►
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
B
C
D
B
A
E
F
A
Becca,
yes,
kenzie,
yes
and
taryn.
Yes,
wonderful!
There
are
six
in
favor,
none
opposed
the
motion
passes.
The
agenda
is
adopted
so
moving
into
the
agenda.
What
I
set
out
for
you
all
was
just
some
space
to
think
through
2022
policy
goals,
and
I
basically
put
in
here
the
priorities
that
you
all
had
established
when
we
did
strategic
planning
for
the
tec,
with
some
space
to
talk
through
where
I
knew
there
was
ongoing
work
on
them
and
where
there
wasn't
space
for
you
all
to
brainstorm.
A
A
A
So
the
first
one
is
kind
of
like
proactive
prevention
of
book
ban,
support
of
trans
youth
in
schools.
More
broadly-
and
I
know
the
only
thing
that
I
remember
us
discussing-
was
just
continuing
to
strengthen
a
partnership
with
mps,
since
this
is
more
so
out
of
the
tec's,
jurisdiction
and
figuring
out
what
it
looks
like
for
the
tc
to
support
this
work
there,
but
want
to
open
it
up.
If
there
are
other
ways
you
all
would
want
to
be
moving
around
this
or
questions
you
have
about
what
could
be
possible.
A
If
not,
I
will
just
continue
to
check
in
with
jason
from
mps.
We
do
our
best
to
have
monthly
check-ins,
although,
unsurprisingly,
that
has
not
happened
recently
with
the
strike
and
everything
else,
and
I
will
keep
you
posted
on.
What's
going
on,
the
next
one
was
around
decriminalization
of
sex
work
and
the
ongoing
work
that's
going
on.
G
Follow
up
on,
I
know
the
hennepin
county
attorney
seat
is
up
for
election
in
november
and
that's
pretty
powerful
in
terms
of
like.
I
know
that
the
attorney
doesn't
control
sentence
like
the
hennepin
county
attorney
is
in
control
sentencing
but
like
in
terms
of
charging.
They
have
all
of
the
power.
Sorry,
my
dog
is
going
to
bark
one.
Second.
G
So
I
know
that
when
that
election's
not
until
november,
I
know
that
that's
the
county,
not
the
city,
but
they
do
have
the
power
to
just
not
charge
people
for
things
like.
If
you
have
someone
who
you
know
some,
I
don't
know,
should
we
even
think
about
that
or
consider
that
as
part
of
decriminalizing
sex
work
or
just
maybe
writing
a
letter
as
the
tec
asking
what
candidates
position
on
a
loitering
ordinance
or
whatever
would
be.
F
Seems
like
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
this
track,
but
first
I
want
to
say
billy
the
fact
that
your
dog
is
so
strongly
moved
about.
Decriminalization
of
sex
work
is
inspiring
to
me.
Sorry
anyway,
it
feels
like
potentially
getting
involved
in
that
as
individuals
we
could
probably
do,
but
it
is
probably
outside
the
scope
of
what
we're
able
to
do
as
the
tec.
Even
like
writing
a
letter
to
candidates,
I
think,
probably
might
go
beyond
what
we're
allowed
to
do.
Is
that
true.
A
I
will
be
honest
that
I
don't
have
great
clarity
like
I
know
you
cannot
speak
as
the
city
to
other
jurisdictions.
I
don't
have
great
clarity
on
whether
you
can
speak
as
the
tec
and
just
be
like.
We
know
we
have
no
authority
but
we're
people
who
are
trusted
to
speak
on
issues
like
this
in
a
different
jurisdiction.
So
we
have
opinions
anyway.
A
A
Yeah
that
I'm
happy
to
look
into
that,
I'm
glad
you
brought
that
up.
I
also
think
for
anyone
here
who
is
trying
to
go
to
the
decrim
coalition
meeting.
I
think
that's
also
a
strategy
question
to
bring
up
there
for
the
larger
coalition,
like
there
are
other
groups
associated
with
that
outside
of
the
tec,
who
could
also
try
to
figure
out
like
where
is
that
value
in
like
pushing
the
county
on
that
level
too?
A
E
And
this
is
probably
outside
the
scope
and
along
that
it
might
be
a
decent
idea
to
encourage
swap
and
the
decrim
coalition
to
maybe
do
a
candidate
survey
in
that
area.
