►
From YouTube: June 28, 2022 Committee of the Whole
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Members
present,
thank
you.
Let
the
record
reflect
that
we
have
a
quorum.
We
have
five
items
on
today's
published
agenda.
In
addition
to
our
reports
of
committees,
we
also
have
two
items
to
add
today:
regate
regarding
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility
and
the
housing
and
rent
stabilization
work
group.
A
A
Then
we
will
do
the
government
restructure
committee.
Those
are
the
other.
Those
are
the
items
two
three
four
and
five
on
the
agenda.
Then
we
will
have
the
update
on
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility.
Then
the
rent
stabilization
work
group
conversation
and
then
finally
committee
reports.
Are
there
any
objections
to
that
order
today?
A
Great
so
with
that,
I
will
welcome
up
director
kruver
to
there.
You
are
to
do
the
current
service
level.
Budget
report
welcome
very.
D
Good,
thank
you
so
much
chair,
palmisano
and
I'm
emilia
kruver,
I'm
the
budget
director
today.
My
entire
team
will
be
getting
up
to
tell
you
about
their
particular
pieces
of
expertise
in
the
budget,
so
they
will
be
getting
up
and
introducing
themselves
as
well.
We
are
here
today
to
talk
about
where
we're
at
in
the
budgeting
process,
so
we
refer
to
this
as
the
current
service
level
budget.
This
is
a
no
new
decisions
have
been
made
in
this
budget.
D
We
are
simply
going
to
be
forecasting
the
cost
of
the
people
and
programs
approved
in
last
year's
budget
into
23
and
24.,
and
so
in
our
charter.
There
is
a
requirement
that,
before
july
1st,
we
have
a
report
out
of
the
revenues
and
expenditures
for
all
city
departments
in
previous
years.
We've
done
this
in
a
very
informal
way
this
year
we're
trying
to
formalize
and
bring
some
more
transparency
to
this
part
of
the
budget
process.
D
So
the
agenda
today
is
to
review
the
cost
of
our
current
service
level,
so
the
revenues
that
we
expect,
or
rather
the
spending
that
we
expect
for
the
people
and
the
programs
that
are
already
approved
by
the
council
and
the
mayor,
we're
going
to
explore
our
revenue
forecast
for
23
through
27.
So
we
always
put
together
a
five-year
outlook
for
our
revenues
and
then
we're
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
timing
and
the
next
steps
for
our
budget
process.
D
D
We
are
increasing
at
right
at
four
percent
at
this
point
in
time,
we're
seeing
limited
resources
available
for
new
spending
in
the
general
fund,
in
particular,
where
revenues
are
slightly
underperforming,
where
we
thought
we
would
be
at
last
year
at
this
point,
and
expenses
are
growing
about
as
projected
slightly
faster
than
predicted,
so
that
dynamic
in
the
general
fund
is
putting
a
strain
on
resources
available
for
new
spending,
and
we
will
get
into
how
we
how
we
forecast
those
revenues
and
expenditures
in
the
following
presentation,
and
once
again,
I
just
want
to
remind
everyone
that
this
is
a
snapshot
in
time.
D
There
are
no
decisions,
there's
no
recommendations
included
in
this.
That
will
happen.
The
next
checkpoint
on
this
journey
will
be
when
the
mayor
releases
his
recommendations
in
august.
So
this
is
really
just
telling
us
where's
our
starting
point
for
decision
making
all
right
and
with
that
I'm
gonna
hand
it
over
to
jane.
E
E
All
of
these
processes
are
driven
by
our
financial
policies,
which
we've
included
on
the
slide
and
you'll,
hear
us
referencing
them
throughout
this
presentation,
you'll
see
that
inflation
is
captured
in
the
first
two
of
those
spending
buckets
so
calculated.
Personnel
and
internal
service
charges
tend
to
fluctuate,
given
circumstances.
Labor
agreements
steps
all
of
these
sorts
of
factors
and
the
base
budget.
The
non-personnel
is
held
flat
year
to
year.
E
F
Thank
you
jane
chairperson
council
members.
My
name
is
justin
carlson,
I'm
on
the
budget
analyst
and
the
first
item
of
our
current
service
level.
We're
going
to
discuss
today
is
personnel,
so
personal
expenses
do
fluctuate
year
to
year,
they're
not
held
flat.
So
we
have
an
annual
update
process
to
really
capture
those
changes
and
it
consists
of
two
phases.
In
the
first
phase
we
collaborate
with
human
resources
and
departments
to
update
our
workforce
plan.
F
So
the
objective
here
really
is
to
get
the
current
incumbent
employee
budget
in
the
correct
position,
and
then
we
look
at
different
inputs.
Thank
you,
such
as
their
step,
their
classification
and
then
also
their
healthcare
coverage,
so
we're
updating
that
workforce
plan
and
then,
in
the
second
phase,
we're
looking
at
cost
assumptions
in
the
budget
so
again,
another
collaborative
approach
with
human
resources
to
look
at
cost
assumptions
such
as
the
step
table
and
colas
that
come
from
our
collective
bargaining
agreements.
F
We
look
at
other
aims
like
medical
and
dental
employer
contributions
which
change
year
to
year.
Some
of
these
are
relatively
stable,
like
fica
and
medicare.
Others
are
changed
year
to
year
or
periodically
are
renegotiated.
Like
life,
insurance
and
long-term
disability,
so
again
these
were
completed
in
march
and
april.
We
did
a
lot
of
these
updates
and
once
the
cost
assumptions
are
updated
and
the
workforce
plan
is
up
to
date,
we
then
calculate
salary
infringe
for
our
personal
budget.
This
entire
personal
update,
this
annual
update,
we
do
is
in
accordance
with
financial
policy
1.7.
F
F
Looking
at
2022
to
2023,
we
see
modest
growth
into
2023
that
actually
comes
in
below
our
benchmark
expectations
and
then
looking
out
to
2024,
we
return
to
more
of
a
standard
inflationary
growth
in
that
year.
There
are
several
drivers
of
why
we're
seeing
this
modest
growth
in
2023.
I
just
want
to
highlight
one
of
them
for
the
council
here
and
that
is
our
medical
self-insurance
fund.
So
on
average
we
budget
five
percent
annual
increases
in
medical
self-insurance.
That's
already
relatively
low
compared
to
market
trends.
G
Hello,
chair
palm
osamu
and
members
of
the
committee
I'm
going
to
cover
the
internal
service
charges.
My
name
is
neil
young
hands,
I'm
the
principal
budget
and
evaluation
analyst,
I'm
going
to
cover
internal
service
charges
and
a
few
other
slides
later
in
the
presentation,
but
start
with
internal
service
charges
are
these
are
charges
for
department's
rent
vehicle
equipment
charges
it
costs.
G
We
started
developing
this
in
the
beginning
of
the
year
in
january
or
february,
so
we
took
we
asked
departments
to
submit
expense
budgets
and
we
use
a
benchmark
to
check
how
how
much
those
costs
are
going
over
every
year
to
check
for
inflation
and
benchmark
those
and
pull
out
some
items
that
we
think
that
are
going
up
faster
than
inflation
and
any
any
of
those
increases.
We
try
to
call
out
and
and
investigate
a
little
bit
more.
G
In
2023
we
have
113
million
budget,
which
is
a
17
increase
from
our
2022
budget
numbers,
and
that
is
likely
due
to
those
standard
inflationary
costs
that
I
was
just
mentioning,
as
well
as
some
larger
items,
so
there's
hrs,
which
is
an
it
system
which
is
for
around
three
million
dollars
and
then
fleet
replacement,
which
these
are
for
departments
spending
on
changing
out
their
vehicles.
G
It
looks
like
a
large
increase.
It's
a
7
million
increase
from
2022,
but
that's
because
those
we
were
still
doing
those
fleet
replacements,
but
that
was
just
coming
out
of
the
fleet
fund
balance.
So
it's
not
showing
up
in
this
actual
chart
right
here
and
then
there
is
the
liability
costs,
those
went
by
5
million
and
that's
based
on
a
third
party
actuarial
study
and
that
budget
is
based
on
our
partners
in
risk
management.
E
Okay
and
then
back
to
that
third
component
of
the
csl,
the
base
budget,
the
non-personnel
base,
which
is
held
flat,
this
one's
much
more
simple
to
calculate.
We
essentially
take
the
2022
adopted
budget
data
and
strip
out
any
one-time
items,
and
that's
the
that's
the
base
for
2023.,
so
you'll
see
on
your
screen.
6.4
million
dollars
in
one-time
change
items
came
out
of
that
overall
total
and
then
24
million
dollars
in
2022's
budget
for
the
one-time,
self-insurance
fund
transfer
is
also
removed
from
there
and
again
referencing
our
financial
policies.
E
Any
ongoing
service
level
commitments
are
the
basis
for
the
next
year's
budget,
so
just
trying
to
tie
those
policies
in
to
reality
here.
So
this
is
a
view
of
the
current
service
level
budget
in
two
different
glimpses
on
the
left
is
the
expenses
by
category
and
then
on.
The
right
is
expenses
by
department,
so
you
will
be
getting
department
by
department
detailed
budget
presentations
in
the
fall,
so
we
won't
go
too
into
depth,
but
you'll
see
that
the
three
biggest
departments
are
the
ones
who
are
typically
in
that
position.
E
E
A
I'm
not
seeing
any
nq.
You
can
also
use
your
flag
if
I'm
not
seeing
any.
G
So
our
capital
program
is
a
six
year
long
planning
period,
so
the
first
year
is
in
which
the
one
that
we're
actually
appropriating
slash
authorizing
dollars
for
so
you'll
notice.
On
the
slide
it
says
22
through
27.
This
is
the
amount
that
was
adopted
from
last
year
and
so
that
2023
number
is
actually
a
planning
number
and
so
our
net
our
bond
redemption
levy.
Those
numbers
are
support
this
level
of
investment
across
these
different
areas,
but
just
for
a
brief
breakdown
on
like
the
process.
G
So
it
goes
through
department,
request,
phase,
so
departments
submit
their
whole
list
of
projects
they'd
like
to
see,
and
then
it
goes
into
the
capital
long-range
improvement
committee,
and
then
it
goes
to
the
mayor's
phase
and
then
to
the
council
phase.
