►
From YouTube: January 11, 2022 Police Conduct Oversight Commission
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
B
Good
evening
my
name
is
robert
jackson,
pino.
I
have
been
asked
by
chair
abigail,
sarah
of
the
police
conduct
oversight
commission
to
call
this
meeting
for
january
11
2022
to
order,
as
we
begin,
I
will
note
for
the
record
that
this
meeting
has
remote
participation
by
members
of
the
commission
and
city
staff
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statute.
Section
13d
021
due
to
the
declared
local
public
health
emergency.
B
The
city
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency.
This
meeting
is
public
and
subject
to
minnesota
open
meeting
law.
At
this
time
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role,
so
we
can
verify
a
quorum
for
this
meeting.
B
C
B
B
And
the
minutes
from
the
last
meeting,
I
will
note
before
a
motion
that
we
do
have
a
a
time
conflict
with
another
commissioner
that
will
compel
us
to
end
at
7
30
tonight.
So
this
will
be
a
45
minute
meeting,
but
in
light
of
that,
I
will
ask
to
amend
this
agenda
to
strike
item
5
the
case
summaries
and
postpone
that
to
our
next
meeting
with
that,
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
adopt
the
agenda
with
my
motion
to
accept
these
minimum
these
this
agenda,
as
amended.
C
B
That
motion
carries
next.
We
will
adopt
the
minutes
from
december
14th
2021
and
may
I
have
a
motion
to
adopt
those
minutes.
D
E
B
That
motion
carries
and
the
minutes
for
december
14th
2021
are
accepted.
Our
next
item
of
business
is
an
update
on
the
mayor's
community
safety
work
group
and
I
recognize
jared
jeffries,
the
mayor's
public
safety
policy
aide.
To
give
that
update.
Mr
jeffries,
are
you
available?
Are
you
here.
B
F
All
right,
perfect,
thank
you,
chairpino
and
thank
you,
commissioners
for
inviting
me
allowing
me
to
speak
here
I'll,
be
concise,
as
I
know
that
this
meeting
is
very
short,
so
I
will
kind
of
give
a
brief
explanation
of
the
work.
That's
ongoing
address
some
concerns
that
were
raised
to
me
and
then
answer
any
questions
that
all
of
you
may
have
too
so
kind
of
at
a
high
level.
F
The
mayor's
community
safety
work
group
is
tasked
with
providing
recommendations
on
a
wide
variety
of
community
safety
related
topics,
including
police
reform,
accountability,
alternatives,
violence,
prevention,
along
with
pretty
much
anything
that
relates
to
public
and
community
safety.
So
it's
a
very
wide
spectrum
of
topics,
and
so
they
will.
F
They
are
tasked
with
issuing
recommendations
on
those
topics
with
the
timeline
tentatively
being
beginning
of
q2
of
this
year
for
those
recommendations,
and
so
those
recommendations
will
essentially
form
the
mayor's
policy
and
the
city's
the
city's
perspective
and
approach
to
community
safety
and
all
these
regards
as
we
move
forward
here,
and
so
with
that.
F
F
The
work
group
will
obviously
be
giving
giving
recommendations
on
you
know
several
things,
including
accountability
and
police
misconduct
and
just
kind
of
our
systems
in
which
address
that
and
because
the
pc
oc
is
part
of
that.
You
know
it's
not
that's
kind
of
how
it
fits
into
this
they're,
examining
the
work
that
all
of
you
are
doing,
that
the
pcrp
is
doing
that
opcr
is
doing
so
kind
of
how
it
all
fits
together
and
how
it
all
works.
F
F
I
know
there
has
been
discussion
among
the
work
group
members
too,
as
to
like
who
to
invite
to
present
who
to
invite
to
speak.
The
mayor
is
being
very
hands-off
as
far
as
allowing
this
work
group
to
go.
Do
the
work
go?
Seek
information
on
the
topics
they
want
to
seek
information
on
and
then
provide
recommendations
based
upon
the
information
they're
receiving
from
city
staff,
external
experts
and
yes,
so
on
and
so
forth.
B
Thank
you,
mr
jeffries.
I
I
do
have
a
couple
questions,
but
I'll
open
it
up
to
the
group.
First.
Are
there
any
questions
from
commissioners
for
mr
jeffries.
B
Sure,
first
question
that
I
I
have
is
entered
on.
The
a
discussion
topic
we
regularly
have
here
at
the
pcoc
is
a
struggle
from
our
perspective.
