to
be
able
to
talk
about
what
the
content
of
this
project
is.
A
lot
of,
I
think
a
lot
of
the
issues
we're
talking
about.
Council-Wise
is
around
process,
but
I
do
want
to
talk
about
the
content
and
create
some
space
for
that
as
well,
because,
as
has
been
mentioned,
the
content
is
really
good.
C
It's
a
it's
an
exciting
project,
so
dr
bostrom,
I
will
yield
the
floor
to
you
to
be
able
to
to
give
a
brief
brief
synopsis
of
what
you're
looking
to
do
here.
Thank
you
and
welcome.
K
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Councilmember
cunningham,
council
members
staff.
I
appreciate
the
caveat
there
chair
and
that
you
know
how
I
can
get
going
on
this,
but
one
I
am
I'm
grateful
for
the
work
that
the
city
of
minneapolis
is
doing,
and
the
commitment
to
looking
at
a
holistic
approach
to
improving
public
safety.
K
For
those
of
you
that
don't
know
my
background.
I've
been
in
law
enforcement
for
for
much
of
my
life
served
most
recently
as
the
ramsey
county
sheriff
and
was
assistant
chief
of
the
saint
paul
police
department
prior
to
that,
but
along
the
way
as
we're
enduring
today,
is
this
ongoing
challenge
of
police
officers,
seemingly
disconnected
in
a
way
that
they
shouldn't
be
with
our
community,
resulting
in
a
lack
of
trust
and
what
I've
discovered
over
the
years
is
that
we
keep
seem
to
be
missing
each
other,
both
groups.
K
You
have
community
members
that
are
desperate
to
trust
the
police.
We
have
men
and
women
serving
us
around
the
clock
who
are
desperate
to
be
trusted,
and
I
I
I
have
a
burden
for
that.
There
has
to
be
ways
for
us
to
bring
them
to
those
sides
together.
If
we
both
want
the
same
thing
and
so
in
an
effort
to
do
that,
instead
of
guessing
what
that
generates,
trust,
what
we've
done
is
went
out
and
talked
to
community
members
in
a
really
deep
way.
K
It's
a
long
story
on
how
we
go
about
this,
but
in
any
case,
in
those
conversations,
the
community
has
really
provided
a
blueprint
and
a
framework
for
policing
to
be
able
to
speak
in
languages
that
the
speaking
language
that
the
community
understands
to
emphasize
the
very
values
that
are
at
the
core
of
trust
and
how
the
community
understands
those
things
and
then
given
direction
as
to
if
the
police
department,
hires
women
and
men
that
have
those
community-based
values
and
exhibit
those
behavior
traits
on
an
individual
level.
K
Trust
increases
in
individual
officers
and,
as
that,
increases
trust
in
the
organization
increases,
and
I
think
all
of
you
know
that
as
trust
in
the
police
or
any
other
department
increases
trust
in
the
city
increases,
and
so
what
what
we've
seen
is
is
that
you'd
say
well.
That
makes
sense.
That's
that's
not
entirely
different
than
anyone's
probably
ever
heard.
K
Here's
here
is
the
difficulty
that
we've
seen
in
the
200
plus
years
of
policing,
and
it's
this:
how
do
we
take
those
values
and
characteristics
and
weave
those
and
operationalize
them
throughout
the
department
to
make
it
part
of
the
culture
therein
has
become
the
challenge
and
what
the
minneapolis
police
department
is
prepared
to
do
is
to
lead
the
way
and
to
set
an
example
on
how
to
do
that,
and
so
I
want
to
just
try
to
clarify
this
in
my
final
remarks
here.
This
isn't
my
this
isn't
about
me.
K
I'm
the
messenger,
my
experience
living
in
saint
paul,
growing
up
in
that
city
being
a
police
officer
and
then
sheriff
there
and
living
alongside
community
members
during
that
entire
time
and
then
also
being
a
police
officer
in
that
same
community.
I
I
do
that.
I
I
struggle-
and
you
probably
can
hear
me
stammering
just
a
little
bit,
but
it's
emotional
for
me
and-
and
I
think
that
that
I've
seen
this
struggle-
and
I
think
the
community
has
shown
us
a
way
out-
and
let
me
just
to
the
last
part
is.
K
I
am
well
aware
of
the
importance
of
these
things
and
making
sure
that
what
the
minneapolis
police
department
does
when
it
comes
to
community
engagement.
We
wouldn't
be
doing
any
of
this.
Nor
would
I
ever
recommend
that
we
don't
harvest
the
information.
That's
already
been
done
and
is
currently
being
done
in
the
city
of
minneapolis.
This
would
not
be
independent.
This
my
purpose
would
be
to
draw
in
all
the
information
that
you've
already
collected,
let's
not
recreate
that,
let's
build
on
it,
so
I'll
pause
there.
K
If
you
have
any
other
specific
questions,
I'm
more
than
happy
to
answer
them,
but
that
gives
you
a
little
bit
of
the
arc
of
of
where
this
is
at,
and
I
think
one
of
the
great
possibilities
on
this
is
that
the
city
of
minneapolis-
if
if
this
goes
50
as
well
as
the
community,
believes
that
it
will,
you
will
in
fact
set
a
new
model
in
policing.
C
Thank
you,
dr
boston
bostrom.
I
really
appreciate
that
additional
context.
So
now
we
will
move
on
to
councilmember
gordon.
E
Well,
thank
you
very
much
and
I
appreciate
that
context
too.
It
sounds
like
some
of
the
research's
research
you've
already
done,
but
I
think
the
proposal
is
to
get
more
community
engagement
going
moving
forward
and
I
can
appreciate
that
it's
kind
of
exciting.
I
also
can
appreciate
the
concerns
that
my
colleagues
have
raised.
It
feels
like
it's
a
little
bit
disjointed
and
not
very
well
coordinated.
E
E
We
also
have
a
police
conduct,
oversight,
commission
and
they're
actually
charged
with
reviewing
policy
and
working
on
that
too,
and
it
would
be
they
are
interested
in
community
engagement
and
they
are
interested
in
hiring
policy
and
then
also
training
policy,
and
then
what
you
do
in
terms
of
somebody
who
might
need
retraining
or
those
kinds
of
differences.
So
I
can-
and
we
also
have
a
police
conduct
review
group
in
civil
rights.
E
So
I
really
wonder
if
there
couldn't
be
some
kind
of
pathway
we
could
have
here
where
your
services
could
be
to
help
us
connect
some
of
the
dots
and
have
others
involved,
and
I
don't
really
know
where
to
go
with
this
necessarily,
but
there's
a
chance
that
we,
this
could
be
another
isolated,
siloed
work,
that's
being
done,
I
mean
we
also
have
this
truth
and
reconciliation
process
that
we've
embarked
on
to
look
at
historic
structural
racism
in
our
city
and
the
police
department
isn't
listed
as
one
of
the
departments
engaging
in
all
of
that.
E
So
there
has
been
this
challenge
of
getting
engagement
in
in
terms
of
the
bigger
projects
and
involvement,
and
you
could
be
the
link
you
could
help
us
bridge
that
divide.
Potentially,
I
will
say
that
your
background
is
going
to
be
create
a
great
deal
of
confidence
for
a
lot
of
people
and
also,
I
will
say,
having
the
chamber
hiring
you
to
do
this
for
us.
E
If
that's
the
way,
we
should
phrase
it
we'll
create
a
lot
of
confidence
for
some
folks,
but
it's
also
just
going
to
raise
a
lot
of
suspicion
and
concern
and
there's
going
to
be
like.
Oh,
this
is
a
big
investment
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
have
to
change
too
much.
You
know,
we've
got
this
seasoned
officer,
who's
also
been
elected,
as
sheriff
who.
B
E
How
to
work
with
people
and
knows
how
to
talk
and
and
who
already
will
have
the
confidence
of
the
police
department
and
and
and
then
big
businesses.
I
don't
know
you're.
This
isn't
necessarily
me
talking,
but
this
is
me
trying
to
represent
voices
of
my
constituents,
but
so
I
can
appreciate
what
we're
saying
and
maybe
there's
a
potential.
We
can
move
it
forward
recommendation
and
have
some
staff
directions
that
would
go
with
this
or
some
clarity
about
where
some
partnerships
would
be,
because
I
think
we
need
to
do
this
work.
E
I
mean
it's
great
that
you've
got
the
resources
to
come
and
help
us
do
it,
and
I'm
also
open
to
seeing
if,
if
my
colleagues
on
the
committee
have
any
ideas
about
how
we
could
move
this
forward,
it's
always
nicer
when
things
leave
committee
with
a
unanimous
vote
of
support
before
it
goes
off
to
the
council.
E
C
E
I
think
I'd
rather
wait
and
see
if,
like
there's
some
council,
councilmember
alison,
alluded
to
the
fact
that
he
might
be
coming
forward
with
something
after
our
discussion,
and
I
see
his
name
and
the
stack
there.
So
I
will
hold
that
off
and
see
if
we
have
a
better
idea.
All
right
sounds
good.
G
I
don't
think
I
have
a
better
idea,
but
I
oh
sorry
go
ahead.
Mr
chair.
G
Well,
yeah,
I
I
don't
have
a
better
idea.
I
just
wanted
to
you
know
just
thank
mr
bostrom
for
for
coming
on
the
call
and,
as
you
can
probably
discern
from
this
discussion,
even
you
know
all
of
these
discussions
lately
have
you
know
turn
into
these
proxy
discussions
about
how
much
you
know.
Council
members,
love
or
don't
love
mpd.
When
really
that's
not
the
discussion,
you
know
the.
G
I
think
that
what
councilmember
gordon
mentioned,
which
is
that
which
is
the
the
trust
issue,
is
what
I'm
getting
at.
I
think
this
is
necessary
work.
I
think
I
think
we
should
proceed
forward
with
this
work,
but
I
do
feel
like
the
way
it's
coming
forward
before
us
today
could
get
us
in
in
a
place
where
it
raises
a
lot
of
questions,
as
councilmember
gordon
said,
I'll
put
it
just
more
simply
whenever
mpd
has
has
has
has
ruptured
trust
with
community
members.
G
One
of
the
big
criticisms-
and
I
hear
this
from
you
know
across
the
board,
at
least
in
my
ward-
is
that
is
that
mpd
always
puts
itself
in
charge
of
holding
itself
accountable
and
that
that
is
a
part
of
what
makes
people
lose
confidence
in
whether
or
not
the
work
is
legitimate.
G
I
think
your
work
is
legitimate,
but
there's
also,
you
know
a
need
for
us
to
prove
that
the
work
is
legitimate
and
if
people
perceive
this
as
just
another
instance
of
mpd
only
wanting
to
play
by
its
own
rules
and
not
not
not
coordinating
with
other
departments
and
not
having
any
other
sort
of
collaboration
with
the
rest
of
the
city
enterprise,
I
think
that
that
could
be
problematic
and
undermine
the
very
work
that
we're
trying
to
move
forward
with
here,
and
so
you
know,
that's
a
part
of
why
my
my
suggestion
was
to
you
know.
G
I
again
I
haven't
talked
to
the
coordinator's
office
and-
and
I
have
no
idea
why
this
wouldn't
be
appropriate
there.
So
before
I
make
that
motion
I'd,
maybe
want
to
have
some
time
to
to
have
a
discussion
with
some
other
departments
about.
You
know
why:
why
is
it
essential?
You
know
my
colleague,
councilmember
palmisano
said
it's
essential.
It
needs
to
be
in
the
department,
but
but
I
I
didn't
get
a
sense
from
from
her
comments
as
to
as
to
why
it's
more
essential
there.
You
know
less
essential
there.
G
I
I
you
know,
so
I
think
that
there's
a
there's
a
need
for
us
to
make
sure
that
the
that
the
work
is
not
only
legitimate,
but
it
also
appears
to
be
legitimate
and
if
it's,
if
it
just
appears
to
be
another
instance
of
you,
know
the
department
not
wanting
to
collaborate
with
the
rest
of
the
city
enterprise
or
putting
itself
in
charge
of
holding
itself
accountable
that
could
undermine.
