►
From YouTube: August 25, 2022 Public Works & Infrastructure Committee
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Good
afternoon,
everyone
I'm
going
to
call
to
order
this
regularly
scheduled
public
works
and
infrastructure
committee
meeting.
My
name
is
andrew
johnson
and
I
am
the
chair
of
this
committee
and
I
will
go
ahead
and
ask
the
clerk
to
call
to
call
the
role,
so
we
can
verify
a
quorum
for
this
meeting.
B
A
Let
the
record
reflect
that
we
have
a
quorum
and
with
that
the
agenda
for
today's
meeting
is
before
us.
We
do
have
nine
items
on
the
consent
agenda,
which
I
will
read
for
the
record.
The
first
is
approving
an
appointment
to
the
bicycle
advisory
committee.
The
second
is
amending
the
seat
number
for
appointment
to
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee,
which
is
a
technical
cleanup.
A
The
third
item
is
authorizing
a
cooperative
agreement
with
the
minnesota
department
of
transportation
for
the
reconstruction
of
intersection
of
I-394
at
washington
avenue
north.
The
fourth
is
authorizing
an
agreement
with
hennepin
county
for
the
bryant
avenue
south
street
reconstruction
project.
The
fifth
is
authorizing
a
contract
with
canadian
pacific
for
a
railway
crossing
upgrade
as
part
of
the
upper
harbor
terminal
public
infrastructure
project.
The
sixth
is
adopting
a
report
designating
the
2023
non-governmental
tax-exempt,
parcel
street
light
operating
fee
assessment
and
setting
a
public
hearing
for
october
13
2022.
A
I
will
ask
colleagues
if
there
are
any
discussion
of
the
consent
agenda,
any
items.
Anyone
would
like
to
pull
for
further
discussion,
and
I
will
also
just
quickly
pull
for
conversation
with
staff
item
number
three.
So
I
will
go
ahead
and
move
all
other
items
on
the
consent
agenda
and
then
pull
that
one
for
discussion
with
staff,
and
I
will
turn
to
council
member
wansley
for
discussion
on
any
of
those
remaining
items.
C
Yeah,
thank
you,
chair
johnson.
I
just
wanted
to
see
if
there
was
any
staff
that
could
speak
to
item
number
eight,
just
knowing
that
I
see
stadium
village,
also
part
of
that
and
want
constituents
to
have
a
clear
sense
of
you
know
what
changes
would
be
included
for
that
special
service
district.
D
E
Chair
council
members,
specifically,
you
had
a
question
with
regards
to
the
stadium
village
special
service
district.
How
can.
E
Yeah,
so
again,
all
we're
doing
today
is
setting
the
public
hearing.
We
are
in
the
process
of
compiling
that
staff
report,
which
will
come
forward
at
the
october.
What
was
the
date
again
october,
13th
pwi
committee,
so
with
that
staff
report
will
also
be
the
districts.
There
will
be
a
report
for
all
the
districts
which
will
be
their
operating
planning
budget.
E
Basically,
it
addresses
two
major
questions:
what
are
the
services
and
how
much
do
they
cost?
So
all
that
will
be
spelled
out
in
that
report.
In
addition
to
that,
there'll
be
a
notice
sent
to
all
of
the
rate
payers
that
contribute
towards
that
for,
for
those
services
to
then
be
procured
within
within
the
public,
right-of-way
so
be
happy
to
meet
with
you
or
your
staff
offline,
leading
up
to
that.
E
But
for
now
I
really
don't
have
a
lot
of
information
which
to
share
at
this
point,
as
that
will
all
be
forthcoming
in
the
coming
weeks
sounds
good.
Thank
you.
Okay,
we'll
be
in
touch.