Is
the
the
concept
of
teeth
enforcement
of
some
ideas
that
we
have,
and
I
would
love
to
hear
your
in
the
mayor's
perspective
on.
I
guess
even
an
editorial
of
the
idea
surrounding
enforcement,
of
emerging
policy
ideas
or
recommended
changes.
B
F
Yeah,
so
I
first
want
to
say
thank
you
for
the
work
that
all
of
you
are
putting
into
this.
I
know,
especially
in
just
analyzing
a
lot
of
these
issues
and
getting
information
in
a
very
virtual
world
that
can
oftentimes
be
really
challenging.
So
I
thank
you
for
sticking
with
it
and
for
your
dedication
to
this
work.
F
The
first
thing
I'll
say
is
continuing
to
stay
the
course
as
to
just
you
know
the
research
analysis
of
what
you
know
what
the
city
is
doing
and
just
everything
you
know
the
policies
kind
of.
F
I
you
all
this
group,
this
group,
the
subgroups,
have
done
excellent
work
on
you
know
warrants
on
a
lot
of
different
topics
here
over
the
last
two
years
or
last
year
and
the
year
that
I've
been
here
in
my
position,
I've
seen,
and
so
I
would
say,
keep
doing
the
work
there
and
then
delineating
the
policy
recommendations.
F
So
you
know
whether
it's
making
a
change
to
the
existing
mpd
policy
and
I
think,
over
the
last
few
months,
where
change
it
like
the
proposed
recommendations,
changes
have
been
like
submitted
to
our
office
to
the
chief's
office
to
opcr.
I
think
doing
that
is
the
best
way
to
continue
to
push
that,
and
you
know
if
there
are
specific
conversations
that
you
want
to
have
in
this
forum.
F
You
know
continue
to
invite
folks,
and
I
think
you
know
this
group
has
gone
over
and
over
again
about
kind
of
the
dynamics
and
how
it
works
with
the
city
and,
I
think,
continuing
to
build
bridges
and
reach
out.
I
think
that
the
efforts
will
pay
off
and
are
paying
off.
B
Thank
you
and-
and
I
will
simply
say
for
the
rest
of
the
group
that
our
chair
has
been
working
with
mr
jeffries
and
in
her
report,
which
I'm
going
to
skip
and
piecemeal.
Throughout
this
conversation,
she
has
reiterated
that
mr
jeffries
has
accepted
those
and
that
the
you
know
thank
you
for
considering
those
proposals.
B
My
second
question,
in
light
of
your
point
about
building
bridges
and
working
together,
one
thing
that
we've
been
trying
to
improve
upon
here
in
the
past
year
or
so
is
the
ability
to
increase
information
flow,
particularly
with
sharing
data
data.
Disclosure
is
still
a
major
need
here.
B
We
can't
really
do
the
proper
policy
analysis
that
we
would
love
to
do
without
the
data
to
analyze,
and
I
understand
that
that
is
nested
within
a
larger
conversation
about
state
regulation.
What
conversations
have
you
and
the
mayor
had
if
any,
regarding
what
we
can
do
short
of
changing
state
law?
So
that
way
we
can
increase
information
sharing
and
have
some
of
these
new
policy
ideas
come
and
become
more
fruitful
for
the
city.
F
Yeah
sure
just
to
clarification
there
chirping
out,
so
when
you're
talking
about
information
flow,
are
you
talking
about
specifically
to
this
group
or
to
the
public
generally
or
what
are
you
referencing
there
just.
B
Well,
we're
a
public-facing
entity
and
we
have,
although
we've
had
a
discourse
here
about
to
the
extent
to
which
we
are
able
to
view
data
that
is
not
necessarily
available
to
the
public.
That
has,
you
know,
let's
take
a
given
that
we
are
only
able
to
view
public
information.
B
In
light
of
that,
we
often
are
told
that
we're
limited
in
a
lot
of
the
information
that
would
be
really
illuminating
in
being
able
to
do
a
proper
data
analysis
of
what's
going
on
at
mpd
and
making
sure
that
the
policies
that
they
have
match
the
practices
that
are
going
on
in
the
department.
And
that's
that's
a
struggle,
particularly
for
me
in
the
audit
committee
and
would
would
love
to
think
of
ways
that
we
were
still
holding
to.
B
F
Yeah
so
two
parts
I'll
answer
two
parts
there.
So
the
first
is
that
you
know
I'll
speak
for
like
the
city
staff
that
I've
worked
with
on
this
generally,
but
we
continue
to
push
the
bounds
with
the
state
data
practices
office
of
what
they
feel
we
can
or
should
should
share
publicly
it's
something
that
I
know
opcr
staff,
mpd
staff.
