►
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
jeffrey
strand,
I'm
the
chair
of
the
capital
long
range
improvements
committee.
Before
we
begin
I'd
like
to
note
that
this
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statute,
section
13d
0.021,
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic.
C
D
E
F
G
C
Kazinka
here
richard
loro
here
here,
erica
mater
here,
dan
mcconnell,
who
reported
he
was
gonna,
be
absent.
Jake
mccormick
here
miller.
C
George
montague,
this
is
beth
toso.
I
didn't
hear
my
name
called.
B
Thank
you
clerk
point
of
inquiry
for
the
staff
to
follow
up
later
is
mr
brandt
still
a
member
of
the
committee,
since
he
was
elected
to
the
board
of
estimate
and
taxation.
So
maybe
just
he.
B
H
A
member,
so
I
think,
we're
just
wired
crossed.
B
Okay,
good
to
know
that's
what
I
thought.
Thank
you
with
that
we'll
proceed
to
our
agenda,
a
copy
which
was
posted
for
public
access
to
the
city's
legislative
management
system,
sometimes
called
limbs
which
is
available
at
lims.minneapolismn.gov.
B
And
then
we'll
proceed
to
the
proposed
agenda,
so
the
city
staff
had
published
the
agenda
prior
meeting
minutes
etc.
So
for
the
agenda,
I
will
entertain
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda.
Will
you
state
your
name
after
the
motion
and
after
the
second.
B
D
B
G
A
C
I
E
A
C
C
E
C
B
B
And
want
to
make
note
of
that,
so
we
also
have
the
meeting
minutes
from
june
30
2021,
so
those
were
in
the
published
agenda
and
meeting
material.
So
if
there's
a
motion
to
adopt
the
minutes
from
june,
30
2021
will
do
so
again.
B
B
E
F
G
F
A
E
B
E
I
B
So
vice
chair,
willie
bridges
and
I
will
be
covering
the
onboarding
presentation
so
we'll
try
to
make
this
fairly
fast.
It's
a
refresher
for
most
members
and
you'll
have
the
material
to
review
at
your
convenience.
So
next
slide.
Please.
B
So
the
key
purpose
of
click
annual
process
is
to
here
discuss
that
the
city
departments
and
independent
boards,
capital
budget
improvement
requests,
so
the
capital
budget,
requests
or
cbrs
will
be
presented
to
us
in
virtual
sessions
or,
as
the
city
permits,
an
in-person
resumption
of
in-person
meetings.
Perhaps
after
may,
1st
2022,
and
so
the
information
we're
going
to
review
today
is
our
purpose,
scope
and
history.
B
We're
going
to
take
a
look
at
our
bylaws
policies
and
procedures.
The
fact
that
we
are
subject
to
the
city's
ethics
ordinance
the
structure
of
our
committee.
If
members
have
not
already
been
provided,
we
will
ask
that
you
receive
the
click
bylaws
and
the
click
policies
and
procedures
manual,
review
our
schedule
for
2022
schedule
of
meetings.
B
Talk
about
our
joint
public
hearing
with
the
planning
commission,
as
well
as
the
public
info
session
that
we're
looking
at
having
at
the
minneapolis
community
connections
conference
on
may
21st
and
look
at
the
project
ratings
schema
and
the
process
for
developing
narrative
comments
that
go
into
the
click
report.
B
B
B
It's
not
the
click
purpose
to
evaluate
the
community
development,
economic
development
or
housing
projects
that
typically
occur
in
conjunction
with
departments
like
community
planning
and
economic
development.
However,
if
there
are
capital
improvements
that
are
considered
a
pertinent
to
such
developments,
those
may
fall
under
the
purview
of
click
next
slide.
B
From
the
the
pickup
truck,
but
it's
still
very
pertinent,
so
remember
that
we're
all
appointed
we
are
not
the
ultimate
decision
makers,
who
are
the
elected
officials,
the
mayor
and
council.
B
We
have
in
our
basically
our
bylaws
and
our
policies
and
procedures
that
nobody
really
speaks
for
the
entire
clique,
except
for
the
chair
typically,
and
the
chair
should
be
designated
to
do
so
by
the
full
body.
So
just
remember
that
we're
all
appointees
we're
all
stakeholders
rate
payers,
taxpayers,
and
so
we
are.
B
We
just
should
be
mindful
of
our
role
as
advisory
members
to
the
council
and
the
mayor.
Next.
B
As
a
long-time
member
of
the
click
committee,
having
served
on
the
click
under
four
council
members
now
and
I've
seen
a
lot
of
changes
over
the
years,
we
now
have
the
six-year
capital
improvement
program.
B
It's
really
critical
that
we
all
bring
our
our
knowledge
and
experience
our
skills
and
abilities
our
life
experience
to
the
to
the
committee
process
and
we
submit
the
narrative
comments
and
that
we
look
at
the
materials
presented
and
provided
and
render
our
best
recommendations
individually
and
collectively
to
the
development
of
this
annual
click
report.
That
is
our
key
deliverable
you
can
see
last
year,
this
was
june.
21
next
slide.
B
We
have
typically
had
a
time
certain
later
in
the
evening
more
along
the
6
p.m,
time
so
as
co-chair
I'll
be
reaching
out
today
or
tomorrow
to
that
body.
For
looking
at
adjusting
the
time.
Apparently,
finance
was
told
by
the
planning
commission
staff
that
the
planning
commission
needed
us
to
be
time
certain
at
4
30
on
thursday
may
12th.
So
that
is
what
appears
in
our
calendar.
B
A
side
comment
is
in
my
perhaps
25
years
on
the
click
committee
we've
had
ups
and
downs
in
terms
of
public
participation
at
this
joint
public
hearing
we
have
had,
I
think,
in
one
instance,
upwards
of
70
people
when
there
was
perception
by
the
public
related
to
an
east
phillips
community
project
that
we
were
the
ones
to
come
to
to
be
heard
and
then
other
times.
We've
actually
had
zero
public
participation.
Sadly,
and
so
it
ends
up
being
a
conversation
between
the
click
members
and
the
planning
commissioners.
B
We
have
tried
to
open
up
the
process
somewhat
with
written
comments
and
pictures
and
other
other
data
that
helps
inform
our
process
and
then,
since
there
is
a
resumption
of
the
in-person
community
connections
conference,
I
am
suggesting
that
we
utilize
that
community
connections
conference
on
may
21st
to
have
members
who
are
comfortable
doing
so
table
at
the
minneapolis
convention
center.
At
the
conference
I
have
tabled
many
times
at
the
community
connections.
As
a
former
neighborhood
and
community
engagement,
commissioner
and
they're
are
literally
hundreds
of
people
who
attend
that
conference.
A
very.
B
So
you
should
be
receiving
if
you
have
not
already
the
click
guidelines
and
rating
process,
so
we
do
have
a
document
that
will
contain
the
city
goals,
the
evaluation
criteria
and
the
rating
summary.
So
we
have
the
schema
that
we
will
be
using
transportation.
Chair
john
bernstein
will
be
going
into
more
detail
on
the
rating
schema
as
part
of
our
presentation
today.
B
And
then,
at
the
end
of
our
process,
once
our
committee
has
heard
vetted
deliberated
made
all
of
its
recommendations.
The
collect
executive
committee
meets
with
the
mayor
and
staff
to
present
the
click
report,
as
we
did
virtually
july,
29
2021
with
mayor,
frye
and
and
staff,
and
so
that's
that's
more
the
conclusion
of
our
our
process.
B
D
Okay,
if
you
click
bylaws
and
governance
roles
of
the
click
committee,
the
membership,
as
you
all
know,
it's
two-year
terms.
That's
there
and
the
executive
committee
and
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair,
transportation,
chair
and
vice
chair,
human
development
task
force
and
chair
and
vice
chair
next
slide.
Please,
the
government
clicks
bylaws,
you
all
should
have
had
the
bylaws
of
the
quick
part.
You
know
the
process,
the
policies
and
procedure.
D
Please
look
at
those
that
you
will
understand
that
you
have
some
understanding
and
if
you
have
any
questions
you
can
ask
any
of
the
chairpersons
of
the
various,
the
transportation
and
the
human
resource
or
the
chair
of
vice
chair
those
questions.
But
we
would
like
for
you
to
look
over
the
bylaws
and
policies
and
procedures
next
slide.
D
As
as
the
chair
mentioned,
these
are
open
meetings.
