►
From YouTube: April 29, 2022 Capital Long-Range Improvement Committee
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
Good
morning,
my
name
is
jeffrey
strand,
I'm
the
chair
of
the
capital,
long
range
improvement
committee.
Before
we
begin
I'd
like
to
note
that
this
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statute,
section
13d
0.021,
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic.
B
D
E
F
G
I
B
B
B
We'll
then
have
capital
budget
requests,
question
and
answer
session
for
public
works,
paving
bicycle
pedestrian
program,
sidewalks
bridges,
approximately
10,
am,
will
have
a
short
break
and
then
we'll
do
task
force.
Breakout
sessions,
which
I
anticipate
will
be
largely
the
transportation
task
force
the
bulk
of
the
projects
today
and
so.
B
B
If
you
need
to
step
away
momentarily,
we're
all
adults
and
we'll
manage
that
ourselves
and
questions
just
try
to
use
the
function
of
the
hand
raise
we'll
have
the
speaker
stack
queue,
that's
easily
identified
for
the
share
and
if
coming
out
of
11
days
from
total
knee
replacement,
I
will
need
to
step
away
to
do
my
walking
regularly.
So
if
that
occurs,
and
vice
chair
bridges
isn't
here
I'll,
probably
call
upon
task
force
chair
eric
or
john
to
manage
to
stack
for
a
few
minutes.
B
J
C
C
B
L
M
C
C
B
B
I
think,
then,
if
public
works
is
ready,
we'll
segue
to
the
the
meeting
room
and
probably
have
screen
sharing
and
presentation,
so
we
can
proceed
with
public
works
unless
finance
and
property
services
has
any
any
additional
introductions.
B
Okay,
we'll
move
along,
I
see
eric,
must
have
got
bumped
out
of
the
meeting,
so
he's
waiting.
So
just
just
a
quick
aside
before
we
move
into
public
works
q,
a
people
probably
seen
in
the
news
report,
star
tribune,
reported
the
uptick
in
covid
and
so
for
our
return
to
in-person
meetings.
Wednesday
may
4th.
You
know,
let's
all
be
cognizant
of
the
public
health
recommendations
and
I
will
personally
be
wearing
a
mask
at
the
meeting
whether
or
not
it's
obligatory.
B
I
will
try
to
respect
public
health
and
safety
of
my
peers
on
the
click
committee
and
staff.
So,
let's
please
be
cognizant
of
kovid
as
we're
we're
not
out
of
the
woods
quite
yet
with
that,
let's
we
can
go
to
public
works.
P
Morning
chair,
I
just
want
to
touch
base
with
neil
here
as
well.
Who's
been
helping
us,
coordinate
and
finance
with
a
lot
of
the
members
of
click.
Obviously
we're
here
for
question
answer
session
today.
So
we've
prepared
a
lot
of
presentations
as
you've
seen
a
lot
of
capital
budget
requests.
So
we
see
this
is
your
time
to
ask
questions.
We
didn't
have
anything
additional
formally
prepared
today.
Obviously
we're
expecting
you're
ready
for
a
lot
of
questions
and
a
good
dialogue
this
morning.
P
So
we're
happy
to
open
up
the
floor
and
see
what
click
members
have
to
ask
today
and
thank
you
all
for
inviting
us
to
attend.
We
should
do
introductions.
Oh
yeah,
good,
good
point
introductions.
I
think
many
of
you
are
familiar
with
me.
I
know
I'm
probably
a
little
far
away
in
the
camera,
but
nathan,
koster
transportation,
planning
manager
overseeing
cip.
So
this
should
be
my
sixth
vip
here
with
transportation
planning
and
public
works
and
I'm
gonna
hand
it
over
here
to
my
left
but
yeah,
possibly
you're
right.
Q
R
Q
And
good
morning
my
name
is
bria
fast,
I'm
an
associate
transportation,
planner
public
works
and
transportation
planning
and
programming,
and
this
is
my
very
first
cip
cycle
and
introduction
to
you
all
and
we
have
one
more
person
at
home
oscar.
Can
you
introduce
yourself.
S
P
I
cycle
we
have
additional
one
other
energy
person
from
engineering
design
so
petru.
Do
you
want
to
introduce
yourself
as
well.
F
B
Very
good
thanks
for
the
introductions.
So
then,
with
that
we'll
there's
no
no
further
introductory
remarks,
we
will
go
to
the
click
members
questions
so.
T
Hi,
thank
you.
I
had
a
question
that
was
answered
in
the.
T
What
do
you
call
the
click
inquiries
page,
but
I
actually
had
a
follow-up
one
on
the
the
nicolet
at
lake
street
project
pv
182.,
so
it
was
mentioned
that
the
so
the
product
I'd
ask
why
the
project
only
has
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
allocated
to
it,
and
so
that
was
noted
that
it's
the
that's
in
the
assessments
that
are
anticipated
to
support
the
network
and
the
most
of
the
funds
for
that
project
will
be
the
value
capture
funds,
and
so
I'm
kind
of
curious,
and
maybe
this
is
more
for
finance
staff.
T
M
O
That
we
see
yeah
yeah,
so
I
was
gonna
say
so.
At
least
I
didn't
see
that
as
maybe
that's
something
I
couldn't
work
with
the
department
on,
but
I
didn't
see
that
submitted
alongside
with
the
other
revenue
sources.
So
I'm
not
quite
sure,
but
I
can.
I
can
work
with
the
public
works
folks
to
figure
that
out
for
probably
next
year
but
yeah
I
don't
have.
I
don't
have
a
great
answer
for
you.
D
P
Is
thanks
for
the
question?
I
think
it's
with
us
just
working
with
finance
both
where
we'll
iron
that
out
and
get
that
additional
revenue
source.
One
of
the
big
things
clique
had
asked
for
in
the
past
is
getting
that
bug
request
brought
through
this
committee.
So
there's
transparency
in
that
project
going
forward.
We
have
descriptions.
Public
works
and
cped
kicked
that
off
last
year
with
city
council
and
a
lot
of
work
is
going
to
be
actively
starting
with
community
engagement
this
year
and
if
you
all,
are
interested.
P
I
hope
you
track
along
and
stay
informed
of
very,
very
important,
long-standing
project
here
at
the
city.
U
Good
morning,
thanks
for
taking
my
question,
actually
it's
a
comment
during
the
presentation
when
you
were
talking
about
pv
177
at
38th
and
chicago
and
as
far
as
community
engagement,
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
trying
to
be
really
sensitive
about
is
how
we
refer
to
that
intersection
and
in
the
presentation
it
was
mentioned
that
george
floyd
died,
but
trying
to
be
a
little
bit
more
thoughtful
and
intentional.
U
He
was
murdered
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
disrespect
what
happened
at
that
intersection
and
as
a
white
person,
I'm
trying
to
be
even
more
cognizant.
So
the
city
when
you
present
these
things,
present
them
with
the
sensitivity
and
thoughtfulness
that
needs
to
happen
in
in
any
project
in
any
situation.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
next
up
eric
juan
and
then
neil.
O
R
I
misunderstand
that
sure
yeah.
I
just
want
to
comment
on
katrina's
question.
Thanks
for
the
question
katrina,
as
you
know,
we're
launching
off
the
we
kicked
off
the
project
for
30th
in
chicago
this
saturday,
with
a
virtual
with
the
in-person
open
house,
was
really
well
attended,
something
around
150
attendees.
It
was
at
phelps
park.
R
We
also
had
a
in-person
virtual
open
house
on
tuesday
of
this
week
was
also
well
attended,
and
it's
really
important,
as
you
mentioned,
to
recognize
how
that
vernacular
is
used
in
the
community,
how
it
perceives
the
community
and
what
the
the
and,
how
the
via
staff
kind
of
referred
to
the
murder
of
george
floyd.
So
I
thank
you
for
that
comment.
B
Thanks
we'll
looks
like
we
have
a
little
time
delay
so
we'll
slow
down
just
a
bit
here
and.
M
J
Okay,
pv
122
the
the
dowling
project,
so
they're
they're,
scheduled
from
your
your
funding
table
they're
scheduled
to
be
19
million,
294
690
dollars
spent
in
2023
with
special
assessments
of
1.2
million.
Could
you
explain
what
those
special
assessments
are?
Will
those
affect
any
of
the
neighbors
in
the
weber?
Camden
area?
J
P
Thanks
eric
per
the
city's
practice
of
special
assessments,
we're
following
the
standard
practice,
so
benefiting
property
owners
adjacent
to
the
work
so
state
the
street
reconstruction
assessments
from
lindale
to
the
site
as
well
as
for
the
parkway,
we
will
be
applying
special
assessments
to
adjacent
property
owners,
so
the
residents
within
the
influence
zone
along
those
two
blocks
of
dowling
will
be
assessed
as
well
as
the
businesses,
the
existing
businesses
along
the
what
we
call
lower
dowling,
so
east
of
washington,
but
as
a
part
of
the
leases
and
the
purchase
with
up
and
the
developer.
P
P
P
J
J
So
I
I
think
it's
going
to
take
more
of
an
outreach
than
sending
out
a
posting
on
facebook
or
sending
emails
out,
and
you
know
I
it's
more
than
a
note
I'd
like
to
say
we
need
a
commitment
that
you'll
do
a
special
outreach
to
to
those
people
living
along
that
corridor.
P
I
I
In
2020,
the
city
finally
came
up
with
their
ada
transition
plan
and
then
just
this
year
in
2022,
they
updated
it
but
being
on
the
click
here,
it
looks
like
nothing's
changed
with
this
program.
There's
there's
no
urgency
to
sort
of
complete
this
project.
I
I
In
the
transition
plan,
I
think
it's
28
years
from
now
is
when
the
city
expects
to
finish
these
pedestrian
ramps,
which
I
feel
like
is
a
really
long
time
in
the
future,
and
the
other
thing
is.
I
feel
like
that.
I
Q
Well,
thank
you
for
the
question.
I
think
it's
a
great
question.
I
think
you
know
there
are
several
capital
programs
that
are
used
to
implement
accessible
infrastructure
within
the
public
right
way.
Q
So
you
know,
in
addition
to
pv
104,
you
know
we
have
about
nine
to
ten
programs
and
or
projects
that
are
also
working
together
to
address
accessibility
needs
in
the
city
and
one
thing,
although
you
know
like
you
said,
the
funding
for
pv
104
has
not
necessarily
changed,
but
something
I
would
like
to
draw
your
attention
to
is
pb056,
which
is
the
asphalt
resurfacing
program
that
was
substantially
changed.
Q
This
year
we
reduced
the
annual
mileage
that
that
program
could
cover
from
30
miles
to
15
miles
per
year,
and
that
was
specifically
for
the
purpose
of
being
able
to
address
ada
upgrades
for
pedestrian
curb
ramps.
So
what
that
funding
or
what
that
decrease
in
mileage
essentially
did
for
the
program
you
know
for
2023,
for
example,
you
know
we
are
going
to
have
an
additional
400,
roughly
ada,
compliant
pedestrian,
curb
ramps
that
are
included
with
pb-056.
Q
That
essentially
goes
to
about
4.2
million
additional
funding
in
just
2023
alone.
To
address
the
ada
pedestrian
curb
ramps
as
well.
I
I
To
hear
I'm
curious,
can
that
be
reflected
somehow
in
the
cbrs?
That's
the
other
thing
I
find
kind
of
frustrating
about
these
documents.
It's
just
like
it's
like
a
vague
notion
that
I
don't
know
it
looked
like
the
pedestrian
or
the
ada
transition
plan,
said
it's
going
to
be
28
years,
but
based
on
what
you
just
said,
it
sounds
like.
Maybe
that
could
be
a
little
faster.
P
Hey
scott
nathan,
here
updating
yeah,
we
we
did
change
the
language
and
the
funding
in
the
cbr
for
pb056,
and
we
were
hoping
today
in
the
q
a
that
we
could
help
clarify
that
we,
we
may
have
gotten
the
wrong
map
in
there
for
the
cbr,
because
we
had
a
map
that
showed
when
the
ramps
are
getting
updated
with
the
resurfacing
and
not
just
the
resurfacing
work,
because
that
is
a
critical
and
important
update
this
year.
P
One
other
thing
I'd
like
to
qual,
highlight
too,
is
in
2021
and
in
2022.
Public
works
worked
with
city
council
to
move
additional
few
million
dollars
to
additionally
accelerate
ada
infrastructure.
I
believe
it
was
in
the
neighborhood
of
like
two-ish
million
dollars
to
get
ahead
for
the
2022
resurfacing
program,
so
this
has
been
a
really
big
focus
area
for
us
to
make
really
move
the
dial
to
all
the
points
that
you
brought
up.
P
So
we
had
five
million
dollars
of
a
request
to
the
state
and
we
also
are
working
at
the
federal
level
on
potential
earmarks
to
further
accelerate
as
well,
but
obviously
those
are
caught
up
in
legislative
bodies
outside
of
our
purview.
But
we've
made
it
very
clear
what
our
priorities
are
to
advance
accessible
infrastructure
right
away.
So
we
agree
with.
I
I
know
these
cbrs
maybe
get
to
be
a
lot
of
work
and
a
lot
of
language,
but
that
would
be
helpful
to
know
that
there's
progress
being
made
some
of
the
like
stormwater
folks,
that
they
they
give
us
that
information
in
their
cbrs.
So
you
know
that
they're
making
the
progress.
So
that
would
be
helpful
to
know
next
year.
P
Thanks
scott,
I
I
believe
we
did
do
it
put
it
in
the
recorded
presentation,
but
I
know
we're
still
working
through,
like
all
those
interactions
with
click,
so
we'll
we'll
take
that
back
and
continue
to
try
to
highlight
the
good
work
we're
doing
so.
Thank
you
for
the
question.
Hopefully
it
resonated
today.
N
Thank
you.
I
have
just
a
quick
question
on
pb158
on
hennepin
avenue
on
the
budget
request
description
on
the
transportation
section.
There
are
a
couple
questions
that
ask
you
about
the
transit
way,
improvements
or
the
pedestrian
improvements
and
bicycle
improvements
in
the
details.
N
How
the
project
anticipates
that
those
how
the
project
will
improve
those-
and
I
see
some
descriptions
on
the
sidewalk
and
bicycle
related
improvements,
but
I
don't
really
see
any
anticipated
transit
facility
improvements
in
relation
to
this
project,
while
the
project
description,
kind
of
talked
a
lot
about
how
important
hennepin
avenue
is
for
transit
users,
how
it
is
identified
as
a
transit
priority
corridor,
but
I
don't
really
see
any
descriptions:
the
the
plan,
what
it
includes
to
improve
transit
on
this
corridor.
N
So
if
you
any
staff,
could
provide
more
details
on
those
anticipated
transit
facilities
enhancements
on
this
project
itself,
that'd
be
really
helpful.
P
Thanks
jonathan
public
works
obviously
has
a
recommended
design
in
the
public
right
now
and
it's
working
its
way
through
that
process
before
it
goes
to
city
council.
So
we
don't
have
any
further
updates
on
the
design,
as
you
likely
know,
that's
working
its
way
through
the
engagement
process,
so
the
cbr
doesn't
have
any
additional
detail
beyond
what
the
project
team
would
have.
T
Okay,
I
think
jeff
you
had
said
I
was
next
I'll,
just
go
ahead
and
take
over
yeah.
T
Okay,
I
have,
I
guess,
three
questions.
The
first
one
is
giving
the
infrastructure
funding
coming
from
the
federal
level.
How
is
that
being
thought
about
incorporated
into
budgets
and
planning
on
the
capital
side.
P
P
Questions
because
there's
a
lot
of
misunderstandings
or
assumptions
about
the
iij
is
so
I
I
think,
there's
a
great
question
because
it
was
going
to
come
up
today,
so
the
iija
represents
a
reauthorization
of
the
federal
transportation
bill,
the
fast
act,
but
at
an
increased
level.
So
I
believe
it's
about
30
higher
than
the
traditional
federal
bill.
So
for
most
instances
it
is
like
the
same
process
that
the
feds
do
to
reauthorize
funding
that
gets
distributed
to
dots
and
mpos
across
the
country.
P
It
is
bigger
by
about
30,
but
it
also
does
create
new,
specific
programs
that
this
administration
likes
to
highlight.
What
I
will
say
is
there's
still
a
number
of
outstanding
questions
about
how
some
of
that
would
work
and
how
that
money's
allocated.