That
might
be
a
strategy
that
works,
because
I
know
there
are
several
nonprofits
and
several
advocacy
groups
who
will
talk,
get
candidates
to
talk
about
their
issues
that
way
and
stuff
so,
but
that
is
probably
something
more
for
kenzie
to
bring
up
at
the
dcrim
coalition
meeting.
A
And
I
will
say
since
decrim
is,
or
since
the
loitering
ordinance
is
specifically
going
to
be
a
city
push.
I
think
this
will
be
something
that
gets
figured
out
in
coalition,
but
once
we
get
further,
there's
definitely
going
to
be
space
for
the
tec
to
be
reaching
out
to
council
members,
because
I
think
I
think
there
will
be
a
lot
who
will
be
willing
to
be
won
over,
but
won't
be
immediately
on
board
without
additional
information.
B
A
It's
going
to
go
initially
through
the
biz
business
inspections,
housing
and
zoning
subcommittee
of
council
and
then
through
full
council
and
should
be
able
to
have
a
majority
vote
in
both,
but
is
gonna,
take
some
conversation
and
briefing
of
council
members
beforehand.
I
don't
have
a
clear
sense
of
rules
beyond
that,
but
if
there
are
folks
who
are
feeling
particularly
excited
to
talk
about
this
with
council
members,
I
would
love
to
know
that
so
that
when
we
get
to
the
point
where
I'm
doing
those
one-on-one
briefings,
I
can
loop
you
in.
A
A
C
A
F
A
A
If
not,
the
next
one
is
the
creation
of
a
department
of
public
safety
which,
as
a
quick
summary,
so
some
people
may
know
that
this
was
on
the
ballot
last
november
as
an
option
to
replace
to
remove
the
minneapolis
police
department
and
create
a
department
of
public
safety.
That
mpd
would
be
a
division
within
potentially
and
that
would
include
any
other
type
of
public
safety
work.
The
city
does
that
ballot
question
failed.
The
other
route
to
creating
new
departments
is
to
get
unanimous
votes
from
the
entire
council
on
the
mayor.
A
If
you
don't
go
the
ballot
route,
and
so
there
are
some
council
members
working
on
trying
to
create
a
department
of
public
safety,
it
looks
different
than
the
ballot
question
in
a
number
of
ways.
The
most
obvious
is
that
it
does
not
currently
involve
mpd,
nor
does
like
the
creation
of
this
remove
mpd
from
being
a
city
department,
but
it
would
combine
other
things
like
9-1-1
and
fire
and
violence
prevention.
A
As
a
couple
examples,
that's
not
comprehensive
to
kind
of
start
the
city
in
the
process
towards
doing
more
holistic,
public
safety
work
and
changing
us
from
like
everything's
siloed
police
only
focus
the
mayor
is
also,
it
seems,
proposing
a
different
version
of
this.
That
does
include
mpd.
I
do
not
have
a
ton
of
information
yet
on
what
exactly
that
conversation
looks
like
and
think
I
don't
feel
clear
on.
A
How
exactly
he
is
envisioning
mpd's
role
in
his
version
and
how
the
council
members,
who
are
proposing
that
their
version
are
relating
to
his
version.
So
I
don't
have
all
the
information.
Yet.
I
think
there
will
definitely
be
in
any
version
like
needs
to
win
elected
officials
over
and
therefore
places
for
the
tec,
to
either
advocate
to
individual
elected
officials
or
to
them
as
a
group,
and
I
think
there
is
going
to
be
a
lot
of
the
council.
A
That
is
what
I
know
so
far
on,
what's
going
on,
which
I
know
is
incomplete
because
I
found
out
about
this
mayoral
version
on
thursday
and
don't
have
enough
info
about
it
yet
but
curious
to
hear
if
folks
have
either
like
specific
questions
that
it's
useful
for
me
to
try
to
look
into
for
you
or
other
strategies
and
ways.
You'd
want
to
see
that
tec
getting
involved.
F
A
A
So
in
the
next
council
cycle
they
will
either
direct
staff
to
draft
an
ordinance
or
postpone
it
further,
and
the
mayor
brought
up
his
version
publicly
when
he
presented
to
city
council
last
week
about
how
we're
implementing
the
the
new
governance
structure,
the
executive
mayor,
legislative
council
that
also
got
voted
on
in
november,
and
he
has
a
follow-up
presentation
to
them
in
like
three
weeks.