So
the
capital
long-range
improvement
committee
click
just
wrapped
up
their
work
last
week
and
they're
still
working
on
producing
their
annual
report,
that's
due
in
july,
and
then
we
will
bring
that
through
to
the
mayor's
recommended
phase
after
that,
but
so
on.
G
Your
screen,
you're,
seeing
right
now
is
you'll,
see
that
for
2022
we
appropriated
or
authorized
233.6
million
dollars.
That's
a
mix
of
revenue
sources,
so
that
could
be
net
debt
bonds
cash.
Some
of
that
likely
includes,
inter
governmental
revenues
like
county
grants
or
federal
grants,
and
so
to
2023
we're
we're
planning
on
216.2
million
dollars
in
program
resources.
D
D
Makes
sense
so
now
we're
going
to
switch
gears
and
talk
about
revenues.
This
pie
chart
shows
all
of
our
revenues
across
all
funds
in
the
city,
and
so
I
just
before
we
dive
into
what
our
forecast
looks
like.
I
just
want
to
sort
of
remind
us
that
we
have
taxes
are
the
top
blue
section.
D
The
main
source
of
revenues
for
the
general
fund
is
property
taxes,
and
so
the
whole
city
budget,
however,
does
include
utility
funds,
special
revenue
funds,
other
enterprise
funds,
and
that's
where
we're
collecting
largely
fees
for
service,
so
we're
collecting
fees,
but
those
fees
are
very
restricted
in
how
we
can
spend
them.
So
the
general
fund
is
our
most
flexible
fund
where
we
can
spend
money
on
a
lot
of
our
core
business.
D
Our
core
government
services,
utilities
and
other
funds
tend
to
be
where
we
collect
money,
but
then
are
restricted
and
have
to
spend
that
money
on
providing
that
service.
So
water
things
like
that,
so
this
is
the
whole
picture.
We'll
now
walk
through
our
forecast,
as
well
as
the
different
components
of
our
general
fund
and
other
funds.
H
That
being
said,
we'll
take
a
step
back
out
to
look
at
again
the
total
revenue
picture
for
all
funds,
with
some
historical
actuals
in
our
forecast
through
2027,
there's
a
pretty
straightforward
picture
here
to
tell
we
can
see
starting
out
in
2019
from
about
1.4
billion
dollars
coming
in
and
a
steady
contraction
through
2022,
and
then
we
are
forecasting
recovery
beginning
in
2023.
H
Again,
as
emilia
said,
this
is
all
funds
all
revenues.
So
a
lot
of
this
is
restricted
in
terms
of
the
uses
so
from
here
it's
important
to
pivot
and
really
just
spend
a
few
slides
talking
about
the
general
fund,
as
that
is
the
general
operating
fund
for
the
city
and
where
we
have
more
flexibility
in
terms
of
how
we
use
funds.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
mr
zimmerman.
I
guess
I'm
just
curious.
If
going
back
to
your
first
slide,
the
percentage,
can
you
talk
about
the
percentage
of
property
taxes,
residential
versus
commercial.
D
So
we
don't
have
that
broken
out
in
this
presentation.
What
we
do
have
is
some
work
from
the
assessor's
office,
where
she
can
tell
us
how
that
has
shifted
from
year
to
year.
In
this,
this
presentation
we're
not
as
focused
on
that,
because
it
doesn't
include
the
mayor's
recommendation
for
how
to
increase
property
taxes.
Once
we
come
forward
with
that
in
august,
then
we
will
also
be
talking
about
how
does
this
impact
the
different
parts
of
our
property
tax
base
differently?
D
H
All
right,
then,
so,
shifting
over
to
talk
about
the
general
fund,
the
first
visual
we
have
up
here
is
our
forecast
for
2023
revenue
into
the
general
fund.
We're
forecasting
a
a
total
of,
I
believe
about
590
million.
You
can
see
some
of
the
primary
categories
here,
taxes
again,
that
is
largely
the
property
taxes.
H
Yeah,
there's
local
lga
local
government
aid
is
the
primary
one.
There
are
some
other
smaller
state
transfers
as
well
as
county,
I
believe,
but
the
bulk
of
that
would
be
local
government
aid.
You
are
correct
and
we
have
a
subsequent
slide
and
I
believe
amelia's
going
to
speak
a
little
bit
more
to
that
in
our
forecast
there.
H
All
right
shifting
here
again
moving
to
that
dynamic,
look
over
time
this
time,
just
the
general
fund
before
I
had
to
look
2019
through
2027
for
all
funds.
Here,
the
story
is
a
little
bit
different.
In
that
previous
graphic,
you
could
see
the
the
slow
and
steady
contraction
of
revenue
beginning
in
2019
through
2022
and
then
slow
growth
forecasted
from
there
here.
Really.
What
we're
showcasing
in
the
general
fund
is
a
story
of
stability
and
access
to
actions
taken
by
the
city
to
prop
up
and
support
ongoing
activities
out
of
the
general
fund.
H
Moving
on
to
2022
through
2024,
there
are
red
boxes
on
the
transfers
category
of
revenue
towards
the
bottom,
and
what
we're
calling
attention
to
there
is
the
decision
by
the
city
to
use
arpa
funds
for
revenue
replacement
again
to
support
ongoing
activities
out
of
the
general
fund
and
and
the
amount
of
those
annually
is
between
35
and
roughly
35
and
45
million
dollars
in
revenue
replacement
to
support
the
general
fund.
H
H
The
revenue
portion
in
the
bar
chart
is
much
larger.
Prior
to
the
covid
pandemic,
hitting
we
had
a
more
substantial
transfer
from
the
downtown
assets
fund,
which
is
primarily
supported
by
sales
tax
to
support
general
fund
activity.
So
our
our
outlook
or
our
forecast
is
that
for
the
next
few
years
we
have
arpa
replacement,
arpa
revenue
replacement
to
support
ongoing
activity
and
we
envision
by
2025
having
sufficient
revenue
to
return
to
to
pivot
back
to
that
transfer
from
downtown
assets
to
support
the
general
fund
in
our
economic
development
activities.
There.
I
Yep,
just
clarifying
you
mentioned
when
did
that
transfer
take
place
from
the
downtown.
H
That's
it
so
so,
historically
yeah
we
have
the
downtown
assets
financial
plan
I'll.
I
have
a
subsequent
slide
to
speak
to
that
revenue
a
bit
more,
but
we
do
financial
planning
and
balancing
expenses
and
revenues
there
plan
to
transfer
to
support
economic
development
activities
out
of
the
general
fund
and
prior
to
the
pandemic.
I
believe
that
figure
was
around
30
million
dollars
in
2019
when
covet
hit.
It
was
reduced
to
closer
to
10
or
11
million
dollars
annually,
because
we
just
took
such
a
hit
in
revenue.
H
H
Downtown
assets
to
the
general
fund-
yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
okay
and
pivoting.
Right
from
that
talking
point
we
can
jump
in
and
talk
about.
This
is
actually
a
non-general
fund
revenue,
but
it
ties
right
into
what
we
were
just
discussing
that
transfer
into
the
general
fund.
So
we
have
our
local
option
sales
tax
and
that's
just
an
encompassing
term
for
the
five
local
sales
taxes.
H
The
city
employs
the
sales
and
use
tax,
entertainment,
tax,
restaurant
tax,
lodging
tax
and
liquor
tax
and
those
revenues
roll
into
the
downtown
assets
fund,
where
they
support
the
convention
center.
The
target
center
and
debt
service
payments,
u.s
bank
stadium.
After
those
economic
activities,
economic
development
activities,
take
place.
There
is
a
transfer
pardon
me
to
the
general
fund,
as
we
were
just
discussing
as
you
can
see
in
this
visual.
H
That
forecast
has
us
returning
to
pre-pandemic
revenue
collection
in
2024,
and
I
know
it
doesn't
look
like
it
at
all.
In
this
graphic
that
is
because,
beginning
in
2021,
the
state
department
of
revenue
actually
began
withholding
roughly
24
to
25
million
dollars
annually
for
u.s
bank
stadium
debt
payments.
H
The
city
knew
about
that
for
eight
or
nine
years.
Prior
to
this,
it's
just
very
unfortunate
timing
that
when
we
were
bottoming
out
in
the
midst
of
the
pandemic
with
less
revenue,
we
also
began
paying
24
to
25
million
dollars
a
year.
For
that,
the
last
thing,
I'll
just
call
attention
to
in
terms
of
the
graphic
2022,
may
stick
out
to
you
all
in
terms
of
the
color
coding.
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair
yeah.
I
was
just
wondering
for
your
forecast
methodology.
Are
there
any
kind
of
standard
assumptions
that
go
into
that,
and
obviously
we
have
all
these
crazy
externalities
that
make
forecasting
pretty
complex,
but
in
a
kind
of
non-complex
year,
is
there
kind
of
some
baseline
assumptions
that
go
into
the
forecast.
D
Yes,
so
great
question
and
I
I
will
say
that
we've
been
really
building
out
our
revenue
forecasting
methods
a
lot
in
the
last
couple
of
years,
and
that's
what
you'll
see
reflected
sort
of
in
this
slide
where
the
22
budget
is,
is
one
solid,
color.
Historically,
we
could
kind
of
go
on
what
was
the
total
last
year
and,
let's
just
tick
this
whole
box
up
by
two
percent.
D
We
can't
do
that
anymore
and
that's
why
you
see
the
much
more
detailed
look
at
each
type
of
tax,
because
each
type
has
been
impacted
differently
by
the
various
in
you
know,
emergency
measures
that
have
happened
and-
and
I
think
for
your
answer-
we
really
tailor
the
forecast
to
the
kind
of
revenue
that
we're
bringing
in,
and
so
we
work
quite
a
bit
with
folks
in
cped
when
we're
thinking
about
business
and
non-business
license
fees.
We
work
closely
with
the
folks,
jeff
johnson
and
the
folks
at
the
convention
center.
D
We
also
have
engaged
national
data
sets.
So
we
look
to
mmb's,
forecast
and
read
through
what
they're
producing
we're
looking
at
their
gdp
growth,
which
has
helped
us
a
lot.