A
A
This
was
flagged
by
a
constituent
around
really
aligning
with
the
transportation
action
plan
and
our
2040
plan
around
the
possibility
of
could
this
on-ramp
off-ramp
to
394
be
potentially
removed
and
that
space
developed
in
order
to
improve
walkability
and
pedestrian
safety
overall
within
the
north
loop
area,
as
well
as
in
the
vehicles
being
able
to
shift
onto
394
by
third
avenue
north,
which
is
just
next
to
this
on-ramp
and
then
vehicles
exiting
394
onto
fourth
street
north.
I'm
trying
to
get
all
the
streets
avenues
sorted
out
here,
so
I
know
we
do
have
staff
here.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
today
with
us,
is
alan
klugman,
he's
the
interim
director
of
traffic
and
parking
services
and
has
the
information
on
this
issue
in
terms
of
both.
What
this
very
specific
small
project
is,
but
then
the
study
that
has
been
done
by
mndot
of
whether
this
on
and
off
ramp
could
be
eliminated.
F
You
good
afternoon,
chair
members
of
the
committee.
As
the
director
noted,
we've
been
working
with
mndot
and
hennepin
county
on
this
project.
Maybe
just
give
a
little
bit
of
background,
then
more
directly.
To
answer
your
question.
This
project
was
originated
by
mndot
as
sort
of
a
spot
safety
improvement
or
spot
intersection
project.
Their
main
impetus
for
the
project,
if
you're
all
familiar
with
it
is
the
exit
ramp
from
394
comes
into
the
city
grid,
was
to
add
one
more
lane
with
a
left
turn
lane
to
sort
of
clarify
operations
leaving
the
exit
ramp.
F
We
worked
very
carefully
with
mndot,
we
kind
of
advocated
for
some
additional
improvements
to
make
this
intersection
much
more
friendly
for
walkability
and
pedestrians,
and
to
make
a
long
story
short.
What
we
came
up
with
was
a
design
that
removed
what
is
currently
there.
We
call
it
a
pork
chop,
island
or
a
free
right
turn
island,
which
has
rather
high
speed
cars
exiting
the
freeway
onto
the
city
grid.
F
Mndot
worked
with
us
was
able
to
redesign
their
plan
to
eliminate
that
crossing,
which
we
eliminate
that
that
free
crossing
greatly
reduce
the
size
of
the
intersection
crossing
to
help
ped
walkability,
and
we
also
worked
with
mndot
to
add
bump
outs
to
the
intersection
to
again
reduce
those
crossings,
make
it
much
more
safer
for
pets.
So
I
want
to
give
you
that
background
in
terms
of
where
mndot
started
and
kind
of
where
we
ended
up,
we
think
it's
a
huge
win
for
pedestrians
in
the
north
loop
area.
F
Now
to
the
more
a
broader
scale
or
system
question
that
you're
asking
about
possible
changes
to
that
exit
ramp
and
could
it
be
removed.
We
did
work
with
midnight
in
that
and
looked
at
that,
and
this
ramp
does
serve
an
important
function.
We
kind
of
have
a
dual
system
of
ramps
there,
so
this
access
us
to
washington
and
third
avenue
north
as
you
refer
to
there's
a
nearby
set
of
ramps,
that
exit
94
and
394
traffic
to
4th
street
there's.
F
Also,
then,
the
entrance
from
3rd
street
to
394,
west
and
94
north,
but
kind
of
where
I'm
going
with
that
chair,
is
that
by
having
the
two
intersection
points,
it
does
a
nice
job
of
distributing
that
traffic
and
helps
the
flow
of
traffic
and
operations
within
the
grid
reduces
the
congestion
which
we
see
that
has
very
strong
benefits
to
the
walkability
and
just
kind
of
livability.
That
area
that
we've
kind
of
clarified
operations
reduce
the
keeps
the
congestion
down
in
that
part
of
town.
F
The
other
thing
I
just
want
to
point
out
is
by
having
the
dual
system
of
ramps.
We
have
some
flexibility
and,
from
time
to
time
we
have
construction
operations.
In
fact,
that's
going
on
right
now,
with
the
ramp
to
to
394.94
and
coming
from
there.
