►
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
B
Did
you
want
me
to
get
through
the
past
the
agenda
and
then
you
can
comment?
Okay?
That
would
be
great.
Thank
you
good
afternoon.
Welcome
to
this
live
broadcast
of
our
virtual
meeting.
This
meeting
includes
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statutes.
Section
13d
point
two:
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic,
the
city
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
in
youtube
channel
as
means
of
increased
increasing
public
awareness,
access
and
transparency.
B
B
I
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order.
The
open
meeting
law
requires
a
roll
call
vote
be
conducted
during
a
virtual
meeting
and
a
certification
form
will
be
completed
for
each
local
board.
Meeting.
This
initial
roll
call
will
allow
the
city
assessor
to
complete
the
certification
form
on
behalf
of
the
board
members
with
a
verbal
signature.
F
G
H
I
B
C
Fair
bland,
thank
you
again
for
your
time
and
for
coming
back
this
afternoon.
I
know
that
was
a
short
turnaround
time
between
the
am
and
the
pm
session.
So
thank
you
very
much.
I
believe
we
have
approximately
18
cases
for
you
this
afternoon,
in
addition
to
reading
in
some
a
list
of
recommended
values
for
you
that
we've
reserved
some
time
at
the
end
of
this
session
for
the
1
to
2
p.m,
session.
We
have
nine
hearings
that
have
been
scheduled.
C
However,
we
have
not
heard
back
from
the
first
four
of
those,
and
I
am
seeing
that
we
did.
We
did
have
one
pers.
We
have
two
other
people
on
the
line,
so
you
can
go
ahead
and
get
started
with
agenda.
Item
number
three.
However,
I
do
not
believe
we
have
item
agenda
items
three,
four,
five
or
six
on
the
call.
E
Share
bland
and
assessor
malm
malmquist
items,
one
and
two
are
roll
call
and
adoption
of
the
agenda
and
the
business
starts
with
item
number
three.
B
B
First,
we
will
call
upon
the
applicant
who
will
be
given
five
minutes
to
present
their
appeal
when
your
case
is
called,
you
will
need
to
press
star
6
on
your
phone
to
activate
your
microphone
and
wait
to
hear
the
pre-recorded
message
before
speaking.
We
ask
that
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
present
your
appeal
to
the
board.
B
Next,
we'll
call
on
the
assessor
staff.
If
there
is
someone
present,
they
will
have
five
minutes
and
the
board
will
consider
and
take
action
at
the
end
of
each
hourly
grouping.
Property
owners
are
notified
of
the
decision
by
mail
after
the
board
has
adjourned
with
that.
Let's
begin
with
the
appeals
deal
application
for
35,
45,
18th
avenue
south
case
number,
22-0449.
B
The
applicant
is
courtney,
klingen
is
the
applicant
on
the
board
on
the
line.
B
Thank
you.
Do
the
board
members
have
any
comments
or
questions
at
this
point
regarding
this
case
hearing
none
will
we
will
move
on
to
the
next
item?
Appeal
application
for
4730,
xerxes
avenue
north
case
number.
E
B
B
Thank
you,
discussion
of
questions
by
the
boy.
B
Yep
questions
from
the
boy.
B
D
President,
madam
chair,
the
applicant,
is
on
the
line
and
unmuted.
Please
you
will
have
five
minutes
to
present
for
each
of
these
properties.
They
are
the
next
four.
J
Okay,
good
afternoon
everybody,
this
is
mike
fetterson,
I'm
calling
in
about
32
20
blades
I'll
have
new
south.
It's
actually
there's
four
coming
up,
including
this
one.
J
One
is
not
like
the
other
three,
but
these
three
that
we'll
go
through
today,
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
the
tax
increase,
because
I
have
about
40
properties
in
minneapolis
and
for
some
reason
these
had
elevated
tax
increases
anywhere
from
10
to
11
percent,
and
I'm
trying
to
understand,
because
all
my
buildings
are
within
15
minutes
of
each
other
and
all
the
buildings
I'm
bringing
up
today.
J
I've
had
for
a
number
of
years,
but
suddenly
there's
a
spike
of
a
10
to
12
percent
increase
in
taxes,
but
it
doesn't
hit
all
my
buildings
and
it
doesn't
hit
buildings
within
500
feet
of
each
other.
So
I'm
trying
to
understand
the
rhyming
reason
of
it.
That's
that's
really.
What
I'm
trying
to
understand.
J
Well,
I've
had
it
for
about
12
years
and
we've
really
done
nothing
with.
It
was
a
foreclosure
and
it
was
in
good
shape.
He
just
walked
away
from
it
with
the
bank,
and
my
tax
increases
have
been
consistent
every
year,
but
not
at
ten
percent.
So
I'm
trying
to
just
I'm
trying
to
understand
the
justification.
Why
suddenly
there's
a
ten
percent
increase
on
it.
B
Okay,
we
need
to
take
each
one
of
these
separately,
mr
patterson,
if
you
will.
I
B
Play
along
here
next
is
the
appeal
for
32
30
nicolette
avenue
case
number
22-0456.
J
This
is
a
bigger
building.
This
again
I
bought
about
12
years
ago.
The
increase
again
is
10
percent.
This
building
is
literally
across,
maybe
a
block
away
from
the
left
we
just
talked
about.
This
is
on
nicolette
versus
blaisdell
and
again
it's
a
10.2
percent
increase
which
our
rents
are
not
going
up.
We
have
a
lot
of
vacancies,
so
I
I
can't,
I
don't
understand
the
justification
for
the
tax
increase.
J
I
guess
because
I
have
about
12
buildings
on
nicolette,
about
10
on
blaisdell
and
only
a
handful
got
major
increases,
even
though
they
all
get
three
to
four.
Every
year
I
had
this
handful,
I'm
talking
about
today,
I'll
get
10
to
12.
So
again,
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
the
justification
where
these
numbers
are
coming
from.
B
Thank
you.
The
next
appeal
is
for
the
property
at
2220
grand
avenue
south
case
number
22-0457,
mr
pedersen,.
J
Thank
you.
This
is
a
duplex
and
the
taxes
went
up
20
and
again
this
is
a
rental
property
we're
trying
to
keep
rents
down.
I
don't
understand
why
it
went
up
20
percent
again,
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
the
rationalization.
We
can't
maintain
rents.
We
cannot
keep
renters
with
a
20
tax
increase
and
I've
had
this
building
for
six
years.
So
it's
not
a
new
purchase,
no
new
financing.
So
again,
I
I
don't
understand
the
justification
again
for
a
20
tax
increase.
J
Thank
you
and
again
I'm
not
trying
to
be
a
negative
or
repeating
myself,
but
this
I
just
pulled
up
these
four,
and
this
is
the
last
one.
So
thank
you
for
your
time.
This
one
again
is
up
this
one's
up.
10.2
percent
and
again
there's
nothing
different
than
this
than
all
the
other
buildings
I
just
brought
up.
We
have
not
done
any
major
remodels,
so
there's
nothing
different
going
on
the
rents
have
stayed
the
same
so
and
I've
had
this
one
for
over
10
years
also.
J
So
I
again,
I
don't
understand
the
justification
for
these
particular
out
of
the
three
out
of
the
four
went
up
to
ten
to
twelve
percent
and
that
went
up
to
twenty
percent.
All
the
rest
of
my
buildings.
My
portfolio
went
up
two
to
four
percent,
which
is
manageable,
with
our
rent
increases.
But
again
it's
just
these
four,
I'm
just
questioning
it.
I'm
not
challenge
I'm
challenging
it,
but
I
just
want
to
understand
the
rationale.
That's
what
I'm
trying
to
so
I
can
run
my
business
more
efficiently
every
year
too.
So
that's
it.
B
Thank
you,
mr
pettison's
board
members.
Here's
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
of
mr
edison
before
he's
no
longer
on
the
line
with
us.
H
I
have
some
questions
for
the
app
appellant
sure
this
is
mr
palmer,
hello,
I'm
looking
at.
Let's
just
take
the
first
one
3220
blaisdell,
I
I
think
you're
looking
at
the
tax
increases
on
that
so
you're
paying
the
taxes
on
what
the
value
was
last
year
of
a
million
679
000.
the
value
this
year
for
22
on
that
one
actually
only
increased
3.1
percent.
H
So
I
I
haven't
looked
at
the
other
ones,
but
I
think
the
increase
in
value
that
we're
talking
about
is
less
than
the
tax
increase
you
have,
which
is
actually
a
change
in
value
from
the
2020
to
the
21..
So
that's
one
discrepancy.
I
just
want
you
to
clear
that
up.
Okay,
the
second
one
is
you
say
your
rents
are
going
down.
So
if
what
I'm
going
to
take
the
first
building
you've
got,
it's
got
six
one
bedrooms,
six
two
bedrooms
and
two
three
bedrooms
is
that
correct,
3220,
blaisdell.
J
Yeah
some
of
those
were
one
bedrooms
at
the
last
one
converted
into
two
bedrooms,
so
they're,
really
not
that
large.
So
yeah.
H
J
A
G
H
Okay
and
then
and
you're
vacant,
so
you
don't
talk
about
that.
