►
From YouTube: May 12, 2021 Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Under
the
may,
12th
committee
of
the
whole
and
I'll
note
that
this
meeting
is
being
held
online,
virtually
to
stop
the
spread
of
kobet
19.,
it
is
allowed
under
state
statute
and
the
webcast
is
viewable
online
and
will
also
be
posted
to
the
website.
A
few
days
after
the
meeting,
and
with
that,
I
will
ask
the
secretary
to
please
take
the
role.
C
D
A
A
But
it's
been
noted,
we
have
a
quorum,
thank
you
secretary,
ringgold,
and
if
we
could
move
on
the
slides,
I
don't
have
a
separate
agenda
here.
So
I
believe
the
next
item
here
is
to
turn
it
over
to
the
superintendent
to
sort
of
take
us
away
on
what
we'll
be
covering
this
evening
and
in
points
for
for
input
and
superintendent
go
ahead.
F
F
F
So,
as
I
said
in
our
first
budget,
retreat
that
we
had
this
is
our
day
two.
So
today
we're
going
to
focus
on
the
2022
budget
planning,
we're
asking
to
provide
information
on
revenue
sources
and
obtain
the
board
or
new
commissioners
input
on
ongoing
and
one-time
resources
allocation.
F
We
wanted
to
talk
about
the
maximum
property
tax
levy,
request
and
also
other
board
directions
that
you
will
bring
forward
or
suggest
for
us
to
look
at
and
work
through.
Some
of
the
key
information
that
we're
going
to
ask
from
you
as
commissioners
by
the
end
of
this
budget
retreat
is
the
priorities
within
the
strategic
directions
and
performance
goals.
F
We're
going
to
also
look
for
information
and
direction
to
link
the
priorities
of
property
taxes,
other
ongoing
funding
or
one-time
funding,
and
we're
going
to
also
ask
you,
commissioners,
to
give
us
directions
for
the
nprb
maximum
property
tax
levy
request.
So
hopefully
those
things
that
I
just
mentioned
here.
G
Through
good
evening,
president
coghill
and
commissioners,
the
first
item
that
I
want
to
just
bring
to
your
attention,
and
also
the
public's
attention,
is
all
of
the
documents,
including
this
presentation,
can
be
found
on
our
park
board.
G
Www.Minneapolisperks.Org
backslash
budget
so
included
on
the
cork
board
website
at
that
location
is
a
revised
copy
of
the
2018-2022
strategic
direction
with
performance
goals.
Next
slide,
please
each
commissioner
received
by
email
a
mark
marked
up
version,
a
redlined
version
of
this
document,
as
well
as
a
clean
version
of
the
document,
the
information
that
was
shared
with
commissioners
during
the
previous
or
day
one
of
the
retreat
is
included
in
the
document,
and
then
there
were
a
few
other
minor
edits,
also
included.
G
G
We
break
down
that
23
into
these
following
categories.
47
is
state
aid
funding
and
then
49
really
cover
our
user
fees,
fees
and
charges.
Rental
charges
permits
all
of
those
things
that
we
implement
for
the
services
we
provide
and
then
donations
and
grants
may
make
up
approximately
one
percent
of
the
general
fund
budget
next
slide.
Please
so
this
chart
you
have
become
familiar
with.
We
have.
G
G
So
we
talk
about
the
considerations
for
each
funding
source
and
last
year
I
provided
the
covid19
endemic
and
economic
recession
risks.
So
again
we
were
just
entering
the
pandemic
at
that
time.
Last
year,
when
we
had
the
budget
retreats
and
we
felt
that
all
of
our
revenue
sources
were
at
risk
due
to
the
covet
pandemic
and
the
recession.
G
I
did
provide
some
updates
to
the
cope
as
now.
We
are
a
year
into
the
pandemic
and
the
recession
and
I'll
go
through
each
one.
Property
taxes
are
ongoing,
funding,
source,
2020
property
taxes,
collection
rate
was
not
impacted
by
covid,
and
we
feel
that
that's
really
due
to
the
federal
stimulus
dollars
that
individuals
received
as
well
as
federal
relief,
that
was
provided
by
the
government
for
fees
and
charges.
G
Our
2020
general
fund
budget
revenue
was
5.4
million
dollars
under
budget
due
to
the
impact
of
it.
So
that
was
definitely
the
area
of
our
budget
that
was
impacted
severely
due
to
coven,
and
we
were
able
to
offset
that
loss
in
revenue
through
some
federal
relief
cost
savings
and
cost
savings.
G
Mprb
funding
received
from
the
state
was
not
impacted
due
to
federal
stimulus
and
federal
relief
received
by
the
state,
and
when
we
looked
at
our
grants
and
donations,
our
unaudited
non-capital
grants
and
donation
amounts
were
just
slightly
below
our
five-year
average,
and
that
is
largely
due
to
our
inability
to
hire
youth
employment
and
because
of
our
rec
centers
being
closed
and
not
being
able
to
provide
the
programs
and
services
to
the
level
that
we
would
normally
do
next
slide.
Please.
A
Thank
you
for
that
note,
secretary
ringgold,
the
last
motion
to
approve
the
agenda
for
the.
D
A
Any
discussion
and
not
hearing
any
I'll
ask
the
secretary
to
take
the
role
on
the
approval
of
the
agenda.
A
H
D
A
Thank
you
that
aries,
but
we
intended
that
we
can
continue
with
the
presentation,
then
and
I'll
hand
it
back
over
to
you
and
your
team.
G
G
G
So
now
I'm
just
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
our
one-time
funding
sources
that
will
be
available
for
a
discussion
and
conversation
as
we
discuss
our
budget
for
2022
next
slide.
Please.
G
So
first
there
is
the
federal
relief,
the
american
rescue
plan,
there's
1.9
trillion
dollars
of
covid19
pandemic
rescue
package.
It
does
include
payments
to
state
and
local
governments.
The
state
of
minnesota
is
receiving
2.8
billion,
the
city
of
minneapolis
is
receiving
directly
281
million
dollars
and
hennepin
county
is
receiving
directly
246
million
dollars.
G
G
G
So
we
use
our
general
fund
access
fund
balance
allocations
for
one-time
project
based
items,
and
so
you
can
see
that
there's
an
extensive
list
that
was
passed
by
this
board
in
the
beginning
of
2021
that
utilized
a
general
fund,
excess
fund
balance
that
was
available
at
the
end
of
2020,
and
you
can
see
the
various
items
that
were
funded
through
those
through
through
that
allocation
next
slide.
Please.