I
think
this
really
important
work,
so
you
know
so
I'll
I'll
sort
of
leave.
My
comments
there.
G
I
think
I'm
being
clear
this,
isn't
this
isn't
a
a
proxy
discussion
for
any
other
issue
except
the
issue
before
us,
which
is
your
work,
dr
bostrom.
G
So,
thank
you
very
much
and
and
and
I'll
again
I
don't
have
emotion-
I
I
guess
you
know
if,
if
councilmember
gordon
doesn't
put
anything
forward,
I
would
maybe
move
to
delay
this
a
cycle
because
I
I
don't
want
to
be
in
a
position
to
vote
against
it
today,
but
I
do
feel
pretty
strongly
that
is
proceeding
forward
in
a
way
that
could
could
undermine
the
work
and
so-
and
so
I
probably
wouldn't
support
it
today
without
some
changes
to
how
it's
coming
forward
and
again,
as
councilmember
paul
masano
said
and
as
dc
huffman
said,
we're
not
discussing
the
exchange
of
you,
know,
money
being
exchanged
between
the
city
and
the
chamber
or
you
know,
or
anywhere
else,
and
so
this
this
discussion
also
isn't
really
about
that.
G
K
C
So
councilmember
allison
I'll,
just
what
I'm
hearing
you
say
there
are.
You
know
two
potential
emotions
that
can
be
made
in
response
to
the
concerns
which
would
be
motion
to
delay
a
cycle
or
also
to
forward
without
recommendation.
C
So
those
are
both
two
options
of
motions
to
be
able
to
achieve
what
it
sounds
like
you
are
hoping
to
be
able
to
do
so.
So
I
will
circle
out.
We
have
council
member
paulistano
in
queue.
J
Mr
chair,
I
I
feel
that
deputy
chief
huffman
needs
a
chance
to
respond
to
this
before
I
before
I
speak.
I
think
she
was
trying
to
get
a
word
in
edgewise
here.
Could
she
be
called
on?
First,
please.
C
I
Thank
you
very
much
chair
cunningham.
I
just
did
want
to
provide
some
more
context
for
the
conversation
since
chair
cunningham
and
vice
chair
fletcher
had
the
opportunity
to
have
a
much
longer
briefing
about
this,
that
the
other
folks
on
this
meeting
didn't
have
a
chance
to
hear
to
know
that.
Of
course,
I
have
been
working
with
other
city
departments
in
bringing
this
project
forward.
I
I
also
have
spoken
with
community
engagement
manager
at
the
office
of
violence
prevention,
to
make
sure
that
our
work
is
parallel
and
additive
to
the
other
city
processes
that
are
going
forward
and
both
former
city
coordinator
mark
ruff
and
the
interim
city
coordinator.
Heather
johnston
are
fully
aware
of
the
details
of
the
project
and
agreed
that
it
is
appropriate
for
it
to
live
in
mpd,
and
we
would
certainly
be
continuing
to
work
with
the
city
coordinator's
office
on
a
regular
basis.
I
As
well
as
coordinating
our
work
with
opposite
violence,
prevention
and
our
colleagues
in
neighborhood
and
community
relations,
because
we
do
want
to
leverage
all
of
the
expertise
available
in
the
city,
so
of
course
we
wouldn't
be
going
forward
with
this
process
alone
and
without
working
with
our
other
city.
Colleagues,
but
I
do
think
it
is
critical
that
mpd
works
to
do
this
community
engagement
as
it
is
very
foundational.
I
I
know
that
one
of
the
things
that
they
will
be
looking
at
and
will
be
expecting
is
to
see
our
plans
for
doing
foundational
community
engagement
work
and,
of
course,
we
also
have
the
really
significant
recruitment
issues
that
we're
addressing
now
and
the
support
order
that
we're
operating
under
requiring
us
to
take
any
and
all
actions
to
meet
a
sworn
staffing
level
of
730
officers
by
the
end
of
next
june.
I
One
of
the
things
that
I
really
like
about
the
timing
of
this
project
is
that
it
is
first
a
discussion
about
recruitment,
and
hopefully
this
kind
of
community
engagement
with
mpd
will
help
to
increase
our
ability
to
recruit
folks
from
our
community
and
will
help
us
be
able
to
reach
that
730
number
by
the
end
of
next
year.
So
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
add
some
additional
context
to
the
discussion.
C
Of
course,
thank
you,
councilmember
cano,
followed
by
councilmember,
gordon.
C
J
You
I
did
just
want
to
briefly
respond
to
council
member
ellison's
concerns.
I
guess
the
the
thing
is.
I
have
spoken
with
the
coordinator
about
this
several
times
to
see
if
there
was
a
more
logical
place
within
the
coordinator's
office.
I
also
have
spoken
second
hand
but
with
office
of
violence
prevention,
who
also
deeply
agrees
that
this
work
needs
to
be
taken
on
by
the
police
department
themselves
indirectly,
and
so
I
think
that
you
know
we
either
demonstrate
that
this
is
top
priority
or
it's
not.
J
J
We
are
not
going
to
give
this
project
an
opportunity
to
do
so
at
a
really
critical
time.
I
think
it's
important
to
get
going.
I
don't
think
that
we
can
just
choose
to
hold
certain
things
back
right
now.
This
is
work
that
one
of
the
our
most
collaborative
top
female
department
leads
in
police
administration
has
taken
on
as
her
own
project
and,
let's
please
not
take
that
away
from
her.
J
I
would
like
to
suggest,
based
on
the
discussion
here
today,
that
we
I
would
like
to
move
this
forward
without
recommendation
for
now,
in
hopes
that
my
colleagues
can
have
some
more
of
those
conversations
and
get
more
comfortable
with
how
this
might
get
placed
by
the
time
of
the
council
meeting
where
we
would
need
to
vote
on
this
again.
So
I
would
like
to
make
that
as
a
motion
that
we
move
this
forward
today
without
recommendation.
C
All
right,
thank
you.
Councilmember
palmisano
has
made
a
motion
to
move
this
item
forward
to
city
council
without
recommendation.
We
do
have
two
other
council
members
in
queue.
I
will
go
ahead
and
call
on
you
if
you
want
to
speak
to
this
motion,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
move
forward.
So
with
that
councilman
mcconnell,
followed
by
councilmember
gordan.
B
B
Just
because
it
feels
like
we're
trying
to
do
a
lot
of
detailed
work
at
the
committee
level
and
it's
nicer
if
there's
a
a
different
vehicle
for
us
to
kind
of
plug
in
all
of
our
energy
and
interest
prior
to
sort
of
the
well,
I
don't
want
to
say
the
dress
rehearsal,
but
you
know
this
has
been
prime
time,
and
so
we
want
to
be
able
to
integrate
our
thoughts
and
our
initiatives
with
you
as
staff
and,
as
the
you
know,
leading
consultants
on
this
work.
B
So
in
the
future,
if
you
could,
let
us
know
how
we
might
be
able
to
either
get
updates
on
the
work
or,
if
there's
a
subcommittee
or
a
work
group
that
that
is
that
coalesces
around
this.
That's
typically
how
council
members
plug
into
different
lines
of
work
and
can
shape
it
ahead
of
time
so
that
when
we
get
to
the
committee
discussion,
you
know
most
of
the
questions
have
been
answered
or
or
the
thoughts
have
been
sort
of
processed
and
integrated
into
the
work.
B
So
so
today,
I'm
happy
to
support
the
item
as
is
or
follow
the
the
motion
that
comes
member
promisana
put
forward.
I
I
feel
like
I.
This
is
a
good
good
piece
of
work
and
that
we
should
really
advance
it
and-
and
I
I
trust
that
we
can
get
most
of
our
questions
answered
by
the
time.
The
city
council
would
officially
vote
on
this
at
the
full
meeting.
C
I
will
just
say
that
this
is
not
a
full
meeting.
It's
a
real
meeting.
Thank
you
for
that
gossip
fergano.
I
do
appreciate
your
feedback
there.
Now
we
have
mr
councilmember
gordon.
E
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
chair.
I
I'll
support
this
motion.
I
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
I
I
just
want
to
share
one
of
the
difficult
situations
that
happens
for
the
city
council
right
now,
more
so
maybe
than
it
did
in
the
past,
when
we
operated
slightly
differently,
because
we
hadn't
gotten
all
the
clarity
we
needed
from
our
city,
attorney's
office
and
everywhere
else.
E
We
do
approve
gifts
like
this,
but
we
actually
can't
direct
the
staff
on
how
they
will
deal
with
a
gift
if
it's
the
police
department.
So
when
I'm
thinking
of
how
could
I
solve
this
problem?
Oh
we
could
direct
you
to
and
to
work
with
the
coordinator's
office
and
the
coordinator's
office
to
work
with
you
and
come
back
and
report
to
us
on
progress
or
do
something
like
that,
but
it
feels
like
now.
We
can
only
request
the
police
department
to
do
things
because
of
the
way
the
charter
is.
E
So
that's
been
one
challenge,
as
I
was
trying
to
think
of
what
could
we
do
now
when
it
gets
to
the
council?
We
could
direct
our
the
staff
that
you
just
listed,
because
the
partnership
and
the
kind
of
the
team
that
that
was
listed
sounded
really
strong
and
really
good,
and
that's
what
we
like
to
hear:
oh
you're,
actually
working
with
all
those.
I
would
like
you
to
reach
out
to
the
police
conduct
oversight.
Commission,
that's
kind
of
the
community
voice
with
community
values,
and
it
could
really
be
a
nice
connector.
E
So
you
know
next
time
you
could
list
them
and
try
to
reach
out
to
them
if
you
want
or
the
chair,
but
at
any
rate
I
appreciate
this
and
maybe
there'll
be
some
opportunity
for
us
to
do
something
before
the
council
meeting
to
help
strengthen
the
proposal
for
the
city
council
and
it
it'll
be
supported,
but
I
I
don't
want
to
see
it
get
too
late
either,
and
I
appreciate
council
thomason,
I'm
making
the
motion.
C
Okay,
thank
you
so
much
everyone
so
on
before
us
is
council
member
palmisano's
motion
to
move
to
forward
to
the
full
council
meeting
without
recommendation
council
member
fletcher.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
can
we
just
get
clarification
I'll
support
this,
and
I
think
that
lets
us
move
the
conversation
forward
to
council
in
a
way
that'll,
encourage
us
and
hopefully
set
a
deadline
to
get
some
clarity
around
a
few
of
the
questions
that
were
raised
here.
H
One
question
that
I
did
want
to
make
sure
I
got
addressed
is:
has
the
chamber
confirmed
the
gift,
because
I
got
very
conflicting
information
about
that
on
friday,
which
made
me
concerned
about
it
having
come
through
agenda
setting
when
it
wasn't,
it
wasn't
clear
that
that
was
finalized,
so
is,
is
this?
Is
this
for
sure
happening,
and
and
do
we
have
confirmation
from
from
the
chamber
that
there
is
in
fact
a
gift
for
us
to
be
voting
to
accept.
I
Thank
you
for
the
question
councilmember
fletcher,
so
I've
been
working
in
an
ongoing
basis
with
jonathan
weinhagen
at
the
chamber
of
commerce,
and
you
know
he
wants
to
make
sure
that
we
have
as
strong
a
possible
chance,
of
course,
of
getting
approval
to
move
forward
with
this
work.
So
he'll
be
continuing
to
work
on
the
details
of
the
funding
with
dr
bostrom,
but
they
are
very
excited
about
this
project.
Moving
forward.
C
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
related
to
this
item,
all
right
so
again
on
before
us.
Now?
Is
the
motion
from
council
member
paul
osano
to
afford,
without
recommendation
with
that,
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
please
call
the
role.
E
D
H
C
That
motion
carries
and
that
item
will
be
forwarded
to
the
full
council
without
recommendation.
So
thank
you,
everybody
for
that
robust
discussion
and
I
look
forward
to
continued
conversations
about
to
be
able
to
address
some
of
the
concerns
that
were
expressed
here
today.