They
want
to
share
more
publicly
too,
and
because
it's
really
frustrating
when
they
can't
talk
about
it
publicly,
because
it
does.
F
F
And
it's
frustrating
on
your
end
and
the
public's
end
that
you
know
you're
not
getting
the
information
that
you
need
to
get
a
full
picture
of
everything,
so
that
I'll
just
say
that
we
are
having
conversations
internally
and
with
the
state
data
practices
office
on
just
how
we
can
provide
more
and
more
information
and
that's
something
that
we're
going
to
plan
on
try
to
we're
going
to
do
our
best
to
improve,
especially
in
the
first
quarter
here
and
just
kind
of
getting
more
and
more
information
publicly
accessible
and
then,
as
far
as
specifically
to
the
the
topics
that
you're
you're
studying
you
know,
we
are
currently
as
far
as
understanding
goes.
F
You
know
we
can
give
you
data.
As
far
as
you
know,
quantitative
data-
that's
you
know,
disaggregated
can,
you
know,
doesn't
identify
officers,
and
I
know
that.
Can
that
kind
of
arranges
an
opinion
as
far
as
the
actual
data
that
we
can
give
you?
But
you
know
I
know,
city
staff.
Will
you
know
if
they're
they'll
continue
to?
You
know,
work
with
you
and
try
and
navigate
that
I'm
not
sure
exactly
what
hurdles?
F
The
audit
committee
specifically
is
running
into
and
apologize
for,
not
having
that
that
insight,
but
you
know
happy
to
connect
with
you
offline
too.
If
that's
something
that
we,
you
know
just
talk
through
specifics
as
well.
B
Yeah,
that
would
be
great,
would
love
to
start
an
email
chain
with
you
and
we
can
have
a
conversation
sometime
in
the
near
future
about
that
yeah
absolutely
well.
Thank
you.
Those
are
all
the
questions
I
have.
I
will
open
this
back
up
to
the
rest
of
the
condition.
E
Hey,
thank
you
so
much
and
I
apologize
for
being
a
little
tardy
to
the
meeting.
G
Today
does
the
mayor's
new
group.
F
Is
the
mayor's
new
group
subject
to
open
meeting
law?
It
is
not
no
so
because
it
is
not
made
up
of
city
appointed
officials.
I
would
have
to
probably
get
a
legal
opinion
on
this,
but
believe
because
of
the
the
composition
of
the
group
and
the
work
that
they're
assigned
and
doing
they
are
not
subject
to
open
meeting
laws.
C
This
won't
be
so
much
a
form
of
a
question,
and
I'm
really
sorry
I
want
to
thank
you.
I
know
you
to
do
a
high-level
overview
and
it's
kind
of
the
group
is
taking
the
approach
that
the
pcoc
is
a
member
or
is
a
part
of
a
system
that
already
exists
and
kind
of
trying
to
step
outside
of
that
system
and
look
at
how
to
improve
it.
C
And
so
I
wanted
to
underscore
I'd
say
if
there's
any
way,
we
can
at
least
meet
with
the
group
or
participate
in
it,
because
we
feel
very,
I
think,
unique
in
the
whole
existing
structure
of
city
government,
because
we
are,
none
of
us
were
well.
Currently,
none
of
us
work
for
city
government,
I
believe-
and
so
we
are
doing
our
best
to
you-
know,
get
information
and
build
those
relationships,
but
partially
due
to
turnover
and
various
reasons.
That
kind
of
hampers
some
of
our
work.
C
And
so
I
think
that's
something
that
we
see
again
and
again
is
we
maybe
make
some
progress
and
then
there's
turnover
at
the
pcoc,
and
so
maybe
there's
certain
things
that
we
we
might
not
have
felt
like.
We
can
really
get
done
just
by
the
nature
of
who
we
are
right
and
it's.
C
This
is
important
to
have
community
members
and
civilians
doing
this
work,
but
then
the
other
side
of
it
is
we're
the
only
ones
that
maybe
aren't
doing
it
for
years
at
a
time,
seeing
the
same
people
all
the
time,
and
so
I
think
that
was
one
of
the
motivations
to
want
to
be
involved
with
the
mayor's
work
group.
