►
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Good
morning,
everyone,
my
name,
is
councilmember
robin
wansley.
I
am
the
vice
chair
of
the
policy
and
government
oversight
committee.
I
will
note
for
the
public
record
that
a
council
member
jeremiah
ellison,
as
well
as
the
chair
of
this
committee,
unfortunately
had
some
travel
issues,
so
he
won't
be
able
to
join
us
today.
Also,
council,
member
johnson
won't
be
able
to
join
us
as
well
and
look
forward
to
having
them
back
at
our
next
pogo
meeting.
A
A
Let
the
record
reflect
that
we
now
have
a
quorum
before
we
move
on
to
our
consent
agenda.
I
do
want
to
know
for
the
public
record
that
item
number
two,
which
is
the
request
for
proposal
for
the
higher
hiawatha
maintenance
facility
demolition,
I'm
going
to
be
moving
to
delay
that
item
for
a
cycle
to
our
next
pogo
meeting,
which
will
take
place
on
september
19th.
I
want
to
know
you
know.
A
Councilmember
chavez
has
been
working
with
the
city
and
community
members
to
set
up
a
meeting
to
discuss
how
remediation
of
the
site
is
going
to
be
done
safely.
I
know
that
councilmember
chavez
has
gotten
a
meeting
on
the
books
with
the
appropriate
city
leaders
for
that
to
happen
before
our
next
pogo
meeting.
So
I
want
to
allow
space
for
the
community
and
council
member
chavez
to
have
that
meeting
before
we
revisit
this
item,
so
I
will
be
removing
it
from
our
consent
agenda
today
and
delaying
it
for
one
cycle.
A
That
said,
we
can
move
forward
with
the
consent
items.
I
want
the
rec
record
to
show
that
we
now
have
14.,
so
there
are
14
items
on
the
consent
agenda
today.
I
will
now
read
them
for
the
record.
The
first
will
be
a
appointed
position
in
the
proposed
office
of
the
city
auditor.
A
Number
two
now
will
be
a
bid
for
the
minneapolis
convention
center
ceiling
and
lighting
upgrade
projects.
Number
three
will
be
a
contract
with
map
light
for
a
campaign
financing
system.
A
The
next
one
will
be
a
contract
with
toonum
partners,
inc
for
crisis
communication,
consulting
services,
the
next
one
I
will
know
I've
already
lost
a
cube
of
the
items
because
of
the
change,
but
there
will
be
a
customization
of
contract
form
with
gallagher
benefit
services,
inc
for
classifications
and
compensation
consulting
services.
The
next
one
is
a
contract
amendment
from
nrg
energy
center
minneapolis
llc.
A
It's
a
clearaway
energy
llc
for
steam
supply
to
heat
the
public
service
building
in
the
community
service
building
the
next
one
is
a
contract
amendment
with
modern,
pipe
piping
inc
for
mechanical
work
for
the
public
service
building.
The
next
one
is
our
contract
amendment
with
advanced
systems,
integration
llc
for
additional
audio
visual
system
services
for
the
public
service
building.
The
next
one
is
a
contract
amendment
with
acoustic
associates
inc
for
additional
flooring.
Work
for
the
public
service
building.
The
next
one
is
a
contract
amendment
with
eagan
company
for
freely
campus
electrical
construction.
A
A
The
next
one
is
a
lease
amendment
which,
with
hbc
acquisitions
llc
for
additional
election
space
and
then
the
last
one
is
a
legal
settlement
with
just
justice,
felderman
versus
the
city
of
minneapolis
mohammad
jamal,
and
those
are
all
of
our
items
on
the
consent
agenda
today.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
these
items?
A
I
see
council
member,
vital.
C
Thank
you,
chair
weinsley.
I
just
had
a
quick
question
about
item
eight.
I
just
wanted
to
know
if
there's
someone
here
that
can
speak
to
the
the
range
in
this
amount
for
this
contract.
Yes,.
A
Can
we
have
do
we
have
staff
here
to
speak
and
are
you
referring
to
the
contract
amendment
with
modern
pipelining?
Yes,
okay,
do
we
have
staff
who
can
speak
to
that
item?
Please
come
forward.
Thank
you.