We
know
the
levels
are
different
and
the
mix
is
different,
but
what
are
folks
at
a
national
level.
Thinking
about
how
quick
this
recovery
will
be
is
something
that
we
factor
in
especially
to
sales
tax,
and
then
we've
we've
looked
at
specific
trade
associations
that
work
in
hospitality
in
particular,
because
that
we
know
has
been
the
most
impacted
in
the
last
couple
years.
I
Thank
you.
I
just
had
a
quick
question
too.
If
there
is
any
overview
or
data
around
the
the
self-insurance
plan.
I
know
you
raised
it
in
terms
of
like
how
that
correlates
to
some
of
the
personnel
components,
so
is
that
yeah?
Is
there
any
way
to
get
an
overview
of
that
one
too?
So.
D
I
think
for
the
for
that
fund,
in
particular
I
we
will
be
when
we
release
the
full
mayor's
budget
and
fit
in
2015
or
in
august
15th.
We
will
have
more
information
about
what
that
fund
looks
like.
I
think
that
we
here
we're
just
looking
at
high
level
expenditures
and
revenues.
D
Just
at
a
high
level,
we
use
actuarial
study,
so
we
partner
with
a
third
party
to
take
a
look
at
our
historical
expenses,
minneapolis
context
to
set
the
amounts
that
need
to
be
pulled
into
the
self-insurance
fund
to
make
sure
that
we're
on
the
right
side
of
our
financial
policies,
and
so
that's
what's
reflected
here.
I
will
note
that
we
are
seeing
and
I'll
say
this
again
at
my
closing,
but
we
are
seeing
growth
in
faster
than
expected
in
our
liability
charges
that
are
going
into
the
self-insurance
fund,
so
that
is
one
area.
D
D
C
D
Okay,
so
I
want
to
speak
for
a
minute
about
lga,
because
this
is
actually
having
a
pretty
significant
impact
on
our
general
fund.
This
year,
since
2019
we've
seen
some
pretty
steady
declines
in
the
amount
of
lga
allocated
to
minneapolis
in
2022,
we
were
slated
to
receive
an
additional
decrease
and
you
can
see
that
we
were
held
flat.
There
was
a
hold
harmless
bill
passed
by
the
legislature
that
helped
minneapolis
and
several
other
large
cities
in
the
state.
D
There
is
a
reason
to
be
hopeful
around
the
future.
The
formula
that
calculates
lga
has
not
been
updated
in
a
while
and
there's
a
general
consensus
that
these
formulas
should
be
updated
regularly.
D
We
are
hopeful
that
that
will
lead
to
an
end
to
this
downward
trend
that
we've
seen
in
lga
allocations
from
the
state,
but
to
have
a
conservative
approach
in
our
five-year
financial
outlook.
We
are
going
to
hold
steady
at
the
lowered
amount
of
about
just
over
64
million
dollars
there.
D
As
I
said,
there
was
broad
support
for
a
hold
harmless
component
of
the
tax
bill
that
did
not
make
it
across
the
finish
line
and
if
there
is
a
special
session,
I
think
there
is
a
good
chance
that
this
is
included
in
that
likelihood
of
a
special
session.
I
think
before
we're
making
a
recommendation
on
the
budget
is
low.
So
that's
why
you
see
a
four
million
dollar
drop
in
our
lga.
D
It's
our
hopes
that
it
will
remain
flat,
so
the
state
does
just
a
two-year
budget.
So
the
last
year
that
we
have
information
on
right
now
is
2023.
We
are
hoping
it
remains
flat.
I
know
that
there
is
a
there's,
been
a
lot
of
discussion,
a
lot
of
work
by
our
partners
in
igr
on
revising
the
formula
so
that
we
don't
see
that
continued
decrease
and
maybe
see
a
catch-up
back
to
pre-pandemic
levels.
So
I
think
it
could
be
the
same.
It
could
be
less.
It
could
be
more.
D
I
think
that
there
is
probably
a
higher
likelihood
that
we
do
see
some
revision
and
that
we
don't
see
a
continued
decrease.
So
that's
why
we're
just
choosing
to
hold
it
flat
at
this
low
level
in
the
forecast
got
it
thanks.
G
It's
about
353
million
dollars
in
revenues
and
you'll
see
municipal
parking
takes
in
about
60
or
next
year,
is
slated
to
take
in
about
62
million
dollars
in
revenues
47.2
in
the
stormwater
fund
and
46.5
in
solid
waste
and
recycling
and
97
million
in
the
sanitary
sewers
fund
and
then
91
million
in
the
water
distribution
fund.
G
There
is
a
a
long
list
of
revenue
sources
across
each
one
of
these
funds,
but
you
have
like,
on
and
off
street
parking
for
the
municipal
parking
fund,
as
well
as
towing
and
holding
fees
for
that
storm,
water,
recycling,
sanitary
and
water.
They
a
lot
of
those
revenue
sources,
are
based
on
charges
based
on
our
rate
schedule
and
also
within
that
there
are
there's
a
lot
of
work
for
others,
so
we
do
work
for
the
county,
and
so
those
are
also
built
into
this
revenue
revenue
scheme.
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair
yeah.
I
was
just
curious
about
whether
or
not
sac
charges
are
represented
here.
I
know
that
my
council
generally
collects
those,
but
is
there
a
revenue
share,
or
is
that
100
going
to
my
council?
I.
G
So
in
2020
the
enterprise
funds
attempted
to
hold
their
rates
flat
due
to
uncertainty
due
to
covid
and
as
a
result
of
kovid.
The
storm
sewer
and
water
usage
went
down
by
a
bit
and
those
revenues
paired
with
a
larger
capital
program.
Some
inflationary
growth
in
their
contracts
and
inflationary
amounts
in
electrical
use
impacted
their
rate
plan,
but
we
did
see
stable
revenue,
growth
or
forecast
across
the
storm
water
and
waste
solid
waste
funds
and
you'll
notice.
There's
this
dip
here.
G
That
is
the
parking
fund
and
in
the
near
term
we
are
not
expecting
those
the
combination
between
on
and
off
street
parking
fees
to
get
above
the
pre-pandemic
levels
in
the
near
term.
G
D
So
that
wraps
up
our
discussion
of
other
funds,
I
figured
I'd
pause
and
see
if
there's
any
questions
before
we
sort
of
tie
it
all
together
and
wrap
up
okay
great.
D
So
this
is
a
a
snapshot
of
where
the
general
fund
stands
at
this
point
in
our
budgeting
process,
and
you
can't
quite
see
here,
but
there
is
some
amount
of
revenues
that
we
are
bringing
in
above
expenditures
for
this
look
at
our
current
service
level
budget,
and
so
just
as
a
reminder,
this
doesn't
include
final
decisions
on
a
levy.
It
doesn't
include
final,
any
change
items
or
new
spending
proposal.
D
This
is
just
looking
at
where,
where
are
we
now
and
when
we
compare
this
to
what
our
forecasts
were
last
year
when
we're
looking
at
that
multi-year
view,
we
see
modest
inflationary
growth
of
the
general
fund
and
we
see
expenses
growing.
Basically,
as
expected,
as
I
mentioned
before,
the
portion
of
the
expenses
that
is
growing
slightly
faster
is
our
charges
for
liability,
so
money
that
is
going
into
the
liability,
self-insurance
fund,
that's
offset
by
savings
and
our
medical
and
dental
insurance
charges.
D
Our
revenues
are
coming
in
slightly
under
where
we
projected
to
be
last
year
and
that's
being
driven
largely
by
business
licenses,
staying
pretty
flat
into
2023
and
lga,
reducing
by
4
million,
so
that
overall,
this
picture
puts
a
puts,
a
lot
of
pressure
on
new
spending
in
the
general
fund.
D
But,
like
I
said
this
is
a
snapshot
at
this
point
in
time.
The
next
step
in
the
process
will
be
the
mayor's
recommended
budget.
So
on
august
15th
the
mayor
will
make
his
budget
address.
We
will
publish
a
budget
book
with
lots,
more
information
about
all
all
of
the
city
departments,
as
well
as
new
spending
proposals
from
the
mayor
in
september.
D
The
board
of
estimate
and
taxation
will
make
a
final
vote
on
the
maximum
levy,
and
so
that
will
sort
of
set
the
revenue
picture
for
decision
making
around
the
budget
from
september
through
october,
you'll
be
hearing
deep
dives
from
departments
on
how
they're
spending
their
current
budget
and
any
new
proposals
that
are
included
in
the
mayor's
recommendation
and
then
november
will
start
public
hearings
related
to
the
mayor's
budget,
followed
by
a
markup
from
council
and
then
a
final
vote
on
the
2023
budget.
D
So
this
is
the
end
of
our
presentation
all
happy
to
answer
any
questions,
but
that
is
it
for
us.
A
I'll
just
pause
a
second
see
if
my
colleagues
have
any
questions
about
this
presentation,
I'm
not
seeing
any
right
now,
I'm
sure
thank
you
director
and
your
team
you're,
always
very
reachable
when
we
have
questions
and
need
something
explained
to
us
in
a
different
way.
So
I
think
these
slides
are
helpful
and
they're
representative
and
they're
certainly
sharing
with
the
public,
but
I
think,
as
we
have
individual
questions,
we
might
reach
out
individually
yeah.
That
sounds
great
all
right.
A
A
Additionally,
since
these
items
are
all
related,
we'll
have
one
combined
presentation
from
mayor
frye
and
that
will
cover
the
mayor's
proposed
executive
reorganization
plan,
funding
for
new
positions
and
the
proposed
appointed
positions
of
city
operations.
Officer
and
community
safety,
commissioner,
so
I
will
invite
up
the
mayor.
L
A
A
All
right
I'll
invite
my
colleagues
to
just
take
a
brief
break
and
we'll
anticipate
that
we'll
start
this
in
just
a
couple
of
minutes.
A
All
right
welcome
back.
We
are
going
to
get
started
here.
I
will
invite
mayor
frye
to
give
the
presentation
on
these
items.
Two
three
four
and
five
in
the
government
structure
subcommittee
welcome
mayor.
N
Thank
you,
council.