G
And
this
is
the
balance
of
those
items
that
were
funded,
there's
two
items
at
the
bottom
here:
the
assessment
for
philanthropic
grant
landscape
and
the
forestry
outreach
coordinator
conditional
funding
that
potentially
could
be
returned
to
fund
balance.
The
outreach
coordinator
position
was
eliminated
during
the
2020
budget
and
with
the
grant
and
donation
coordinator
or
administrator
position,
the
25
000
may
no
longer
be
needed
for
that
next
slide,
please.
E
And
what
we
wanted
to
be
able
to
do
is
give
you
a
sense
of
the
progress
that
has
been
made
on
those
priorities
that
you
had
put
forward
back
in
falwell
park.
Now,
a
couple
of
years
ago,
a
little
later
on
in
our
evening
together,
we'll
spend
some
time
considering
additional
priorities
that
might
fit
into
the
ongoing
or
the
one-time
fund
category
as
we
build
a
recommended
2022
budget.
But
this
is
a
snapshot
of
the
top
20.
E
You
have
in
your
inbox
in
your
email,
the
full
document
which
includes,
if
I
can,
if
I
can
capture
that
in
a
minute,
but
a
clue
includes
all
of
the
items
that
received
some
level
of
funding,
I'm
going
to
struggle
off
of
the
top
of
my
head
to
remember
exactly
how
many
items
are
included
on
that,
but
you
will
see
that
there
are
some
color
coding
in
them.
There's
purple
ones.
There
are
blue
ones
and
there
are
green
ones.
E
One
correction
I
will
make
is
that
the
top
two
one
is
the
creation
spaces
and
the
other
one
is
the
youth
employment
will
actually
show
up
as
blue
on
your
document.
The
correction
has
been
made
here,
and
the
difference
is,
is
that
those
that
are
showing
up
in
purple
are
funded
by
both
ongoing
funds
and
one-time
funds.
E
I
think
this
will
be
an
interesting
tool
for
you
to
use
actually
throughout
the
entire
budget
process,
because
you'll
get
a
sense
of
which
changes
you've
made
as
a
board
that
are
long-term
changes,
which
things
were
specifically
from
additions
and
property
taxes,
which
things
were
a
result
of
moving
funding
from
maybe
one
part
of
the
organization
to
another
part
of
the
organization
and
then
are
there.
Some
things
that
you
invested
in
considerably
in
one-time
funds
but
won't
be
won't
live
beyond
that
allocation
of
one
by
one-time
funds
unless
there's
more
ongoing
funds.
E
Added
to
that.
So,
if
I
take
as
a
start,
the
first
one
item
number
one:
it's
from
the
recreation
division,
it's
the
creation
spaces
throughout
2019
to
2021
through
a
variety
of
sources,
both
ongoing
and
one-time
funds.
E
As
we
look
forward,
we
would
see
needing
an
additional
1.5
so
we're
about
halfway
there
on
this
one,
and
when
we
did
the
vote,
when
you
did
the
vote
for
actually
the
2020
budget,
you
gave
it
seven
dots
at
that
time,
and
then
you
can
see
that
the
funding
sources
include
fees
and
charges,
changes
in
current
service
level,
reductions,
excess
fund
balance,
capital
levy,
funding
and
grants
and
donations.
E
So
a
lot
of
what
you've,
already
funded,
is
really
around
the
creation
of
the
creation
spaces.
So
that's
why
you
see
a
lot
of
it
in
the
one-time
fund
category
versus
the
ongoing
and
a
lot
of
what
we're
looking
for
in
the
future
is
more
of
that
ongoing
funding
for
staffing
and
upkeep
and
use
of
those
spaces,
as
well
as
adding
an
additional
space
through
one-time
funds
in
the
youth
employment
category.
Here
you
have
invested
about
seven
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
dollars
in
youth
employment.
E
During
your
term,
we
are
still
looking
at
an
additional
three
hundred
thousand
dollar.
Investment
is
what
we
would
be
looking
for
to
meet
the
targets
that
you
established
in
the
strategic
directions.
E
You've,
given
that
five
dots
in
the
previous
work
on
this
and
you
can
see
where
the
funding
is
allocated
from
or
shifted
from
to
to
accomplish,
that.
I
E
E
B
A
Thank
you,
commissioner
music.
While
we
are
paused,
I
would
just
ask
a
question
of
clarification.
Why
are
the
additional
requests
we're
seeing
here
in
the
additional
request,
column,
or
only
the
first
three
items.
E
E
E
And
in
this
in
this
next
grouping
of
slides
is
aware,
president
coghill
you'll
get
a
little
bit
more
information
about
your
question.
These
are
some
of
the
information
repeated
from
the
first
meeting,
our
first
retreat.
That
is
specifically
around
those
areas
where
either
through
existing
board
action
or
existing
for
direction.
E
K
Category,
thank
you,
deputy
ringgold
good
evening.
Commissioners,
as
mentioned,
are
you
guys
getting
a
little
feedback
from
me.
A
K
Thank
you,
as
mentioned.
What's
before,
you
are
ways
that,
with
the
additional
resources,
we
can
advance
the
work
that
we've
already
begun
and
demonstrating
a
commitment
to
youth,
and
so
what
you
will
see,
we
are
asking
for
an
additional
12
ftes
to
serve
in
youth
programming,
an
additional
seven,
I'm
sorry,
two
additional
creation
spaces
and
the
staff
associated
with
that.
K
You
will
see
that
youth
employment
continues
to
be
a
part
of
the
the
discussion
and
nature-based
programming
as
well
all
of
the
fd
ftes
associated
with
that
work
as
to
22
additional
staff.
G
Before
we
move
on
to
the
next
slide,
president
kokel,
I
will-
I
will
just
point
out
that
on
this
slide,
this
is
the
property
tax
funded
priorities.
G
So
this
one
point
almost
1.2
million
would
be
ongoing,
would
be
the
ongoing
amount
for
for
these
items
or
I'm
sorry.
I
want
to
talk
about
creation
spaces.
This
756
thousand
dollars
is
ongoing
on
the
spreadsheet,
for
additional
funding.
There's
also
the
capital
cost
for
adding
two
additional
locations,
so
the
dollar
amount
is
1.5
million,
because
there
would
need
to
be
the
capital
costs
of
creating
two
more
two:
more
creation
spaces.
G
H
I
Thank
you,
president
cobill.
Can
we
go
back
to
the
previous
slide?
