►
From YouTube: February 10, 2022 Transgender Equity Council
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
I
will
now
call
the
regular
meeting
of
the
transgender
equity
council
to
order,
and
I
will
call
the
roll
give
me
one
second
to
take
this
slide
back
down,
so
that
I
can
see
roll
call.
B
C
C
C
D
A
Olivia,
st
john
here
amira
khan,
present
taryn
wood.
Here,
wonderful,
there
are
eight
members
present.
There
are
three
absent
as
and
there
are
as
well
a
couple
guests
joining,
so
we
do
have
quorum
and
I
will
pass
it
over
to
kenzie
our
chair
to
take
care
of
adopting
the
agenda.
A
Wonderful-
and
this
is
track-
I'm
gonna
call
roll
again
to
vote
on
that
kenzie
here,
yes,
you're
going
for
yes,
kenzie.
D
G
A
A
I
have
to
provide
so
apologies
that
there's
a
decent
amount
of
me
talking
at
you
all
today,
but
I
promise
we'll
move
into
a
lot
of
discussion
in
the
second
half
of
this
conversation
when
we
start
to
think
through
strategic
planning
for
2022,
but
we're
going
to
start
I'm
going
to
give
an
update
on
just
the
timeline
of
what
online
meetings
are
going
to
look
like
for
us
for
the
foreseeable
future
and
then
some
updates
on
meetings
with
new
and
returning
council
members
on
progress
on
the
fall.
A
2021
recommendations,
including
I've,
been
following
the
conversations
in
city
council
in
over
the
past
week
around
banning
no
knock
warrants
and
other
other
responses
to
amir
lock's
murder,
and
I
will
share
updates
on
that
as
well.
I
wanted
to
kind
of
add
that,
both
as
it
related
to
your
recommendations
and
in
general
and
brief
you
all
on
what
was
going
on
internally
within
the
city
on
that
and
then
we'll
share
some
updates
on
other
ongoing
projects
and
please
jump
in.
A
I
will
pause
for
questions
at
points
in
this,
because
it
is
a
lot
of
me
offering
updates
and
I
will
also
send
out
minutes
afterwards
and
if
you
click
on
the
agenda,
that's
in
the
calendar
invite
or
on
the
agenda
posted
in
limbs
the
documents
I'm
referencing
are
in
there
if
that's
useful,
for
you
to
follow
along.
But
please
interrupt
me
with
questions
throughout
too,
because
I
know
this
is
a
decent
amount
of
me
talking,
but
the
most
logistical
first.
A
I
just
know
that
I
haven't
gotten
back
to
you
all
for
a
while
with
a
timeline
on.
Is
there
a
point
at
which
we
need
to
be
back
in
person
and
wanted
to
just
give
you
the
update
that
there
probably
is
a
point.
We
at
the
city
have
not
determined
the
people
at
the
city
in
charge
of
making
that
determination
have
not
determined
what
it
is.
A
Yet
city
staff
are
starting
to
be
sent
back
to
work
next
week
who
were
working
from
home,
but
we
are
not
going
to
move
any
of
our
public
online
meetings
back
to
in
person
yet
and
when
we
do
that,
we're
first
gonna
move
city
council
meetings
and
figure
out
everything
we
need
for
that
before
we
get
anywhere
near
moving
appointed
board
meetings.
The
city
has
for
now
indefinitely
extended
the
state
of
emergency
so
that
we
are
legally
allowed
to
continue
meeting
online.
A
So
I
don't
anticipate
being
back
in
person
as
the
tec
at
any
time
within
the
next
few
months,
based
on
the
fact
that
they're
trying
to
phase
this
at
the
point
when
we
are
required
to
be
back
in
person,
it
will
be
because
they
took
down
the
state
of
emergency
and
we
will
be
by
state
law
legally
required
to
be
in
person
and
as
much
advanced
warning
as
I
get
on
that.
A
I
will
pass
on
to
you
as
well
and
work
with
you
all
on
covet
boundaries
around
that
in
all
the
ways
that
are
within
my
power,
but
just
wanted
to
give
you
that
update.
Since
I
know
I
haven't
had
clarity
on
that
for
a
while
and
therefore
haven't
offered
you
all
any
clarity
on
that
for
a
while.
Does
anyone
have
any
logistical
questions
on
that
before
I
move
on
to
like
project
and
policy
type
updates.
D
I
screw
up
my
own
name
these
days.
Isn't
that
fun
anyway,
I
was
wondering
if
we
end
up
having
to
go
back
in
person.
Are
we
going
to
have
another
conversation
about
when
the
meetings
are
scheduled
to
ensure
that,
like
folks,
are
still
able
to
attend,
because
obviously
it's
a
different
logistical
situation
to
be
able
to
attend
from
home
than
to
go
to
a
particular
physical
location.
A
That
this
is
track.
That's
a
great
question.
We
can
totally
have
that
conversation
once
we
have
a
timeline
technically,
you
all
legally
had
to
adopt
your
calendar
of
meetings
for
2022,
but
we
can.
We
will
just
vote
to
amend
that
calendar
of
meetings
if
people
need
to
change
timing
in
order
to
make
it
accessible
in
person.
A
There's
one
person
on
the
phone
who
I'm
gonna
remove
just
because
we're
getting
a
lot
of
background
noise
from
you
who
just
joined
recently.
But
if
you
have
something
to
contribute
later,
please
feel
free
to
press
star
six
to
unmute
yourself.
A
Okay,
I
will
move
on
then
I'm
gonna
give
some
updates
on
meetings
with
new
and
returning
council
members.
I
have
been
trying
to
brief
a
bunch
of
the
new
council
members
on
all
of
your
recommendations
from
2021
over
the
course
of
the
past
month
since
they've
been
inaugurated
so
that
they
know
what
is
the
community
engagement
and
community
feedback
they're
already
stepping
into,
and
so
that
you
all
know
what
they're
planning
on
working
on
for
the
year.
A
So
you
have
a
sense
of
what
policies
you
might
have
space
to
comment
on
this
year
and
we'll
talk
more
about
like
what
we
anticipate
happening
in
the
capital
c
city
in
the
city
government
when
we
get
into
strategic
planning,
but
some
brief
pieces
around
new
council
members.
So
I
have
not
connected
with
all
of
them
yet
but
of
the
ones
I
have
connected.
I
wanted
to
just
raise
a
couple
priorities
that
people
are
excited
about
that
overlap
with
what
you
all
are
working
on.
A
The
new
council
member
for
ward,
one
councilmember
payne
p-a-y-n-e,
is
some
of
his
big
priorities
are
going
to
be
community
safety
and
public
health,
which
overlaps
with
a
lot
of
your
work,
he's
really
interested
in
work
around
safe
use
sites
or
supervised
injection
sites
and
looking
into
legal
options
for
that,
and
he
has.
He
is
really
interested
in
auditing
city
processes
that
aren't
serving
us.
A
How
we
need
to
including
things
like
how
we're
assessing
whether
our
work
is
racially
equitable
auditing
that
process
and
kind
of
analyzing
that
from
a
data
perspective,
which
I
think
could
prove
valuable
to
you
all,
as
we
figure
out
what
you'll
be
focusing
on,
and
this
will
be
in
the
minutes
too.
I
apologize-
I
probably
should
have
like
written
this
up
on
a
powerpoint
slide
for
a
visual,
and
I
did
not
manage
to
do
that.
So
I
know
this
is
just
me
talking
at
you.
A
Sorry,
I'm
not
good
at
spelling
things
out
loud
kenzie
has
watched
me.
Do
it
a
lot
and
is
laughing
at
me.
A
I
think
she,
one
of
her
highest
priorities
is
going
to
be
housing,
which
is
looking
like
rent
control
and
also
getting
the
city
to
publish
a
standardized
response
to
encampments
so
that
we
actually
have
a
policy
we're
following
as
opposed
to
kind
of
how
things
have
been
happening
right
now,
public
and
then
she
is
on
the
public,
health
and
safety
and
public
works
and
infrastructure
council
committees
and
is
interested
in
figuring
out
how
to
leverage
those
roles
and
being
in
those
conversations,
ward,
9,
council
member
chavez.
A
C-H-A-V-E-Z
is
really
committed
to
the
east
phillips
urban
farm
project
to
addressing
concerns
around
disability
justice
in
the
minimum
wage,
ordinance
and
carve-outs
that
currently
currently
exist
for
not
having
to
pay
disabled
workers
in
certain
contexts.
