►
From YouTube: March 23, 2022 Bicycle Advisory Committee
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Thanks
melissa
welcome
everyone
to
the
march
23rd
meeting
of
the
minneapolis
bicycle
advisory
notice.
This
meeting
may
involve
the
remote
participation
by
offers,
either
by
telephone
or
other
electronic
needs
due
to
the
local
public
health
agency,
novel
corona
pandemic
to
the
provisions
of
minnesota
state
statutes,
section
15
d
.021
welcome
everybody
on
this
kind
of
snowy
wednesday.
Let's
start
with
calling
the
roll,
if
I
could
turn
it
over
to
millicent.
For
that.
B
C
B
B
D
B
B
B
E
D
B
B
A
Thank
you,
nelson.
For
calling
the
role.
I
would
entertain
a
motion
to
adopt
the
agenda
and
accept
the
minutes
for
the
february
bicycle
advisory
committee
meeting.
A
Thanks
erin
any
discussion
on
the
agenda
or
the
minutes.
F
Yeah
I'd
like
to
just
add
something
at
the
end
of
the
discussion,
if
there's
time
to
talk
about
some
issues
that
have
been
brought
before
me
and
just
to
report
about
a
few
things,
I've
seen
which
are
positive
and
that,
if
that's
possible
or
do
you
want
to
just
do
it
in
announcements.
A
A
I
think
if
we
do
that
after
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you
get
through
the
engineering
subcommittee
report,
so
maybe
we'll
just
talk
about
that
during
announcements
and
plan
for
a
little
bit
more
time
during
the
announcements
portion
of
the
meeting.
Does
that
sound?
Okay.
C
A
A
All
right
not
seeing
any
other
hands
up
or
folks
coming
off
mute.
I
would
ask
millicent
to
call
the
role
on
approving
the
agenda
in
the
february
minutes.
D
H
E
B
J
B
A
I
think
jeremy
can't
vote
until
june,
so
thank
you,
jeremy.
We
will
look
forward
to
future
meetings.
A
Thanks
everybody:
let's
move
on
to
the
discussion
portion
of
our
agenda,
as
I
said,
I'm
very
excited
that
we
have
like
a
luxury
of
time
today,
we'll
endeavor
not
to
fill
it
all,
just
for
filling
it
all,
but
it,
but
it
is
nice
to
have
a
little
bit
of
space
first
on
the
agenda
for
discussion
is
appointments.
I
think
chris
is
probably
going
to
follow
up
on
the
email
that
he
sent
all
of
us
yesterday.
K
Yeah,
just
a
quick
one,
I
sent
an
email
yesterday
actually
a
couple.
I
always
get
the
bac
and
the
pac
confused
because
they
do
their
member
appointments
on
on
different
half
of
the
pac
is
up
each
year,
but
all
of
the
bac
ward
members
are
up
for
reappointment
this
year,
so
I've
heard
from
at
least
one
person
who's
not
coming
back.
A
Thanks
chris
and
definitely
I
know,
we've
been
encouraging
folks
to
reach
out
to
their
appointing
council
member
if
they're
interested
in
reappointment,
if
you
don't
already
have
a
relationship
with
those
folks,
definitely
continue
to
encourage
that
and
then
also
it
is
really
helpful
if
you
are
deciding
to
put
your
time
and
energy
towards
other
things
to
also
let
chris
know
like
he
said,
because
those
of
us
who
are
remaining
or
even
folks
who
are
leaving
some
sometimes
do
some
recruitment
to
fill
those
open
seats.
A
And
so
it
is
helpful
if
we
know
before
the
april
15th
deadline.
So
we
can
encourage
other
folks
to
get
on
the
committee,
because
we
know
that
not
everybody
is
going
to
always
want
to
recommit
to
a
two
years
of
a
lot
of
volunteer
time
for
the
city.
So,
but
I
would
be
excited
to
continue
to
work
with
all
of
you.
A
Anyone
else
want
to
say
anything
about
member
appointments.
I
think
chris
and
I
kind
of
have
the
basics
covered.
But
if
anybody
who
has
reapplied
multiple
times
has
anything
else
to
add
would
be
happy
to
give
you
a
minute
to
talk.
A
All
right,
not
not
seeing
anybody
I'm
going
to
move
on
thanks
everyone,
the
next
item
for
just
oh
dan,
did
you
want
to
jump
in.
F
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
you
know:
we've
been
through
two
years
of
this
pandemic
and
two
years
of
virtual
meetings
and
everything
else
and
many
kudos
to
everybody
that
has
hung
through
this
and
been
part
of
it.
It's
been
a
great
time
and
I
think
we've
done
some
really
good
work.
You
know,
we've
we've
gone
through
a
lot
of
changes.
Personnel
changes
in
in
you
know,
government
and
and
and
to
our
staff.
F
So
I
think
a
thought
to
keep
in
mind
is
that
it's
always
good
to
have
a
to
have
a
a
blend
of
experience
as
well
as
new
new
voices
and
whatever
you're
deciding
I
mean
I.
I
know
that
the
work
is
not
done
and
that's
something
that
motivates
me
thanks.
A
Thanks
dan,
I
appreciate
you
adding
that
cool
all
right,
speaking
of
blend
of
new
perspectives
and
experience
perspectives.
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
annual
report
to
council.
So
I'm
going
to
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
and
just
to
kind
of
like
contextualize
and
keep
the
conversation,
and
then
this
is
really
like
an
open
forum
for
me
to
get
feedback
from
all
of
you,
because
I
am
the
person
who
has
to
do
the
annual
report
to
council
on
behalf
of
our
committee.
A
So
I
think
we
mentioned
this
in
other
meetings,
but
just
a
little
bit
of
grounding
context.
So
you
know
we,
as
a
committee
exist
because
at
some
point
there
was
an
enabling
resolution
that
passed
city
council.
A
That
said
put
into
existence
this
committee
and
here's
its
responsibilities
and
in
that
enabling
resolution
one
of
the
responsibilities
or
charges
for
the
committee
is,
was
to
come
back
to
the
public
works
and
infrastructure
committee.
It
is
now
and
give
an
annual
report
on
our
work.
A
That
annual
report
has
looked
a
lot
of
different
ways.
It's
evolved
a
lot
over
the
years
for
a
long
time.
The
bicycle
advisory
committee
did
its
own
report
and
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee
did
its
own
report
in
recent
years.
We've
done
a
joint
report
together
because
they
also
have
a
requirement
and
there's
a
lot
of
overlap
between
the
concerns
of
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee
and
the
concerns
of
the
bicycle
advisory
committee.
So
that's
been
a
really
nice
joint
effort,
a
way
for
our
committees
to
collaborate
and
stay
more
in
touch
on.
A
You
know
the
priorities
of
the
pac
and
the
bac.
It's
also
evolved
in
terms
of
focus
and
tone.
I
think
when
it
was
first
envisioned
and
for
many
years
it
was
really
an
opportunity
for
all
of
us
to
celebrate
with
the
council
some
of
our
achievements.
A
There
there's
been
a
lot
of
achievements
over
the
last
decade
or
so
and
in
especially
last
year
it
was
both
an
opportunity
to
celebrate
and
also,
I
think,
a
significant
challenge
to
council
to
say
you
know:
we've
done
a
lot
of
really
really
great
things,
and
also
we
need
to
do
a
lot
more
and
we
need
to
do
it
a
lot
faster
right.
So
that
was
a
little
bit
of
a
shift
in
tone.
A
Last
year
you
know
there
were
a
lot
of
content
things
that
we
focused
on
a
couple
of
the
things
that
are
top
of
mind
for
me,
as
we
think
about
bringing
the
concerns
of
the
committee
to
the
public
works
and
infrastructure
committee
of
council,
which
is
six
folks,
five
of
whom
are
new
to
city
council.
A
Is,
you
know,
filling
those
folks
in
on
some
of
the
history
of
what
we've
done,
making
sure
they're
familiar
with
who
we
are
thinking
about
some
of
the
major
priorities
that
we've
discussed
as
a
group
this
year,
and
so
what
just
want
to
have
a
group
brainstorming
discussion
about
you
know:
what
do
we
want
to
communicate?
What
do
we
think
is
really
important
for
that
committee?
A
Who
is
you
know
the
one
who
approves
all
of
the
projects
we
review
all
of
the
policies
we
review
and
and
making
sure
that
we're
you
know
the
messaging
that
I
am
giving
on
behalf
of
the
committee
aligns
with
what
we
all
are
thinking
so
janice.
Do
you
did
you
want
to
have
more
context?
Are
you
jumping
in
with
brainstorming.
I
Actually
excited
about
well,
I
was
going
to
say
something
and
ask
a
question,
so
I
was
going
to
ask
whether
it
was
going
to
be
in
person
this
year
and
just
mention
that
in
the
past,
when
it
has
been
in
person,
I've
gone
well.
We've
been
encouraged
as
members
to
to
to
kind
of
offer
moral
support
and
to
come
and
there's
always
been
a
few
of
us
and
I've
gone
a
few
times
and
I
have
to
say
when
I
have
come.
I
You
know
it's
been
really
appreciated
by
the
council
so
and
then,
but
so
that
I
guess
then
now
my
question
isn't
going
to
be
in
person
this
year.
A
The
answer
is
like
65,
probably,
and
also
that
doesn't
mean
that
our
presentation
will
be
in
per
so
there's.
Chris
can
talk
about
this
a
little
bit.