I
just
want
to
clarify
so
the
total
property
tax
funded
priority
increase
is
two
million
six
hundred
twelve
thousand
dollars,
plus
the
additional
capital,
expanded
expenditures
that
would
be
needed
to
support
the
creation
space
staff.
Is
that
accurate.
G
President
coghill
and
commissioner
music,
the
capital
support,
is
for
the
capital
infrastructure
that
would
be
needed
to
create
the
two
additional
creation
spaces.
So
the
building
modifications
the
equipment
per
purchases
to
establish
that
creation,
space.
E
I
G
G
I
J
J
So
system
expansion
is
our
process
of
implementing
new
parks,
as
identified
in
our
service
area
master
plans,
and
when
we
go
through
that
process,
we're
looking
in
particular
to
position
parkland
better
to
to
better
balance,
access
and
and
to
some
degree
park,
acreage
disparities
that
have
been
identified.
J
J
Land
we've
been
responding
with
parks
that
are
generally
small
like
tower
side,
which
is
about
0.6
acres
and
then,
as
noted
at
the
hiawatha
avenue
lake
street,
the
park
that
we
call
market
square
at
this
point,
which
is
about
fifty
thousand
square
feet
or
about
one
point,
two
acres,
both
of
which
are
surrounded
by
areas
of
significantly
higher
residential
development.
J
J
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
so
we
anticipate
as
we
go
forward,
that
we're
going
to
continue
to
discover
that
the
higher
density
residential
development
is
going
to
result
in
the
need
for
more
smaller
and
probably
more
plaza
like
spaces
like
those
at
tower
side
markets,
market
square,
the
south
service
southwest
service
area
recognize
some
of
those
along
the
greenway
and
as
we
as
we
continue
to
study,
what's
happening
with
the
2040
plan,
we'll
probably
be
identifying
even
more
of
those
spaces.
J
J
J
Planning
is
working
closely
with
asset
management
to
make
certain
that
we're
being
responsive
as
we
program
what
it's
going
to,
what
we
will
need
to
be
able
to
take
care
of
these
new
parks,
we
don't
want
to
simply
introduce
them
and
then
expect
that
we
have
enough
resources
to
be
able
to
support
them
properly
with
existing
resources.
J
If
we
were
to
do
that,
we
would
essentially
be
and
not
increasing
the
the
the
the
the
dollars
we
have
for
taking
care
of
them.
We
would
have
to
be
drawing
dollars
from
other
areas
to
maintain.
J
Well
note
that
the
north
loop
park,
the
8th
avenue
streamscape
market
square
and
26th
are
which
are
opening
in
either
late,
either
this
year
or
early
next
year.
We
don't
need
property
taxes
above
the
forecast
to
accommodate
those
parks.
J
The
next
slide
is
undertaken
by
assistant
superintendent,
eric,
yes,.
C
Thank
you
assistant
secretary
schroeder,
good
evening,
president
colgan
commissioners,
shifting
gears
a
bit
to
the
one-time
fund
of
priorities.
C
You'll
recall
that
last
wednesday
the
resolution
was
passed,
directing
staff
to
develop
an
mou
with
green
minneapolis
to
establish
a
partnership
for
planning
funding
and
implementing
an
urban
tree
carbon
offset
program
in
so
the
resolution
kind
of
did
two
things
that
that
was
the
first
piece
of
the
the
mou
outlining
a
relationship
in
developing
a
carbon
offset
program
and
then
also
there
was
a
there's.
C
The
next
line
of
supporting
green
minneapolis's,
2.25
million
dollar
proposal
to
the
city
of
minneapolis
office
of
sustainability
to
funeral,
to
fund
a
one-time
year
pilot
program
and
that
funding
is
part
of
that
one-time
recovery
funding.
That
julie
mentioned
earlier,
that
the
city
is
receiving,
and
so
the
park
board
is
a
bit
of
a
benefactor
to
the
green
minneapolis
proposal
and
of
one-time
funding
to
initiate
a
carbon
offset
program
so
funding
the
tree
planting.
C
D
C
E
Commissioners,
at
this
point,
what
we'll
do
is
we
will
now
do
some
brainstorming
on
the
things
you
would
like
us
to
continue
to
work
on
as
the
budget
is
developed
I'll
bring
up
in
a
moment
a
worksheet
for
us
to
fill
out.
But
on
this
slide,
what
I,
what
I
want
to
draw
our
attention
to
is:
first,
the
four
strategic
directions:
invest
in
youth,
be
fiscally
sustainable,
protect
the
environment
and
engage
communities
power
in
your
materials.
E
And
then
president
coghill,
either
we
can
do
this
kind
of
as
a
popcorn
or
you
can
do
this
as
a
hand
raise
and
you
acknowledge
them,
and
then
I
can
record
it.
Whatever
is
the
the
method
you
want
to
use.
A
Okay,
thank
you
secretary
ringgold.
I
I
believe
that
probably
we
don't
have
too
many
people
here.
So
if
anybody
would
like
to
any
commissioner
had
any
thoughts
about
what
they
wanted
to
start
with,
we
can
just
go
and
just
speak
now.
If
it
gets
a
little
bit
chaotic,
I
will.
I
will
have
us,
raise
our
hands.
I
A
couple
of
ongoing
fund
items
that
I
think
we
should
be
considering,
one
of
which
is
an
item
that
was
funded
one
time
in
a
previous
budget,
but
I
just
think
it's
gonna
be
incredibly
difficult
for
us
to
recruit
someone
to
do
the
work,
especially
in
this
hiring
environment.
If
it's
not
a
full-time
job,
so
I
would
like
us
to
reconsider
funding
the
forestry
outreach
coordinator.
I
E
H
I
we'll
have
to
more
closely
review
the
strategic
directions
to
figure
out
which
one
each
of
them
fits
in.
First,
you
know
I'll
just
reiterate.
I
support
asking
for
a
higher
property
tax
levy
to
pay
for
the
things
we
want
to
see.
H
H
H
What
is
the
lowest
hanging
food
that
we
can
build
on
the
three
percent
reduction
that
we
got
last
year
at
this
year?
Next,
I
would
like
to,
and
all
three
of
mine
are
ongoing,
requests
that
I'd
like
to
see
long
term.
H
The
next
one
is
I'd
like
to
see
continued
investment
in
parkway
infrastructure
and
we'll
want
to
see
how
well
the
pilot
goes
as
we
implement
the
one
one
time
funds
that
we
allocated
this
year
for
that,
but
fingers
crossed
that
it
goes
well
like.
Do
you
see
that
be
a
continued
investment
and
third
I'd
really
like
to
see
us
expand
access
to
public
bathrooms?