We
opened
the
meetings
to
the
communities
at
this
time,
we're
recording-
hopefully,
hopefully
we're
hoping
that
we
will
see
each
of
you
in
person
come
may
that's
the
possibility
of
looking
at
that
so
hope
we
will
have
face-to-face
contact
in
may,
but
these
are
meetings
are
open
to
the
public
compliance
with
the
ethics
and
in
the
ethics.
D
All
of
you
click
members,
basics
of
the
complete
ethics
government
training.
The
new
members
should
have
those
trainings
and
you
can
check
with
the
staff
with
the
ethics
training.
That's
very
important
that
you
do
that
that
you
get
that
taken
care
of,
and
we
all
have
to
do
that
with
the
city
clerk.
But
the
staff
will,
let
us
know
the
date,
the
process,
how
to
get
that
taken
care
of
next
slide.
D
Clicks
the
committee
presentation
and
task
force
meeting
schedule.
You
all
have
a
schedule
of
our
meetings.
I
would
strongly
suggest
that
you
get
those
dates
on
the
calendar
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
want
to
stress.
It's
important
that
we
all
try
to
attend
all
these
meetings.
It's
very
important
that
that
we
attend
these
meetings.
If
you
can.
D
D
D
The
principles
of
the
community-
you
know
they
have
a
right
to
be
involved.
Contribution
is
very,
very
important,
recognize
the
need
of
all
seek
out
involvement,
participate
in
design
participation,
adequate
information,
no
effective
participation,
a
lot
of
times.
What
what's
important
is
that
this
gives
the
click
members
an
opportunity
to
hear
what
the
community
has
has
to
say
and
also
it
gives
them
the
opportunity
to
ask
questions
of
us
and
that's
important
that
we
hear
the
voice
of
the
community.
D
D
D
One
of
the
things
that's
important:
we
do
get
as
again,
I'm
repeating
this.
It's
so
important
that
we
have
community
involvement,
as
those
dates
are
coming
up.
You
will
know
the
dates.
Please
please
let
the
community
know
that
we'll
be
at
those
three
places,
north
south
side
and
at
the
the
fair
that's
going
to
be
in
may,
that
will
be
there
and
invite
the
community
to
those
meetings.
D
It's
important
that
we
communicate
what
we're
doing
to
the
community
and
one
of
the
ways
that
this
happened
is
that
again
north
side,
south
side,
you
got
your
various
community
organizations.
You
got
various
community
things
going
on,
please
let
them
know
the
dates
and
you
will
get
those
dates
be
at
those
meetings.
It's
important
that
we
get
the
community
engagement
next
slide.
D
And
you
know
thank
you
for
attending
looking
forward
to
this
year
again,
hopefully
in
may,
we
will
see
each
other
in
person,
so
we're
really
looking
forward
to
the
may.
You
figure
two
years
members
who've
been
around.
We've
done
this
virtually
hopefully
we'll
get
to
see
each
other
in
may
jeff
back
to
you.
B
H
All
right:
well,
I'm
I'm
neil
young
hands,
I'm
the
principal
budget
evaluation,
analyst
in
the
office
of
fines
and
property
services.
From
the
just
from
the
city
side,
we
have
amelia
cooper.
The
director
robert
harrison
is
the
budget
manager.
Justin
is
about
an
analyst
and
lindsay
is
our
new
capital
budget
intern,
so
we'll
between
the
five
of
us
will
be
supporting
the
click
and
capital
process
this
year.
H
Justin.
Would
you
mind
moving
on
so
I'm
going
to
cover
for
just
from
the
city
side.
Here
the
agenda
is
the
roland
function
of
finance
and
property
services.
H
The
22
through
27
click
recommendation,
verse,
council
adopted
the
net
debt
bond
resource
levels
for
23
through
28,
and
then
the
federal
infrastructure
bill
update
and
then
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
amelia
to
talk
about
the
racial
equity
in
the
capital
budget
process,
and
then
we
have
some
justin
will
have
some
information
on
the
logistics
going
forward
with
the
click
process.
H
So
you
can
move
on
to
that
yeah
there
you
go
so
jeff
mentioned
this
earlier
or
is
in
jeff's
slides,
but
click
is
appointed
under
chapter
35
of
the
municipal
code.
That
is
also
where
the
finance
and
property
services
has
designation
to
the
chief
financial
officer,
the
chief
financial
officer
for
the
city
chooses
or
designates
a
executive
secretary
for
the
click
process,
as
well
as
appropriate
resources
for
the
capital
and
click
process.
H
So
finance
property
services
staff
are
here
to
support
and
give
guidance
and
financial
advice
to
the
committee
to
the
committee
as
well
as
kind
of
stewarding
through
this
six-year
capital
budget
annually,
and
so
we,
as
far
as
like
guidance
and
support
and
advice,
we
give
this
to
all
our
stakeholders
and
in
the
process
of
building
the
capital
budget
and
so
for
for
this
committee.
We
help
administrate
it
and
then
we
also
provide
analysis
and
information
on
resource
levels.
H
H
So
that's
the
beginning
of
the
year,
where
departments
have
just
been
submitting
their
requests
into
our
opengov
system,
now
we're
in
the
click
phase
and
which
will
wrap
up
around
june
or
sorry
july,
and
then
the
mayor
will
recommend
a
budget
capital
budget
in
early
august
and
then
council
will
adopt
a
budget
in
december,
so
that's
kind
of
our
our
process
with
with
click
and
the
capital
budget,
so
for
22
through
27.
H
So
we,
if
you
remember
the
2022,
is
the
year
that
we
are
appropriating
money
and
authorizing
bonds,
so
that
is
the
year
of
the
rest
of
it
is
actually
the
capital
planning
period
so
for
the
entire
22,
through
27
period,
there
was
a
total
of
1.15
billion
dollars
planned
or
appropriated
or
authorized.
H
A
very
large
chunk
of
that
was
for
public
works,
which
was
185
million
dollars.
15
million
was
for
mbc
park,
ford
was
13
million
and
16
million
public
grounds
and
facilities.
H
So
we
can
move
on
to
the
next
slide.
So
I'll
briefly
go
over
this.
I
know
it
sounds
like
eric
is
going
to
go
over
this
in
his
presentation
as
well,
but
for
the
2022
click
verse
council
adopted
budgets.
Last
year,
the
council
adopted
92.7
percent
of
the
funding
recommendations
from
clicks
recommendations,
so
click
recommended
217
million
dollars
in
projects
and
council
adopted
233.7
million
the
projects
that
contributed
mostly
to
the
difference.
H
There
was
a
few
smaller
things
in
there,
but
the
large
differences
were
nbc
12,
which
was
the
safety
improvements
and
non-stage
work
areas
for
4.9
million
dollars,
mpdo4,
which
is
for
which
is
the
new
first
police
precinct
for
6
million,
psd,
21,
hiawatha
training
and
recruitment
center
for
4.872
million
and
pv
108,
which
is
the
concrete
streets
rehabilitation
program
for
3.134
million
and,
if
you
so,
that's
just
for
2022.
H
So
if
you,
if
you
haven't
already,
you
can
go
to
the
20,
our
council
adopted
budget
and
go
in
and
see
our
to
see
the
decision
tree
of
where
which
projects
were
submitted
and
which
ones
click
recommended,
which
ones
mayor
recommended,
which
ones
were
ultimately
adopted.
So
that
is
in
our
in
the
city's
capital
budget.
H
At
bond
resource
levels,
so
this
is
an
interesting
area
right
now,
since
the
city
is
moving
to
the
strong
mayor
system,
so
we're
as
we're
council
and
mayor
going
through
a
government
restructure.
H
H
So
in
22-27
there
was
authorized
349
million
or
planned
and
authorized
349
million
in
net
debt
bonds
and
and
for
2023
through
2028.
H
There
was
an
increase
in
the
total
program
of
about
like
two
percent,
so
we
moved
from
348.6
million
to
355
million,
so
we're
based
on
the
guidance
we've
got.
We've
received
from
our
debt
director
2028
we'd
be
adding
64
million
dollars
as
a
target.
H
And
there
you
go
so
for
the
federal
infrastructure
bill.
Minnesota
was
estimated
to
net
more
than
6
billion
in
federal
funding
over
the
coming
years.
That
includes
four
and
a
half
billion
for
highways:
818
million
for
public
transportation,
680
million
for
water
infrastructure,
302
million
for
bridge
replacement
and
repairs,
100
million
for
broadband
internet
20
million
for
wildlife
or
wildfire
prevention,
72
million
for
cyber
security.