The
minimum
wage
that
is
otherwise
applicable.
A
A
Ward
10
new
council
member
chugtai
c-h-u-g-h-t-a-I,
is
also
has
a
ton
of
priorities
around
housing.
She's
also
really
interested
in,
as
you
all
said,
in
your
recommendations.
Expanding
the
pilot
guaranteed
basic
income
program.
That's
going
on
right
now
in
issues
around
reproductive
justice
in
looking
into
getting
a
city
municipal
id
which
would
be
could
serve.
A
Multiple
fronts
could
ideally
be
both
a
way
for
people
who
are
undocumented
to
have
some
form
of
documentation
and
also
depending
on
how
it
works
out,
possibly
could
be
an
easier
route
for
folks
accessing
name
like
changed
names
or
gender
markers
on
some
ids,
without
going
through
the
barriers
that
other
ids
involve.
A
A
She
I
mostly
I
didn't
hear
about
her
priorities
as
much
as
just
the
things
that
you
all
are
talking
about,
that
she
is
supportive
of,
but
she
is
supportive
of
the
mental
health
crisis
response
teams
that
go
out.
Instead
of
mpd
to
mental
health
crisis
calls,
and
also
of
like
the
funding
that
you
all,
that
we
that
the
trans
equity
work
is
possibly
asking
for
out
of
the
american
rescue
plan
act
around
training
for
property
owners,
I'm
gonna
pause
there.
I
threw
a
lot
at
you.
A
That
will
also
be
in
the
notes,
but
I
wanted
to
kind
of
flag
that
and
also
put
out
a
call
for
if
there
are
people
who
live
in
any
of
those
wards
and
want
to
be
further
involved
in
conversations
with
their
council
members
or
live
in
other
wards
and
want
to
be
involved
in
conversations
with
their
council
members.
A
If
not,
I'm
gonna
go
into
talking
a
little
bit
about
the
fall
2021
recommendations.
I
am
going
to
open
the
wrong
document.
First,
so
attached
to
the
agenda
is
a
full
pdf
of
all
of
your
recommendations
with
kind
of
listed
under
each
bullet
point.
What
progress
we've
made
on
that?
I
am
not
going
to
screen
share
it,
because
it's
way
more
words
than
is
actually
the
level
of
detail.
A
We
want
to
go
into
here,
but
it
is
available
for
reference
if
anyone
wants,
but
I
will
pull
out
kind
of
the
highlights
of
where
there
are
progress
on
things
so
under
housing
for
tenant
opportunity.
Sorry,
I'm
distracted
by
this
dog
and
it's
bringing
me
a
lot
of
joy.
A
You
don't
need
like
truly
bringing
me
joy.
You
don't
need
to
apologize
for
ten,
an
opportunity
to
purchase
the
city
council
was
in
the
process
of
trying
to
pass
a
tenant
opportunity
to
purchase
ordinance
last
year.
That
did
not
happen
before
the
council
transition
council
member
ellison,
e-l-l-I-s-o-n
and
chug-tai.
C-H-U-G-H-T-A-I
are
co-authoring
that
ordinance
now
and
working
on
the
process
of
moving
it
forward
again
of
any
policy
that
you
all
have
advocated
on
in
the
past.
That's
probably
the
thing
that's
going
to
come
before
a
council
vote
soonest.
A
I
think
there
is
going
to
be
a
push
to
make
some
changes
to
it
so
that
the
there
is
currently
an
exemption
for
property
owners
who
own
five
or
fewer
properties.
They
don't
have
to
give
their
tenants
like
the
first
right
to
buy
the
property
when
they're
selling
it,
and
I
think,
there's
going
to
be
a
push
to
move
that
exemption
even
lower,
because
right
now,
most
most
north
side,
rental
properties
don't
actually
qualify
for
the
ordinance
with
that
exemption.
A
I
think
of
anything
you
all
have
spoke
out
spoken
out
about
this.
Both
the
opportunity
to
try
to
change
the
ordinance
and
the
opportunity
to
try
to
get
enough
votes
to
get
it
passed
in
council
is
probably
going
to
be
the
thing
that
comes
forward.
The
soonest,
as
there
are
community
engagement
opportunities
around
it.
I
will
send
them
your
way,
but
that
is
that
is
in
progress
and
probably
probably
up
soonest,
and
then
I
don't
have
any
other
active
updates
on
housing.
A
As
I
mentioned,
the
piece
around
funding
for
anti-discrimination
training
for
property
owners
is
in
progress
and
there
has
been
some
miscommunication
within
the
department
about.
A
A
So
I
think
that
needs
to
get
figured
out
before
we
can
even
make
a
clear
ask
of
the
mayor's
office
around
funding
right
now,
because
what
we
learned
from
the
budget
process
is,
if
you
make
an
ask
in
the
budget
and
that
department
leadership,
it
has
not
actually
felt
clear
amongst
themselves
that
they
need
that
funding
you're
not
going
to
get
that
money
in
the
budget,
because
the
department
needs
to
say
they
need
it
for
it
to
happen
so
figuring
out.
I
am
working
on
figuring
out
those
clarifications
with
regulatory
services.
A
First,
the
american
rescue
plan
act
phase
two
budget.
The
mayor
is
theoretically
presenting
his
proposed
budget
in
march,
and
then
there
will
be
time
for
the
council
to
comment
on
it
and
make
amendments
and
for
the
public
to
comment
and
depending
on
what,
in
what
form
we
get
this
in
that
budget.
That
would
be
a
space
for
you
all.
To
advocate
around
that.
I
have
no
more
clear
timeline
than
march.
When
I
have
more
clear
timeline,
I
will
let
you
all
know
around
community
safety
work,
so
one
a
couple
updates.
A
Excuse
me,
there
was
also
a
presentation
and
I've
linked
this
in
the
document
that
has
all
of
this
in
detail,
but
there
was
also
a
presentation
early
last
week
to
the
public
health
and
safety
council
committee
on
the
results
of
the
mpd
staffing
study,
which
concluded
that
mpd
would
benefit
from
exploring
more
alternative
responses
to
policing
and
hiring
more
like
non-sworn
officers
to
do
administrative
tasks
in
the
police
department
that
they're
they
do
not
actually
need
to
staff.
A
The
department
with
more
police
officers,
in
order
to
accomplish
the
things
they
are
responsible
for
I'm
also
kind
of
under
the
realm
of
community
safety,
going
to
speak
a
little
bit,
and
this
is
a
separate
attachment,
that's
linked
in
the
agenda,
but
to
what's
going
on
around
conversations
around
no
knock
warrant
bans.
A
I
what
I
linked
in
the
agenda.
I
keep
opening.
The
wrong
document
is
just
literally
my
notes
from
watching
a
couple
council
committee
meetings
this
week,
so
they
don't
look
more
polished
because
they're,
just
I
mean
not
verbatim
but
trying
to
capture
in
detail
what
was
going
on,
but
the
high
level
summary
is,
as
of
last
friday,
in
response
to
a
murloc's
murder,
the
mayor
issued
a
moratorium
on
no
knock
warrants,
which
means
that
mpd
cannot
request
and
cannot
carry
out
no
knock
warrants.
A
The
moratorium
will
go
on
until
a
new
policy
on
no
knock
warrants
is
written
there.
They
have
not
given
a
timeline
for
that,
but
have
promised
the
moratorium
well.
He
the
mayor,
has
promised
the
moratorium
will
go
on
until
that.
A
There
is
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
detail
in
this
that
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
all
of,
but
basically
things
that
have
happened
in
city
council.
In
the
past
week,
council
member
ellison
brought
in
legal
experts
to
present
to
the
council
and
mayor
on
no
knock
warrants
on
advised
potential
policies.
The
advised
potential
policy
being
banned
them
in
every
way
possible.
And
then
there
was
time
for
council
to
ask
the
mayor
questions
about
the
current
moratorium,
about
proposed
policy
changes
and
about
the.
A
Somewhat,
but
not
fully
ban
policy
that
got
passed
in
november
of
2020.
That
was
often
referred
to
as
a
ban
on
no
knock
warrants,
but
was
not
one
and
to
ask
questions
both
on
like
okay.
How
did
this
get
referred
to
and
perceived
as
a
ban
on
no
knock
warrants?