What
what
was
in
these
buildings?
What's
your
vacancy
percent
and
22
is?
Is
it
above
five
percent.
J
H
Okay,
I
you
know
it
what
these
cases
are
really
hard
to
to
do
on
a
local
level,
because
you
know
to
really
get
into
them.
We
should
have
income,
expense
statements
and
that
type
of
thing
on
them,
so
I
hesitate
to
do
a
lot
of
moves
on
it.
H
I'm
just
trying
to
tell
you
where
the
assessment
came
from
here-
and
I
do
know
that
working
with
apartments
last
few
years
that,
even
though
rents
have
flattened
out
a
little
bit
compared
to
the
when
they
went
up
a
few
years
ago,
the
cap
capitalization
rates
have
continued
to
stay
the
same
or
go
down
which
it
causes
an
increase
in
value.
So
that's
just
the
market
being
what
it
is.
H
J
Yeah
and
my
general
comment
is
when
we're
trying
to
push
through
rent
control
and
if
taxes
go
up,
ten
percent
and
rent
can
only
go
up
three
percent
and
our
vacancies
keep
going
down
and
going
up
and
we're
dropping
our
rents
or
giving
a
month
free
it
doesn't.
It
doesn't
make
sense.
There's
it's
not
sustainable.
F
My
question
or
not
question
but
comment
is
going
forward.
Anybody
analyzing
income
property
such
as
this,
and,
as
mr
palmer
said,
you
know,
incoming
expenses
are
important.
That
is
very
important
too
for
helping
analyze
these
properties
so
any
further
or
any
other
reviews
that
you
request
it
would
be
great
to
supply
those
for
analysis.
J
Sure-
and
I
I
would
do
anything
you
guys
would
ask
I
just
you
know:
I've
been
doing
this
for
30
years
and
I've
never
challenged
ever
in
my
life
taxes.
I
just
haven't
because
they've
been
very
moderate,
we
can
handle
it,
we
can
absorb
and
we
can
plan,
but
when
I'm
getting
10
to
20
increases,
that's
pretty
aggressive,
we're
not
getting
those
kind
of
rents
and
our
expenses
are
definitely
not
going
down
to
cover
that.
So
that's
the
reason
why
I'm
challenging
I
want
to
be
a
good
landlord.
J
B
Thank
you,
mr
patterson.
We
will
thank.
J
B
Okay
board
members:
we
will
be.
B
Looking
at
these
appeals
and
making
some
decisions,
so
let's
start
with
the
first
one:
go
back
to
the
beginning:
appeal
application
for
35,
45,
13th
avenue
yourself
by
the
way
before
we
continue
with
this,
I
want
to
clarify
something
I
talked
about
this
morning.
If
we
have
a
a
motion
that
is
not
seconded,
it
will
die
for
the
lack
of
second,
and
somebody
else
can
make
a
motion
or
somebody
can
second
it
even
if
they
disagree
with
it.
B
So
we
can
have
discussion
in
either
case
until
we
have
a
second,
we
can't
really
discuss
the
motion.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
you
understand
either
way
is
acceptable,
whether
you,
whether
we
not
not,
second,
something
or
second
it
only
for
us
to
be
able
to
make
have
discussion.
However,
if
there
is
no
second,
somebody
needs
to
make
another
motion,
not
just
spin
and
stare
at
each
other,
so
be
involved.
Okay,
that's
my
lecture
for
the
afternoon
appeal:
application
for
35,
45,
18th
avenue
south
case
number,
22-0449.
F
A
discussion
would
be
from
remember:
bedertha
is
the
appraisal.
345
000
late
in
2021
might
be
a
an
indication
that
our
value
or
the
assessor's
value
of
409
might
be
a
little
high.
H
This
is
mr
palmer.
I
I
would
agree
again.
I
I
think
the
comps
are
pretty
close
on
those
to
the
to
the
actual
subject
on
that
appraisal.
They
have
if
the
date
is
september.
21
I
my
my
take
is
it
should
be
a
little
higher
than
this
appraisal,
there's
still
something
at
the
end
of
the
year.
The
values
were
still
going
up,
but
that
would
be
you
know
something
north
of
this
345
just
slightly
north
of
that
would
be,
I
think,
a
fair
value.
B
And
without
the
same
opinion
that,
starting
with
the
appraisal,
then
I'm
about
six
months
old
and
a
few
months
old
by
the
of
the
year
that
345
is
kind
of
starting
point
and
where
we
go
from
there
on
the
block,
350
355
would
be
a
possibility.
F
I
I
moved
to
reduce
the
value
to
355
and
I
believe
that's
what
the
owner
requested
too.
B
Removed
by
the
derpa
and
second
bioma
to
reduce
the
value
of
35,
45
18th
avenue
south
to
355.
I
K
B
Motion
carries
next.
We
have
the
appeal
for
4730
xerxes
avenue
north.
Are
there
questions
or
discussion
from
the
board
members
regarding
this
property.
H
My
only
discussion
is
that
she
didn't
provide
any
information
except
it
was
too
high.
I
believe
we
did.
We
have
one
earlier
on
xerxes
north
this
morning
and
it
was
a
totally
different
property,
a
lot
larger,
but
it
ended
up.
We
didn't
do
anything
with
that
value,
so
I
given
no
information.
I
I
guess
I
would
tend
to
just
hold
the
value.
B
It
really
was
going
to
the
only
information
provided
was
there
were
no
improvements
or
maintenance
for
20
years.
Okay,
the
owner
sees
the
value
at
149,
000.,
two
or
three
years
ago
is
assessed
at
1795..
B
I
can
say
that
you
know
nothing,
but
you
know
even
dog
houses
sell
for
more
than
149
these
days,
so
that's
kind
of
a
in
the
sky
idea
that
we
at
149
as
a
reasonable
price.
B
C
B
And
the
property
owner
really
hasn't
done
that
in
this
case,
that's
correct.
Thank
you,
mr
simon.
Is
there
motion.
B
Okay,
so
you
can
move
by
the
dirt
side
and
second
and
by
palmer,
to
sustain
the
value
of
4730
xerxes
avenue
north
quickly.
Please
call
the.
I
K
B
We
have
field
application
for
18,
16
third
avenue
north
case
number,
220451.
F
Again,
this
is
member
bergertha,
there's
a
recent
appraisal
after
the
appraisal
date.
Of
course
it
was
in
april
of
this
year
just
weeks
ago.
I
guess
and
there's
a
sale.
It
must
be.
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
pending
sale,
because
it
isn't
even
22nd
here
is
it
above.
270
appraisal
is
274.,
and
this
looks
like
a
sale
of
270.,
so
I
think
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
reducing
it
down
towards
that
level.
H
H
I
did
notice
for
this
area
that
and
its
appraisal
to
me.
This
is
the
right
one.
This
house
for
this
area
was
built
in
1995,
so
it
must
have
been
vacant
or
a
tear
down
and
then
rebuilt
in
in
1995,
because
there's
all
his
comps
are
much
older
than
that.
So
I
it's,
I
don't
know
how
you
can
call
them
comps
or
if
that's
really
good
indication,
but
just
the
point
that
this
house
is
is
a
lot
newer
in
in
this
neighborhood
than
most
of
them.
B
I
noticed
that
too,
the
two
of
the
cops
are
over
100
years
old
compared
to
something
was
built
in
95,
so
that
book
you
know,
calls
into
question,
and
I
and
I
looked
at
the
appraisal,
there
was
no
adjustment
made
for
on
age
of
property.
So
that's
a
little
concerning.
I
also.
It
also
has
an
attached
garage,
which
I
assure
you
nothing
else
in
the
neighborhood.
Has
some
of
them
don't
even
have
garages
at
all
the.
B
B
So
346
does
seem
high
to
me,
even
though
it's
a
new
property,
but
I
have
no
idea
how
high.
H
Yeah,
I
I
would
agree,
I
would
just-
and
I
don't
know
the
number,
but
if,
if
you
made
adjustments
for
the
age,
you'd
have
to
at
least
come
up
with
20
000
or
something
on
that
which,
to
my
mind
it
should
be.
It
should
be
at
least
300
000
for
a
newer
property
at
just
than
the
limited
information
that
we
have.
B
Yeah,
the
fact
that
we
have
an
appraisal
really
throws
things
off,
because
you
would
we
tend
to
rely
on
those
appraisals,
but
there's
such
a
discrepancy
here
that
it
makes
it
hard
to
you
know,
know
where
to
go
with
that.
B
And
by
the
way
they
I
think
the
offer
that
they
got
was
20
000
over
their
ass,
so
they
were
at
250.
They
got
a
370
offer
and
then
it
appraised,
it's
275
that
I
see
270
only
the
250
and
then
it
crazed
at
274..
F
I
had
a
quick
question.
I
was
looking
on
the
appraisal
night
and
I
apologize
because
I
didn't
know
it
was
a
brand
new
building.
I
hadn't
paid
that
close
attention
to
that,
but
I
was
wondering
some
of
these
others,
I'm
looking
for
the
on
the
appraisal
of
the
date
or
age
of
the
building,
where
it
is.