But
what
I
will
say,
the
things
that
we
do
know
is
that
the
federal
portion
that
comes
to
minnesota
will
be
bigger
and
it
will
be
allocated
to
mndot
and
that
portion
that
goes
to
mndot
then
gets
allocated
to
mpos.
P
P
What
we
do
know
and
what
we
can
go
after
is
the
regional
solicitation.
They
have
informally
announced
what
the
regional
solicitation
will
mean
as
far
as
increased
funding.
This
is
the
two-year
cycle
which
met
council
allocates
federal
funds,
but
we
do
anticipate
that
to
be
a
lot
higher.
We
know
what
the
funding
categories
are.
We
know
what
we're
competitive
in
we
know
what's
eligible
and
this
year
through
council,
we
did
submit
a
much
higher
package
to
see
what
we
might
be
able
to
go
after.
P
Minneapolis
will
have
to
compete
with
jurisdictions
across
the
country
for
much
smaller
pots
of
money.
That
would
help
us
advance
our
work.
So
it's
a
it's
a
lot
and
there's
still
a
lot
of
information
pouring
out
from
both
the
feds
in
the
state,
but
that's
kind
of
the
best
we
know
and
we're
trying
to
use
our
capital
program
to
leverage
as
many
of
those
federal
dollars
as
possible.
But
right
now
I
would
say
the
opportunities
are
still
pretty
limited
and
we're
doing
the
best.
We
can.
T
Thank
you,
that's
really
helpful
and
with
those
new
discretionary
pots
that
you
were
mentioning
for
bridges,
stormwind,
water
or
storms,
water
climate,
those
types
of
things
would
those
also
go
through
the
normal
regional
solicitation
is
like
that.
How
minneapolis
or
no
it'd
be
okay,
separate,
so.
P
Those
are
discretionary
grants
and
sorry
if
I
I'm
good
question
to
like
pause,
because
we
use
a
lot
of
like
terminology
here
that
can
go
above
people's
heads
and
that's
that's
a
flaw.
We
have
so
discretionary
programs
are
big
grant
open
like
competitive
programs
that
are
opened
either
at
a
state
or
a
federal
level
and
in
this
case
we're
seeing
a
lot
that
are
going
to
come
out
at
the
federal
level.
P
So
minneapolis
will
be
going
against
the
seattles,
the
las,
the
new
york's,
like
any
other
in
between
and
is
you're
kind
of
getting
the
picture.
The
dots
the
mpos,
like
the
big
groups,
are
they're
getting
direct
money.
Everyone
else
is
kind
of
hafting
having
to
like
fight
over
a
lot
of
smaller
pots
of
money
and
they're
going
to
be
hyper
competitive.
T
Okay,
thank
you.
I
guess
so
a
question.
That's
related
to
that.
When
we
have
federal
funds,
there
are
deadlines
on
them.
Is
my
understanding
to
be
used?
Can
you
describe
how
that
works?
Like
is?
If
there's
a
deadline,
is
that
at
the
end
of
the
calendar
year
does
it
depend
on
the
funding
pot?
I've
just
heard
that
some
of
our
projects
are
can
be
at
risk
if
we're
not
meeting
our
design
timelines
and
that
you
know
can
and
influence
some
of
click's
recommendations.
I
think.
P
Yeah,
so
we
already
have
a
number
of
projects
that
have
been
awarded
federal
funding,
and
I
think
this
group
is
aware:
you'll
see
it
in
the
budget
request.
We
have
37th
ave
northeast
a
joint
project
with
columbia
heights.
That's
coming
up
that
says:
federal
funding
in
23.
we
have
hennepin
with
10
federal
funding
in
24,
and
we
have
a
number
of
non-motorized
projects
as
well
as
partnership
projects
with
hennepin
county
that
they're
on
timelines.
Most
of
I
would
say,
all
of
those.
P
Every
two
years
met
council
is
tasked
with
taking
federal
funds
and
then
competitively
allocating
them
to
local
jurisdictions,
and
then
they
have
a
timeline
at
which
the
federal
government
says
you
have
to
spend
this
money
and
they
run
on
a
fiscal
calendar
for
the
state
and
the
timeline
at
which
the
cities
have
to
get
authorization
to
use
those
funds
and
expend
those
funds
have
a
number
of
rules
which
I
think
would
be
very
very
complicated
to
get
through
the
like
to
talk
through
this
group.
T
Sorry,
I
just
one
more
question,
so
I
think
there's
two
out
of
my
three,
the
last
one
is
on
the
lauren
greenway.
I'm
really
excited
to
see
a
a
bike
project.
Actually
I
think
it's
a
pv
project,
but
it's
it's
for
the
the
improving
the
path,
that's
on
lauren
greenway
and
I
think
it's
still
indicating
that
what
is
it
pvi
or
sorry,
p,
pc.
I
pavement
condition
index
is
being
used
for
that.
T
I
know
we've
made
comments
in
the
past
about
pavement
conditions,
specifically
on
trails.
You
know
I'm
happy
to
see
the
lauren
greenway
one,
but
I
I
still
am
not
seeing
any
projects
on,
especially
on
park,
property
and
curious
again
about
the
relationship
between
park.
So
mprb
public
works
because
I
know
public
works
is
a
lot
of
the
maintenance
on
those
types
of
things,
and
so,
basically,
you
know
there's
bad
condition
in
some
of
our
park
trails.
T
What,
where
is
the
gap
or
you
know?
How
can
we
make
sure
that
that's
getting
done
or
how?
How
is
that
being
done
to
make
sure
our
park
trails
are
staying
in
good
condition.
P
Thanks
katie,
so
I'll
go
step
stepwise
through
the
order
in
which
you
ask
the
questions,
so
I
met
with
the
lauren
greenway
association
last
night
and
it
was
good
to
hear
and
do
like
get
a
field
walk
and
understand
the
inventory
we're
starting
from
a
place.
But
we
know
we
have
to
collect
a
lot
of
information
along
the
greenway
and
you
know
working
within
the
parameters
of
the
cbr.
We
might
have
gotten
like
pci
versus
other
asset
condition
like
ratings
for
the
greenway.
P
You
know
it's
just
hard
to
fit
in
the
box
of
cpr
we'll
do
better.
Next
year
we
can
figure
that
out,
but
a
big
thing
that
I
want
to
highlight
on,
like
the
lauren
greenway,
having
been
built
as
a
part
of
like
that,
nickel
mall
pb,
plaza
connection
to
our
first
city
park
at
loring.
There's
a
lot
of
accessibility
features
that
we
know
are
likely
to
be
out
of
date
with
stairs
and
just
the
tactile
strips
for
people
with
mobility
devices
or
vision.
P
Impaired
like
we
know,
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
need
to
be
inventory.
So
that's
we
just
want
to
get
a
good
starting
point.
Common
taken
we'll
try
to
improve
that
cbr
and
work
with
finance,
to
figure
out
a
good
way
to
get
that
in
the
form
next
year.
As
far
as
it
relates
to
trails,
I
have
a
little
bit
of
a
two-part
answer.
P
The
city
has
a
network
of
trails
that
we
maintain
as
city
trails
and
this
past
year
in
alignment
with
the
goals
identified
by
the
transportation
action
plan.
We
went
out
and
did
an
inventory
of
the
trails,
so
the
city-owned
trails,
we
have
done
an
inventory
of
a
number
of
those
in
a
second.
I
can
have
oscar
describe
that
if
people
are
interested,
but
the
park
board
maintains
and
inventories
their
network
of
parkway
trails,
there
is
some
gray
area
between
some
systems,
where
there's
city
trails,
that
kind
of
go
up
to
parks
and
vice
versa.
P
There's
parkway
trails,
that
kind
of
come
up
to
city
streets,
but
primarily
it's
different.
It's
a
different
relationship
than
the
actual
parkway
streets
themselves.
The
park
board
owns
and
maintains
their
trails.
They
own
the
streets,
but
the
city
is
responsible
for
maintenance
of
the
parkway
streets
themselves.
P
T
Yes,
thank
you.
I'd
love
to
see
that
that
inventory,
information
about
the
the
city
trails,
at
least.
C
B
B
Oh
okay,
so
I'll
put
I
had
george
montague,
who
was
on
in
queue,
then
dropped
off.
So
george
george
was
next
on
my
list.
Sure.
V
V
Thank
you
and
it
actually.
My
question
actually
is
a
follow-up
to
the
one
previously
raised
by
scott
regarding
pv
104,
because,
as
I
reviewed
it,
it
did
catch
my
eye
that
you
know
acknowledging.
We
have
16
17,
000,
sidewalk
corners
and
pv
104
itself
is
addressing
50
corners
a
year.
So
that's,
I
think
it
takes
more
than
the
amount
of
time
that
scott
initially
indicated
but
acknowledging
it
makes
reference
to
swk01,
vpn,
bp004
and
many
others.
V
I
think
also
have
funding
for
to
improve
ada
compliance,
and
I'm
just
wondering
is:
is
it
it'd
be
really?
I
think
it'd
be
really
helpful
for
us
to
understand,
as
we
look
across
the
many
programs
that
do
improve
the
city's
compliance
with
the
ada
standards
and
you.
V
The
living
standards
of
its
residents
is
there
any
way
to
understand
holistically
as
we
look
across
the
many
capital
projects.
What
is
the
plan
to
get
ada
compliance,
as
well
as
the
timeline.
P
Thanks
george
annually
as
a
part
of
the
20-year
streets
funding
plan
requirements,
we
do
report
back
on
our
progress
of
our
capital
investments.
Last
year
we
did
in
july,
and
we
expected
this
year
in
july,
where
we
tracked
how
many
miles
of
street
or
88
ramps
that
we
do
on
an
annual
basis.
P
So
we
will
have
that
number
ready
shortly
for
what
we
completed
in
2022
and,
as
you
can
see,
with
the
number
of
increasing
investments
that
that
number
for
80
ramps
is
going
to
go
up
substantially,
starting
in
21
and
22
into
the
future,
as
well
as
the
report
backs.
We're
required
to
do
with
the
ada
transition
plan,
and
I
would
say
this
has
been
a
big
focus
point.
P
As
you
can
see,
the
money
really
talks
on
what
we're
trying
to
do
in
moving
the
needle
there
and
it's
more
than
just
one
program
and
we're
trying
to
do
that,
and
it's
more
than
just
us
is
like
a
city
doing
public
infrastructures,
also
focusing
on
our
utilities
and
our
development
and
making
sure
everyone
else
who's
disrupting
the
right-of-way
is
putting
it
back
in
an
accessible
fashion.
So
I
would
say
at
all
levels
this
has
been
a
huge
focus
point
in
the
last
year
for
public
works.
V
Yes,
no,
I
I
agree
and
convince
you
for
that.
I
just
think
this
is
a
citizen's
group
that's
supposed
to
opine
on
the
city's
long-term
capital
budget.
It's
poor!
Looking
budget,
I
think
it'd
be
helpful
in
order
for
us
to
do
that
to
understand
holistically.
What
is
the
plan
not
not
individually?
It's
great,
you
know
like
this.
Project
has
50
corners
and
this
project
has
x
corners
and,
and
then
you
know
after
the
fact,
let
us
know
what
happened.
I
just
think
you
know
for
planning
purposes.
B
All
right,
then,
next
one
of
our
newer
members,
mike
erlinson,
I
hope,
you're,
going
to
be
fully
permanent,
approved
here
sooner
rather
than
later.
D
B
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair
and
good
morning.
Everybody
just
a
follow-up.
D
I
think
a
little
bit
to
a
question
that
jonathan
raised,
if
I'm
remembering
the
names
of
people
correctly
about
158,
which
is
the
hennepin
avenue
project,
and-
and
maybe
this
isn't
for
this
group,
but
I've
looked
at
the
information
in
your
presentation
and
I've
looked
at
the
the
link
on
the
actual
site
for
hennepin
avenue
and
to
me
the
thing:
that's
there's
a
number
of
things
that
are
missing,
which
which
includes
a
study
of
the
impact
of
the
traffic
into
the
neighborhoods
and
I
by
full
disclosure.
D
I
live
in
the
this
area,
I'm
also
on
the
board
of
the
east
isles,
neighborhood
association
and
so
you've
got
little
information
on
taking
out
the
parking
and
taking
out
the
lane
of
traffic
on
how
that
will
impact
the
neighborhood
and
so
I'd
be
curious
when
that
sort
of
thing
is
done,
both
as
it
relates
to
traffic
and
to
parking
or
if
that's
not
part
of
the
process,
and
also
a
study
as
to
what
improvement.
D
If
any,
there
is
to
the
bus
time
running
along
a
dedicated
route,
I've
heard
anywhere
from
30
seconds
to
90
seconds
and
a
40
million
dollar
project,
that's
primarily
driven
by
a
busway,
seems
to
me,
should
improve
traffic
or
the
ability
to
ride
the
bus
downtown
a
lot
faster
than
a
minute
or
so
going
through.
What
is
a
very
busy
area,
and
you
know,
and
finally,
this
one
sam
again-
maybe
this
is
a
little
bit
of
a
a
different
take
on
katie's
question
about
federal
funding.
D
To
me,
it
looks
like
this
project
is
primarily
being
driven
or
pushed
along
faster
than
maybe
it's
ready
to
be
at
this
point
in
time
because
of
the
seven
million
dollars
in
federal
funding
that
could
expire
at
at
some
point
in
time.
That's
coming,
I
believe,
from
met
council
and
so
as
much
as
we
don't
want
to
see
federal
funding
not
get
used
or
leveraged
for
a
project
in
our
city.
D
At
the
same
time,
I'd
hate
to
see
federal
funding,
driving
bad
decisions
being
made
or
not
a
complete
review
of
that
of
of
the
total
impact
on
the
local
community
there.
So,
thank
you
very
much
and
again
I
may
I'm
new
to
this
group,
as
was
pointed
out
by
jeff,
and
so
I
may
be
asking
questions
that
are
to
the
wrong
group,
but
I'd
interested
in
your
take.
Nonetheless,
thank
you.
P
Thanks
mike,
I
would
say
primarily,
those
are
pri.
Those
are
project
related
questions
that
I
would
direct
you
to
the
project
team.
We
can
bring
them
back
and
forward
them
along,
but
obviously
we're
here
to
talk
about
the
capital
budget,
requests
at
hand
and
we'll
make
sure
to
get
those
to
the
project
team.
Thank
you.
D
B
Thank
you
next
go
to
eric
juan
and
then
dan
miller.
J
Thank
you
chair,
so
so
I'd
like
to
circle
back
a
bit
to
what
katie
was
asking
and
and
connect
you
to
a
conversation
that
the
click
executive
committee
has
had
with
the
mayor
for
a
number
of
years
having
to
do
with
public
engagement,
the
the
the
the
way
that
money
flows
down
from
the
federal
government
through
through
mdot
and
and
through
the
met
council
and
other
sources,
is
in
that's
the
money
coming
down.
But
what
they
review
is
a
list
of
priorities
submitted
by
the
city
and
they're.
J
Clearly,
looking
for
one
of
the
major
criterion
is,
is
whether
a
project
is
shovel
ready
or
not.
So
if
your
project
is
in
the
click
says,
okay,
we'll
put
this
in
2027,
it
becomes
a
low
priority
for
funding.
So
you
know
hold
on
to
that
thought.
The
question
is
at
what
point
do
you
include
public
engagement?
J
J
P
Thanks
eric
as
it
relates
to
the
public
engagement,
the
projects
that
we're
submitting
for
funding
applications
that
is
solicited
by
met
council
or
the
federal
funds,
those
are
rooted
in
a
lot
of
the
community
engagement
that
we've
done
to
develop
our
plans
policies,
whether
it's
feedback
from
the
neighborhood
click
and
we're
working
years
in
advance
to
identify
those
projects.
In
a
lot
of
cases.
We
are
going
out
and
doing
community
engagement
before
we
submit
the
grants.
P
So,
in
the
case
of
hennepin
back
in
2017
2018,
we
were
doing
engagement
advance
like
this
year,
north
side,
greenway,
there's
many
many
years
of
engagement.
A
lot
of
our
projects,
we're
doing
engagement
before
we're
even
going
to
council
to
get
authority
to
submit
applications,
and
that's
done
through
a
public
process
by
getting
city
council
approval
to
submit
the
grants
and
having
a
local
match
before
they
go
into
the
cip.
P
So
we're
working
ahead
and
aligning
all
those
funding
opportunities
to
help
offset
local
funding
needs
in
our
capital
program
that
are
bringing
millions
of
dollars
of
relief
to
the
city's
capital
program
and
leveraging
our
dollars
farther.