If
it
wasn't
one,
and
also
what
does
this
mean?
Where
does
this
mean
we're
going
now
and
then.
A
So
city
council
cannot
ban
no
knock
warrants
because
city
council
has
no
jurisdiction
over
mpd.
This
falls
squarely
within
the
mayor's
office.
The
mayor
has
brought
in
two
like
national
consultants,
dr
pete
kraska,
k-r-a-s-k-a
and
deray
mckesson
d-e-r-a-y
m-c-k-e-s-s-o-n,
both
of
whom,
amongst
other
things,
were
involved
with
writing
rihanna's
law
in
louisville.
A
They
will
be
involved
in
consulting
on
this
policy.
There
were
a
lot
of
questions
by
council
members
about
how
much
council
can
be
involved
in
consulting
on
this
policy.
There
aren't
super
clear,
concrete
answers
on
that.
A
There
are
a
lot
of
good
specific
questions
that
council
members
asked
the
mayor
that
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
all
of,
but
if
you
want
to
see
more
detail
of,
that
is
in
the
attached
document
and
then
the
other
thing
that's
in
that
attached
document
is.
There
was
a
press
conference
yesterday
where
the
mayor,
the
civil
rights
interim
director
and
two
two
people
from
campaign,
zero,
deray,
mckesson
and
then
one
other
staff
talked
kind
of
to
the
public
about
some
of
the
same
things.
A
There
is
a
moratorium
right
now
there
will
like
mpd,
cannot
request
or
carry
out
no
knock
warrants
during
the
moratorium.
This
does
not
prevent
other
jurisdictions
like
hennepin
county,
carrying
out
a
no
knock
warrant.
That
does
involve
that
does
not
involve
mpd
but
is
in
minneapolis
borders,
but
the
moratorium
controls
everything
mpd.
A
Does
the
civil
rights
department
will
be
involved
in
drafting
this
new
policy
and
will
also
be
involved
in
reviewing,
what's
called
the
city's
communication
process,
around
quote-unquote
critical
incidents,
which
I
would
read
that
statement
as
a
response
to
the
the
fact
that
the
city
originally
called
amirlock
a
suspect
and
other
kind
of
ways
that
the
city
has
communicated
over
the
past
week
and
a
half
and
the
other?
A
I
think
the
other
thing
that
was
said
in
that
press
conference
that
is
worth
highlighting
is
that,
no
matter
what
policy
changes
happen
and
to
my
understanding
this
includes
like
a
complete
ban,
there
will
be
a
loop.
There
will
probably
be
a
loophole
for
extreme
circumstances,
because
there
are
circumstances
like
a
quote-unquote
like
active
pursuit
or
something.
I
do
not
know
the
technical
language
that
don't
technically
require
a
warrant,
and
so
a
ban
on
no
knock
warrants
would
not
change
that.
A
Based
on
my
understanding
of
what
was
said
in
this-
and
I
want
to
be
very
transparent
that,
like
I
experience
it
as
my
responsibility
in
especially
a
moment
like
this,
to
follow,
what's
going
on
internally
in
the
city
and
report,
it
back
to
you
as
accurately
as
possible-
and
I
am
not
an
expert
in
any
of
this-
and
so
I'm
like
capturing
things.
The
best
I
understand
them
and
definitely
am
not
definitely
don't
always
know
enough
to
catch
when
things
are
poorly
or
unclearly
communicated,
and
so
just
want
to
apologize
in
advance.
A
If
I
then
re-communicate
them
in
those
ways
and
like
name
that
and
hold
that,
especially
as
we're
in
the
messiness
right
now
of
like
a
lot
of
us
thought,
we
had
a
ban
on
no
knock
warrants
already.
I
don't
know
if
we've
ever
discussed
that
on
the
tec,
but
I
probably
thought
we
did
too
and
therefore
probably
called
it
that
on
the
tec.
If
we
talked
about
it,
because
that
was
a
thing
that
was
unclearly
communicated
in
so
many
places.
A
So
I
do
not
have
clarity
on
immediate,
like
avenues
that
the
city
is
actively
providing
for
public
engagement.
I
think
both
in
terms
of
the
crafting
of
this
policy
and
in
terms
of
council
member
pain
is
bringing
forward
is
intending
to
introduce
an
ordinance
to
replace
mpd
with
a
department
of
public
safety.
A
A
One
is
the
ballot
which
is
for
those
who
are
following
it
question
two
to
last
november,
to
create
a
department
of
public
safety
that
did
not
pass.
The
other
way
is
unanimous,
yes,
votes
from
all
council
members
and
the
mayor,
so
council,
member
payne,
is
introducing
an
intention
to
approach
that
avenue
of
changing
the
charter
again
both
on
this
and
the
no
knock
warrants
piece
I
have
not
like
heard.
A
Anyone
explicitly
say
yet
like
here
is
an
avenue
for
public
comment
or
a
space
where
we
are
explicitly
requesting
the
input
of
the
public,
which
is
not
to
say
that
you
cannot
give
it.
It
is
just
to
say
that
I
don't
have
like
a
hearing
to
put
on
your
calendars
and
if
there
are
perspectives
that
the
tec
wants
to
share,
either
individually
via
any
of
you
reaching
out
to
council
members
or
the
mayor
or
collectively
via
a
letter
or
something
like
that,
I'm
happy
to
help
get
whatever
information.
You
need
to
do
that.
A
D
D
A
And
there
also
do
not
need
to
be
questions
now.
I
know
that
was
both
a
lot
of
information
and
intense
and
heavy,
but
please
feel
free
to
reach
out
one
on
one
as
well.
If
there
are,
there
is
information
I
can
offer
or
just
any
conversation
you
want
to
have
later
or
to
jump
in
later
on
in
the
meeting.
If
things
come
up
that
you
want
to
talk
about.
A
And
in
terms
of
other
recommendation
updates,
I
will
share
a
little
bit
more
and
again
if
you
want
to
follow
along.
This
is
also
in
the
document
that's
attached
to
the
agenda,
but
in
terms
of
expanding
the
city's
definition
of
supplier
diversity
right
now
to
include
lgbtq
owned,
disabled
owned
and
veteran-owned
businesses.
Right
now.
What
we're
hearing
from
the
attorney's
office
is.
A
We
would
need
data
from
the
next
metro,
wide
disparity
study
in
2024
in
order
to
do
it
in
a
way
that
would
legally
hold
up
in
the
way
they
recommend
in
the
meantime,
hopefully
in
partnership
with
tc
quorum,
we
can
explore
other,
like
quote
unquote,
gender
neutral,
which
is
it
like
means
other
things,
and
it's
not
the
word
I'm
going
to,
but
not
like
in
the
same
way
that
you
might
say
something
is
a
race
neutral
policy
like
other
ways
to
get
more
vendors,
doing
business
with
the
city
that
aren't
technically
targeted,
but
that
we
are
doing
our
best
to
informally
target
in
some
way
or
another.
A
Until
we
can
target
these
business
owners
explicitly
in
policy.
A
This
will
both
expand
opportunities
in
the
meantime
and
assuming
it
doesn't
fully
close,
the
disparity
will
prove
the
necessity
of
a
quote
gender
aware
policy
like
expanding
the
supplier,
diversity
definition,
so
I
will
keep
you
all
updated,
but
that's
where
it
looks
like
that
conversation
is
at
right
now.
A
One
piece
that
has
moved
so
I
don't
know
how
long
ago,
but
I
know
it
was
in
person
so
like
really
a
previous
moment
of
the
tec,
worked
with
destiny.
Who's
a
current
member,
but
can't
be
here
tonight
for
parent-teacher
conferences
on
developing
what
was
called
a
trans
equity
review
of
the
city
as
a
workplace,
something
that
hr
benefits,
team,
hr
learning
and
development
team
would
all
have
to
fill
out
to
look
at
how
the
city
is
treating
trans
and
gnc
employees.
A
A
But
it
found
some
of
the
key
things
that
came
out
in
the
study
were
around
like
a
need
for
a
way
for
people
to
identify
themselves,
both
in
terms
of
name
and
pronouns,
and
also
like
there
being
more
gender
options
in
the
application
process.
More
ways
to
change
names
in
city
systems
and
know
where
gender-neutral
restrooms
are
that
are
like
a
part
of
our
onboarding
and
ongoing
processes
having
hr
policies
for
how
to
support
transitioning
employees,
improving
health
care
benefits
and
improving
training
for
staff.