If
these
are
these
all
other
ones,
in
the
the.
F
F
B
I
B
H
I'll
just
mention
that
the
only
thing
she
says
is,
it's,
the
felon
says:
deferred
maintenance
and
no
driveway
or
the
assessors
have
it
as
fair
quality
and
average
minus
condition,
and
the
value
is
only
130
000
with
no
further
information.
I
would
hold
this
value.
B
It's
not
unusual
in
that
area
that
there
are
no
garages
there's
a
couple
of
really
small
lots.
There
are
two
properties
that
sold
within
a
couple
of
blocks
of
that
property
is
just
north
of
edison
high
school
and
the
other
two
sold
for
243
and
210.
B
Neither
one
had
a
garage
nor
had
any
large
enough
lots
for
garage.
I
think
what
struck
me
on
this
one
was:
the
owner
is
asking
this
thing
that
we
assessed
at
a
hundred
thousand.
If
you
look
at
the
the
value
of
the
land,
that's
eighty
thousand.
That
leaves
twenty
thousand
for
the
structure.
B
H
B
All
right,
it's
been
moved
by
congress
seconded
by
elva
that
the
sustain
that
we
sustained
the
value
at
130
000,
so
a
quick
place.
H
My
only
discussion
with
she
put
a
lot
of
data
in
there
from
realtors
and
that
that
type
of
thing,
but
it's
hard
to
analyze
it
without
any
kind
of
she
didn't
analyze
it
or
put
in
any
form
that
says
here
this
sold
for
x
or
how
much
a
square
foot
or
anything.
So
I
do
note
that
some
of
the
comps
were
2
000
square
feet
or
a
little
larger,
and
it
appears
to
me
that
her
square
footage
is
1440.
H
So
a
little
on
the
lower
side
and
all
the
sales
on
stevens
anyway,
she
put
in
there
were
200
to
300
000.
So
I
think
it
might
need
a
small
reduction,
but
how
much
it's
open
to
discussion.
B
I
I
was
amused
by
the
comp
on
at
3001
glazed
elf,
that's
page
12
of
this
piece.
That's
definitely
an
outlier
in
any
sense
of
the
word
with
that
answered
both
and
yeah.
B
Stephen's
houses
on
stephen's
face
the
freeway,
so
they're,
looking
out
on
on
the
wall.
Now
some
people
find
that
okay,
there
may
not
be
a
lot
of
noise
there,
depending
on
how
the
noise
is
affected
by
the
wall,
but
it
can.
B
It
can
turn
off
people
too
to
be
on
the
street
that
faces
the
feeling,
even
if
there's
a
wall
there,
so
375
seems
a
bit
on
the
high
side,
but
I
really
don't
know
the
the
one
of
the
comps
that
she's
provided
I'm
familiar
with
one
on
third
avenue.
B
That
was
an
over
improved
house
that
took
a
while
to
sell,
even
though
it
was
really
quite
nice.
It
was
a
small
prop,
a
small
house.
It
had
been
added
on
to
and
over
improved
for
the
neighborhood.
B
Hearing
then
I'll
call
for
the
clerk
to
call
it
what's
been
moved
by
obama
and
second
guard.
Am
I
right.
B
Okay,
I'm
sorry
moved
by
the
director
and
seconded
by
palmer
to
reduce
the
value
to
350.
000.
quote
paulie
roll.
Please.
I
K
B
Okay.
The
next
item
is
3220
blaisdell
avenue
case
number
22-0455.
H
B
Yeah
this
is
llc
was
the
applicant,
but
it's
clear
from
your
comments
that
you
have
more
knowledge
than
I
do
about
assessing
values
of
large
rental
properties.
The
kind
of
bottom
line
is
in
our
venue
where
we
are
here.
B
We
really
don't
have
the
capacity
to
do
the
research,
even
if
the
research
had
provided
for
us
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
going
over
it
and
looking
at
rent
rolls
and
pap
rates
and
whatever
what
we
tend
to
do
in
these
large
properties
when
we
go
into
this
kind
of
thing,
is
to
send
it
along
to
the
next
stage
and
simply
thank
them
for
their
appeal
and
encourage
them
to
go
to
the
next
stage,
where
there
will
be
more
opportunity
to
present
the
information
that
can
be
helpful
to
the
assessor.
H
H
C
H
B
So
what
we
really
need
to
do
here
is
to
sustain
the
value
and
send
them
on
their
way.
If
they
want
to
appeal
further,
they
can
but
there's
not.
We
really
aren't
in
a
position
to
make
any
decisions
with
information
provided
or
even
if
there
was
a
lot
of
information
provided,
really
isn't
our
role
to
analyze,
fabrics
and
landfills,
etc.
H
I
I
will
motion
to
sustain
the
value
of
3220
blaisdell
at
one
million
seven
hundred
thirty,
two
thousand
eight
hundred.
B
I
K
C
Land,
may
I
interrupt
real
quickly
regarding
an
income
producing
property,
whether
it's
commercial,
industrial
or
apartment,
if
the
property
owner
does
provide
sufficient
there's
the
word
evidence
that
does
support
a
reduction,
they
do
provide
income
and
expense
information,
for
example,
and
the
board
does
have
board
members
that
have
the
knowledge,
skills
and
ability
to
review
that
value.
The
board
can
make
a
reduction
in
value
if
they
have
the
information
needed
it's
just
in
this
case.
They
didn't.
You
didn't,
have
what
you
needed
to
be
able
to
do
that
analysis.
B
K
B
Motion
carries
next,
is
the
property
at
2220
grand
avenue
south
case
number
22-0457.
B
B
Okay,
it
has
been
moved
by
pederta
and
seconded
by
palmer
to
sustain
the
value
of
the
property
at
2220
grand
avenue
clerk.
Please
call
the
rule.
K
B
F
B
Okay,
it's
been
moved
by
the
german
and
second
in
myomba
to
sustain
the
value
at
260
600..
Please
call
the
goal.
I
B
B
Motion
carries.
That
concludes
the
appeals
for
the
one
to
two
o'clock
session.
It
looks
like
we
can
take
a
brief
recess
here.
I
have
about
four
to
two.
So
if
we
reconvene
at
five
minutes
to
two
so
this
will
be
a
very
brief
recess.
C
Yeah,
chair
bland,
if
I
can
before
you
do,
if
you
do
to
choose,
to
take
a
quick
recess,
a
couple
of
things
about
this
two
to
three
o'clock
session.
There
are
a
substantial
amount
of
cases
that
you
will
have
presented
to
during
this
session,
just
to
make
sure
that
we
stay
as
timely
as
possible
and
sticking
to
the
board
policy
about
five
minutes,
and
there
is
one
change
in
that
case,
two:
two:
zero,
six,
that
property
owner
will
be
phoning
in.
It
wasn't
indicated
on
the
first
hearing
schedule.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
I
have
my
phone
here
and
I'm
signing
people
for
five
minutes.
Don't
interrupt
them
if
they
go
behind.
E
B
Before
we
resume
assessor
conquest,
do
you
have
any
comments
about
our
afternoon
session.
C
Chair
blend,
thank
you.
We
again
have
a
full
hour
scheduled
here
and
I
will
guide
you
through
a
couple
of
cancellations
that
we
have
once
we
get
to
them
it's
later
on
in
the
hour,
I
would
just
mention
to
the
clerk's
staff
case
22-0461
at
5256.
Zenith
avenue
did
indeed
call
in.
I
believe
they
are
present.
Let
me
check
the
phone
numbers.
Yes,
they
are
here,
and
I
do
not
know,
though,
that
our
first
case
has
called
in,
but
we
will
guide
you
through
these
as
we've
done
previously.
D
Madam
chair,
the
applicant
is
not
on
the
line
and
did
not
verify
in
advance
that
they
would
be
attending.
B
Thank
you
board
members.
C
B
L
Stephen
t
hetland
here
for
5256
zenith.
Can
you
hear
me.
L
Thank
you.
I
will
proceed.
I
will
just
kind
of
highlight
what
I
put
in
the
the
application.
Basically,
this
is
a
1925
stucco
story
and
a
half
I've
owned
it
since
1986.
L
in
2017,
my
wife
and
I
remodeled
the
house,
and
in
doing
so
we
stayed
within
the
same
house
footprint
so
that
it
remains
still
less
than
a
full
two-story
house
and
the
basement
remains
unfinished.
We
did,
however,
add
a
garage
at
the
time
of
the
remodel
in
2017.
The
city
obviously
received
the
plans
and
had
numerous
inspections
where
photos
and
such
were
taken.
So
the
city
is,
and
was
that
made
very
much
aware
of
all
the
changes
that
were
or
not
made
for
valuation
purposes.
L
The
key
point
I
want
to
make
is
that
there's
been
no
more
further
improvements
or
changes
to
the
house
since
this
remodel
in
2017.,
as
the
application
points
out.
What
I'd
like
really
we're
focusing
on
is
the
last
two
valuations
that
occurred,
which
the
result
was
an
increase
in
this
house
of
104
000,
just
over
two
years
in
2021
payable
2022,
the
assessed
value
jumped
33
000
from
then
585
to
618..