Thank
you
to
dr
vostrom
for
joining
us.
C
Next
up.
We
will
move
into
our
discussion
items
so
today
we
will
have
our
monthly
community
safety
update,
presentation
and
we'll
then
follow
that
with
getting
an
update
on
the
project
plan
surrounding
some
community
safety,
research
work
and
engagement
work.
So
we
will
get
an
update
on
that
for
our
presentation
today
we
are
gonna,
have
to
switch
it
up
a
little
bit
here
and
actually
have
josh
peterson
from
the
office
of
violence.
C
Prevention
move
us
forward
with
our
community
safety
update
first
starting
to
flip
it
around
just
got
a
request
because
there
is
an
urgent
meeting
that
he
needs
to
join.
So
let's
go
ahead
and
pull
up
that
presentation
for
the
community
safety
update
and
we
will
pass
it
over
to
josh
peterson
manager
of
the
opposite
violence
prevention
to
get
us
started,
and
then
we
will
circle
back
to
our
police
department
to
give
us
the
update
related
to
crime,
trend,
statistics
and
strategies.
C
Thank
you
welcome
mr
peterson.
F
Thank
you,
mr
chair
and
committee
members.
If
you
could
advance
the
slides
please
to
the
office
of
bounce
prevention
section
that
would
be
wonderful
and
as
you're
doing,
that
director
cotton
sent
her
apologies
today.
She
had
a
conflict
this
afternoon,
so
she
asked
that
I
step
in
and
share
some
brief
updates
with
you
all
and
then
also
relay
any
questions
or
concerns
or
needs
back
to
her.
So
I'm
happy
to
do
that
as
well,
and
you
can
actually
skip
to
the
next
slide.
Please
thank
you.
F
So
first,
I
just
want
to
briefly
give
an
update
about
our
youth
violence
prevention
week
efforts.
I
think
director
cotton
shared
a
little
bit
about
this
last
time.
F
Just
sort
of
transition
us
back
to
a
safe
school
year,
so
back
in
june,
we
had
over
20
events
and
then
actually
this
week
right
now
we're
hosting
our
second
iteration
of
youth
violence
prevention
week
this
summer
and
we've
got
16
events
happening
throughout
the
course
of
this
week,
all
around
promoting
the
idea
of
again
a
healthy
and
safe
start
to
the
school
year.
Next
slide,
please.
F
So
this
is
an
incredibly
busy
slide.
I'm
not
going
to
walk
through
all
these
events,
but
I
just
wanted
to
put
these
events
out
there
for
the
record
for
folks
who
are
interested.
These
are
the
remaining
events.
We
have
the
rest
of
the
week
here
and
there's
a
whole
diverse
array
of
things:
there's
basketball,
tournaments,
there's
community
movie
nights,
there's
arts
activities
all
sorts
of
great
things
for
young
people
and
families
in
the
community,
so
this
slide
is
available
for
folks
who
want
to
access
it.
F
F
There
is
also
this
information
on
the
city
newsletter.
We
did
send
it
to
council
members
and
the
info
is
available
on
our
office
of
violence
prevention,
facebook
page
as
well.
So
please
folks,
who
are
interested,
take
an
opportunity
to
take
a
look
at
what
kind
of
events
we
have
the
remainder
of
the
week
and
come
show
up
for
our
young
people
next
slide,
please.
F
So
I
want
to
talk
very
briefly
about
some
new
funding.
We
got
from
the
centers
for
disease
control
and
prevention,
so
I've
talked
a
little
bit
at
these
meetings
in
the
past
about
a
five-year
grant.
We
had
from
the
cdc
focused
on
teen
dating
violence
and
youth
violence
prevention.
F
That
grant
is
ending
at
the
end
of
this
month
august
of
2021,
but
we
did
apply
for
sort
of
the
successor
funding
to
that
grant
and
found
out
recently
that
we
were
awarded
that
grant.
So
we
were
one
of
eight
organizations
across
the
country
who
were
awarded
that
funding.
There
are
folks
in
boston
and
alaska
and
georgia
and
california
and
other
places
around
the
country.
So
we're
excited
to
share
about
that.
F
We
will
be
bringing
forward
the
the
formal
request
to
have
to
receive
that
money,
but
I
wanted
to
share
that
news
and
just
talk
just
very
briefly
about
the
project.
So
this
project,
which
is
is
titled
prevail
by
cdc,
is,
is
sort
of
building
upon
that
previous
grant
opportunity
and
is
really
focused
on
preventing
violence,
impacting
young
people,
and
particularly
also
around
this
idea
of
the
intersections
between
youth,
violence
and
racism
and
other
social
determinants
of
health,
and
the
work
is
really
meant
to
be
sort
of
operating
at
the.
F
What
we
call
the
community
and
societal
levels
of
the
social
ecological
model,
so
not
to
get
too
public
health
nerdy
here.
But
we
sort
of
approach
our
work.
You
know
based
on
this
idea
of
what
we
call
the
social
ecological
model,
which
essentially
says
that,
in
order
to
effectively
prevent
violence,
we
need
to
really
work,
not
just
with
individuals
but
with
individuals
and
then
the
relationships
that
they
have
and
then
the
broader
communities
surrounding
them
and
then
also
sort
of
societal
level
factors.
F
You
know
we
have
laws
and
policies
and
procedures,
and
things
like
that,
and
so
cdc
was
really
interested
in
funding
jurisdictions
who
were
going
to
do
work
at
the
community
in
the
societal
level
of
that
social
ecological
model,
which
I
think
works
out
well
for
us,
because
we
have
a
number
of
of
initiatives
already
in
the
office
of
violence
prevention
that
do
operate
at
that
individual
and
relationship
level.
So
really,
this
work
is
meant
to
sort
of
complement
some
of
the
work
we
already
have
going
on.
F
I
think
in
a
nice
way,
and
so
just
very,
very
briefly,
cdc
sort
of
offered
a
couple
of
you
know:
sort
of
a
menu
of
potential
strategies
to
choose
from
and
we
landed
on
a
couple
of
them.
F
So,
by
offering
some
training
and
resources,
we
hope
to
build
sort
of
violence
prevention,
community
champions
who
can
engage
with
us
in
this
work,
really
sort
of
all
around
that
idea
of
promoting
collective
efficacy
and
kind
of
you
know
promoting
social
norms
that
protect
against
violence
in
the
community
and
then
the
other
strategy
which
we're
excited
about
is
working
with
some
of
our
partners
in
the
school
system
around
sort
of
what
it
means
to
promote
peaceful
and
protective
community
environments
for
young
people
in
school
environments,
and
so
we're
planning
to
engage
some
young
people
in
really
sort
of
working
with
them
to
help
think
about
what
those
systems
might
look
like
in
schools.
F
So
just
a
couple
of
quick
updates
from
the
past
month
on
this
earlier
this
month
we
were
able
to
host
a
visit
from
congresswoman
omar
at
north
memorial.
Her
office
reached
out
really
wanting
to
sort
of
just
learn
about
next
step,
and
it
was
a
really
great
opportunity
to
sort
of
raise
awareness
about
a
few
things,
so
one
you
know
raise
awareness
about
this
unique
partnership
that
we
have
between
three
different
hospital
systems
and
our
city,
minneapolis
office
of
violence
prevention
and
the
state
of
minnesota
will
provide
some
funding
around
it.
F
So
we
feel
that
that
that
partnership
is
a
pretty
unique
thing.
It
was
an
opportunity
to
lift
that
up.
Also,
obviously,
it
was
an
opportunity
to
lift
up
sort
of
the
impact
that
gun
violence
has
on
on
folks-
and
you
know,
by
allowing
some
or
by
having
some
staff,
share
their
experiences,
it
was
really
an
opportunity
to
sort
of
share
what
some
of
those
first
first-hand
experiences
with
violence
feel
like
and
then
the
third
piece
was.
F
It
was
an
opportunity
to
raise
awareness
just
about
the
impact
that
the
amazing
folks
who
work
next,
who
work
for
nextstep
have
on
a
regular
basis,
so
the
congresswoman
was
able
to
hear
from
staff
again
directly
about
some
of
the
work.
They're
doing
is
a
really
really
great
opportunity
to
to
share
that
information
and
raise
awareness
next
slide.
Oh
sorry,
one
more
thing
on
this
one.
If
you
could
go
back.
Thank
you.
F
In
the
city's
first
round
of
allocation
of
arp
funds,
there
was
some
funding
allocated
for
stabilization
and
housing
supports
for
people
who
are
caught
up
in
a
cycle
of
violence,
and
particularly
folks
who
are
involved
in
some
of
our
initiatives
that
deal
with
folks
who
are
again
caught
in
that
cycle,
and
so
we
are
working
on
sort
of
operationalizing
that
I
think
the
first
way
that
that's
gonna
sort
of
come
into
into
being
is
in
the
form
of
some
additional
support,
around
housing
and
stabilization
for
participants
in
our
next
step
program,
and
so
we're
making
progress
toward
establishing
a
contract.
F
F
Next
slide,
please
one
more
brief
update
I
want
to
provide
here
is
about
a
new
federal
community
violence,
intervention
collaborative
so
back.
In
june,
the
biden
administration
announced
that
they
were
going
to
convene
and
support
this
community
violence,
intervention
collaborative
and
they
identified
15
cities
that
they
wanted
to
participate
in.
That,
and
these
were
cities
who
were
already
doing
a
lot
of
community
violence,
intervention
work
and
also
who
had
dedicated
to
use
dedicated
use
of
some
of
the
federal
arp
funds
for
violence
prevention
initiatives.
F
So
minneapolis
and
st
paul
were
identified
by
the
biden
administration.
As
sort
of
you
know,
joint
participants
in
this
effort
and
the
effort
is
really
about
sort
of
supporting
both
proven
existing
strategies
and
also
new
innovative
strategies
around
community-based
violence,
prevention,
intervention
and
infrastructure.
F
How
do
we
both
strengthen
the
the
things
we
already
have
going
on
and
also
potentially
bring
on
new
things
and
for
folks
who
have
been
around
this
work
for
a
while
there's
some
echoes
of
something
we
used
to
be
a
part
of
long
ago
called
the
national
forum
on
youth
violence
prevention,
which
was
started
under
the
obama
administration
and
was
really
a
useful
tool
for
us
to
be
able
to
connect
with
practitioners
in
local
government
and
cities
across
the
country
doing
this
work,
it
was
really
invaluable
for
us
to
be
able
to
problem
solve
and
share,
and
so
we're
really
excited
about
this
opportunity
to
do
something
similar
now
we're
still
waiting
on
what
a
lot
of
the
details
are
going
to
look
like
in
terms
of
you
know,
sort
of
all
of
the
nuts
and
bolts
of
it.
F
F
So
we're
really
excited
and
happy
to
be
able
to
fund
those
additional
projects,
because
when
we
did
this
the
first
time
around
in
the
spring,
we
had
significantly
more
interest
in
significantly
more
applications
than
we
were
able
to
fund
at
the
time.
So
through
this
additional
round,
this
fall.
We
plan
to
be
able
to
make
up
to
750
000
available
for
these.
These
community
oriented
violence,
prevention
solutions,
the
request
for
proposals
for
that
closed
yesterday,
so
we
will
be
doing
the
review
process
shortly.
F
We
hope
to
have
the
awards
out
within
two
months
or
so
I
believe,
that's
the
end
of
my
slides.
I'm
happy
to
stand
for
questions
or
comments
and
again
I
appreciate
the
time.
C
Thank
you
so
much
very
excited
for
this
update
of
information,
very
important
work
with
any
questions
or
comments
related
to
the
office
of
violence.
Prevention's
update
all
right,
I'm
not
seeing
any.
Thank
you,
mr
peterson.
Thank
you
for
all
that
you
all
do,
and
so
now
we
will
circle
back
and
welcome
commander
jason
case
and
his
team
to
be
able
to
give
us
an
update
around
crime
statistics
and
our
responses
to
that.
So
welcome
commander
and
welcome
to
your
team.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
patience.
A
Sorry,
good
afternoon,
sharon
cunningham
thanks
for
having
us
again.