A
So
not
all
of
those
are
things
that
will
be
the
first
thing
targeted,
but
that
was
some
of
what
came
out
of
it.
It
is
honestly
a
big
win
just
to
have
that
data
and
be
able
to
therefore
plan
from
that
plan.
From
that
considering
we
had
an
almost
finalized
draft
of
this
review.
Pre-Covered
and
hadn't
been
able
to
get
that
data
until
now
so
destiny,
and
I
will
report
back
to
you
with
more
on
that
and
the
sorry.
This
is
very
long,
almost
done
with
updates.
A
I
swear
in
terms
of
last
year.
In
the
budget
process,
you
were
trying
to
get
minneapolis
employment
and
training
to
get
lgbtq
competency,
training
for
like
the
like
career
force
and
other
organizations.
They
fund
that
do
resume
development,
career
development
work.
We
are
working
with
the
trainers
who
are
also
contracted
for
the
city's
gender
inclusivity,
trainings
shore
shor
who's,
a
former
tec
member
and
enzi
enzi,
and
they
are
going
to
provide
this
training
for
all
of
minneapolis
employment
and
trainings
providers
as
well.
A
So
that's
in
process
and
is
exciting
news,
and
then,
last
but
not
least,
when
kenzie
and
hunter
presented
the
recommendations.
Last
fall.
The
council
issued
a
staff
direction.
Looking
into
can
we
require
all
of
the
single
stall
restrooms
in
city
licensed
buildings
to
be
gender
neutral.
A
I
have
been
staffing
the
internal
work
group
on
that
we'll
be
reporting
back
to
council
next
month.
The
long
story
very
short,
is
legally.
We
can't
require
it.
However,
it's
not
all
bad
news,
a
for
buildings
that
were
built
in
or
after
2020.
A
It
is
required
in
state
code
and
we're
going
to
start
enforcing
that
better
and
b
we
can
incentivize
it,
and
what
this
work
group
is
going
to
present
to
council
next
month
is
a
very
clearly
laid
out
plan
of
what
that
incentive
process
would
look
like,
along
with
an
ask
for
thirty
thousand
dollars,
which
is
small
in
city
budget.
A
Even
though
I
still
experience
it
as
a
lot
of
money
to
get
on
a
team's
call
and
ask
for
but
thirty
thousand
dollars
to
cover
all
of
the
like
mailings
and
handout,
printing
and
purchase
of
bathroom
signs,
so
that
we
can
provide
free
bathroom
signs
to
all
the
businesses
who
are
just
willing
to
update
them
themselves,
and
that
will
be
an
ask
in
the
american
rescue
plan
act.
Phase
2
budget,
which
I
have
presented
to
the
mayor's
office
in
the
hopes
that
they
just
propose
it
in
their
proposed
budget.
A
A
Or
or
renovation
that
includes
the
bathroom
area,
so
builder
renovation
yeah,
but
because
it's
now
in
state
building
code
we
have
no
ability
to
legislate
on
it
as
a
city,
and
so
we
can't
address
any
of
the
buildings
from
before
2020.
A
gotcha.
Does
anyone
have
any
other
questions?
I
threw
a
ton
of
stuff
at
you
there,
as
there
are
like
asks
for
public
input
on
things.
I
will
always
update
you,
but
that
does
not
mean
that
you
cannot
choose
to
give
input
on
things
outside
of
when
there's
a
public
hearing
or
something
like
that.
So
please
feel
free
to
still
jump
on
things.
If
there's
anything,
you
want
to
hear
more
about
or
engage
more
with.
A
If
not,
I
am
going
to,
lastly
give
trans
issues,
work
group
that
internal
city
group
updates
and
then
I'm
thankfully,
going
to
pass
it
over
to
some
tec
members
to
talk
about
updates
on
an
ongoing
project
that
started
out
of
conversations
over
the
past
few
months,
but
in
terms
of
trans
issues,
work
group,
the
big
thing
that
is
happening
out
of
that
group
right
now-
is
trying
to
attach
gender
equity
guidelines,
basically
very
thorough,
comprehensive
guidelines
for
policies,
practice
procedure,
training,
around
treatment
of
trans
and
gnc
clients
to
city
contracts
with
homeless,
shelters
and
other
social
service
providers.
A
Above
a
certain
minimum
dollar
threshold.
We
have
almost
all
of
the
logistics
on
that
worked
out.
I
swear
I
keep
saying
that,
but
it
is
getting
more
and
more
true.
We
are
finalizing
some
last
great
questions
from
procurement.
I
have
met
with
all
the
contract
managers
who
would
be
involved.
They
are
excited
to
carry
this
out
and
I'm
hoping
that
we're
bringing
it
to
council
in
the
next
few
months
to
get
council
approval.
A
It
is
one
of
those
things
as
the
city
works
on
implementing
this
new
governance,
strong
mayor
structure,
that
there's
not
a
ton
of
clarity
on
whether
it
needs
to
go
through
council
or
also
through
the
mayor's
office,
but
the
mayor's
staff
who
would
be
responsible
for
this
work
is
supportive
of
it
and
we
have
yet
to.
There
is
yet
to
be
any
policy
that
has
this
go
anywhere
otherwise
other
than
towards
council.
So
we
should
be
fine,
regardless
of
which
direction
it
has
to
take.
A
There
are
a
number
of
council
members
who
are
really
excited
about
this
and
we're
working
right
now
on
figuring
out
who
would
actually
author
it
council
president
jenkins,
also
update
andrea
jenkins
is
now
the
council
president,
and
now
the
council
vice
president,
as
one
both
like
logistical
language,
update
and
also
exciting
piece
of
news
she's,
the
one
we've
been
working
with
most
closely
on
this,
but
we
need
to
present
it
to
the
biz.
A
It's
an
acronym
b-I-h-s,
which
is
like
business
inspections,
housing
and
zoning
council
committee
and
she's
not
on
that
one.
So
we
need
a
different
resolution-
author,
so
working
on
identifying
who
that
will
be,
but
that
is
pretty
close
to
in
progress
honestly,
the
next
project
after
that
is
going
to
be
trying
to
get
the
county
to
pass
something
similar.
The
city
does
not
fund
that
many
shelters.
So
while
this
project
started
out
of
a
focus
specifically
on
trans
folks
experiences
in
shelters,
it's
not
going
to
impact
that
many
local
shelters.
A
It's
mostly
going
to
impact
other
types
of
social
services
which
is
great
but
means
that
if
we
want
it
to
reach
all
the
shelters
here,
the
county
would
need
to
pass
something
similar
as
well.
So
I
am
in
ongoing
conversation
with
staff
at
the
county
about
what
that
would
look
like.
I
think
us
actually
passing
the
thing
in
the
city
is
gonna,
do
a
lot
to
getting
the
county
moving
on
it,
but
that
is
gonna.
Be
the
next
push
on
that
honestly.
A
If
not
folks
who
were
in
the
meeting
around,
can
we
make
weight
and
size
a
protected
class
at
the
city?
Does
anyone
want
to
share
back
some
of
what
happened
in
that
conversation
diana,
I
see
your
hand
go
for
it.
H
Yep
I'll
happily
share,
so
we
were
talking
about
adding
weight
and
size
weight
and
height
discrimination
to
the
civil
rights
protections
of
the
city.
We
have
a
civil
rights
ordinance
that
defines
protected
classes
and
just
adding
that
as
a
protected
class
would
be,
was
a
thing
that
we
were
considering.
So
we
talked
about
several
things
about
the
process
around
it
right
now,
this
the
department's
pretty
understaffed.
So
it's
kind
of
tough
for
them
to
to
focus
on
specific
things,
but
they're
they're
looking
into
it.
H
They
think
it's
a
great
it's
an
interesting
idea.
We
met
with
kayla
from
the
department,
and
one
of
the
questions
that
we
focus
on
is
that
in
that
meeting,
is
what
kind
of
need
is
there
around
it,
because
a
lot
of
the
times
with
the
civil
rights
office?
They
recognize
a
need
when
cases
get
brought
forward
to
them,
but
the
thing
with
fat
discrimination
is
that
so
few
people
realize
that
it's
a
that.
It
is
a
nexus
for
discrimination.