C
That
being
said,
I
mean,
I
can't
say,
I'm
super
familiar
with
everybody
in
the
work
group,
but
there
are
people
who
touch
the
criminal
justice
system
in
the
same
ways
that
we
do
who
are
involved,
and
so
I
would
just
like
to
you
know,
reconsider
or
if
there's
ways
that
we
can
bring
our
perspective
in,
because
I
think
we
are
unique
in
the
whole
systems
that
are
being
looked
at,
so
I
know
not
much
of
a
question
just
taking
the
opportunity
since
you're
here
to
to
kind
of
bring
that
concern
up.
F
Yeah
absolutely
thank
you,
commissioner.
Mcguire
yeah.
I
can
certainly
pass
that
along
to
the
the
co-chairs
of
the
group-
and
I
know,
commissioner,
sarah
has
already
emailed
them
as
well,
so
they
are
aware
of
your
interest
in
participating
and
being
giving
your
perspective
on
kind
of
the
system
as
a
as
it
currently
stands
and
your
experience
as
well.
F
So
I
know
that's
something:
that's
being
discussed
currently
and
they're,
where
they're
kind
of
getting
their
their
wheels
rolling
right
now
they
had
their
first
meeting
december
and
their
second
meeting
this
week,
and
so
I
think
after
this
week's
meeting,
they'll
have
a
better
idea
of
like
their
trajectory
and
where
they
want
to
go.
B
Well,
thank
you
very
much,
mr
jeffries.
I
don't
see
any
hand
hands
currently
raised.
Thank
you
again
for
your
time
and
since
we
did
have
commissioners
that
were
not
able
to
attend
this
meeting,
is
it
possible
that
they
could
follow
up
with
any
questions
via
email
to
in
case
they
wanted
to
ask
you
something
in
specific.
F
Yes,
yeah,
that
would
be
fine.
I
will
also
say
I
will
continue
to
be
on
these
meetings.
I
don't
always
have
my
camera
on,
but
I
am
often
I'm
usually
in
attendance.
So
if
there's
ever
a
question
that
comes
up
just
feel
free
to
call
on
me
and
happy
to
help
well,
thank
you
again.
Yep.
B
Absolutely
next
item
of
business,
we
will
be
skipping
over
item
five,
as
we
previously
said,
and
move
into
staff
reports.
I
would
like
to
recognize
opcr
staff
to
give
the
commission
a
status
report
on
new
appointments.
E
Hey
sorry
about
that,
can
you
repeat
just
one
more
time?
Is
it
with
new
appointments
that
you
were
asking
yes,
yeah.
E
Obviously,
if
your
term
expired-
and
we
haven't
put
somebody
else
in
the
position-
you're
able
to
continue
until
the
position's
filled,
I
don't
mean
that
to
sound
ominous,
if
I'm
hoping
back
but
but
yeah,
so
we
are
currently
finishing
set
going
through
applications
and
setting
up
interviews,
hopefully
that
those
invites
will
be
sent
out
by
the
end
of
this
week,
one
of
the
again
just
the
way
that
the
calendar
works
out
right
now
and
the
impacts
that
it
has
on
on
the
work
is,
you
know
I'm
starting
last
year
when
again,
like
my
group,
took
this
over
kind
of
on
behalf
of
you
know
the
department
both
for
the
minneapolis
commission
on
civil
rights
and
the
office
and
the
police
conduct
oversight.
E
Commission
is
you
know
like
the
virtual
component
of
everything
you
know,
trying
to
find
positives
where
we
can
it
made
it
a
lot
more
accessible.
You
know
to
invite
members
of
this.
You
know
city
council
mayor's
office
to
participate
kind
of
open
up
the
process.
So
that
way,
you
know
down
the
road.
You
know
when
we
used
to
get
some
questions.
You
know
that
I
noticed
where
it's
like.
Well,
you
know
what
happened
here.
What
about
this?
You
know
instead
of
you
know
those
being
the
questions.
E
It's
more,
you
know
you
were
part
of
this.
You
know
you
had
somebody
in
the
room
that
saw
you
know
that
saw
the
whole
thing,
so
I
think
it's
beneficial
and
I
also
think
it's
beneficial
for
people
that
are
applying.
You
know
to
see
that
they're
taking
the
time
out
of
their
schedule
to
participate
and
taking
this
seriously.
So
with
you
know,
when
we
had
it,
you
know
after
the
election
we
obviously
had
more.
E
I
believe
it
was
more
than
50
turnover
on
the
city
council,
so
we
made
the
decision
to
wait
until
we
had
the
new
council
sworn
in
in
order
to
know
who
we
have
to
invite.