Where,
then
we
had
the
option
of
diverting
traffic
to
the
other
ramp.
Also,
metro
transit,
which
runs
buses
on
all
those
facilities,
uses
that
flexibility
as
well.
A
Thank
you,
mr
klugman,
a
follow-up
question
for
you.
So
what
are
the
traffic
volumes
both
leveraging
the
on-ramp
and
then
the
off-ramp?
There.
F
Yeah,
chair
johnson
members
of
the
committee-
I
I
don't
really
have
those
numbers
at
the
top
of
my
head.
We
can
supply
those
to
you,
but
we
know
we
have
a
pretty
strong
balance
between
the
two
and
that's.
Why
both
of
those
intersections
both
those
sets
of
rams,
pretty
much
stay
below
capacity
and
congestion,
because
we're
distributing
them
as
we
work.
F
A
F
Right
so
chair
members
committee,
there's
really
a
dual
value
there.
I
think
it's
referred
to.
You
know,
which
one
is
there
more
value
to
it's
kind
of
in
both
directions
because
leaving
the
grid
it's
nice
to
have
sort
of
that
outflow
capacity,
so
we're
not
kind
of
backing
up
into
the
grid.
F
It's
also
good
that
we
have
kind
of
a
dual
approach
into
the
grid
because
a
lot
of
traffic,
that's
kind
of
destined
both
I'll,
say
business
and
residential
up
to
kind
of
the
washington
avenue
area
of
the
north
loop
they
kind
of
have
their
own
separate
area.
Forestry
has
its
own
separate
area.
As
you
know,
we've
kind
of
reduced
forestry
with
our
new
design.
We
don't
want
to
overload
the
number
of
cards
entering
the
grid
onto
that
facility
as
well.
F
So
it
is
nice
from
a
kind
of
a
I'll
say,
a
balanced
point
of
view
that
we
sort
of
we've
kind
of
moved
them
to
both
or
kept
them
at
both
locations
and
again
that's
to
preserve
not
just
for
car
capacity
but
overall
operations.
I
think,
as
you
know,
the
population
the
north
loop
has
gone
up.
You
know
tremendously,
we
have
much
more,
you
know
many
more
pedestrians
than
we
used
to
have,
and
that's
kind
of
why
we
approached
this
job
was
just
make
that
environment
more
safe
for
pedestrians
in
the
north
loop
gotcha.
Thank.
A
G
A
All
right
that
motion
carries
next.
We
will
move
on
to
our
discussion
item
which
today
is
receiving
and
filing
an
update
on
the
new
neighborhood
traffic
calming
process
director
anderson
keller,
who
will
be
presenting
this
item.
D
Well,
thank
you,
mr
chair
and
committee
members.
This
is
a
long-awaited
presentation,
I
believe,
and
I
know
that
many
people
have
been
briefed
already.
We
are
excited
to
have
this
public
presentation
and
jennifer
lowery
will
be
doing
the
presentation,
principal
professional
engineer
in
traffic
and
parking
services.
H
You
chair
members
of
the
council,
I
I'm
jennifer
lowry,
like
she
said
principal
engineer,
traffic
and
parking
services.
I'm
just
gonna
give
a
brief
presentation
on
where
we're
at
with
this
receive
and
file
item.
That's
before
you
today.
So
I
want
to
start
with
we'll
cover
the
who.
What
when,
where
why
now?
H
So
what
traffic
calming
is
taking
phys
putting
in
place
putting
in
place
physical
measures
that
can
reduce
negative
behaviors
and
effects
caused
by
vehicles
and
drivers
and
therefore
increase
the
safety
of
our
roads.
So
more
specifically,
what
I'm
talking
about
today
are
some
of
these
tools
that
you
see
before
you.
H
These
tools
are
included
in
the
process
document
that
we're
bringing
forth
in
the
appendix
a
few
things
to
note
is
that
this
is
a
living
document
and
will
be
updated
as
needed.