Can
we
get
to
the
is
this
the
first
slide
here?
Let's
keep
backing
it
up.
Well
we're
getting
that
set.
So
one
of
our
analyst
austin
rice
is
not
with
us
today
he's
on
vacation.
A
So
it's
going
to
be
scott
and
lindsey,
presenting
on
the
statistical
analysis
of
crime
around
the
city,
and
then
we
will
launch
into
a
brief
preliminary
discussion
on
use
of
force
and
lindsay's
been
doing
some
work
on
a
an
initial
analysis
of
that,
and
we
can
talk
more
about
that,
specifically
obviously
at
the
end.
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
scott
and
he
can
start
with
the
violent
crime.
L
All
right,
if
you
just
want
to
move
over
to
the
next
slide
and
the
next
one,
I
guess
sorry
all
right.
Just
the
kind
of
the
statistical
analysis
of
the
year-to-date
violent
crime
year-to-date.
We
have
had
60
homicide
victims
and
that's
compared
to
the
four-year
average
of
31.
So
the
one-year
change
of
that
is
15.
L
The
rapes
continue
to
be
decreasing
in
terms
of
comparing
it
to
last
year
and
also
the
four-year
average
robbery
and
aggravated
assault
both
are
up
this
year
and
are
up
compared
to
the
four-year
average.
The
subset
of.
L
Can
you
move
on
to
the
next
slide,
so
most
of
the
property
crime
or
all
the
property
crime
is
down
compared
to
2020
and
then
just
to
kind
of
summarize,
this,
the
two
ones
that
I
want
to
bring
to
the
attention
is
auto
theft
and
then
also
theft
for
motor
vehicle.
Those
are
down
this
year,
but
they're
still
higher
than
that
for
your
average.
So
more
than
we've
seen
going
back
four
years
and
that's
about
it
for
this
slide.
L
If
you
want
to
move
on
to
the
next
one,
and
in
this
section
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
in
depth
about
the
violent
crime
trends
that
we're
seeing
and
then
also
the
property
crime
trends,
if
you
just
want
to
go
on
to
the
next
slide
and
the
next
one,
all
right,
shooting
victims.
So
on
the
left-hand
side,
since
our
last
meeting,
that
should
say
a
july
27th,
my
apologies,
the
previous
four-year
average,
was
79
gunshot
wound
victims,
both
fatal
and
non-fatal.
L
These
numbers
are
for
both
of
those
categories.
In
2020
we
had
142
victims
in
that
time
period
from
july,
27
to
august
23rd
and
in
so
far
in
2021
or
for
that
time
period
we're
down
about
10
percent
and
then
looking
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
the
chart
there,
the
year-to-date
total
compared
to
last
year,
we're
about
23
percent
higher
and
then
looking
at
that
four
year,
average
that
is
considerably
less
at
216
victims
and
just
updated
the
demographics
that
we're
seeing
of
the
shooting
victims.
L
So
far
this
year,
as
of
the
23rd
82
are
male
and
18
are
female
and
then
84
are
black
and
10
are
white,
which
includes
hispanic
individuals
and
then
three
percent
are
listed
as
unknown
and
then
the
two
percent
and
one
percent
native
american
and
asian
respectively.
The
top
two
age
groups
of
the
gunshot
wound
victims
that
we
have
been
seen
year
to
date,
the
ages
of
17
to
21
or
23
percent.
And
then
the
27
to
31
are
20.
L
And
then
the
city
listed
in
our
rms
of
residents
is
roughly
60,
live
in
minneapolis
and
then
40
percent
or
so
live
in.
Other
cities
and
then
eight
individuals
have
been
shot
more
than
one
time
this
year.
L
If
you
want
to
move
on
to
the
next
slide
and
then
just
as
just
the
updated
kind
of
overall
graph
of
shooting
victims
by
a
week
since
2018
and
looking
more
recently,
we've
had
more
of
a
an
up
and
down
pattern.
L
If
you
look
at
the
last
several
weeks
with
a
high
of
approximately
28
or
so
victims,
and
then
the
last
couple
weeks
week,
33,
which
just
ended
in
week
32,
we
each
had
11
victims
in
those
two
weeks
previously
and
then
updated
the
year
to
date,
2021
we're
averaging
about
12.7
victims
per
week,
and
then
you
can
see
the
comparative
numbers
for
the
whole
year
of
2018
through
2020..
L
If
you
want
to
go
on
to
the
next
slide,
please
and
just
more
of
a
recent
snapshot
of
the
shot,
spotter
activation
trends.
Basically
since
week,
three,
which
is
january
19th
through
the
25th
through
this
previous
week,
33,
which
is
ending
on
august
23rd,
you
can
kind
of
see
just
a
slight
upward
trend,
more
of
a
seasonal
trend.
That's
where
we've
moved
from
winter
to
spring
into
summer
and
then
the
bottom
graph
shows
the
rounds
detected
kind
of
mirroring
the
activations.
With
a
couple.
L
Please-
and
this
is
just
a
updated
year-
comparison
or
year
to
day
comparison
through
the
23rd
of
activations,
rounded
detected
the
chain
percent
change
in
activations
and
also
the
percent
change
in
rounds,
and
you
can
kind
of
see
the
updated
one
through
comparing
2021
to
2020
we're
at
a
35
increase
in
activations
and
a
30
increase
for
rounds
and
then
also
kind
of
tracking
the
those
activations
with
10
or
more
and
I've
updated
that.
L
So
we
are
the
activations
that
have
had
10
or
more
rounds
account
for
6
300
of
the
total
rounds
detected,
which,
from
the
top
chart
there
at
17
275.
L
and
then
what
we've
been
seeing
and
kind
of
what
we've
been
tracking
are
the
number
of
activations
of
the
total
and
the
number
of
rounds
of
the
total
percent
of
the
total
that
have
been
increasing
since
2019.
We're
just
kind
of
monitoring
that
also
there's
some
some
weather
moving
in.
So
if
you
hear
lightning
or
thunder
that's
what's
going
on,
you
want
to
move
on
to
the
next
slide.
L
This
is
the
guns
recovered
so
far
this
year,
so
we
are
at
680
guns
recovered
as
evidence
so
far,
and
that's
basically
where
we
were
in
2020,
just
the
eight
gun
difference
on
the
the
chart
below
you
can
kind
of
see
where
those
where
those
guns
were
located
by
precinct
and
also
out
of
the
city-
and
I
did
do
it's
not
shown
on
the
slides,
but
I
did
do
a
comparison
of
last
year
at
this
time
to
see
if
the
change
was
noticeable
in
one
precinct
to
another,
and
the
biggest
change
has
been
in
the
fourth
and
fifth
precinct
which,
in
the
fourth
precinct,
there's
45
less
guns
recovered
in
2021
than
in
2020.
L
But,
conversely,
almost
the
same
41
guns
increased
in
terms
of
collecting
them
for
evidence
in
the
fifth
precinct
and
then
so.
Overall,
the
net
change
is
just
eight
guns.
Different,
like
I
had
said,
move
on
to
the
next
slide,
please,
okay!
L
So
moving
on
to
robbery,
the
the
kind
of
snapshot
since
the
last
time,
we
gave
a
presentation,
there
have
been
30
carjackings,
only
four
business,
robberies,
which
is
a
good
thing
and
then,
if
you
slide
over
to
the
percent
change,
we've
actually
got
a
decrease
in
business
robberies
compared
to
last
year,
which
is
good
to
hear
and
then
overall
robberies,
including
robbery,
business
and
carjacking
and
aggravated
robbery.
L
There
have
been
155,
and
so,
as
shown
on
the
previous
slide,
with
the
statistics,
that's
11
increase
over
last
year,
just
some
general
trends
of
what
we're
seeing
in
terms
of
carjackings
85
of
the
30
have
been
reported
in
the
third
fourth
and
fifth
precincts.
L
The
third
precinct
had
12
incidents
of
those
and
those
were
mainly
located
in
the
east,
phillips
neighborhood
p4
had
eight
incidents
and
those
are
kind
of
centered
around
the
west
fremont
or
I'm
sorry
west
of
fremont
avenue
and
from
broadway
to
lowry,
and
then,
lastly,
a
cluster
straddling
the
interstate
35w
corridor.
L
In
the
third
and
fifth
precinct
trends
about
robbery
of
person
and
aggravated
robbery,
we've
noticed
an
increase
of
robberies
in
the
warehouse
district,
especially
during
peak
bar
hours
and
two
areas
of
increased
concentrations
in
the
fifth
precinct
in
stephen
square
area
and
the
wittier
neighborhoods
again.
The
common
losses
are
phones
and
wallets
and
purses,
and
then
the
associated
contents
of
the
wallet
and
purse.
L
If
you
want
to
move
on
to
the
next
slide-
and
this
is
just
kind
of
a
trend
line,
as
you
kind
of
like
for
the
shooting
victims,
I
did
add
the
average
number
of
robberies
like
I
did
for
the
shooting
victims.
So
in
2021
year
to
date
we're
average
averaging
35
robberies
per
week
and
then
in
2020.
L
That
was
actually
the
same,
which
is
and
then
looking
back,
23
and
25
respectively
for
2018
and
2019,
and
that
should
be
noted
those
those
three
years
or
for
the
entire
year
and
then,
as
you
can
kind
of
see
too
there,
like
the
shooting
of
victims.
There's
a
in
certain
weeks,
there's
a
different,
wide
range
of
up
to
50
or
more
robberies.
L
And
then,
conversely,
the
following
week
or
soon
after
it
drops
below
20.,
so
just
kind
of
note
that
and
then
I
think
that's
it
if
you
want
to
move
on
to
the
next
slide.
C
I'll
just
jump
in
right,
quick
here
fletcher
has
a
question
or
comment
great.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
just
wanted
to
check
in
on.
I
know
you
mentioned
an
increase
in
the
warehouse
district.
How
does
that
compare
to
like
19
and
18,
because
I
I
know
that
there's
gonna
be
some
amount
of
noise
in
the
data
correcting
for
when
all
the
bars
were
closed
last
summer.
Obviously
there
were
just
fewer
people.
H
That
means
fewer
people,
committing
crimes,
fewer
victims
available
for
people
who
are
looking
for
targets
and,
as
things
open
up,
you
would
expect
some
of
the
crime
that
got
pushed
out
to
other
neighborhoods
to
reorient
back
to
the
to
the
bar
area.
So
how
much
is
this
almost
like
return
to
previous
years,
or
is
it
actually
a
spike
above
and
beyond
that,
or
just
give
a
little
context?
If
you're,
if
you're
able
to
about
the
warehouse
district
specifically.
L
Yeah,
actually,
I
would
have
to
get
back
to
you
on
that
one.
I
don't
have
those
in
front
of
me
and
I
don't
want
to
speak
incorrectly,
but
I
can
definitely
look
back
in
2018.
I
can
go
back
2018
2019
from
january
through
july
or
august
23rd
into
a
comparison
of
what
we're,
what
we're
seeing
and
actually
where
to
if
it's
in
that
same
general
area
or
if
it's
in
different
areas
or
what
we're
seeing
compared
to
now
and
I
can
bring
that
back
up
at
the
next
meeting.
If
that's
okay,.
L
L
Okay,
moving
on
to
the
property
crime
segment,
so
we're
looking
at
burglaries,
the
burglary
of
dwelling
and
burglary
of
business
are
both
down,
namely
the
burglary
of
business
is
down
52.9
for
the
year
and
then
I
just
want
to
touch
on
one
of
the
trends
that
we're
seeing
and
it's
actually
the
bottom
bullet
point
there.
L
Burglary
of
dwellings
are
continuing
their
decrease,
but
we're
experiencing
different
trends
in
2021
such
as
occupied
home,
burger
burglaries
via
unlocked
windows
or
theft
of
vehicles,
from
burglaries
where
the
the
burglar
may
have
taken
the
keys
from
inside
the
house,
gone
outside
and
stolen
the
vehicle
or
or
from
the
streets
or
wherever
it
happened
to
be
parked
and
those
are
up
80
percent
over
the
last
two
years
and
then
kind
of
touching
on
that
the
vehicle
stolen
burglaries.