A
They
might
be
in
person,
but
presenters
might
still
be
remote,
but
it's
unclear,
I
think,
a
little
bit
how
that
applies
to
us
as
a
board
and
commission.
So,
chris,
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
say
any
more
of
that
this
is
discussion
item
the
next
discussion
item
on
the
agenda
is
meeting
format
and
so
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
that
in
depth.
But
maybe
we
should
just
talk
about
it
now,
since
it's
relevant
to
this.
K
I
I
think
that
was
a
good
overview
as
far
as
whether
or
not
this
one
will
will
be
in
person.
I
think,
there's
I
think,
there's
an
upcoming
pwi
meeting
that
has
the
potential
to
be
in
person.
So
if
that
one
is,
I
think
we
would
know
in
advance,
but
I
might
be
maybe
this
is
the
first
one
I
can't
remember
exactly
but
yeah
there's
a
chance
like
alyssa
said
I'll,
just
leave
it.
There.
A
Yeah-
and
I
should
say
we
are
tentatively
scheduled
right
now,
assuming
we
meet
all
of
the
like
11
pre-checklist
milestones
to
be
at
the
pwni
committee
on
the
april
21st
meeting
so
it'll
be
about
a
month
from
now.
I
A
Appreciate
that
I
I
went
several
times
before
I
had
to
present,
and
it
was
really
fun
and
nice
to
see
people
and
yeah
interesting
to
if
you've
never
been
to
a
p.
It
used
to
be
t
and
pw,
but
now
it's
pw
and
I,
if
you've
never
been
to
the
public
works
and
infrastructure
meetings,
they're
really
interesting,
so
for
for
our
kind
of
crowd
cool.
So
I
think
that's
like
the
kind
of
the
high
level
of
context
I
would
give
at
this
point.
A
I
can
share
some
high
level
thoughts
about
you
know
what
am
I
thinking
based
on
the
major
themes
that
we've
had
as
a
committee
over
the
last
year,
what
what
appears
to
me
to
have
come
up
over
and
over
again,
but
would
really
love
to
hear
from
other
folks.
You
know
what
what
you
think
is
important
to
communicate
to
council.
What's
on
your
mind,
what
do
you
feel
like
our
big
successes
from
the
last
year
have
been
big
challenges
from
the
last
year?
A
You
know
it's
yeah,
like
I
said
an
opportunity
to
celebrate,
also
an
opportunity
to
be
very
clear
about
where
things
can
be
done
better.
So.
A
C
I
think
for
me,
two
things:
two
possible
messages
or
concerns
jump.
To
my
mind.
One
is
that
I'm
certainly
I'm
sure
alyssa
in
your
comments.
You'll
talk
about
are
sort
of
foundational
documents
such
as
the
climate
emergency
mentioned,
but
I
think
it's
I
think
it
just
repeats.
C
C
So
it's
not
because
I
think
I
still
think
some
people,
I
I
really
don't
know
the
new
council,
but
I
think
it's
it's
it's
possible
that
some
people
are
still
thinking.
Well,
we've
got
you
know
if
you
don't
get
around
to
it
this
decade,
we'll
sort
of
get
around
next
decade,
and
it's
like
you
know,
the
2030s
is
going
to
be
much
more
of
our
resilience
as
opposed
to
mitigation
of
climate
impact,
so
so
that
that
would
be
one
consideration
for
you
to
mention,
but
the
other
one
is
a.
C
I
don't
know,
maybe
a
little
a
little
more
dicey
and
imprecise,
but
if
we
were,
if,
if
we
were
talking
about
sort
of
multimodal
transportation
and
the
region
or
this
really
the
season,
you
know
we
were
talking
about
induced
travel
and
the
you
know
really
good
research
over
the
past
20
years.
That
shows
that
if
you
make
it
easier
to
drive,
people
will
drive.
If
you
spend
more
money
on
roads,
we
do
induce
more
people
to
drive,
and
so
the,
but
it's
a
it's
sort
of
a
tough.
C
It's
sort
of
a
tough
love
message
to,
I
would
say,
expose
what
I
think
is
the
reality
for
us
on
the
commission,
which
is
we
to
a
certain
extent.
We
don't
want
to
make
it
easier
to
drive.
We
obviously
want
people
to
be
able
to
drive.
We
know
a
lot
of
economic.
Social
activity
happens
because
of
driving,
but
we
also
are
part
of
our
business.
I
feel,
is
to
make
the
alternative
to
driving
easier,
more
pleasant.
C
The
easiest
first
choice,
but
it's
also
I
mean
we
talked
about
this,
making
a
little
harder
to
drive
so
something
I
mean
the
sort
of
bloodless
way
to
talk
about
that
is,
that
is
that
you
can
spend
a
phenomenal
amount
of
money,
and
people
will
continue
to
drive
and
drive
more
and
even
drive
more
until
you
bulldoze
the
entire.
You
know,
city,
so
I
don't
know
that's
a
little
rambly
there,
but
that
would
be
just
one
point
approach
something
to
touch
on
if
that
seems
appropriate.
A
A
I
think
for
all
of
us,
but
I
think
I
largely
you
know
one
of
the
things
philip
that
comes
to
mind
based
on
what
you're
saying
is
this
this
thing
I'd
like
to
talk
about
of
the
false
equivalency
right,
we're
like
worried
about
delaying
drivers
30
seconds
and
then
there's
a
like
the
cost
is
more
people
are
seriously
hurt
or
killed
while
walking
or
biking
right,
and
so
we
talk
about
those
like
they're
the
same
right,
the
manual
that
they
have
when
we
think
about
like
why
there
can't
be
improvements
made
on
lindale
right
away,
say
that
like
well
until
you
have
a
certain
amount
of
human
cost,
then
the
time
cost
isn't
worth
it,
and
I
think
there
is
there
is
that
false
equivalency
that
is
worth
pointing
out
excellent,
excellent
yeah
yeah.
I
Yeah
and
since
you
said
so,
many
of
the
people
on
this
committee
are
new.
I
I
just
wanted
to
second
you
on
your.
I
think
you
should
give
some
more
some
background
on
the
committee
and
explain
who
we
are
to
them,
and
you
know
you
said
you
were
going
to
do
that.
I
think
that's
a
great
idea
and
as
we're
talking
about
the
importance
of
dealing
with
climate
change,
I
mean
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
specifically
talk
about
hennepin
avenue,
but
that's
really
key.
I
I
mean
here
the
city
council,
you
know
the
staff
have
come
up
with
a
really
good
plan
that
promotes
transit
and
biking
and
less
car
use
and
there-
and
this
council
is
probably
under
tremendous
pressure
not
to
accept
that
plan.
So
I
I
don't
know
whether
it's
worth
calling
out,
I
think,
probably,
is
worth
mentioning
specifically
how
important
hennepin
avenue
is
and
and
the
current
plan.
A
Thanks
and
I
think
we
we
still
don't
know
about
a
vote
timing
on
the
hennepin
avenue
project.
My
understanding
is
sometime
in
april
to
early
may,
so
there'll
be
a
little
bit
of
this.
Might
this
presentation
might
be
right
after
it
or
might
be
right
before
it
so
in
either
in
either
case?
I'm
sure
there
will
be
things
we
could
say
about
hennepin
avenue,
I'm
getting
my
chat
list
up,
someone's
got
their
hand
up
deanna.
L
Yeah,
it's
me,
I
don't
know
all
of
our
audience,
but
I
do
happen
to
know
the
one
that
I'm
supposed
to
know,
and-
and
so
I
guess
my
feeling
is
that
that
part
of
what
we
need
to
say
is
that,
although
we
are
the
bicycle
advisory
committee,
we
aren't
a
bunch
of
rabid,
isola
bicyclists
only
advocating
for
ourselves,
but
that
we
actually
are
thinking
about
a
more
holistic
picture.
You
know
a
picture
that
that
does
deal
with
with
climate
and
with
with
safety
of
of
of
all
multi
multimodal.
L
You
know
that
that
really
our
issue
is
not
making
more
bike
lanes
just
so
that
we
would,
you
know,
have
bike
lanes
to
run
around,
and
I
just
say
that
from
another
perspective
that
it's
worth
emphasizing
that.
A
Dana,
can
I
ask:
are
there
particularly
so
you
mentioned
climate?
Are
there
other
sort
of
values
things
that
you
have
in
mind
that
you
know
when
you're
thinking
about
about
that
idea?
We're
not
just
advocating
for
ourselves
well.
L
I
mean,
and
you
brought
it
up
too
right
with
it
when
we
make
it
easier
for
cars
to
go
faster,
we
then
create
safety
issues
for
pedestrians
and
and
bikes.
Also,
I
mean
there.
There
are
all
sorts
of
reasons
why
the
making
the
city
more
multi-modal
more
attractive
to
to
those
people
who
are
not
in
cars.
I
think
that
is
good.
It's
good
for
the
city,
it's
good
for
our
economy,
it's
good
for
businesses
it
it's!
There,
there's
a
lot
of
benefits
to
this.
Besides,
just
putting
in
more
bike
lanes.
A
Great,
thank
you.
I
see
dan
miller
again
and
then
dan
booty.
F
Yeah,
just
to
piggyback
off
of
what
deanna
said,
I
think
you
may
be
able
to
work
in
that
bikes
are
a
business
generator
and
and
that's
going
to
help
us
get
back
to
the
new
normal,
and
we
should
be
doing
what
we
can
do
to
encourage
people
to
to
do
alternative
means.
Besides
an
automobile.