E
Morning,
council,
member
chris
baucus,
finance
and
property
services,
and
primarily
this
change
with
modern
piping,
is
for
radiation
and
heat
in
the
skyway
connection
to
hennepin
county
government
center.
That's
the
primary
change
for
this
item.
The
existing
radiant
heat
was
not
working,
and
this
is
full
replacement
of
radiant
heat
in
that
skyway
connection.
C
E
F
C
A
Awesome
is
there
any
other
questions
on
the
consent
agenda
and
just
for
public
record
before
we
take
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
items.
I
do
want
to
know
a
correction
for
item
number,
two,
that
it
will
now
be
on
the
consent
agenda
and
it
will
have
a
shift
to
a
postponement
for
our
next
pogo
cycle,
which
will
be
on
september
19th
with
that
said,
I
see
council
member
chavez.
Thank
you.
B
A
So
that
said,
I
will
take
up
the
motion
to
approve
all
consent
items.
All
those
in
favor
say
I,
those
not
in
favor,
say,
nay,
all
right.
Well,
let's
the
record
show
that
that
motion
carries
and
all
the
items
are
improved.
Next,
we
have
a
discussion
on
discussion
17
around
quarterly
donations,
and
I
realize
I'm
also
out
of
order
here,
but
let's
start
with
that,
our
our
next
item
is
the
receiving
and
fouling
of
the
2022
second
quarter
financial
status
report
on
select
city
funds.
A
G
All
right
vice
chair,
wansley
members
of
the
committee,
thank
you
for
having
me
today.
As
I
was
introduced,
I'm
al
hodges,
I'm
the
controller
from
finance
and
property
services
and
I'll
be
presenting
the
financial
status
as
a
second
quarter.
2022
for
select
city
funds.
G
G
This
past
summer,
our
bond
rating
agencies
re-evaluated
our
position
and
confirmed
their
upgrades
from
last
fall,
which
was
changing
us
from
stable
to
positive,
by
finch
pitch
and
from
negative
to
stable
by
s
p.
So
our
parking
revenues,
while
rebounding
are
still
less
than
pre-pandemic
levels,
as
you
might
expect.
G
Building
permits
and
local
tax
revenues
are
also
increasing
from
2021
careful
spending
decisions
and
allocations
by
the
council
with
our
arpa
money
is
allowing
programmatic
spending
to
to
continue
in
that
area,
and
we
did
receive
our
second
half
payment
of
the
arpa
funds
this
past
june.
So
now
we've
received
all
271
million
dollars
from
arpa.
G
Continuing
on
with
an
overview
total
book
value
of
our
cash
and
investments
at
june,
30th
2022
is
just
under
1.2
billion
dollars.
So
this
is
an
increase
from
where
we
were
last
year.
At
this
time
of
about
136
million,
we
are
meeting
fund,
balance
and
net
position
reserve
requirements
in
all,
but
two
funds,
those
being
the
self-insurance
fund
group
and
then
the
information
technology
fund.
G
Originally
we
were
planning
to
spend
some
of
the
fund
balance
out
of
the
general
fund
and
in
the
next
few
slides
I'll,
get
into
reasons
why
we're
actually
increasing
the
fund
balance
rather
than
spending
it
down,
and
then
the
cash
balance
in
the
general
fund
likewise
is
expected
to
increase
year
over
year
again,
based
on
spending
and
revenue
projections.
G
So
looking
at
revenue
in
the
general
fund
by
category
you
can
see
here,
with
the
exception
of
property
taxes,
we're
expecting
to
exceed
budget
in
all
the
categories
listed
in
that
table
below
property
taxes
is
a
little
unusual
because
we
budget
for
essentially
a
100
collection
rate.
Even
though
it's
not
realistic
that
in
a
year
we
would
collect
100
of
all
property
taxes.
G
G
And
then,
once
again,
we
do
typically
looking
back
three
years.
We
do
often
underspend
in
the
general
fund
and
that
once
again,
the
underspending
this
year
is
just
a
little
bit
more
than
previous
years.
So
we
expect
to
spend
about
96.7
percent
of
budget,
while
typically
we
spend
about
97
to
budget.
So.
G
All
right,
shifting
away
from
general
fund,
we
move
into
collective
fund
groups,
and
so
the
first
one
here
is
the
special
revenue
funds.