You
know
generally
we'll
use
our
home
committees
so
for
opcr
you
know,
that's
the
public
safety
committee.
We
want
to
invite.
E
You
know
multiple
members
of
that
council,
president
council
vice
president
and
then
usually
depending
on
the
app
you
know
where
the
applicant's
from
we'll
try
to
if
they're
not
already
included,
we'll
try
to
extend
an
invitation
to
their
their
respective
council
members
office.
E
So,
as
you
know,
many
of
you
probably
know
that
the
inauguration
and
everything
was
this
week.
Everybody
got
sat
on
their
committees,
we
know
who
we're
dealing
with,
and
so
you
know
we
just
kind
of
had
to
wait
for
this
week
in
order
to
extend
those
invitations
and
make
sure
that
everybody's
included.
E
So
the
goal
is
to
send
those
out
and
hopefully
do
the
interviews
in
the
latter
part
of
this
month
and
then
move
everything
through
as
soon
as
we
possibly
can
to
get
applicants
put
in
for,
like
bob
no
later
than
I
have
to
look
at
the
council
calendar
and
see
where
it
falls,
but
no
later
to
the
the
end
of
february.
E
So
the
goal
is,
I
think
we
did
it
last
year
where
we-
and
you
know
again,
your
group
can
talk
amongst
themselves,
but
if
we
still
have
a
meeting
in
february,
then
we
can
do
a
special
meeting
at
the
end
of
the
month
or
you
know
or
the
beginning
march
meeting.
But
I
think
when
we
do
the
trainings,
I
think
it's
it's.
E
I
definitely
like
the
way
we
did
it
last
year
where
it
was,
you
know
we
did
it
as
part
of
a
public
meeting
so
that
again,
I
kind
of
added
degree
of
transparency.
Anybody
can,
you
know,
jump
on
and
see
how
we're
doing
this
and
what
we're
talking
about
and
what
the
questions
are.
So
I
think
that's
the
goal
this
year
as
well.
For
that
so.
B
That's
great,
I
do
have
one
question
just
in
regards
to
the
applicants,
not
necessarily
for
myself,
because
I
know,
but
for
particularly
people
who
are
new
applicants,
have
they
been
informed
that
they're
still
under
consideration.
E
I
don't
know
if,
when
people
apply,
what
the
responses
from
the
clerk's
office
obviously
is
we've
been
staffing
off.
I
mean
that's
one
of
the
biggest
benefits
of
finally
having
some
actual
people
that
can
you
know
kind
of
assist
with
this
process.
I'm
sorry,
that's
that's,
certainly
something
we
want
to
reach
out
and
do.
E
Oh
you
know
so,
but
it's
just
one
of
those
where,
like
all
that
takes
like
systems
and
people
in
time,
and
so
it's
certainly
something
I'm
aware
of,
but
but
I
don't
know
what
the
communication
has
been
from
the
clear
side
from
our
side.
It's
even
we've
kind
of
been.
You
know
waiting
for
this
point
in
the
process.
B
Fair
any
questions
for
mr
hawkins
before
we
move
swiftly
on
to
our
next
item.
B
All
right
seeing
none,
we
will.
I
will,
without
objection,
direct
the
clerk
to
receive
and
file
mr
hawkins
report,
and
next
I
will
I
will
choose
to
acknowledge
because
it
is
item
seven,
the
chair
and
vice
chair
report,
since
both
of
them
are
not
here
right
now
and
we
are,
we
have
about
ten
minutes
left
before
we
no
longer
will
meet
quorum.
I
will
say
that
there
is
no
report
to
give
from
the
chair
or
vice
chair
next.
D
All
right,
thank
you,
chairpino,
so
audit
subcommittee,
we
met
commissioner
sparks
and
I-
and
we
spoke
about
the
no
knock
warrants.
Coaching
and
attorney
fussy
came
to
speak
about
a
little
bit
about
arbitration,
research
and
study.
As
far
as
what
we
spoke
about
specifically
nothing
specific
to
report,
I
believe
chris,
I
apologize.
D
I
don't
remember
a
specific
title,
but
chris
essentially
said
that
he's
still
working
on
a
lot
of
the
data
for
the
coaching
and
no
knock
warrants,
there's
some
variables
that
he
was
continuing
to
work
on
and
then
attorney
fussy
gave
us
a
a
brief
about
arbitration
research
and
study,
and
then
that
was
that
was
it.
Forgive
me,
commissioner,
sparks
also
had
some
add
some
notes
there
too.
So.