F
The
other
thing
I
wanted
to
mention
was
it's.
The
april
15th,
I
think,
was
when
you're
planning
to
be
there.
Is
it
the
21st.
F
Okay,
so
it's
it's
a
week
after
the
deadline,
for
you
know
the
things
to
reapply
for
to
apply
for
the
bac
and
we
may
have
candidates
in
each
of
those
things
we
may
not.
F
But
it
may
be
worthwhile
to
point
out
that
you
know
as
a
representative
of
the
bac
an
award
appointee,
it's
important
that
your
award
is
is
recognized
and
that
as
a
and
that
your
appointee
is
a
partner
with
you
and
is
a
worthwhile
person
to
bounce
ideas
off
of
and
to
get
involved
with,
issues
that
are
affecting
their
ward
as
well
as
the
city.
A
Thank
you,
they're
very
cheerful
on
days
like
today,
so
thanks
dan,
yes,
dan
booty.
H
Yeah
piggybacking
off
of
deanna
on
two
things
also,
I
was
gonna
say
nice
earrings,
and
the
other
thing
is
to
her
comment
about
safety.
It's
worth
emphasizing
that
slowing
traffic
down
is
safer
for
all
users,
including
vehicles.
So
it's
not
just.
I
mean
obviously
we're
focusing
on
bicycles,
pedestrians
and
people
rolling,
but
changing
things
to
benefit
bicyclists
and
pedestrians
also
benefits
the
safety
of
vehicle
drivers.
So
you
know
anything
that
increases
speed
is
is
unsafe
for
everybody
not
just
bicyclists.
M
What
other
folks
have
said
just
being
careful
in
the
language
and
like
the
wording
in
the
framework
that,
like
people
who
drive
cars,
it's
not
a
zero-sum
game
and
they're,
not
losing
anything
in
particular
when
more
infrastructure
is,
is
actually
balanced
in
a
more
equitable
way
for
people
who
are
biking
and
walking,
and
that
you
know
for
folks
who,
who
truly
do
rely
for
all
sorts
of
mobility
needs
or
lifestyle
needs
for
for
vehicles
that
it
actually
alleviates
traffic
for
those
for
whom
transit
and
biking
and
walking
are
never
going
to
be
able
to
fulfill
their
mobility
needs,
and
so,
like
really
making
sure
that
you
know
all
of
the
languages
that
this
is
mutually
beneficial
for
for
everyone,
because
I,
I
honestly
get
really
tired
of
the
bad
faith
arguments
from
folks
who
aren't
disabled,
arguing
on
behalf
of
disabled
people
and
that
they
need
to
drive.
M
And
then,
when
I
talk
to
people,
a
lot
of
disabled
folks
are
like.
Actually
I
take
transit
or
I
don't
have
a
car.
I
can't
afford
a
car,
so
like
transit
improvements
would
actually
be
the
best
for
me.
So
I
I
really
dislike
when
folks
use
other
identities
that
they
don't
personally
share
in
to
to
make
bad
faith
arguments
on
their
behalf
that
are
actually
not
in
line
with
you
know
what
folks
would
want
and
would
need
if
we
actually
talked
directly
to
them.
A
Thanks
katie,
I
don't
see
anybody
else
currently
with
hands
up.
We
probably
have
another
five-ish
minutes
we
could
spend
on
this.
If
folks
have
other
ideas
or
even
like
it
would
be
helpful
if
anybody
wants
to
like
you.
H
A
Plus
one
anything,
that's
already
been
shared,
I've
appreciated
when
folks
do
that
as
well.
You
know
we'll
have
probably
15
minutes
to
talk
about
a
whole
year's
worth
of
work,
and
so
you
know
I
will
we'll
do
our
best
to
incorporate
as
much
of
this
as
possible
and
also
still
only
have
15
minutes,
which
is
a
challenge,
but
so
I'll
just
give
it
one
more
awkwardly
long
pause
to
see
if
anybody
wants
to
raise
their
hand
after
phil.
C
Okay,
well,
I
was
just
thinking
in
terms
of
the
yeah
sort
of
bigger
picture.
I
think
it's
really
we're
saying
that
this
is
a
high
functioning
collaborative
commission,
where
great
participation,
every
meeting
and-
and
I
guess
we'll
know
whether
there
are
only
maybe
one
or
two
or
three
people
out
of
28
who
are
not
reapplying.
So
I
think
I
think
a
message
of
this
is
a
this
is
not
just
yet.
You
know,
sort
of
another
sort
of
city.
Commission,
it's
a
it's!
A
commission
that
works
together
well
loves
its
work.
C
Does
a
lot
of
work
yeah.
I
think
we
can
just
really
take
pride
in
in
what
we
do
and
show
that
it's
a
a
commission
that
has
a
lot
of
support
among
us
us
all.
That's
not
always
the
case
I
mean,
I
think
some
commissions,
you
have
a
fair
amount
of
turnover
every
time
and
it
appears
we're
not
going
to
have
that
this
time.
So
that's
great
in
terms
of
replication,
so.
A
M
M
There
are
very
tremendously
scary
things
happening
in
the
world
right
now
and
like
we
are
witnessing
in
real
time
like
how
our
foreign
policy
and
what
we
do
and
don't
do,
and
what
we
can
do
and
can't
do
really
greatly
impacts
like
other
people's
ability
to
live
right
now
and
if
I
you
know,
could
be
more
specific.
M
There
is
a
war
happening.
There
are
multiple
wars
happening
right
now,
but
there
is
a
war
happening
in
ukraine
right
and
something
like
a
billion
dollars
goes
to
the
russian
state
every
single
day
from
oil,
and
we
know
that
oil
prices
here
have
already
shifted
upward,
even
though
the
supply
hasn't
gone
down,
and
so
like.
We
have
a
responsibility
to
explore
how
transportation
plays
a
role
in
this
right
like.
M
If
you
want
to
be
anti-war,
then
that
also
means
that
we
have
to
consider
like
our
impact
and
participation
in
the
global
economy,
and
so,
like
you
know
such
such
is
that,
in
a
way
like
our
lifestyles
are
dependent
on
this,
and
if
we
can
make
our
lifestyles
less
dependent
upon
oil,
whether
that's
domestic
production
or
importation
of
internationally
sourced
oil,
like
that,
that's
also
good
policy
at
a
lot
of
different
levels
of
government,
and
so
that
that
is
something
to
like.
You
know.
M
A
Thanks
cadence-
and
I
you
know,
I
think
the
world
in
which
we
live
in
is
always
relevant
to
this
discussion.
I
don't
think
we
can
have
a
context
about
like
biking
and
being
in
public
space
and
living
in
community
and
living
in
part
of
a
government
without
also
thinking
about
all
those
things.
So
I
appreciate
you
bringing
that
up.
J
But
and
potentially
you
know
something
like
what
percentage
of
the
members
have
a
driver's
license,
not
that
it's
like
a
qualifying
factor
for
anything,
but
like
that
we
are
like
we.
We
there's
a
lot
of
us
who
who
do
drive
as
well
and
are,
are
really
trying
to
actively
change
like
our
nature
of
having
to
drive
to
places
just
a
kind
of
a
thought.
I'd
want
to
throw
out
there,
because
I
know
I
don't
know.
J
I
would
guess
that
at
least
like
probably
50
percent
of
the
committee
has
a
driver's
license
and
but
we're
all
actively
trying
to
make
biking
better,
and
sometimes
that
requires
sacrifices
of
like
less
convenient
car
travel,
yeah.
A
Thanks
jesse,
I
think
that's
like
a
really
interesting
frame
to
think
about
how
we
how
we
tie,
who
we
are
to
some
of
the
things
that
deanna
brought
up
around
like
we're.
Not
just
we're
not
just
here
to
like
advocate
for
more
bike
lanes
for
no
reason,
we're
people
we're
we're
people
who
live
here
and
we
want
it
to
be
better
for
everyone
cool
all
right.
A
I
think
we
are
close
to
the
end
of
what
I
would
want
to
have
for
discussion
time
on
this
agenda,
because
I
want
to
make
sure
chris
has
a
few
minutes
to
talk
about
meeting
format
and
that
we
can
go
through
the
engineering
subcommittee
report.
So,
thank
you,
everybody.
I
have
a
page
and
a
half
of
really
great
notes.
A
Efficient
presentation
and
look
forward
to
sharing
how
that
went
with
you
all
at
our
april
bicycle
advisory
committee
meeting,
since
it
will
happen,
I
think
before
then
so
yeah.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
again.
This
was
a
really
great
discussion.
There
were
lots
of
nuances
that
you
all
teased
out
that
I'm
really
excited
to
explore
more.
So
with
that,
I
will
move
us
on
to
our
next
discussion
item,
which
is
chris
talking
about
meeting
format.
K
Yeah
another
quick
update
here
and
unfortunately,
nothing
super
concrete,
basically
we're
kind
of
on
standby
to
go
back
to
in
person,
they'll
be
bringing
the
council
meetings
back
in
person
first.
So
whenever
that
does
happen,
if
it
is
for
that
april,
21st
one
that'll
be
kind
of
a
signal
that
it'll
be
coming
somewhat
soon
for
us.
We
still
don't
know
like
an
exact
timeline
from
from
that
what
it
means,
but
I
would
say
we're
probably
looking
at
may
being
like
a
fairly
decent
likelihood
of
being
in
person.
K
I
don't
think
any
of
the
april
meetings
would
be
there's
a
there's
a
chance
and
then,
as
we
get
further
into
the
summer,
assuming
nothing
changes.