These
are
used
to
account
for
the
proceeds
of
specific
revenues,
as
the
name
implies.
G
G
However,
we
are
projecting
the
cash
balance
to
increase
just
over
71
million,
and
that's
almost
exclusively
due
to
the
arpa
funds
that
I
just
mentioned
we
received
in
june.
We
will
not
have
spent
all
of
them
by
the
end
of
the
year,
so
that
will
cause
an
increase
in
the
arpa
fund
cash
balance.
G
G
All
right
this
table,
obviously
a
lot
of
numbers
and
not
really
a
lot
of
news.
I
would
say
so.
Most
of
the
funds,
as
you
can
see,
are
expected
to
finish
the
year
with
cash
and
fund
balance
in
a
similar
position,
as
they
finish
2021
two-thirds
of
the
way
down
there.
You
can
see
the
grants
fund
cash
balance,
that's
the
one
where
the
opera
money
goes
and
that's
the
one
that's
increasing
significantly
year
over
year.
G
Okay
up
next
are
the
internal
service
funds
group.
So
these
are
the
funds
that
we
use
to
account
for
goods
and
services
that
we
use
internally
by
other
city
departments.
So
there
again
is
the
list
of
the
six
internal
service
funds
that
we
have
at
the
city
net
position
in
this
group
by
year.
End
2022
is
expected
to
decrease
again
just
slightly
by
about
two
and
a
half
million,
and
we
do
expect
the
cash
to
increase
by
7.9
million
by
year-end
as
compared
to
2021
this
group
of
funds.
G
Again
they
deliver
services
internally,
and
so
we
can
kind
of
moderate
and
manage
their
spending
and
and
how
that
impacts
other
departments,
and
so
we
try
to
be
consistent
and
not
see
spikes
and
dips
in
their
activity.
G
G
All
right
and
then
similar
chart
for
internal
service
funds.
These
are
fund
by
fund
cash
and
that
position
changes
from
21
to
22..
G
G
And
then
the
final
group
of
funds
that
we
talk
about
is
the
enterprise
funds,
so
these
are
our
business
type
funds
they
provide
goods
and
services
to
outside
parties
includes
our
utility
funds
are
listed
there.
G
G
Once
again,
just
reflecting
stability
in
those
funds
with
some
projected
increases
in
stormwater
just
due
to
some
budgeted
operating
gains
this
these
group
of
funds
at
this
level,
when
you
combine
them
all
together,
is
kind
of
hard
to
do
some
analysis
because
they
are
just
so
much
bigger
and
in
the
volume
of
activity
that
goes
through
them.
But
again,
on
the
next
page,
we've
got
fun
by
fund
activity
showing
the
change
in
cash
in
that
position,
so
you
can
see
once
again
a
lot
of
stability.
A
A
No,
I
did
have
one
quick
question,
so
I
know
you
know.
Several
weeks
ago,
mayor
frye
announced
the
move
towards
the
biannual
budget
in
his
budget
proposal.
I
know
we
haven't
as
counsel
taken
any
formalized
action
to
approve
that,
but
in
thinking
of
if
this
is
where
the
mayoral
office
is
looking
to
move
towards,
is
there
projections
that's
going
to
be
included
for
that
second
year
or
to
reflect
kind
of
that
proposed
change.
G
Yeah,
I
believe
so
I
don't
know
if
our
budget
director
shared
today
but
in
in
the
mayor's
proposed
budget.
You
know,
as
usual,
they've
got
that
five
or
six
year
financial
direction,
and
so
it
is
something
we
keep
an
eye
on
the
future
and
making
sure
that
our
fund
balance
is
sufficient
to
to
account
for
any
you
know,
hopefully,
hopefully
planned,
but
maybe
even
unplanned
financial
variants.
A
That's
fine!
Thank
you.
If
there's
no
questions,
then
thank
you
for
your
presentation.
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
file
that
report
and
then
we're
going
to
go
in
the
original
order.
Discussion.
Item
number
16
is
a
gift
acceptance.
The
this
is
a
requesting
a
passage
of
a
resolution
for
a
gift
donation
from
the
minneapolis
downtown
council
for
the
mayoral
work
group.
Reception
event.
I
understand
that
we
have
staff
peter
from
the
mayor's
office
to
speak
on
this
item.