H
They
don't
realize
that
there's
a
possibility
to
build
a
case
out
of
that.
So
one
of
the
things
when
I
was
researching
on
it
that
I
found
was
that
in
cities
that
passed
these
laws,
because
san
francisco
washington
dc
and
the
state
of
michigan
actually
have
weight
and
height
discrimination
as
protected
classes.
Passing
the
law
acts
as
an
education
initiative
to
a
lot
of
the
the
population,
and
it
makes
it
possible
for
people
who
hadn't
realized
that
what
they
were
experiencing
was
legally
discrimination
can
now
do
it.
H
So
that's
one
reason
for
minneapolis
to
move
forward
on
that
to
do
that,
and
they
are
looking
at
updating
the
civil
rights
ordinance
as
it
is.
So
that
would
be
one
way,
and
one
reason
that
would
be
a
tec
issue
is
that
it
intersects
a
lot
with
a
lot
of
other
protected
classes.
H
With
that
fact,
trans
men
tend
to
experience
a
unique
sort
of
discrimination
with
that,
and
it's
there's
also
a
poverty
issue
where
being
fat
makes
it
harder
to
get
a
job,
makes
it
harder
to
stay
employed
because
of
discriminations,
where
hiring
managers
see
you
as
an
unprofessional
simply
because
of
your
weight
or
your
height.
H
H
Oh,
can
I
add
one
more
thing
yeah.
This
is
diana
by
the
way.
The
reason
this
isn't
a
disability
rights
issue
is
because
fat
discrimination
cases
that
have
been
brought
under
the
ada
have
only
really
been
applied.
Had
a
disability
disability
framework
applied
for
the
severely
obese
is
the
term
that
they
use
the
the
super
fat
sort
of
stuff.
So
people
who
are
more
in
the
middle,
who
are
still
fat
but
not
considered
super
fat
under
the
law,
myself,
don't
qualify
as
a
disability.
A
Thank
you
for
that.
This
is
track,
and
I
will
also
highlight
one
great
point.
Diana
made
in
the
meeting,
which
is
that,
if
this
were
to
get
updated
as
a
protected
class
like
people,
would
then
be
able
to
file
cases
against,
for
example,
like
surgeons
who
refuse
gender
affirming
procedures
due
to
weight,
which
is
one
of
the
particular
ways
that
people
will
see
this
as
a
trans
specific
quote-unquote
issue,
even
as
it
is
in
all
of
the
ways
you
named
also
relevant
to
the
tec.
A
I
will
keep
you
all
updated
as
I'll.
Let
you
switch
interpreters.
D
Thank
you.
I
was
just
gonna
say
something
and
do
you
have
captain
yeah?
Okay,
there
we
are
great
we're
ready.
A
Sweet,
I
will
keep
you
all
updated,
as
I
hear
from
kayla
on
how
they're
moving
forward
on
updating
the
civil
rights
ordinance.
I
think
it's
just
going
to
be
about
this
getting
tied
in
with
the
rest
of
that
timeline
and
process
and
getting
a
little
more
staffing
in
that
department.
A
They
are
really
understaffed
right
now
and
then
the
last
like
project
update
I
wanted
to
offer,
is
the
tec
has
been
trying
to
support
an
ongoing
partnership
with
the
office
of
violence
prevention
to
get
them
to
do
more
around
like
trans-specific
violence,
and
they
do.
A
They
are
running
a
program
right
now
called
minneapolis
violence,
prevention,
community
champions,
it's
workshops
around
violence
prevention
that
people
can
go
to
to
get
a
sort
of
certification,
and
they
just
wanted
to
extend
the
offer
that
if
the
tec
had
any
interest
in
pre
like
proposing
a
workshop,
that
would
be
a
part
of
those
full
day
trainings.
A
If
there
is
any
particular
content
that
you
wanted
them
covering
either
that
some
of
you
wanted
to
help
provide
or
just
that,
you
wanted
to
be
in
there
and
you
wanted
to
throw
out
and
see
if
they
could
find
someone
else
to
help,
provide
that
they're
really
interested
in
tec
feedback
on
what
the
minneapolis
violence
prevention,
community
champions
should
be.
Learning.
G
This
is
a
mirror,
I
guess.
The
first
thing
that
comes
to
mind
is
is
sort
of
intimate
partner,
violence
and
yeah.
I
don't
actually
know
of
anything
besides
awareness
and
like
like
in
terms
of
data
collected
on
that
in
the
city
or
anything,
but
that's
one
thing
that
comes
to
mind.
I
A
G
I
think
there's
what
I
would
want
to
highlight
is
is
sort
of
like
these
specific
experiences
that
trans
people
go
through
in
and
the
intimate
partner
violence,
sort
of
that
that
is
kind
of
a
trans-pacific
experience
being
like
part
of
that
curriculum.
A
This
track,
if
nobody
has
anything
else,
we
are
gonna
move
into
co-chair
elections
and
then
into
priority
setting
and
subcommittees
for
2022,
and
so
the
framing
I'll
offer
for
co-chairs
real
quickly
is
the
teeth
I
mean
objectively,
you
all
can
choose
the
number
of
chairs
you
have.
A
Historically,
the
tec
has
had
anywhere
from
one
to
three
co-chairs
generally
two
or
three
only
one
at
these
kind
of
in
between
moments
of
somebody
having
stepped
off
and
us
not
having
brought
more
people
on
yet
and
are
we
sorry
words,
and
since
it
is
up
to
you
all
how
many
you
want
to
have.
I
think
the
smoothest
votings
process
for
this
logistically
probably
is
going
to
be
everyone
who's
interested
in
being
a
co-chair
like
sharing
their
name.
A
If
you
want
to
share
a
couple
sentences
about
why
you're
interested
and
then
probably
having,
I
think
we
could
approach
this
one
of
two
ways,
I
spent
a
little
bit
of
time
trying
to
figure
out
logistically
how
best
to
do
this.
I
think
either
somebody
could
motion
for
how
many
co-chairs
they
wanted
to
have,
depending
on
how
many
people
are
running,
and
then
we
could
vote
on
that
and
vote
from
there
or
we
could
have
everybody.
A
No,
I
think
we
need
to
figure
out
how
many
coaches
we
want
to
have
before
there's
any
logical
way
to
vote.
So
the
people
who
are
running
for
co-chair
are
going
to
share
then
we'll
accept,
motions
and
vote
on
motions
for
how
many
co-chairs
we're
having
and
then
from
there
we'll
figure
out
voting
on
the
co-chairs.
Specifically
sorry,
the
last
time
we
did
this.
A
H
I
can
go
first
on
diana.
I
am
interested
because
I
enjoy
doing
this
work.
This
is
something
I'm
really
excited
to
be
involved
in,
and
I
think
it's
something
that
can
really
it
it's
fun
to
have
a
hand
in
city
government
and
to
feel
like
I'm
actually
affecting
my
city
in
a
good
way.
I've
been
in
minneapolis
for
five
years
now
and
I've
fallen
in
love
with
the
place
and
want
to
make
it
better.
So
I
want
to
be
able
to
do
that
by
having
a
sort
of
leadership
role
here
as
well.
J
I'm
olivia
st
john
and
I
spend
a
lot
of
my
day.
My
my
my
work
basically
is
focused
entirely
around
like
storytelling
stakeholder
management
and
raising
funds
and
finances
for
projects
that
I
believe
in
so
I'd
love
to
put
those
skills
to
use
whether
it's
co-chair
or
not.
I
will
absolutely
be
actively
involved
in
every
way
that
I
can,
but
as
a
six
foot
three
trans
women,
I
often
don't
have
a
choice
about
whether
or
not
I'm
thrust
into
political
discussions
or
debates
about
my
existence.
J
E
And
this
is
kenzie
your
boy's
running
for
reelection,
but
I
will
say
as
an
asterisk
and
I'm
kind
of
getting
emotional
just
thinking
about
it,
but
I
believe
my
last
official
tec
meeting
will
be
in
june
and
it
is
a
little
premature
to
kind
of
announce
that.
But
I
feel
like
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
for
this
context.
E
But
my
my
dream
is
to
usher
in
our
two
other
folks
running
and
and
then
eventually,
when
I
fall
off
mid-year,
then
we'll
still
have
two
co-chairs,
so
yeah
kind
of
a
sad
announcement,
but
also
I
still
want
to
be
co-chair
until
I
leave
so
yeah.