I
would
say
june,
there's
pretty
pretty
high
likelihood
that
we'll
be
back
in
person
then,
and
so
just
so
folks
know
I
I've
talked
about
this
before,
but
the
janice
you
want.
You
got
a
question.
You
want
to
join.
K
Yes,
thanks
for
clarifying
so
yeah
all
meetings,
the
full
meeting
as
well
as
the
subcommittee
meetings,
you
may
remember
that
a
state
law
was
passed.
I
don't
know
sometime
last
year
that
essentially
makes
it
very
hard
for
us
to
do
any
sort
of
online
meeting,
so
everyone
will
need
to
attend
in
person.
K
There
are
a
few
exemptions
to
that
for
like
medical
reasons,
you
can
have
like
three
virtual
meetings
a
year
or
something
like
that,
but
even
those
might
be
hard,
depending
on
the
setting
that
we're
in
and
things
like
that,
so
I
would
say,
for
the
most
part,
it'll
be
functioning
the
way
it
was
before
we'll
be
back
to
just
regular
in-person
meetings.
K
The
full
meetings,
I
think,
will
be
in
the
new
building
the
conference
rooms
on
the
first
floor
have
are
some
pretty
nice
big
open
spaces,
so
we
can
kind
of
take
advantage
of
space
there
for
the
full
meetings
in
terms
of
kind
of
figuring
out
everyone's
comfort
level,
with
how
close
to
be-
and
things
like
that,
you
know,
especially
for
those
first
meetings
and
then
the
subcommittees.
K
We
have
to
figure
out,
we
we
might
have
some
rooms
in
the
new
building
and
we
might
still
be
in
city
hall,
like
we
were
before
for
those.
So
we'll
get
more
information
on
that
when
it
comes,
I
think
that's
everything.
I've
got
happy
to
answer
any
questions
ambiguously
most
likely,
but
if
you
have
any
I'll
give
it
a
shot.
A
Chris
I'll
just
add
one
thing,
which
is
that
chris
and
I
have
been
in
conversation
to
try
to
determine
what,
if
any,
additional
latitude,
we
as
a
committee
have
to
decide
what
are
what
the
expectations
might
be
for
our
group
meeting
in
person.
My
understanding
at
this
point
is
that
if
the
city
doesn't
have
a
mass
mandate,
the
bac
could
not
have
a
mass
mandate.
If
the
city
does
have
a
mass
mandate,
the
bac
is
mandated
to
be
masked.
A
So
I
guess
I'll
just
put
that
out
there
as
a
question.
Certainly
we
can
have
a
discussion
as
a
group
about
what
our
hoped
for
norms
are
and
and
how
we
are,
you
know
doing
our
best
to
protect
each
other
and
take
care
of
each
other
and
make
folks
as
comfortable
as
possible
with
the
idea
of
returning
to
in
person.
A
But
I
do
not
know
currently
that
I
would
have,
for
example,
the
power
as
committee
chair
to
say,
everyone
who
attends
our
meetings
must
be
masked,
so
I'll
just
make
that
a
little
more
explicit
that
we're.
Also,
having
that
conversation,
as
we
think
about
this
return
to
in
person
and
figuring
out
what
is
what
is
the
clerk's
office
gonna
say.
A
Long
awkward
pause
all
right,
not
seeing
any
raised
hands
or
folks
coming
off
mute.
I
know
it's
a
big
change
for
us
to
contemplate
as
a
committee,
just
like
going
totally
virtual
two
years
ago
with
an
unseen
end
date
was
a
really
big
change
for
us
to
contemplate.
So
do
really
want
to
encourage
folks.
If
you
have
any
questions
concerns
things
you
want
to
raise.
Please
feel
free
to
email
text.
Call
me
we
can
talk
through
those
and
and
figure
out.
A
A
We
went
from
extremely
high
level
to
extremely
detailed
and
now
we're
gonna
go
back
to
the
middle,
a
little
bit
of
both
with
the
engineering
subcommittee
report,
so
I
will
turn
it
over
to
dan
and
I
I
think,
is
marty
here
today.
I
can't
remember
if
they
called
that
we're
called
enroll
but.
F
Okay,
yes,
we
had
only
one
item
that
came
before
the
engineering
subcommittee
and
millicent.
If
you
can
pull
up
the
metro
beeline
route
there.
The
illustration
that
would
be
helpful.
Thank
you.
Anyways.
We
had
one
item
and
the
presenters
were
jasna
hadzik
stanek
from
minneapolis
public
works,
cody
olson
from
metro
transit
and
chad
aylos
from
hennepin
county.
F
So
this
project
is,
is
it's
going
to
be
installed
in
2023
and,
as
you
can
see,
it
goes
from
west
lake
street
on
the
left
side
of
the
illustration,
all
the
way
to
downtown
saint
paul
and
what
we
discussed
at
the
meeting
was
the
minneapolis
park
between
west
lake
street
and
the
river.
F
So
it's
this
is
a
a
b-line
presentation,
but
it's
being
coordinated
with
hennepin
county
in
minneapolis,
and
it's
going
to
be
adding
bi-directional
direct,
dedicated
bus
lanes
that
have
a
red
pavement,
marking,
primarily
between
dean,
parkway
and
to
the
river,
and
that's
about
six
miles
of
of
a
route.
That's
going
to
be
marked
or
using
shared
lanes.
The
project,
presentation
and
you'll
find
these
materials
in
the
in
the
agenda
is
quite
a
lengthy
item
and
it's
if
you're
interested
in
further
reviewing
this.
F
This
is
a
worthy
thing
to
take
a
look
at,
but
the
project
presentation
by
hennepin
county
was
included.
Ten
percent
design
level
striping
a
ten
percent
level,
design,
striping
concept
and
and
so
and
and
we've
got
a
number
of
shots
here
that
we
could
go
through.
But
I'm
going
to
try
to
get
through
my
presentation
first
and
then
we
can
have
a
little
bit
of
discussion
and
maybe
some
of
the
members
that
attended
can
point
things
out
and
we
can
talk
about
specific
slides
and
this
is
a
40-page
presentation.
F
So
it's
it's
it's
fairly,
deep,
so
anyways.
If
we
have
in
this
thing
both
dedicated
red
marked
lanes
as
well
as
areas
where
it
will
be
a
shared
lane
with
two
lanes
of
of
traffic
each
way-
and
it
goes
back
and
forth.
F
However,
during
the
the
interesting
thing
is
that
a
fair
amount
of
it
is
going
to
be
converted
to
a
four
to
three
conversion
with
a
striping
plan.
F
F
So
this
is
kind
of
a
repeating
project
and
if
they
deemed,
if
you
were
going
to
put
in
a
bike
facility,
something
would
have
to
give
and
would
likely
be
the
dedicated
bus
lane.
That's
between
minnehaha
and
the
river.
F
F
What
kind
of
struck
me
as
a
little
odd
about
this
was
the
the
beeline
is
being
pro
present,
was
going
to
be
presented
to
the
public
works
and
infrastructure
this
month
and
city
council
shortly
thereafter.
F
So
this
is
a
lot
of
information
to
take
place
and
we're
seeing
a
10
drawing,
and
we
really
didn't
touch
a
lot
on
pedestrian
improvements.
You
just
couldn't
see
much
that's
going
on
and
you
would
hope
that
some
of
that
would
be
involved
in
a
free,
striping
project.
F
F
Then
the
brt
will
as
well
meaning
it
may
make
crossing
lake
in
congested
environments
even
more
hostile.
So
we
question
why
some
of
the
sections
did
not
have
pavement
brt
lanes
why
it
didn't
flow
continuously.
F
Instead,
sometimes
it's
being
looked
upon
as
being
a
general
purpose,
laying
a
double
general
purpose
lane
and
they
they
have.
A
number
of
these
areas
are
still
under
consideration,
but
they
felt
that
this
was
a
better
plan
to
allow
those
areas
to
be
two
lanes
instead
of
a
dedicated
lane,
and
we
brought
up
the
need
to
improve
crossings
at
intersection
at
intersecting,
aaa
network
streets
with
bump
outs
and
conflict
zone
markings
and
to
improve
bike
parking
along
lake
street.
F
So
with
that,
I'd
like
to
see,
if
there's
any
comments
from
the
group
about
that
attended
the
engineering
meeting,
if
they
would
like
to
just
weigh
in
and
afterwards
we'll
get
to
a
resolution
that
I
kind
of
drafted
and
several
members
provided
input,
and
thank
you
for
those
people
that
did
that.
A
Dan,
can
I
just
jump
in,
I
think
the
only
thing
I
would
add,
unless
you
plan
to
speak
to
it,
is
sort
of
the
some
of
the
things
yazna
said
towards
the
end
of
the
meeting
about
council
approval
and
and
it
being
a
receiving
file.
A
A
This
is
kind
of
a
follow-up
to
a
request
to
explore
them
more
space
for
the
bus
lanes
on
lake
street
and
so
city
council
isn't
going
to
be
the
group
to
take
significant
action
on
this,
because
it's
a
county
road
and
so,
as
we
think
about
you
know
who
is
the
audience
for
a
resolution
I
think
obviously,
city
council
is,
is
important,
but
thinking
about
other
jurisdictions
like
metro,
transit
and
hennepin
county
as
equally
important,
if
not
more
important
audiences
in
this
particular
instance.
A
So
I
know
they're
not
part
of
our
normal
sort
of
resolution
distribution.