L
At
that
time
I
had
conversations
with
the
assessor's
office
regarding
this
increase
and
specifically
how
it
seemed
to
be
impacted
by
the
historic
pandemic,
coupled
with
obviously
at
that
time,
the
lack
of
sufficient
housing
stock.
L
I
concluded
at
that
time
that,
while
I
believed
there
was
still
high
the
value
compared
to
those
comparables,
I
was
able
to
see
how
the
city
was
coming
up
with
those
numbers
based
on
the
the
interplay
between
the
effect
of
the
pandemic
as
it
related
to
the
increased
boom
in
the
housing,
along
with
the
lack
of
sufficient
housing
stock.
And
so
I
decided
at
that
time,
obviously
to
increase
that
in
value
rather
than
challenge
it.
L
And
it's
simply
my
belief
that
there
is
no
similar
housing
event
that
is
taking
place
in
the
city
beyond
what
took
place
in
the
prior
year,
which
has
already
been
factored
in
in
the
increase
of
this
house
that
wouldn't
justify
any
further
increase,
let
alone
the
one
we're
looking
at,
and
so
it's
my
position
that
that
should
stay
the
same
as
it
was
last
year
when
I
worked
this
out
with
the
city
and
took
their
number
and
keep
it
at
the
618
000
value.
L
I
have
not,
as
I
did
wasn't
didn't
have
the
time
this
year,
as
I
did
last
year,
to
actually
work
with
the
city's
office
and
do
comparables
on
this.
But
I
do
believe
my
position
is
accurate,
which
is
that
there
is
no
justification
for
this
increased
value,
and
I
think
that
the
the
boom
housing
that
we
are
still
experiencing
has
already
been
factored
in.
On
the
increase
from
the
prior
year.
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
H
So
this
is
mr
palmer.
I
recognize
some
of
your
arguments,
but
is
there
any
indication
of
houses
around
you
that
have
sold
that
that
you
don't
think
they're
going
up
from
last
year
in
the
value
that
that
there's
no
increase
in
values
in
residential
properties
in
that
area
over
the
year.
L
I
wish
I
had
the
opportunity
to
provide
you
some
and
I
don't
have
the
opportunity.
Yes,
I
I
think
it
is
my
position
that
if
you
do
compare
my
house
with
the
similar
houses,
even
in
the
full
neighborhood
or
linden
hills,
neighborhood
for
that
matter,
that
the
increased
value
of
the
sale
price
has
not
changed
from
the
prior
year
to
this
year.
L
I
think
what
you're
experiencing
is
a
lot
more
rebuilds
knock
down,
rebuilds
in
which
they're
putting
houses
up
now
over
a
million
dollars
which
are
dramatically
increased
size
relative
to
the
existing
stocks
that
existed
before,
and
so
yes,
I
think
houses
are
still
being
sold
in
this
neighborhood
and
they're
they're,
usually
in
the
much
higher
numbers
over
a
million.
L
If
you
compare
to
the
houses
that
stayed
within
the
same
footprint
as
we
did
and
have
not
boomed
or
popped
the
top
off
to
increase
it
to
a
full
two
stories,
I
think
that
the
value
is
roughly
the
same
as
it
was
the
prior.
If
you
compare
with
the
actual
sale
prices
being
received,
I
don't
see
a
any
further
increase
from
this
year
from
last
year.
If
that
answers
your
question,
but
it's
based
just
on
my
impression
I.
B
Questions
or
comments
from
board
members
for
my
applicant,
mr
hedlund.
B
D
Madam
chair,
there
is
one
caller
that
I
don't
recognize
their
number,
so
I
I
would
ask
that
if
the
applicant
is
present
that
they
press
star
six
and
unmute
themselves.
G
B
G
Oh,
I'm
sorry
45
university
avenue,
southeast
minneapolis
number
805.
B
Okay,
you
have
five
minutes
to
present
your
case.
H
G
H
Okay,
yeah,
that's
that'd,
be
taxes
payable
in
2023.,
it's
kind
of
confusing.
Okay.
Let
me
ask
you:
I
read
what
your
realtor
said.
I
see
that
I'm
not
familiar
exactly
with
this
cobalt
condominium,
but
on
the
notes
on
pricing.
Your
home,
you
said
nice
units
facing
the
park
are
selling
for
415
per
square
foot.
Yours
has
nice
finishes
and
is
high
in
the
building.
What
so
is,
is
it
a
eight
floor
building?
Are
you
on
the
top
floor
or
what
what's
the.
H
G
Well,
they
have
different
views.
I
don't
know
if
you
you
could
call
it
better
views
but
yeah
as
you
get
lower,
then
you
know
you're
looking
more
into
the
park
cross
street
and
then
you
see
more
of
the
city
as
you
get
up
higher
across.
B
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Questions
board
members.
B
F
Have
a
question:
oh,
I
have
a
quick
question,
mr
mackey,
is
it
yeah
it
you
had
a
realtor,
give
you
an
opinion
of
value.
Is
it
currently
listed
at
the
six
hundred
and
fourteen
thousand
then.
G
B
I
believe
the
speaker's
on
the
line
is
that
correct.
B
So,
let's
take
them
one
at
a
time.
Any
comments
from
the
board
regarding
3240
aldrich.
H
I
just
had
to
have
some
general
comments:
he
he
included
the
same
handouts
for
each
property.
It
looks
like
and
he
he
put
in
a
his
schedule
e,
which
just
tells
you
what
his
gross
income
was
there
for
for
the
properties
he
does
have
a
rent
roll,
but
I'm
not
as
familiar
with
the
minneapolis
princes
they
used
to
be
and-
and
for
these
addresses,
like
3240
aldrich,
is
a
pretty
good
rental
area.
H
He
has
rents
listed
from
750
to
925
and
to
me
I-
and
he
doesn't
have
any
vacancies
listed
on
this
one.
So
again
it's
one
of
those
deals
where
I
you
know
he
seems
to
be
full
up
on
it.
I
don't
know
if
he's
getting
market
rents
for
these
or
he
keeps
him
a
little
low
to
make
sure
that
he's
filled
up.
I
it's
hard
to
tell.
B
Hey
we
will
move
on
to
the
next
one,
but
you're
gonna
have
to
bear
with
me
for
a
moment
here,
because
I
got
my
papers
out
of
order.
So
just
take
a
breath.
While
I
get
him
back
in
order,
would
you
please.
B
D
Madam
chair,
this
is
the
same
applicant
as
the
previous
case
and
did
not
pre-confirm
that
he
would
be
available
today.
B
B
D
M
Can
you
hear
me
okay?
Thank
you.
The
application
for
the
appeal
has
most
of
the
information
for
today's
discussion.
The
only
thing
I
guess
I
would
summarize
and
highlight
is
that
we've
had
this
property
on
the
market
since
early
october
and
have
had
very
little
traffic.
We've
had
a
fair
number
of
showings,
but
not
a
whole
lot
of
interest.
M
M
It
then
went
back
on
and,
as
I
think
I
stated,
it
was
about
sixty
thousand
dollars
in
improvements,
and
that
was
from
january
15
through
february
early
february.
Then
it
went
back
on
the
market
the
third
week
in
february
and
has
been
on
the
market
ever
since
the
entire
property,
which
incorporates
not
only
the
unit
but
also
two
parking
spaces
in
the
covered
garage
and
a
storage
unit,
and
the
sub-level
is
on
the
market
for
1
million
eight
hundred
and
six
thousand.
M
We
chose
that
number
in
part,
because
that
was
the
estimated
market
value
for
taxes
payable
in
2021
just
for
the
unit
itself,
not
the
not
the
garage
or
storage
spaces,
but
we
felt
that
that
was
probably
a
fairly
conservative
number
based
on
what
we
knew
from
the
city
and
what
the
realtors
were
also
recommending.
M
What
we
have
found
is
that
the
issue
that
we're
bumping
up
against
that
is
different
than
some
of
the
other
condominiums
in
the
urban
core
is
that
our
unit
is
considered
a
town
home.
That
is,
we
have
seven
floors
above
us,
but
our
front
door
actually
opens
out
to
our
patio
and
the
sidewalk.
So
we
don't
have
that
additional
security
of
a
vestibule
and
and
and
electronic
locks,
and
that
sort
of
thing
and
what
we're
finding
and
feedback
from
those
that
have
looked
at
it
is.
M
The
perception
is
that,
since
it's
part
of
the
urban
core,
safety
and
security
has
become
a
real
issue
and
that
people
don't
feel
safe
in
a
unit
that
opens
up
onto
the
ground
floor.
So
we
are
struggling
a
little
bit
on
what
to
do
with
this.
In
talking
with
our
realtor,
we're
looking
at
at
probably
reducing
the
price
even
further,
maybe
one
to
maybe
even
150
000
lower,
just
to
see
if
that
will
generate
more
interest.
M
But
the
point
we
wanted
to
make
is
that,
based
on
2023
taxes
payable
in
2023
we're
looking
at
a
valuation
of
one
million
nine
hundred
and
ten
thousand,
if
you
combine
the
parking
spaces,
the
storage
unit,
as
well
as
the
unit
itself,
and
it's
clearly
not
worth
that,
we
we.