A
A
Amazing,
okay,
amendment
to
my
previous
plan.
I
think
actually
probably
the
easiest
vote
process
on
this,
so
I
don't
do
three
rounds
of
calling
roll
is.
If
you
are
motioning,
therefore,
for
it
to
be
these
three
co-chairs
for
you
to
say
that
and
that
if
you
are
not,
please
say,
but
if
you
are,
you
can
say
that
and
then
everybody
can
just
vote
on
that
and
we
call
roll
once.
F
A
D
E
F
A
You're
good,
no
worries
amazing.
There
are
eight
in
favor,
none
opposed
three
absent
and
the
motion
passes
and
welcome
to
our
two
new
chair
new
co-chairs
and
our
returning
co-chair.
I
will
follow
up
with
you
all
after
this
to
schedule.
Co-Chair
meetings
get
excited.
A
apologies
kenzie,
I
feel
like
I
took
over
a
lot
of
facilitation
because
I
just
had
to
lead
most
of
these
sections
anyway,
but
that
was
not
what
I
was
supposed
to
do,
but
I
feel
like
I'm
gonna,
propose
a
like
one
minute
stretch
break
before
we
get
into
this
because
we've
done
a
bunch
of
talking,
grab
water
or
something
if
you
need.
While
I
get
this
powerpoint
up
to
screen,
share.
A
A
A
A
Sweet,
so
I
believe
how
we're
going
to
do
this,
I'm
going
to
do
a
little
bit
of
like
quick,
past
history
to
ground
us
in
like
what
subcommittees
have
you
had
in
the
past?
What
do
we
know
is
coming
up
this
year
and
then
kenzie
is
going
to
facilitate
you
all
through
thinking
about
priorities
for
this
year
subcommittees
budget
and
who
you
want
to
bring
in
to
present
to
the
tec,
all
of
which,
of
course,
can
be
ongoing
conversations
but
kind
of
setting
some
amount
of
framework
for
the
year.
A
C
This
is,
may
I
have
a
question
go
for
it
when
kenzie
is
describing
the
subcommittees.
Will
there
be
discussion
about
when
the
subcommittees
meet,
because
that
will
influence
choices.
A
Yes,
thank
you.
We
are
just
going
to
figure
out
what
subcommittees
to
have
this
year
and
then
my
goal
is
people
can
raise
their
hands.
Who
wants
to
be
on
what,
and
I
will
follow
up
with
you
all
afterwards
to
like
do
a
scheduling
poll
and
hopefully
find
a
time
that
works
for
you
all
and
then
next
month
you
will
officially
adopt
your
subcommittee
meeting
calendar
so
hopefully
we're
gonna
make
it
work
based
on
your
schedules.
A
If
not,
I
am
going
to
screen
share
and
ryder
and
taftan
if
this
messes
up
having
each
other
pinned
or
if
you
need
a
minute
to
just
get
stuff
reset
up.
Let
me
know
so.
I
know
we're
good.
A
Righty,
if
one,
if
I
could
get
a
like
update
when
we're
good,
that
would
be
awesome.
D
A
I
also
put
this
in
the
chat,
but
if
you
click
on
a
person,
they
should
get
bigger
again.
A
Got
it
great
everybody
if
you
have
tech
difficulties?
Let
me
know
if
you
have
comments,
please
just
unmute
and
share
them
or
like
write
or
jump
in
signing
and
share
them.
Obviously,
because
I
cannot
see
you
all
well
on
this
screen
when
I
am
screen
sharing,
but
so
past
subcommittees
super
high
level.
The
two
that
existed
last
year
were
policy
and
training.
A
I've
listed
on
here
the
priorities
they
had
as
well,
most
of
which
are
themes.
You
can
see
in
your
recommendations,
policy
focusing
on
mpd
accountability
and
alternatives
to
policing
housing,
equity,
sex
work,
decriminalization
banning
the
transpanic
defense
and
safe
use
sites
and
training
focused
on
expanding
the
city's
gender
inclusivity,
101
training,
which
is
now
up
and
going
again
getting
a
trans
and
gnc
competency,
training
for
asl
interpreters,
which
we
did
and
developing
a
kind
of
action-oriented
201
training
at
the
city.
A
Other
past
subcommittees
include
public
awareness
and
community
engagement,
which
was
responsible
for
a
lot
of
the
tec's
like
tabling
at
events
or
holding
listening
sessions,
summit
planning,
which
has
since
been
incorporated
just
into
the
general
planning
process
at
the
city.
If
tec
members
want
to
be
a
part
of
that,
a
brief
but
awesome
committee
that
worked
on
the
tc's,
bylaws
and
guidelines
and
then
before
I
was
at
the
city,
a
housing
committee.
So
I
can't
give
you
as
much
detail
about
what
they
did.
A
Some
key
past
accomplishments
and
highlighting
these
again
just
so.
We
don't
end
up
accidentally
restarting
a
project.
We
already
did,
as
I
said,
the
gender
inclusivity
101
training,
getting
the
staff
role
that
I
am
in
funded,
full-time
and
ongoing
was
a
big
budget
fight
and
a
big
accomplishment
presenting
annual
recommendations
to
council
since
2018
and
out
of
those
some
housing
policies
have
been
adopted,
or
amendment
amended.
A
There's
the
restroom
policy
piece
that
I
just
talked
about:
the
property
owner
training,
the
gender
equity
guidelines.
We
were
just
talking
about
adding
the
panic
defense
ban
to
what
we're
lobbying
for
the
state
to
change,
since
we
can't
change
it
at
the
city
level
and
the
hr
trans
equity
review
that
we
were
just
talking
about
has
been
completed.
These
are
not
all
the
things
that
have
ever
happened,
but
some
highlights
I'll
pause
for
questions
before
I
go
to
the
next
slide.
C
A
Okay,
so
what
do
we
know
about?
What's
coming
this
year?
What
is
going
to
be
happening
in
the
city
that
you
all
can
influence?
In
general,
we
are
moving
to
a
strong
mayor
structure.
A
I
know
less
than
I
want
to
about
what
that's
going
to
mean
these.
This
city,
council
term
is
only
two
years
instead
of
four
years
because
of
the
impact
of
redistricting,
which
means
a
lot
of
things.
It
means
it's
going
to
be
hard
for
them
to
get
much
done,
because
they're
going
to
spend
the
first
year
really
getting
their
feet
underneath
them.
That's
a
weird
metaphor:
they're
going
to
spend
the
first
year
really
figuring
out
the
processes
and
then
by
the
next
year,
it'll
already
be
an
election
year.
A
A
Where,
like
I
said
I
have
hopefully
I
have
put
in
an
ask
around
the
restroom
incentives.
I
will
hopefully
be
able
to
put
in
an
ask
for
the
property
owner
trainings
in
november
and
december,
as
always
we're
going
to
have
the
annual
budget
process.
A
If
tenant
opportunity
to
purchase
passes,
there
will
be
a
big
push
to
get
enough
funding
behind
the
project.
For
it
to
be
successful.
There
will
also
probably
be
a
big
push
to
continue
to
fund
and
expand
the
mental
health
crisis
response
teams
that
are
going
out
instead
of
mpd.
A
Obviously,
but
those
are
things
in
your
recommendations
that
I
know
will
be
budget
conversations
and
then
this
year
is
also
going
to
involve
a
lot
of
redevelopment
and
re-envisioning
of
the
division
of
race
and
equity,
both
because
we
just
concluded
a
five-year
grant
that
directed
most
of
our
work
and
are
figuring
out
where
we
go
from
here,
and
because
I'm
the
only
staff
left
in
the
division
right
now
and
as
we
restaff
the
office
and
particularly
as
we
hire
a
new
director
who
gets
to
kind
of
shape,
the
future
direction
of
the
office.
A
That
is
a
weird
thing
to
say,
when
I
can't
see
any
of
your
faces
policy
that
we
know,
city
council
is
working
on
this
year,
tenant
opportunity
to
purchase
a
work
group
looking
at
rent
control
options,
the
encampment
response
policy
I
mentioned
there
are
a
ton
of
things
that
will
probably
happen.
Those
three
are
things
I
know
are
happening
potential
council
policy,
community
safety
work
such
as
the
mpd
staffing
study.
I
made
this
powerpoint
more
than
two
weeks
ago.