So
I
would
say
that
we
are
doing
that
community
engagement
and
a
lot
of
those
are
reflected
in
our
adopted
plans
and
policies
that
we
have
here
at
the
city.
J
But
perhaps
I
can
rephrase
that,
for
example,
if
this,
if
you
did
public
engagement
and
city,
said
hennepin,
hennepin
is
not
a
priority.
We
want.
We
want
to
have
chicago
as
being
a
higher
priority.
Is
there
a
way
for
that
type
of
input
to
occur,
or
have
you
already
decided
that
hennepin
is
a
priority
over
other
other
project
areas?.
P
When
we
look
at
the
universal
projects,
I'm
sure
this
might
be
a
theme
on
other
aspects
of
the
city.
We
are
tasked
with
looking
at
many
metrics
of
maintaining
our
right-of-way.
It
is
age
and
condition
to
make
sure
like
we're
maintaining
streets
in
good
condition.
A
lot
of
focus
is
also
on
safety
accessibility.
P
We
have
to
look
at
all
those
metrics
and
making
our
data-driven
priorities
and
also
weighing
that
against
community
feedback.
We
know
that
hennepin
is
really
old.
We
know
that
other
streets
are
really
old.
We
know
other
streets
have
higher
proportion
of
crashes
that
are
impacting
our
black
and
indigenous
populations
like
we're,
using
that
information
to
inform
what
the
priorities
are,
and
in
some
cases
we
have
very
old
or
infrastructure.
That's
just
not
working
for
everyone
that
we
have
to
continue
to
elevate
those
as
priorities.
J
Okay,
I
see
a
lot
of
people
in
line
in
queue
here
what
we
can
follow
up
later.
Thank
you.
L
H
Good
morning,
everyone
I
just
wanted
to
ask
or
perhaps
offer
a
comment
about
re-scoping
or
scoping
projects
and
sort
of
project
creep.
And
can
you
hear
me
all
right?
Yes,
okay,
thank
you.
I've
been
having
some
problems
with
teams,
so
I
represent
ward
one
on
click.
G
H
We've
had
some
projects
rescued
and
dropped
this
year
that
we're
actually
in-click
comments
to
the
mayor
last
year
about
concerns,
and
I
just
wanted
to
comment
briefly
on
them.
One
is
what
was
pb137
29th
avenue
northeast
east,
which
was
rescued
to
the
asphalt
repaving
project.
G
H
As
eric
might
point
out,
this
project
has
been
in
community
discussion
about
something
since
well
before
2008
and
since
in
2008,
they
actually
created
a
master
plan
for
29th
avenue
and
the
last
couple
years
they've
been
busily
involved
with
preparing
for
this
reconstruction
and
what
that
streetscape
might
look
like.
H
So
it
was
with
a
great
disappointment
to
hear
this
street
rescued
or,
let's
put
it
bluntly,
downgrading
to
an
asphalt
repeating
at
some
time
is
going
to
happen
in
2026
to
2-8,
which
isn't
a
given,
and
I
I
guess
I'd
just
like
to
ask-
is
that
a
possibility
of
rescuing
this
thing?
The
other
way
to
see
that
happen
so
I'll
just
offer
two
other
projects.
H
Two
years
ago
the
project
pb157
33rd
avenue
northeast
was
brought
before
click,
and
it
was
here
last
year
and
we
received
public
comments
about
this
project.
H
Having
been
part
of
the
concrete
rehabilitation
program
that
went
through,
there
went
through
that
area
in
2016,
and
they
deemed
this
stretch.
They
deemed
this
street
too
bad
two
worse
to
to
do
a
concrete
rehabilitation
would
have
to
come
back
and
become
a
a
reconstruction.
So
it's
in
one
place.
This
is
talked
about
in
your
presentations
as
being
a
part
of
a
future
concrete
rehabilitation
project,
but
it's
not
showing
up
on
your
maps
in
the
concrete
rehabilitation
project
program.
H
So
again,
here
are
two
projects
that
are
to
the
public.
It's
it's
a
real
pain
or
it's.
It's
hurtful
that
to
wait
your
turn
to
wait.
Your
turn
patiently
to
see
these
things
happen
and
then
to
just
have
them
disappear.
H
Is
bp
006,
it's
a
trail
gap
on
18th
avenue,
it's
an
important
gap
between
marshall
street,
the
east
bank
trail
and
the
great
northern
greenway,
and
about
two
blocks:
that's
been
in
the
works
since
I
believe
2018
and
it
was
scheduled
for
2023
construction
and
now
that
has
been
moved
back
a
year
and
I
hope
that
doesn't
wind
up
in
the
dust
bin
as
these
other
two
projects
have
we've
had
mission
creep
on
the
queen
bike,
boulevard
on
the
north
side
and
hopefully
can
get
done
this
year
and
just
a
comment
that
I've.
U
H
Regarding
the
midtown
greenway
and
these
other
projects
that
are
scheduled
towards
the
end
of
the
year,
I've
well,
the
midtown
greenway
is
a
good
example
of
something
that
really
went
bad
and
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
think
about
some
of
these
projects
coming
back
into
scope
and
the
bike
projects,
particularly
getting
the
attention
that
they
deserve
at
the
front
end
of
the
season,
rather
than
at
the
end.
Thank
you.
P
Thanks
dan,
I
guess
I'll
I'll
try
to
start
with
bp006.
I
think
there's
a
more
direct
answer
there.
Obviously
we
don't
have
right-of-way
there.
We
are
working
with
an
active
rail
line,
so
some
of
the
aspects
of
that
project
are
a
little
out
of
our
hands.
Working
with
railroads
requires
some
delicacy
and
trying
to
make
sure
we
have
a
successful
project
that
aligns
with
there
right
away
and
how
we're
working
near
railroad
tracks,
but
also
designing
trails
that
maintain
the
appropriate
distance
and
elements
of
a
safe
facility.
P
So
some
of
that
is
out
of
our
hands
and
it
hasn't
gone
as
quickly
as
we
would
like,
and
it's
very
hard
to
rush
negotiations.
So
I'd
say
it's
not
in
a
dustbin,
it's
just
working
working
with
a
project
partner.
So
that's
just
one
thing
that
I
would
just
say
it's
a
little
out
of
our
control.
We're
trying
our
best.
H
Thank
you
for
that.
I
understand
how
difficult
that
is
and,
as
I'm
sure,
you're
well
aware,
that
across
the
river
on
the
north
across
the
river
on
the
north
side,
you
we
have
the
trail
gap
between
ole,
olsen
and
26th
going
in,
and
it
certainly
would
be
terrific
to
have
these
two
projects
come
together
at
that
bridge.
H
I
Correct,
I
was
I'm
very
supportive
of
the
vision,
zero
program,
bp
one
and
it's
the
number
one
priority
in
this
list,
though
the
the
dollar
amount
seems
really
low.
500
000
is
this
enough
to
to
get
to
zero
deaths.
I
think
last
year
we're
we're
actually
going
in
the
wrong
direction
for
deaths
on
our
roads
in
the
city.
So
I
don't
know
I'm
kind
of
hoping
that
once
again,
you
know
it's
the
same
dollar
amount
every
year.
I
I
P
God,
thanks
for
the
question
and
obviously
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
perspectives,
we're
taking
on
this
from
an
infrastructure
perspective.
This
program
is
more
trying
to
do.
The
quick,
rapid
builds,
obviously
we're
we're
aggressively
attacking
a
lot
of
the
reconstructs
both
of
the
city
and
we've
been
pushing
the
county
on
a
lot
of
their
streets.
You've
seen
a
lot
of
ford
threes
that
we've
gone
for
with
them
on
our
pedestrian
safety
program.
P
Our
traffic
program
is
aggressively
taking
on
those
major
intersections,
so
this
is
more
of
that
quick,
build
approach
to
it,
and
one
thing
that
will
help
inform
to
that
question.
Exactly
you're
asking
is
that
the
right
amount
we're
updating
our
three-year
action
plan
right
now.
So,
as
you
all
know,
ethan
or
many
of
you
know,
ethan
foley
is
our
vision.
Zero
coordinator
he's
getting
actively
started
to
update
the
next
three
year
action
plan.
The
previous
one
was
2019
through
2022,
I
believe,
or
2020-2022,
and
the
next
one
will
be
23
through
25.
P
So
we're
actively
doing
that
getting
more
crash
information
and
trying
our
best
to
pursue
as
many
funds
to
make
physical
permanent
improvements,
because
we
know
that
the
striping
and
sticks
can
change
so
much
behavior.
But
physical
infrastructure
is
what's
going
to
be
key
and
scott.
I
would
say
we
are
trying
to
root
that
lens
and
everything.
P
Hopefully,
we
can
start
to
see
that
in
the
coming
years,
as
those
plans
are
coming
to
fruition,
one
of
the
things
that
relates
to
the
federal
infrastructure
bill,
we
are
keeping
a
very
close
eye
on
safe
streets
for
all
and
seeing
what
we
might
be
able
to
do
to
bring
in
additional
funds.
P
That's
very
specific
to
vision,
zero
as
it's
been
written
by
the
feds
like
it's
a
very
multi-prone
approach,
and
you
know
one
thing
also
we're
being
mindful
of
is,
you
know,
there's
many
aspects
that
are
out
of
our
control
as
far
as
like
enforcement
or
other
things,
but
we're
trying
to
control,
we
can
control
with
infrastructure
and
public
works,
and
you
know
scott,
it's
a
great
question.
P
Hopefully
with
our
updated
policy
documents,
we
can
take
that
and
figure
out
if
the
right
number
we,
if
we
have
the
right
number,
but
I
think
across
the
cip,
between
all
of
our
programs,
we
are
trying
to
move
all
in
the
same
direction
to
address
as
many
of
those
hot
crop
or
hot
spot
trash
locations.
As
you
can.
I
That's
fantastic.
Can
you
address
the
the
idea
of
the
construction
inflation?
It's
something
I
noticed.
Some
projects
seem
to
over
the
cip
do
increase
over
time
per
year
and
then
others
like
this
one
remain
a
constant.
P
Of
it
isn't
inflation-driven
scott.
Some
of
it
is
related
to
some
of
the
estimates
that
we
do
have
for
expected
work.
Obviously
you
know,
inflation
is
probably
something
that
this
group
in
the
breakout
session
you're
going
to
talk
with
a
lot,
and
I
think
also
like
just
as
public
works,
has
been
a
very
unknown
topic
of
like
what
inflation's
going
to
look
like.
So
I
think
it
was
too
speculative
to
us,
as
we
were
trying
to
that.
You
know
put
together
buzzards
this
year
to
try
to
move
things
around.
P
That
would
have
resulted
in
other
projects
being
rescued
or
cancelled
and,
as
you
guys
know,
from
the
last
two
years,
it's
been
very
tough
to
make
difficult
decisions
on
what
is
or
is
not
going
to
get
funded,
and
that
was
just
something
that
I
think
was
too
complex
for
us
to
try
to
have
any
confidence
saying
what
inflation
was
going
to
look
like.
So
I
would
say
it's
more
directly
associated
with
the
budgets
and
estimates
that
we
have
best
our
knowledge
of
those
projects
and
why
the
numbers
are
moving.
B
B
I
tend
to
prefer
programmatic
approaches
rather
than
one-off,
and
so
looking
at
things
like
the
pv-131
residential
neighborhood
reconstruction
program
or
pv-108,
concrete
streets,
rehab
or
the
pv56
asphalt
pavement
resurfacing,
where
we
as
a
city,
have
you
know
it's
a
697
miles,
155
miles
of
concrete
street
740
miles
of
asphalt,
so
looking
at
things
that
are
constructed
over
50
years
ago
or
over
30
years
ago,
were
between
1961
and
76
and
as
someone
over
50,
I
know
how
time
has
taken
a
toll
on
my
physical
body,
and
so
our
streets
are
probably
not
dissimilar.
B
So
I'd
like
to
just
hear
again
and
maybe
for
new
members,
benefit
the
the
distinction
and
kind
of
bifurcation
from
programmatic
project.
You
know
projects
that
are
in
the
programs
versus
individual
project
and
that's
my
main
point
and
then.
Secondly,
I'd
like
to
just
go
on
record
agreeing
with
dan
miller's
comments
about
the
29th
avenue,
northeast
and
other
projects
that
seem
to
be
waiting
in
queue.
Since
we
we
do
look
at
trying
to
ensure
maintenance,
maintenance
of
the
city's
infrastructure
and
equitable
delivery
of
services.
B
Click
has
equity
criteria
added
to
our
scoring
criteria,
and
yet
we
do
also
have
an
overarching
goal
of
making
sure
that
the
entire
city
that
our
entire
infrastructure
system
is
properly
maintained
and
that
we
reinvest
appropriate
funds
so
that
we
don't
build
ourselves
into
infrastructure
gaps
as
we
as
we've
experienced
multiple
times
in
the
past,
and
then
with
that
I'll.
Ask
that.
P
Thanks
jeff,
so
the
difference
between
programs
and
projects,
good
question,
especially
for
new
members
projects,
represent
typically
reconstructions
or
one-off
specific
scopes.
That
are
one
time
in
nature,
typically
of
reconstructions,
whereas
programs
are
recurring
activities,
you
know
you
have
them
in
traffic,
you
have
them
in
bridge,
you
have
them
in.
You
know
non-motorized
and
streets.
So
that's
typically
how
we're
allocating
that
and
I'll
just
say.
One
comment:
you
know
you
did.
You
know
jeff
put
out
a
lot
of
stats.
We
have
a
thousand
miles
of
streets.
P
We
cannot
afford
to
reconstruct
everything
and
wait
to
put
everything
into
reconstruct
we're
talking
billions
with
the
b
and
what
the
city's
asked
to
do.
Using
a
data
driven
approach
and
we
do
have
to
make
tough
decisions
as
staff,
but
trying
to
look
at
the
whole
city
is
making
sure
well
not
waiting
for
the
reconstructive,
we're
not
able
to
get.
How
do
we
maintain
the
city
and
maintain
it
with
accessible
infrastructure?
P
Looking
at
what
the
what
we're
trying
to
achieve-
and
we
can't
get
to
every
reconstruct-
and
we
can't
wait
to
get
to
every
reconstruct,
so
we
do
have
to
often
make
hard
decisions
of
like
how
we
continue
to
maintain
our
assets
over
time
using
resurfacing
renovation
and
reconstruction,
and
we
know
that's
not
easy.
We
have
people
representing
wards
in
various
neighborhoods
and
they
feel
very
passionately
about
their
wards
and
neighborhoods,
and
a
lot
of
the
streets
have
personal
connections.
P
But
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
take
the
city
lens
of
trying
to
maintain
that
infrastructure
city-wide-
and
I
know
that
is
challenging,
but
we're
trying
to
do
our
best
of
allocating
those
dollars
within
the
budget.
We
have
to
try
to
continue
to.
You
know,
maintain
those
system
and
find
that
balance
between
what
we
can
reconstruct
and
what
we
can
preserve
a
little
bit
longer.
J
Okay,
thank
you.
I
I'd
like
to
continue
with
rich
and
then
we'll
get
to
john
bernstein,
rich
larue.
L
Hi,
this
is
a
question
that
I
I
think
you've
touched
on
in
various
aspects,
but
I
don't
have
a
particular
connection
to
any
specific
project
or
program,
etc.
L
I'd
like
to
just
sort
of
look
at
everything
and
try
to
understand
what
collectively
is
needed
and
what
should
be
ranked
higher
or
lower.
I'm
asking
about
the
I
think
the
street
projects
collectively
use
60,
separate
projects
or
60
separate
proposals
and
they're.
All
ranked
10
of
60
or
50
of
60.
L
are:
are
those
numbers
sort
of
carefully
selected?
Are
they
sort
of
put
in
at
the
last
minute
or
are
they
old?
How?
Well
might
I
look
at
those
projects
and
rankings
and
and
judge
them
for
myself?
You
know
from
from
from
what
I
would
consider
the.
R
Thanks
experts
I'll
take
this
question
straight
here,
so
those
numbers
are
really
reflective
of
where
the
project
kind
of
sits
in
the
cip
most
times,
projects
that
are
sooner
in
the
cip
programs
get
higher
ranking
numbers
because
we're
there
have
dedicated
funding
across
multiple
years
of
cip
reconstruction
projects
kind
of
fluctuate.
L
J
Thank
you,
okay,
john
bernstein
and
then
I'll
put
myself
into
cue.
John
thank.