We
have
lots
of
evidence
to
show
that
it's
going
to
be
significantly
less
than
that.
Hence
the
request
for
a
200
000
reduction.
H
Yeah
this
is
mr
palmer,
so
you
say
you're
on
the
first
floor,
oh
you
haven't
owned
your
own
exterior
entry
in
egress
correct.
Does
that
open
up
toward
I'm
looking
toward
kenwood
parkway
or
toward
bryant
avenue
or.
M
Well,
it
is
a
detriment
as
we're
hearing
now,
we've
lived
there
for
almost
20
years
and
we've
enjoyed
it,
but
what
we're
finding
now
is
that
everyone
is
coming
into
this
with
a
great
deal
of
fear
and
concern
for
safety,
and
it's
not
just
one
client.
It's
everyone.
That's
looked
at.
It
has
thought
we
need
more
security,
more
privacy,
that
that
their
perception
of
safety
is
significantly
impacted.
H
Okay
and
then
you
said
so,
you've
only
filed
on
the
condo
unit,
but
there's
two
other
ids
here.
What
what
was
the
garage
and
the
and
the
storage
values
as
of
19
20
22..
So
we
can
just
look
at
the
overall
total.
M
Yeah
you.
M
M
H
B
B
Is
the
applicant
on
the
line
with
this
one.
B
Catherine
mini
is
the
applicant
and
I
don't
believe
she's
on
the
line.
Is
that
correct.
B
Okay,
any
discussion
or
comments
from
the
board
members:
okay,
moving
on
your
application
for
excuse
me,
3915
thomas
avenue,
south
case
number,
22-0472.
B
B
The
app
the
applicant
is
jonathan
bianchi
bianchi,
I
do
don't
believe
mr
bianchi
is
calling
in.
Is
that
correct?
Madam.
D
Chair
the
applicant
is
available
on
the
line.
If
you
could
please
press
star
six
to
unmute
your
phone
and
once
you
do
that,
you
will
have
five
minutes
to
address
the
board.
N
Perfect,
this
is
jonathan
bianchi.
N
All
right,
I
I
appreciate
you
guys
time.
I
apologize
I've
never
done
this
before.
I
guess
what
what
initially
led
to
my
interest
in
this
is.
I
have
been
looking
at
putting
804
fist
feet
on
the
market.
N
I've
talked
to
a
couple
of
different
realtors
and
kind
of
went
through
the
properties
with
them
in
the
amount
that
they
are
telling
me
it's
worth.
Is
you
know
substantially
less
than
my
assessment
for
2023
here.
N
The
reason
they're
giving
me
is,
I
do
still
have
a
very
ancient
gravity-fed
furnace
in
the
the
duplex
there
and
the
cost
to
upgrade
this.
To
you
know
your
central
ac
and
that
forced
their
furnace
is
is
substantial.
I'm
looking
at,
I
got
a
couple
of
different
bids,
but
it'll
be
around
40
to
45
000,
with
all
the
work
that
goes
into
that
and
permits,
and
such
what
I'm
being
told
by
my
real
estate
agents
is
we'd
list
it
around
335.
N
N
So
once
I
got
that
information
from
them,
I
reached
out
to
the
assessor
listed
on
it
and
asked
her
for
details
on
just
how
she
was
arriving
at
my
assessment.
She
provided
me
three
addresses
the
first
was
647
monroe
street
355.
N
It
was
listed
on
all
the
sales
documents,
all
the
advertisements,
of
having
a
gravity
fed
furnace.
I
found
in
the
permit
records
that
that
was
replaced
in
2019
right
before
the
sale
in
2021,
so
I
don't
believe
that's
a
truly
great
comp
for
for
my
property.
She
also
listed
1611
adams
street
that
was
sold
for
464..
N
That
one
again
was
clearly
mislabeled,
as
you
can
see
from
the
marketing
photos.
It
has
a
radiator
heat
in
there
and
again
it
has
multiple
updates
to
the
interior.
So
I
just
I
didn't
really
see
how
that
one
even
correlated
other
than
you
know
it
was
built
within
20
years
of
804.
N
and
the
final
one
was
1947
fillmore
street,
which
sold
just
a
couple
months
ago
here
in
february
and
it
sold
for
390
000..
It
does
appear
to
actually
have
the
asian
furnace
system
like
mine
and
in
right
down
the
road
similar
year,
so
I
actually
did
think
this
was
a
strong
comp
and
when
I
look
at
the
price
per
square
foot
on
that
one,
it
comes
up
to
about
165.
N
N
it.
It
has
newer
systems
in
it.
It's
3
000
feet.
It's
a
duplex
like
mine,
much
larger,
but
you
know
again
when
I
break
out
the
square
footage
on
that.
That's
at
like
a
140
per
square
foot
and
the
other
one
that
I
found
that
was
similar
in
size,
but
with
newer
system
was
2513
pierce
street
northeast,
which
is
currently
on
the
market.
It's
listed
at
425.
N
H
Yeah
hi,
this
is
mr
palmer.
Thanks
for
the
information
I'm
so
your
realtor
said
you
would
list
it
for
345
in
the
current
condition.
Is
that
is
that.
N
H
Okay
and
then
you
said
40-45
to
take
you
out
your
grab
and
then
is
that
to
put
a
forced
air
and
a
central
air
both
in.
H
So
a
lot
of
forced
areas
of
that
age.
Do
you
need
new
duct
work
or
is
the
duct
work
sufficient
from
the
from
the
gravity
to
to
be
able
to
use
in
30
minutes.
N
Unfortunately,
that's
the
issue:
it's
an
old
octopus
style
one.
So
it's
got
asbestos
graph
pipe.
So
I'm
looking
at
asbestos
abatement
on
top
of
the
removal
and
all
new
duct
work
we'd
actually
have
to
because
the
upstairs
unit
is
done
with
a
space
heater,
so
I'd
actually
have
to
install
a
furnace
in
the
attic
space
and
when
we
were
talking
to
the
city,
there's
some
code,
compliance
thing,
so
I'd
have
to
run
a
condensate
line
down
down
through
the
property.
So
I
best
case
they
were.
N
So
so,
no
sorry
and
I
filled
out
the
form-
and
I
try
to
put
the
info
in
there
best-
it's
not
technically
owner
occupied.
My
my
address
is
19400
141st
and
rogers.
My
girlfriend
is
currently
living
in
the
lower
unit.
Not
paying
rent.
The
upper
unit
is
rented.
It
is
rented
at
1200
a
month
and
I'm
happy
to
provide
all
that
documentation.
I
didn't,
though,
just
based
on.
I
don't
think
you
can
get
an
accurate
price
off
of
the
rent
that
I'm
actually
collecting
from
the
duplex.
N
Very
similar
yep.
So
if
I
was
right
before
my
girlfriend
moved
in
I
it
was
rented
at
like
1100
a
couple
of
years
ago,
and
then
I
you
know
I
would
expect
I
could
get
12
12.50
for
it.
You
know
as
as
is.
B
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
presentation.
We
will
be
in
touch
via
mail.
B
All
right
very
good,
so
then
we
will
move
on
to
field
application
for
110
bank
street
southeast
number,
l,
one
two
three
zero
case
numbers
two:
two
dash
zero:
four,
seven:
five,
two:
two
dash
zero:
four:
seven:
six
and
two:
two:
four:
zero:
two:
two
dash
zero:
four,
seven:
seven.
I
believe
that
just
to
clear
this
up,
this
is
for
the
unit
the
parking
space
and
the
storage
space.
If
I'm
not
correct,
let
me
know:
do
we
have
a
the
speaker
on
the
line
for
this
one.
B
Okay,
very
good,
in
that
case,
we'll
move
on
to
making
some
decisions.
Let's
see
we're
at
2
30.,
so
we
have
to
go
back
to
beginning.
H
I
think
we
have
that
appraisal.
I
think
we
discussed
that
early
from
september
of
21
I've
got
notes,
saying
we
I
would
recommend
reducing
it
to
just
over
that
value.
I've
got
360
written
down
here.
B
Okay,
I
don't
think
we're
looking
at
the
same
thing.
What
what
are
you
looking
at.
B
Okay,
I
guess
I
got
out
of
order
again
chair.
B
B
Okay,
everybody
else
in
the
same
page,
all
right
questions
and
discussion.
F
Well,
this
is
on
board
member
bertha.
I
see
that
there's
no
expenses
that
and
it's
appears
to
be
an
apartment
property.
There's
no
expenses
given
here
and
it's
a
current
current
court
case
has
been
filed
on
it.
So
they
are
going
to
take
the
appeal,
obviously,
for
a
previous
year,
they'll
be
working
the
system
through
that
approach
and
with
no
other
information
and
the
value
went
up
only
three
percent
this
year
from
last
year.
I
K
B
Excuse
me,
our
next
case
is
3639
bryant
avenue
north
case
number.
22-0460
is
everybody
there.
H
Mr
cornwell
doesn't
have
much
data
there.
I
don't
see
on
the
application
he
asked
for
89.9.
This
property
went
from
102
to
120
000.