Vice
president
members
of
the
city
council,
it's
an
honor
to
be
here
with
you
today
to
provide
another
update
on
our
government
structure,
progress,
and
so
what
you
will
see
before
you
hear
is
our
most
recent
update
to
the
government
structure
proposal.
N
This
council
cycle
is
the
first
time
that
we
are
requesting
an
action
to
take
this
conversation
from
the
theoretical,
which
is
where
it's
been
for
several
months
now
to
begin
implementation,
and,
as
all
of
you
know,
last
november
the
voters
approved
a
charter
change,
establishing
a
clear
executive
and
clear
legislative
branch,
and
since
december
the
mayor
has
been
responsible
for
the
day-to-day
operations
of
the
city
department.
N
As
I've
said
before,
the
overriding
goal
here
is,
as
I
just
mentioned,
to
make
sure
that
our
government
is
working
better
for
the
people
that
we
represent.
So,
after
careful
consideration,
recommendations
and
feedback
from
the
charter,
commission,
the
government
structure,
work,
group,
city
staff
and
council
members,
we've
arrived
at
this
organizational
structure,
truly
responsive
to
the
changes.
Minneapolis
residents
asked
for
as
part
of
last
november's
vote
now
to
be
clear:
you're
not
asking
being
asked
right
now
to
approve
the
entirety
of
any
organizational
structure
today.
That
is
not
the
subject
of
this
action.
N
N
Additionally,
you'll
be
voting
on
a
resolution
creating
and
funding
the
coo
a
commissioner
and
the
city
auditor,
so
that's
the
funding
for
those
positions.
Finally,
I'm
going
to
provide
an
update
on
the
work
of
our
government
structure,
implementation
teams,
which
has
been
extensive
over
the
last
several
months.
So
let's
dig
into
some
of
the
specific
actions
for
this
thursday.
N
Second,
is
the
creation
of
the
community
safety
commissioner,
an
allocation
of
contingency
funding
again
for
that
position
and
for
some
administrative
support?
Finally,
is
the
allocation
for
the
city
auditor,
so
this
resolution
provides
funding
for
a
community
safety.
Commissioner,
administrative
support
to
start
as
early
as
mid-july
and
the
city
operations
officer
and
city
auditor.
N
To
start
at
some
point,
possibly
in
september
2022,
all
four
positions
will
be
funded
permanently
in
my
2023
budget
recommendations
and
the
city
coordinator
role
will
be
phased
out,
ultimately
in
2023,
2022-2023
and
so
ultimately
we'll
be
including
these
ongoing
funding
measures
in
my
budget
next
slide.
N
Next,
I
want
to
give
an
update
on
implementation
teams
outlined
on
the
slide
in
front
of
you.
The
legal
and
legislative
team
has
been
working
on
quite
a
bit
of
quite
a
few
things.
First
drafting
updated
code
for
the
the
new
structure.
This
work
is
already
underway,
I'll
note
that
potential
charter
amendments
are
also
near
completion,
but
resources
have
been
dedicated
for
the
most
part
to
the
code
changes
themselves
for
now.
N
Finally,
our
legal
team
recommends
describing
the
changes
in
detail
within
city
code
and
keeping
the
charter
general
to
allow
for
flexibility
and
any
future
changes.
The
operations
team
has
also
been
doing.
Work
they've
been
identifying
new
positions,
along
with
the
budget
resolution
to
fund
them
on
the
cow
agenda,
for
I
believe
june
28th
funding
for
these
new
positions
will
ideally
be
made
via
budget
resolution
using
the
contingency
fund.
N
There's
a
request
for
waivers
from
the
state
at
mmb
for
the
city,
operations
officer
and
community
safety,
commissioner,
which
have
been
improved
and
then
for
the
public
service
team
that
has
completed
review
structure.
They've,
included
discussions
of
some
details
for
division
between
community
safety
and
public
services.
N
An
example
of
that
would
be
decisions
like
whether
traffic
control
should
stay
in
public
services
and
opioid
efforts
should
remain
in
health.
These
are
all
discussions
that
they
are
working
through
at
the
moment,
not
for
again
the
purview
of
what
you
are
deciding
on
today,
but
just
this
is
the
work
that
is
happening,
which
is
quite
extensive
at
the
moment.
They've
also
provided
some
recommendations
for
city
operations
officer
and
transmitted
to
operations,
team
for
review,
and
then
next
is
the
community
safety
team,
they've
reviewed
and
made
recommendations
on
support
team
for
community
safety.
N
N
The
race
equity
team
has
been
working
with
scholars
from
cura
at
the
university
of
minnesota
to
complete
a
race,
equity
and
inclusion
analysis
to
level
set.
Our
expectations,
review
of
the
research
and
findings
from
cura
is
underway,
and
then
the
communications
team
started
some
discussions
on
what
internal
and
external
messaging
is
needed
on
government
structure.
N
We
know
that,
certainly
this
is
going
to
be
critical
for
our
employees
to
to
have
some
stability
here
as
we
move
forward
and
we're
going
to
be
making
every
single
effort
to
make
sure
that
that
work
continues
and
so
I'll
just
close
here
then
with
the
updated
timeline.
So,
as
I
mentioned
earlier
on
thursday,
there
will
be
a
notice
of
intent
for
the
ordinances
that
will
start
to
create
the
new
government
structure.
A
O
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
had
a
question
on
the
slide
with
the
three
positions
I
noticed
for
the
city
operations
officer.
It
mentions
that
funding
is
specifically
included
for
an
executive
search
process,
but
that's
not
mentioned
for
the
community
safety.
Commissioner,
I'm
wondering
what
your
plans
are
for
a
search
process
or
how
you
plan
to
fill
that
position.
Given
the
prominence
of
this
role.
N
Thank
you,
councilmember
johnson,
it's
a
it's
a
good
and
fair
question.
We
have
already
been
doing
quite
a
bit
of
search
underway
with
local
and
national
leaders,
local
and
national
organizations
and
I've
been
personally
encouraged
by
the
interests
that
we've
seen.
I've
personally
reached
out
to
a
number
of
these
national
organizations
and
local
organizations,
leaders
from
enforcement
to
civilian
from
cop
21,
to
noble
to
either
prosecutorial
or
attorney
based
in
legal
arms.
N
We've
made
sure
to
do
a
number
of
outreach
at
this
point.
At
this
point
I
I
don't
believe
that
we
need
another
search
for
this
position
at
this
time.
Now
importantly,
if
our
ability
to
recruit
a
transformational
leader
for
whatever
reason
stalls
I'd,
be
happy
to
revisit
that
conversation,
but
as
of
right
now,
things
are
moving
forward
and
there
is
some
interest
from
very
high
caliber
candidates.
O
N
From
that
chair,
paul,
masano,
council
member
johnson,
certainly
the
search
for
the
chief
position
also
allows
four
individuals
that
are
applying
for
that
position
to
also
be
of
potential
interest
for
the
head
of
office
of
community
safety.
Now
importantly,
as
I've
said
before
and
I'll
say
again,
I
do
not
believe
that
the
head
of
the
office
of
community
safety
or
the
commissioner
needs
to
be
a
sworn
position.
N
So,
while
the
search
certainly
leverages
the
interest,
it
isn't
necessarily
conclusive
for
the
outcomes.
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you,
mr
mayor
yeah,
just
for
context.
We
have
been
briefed
on
this
just
over
the
last
week.
This
is
a
bit
of
a
pivot
for
our
implement
implementation
path
to
be
more
iterative.
J
I
just
want
to
share
that
for
the
public
for
context,
but
I
need
to
be
honest
that
my
first
impression
about
this
was
I
was
a
hard
no
because
of
all
the
unanswered
questions
associated
with
pursuing
code
changes
and
as
it
relates
to
the
complexity
of
charter
changes,
but
I've,
since
my
briefing
been
able
to
have
really
constructive
conversations
with
both
the
mayor,
his
staff
council
leadership,
and
I
am
feeling
that
there's
some
really
promising
actions
that
we
can
take
around
the
legislative
support
piece
that
was
one
of
the
biggest
missing
pieces
that
I
saw
in
this
approach.
J
I
I
feel
that
there
are
some
unanswered
questions
about
hiring
pretty
high
level
executives
in
the
enterprise
and
having
not
a
lot
of
clarity,
yet
for
how
that
structure
is
going
to
play
out
and
us
as
a
legislative
body,
not
necessarily
having
the
resources
that
we
need
and
I've
gotten
some
really
strong
assurances
from
the
mayor
and
our
conversations
around
that
legislative
support.
And
so
I'm
looking
forward
to
supporting
this
structure
as
we
get
to
our
formal
vote
on
thursday
and
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
have
some
follow
through
on
those
conversations.
J
But
for
today
I
think
I'm
gonna
abstain
until
I
see
what
what
what
what
those
firm
commitments
look
like,
but
I'm
really
encouraged
by
the
direction
that
we're
taking.
So
thank
you.
N
Just
briefly,
I
know
it
wasn't
a
question
but
council
member
payne,
thank
you
and
yes,
you've
made
very
clear
the
desire
to
ensure
that
a
the
legislative
team
from
within
the
council
has
support
and
has
funding,
and
I
hear
you
entirely.
I
Thank
you,
chairman
palmisano.
I
just
have
three
questions:
the
first
being
around
how
community
input
has
shaped
this
proposal
just
for
a
comparison,
the
hennepin
ave
reconstruction
project
hosted
several
open
houses.
We
had
our
own
staff,
attend
dozens
and
dozens
of
neighborhood
association
meetings
to
the
point
that
the
project
received.
You
know
more
than
ten
thousand
comments
on
the
design,
also
for
our
transit
action
plan.
Public
works
created
a
eight-page
document
outlining
a
comprehensive
multi-phase
community
engagement
plan
that
also
included
a
code
of
ethics.
I
That
said,
can
you
share
what
kinds
of
public
engagement
you
did
to
inform
this
entire
government
restructure
reorganization
plan?
Outside
of
I
know
you
have
a
closed
work
group
that
you
had
as
well
as
the
staff
led
implementation
teams
that
you
pulled
together.