So
some
of
these
things
are
directly
related
to
some
of
the
functions
of
the
city.
We
have
not.
H
We
don't
have
a
strong
update
yet
the
last
I
had
heard
it
was
still
at
the
state
level
and
they
were
trying
to
figure
out
which,
if
old
programs
were
going
to
be
funded
or
new
programs
were
going
to
be
funded,
but
we're
still
kind
of
in
a
standstill
in
this.
I
suspect
that,
as
we
keep
going
along
in
the
click
process
that
we'll
find
out
more
but
as
far
as
we
know
right
now,
this
is
this
is
kind
of
where
we're
at.
K
Wonderful,
thank
you
so
much
neil
and
thank
you
jeff
for
that
introduction.
I'm
amelia
kruger,
I'm
the
budget
director
at
the
city
of
minneapolis,
I'm
the
executive
secretary
of
click,
I'm
here
to
give
a
presentation
about
race,
equity
and
the
capital
budget
process,
but
also
start
with
some
grounding
assumptions
and
a
little
bit
of
a
look
back
at
how
we've
been
incorporating
racial
equity
in
the
work
we
do
in
the
budget
office,
so
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
next
slide.
K
Thank
you,
justin.
So
learning
objectives
for
this
portion
of
the
orientation
is
what
goals
or
policies
does
the
city
have
around
equity?
How
does
the
budget
process
support
these
equity
goals
and
then,
specifically,
what
role
does
click
play
in
supporting
those
goals
going
to
the
next
slide?
K
Thank
you.
So
before
we
get
started,
these
are
three
grounding
assumptions
that
I
just
want
to
want
to
mention.
The
first
is
that
race
matters,
so
we
know
that
some
progress
has
been
made
over
the
years
when
it
comes
to
racial
equity,
but
particularly
in
the
city
of
minneapolis.
When
you
look
at
measures
of
success
around
income,
education,
health,
criminal
justice,
significant
differences
and
outcomes
based
on
race
remain
deep
and
pervasive,
and
so
I
just
want
to
start
with
that
grounding.
K
K
I
think
a
great
example
of
this,
especially
for
folks
that
are
interested
in
capital
and
infrastructure
was
when
pete
booted.
I
still
can't
say
his
name
right
was
announcing
the
the
federal
spending
on
infrastructure,
and
I
think
there
was
a
lot
of
misunderstanding
and
sort
of
jokes
made
about
the
story.
He
told
about
a
racist
bridge.
K
K
If
you
didn't
hear
about
it,
I
encourage
you
to
google
it
it's
a
really
powerful
example
of
how
local
decisions
and
infrastructure
decisions
are
part
of
a
system
that
can
promote
equity
or
can
deepen
those
divides,
and
then
the
the
last
piece
is
just
to
start
with
an
assumption
and
an
expectation
that
we
have
a
responsibility
in
advancing
racial
equity.
K
I
think
that
be
speaking
for
myself
as
a
white
woman
there
in
the
past
has
been
a
strong
tendency
to
think
about
discussions
of
race,
as
as,
though
you
are
walking
through
a
museum
and
looking
at
a
picture
on
the
wall
about
race
in
america,
and
then
you
continue
to
walk,
and
one
thing
that
I
just
want
us
to
just
ground.
This
conversation
and
think
about
is
that
we
are
in
the
picture
as
well.
K
So
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
next
line.
These
are
definitions
that
have
been
adopted
by
the
city
council,
around
race,
equity
and
equity.
So
I'll
just
put
them
up
here,
but
race
equity
means
the
development
of
policies,
practices
and
strategic
investments
to
reverse
racial
disparity
trends,
eliminate
institutional
racism
and
ensure
that
outcomes
and
opportunities
for
all
people
are
no
longer
predictable
by
race,
equity
means
fear
and
just
opportunities
and
outcomes
for
all
people
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
next
line.
K
So
when
we
are
talking
about
the
formal
frameworks
for
thinking
about
racial
equity
of
the
city,
this
is
really
the
the
main
one:
the
strategic
racial
equity
action
plan.
It
stems
from
work
started
in
2017
with
an
ordinance
by
city
council.
There
was
strategic
planning
efforts
that
culminated
in
some
operational
and
policy
priorities.
K
I
would
encourage
you
if
you
haven't
spent
any
time
on
our
city's
website,
looking
at
all
of
the
materials
highlighting
those
specific
goals
and
program
areas
to
do
so.
It's
really
rich
data
that
was
created
by
the
team
in
race
equity
and
has
had
a
profound
impact
on
the
work
that
we
do
at
the
city
as
you'll
see
in
the
next
couple
slides.
So
that's
just
a
good
resource
for
you
to
dig
into,
but
now
we'll
talk
specifically
about
budget,
so
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
next
slide.
K
So
starting
in
2020
is
when
we
started
formally
bringing
in
race
equity
analysis
to
the
budget
process
in
2020.
We
needed
to
do
something
rather
unprecedented
with
the
budget,
which
was
go
in
mid-year
and
make
cuts
to
spending.
This
was
brought
on
by
the
the
expected
and
then
the
crash
in
revenues,
around
sales
taxes
and
others
related
to
the
chronic
virus
pandemic.
K
In
the
middle
of
that
year.
We
are
also
seeing
projections
for
city
spending,
increasing
related
to
the
murder
of
george
floyd
and
the
unrest
that
followed.
So
the
city
was
in
very
stressed
financial
situation
and
we
had
to
engage
in
mid-year
budget
cuts,
which
is
not
something
that
we
had
done
so
to
make
sure
that
we
were
cutting
in
a
way
that
was
not
blind
to
racial
equity
issues.
We
started
asking
departments
to
submit
cut
proposals
that
included
an
analysis
of
who
would
be
impacted.
K
What
data
do
they
have
about
racial
equity
around
those
impacted
communities
and
we
use
that
data
to
make
cuts,
and
so
we
went
in
and
asked
departments
to
complete
that
analysis.
We
sent
it
over
to
council,
council
and
the
mayor
included
that
analysis
and
their
decision
making
in
those
mid-year
cuts
in
2021,
which
was
about
a
month
after
the
mid-year
budget
cuts
when
we
were
planning
for
the
full
annual
budget
for
2021.
K
We
just
put
a
lot
more
structure
around
that
process,
so
we
started
using
the
formal
race
equity
impact
analysis,
questions
that
our
partners
in
race
equity
had
developed
in
the
budget
process
as
well
as
in
the
legislative
process.
K
So
in
2021
we
were
looking
at
another
year
of
deficits
where
we
needed
to
ask
our
departments
to
make
cuts
in
the
budget.
We
asked
departments
to
submit
scenarios
for
cuts
to
their
budget
and
with
each
scenario
to
describe
the
impact
on
racial
equity
of
those
cuts,
and
so
those
were
used
in
discussions
with
the
mayor's
team.
K
The
operating
side
is
our
department
of
regulatory
services,
one
area
where
they
would
have
to
cut,
given
the
the
high
target
that
we
started
with
was
in
response
to
properties
that
are
dilapidated,
so
grass
running
grass
growing
all
over
the
place,
weeds
and
things
like
that.
K
That
was
a
contract,
so
we
would
have
avoided
a
layoff,
and
so
I
think,
had
we
not
used
the
racial
equity
impact
lens
that
would
have
looked
like
an
attractive
place
to
cut,
but
our
team
in
reg
services
looked
at
the
data
about
where
that
work
is
happening
and
overwhelmingly
a
cut
to
services.
K
So
that
was
the
2021
budget
in
2022
we
are.
We
were
looking
at
a
scenario
where
we
were
no
longer
in
a
phase
of
cutting
budgets.
We
were
adding
back,
and
so
we
maintained
the
racial
equity
impact
questions
that
we
had
in
the
2021
budget
process.
K
We
also
added
a
discussion
of
narratives
to
every
program
at
the
city
that
asked
departments
to
discuss
the
racial
equity
impact
of
what
is
what
are
they
doing
in
a
day-to-day
business?
I
think
in
the
budget.
A
lot
of
time
is
spent
on
the
new
spending,
but
that
is
just
a
tiny
fraction
of
the
ongoing
spending
that
we're
doing
on
what
we
would
call
a
base
budget.
So
we
broader
discussion
of
racial
equity
into
those
narratives
that
are
not
just
talking
about
the
new
stuff,
but
the
old
stuff
too,
and
then
in
2022.