I
don't
see
enough
basis
for
him
to
to
to
warn
a
reduction
based
on
anything
that
he
supplied.
B
Yeah,
it
was
kind
of
skinny.
His
his
input
was,
please
see,
attached
application.
Okay,
so
we
have
nothing
to
go
on
here.
So
would
I
get
a
motion?
Please.
I
K
F
I,
though
this
is
one
where
the
appellant
called
in.
I
think
he
was
the
one
that
was
mentioning.
There
was
no
in
increases
in
that
area
from
last
year
and
he
he
thought
618
was
800.
618
000
was
somewhat
okay.
Last
year,
I
didn't
think
there
was
any
increases
and
I
think
maybe
we
all
can
disagree
on
that-
that
there
probably
was
some
increases
out
there.
B
Yeah,
I
would
agree
with
that.
There
were
some
increases
and
this
is
a
a
really
popular
neighborhood
zenith.
He
is
one
block
from
the
creek,
so
zenith
doesn't
go
through.
So
if
you're
going
southbound
zenith
from
this
property,
you'll
get
you'll,
get
bent
around
going
west
towards
abbott
and
eventually
what
crosses
the
next
cross
through
this
france.
B
B
F
It
was
like
8.6
percent
and
his
value
went
up
eleven
percent,
but
again
everything
of
those
you
know
the
8.6
would
be
on
median
last
year's
median
price
as
opposed
to
or
2020
to
2021.
I
believe
so.
We
don't
have
to
necessarily
follow
the
8.6
at
all.
H
H
I'm
sorry,
I
think
the
choice
would
be
if
it
went
up
11
so
you'd
hold
it
at
689
if
it
goes
up
to
median
as
steve
just
sent
out
at
8.6
we'd
be
at
670..
So
I
I
guess
I
don't
know,
I'm
not
don't
still
feel
strongly
either
way,
but
that's
the
kind
of
ballpark.
F
I
I
think,
if
it's
appropriate
to
move,
I
I
moved
to
hold
the
value
at
689.
We
haven't
really
been
following
neighborhood
averages
or
anything
to
make
our
decisions
all
along,
and
I,
without
knowing
everything
about
the
house
and
eleven
percent,
is
reasonable
to
me.
I'm
going
to
move
to
hold
the
value
at
689,
000.
B
B
All
right,
it's
been
moved
by
bedroom
seconded
by
palmer
to
sustain
the
value
at
52
56
unit,
avenue
cell
clerk.
Would
you
call
the
role
please.
I
K
B
B
Okay,
our
next
case
is
okay.
I
think
I
might
be
out
of
nope.
I've
got
it
right.
The
appeal,
the
application
for
45
university
avenue,
southeast
number,
805
case
number
22-0463,.
F
All
right,
this
is
the
dirt
that
I
think
we
might
defer
a
little
bit
to
current.
You
know
what
the
realtor
has
mentioned,
as
well
as
the
list
price
which
is
at
650,
is
lower
than
the
current
value
of
679.
in
our
679.
I
see
on
here,
we've
been
at
700
000
for
three
years
prior
and
it
got
lowered
to
679,
and
I
don't
know
if
that
was
a
computer,
assisted
value,
or
if
that
was
enough.
F
B
So
the
properties
near
the
core
did
take
a
hit
because
of
all
the
unrest,
so
it
did
come
down
from
the
last.
I
just
said
three
years
I
was
there
was
a
bunch
of
information
provided,
but
it
made
my
I
made
my
eyes
cross.
B
B
So
the
things
the
few
things
that
I
did
note
were
some
of
the
things
were
much
lower
like
one
on
the
second
floor
and
this
one's
on
the
eighth
floor.
That
makes
a
huge
difference.
B
Usually
when
you've
got
these
when
they're
first
selling,
the
developer
will
have
a
premium
of
at
least
five
thousand
dollars
per
floor
on
the
very
same
unit
in
the
same
stack
and
sometimes
more
so
that
needed
to
be
taken
into
consideration.
Also,
I
I
was
torn
about
the
7
or
the
679
as
opposed
to
maybe
something
like
650,
but
I
certainly
wasn't
in
agreement
about
the
614,
which
is
where
the
owner
seems
to
think
it
should
be.
H
Yeah
right
at
the
end,
then
he
admitted
when
steve
asked
him
that
he's
got
it
listed
just
briefly
for
650.
So
I
I
like
that,
I
I
looked
at
it.
The
only
thing
I
disagree,
I
mean
his
415
or
420.
The
realtor
says
per
square
foot
seems
kind
of
high,
but
then
he
says
yours
has
nice
finishes
and
high
in
the
building,
so
I'll,
say
420
well
that
that's
hardly
any
different
than
415.
H
B
I
K
H
That's
the
other
case,
you
don't
we
don't
get
any
answers
because
he
didn't
call
in,
but
we
don't
really
have
income
expenses
he's
got
the
rent
rolls.
These
are
good
addresses.
I
mean
I
work
departments,
30th
and
aldrich,
the
other
ones
he
had
were
on
31st
in
gerard.
H
H
I
will
motion
for
3240
eldridge
avenue
south
to
retain
the
value
of
one
million
six
hundred
eighty
one
thousand
seven
hundred.
B
It's
been
moved
by
palmer
and
seconded
by
boldurka
to
sustain
the
value
of
one
million.
Sixteen
eighty
one
thousand
seven
hundred
buck.
Would
you
please
call
the
roll.
I
K
B
Six
22-0465
discussion,
questions
board
numbers.
This
is
another:
the
same
owner,
david's
david
hansen,.
H
I
would
just
read
it
what
I
said
on
the
last
case
that
the
same
deals
and
it's
a
another
good
address,
a
block
west
of
hennepin
and
south
of
lake,
so
very
good
rental
area.
I
would
move
to
retain
the
current
value.
H
B
I
would
point
out
that
it's
actually
at
that
point
it's
east
of
one
of
them,
but
still
a
good
address.
So
we've
had
a
motion
by
palmer
and
the
second
bangladesh
who
sustained
the
value
of
2
406
100
dollars
clerk.
Would
you
call
the.
I
B
Motion
carries
next
another
property
owned
by
mr
hanson
at
1933,
fremont
avenue
south
case
number,
22-046.
H
Yeah
I
I
would
agree
it's
a
similar
situation.
This
is
more
like
a
wedge
address,
but
still
a
good
address.
I
move
that
we
sustain
the
value
of
three
million
three
and
seven
excuse
me:
three
million
seven
hundred
twenty
six
thousand
seven
hundred.
B
I
K
B
The
applicant
was
john
kennedy.
H
Well,
he's
listed
and
he's
made
some
good
points
on
that
and
it
seems
to
be.
We
should
lower
it,
but
I
looked
at
his.
He
wants
to
go
to
a
million
six
hundred
thousand,
and
that
seems
like
just
he's
picking
a
number
out.
That's
a
lot
lower.
I
was
trying
to
do
the
math.
If
you
have
the
garage
and
the
storage
it
looked
like,
they
were
about
90
000,
something
like
that.
So
maybe
we
I
was
thinking
about-
maybe
a
million
seven
hundred
thousand
or
a
million
seven.
H
Yeah
that
that's
true,
so
I
maybe
that's
too
much,
but
he
is
asking
with
a
realtor
boy.
I
I
don't
know
what
do
you
think
about
his
points?
Faye,
I'm
going
to
ask
you
what
about
his
points
about
having
the
own
your
own
egress
out
the
building,
because
I
mean
that's
basically
next
to
parade
stadium
and
and
it's
it's
a
pretty
nice
area
and
I
working
in
bloomington
we
had
condos
and
in
apartments
townhouses
and
people
liked
having
their
own
interests
and
egress
instead
of
having
to
go
through
the
lobby
or
whatever.
So.
B
For
me,
that's
a
plus
for
other
people,
they're
they're
concerned
about
it.
I'm
I'm
gonna,
guess
that
if
the
feedback
has
been
people
are
concerned
about
that
for
safety,
I'm
guessing
if
that
hasn't
really
been
a
concern.
But
it's
just
the
sort
of
thing
that
the
the
realtor
puts
in
the
feedback
space
that
was
maybe
mentioned,
maybe
not
to
me
now.
B
I
will
say
that
I
know
that
in
that
area
you
know
I'm
in
a
citizen
app,
and
so
I
always
get
notifications
about
carjackings
and
attempted
break-ins
and
actual
break-ins
whatever,
and
it
has
increased
in
that.
You
know
kenwood,
like
the
isles
area,
beyond
what
it
farvion
used
to
be,
but
I
don't
personally
see
that
as
a
detriment.
B
As
a
matter
of
fact,
I
see
it
as
a
plus
feels
more
like
a
house
than
a
condominium,
an
apartment
that
way.
So
it's
interesting
to
me
he's
asking
for
a
million
and
six
and
then
he's
gonna
market
for
a
million
806.,
so
that
doesn't
quite
fit
together.
Sorry.
F
I
have
a
comment,
I
think
you
know
having
a
unit
number
of
101
shows
that
he's
on.
I
know
it's
a
two
level,
so
his
upper
level,
probably
his
bedrooms,
are
got
a
little
bit
of
a
view,
but
he
won't
have
like
the.