N
There
are
some
fairly
specific
questions
that
need
to
be
answered
internally
about
how
we
conduct
our
day-to-day
operations,
and
so
that
was
laid
out
in
long
form
with
a
report
that
was
made
very
public,
which
we've
gotten
positive
feedback
on,
and
so
now
we
are
moving
forward
with
the
positions
themselves
and,
specifically
again,
this
is
for
approval
of
the
commissioner
for
the
office
of
community
safety.
N
I
Oh
just
to
clarify,
I
have
two
more
questions
to
chair
famisano,
so
you,
you
noted
the
first
part.
The
public
made
a
mandate
for
this
with
the
election,
which
I
think
you
stated
earlier
around
question
one
that
was
implemented.
This
is
follow-up
and
just
follow
up
on.
You
said
positive
feedback
to
the
work
group
findings.
Another
another
part
that
was
somewhat
closed
door.
Can
you
share
outside
of
that?
N
Council
member
for
today
we're
talking
about
the
approval
for
the
of
positions
as
ordinances
and
code
changes
are
made.
Of
course,
as
you
know,
there
are
baked
in
requirements
for
public
engagement
and
hearings,
which
will
inevitably
take
place.
That
is
part
of
the
process,
that's
built
into
the
process,
and
it's
a
process
that
I'm
committed
to,
but
to
be
clear,
the
the
notion
that
the
voters
approved
the
charter
amendment
and
the
city
has
no
further
action
after
that.
That
would
be
laughable.
I
But
it
was
implemented.
Second
question:
nine
months
ago
you
noted
this
too.
We
have
over
140
000
people
come
out
to
vote
on
the
future
of
public
safety.
Of
course,
there
were
tons
of
divided
opinions
on
that,
but
it
was
very
clear.
Many
of
our
constituents
were
interested
in
coming
together
to
shape
a
path
forward.
Can
you
also
share
what
other
public
engagements
you
did
to
inform
your
proposal?
I
know
we're
talking
about
three
positions,
but
the
fact
that
we're
considering
also
an
entire
reorganization
structure
before
these
positions.
I
I
will
also
note
for
the
record:
I
have
opportunity
to
go
to
the
one
community
engagement
session.
I
know
that
many
of
my
colleagues
did
that
that
public
safety
work
group
held.
So
that's
why
I'm
asking
for
a
broader
synopsis
of
what
outside
of
the
work
group
in
that
one
community
session
that
they
held
with
the
public
that
was
also
not
poorly,
it
was
very
poorly
attended.
We
had
half
of
the
people
there
that
were
staff.
I
So
well
last
question
then,
since
that
one
wasn't
answered,
can
you
confirm
how
will
it
be
possible
to
have
a
comprehensive
public
safety
office
that
provides
equitable
services
if
mpd
is
not
subjected
to
the
same
policies
and
levels
of
accountability
as
other
public
safety
departments
which
this
legislative
body
will
have
oversight
on
for
the
public
record
and
with
clarity
I
know
this
is
confusing,
especially
since
we'll
have
legislative
authority
over
all
of
the
departments
in
the
office
of
community
safety,
with
the
exception
of
mpd.
N
A
big
part
of
standardization
is
bringing
the
mpd
in
line
with
the
rest
of
the
enterprise
one
and
two
making
sure
that
they
have
a
comprehensive
approach
where
they're
not
on
an
island
by
themselves.
Council
member
wamsley.
This
is
a
position
that
I
know
that
you
long
supported
through
an
entire
campaign.
It's
a
position
that
I've
long
supported
as
well.
If
you've
changed
your
position,
that's
certainly
a
prerogative.
My
position
hasn't
changed.
I
I
I
What
we
pass
will
not
have
any
application
to
mpd,
so
there
is
going
to
be
a
disconnect.
How
do
you
reconcile
that.
I
From
both
and
you're
putting
mpd
in
a
department
where
you
only
have
oversight
over
we're
going
to
be
able
to
make
legislative
changes
for
the
rest
of
the
departments,
with
the
exception
of
mpd,
so
that's
why
I'm
asking
before
we
vote
on
taking
money
to
out
to
create
a
position?
How
will
we
reconcile
that
lack
of
standardization?
N
Well,
there
is
standardization
of
policies.
Every
department
is
different
to
a
certain
extent
and
in
this
case
we've
taken
great
efforts
to
bring
forward
reforms
one,
but
then
two
to
do
so
transparently.
We
just
issued
a
disciplinary
matrix
very
publicly,
with
a
disciplinary
reset
very
publicly.
We
just
issued
just
yesterday
at
a
council
meeting
a
whole
revamp
to
our
field,
training
officer
policy
as
well.
Council
members
could
ask
questions
those
questions
could
get
answered
by
mpd.
N
I
And
the
three
I
just
want
to
clarify
again:
you're,
absolutely
right:
the
voters
affirmed
question
two:
you
have
authority
over
mpd,
I'm
saying
how
do
we
reconcile
those
challenges
if
we
pass,
for
instance,
a
policy
in
the
next
future?
You
know
council
meeting
with
this
establishment
of
the
department
that
policy
on
the
legislative
side
will
only
apply
for
all
of
the
departments
without
mpd.
N
I
I
I
A
M
Madam
vice
president,
it's
it's
a
little
bit
difficult
to
answer
it
off
the
cuff,
but
you
know
the
council
does
have
some
limited
legislative
authority
over
the
police
department.
So,
for
example,
when
there
are
ordinances
that
are
passed
requiring
anti-discrimination
civil
rights
and
those
can
impact
the
police
department,
so
on
broad
levels
there
remains
legislative
impact.
M
M
I
M
Again
through
the
chair,
there
may
be
some
policies
that
may
be
applicable.
It
depends,
and
there
are
policies
that
are
passed
by
the
council,
that
sometimes
the
mayor
agrees
with
and
apply
to
the
particular
police
department.
I've
seen
that
happen
in
the
past,
where
there
may
have
been
issues
whether
the
council
had
authority
to
implement
a
policy,
but
the
mayor
agreed
with
the
policy
that
was
implemented,
and
so
it
took
it
took
effect.
I
M
M
Yes,
and
so
that
was
a
broader
ordinance
that
covered
all
city
departments,
it
was
questionable
whether
the
council
had
authority
to
do
that
for
the
police
department.
However,
the
mayor
at
the
time
acceded
to
that
and
the
police
have
followed
that
policy.
M
M
The
mayor
has
has
always
had
the
executive
authority
over
mpd
and
and
currently
has
executive
authority
all
over
all
of
the
other
chapter,
seven
departments
in
the
charter,
so
that
kind
of
authority
is
not
that
dissimilar.
It's.
It's
called
out
more
clearly
in
the
ordinance
governing
the
police
department,
but
that
similar
authority
exists
for
all
departments
that
are
under
the
mayor's
control.
O
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
just
wanted
to
comment
on
these
changes
coming
forward
today
and
just
say
that
I
really
appreciate
all
the
work
that
went
into
this.
I
know
it
was
a
lot
and
staff
and
community
members
involved.
The
mayor's
office
worked
very
quickly
to
try
to
respond
to
the
charter.
Amendment
number
one
passing
and
make
sure
that
it
could
be
effectively
implemented
and
that
there
was
a
responsive
administrative
structure
in
order
to
best
run
this
organization.
This
enterprise-
and
I
think,
that's
reflected
overall
in
the
changes
today.
O
I
know
I'm
sure
all
of
us
can
point
at
one
thing
here
there
and
say:
oh
maybe
this
position
over
here
would
be
better.
This
one
over
here
would
be
better
and
there's
going
to
be
room
for
conversation
or
disagreements
on
that,
but
I
think
overall,
I'm
pleasantly
surprised
and
happy
with
the
outcome
of
this
and
just
want
to
recognize
the
work
that
went
into
it
and
also
explicitly
state
on
the
commissioner
role.
How
important
I
think
that
is,
and
what
value
that
brings.
O
That
was
one
of
the
positives
that
I
saw
in
charter
amendment
number
two,
which
voters
did
not
approve,
but
is
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
when
you
ask
people
why
they
didn't
support
it.
They
never
said
because
of
the
commissioner
at
least
the
people
that
I
spoke
with
in
the
community
didn't
say
that,
and
I
think
they're
when
I
was
explaining
to
them
at
least
the
intention
behind
that.
I
think
there
was
a
lot
of
receptivity
to
that.
O
I
can
also
do
the
integration
with
the
other
functions
as
well,
and
so
I'm
particularly
pleased
to
see
that
in
this-
and
I
do
think
they're-
certainly
we're
going
to
have
to
have
a
pretty
exceptional
candidate
for
that
role,
because
it's
a
big
task,
but
also
a
huge
opportunity
as
well,
for
somebody
to
roll
up
their
sleeves
and
bring
a
lot
of
experience
and
expertise
to
really
the
challenge
of
probably
their
careers
as
well,
and
so
overall,
really
think.
This
is
great
and
really
appreciate
it
and
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
was
said.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember,
there's
a
couple
more
people
in
queue,
council,
member
wansley
and
then
council
member
chavez,
and
then
I
plan
to
move
a
vote
on
three
four
and
five
together.
Unless
there's
objections
from
my
colleagues
council
member
wansley.
Q
Q
I
will
be
voting
to
send
these
specific
ones
to
the
council
today,
but
do
expect
and
been
having
conversations
with
the
mayor's
office
that
opi
stays
intact
in
this
process,
that
our
legislative
structure
is
adequately
staffed
and
that
my
office
continues
to
receive
these
updates
that
have
been
guaranteed
through
this
process.
So
I
can
be
fully
comfortable
by
thursday.
Q
I
do
want
to
say,
though,
that
I
do
continue
to
think
that
the
pathway
forward
to
this
is
through
a
charter
change
rather
than
rather
than
an
ordinance,
simply
because
I
expect
that
all
13
council
members
in
the
mayor's
office
work
together
as
we
move
forward
through
this
new
government
structure,
that
will
change
the
lives
of
many
people,
so
I'm
supportive
of
sending
this
to
full
council,
but
do
want
to
say
that
I
want
all
of
us
to
work
together
on
this
structure.
I
You
chair
promising
similar
to
councilmember
johnson.
Just
have
some
comments
more
so
for
my
constituents.
For
this
you
know
public
record.
I
want
to
recognize
just
our
current
political
landscape.