K
As
a
part
of
this
clip
process,
we
have
added
the
same
questions
that
we're
doing
in
the
legislative
process
that
we're
doing
in
the
annual
budget
process
are
now
going
to
be
a
part
of
the
capital
budget
process.
So
departments
are,
I
believe,
still
working
away
at
those
capital
budget
requests
and
they
will
need
to
answer
those
same
questions
that
are
around
racial
equity
impact
analysis
in
capital
budget
requests.
J
K
K
And
I
think
the
next
slide
there
we
go.
So
what
do?
What
do
we
do
after
they
complete
the
information
around
the
racial
equity
impact
questions,
though,
the
answers
to
those
questions
are
meant
to
inform
your
overall
assessment
of
the
project,
but
also
specifically,
your
ranking
using
the
equity
criteria,
which
is
a
part
of
the.
K
K
There
also
is
a
time
to
do
question
and
answer
with
departments
and
that's
another
time
to
ask
these
good
questions
and
if
there
are
lacking
or
additional
things
that
make
that
you
want
more
information
about
to
ask
those
questions
there
too,
and
I'll
I'll
pause
and
go
to
neil.
H
Yeah
so
I
was
gonna
say
we
already
started
getting
information
back
from
departments
for
our
cbrs,
so
they've
already
been
entering
in
their
narrative
information,
and
so
this
year
we're
trying
to
do
a
better
job
of
getting.
H
If
we
see
that,
there's
like
an
answer
that
doesn't,
it
doesn't
seem
like
it's
fully
fleshed
out
we're
trying
to
go
back
to
them
and
get
better
information
from
them
this
year,
where
I
don't
know
if
we
have
the
capacity
to
do
that
in
prior
years,
so
I'm
hoping
through
this
process
we'll
be
able
to
like
pull
out
some
of
the
some
of
those
issues
that
you're
highlighting
some
department's,
not
necessarily
answering
completely.
K
And
I
think
I
mean
the
the
continuing
to
ask
that
question
and
when
you're
talking
to
your
council
member
about
your
time
on
click,
you
know
talking
about
your
experience
and
what
kind
of
information
you're
getting
and
what
kind
of
information
you're.
Looking
for.
Sharing
that
with
us,
sharing
that
with
departments.
When
we
talk
about
it,
I
think
that
that's
also
a
really
powerful
tool
just
to
make
sure
that
we
are
improving
every
year
and
getting
better
information
so
that
the
decisions
made
can
be
made
with
an
accurate
understanding
of
how
this
impacts.
K
So
if
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
I
don't
know
justin.
If
you
can
pull
up
that
example.
K
But
this
is
just
a
sample
of
what
we're
gonna
get
back
with
those
those
new
questions,
and
so
I
think
it's
there's
a
lot
of
scrolling
here,
because
we've
packed
in
a
lot
of
information.
This
is
a
park
board
capital
budget
request.
K
We
are
including
some
more
information
around
asset
management,
and
then
here
we
go
so
the
racial
equity
impact
analysis
you'll
see
on
your
screen
here,
and
this
I
think
it
is
like,
is
still
a
week
or
so
away
where
you
guys
will
have
access
to
all
of
the
cbrs.
But
oh
lovely,
thank
you
justin,
but
the
first
question
is
just
who
is
going
to
be
impacted,
and
what
do
we
know
about
the
racial
makeup
of
those
communities
that
are
impacted
and
you'll
see?
K
The
park
board
has
done
a
great
job
of
getting
really
robust
information
about
the
folks
around
the
this
project.
What
does
available
data
tell
you
about
how
constituents
from
bypoc
communities
currently
relate
to
the
desired
outcomes?
What
data
is
available
or
missing?
K
K
Data
is
available
each
year
that
we're
digging
into
this
there's
a
question
about
community
engagement,
so
we're
asking
them
what
have
they
done
on
the
front
end
to
engage
with
the
community
so
that
you
guys
will
know
you
know.
This
is
something
that
this
is
what
has
happened
before
it's
come
to
me
and
then
an
analysis
about
what?
What
does
the
outcome
for
this
project
help
achieve
in
terms
of
racial
equity,
I'll
pause
it
and
and
toss
it
to
eric.
I
Yeah,
thank
you
emilia.
Here's,
a
quick
question.
The
park
board
has
been
our
sort
of
model
of
of
the
best
of
the
best
analysis.
I
Have
any
of
these
examples
been
shared
with
the
other
department
heads
so
that
they
know
what
is
possible
and
the
type
of
data
mining
that
can
be
accomplished
if
they
learn
from
the
model
that
the
park
board
uses.
That's
my
question.
K
Well,
so
these
we
have
not-
even
I
don't
think
the
due
date
has
yet
passed
for
collecting
cbrs.
Yet
I
think
we
certainly
can
do
that
once
that
happens.
This
is
the
first
year
that
we've
used
these
robust
questions.
We
used
something
we
had
something
last
year
that
wasn't
quite
as
thorough,
so
we
definitely
can
do
that.
K
The
other
thing
I'll
say
is
that
departments
in
the
city
have
been
answering
these
questions
anytime.
They
bring
something
through
the
legislature
anytime.
They
bring
it
through.
Council
nrca
often
requires
this,
so
I'm
hoping
that
there
is
some
muscle
memory
there
that
will
allow
folks
to
to
start
with
a
good
head
start
this
year,
but
I
think
that's
a
great
idea,
and
we
can
do
that
after
we
start
collecting
those
cbrs
formally
great.
G
Thank
you
I'll
make
this
really
quick.
I
just
I'm
really
glad
to
hear
you
guys
are
following
up
with
the
requesting
departments
when
stuff
is
incomplete,
since
you're
talking
about
racial
equity.
Specifically,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
great
that
you're
doing
that
on
racial
equity,
I
hope
you're
doing
that
across
the
entire
cbr
yeah.
K
We
are-
and
this
is
another
area
where
we
are
in
the
budget
office.
Just
something
we're
trying
to
do
in
general
is
a
lot
more
cross-training
and
bringing
other
folks
that
don't
touch
the
capital
budget
all
the
time
in
to
help
us
have
another
set
of
eyes
on
on
these
projects
and
giving
some
feedback
to
them
early
in
the
process.
K
A
No
thanks
amelia.
This
is
justin
just
while
we
have
the
cbr
up
john
ericka
really
good
questions
and
we
focused
on
the
racial
equity
impact
analysis.
Just
a
note
for
click
members,
as
you
see
these
cbrs
as
we're
collecting
them
from
departments
and
hope
to
distribute
them
to
you
all
soon.
A
These
cbrs,
the
template
itself,
was
updated
this
year,
so
city
goals
are
listed
in
different
formats.
You'll
see
a
new
asset
management,
an
asset
condition
project
investment,
section
departments
are
doing
a
lot
of
work
on
updating
the
entire
cbr
as
well,
and
not
just
copying
over
from
last
year.
So
this
year's
we're
updating
an
existing
cbr.
So
all
of
the
cbrs
you
all
will
receive
this
year
for
consideration.
A
A
A
lot
of
this
was
already
touched
on,
so
I
don't
want
to
be
too
repetitive,
but
I
just
want
to
hold
some
space
for
just
logistics
as
quick.
It's
going
again
this
year
meetings,
as
you
know,
as
you
found
your
way
here,
we
are
still
on
teams
in
a
virtual
capacity
that
will
continue
for
the
time
being.
As
neil
mentioned,
we
defer
to
the
city,
clerk's
office
and
policy
makers
on
the
timing
of
an
eventual
return
to
in-person
meetings.
A
The
city
council
is
beginning
that
transition
now
with
their
meetings
they'll,
then
look
at
independent
boards
or
independent
bodies
to
transition,
hopefully
in
april
with
boards
and
commissions,
possibly
returning
in
may
again.
This
is
also
up
in
the
air
and
we'll
move
through
this
process
and
we'll
flow
through
the
c
clerk,
and
we
will
share
that
information
as
we
get
that
from
them
right
now,
because
remote
participation
for
boards
and
commissions
is
the
current
directive.
A
All
of
our
meetings
for
this
year
have
been
set
up
in
teams
and
you
should
have
received
invites
for
them
if
that
changes,
and
we
go
back
to
in
person
we're
already
starting
to
make
preparations
for
that,
we
will
update.
Calendar
invites
we'll
communicate
to
you
kind
of
next
steps.