E
You
so
I
have
questions
on
three
different
projects,
so
I'll
take
them
one
at
a
time.
None
of
them
should
be,
I
think,
they're
all
pretty
simple
questions
and
hopefully
answers
as
well.
The
first
is
on
br
101.
E
I
see
van
wyk
memorial
bridge
is
slated
in
2027
and
I'm
a
little
surprised
to
see
that
bridge
in
there.
Unless
I'm
remembering
this
incorrectly,
that's
a
fairly
new
bridge
less
than
10
years
old.
So
I'm
curious
as
to
why
that's
what
needs
to
be
done
and
why
that's
showing
up
already,
unless,
unless
my
facts
are
incorrect,.
R
M
F
Here,
dispatch
from
the
bridge
group,
I
don't
have
an
answer
right
now
regarding
this,
but
we'll
I
already
don't
will
get
back
to
you,
but
based
on
what
I
know
yes,
you're
right
this
bridge
is
it's
a
new
bridge
and
probably
shouldn't
be
on
that
list.
F
There
is
you
and
we'll
get
back
to
you,
an
answer.
E
Thank
you.
I
mean
if
there's
something
that
legitimately
to
me
to
be
done,
that
I'm
certainly
not
opposed
to
that.
But
I
guess,
if
that's
the
case,
I'd
be
a
little
disappointed
to
hear
that
such
a
new
bridge
is
already
needing
work
and
I'd
be
curious
to
know
you
know
what
happened
if
there
was
a
mistake
made
in
during
construction
or
what
thank
you
so,
the
next
one
this
is
pv182
following
on
katie,
had
asked
about
this
earlier.
E
So
I
apologize.
If
I
missed
part
of
the
answer
on
this,
I
see
in
the
sharepoint
that
so
just
to
keep
people
up
to
date
on
this
is
the
nikola
avenue
reopening
it's
requesting,
300
000,
which
is
clearly
a
tiny
fraction
of
what's
actually
going
to
get
spent
there
they're
reconstructing
a
bridge
and
reconstructing
two
tenths
of
a
mile
of
street.
You
guys
need
to
show
us
all
the
funding.
We
need
to
be
able
to
see
that
we
need
that
context.
It
doesn't
matter
whether
it's
netdefons
or
not.
E
That's
always
the
way
this
has
worked.
Yes,
we're
only
specifically
approving
net
debt
bonds,
but
but
a
huge
part
of
what
we're
doing
is
seeing
the
context
around
that
with
all
the
other
levels
of
funding.
So
I
don't
know
whether
that's
a
request,
that's
for
public
works
or
for
finance
or
both,
but
I'll
just
put
that
out
there.
I
don't
feel
good
about
rating
that
project
today
or
individually
in
the
near
term,
without
having
all
of
that
information.
P
Yeah
I'll
just
answer
that
quickly.
I
I
think
that
was
just
a
misstep
by
us
here
in
public
works.
We
can
work
with
neil
to
get
you
the
information.
But
yes,
the
300
000
is
for
assessments.
That's
our
standard
process
when
we
do
street
improvement
projects,
so
we'll
do
the
assessments
and
that's
why
we
put
that
in
the
cip.
But
we
did
miss
the
fun
like
the
revenue
source
because
it
is
unique
compared
to
open
gov,
it's
very
unique
funding
source
that
isn't
traditionally
in
there.
So
just
an
oversight.
P
D
P
Be
off
by,
but
what
I
can
tell
this
group
is
we're
going
to
build
a
street
from
lake
to
approximately
29
cecil
newman.
There
will
be
a
bridge.
There
will
be
bike
accommodations,
there
will
be
sidewalks,
there
will
be
green
infrastructure,
storm
water,
public
utilities,
but
that
can
vary
very
widely
as
we
learn
through
the
upper
harbor
project
of
what
we
ultimately
decide
to
do.
So
that's
what
I
can
tell
you
right
now,
but
we're
going
to
work
diligently
with
the
community,
that's
starting
the
summer
to
figure
out
what
it's.
What
it's
going
to?
P
I
I
honestly
don't
know-
and
I
I
I
don't
know
what
the
estimate
is
going
to
be.
I
think
it'll
be
more
than
10
million
dollars.
That's
easy,
but
I
don't
know
how
high
it's
going
to
be,
and
I
don't
want
to
have
a
number
stuck
to
me
this
early
in
the
project.
E
Thank
you
last
one
is
pv
181.
This
is
probably
more
of
a
comment
than
anything
else.
That
project
strikes
me
as
a
project.
That
is
a
a
no-brainer
in
terms
of
doing
something
that
that
meaningfully
does
something
around
equity,
and
so
I'm
wondering
why
that's
all
the
way
out
in
2028,
it's
not
a
huge
project.
It's
half
a
million
dollar
ask
that's
the
reconstruction
of
that
the
streets
near
hiawatha,
where
the
indian
housing
is.
P
Thanks
john
much
like
we
do
with
a
number
of
new
capital
budget
proposals,
capital
budget
requests
they
start
in
the
out
year.
But
given
the
opportunity
to
have
this
committee
review
it
and
rank
it
and
bring
that
forward
to
both
mayor
and
council,
that's
where
we
want
to
start
it.
The
study
when,
when
the
capital
budget
requests
were
due,
we
did
not
have
the
study
complete
with
the
community
and
all
of
our
technical
work.
P
So
we
also
didn't
have
a
great
estimate
of
what
we
thought
the
project
budget
would
be
so
just
know
that
that
will
likely
to
change
too.
But
we
agree.
This
is
a
very
important
project
from
an
equity
in
advancing
many
goals,
as
it
relates
to
environmental
justice,
social
justice
and
safety
and
across
many
suave.
So
we
hear
you
and
that's
something
that
might
change,
and
I
would
say
this
is
a
project
that
is
a
strong
candidate
for
us
to
try
to
pursue
many
outside
grants
to
fulfill
the
division
of
both
public
works
in
the
community.
E
So
I
just
want
to
follow
up.
I
appreciate
you
guys
trying
to
use
the
capital
planning
system
the
way
it's
designed
to
be
used,
which
is
a
new
project
goes
in
the
very
out
year
and
and
that
that's
a
fair
response,
maybe
in
the
future,
with
a
project
like
this,
you
can
say,
listen
we're
putting
this
in
the
out
year,
but
if
you
guys
see
fit,
you
know.
I
think
this
is
one
that
the
committee
should
seriously
consider
recommending
that
we
move
up
as
long
as
there's
no
timing
issues.
P
Yup
and
in
some
projects
is
we
want
to
move
at
the
pace
of
trust
with
the
neighborhood
and
we'll
learn
what
that
looks
like
as
we
wrap
up
this
up
and
find
out
what
other
funding
is
available
through
click
and
mayor
markup,
as
well
as
like
grant
opportunities,
but
absolutely
hear
you
john.
Thank
you.
J
Okay,
thank
you,
john.
So
I
I
see
no
others
in
queue,
so
I
will
go
at
this
point
first,
connecting
to
what
john
just
spoke
about
regarding
public
input.
The
the
upper
harbor
terminal
is
a
good
example
of
something
that
you
might
want
to
study.
Public
input
had
been
solicited
for
almost
14
years,
yet
it
it
was
not
effectively
communicated
because
there
seemed
to
be
a
flurry
of
activity
after
13
years
of
collecting
data.
J
What
what
I
would
suggest
is
that
a
public
engagement
plan
be
published
in
advance
so
that
you
don't
have
a
trickle
in
of
of
comments
over
you
know.
Basically
what
will
be
a
15-year
period
if
you
really
want
their
project
to
move
forward?
Okay,
so
so
I'll.
Just
put
that
aside
for
a
second
for
the
past
few
years,
we've
placed
a
comment
regarding
the
our
week
request
to
see
the
inventory
of
of
projects
covering
the
next
30
years.
J
We
we
know
that
there's
a
useful
life
for
most
infrastructure,
and
I
think
you
you've
hinted
that
you
do
have
such
a
list
and
the
mayor
committed
to
checking
on
whether
we
can
gain
access
to
that
list
of
projects
it.
J
One
of
the
things
we
don't
want
to
do
is
be
surprised
when,
when
a
a
slew
of
projects
become
due
in,
let's
say,
10
years,
when
we're
not
planning
for
those
those
that
little
bubble
of
infrastructure
replacement
projects.
J
B
Eric
for
we'll
carry
while
I
was
doing
my
walking.
B
P
We
have
a
six-year
capital
improvement
plan.
We
do
not
have
a
30-year
capital
improvement
plan.
We
have
a
10-year
action
plan
that
is
more
high-level,
but
we
have
a
specific
six-year
capital
improvement
plan
that
we
bring
to
this
community.
I
just
want
to
be
clear,
like
a
30-year
capital
improvement
program
is
not
something
that
we
have
or
plan
to
create.
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
expectations
for
this
group.
J
Right,
if
I
might
share
so,
I
don't
think
we're
looking
for
a
plan,
we're
looking
for
an
inventory
of
of
capital
investment
needs
that
may
emerge
during
the
useful
life
of
the
cap
of
the
infrastructure.
J
J
H
Yes,
I
just
wanted
to
compliment
everybody,
for
I
believe
it's
the
first
year
that
bik
24
major
trail
maintenance
is
coming
before
click,
and
I
think
that
is
a
a
wonderful
addition
would
love
to
hear
a
little
bit
about
it.
The
program
that
was
started
last
year,
with
the
parks
board
to
address
kind
of
trails
that
have
are
quickly
well,
are
going
to
be
going,
are
bad
or
are
going
to
go.
Get
bad
is
a
great
idea.
S
Yes,
big
24
is
is
a
direct
response
to
the
transportation
action
plan.
S
S
The
10
feet
comes
from
the
equipment
used
to
rate
those
trails.
It's
mounted
on
a
pickup,
so
narrow
trails,
just
weren't,
going
to
be
able
to
be
rated
in
the
same
way
that
streets
are
that.
That
condition
was
actually
very
good
news
for
the
system
as
a
whole
of
the
about
30
miles
that
we
got
rated,
we
were
in
the
fair
to
good
range
as
a
as
a
whole
system,
and
so
starting
with
big
24
as
a
way
to
programmatically.
G
S
Correct
and
so
one
of
the
reasons
that
it's
it's
not
starting
right
away
is
so
that
we
can
have
a
couple
years
to
identify
the
trails
where
we,
where
we're
going
to
start,
and
so
we
can
hone
in
on
the
the
appropriate
level
of
funding
for
specific
maintenance
and
what
types
of
maintenance
are
going
to
be.
The
most
useful
to
extending
the
the
life
cycle
of
those
trails.
K
P
We
have
a
lot
of
competition
for
funding
last
year.
We,
you
know,
we've
extended
to
a
six
year,
cip
and
then
we've
also
added
a
lot
of
projects
in
those
two
out
years,
so
we're
trying
our
best
to
provide
click
options,
but
we
know
there's
limited
funding.
The
other
aspect
is
with
26
and
27.
That
is
the
next
two
years
for
the
federal
funding
through
met
council
or
other
grants.
P
So
it's
multifactorial
on
why
projects
are
moving
around,
especially
in
those
last
two
to
three
years,
but
I
would
say
second
street.
We
are
very
aware
of
some
of
the
storm
water
conditions
and
the
flooding
in
there,
especially
near
the
intersection
of
second
and
13th.
P
So
we
are
starting
to
look
at
that
one
a
little
bit
more
closely,
especially
given
some
of
the
prominence
of
the
rains
that
we've
experienced
and
seen
what
other
options
for
moving
that
forward
or
working
with
their
partners.
Your
founding
outstanding
grad
funding
might
look
like.
K
E
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
circle
back
to
eric's
request
from
a
minute
ago.
Maybe
there
was
some
misunderstanding:
I'd
be
shocked
to
learn
that
public
works
doesn't
have
some
kind
of
an
asset
inventory
that
they
either
are
working
on
or
have
that
informs
how
you
go
about
planning
the
six-year
capital
improvement
process
each
year.
E
If
that
doesn't
exist,
that
would
imply
to
me
that
you're,
using
a
very
reactive
methodology,
instead
of
a
proactive
one,
looking
at
what
the
assets
are
and
what
the
age
are,
and
at
least
trying
to
be
aware
of
where
problems
may
come
up
before
they
actually
come
up.
So
that's
what
eric
I
believe
is
asking
for
that.
I
we've
asked
for
that
as
a
committee
for
several
years.
If
it
doesn't
exist,
then
I'd
like
an
answer
as
to
why
something
like
that
doesn't
exist.
P
P
Maybe
I
was
interpreting
like
does
that
projection,
say
here's
the
specific
30
project
or
the
next
30
years
of
all
the
detailed
projects
like
that
is
a
world
of
difference
of
workload
and
being
able
to
be
that
finite
to
predict
everything
for
the
next
30
years,
like
we
don't
have
that,
but
we
have
software
and
inventory
of
our
assets
to
help
inform
our
six-year
program
and
start
understanding.
Our
backlog
of
needs.
P
We've
updated
that
a
couple
of
years
ago,
and
we
updated
it
as
we
needed
to
keep
rolling
forward
to
update
the
six-year
program.
But
I
think
it
might
just
be
our
interpretation
of
how
that
question
was
asked
but,
like
we
are
using
like
collecting
new
information
like
we
collected
new
pci
data
last
year
for
a
quarter
of
the
city,
we're
collecting
it
again.
This
year,
we've
got
the
bike
trails,
we're
collecting
inventory
on
look
like
inventory
on
88
to
inform
the
capital
program.
E
I
think
that's
right.
Thank
you,
so
we're
asking
for
more
than
to
hear
that
you're
doing
that
where
I
don't
think
we
need
to
see
that
at
an
incredibly
granular
level,
but
at
a
bigger
higher
level,
it
would
be
helpful,
I
think,
for
us
to
see
some
kind
of
a
report.
That's
produced
from
that.
Certainly
anything
about
updates
to
pci
around
the
city
would
be
very
useful
for
us
to
see,
especially
since
the
streets
and
parks
ordinance
was
specifically
trying
to
address
that.
E
P
So
some
of
those
things
might
be
new
work
plan
items
for
public
works
that
would
have
to
be
updated
specifically,
so
I
just
want
to
like
understand
like
running
new
projections
for
bridges
or
other
things,
and
that's
something
we
have
to
take
back
internally
to
understand.
If
it's
a
new
work
plan
request
for
public
works
staff
to
undertake,
because
there
are
things
that
we
do
as
a
part
of
our
planning
process,
but
we'll
review
that
and
see
what
we
can
get.
P
What
I
would
note
is
we
do
have
a
public
web
page
that
we
can
share
with
you,
showing
our
our
plan
for
the
pci
condition
collection
from
last
year
and
moving
forward,
and
then
we
also
have
an
open
data
portal
that
shows
all
of
our
pavement
condition:
data.
That's
that's
available
on
open
data
on
minneapolis's
website,
so
we
we
do
have
data
sources
available
to
the
public
to
review
all
that.
E
B
It
okay,
personal
privilege.
I
will
just
say
that
I
I
agree
with
john
and
eric's
concerns
and
as
the
click
chair
I
I
too
have
asked
for
asset
inventories,
for
example
with
public
facilities,
more
so
public
buildings
and
grounds,
and
so
speaking
for
myself
I'll
say
that
we
are
certainly
not
trying
to
insert
ourselves
as
the
paid
professional
managers
of
the
city
administration
or
the
elected
officials
and
policy
makers,
but
as
taxpayer
rate
payer
voters.
T
Thank
you.
I
have
two
questions,
one
to
follow
up
on
dan's
line
of
comments
around
bik
24
and
specifically
the
the
pavement
condition
index.
So
I
was
just
reading
more
about
it
and
note
that,
like
it,
the
this
cbr
specifically
references
the
astm
d6433,
which
is
all
about
pavement
condition,
index
for
roads
and
parking
lot
surfaces.
T
So
just
noting
that
you
know
bike
trails
and
are
are
used
by
different,
you
know
users.
How
are
you
taking
that
into
account,
given
that
that
metric
is
for
a
different
road
user?
Or
I
guess
surface
user.
S
Yeah,
I
can
respond
to
that
that
first
point
the.
When
we
got
the
trail
rated
conditions,
we
got
a
a
pavement
condition
report.
We
got
a
smoothness
condition
report
and
we
also
got
a
a
a
an
adjusted
count,
basically
of
any
dips
that
you
would
be
feeling
on
a
a
bicycle,
basically
or
or
a
electric
scooter
type
of
light
transit.