For
example,
the
two
red
items
at
the
bottom
of
the
page
weren't
on
our
draft
last
fall
and
have
since
been
updated.
So
it
is
something
that
we're
learning
from
and
growing
and
changing.
H
I
also
want
to
note
that
the
tools
that
we're
talking
about
as
a
part
of
this
new
process
tend
to
be
more
temporary.
So
if
you
look
at
the
bottom
photo,
it's
the
temporary
bollards,
it's
not
full
reconstruction
of
a
concrete
curb
and
third,
there
are
some
other
supporting
strategies
that
might
be
considered
tools
outside
of
this
list,
such
as
deployment
of
speed
wagons,
that
we
might
utilize
in
conjunction
with
deploying
some
of
these
tools,
but
the
process,
for
example,
to
request
a
speedway
again
will
still
exist
outside
of
this
new
process.
H
The
subsequent
engagement
we
received
over
200
comments,
which
was
pretty
good
for
feedback
and
staff
spent
this
spring
and
summer.
Reviewing
these
comments
and
refining
the
document
and
creating
a
new
intake
website
for
all
traffic
calming
requests.
So
not
just
requests
related
to
this
process
before
you,
but
if
you
have,
if
the
public
has
a
request
or
concern
on
other
streets,
they
would
do
it
via
this
new
website
that
will
roll
out.
H
So
why
did
we
develop
a
new
process
and
why
now
public
works
receives
approximately
2
500
requests
annually
for
safety
and
traffic
calming
through
311
and
emails
and
phone
calls
in
the
council
offices
to
date?
These
requests
are
individually
reviewed
and
action
is
taken
if
they're
mitigatable
and
we
have
the
resources
to
do
so,
but
the
volume
of
requests
has
greatly
outpaced
our
available
resources
and
also
to
date.
H
So
understand
that
the
goal
of
this
effort
isn't
to
solicit
more
requests,
although
that
might
happen,
it's
not
the
goal,
but
rather
to
create
a
better
process
to
vet.
The
requests
that
come
into
us
in
a
transparent
and
equitable
manner,
and
also
use
data
to
do
this
vetting
of
them
to
be
more
efficient
with
our
limited
resources.
H
So
what
are?
Where
are
the
neighborhood
streets?
The
neighborhood
streets
are
what's
shown
in
green
they're,
essentially
streets
in
the
city,
but
for
these
listed
they
the
process
is
not
meant
to
apply
to
the
high
injury
streets.
Those
are
being
addressed
and
funded
by
our
vision,
zero
program,
it's
not
including
the
municipal
state
aid
streets,
because
those
have
different
funding
sources
and
also
often
different
design
standards
or
requirements.
H
It's
not
meant
to
address,
or
roads
owned
by
other
agencies
or
private
roads,
roads
owned
by
other
agencies
and
msa
roads.
We
will
still
intake
requests
on
those
we're
not
saying
we're
not
going
to
listen
to
concerns.
They
just
won't
be
put
into
that
bucket
and
compared
against
one
another
and
then
finally,
roads
that
are
under
construction.
H
Note
that
this
process
isn't
the
end
all
and
be
all
to
improving
safe
traffic
safety,
like
I
said,
there's
a
lot
going
on
both
with
this
process,
but
also
vision,
zero
capital,
reconstruction
and
other
safety
improvements
throughout
the
city.
So
who
can
request
improvements?
The
the
short
is
anyone
can
request
it?
We
want
to
make
sure
it
can
be
anyone
who
sees
or
perceives
a
safety
issue
and
can
make
us
aware
of
it,
regardless
of
if
you
live
or
work
in
the
city,
and
this
is
the
application.
H
So
the
general
annual
process,
we're
proposing,
is
shown
on
the
screen
this
year.
I'll
touch
on
a
second
we'll
be
a
little
bit
different
and
kind
of
a
truncated
process.