Parking
comes
into
play
with
parking
reimbursements,
so
all
of
that
is
being
considered
at
this
point.
We
just
don't
have
enough
information
or
a
timeline
for
when
that
transition
will
happen.
A
A
If
you
reply
to
those
meetings,
just
a
housekeeping
note,
that
often
does
go
to
everybody
on
click.
So,
if
you're,
looking
just
to
reply
to
staff,
feel
free
to
just
email,
neil
directly
or
email,
all
of
this,
a
staff
directly
rather
than
replying
all
to
any
of
the
emails,
are
distributed.
That's
the
same
for
calendar
invites
when
you
rsvp
that
does
go
directly
to
staff.
A
But
if
you
reply
to
a
calendar,
invite
the
default
is
likely
to
go
to
the
entire
email
list
for
click
we
have
our
same
sharepoint
site
that
you
all
should
still
have
access
to,
and
that
was
included.
That
link
was
included
in
one
of
meal's
recent
emails.
If
you
need
any
assistance
with
accessing
the
sharepoint
site,
please
just
reach
out
we'll
be
happy
to
walk
you
through
make
sure
you
do
have
access
and
point
out
some
of
the
key
features
of
that
resource.
A
We
do
try
to
share
relevant
information
through
email,
either
before
meetings.
If
it's
going
to
be
discussed
or
after
meetings,
if
there
are
helpful
resources,
but
that's
just
an
easy
way
for
us
to
distribute
a
lot
of
documents
to
maintain
resources
and
then
to
link
out
to
other
resources
as
well,
so
these
meetings
are
currently
being
recorded
and
posted
on
youtube.
There
are
links
to
the
recordings
from
2021,
we'll
be
posting
these
recordings
there
as
well.
There
are
links
to
the
budget
to
different
clerk
documents
and
other
resources.
E
A
quick
question
somebody
mentioned
earlier
that
these
meetings
were
available
to
the
public.
Do
you
just
mean
that
they
are
posted
after
we're
done,
or
is
the
public
actually
invited
to
these
live
meetings?.
A
Good
question
so
per
open
meeting
law
the
public
is
invited
to
attend
any
of
the
boarding
commission
meetings,
so
we
do
have
a
dial-in
number
for
all
of
our
teams,
meetings
that
is
on
the
agenda
and
on
the
limbs
website.
So
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
attend
right
now
can
use
that
dial-in
feature
to
attend
the
meetings
when
they,
when
we
do
go
to
in
person.
The
meeting
location
will
just
take
the
place
of
that
conference
id,
but
members
of
the
public
are
welcome
to
attend.
A
So
one
other
item,
the
capital
budget
request
that
we
discussed
we're
actively
working
with
departments
to
collect
those
to
review
those
to
ensure
that
you
all
have
the
information
you
need,
as
you
consider
those
proposals
we're
also
working
on
the
presentations.
That
departments
will
be
providing
we're
going
to
have
those
pre-recorded
again
this
year,
we're
hoping
the
departments
are
going
to
submit
those
soon,
and
we
did
hear
your
feedback
from
last
year.
A
The
schedule
was
quite
tight
from
when
cbrs
were
distributed.
Presentation
recordings
were
distributed
to
then
you
all
turn
around
and
having
to
do
your
rankings
and
prepare
for
the
q
a
sessions.
So
we've
worked
with
departments
to
get
that
information
as
far
in
advance
as
we
can
so
we
can
get
to
you
early,
so
you're
prepared.
You
have
time
to
review
all
this
information
and
then
we'll
have
the
q
and
a
sessions
and
those
are
listed
on
the
schedule.
A
I
Oh
yeah,
thank
you
justin,
so
a
question
regarding
ex
parte
communications.
Could
you
speak
for
a
second
about
what
that
means
under
the
open,
gov
laws
and
and
how
we
can,
whether
or
not
we
can
have
conversations
outside
of
plant
planned
meetings
regarding
any
of
the
projects
that
we're
discussing.
A
If
there
are
going
to
be
meetings
of
click
members
that
kind
of
go
towards
a
quorum,
then
those
discussions
need
to
be
taking
place
within
a
regularly
scheduled
meeting
and
or
we
would
need
to
work
with
the
clerk's
office
to
post
that
that
sort
of
a
meeting
is
going
to
take
place.
Currently,
the
meetings
that
we
have
are
meetings
of
the
full
body,
our
regular
meetings
and
then
the
two
recognized
task
forces,
transportation
and
human
development
we
have
quorums
established
for
both
of
those
those
meetings
are
open
to
the
public.
A
Any
agenda
setting
meetings
so
like
when
the
executive
board
gets
together
prior
to
meetings
to
set
the
agenda
or
to
discuss
internal
affair
items
in
preparation
for
a
meeting.
Those
aren't
for
open
meeting
law
open
to
the
public,
but
the
vast
majority
of
the
work
that
click
does
is
part
of
the
regular
meetings
can
be
attended
by
the
public,
including
the
public
outreach
that
you
all
do.
A
If
quick
members
have
questions
for
staff,
if
click
members
on
their
own
have
conversations
about
different
projects
or
if
you
all
end
up
arranging
kind
of
tours,
that's
something
that
there's
been
interest
in
those
things
aren't
considered
regular
meetings
where
a
quorum
of
the
body
is
gathering
together
to
discuss
the
work
of
the
body.
A
All
right
final
sign,
just
our
contact
information
again
we're
all
on
the
call
here.
If
you
need
to
reach
out
to
any
of
us,
please
don't
hesitate.
Neil
has
listed
his
contact
information
there,
too
you're
going
to
see
most
emails
come
from
neil,
but
we're
all
available
and
accessible.
If
you
have
questions
as
we
continue
on
this
year,
I'll
turn
back
over
to
chair
strand.
B
I
Okay,
thank
you
chairman
strand.
I
get
the
hint
so
thank
you
to
neil
for
covering
most
of
the
information
that
we
needed
regarding
last
year's
decisions.
This
is
to
follow
up
on
what
what
vice
chair,
willie
willie,
said.
Willie
bridges
said
about
the
known
effects
of
participation.
I
Makes
and
the
council
makes
we
we
are
having
an
impact.
That's
that's
very
important.
A
second
piece
of
to
that
is
how
important
the
comment
section
is.
The
comment
section
clarifies
what
we
we
do
in
the
budget
in
a
very,
very
important
way
and
I'll
give
you
a
specific
example.
I
For
the
past
couple
of
years
we
have
given
the
police
department
zeros
on
capital
investments,
not
because
we
didn't
want
them
to
make
capital
investments,
but
rather
that
we
felt
that
there
was
a
lack
of
of
guidance
on
where
the
city
was
heading
with
policing,
and
so
our
our
notes,
our
comments
within
the
the
the
click
report
makes
that
clear
and
in
further
discussions
with
the
mayor,
when
we
had
our
meeting
subsequent
to
the
clicks
recommendations,
we
were
able
to
clarify,
and
if
you
look
at
the
capital
budget,
the
mayor
indeed
put
money
back
in
with
our
guidance
for
for
both
the
first
precinct
and
the
third
precinct,
so
you'll
see
where
we
put
in
zero.
I
The
mayor
put
six
million
dollars,
in
that
case
nine
million
dollars,
and
it
it
was
actually
consistent
with
the
guidance
we
were
giving
the
mayor.
Regarding
having
a
clear
vision
of
what
policing
looks
like
in
the
future,
so
so
yeah,
that's
about
all
I
I
have
to
add
right
now
other
than
welcome
everyone
back.
I
We
only
have
one
new
addition
to
the
human
development
task
force,
and
I
believe,
is
that
michael
and
hopefully
he'll
get
through
the
confirmation
process
quickly
and
will
be
able
to
join
us
in
our
first
discussions
with
that.
Back
to
you,
mr
chairman,.
B
Thank
you,
chair,
juan
vice
chair
beard,
anything.
J
G
Thanks
jeff,
not
sure
who
in
staff
is
controlling
things,
but
if
you
can
throw
the
presentation
up,
that
would
be
great.
G
So
advance
to
the
next
slide,
please
so
some
of
this
you've
heard
before
I'll
move
pretty
quickly
here.