S
We're
we're
still
actively
pursuing
and
listening
to
how
other
cities
are
trying
to
to
rate
trails
and
how
their
maintenance
plans
extend
the
life
of
those
trails,
and
so
it's
not
just
new
to
us
to
be
raiding
trails
in
this
way.
It's
it
is
sort
of
a
a
unique
way
to
address
infrastructure.
That's
not
designed
for
cars
or
heavy
traffic.
T
Great,
I'm
really
encouraged
to
hear
that
you
know
and
would
encourage
public
works
to
to
be
innovative,
and
you
know
to
not
wait
for
other
cities
to
to.
You
know
come
up
with
a
metric
that
and
to
test
things
out,
but
yeah,
I'm
really
happy
to
hear
about
the
other.
You
know
the
smoothness
of
the
other
pieces
that
you're
I'm
taking
into
account
because
it
is
just
it's
a
different
feel
and
a
different
ride
than
in
a
car.
T
My
other
question
is,
in
general,
this
is
probably
to
nathan
what
makes
a
project
ripe
or
suitable
or
a
good
candidate
for
federal
funding,
requests.
P
I'm
seeing
amity
nodding
because
I
know
she's
on
tab,
but
she
probably
knows
this
as
well,
but
for
like
roadways,
you
have
to
be
on
the
a
minor
functional
classification
system
to
be
eligible,
which
is
why
there's
only
certain
stretches
of
city
streets
that
are
eligible
for
that
funding
for
roadways
most
of
the
county
streets.
I
think,
if
not
all
of
them
in
minneapolis
are
all
a
minor.
So,
like
the
county,
has
a
lot
much
easier
time
pursuing
grants
for
roads
for
pedestrian
it's.
P
They
have
a
lot
of
factors
about
volume
and
crashes
and
interactions.
Population
density
like
they're,
very
prescriptive
to
the
regional
station
bikeways.
It's
you
have
to
be
on
certain
bikeway
type
classification
networks
in
the
region.
They
call
them
rvtns,
regional
bikeway,
transportation
networks,
so
we're
looking
at
our
policies,
put
plans,
crashes,
equity,
we're
looking
at
all
this
data
and
then
seeing
what
would
score
high
because
we
don't
want
to
submit
loser
applications.
P
It
just
varies:
there's
lots
of
random
grants
that
come
up
through
the
the
you
know,
the
national
level
that
we
just
have
to
screen.
They
get
forwarded
us
through
elected
officials
or
communities.
Saying
hey,
let's
pursue
this,
and
we
have
to
evaluate
each
of
them
independently.
But
I
would
say
the
regional
association
is
very
prescriptive
and
we
have
a
very
good
understanding
of
what's
eligible
and
what
would
make
sense
pursuing.
H
Yes,
I
just
this
was
also
another
comment
that
was
responded
to
last
year
that
was
submitted
to
public
works,
and
we
also
made
a
comment
in
the
click
report
and
it
regarded
if
you
know,
parkway
paving,
is
not
necessarily
the
place
to
park
at
pv01.
G
H
It
it
involves
being
able
to
get
pedestrian
facilities
across
particularly
north
minneapolis,
to
the
across
theater
parkway
and
victory
memorial
drive
to
the
the
grand
rounds,
and
you
know
there's
there's
some
finger
pointing
on
this,
and
inevitably
it
just
dies
because
there
isn't
the
weight
of
a
program
to
put
it
underneath-
and
I
studied
this
first
of
all
for
26th
avenue,
which
is
a
a
crossing
of
a
of
a
bikeway
to
the
theater
worth
park
and
and
through
that.
H
Just
became
profoundly
aware
of
the
difference
of
pedestrian
signing
as
pedestrian
warning
signing
as
well
as
crosswalks
that
exists
on
west
river
road
and
around
the
basically
the
south
side
of
of
394
compared
to
the
north
side.
So
I
don't
expect
you
to
have
an
answer
to
that,
but
it's
just
a
concern
that
I
keep
on
seeing
peterworth,
parkway
and
victory.
Memorial
drive
often
feel
like
they
serve
robbinsdale
and
golden
valley
better
than
those
neighborhoods
to
the
east,
and
I
th.
H
R
Dan
thanks
for
thanks
for
your
question-
I
just
want
to
you
know
highlight
that
you
know
our
parkway
system
is
really
important
to
to
really
improve
it.
The
ride-ability
that
the
the
driving
surface
of
it
across
the
city-
as
you
know,
we've
you
know-
had
some
real
needs
with
the
parkway
system
along
the
lake
of
the
aisles
around
other
portions
of
the
city
and
northeast
and
stinson
parkway
and
st
anthony
parkway.
R
So
when
we're
working
with
the
park
board
to
really
address
those
condition,
needs
and
asset
needs
for
the
for
the
parkway,
we
really
want
to
be
sure
that
we
can
make
those
improvements
and
also
work
with
the
park
board
and
work
with,
as
we
do
site
visits
to
really
look
at.
R
You
know
if
there
are
some
needs
or
some
points
of
coordination
with
our
traffic
and
parking
service
department
who
do
science
should
do
the
crosswalks
that
we
can
probably
implement
those
with
the
project,
but
otherwise
you
know
we're
really
just
focusing
on
addressing
those
and
use
the
parkway
system.
As
you
know,
it's
it's
it's
it's
it's
important
across
the
city.
H
Yeah,
I
realize
that,
and
it's
just
something
that
slips
through
the
cracks
of
how
to
get
at
that.
G
H
About
north
minneapolis
being
able
to
offer
a
more
accessible
and
easily
easy
way
to
get
to
see,
get
to
that
trail
system,
it's
an
important
deal
to
do
thanks.
B
B
O
That's
someone's
going
to
suggest
chair
strand
and
then
we
can
come
back
and
I
give
a
brief
staff
announcement.
B
P
R
R
R
O
Yeah,
so
I
was
gonna,
give
a
brief
update
here,
so
we
so
we're
coming
back
into
person
starting
next
wednesday,
so
in
the
click
sharepoint
folder
I've
put
together
like
a
one
pager
on
where
we'll
have
parking
so
we'll
have
parking
vouchers
and
transit
tokens
available.
So
there's
like
a
one
pager
on
just
like
where
you,
where
you
can
park
it's
at
the
half
ramp,
it's
about
a
block
and
a
half
away
from
the
public
service
building
and
there's
like
a
little
map
in
there.
O
So
if
you
can
look
at
that,
we
will
also
again
have
like
parking
vouchers
available.
So
you'll
have
to
get
those
at
the
meeting
itself
and
then
so
yesterday.
Thank
you
for
forwarding
that,
but
we,
the
city,
has
issued
a
mass
recommendation,
so
we
are
recommending
that
our
meetings
as
we
come
back
into
person
that
members
wear
mass
we
these
are
not
mandated.
But
this
is
a
recommendation
from
city
staff.
O
And
additionally,
as
a
reminder,
all
these
these
meetings
are
open
to
the
public.
So
if
there
are
members
of
the
public
at
the
meetings
like
just
be
aware
that
these
are
these
are
open
to
the
public.
And
aside
from
that,
I
don't
know.
If
anyone
has
any
questions
about
parking
or
transit
or
mass,
we
can,
I
think,
start
doing
our
task
force
work.
K
K
O
Started
interview
but
there
so
we
literally
just
have
like
a
parking
voucher,
so
you'll
come
and
then
it's
like
a
little
you.
I
think
you
just
use
at
the
machine
and
you'll
get
voucher
for
it
and
then
the
for
transit
tokens
that
literally
went
down
the
metro
transit
stop
yesterday
in
the
store,
and
they
have
like
tokens
that
you
can
use
yeah.
So
those
are
two
options:
yeah.
K
B
H
I'm
sorry
jeff,
I
just
came
back
and
I
just
have
a
question
regarding
the
breakout
rooms
and
I
didn't
realize,
where
you're
at
so
I'll
just
hold,
so
you
get
to
that
level.
Thanks.
O
I
guess,
for
I
mean
at
least
for
right
now.
This
is
the
recommendations
we've
got
from
the
clerk's
office,
so
this
is
what
we're
we're
offering
at
this
moment.
I
don't
know
we
can
have
a
conversation
about
the
other
stuff,
but
this
is
what
we
have
at
the
moment.
H
H
I've
had
my
mute
button
on
and
when
we've
gone
to
a
breakout
room,
the
whole
screen
just
goes
black
and
sometimes
I
can
hear
but
there's
nothing.
I
can
do
I'm
just
totally
immobilized.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
if
and
then
I
try
to
restart
and
I
just
can't
get
back
into
the
meeting.
Can
I
email
neil?
If
I
have
issues?
Thank
you.
O
Yeah
yeah,
dan
and
and
this
offers
for
everyone,
I'm
on
the
transportation
side
and
justin's
on
the
other,
the
other
task
force.
But
if
you
have
any
issues
like
raising
your
hand
or
have
a
question
to
submit
just
like
email
staff,
and
we
can
bring
those
questions
to
the
chair.
O
I
think
you
we
have
to
finish
reading
up
the
script,
so
there's.
B
A
Thank
you,
chair
strand,
as
you
mentioned,
human
development
is
going
to
the
breakout
room.
This
will
be
our
last
attempt
at
doing
this.
If
you
see
a
button
to
rejoin
the
room,
that's
going
to
send
you
back
to
the
main
room.
So
if
you're
in
human
development
and
you
move
over,
please
don't
hit
that
button.
A
If
you
have
technical
issues
that
black
screen
mute,
give
it
a
minute
if
it
still
doesn't
work,
then
try
to
rejoin
the
room
or
reconnect
to
this
meeting,
I'm
going
to
pause
in
this
room
just
for
a
little
bit
to
make
sure
anybody
who
bounces
back
gets
into
the
correct
room
and
then
I'll
join
the
human
development
task
force.
Thank
you
all
for
your
flexibility
and
patience
with
this.
I
will
open
the
room
and
members
of
human
development
should
transfer
over
there
momentarily.
A
E
So
we'll
just
give
it
a
minute
guys
to
what's
happening
here
out
of
curiosity
to
neil
or
justin.
Are
these
task
force
meetings
open
to
the
public
while
we're
online
right
now.
O
John,
do
we
just
for
kind
of
the
mechanics
of
the
rest
of
this
morning?
Do
you
want
me
to
just
drive
like
we
did
last
time
where
I
pull
up
the
cbr
and
then
you
you'll
keep
track
on
your
sheet
and
I'll
keep
track
of
my.
E
Sheet
that
sounds
fine,
and
then
I
was
thinking
today
about
how
are
you
keeping
track
of
all
of
this?
I,
I
am
keeping
track
of
it,
and
I
thought
I
was
the
only
one
if
you
are
great,
if
you're
not,
I
got
to
figure
out
how
to
get
this
to
you.
O
E
It
out
all
right
before
we
dive
in.
I
just
give
everybody
a
heads
up:
hi
jocelyn.
E
I
hit
that
rejoin
button
and
went
into
the
hd
meeting,
so
we
have
a
couple
of
projects
to
revisit
that.
We
passed
on
last
week:
traffic
10
and
traffic
22
and
I've
double
checked
that,
though
the
links
are
now
working
properly
and
all
the
data
is
there.
Hopefully
people
have
remember
to
go
back
and
take
a
look,
if
not
here's
your
cue
to
go.
Take
a
quick
look
at
those
two
and
then
also
we
deferred
on
off
street
system
parking
systems
pk004,
and
it
looks
to
me
like
at
least
in
sharepoint.
E
The
parking
people
responded
to
some
of
scott's
questions
about
some
more
financial
information.
So
let
me
get
going
here
in
a
minute,
I'd
like
to
start
by
taking
care
of
those
three
and
then
we'll
dive
into
the
stuff
that
we
just
heard
from
today.
E
So
again,
if
you
haven't
had
a
chance
to
take
a
look
in
sharepoint
on
the
tab
for
this
year,
you
can
find
that
some
of
the
stuff
about
the
parking
finances
and
then
traffic,
10
and
traffic
22
are
now
the
information
is
all
populated
in
those
tbrs.
E
Jeff,
I
just
want
to
get
your
thought
on
this.
Do
we
want
to
ask
people
who
at
least
it
looks
to
me
who
are
not
part
of
the
task
force
to
identify
who
they
are
so
we
know
and
welcome
anybody
who's
here.
That's
appropriate.
E
O
E
O
E
B
Yeah,
mr
chair,
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
we
are
having
people
bounce
out
of
the
main
meeting
and
come
back,
so
I
guess
neil
or
someone
neil
may
have
neal
may
have
to
send
people
to
the
hd
breakout.
If,
if
neil
can
do
that,
I
don't
know
that.
O
Yeah
we're
we're
working
on
it.
Yeah
justin
is
okay,
moving
back
and
forth,
so
I
think
a
bit
probably
wise.
Just
we
can
start
and
then.
B
E
Yeah,
I
think
that's
probably
unnecessary.
I
mean,
if
you
guys,
there's
a
button
on
here
that
allows
you
to
see
the
participants
which
I'm
using
and
I
can
everybody
and
I
recognize
every
single
name
with
the
effect
we've
verbally
asked
for
identification
and
either
that
person
is
not
present
at
the
moment
or
it's
some
kind
of
a
glitch
or
they're,
not
responding.
So
doing
a
roll
call
isn't
going
to
change
that.
So
I
I'll
propose
that
we
just
dive
in
so
I'd
like
to
start
with
well
before
we
dive
in
does
any.
H
H
Other
information,
I
noticed,
there's
some
stuff
on
the
sharepoint
in
the
transportation
folder-
is
for
comments
discussed
in
missouri.
E
H
O
Was
gonna
say
just
for
for
dan
and
any
members
who
are
looking
through
that
transportation
folder
right
now?
We're
we're
city
staff
and
the
task
force
chairs
are
just
trying
to
exploring
some
ways
of
how
we're
gonna
collaborate
on
comments,
so
that,
for
at
the
moment,
is
just
a
placeholder.
For
what
we'll
likely
use
for
developing
comments
for
the
task
force.
T
Today,
our
task
force
is
talking
about
the
prioritization
project
priority
and
then
I'm
assuming
we'll
talk
about
or
give
a
preview
of
how
our
task
forces
will
be
meeting
going
forward.
E
Yeah,
well,
we
got
a
lot
to
get
through
first,
let's
we'll
handle
that
first
and
see
where
we're
at
on
the
clock.
So
without
further
ado,
let's
dive
into
traffic
10
and
traffic
22..
So
that's
traffic
management
systems
is
traffic.
10
and
traffic.
22
is
traffic
safety
improvements.
E
Those
were
rated
significant
and
strong
last
year
for
context.
That's
the
way
all
of
the
traffic
projects
they're
only
about
six
or
seven
of
them
were
rated
last
year
and
that's
the
way
we
rated
the
other
ones
that
we
did
deal
with
last
week.
So
again,
there's
nothing
sacred
about
that,
but
it's
a
point
of
reference,
and
so
with
that
I'll,
entertain,
emotion,.
T
I'll
move
that
traffic,
10
and
traffic
22
are
significant,
strong.
E
Hearing
none,
I'm
gonna
do
this
vote
the
way
we
did
last
week
instead
of
asking
for
the
eyes
on
things
that
are
likely
unanimous
or
at
least
non-controversial,
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
raise,
use
the
raise
your
hand
feature
in
teams.
If
you
oppose
the
motion.
E
I
I
guess
I
find
this
to
be
one
of
the
more
frustrating
cbrs
and
you
know,
there's
a
economic
development
case
for
these
parking
ramps
and
sort
of
a
public
service
for
the
parking
ramps,
especially
you
know,
sort
of
for
the
city
facilities,
but
I
feel
like
they
do
such
a
bad
job
in
recent
years,
explaining
during
the
pandemic,
whether
they're
being
utilized-
and
I
know
there
are
a
few
of
these
facilities
that
actually
lose
money.
I
E
T
Yeah,
scott,
I
mean
I'd,
say
I'm
in
a
similar
boat
in
a
number
of
ways.
I
I
will
also
point
out-
and
I
honestly
I
laugh
at
this-
that
they
put
their
level
of
need
as
critical.
T
I
mean
they're,
not
a
bridge
they're
not,
and
they
like
that.
No
one's
life
is
in
danger.
Anyway.
I
think
that
helps
to
provide.
T
That
helps
me
take
a
step
back
in
terms
of
like
yeah,
how
how,
via
like,
how
important
is
it
and
with
that
lens,
it
kind
of
like
that,
helps
to
balance
it
out.