I
think
it's
probably
a
six
story.
Building
or
so
I
won't
have
the
views
that
come
out
the
top
and
just
to
correct
mr
palmer.
F
I
think
it's
44
600,
as
the
total
for
the
two
garages
and
the
storage
area
is
the
difference
between
the
million
nine
ten
six
hundred,
that,
for
all
three
of
them,
are
all
four
pids.
If
you
will
and
the
million
eight
six
six
six
sixty
six.
So
forty
four
thousand
forty
five
thousand
yeah.
So
thank
you
steve.
F
So
I
I
think,
with
this
trouble
of
having
you
know,
I
agree
I
don't
believe
going
down
to
the
1.6,
but
something
something
in
that
mid:
17
1.725
to
1.75,
possibly.
B
I
cannot
picture
this
building,
it
was
built
in
2002
and
I'm
sure
I've
been
by
it,
but
I
can't
I
can't
figure
out
what
it
looks
like
it's.
According
to
this,
it's
three
floors,
so
the
indicator
is
something
like
there's
seven
units
all
together.
So
I
think
it's
unusual
sounds.
F
Except
you
know
I
worked
with
this
building
when
it
was
built
and
all
I
believe
it's
taller,
I'm
going
to
say
it's
15
to
18
units
a
lot
of
large
floor
plates.
You
know
two
or
three
per
floor,
so
there
really
isn't
very
many
units
if
I'm
thinking
about,
hopefully
the
same
building
right
across
from
where
the
spoon
where
the
cherry
is
yeah.
If
I'm,
unless
I'm
wrong,
I
I
believe
it's
that
very
nice
building,
where
there's
private
elevators
that
you
know
take
folks
to
their
units
upstairs.
H
Okay,
well,
if
you
just
took
he's
asking
a
million
806
now,
if
you
take
the,
what
did
you
say
was
44
600
off
for
the
garage
and
the
storage
you're
at
about
a
million
760..
I
would.
I
would
be
open
to
lowering
it
to
that.
That's
if
it
sells,
might
sell
for
less
than
that.
It's
been
on
the
market,
but
at
least
we're
right
where
we
should
be
on
the
asking
price.
B
F
They'll
all
be,
they
all
have
their
separate
pids.
H
K
H
H
H
B
B
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
by
conor
second
in
by
alba,
to
reduce
the
value
to
one
million
seven
hundred
was
it
sixty
five
thousand.
K
B
Okay
clerk,
would
you
call
the
roll
please.
B
B
What
is
the
address
we're
looking
at
at
16.53?
That
is
correct?
Okay,
so
1653
west
26th
street
case
number
22-0469.
B
I
would
entertain
a
motion.
B
B
All
right,
it's
been
moved
by
the
durka
and
seconded
by
palmer
to
sustain
the
value
of
20
16
53
26th
street
west
at
899
000..
Would
you
please
call
the
royal
court
board.
I
K
B
Next
item
is:
is
it
6,
15,
okay
and
I'm
out
of
order
here.
B
Okay:
next
item
is
6
15
6th
street
northeast,
and
that
is
case
number
oops
ahead
of
myself
here.
B
H
I
changed
him
to
faith
because
he
they
mentioned
this
was
the
same
owner
as
an
earlier
property
and
he
might
appear
so.
I
moved
it
around
too.
H
Well,
I
was
really
hoping
someone
might
show
up
on
these
because
that
other
one
was
on
university
and
they
had
huge
units
on
that.
One,
I'm
guessing
it's
it's.
It's
got
to
be
student
housing
or
perhaps
for
families
of
student
housing.
Something
like
that.
A
newer
build.
H
We
held
that
one.
He
doesn't
have
any
information
to
to
really
cut
this
one
that
I
can
see,
but
I
did
notice
that
he's
got
on
his
rent
roll.
He
has
six
units
and
two
are
empty
at
the
beginning
of
the
year.
Out
of
the
six,
which
is
looks
like
you
filled
one
up,
but
that's
kind
of
problematic,
but
I
I
without
anything
else
to
go
on.
I
I
don't
know
that
I
can
really
make
any
decisions.
F
This
property
owner
also
but
same
as
before
he
has
it
a
petition
filed
in
state
tax
court.
So
you
can
take
it
further.
That
way
too.
E
B
I
K
B
B
There
is
a
very
little
information
here,
just
a
couple
of
sales
that
don't
even
tell
you
tell
us
what
floor
they're
on
one
was
in
december
of
2020,
and
one
was
in
february
of
21..
F
I
believe
I
believe
the
2021
sale-
I
don't
know
if
I
looked
it
up
somewhere.
It's
on
the
fourth
floor,
so
still
a
couple
floors
below
the
appeal
property
on
that's
on
the
sixth
floor.
But
I
do
I
do
not
know
what
the
first
one
is.
I
think
it's
a
similar
size
at
893
square
feet
I
think,
is
similar,
but
not
again,
not
much
to
go
on
the
opponent
wasn't
asking
for
a
lot
I
mean
they
were.
You
know.
We're
looking
to
go
down
to
190.
F
last
year
was
225
and
got
some
kind
of
reduction,
but
that
probably
speaks
to
the
possibly
the
condo
market
down
in
that
area.
Near
loring
park
maybe
had
some
problems
this
year
over
the
last
few
years
with
values-
I'm
not
I'm
not
sure,
but
its
location
puts
it
down
down
in
that
loring
park
area.
B
Don't
know
what
the
view
is
on
this
one,
but
it's
easy
to
get
a
nice
either
greenway
viewer
or
mooring
view
going
parkview
in
a
lot
of
the
units.
B
So
I
wouldn't
be
opposed
to
doing
some
reduction,
but
I'm
not
really
pushing
for
it
either.
B
The
condo
market
down
there
has
recovered
a
bit
from
where
it
was
in
2020
and
in
2021
one
of
the
problems
that
has
occurred
in
buildings,
the
other
side
of
the
park,
because
they've
had
one
of
those
city
loans
where
it
can't
be
paid
off
and
it's
you
know,
every
unit
is
assessed
like
a
gazillion
dollars
and
I'm
not
exaggerating
so
that
has
to
be
passed
on
from
owner
to
owner
and
it
really
has
affected
the
values
in
those
units.
B
This
is
not
one
of
those
buildings,
but
others
have
been
affected
by
that.
H
B
Okay,
I
personally
would
probably
vote
for
sustaining
the
value
it
has
actually
come
down.
Some,
but
I'd
be
open
to
other
suggestions.
Anybody's
feel
strongly.
C
B
It's
been
moved
by
the
durka
and
seconded
by
palmer
to
sustain
the
value
of
the
property
at
to
10
grand
street
west
number
616..
Where
would
you
call
the
vote?
Please.
K
B
B
Okay,
next
is
3915
thomas.
B
And
that
is
3915
thomas
avenue
south
case
number
22-0472
comments,
questions.
H
Now
this
appears
to
be
another
one
where
he's
just
challenging
the
rapid
increases
of
values
which
I
think
have
been
happening
as
we
know,
so
he
has
a
increase
of
10.7
percent
and
we've
seen
other
ones
9
10
11.
He
doesn't
really.
He
has
market
values
from
prior
years.
I
I
don't
think
he
has
anything
except
for
he
bought
the
house
for
525
in
2020.
H
B
Well,
based
on
the
fact
that
it's
up
to
the
owner
to
provide
us
with
information,
he's
provided
no
information
about
anything
that
would
be
a
comparable
he's,
just
simply
talked
about
his
own
property
and
what
needs
to
be
done
or
hasn't
been
done.
And
so
I
would
say
that
he's
failed
to
provide
any
information
for
us
to
make
any
decision
on
other
than
a
sustain
so
I'll.
Introduce
an
ocean.
B
K
H
I
thought
this
guy
made
a
good
case
and
he
agreed
the
one
comp
was
quite
good
that
still
had
the
gravity
furnace
that
the
assessor
provided.
So
what
does
that
put
it
down
to
somewhere
40
to
45
for
the
hvacs
at
382?
H
B
B
F
H
I'll
motion
that
we
reduce
the
value
of
804
fifth
street
northeast
to
355
000.
B
Okay,
it's
been
moved
by
palmer
and
seconded
by
bedertha
that
we
reduced
the
value
of
805,
804
fifth
avenue
northeast
from
382
000
to
355
000..
Or
could
you
please
call.
I
K
B
Thank
you.
I.
B
Okay,
it's
been
moved
by
palmer
and
seconded
by
alba
to
sustain
the
value
at
361
chester
street.
I
K
B
Okay,
the
final
one
we
have
to
consider
is
110
bank
street
southeast
number
l1203
case
numbers22-04575.
B
B
H
Well,
the
the
the
whole
premise
is
the
talking
about
this
sale
of
unit
1003.
That's
only
two
floors
below
this
one,
but
it's
hard
to
know
it's
just
what's
the
square
footage
of
that?
I
don't
know
if
they're
the
same,
they
say
it's
identical
in
layout,
so
apparently
it
is
and
renovated.