I
think
that's
a
really
important
need
and
that
might
be
more
in
the
capital
budget
and
might
be
implementing
things
that
are
already
in
master
plans.
H
You
know
that's
something
that
we
could
have
further
discussion
about,
but
I
think
that's
really
something
that
is
important
for
us
to
do,
because
for
a
lot
of
people
who
are
older
or
you
know,
have
certain
conditions,
their
access
to
the
bathroom
really
becomes
their
access
to
the
park
because
they've,
if
there's
nothing
nearby
and
they
need
to
use
the
bathroom,
then
it's
not
accessible
to
them.
D
Thank
you,
along
with
commissioner
meyer's
request
for
additional
bathrooms,
I'll,
say
water
fountains,
so
even
to
put
a
matrix
in
there
too,
within
six
blocks
or
ten
minute
walk.
I
guess
is
the
better
way
of
saying
it.
So
I
I'm
I'm
sure
I'm
reaching
on
this
thing,
but
when
you
say,
as
far
as
replacement
of
revenue
loss.
D
Building
a
more
robust
child
care
assistance,
so
I
guess
that
to
me
I
don't
know
if
that's
a
priority
here
or
not,
but
I
also
wanted
to
second
or
whatever
commissioner
musage's
requests
that
she
put
in
there.
L
Thank
you,
president
coghill.
Just
for
clarification,
are
we
talking
about
any
category
or
are
we
specifically
on
okay
so
instruction?
Yes,
so
for
sure
water,
fountains
and
bathrooms,
and
make
sure
that
the
restrooms
that
we
have
and
then
also
parkway
infrastructure.
H
I'll
add
clarification
on
my
original
thing
too,
because
I
do
think
both
are
important.
Not
just
you
know
the
new
things
that
we're
doing,
but
the
amount
of
money
that
the
city
has
been
giving
us
for
repairing
the
parkways
has
stayed
the
same
since
the
90s.
We
have
a
really
big
backlog
of
needed
investments,
and
you
know
I
know
that
we
had
been
working
with
councilmember
wright,
the
chair
of
the
transportation
committee,
to
increase
that
funding.
H
I
think
we
need
to
really
really
push
that,
because
every
year
the
problem
gets
bigger,
the
the
funds
aren't
going
as
far
because
inflation
goes
up,
so
we
we
really
need
to
to
push
to
get
the
the
funds
that
we
need
to
properly
repair
our
partners-
and
you
know
I
know
I
know
that-
was
also
part
of
mpp
20.
So
like
we,
we
need
to
get
that
problem
resolved
one
way
or
the
other.
D
E
A
E
It's
not
and
thank
you,
president
coghill.
I
did
write
it
down
so
that
commissioner
forney
could
see
that
we've
heard
it,
but
I
was
just
going
to
say
that
I
think
that'll
be
part
of
a
later
conversation
about
the
levy
itself.
A
Understood,
thank
you,
I'm
not
seeing
any
other
hands
at
the
moment.
I
would
want
to
underline
an
ad
to
to
a
few
of
these
things.
I
am
interested
in
perpetuating
if
we're
looking
at
one-time
funds,
perpetuating
some
of
the
priorities
and
investments
that
are
kind
of
one-time
and
ongoing
funds.
So
the
youth
programming
enhancements
that
we
have
been
investing
in
the
deets
again
innovation
fund
is
something
that
we
could
actually
establish
all
of
that
fund
as
being
ongoing.
A
That
would
be
very
good,
but
if
we
can't
do
that,
looking
at
one
time
funds
to
perpetuate
it
for
another
year.
Similarly,
I
don't
think
that
our
violence
prevention
initiatives
should
be
going
away.
I
think
that
that
is
something
that's
going
to
need
to
continue
free,
rec
plus
in
our
conservation
court
crews,
as
is
feasible,
we
should
perpetuate
those
and
the
racial
equity
work
that
has
been
going
on.
A
Oh
okay,
I
did
mention
free
rec,
plus.
E
A
Yes
and
then
one
other
item
that
I
would
put
in
the
category
of
potential
one
fine
one-time
fund
request,
that's
in
in
in
alignment
with
our
a18
a2
strategic
direction.
Performance
goals
is
investing
more
more
fully
in
youth-led
arts
initiatives
in
the
parks.
We've
had
a
few
murals
that
we've
approved
recently.
A
I
think
one
time
funds
are
the
perfect
thing
that
we
could
collaborate
with
the
creation
spaces
on
developing
designs
and
implementing
throughout
our
park
system.
It
touches
on
the
creation
spaces
work,
it
touches
on
youth
employment.
It
touches
on
activating
young
people
throughout
the
system.
A
Point
I
am
suggesting
that
they
should
ultimately
be
ongoing,
but
if
I'm
looking
at
our
strategy
here,
we
already
have
a
proposal
that
I
think
is
a
very
valid
one
for
filling
the
gap
of
based
upon
our
our
youth
engagement
or
our
youth
funding
gap
of
hiring
the
the
22
youth
workers
that
we
need
to
to
fill
that
gap.
And
so
I,
while
I
want
to
ask
for
for
much
more,
I'm
looking
at
what
is
feasible,
and
I
guess
I
would
say
ultimately
they
should
be
in
both
columns,
but
within
this
year.
A
L
You're
on
me,
oh
thank
you.
So
a
couple
of
things
you
know.
I
brought
some
amendments
forward
about
youth
investment
in
golf
and
and
like
in
maintenance
and
golf,
so
strengthen
our
youth
involvement
in
our
golf
program.
L
And
then
I
agree
with
president
coghill
on
the
the
continued
violent
prevention
work.
I
don't
I
can't
remember
if
you
said
a
one-time
or
not,
but
I
think
we
really
need
to
look
at
investing
long-term
in
youth,
violence
prevention
and
I
mean
the
park
board-
has
done
a
great
job
at
youth
employment,
but
we
can
always
make
that
stronger.
L
So
those
are
a
couple
of
the
things
that
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
continue
to
do
and
then
also
there's
been
a
great
I've
been
getting
great
feedback
about
the
senior
recreation
and
the
opportunities
that
we've
provided
through
covet
for
our
senior
population.
So
that
is
well
also.
L
I
think
president
coghill
also
talked
about
art
projects,
so
you
know
additional
opportunities
for
art
in
the
parks,
maybe
even
music,
but
just
things
different
from
sports
for
young
people
for
whomever
I
don't
think
it
has
to
be
limited
to
young
people.
I
think
there's
all
age
folks
who
enjoy
that
type
of
recreation.