For
me,
in
this,
like
lower
to
middle
important,
moderate.
E
I'm
going
to
put
myself
I'm
going
to
speak
on
this.
You
know,
I
I
think
important
in
moderate
is
fine.
I
don't
agree
with
the
idea
that
the
way
to
improve
usage
of
transit
is
to
make
other
forms
inconvenient.
I
think
the
focus
should
be
on
making
transit
more
convenient,
not
making
it
really
hard
to
park.
That
has
a
lot
of
unintended
consequences.
E
I
think
whether
it's
somebody
like
jeff,
who
right
now
has
some
mobility
issues
right
because
of
his
knee
transit
is
a
lot
harder
for
somebody
like
him
and
there's
lots
of
examples
like
that.
So.
E
Scott,
you
can't
interrupt
me,
you
need
to
get
in
queue
and
and
then
you
can
speak.
The
other
thing
I
want
to
say,
which
I
think
is
unique
to
this
project,
and
I
don't
I
don't.
There
may
not
be
a
way
to
deal
with
it
because
it's
too
uncertain,
but
these
projects
can
raise
money
for
other
things.
E
So
I
I
don't
know
how
you
deal
with
that
right
because
you
don't
know
how
they're
going
to
use
the
money
and
just
the
fact
that
they
can
raise
money
for
other
projects
doesn't
mean
we
should
necessarily
rate
it
higher.
But
I
just
point
that
out
because
it's
kind
of
an
interesting
aspect
of
this
all
right.
Scott.
If
you
want
to
speak,
I
I
can.
E
Talking
so
yeah,
no,
no,
it's
okay!
I
just
so
jeff
is
in
queue.
Let
me
recognize
jeff,
then
I'll
go
to
scott
neil
just
took
his
hand
down,
and
then
I
see
amity
so
jeff
go
ahead
and
then
we'll
go
to
scott.
B
Thanks
chair,
I
will
speak
in
favor
of
the
important
moderate.
I
I
personally
feel
that
the
off-street
program
serves
a
definite
public
need
and
not
only
for
you
know
what
some
people
might
want
to
call
privileged
suburban
visitors
to
the
city,
but
I
think
it's
really
important
for
our
business
infrastructure
and
our
workforce
prior
to
retiring.
B
B
There
are
lots
of
personal
circumstances,
and
I
think
we
multimodal
system
where
we
already
favor,
you
know
in
the
ranking
we
favor
transit
and
so
historically,
I
think
there
was
a
need
that
the
cap
of
the
private
sector
failed
in
terms
of
the
parking
infrastructure
and
I
believe
that's
why
the
city
ended
up
investing
in
the
system
as
well
as
the
state,
and
you
know
if
that
is
changing,
and
we
want
to
what
do
you
say,
privatize
this
network
and
then
get
the
city
out
of
the
business
and
let
the
private
sector
rule
again.
B
That's
a
decision
for
the
policy
makers,
but
I
think
we
have
this
infrastructure
and
I
I'm
in
support
of
funding
it
adequately
so
that
we
aren't
underfunding
a
system
in
which
we
have
invested,
in
which
we
still
have
to
maintain
as
long
as
we,
the
city
own
it.
So
I
think,
we're
I
think,
we're
kind
of
striking
a
middle
ground
here.
So
I'm
opposed
to
any
further
lessening
of
the
scoring.
I
I
I
think
the
the
question
that
I
have-
and
it
doesn't
seem
to
get
answered
is
I
have
a
general
sense
that
there
are
very
empty
giant
buildings
that
are
taken
that
require
a
lot
of
maintenance,
millions
of
dollars
of
maintenance
and
especially
during
the
pandemic,
that
they
may
or
may
not
be
losing
tens
of
millions
of
dollars
and
those
dollars
do
go
into
the
general
fund,
so
the
parking
revenues
go
into
the
general
fund.
So
that's
my
only
point.
Is
that
and
you
know
we
can,
I
don't
think
we
need
to
belabor
this.
I
I'm
never
gonna
bring
this
up
again,
so
I'm
gonna
rate
it
low,
but
you
know,
I
think
it's
fine.
K
Thank
you.
I
was
just
gonna
say
that
if
we're
going
to
use
other
click
members
in
our
defense
or
lack
of
defense
for
projects
like,
we
should
actually
ask
ask
those
members
how
the
project
impacts
them.
So
saying
like
jeff
is
like
this
project
is
necessary
because
jeff
can't
use
public
transit
because
of
his
knee
right
now,
like
I'm,
actually
really
interested
in
jeff's
response
to
that.
E
B
Oh
yeah,
thanks
for
the
chair,
yeah
I
I
have.
I
have
had
arthritis
and
these
spurs
in
my
both
knees
for
about
a
decade
and
I've
been
getting
regular
injections
for
about
seven
years
and
finally,
I
was
actually
treating
another
orthopedic
issue
pre-covered
and
I
had
to
just
self-care
that
at
home,
but
after
two
years
I
did
finally
get
scheduled
for
total
knee
replacement
on
april
18th
and
so
yeah
steps
are
an
issue
and
walking
any
great
distance.
At
this
point
I
do
have
a
walker
at
home.
B
I
do
have
a
a
cane
that
I
use
it's
probably
going
to
be
about
a
six
week.
I
think
six
week,
total
you
know
could
be
back
to
the
new
normal.
So
if
I
were
on
a
a
rail
transit
line,
you
know
within
outside
of
my
house
like,
I
am
on
a
bus
line
that
runs
in
front
of
my
house,
but
I
could
probably
more
easily
get
onto
the
the
light
rail
but
outside
of
catching
the
line
that
runs
on
my
house.
B
B
So
that's
my
my
personal
experience
and
I
don't
mean
to
you
know,
say
that's
everybody's
situation,
it's,
but
you
know,
I'm
sure,
they're,
a
myriad
of
people
who
have
temporary
disabilities
as
whether,
as
well
as
people
who
have
long
long-term
and
permanent.
If
we
call
disabilities
or
limit
limitations
on
abilities
or
diff
different
abilities.
E
Let
me
just
jump
in
quick
and
then
I'll
recognize
katie.
So
just
two
points
one
I
could
have
made
the
same.
I
probably
should
have
asked
jeff's
permission
before
I
used
his
name
specifically
like
that,
and
I
could
have
made
the
same
point
without
using
a
specific
person
right,
whether
it's
elderly
or
handicapped
or
temporarily,
handicapped.
There's
lots
of
different
examples
like
that.
So
that
was
generally
the
point
I
was
trying
to
make,
and
I
didn't
use
jeff
with
the
intent
of
trying
to
make
it
any
more
dramatic
or
anything
like
that.
E
It's
just
popped
into
my
head
because
he
and
I
have
had
that
conversation
before
that's
all
that
was
intended
by
that
and
then
I
just
brought
I'm
keeping
an
eye
on
the
clock.
I
think
we
should
probably
keep
moving
here.
I
have
strong
opinions
about
some
of
this
stuff.
Instead
of
going
further
with
it
here,
I'd
much
rather
discuss
it
with
amity
and
katie
and
others
and
and
scott
over
a
beer
at
happy
hour.
E
Thank
you
perfect
all
right,
so
the
motion
on
the
floor,
just
to
remind
everybody,
is
important
and
moderate.
So,
oh
sorry,
amity
did
you
want
to
say
something.
E
Okay,
so
again,
if
you're
opposed,
please
use
the
raise
your
hand,
feature
skype,
yeah.
Okay,
thank
you.
Anybody
else
want
to
use
the
razer
hand
feature
on
this
one
all
right,
so
this
one
passes
all
right
with
that.
Let's
dive
into
today's
stuff.
E
E
O
Okay,
so
bike
24
major
trail
maintenance.
The
project
description,
minneapolis
public
works,
operates
and
maintains
approximately
33
miles
of
off
street
trails
in
order
to
maintain
and
improve
the
condition
of
trails,
the
city
annually
performs
a
combination
of
spot
and
full
surface
maintenance
activities.
O
The
ob,
the
objective
of
this
program
is
to
extend
the
life
of
the
pavement,
thus
delaying
the
need
for
total
reconstruction
on
the
city's
network
of
trails
and
off
street
bikeways.
This
program
will
reduce
annual
maintenance
expenditures
by
addressing
failing,
pavement
and
potholes,
while
also
improving
the
ride
quality
for
people
walking,
rolling
and
biking.
O
The
construction
may
also
include
replacement
of
some
select,
some
sections
of
curb
gutter,
pavement,
striping,
signage
and
upgrading
non-compliant,
curb
ramps
to
meet
current
ada
design
standards
and
for
the
project
cost
breakdown.
This
is
it
begins
in
2026
for
225,
000,
225,
000,
2027
and
225
thousand
and
2028.,
and
this
is
all
backed
by
bonds.
B
Yeah
move
significant,
strong.
B
E
All
right
now
we'll
start
to
accelerate
things,
so
I'm
going
to
take
bp01
through
bp07.
That's
four
projects
at
safe
routes
to
schools,
pedestrian
safety
program,
18th
avenue,
northeast
trail
gap
and
northside
greenway
phase
one
the
motion
or
excuse
me.
Those
four
projects
were
all
rated
significant
strong
last
year
and
I'll
entertain
a
motion
on
that.
T
B
I
am
go
ahead.
I
just
want
us
if
we're,
if
we're
in
the
process,
I
just
think
we
should
kind
of
have
a
footnote
for
bp006
that
you
know
like
parking
lot.
Footnote
comment
needed.
B
Timing
and
connectivity
to
the
great
northern.
E
Yeah,
let's
do
that
so
again,
any
any
discussion
specifically
on
the
motion
all
right
see.
None!
Please
use
the
raise
your
hand
feature
if
you
object
to
the
motion
see
none
that
motion
passes
so
to
jeff's
point.
What
I
would
propose
if
he's
willing
is
dan,
raised
the
question
about
this
in
the
meeting.
So
maybe
he'd
like
to.
E
Be
the
guy
that
at
least
heads
up
the
team
that
that
does
a
comment
on
bp006
I
mean
I'm
not
sure.
Well,
we
can
certainly
do
a
comment.
I
I
recognize
from
past
bike
projects
that
that
we
should
be
careful
what
we
say
in
a
public
document
about
this,
because
the
railroads
will
take
every
event
as
they
can
to
hijack
the
city
and
try
to
get
asked
for
way
too
much
money
for
these
pieces
of
land
that
the
city
tries
to
get
back.
B
E
E
Okay,
maybe
that
was
all
right:
we've
got
katie
and
q
and
then
amity.
T
So
I
happened
to
talk
with
one
of
the
public
works
staff
more
about
these
mobility
hubs
and
got
a
better
understanding
of
them
compared
to
last
year
and
learned
more
about
their
importance
regarding
moving
our
transportation
action
plan
forward
and
and
making
active
transportation
more
attractive
and
enticing,
which
is
honestly
one
of
the
things
that
we're
kind
of
talking
about.
With
regard
to,
oh
goodness
of
forgetting
what
project
we
were
talking
about
at
that
point,
I
think
the
parking
lots
anyway.
T
E
Let
me
let
me
recognize
amity
and
then
I'll
circle
back
to
erica
and
ask
if
she
considers
that
a
friendly
amendment
go
ahead.
Amity.
K
E
T
Which
document
happy
to
help?
But
there's.
E
E
E
It
erica
do
you
consider
katie's
proposal
a
friendly
amendment
or
not.
I
think
you
were
the
one
who
made
the
motion
right.
W
I
was,
I
would
take
that
friendly
amendment,
I'm
trying
to
remember
what
our
discussion
last
year
was
to
me
in
favor
of
important
moderate,
but
I'm
willing
to
take
that
amendment.
T
I
could
do
my
best,
I
think
honestly,
it
was
a
newer
project
for
all
of
us
and
we
were
just
thinking
like.
Oh,
these
are
like
nice
little
doodads
next
to
transit,
centers!
W
E
E
All
right
scene,
none,
please
use
the
raise
your
hand
feature
if
you
object
to
this
motion,
all
right
that
one
passes.
E
Let's
do
vision,
zero,
quick
that
was
rated
critical
strong
last
year,
never.
T
T
I'll
just
speak
quickly
in
favor
of
the
fact
that
the
vision,
zero
program,
as
they
were
talking
about
earlier
from
public
works,
that
these
are
quick
implemented
strategies
to
to
lower
likely
injury
and
death
on
our
streets.
And
so
it's
I
really
like
the
program,
because
it
is
like
kind
of
a
quick
implementation
type
of
thing.
E
H
There
we
go
I'm
on
now
yeah,
I
I
I
like
this
program
as
well,
but
I've
got
a
few
observations
that
are
troubling.
G
H
You
know
it
just
hasn't
rolled
out
again.
What
was
supposed
to
get
done
last
year
didn't
get
done
and
as
far
as
public
input
into
this
stuff,
they
recently
put
up
something
that
would
allow
people
to
comment
about
what
they
were
planning
to
do.
So
what
I've
seen
what
they've
said
they
did.
They're
gonna
do
was
an
array
of
stuff,
but
in
some
places-
and
I'm
just
gonna
use
monroe
street
northeast.
H
All
you
see
is
bollard
treatments
that
are
on
intersections
and
there
are
a
lot
of
other
things
that
what
they
missed
of
all
things
was
putting
us
putting
a
crosswalk
or
a
pedestrian
signing
at
logan
park
which
just
floored
me.
I
I
looked
into
this
and
I
was
told:
well
we
don't
do
this
and
we
do
that
and
I'm
going
well.
H
This
is
one
place
to
do
it
and
yet
they're
doing
the
same
thing
down
on
15th,
which
is
the
crosswalk
to
get
to
indeed
brewing,
and
so
I
just
I've
been
for
I've
been
told
by
that,
and
the
other
thing
I've
been
troubled
with
is:
is
okay,
monroe
gets
filled
between
broadway
and
monroe
between
broadway
and
lowry,
with
these
bullards
who's
taking
care
of
them,
and
how
long
are
they
supposed
to
last
and
once
they
get
by
I
mean?
Is
it
a
tenure
program
or
is
it
a
one-year
program?
H
And
one
of
the
issues
with
this
is
that
when
you
put
these
things
in
lindell
avenue,
north
is
a
perfect
place
where
they
did
a
test
of
this,
and
everything
got
ripped
up
in
the
first
three
months,
because
nobody
was
familiar
with
it.
G
T
Can
I
respond
to
dan
yeah?
That's
a
question.
Is
that
something
that
we
can
get
more
clarification
on?
I
I'm
actually
really
liking
this.
The
click
inquiry
spreadsheet.
So
I
mean
you
know
it
had
like
ethan
been
at
the
meeting
today
like
we
could
have
maybe
asked
him
some
of
those
questions
like
what
are
the
maintenance
like
so
then
that
can
maybe
inform
a
comment.
E
Yeah,
we'll
start
with
the
question:
let
me
stop
you
guys
there
for
a
minute
and
as
this
is
important
stuff,
we
should
definitely
be
having
this
conversation,
and
this
is
going
to
generate
comments,
and
this
is
really
good.
I'm
keeping
an
eye
on
the
clock,
and
what
I'm
going
to
ask
of
everybody
is
that,
if
the
comment
that
you
want
to
make
doesn't
directly
impact
how
we're
doing
these
ratings,
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
hold
off,
at
least
on
a
lot
of
detail,
maybe
just
say
hey.
I
have
some
issues
with
this.
E
I
want
to
please
put
me
down
for
a
comment
and
we
can
get
into
the
detail
that
we're
dan
and
katie
are
talking
about
right
now
on
wednesday.
I
think
that
would
be
a
better
time
for
that
or
if
we
finish
quick
enough
today,
we
can
circle
back,
but
I'd
like
to
try
to
at
least
get
through
these
ratings.
First
again,
I
don't
want
to
railroad
anybody
if
you're
making
a
comment
that
directly,
you
know
is
trying
to
argue
for
changing
the
way.
We're
doing
these
rankings
absolutely
make
that
comment.
E
E
E
E
E
All
right,
so
the
motion
on
the
floor
is
for
significant,
strong,
sorry,
critical,
strong
on
vision,
zero
program,
any
further
discussion.
E
All
right,
let's
take
the
two
side,
work,
walk
projects
together,
that's
swk001
and
swk002,
both
rated
critical
and
strong
last
year.
Do
I
have
a
motion
so.
U
E
E
See
none
if
you
object
to
this
motion,
please
use
the
raise
your
hand,
feature
george.