I
know
ordinary
people
are
fearful
about
the
state
of
our
democracy,
not
only
as
a
result
of
the
events
that's
happening
nationally
around
scotus,
but
right
here
locally
and
we're
seeing
our
residents
show
up
with
mass
action
around
protecting
reproductive
rights
every
single
day.
I
I
Over
the
last
few
weeks,
myself,
I've
attended
community
meetings
across
my
own
ward,
I
hosted
a
university
area,
public
safety
meeting
that
held
over
100
people
there
and
no
matter
the
frustrations
and
disagreements
people
had
they
value
having
someone
from
the
city
come
and
listen
to
them
and
discuss
action.
Steps
from
today's
presentation.
I
think
it's
clear
that
they're
still
not
a
formalized
plan,
they're
still
on
clear
lines
of
authority.
The
proposal
still
doesn't
possess.
I
A
robust
level
of
data
and
public
input
and
changes
to
our
government
is
is
going
to
be
very
significant.
I
think
all
of
us
have
talked
about
this
and
they
will
outlast
every
single
one
of
us
and
we're
doing
this
even
not
two
weeks
out
from
again
appointing
leaders
where
again
we're
still
addressing
dynamics
of
racism
in
the
city.
So
you
know
a
piecemeal
strategy.
I
think
something
that
councilmember
chavez
just
raised
with
no
long-term
vision
is
setting
us
up
for
failure.
Question
one
has
been
implemented
for
nearly
seven
months.
I
The
government
structure
should
be
our
opportunity
to
show
that
the
city
is
serious
about
rebuilding
a
better
minneapolis
and
wants
to
do
that
in
partnership
with
the
public,
so
that
I
would
like
for
us
to
delay
this
a
cycle
for
you
all
the
mayor's
office
to
come
back
with
a
robust
engagement
process
of
how
we
can
actually
bring
the
public
into
this,
because
I
don't
think
they
have
been
we're
going
by
november
november
actions.
Question
one
was
implemented.
R
Thank
you
vice
president
palmisano.
I
just
want
to
speak
to
the
commissioner
of
community
safety
specifically
because
you
know
my
team
did
some
work
with
some
community
conversations
around
the
chief
search
and
I
just
wanna
for
the
record.
I
wanna
put
it
out
there
that
this
position
came
up
a
lot
in
those
community
conversations
from
community
members
the
opportunity
for
the
city
to
have
someone
leading
our
police
department,
our
fire,
our
emergency
response.
That
is
not
a
sworn
in
police
officer.
R
It
came
up
at
every
single
community
conversation,
so
I
think
it's
important
that
you
know
we
have
community
input,
of
course,
but
I
mean
I've
heard
this
over
and
over
and
over
again
from
the
the
online
versions
of
the
forms,
people
in
person,
people
reaching
out
at
the
grocery
store,
even
in
my
front
yard.
So
like
I,
this
is
something
that
I've
heard
the
people
of
minneapolis
say,
I'm
so
happy
that
we
heard
them
loud
and
clear
and
we're
making
this
an
option
for
our
new
government
structure.
R
There
are
so
many
ways
we
could
have
went
with
this,
and
this
is
one
of
the
ways
that
I'm
super
proud
that
we're
thinking
about
doing
this,
and-
and
I
I
have
some
questions-
you
know
about
this
process,
especially
with
health,
I
feel
like
health-
can
be
lost
in
this.
R
The
way
that
the
government
structure
is
and
health
is
a
big
deal
to
our
city,
especially
we're
living
in
times
of
global
pandemic,
and
so
my
fear
is
that
some
departments
can
get
lost,
but
I'm
working
with
the
mayor's
office
and
working
with
my
colleagues
on
the
council
to
figure
out
what
that
looks
like,
but
this
this
commissioner
of
community
safety,
I
mean,
I
think,
we're
getting
it
right
with
this.
I
think
we're
really
doing
what
the
people
of
minneapolis
are
asking
for
here.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
further
questions
from
my
colleagues,
I'm
not
seeing
anybody
in
queue
or
flags
up
so
first,
I'm
going
to
ask
the
clerk
to
please
receive
and
file
number
two:
the
mayor's
proposed
executive
reorganization
plan
and
I'm
going
to
put
forward
a
motion
for
items
three,
four
and
five,
and
so
that
would
be
to
pass
the
resolution
to
add
resources
for
these
following
positions
for
the
rest
of
this
year.
I'm
going
to
sorry
there's
a
number
of
things
happening
here.
A
I'm
going
going
to
vote
to
establish
the
appointed
position
of
city
operations
officer
and
community
safety,
commissioner,
so
I
will
put
forward
that
motion.
Do
my
colleagues
have
any
further
comments?
First,
council,
member
payne,
you
just
removed
yourself
so
councilmember
chavez.
No
all
right,
then
I'll.
Ask
the
clerk
to
then
call
the
roll
on
that
motion.
L
I
was
I
was.
I
was
a
little
late
on
the
on
pulling
that
just
wanted
to
echo
some
of
the
comments
that
I
heard
from
some
of
my
colleagues
regarding
some
being
encouraged
by
the
direction
that
we're,
but
that
we're
headed
in
we've
had
a
lot
of
conversations
with
the
mayor's
office,
and
I
am
encouraged
by
the
direction
that
we're
headed
in.
But
I
want
to
echo
councilmember
payne
and
saying
that
you
know
I
think,
there's
a
few
assurances
with
regards
to.
L
You
know
ensuring
that
the
council
still
has
some
sort
of
ability
to
do
its
work,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we've
got.
You
know
some
of
those
assurances
a
little
bit
firmer
than
maybe
a
good
faith
handshake
and
before
we're
moving
forward,
but
otherwise,
and
so
I'll
be
abstaining
alongside
councilmember
payne.
Today,
I
do
look
forward
to
getting
myself
to
a
yes
by
thursday,
as
I
do
feel
like
a
lot
of
those
conversations
have
been
good.
They've
been
healthy
and
happening
in
good
faith.
L
So
I
just
wanted
to
note
that,
for
the
record
and
and
for
the
public
just
to
just
to
say,
you
know,
while
while
this
is
the
will
of
the
people,
and
I'm
excited
to
sort
of
move
us
in
this
direction,
where
we
can
execute
this
government
structure,
I
do
want
to
make
sure
that
council
members
still
feel
can
be
confident
that
they
can
serve
their
constituents.
L
And-
and
so
that's
that's
been
the
thing
that
I'm
most
concerned
about,
so
wanted
to
note
that,
for
the
record
before
we
called
the
role.
Thank
you.
A
S
Council,
member
paul
masano,
I
asked
you
briefly
just
now
but
wanted
to
clarify.
I
I
know
there's.
I
know
we're
working
actually
in
really
good
partnership
right
now,
with
the
mayor's
office
on
getting
some
of
the
legislative
pieces
figured
out,
and
I
agree
it
all
of
it
seems
incredibly
promising
and
and
the
most
forward
momentum.
S
I
think
we've
seen
on
on
government
structure
and
hopefully
the
start
to
a
lot
more
strong
partnership
between
the
legislative
and
executive
branches,
and
so
I
wonder,
if
it's
possible
for
us
to
forward
these
items
to
council
without
recommendation,
knowing
that
by
thursday
we
are
planning
on
having
the
the
legislative
department
piece
codified
in
a
more
serious
way,
and
I
understand
your
your
point
about
not
wanting
to
take
up
a
bunch
of
items
separately,
and
you
know
I
I
would
be
it
would
make
sense
to
me
even
on
thursday,
for
us
to
vote
on.
S
A
I
appreciate
your
comments.
Council
member.
I
think
that
the
motion
before
us
is
to
approve,
so
unless
there
is
a
substitute
motion
that
you
want
to
put
forward
to
to
change
that
which
you're
welcome
to
do,
if
not
we're
going
to
we're
still
on
this
motion,
which
would
be
to
approve
these
things
and
send
them
to
council.
A
L
Just
for
clarity-
and
maybe
this
is
a
usually
I
feel
like-
I
have
a
pretty
decent
handle
on
the
rules,
but
why?
Why
wouldn't
it
be
appropriate
for
councilman
richard
ty
to
make
a
substitute
motion
here.
T
C
L
C
B
A
Thank
you
that
motion
passes
again.
It
looks
like
we
will
have
some
additional
items
ready
to
codify
in
some
way
by
the
full
council
meeting.
So
now
we
are
going
to
transition
out
of
this
government
structure
subcommittee
and
back
to
the
regular
committee
of
the
whole,
which
again
is
all
of
us
and
move
on
to
our
next
topic,
which
is
a
walk-on
topic
about
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility.
We
have
an
update
from
our
last
committee
of
the
whole
presentation
and
I
will
call
on
council
member
chavez
to
give
that
update.
Thank.
Q
You
tripp
amazon,
council
members,
here's
an
update
to
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility
expansion.
You
should
have
in
front
of
you
an
rca,
a
fiscal
note
area
and
supporting
documents
for
this
walk-on
item
in
the
agenda.
The
east
phillips
neighborhood
institute
award
nine
community
meters
met
yesterday
from
five
to
seven
pm
with
mayor
frye
and
public
works
and
department
leadership
and
discussed
further
initiatives.
There'll
be
some
edits
to
this.
Q
Possibly
I
think
on
thursday,
at
full
council
discussing
some
communication
with
mpca
about
a
third
party
vendor
and
implementations,
and
discussions
further
with
our
city,
lawyers
and
etmi's
legal
team
as
well,
so
other
editions
we'll
be
discussing
investments
in
public
health,
a
traffic
study,
prioritization
and
fully
electrifying
our
fleet
at
the
site,
but
there
will
be
something
to
vote
on
this
thursday
at
full
council.
So
thank
you.
If
there's
any
questions.
A
Yeah
I
open
up
the
floor
to
any
questions
about
this
update.
I
know
we
have
director
anderson
kelleher
in
the
room
as
well
as
others
that
have
been
part
of
these
discussions
in
detailed
ways.
I'm
not
seeing
any
right
now.
So
thank
you
for
that
update
and
that's
all
we
will
be
doing
on
that
item.