So,
just
looking
at
investing
in
some
different
opportunities
outside
of
of
sports
with
music
and
the
arts,
and
maybe
theater-
I
don't
know
but
it'd-
be
it'd-
be
cool
to
have
something
else
going
on.
L
A
I
Thank
you,
president
cogel.
So
the
the
wealthy
tick
innovation
fund
has
gotten
a
lot
of
money
from
this
board
and
I'm
just
interested
in
better
understanding.
I
Community,
that's
been
engaged
around
it,
so
just
is
it
really?
Are
we
creating
a
lot
of
innovation?
Are
we
getting
a
lot
of
new
people
engaged
in
park
programming
that
previously
were
not
engaged?
Are
we
seeing
some
of
those
programs
be
so
successful
that
they're
now
perpetuated
not
only
at
the
location
where
they
started,
but
across
the
system?
A
Yeah,
yes,
go
ahead.
Super
assistant,
superintendent.
K
Thank
you,
commissioner
music.
The
answer
is
yes
actually
to
all
of
it,
so
is
it
encouraging
staff
to
be
more
creative
to
kind
of
stretch
themselves
in
the
kind
of
programming
that
they
offer?
Yes,
I
can't
give
you
hard.
I
can't
give
you
concrete
numbers
right
now,
but
I
know
anecdotally
that
we
are
seeing
a
variety
of
programs
offered
that
ordinarily
wouldn't
be
particularly
in
parts
of
town
where
it
hasn't
been
kind
of
traditional
programming.
K
I
A
You
thank
you,
commissioner.
Music.
Are
there
any
other
thoughts
or
priorities
that
any
commissioners
want
recorded
here
this
evening?
Superintendent,
deputy
superintendent,
for
for
those
commissioners
who
aren't
in
attendance
this
evening?
A
Is
there
any
process
for
providing
additional
in
comments
or
their
ideas
to
staff,
or
is
that
essentially
not
the
case
since
they
are
not
in
attendance
at
this
budget?
Retreat
just
want
to
be
clear
about.
F
That
president
coghill-
yes,
there
will
be.
We
haven't.
I
have
not
at
this
point.
I
know
we
haven't
had
a
discussion
specifically,
but
of
course
we
want
to
get
full
all
of
our
commissioners
in
response
to
this
budget
process,
and
so
we
will,
we
will
do
whatever
is
necessary
to
make
sure
that
they
have
the
information
they
can
share
their
priorities,
both
in
the
ongoing
fund
and
also
the,
of
course,
the
one-time
funding.
F
So
I
work
with
the
deputy
director
weissman
and
we'll
work
to
make
sure
that
we
get
this
information
out
to
the
commissioners
that
we
get
a
response
back
as
we
move
through
this
process.
It's
critical
because
nine
commissioners,
nine
ideas
and
very
important
for
us
to
make
sure
that
we
are
getting
all
the
information
we
need
to
move
forward
in
the
budget,
fantastic.
A
Thank
you,
superintendent,
commissioner.
Music.
D
Thank
you,
president
cocaine.
I
don't
know
how
to
say
this,
but
hearing
some
of
the
things
that
commissioner
meyer
said
and,
of
course,
conditioning
usage,
I'm
almost
wondering
if
we
need
a
full-time
I'll
call
it
climate
resiliency
staff
person.
D
L
Thank
you,
president
coghill.
We,
you
know,
we
have
always
been
talking
about
building
community
power
and
I
just
wanna
just
make
a
note
that
I
think
we
should
explore
ideas
and
you
know
other
ideas
around
engaging
community
outside
of
like
traditional
cacs
and
just
you
know
the
way
that
we
currently
engage
communities.
So
I
would
really
like
us
to
invest
in
different
opportunities
to
engage
different
ways.
You
know
not
traditional,
like
surveys
or
just
you
know,
commissioner
appointed
cats
like
just
maybe
there's
some
new
ways
to
do.
A
I
Thank
you,
president
cogail.
I
don't
know
that
we
necessarily
need
a
full-time
client
climate
resiliency
staff
person.
We
have
an
entire
planning
division,
that's
working
on
implementing
and
designing
plans
that
are
creating
resilient
parks.
So,
if
we're
going
to
be
putting
money
towards
climate
resiliency,
I'd
love
to
see
us
put
more
money
in
the
capital
fund
to
facilitate
that
versus
adding
more
head
count
to
do
work
we're
doing
already.
A
J
A
Looks
like
a
sound
okay,
moving
on
I'll
turn
it
back
over
to
director
wiseman,
I
believe,
or.
G
G
G
The
state
executive
orders
are
starting
to
be
rolled
back
a
center
for
disease
control,
guidelines
are
changing
and
there
again
has
been
federal
stimulus
and
federal
relief
so
going
into
our
current
service
level.
As
I
mentioned
before,
we
are
really
developing
a
projection
for
the
next
five
years.
That
is
a
pre-endemic
levels
of
funding.
So
next
slide,
please
so,
based
on
the
conversation
that
we
had
with
the
board
during
day,
one
of
the
budget
retreat,
where
we
heard
a
strong
support
for
requesting
a
property
tax
levy,
increase
to
support
filling
the
youth
investment
gap.
G
We
now
have
provided
you
with
a
current
service
level
budget
that
includes
the
2.6
million
dollars
that
we
discussed
on
a
previous
slide
or
our
general
fund.
That
equates
to
a
9.93
percent
property
tax
levy
increase
for
our
general
fund.
Next
slide,
please
and
again,
just
to
remind
you
what's
included
in
this
current
service
level,
would
be
a
6.7
million
dollar
increase
in
property
tax
revenue.
G
G
So
that's
where
we
are
beginning
this
conversation,
if,
if
it
is
the
will
of
this
board,
to
move
forward
with
closing
the
gap
for
the
youth
investment,
this
is
being
mindful
of
where
we
are
starting
from.
So
president
cogill,
when
you
talked
about
things
that
are
in
the
one-time
column,
because
you
want
to
be
supportive
of
filling
the
youth
investment
gap.
G
This
you
know
this
reflects
that.
So
if
we,
if
we
are
looking
to
add
much
more
to
our
general
fund
budget
above
the
youth
investment
gap,
we
would
need
to
consider
potentially
current
service
level
reductions
or
one-time
funding
for
other
things,
rather
than
maybe
a
property
tax
levy
increase
going
forward.
So
I
will
open
it
up
for
questions
at
this
point.
A
Thank
you,
director
wiseman,
a
couple
of
clarifying
questions
here
of
the
items
listed
here
which
are
required.