Are
you
objecting
or
are
you
asking
to
be
recognized?
I.
E
E
It
so
katie,
if
you
could
note
scott
and
george,
to
comment
on
that.
Is
that
for
both
of
those
or
should
we
put
that
under
zero,
the
defective
hazardous
or
sidewalk
gaps
or
both,
or
are
you
going
to
do
that.
V
I
I
noted
it
on,
I
think
it's
swk01,
because
because
the
the
ada
accessibility
project
makes
reference
to
that,
okay,
so
it
might
be,
it
might
be
a
combination
of
those
two
and
any
others
where
you
think
that,
because
I
noted
a
couple
where
there
was
reference
to
ada
accessibility,
so
it
will
be
a
more
holistic
comment.
E
All
right
so
katie,
if
you
could
message
under
that
project,
right
so
back
to
the
vote
on
this.
If
anybody
objects
to
the
motion,
which
is
significantly
critical
strong
for
both
of
these,
please
raise
your
hand
and
see
none
that
passes.
E
All
right,
let's
dive
into
the
paving
projects,
I'm
going
to
take
pv001,
I'm
going
to
skip
over
the
alley
renovation
for
a
minute,
I'm
going
to
take
pz,
pv-056
and
pv-059
those
three
156
and
59
created
significant
and
strong
last
year.
So
I
have
a
motion.
E
All
right,
let's
take
the
two
alley
projects
together,
that's
six
in
63,
so
six
is
ali
renovation
and
63
is
unpaved
alley
construction.
They
were
both
rated
important
and
moderate.
Last
year,.
B
W
E
E
E
We
can
attach
the
comment
to
this
one
as
well
see.
No,
nobody
is
raising
an
issue.
If
you
object
to
the
motion
of
critical
and
strong
for
pv
104,
please
use
the
raise
your
hand,
feature
that
passes
unanimously.
E
W
T
E
Okay,
we're
gonna,
take
a
big
chunk,
pv
123
through
pv
132
I'll,
read
the
titles.
That's
logan
park,
industrial
bryan
avenue
south
from
50th
to
lake
37th,
avenue,
northeast
residential
neighborhood
reconstruction
projects
and
first
avenue
south
from
lake
to
franklin.
Those
were
all
rated
significant
and
strong.
Last
year.
That's
five
projects.
W
E
Seeing
none,
please
use
the
raise
your
hand
feature
if
you
object
to
the
motion.
E
All
right,
let's
take
pv
140
and
pv
143
to
get
no
sorry,
let's
not
do
that.
Let's
do
pv
140
13th
avenue
northeast
rated,
significant
and
strong
last
year.
A
E
Is
there
any
discussion
significant
and
strong
for
13th
avenue
northeast
pv
140.
go
ahead
dan.
H
Yeah
this
this
is
for
a
comment,
possibly
it's.
It's
listed
here
as
a
as
a
cbr,
but
in
the
presentation
on
the
concrete
rehabilitation
program
they
had
this
thing
listed
as
a
as
part
of
the
concrete
rehabilitation
process
in
the
future.
So
it's
just
a
question
to
ask
which
is
which.
E
Okay,
dan,
maybe
you
maybe
you
could
put
that
in
an
email
to
neil
and
he
can
forward
it
on
to
them.
That
would
be
for
us
to
get
clarified.
Okay.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
The
motion
on
the
floor
is
significant,
strong
I'll
just
say:
let's
go
forward
with
readiness.
If
we
get
information
from
from
back
from
public
works
that,
yes,
we
should
revisit
this.
We
can
do
that
at
that
time.
E
H
E
E
E
H
I
would
rate
that
significant.
B
E
H
No,
but
this
is
involved
with
botnet
and
it's
I
don't
know,
they're
doing
a
bunch
of
stuff
in
this
section
that
it's
it's
kind
of
it's
more
than
important.
Let's
put
it
that
way,.
E
E
The
map
isn't
showing
all
of
it
that
that
red
line
should
extend
all
the
way
down
to
washington
it's
right
through
the
heart
of
downtown.
This
goes
right.
Past
target
center,
all
that
stuff
and
there's
construction
going
on
there.
Now,
maybe
it's
unrelated
construction,
but
there's
construction
on
first
avenue.
Right
now
I
mean
it's
clearly
a
major
thoroughfare
through
the
city.
Right
I
mean
I,
I
certainly
approve
of
significant
strong.
I
don't
know
if
anybody
else
wants
to
be
recognized
and
comment
on
this.
B
B
E
E
E
E
E
All
right,
I'm
going
to
take
a
big
chunk
here.
If
and
well
yeah,
I'm
gonna
take
a
big
chunk
here.
Let's
just
see
what
happens
pv
158
through
pv
167,
that's
seven
projects,
I'll
read
them
off
in
order.
158
is
hennepin
avenue
from
lake
to
douglas.
E
Excuse
me:
160
is
first
avenue
south
from
franklin
to
grant.
161
is
third
street
south
from
hennepin
to
norm
mcgrew
place.
163
is
31st
street
east
from
blaisdell
to
bloomington.
165
is
35th
street
from
nicollet
avenue
to
chicago.
166
is
2nd
street
northeast
from
broadway
to
lowry,
and
167
is
dowling
avenue
north
and
I'm
of
colindale.
E
All
right,
so
that's
seven
projects.
I
want
to
give
everybody
a
minute
to
take
a
look
at
that
in
case.
Anybody
wants
to
break
something
out.
Those
were
all
rated
that
way
last
year.
So
is
there
any
discussion
on
that.
E
See
none,
please
use
the
raise
your
hand
feature
if
you
object
to
this
motion.
E
Holy
cow:
we
got
a
lot
of
paving
projects
all
right,
we're
gonna
do
another
big
chunk
here.
This
is
starting
with
pv
169
through
pv
178
and
again
I'll
read
the
titles.
169
is
38th
street
from
lindale
avenue
to
park.
Avenue
172
is
chicago
avenue
from
lake
street
to
38th
street
174
is
36th
street
from
nicolette
avenue
to
chicago
avenue.
E
W
I
I
have
a
no
issue
with
the
motion,
but
the
lindale
on
38th
street
lindale
to
park.
I
believe
that
the
description
when
you
get
into
it
says
blaisdell
to
park,
so
I
don't
know
which
is
the
real
answer,
but
I
think
I
think
the
city
went
through
and
cut
that
project
short.
So
I
think
the
name
is
wrong
at
any
rate,
if
it's
not
the
name
is
wrong.
The
description
is
wrong
and
it
says
blaze
delta
park.
E
So
scott
we're
pulling
it
up
on
the
screen
right
now.
The
title
is
the
other
part.
Neil.
Can
you
scroll
down
to
the
map
yep
see
what
this
map
looks
like
you
flip
it
up
a
little
bit
so
yeah
you're
right.
It's
got!
The
the
map
shows
blaise
delta
park,
not
lindale
to
park.
A
E
E
B
E
Again,
I
don't
think
that
impacts
the
way
we
want
to
rate
these,
but
it's
something
we
should
get
clarified
and
ask
for
better
attention
to
detail
next
year.
Anything
else
on
this.
This
motion,
just
to
remind
everybody,
we're
talking
about
169
through
178
rated
significant
strong,
is
the
motion
on
the
floor.
E
E
see
none.
Please
use
the
raise
your
hand
feature
if
you
object
to
the
motion
that
passes.
O
O
E
None
please
use
the
raise
your
hand
feature
if
you
object
to
the
motion.
O
Pv
181
18th
avenue
south
em
stately
street
and
then
what's
a
gemma
place
project
description.
The
proposed
project
will
reconfigure
approximately
0.24
miles
of
18th
avenue
south
between
east
24th
and
east
26th
streets
and
0.36
miles
of
the
gema
place
and
em
stately
street
between
cedar
avenue.
O
The
area
along
the
project
corridor
includes
a
range
of
residential
densities,
including
the
little
earth
housing
or
an
urban
development
subsidized
housing
complex
on
the
northern
portion
of
the
segment,
as
well
as
institutions
such
as
daycares
places
of
worship
and
cedar
field
park,
ojama
place
and
em
stately
street
include
a
mix
of
existing
sidewalks
and
gaps,
one-way
and
two-way
traffic
and
two
parking
lanes.
The
area
along
the
segment
of
the
project
corridor
includes
a
range
of
residential
densities
such
as
an
urban
farm
and
vacant
lots.
O
This
included
a
transportation
study
and
the
deployment
of
a
demonstration
project
to
inter
interactively,
engage
with
residents
and
explore
more
permanent
solutions
to
address
ongoing
concerns
related
to
public
safety,
traffic,
livability
and
equity.
This
project
will
help
improve
traffic
safety
for
people,
walking,
rolling
biking
and
driving
and
will
explore
green
storm
water
infrastructure.
O
This
area
of
east
phillips
neighborhood
is
high
priority
for
green
infrastructure,
especially
trees
and
enhanced
vegetation.
It
is
designated
as
the
south
side
green
zone,
a
place
based
policy
initiative
and
improving
health
of
low-income
indigenous
communities
of
color,
which
are
overburdened
by
environmental
conditions
such
as
traffic
and
other
pollutants.
F
E
E
Moving
it
up.
It
sounds
like
they
have
some
more
community
work
to
do,
but
I
don't
think
that
needs
to
means
it
needs
to
be
six
years
out.
It
could
probably
be
two
years
out,
and
you
know
this-
one
just
struck
me
as
one
that
just
it's
a
no-brainer
from
an
equity
perspective,
so
why
not
get
it
done
earlier
rather
than
later?
E
O
O
Currently,
the
corridor
contains
no
roadway,
as
it
was
developed
into
the
old
kmart
in
coordination
with
cped
public
works
is
evaluating
the
redevelopment
potential
of
the
10-acre
site.
The
project
is
a
reconstruction
project
involving
the
entire
right-of-way
and
will
include
new
sidewalks
ada
compliant
pedestrian
ramps,
bicycle
accommodations,
payment
curb
and
gutter
and
utility
improvements.
O
The
project
will
also
include
signal
improvements,
new
signage
and
new
payment
markings
as
needed,
and
this
is
for
300
000
in
2025
and
as
noted
that
as
people
in
the
in
our
q,
a
station
noted
that
we're
missing
one
of
the
revenue
sources
here,
which
is
it
sounds
like
assessments
or
sorry
that
that
streetcar
value
district,
I
think,
is
whatever
that's.
What's
missing.
E
W
E
I
have
no
objection
to
that
rating.
I
would
just
point
out
that
this
I
tried
to
bring
this
out
in
heating
today.
This
is
an
expensive
project
that
they've
made
look
like
it's
not
I
mean,
maybe
not
intentionally,
but
it's
coming
off
like
it's
a
cheap
project
and
it's
not,
and
I
suspect
that
his
that
my
north
of
20
million
dollar
gas
is
going
to
be
correct.
B
You
know
when
I
lived
in
south
minneapolis,
so
we're
we're
kind
of
rectifying
something
that
was
probably
a
bad
choice
with
2020
hindsight.
So
I
think,
as
long
as
we
understand
the
cost
going
into
it,
citywide
that
I
think
we
should
be
transparent
and
city
leaders
need
to
be
and
they
need
to
explain
the
funding
sources.
So
I
agree
with
john
in
that
regard,
but
I
do
think
going
ahead
with
this
significant
strong
on
this.
V
I
agree
with
everything
that
jeff
said,
but
also,
I
think,
just
let's
capture
in
the
notes
to
I'm
not
sure
what
additional
information
they're
going
to
provide
or
whether
they'll
actually
amend
this
form.
But
if
not,
we
should
you
point
out
that
the
need
to
understand
the
overall
causes
of
paramount
importance.
E
Yeah,
no,
I
I
I
so
don't
please
don't
misunderstand
my
this
is
for
every
misunderstand
my
comment
just
to
be
implying
that
if
this
is
really
expensive,
we
shouldn't
do
it.
I
agree
wholeheartedly
that
this
is
an
important
project,
regardless
of
the
price.
It
just
is
really
bothering
me
that
it's
showing
up
on
a
cbr
at
300
thousand
dollars,
when
it's
in
fact
something
20
million
dollars
right,
I
mean
that's
outrageous,
even
if.
E
And
for
just
for
a
little
perspective,
this
project
has
been
around
forever
almost
as
long
as
I've
been
on
click
and
for
years
we
gave
it
really
low
rankings,
because
the
city
didn't
own
the
land
yet,
and
it
was
all
sort
of
a
dream
because
kmart
still
occupied
the
property,
so
we
didn't
want
to
give
any
money
for
this
matter.
Of
fact,
the
joke
I
used
to
make
about
this
is
you
know,
attention
kmart
choppers.
I
So
just
a
piece
of
information.
I
think
I
made
a
couple
inquiries
about
this
over
the
last
two
years
and
I
think
I
don't
know
if
it's
the
cpad
or
the
public
works
was
really
resisting
coming
up
with
a
cbr
for
this
project.
So
it's
a
first
step.
I
guess
that
they've
actually
done
this
but
yeah.
It's
missing
lots
of
information
so.
E
E
E
O
Pv
183
first
avenue
north
washington
to
8th
street
project
description.
The
proposed
project
will
recondition
approximately
0.5
miles
of
first
avenue
north
between
washington
avenue
and
8th
street
north.
Currently,
the
corridor
includes
two
travel
lanes,
standard
bike
lanes
and
on-street
parking
on
each
side.
The
area
along
the
project
corridor
primarily
serves
the
downtown
entertainment
industry,
including
live
music
venues,
restaurants
bars,
retail
and
a
target
center.
The
project
will
focus
on
improving
the
pedestrian
realm
by
expanding
the
sidewalks
and
incorporating
safer
street
crossings.
This
project
involves
an
entire
right-of-way.
O
It
will
include
improved
sidewalks,
ada,
compliant
pedestrian
ramps,
pavement
curb
and
gutter
and
utility
improvements.
The
project
will
also
include
signal
improvements,
new
signage,
green
storm,
water
infrastructure
and
new
payment,
prop
new
payment
markings
as
needed,
and
this
request
is
for
14.7
million
in
2027.
A
T
This
I'll
just
say
I
plan
to
make
a
an
inquiry,
and
I
wish
I
had
found
or
noted
this
earlier,
but
it
says
the
proposed
project
will
recondition
the
street
and
I
don't
entirely
know
what
that
means.
E
E
So
thank
you
for
everybody's
diligence
on
this
we're
going
to
move
to
the
bridge
projects
and
that
will
be
it
for
ratings
and
then
we'll
have
I
plan
to
give
you
guys
back
a
whole
bunch
of
time,
but
I
want
to
take
a
few
minutes
after
we're
done
with
this
to
just
talk
about
next
week
and
then,
if
anybody
has
anything
they
want
to
ask
or
express,
we
can
do
that
as
well.
So
with
bridge
projects,
let's
take
br
101,
that's
major
bridge
repair
and
rehab
br
127.
E
W
E
All
right
hearing,
none,
please
use
the
raise
your
hand
feature
if
you
object
to
the
motion.
E
G
W
M
O
Do
you
want
to
read
you
want
me
to
read
it
too?
Well
sure
why
not
br
133
cedar
lake
road
bridge
over
bnsf
railroad
project
description,
the
proposed
project
will
reconstruct
approximately
280
feet
of
cedar
lake
road
bridge
over
bnsf
between
morgan
avenue,
south
and
cedar
lake
road
bridge
over
cp,
rail
and
bassett
creek.
O
Currently,
the
corridor
includes
142
foot
bridge
that
spans
over
bnsf
railroad.
The
approach
road
includes
at
grade
unpredicted
bike
lanes
in
both
directions,
cubic
vehicular
lanes
and
sidewalks
on
both
sides
of
the
road
roadway.
The
area
along
the
project
corridor
includes
residential
single-family
homes,
park
area
owned
and
operated
by
the
minneapolis
park
and
recreation
board
and
bnsf
railway
under
crossing
the
project
is
a
bridge
reconstruction
project
involving
the
entire
right-of-way
and
will
include
bridge
replacement,
new
sidewalks,
ada
compliant
pedestrian
ramps,
bicycle
accommodations,
pavement,
curb
and
gutter
and
utility
improvements.
O
The
project
will
also
include
lighting
improvements,
new
signage
and
new
payment
markings
as
needed,
and
the
request
is
in
2026
it's
for
seven,
seven
million
and
forty
seven
thousand
and
six
hundred
ninety
seven
dollars
in
2027.
It's
for
one
point:
six
million
dollars.