A
There
is
obviously
now
a
lot
more
in
that
conversation
than
there
was
when
I
made
this
powerpoint,
I
would
add
the
conversation
on
no
knock
warrants
and
a
potential
department
of
public
safety
and
probably
a
lot
else
to
that
bucket.
A
Now,
municipal
id
safe
use
sites,
many
more
things,
but
as
some
potential
things
and
what
do
we
know
is
happening
internal
to
the
city,
continuing
to
roll
out
the
gender
inclusivity,
training
for
city
departments,
following
up
on
the
results
of
the
trans
equity
review,
supporting
minneapolis
employment
and
training
in
getting
those
trainings
out
to
their
providers
and
then
policy
that
is
in
process.
A
Right
now
that
I
am
working
on
that
raceequity
is
working
on
the
gender
equity
guidelines
in
professional
services
contracts
that
work
around
incentivizing,
gender-neutral,
restrooms
and
trying
to
get
more
anti-discrimination
content
in
the
property
owner
training.
A
There
aren't
any
I'm
going
to
say
a
couple
things
quickly
about
budget
and
past
presentations
and
then
we're
going
to
figure
out
this
year.
So
what
have
we
historic?
So
there
is
15
000
each
year
that
is
allocated
to
the
trans
equity
work
that
does
not
cover
salaries
or
benefits,
or
anything
like
that.
That
is
program
money.
A
What
have
we
historically
spent
it
on
interpretation?
The
city
does
not
have
a
process
for
like
a
centralized
money,
source
of
funding
for
interpretation
and
so
each
office
to
the
degree
that
they
have
anything
translated
or
interpreted
covers
that
which
feels
like
helpful
context
in
terms
of
how
this
process
works:
compensation
for
community
engagement.
If
we've
held
a
focus
group
and
paid
people,
tabling
fees
and
or
supplies
for
outreach
events
and
summit
expenses,
the
summit
costs
far
more
than
fifteen
thousand
dollars.
A
It
is
mostly
funded
by
sponsorships
by
outside
money
that
we
raise
ourselves
any
amount
of
the
fifteen
thousand
dollars
that
we
have
to
cover
the
summit
we
put
to
it,
but
it
would
not
cover
the
summit
even
if
we
spent
it
wholly
there.
A
We
cannot
spend
this
money
based
on
city
policy
on
food
or
beverages
on
gift
cards,
which
is
why,
in
order
to
compensate
people
for
focus
groups,
they
have
to
invoice
the
city
on
stipends,
for
you
all,
unfortunately,
and
on
anything
over
five
thousand
dollars
unless
we
go
through
an
official
contracting
process,
and
so
I
offer
these
just
as
kind
of
limitations.
Appointed
boards
do
not
technically
have
budgets.
This
money
is
not
like
technically
the
tec's
money,
and
I
experience
you
all
as
one
of
the
forces
that
directs
and
shapes
the
work
I
do.
A
A
And
the
last
thing
I'm
gonna
go
through
is
like
who
have
we
heard
from
in
the
past
in
terms
of
monthly
presentations,
and
then
I'm
gonna
pass
it
to
kenzie.
So
you
all
can
kind
of
take
this
information
and
do
some
brainstorming
on
where
to
go
from
here,
and
this
is
mostly
moving
from
most
recent
to
least
reason.
If
I
did
it
right
emphasis
on,
if
I
did
it
right,
we
heard
about
tenant
opportunity
to
purchase
as
it
was
being
written.
A
A
A
A
A
If
you
haven't
used
the
jamboard
before
I'm
hoping
that
it's
kenzie
and
I
are
hoping
that
it's
pretty
self-explanatory,
and
this
is
going
to
give
some
space
to
think
through
kenzie.
I
will
let
you
take
this
over
now.
I
will
stop.
E
You
would
think
I
would
know
better
by
now,
but
yes,
I
have
never
used
jamboard
before,
but
in
track.
Now
I
can't
see
your
little
key
that
you
made.
E
How
easy
slash
hard
are
these
issues
to
accomplish
and
to
do
that
we'll
do
a
classic
red,
yellow,
green
and
then
are
these
issues
in
the
realm
of
our
influence
and
arrow?
If
yes,
trex
says
so,
I
think
my
only
preface
before
we
really
start
jamming
is.
E
Just
to
be
aware-
and
I
believe
this
is
a
conversation
that
we've
had
before-
but
because
trans
people
are
human
beings
with
several
identities
and
lives,
I
think
everything
could
be
framed
as
an
issue
that
affects
trans
people,
and
so
that's
gonna
give
us
a
lot
of
ideas
in
terms
of
like
what
is
important
to
us.
So,
unfortunately,
we're
gonna
need
to
whittle
that
down,
but
yeah.
We
we
have
the
opportunity
to
shape
where
our
recommendations
are
going
this
year.
E
So
I
would
say
I
don't
know
really
advocate
for
something
that
you're
passionate
about,
because
then,
when
it
comes
time
to
start
like
actually
advocating
for
these
things,
tc
members,
I
think,
are
going
to
be
more
open
to
emailing
their
like
council,
member
or
making
calls
when
it
comes
to
voting
times
so
yeah
with
that,
I
myself
am
gonna
open
up
the
jamboard.
A
So
if
you
open
the
link
in
the
chat
and
thank
you
to
our
observers,
who
joined
on
the
phone
and
are
very
patiently
waiting
through
this-
and
I
will
also
read-
we
will
read
things
out
as
we
come
up
with
them,
but
on
the
left,
you're
going
to
have
a
line
of
options
and
like
the
middle
one,
is
this
little
post-it
square?
If
you
click
on
that,
it'll
give
you
a
post-it
that
you
can
type
in
and
then
plop
anywhere
on
the
page.
A
I
stuck
in
the
corner,
some
red,
yellow
and
green
circles,
and
some
arrows
you
can
drag
those
around
to
mark
your
and
other
people's
post-its.
If
we
run
out
of
room
at
the
top
of
your
screen
is
a
one
like
one
out
of
one
with
left
and
right
arrows.
If
you
just
click
the
right,
arrow
it'll
give
us
another
board
and
you
can
keep
throwing
things
on
there,
and
so
this
is
just
a
little
quiet
time
closest.
A
We
can
get
to
the
like
post-it
big
post-it
paper-on-the-wall
situation,
for
you
to
throw
some
ideas
up
there
and,
if
you're,
having
technical
issues
also,
please
feel
free
to
unmute
and
say
things
and
I'll
put
them
on
a
post-it
for
you
or
put
things
in
the
chat,
I'm
happy
to
translate
stuff
over
if
needed.
F
This
is
billy.
I
just
have
a
question:
are
we
putting
on
the
sticky
notes
our
thoughts
on
what
the
subcommittee
should
be?
Also
like?
We,
I
don't
think
we've
had
the
discussion
yet
like.
I
think,
that's
what
we're
trying
to
do
right
now
right
like
do
we
want
more
than
two
subcommittees.
Do
we
want
three?
Should
we
put
that
on
sticky
notes
like
what
we
think
a
subcommittee
should
be
to
address
the
issues
that
we're
getting
or
if
we
want
to
have
that
discussion
beforehand?
I
don't
know.
A
A
Oh,
and
this
is
track-
I
just
want
to
offer
a
reminder
that
priorities
can
be
both
like
policy
priorities.
You
want
to
pass
or
like
priorities,
you
want
things
you
want
to
spend
time
on
as
the
tc,
whether
that's
like
a
form
of
community
engagement
or
something
else
like
that.
Like
I
actually
see
someone
putting
getting
the
word
out
about
that's
easy
right
now,
but
realize
that
that
maybe
came
out
sounding
only
like
policy,
so.
E
So,
okay
to
be
transparent,
I
wrote
getting
the
word
out
about
tec
and
since
we
already
opened
up
the
conversation
about
subcommittees,
I
would
like
to
see
pace
or
a
community
engagement
subcommittee
pop-up,
and
so
I
I
don't
know
that's
why
I
put
that
sticky
note
somebody
wrote
city,
contract
requirements,
decriminalizing
sex
work,
policing
generally
and
then
a
little
more
detail
on
that
replacing
mpd
with
mental
health
workers.
E
E
E
D
I
can
go.
This
is
nissan,
so
I
added
in
city
contract
requirements.