But
year
to
year
we're
saying
we'll
accept
applications
on
a
rolling
basis
and
on
september
1st
of
each
year
will
be
a
deadline.
We'll
take
all
the
applications
that
have
come
into
that
point
and
do
a
screening
and
preliminary
scoring
on
them
to
see
which
ones
kind
of
rise
to
the
top.
H
Before
continuing
on
with
a
handful
of
those
requests
that
come
to
the
top
we're
thinking
about
10
to
20
a
year,
we'll
move
through
the
process
so
that
we
would
then
have
10
to
20.
That
we'd
be
focusing
our
efforts
on
developing
plans
for
what
could
be
implemented
in
the
field
to
provide
traffic
calming
and
engaging
with
the
requesters
and
the
nearby
property
owners,
tenants,
neighborhood
organizations
etc
before
constructing
those
projects
the
following
summer.
H
So
the
difference
would
be
this
year,
we
it's
almost
september
already.
Sadly,
so
we
intend
to
roll
this
out
by
september
15th
and
then
accept
applications
until
november
1st,
so
that
would
be
the
difference
this
year
now.
What
I've
presented
thus
far
has
been
similar
to
what
we
presented
last
fall.
H
However,
I
just
wanted
to
touch
on
some
of
the
feedback
we
received.
Like
I
said,
there's
over
200
comments.
People
appreciate
the
clear
process
for
traffic
calming
and
and
having
an
understanding
of
how
we
were
reviewing
these
applications
and
where
they
were
at
in
that
review
process
and
then
also
it
could
be
requested
by
anyone.
H
H
We
were
asking
the
neighborhood
organizations
to
receive
and
vet
all
the
applications
and
kind
of
vote
on
them
before
they
got
to
us,
and
that
wasn't
something
that
the
public,
nor
even
the
neighborhood
organizations
were
comfortable
with.
So
we
backed
off
on
that
a
little
bit.
H
But
we've
replaced
the
neighborhood
organization
approval
with
more
informal
asking
for
the
proposal
to
have
five
or
more
signatures
prior
to
doing
our
data
collection,
just
to
demonstrate
some
acknowledgement
of
the
concerns
in
the
neighborhood
and
get
some
buy-in
so,
like
I
said
for
this
first
iteration,
although
it's
truncated,
we
do
want
to
get
something
rolled
out
such
that
we
have
kind
of
a
at
least
some
numbers
to
work
with
and
go
through
this
process,
and
we
might
need
to
tweak
it
as
we
go.
But
I
think
it's
important
to
get
it
started.
H
So
we
have
starting
accepting
applications
once
our
website
is
up
and
we're
saying
by
september
15th
if
it's
earlier,
it'll
be
updated
on
the
website
and
then
we'll
accept
applications
through
november
1st
for
implementation
next
summer
and
then
moving
forward
in
subsequent
years.
It
would
be
a
september
first
deadline.
H
G
Thank
you,
chair
johnson
yeah.
One
thing
I've
been
thinking
about
is
just
I'm
very
excited
about
this
program.
I'm
very
excited
about
more
traffic
plumbing
interventions
and
I'm
very
aware
of
the
capacity
constraints
that
your
team
has.
So
I'm
trying
to
think
from
our
perspective.
You
know.
Is
it
a
funding
barrier?
Is
it
a
staff
barrier?
Is
it
an
equipment
barrier?
G
D
D
The
there
are
in
this
first
year
of
the
new
process.
I
think
one
of
the
important
goals
is
the
collection
of
the
input
of
what
people
are
looking
for
in
one
place,
how
many
traffic
calming
requests
there
are
that
don't
fall
into
those
other
buckets
that
ms
lowry
talked
about
things
like
construction,
related
outcomes,
and
things
like
that,
so
the
I
think
the
the
question
is
going
to
be
after
we
go
through
this
first
process.
D
It's
really
about
then,
being
able
to
benchmark
and
set
what
are
the
policy
goals
and
how
many
resources
will
it
take?