So
take
the
floor.
H
Good
morning,
chair
wansley
committee
members,
my
name
is
peter
ebnet,
I'm
here
representing
the
mayor's
office.
This
is
a
gift
acceptance,
providing
food
and
coffee
for
an
event
to
acknowledge
the
contributions
of
the
work
groups
on
government
structure,
community
safety
and
economic
recovery.
Mr
fry
is
hosting
the
reception
and
recognition
ceremony
on
monday
september.
12Th
at
8
am
in
room
100
in
the
city's
new
public
service
building.
H
H
A
Thank
you
so
much
peter
abnett.
I
will
open
it
up
for
comments
for
questions
from
my
colleagues.
A
A
We
also
don't
typically
have
receptions
for
members
of
those
boards
and
commissions
other
boards
have
presented
to
council
members
about
their
recommendations
and
also
about
their
shared
frustrations,
of
of
not
being
heard
by
this
body
or
by
the
city
enterprise,
and
now
we're
going
to
be
celebrating
the
advice
of
these
work
groups,
and
I
think
that
creates
an
equitable
standard
that
could
lend
itself
to
our
perception
that
the
involvement
of
ordinary
people
in
our
boards
and
commissions
that
also
our
advisory
role
to
this
entreprise
to
us
as
a
legislative
body.
A
Their
advice
might
be
perceived
as
somewhat
invaluable,
as
opposed
to
these
work
groups
and
for
those
reasons
I
won't
be
voting
in
favor
of
this.
But
I
will
a
motion
to
take
a
vote
on
this.
So
all
those
in
favor
say
I
all
right,
all
those
in
favor,
say,
nay,
nay,
and
that
item
has
been
moved
for
approval
and
then
our
last
discussion
item
is
one
on
our
surveillance.
Ordinance.
Our
final
item-
and
I
do
want
to
note
before
our
clerk
clerk
carl
comes
up
to
provide
a
presentation.
A
I
asked
this
update
as
for
this
update,
because
two
weeks
ago
we
had
a
public
hearing
about
mpd's
use
of
drones.
Do
you
want
to
know
this
is
not
something
that
the
council
has
a
say
over,
because,
of
course
the
mayor
has
a
slow
authority
over
mpd,
but
at
the
hearing
it
was
abundantly
clear
that
people
are
extremely
concerned
about
expanding
mpd's
surveillance
technology.
A
Given
the
fact
that
our
recent
minnesota
department
of
human
rights
findings
have
shown
that
they've
exhibited
a
pattern
of
racism,
sexism
and
violence.
So
while
you
know
the
council
doesn't
have
any
authority
over
mpd,
we
do
have
the
authority
to
legislate
policy
for
the
city
overall,
and
I
know
councilmember,
payne
and
pamasana.
Also
thank
you,
councilmember
payne
for
joining
us
to
also
speak
to
the
progress
on
this.
A
I
do
know
those
council
members
have
been
working
on
and
with
our
staff
on
our
surveillance
policy,
and
I
requested
this
update,
so
we
can
hear
what
the
status
of
that
policy
is
where
the
development
is
on
it.
I
hear
that
is
clearly
a
big
concern
for
our
residents
and
I
want
the
council
to
be
fully
aware
of
all
of
our
possible
avenues
for
accountability
over
our
surveillance
technology.
A
F
Morning,
madam
chair
and
committee
members,
as
noted,
I'm
just
here
to
provide
a
brief,
summary
and
status
report
on
enterprise
efforts
that
are
associated
more
largely
with
information,
governance
policy
surveillance
being
one
of
those
and
with
apologies,
as
you
noted,
madam
chair,
this
is
a
late
edition
of
the
agenda.
I've
been
out
of
office
the
past
week,
so
my
materials
were
not
included
in
the
published
agenda
packet,
but
hopefully
you
all
have
a
copy
of
the
slides
in
front
of
you
and
they
will
be
uploaded
in
limbs
after
the
meeting
is
adjourned.
F
F
These
laws
apply
to
all
information
generated
or
received
maintained,
used,
exchanged
or
kept
by
the
city
as
reflected
in
this
image.
They
fit
together
like
puzzle,
pieces
and
they're
intended
to
complement
one
another.