Our
purpose
is
to
provide
guidance
to
the
mayor
and
city
council
on
the
roughly
120
infrastructure
projects
that
will
be
part
of
the
six-year
capital
improvement
plan
and,
more
specifically,
what
we
do
is
determine
which
projects
best
match
the
city's
goals
and
priorities
that
have
been
established
by
both
the
mayor
and
the
city
council
and
those
goals
and
priorities
to
a
large
extent,
are
summarized
in
the
click
capital
guidelines
that,
hopefully,
everybody
has
received.
G
We
are
an
advisory
board
and
our
recommendations
are
not
binding,
but,
as
you've
heard,
they
tend
to
follow
what
we
do
relatively
closely.
I
was
I've
been
on
a
long
time,
but
not
all
the
way
back
to
the
1990s,
but
my
understanding
is
back
at
that
period
of
time.
There
was
a
lot
more
horse
trading
around
the
budget
and
click
recommendations.
Weren't
followed
nearly
as
closely
during
that
period
of
time
as
they
are
today
and
you
know,
even
though
we're
advisory.
G
That's
basically
what
we'll
be
doing
in
the
month
of
april.
In
may,
then
we
sort
of
divide,
not
sort
of
we
basically
divide
up
into
the
task
forces,
transportation
and
human
development
and
the
the
there's
a
couple
of
tasks
that
we
do.
G
One
is
in
the
scoring
there's
a
couple
of
areas
where
we
give
guidance
to
each
into
to
all
of
us
in
our
individual
scoring
and
I'll
get
into
the
details
of
that
in
a
minute.
The
other
thing
that
we
do
is
we
make
comments
about
various
projects
that
fall
under
each
task
force's
purview.
G
I
want
to
really
emphasize
this
if
you're
on
transportation,
that
does
not
mean
that
you
can't
make
comments
on
human
development
projects.
You
are
free
to
make
a
comment
on
any
project
that
comes
through
it
just
means
you
won't
be
sitting
on
the
meeting
where
they
deliberate
and
discuss
the
comment
that
you
submit,
but
you
are
encouraged
to
make
a
comment
about
any
project.
You
want,
whether
it's
the
one
that's
on
the
committee,
you
sit
on
or
not
and
they're
just
logistically.
G
You
just
have
to
make
sure
you
email
it
to
the
chair
of
the
other
committee,
so
that's
may
and
then
in
late
may
and
early
june.
Those
comments
come.
The
comments
that
have
been
drafted
and
approved
by
each
task
force
come
to
the
full
board.
Nothing
gets
in
the
report.
That's
not
passed
by
the
full
board,
so
those
will
be
presented
and
deliberated
as
necessary
and
then
passed
by
the
full
board.
G
At
that
same
time,
additional
comments
get
drafted
as
we
discuss
things
as
we
talk
about
funding
things
come
up
that
may
not
have
come
up
when
they
were
at
the
task
force
level.
So,
just
because
a
comment
doesn't
come
through
a
task
force
doesn't
mean
it
can't
be
introduced
later
when
we're
with
the
full
committee,
which
starts
in
late
may
and
early
june,
and
then
the
month
of
june
is
largely
wrapping
up
those
comments
and
making
decisions
about
number
one
which
projects
get
funded
and
how
they
get
funded.
G
We
have
to
make
the
budget
balance.
So
if
we
take
the
projects
that
we
want
to
fund
and
just
leave
it
at
that,
the
budget
won't
be
balanced.
So
we
have
to
do
some
shifting
around
of
what
gets
funding
in
which
year
to
make
the
budget
get
fairly
close
to
balance,
and
that's
largely
what
happens
in
june
next
slide,
please
all
right.
G
So
these
project
presentations
for
those
of
you
that
are
either
new
this
year
year
or
maybe
even
second
year,
keep
in
mind
that
people
that
have
been
around
for
a
while
this
is
a
was
a
five-year
process,
is
now
a
six-year
process.
We've
seen
these
80
to
90
percent
of
these
projects
before
they're
back
again
for
year,
two
year,
three,
whatever
it
is,
so
we're
pretty
familiar
with
them.
G
We
know
where
the
the
sensitive
spots
were
in
the
past
and
we
go
right
through
those
with
our
questions,
we're
not
any
smarter
than
anybody
else.
We've
just
seen
this
stuff
before
it's
overwhelming
in
year,
one
it
was
16
years
ago
for
me,
but
I
remember
it.
There's
120
of
these
projects
that
you're,
seeing
for
the
first
time
and
you're
doing
this
with
a
bunch
of
people
that
have
seen
this
stuff
before.
G
So
it's
pretty
normal
to
feel
like
you're,
a
little
bit
lost
or
you're
a
little
bit
behind
and
the
reality
is
it
takes
a
couple
years
to
come
up
to
speed
on
this,
where
you
sort
of
have
it
all
in
your
memory
banks,
and
it
comes
back
quickly
and
that
sort
of
thing.
So
a
quick
couple
of
quick
tips
about
this.
G
I
would
recommend
that
you
review
the
cbrs
that
are
coming
up
in
that
in
each
week's
meeting
in
advance.
I
wouldn't
try
to
memorize
anything,
just
review
them
familiarize
yourself
with
them.
You'll
quickly,
learn
which
parts
of
the
cbr
have
really
useful
information
and,
in
some
cases,
slightly
less
information.
G
We
had
a
task
force
that
that
gave
some
advice
to
the
city
on
on
revamping
those
forms
and,
as
you
heard,
it's
a
new
form
this
year.
So
hopefully
some
of
that's
been
solved,
scribble
notes
as
necessary,
so
that
you
remember
the
things
that
you
want
clarification
on
and
if
you
feel
like
you
need
clarification
on
something.
G
G
G
G
All
of
the
things
that
are
in
this
scoring
template
are
outlined
with
definitions
in
the
click
capital
guidelines
be
sure
you
familiarize
yourself
with
those
really
well,
because
you'll
need
that
to
understand,
for
instance,
under
level
of
need
with
project
priority
the
definition
of
critical,
significant,
important
and
desirable
those
are
defined
in
words,
so
you
understand
what
they
each
mean.
Each
task
force
I'll
just
talk
about
transportation,
we'll
go
through
the
the
projects
that
relate
to
them
and
identify
a
project
priority
for
each
project.
G
G
About
five
years
ago,
we
were
required
to
stay
within
the
range
that
the
task
force
recommended.
We
changed
that
now.
It's
strongly
recommended
that
you
stay
in
that
range.
However,
if
you
feel
very
strongly
about
a
project
differently
than
how
the
task
force
rated
it,
you
are
allowed
to
go
outside
of
the
range
that
was
recommended.
So
if,
on
project
number
one
transportation
said,
this
project
has
a
significant
level
of
need,
but
you
think
it's
critical.
You
are
allowed
to
rate
it
up
in
the
critical
range.
Otherwise
you
should
stay
in.
G
E
Yeah,
I
didn't
ever
figure
this
out
last
year.
Last
year
was
my
first
year.
Are
these
scores
that
we're
compiling
shared
in
any
way
or
do
we
do
do
all
the
committee
finally
see
it's
just
our
rankings
from
top
to
bottom?
Are
these
scores
just
for
our
own
worksheet.
G
Yeah,
so
that's
one
of
the
things
I'm
going
to
cover
here:
yes,
they
we
each
rank
individually.
Those
are
submitted
via
email
directly
to
the
department.
They
are
then
tabulated
and
averaged,
and
everything
that
we
do
as
a
task
force
is
based
on
the
average
score
for
each
project
of
the
whole
committee.
G
These
this
individual
scores
are
confidential,
they're
not
shared
out.
Even
the
executive
committee
doesn't
see
anybody
else's
individual
scores,
and
it's
always
been
that
way.
So
you
don't
have
to
worry
about
somebody
else
on
the
committee,
seeing
how
you
just
chose
to
rank
something.
That's
confidential
information
and
everything
that
we
do
as
a
committee
is
based
on
the
average
scores
of
the
entire
committee.
G
That
that's
correct.
Yes,
there
will
be
a
total
score
shared.
They
won't
see
all
the
the
fine
detail
here.
So
if
you
look
at
the
bottom
of
this
form,
maybe
can
you
scroll
up
a
little
bit
or
scroll
down,
so
they
can
see
the
bottom
of
the
form.
So
the
point
system
is
out
of
300
points
in
the
report.
These
reports,
the
projects,
will
be
ranked
in
order
and
it
will
also
show
what
the
total
score
was
for
each
project
and
just
a
little
bit
more
on
this.
The
scoring
system.
G
Here,
if
you
look
at
what's
going
on
here,
you
sort
of
back
up
big
picture.