I
think
the
resources
are
all
of
the
things
you
mentioned.
I
mean
the
resources
are
about
the
dollars
to
get
the
traffic
calming
projects
actually
done.
It's
about
having
the
people
to
design
and
then
work
with
the
community
as
they're,
designing
it's
the
crew
or
contractor
to
work
to
put
that
in,
and
so
I
I
believe
that
you
know.
D
One
of
the
things
we
can
think
about
with
this
process
is
that
this
new
process
will
help
us
get
those
benchmarks
in
place
and
allow
us
to
then
say:
you
know:
where
should
we
be
in
a
year
in
five
years
in
10
years,
on
the
issues
around
traffic
calming
and
how
many
projects
can
we
get
done?
So
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
process
that
we'll
be
going
through
with
you
as
policy
makers
to
work
on
both
the
budgeting
side
of
it
and
the
people
side
of
it.
G
G
It
was
originally
slated
for
a
full
redesign
in
which
I
feel
like
our
street
design
guide
already
embedded
in.
It
are
strategies
around
traffic
calming
as
our
kind
of
default
when
we
do
a
road
redesign
and
reconstruction
that
that
got
down
great.
So
there's
going
to
be
some
potential
traffic
calming
elements
to
that
redesign
that
got
downgraded
to
a
mill
and
replace
or
mill
and
resurface
and
pushed
back,
and
some
of
my
constituents
have
this
urge
to
say:
well,
let's
not
waste
our
money
on
a
mill
and
resurface.
G
Let's
go
all
in
on
a
redesigner
bust
and
I
I
see
there's
a
potential
to
say.
Maybe
in
the
interim
there
could
be
some
traffic
calming
interventions
here
so
where
we
are
looking
at
the
budget
for
a
mill
and
resurface,
is
it
possible
for
us
to
evaluate
you
know
thinking
about
this
in
the
five
and
ten
year
time
frame
before
we
would
possibly
get
to
a
redesign
which
would
actually
be
pushed
out
even
further?
G
If
we
did
a
mill
and
resurface,
is
there
an
opportunity
to
actually
have
a
budget
savings
and
prioritize
some
of
these
types
of
interventions
versus
a
mill
and
resurface
director.
D
So,
mr
chair
and
councilmember
payne,
I
think
that
it,
it
is
a
little
bit
difficult
when
we
start
to.
You
know
be
so
specific
about
a
particular
project.
But
what
I
will
say
is
that
you
know
the
purpose
of
a
mill
and
overlay
is
to
preserve
the
underlying
infrastructure
for
a
longer
use
and
longer
life
before
its
reconstruction
need,
and
my
get
my
I
think
what
happened
on
the
project
you're
talking
about
is.
There
was
a
re-evaluation
of
that.
D
That
does
not
mean
that,
with
mill
and
overlay
there
there
we
eliminate
the
possibility
of
some
traffic
calming
interventions
and
what
you're
seeing
and
what
what
ms
lowery
presented
is.
There
are
a
wide
range
of
those
options,
everything
from
some
very
temporary
options
that
we
take
up,
seasonally
to
temporary
interventions
that
could
last
for
a
few
years
until
we
get
to
that
reconstruction.
D
For
maybe
a
more
full
and
some
of
the
permanent
changes
that
you
know
we
do
imagine
seeing
as
we're
working
on
safe
streets
for
all
and
all
sorts
of
items,
vision,
zero.
Where
you
get
the
more
permanent
you
know
build
out
of
items
in
it,
so
I
don't
think
it's
mutually
exclusive.
The
bottom
line
is
a
mill
and
overlay
can
have
safety
elements
built
into
it
and
particularly
calming
elements.
C
Thank
you
sheryl
johnson
first,
I
just
want
to
say
major
thanks
to
our
staff
for
leading
a
standardized
process
or
creating
the
standardized
process
around
traffic
calming
measures.
I
know
my
office.
It
seems
like
many
of
us
get
this
request
a
lot
about
this
specific
thing.