The
next
item
we
have
is
the
other
walk-on
item
on
the
housing
stabilization
work
group.
A
U
U
U
U
But
everything
I
just
talked
about
buying
old
properties
taken
on
properties
that
had
a
lot
of
police
calls
under
the
previous
owner.
All
of
those
will
contribute
when
it
comes
to
tier
rating.
U
My
staff
working
along
with
council
council
president
and
vice
president
staff,
as
well
with
the
mayor's
office,
have
identified
couple
partners.
We
need
at
least
to
be
able
to
consider
for
the
work
group
because
of
their
experience
and
value
urge
my
colleagues
to
support
this
amendment.
There's
any
question.
A
Thank
you
for
those
in
the
audience
there
are
copies
of
the
motion
by
council
member
osman
on
the
dais
there.
All
of
my
colleagues
have
this
recommended
workgroup
structure,
change
or
proposal
before
you
again.
This
is
to
change
the
I
guess
give
make
a
slight
change
to
our
rent,
stabilization
work
group
and
we
have
a
number
of
members
in
queue.
Council.
President
jenkins,.
C
C
Work
on
this
changed
to
this
amendment
to
the
resolution
which,
as
we
were
talking
to
various
stakeholders
who
who
want
to
be
a
part
of
this
process.
C
We
realized
that,
and
I
should
say,
staff
realize
that
some
of
the
two
tier
or
tier
two
properties
actually
have
individuals
that
we
really
want
to
be
a
part
of
this
conversation.
C
C
P
As
many
of
you
recall,
I
argued
very
passionately
against
excluding
tier
two
properties
when
we
brought
this
forward
before.
So.
Let
me
just
add
a
bit
of
context.
Tier
two
property
owners
can
be
people
who
have
had
didn't
pay
a
rental
license
fee
or
paid
a
rental
license
fee
a
month
late,
and
then
they
get
knocked
into
a
tier
two
property,
and
then
it
doesn't
get
changed
until
it's
reviewed
again,
and
that
could
take
time.
P
Sometimes
it
could
take
up
to
six
months,
and
so
I
wouldn't
say
that
tier
two
property
owners
are
problem:
property
owners
universally.
When
you
have
property
owners
who
have
challenged
properties,
they
could
miss
an
inspection.
They
could
not
be
there
when
someone
is
supposed
to
be
there
to
do
some
sort
of
inspection
and
that
knocks
them
into
tier
two.
If
we
rule
out
tier
two
properties,
as
I've
said
before
many
non-profit
cdc's
would
be
ruled
out
of
participating
in
this
process.
P
So
basically,
what
I
said
before
has
now
come
true,
and
you
have
this
long
list
of
people
who
want
to
participate
and
half
of
them
are
ruled
out,
because
they
have
one
tier
two
property.
It
makes
no
sense
tier
three,
that's
a
different
story.
Tier
two
is
like
a
warning
once
you
get
to
tier
three,
those
are
people
who
have
been
reminded
over
and
over
again
to
do
something
that
they
have
not
done
appropriately.
P
So
I
am
really
grateful
of
the
work
of
the
council
president
and
vice
president
and
council
member
osman,
who
have
taken
this
super
seriously
as
they
work
towards
getting
a
very
active
and
diverse
group
of
people
to
be
on
this
rent
control
work
group.
I
think
you're
gonna
have
to
take
tier
two
property
owners
or
you
have
not
very
many
choices
left.
Thank
you.
L
Thank
you.
I
don't
have
a
ton
to
add.
I
do
want
to
say
that
the
original
spirit
of
the
of
the
motion
that
we're
now
modifying
is
was
to
make
sure
that
we
didn't
have
exploitative
actors,
bad
actors
involved
in
this
process,
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
that
when
I'm
looking
at
this
change,
the
change
is
pretty
narrow
in
scope
and,
I
think,
a
very
informed
change
led
by
councilmember
osman.
So
I
both
want
to
commend.
L
I
believe
it
was
council
member
wansley
for
initiating
this
this
this
direction,
to
make
sure
that
we've
got
good
people
on
the
board.
But
I
also-
and
I-
and
I
also
want
to
thank
councilmember
osman
for
this
modification.
L
You
know
in
some
cases
it's
not
just
that
these
tier
two
properties,
you
know,
are
for
relatively
small
reasons.
In
some
cases,
when
you
do
have
a
landlord
that
you
don't
want
we're
asking
some
of
these
some
of
our
nonprofit
developers
to
take
on
tier
two
properties
and
that
tiering
stays
with
the
property.
L
It
doesn't
change
at
the
start
of
new
ownership,
and
so
you
might
have
somebody
who's
gonna
be
getting
that
that
who
just
bought
a
property
and
they're
gonna
be
getting
those
into
tier
one
in
in
in
sort
of
no
time
so,
and
we
don't
wanna
discourage
we
don't
wanna
discourage
those
nonprofit
developers
or
or
or
anyone
from
taking
on
tier
two
properties
that
they
intend
to
improve
so
supportive
of
the
change,
but
also
wanted
to
note
that
I
was
supportive
of
the
of
the
original
intent,
which
was
to
make
sure
that
we
did
not
have
bad
actors
influencing
policies
in
our
city.
L
I
Chair
promissamo,
I
want
to
see
if
one
of
our
staffers
from
cpap
was
here
to
just
answer
any
questions.
I
know
that
we
received
a
email
from
joey
dobson
on
june,
8th,
just
an
update
provided
to
us,
considering
the
deadline
for
the
work
group
was
june,
6
and
noted
that
we
received
46
applications.
I
see
here
that
at
that
time
we
were
still
compiling
data
on.
You
know
whether
or
not
licenses
for
property
owners.
If
they
had
any
two
tier,
two
or
three
properties
was.
A
K
Thank
you
good
afternoon,
thank
you,
chairman
palmisano,
and
to
council
member
wansley,
so
I
can
give
a
little
bit
of
an
overview
of
the
applications
that
we
received.
So
as
your
as
you
stated,
the
deadline
for
applications
for
the
council
and
mayoral
appointed
appointments.
There
are
12
of
them
in
total
seats
that
we're
looking
to
fill
here,
six
for
renters
three
for
property
owners
and
three
for
developers.
K
I
will
note
some
entities
identify
as
both
a
property
owner
and
a
developer,
so
there
is
a
little
bit
of
crossover
with
some
of
those
applications,
but
just
to
give
an
overview.
Yes,
there
were
46
applications
for
those
for
all
of
those
12
seats
that
we
received.
21
of
the
46
were
rents,
renters
for
those
six
renter
seats,
18
or
the
remaining
25
were
for
the
property
owner
and
developer
seats.
K
So
we
received
20,
total
25
for
property
owners
and
developers
taken
together
as
one
category
based
on
analysis
that
running
services
provided
for
the
process.
There
were
a
total
of
seven
of
those
25
applications
were
individuals
who
were
associated
with
an
entity
that
had
at
least
one
tier
two
property.
So
there
were
seven
applications
representing
six
entities.
We,
we
did
receive
two
applicants
for
the
same
that
are
associated
or
work
with
the
same
entity.
K
So
out
of
the
25,
seven
of
the
applications
were
identified
as
having
or
being
associated
with
at
least
one
tier
two
property.
K
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
a
question
for
for
staff,
but
to
the
extent
that
I
can
answer
my
understanding
is
that
of
the
amendment
would
be
that
it
would
be
to
potentially
make
some
of
the
applications
eligible
again,
who
wouldn't
be
under
the
previous
draft,
but
that
that's
I'm
not
sure,
that's
a
question.
A
Will
actually
defer
to
the
author,
so
council
member
osman,
is,
is
the
intention
with
this
to
make
some
of
the
other
applications
that
were
received
by
this
deadline
eligible
and
open
to
some
of
these
tier
two
applicants?
I
think
that's
the
case,
but
I
wanted
to
confirm
with
you.
Okay
thank.
I
K
Chair
promisano
and
to
council
member
wansley,
I
would
want
to
defer
any
questions
about
public
data
to
perhaps
the
clerk's
office,
but
it
is
my
understanding
that
at
least
some
of
that
information
is
is
public
data.
But
I
would
defer
to
the
clerk's
office
for
that
information,
but
all
of
I
have
provided-
or
our
team
has
provided
all
of
the
council
offices
and
the
mayor's
office
with
the
details
of
the
of
the
applications
that
we
received.
A
Clerk
carl,
I
believe
all
the
applicants
names
are
public,
although
the
information
on
that
application
is
not
entirely
public.
Is
that
correct.
T
Madam
vice
president
you're
correct,
the
application
form
identifies
on
its
face.
What
data
is
public
and
what
data
is
not
public
decision
makers
because
of
a
business
need
to
know
are
given
the
full
application
when
we
make
those
applications
available
to
the
public.
The
clerk's
office
works
with
the
departments
that
submit
to
redact
and
make
public
versions
of
the
application
form
that
have
the
private
or
not
public,
data
removed.
S
Miss
dobson,
if
you
could
just
stick
around
for
another
second,
I
I
just
want
to
clarify
that.
I'm
understanding
what
you
shared
correctly
of
the
of
the
three
seats
that
go
to
property
owners
and
developers.
K
Right
thanks
for
that
question,
chair
palmisano
and
to
council
member
chug
thai.
So
again,
there
are
12
seats
that
are
council
and
mayoral
appointees.
Six
are
for
renters
and
there's
some
more
specific
categories.
There
three
are
for
property
owners,
one
of
whom
has
one
rental
license
and
one
of
whom
is
a
participant
of
the
the
city's
4d,
affordable
housing
program
and
then
there's
so
there's
three
for
property
owners
and
then
an
additional
three
for
property
developers,
and
I
just
noted
that
there
are
some
entities
that
are
both
developers
and
property
owners.
K
So
it
would
be
up
to
the
council
and
mayor
to
sort
of
decide
which
seats
they
might
want
to
fill
with
which
applicants,
and
so
we
received
a
total
of
25
applications
for
those
two
category.
For
those
12.
Excuse
me
for
those
six
seats
together,
great.
S
So
25
applicants
for
six
seats
and
then
seven
of
those
25
applicants
were
you
know
more
or
less
disqualified
because
of
the
tier
two,
because
they
they
have
a
tier
two
property.