I
don't
know
if
he
will
talk
more
about
this
part,
then
or
maybe
elsewhere
in
another,
like
press
conference
or
something
that
I'm
not
yet
aware
of.
A
A
A
And
then
kind
of
you
all
had
a
priority
around
policing
that
included
both
expanding
the
mental
health
responders
and
banning
no
knock
warrants
the
ongoing
work,
as
is
obvious
to
me
there
so
in
terms
of
the
mental
health
responders,
expanding
them
will
be
mostly
I'm
guessing
the
2023
budget
process
so
november
and
december
of
this
year
there
will
be
space
for
you
all
to
advocate
on
that.
My
guess
is
there
won't
be
anything
around
that
sooner
there
is.
The
city
is
putting
out
a
social
media
campaign
with
the
hashtag.
A
The
word
about
what
this
is,
so
the
other
pre-budget,
the
clear
rule
for
the
tec,
not
in
terms
of
expanding
and
funding
the
mental
health
responders,
but
just
in
terms
of
spreading
community
word
is
to
spread
that
social
media.
If
you
want
it's
on
the
cities
like
facebook,
instagram
twitter,
I
think
that's
it
maybe
more.
I
don't
know,
but
that's
what
I
have
on
that
and
then
ongoing
work
on
the
ban
on
no
knock
warrants.
A
A
So
I
think
there
if
tec
members
wanted
to
follow
up
on
anything
you
heard
from
the
listening
sessions
or
from
that
press
conference,
either
individually
as
individual
humans
or
as
the
tec.
Collectively,
you
could
absolutely
do
that.
There
is
not.
The
city
has
not
created
a
space
for
engagement
right
now,
but
that
is
where
we're
at
in
the
process
and
if
you
wanted
to
reassert
things
that
came
up
in
those
listening
sessions
for
people
who
were
there
like,
the
tc
could
write
a
letter
after
the
next
meeting
or
something
like
that.
A
F
D
A
A
If
there
are,
I
don't
remember
all
of
the
deadlines
by
which
that
work
group
would
need
to
create
a
proposal
in
order
for
it
to
successfully
end
up
on
the
ballot
in
2023.
But
there
is
kind
of
there
are
deadlines
in
order
for
them
to
create
a
proposal
that
could
then
get
voted
on
in
2023.
So
I
think
there
is
space
for
the
tec
to
push
around
how
soon
this
work
group
starts.
A
I
am
hoping
to
find
out
more
about
where
this
is
going
to
be
at
than
I
know
right
now,
but
I
I
really
don't
have
much
more
than
that
at
the
moment
and
then
the
other
thing
is
tenant
opportunity
to
purchase
which
gives
tenants
the
first
option
to
buy
a
house
if
their
landlord
is
selling
it
before
it
gets
put
on.
The
regular
market
is
theoretically
a
policy.
That's
going
to
go
through
council
in
the
next
few
months.
A
D
A
Yes,
I
am
making
a
note
to
myself
to
try
to
find
that
out
more
and
then
answer
your
questions,
but
I
don't
have
a
full
gauge.
My
sense
is
a
decent
number
are
supportive,
but
not
necessarily
all
I
like
I
mean
the
the
council
members
that
generally
get
summarized
as
the
progressive
council
members,
I
think,
are
all
supportive
beyond
that.
I
don't
have
a
person
by
person
read
on
it.
A
I'm
not
positive
whether
or
not
like
there
is
an
assumed
majority
who's
supportive
right
now-
and
I
don't
remember
if
the
mayor
is
supportive.
If
he's
not,
they
would
need
a
veto,
proof
majority,
which
is
nine
in
order
to
prevent
a
veto.
So
I
don't
have
that
right
now.
I
can
try
to
get
that
information.
A
But
what
I
will
say
is,
I
think,
the
more
the
topa
policy
gets
strengthened.
So,
like
one
conversation
I
know
is
going
on
right
now
is
that
it
does
not
apply
to
landlords
who
own
five
or
fewer
properties
which
excludes
almost
all
of
the
otherwise
potentially
eligible
properties
in
certain
parts
of
the
north
side.