It's
looking
like
the
benefit
and
wage
adjustments.
I'm
assuming
are
required
based
upon
our
current
agreements
with
our
unions,
and
then
we
have
the
minimum
wage
increase
which
is
required
are:
are
the
forestry
operating
expenditures
and
new
arc
operations
required
budgetary
increases.
G
So
again
for
the
forestry
trees
and
stumps,
this
gets
us
back
to
the
pre-levy,
with
the
left
tree
levy.
Going
away
this
shores
up
the
general
fund
to
a
point
where
the
general
fund
will
support
the
planting
of
about
3,
000
trees
and
stump
removals.
So
if
you
don't
do
that,
you
would
be.
G
You
would
be
affecting
the
amount
of
trees
that
could
be
planted
through
the
general
fund
and
then
again
we
are
adding
four
locations
to
our
operations
in
2022
with
the
26th
street
park
and
the
north
loop
and
the
8th
avenue
streetscape
and
market
square.
A
A
A
G
Okay,
all
right,
thank
you,
president
cogail
and
commissioners.
Then
we
will
move
on
to
the
maximum
property
tax
levy
discussion,
so
the
board
of
estimate
and
taxation
was
created
in
1990
through
straight
through
the
state
legislature.
G
The
membership
of
the
board
consists
of
six
members,
the
mayor
city,
council,
president,
chairperson
of
the
ways
and
means
committee
and
the
park
and
recreation
board,
commissioners
and
two
members
that
are
elected
city-wide
for
four-year
terms
next
slide,
as
required
by
state
law.
The
board
of
estimate
and
taxation
sets
the
maximum
property
tax
levy
for
the
city
of
minneapolis,
the
park
board,
the
minneap
municipal
building
commission
and
the
public
housing
authority.
G
The
mprb,
the
board
by
resolution,
will
request
an
annual
property
tax
levy.
Maximum
amount
that
the
board
of
ex
the
board
of
estimate
and
taxation
should
consider
to
set
for
the
nprb
public
hearing
is
held
with
the
bet
to
allow
citizens
input
regarding
the
setting
of
the
maximum
property
tax
levy
increase
and
then
the
board
of
estimate
and
taxation
sets
the
maximum
property
tax
levy
on
or
before
september
30th
of
each
year.
G
The
board
is
also
entrusted
with
incurring
indebtedness
for
the
municipal
purposes,
on
request
of
the
city
council.
It
issues
and
sells
the
general
obligation
bonds
in
support
of
the
capital
improvement
without
the
board
of
estimate
and
taxation.
The
city
would
have
to
go
to
the
state
legislature
for
approval
to
issue
bonds,
and
so
the
park
board
requests
both
the
city
council
and
the
bet
to
issue
and
sell
bonds
related
to
our
capital
program.
Next
slide,
please.
G
So
the
park
board
again
is
much
more
heavily
reliant
on
property
taxes
than
the
city
of
minneapolis
city
of
minneapolis.
50
percent
of
the
city's
general
fund
is
funded
through
property
taxes,
with
37
with
fees,
fines
and
other
revenues.
So,
as
we
talked
about
the
pandemic
last
year,
we
understood
that
the
city
was
being
impacted
at
a
larger
level
than
we
were
due
to
coven,
but
with
the
relief
that
has
been
provided
to
the
city
of
minneapolis
both
last
year
and
with
the
american
rescue
plan
that
goes
through
2024.
G
So
this
is
just
a
reminder
that
for
last
year,
the
overall
property
tax
levy
increase
for
the
city
of
minneapolis
was
5.75
percent.
The
park
board's
general
fund
increased
by
1.18
percent.
G
So
it
will
be
of
interest
to
us
to
see
if
the
city
of
minneapolis
will
come
forward
with
a
lower
property
tax
levy
increase
for
their
general
fund,
which
would
potentially
allow
us
to
have
a
larger
increase
without
impacting
the
overall
total
property
tax
levying
increase
when
we
get
into
20
next
slide.
Please.
G
G
When
we
look
to
2022
residential
property,
values
are
increasing
faster
than
commercial
properties,
shifting
more
of
the
property
tax
burden
to
residential
there's,
also,
a
reduction
in
apartment,
construction
or
commercial
vacancies
downtown
that
may
impact
future
years
and
in
2022
there
are
no
expiring
tif
districts
to
reduce
the
impact
on
tax
increases
in
2022
next
slide,
please
so
to
remind
people.
Last
year
with
the
5.75
increase,
it
was
really
felt
differently
across
non-homesteaded
property,
residential
property,
homesteaded
residential
property
apartments,
who
felt
the
largest
increase
last
year
and
then
commercial
properties
next
slide.
G
G
So
if
we,
if
we
go
for
a
maximum
property
tax
levy,
option
that
supports
our
investment
in
youth,
we
have
our
forecasted
amount,
which
is
a
6.1
percent
increase
or
4.2
million
dollars.
G
So
the
cumulative
impact
of
our
property
tax
levy,
maximum
request
would
be
7.72
percent,
and
so
and
then
I
just
show
that
for
every
one
percent
in
property
taxes
it
generates
689
thousand
dollars
and
is
equates
to
a
point
two
percent
increase
on
total
city
of
minneapolis
property
taxes.
G
G
I
Thank
you,
president
coco,
so
the
percent
change
of
7.72
is
that
if
we
were
to
ask
for
a
maximum
levy
increase
of
the
nine
point,
whatever
percent
that
we
had
discussed
earlier.
G
I
G
If
you
would
like
to
see
what
level
you
would
like
to
see
a
maximum
property
tax
levy
increase,
if
you,
if
you're
comfortable
with
the
7.72,
if
you'd
like
to
be
like
it
to
be
lower.
If
you
don't
mind
if
it
goes
higher
because
of
the
ideas
or
the
priorities
that
were
discussed,
that
are
unfunded
so
far.
I
Okay,
thank
you.
So
I
guess
what
I
would
like
to
understand,
and
unfortunately
our
bet
representative
is
not
with
us
this
evening,
but
perhaps
they've
briefed
president
coghill,
but
I'd
like
to
understand
what
appetite
there
is
on
the
bet
to
provide
a
increase
of
this
amount
for
the
park
board.
I
I
would
hope
that
people
understand
that
we
really
would
have
liked
to
have
done
this
incrementally
over
a
two-year
period,
but
that
kovid
really
mucked
that.
K
I
So
we're
now
looking
at
asking
for
essentially
two
years
worth
of
increase
in
our
levy
in
one.