L
That's
also
the
last
row
there
on
the
chart,
and
that
is
up
2.4
percent
over
last
year
and
in
2019
it
was
from
2019
to
2020.
There
was
a
sizeable
jump
there
as
well,
so
just
something
we're
tracking
next
slide.
Please,
theft
motor
vehicles,
continuing
the
increase
of
catalytic
converter
thefts,
a
22
percent
increase
over
last
year,
also
increasing
that
we're
tracking
are
the
theft
of
license
plates
from
vehicles
parked
on
the
street
or
other
where
those
are
almost
70
percent
theft
from
vehicle.
L
A
good
subset
of
larceny
is
down
20,
which
is
great
theft
of
vehicle.
I'm
sorry,
theft
of
firearms
from
vehicles
is
up
35
over
2020
and
that's
something
we're
also
tracking
still.
The
common
makes
and
models
that
are
being
targeted
are
total
priuses,
honda,
crvs
and
honda
elements
next
slide.
Please.
L
And
then
just
to
touch
on
auto
theft,
as
I
had
mentioned
it's
down
compared
to
2020,
but
over
that
four
year,
average
it's
up
considerably
and
what
we're
seeing
most
notable
is
the
prevalence
of
vehicles
stolen.
While
running
and
unattended.
L
What
we
kind
of
see
that
typically,
is
a
common
trend
in
the
colder
months,
but
we're
seeing
it
kind
of
consistently
or
even
escalating
and
most
of
the
victims.
L
You
know
their
story
is
that
they
ran
into
a
store
or
for
a
short
time
or
it's
delivery,
drivers
making
deliveries
and
leaving
their
cars
running
even
for
us,
a
few
minutes
unattended
and
they
come
back
and
it's
no
longer
fair
and,
like
I
just
said
the
bottom
point,
there
is
like
typically,
we
kind
of
see
that
a
decrease
in
that
kind
of
activity
of
people
leaving
their
cars
running
and
they
end
up
being
stolen,
so
kind
of
concerning.
We
have
a
slide
coming
up
in
our
kind
of
action
plan.
L
That
kind
of
addresses
what
we're
trying
to
do
in
messaging
regarding
auto
thefts,
next
slide,
please
all
right
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
commander
case
to
kind
of
touch
on
some
of
those
action
plans
that
we're
working
on.
A
A
So,
since
our
last
meeting,
we've
conducted
four
focus
enforcement
details,
those
has
recovered
16
guns
and
we've
made
39
arrests.
Those
arrests
have
ranged
in
spectrum
from
carjacking
suspects,
homicide
suspects,
people
involved
with
weapons
violations
and
narcotics
violations,
and
some
of
the
other
things
that
we're
doing
is
we
started
sharing
mapping
data
with
the
office
of
violence,
prevention
to
help
them
coordinate
their
resource
deployment
for
their
violence.
Interrupters
go
to
the
next
slide,
and
this
is
what
scott
was
referring
to
here.
A
As
far
as
messaging
we've
spoken
before
about,
we've
used
our
cps
staff
to
try
to
message
out
to
residents
on
different
platforms
to
be
more
aware
of
keeping
their
items
locked
or
remove
items
from
their
vehicles.
So
this
is
an
initiative
with
the
state
that
we
partnered
with
just
again
it's
a
public
safety
announcement
as
a
way
to
make
people
more
aware
of
the
issue
and
to
be
diligent
about
removing
items
or
locking
their
their
vehicles
and
not
leaving
them
running
next.
A
So
before
we
go
on,
is
there
any
questions
chair
that
you
have
on
the
statistical
analysis
or
from
any
of
the
other
culture
members.
C
C
I'm
not
seeing
any.
I
appreciate
very
much
so
the
information
on
the
target
and
enforcement.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you.
C
Again,
this
information
has
been
very
helpful,
so
continuing
forward.
Thank
you.
A
All
right,
so
if
you
could
just
start
with
the
next
slide,
so
I'm
going
to
turn
this
over
to
lindsay
larson
and
she's,
really
the
analyst
who
has
been
digging
into
this
and
just
to
set
the
stage
for
conversation,
as
I've
mentioned
before
it's
the
data
set's
very
complex,
to
try
to
pull
apart
and
just
because
of
our
records
management
system
and
all
the
different
variables
that
surround
this.
So
just
trying
to
set
some
expectations
for
the
conversation
during
this
presentation.
A
This
is
very
preliminary
or
initial,
and
so,
as
you
form
questions,
if
you
want
to
hold
them
to
the
end,
if
you
can,
it
might
be
helpful
because
lindsey
might
address
your
questions
throughout
the
presentation.
There's
about
five
or
six
slides
and
there's
a
lot
of
information
here,
and
it's
just
really
the
tip
of
the
iceberg
of
what
we're
finding.
As
far
as
trying
to
understand
the
dynamics
and
the
variables
around
use
of
force
and
and
really
what
we're
trying
to
do
as
an
agency
is
represent
this
visually
in
the
most.
A
You
know
efficient
manner
than
the
the
easiest
platform
for
people
to
understand.
Given
the
complexity
of
all
the
variables
associated
with
force,
so
with
that,
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
lindsay
and
she
can
go
ahead
and
start
her
here.
M
I
M
Thank
you
so
just
to
get
us
started,
I
want
to
let
you
know.
I've
spent
a
ton
of
time
digging
into
the
data
I'm
going
to
share
what
I
have
what
I've
learned
so
far,
but
trust
me,
like
commander
k,
said
there
is
a
ton
more
to
explore,
and
this
is
really
just
the
beginning.
I
expect
I'll
have
a
lot
to
share
over
the
next
few
meetings
with
you.
M
Just
before
I
show
you
the
numbers.
I
want
to
provide
some
important
context.
The
mpd
has
dramatically
changed
how
it
records
for
force.
So
I
want
to
walk
you
through
some
of
these
changes
at
a
high
level.
To
start
the
timeline
definitions
changed
around
september
2020,
that's
when
we
started
looking
at
force
differently
and
recording
more
of
it.
M
The
software
updates
and
officer
training
then
happened
between
october
and
december
and,
in
my
charts,
I'll
show
you
that
that
time
frame
the
requirements
that
changed,
one
of
the
really
big
ones
was
we
started
tracking
handcuffing
and
escort
holds
so
that
was
not
captured
previously
and
if
you
think
about
arrests,
you're
often
handcuffing
an
escort
holding
someone
that
is
very
common,
so
you're
going
to
see
a
large
increase
of
those
situations.
M
In
addition,
we
added
more
selections
to
reflect
through
the
level
of
specificity
of
the
force.
So,
for
example,
previously
we
tracked
handgun
and
now
we're
tracking
a
more
specific
handgun,
unholstered
or
handgun
pointed,
or
did
you
do
both
that
can
be
captured
as
well?
M
So
with
all
these
changes
going
on
the
definitions
changing
in
september,
but
actually
software
updates
not
happening
until
later.
In
the
year
officers
were
sort
of
left
to
their
own
devices
and
and
data
tracking
wasn't
necessarily
available
to
them.
For
example,
handcuffing
and
escort
holds
was
not
something
they
could
select
in
that
period
of
time.
It's
only
been
like
this
year
that
that's
been
available,
so
they're
they're,
trying
to
record
this
they're
trying
to
fulfill
their
obligation
to
report.
M
M
I
was
reviewing
examples
and
found
situations
where
an
officer
mentioned
that
they
encountered
someone
who
was
having
a
medical
issue
and
they
turned
them
on
their
side
and
then
took
their
pulse
on
their
neck
and
then
realized
they
should
take
it
on
their
wrist.
They
filled
out
a
force
of
use
of
force
form
for
that
action.
Similarly,
I
saw
situations
where
ems
assistance,
helping
someone
to
a
gurney
or
stretcher.
M
They
filled
out
a
force
form
another
case.
An
officer
encountered
someone
who
they
knew.
There
was
an
issue
and
they
wanted
to
have
a
conversation
with
that
person
to
discuss
resources,
and
it
was
february
it
was
cold.
M
They
wanted
to
just
have
that
conversation
in
the
car
show
them
some
videos
and
go
over
a
few
things,
so
they
they
patted
the
person
down
for
weapons
and
then
just
had
a
conversation
in
the
car
finished
the
conversation
and
and
the
guy
went
on
his
way
that
the
officer
filled
out
a
use
of
force
for
him.
So
these
are
the
anomalies.
I'm
not
saying
this
is
happening
all
the
time,
but
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
all
those
situations,
even
though
we
might
not
traditionally
think
of
them
as
force.
M
They
are
captured
in
this
data.
A
force
form
was
filled
out,
I'm
counting
it
so
just
kind
of
I
wanted
to
give
you
that
sort
of
give
you
the
landscape
of
data
entry
and
where
it's
at
all
right
next
slide.
M
So
now
comes
the
fun
part.
How
do
we
want
to
count
force
in
this
presentation?
I've
got
it
counted.
Two
ways
first
is
by
incident,
and
this
is
counting
unique.
What
we
call
case
numbers
that
means
a
crime
happened.
There
was
a
police
report
that
was
filled
out,
so
a
form,
a
use
of
force
form
would
have
been
done
and
I'm
counting
it
very
simply.
To
start
it's
a
yes,
no,
yes,
force
was
used,
no
force
wasn't
and
it
can
include
any
type
of
force,
handcuffs,
taser,
firearm
body
bodily
force.
M
Just
if
force
was
used
on
a
person
it
is
captured,
it
is
counted
in
my
numbers
right
now
we
will
get
to
types
of
force,
but
for
right
now
we're
just
counting
did
this
incident
have
force
and
then,
similarly
with
person,
I'm
looking
at
unique
persons
per
case
per
incident
per
event,
if
you
will
so,
if
I
had
force
used
against
me,
I
will
count
in
the
data.
For
that
case,
let's
say
in
a
month
I
commit
a
crime
and
I
have
force
used
against
me
again.
M
I
will
count
a
second
time
in
the
data
set,
so
it's
per
case
that
people
are
getting
counted
and
again
it's
for
any
type
of
force
that
is
used,
handcuffs,
which
is
a
lot
of
our
force
all
the
way
up
to.
If,
even
if
a
firearm
was
pointed
at
you,
as
far
as
sort
of
data
considerations,
go
just
just
so
you're
aware
park,
police
and
u
of
m
police
cases,
calls
are
not
included
in
the
data
and,
as
commander
case
was
mentioning,
this
data
is
very
complicated.
M
It's
messy,
but
I'm
working
really
hard
to
get
usable,
informative
numbers
so
that
everyone
has
the
information
and
understanding
needed.
So
you
can
make
decisions
next
slide.
M
Okay,
sorry!
This
is
my
last
descriptive
one
and
then
I
will
show
you
numbers.
My
goal,
as
I
was
saying,
is
to
count
and
include
as
much
as
I
can
so
I
just
want
to
walk
you
through
what
I
learned,
after
digging
into
the
data.
There's
a
couple
odd
scenarios
that
I
just
want
you
to
understand
how
I
counted
them
so
by
incident.
There
are
two
situations
I
encountered.
M
One
were
blank
force
forms,
so
details
were
not
entered
in,
but
a
force
form
was
created
and
then
another
situation
is
when
you
have
a
case
in
our
records
management
system
you
put
in
an
offense
code
and
so,
for
example,
if
there's
a
homicide,
you
would
put
murder
as
the
code
when
force
is
used,
officers
are
supposed
to
put
force
in
there
as
one
of
the
offense
codes
I
have
encountered
where
force
is
a
code,
but
there
was
no
force
form
that
was
completed
in
both
these
cases.
M
I
am
counting
those
that
force
was
used.
That
case
is
counted
as
a
force
used
case
now
talking
about
persons,
people
if
they're
only
identified
by
their
race,
but
they
don't
have
a
name
or
if
they're
identified
name,
but
without
a
race.