But
certainly
if
we
have
a
resolution,
I
would
be
happy
to
distribute
it
to
other
audiences.
If
the
committee
feels
that's
appropriate.
I
Yeah
yeah
I'm
just
having
I'm
trying
to
unmute,
I
was
just
going
to
say:
maybe
it
well.
Obviously
people
have
other
things
to
say.
We
should
hear
them
first,
but
I
was
going
to
say
if
you
cut
to
the
resolution,
then
that
might
be
a
subject
for
discussion,
because
that
has
a
lot
of
our
concerns
in
it.
L
I
I
was
just
going
to
say
that
this
is.
I
was
fascinated
that
that
one
that
they
brought
this
to
us
and
it
had
no
bike
lanes
in
it.
It's
going
back
to
my
earlier
comment
that
it
wasn't
about
the
bike
lanes
and
that
they
wanted
a
resolution
from
us,
even
though
you
know
it
had
no
bike
lanes
on
it
that
it's
really
about
us
supporting
the
overall
vision.
A
A
I'll
just
say,
I'm
glad
to
see
them
back,
so
I
don't
think
they.
They
came
to
visit
the
committee
what
it
was
in
the
fall
initially,
I
think-
and
that
was
at
my
request,
because
they
at
that
time
didn't
see
that
it
was
terribly
relevant
for
us
to
receive
a
presentation
on
this.
A
So
I'm
really
glad
that
they
came
to
join
us
initially
and
also
like
have
received
the
message
that
that
it
is
important
for
us
to
be
involved
in
projects
where
there
might
be
future
bike
facilities,
but
also
for
the
reasons
that
deanna
just
said.
O
F
I
have
a
question
to
ask
chris
and
as
far
as
procedure-
and
this
is
a
fairly
lengthy
resolution
and
I'm
wondering
if
I
can
just
break
this
down
by
the
first
paragraph
and
then
go
point
by
point
through
it
and
then
the
last
paragraph.
A
I
think
we
do
need
to
read
the
whole
thing
in
one:
go
for
it
to
be
a
proper
resolution,
but
we
could
certainly
read
it
and
then
re-read
certain
bullet
points.
If
those
are
areas
we
want
to
discuss
in
more
depth.
F
The
minneapolis
bicycle
advisory
committee
supports
a
plan
for
the
metro
b
line
on
lake
street
that
features
dedicated
bus
lanes,
a
4-3,
roadway
conversion
and
additional
safety
enhancements
that
include
improved
signals,
crossings
and
bump
outs.
The
concept
presented
was
listed
as
a
preliminary
10
design
level
and
did
not
yet
show
pedestrian
safety
enhancements.
F
Four
reconsider
westbound
brt,
sharing
a
single
general-purpose
lane
between
the
river
and
hiawatha
and
adding
the
aaa
network
protected
two-way
bike
lane.
On
the
north
side,
the
next
one
is
lower.
The
speed
limit
on
lake
street
to
25
miles
per
hour
or
less
next
is
add,
bump
outs
and
conflict
zone
markings
at
all
ages
and
abilities
intersections
next
is
to
review
vision,
zero
traffic
safety
concerns
provided
by
residents
on
their
comment.
F
Given
that
this
corridor
is
overloaded
and
serves
both
a
disproportionate
bypass,
ridership
serves
a
significant
percentage
of
metro,
transit's
overall
ridership
and
is
a
significant
investment
by
state
legislatures,
specifically
for
improvement
of
traffic
service.
All
jurisdictions
should
target
a
greater
than
marginal
improvement
to
transit
service.
F
So
that's
it
is
there
a
second.
F
So
adrian
had
a
comment
that
she
wanted
to
make
regarding
the
adding
something.
F
Yeah,
it's
basically
wherever
they.
Let's
see,
I'm
sorry,
I
gotta
read
this
thing
so
west
of
hiawatha
going
towards
the
lakes.
There
are
sections
where
the
bus
lane
disappears
and
it
becomes
two
general
purpose
lanes
rather
than
one
per
one
drive
lane
and
one
bus
lane.
F
And
what
I'm
trying
to
say
there
is
to
nix
the
two
general
purpose
lanes
and
just
extend
the
bus
lane
through
that,
and
you
will
see
that
you
know
it's
it's
in
very
interesting
spots
that
I'm
not
sure
if
we
could
pull
up
some
different
shots
of
this.
That
kind
of
highlight
that,
if
that's
helpful
for
people.
H
F
No-
and
there
was
no
bike
parking
study
done
on
on
lake
street
street
either
when
I
asked
that
at
I
went
to
two
presentations
of
this,
the
bac
in
a
a
public
one,
and
I
asked
that
I
asked
the
question
about
bike
parking
and
I
think
that's
just
assumed
that
they're
I
mean
parking
is
staying
the
way
it
is
along
lake
street,
as
as
we
see
it,
with
the
exception
of
maybe
some
additional
bump
outs
that
would
are
yet
to
come.
That
would
kind
of
you
know
expand
on
an
intersection.
G
And-
and
my
understanding
is
that's
because
the
parking
is
protected
between
those
bump
outs,
because
it's
not
reconstruction,
yeah
yeah,
maybe
one
thing
we
could
add
to
that
first
bullet
point,
then,
is
just
to
make
sure
that
I
know
we're
saying
west
of
hiawatha
if
we
could
just
specify,
maybe
at
the
end
of
that
sentence,
that
it
should
go
all
the
way
to
that
west
lake
station
because
right
now
it
completely
cuts
off
at
dean,
parkway
but
west
of
there.
G
F
Does
somebody
want
to
help
millicent
with
the
language
there
well
she's
catching
this
stuff?
I
know
that
I
I
liked
what
dan
had
mentioned
about
the
language
and
as
well
as
what
you
had
mentioned
so
could
see
the.
H
F
H
G
F
F
P
That's
okay!
Thank
you!
So
in
looking
at
this,
I
I
see
that
there's
mention
of
bump
outs
and
whatnot,
but
nothing
specific
to
bryant
or
17th
or
29th,
where
bike
facilities
do
intersect
with
lake
street.
Was
there
any
talk
about
at
least
getting
the
county
to
build
some
bump
outs,
any
anything
to
just
slow
the
traffic
and
and
and
create
safer?
I
know
it
talks
about
state
crossings
and
whatnot.
Is
it?
Was
it
necessary
to
mention
those
those
north-south
bike
facilities?
I
wasn't
able
to
go.
F
Yeah
I'll
try
to
answer
that.
It
is
one
two
three
four
five,
so
the
sixth
bullet
down
is
add,
bump
ups
and
conflict
zone,
markings
at
all
ages
and
abilities
intersections.
So
I
think
that
addresses
what
you're,
what
you're
leading
up
to
that.
In
fact
that
to
me
that
addresses
not
only
the
ones
that
are
on
the
ground,
but
the
ones
that
are
planned.
F
Like
I
say
when
this
deanna
said
it,
this
was
a
lot
of
information
about
it,
didn't
have
a
bike
lanes
and
because
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
discussion
about
pedestrian
improvements
and
that
stuff,
I
thought
it
was
worth
pointing
out
that
this
was
the
stuff
we
were
listening.
We
were
interested
in,
and
so
this
is
fairly
deep
and
I
think
at
times
you
know
I
would.
F
I
would
ask
this
group:
is
it
pertinent
to
keep
these
things
in
or
out,
and
that's
why
I
kind
of
wanted
just
to
go
down
this
list
and
discuss
why
they're
there
and
whether
they
should
remain
or
whether
we
might
delete
or
modify
it
just
like
the
the
first
bullet?
F
So
if
if
people
would
be
willing
I'll
just
start
down
this
list
and
see,
if
there's
any
questions
that
could
be
answered
about
them
and
go
from
there,
the
second
one
is
reduced
crossing
distance
and
considered
mid
street
pedestrian
safety
medians
in
congested
areas,
as
well
as
reducing
general
purpose
lanes
at
the
west
end
of
the
project.
These
were
comments.
This
was
primarily
comments
from
janet
and
matthew
hendricks
and
maybe
you'd
like
to
speak
to
this.
O
Hi,
this
is
matthew
so
for
the
mid
street
pedestrian
safety
medians.
I
think
there
may
be
some
opportunities,
especially
between
hiawatha
and
the
river,
where
it
would
make
sense
to
to
put
in
something
that
would
take
priority
over
a
left
turn
lane
in
that
location
or
at
specific
intersections
and
give
pedestrians
the
opportunity
to
cross
one
direction
of
lake
street
traffic
and
then
wait
in
the
middle
until
it's
safe
to
cross
the
other
direction.
F
F
I
Yeah
and
I
had
I
had
talked
about
the
west
end
because
I'm
familiar
with
that
end
of
lake
street
and
it's
really
wide
and
the
cars
go
really
fast.
So
that's
why
I
was
just
saying
anything
we
could
suggest
to
reduce
car
speeds.
There
would
be
great.
O
F
F
F
You
know
diagonally
across
the
the
thing,
but
I
thought
it
might
be
worth
if
we
have
a
congested
street
congested
area
in
the
city.
This
is
one
of
them
that
something
like
that
might
be
worth
just
posing
as
something
to
consider.
D
I
think
I
think
that's
a
great
idea.
I
think
that
should
be
included.
Oh,
this
is
aaron.
If
that
matters,
but
yeah,
I
think
lake
street
is
so
wide.
Even
with
this
change,
since
we're
not
actually
changing
the
structure
of
the
road,
it's
just
paint
that
a
leading
pedestrian
interval
or
crossing
could
be
pretty
helpful.