H
So
that
would
indicate
a
slight
reduction,
but
we
don't
have
any
further
market
information
than
just
that
one
sale.
So
that's
it's
an
indication,
but
it's
not.
You
know,
substantiated.
B
B
Okay,
second,.
B
All
right,
it's
been
moved
by
the
jurisdiction
and
seconded
by
palmer
to
sustain
the
value
of
poverty
at
110
bank
street
number
1203
at
506
thousand
dollars.
Where
could.
B
B
Those
of
you
who
haven't
had
the
opportunity
to
list
to
assessor
monquist
read
off
these
read
off
this
list,
you're
going
to
be
stunned,
she's
a
spectacular
edit,
but
this
is
going
to
take
a
while.
Am
I
correct
a
sister
monquist.
C
C
This
is
the
first
portion
of
that
list
and
we
will
end
your
last
meeting
whenever
that
is
with
the
conclusion
of
this
list.
These
are
cases
that
we're
bringing
to
you
that
are
within
that
10
day
window,
where
the
assessor
cannot
make
a
change
without
the
approval
of
the
local
board.
So
what
we
will
do
is
we.
I
will
read
the
property
id
number,
the
original
market
value
and
the
assessor's
recommended
value.
You
do
not
need
to
take
action
after
each
one.
You
just
need
to
take
action
after
the
conclusion
of
the
list.
C
All
right,
I'm
going
to
read
the
first
one
to
make
sure
I
have
them
in
proper
order
and
the
clerk's
team
and
our
team
in
the
assessor's
office
can
make
sure
that
I
have
the
correct
first
one
property
id
number
is
one
one:
zero,
two,
nine
two,
four,
three:
four:
zero
zero
one,
one
original
value,
five
hundred
and
three
thousand
recommended
value.
Four
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
dollars-
is
that
correct
clerk
and
assessor
team.
C
Two
hundred
and
forty
thousand
dollars,
one
four:
zero:
two:
nine
two,
four
one:
three:
zero:
zero:
three:
two
original
value:
five
hundred
forty
five
thousand
dollars
recommended
value:
five
hundred
fifteen
thousand
dollars,
one
one:
zero:
two:
nine
two,
four:
two:
three:
zero:
zero:
six:
nine
original
value.
Three
hundred
forty
three
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
C
Two
hundred
ninety
five
thousand
dollars:
two:
two:
zero:
two,
eight
two,
four,
four:
three:
zero
one:
zero
four
original
value:
five
thousand
dollars
recommended
value;
three
hundred
and
fourteen
thousand
dollars;
one
eight
zero,
two,
eight
two,
three:
four:
four:
zero
one:
zero,
zero
original
value;
two
hundred
thirty
four
thousand
dollars
recommended
value.
Two
hundred
five
thousand
dollars:
zero:
eight
zero;
two,
eight
two,
four,
three:
three:
zero
one:
two
four
original
value:
four
hundred
thirty
eight
thousand
dollars
recommended
value.
C
Three
hundred
seventy
thousand
dollars;
three:
two:
zero:
two:
nine
two,
four:
three:
one:
zero
zero:
two:
five
original
value
of
six
hundred.
Seventy
two
thousand
dollars
recommended
value.
Six
hundred
forty
thousand
dollars,
one
seven:
zero;
two,
eight
two,
four:
three:
two:
zero:
zero
one:
nine
original
value:
four
hundred:
seventy
nine
thousand
dollars
recommended
value.
C
Four
hundred
fifteen
thousand
dollars,
one
seven:
zero;
two,
eight
two,
four:
three
one:
zero
one:
four,
six
original
value:
four
hundred
twenty
nine
thousand
dollars
recommended
value:
four
hundred
five
thousand
dollars;
two:
three:
zero:
two:
nine
two,
four
two
one:
zero,
eight
five,
three
original
value:
two
hundred
sixty
three
thousand
dollars
recommended
value.
Two
hundred
nineteen
thousand
dollars
one
two:
zero:
two,
eight
two,
four
two
one:
zero
one:
eight
eight
original
value,
350
000,
recommended
value,
305
thousand
dollars,
1-7-0-2-8-2-4-3-4-0-0-4-2.
C
Original
value,
446
thousand
dollars
recommended
value,
380,
four,
zero,
nine,
two:
four:
two:
three:
zero:
two:
zero
nine
original
value.
Five
hundred
sixteen
thousand
dollars
recommended
value.
Four
hundred
seventy
five
thousand
dollars;
one:
five:
zero:
two:
eight
two,
four:
two:
two:
zero:
two:
two:
nine
original
value:
three:
ninety
390s
396
thousand
dollars
recommended
value;
360
thousand
dollars;
one
seven:
zero;
two,
eight
two,
four:
three:
two:
zero:
zero:
six,
eight
original
value:
nine
hundred
sixty
four
thousand
dollars
recommended
value.
C
Two
hundred
thirty
six
thousand
dollars:
zero;
eight
zero;
two
eight
two,
four:
two:
one:
zero
zero:
seven,
three
original
value,
546
thousand
dollars,
recommended
value;
470
thousand
dollars;
two
one:
zero;
two,
eight
two,
four
one:
one:
zero
zero,
eight
one
original
value:
four
hundred
twenty
three
thousand
dollars
recommended
value.
Three
hundred
fifty
five
thousand
dollars;
one
three:
zero:
two:
eight
two,
four
one:
one:
zero:
zero:
six:
four
original
value:
six
hundred
twenty
seven
thousand
dollars
recommended
value;
five
hundred
twenty
two
thousand
dollars:
zero;
eight
zero.
C
I'm
going
to
pause
there
there's
something
in
the
chat,
I
believe
it's
case2209297
pid0902924330185.
C
Okay,
so
and
the
indicated
values,
22,
000,
okay,.
D
And
director
malmquist,
the
clerks
believe
also
the
next
case
for
o2
222.0299.
If
you
could
restate
that
one
as
well.
C
C
Two
eight
two:
four:
two:
four:
zero:
zero:
eight
seven
original
one
million
three
hundred
forty
four
thousand
recommending
one
million
one
hundred
eighteen
thousand
dollars
and
with
that
cheer
plan.
That
concludes
the
reading
of
the
recommendations
being
brought
by
the
assessor
to
the
local
board
for
your
approval.
D
Madam
chair,
madam
chair
and
director
mom
quest,
can
we
go
back
to
a
couple
of
cases
specifically
case
22-0371,
both
clerks
believe
you'd
misread
the
p,
the
p
p
id
number
for
that
case
and
then
also
case
22-0398.
C
C
B
Thank
you
assistant
now,
just
to
clarify
all
the
things
that
she
just
read.
If
I
have
it
quit
correct,
are
people
who
challenged
their
evaluation
and
assessor
assessor
did
adjust
evaluations.
B
So
a
great
big
thank
you
to
150
people
who
agreed
with
the
assessor
so
that
we
didn't
have
to
go
through
those
cases
sitting
here
today.
Thank
you,
rebecca
you've.
You
have
a
marvelous
talent.
I
couldn't
have
done
it
so
may
I
please
have
a
motion
to
concur
with
the
recommendation
for
evaluation
changes
brought
by
the
city.
Assessor
motion.
Please.
H
B
I
K
B
B
D
Madam
chair,
yes,
before
I'm
sorry,
maybe
board
member
palmer
is
going
to
talk
about
this
as
well.
I
believe
the
board
needs
to
go
back
to
item
26
on
its
agenda
for
110
bank
street
southeast.
There
were
two
other
cases.
B
So
one
is
the
garage
space
and
one
is
the
storage
space.
I've
never
seen
a
storage
space
getting
a
separate
id
before..
You
know
go
ahead
and
I
don't
know
what
the
sustained
value
is,
however,
and
what
the
value
is
of
the
other
two.
Do
we
have
that
somewhere.
H
I
have
that
one,
I
believe,
on
the
on
the
condo
unit
itself.
We
sustain
it
because
we
didn't
give
enough
information
so.
B
H
Suggest
I'm
going
to
suggest
that
on
this
one
110
bank
street
g29,
I
recommend
we
sustain
the
value
of
twenty
four
thousand
one
hundred.
B
Okay,
it's
removed
by
palmer
and
seconded
by
alva
that
we
sustain
the
value
on
the
property
at
110
bank
street
southeast
g29
at
24,
100.
clerk.
Would
you
please
call
the
rule.
K
B
Motion
carries
we
have
a
motion
on
case
number
22-0477,
which
I
believe
is
a
storage
unit.
B
B
Okay,
it's
been
moved
by
bedrock
and
second
and
by
alba,
to
sustain
the
value
for
case
number
22-0477.
I
K
B
Wait,
I
do
have
a
question:
have
the
packets
been
sent
out
already
for
tomorrow?
Does
anyone
know
anyone.
F
B
Too,
so
just
do
two
more
mornings
it
may
be.
Not
does
it
look
staffed?
Does
it
look
like
we'll
have
spill
over
into
next
week?
At
this
point,.
B
E
K
C
H
Okay,
because
yeah
well,
they
weren't
in
our
calendar
this
morning,
but
I'll
look
at
the
calendar,
then
yeah.
Okay,
thank
you.