K
A
Commissioner,
music,
I
might
say
I
have
not
connected
recently
with
commissioner
french,
our
pt
representative,
on
where
he
is
personally
and
I
would
hesitate
to
characterize
any
opinions
of
bet
members.
A
J
A
We've
had
discussions
for
now
three
years
about
the
gap,
so
the
mayor's
office
is
very
well
aware,
as
are
the
council
representatives
on
the
bet,
and
I
have
spoken
with
both
of
them.
A
G
President
colgail
and
commissioner
music,
that
is
correct,
so
the
6.1
percent
general
fund
increase
and
the
sun
setting
of
the
tree
preservation
reforestation
fund
equates
to
that
four
percent
forecast
for
2022.
I
L
Thank
you,
president
coghill.
How
does
how
does
park
funding
fit
into
the
money?
That's
going
to
be
coming
into
the
federal
dollars?
That's
going
to
be
coming
into
minneapolis.
Do?
Is
the
mayor
gonna
allocate
that
in
ways
that
he
wants?
Is
it
for
specific
reasons
or
like
would
us?
Would
us
asking
for
increase?
Would
that
you
know
be
like
now
for
us
to
do
it,
because
we
know
there
is
going
to
be
money
coming
into
minneapolis.
G
President
coghill
and
commissioner
vita
after
we
complete
our
conversation
around
the
maximum
property
tax
levy,
request,
deputy
ringgold
will
be
walking
us
through
a
conversation
around
the
american
rescue
plan
and
what
types
of
things
we
want
to
maybe
go
after
those
dollars
for
when
I'm.
What
I'm
saying
with
the
american
rescue
plan
is
that
there
is
the
ability
to
offset
revenue
losses
with
with
the
american
rescue
plan.
G
It
remains
to
be
seen
what
the
city
and
the
city
council
do
with
that,
if
they,
if
they
use
it
to
help
cover
some
of
those
revenue
losses,
which
means
potentially
that
maybe
they
would
provide
some
property
tax
relief
on
their
side,
which
potentially
would
allow
us
to
go
a
little
higher
because
we
went
zero
last
year
and
they
they
didn't.
You
know.
G
So
I
think
that
there's
things
that
can
be
discussed
and
negotiated
with
the
city
and
it's
really
important
that
we
get
the
guidance
from
the
commissioners
so
that
we
kind
of
we.
You
know
we're
gonna,
be
continuing
those
conversations
with
with
the
mayor's
office
and
with
the
bet
members
and
with
city
council
members,
and
if
we
have
you
know
the
direction
from
the
board,
then
we're
able
to
have
those
conversations.
L
Okay,
well,
I
would
definitely
I'm
open
to
conversations
about
the
increase
for
sure,
especially
when
we're
talking
about
parkway
infrastructure-
and
you
know-
continue
the
investment
in
youth.
So
I'm
definitely
open
to
having
more
conversations
about
the
increase.
A
Thank
you
vice
president,
not
seeing
other
hands.
I
have
a
question
the
right
now,
the
youth
investment
or
what
I
would
maybe
like
to
call
the
youth
levy
similar
to
like
what
we
refer
to
as
the
tree
levy
is.
Is
that
going
to
be
proposed
as
its
own
separate
levee
shown
here
as
its
own
line
item
outside
of
minneapolis
park
board?
G
President
colgall
and
commissioners,
I
apologize
for
that
confusion,
but
that
would
not
be
a
separate
levy.
It
really
should
say
minneapolis
park
board
dash
youth
investment.
It
is
a
part.
It
would
be
a
part
of
our
general
fund
levy
and
be
part
of
the
sustainable
levy
going
forward.
A
G
A
D
D
At
its
same
level
and
increase
ours,
I
am
definitely
in
favor
of
that,
so
I
I
just
I
I
I
know
all
too
well
how
the
levy
has
impacted.
D
The
lower
valued
homes,
particularly
in
north
minneapolis,
it's
really
devastating
so
and
and
definitely
is
being
filtered
down
to
renters,
and
you
know
that
is
a
real
crux
of
our
affordable
housing
issue,
so
that,
if
there's
a
way
to
test
the
waters
where
the
city's
thrust
is
going
to
be
that's
how
I
would
approach
it.
Thank.
A
E
A
Not
seeing
any
thank
you
for
the
presentation,
I'll
just
underline,
I,
I
think
that
it
is
important
that
we
do
request
the
the
full
total
of
seven
point-
seven,
two
percent-
I
I
would
still
be
interested
in
seeing
what
that
total
would
be
without
the
items
I
had
mentioned
before
that
are
built
into
our
level
of
service
increase.
A
Just
out
of
curiosity-
and
I
think
that's
all
I
have
to
say
on
this
issue-
so
thank
you
very
much
director
wiseman,
I
don't
know.
What's
next
superintendent
or
director
wiseman.
E
Thank
you,
director,
wiseman
president
cogail.
So
I
think
this
is
aside
from
closing
remarks
and
additional
comments
and
questions
that
folks
might
have.
Perhaps
the
last
planned
discussion
item
for
the
evening
and
and
director
wiseman
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
what
we
want
to
do
in
this
discussion,
recognizing
that
this
has
some
level
of
impact
on
how
we
might
think
about
the
2022
budget,
but
isn't
in
itself
fully
20
22
budget
related.
E
Regarding
the
to
the
2022
budget,
and
basically,
what
we
have
in
front
of
you
is
a
is
the
american
rescue
plan
and
wanting
to
get
a
sense
from
you
in
terms
of
how
we
should
as
an
organization
approach
the
city
regarding
these
dollars,
so
julie
earlier
went
through
that
we
have
the
1.9
trillion
dollar
package.
That
happened
at
the
federal
level,
and
we
know
that
281
million
of
that
is
flowing
toward
the
city
of
minneapolis.
E
We
also
know
that
this
isn't
necessarily
just
a
single
year
allocation,
but
it
is
a
three-year
allocation,
so
we
should
still
think
about
this
in
the
category
of
not
ongoing
funding,
because
it
doesn't
sustain
itself
beyond,
perhaps
a
three-year
time
frame,
so
we
should
still
think
about
it
as
more
of
a
one-time
funding
source,
but
it
is
something
that
we
will
need
to
respond
to
over
the
next
year
for
certain
and
perhaps
even
into
the
next
two
years.
E
So
a
couple
of
things
to
think
about
director
wiseman
has
already
walked
through
kind
of
the
balance
last
year
of
how
we
took
a
very
low
levy,
increase
specifically
related
to
the
commons,
but
did
receive
relief
dollars
from
the
city
of
minneapolis
received
about
two
million
dollars
in
relief
dollars.