F
K
Yeah,
I
thought
maybe
I'd
just
weigh
in
on
the
kind
of
diagonal
like
the
the
all
weight
crossing.
Is
that
what
you're
talking
about
there
yep
so
like
a
pedestrian
scramble,
so
not
to
say
that
you
can't
put
this
in
in
here,
but
from
my
understanding
of
those
which
are
really
cool,
I
was
actually
just
in
in
nashville
and
nashville
has
a
couple
of
those
and
they
work
really
well.
K
They
they
kind
of
the
places
that
they
work
well,
are
where
there's
a
lot
of
pedestrians,
like
not
just
like
lake
street
busy
a
lot
but
like
really
dense,
downtown
kind
of
urban
environment,
so
I'll
just
put
out.
I
I
don't
think
it's
likely
that
that
would
be
received
for
a
place
like
this,
not
that
you
can't
put
it
in
here
and
ask
for
that.
K
But
if
that's
something
you
all
are
kind
of
interested
in
exploring,
I
haven't
heard
you
all
bring
it
up
before,
but
there
might
be
other
places
to
kind
of
push
on
that.
That
would
be
better
examples,
but
again,
like
you're,
welcome
to
put
it
in
here.
I
don't
think
it's
a
detriment
to
to
this
resolution.
By
any
means,
but
just
throwing
that
out
there
all.
C
Right,
phil
yeah,
I
I've
I've
seen
these
pedestrian
scrambles
and
she
said
chris.
I've
seen
these
intersections
work
in
a
town
city
of
about
200
000
in
a
dense
sort
of
commercial,
mixed
or
historic
downtown,
and
they
work
really
well,
but
I
would
say
they
yeah,
they
really
work.
Well,
so
maybe
we
add
language
dedicated
diagonal
pedestrian
crossing
in
you
know
heavy
pedestrian
areas.
C
I
I
would
yeah
just
to
say
that
just
a
signal
that
we
we
we
know
that
you
wouldn't
put
a
diagonal
pedestrian
crossing
at
just
sort
of
any
congestion.
More.
I
think
some
more
a
little
more
specific
language
would
be
good
for
throwing
that
in.
But
I
think
that's
it's
a
good
signaling
to
them
to
think
about.
Like
uptown
east
of
hennepin
lake
occurs
to
me,
yeah.
K
I
I
feel
like
that
would
be
a
good
clarification
from
a
staff
perspective,
at
least.
F
Meaning,
possibly
not
many,
but
you
know
it's
it's
when
I
was
trying
to
think
this
stuff
through.
I
was
thinking
about
lake
street,
coming
back
to
life
and
the
future
of
of
lake
street
beyond
four
to
three.
So
this
is
aspirational
and
I
I'm
I'm
open
to.
However,
you
guys
want
to
put
that
in
there.
So
if
you
want
to
highlight
a
couple,
but
I
think
that
bloomington
is
definitely
a
busy
intersections,
you
know
and
I'd
have
to
think
more
about
it's,
not
many,
but
the
street
after
that.
K
I
I
would
maybe
I
don't
know
how
you
feel
about
this,
but
similar
to
kind
of
how
phil
frame
phrased
it
if
you
do
after
diagonal
pedestrian
crossing,
instead
of
seeing
at
all
congested
congested
intersections,
just
saying
at
high
pedestrian
activity
intersections
or
something
of
the
sort.
H
F
But
you
know,
you've
got
a
12.
You've
got
a
10
foot,
eight
lane
with
a
two
foot
gutter.
There
that's
12
feet,
and
this
this
part
is
on
the
aaa
network
and
it
was
their
reasoning
for
not
doing
is
because
they
said
there
wasn't
enough
room,
and
we
know
that
in
resurfacing
jobs
throughout
the
city,
where
there's
a
triple
a
network,
we
can,
we
can
discuss
putting
it
on
the
streets.
So
that's
why
I
put
it
in
there.
O
Dan,
this
is
matthew
hendricks.
I
support
having
this
bullet
point,
because
these
are
the
blocks
that
are
so
rarely
heavily
congested
that
I
I
feel
the
bus
lane
is
not
the
best
use
of
space
in
these
blocks.
In
particular,
there
are
other
blocks
where
the
bus
lane
is
not
proposed,
where
I
think
it
would
have
a
much
greater
impact
in
terms
of
allowing
the
bus
to
pass
general
traffic
yeah.
F
In
the
presentation
they
said
that
the
westbound
traffic
bus
traffic
is
heavier,
I
believe,
and
then
the
eastbound
towards
the
river,
the
eastbound
traffic
uses
one
general
purpose
lane
for
the
bus
and
the
and
driving,
and
so
this
would
be
making.
This
point
makes
it
equivalent
going
both
ways
and
adding
a
bike
lane.
F
E
This
is
jordan
with
hennepin
county.
I
have
a
comment
on
that.
One:
okay,
so
hennepin
county
is
not
legally
able
to
set
a
speed
limit
lower
than
30
miles
an
hour.
E
E
Yeah,
that's
true,
you
can.
You
can
request
a
speed
study,
but
you
might
not
always
like
the
results
you
might
might
end
up
going
up
rather
than
down.
That's
always
a
risk
so
yeah,
I
I
I
guess
I
personally
wouldn't
go
that
route
here,
but.
F
And
I
agree
with
you,
jordan
right
now
it
isn't
and
there's
it's
been
a
topic
on
the
it's
actually
going
through
the
the
state
right
now
with
hf2771,
to
allow
counties
to
determine
speed
limits
on
their
roads.
I
don't
know
where
it's
going
to
go.
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
go
anywhere,
but
it
was
interesting
to
see
that
come
up
in
relation
to
three
projects
that
are
going
on
in
the
county
right
now
with
lowry
and
lindale,
and
and
this
thing
what's
up.
A
I
think
I
was
just
gonna
contextualize
what
what
jordan
said.
I
appreciate
the
like
the
technical
reasons
why
the
thing
isn't
possible
and
also
it
is.
I
think
it
continues
to
be
with
this
project,
like
with
other
things,
we've
commented
on
really
important
for
us
to
ask
for
what
we
want,
even
if
it's
not
technically
possible,
because
part
of
what
makes
it
become
technically
possible
is
demonstrated
interest
in
that
thing
happening.
A
So
I
I
you
know
if
this
is
what
we
want,
I
would
say
we
should
leave
it
in
the
motion,
even
if
we
know
that
it's
not
possible
to
say
this
is
still
what
we
want.
You
should
figure
out
a
way
to
make
it
happen.
H
Alyssa
is
it
worth
saying
anything
to
that
effect
that
we
know
it's
not
possible,
like
I
don't
know
like
get
it,
make
it
possible
to
lower
the
speed
one.
You
know
better
wording,
but
essentially
acknowledging
that
we
know
it's
not
technically
possible,
but
they
should
push
for
it.
A
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
that
would
be
great,
I'm
not
sure
if
jordan
would
be
able
to
help
wordsmith
some
language
around.
You
know
push
for
a
policy
that
would
make
it
possible
to
lower
the
speed
limit
to
25
miles
per
hour
on
lake
street.
I
don't
know
if
that
gets
at
what
jordan
is
saying
or
if
we,
if
we
specifically,
would
want
to
reference
the
state
legislature
or
others.
C
Maybe
if
we
said
something
like
understanding
that
currently
county
roads
generally
require
30
miles
per
hour
at
a
minimum,
that
would
be
a
very
neutral
way
to
say
we're
not
idiots
here.
We
know
we're
asking,
but
we
know
there's
a
general.
E
Yeah
well,
it
is
ultimately
the
state
legislature
that
gives
the
county
and
that
gave
the
city
of
minneapolis
the
authority
to
set
those
speed
limits.
So
it
would
what
you're
really
asking
is
for
the
county
to
lobby
the
state
legislature
for
that
authority.
E
E
Yeah
so
but
but
I
guess
I
I
digress
ultimately
to
get
there,
you
know
the
county
or
you
know,
a
coalition
of
counties
would
need
to
lobby
for
that
change
to
get
the
authority.
F
So
getting
back
to
what
elisa
said,
something
the
effect
of
pushed
push
for
policy
changes
to
allow
for
the
speed
limit
on
lake
street
to
be
reduced
might
be.
A
I
I
think
I
will
say
if
we
want
to
have
some
space
for
discussion
of
several
items
at
the
end
we'll
want
to
be.
You
know,
calling
the
roll
on
this
sometime
around
5
30,
so
we
could
bundle
a
couple
of
these
and
have
comments
on
two,
maybe
two
of
them
at
a
time
or
two
or
three
at
a
time
that
might
help
us
get
to
a
point
where
we're
able
to
call
the
role
and
have
some
of
that
announcements.
Time
for
discussion
later.
F
Thank
you
for
the
reminder.
Okay,
so
the
next
one
is
add,
bump
ups
and
conflict
zone
markings
at
all
ages
and
abilities
intersections
that
this
is
the
the
aaa
network
going
north
and
south
intersecting
with
lake
street.
F
I
think
we're
good?
Okay,
the
next
one
review
vision,
zero
traffic
safety
concerns
provided
by
residents
on
their
comet
map.
This
is
a
really
cool
little
map,
it's
not
a
complicated
thing,
but
it
finally
just
came
out
the
last
month
or
so
and
it's
it
just.
It
allows
people
to
comment
on
conditions
and
concerns
and
if
they
haven't
seen
it,
they
should
look
at
it.