A
But
what
I
have
heard
is
that
even
some
of
the
more
conservative
council
members
are
really
into
the
idea
of
home
ownership
and
supporting
home
ownership
and
because
topa
is
focused
on
pathways
to
homeownership
it
like
is
an
easier
sell
than
some
of
the
other
housing
equity
work
that
is
going
on.
So
that's
my
high
level
summary.
I
will
try
to
get
more
specifics
on
who
would
be
useful
for
the
tec
to
meet
with.
I
think
that
is
a
great
idea,
but
that's
kind
of
my
read
on
it
overall
at
the
moment.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that's
great
and
I
think
there's
a
couple
council
offices
that
I
can
tell
you
are
supportive,
like
particularly
the
ones
who
are
co-authoring
it,
but
I
think
it
is
valuable
for
council
offices
to
be
able
to
say
look.
I
have
constituents
in
support
of
it,
so
it
doesn't
hurt
to
even
call
those
if
you
want
to
like.
Maybe
your
question
is
more,
like
I
know,
you're
a
co-author,
I'm
in
support,
I'm
checking
who's
in
support.
Are
there
any
amendments
you
want
to
see
like
maybe
with
the
ones
you
know
are
supportive?
A
A
Sweet
then
I
will
jump
with
our
last
little
bit
into
other
ongoing
projects,
so
just
kind
of
flagging,
like
work
that
is
actively
moving
out
of
past
recommendations,
even
if
you
all
didn't
name
it
as
a
priority.
This
year,
safe
use
sites
which
are
supervised
places
where
people
can
use
injection
drugs
that
significantly
prevent
the
risk
of
overdoses,
but
are
like
a
legal
process
to
figure
out
how
to
do.
A
There
is
a
conversation
later
this
week
between
a
couple
interested
council
offices
and
some
of
the
community
groups
who
are
working
on
this.
So
I
will
have
more
information
after
that
and
report
back.
I
think
the
process
for
a
long
time
is
just
going
to
be
kind
of
like
figuring
out
legal
strategy
before
it
gets
anywhere
near
like
putting
something
in
the
budget
or
anything
like
that.
But
I
will
keep
you
posted
when
it
is
getting
to
that
point.
I
think
there's
been
intentionality
around.
A
Let's
start
this
work
not
loudly
so
that
people
who
are
going
to
be
opposed
to
it
aren't
like
spending
their
energy
getting
in
the
way
before
it's
even
started,
which
is
why
the
tec
never
ended
up
like
sending
the
letter
to
council
that
they
wrote
about
supporting
this
or
anything
like
that.
But
that
letter
exists
to
be
used
at
the
point
when
this
work
is
getting
louder.
E
A
Yeah
and
that,
if
there
are
other
places
where
you're
seeing
either
like
things
happening
in
other
cities
or
things
in
the
public
conversation
that
would
be
useful
to
kind
of
hold
on
to
for
when
you
all
need
to
maybe
do
more
direct
advocacy
on
this,
please
feel
free
to
send
them
my
way.
Collect
them
in
a
word
document
whatever,
but
that
is
those
are
all
useful
resources.
A
Supplier
diversity,
essentially
expanding
the
city's
definition
of
like
preferred
businesses
to
work
with
to
also
include
lgbtq,
disabled
and
veteran-owned
businesses.
It
is
folks
who
are
on
the
tc
last
year
heard
a
presentation
about
this.
It
is
looking
right
now
like
it,
won't
be
possible
to
do
that
for
a
couple
years
until
after
the
city
does
their
next.
What's
called
the
disparity
study
and
essentially
like
statistically
proves
the
need
for
it,
so
that
they
have
legal
backup
in
court
for
doing
it.
A
So
I
think
that
is
that
would
be
a
pretty
hard
push
to
make
anything
move
beforehand
and
twin
cities
quorum,
which
is
the
org
that
presented,
would
need
to
have
a
lot
of
capacity
to
kind
of
lead
that
push.
I
think
for
you
all
to
be
able
to
work
in
coalition
with
them.
So
my
sense
is
that
is
a
little
bit
paused,
but
if
folks
want
to
try
to
figure
out
how
to
push
that
sooner
or
have
questions
definitely
down
to
talk
through
that.