H
Okay,
yeah,
I
I
don't
want
to
get
into
too
much
conversation
about
this
respecting
your
decision,
but
I
do
find
this
interesting
that
its
level
of
need
is
significant,
but
the
priority
is
60
of
60.
H
that
given,
if
you
look
at
the
map,
there's
a
very
interesting
connection
here,
that's
going
to
get
made
to
bassett
creek
park
to
burn
mall
park,
and
that's
that
to
me
is
more
than
I
think
that's
significant.
H
So
I
would,
I
would
move
to
rate
this
significant.
E
All
right,
let
me
recognize
jeff
and
then
we'll
circle
back
to
see
if
that's
considered
friendly,
go
ahead.
Jeff.
B
It's
critical,
but
you
know
things
are
relative
in
the
entire
infrastructure
framework,
and
so
not
everything
can
be
critical.
Not
everything
can
be
significant,
so
I
kind
of
get
the
why
we
had
this
lower
rating
and
the
city
is
responsible,
but
it's
not.
The
city
doesn't
own.
The
infrastructure,
apparently.
M
E
You
scroll
back
up,
please
kneel
to
the
description
area.
This
this
bridge
is
owned
by
the
railroad,
but
there's
an
agreement
that
the
city
is
responsible
for
maintenance
on
it,
which
begs
the
question
that
when,
if
and
when
the
bridge
needs
replacement,
is
that
then
on
the
railroad
or
is
that
on
the
city?
It's
not
clear
from
the
way
that's
worded,
which
is
which
to
me.
It's
implied
that
it's
not
the
city,
that
the
city
is
only
responsible
for
maintenance,
which
of
course,
you
know.
E
That's
an
interesting
question
right
I
mean
if
they
were
going
to
be.
What's
the
word
strategically
clever,
but
not
very
honest
about
that
agreement.
You
know
they
could
let
the
bridge
fall
into
disrepair
and
say:
hey
railroad
time
to
replace
the
bridge.
E
E
I
think
I
did
it,
I'm
tight,
it
was
you,
I'm
fine.
All
right.
Are
you?
Okay,
I'm
changing
it.
Okay,
so
we're
moving
this
to
significant
strong.
E
Sorry,
yes,
you're
right
significant
moderate!
Is
there
any
further
discussion
on
that
motion.
E
See
none
if
you
object
to
the
motion,
please
use
the
raise
your
hand
feature
all
right.
Bronzer.
T
Question
you
would
mention
it's
probably
worth
some
inquiries
who
would
like
to
take
the
lead
on
that.
E
If
no
one
else
will
do
it
I'll,
do
it
dan,
if
you
or
somebody
else
wants
to
do
it
feel
free.
H
H
A
piece
that
we
could
share
next
week
and
figure
out,
of
course,.
E
O
Would
you
also
do
me
a
favor,
so
if
you're
going
to
email
me
or
like
staff
about
like
a
question,
will
you
also
just
park
it?
I
I've
been
trying
to
circulate
them
all
in
that
click
inquiries
document
too.
But
if
you
have
a
question
like,
can
you
put
it
also
in
there.
O
E
The
only
reason
I
see
anyways
that's
how
we
used
to
do
it
in
the
past,
but
that's
fine,
that's
more
efficient!
There's,
no
reason
to
take
extra
steps.
Yeah!
That's!
I
think,
that's
great
all
right
so
for
everybody
where
we
talked
about
emailing
neil,
unless
you're
uncomfortable
doing
that
or
have
any
technology
issues
just
do
what
he
suggested,
which
is
go
to
sharepoint
and
put
your
inquiries
and
he'll
make
sure
that
people
are
alerted
that
there's
questions
they
need
to
respond
to
in
there
yeah
exactly
and
just
to
be
clear.
E
I
I
dan
you're
wanting
to
talk
about
this
is
in
line
with
changing
the
recommendation,
so
I
I
absolutely
do
not
want
to
cut
off
any
conversation
about
that.
It
was
just
if
we're
going
to
get
into
a
long
conversation
about
comments.
I
would
like
to
hold
off
on
that
to
get
through
all
these,
but
I'm
not
trying
to
short
circuit
anything
here.
People
have
things
they
want
to
say
that
relate
to
how
we're
rating
these
right.
Now,
then,
that's
absolutely
disgusting.
We
should
be
having
all
right
all
right.
Dan.
E
All
right
so
down
to
the
last
one
here:
br
135.
This
is
glittery
avenue
south
over
the.
What
is
that
hennepin
county
railroad.
E
Gotcha
all
right,
this
was
rated
significant
and
moderate
last
year,.
E
T
Yeah,
I
was
just
gonna
say
I
think
there
I
mean.
I
don't
know
why
we
said
moderate
last
year,
but
this
is
near
carmel
mall,
and
so
anyway,
it's
it's
heavily
utilized,
and
just
if
we're
thinking
about
equity
issues,
I
think
this
would
be
another
one
that
we
want
to
like.
Make
sure
that
we're
addressing
seagulls
like
this
is
a
way
to
help
address
any
goals.
V
Yeah,
I
support
that.
I,
in
fact
I
lobbied
for
a
higher
rating
last
year,
just
ride
your
bike
underneath
that
bridge
and
I'm
not
a
bridge
expert.
But
it's
you
know
so
it
looks
like
it's
over
100.
E
All
right
jeff
go
ahead.
B
Okay,
so
I
know
I'll
be,
this
will
be
unwelcome
comment
but
I'll
just
say
from
a
parochial
viewpoint
and
having
lived
in
south
minneapolis,
you
know
what
are
their
41
bridges
was
that
the
number
of
bridges
on
the
historic
greenway
that
you
know
we
as
a
city
also
have
to
consider
what
is
the
total
cost
for
all
bridge
replacements?
B
You
know
not
exactly
what
was
said,
but
you
know
there
are
limits
to
how
much
capital
improvement
funding
we
have
as
a
city,
and
so
this
is
just
something
that
the
past
20
years
we've
talked
about
a
historic
corridor
that
has
a
bridge
nearly
every
block
and
it
will
be
a
huge
long-term
cost.
So
that's
my
point.
E
E
E
E
So
that
next
week's
task
is
going
to
be
to
to
start
diving
into
comments
and
when
I
say
that
what
really
needs
to
happen
to
the
extent
that
it's
possible,
if
people
can
get
stuff
authored
between
now
and
then
and
get
it
into
the
sharepoint
folder,
we'll
use
that
to
for
our
jump
off
spot
next
week,
there's
some
maybe
I'll
talk
about
it
now,
there's
some
logistical
we're
not
oh,
we
are
being
recorded.
Is
this
an
official
public
meeting
right
now?
E
A
E
There's
a
few
logistical
things
I
want
to
talk
about.
I
think
I'll
actually
wait
till
next
week
when
we're
together
to
go
over
some
of
that
things
are
for
those
of
you
that
well
just
everybody's
been
around
you
know.
These
meetings
were
not
previously
recorded
before
the
pandemic.
They've
always
been
open
to
the
public,
but
the
reality
is
the
public
has
never
shown
up
at
them.
E
Don't
know
what's
going
to
happen
going
forward,
but
there
is
a
bit
of
a
change
to
the
way
we're
doing
this
they're
they're
slightly
more
formal
now
that
it's
one
of
the
effects
of
of
the
pandemic
so
I'll
discuss
that
a
little
bit
at
the
start
of
the
meeting
next
week.
I
think
the
prep
for
between
now
and
then
is
again
anybody's,
welcome
to
make
a
comment
about
anything.
I'll.
Just
reiterate
this.
I
think
everybody
knows
this,
but
if
you
want
to
make
an
hd
comment,
you
don't
need
to
ask
anybody's
permission.
E
If
you
can
access
the
sharepoint,
that's
the
best
way
to
do.
It
is
write
the
comment
and
put
it
in
there
and
let
them
address
it
in
their
subcommittee
and
same
for
our
task
force.
If
you've
got
a
comment,
you'd
like
to
make
stick
it
draft
it
and
put
it
into
the
folder
and
we'll
try
to
address
those
next
week.
E
This
is
pretty
much
what
we're
going
to
do
for
the
rest
of
may
so,
to
the
extent
that
people
can
get
stuff
done
before
our
meeting.
I
think
we'll
be
able
to
have
a
more
productive
meeting,
so
that
would
be
great
if
anybody
has
any
questions
about
anything
or
wants
to
collaborate
with.
Somebody
else
feel
free
to
communicate
with
one
another
offline
about
that
or,
if
you
want
to
get
through
me,
for
whatever
reason
you're
welcome
to
do
that
too.
E
That's
not
necessary,
I'm
just
offering
that
if
somebody
wants
to
do
it
that
way,
I
think
that's
everything
I
have
to
say
about
that.
Jeff
has
his
hand
up
and.
B
It
would
be
helpful
and
because
I'm
looking
and
have
been
working
in
the
sharepoint
click
inquiries,
but
I've
had
difficulty
with
different
devices.
So
for
my
ipad,
for
example,
no
luck
accessing
sharepoint.
It
seems
to
want
to
bring
me
back
to
my
former
employers
account
which
of
course
I
no
longer
have,
but
maybe
resending.
The
links
to
us
would
be
a
quick
helpful
for
that
transportation.
B
E
So
let
me
before
I
recognize
dan.
Let
me
just
jump
in
on
that,
so
this
is
a
bit
of
a
change
we're
going
to
try
to
use
the
sharepoint
this
year.
I
have
a
few
concerns
about
that
that
we're
trying
to
address
one
is
once
we
have
a
comment
finalized,
I'm
not
suggesting
that
there
would
be
any
intent,
but
somebody
could
unintentionally
make
changes
to
a
comment.
E
That's
been
finalized,
so
we
need
talking
with
neil
about
how
we're
going
to
address
that
we'll
figure
out
something
on
that,
but
so
we're
asking
everybody
to
try
to
use
the
sharepoint
if,
for
some
reason,
technology
does
not
allow
you
to
do
that.
Please
contact
neil
or
me
and
we'll
figure
out
a
way
to
make
sure
that
you're
included.
I
don't
want
anybody
to
feel
like
they
can't
participate
because
they
can't
access
that
stuff.
But
let's
try
to
use
that.
E
O
All
right,
okay,
so
here's
the
we're
in
the
transportation
task
force
subfolder
in
2022.
O
We
have
this
main
excel
document
where
you
guys
can
just
track
the
progress
of
each
comment:
who's
working
on
them,
yeah
project
topic,
the
lead
contributors
and
then
the
status,
I
think,
will
be
very
important.
So
please
just
like
write
in
progress
if
you're
still
working
on
it
and
then
when
it's
done,
please
write
that
you're
done
with
it
and
then
for
the
actual
comments.
Space
that
were,
I
was
hoping
to
have
everyone
go
into,
would
be
in
here
in
the
transportation
comments
for
possible
inclusion.
O
So
this
is
where
you
can
list
again
your
project,
your
lead
and
contributors,
and
then
the
comment
you're
drafting.
I
think
it
probably
is
wise
just
to
have
a
another
column
off
to
the
side.
Here
that
says
there
we
go
in
progress
or
complete.
O
So
yeah,
so
then
we
have
that
and
then
so
separately.
I
think
I
was
trying
to.
I
was
trying
to
set
up
a
separate
space
where
the
like
this,
like
final
master
document,
would
hold
like
the
com
like
absolute
completed
comments,
I'm
still
trying
to
work
on
some
of
the
permissions,
but
I
I
think
I
ran
into
a
few
issues
yesterday.
I
don't
know
katie
if
you
had
a
chance
to
try
to
go
into
the
other
folder,
but
I
think
I've
locked
everyone
out.
O
O
So
here's
your
main
here's
your
main
space.
If
you
come
down
to
this
like
documents,
little
subfolder
down
here,
you
can
go
to
transportation,
task
force
and
then
there's
a
list
of
years
and
then
you
go
to
2022
and
then
you'll
have
all
those
documents
right.
There.
E
Thank
you.
Okay,
with
that
dan
go
ahead,.
H
Okay,
I
think
what
I
understand
that
I'm
supposed
to
do
is
to
make
the
comment
and
put
it
into
your
document.
That's
about
possible
inclusion.
Is
that
correct.
O
H
H
Yeah
and
then
just
one
side
comment
to
this:
the
the
click,
the
the
department
comments
back
to
click,
questions
which
you
had
emailed
is
that
someplace.
In
this
thing,
I
couldn't
find
it
in
the
trans
in
I
couldn't
find
it
anyway.
O
Okay,
so
you're
talking
about
the
clicking
queries
yeah,
I
think
yeah.
So
if
you're
in
here
on
the
main
page,
if
there's
just
this
quick
links,
section,
there's
clicking
queries
off
to
the
side
here.
Okay,
if
you
come
into
here,
it's
a
just
a
spreadsheet
and.
O
Last
year's
questions,
and
then
this
year's
questions,
so
this
is
where
people
have
been
responding
yeah.
So
I
see
yeah.
It
looks
like
we
have
a
list
of
questions
here
so
yeah.
I
would
just
keep
adding
stuff,
adding
your
questions
here
and
then
I'm
just
directing
the
different
submitting
agencies
to
respond
in
here.
Super.
O
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think
I
think
if
you
I
mean
I'm
trying
to
limit
how
many
questions
that
go
to
submitting
agencies
but
like
if
you
are
asking
a
question
to
the
submitting
agency,
I
would
like
also
prefer
that
you
put
it
here
and
then,
if
you
get
a
side
answer
from
them
like
also
like
cc
me
or
you
know,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
all
have
access
to
the
same
information.
Okay.
So
if
we
can
kind
of
collectively
try
to
put
it
all
in
this,
this
document,
I'd
really
appreciate
it
all.
M
T
O
Okay,
so
I
think
at
this
point
I
think
john
and
katie,
you
only
you
two
have
access
to
that
master
document
and
no
one
else
does
and
then
I
think
eric
and
jocelyn
are
the
only
ones
that
copies
or
have
access
to
theirs.
So,
like
at
least
you
guys
can
be
like
the
administrators
of
those
of
that
document.
E
Sounds
good,
does
anybody
else
have
any
questions
or
concerns
they'd
like
to
raise
now.
V
T
Neil
another
question
for
you,
so
I
added
the
new
questions
to
the
inquiries
sheet:
they're,
just
the
four
or
five
at
the
bottom
that
don't
have
any
answers.
So
can
you
just
run
from
there
and
ask
public
works
the
questions.
I
I
have
a
question
all
right,
so
I
think
we
have
multiple
dates
where
we're
going
to
discuss
comments.
That's.
E
I
E
No
any
comments
you
want
to
write
so
if
you're,
if
there's
a
comment,
you
want
to
write
about
ada
and
you
haven't
heard
back
from
public
works,
yet
you
clearly
can't
do
that
comment
yet
there's!
No!
No
we're
not
going
to
say
sorry,
it's
too
late
for
that
or
anything
like
that.
If
you
feel
like
you
can
write
it
pending,
what
you
hear
from
them
go
for
it.
If
you
feel
like
you
want
to
see
what
they
have
to
say.
First
then
wait.
We've
got
three
meetings
of
this
stuff.
O
Yep
so
wednesday
may
4th
that's
work
on
comments
and
then
the
may
11th
meeting
and
then
we
have
another
may
18th,
meaning
for
working.
E
Comments:
we've
got
the
next
three
meetings,
two
hours
each
to
work
on
comments,
so
all
I'm
asking
is
that,
to
the
extent
anybody's
got
any
comments
that
they
can
get
written
before
next
wednesday
it'll
make
our
meeting
more
efficient.
I
know
some
comments
won't
be
ready
yet
or
there'll
be
things
that
come
up
later,
that
nobody's
thought
of
yet,
and
that's
fine
we'll
get
to
those
when
we
get
to
those
whatever
people
can
do
now,
I'm
asking
you
to
do
that's
it.
E
All
right
scene,
none!
Thank
you!
Everybody
for
your
time
on
this
today.
We'll
officially
adjourn-
and
I
guess
you
know,
do
you
guys
have
a
target
on
when
the
spreadsheet
will
get
distributed
to
everybody
for
waiting.
E
E
Anybody
else
before
we
close
all
right
thanks
again
everybody.
I
appreciate
everybody's.
This
was
a
long
one
today
and
I
think
we
we
were
efficient
and
got
everything
done,
but
did
so
in
a
thoughtful
manner.
So
again,
I
really
appreciate
everybody's
cooperation
and
collaboration
around
that
enjoy
the
weekend.