F
All
right
we're
moving
along
perform
a
bike
parking
study
along
lake
street,
where
block
by
block
bike
corrals
can
be
added
to
on
street
parking
areas.
Encouraging
access
to
lake
street
businesses
combined
with
that
one
is
a
separate
one.
That's
coordinate
with
metro
transit
to
install
permanent
bike
parking
adjacent
to
brt
stations.
F
So
once
talking
about
bike
corrals
and
looking
at
this
immense
amount
of
parking
that
is,
is
staying
and
saying
you
know,
take
take
up,
take
a
parking
space
on
each
block
on
each
side
of
the
street
and
and
turn
it
into
a
place
where
people
can
bike
to
lake
street
and
and
do
something
rather
than
parking
at
at
the
parking
meter.
N
K
C
You
know,
I
know
that
there
are
parking
spots
along
when
east
lake
street
was
redone
between
hiawatha
and
the
river.
Oh
there
were,
I
think
every
block
does
have
bike
parking
already
and
I
frankly
I
I
get
there
enough.
I
don't
I
don't
I'm
not
sure
it's
needed
on
the
east
east
east
section
of
lake
street,
clearly
on
the
west
section,
but
that's
just
I
mean
I
know
we
had
this
this
big
redo
about
three
four
years
ago:
east
part
of
lake
street.
C
So
I
might,
if
that's
true,
which
I
think
it
is,
I
might
just
say,
west-
of
the
bike
parking
study
west
of
hiawatha,
but
do
others
have
thoughts.
A
I
guess
philip
I'll
just
say
you
know
if
we
have
20
of
10
to
20
of
people
biking
everywhere,
we're
gonna
need
more
bike
parking
than
we
have.
If
we,
if
we
actually
meet
our
goals,.
C
Just
to
do
the
part:
okay,
okay,
yeah
leave.
It
then
yep.
N
Yeah
hi
hi
dan.
This
is
armand
from
metro
transit.
I
just
wanted
to
note
on
that
second
bullet
point
about
bike
racks
adjacent
to
brt
stops.
I
will
note
that
bike
racks
are
a
standard
amenity
as
a
part
of
the
brt
platform
suite
of
amenities.
If
you
will
so
just
wanted
to
note
that
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
keep
it
or
just
you
know,
to
keep
it
just
to
drive
that
point
home,
but
just
know
that
there
will
be
some
bike
racks
as
a
part
of
that
brt
platform.
F
All
right,
let's
leave
it
in
for
the
time
being
and
then
the
last
one
is
to
add
block
by
block
e
charging
stations,
and
this
was
actually
meant
for
bike
part
bikes,
but
we
could
include
it
for
vehicles
as
well.
So
we
just
left
it
without
a.
D
Dan,
it
might
be
worth
just
saying
I
guess
specifying,
even
though
I
know
I
get
what
you're
trying
to
do
with
that,
because
I
I
kind
of
forgot
about
that
myself
until
you
just
said
it.
F
That's
good
yeah,
e-bikes
and
and
vehicles
yeah.
F
All
right,
we've
got
a
last
paragraph
here,
and
that
is,
we
also
encourage
metro,
transit,
hennepin
county
and
the
city
of
minneapolis
to
set
transit
travel
improvement
goals
of
more
than
20
percent
for
this
corridor.
Given
that
this
corridor
is
overloaded
and
serves
both
a
disproportionate
bipart,
ridership
serves
a
significant
percentage
of
metro,
transit's
overall
ridership
and
is
a
significant
investment
by
the
state
legislature,
specifically
for
improved
mint
of
transit
service.
F
Okay,
so
generally,
overall,
we're
gonna
be
ready
to
vote
here,
but
to
take
elissa's
comment
about
just
any
changes.
Thoughts
about
the
entire
package
have
at.
B
B
B
D
N
L
E
J
B
E
B
C
B
A
Thank
you,
dan,
and
thank
you.
Everyone
who
worked
on
the
resolution
and
provided
feedback.
I'm
excited
I'm
excited
about
the
comments
that
is
the
end
of
our
scheduled
agenda.
So
now
I
am
going
to
move
us
into
announcements
and
it
sounds
like
folks
have
several
things
to
share
or
have
some
brief
discussion
about
during
our
announcements
so
and
we'll
turn
it
over
to
the
group.
F
Yeah,
I
have
three,
but
I'm
just
gonna
do
one
and
then
give
room
for
somebody
else,
and
it
was
brought
to
my
attention
this
past
few
weeks
by
a
member
of
the
public
that
the
parking
around
the
hennepin
county,
plaza
was
had
been
removed.
The
bike
parking
and
chris
helped
me
out
with
this,
and
we
we
found
out
that
it
was
indeed
the
the
parking
that
was
by
the
transit
station.
F
That
was
gone
and
we
had
several
back
and
forth,
and
this
week
my
bike
ride
was
to
go
out
and
take
a
look
at
parking
conditions
on
down
there,
as
well
as
up
the
the
first
at
first
street
in
the
glendale
woody
rolindale
bikeway
and
the
midtown
greenway.
F
So
I
saw
a
bunch
of
stuff
that
kind
of
got
me
going
and
anyways
what
was
interesting,
that
not
only
was
there
no
parking
at
the
hennepin
county,
plaza
where
there's
traditionally
been
parking
and
it's
the
reason
for
it
being
removed,
has
been
likely
for
winter's
maintenance
or
possibly
for
the
shelving
trial
that
just
never
got
cut
back.
F
I
would
imagine
five
posts
if,
if
that-
and
I
went
over
to
city
hall
or
to
the
new
public
services,
building
and
kind
of,
was
disappointed
to
see
the
sign,
the
the
amount
of
bike
parking
in
front
of
the
building
and
that
there
was
more
reserved
on
the
sides
of
the
building
that
actually
could
be.
I
think,
would
be
unsafe
to
use
both
sides
because
it
was
so
close
to
the
drive
lanes.
F
So
I've
talked
to
both
chris
and
and
jordan
about
this
and
they've
both
been
very
helpful
and
the
the
word
has
gotten
out
to
the
hennepin
county
facilities.
The
stuff
will
come
back
this
spring,
that
there
are
plans
in
the
works
to
add
more
parking
to
the
front
of
the
public
services
center
and
as
well
as
on
the
fourth
street.
F
There's
three
things
going
on
here:
hennepin
county:
you
got
the
new
public
service
building
and
then
you
got
the
mini
municipal
building.
Commission,
that's
the
third
item
and
I
tell
you
whatever
spring
is:
when
we
go
back
in
person
and
you
go
to
try
to
find
biking
there
or
anybody
that's
trying
to
get
there
for
public
you're
going
to
see
you're
going
to
be
scratching
your
head
about
what
you're
doing
so.
F
I
think
people
are
people
have
investigated
this
as
best
as
we
can,
and
I
think
that
it
may
be
something
that
is
worth
having
on
the
five
e's
committee
and
having
some
of
these
people
come
and
talk
to
us
about
this,
because
I
just
I
was
shocked.
I
just
I
I
was
really
you
know
where
we
always
parked
on.
Fourth,
I
mean
there's
just
nothing.
F
You
couldn't
fit
you'd
be
gone
so
for
the
public
visiting
that
whole
government
center
hennepin,
county
minneapolis
and
the
federal
there's
not
a
lot
of
parking
down
there,
and
we
should
really
be
opening
up
with
new
visions
to
getting
people
to
those
locations.
That's
it
so
just
to
thought
for
something
for
a
future.
5E
to
keep
track
on
this
see
if
we
can
help
out.
A
I
I
think
that
would
be
a
great
discussion.
I
actually
did
a
bike
ride
with
a
public
works
staffer
along
fourth,
while
that
project
was
like,
while
everything
was
being
constructed,
and
at
that
time
the
verbal
conversation,
we
had
indicated
that
all
the
bike
parking
would
go
back.
It
had
like
not
been
installed,
and
so
I'm
discouraged
to
hear
this.
This
is
something
that
was
on
my
radar
during
the
construction
phase,
but
not
after
because
I
was
expecting
it
to
come
back.
A
K
Yeah
just
quickly
one
thing
that
the
municipal
building
person
said
for
city
hall
is
that
they
are
still
planning
to
install
more
on
fourth,
so
I
I
don't
know
exactly
the
extent
of
that,
but
there
are
plans
to
put
more
back
in.
I
don't
know
if
that
completely
goes
back
to
what
it
was
before,
like
you
were
saying
alyssa,
which
was
your
understanding
of
what
they
had
said.
K
So
I
I
can
at
least
ask
what
that
next
implementation
phase
looks
like
and
when
it's
going
to
happen
and
and
how
much
and
stuff
like
that.
A
That
would
be
great,
and
it
occurs
to
me
a
little
too
late
in
this
conversation
that
as
someone
who
served
on
click,
I'm
familiar
with
the
municipal
building
commission.
But
there
might
be
members
here
who
are
not
at
all
familiar
with
that
chris
or
dan.
Would
you
like
to
give
like
a
a
little
bit
of
an
explanation
of
of
who
they
are
because
they
don't
come
up
very
often,
you
know
we're
talking
about
the
county
and
the
city
and
the
state
a
lot,
but
not
the
municipal
building
commission.
K
F
F
They
take
care
of
city
hall,
so
the
all
the
improvements
from
you
know
air
conditioning
and
heat
to
elevators
to
the
outside
of
the
building
to
you
name
it.