Those
people
are
included,
they're
counted
in
the
numbers
and
you'll
see
that
when
I
get
to
them,
however,
people
with
completely
blank
information,
so
no
name
no
race,
no
role
regarding
like
who
they
were
in
the
case.
M
Those
situations
are
not
being
counted.
Now.
When
I
looked
at
these,
I
did
a
review.
I
I
took
a
sample
and
tried
to
understand,
okay,
why?
Why
am
I
seeing
blank
people
like?
What's
what's
going
on?
Most
of
the
time,
I
can
say
that
the
person
does
end
up
getting
captured
in
another
officer's
report.
So
most
of
the
people
are
still
counted
in
my
numbers.
They
do
get
counted,
but
there
are
situations
where
it
was
blank
and
and
that
person
was
missed.
There
are
also
situations
where
there
wasn't
a
person.
M
So
in
reading
through
the
police
narrative,
I
encountered
cases
where
officers
they
unholstered
a
gun.
So
an
example
would
be
like
a
domestic
abuse
in
progress
call,
you
know.
Perhaps
they
meet.
Let's
say
girlfriend
downstairs
and
she
says
my
boyfriend's
upstairs
he
has
a
gun.
The
officer
in
some
cases,
will
unholster
their
gun,
go
up
and
clear
that
apartment
clear.
That
house
check
to
see
if
anyone's
in
there,
and
so
in
the
cases
where
maybe
the
boyfriend
fled
he
left
and
there
was
no
person
there.
B
M
Anyone,
so
that's
why
that
is
blank.
This
happened.
I
encountered
this
a
couple
times.
So
that's
one
situation,
however,
to
go
back
to
when
people
are
genuinely
missing
and
should
have
been
included,
we're
looking
into
that.
We
think
it
might
be
a
timing
issue
when
the
officer
fills
out
the
report
and
when
person
information
is
added
into
the
case.
M
So
we're
going
to
investigate
that,
because
if
it
is
a
timing
issue
within
the
system,
maybe
there's
training
or
ways
we
can
circumvent
that
I
have
to
understand
more
of
the
process
of
when
officers
are
completing
stuff.
So
we're
going
to
look
into
that.
Another
solution
that
I'm
going
to
implement
is
sort
of
an
audit
function.
Looking
back
at
cases
where
stuff
is
missing-
and
you
know
addressing
that,
is
that
stuff
supposed
to
be
missing
or
was
that
just
you
know
they
missed
it?
M
M
All
right
on
to
the
numbers
next
slide,
so
let
me
kind
of
walk
through
this
with
you.
This
is
an
overview
that
I
want
to
provide
helpful
context
as
we're
looking
at
use
of
force,
I
sort
of
pulled
out
what
I'd
consider
to
be
sort
of
other
health
metrics
to
showcase,
what's
going
on
at
the
same
time
as
use
of
force,
so
I'll
walk
you
through
it
to
start.
If
you
look
at
the
bottom,
this
data
is
looking
is
going
from
january
2020
to
july
of
this
year.
2021.
M
you
can
see
those
big
bars
running
vertically.
The
blue
bar
is
that
september
definition
change
and
then
that
green
bar
is
when
the
system
updates
were
occurring
and
training
was
happening
with
the
officers.
So
just
keep
that
in
mind,
as
I
walk
through
these
different
line-
charts
that
that's
going
on
in
those
periods.
M
Okay,
the
top
line
chart
that
black
line
that
looks
at
mpd
calls
for
service.
So
one
thing
I
want
to
know
is:
have
our
calls
changed?
Is
there
any
sort
of
volume
difference
there?
Overall,
you
can
see
not
really.
It's
roughly
been
the
same
over
that
time
period.
I
mean
you
have
a
couple:
spikes
a
couple
dips,
but
you're,
looking
at
roughly
20
to
20
000
calls
a
month
for
the
mpd.
M
Another
question
I
ask
myself
is
so:
when
we're
thinking
of
use
of
force
have
we
seen
community
reaction
change?
Have
we
seen
complaints
more
complaints?
Now
this
data
here
in
the
green
line,
are
all
opcr
complaints
received.
M
I
pulled
this
from
their
public
facing
dashboard,
so
I
have
to
say
it's
not
just
mpd
complaints
I'll
see
if
I
can
get
that
for
for
next
time.
Maybe,
but
it
was
sort
of
a
metric
that
I
could
look
at
and
say.
Okay,
did
we
see
any
fluctuation?
Did
we
see
on
all
complaints
received?
So
I'm
not
talking
about
duplicates
or
just
everything
that
came
in?
Did
we
see
anything
there
and
aside
from
the
the
spike
you
can
see?
M
No
roughly,
it's
been
same,
maybe
even
a
little
bit
of
a
dip
at
the
beginning
of
the
year.
But
again,
that's
aside
from
that
big
spike,
relatively
steady.
M
The
next
line
is
that
light
gray
line,
that's
looking
at
all
cases
or
you
could
consider
it
police
reports
or
crimes.
This
is
where
a
narrative
has
been
written.
A
police
report
has
been
created
out
of
the
calls
for
service,
and
this
is
so
you
can
see
again.
It's
been
relatively
steady,
maybe
a
slight
decline,
we're
at
roughly
3
800
a
month
right
now
and
I'll
pause
for
a
second
case.
Are
there
questions.
E
Yeah
and
thanks
for
all
this
information,
it's
of
course
a
lot
to
take
in.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
a
question
for
clarity
and
also
for
the
the
public,
because
you
referenced
that
the
opcr
these
are
all
complaints
received,
and
then
you
implied
it
wasn't
just
for
minneapolis
police.
Could
you
just
maybe
elaborate
on
what
other
complaints
might
have
come
in
that
weren't
minneapolis
police
officers
involved.
A
All
right,
councilmember,
gordon,
it's
commander
case
so
I'll
I'll
touch
on
that.
So
when
the
opcr
receives
complaints,
there's
sometimes
there
will
be
four
different
jurisdictions,
so
it
could
be
for
somebody
from
the
park,
police
or
somebody
from
metro,
transit
or
different
policing
agencies.
So
those
numbers
can
be
pulled
out,
but
their
public-facing
dashboard
doesn't
need
those.
A
E
M
Okay,
here
we
go,
and
I
know
sometimes
there
were
duplicates
from
what
I
could
see
that
was
available
on
the
dashboard
so
yeah.
I
just
tried
to
include
everything
to
start,
but
we'll
see
if
we
can
pull
out
the
the
right
ones.
If
that's
a
that's
helpful,
moving
on
to
the
cases
with
use
of
four,
so
that's
that
dark
gray
line
towards
the
bottom.
M
So
this
is
counting
all
police
cases
where
use
of
force
happened
again,
it's
that,
yes,
it
occurred
or
no
it
didn't.
It
could
be
handcuffing,
it
could
be
firearm,
it
could
be
bodily
force,
taser,
etc.
So
you
can
see
early
in
2020,
we're
filling
in
or
completing
50
to
80
give
or
take
a
month,
and
then
we
change
the
definition
in
september
and
that's
where
you
can
see
a
huge
spike
in
in
the
number
of
reports
per
in
the
number
of
cases
and
that
spike
continues
to
go
up.
M
I
can
tell
you
that
in
that
672
and
the
number
below
it,
a
lot
of
those
are
the
handcuffing,
the
things
that
we
were
not
recording
before
officers
now
entering
that
information
and
actually
I'll
explain
later,
but
they
entered
because
it
wasn't
available
in
the
system.
Yet
it
was
a
blank
form
they
wanted
that
force
captured,
but
we
didn't
have
a
data
field
yet
so
that's.
M
Why
there's
this
huge
spike
of
sort
of
capturing
everything
and
and
definitely
airing
on
that
side
of
caution
you
can
see,
as
as
training
happens
as
the
system
actually
updates
that
things
start
to
normalize.
I
would
say,
and
we're
sustaining
more
of
a
level
of
500
ish
by
550,
maybe
on
the
high
end
of
cases
that
have
force
per
month.
M
So
now
let
me
break
that
down
a
little
bit
in
the
blue
lines
at
the
bottom.
So
the
light
blue
line,
that's
running
along
the
bottom
and
sort
of
jumps
up.
Those
are
handcuffing
and
escort
hold
only
cases.
So
no
other
force
was
used.
Just
someone
was
either
it
could
be
handcuffed
and
escort
holded
or
just
one
or
the
other.
M
M
So
you
can
kind
of
see
that
spike
in
that
659
that
509
568
there
of
the
dark
blue
this
is
before
handcuffing
was
a
field
they
could
select.
So
that's
where,
in
those
months
I
actually
see
a
lot
of
blank
forms
because
officers
were
trying
to
complete
it,
but
it
wasn't
available
in
the
system
again
now,
in
january
those
updates
have
gone
through
and
training
has
occurred,
and
now
I
think,
there's
a
better
understanding
and
the
fields
are
there
that
they
can
complete
the
form
correctly.
M
If
you
look
like
sort
of
for
this
year,
2021
you
can
see
about
half
the
cases
are
that
handcuffing
and
escort
hold
only
and
the
other
half
would
have
some
other
force
used
in
them.
I
will
explain
that
in
in
next
meeting
I
will
break
down
force
types
for
us
to
look
at.
This
is
just
that
binary
of
yes,
there
was
force
or
no
there
wasn't
force
and
then
the
last
thing
I'll
leave
you
with.
M
I
thought
about
this,
like
after
turning
in
the
slides
of
course,
to
give
you
perspective
on
how
much
is
use
of
force
out
of
our
cases
out
of
our
calls
for
service.
M
So,
if
you're
looking
at
the
dark
blue
line,
let's
say
for
2021
that's
about
eight
percent
of
our
cases,
so
eight
percent
of
our
cases
are
using
force
other
than
just
handcuffs
and
escort
holes.
M
If
you
combine
the
two,
the
the
light
blue
and
the
dark
blue
lines,
so
what
that
dark
gray
line
is
above,
if
you
add
those
together,
you're
looking
at
15
of
cases,
if
you
combine
it
all
so
looking
at
all
use
of
force,
it's
15
of
our
cases
and
then,
if
you
take
that
and
you
look
at
calls
for
service,
so
all
of
our
calls
you're
looking
at
about
2.6
of
the
calls
we
take
force
is
used
now.
M
I
know
that
was
a
ton
of
information,
I'm
I'll
pause
for
a
sec,
see
if
there
are
questions.
Otherwise,
I'm
happy
to
move
on
and
answer
questions
if
they
come
to
you
as
well.
C
Great,
thank
you.
We
love
a
nerd,
so
thank
you
for
the
level
of
detail.
This
is
great.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
from
my
colleagues.
M
Me
yes,
yeah!
Let's
keep
going
all
right!
Thank
you,
so
that
was
interesting
information
to
get
a
handle
on
of
okay.
How
many
cases
are
we
seeing
per
month?
Another
thought
I
had
is
okay.
Well
what?
What
are
the
situations
where
we're
using
force?
Let's
start
to
dig
into
that
and
understand
when
force
is
occurring,
so
I
started
off
with
looking
at
the
most
common
mpd
calls
where
force
is
used.
M
This
top
chart
here
is
looking
at
the
highest
number
of
force
cases,
so
the
highest
number
of
sort
of
incidents,
and
then
that
bottom
chart
is
looking
at
the
highest
percentage,
so
saying
of
calls
how
many
calls
had
force
used.
So
let
me
walk
you
through
both.
If
you
look
at
the
top
one,
you
can
see
domestic
abuse
and
progress
is
the
top
call
for
service
that
we
get
where
force
ends
up
being
used.
522
out
of
3000
calls
so
you're.
M
Looking
at
roughly
17
of
domestic
abuse
and
progress
calls,
some
form
of
force
is
used.
I
can
give
you
a
little
preview
for
maybe
next
time.
Most
of
that
is
handcuffing.
M
Most
of
that
is
escort
holds
after
those
two
bodily
force
tends
to
be
the
the
next
common
force
type
that
gets
used
and
you
can
look
sort
of
if
you
go
down
the
column
there
of
the
different
types
and
then
look
at
the
percentage,
it
sort
of
shows
you
how
most
of
the
time
force
is
not
used
in
these
situations,
the
rest
of
them
it's
less
than
ten
percent.