These
three
laws
include
the
official
records
act
which
prescribes
what
records
the
government
must
make
and
keep
the
records
management
statute,
which
regulates
how
government
data
and
records
must
be
managed,
maintained
and
destroyed
according
to
set
life
cycles
and
retention
schedules,
and
then
the
government
data
practices
act,
which
regulates
who
can
access
government
data
and
under
what
conditions.
F
So
you
have
the
official
records
act
which
says
what
has
to
be
created
the
records
management
statute
that
says
how
and
the
government
data
practices
act.
That
says
who
and
under
what
conditions
the
data
practices
act
is
the
probably
the
most
well
known
of
these
three
laws.
It
imposes
an
obligation
on
all
governments
to
ensure
that
the
public
has
access
to
all
data,
that's
classified
by
law
as
public,
while
simultaneously
restricting
access
to
any
data
not
classified
as
public
data.
F
It
mandates
this
very
careful
balance
between
access
and
transparency
on
the
one
hand,
and
also
privacy
on
the
other.
So
it's
important
to
note
that
none
of
these
laws
provide
a
legal
right
to
privacy,
a
blanket
right
to
privacy.
Instead,
there
are
some
data
classified
by
law
that
are
not
public
and
those
data
not
classified
as
public
would
be
subject
to
restricted
access.
F
F
F
The
audit
used
arma's
generally
accepted
record
keeping
principles
garp
to
measure
the
city's
policies
and
programs.
Those
principles
measure
performance
across
eight
categories
that
are
shown
on
this
slide.
They
include,
for
example,
accountability,
transparency,
integrity
protection,
compliance,
accessibility,
retention
and
disposition.
F
F
We
sometimes
refer
to
that
as
the
igpc.
The
igpc
was
tasked
with
creating
implementing
and
administering
the
enterprise
program,
but
the
ig
policy
committee.
It
consisted
of
three
relevant
charter
departments
that
have
an
influence
on
information
governance.
Those
include
the
city
clerk,
the
city
attorney
and
the
city
coordinator,
as
well
as
the
city's
chief
financial
or
chief
information
officer
in
charge
of
information
technology.
F
Unfortunately,
due
to
a
lack
of
strong
executive
sponsorship
and
support,
the
policy
committee
failed
to
produce
the
executive,
the
expected
results
and
the
program
stalled
during
subsequent
electoral
transitions
and
following
the
departure
of
several
key
executives,
no
substantive
progress
was
made
in
addressing
the
audit
findings.
As
a
consequence,
the
original
findings
from
the
2015
audit
and
enterprise-wide
deficiencies
are
largely
still
applicable
across
the
enterprise.
Today,
however,
there
are
a
few
notable
exceptions
to
that
statement.
F
In
2017,
the
council
adopted
a
set
of
data
privacy
principles
that
the
purpose
of
that
adoption
was
to
set
clear
policy
expectations
in
terms
of
the
city's
collection,
use
and
maintenance
of
any
personally
identifiable
information,
and
although
data
privacy
was
not
specifically
addressed
in
the
audit,
the
issue
of
data
privacy
is
connected
to
measurements
that
are
contained
in
at
least
six
of
the
eight
categories.
In
those
arma
principles
that
I
mentioned
as
shown
on
this
slide,
the
data
privacy
principles
were
adopted
through
resolution
number
2020
r-030.
F
Unfortunately,
they
were
not
adopted
as
part
of
the
overall
information
governance
policy
and
therefore
not
codified
in
chapter
41..
Thus,
the
visibility
of
these
privacy
principles
across
the
city
enterprises
not
particularly
well
known.
This
is
an
error
in
process
and
should
be
considered
as
part
of
any
technical
corrections
to
the
existing
policy.
That's
in
the
city
code,
the
other
major
policy
initiative
with
respect
to
information
governance,
followed
on
the
heels
of
the
adoption
of
that
data
privacy
principles
in
2021.
F
The
code
was
amended
to
add
a
general
prohibition
on
the
use
of
facial
recognition
technologies,
except
for
certain
pre-authorized
instances
that
were
included
in
the
ordinance
or
additionally,
any
pre-authorization,
as
an
exception
authorized
by
the
city
council.
However,
that
policy
itself
does
create
some
concerns.