E
E
I
think
these
questions
are
probably
on
the
city's
mind
as
well
they're,
most
likely
trying
to
sort
out
how
they
are
going
to
approach
these
dollars
and
what
is
going
to
work
best
to
solve
some
of
their
budget
issues
moving
forward.
But
it
would
be
helpful
to
have
any
guidance
that
this
board
might
already
be
thinking
about
on
how
we
would
approach
these
dollars.
I
Music,
thank
you,
president
coco.
I
think
making
the
ask
that
we
get
an
equivalent
share
to
our
lga.
Funding
might
be
a
difficult
one
in
that
the
city
had
much
broader
impacts
to
their
budget
from
kobit
19
than
we
did
in
that
we
we're
not
as
reliant
upon
downtown
parking
fees
and
use
the
convention
center
et
cetera,
to
be
able
to
balance
our
budget.
I
So
I
think
that
might
be
a
kind
of
a
hard
so,
but
I
do
think
trying
to
find
ways
to
receive
replacement
revenue
losses
that
we
can
directly
tie
to
the
coronavirus
pandemic
is
sensible.
I
think
you
know
letting
letting
them
understand
the
impacts
to
a
resident's
ability
to
pay
for
preschool
and
child
care
progress.
Child
care
programs
within
the
system
would
be
wise.
I
A
focus
that
we
should
we
should
look
at
in
in
ways
of
expanding,
because
I
know
we
we
did
say
that
people
that
live
in
certain
parts
of
town
are
going
to
get
assistance
from
the
park
board
to
help
pay
for
child
care,
but
we
excluded
everyone
else
in
the
same
situation.
Financially
that
doesn't
live
in
that
geographic
area
from
accessing
that
assistance,
so
there's
a
way
to
expand
it.
That
would
be
great
I'll.
Think
about
it,
some
more!
But
that's
my
initial.
D
I
just
want
to
pair
it.
You
know
what
commissioner
music
is,
I
think,
that's
obvious,
and
and
somehow
I
I,
the
framing
of
it
to
be
a
benefit
to
parents,
it's
more
of
the
benefit
to
the
our
our
children.
If
we're,
if
there's
a
gap
in
youth,
you
know
this
is
the
most
fundamental
is
having.
A
E
President
coghill,
I
might
check
what
I
might
ask,
either
director
wiseman
or
superintendent
of
bangora,
to
to
respond
to
that.
I
am
not
currently
aware
of
of
those
types
of
connections
they
may
be,
and
then
maybe
director
wiseman,
if
you
have
any
details
about
how
the
county
approached
the
original
dollar
they
received
in
any
any
relationship
we
had
around
those.
G
Sure,
president
coghill
and
commissioners,
so
with
the
city
of
minneapolis
dollars,
we
have
more
of
a
direct
connection
and
relationship
to
those
dollars.
The
federal
relief
that
we
received
in
2020
from
both
the
state
and
the
county
ended
up
being.
You
know
special
allocations
that
they
made
through
their
legislative
bodies,
so
they
allocated
money
to
assisting
people
who
were
experiencing
homelessness
at
the
state
level
and
those
dollars
became
available
and
we
were
able
to
apply
for
those
dollars.
G
Hennepin
county
at
a
certain
point
understood
that
they
weren't
going
to
be
spending
all
of
the
dollars
that
were
directed
to
the
that
were
being
directed
to
the
county,
and
so
they
wanted
to
specifically,
specifically
do
this
save
the
summer
youth
program
dollars
and
by
county
board
action.
They
created
this
pot
and
again
it
was
something
that
needed
to
be
applied
for
and
we
were
able
to
apply
and
receive
it.
So
we
again
with
the
american
rescue
plan,
we
will
be
watching
the
other,
the
state
and
the
county
as
well,
to
see.
G
A
Okay,
that's
helpful,
I
I
wonder
if
it
wouldn't
be
a
bad,
it
wouldn't
be
a
good
idea
to
to
at
least
superintendent
or
somebody
to
to
reach
out
to
the
county
administrator
to
mr
ho
or
others
in
the
county
administrator's
office
to
at
least
just
get
a
sense
of
what
their
thoughts
are
even
to
just.
F
That
is,
you
anticipate
what
I'm
what
I'm
working
on,
but
that
is
on
my
list
and
that
yes,
and
that
those
conversations
will
be
happening,
and
so
yes
thank
you
for
that.
But
we
will,
I
will
definitely
be
connecting
with
the
county,
the
state
and
the
city,
fantastic
yep,.
A
I
think
that's
a
really
good,
really
good
kind
of
across-the-board
investment,
in
addition
to
all
the
discussions
that
we've
had
about
other
one-time
fun
priorities,
kind
of
dovetails
with
the
free
record
plus
in
terms
of
the
theory
of
the
ask,
I
still
do
think
that,
while
we
might
not
be
able
to
get
the
same
amount
of
money
as
lga
or
whatever
asking
for
an
amount,
that
is
a
proportion
of
the
dollars.
I
think
would
be
a
good
way
to
think
about
this.
A
But
I
suppose
it
depends
on
the
philosophy
of
of
the
city
and
how
they
want
to
allocate
the
dollars.
We've
already
gone
down
the
path
of
kind
of
specific
project
support,
so
it
may
be
that
we've
set
that
precedent
already
and
we'll
have
to
continue
thinking
about
it
in
that
way.
A
A
I
Thank
you
very
much.
I
I
forgot
to
note
earlier
that,
because
we
haven't
really
covered
it
as
part
of
this
conversation,
but
I
do
think
we
should
be
supportive
of
lenny
panasano's
councilmember
palmisanos
ask
to
fund
the
kickstarting
of
the
carbon
offset
tree
program
in
the
city,
because
I
believe
that
was
a
proposal
that
she
submitted
from
her
office
for
funds
from
this
particular
allegation
of
federal
money.
A
Right
noted,
thank
you,
commissioner.
Music.
Any
other
comments,
I'm
not
seeing
any.
Thank
you
staff
that
wrap
up
our
items
here.
It
does
look
like
that's
the
case.
Are
there
any
other
comments
from
commissioners
on
any
anything?
Particular
I'm
seeing
nothing
all
right.
I
will
get
us
all
adieu
and
with
that
I
will
adjourn
this
committee
of
the
whole
and
wish
you
all
a
wonderful
evening
get
outside
enjoy
the
evening.