So
much
so.
Thank
you,
coach,
eric
koski
for
letting
me
borrow
many
of
your
20
miles
per
hour
signs.
Those
have
been
greatly
helpful
for
ward
2
residents.
C
I
also
just
want
to
note
too
just
thank
you
for
presenting
and
allowing
space
to
have
transparency
about
this
new
process
and
really
letting
our
residents
and
the
public
know
how
these
resources
are
going
to
be
allocated
in
a
more
thoughtful
and
intentional
way.
I
also
want
to
emphasize-
and
you
put
this
in
your
slide-
you
know
that
this
measure
is
being
data
driven
and
that
there's
going
to
be
continuous
channels
of
open
communication
between
our
staff.
You
know
public
works
department
and
the
residents
that
we
all
serve
up
here.
C
So
I'm
really
excited
about
this
process
to
move
some
of
those
messages
out
our
inbox
into
this
form
and
really,
I
think,
building
upon
council
member
pains,
comments
of
you
know
continuously
figuring
out
how
we,
as
council,
can
support
this
work.
How
this
can
also
extend
to
standardization
of
other.
I
think
infrastructure
measures
I'm
just
going
to
throw
in
there
like
lights.
So
I'm
really
excited
about
this
process
and
just
want
to
say
thanks.
I
Thank
you,
dear
johnson,
thank
you,
miss
laurie
for
being
here.
I
appreciate
it.
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
could-
and
perhaps
you
did
this
a
little
bit
and
I
know
we
had
a
broader
conversation
but
talk
through
just
the
experience
for
a
constituent.
So
what
that
process
will
look
like.
I
saw
the
survey
on
here.
Are
there
other
ways
beyond
just
online
to
do
the
survey?
Can
they
call
through
on
one?
I
So
could
you
just
kind
of
talk
through
a
little
bit
more
of
that
process
of
getting
to
your
getting
this
access
to
this
information.
H
Chair
members
of
the
committee,
thank
you
I
so
we
have
the
the
online
intake,
like
I
mentioned.
H
So
some
of
it
is
currently
automated
some
of
it
we're
working
through
and
might
do
it
manually
until
we're
sure
that
stuff
is
working
correctly,
but
they
should
be
getting
emails
once
they
submit
it.
They'll
get
emails
and
their
scores
once
they
reach
a
different
point,
so
they
have
some
feedback
and
understanding.
H
I
A
Any
other
comments
or
questions
from
colleagues
councilmember
payne.
G
Yeah
so
very
frequently,
I
just
I
submit
through
on
requests
on
behalf
of
my
constituents,
often
for
traffic
calming
as
this
is
coming
online.
Should
I
kind
of
revisit
some
of
those
past
submissions,
or
is
your
team
bringing
those
in
from
three
on
one
and
getting
them
into
this
process?.
H
D
H
So
we
will
reach
out.
I
believe,
we've
been
sharing
information
with
with
requests
that
have
been
coming
in
and
so
is
three
on
one
that
a
new
process
is
coming,
and
so
we
talked
about
maybe
taking
off
a
few
of
those
requests
that
have
kind
of
been
ongoing
conversations
for
a
long
time
that
have
been
put
on
hold
and
putting
them
in,
but
for
the
most
part,
we're
going
to
ask
for
people
to
resubmit
through
this
new
process
so
that
we
can
get
them
to
articulate
what
the
issues
are
and
get.
H
It
noted
on
the
map
correctly
and
get
that
data
that'll
help
us
analyze
it
and
keep
it
moving
forward,
because
we
haven't
been
getting
that
you
know
with
any
consistency
through
our
current
through
in
one
request,
so
it
would
be
best
and
and
to
get
it
through
the
new
form-
and
I
do
owe
you
guys
some
talking
points-
I'm
working
on
it.
A
All
right
any
other
comments
or
questions
not
seeing
any
I'll
just
say
as
well.