B
B
Well,
thank
you
very
much
and
are
there
any
questions
for
commissioner
crockett
regarding
this
report.
B
Crockett
and
without
objection
I
will
direct
the
clerk
to
receive
and
file
this
report.
Next
order
of
business
is
a
discussion
item
regarding
the
city,
attorney's
office,
outside
council
process
and
mr
fussy,
are
you
going
to
be
the
one
who's
speaking
on
that
or
is
there
someone
else
here
to
speak
that
on
that
discussion.
G
I
I
don't
have
anything
to
add
on
that.
I
think,
commissioner,
sarah
was
kind
of
cheering
that
up
I'd
provide
her
some
responses
to
some
inquiry.
G
B
I
will,
I
will
note
simply
because
it
is
attached
to
the
the
public
agenda
on
limbs
this.
This
is
the
document
you're
referencing,
the
one
page
or
entitled
city
attorney's,
outside
counsel,
legal
services.
Information.
G
Yeah
there
was
an
email
I
sent
a
few
weeks
ago
and
there's
also
one
today
that
commissioner,
sarah,
that
I
sent
commissioner,
sarah
and
the
vice
chair
and
she
said
she
was
gonna-
provide
it
to
the
remaining
remaining
members
of
the
commission.
B
All
right,
thank
you
very
much
and
yes,
that
is
correct.
Chair
sarah
did
forward
along
that
email.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
sending
that
email
and
we
we
now
have
it
to
the
rest
of
the
commissioners
or
is
anyone
interested
in
speaking
on
this
item
either
regarding
the
the
email
or
the
document
attached
within.
B
C
I
just
want
to
thank
thank
you,
mr
fussy,
for
providing
this,
and
I
I
think
maybe
we
will
want
to
have
further
discussion
with
when
commissioner
sarah's
present
again
and
I
looked
at
it
today,
but
obviously
I
think
we
might
want
to
one
of
the
questions
that
she's
going
to
bring
up
is
more
just
what
does
consult
mean
in
the
when
we're
looking
at
the
ordinance
that
city
attorney's
office
is
to
consult
with
the
police
contact
oversight.
Commission,
but,
commissioner,
sarah
isn't
here
tonight
and
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
time.
C
B
And-
and
I
agree-
you
took
the
words
right
out
of
my
mouth,
given
that
this
is
something
that
I
I
believe
we
should
spend
more
than
just
a
few
rushed
minutes
on
and
without
objection.
I
will
table
this
item
for
next
meeting
of
the
pcoc.
So
that
way
we
can
consider
this
further.
B
The
this
order
of
business
is
the
acceptance
of
the
2022
meeting
calendar.
Our
operating
rules
state
that
the
commission
shall
meet
on
the
second
tuesday
of
each
month.
In
august
of
this
year,
however,
there
is
a
statewide
primary
on
the
second
tuesday
of
the
month,
so
we
will
need
to
select
a
different
meeting
date.
The
draft
calendar
has
availa
been
available
on
lims
with
today's
agenda
and
it
shows
an
alternative
meeting
date
for
tuesday
august
16th.
B
As
a
starting
point
for
this
discussion,
I
will
now
open
it
up
for
discussion
regarding
the
alternative
date
proposed
as
august
16th.
B
Hearing
no
discussion:
do
I
hear
a
motion
to
accept
the
police
conduct
oversight.
Commission
2022
calendar
as
amended
to
include
august
16th
as
our
meeting
for
the
month
of
august.
B
All
right
there
is
a
motion
and
it
will
there
be
any
further
discussion
before
I
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role
on
this
hearing.
None
will
the
clerk,
please
call
the
roll.
F
B
All
right
that
motion
carries
and
the
2022
calendar
is
adopted
next
order
of
business
is
the
acceptance
of
public
comment.
I
will
open
the
floor
and
invite
comments
from
members
of
the
community.
We
will
limit
public
comment
period
to
no
more
than
two
minutes
per
speaker
and
with
that
are
there
any
members
of
the
community
on
the
line
who
wish
to
address
the
commission.
A
At
this
moment,
we
do
not.
We
had
one
member,
but
that
person
just
left.
B
Okay,
totally
understandable,
we
started
late
so
we'll
make
sure
that
we
we
get
the
public
comment
in
nice
and
early
next
time.
B
Well,
we've
concluded
all
items
on
our
agenda
for
this
meeting
and
seeing
no
further
business
before
us
and
without
objection.
I
will
declare
this
meeting
adjourned.
Thank
you,
everyone
and
we
hope
you
have
a
good
night.