In
some
cases,
less
than
five
percent
of
cases
force
ends
up
being
used
again.
M
Most
of
the
force
for
these
cases
tends
to
be
that
handcuffing
and
escort
hold
that's
all
counted
in
here.
I
will
call
out,
though,
that
suspicious
vehicle
that
one
tends
to
have
more
firearms
used,
and
I
can
show
that
next
time
I
was
looking
into
okay.
Why?
Because
I'm
curious
from
the
quick
review
that
I
did
just
to
give
you
some
idea:
it
tended
to
be
stolen
vehicles.
M
Okay,
I'm
gonna,
move
to
that
bottom
chart
now
this
is
looking
at
highest
percentage.
So
if
we
look
at
that
chase
on
foot,
there
have
been
41
calls
situations
with
chase
on
foot.
31
of
them
had
some
sort
of
force
used
so
that
ends
up
being
about
75
typical.
That
force
will
happen.
I
think
we
can
say
that
again
that
one
tended
to
be
handcuffing
as
well.
M
M
So
that's
that
data
you
can
see.
I
will
just
point
out,
you
know.
The
volumes
here
are
relatively
low,
like
if
you're
looking
at
that
top
table,
3000
domestic
abuse
and
progress
calls
versus
these.
Other
ones
are
more
in
the
40
hundred
range.
We
do
get
some
more
with
with
shootings
and
stabbings,
but
the
volume
is
still
low
and
you
can
see
particularly
on
that
bottom
chart
like
yes,
those
top
calls
there.
M
The
percentage
is
high,
but
it
does
kind
of
quickly
drop
off
to
more
that
24
22
22
20
of
the
call
so
overall,
especially
when
you
look
at
that
top
chart
for
the
use
of
force
on
these
calls,
is
not
the
norm.
You
can
see
by
those
percentages,
it
tends
to
be
very
low
and
when
force
is
used,
it
does
tend
to
be
the
handcuffing
and
escort
hold
so
that
I
will
explain
more
next
time
I'll
get
into
the
details
of
the
types
of
force
used.
M
M
Okay,
this
is
a
a
look
here
at
race
and
ethnicity.
So
let
me
walk
you
through
this
table
in
the
left
table
here.
You'll
see
that
race
is
along
the
rows
and
ethnicity
is
in
the
columns.
M
If
we
and
you
can
see
yeah,
hopefully
you
can
see
non-hispanic
hispanic,
east
african
origin,
unknown
blank,
that's
the
ethnicity
and
then
black
white,
american,
indian
alaska,
native
asian
wine,
other
pacific
islander.
Those
are
the
race
fields.
M
White
is
22.7
percent
american
indian
alaska,
native
8.5
asian
is
1.2
percent
and
hawaiian
or
other
pacific
islander
is
0.1
percent
unknown
is
6.7
or
363
persons.
M
What
I
was
able
to
find
in
the
data
is:
if
we
look
at
ethnicity
along
unknown
race,
we
do
actually
get
some
more
information
and
you
can
see
non-hispanic
hispanic
or
latino
and
east
african
origin
under
that
unknown.
Race
row
have
values,
so
it's
quite
possible
that
maybe
officers
were
uncomfortable
with
selecting
the
race
but
felt
more
comfortable,
selecting
ethnicity.
M
I
mean
you
can
also
look
at
with
3
100
black
persons
captured.
We
have
1200
white
persons,
we
have
363
unknown
and
if
I
take
out
the
hispanic
and
the
east
african,
it's
it's
an
even
smaller
number.
I
don't
think
things
are
trying
to
be
hidden
or
obfuscated
with
this
data.
M
M
I'm
not
sure
why
that
why
they're
blank
and
that's
probably
something
we
can
improve,
I
will
say
that
other
analyses
that
have
been
done
that
have
used
this
data.
They
don't
have
the
ethnicity
field
right
now
in
our
open
data.
That's
something
as
I'm
doing
all
this
work.
I'm
preparing
data
sets,
I
we
will
publish
new
data
and
I
would
really
like
ethnicity
to
be
available.
Assuming
that's,
okay
with
the
city.
I
I
think
that's
a
very
important
metric
that
people
have
access
to
and
then,
regarding
other
thought,
it's
quite
possible.
M
M
The
one
other
thing
I'll
mention
is,
I
incorporated
this
arrestees
table
as
I
thought
it
might
be,
an
important
reference
point:
it
mimics
the
proportion
of
race
with
the
use
of
force
reports
data
you
can
see.
Black
is
very
similar
at
that
almost
60
percent
white
more
in
that
25
percent
range
american
indian
alaskan
native,
is
about
10
asian
about
one
to
two
percent
unknown
again
at
six
percent.
M
If,
if
those
were
very
different,
I
would
have
a
lot
of
questions
around
that,
but
knowing
that
when
we
arrest
someone,
we
are
now
counting
that
as
force
handcuffs
escort
holds
that
is
force.
This
starts
to
this
aligns,
I
would
say
next
slide.
Oh
sorry,
go
ahead.
C
E
M
Correct
yeah:
this
is
this
year,
I
think
technically,
it
would
be
through
yesterday
or
wednesday,
yeah
wednesday.
E
Do
you
think
that's
typical
for
well,
we
probably
can't.
I
can't
expect
you
to
compare
it
to
other
years,
because
you
wouldn't
be
willing
to
with
the
data.
Wasn't
right
in
front
of
you
probably,
but
I'd
be
curious
about
if
this
has
changed
at
all
over
the
years.
It
also
is
it's.
I
think,
pretty
clear
that
this
is
out
of
sync
with
the
population
percentages
in
our
city,
so
there
seems
to
be
some
disparate.
M
All
right
I'll,
my
last
slide
here
is
just
sort
of
letting
you
know
what's
coming,
so
I
mentioned
the
next
time.
I
want
to
report
details
regarding
types
of
force
that
are
used.
M
I
also
want
to
let
you
know
and
give
a
great
shout
out
to
it.
They
have
been
invaluable
partners
with
us
as
we're.
Looking
at
data
together,
I'm
looking
at
the
front
end,
I'm
looking
at
the
data
set
and
when
they
don't
match,
I'm
working
with
it
to
solve,
for
that
they've
been
wonderful
and
are
helping
to
continue
to
build
out
this
data,
I'm
also
working
on
building
a
new
dashboard.
M
So
we
can
have
this
data
out
and
available
and
then,
as
I
mentioned,
publishing
new
data
sets
to
open
data,
so
people
have
access
to
it
all
right.
I
will
let
you
two
questions.
C
Great.
Thank
you
so
much
councilmember
fletcher.
H
Thank
you,
chuck
cunningham,
and
thank
you
for
this
report.
This
is
helpful
and
it
answers
a
lot
of
the
questions
that
we
raised
in
in
the
last
couple
of
meetings.
So
I
really
appreciate
you
digging
into
this
and
I
was
getting
ready
to
ask
you
a
question
about
coming
back
to
us
with
report
details
for
types
of
force
and
you've
already
got
it
on
the
slide
there.
So
that
means
we're
very
much
on
the
same
page
and
on
the
right
track
about
what
information
will
help
inform
the
public.
H
Obviously
there's
a
confusion,
that's
created
because
we
started
tracking
more
where
it
looks
like
there's
a
lot
more
use
of
force
happening
and
the
challenge
of
that
is.
We
have
an
explanation
for
why
that
number
went
up,
but
until
we
get
that
next
report,
we're
not
going
to
know
whether
the
use
of
force
that
people
are
most
concerned
about,
went
up
or
down
during
that
period,
because
it's
kind
of
hidden
in
some
other
data.
H
And
so
I
think
that
getting
to
the
detail
about
types
of
force
so
that
we
can,
we
can
track
some
of
that
over
time
and
and
understand
which
way
things
are
trending
and
the
ways
we're
using
force
is
gonna.
Be
really
important.
And
I
really
appreciate
the
presentation
here.
So
thank
you
and
looking
forward
to
seeing
you
come
back
with
the
type
of
horse.
C
C
A
Yes,
you
are
correct,
chair,
sir,
for
the
delay.
We
have
a
process
we
have
to
go
through
with
clicking
microphones
and
speakers
off,
so
we
don't
have
weird
echo.
So,
yes,
you're
all
done
great.
C
You
know
really
great
presentation
per
usual
great
data.
Thank
you
to
you
and
your
team
for
this
information.
It's
definitely
very
informative
for
us
as
policymakers,
as
well
as
the
public.
So
thank
you
very
much
and
I'll
just
pause
one
last
time
and
see
if
there
are
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
my
colleagues
all
right,
I'm
not
seeing
any
thanks
team
much
appreciated.
C
Thank
you
all
right.
Moving
on
to
our
last
item
today
is
our
discussion
item
regarding
receiving
and
filing
an
update
on
the
project
plan
surrounding
community
safety
led
by
dr
antonio
lee.
I'm
sorry,
I
know
I
just
said
your
name
wrong.
So
this
is
the
an
overview
of
the
community
safety
project
and
I
will
give
a
brief
little
bio
here,
because
we
don't
have
staff
to
be
able
to
do
an
introduction
today.
C
So
so
what
we
have
here
is
that
our
presenter
is
here
to
present
an
overview
of
the
pro
bono
community
safety
project
that
he
is
leading
with
the
team
at
leadership
for
a
networked
world
at
harvard
university.
This
project
was
authorized
by
council
at
his
regular
meeting
on
march
26
2021.
C
He
is
a
minneapolis
native
born
and
raised
on
the
south
side
of
minneapolis.
He
is
now
the
executive
director
of
leader
leadership
for
a
networked
world
a
center
at
univer,
harvard
university
that
helps
to
create
leaders
or
excuse
me
helps
creators
leaders
create
exceptional
environments
for
organizational
innovation.
C
In
addition,
antonio
is
a
past
commissioner
on
the
commission
on
the
future
of
policing
in
ireland,
a
current
board
member
of
lutheran
services
in
america
and
the
current
u.s
federal
monitor
for
the
consent
decree
overseeing
the
seattle
police
department
and
through
all
of
this
he
remains
a
steadfast
vikings
fan.
So
with
that,
I
shall
pass
the
presentation
over
welcome.
Thank
you
so
much
for
being
here.
Antonio.
N
Thank
you,
chairperson
cunningham,
and
thank
you
for
having
me
join
fellow
council
members.
I
wanted
to
give
you
a
walkthrough
of
the
project
that
is
in
flight
right
now,
we're
currently
working
on
this
and
also
give
you
a
bit
of
a
respite
from
being
in
the
weeds
on
the
data.
N
This
will
kind
of
get
up
on
the
balcony
a
little
bit
to
look
more
at
the
future
of
of
safe
and
thriving
communities,
and
what
that
may
mean
for
for
activities
going
forward
so
I'll
give
a
broad
overview
on
this.
Really.
N
The
the
thrust
of
this
work
is
around
answering
questions
for
the
city,
we're
at
a
point,
as
all
of
us
know,
where
we're
looking
at
what
the
future
can
be
for
community
safety,
making
sure
that
the
community
feels
safe
and
thriving,
and
what
the
services
and
capabilities
may
need
to
be
in
the
future.
In
order
to
make
that
happen,
so
we're
really
trying
to
answer
the
question
questions
around
what
could
five
years
look
like
what
could
10
years
out
even
look
like
if
minneapolis
started
to
build
towards
that
future
next
year?
N
So
what
what
would
be
that
in
many
ways,
the
art
of
the
possible?
We
all
know
what
some
of
the
big
challenges
are
and
on
that
very
first
slide.
N
N
A
lot
of
this
work
is
great,
a
number
of
initiatives
that
are
really
moving
the
needle
or
trying
to
make
progress
on
on
these
vital
community
initiatives,
but
oftentimes
they're
they're
run
without
a
lot
of
coordination,
a
lot
of
collaboration
across
those
entities,
so
policing
and
public
health
and
human
services
and
mental
health
services,
etc
across
programs
across
jurisdictions
are
often
times
siloed,
so
the
future
on
the
next
slide
and
again,
these
are
very
broad
strokes
that
we're
talking
about
here,
but
the
future.