D
A
A
A
Like
kind
of
integrating
that
process
with
the
reorganization
of
the
city
departments,
that's
happening
as
a
part
of
implementing
this
executive
mayor
legislative
council
governance
structure,
and
so
I
think
there
is
space
for
the
tec
to
maybe
advocate
around
around
race
equity,
becoming
a
department
around
where
race
equity
sits.
Do
they
report
directly
up
to
the
mayor
and
have
that
level
of
access
to
him?
Are
they
a
couple
levels
down?
Are
we
a
couple
levels
down
in
the
org
chart?
If
there
are
other
things,
you
want
to
see
that
I'm
not!
A
Thinking
of,
I
think
there
will
be
space
for
the
tech
to
reach
out
to
the
mayor's
office
around
that
once
I've
had
a
director
for
more
than
day
and
we
get
a
little
clearer
on
how
things
are
trying
to
move
forward,
and
once
I
have
been
able
to
prep
some
more
of
the
information
I'm
gonna
try
to
give
to
the
faulty
ec
meeting
and,
I
think,
knock
on
wood.
That
is
nowhere
near
me.
If
that
were
to
happen
by
the
end
of
this
year.
A
That
may
be
something
that's
worth
voting
on
in
this
upcoming
tec
meeting
and
I'm
kind
of
putting
that
out
there
so
that
you
all
can
propose
that
if
it
makes
sense,
I
just
I
don't
have
quite
enough
clarity
on
what's
going
on
to
give
you
enough
information,
because
she
just
started
today,
but
that
is
my
sense
on
that.
Please
feel
free
to
ask
me
questions,
because
that
feels
like
actually
the
least
eloquent
thing
I
said
today.
A
Okay
and
then
the
last
few
things
I
have
so
I
just
presented
to
council
last
week
two
weeks
ago.
I
have
no
idea
about
a
hopeful
initiative
to
incentivize,
basically
making
most
of
the
single
stall
bathrooms
anywhere
in
the
city,
gender
neutral.
So
not
just
single
steel
bathrooms
in
like
city
capital,
c
buildings,
but
single
sole
bathrooms
in
minneapolis
that
for
that
incentive
to
move
forward,
it
would
need
funding
from
the
american
rescue
plan
act
phase,
two
or
otherwise.
A
I
have
proposed
to
the
mayor
that
we
get
american
rescue
plan
act.
Arpa
phase
two
funding
for
this.
If
he
does
not
put
this
project
in
his
arpa
phase,
two
proposed
budget
to
council,
there
is
space
for
the
tec
to
advocate
to
council
and
ask
them
to
amend
it,
which
I
think
a
decent
number
of
council
members
would
be
supportive
of.
A
So
that
is
the
clear
next
step
there
and
I
will
keep
you
all
updated
on
what
the
mayor
does,
but
it
may
be
a
pretty
quick
turnaround
between
when
he
proposes
the
budget
and
like
when
you
all
would
have
to
advocate.
I
don't
like
I
don't
know
if
there
would
be
a
tec
meeting
in
between
where
you
could
vote
on
a
letter.
A
E
F
A
A
A
Okay,
I'm
composing
myself,
because
we
only
have
a
couple
minutes
left.
The
last
few
things
are
just
the
like
big
moments
in
the
year.
So
I
feel,
like
we
talked
through
like
here,
are
the
policies
here
are
some
potential
plans
for
each
of
them
so
that
when,
when
we
get
to
that
point
in
the
year,
you
all
can
just
kind
of
go.
The
other
big
moments
in
the
year
in
general
are,
as
I
mentioned,
the
arpa
phase.
A
That
deadline
is
actually
like
sometime
in
may,
and
so
that
is
just
something
we
can
discuss
more
in
the
next
tec
meeting.
That
is
something
that,
like,
if
folks,
wanted
to
go,
do
some
brainstorming
around
and
bring
specific
ideas
back
to
the
next
tec
meeting.
But
those
are
the
like
points
in
the
year
as
well.
A
I
guess
my
only
question
is:
if
there
is
anything,
that's
most
useful
for
me
in
like
how
I'm
structuring
our
time
as
a
policy
commit
subcommittee
to
set
you
all
up
for
success
in
advocating
around
some
of
these,
like
either
big
policies
that
we
know
are
gonna
happen
or
big
processes
like
budget.
That
we
know
are
gonna
happen
because
I
can
structure.
These
meetings,
however,
is
most
useful
for
you.