D
While
I
know
that
the
work
is
continuing
to
like
progress
around
this,
I
feel
like
this
is
one
of
the
easiest
levers
that
we
have
as
a
city
to
encourage
certain
behaviors
that
we
would
like
to
see
in
you
know,
organizations
that
we
work
with
and
so
continuing
to
focus
on
ways
that
we
can
push
anyone
the
city
contracts
with
about
anything
essentially
to
meet
certain
basic
requirements
regarding
trans
and
gender
non-conforming.
Folks,
I
think,
would
be
definitely
within
our
purview
and
definitely
accomplishable
with
the
right
poking
at
the
right
people.
J
I'd
like
to
speak
to
two
of
them,
one
is
the
the
pace
the
getting
the
word
out.
I
think
that
it's
super
important,
because
we
need
to
make
sure
that
people
understand
that
they
have
advocates
and
that
they
can.
You
know,
reach
out
to
us
with
their
issues
and
it's
also
very
useful
for
building
empathy.
J
We
all
have
our
own
experiences
that
are
very
intimate
to
us,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
we
understand
everything
that
people
are
experiencing
as
well
around
us
in
the
cities,
and
so
it
gives
us
a
lot
of
opportunities
to
be
out
in
front
of
people
that
we're
serving
in
this
role,
and
so
it's
very
important
to
me
on
that
and
then
the
other
one
I
put
out
there,
the
one
I
put
out
there
was
the
continued
lgbtq
lgbtq,
inclusive
education,
and
somebody
grew
up
in
the
bible
about
in
the
south,
where
we
did
not
allow
any
discussion
about
things
that
were
lgbtq
related.
J
It's
all
too
real
to
me
when
I
see
the
stuff
that's
going
on.
It's
it's
been
hard
to
read,
so
I'm
I
just
I
I'm
while
minneapolis
might
be
very
progressive
compared
to
a
lot
of
places
done
that
I
I
wouldn't
put
it
past
there
being
advocates
on
the
other
side
already
pushing
for
similar
things.
So
I
think
that
we
need
to
take
a
proactive
approach.
D
I'm
just
gonna
say
a
thing:
real,
quick
on
the
education
side
of
things
nissa
again,
one
of
the
things
that
we
kind
of
talked
about
when
we
had
someone
from
minneapolis
public
schools
visit
with
us
is:
how
can
we
be
working
with
minneapolis
public
schools
more
because
we
don't
actually
have
any
authority
over
over
what
they
do
and
so
trying
to
find
an
inn.
D
But
that
seems
like
worth
exploring
or
at
least
who
we
could
partner
with
or
ways
that
I'm
not
sure
it's
a
function
of
a
of
a
city
advisory
board,
though,
but
more
just
like
making
sure
that
we
have
a
connection,
because
I'm
not
sure
what
we
can
even
do
regarding
minneapolis
public
schools
because
they're
their
own
thing.
So
I
just
wanted
to
throw
that
out.
There
is
something
that
I
wish.
H
Yeah,
this
is
diana,
I
think
something
like
that
could
easily
fall
under
community
engagement
as
of
doing
that
sort
of
thing,
with
the
public
schools,
developing
a
relationship
between
the
schools
and
the
city
and
stuff,
and
our
our
council
to
advocate
for
those
things,
yeah.
E
E
E
So
I
am
a
strong
advocate
to
keep
the
policy
subcommittee
around
and
then,
while
I'm
on
on
the
mic,
I
also
would
really
like
to
see
a
community
engagement
or
a
pace
subcommittee,
and
I
think
my
only
question
is
historically,
we've
had
a
training
subcommittee
and
it
doesn't
seem
to
be
like
our
asks,
skew
towards
the
training
realm.
E
So
I
guess
I
would
ask
if
anybody
sees
value
or
or
of
course,
there's
value,
but
given
what
our
priorities
are.
Is
that
something
you're
excited
about
you
know?
Would
you
be
on
the
training
subcommittee.
F
F
I
would
also
volunteer
that
I
think
it
might
be
helpful
to
have
a
budget
or
like
maybe
a
budget
and
outreach
subcommittee
in
terms
of,
and
maybe
this
could
be
like
in
conjunction
with
puzzles.
I
just
think
that
policy
does
so
much
like.
I
don't
want
to
put
too
much
on
the
policy
subcommittee,
I
think,
having
a
budget
subcommittee,
especially
for
people
who
have
like
fundraising,
experience
that
maybe
can
help
out.
F
I
know
with
the
summit
the
summit's
quite
a
bit
of
money,
but
also
the
outreach
portion
would
be
to
help
sorry,
my
dog's
gonna
bark
in
a
second
to
to
help
the
outreach
portion
of
the
budget
and
outreach
committee
would
be
like
to
help
with
summit,
to
help
us
presenters
for
like
tec
meetings
and
like
just
things
that
kind
of
fall
to
the
wayside.
F
That
might
be
too
much
of
an
ask
to
put
on
a
policy
subcommittee
or
the
pace
subcommittee,
and
since
we
have
three
co-chairs
like
maybe
it
would
also
be
helpful
to
have
a
co-chair
oversee
each
subcommittee.
H
This
is
diana.
I
would
second
that
I
think
policy
would
be
good
for
the
overarching
policy
goals
that
we
want,
and
then
the
budget
committee
would
be
the
nitty-gritty
of
what
we
actually
like
are
able
to
put
into
the
city
budget
and
suggestions
to
make
and
stuff.
So
I
think
it's
good
to
separate
those
two
out.
D
This
is
nissa,
I
don't
have
a
comment
on
the
budget
side
of
things,
but
I
did
want
to
speak
to
kinsey's
comments
around
whether
or
not
we
have
training
and
whether
people
are
interested
in
that.
D
I
also
think
that
that
is
the
sort
of
thing
that
could
be
taken
on
if
we
did
find
that
there
is
a
need,
like
part
way
through
by
either
the
pace
subcommittee,
it
was
where
I'd
probably
place
it
or
if,
if
everything
like
hit
hit
the
wall
or
whatever
it
could
go
into
policy
because
there's
some
related
policy
things,
and
we
could
address
that
if
it
needs
to
be
its
own
thing
at
that
time.
D
A
This
is
track.
I
just
want
to
offer
one
thought
on
the
budget
piece
as
as
context
not
as
in
this
is
my
decision,
one
being
that
other
than
american
rescue
plan
act.
So
this
year's
unusual,
normally
the
city
budget
process
kind
of
happens
for
one
month
a
year
this
year,
it'll
happen
in
two
chunks,
so
in
terms
of
advocating
around
city
budget,
you
all
can
make
a
subcommittee
around
that
or
like
pull
together
a
couple
people
to
just
like
work
on
that
for
a
month
or
two.
A
If
you
need
to,
if
you
don't
want
it
to
be
a
year-long
thing,
I
know
in
2021
folks
chose
to
only
have
two
subcommittees
instead
of
three
so
that
there
would
be
like
more
than
two
or
three
people
on
each
subcommittee
and
you
would
feel
like
you
had
a
like
critical
mass
to
get
stuff
done,
depending
on
people's
capacity.
We
are.
We
have
a
couple
open
seats
on
the
tc
right
now
that
I'm
working
on
filling,
but
we
are
a
little
low
on
numbers
right
now.
A
E
E
D
Given
all
that
this
is
nissa,
I
motioned
to
do
what
track
told
us
to
do.
No,
I'm
just
just.
D
And
vote
on
whether
we
would
like
there
to
be
two
subcommittees
going
into
this
year:
pay
slash
community
engagement,
subcommittee
and
policy.
A
A
A
A
E
Yes,
well,
I
was
going
to
say:
is
there
a
way
that
when
you
send
out
that
the
scheduling
poll,
if
we
could
also
maybe
do
like
a
google
form
of,
is
there
anyone?
You
want
to
ask
back
in
terms
of
presentations
or
is
there
any
anything
in
particular,
you
wanna
a
lot
for
the
budget.
E
A
Yeah
this
is
track.
I
will
send
out
a
google
form
and
then
we
can
talk
through
the
results
next
time,
but
the
co-chairs-
and
I
can
go
through
that
in
advance
and
see
if
it's
possible,
to
get
something
going
even
for
march
and
if
not,
definitely
once
you
all
talk
it
through
for
april,
but
around
both
budget
and
presentation
stuff.
That
is
a
great
idea.
Thank
you.