So
it's
it's
that's
their
territory
and
you
know
they've
been
involved
recently
with
before
george
floyd's
murder.
F
They
they
were
already
starting
to
talk
about
security
improvements
where
they'll
be
locking
down
fifth
more
as
well
as
actually
the
entrance
will
be
the
driving
people
to
the
fourth
street
entrance
and
there'll
be
more
closures
that
you
it'll
be
more
difficult
to
get
around
city
hall
than
it
has
been
in
the
past.
A
N
F
You've
got
kind
of
one
group
nbc
and
one
group,
then
you
got
the
new
building
public
services
center
and
another
group,
and
you
got
hennepin
county
in
a
third
and
okay.
What
spring?
When
when
will
we
see?
This
actually
happen?
If
I
mean
I
can
see
this
extending
well
past
summer
and
then
if
it
gets
up
we're
lucky,
so
it
would
be
nice
to
put
some
steam
in
this
to
know
that
we're
not
short-handed
before
we
er
and
yeah.
F
So
I
think
that
maybe
getting
somebody
from
the
public
services
building
that
could
answer
these
questions
to
us
in
the
nbc
and
not
putting
chris
on
the
spot,
because
he's
done
what
I
think
he
can
do
at
the
moment,
but
it'd
be
worth
us
weighing
in
on
it,
and
you
will
find
out
about
what's
going
on
when
we
get
back
to
meeting
in
person.
A
Well,
it
sounds
like
there's
a
good
amount
here
that
we
can
talk
about.
Maybe
we
can
coordinate
with
heather
as
the
five
e's
co-chair
who's
on
the
call
today
to
figure
out
how
to
bring
this
to
five
e's.
So.
A
C
Yeah,
just
I
think
also,
I
think,
maybe,
if
worthy
of
five,
these
discussion
would
be
I'm
just
imagining
that
since
we
we
know
bike,
walk
transit,
road
projects
get
funded
from
a
number
of
sources
sources.
I'm
I'm
just
sort
of
wondering
about
infrastructure
money
that
just
may
parachute
in
and
will
is
it
possible
that
that
in
the
flurry
of
sort
of
spending
infrastructure
money,
might
we
miss
out
on
opportunities
to
do
some
bike?
Walk
transit,
stuff?
So
it's
it's
really
more
sort
of
a
question.
C
Maybe
it's
not
an
issue,
but
it
feels
like
it
might
be
something
to
put
on
on
five
e's
to
touch
on.
A
Yeah,
I
think,
probably
it
probably
warrants
a
a
fair
amount
of
discussion.
I
think,
to
have
an
effective
discussion.
We
probably
need
to
have
some
outside
presenters.
I
don't
on
the
top
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I
don't
know
who
those
folks
might
be
right.
Money
is
going
to
flow
through
minda,
probably
through
the
metropolitan
council,
as
an
agency
that
has
previously
been
prepared
to
accept
and
distribute
federal
dollars.
A
Yeah,
I
feel
like
there
there's
a
lot
there.
We
could
probably
have
a
two-hour
discussion
about
just
that
if
we
wanted
to.
C
Yeah
I
yeah
like
you,
it's
like
I
mean
there's
obviously
yeah
that
council's
state.
I
don't
know
I
just
I
guess
the
worry
is
having
seen
this
happen
at
the
state
level.
Money
flows
through
sources
that
weren't
available
and
they
flew
through
channels
and
we
miss
out
so.
K
Yeah
all
right,
phil
I'll,
add
like
I
can
maybe
do
some
digging
or
just
like
education.
If
we
do
a
5e
item
about
some
of
the
things
that
we
are
pursuing,
that's
coming
out
of
that
money
and
like
different
grants
at
the
federal
level
and
all
the
stuff
alyssa
mentioned
is
also
accurate
and
regional
solicitation
probably
will
have
more
money.
That's
another
one
right
or
different
things
like
that.
So
at
the
very
least,
to
kick
that
off.
I
could
share
the
some
of
what
I
know
or
some
of
what
we're
kind
of
pursuing.
A
Thanks
phil
other
announcements
or
discussion
items
that
folks
have.
A
I
will
just
add
that
the
open
streets
dates
for
2022
have
been
announced.
I
don't
remember
all
of
them
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
per
usual.
It
kicks
off
with
lindale
as
the
first
sunday
in
june
and
concludes,
I
think,
in
late
september
or
early
october,
so
looking
forward
to
hopefully
seeing
some
of
you
all
biking
around
for
open
streets
once
it's
actually
summer
and
has
stopped
stopping.
F
Yeah,
I
by
chance,
was
invited
to
a
a
mndot
webinar,
not
a.
E
F
But
a
a
project
introduction
for
highway,
55
resurfacing,
which
is
going
to
happen
this
spring,
and
this
is
going
from
downtown,
7th
and
8th
all
the
way
up
to
62,
and
this
was
a
you
know,
a
public
meeting
and
I
just
listened
in-
and
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
information
given
provided
about
pedestrian
improvements
across.
What's
going
to
happen
with
them.
Is
there
a
chance
for
improvements
with
pedestrian
crossings
across
hiawatha,
and
I
didn't
get
a
very
good
a.
I
didn't
get
an
answer.
C
F
Any
answers
that
were
satisfying
to
me
and
I
think
that
this
would
be
good
to
reach
out
to
them
to
talk
with
them
about
this
see
if
they
could
come
to
a
bac
meeting
to
address
and
crossing
hiawatha.
They
are
talking
about
doing
crack
replacements
or
some
repairs
to
the
hiawatha
trail
that
runs
along
that
it'd
be
an
interesting
conversation
to
just
you
know.
F
My
memories
is
a
central
avenue
up
in
my
neighborhood
was
redone
two
years
ago,
and
we
had
conflicts
that
the
only
conflict
zone
crossing
in
central
avenue
was
up
on
saint
anthony
parkway
across
central
avenue,
and
they
came
through
and
resurfaced
that
thing
and
never
came
back
and
then,
when
they
went
to
the
pedestrian
crossings
or
all
these
wonderful,
wide
pedestrian
crossings
that
crossed
central,
they
came
and
they
pasted
a
six-foot
thing
right.
F
On
top
of
the
thing
and
didn't
pay
attention
to
the
new
crossings
that
were
built
for
the
new
signals
that
were
put
in
the
previous
year
in
conjunction
with
mndot,
they
just
traced
over
the
old
crossings,
and
it
just
was
really
really.
F
J
J
Okay,
yeah
yeah
aaron
tag.
I
can
talk
with
air
and
type
see
what
we
can
do
for
that.
He
was
at
that
meeting
that
you
were
at
yes,
yep.
Okay,
all
right,
unfortunately,
I'd
say
he'd
be
the
one
to
answer
your
questions
so
yeah.
O
J
I'll
I'll
dig
into
it
a
little
bit
more.
I
know
that
there
are
some.
I
believe
there
are
some
minor
ada
improvements
right
and
some
crossing
improvements,
but
not
there.
There
definitely
were
some
missed
opportunities
in
that
project,
but
we
can
pick
you
too.
I
could
we
could
do
a
follow-up
too.
F
F
It's
they're
they're,
looking
to
be
done
with
mid
by
mid-summer
up
to,
I
think,
between
downtown
and
31st,
and
then
they're
going
to
tackle
the
rest
of
the
way
after
that-
and
I
just
I
mean
when
they
came
in
on
central
avenue-
what
they
could
have
done
had
somebody
been
thinking
about
it
would
it
would
have
been
just
a
different
experience
and
I
just
I
think,
there's
some
chances
here
to
pay
attention
to
some
things
that
can
happen
within
the
scope
of
this
project.
A
Well,
dan
and
jesse:
let's
follow
up
and
and
figure
out
which
agenda
this
might
live
on
and
and
what
the
discussion
we
want
to
have
is
so
any
other
announcements
we
might
still
end
early.
F
Okay,
I
just
got
noticed
that
the
last
part
of
the
weber,
parkway
weber,
50,
rubber,
44
reconstruction
county-
is
going
to
get
completed
this
spring
of
the
summer
and
spring,
and
part
of
that
is
something
which
we
worked
on
when
I
was
a
very
new
member
of
the
bac,
and
it
was
a
small
little
improvement
that
I
really
consider
one
of
the
big
things
that
I
mean
it
may
have
had
something
to
do
with,
and
that
is
that
there
will
be
a
shared
use
path
going
between
weber,
parkway
down
to
41st
avenue,
which
is
the
connection
to
second
and
the
upper
harbor.
F
It
also
will
connect
the
great
the
grand
rounds
over
the
camden
street
bridge.
This
is
a
big
deal
and
it's
finally
happening-
and
I
just
wanted
to
share
that.
A
And
it's
nice
to
be
able
to
celebrate
our
work.
It
takes
takes
a
long
time
for
things
to
for
ideas
and
suggestions
to
become
reality.
So
thanks
for
giving
us
something
to
celebrate
dan
and
thanks
for
all
your
work
on
that
all
right,
any
other
announcements
or
things
folks
want
to
discuss
one
more
long,
awkward,
pause.
A
All
right
not
seeing
any
raised
hands,
not
seeing
any
folks
come
off
mute.
I
will
call
us
adjourned.
Thank
you,
everyone
for
all
your
comments
and
suggestions
at
today's
meeting.
It
was
really
great
to
connect
with
all
of
you.
I
am
looking
forward
to
potentially
seeing
some
of
you
in
person
sometime
in
the
next
four
to
twelve.