N
It's
going
to
be
much
more
driven
by
what
I
would
call
an
ecosystem-based
approach
where
we
say
what
does
safe
and
healthy
and
thriving
communities
look
like,
and
what
are
these
services
in
a
continuum
that
can
that
can
build
that
up
over
time,
so
looking
at
across
upstream
type
human
services
downstream
policing
services
in
all
these
areas,
in
the
middle,
where
we
can
get
real-time
response
and
action
to
solve
community
problems,
oftentimes
solve
the
root
cause
of
problems
as
well.
The
more
we
move
upstream.
N
N
So
if
you
envision,
maybe
on
a
left
side
of
the
continuum,
you
have
all
these
prevention
oriented
activities
that
the
city
can
do.
Violence,
prevention
and
youth
programs
and
programs
around
housing
assistance-
and
you
know
all
these
core
things
driven
by
social
determinants
of
health
that
lead
to
healthier
and
safer
communities.
N
As
you
move
kind
of
to
the
right
on
that
continuum,
you
start
to
get
into
these
areas
where
there
can
be
joint,
multidisciplinary
co-response
to
a
number
of
range
of
ranges
of
issues
in
a
city.
You
may
have
an
incident
that
needs
you
know:
80
human
services,
type
capabilities
and
20
sworn
officers
as
you
move
over
and
that
other
side
of
continuum
might
you
might
have
this
incident
that
needs
80
sworn
officers
and
20.
N
You
know
mental
health
or
human
services
type
capabilities
along
with
that
call
and,
as
you
move
all
the
way
to
the
other
end
of
the
spectrum,
there's
also
other
prevention-oriented
activities
more
around
healing
and
trauma
response
in
making
sure
that
we
can
learn
from
community
incidents
in
order
to
inform
that
overall
continuum.
N
So
the
that
mean
the
main
thrust
of
a
lot
of
this
work
will
be
looking
at
the
continuum
of
services
and
what
it
means
to
to
build
up
safe
and
thriving
communities.
Let's
go
to
the
next
slide,
practically.
What
we'll
be
doing-
and
we're
currently
doing
right
now
is
looking
at
what
capabilities
does
minneapolis
currently
have?
What
capabilities
do
we
need
along
that
continuum
of
services,
and
what
do
we
build
and
build
meaning?
N
Should
these
services
be
community
based
that
the
city
collaborates
with
and
perhaps
funds,
or
should
they
be
city
based
services
or
some
type
of
a
hybrid?
So
this?
What
do
we
have?
What
do
we
need
and
what
we
build
will
be
will
be
critical
to
this
overall
continuum
of
services.
N
So
that's
probably
the
most
important
piece,
but
underneath
that
will
be
on
the
next
slide,
you
can
go
to
is
a
report
of
where
we're
at
on
this.
So
it
says
violence,
prevention
services,
but
that,
but
I
actually
look
at
that-
a
little
bit
more
holistically
in
that
as
prevention
services,
social
determinants
of
health,
driven
services
that
that
can
get
to
the
root
cause
of
challenges
in
the
community.
N
So
we'll
have
an
inventory,
as
I
mentioned,
of
this
work
and
then
we'll
we'll
look
at
what
what
could
take
place
across
jurisdictions
across
boundaries
across
agencies,
in
order
to
build
that
that
cohesive
ecosystem
out
and
integrate
those
services
supporting
that,
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
will
be
some
work
around
transforming
9-1-1.
So
9-1-1,
you
could
also
say
9-9-8-8,
which
should
be
part
of
that
as
well.
N
So
this
is
really
vitally
important,
because
if
we
have
this
continuum
of
services
in
the
future
that
can
respond
to
all
these
these
varieties
of
community
needs.
We
want
that
response
to
be
real
time
to
be
dynamic,
meaning
that
it
can
it
can
shape
shift
you
can
mix
and
match
services
on
demand.
We
need
911
and
the
988
service
to
be
able
to
triage
that
in
real
time
and
to
be
able
to
to
pick
and
choose
services
and
be
able
to
deploy
those
in
a
connected
way.
N
So
we'll
be
looking
at
how
911,
along
with
cad
and
rms
systems,
can
can
integrate
that
more
fully.
So,
if
you
have-
and
this
will
answer
a
lot
of
questions-
I
should
say
that
going
back
to
the
core
of
this
as
well-
that
we
don't
necessarily
have
the
answer
to
yet
right.
N
So
if
we
had,
for
example,
in
eighty
percent
human
services,
mental
health,
for
example,
response
and
twenty
percent
police-
and
they
were
integrated
in
a
computer,
rated
dispatch
and
records
management
system
should,
for
example,
what
how
many
human
services
type
people
should.
The
city
have
in
their
capability
mix
right
now.
We
don't
know
that
exact
number.
How
should
they
be
trained
if
we
have
them
out
in
the
field
and
they're
24
7
365?
N
What
would
that
look
like
from
an
infrastructure
perspective
things
as
granular,
as
should
a
mental
health
person
or
human
services
person
going
out
in
the
field
with
corresponding
officers?
Should
that
person
have
a
body
camera?
N
What
types
of
data
should
they
collect
to
go
into
rms
so
that
things
like
we've
been
tracking
with
mpd
around
force,
for
example,
and
incidents,
can
be
measured
and
be
transparent,
and
we
can
look
at
that
from
many
lenses.
So
the
number
of
different
questions
around
how
we
integrate
all
this
work
and
how
901
can
be
the
backbone
of
that
and
computer,
aided
dispatch
and
records
management
can
also
bring
the
transparency
and
the
measures
that
we
need
as
well.
For
that
continuum,
so
that'll
be
a
big
piece
of
this
work.
N
The
transforming
911.,
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
we'll
also
have
looking
directly
at
what
this
means
for
cross-boundary
collaboration.
This
is
where
it'll
it
will
more
directly
look
at
minneapolis
police
department.
N
In
the
context
of
what
policies,
practices,
structure,
systems
processes
would
mpd
maybe
need
to
augment
or
change
going
forward
in
order
to
integrate
more
holistically
with
the
other
services
in
that
continuum,
so
leaning
a
bit
more
into
what
it
would
take
to
actually
drive
this
type
of
collaboration
and
how
we
may
need
to
augment
mpd
going
forward
with
that
and
then
the
next
slide.
Simply
the
you
know.
N
We
want
to
weave
all
those
three
elements
together
that
continuum
the
911
transformation
and
how
we
work
across
the
agency
boundaries
into
one
comprehensive
framework
that
can
say
here's
how
again,
if
we
wanted
to
start
transforming
in
a
large
way
the
city
in
more
of
a
five
year,
six
seven
year
view
here's
what
that
could
potentially
look
like
here's
a
lot
of
the
major
questions,
hopefully
a
lot
of
answers
as
to
how
that
how
that
plays
out?
N
What
the
investment
for
the
city
would
need
to
look
like
which
one
the
big
change
pieces
would
look
like
going
forward
and
we
have
a
pretty
robust
team
from
the
last
slide.
Working
on
this,
we
have,
who
is
part
of
health
management.
Associates
has
been
a
national
nationwide.
Leader
in
human
services,
ran
montgomery
county
maryland's.
N
Human
services
organization
was
also
in
washington
state
running
the
human
services
brian
maxie,
who
was
the
architect
of
seattle's
data
analytics,
which
is
now
viewed
as
probably
one
of
the
best
in
the
country
and
a
lot
of
their
co-response
design.
He
worked
on
rebecca
newstetter
in
the
university
of
chicago
that
is
spearheading
a
901
transformation.
Initiative
nationwide
will
be
looking
directly
at
minneapolis
and,
of
course,
me
we'll
be
leading
and
leading
the
team
going
forward.
So
I'll
stop
there
and
we
can
probably
take
the
presentation
down.
N
I
know
we
probably.
I
think
we
only
have
one
minute
left
of
your
time.
I
think
here
today
so
more
than
happy
to
take
some
questions
or
answer
anything
you
may
need
in
the
remaining
minute
or
so
or,
however
long
chairperson
cunningham
gives
us.
C
Oh
yeah,
I
appreciate
your
thoughtfulness
around
the
the
timing.
We
do
go
as
long
as
we
need
so
so
no
worries
there
so
no
rush.
This
is
a
really
important
bit
of
information.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
from
my
colleagues,
councilmember
fletcher.
H
Thank
you,
chuck
cunningham,
and
thank
you
for
this
presentation
and
for
your
work.
I'm
excited
about
this.
I
you
know
you
heard
us
have
some
discussion
about
coordination
of
research
even
earlier
in
this
meeting,
and
it's
it's
a
topic.
That's
pretty
live
for
us,
so
getting
us
getting
a
an
inventory
of
what
we
have
and
and
all
the
different
things
that
are,
as
you
said,
sort
of
in
flight
in
in
a
lot
of
different
areas
is
really
helpful.
H
I
guess
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you're
getting
access
that
we're
not
duplicating
efforts
as
we
get
into
this
work.
So,
for
example,
the
911
work
group
is
something
that
I've
you
know
cared
a
lot
about
and
and
seeing
a
lot
of
really
good
work
happening
there
as
you
bring
in
folks
who
are
looking
at
911
from
other
places
and
and
thinking
through.
H
Some
of
the
same
questions
and
issues
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
getting
everybody
full
access
to
the
work,
that's
already
been
done
and
making
sure
that
we're
we're
moving
together
rather
than
duplicating
effort.
So
how
this
is.
This
is
our
chance
to
check
in
a
little
bit
to
make
sure
that
we're
getting
you
what
we
would
hope
we
would
be
getting
you.
H
N
Absolutely
yeah
thank
you
for
that.
We
were,
I
think,
we're
doing
well
in
this
regard
and,
of
course,
we'll
reach
out
for
help.
If,
if
we
need
some
on
that
we've,
the
city
coordinator's
office
has
been
quite
helpful
mark
before
we
left,
of
course,
was
was
helping
substantially
on
this
and
heather
johnson.
We
just
met
in
person
last
week
and
is
helping
coordinate
a
lot
of
that
activity
and
we've
been
pretty.
N
N
The
office
of
violence
prevention
obviously
has
been
very
integrated
into
our
work
so
far
in
various
other
city
functions,
so
so
far,
good
on
the
collaboration
piece
as
we
get,
we
haven't
gone
very
deep
yet
into
9-1-1,
we'll
be
starting
that
likely
in
about
about
10
days
or
so
doing.
Some
we've
had
one
round
of
discussions
with
not
the
leadership
of
9-1-1,
but
we'll
be
going
deeper
into
that.
So
would
very
much
welcome
the
collaboration
on
that
and
any
help
we
can
get
from
you.
C
I'm
not
seeing
any
very
excited
about
this
work,
I'm
somebody
who
appreciates
the
getting
into
the
deep
into
the
weeds,
but
also
really
love
systems,
work
and
so
really
appreciate
the
framing
around
building
up
the
ecosystem
and
being
really
thoughtful
about
that.
C
I
think
this
is
a
really
great
example
of
the
kind
of
research
that
we
really
need
right
now,
as
we
are
in
a
time
of
questions
about
what
should
I,
what
should
our
systems
look
like
and
how
should
they
operate,
and
so
I'm
very
excited
about
this
work
and
look
forward
to
being
of
support,
as
you
were,
as
you
move
forward
through
it.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
being
here
today
and
I
look
forward
to
future
conversations
as
well.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all.
Thank
you
all
right
with
that.
C
We
have
conducted
completed
all
of
the
business
for
our
committee
today
and
thank
you
again
to
all
of
the
city
staff
for
all
that
you
do.
We
are
better
off
because
of
your
service
and
thank
you
to
the
public
for
being
plugged
in
and
watch
the
business
of
the
city.
So
with
that,
thank
you.
Everyone-
and
I
hope
that
you
have
a
great
rest
of
your
day,.