F
First,
the
ordinance
provides
that
the
city's
policy
cannot
be
interpreted
or
applied
to
conflict
with
any
provision
of
federal
or
state
law
being
higher
levels
of
the
law.
Therefore,
there
is
a
possible
policy
loophole
with
higher
authority
which
might
permit
some
use
of
that
technology
which
could
otherwise
be
restricted
under
the
city's
policy
and,
additionally,
with
the
change
in
the
city's
government
structure,
which
was
adopted
by
voters
last
year
and
the
change
in
the
council's
authority
over
department
operations.
F
I
think
there's
a
legal
question
about
whether
or
not
this
policy
could
constitute
legislative
interference
in
the
mayor's
authority
over
city
departments
and
day-to-day
operations.
But
those
are
legal
issues
to
be
addressed
by
the
city
attorney.
Notwithstanding
those
concerns,
the
policy
nominally
makes
the
city
clerk
responsible
for
enforcement.
F
However,
no
delegation
of
authority
was
given
nor
resources
provided,
which
means
there's
no
formal
means
to
enforce
the
policy
and
no
capacity
to
monitor
compliance
across
the
enterprise.
These
faults
in
the
existing
policy
should
be
re-evaluated
and
addressed
as
part
of
other
work
on
information
governance
as
a
larger
topic
going
forward.
F
This
slide
reflects
other
outstanding
issues,
related
information
governance,
and
I
believe
madam
chair
was
more
the
primary
focus
of
your
direction
to
us
today.
In
2018,
a
proposed
amendment
related
to
data
privacy
and
security
was
introduced
and
then
in
2020,
a
proposed
amendment
related
to
surveillance
was
introduced.
However,
no
further
action
on
either
of
those
proposals
was
taken
during
the
last
council
term,
2018-2021
and
under
council
rules.
Those
ordinances
would
have
been
expired
at
the
end
of
that
council
term,
but
they
were
both
reintroduced
into
the
current
two-year
term
council.
F
Vice
president
who's
here
is
the
primary
author
on
those
ordinances
council.
Member
payne
is
the
co-author
on
one
of
them
and
in
my
preliminary
discussions
with
the
council
vice
president,
it's
my
understanding.
It
was
her
intent
to
address
all
of
these
issues
that
I've
summarized
as
part
of
a
comprehensive
revenge
revision
to
the
existing
information
governance
ordinance.
F
So
then,
the
final
slide
I
offer
is
a
summary
of
the
status
of
various
enterprise
work
on
information
governance.
As
noted,
there
are
two
outstanding
issues
in
queue
right
now,
and
that
of
course
opens
up
chapter
41
for
amendment.
This
provides
the
council
the
chance
to
address
the
errors
and
faults
that
I've
already
identified,
as
well
as
further
an
additional
issues
to
improve
the
city's
management
of
its
information
assets.
F
There
are
some
excellent
models
from
comparable
jurisdictions
and
I
think
it
would
be
a
good
idea
for
council
to
direct
staff
to
pull
some
of
those
best
practices
to
help
create
an
excellent
program
for
the
city
of
minneapolis.
We
also
should
work
with
the
audit
committee
to
have
another
review
of
the
city's
information
governance
practices
completed.
It's
been
seven
years
since
that
initial
audit,
which
provided
the
findings
showing
an
unacceptable
status
in
our
enterprise.
So
I
think
it's
time
for
us
to
revisit
the
audit
and
to
get
those
details
updated.
F
So
we
know
where
the
city
enterprise
is
today.
It
would
give
us
real-time
data
so
that
we
can
make
some
informed
decisions
about
how
to
prioritize
the
work
going
forward
with
that.
Madam
chair,
that
completes
my
brief
status
report
on
the
status
of
information
governance
issues.
I'm
happy
to
respond
any
questions.
The
committee
may
have.
A
Yes,
thank
you
so
much
clerk
carl
for
this
extensive
presentation,
oh
and
thank
you
for
including
some
of
the
short
comings
and
and
things
that
we
need
to
be
addressing
in
further
consideration
that
you
know
as
this
body
and
with
the
co-authors.
I
also
want
to
know,
as
you
highlight
it,
council
vice
president
leonard
palmisano,
has
joined
us.
We
again
also
have
council
member
elliot
payne,
both
who
are
co-authors
of
the
surveillance
amendment.