You
have
the
tier
two
status.
Thank
you.
K
Yes,
chair
promisano
and
council
member
chug
thai,
we
identified
seven
of
the
applications
as
having
tier
two
properties,
or
at
least
one
tier
two
property.
S
That's
great
so
then
we
but
we
still
have
18
other
applicants
who
also
all
really
want
to
participate
and
have
their
their
their
voices
as
a
a
part
of
shaping
the
conversation,
and
we
still
only
have
six
seats
between
to
fill
with
those
18
applicants.
I'm
I
guess
I'm
like,
I
think,
that's
the
end
of
my
questions
for
you
and
then
I
will
direct
the
question,
perhaps
to
the
authors
or
maybe
to
you
know
anyone
else
that
that
cares
to
jump
in
here,
but
I'm
just
trying
to
understand.
S
Then
I
know
when
we
first
codified
this.
This
work
group
and
you
know
all
of
the
different
all
of
the
different
requirements
of
who
was
going
to
participate
and
and
what
made
a
person
eligible
or
ineligible
it
was.
I
mean
it
was
one
of
our
longest
council
meetings
and
we
went
back
and
forth
many
many
many
times
on
what
we
wanted
to
see
in
that
work
group,
and
so
you
know
now
we're
here
at
the
end
of
june.
The
deadline
for
applying
has
closed
we're
getting
ready
to.
S
Actually,
you
know
move
forward
with
with
the
formation
of
of
the
actual
work
group
and,
like
so
near
the
end
of
that
process,
for
us
to
make
a
change
when
there
are
18
perfectly
eligible
people
for
six
seats.
It
just
I'm
confused
by
why
we're
doing
that.
A
L
Answer
that
defer
to
councilmember
osmond
if
he
wants
to
oh,
I
I'm
I
feel
like
through
some
of
the
briefings.
I've
gotten
I've
gotten,
maybe
privy
to
information
that
I'm
not
sure
if
I
can
stay
at
the
dice.
So
I'm
going
to
be
careful
about
how
I
speak
on
this,
but
my
understanding
is
that
some
of
the
people
who
are
currently
sort
of
ineligible
would
be
preferable
and
maybe
more
knowledgeable
about
the
needs
of
renters
than
some
of
the
others
who
are
who
are
technically
eligible.
L
So,
for
example,
you
know
there's
a
a
developer,
a
non-profit
developer
in
my
ward,
they
have
been
incredibly
instrumental
in
how
and
and
helping
us
deal
with
everything
from
like
the
con
portfolio
to
you
know
other
other
properties
that
have
been
issues.
They've
been
really
great
about
tenant
protections
and
have
even
been
advocates
for
tenant
protections.
L
L
Under
these
current,
under
the
current
guidelines
and
the
and
and
I
think
that
they
also
are
the
only
applicant
to
to
have-
or
one
of
the
only
applicants
have
a
person
of
color
and
a
woman
of
color,
be
the
be
the
person
that
would
occupy
that
seat.
I'm
using
you
know
so.
L
That's
like
one
example
of
someone
who
might
not
be
eligible
based
on
the
current
criteria,
who
I
think
that
we
would
want
to
that's
a
that's
a
that's
a
perspective
and
some
wisdom
that
we
would
potentially
want
on
this
on
this
body.
But
I'm
not
actually
speaking
to
what
staff
will
ultimately
recommend.
I'm
just
sort
of
giving
an
example
of
maybe
one
of
the
applicants.
That
would
be
disqualified,
that
we
would
want
to
at
least
have
as
a
part
of
our
consideration
for
being
on
on
the
work
group.
A
Thank
you
for
speaking
from
your
personal
experience.
We
won't
be
discussing
specific
individuals
here
on
the
dais.
I
don't
see
any
other
colleagues
in
queue,
so
I
will
say
we'll
take
up
a
motion
to
amend
resolution.
2022
r110,
the
housing
and
rent
stabilization
work
group
revising
the
work
group
structure
per
council
member
osmond's
motion
clerk.
Will
you
please
call
the
rule.
C
A
Thank
you.
That
item
carries
next
and
I
apologize
for
this.
We
need
to
go
back
one
step
back
to
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility,
because
it
has
been
corrected
for
me
up
here
that
we
need
to
take
a
motion
on
that
item
and
of
that
update
these
past
two
cycles.
So
I
will
entertain
a
motion
to
approve
the
memorandum
of
understanding
agreement,
term
sheep
and
authorize
appropriate
city
officials
to
execute
an
agreement
and
other
documents
necessary
to
effectuate
the
settlement
with
ebny
the
east
phillips
neighborhood
institute.
A
C
C
A
Thank
you
that
carries.
I
also
want
to
just
say
we
talked
about
this
a
lot
last
time,
but
thank
you
to
everybody
up
here
on
the
dais
who
has
played
some
role.
You
two
mayor
before
you
leave
in
trying
to
reach
a
place
that
we
could
all
move
forward
here.
It's
been
a
long
time
coming
so
last
but
not
least,
we
need
to
go
to
committee
reports.
A
P
You,
madam
vice
president,
the
biz
committee
is
bringing
forward
16
items
for
approval
on
thursday
item.
One
is
the
long-awaited
malt
liquor
packaging
ordinance.
This
will
allow
brewers
to
be
able
to
do
off
sale,
cans
and
bottles,
as
approved
by
the
legislature.
Item
number
two
is
also
a
long-awaited
land
sale
at
800.
Washington
avenue.
South
item
number
three:
the
city's
biggest
development
project.
P
This
is
the
land
conveyance
and
tax
increment
plan
for
the
upper
harbor
terminal
item
number
four
is
a
variance
appeal
that
we
have
voted
to
grant
item
five
or
liquor
licenses
as
our
item
six
approvals
and
renewals
item.
Seven.
Are
the
gambling
license
approvals?
Item
number.
Eight
is
a
adjustment
to
our
consolidated
plan
item
9
are
grant
applications
for
lcda
and
tod
rounds
from
the
various
organizations,
including
the
met
council
item.
P
10
are
appointments
to
the
advisory
committee
on
housing
item
11
is
a
bond
issuance
for
hennepin
county
to
do
a
project
in
the
first
ward
item.
12
is
an
extension
for
penn
avenue,
unions,
housing
revenue
bonds
item
13
is
the
agreement
for
the
name,
image
and
likeness
of
prince
rogers
nelson?
That's
for
the
mural
item.
L
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president.
The
policy
and
government
oversight
committee
is
bringing
forward
15
items
that
will
be
recommended
for
approval
item
number.
One
is
the
passage
of
resolution
related
to
the
transfer
of
funds
related
to
the
minneapolis
public
housing
authority,
scattered
site
construction
project
and
the
housing
opportunity
fund
item
number
two
is
accepting
a
bid
for
the
upper
harbor
terminal,
grading
and
demo
project
item
number
three
is
accepting
a
bid
for
the
liquid
for
liquid
chlorine
item.
L
Number
four
is
accepting
a
bid
for
minneapolis
parking
ramp
sign
replacement
item
number
five
is
accepting
a
bid
for
public
towing
in
district
b
district
b
zone.
Five
item
number
six
is
authorizing
a
contract
with
city
of
st
louis
park
for
animal
sheltering
services.
L
Item
number
seven
is
authorizing
a
contract
with
hennepin
county
for
digital
elevation
data
item
number.
Eight
is
authorizing
a
contract
with
aspen
psychological,
consulting
llc
for
psychological
evaluation
services.
Item
number:
nine
is
authorizing
contract
amendment
with
thomas
and
sons,
inc
for
franklin
avenue
avenue.
West
reconstruction
project
at
number
10
is
authorizing
contract
amendment
with
granicus
inc
for
subscription-based
document
hosting
services.
L
We
will
be
withdrawing
the
mayor's
nomination
of
elizabeth
peterson
and
item
15
2.
We
will
be
granting
consent
to
the
mayor's
nomination
of
william
walker
and
then
I'll.
Just
sort
of
note
that
you
know
both
of
these
folks
were
put
forward.
I
think
they're
both
incredibly
qualified
we've
had
a
lot
of
discussion
with
the
mayor's
office
and
I
think
he
will
be
putting
a
new
person
forward
in
place
of
elizabeth
elizabeth
peterson
in
the
near
future.
So
with
that
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
A
R
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president.
The
public
health
and
safety
committee
is
bringing
forward
seven
items
that
is
recommended
for
approval
item.
One
is
granting
consent
to
the
mayor's
nomination
of
barrett
lane
to
the
appointed
position
of
director
of
emergency
management
item
two
is
approving
the
minneapolis
advisory
committee
on
aging
appointments
item.
Three
is
approving
south
side
green
zone
council
appointments
item.
Four
is
approving
the
police
conduct
review
panel
appointments
item.
R
Five
is
accepting
a
police
bomb
disposal
unit
services
grant
from
minnesota
homeland
security
and
emergency
management
item
6
is
accepting
a
2022
national
forensic
sciences,
improvement
grant
from
the
minnesota
department
of
public
safety
for
the
police,
crime
lab
and
item
7
is
accepting
the
national
association
of
county
and
city
health
officials
grant
for
overdose
and
suicide
prevention.
I'll
stand
for
questions
on
these
items.
A
O
You,
madam
chair,
the
public
works
and
infrastructure
committee
is
bringing
forward
six
items
on
thursday.
The
first
is
the
2022
capital
improvement
program,
appropriation
and
revenue.
Adjustments
within
the
city's
capital
projects.
Item
number
two
and
three
are
appointments
to
the
bicycle
advisory
committee
and
pedestrian
advisory
committee
item
four
is
a
grant
from
aarp
for
the
community
challenge
and
items.
Five
and
six
are
both
large
block
event
permits.
I
will
stand
for
any
questions.
J
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president.
The
audit
committee
is
bringing
forward
three
items
for
council
to
review
item
number.
One
is
a
report
on
the
personal
work
issued
mobile
device
policies
and
controls.
Audit
report
item
number:
two:
is
the
minneapolis
police
department,
field,
training,
officer
program,
special
project
report
and
item
number:
three
is
the
report
of
the
internal
auditor
and
I
will
stand
for
any
questions.