There's
three
boxes
there.
Each
of
those
boxes
totals
to
100
points,
so
each
of
those
sections
is
about
a
third
of
the
scoring.
So
up
top
there's
two
things:
the
project
priority
that
we
talked
about
you'll
get
guidance
from
each
task
force
on
on
on
where
they
think
that
should
be
ranked
and
as
much
as
possible.
You
should
should
try
to
stay
in
that
range.
G
The
second
thing
is
consecutive
previous
years
in
the
budget
we're
trying
to
encourage
good,
long-term
planning,
so
a
project
that
gets
introduced.
You
know
in
the
sixth
year
of
the
budget
and
then
bumps
up
each
year.
That's
what
we're
looking
for
and
they
get
points
for
that
as
individuals.
You
do
not
need
to
worry
about
that
city
staff.
It's
a
it's
a
factual
thing,
there's
no
opinion
about
this.
Either
it
meets
those
criteria
or
it
doesn't
so
there's
nothing
that
you
have
to
do
individually.
G
D
Got
a
question
mike
status:
neil
has
in
a
first
and
then
might.
H
Yeah,
I
was
gonna
add
on
just
that,
like
like
you're,
saying
john,
that
the
scores
are
submitted
to
me
and
I
compile
all
of
them,
but
at
the
end
of
it
I
do
put
together
like
a
high
level,
like
summary
statistics,
just
to
see
what
are
like
variation
across
all
of
them,
and
so
it's
all
I
mean
so
all
private
information,
but
we
can
still
see
like
where
some
projects
are.
F
Thanks
john,
this
is
great
information
very
helpful,
so
the
in
the
end,
the
number
that
we
submit
is
our
version
of
the
perfect
score
300.
In
other
words,
so
it'll
be
project
x
and
then
one
number
or
do
we
submit
this
entire
sheet.
G
B
John
john,
I
just
want
to
say,
because
it
happens
every
year
you
do
not
need
to
send
your
ratings
to
the
collect
chair.
If
I
get
them,
I
will
not
open
the
file.
I
would
just
pass
it
on
to
the
city
staff,
but
it
seems
to
happen
every
year,
so
you
do
not
need
to
submit
ratings
to
the
click
chair
and
technically.
This
could
be
a
fine
point.
I
don't
want
to
take
too
much
time
on
it,
but
we
are
public
body
appointees.
B
G
Yeah
when
I
said
confidential,
I
meant,
among
the
committee
I've
never
heard
of
this
going
outside
the
committee,
but
you
know
the
idea
is
not.
This
is
not
information
that
gets
shared
amongst
other
members,
including
the
chair,
the
vice
chair,
all
the
rest,
and
to
that
end
also,
as
you
read
the
definitions
of
these
various
things
like
critical,
significant
important
desirable,
of
course
it's
great
if
we
all
have
the
same
view
of
that
and
score
the
same
way,
but
we're
33
different
humans
that
you
know,
that's,
probably
not
realistic.
G
G
You'll
see
that
there's
a
you
know,
some
people
are
a
little
harsher
some
people
a
little
easier
and
when
you
go
averaging
33
together
it
it
should
all
work
out
pretty
well
all
right,
just
continuing
quickly
with
this,
so
the
top
third
day
I
mentioned
the
project
priority
and
the
the
consecutive
years
in
the
budget,
then
that
middle
third
is
contribution
to
city
goals.
Again,
that's
one
that
you'll
get
guidance
from
the
task
force
on
and
then
the
other
piece
of
that
is
operating
costs.
G
G
If
that's
the
case,
there's
plenty
of
other
places
to
re
reward,
a
project
that
you
think
the
city
that
has
merit
the
city
ought
to
do,
even
though
it
has
an
operating
cost,
an
ongoing
operating
cost
and
then
the
final
box
down
at
the
bottom,
that's
the
qualitative
stuff.
You
heard
about
equity,
you
can
see,
there's
some
other
components
of
that
those
this
is
like.
It
says
it's
qualitative
right,
so
a
personal
tip.
I
would
give
you
you
know.
G
When
you
see
25
points
and
15
points,
I
try
to
move
in
five
point
increments.
I
I
just
think
it's
easier.
It's
you
know
when
you
use
numbers
like
this,
you
can
sort
of
have
a
false
sense
of
precision
around
this
stuff.
If
you
use
five
point
increments
and
then,
if
you,
you
know
you're
looking
at
the
four
projects
that
you
gave
20
points
to
on
on
equity-
and
you
see
one
that
you
think
is
even
better-
you
can
bump
it
to
22
or
23
or
whatever
something
like
that.
G
I
wouldn't
get
too
focused
on
going
number.
My
number
with
this
kind
of
thing.
I
think
that
can
really
bog
you
down
again.
You
got
120
of
these.
You
have
to
rate
one
last
thing
on
scoring
the
ratings
are
individual
ratings
are
due
from
everybody
on
may
19th.
That's
on
the
schedule.
It's
really
important
that
you
try
to
get
those
in
on
time.
This
is
your
voice.
This
is
probably
the
strongest
part.
G
One
of
the
strongest
parts
of
your
voice
as
an
individual
on
the
committee
is,
is
your
ratings
so
make
sure
you
get
them
done
and
make
sure
you
get
them
in
on
time?
Is
there
another
hand
up.
D
G
Okay,
so
next
slide
all
right
task
force
meetings.
We
use
a
really
loose
version
of
robert's
rules,
that's
not
to
try
to
be
formal
and
stuffy,
it's
mostly
to
make
sure
that
people
aren't
talking
over
one
another
and
everybody
gets
a
chance
to
be
heard
and
leaves
those
task
force,
meetings
feeling
like
they
got
heard
and
they
didn't
get
railroaded
so
again.
G
A
large
part
of
what
we
do
is
assign
project
priority
and
contribution
to
city
goals
to
each
of
the
projects,
and
then
the
lion's
share
of
our
time
in
may
will
be
around
drafting
comments,
and
you
might
want
to
make
note
as
you're
hearing
these
presentations
or
reading
these
presentations.
If
there's
projects
you
feel
strongly
about
or
you've
got
some
real
questions,
the
direction
the
city
is
going
with
it.
Those
are
the
projects
to
make
a
note
that
you'd
like
on.
G
It
can
be
any
of
those
things.
It's
very
helpful
if
you
are
able
to
draft
comments
in
advance
of
the
meeting.
Typically,
we
collect
those
a
few
days
before
and
then
try
to
distribute
them
to
people.
So
that
the
meeting
time
doesn't
get
get
taken
up
by
reading
comments
that
you
know
no
one,
no
one
has
yet
seen
and
then
at
the
towards
anime.
We
we
try
to
finish
the
final
project
of
the
task
force
is
approved
comments
that
then
get
forwarded
to
the
full
committee
for
consideration
next
slide.
G
So
lots
of
information,
I'm
sure
for
some
of
you.
I
remember
you
know,
there's
even
terminology
you're,
probably
going
what
the
heck
does
that
mean.
I'm
not
sure
I
had
heard
the
term
net
debt
bonds
before
I
joined
this
committee
16
years
ago
and
there's
simple
things
like
that.
Where
ask
someone
to
explain
what
it
is
to
you,
a
couple
of
resources
for
you
online.
At
the
address
you
see
there,
you
can
find
all
of
the
click
reports
going
back
to
2005..
G
I'm
not
suggesting
you
go
read
all
of
those,
but
you
know
perusing,
some
of
those
and
kind
of
seeing
what
the
final
project
looks
like,
and
that
may
help
you
sort
of
understand
where
we're
headed
with
this.
You
can
also
see
the
actual
capital
budget
requests
that
the
city
has
been
making
going
all
the
way
back
to
2008.
G
other
resources.
The
veteran
committee
members,
I
didn't
use
old
I'll,
have
you
know
willie
myself
included,
I
I
won't
speak
for
anybody
else,
although
I'm
sure
that
many
others
are
happy
to
do
this,
I'm
more
than
happy
to
entertain
questions
from
people
spend
time
talking
to
you.
I
was
going
to
put
my
phone
number
on
this,
but
since
this
is
a
public
meeting,
I'd
prefer
not
to
do
that.
Everybody
on
the
committee
has
my.
G
I
won't
object
and
then
city
staff
is
the
other
obvious
resource
for
everybody
as
well,
and
so
I
see
it
and
that's
the
end
of
my
presentation,
but
I
see
eric
got
his
hand
up.