A
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I'm
I
just
want
to
thank
you.
I'm
glad
that
there's
interest
in
revisiting
these
issues
as
we
get
back
to
a
new
post-pandemic
normal.
I
think
we
can
work
on
prioritizing
these
kinds
of
efforts
again
and
and
in
a
new
way,
because
how
we
use
move
and
store
data
has
changed
so
much
over
the
past
three
years
too,
in
operating
in
remote
work
environments.
D
So,
yes,
I
also
think
that
a
refresh
of
the
information
governance
audit
is
warranted,
but
we
are
going
to
need
to
see
what
our
auditor
thinks
of
prioritizing
this
against
his
existing
work
plan.
Our
audit
work
plan
has
a
work
plan
that
goes
out
approximately
two
years.
So
how
where
this
fits
in
terms
of
priority
within
that
is
going
to
have
to
be
a
conversation
with
the
audit
committee,
so
yeah,
thank
you
for
having
us
at
your
committee
today.
I
I
bring
some
fresh
eyes
to
this
and
I
think
one
of
the
things
that's
been
really
helpful
in
co-authoring
with
vice
president
paul
masano
is
kind
of
having
that
continuity
of
the
view
of
some
of
the
work
that
happened
in
the
last
term.
So,
as
we
know,
the
facial
recognition
ban
passed
last
term,
as
mr
carl
is
highlighted.
There's
these
intersecting
state
statutes,
city
policies
and
then
new
ordinances
that
are
supposed
to
fit
really
cleanly
together
as
puzzle
pieces.
I
But
I
think
what
we're
in
the
early
work
that
we've
done
around
the
surveillance
ordinance
is
really
flagged,
that
these
puzzle
pieces
are
not
fitting
together
as
elegantly
as
they
could,
and
so
I
think
a
lot
of
the
work
that
we
have
to
do
right
now
is
making
this
distinction
between
governance,
like
data
governance,
data,
privacy
and
surveillance
technology,
and
how
each
of
those
different
kind
of
conceptual
pieces
might
fit
together
in
a
more
comprehensive
way,
around
a
set
of
shared
values,
around
transparency
of
use,
making
sure
that
there
is
good
resources
for
enforcement
and
oversight,
and
so
I
think
that
that's
essentially
the
work
that
we've
been
engaged
in
right
now.
A
Thank
you
so
much
one
thing
for
sure:
I'm
excited
that
there's
interest
in
moving
this
this
term.
I
think,
as
we
saw
in
the
public
hearing
and
as
I
noted
earlier,
there's
a
great
deal
of
interest
around
this
work
and
anyway,
as
you
extended
that
offer
council
vice
president
palmer
palmisano.
If
this
committee
can
support
in
helping
identify
and
support
you
all
in
moving
some
of
those
intermediate
pieces
that
clerk
carl
you
identified,
especially
since
we're
going
to
a
budget
session,
you
identify
resources
are
needed
for
staff
to
be
able
to
do
this
work.
A
So
we'll
love
to
work
with
both
of
you
all
and
I'm
pretty
sure,
there's
a
number
of
my
other
colleagues
who
would
like
to
see
how
we
can
make
movement
or
some
of
those
pieces
that
we
can
do
in
the
short
term
as
we're
working
out
some
of
the
larger
kinks
that
you
identify
council
member
pain
to
really
bring
forth
something
solid
and
strong,
and
that
our
constituents
will
really
be
proud
of
and
feel
confident
in.
So
thank
you
both
thank
you
to
our
staff
clerk
carl
for
providing
this
presentation
we'll
be
following
up.
A
I
know
in
consultation
with
jeremiah
ellison
the
chair
of
this
committee
around
ways
we
can
support
you
both,
but
that
is
all
unless
there
is
any
additional
questions
from
my
fellow
colleagues.
A
So
with
that
said,
I
don't
see
any
following
questions
from
my
colleagues
and
with
that
we
have
actually
concluded
all
of
our
business
before
the
committee.
Oh
sorry,
before
I
do
that,
I
will
ask
our
clerks
to
file
the
report
that
we
just
received
from
clerk
carl
and
now
I
can
do
the
gamble
trick
and
conclude
our
business
officially.
So
thank
you.
All
this
meeting
is
a
jar.