I
do
have
a
question,
but
I'll
start
first
by
saying
you
know
as
the
the
only
incumbent
on
this
committee.
You
know
I
want
to
take
a
step
back
and
look
at
the
work
of
your
team
and
just
really
acknowledge
for
my
eight
and
a
half
years
of
being
here
how
your
team
has
consistently
stepped
up
and
really
work
closely
with
residents
with
the
council
offices
and
really
taken
these
issues
so
seriously.
A
A
I'm
really
glad
that
we're
having
a
presentation
today,
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
very
excited
about
this.
Coming.
I
appreciate
the
questions.
Councilmember
payne
raised
around
capacity.
You
know
1100
miles
of
city
street,
so
10
to
20
improvements.
A
year
is
a
starting
place,
I
will
say,
but
hopefully
we
can
get
that
number
up
as
well,
and
so
I
will
close
with
a
question
which
is
really
about.
This.
Is
such
a
great
process
for
responding
these
concerns
that
people
are
seeing
out
on
the
streets,
the
requests
that
they
have?
A
A
Are
there
maybe
some
blind
spots
in
our
our
our
roads
out
there,
certain
intersections
certain
stretches
of
street,
where
there
might
actually
be
a
problem
that
needs
to
be
addressed,
that
for
one
reason
or
another,
maybe
people
have
just
written
it
off
as
like
that'll,
never
change
or
you
know
they
don't
think
to
put
in
a
request
or
whatever
it
may
be,
we're
not
really
hearing
about
it,
but
it
might
be
out
there
do
we
have
those
efforts
underway
now.
Is
that
something
that
we
need
capacity
for?
A
H
Jericho
members,
I
think
that
this,
like
I
mentioned
this,
is
like
one
of
many
pieces
that
public
works
and
the
city
are
doing
for
in
improving
safety
on
the
roads.
I
think
that
when
you
cut
off
or
to
take
out
this
little
chunk
of
this,
we
will
be
gathering.
F
H
Data
that
will
be
helpful
for
us
ultimately
to
get
there,
but
in
the
programming
of
capital
and
rehab
projects.
A
lot
of
that
is
already
happening,
so
you
know
when
we
get
requests
or
comments
or
questions
in
and
today
or
in
this
new
process,
if
they
don't
rise
to
the
front.
It's
not
like
it's
a
wasted
comment,
it'll,
be
something
that
we
can
share
with
our
our
planning
group,
our
design
groups
and
and
share
that
public
feedback
for
something
that
they
can.
They
can
kind
of
run
with.
H
If
there's
a
project,
that's
occurring
there
or
an
opportunistic
something
else
that
could
address
it
if
it's
outside
of
this
process.
So
we
talked
about
this
ultimately
getting
us
more
towards
that
from
looking
at
how
to
maybe
review
the
requests
coming
in,
but
this
is
still
a
request-based
process,
but
not
the
only
process
in
the
city
to
make
improvements.
A
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
and,
as
you
continue
to
do
this
work
ahead,
I
just
encourage,
especially
in
that
data
driven
proactive
space
as
well
to
expand
into
that
and
look
for
opportunities
to
pilot
different
traffic
calming
measures
and
creating
that
space
to
do
essentially
that
experimentation
on
how
you
might
improve
even
further
and
so
and
I'm
sure
very
data
driven
tech
background
director.
Also,
I
see
head
nodding
and
probably
shares
that
sentiment,
I'm
guessing
so
and
then
just
again,
building
off
a
council
member
pain.
A
A
If
that's
not
already
included
in
any
amendments
or
proposals
brought
forward
from
the
executive
branch
so
again,
thank
you
so
much
for
the
presentation
and
the
conversation
as
well
on
this
not
seeing
any
further
questions
and
without
objection
I'll
direct
the
clerk
to
receive
and
file
this
report
with
that
we
have
concluded
all
business
before
this
committee,
and
so
I
will
call
this
meeting
adjourned
thanks.
Everyone.