I
Yeah
I'd
like
to
remind
people
that
there's
a
useful
resource
which
are
the
comments
from
previous
years.
There's
some
projects
that
we've
been
asking.
I
The
city
to
separate
the
the
gasoline
from
the
electric
charging
stations
for
for
vehicles
and
for
the
past
two
years
they
have
not
submitted
in
that
format.
So,
if
you
read
back
in
previous
year's
budgets,
you're
you're
gonna
see
things
that
you'll
wanna
bring
up
again
this
year.
That
may
be
important
so
that
that's
my
ad
thank
you.
B
Thanks
eric
thanks
john
thanks
eric,
we
can
change
out
the
slide
deck
so
agenda,
7,
review
our
collect,
22
process
and
logistics.
So,
basically,
in
conjunction
with
city
staff,
we
will
develop
a
meeting
agenda
for
each
of
the
meetings.
B
H
So
I
was
going
to
say
we
I
reached
out
to
council
member
ellison
a
few
weeks
ago.
The
period
for
applications
to
be
taken
in
from
the
clerk's
office
are
still
open,
but
I
have
not
seen
any
applications
come
through
yet.
B
I
should
make
mention
just
so
that
members
you're
all
aware
the
executive
committee
discussed
so
as
part
of
our
presentation
meetings.
We
have
the
hour
and
a
half
blocked
off
members
who
are
returning
will
know
that
we
have
to
have
short
meetings
of
the
task
force
groups
to
assign
group
ratings,
and
so
our
conversation
has
been.
We
either
need
to
end
the
presentations,
say
15
minutes
before
1
30
and
then
perhaps
run
the
meeting
to
1
45
or
make
it
a
two
hour
meeting
and
then
do
the
ratings
group
ratings
for
the
30
minutes.
B
So
whenever
we
have
presentations,
the
practice
has
been
long-standing
that
the
task
force
that
deals
with
that
specific
project
or
group
of
projects
would
do
the
group
ratings
right.
Then,
at
that
time,
and
typically
we
try
to
get
a
rating
spreadsheet
out
to
members,
so
we're
contemplating
that
staff
would
be
able
to
provide
that
april
29th,
which
still
gives
members
a
full
three
weeks
to
do
their
ratings.
B
G
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
for
people
that
things
are
the
schedule's
a
little
bit
different
this
year
and
whenever
there's
a
little
bit
of
change,
there's
always
pros
and
cons
of
that.
So
we
don't
have
those
long
grueling
days
doing
all
squeezing
all
the
presentations
into
two
full
days.
Instead,
it's
been
divided
up
mostly
into
our
two
hour
meetings,
with
the
one
exception
of
that
friday,
where
we
have
the
full
morning.
So
that's
a
pro
the
con
that
goes
with.
G
It
is
now
it's
a
little
bit
more
challenging
for
each
task
force
to
rate
to
do
the
project,
priority
and
contribution
to
city
goals.
My
personal
view
is,
I
think,
it's
important
for
each
for
each
committee
to
do
that
right
after
the
meeting.
Well,
it's
all
fresh
in
your
head,
especially
for
newer
people,
where
it's
hard
to
keep
all
this
straight.
Instead
of
waiting
till
all
the
presentations
have
been
done
and
then
trying
to
go
through
all
all
the
projects
that
relate
to
each
committee.
G
So
my
personal
preference
would
be
that
each
committee
get
a
carve
out
of
time
on
each
day
when
those
projects
are
presented
to
go
through
and
do
those
contribution
to
city
goals
and
project
level
priority.
I
think
that
would
be
nothing's
going
to
be
perfect.
I
my
personal
view
is
that's
the
best
compromise.
D
Hey
jack
jeff,
just
a
real,
quick
thing
I
want
to
acknowledge.
I
really
want
to
acknowledge
neil
and
amity
and
catherine.
This
summer
we
worked
on
with
the
staff
with
the
on
the
racial
equity
and
we're
still
working
with
that.
So
I
really
want
committee
know
that's
what
we're
doing.
That's
what
neil
helped
us
this
summer
over
the
summer
to
make
sure
that
was
part
of
our
discussion,
that
race
equity
is
there
and
we're
also
looking
at
the
definition.
D
So
anyone
who
wants
to
work
with
catherine
amity
and
I
to
look
at
that-
please
let
me
know,
but
then
again
thanks
neil
for
your
working
with
us
and
hearing
amelia
talking
about
it,
making
a
part
of
the
discussion.
B
Thanks
julie,
rich
final
question
or
comment,
yeah
I'll.
E
Follow
up
on
john's
recommendation,
I
thought
I
inferred
this
from
the
schedule,
but
will
we
have
in
our
hands
both
a
copy
of
sort
of
the
spreadsheet
of
all
the
projects
that
we
can
actually.
E
Will
that
include
also
from
each
department
the
department's
recommended
rankings?
I
believe
that
the
departments
have
their
own
preferred
rankings
and
will
we
have
those
in
our
hands
at
the
time
we
see
the
presentations.
H
So
the
the
department
rankings
will
just
show
up
on
the
cbr
itself,
so
those
will
be
those
will
be
available
pretty
soon.
I
think
we're
still
kind
of
going
back
and
forth
to
the
departments
to
clean
up
some
of
that
information,
but
that
information
should
be
on
the
cbr
and
then
john.
I
thought
we
were
gonna.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
connect
at
some
point.
I
don't
know
what
the
what
your
thought
or
the
executive
board's
thought
is
on
having
a
very
big
sheet
earlier.
G
Yeah
so
I'll
jump
in
so
I
recognize
what
you're
asking
rich
and
it's
a
reasonable
request.
Here's
the
problem
on
the
other
side
of
that.
If,
if
that,
if
those
spreadsheets
go
out
early,
what
happens
is
there's
confusion
because
there's
multiple
versions
of
it
out
there.
Ultimately,
the
version
that
people
are
going
to
score
from
is
going
to
be
the
version
that
you
receive.
That
indicates
how
each
task
force
rated
each
project
on
contribution
to
city
goals
and
level
of
need
that
won't
be
available
until
april
29th
after
all
of
the
presentations
have
been
given.
G
G
Most
of
the
information
we
need
is
on
cbrs
and
I
think
we
can
work
from
those
and,
as
neil
said,
the
the
the
rate
the
priority
ranking
by
department
is
on
the
cbr
and
just
really
quick
on
that.
I
would
say
that's
an
important
input
to
look
at,
but
that's
all
it
is
right.
It's
we're
not
a
rubber
stamp
committee
and
I
know
you're
not
suggesting
this.
That's
just
one
more
piece
to
take
in
just
because
the
city
departs
given
city
department
thinks
one
project's
more
important
than
another.
E
G
Yeah,
it's
a
fair
point.
This
is
very
challenging
right.
I
think
eric
operates
the
same
way.
I'll
just
say
this
quickly,
one
of
the
things
we
do
with
these
projects
when
we're
doing
that
task,
force
ranking
since
most
of
them
have
been
seen
before
we
tell
you
how
it
got
ranked
the
previous
year
and
that's
not
to
say,
we've
got
to
do
the
same
thing.
It's
just
to
inform
you
about
that
and
it
gives
a
starting
place,
and
I
think
that
helps
a
little
bit.
G
If
you
know
how
it
was
ranked
before,
then
you
could
think.
Okay
is
that
reasonable?
Do
we
want
to
change
that?
Do
we
have
different
information
that
says
we
should
change
that,
or
do
we
just
move
forward
with
that
and
if
you
operate
from
that
position,
I
think
that
might
help
with
feeling
like
you're
flailing
a
little
bit
that
you
just
got
all
this
information.
B
Okay
sounds
great.
One
last
point
I
put
in
the
chat
the
2022
community
connections
conference
link
so
as
time
permits
take
a
look
at
the
neighborhood
and
community
relations
so
may
21st.
We
will
tentatively
be
considering
our
public
info
session
at
that
conference,
and
so
with
that
we
have
completed
all
the
items
on
the
agenda
for
this
meeting.
B
Seeing
none,
if
not
without
objection,
I'll
declare
this
meeting
adjourned.
Our
next
meeting
will
be
wednesday
april
6
2022
at
noon.
The
executive
committee
will
be
scheduling
a
meeting
for
thursday
tomorrow
great
to
see
everyone
with
that.
We
are
adjourned
and
thanks
for
attending
the
onboarding
and
orientation.