►
From YouTube: April 14, 2022 City Council
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
This
entire
week
has
been
a
reminder
about
how
we
conduct
the
public's
business
in
person,
and
I'm
really
excited
to
welcome
you
all
back
to
the
chambers
and
to
be
meeting
in
person
with
my
colleagues.
So
welcome
back
everyone
with
that.
I'm
going
to
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role
to
verify
the
presence
of
a
quorum.
B
Council
member
chavez,
president
council,
member
allison,
council,
member
vita
president
council
member
rainville,
president
council
member
wansley
warlabah,
president
councilmember
goodman,
president
councilmember
johnson,
is
absent.
Council
member
osman
president
councilmember
payne,
president
councilman
berkowski,
president
councilmember
thai
president.
Vice
president
palmisano
president,
president
jenkins,
here
there
are
12
members
present.
A
Colleagues
before
we
proceed
with
the
rest
of
our
agenda,
I
do
want
to
acknowledge
council
member
rayne
bill
for
the
presentation
of
a
resolution
to
stand
in
unity
with
ukraine,
council
member
rainville.
C
One
two
sound
thank
you.
So
thank
you,
madam
president.
C
It's
my
honor
to
introduce
orris
kramarczyk,
a
leader
in
the
ukrainian
community
to
I'll,
read
this
resolution
horse
and
and
give
it
to
you
and
ask
you
to
say
a
couple
words
expressing
unity
with
the
people
of
ukraine,
whereas
the
census
bureau
estimates
there
are
currently
about
4
600
residents
of
minnesota
that
were
born
in
ukraine,
many
of
whom
still
have
family
and
friends
living
in
the
ukraine
and
whereas
northeast
minneapolis
has
welcomed
ukrainians
to
our
city
for
over
a
century
and
remains
a
physical
and
spiritual
home
to
tens
of
thousands
of
minnesota
ukrainians.
C
And
whereas
this
naked
aggression
against
ukraine
and
democracy
must
not
stand
now,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
mayor
and
city
council
do
hereby
stand
with
people
of
ukraine
in
their
fight
to
protect
their
homes
and
loved
ones
against
those
who
wish
to
do
them.
Harm
and
call
for
additional
humanitarian
support
from
the
federal
government
for
ukrainian
evacuees.
D
D
D
They
just
had
a
dream
for
freedom
and
and
the
pursuit
of
happiness
and
democracy,
and
this
has
been
endangered
by
this
war.
This
resolution
is
not
only
for
the
city
of
minneapolis.
It's
for
everybody.
Here
are
we
willing
to
die
for
our
freedom?
Are
we
willing
to
die
for
the
right
for
our
democracy?
Are
we
willing
to.
E
D
I'm
sorry,
I'm
sorry,
there's
a
lot
of
crises
going
on,
but
we
as
as
a
nation,
have
the
right
to
come
together
and
make
make
the
resolution
trying
to
solve
these
problems.
I
think
people
have
become
after
80
years
since
the
war
everybody
has
become
too
complacent.
D
You
know
everybody's
it's
my
way
or
the
highway
and
nobody's
willing
to
compromise.
I
think
we
should
listen
to
each
other
and
try
to
resolve
these
problems.
Make
this
city
stronger,
make
the
state
stronger
make
this
country
stronger.
Putin
has
poisoned
the
democracies
of
the
world,
he
has
turned
people
against
each
other.
D
We
have
to
get
together
and
be
americans
and
be
willing.
Are
you
willing
to
die
for
your
rights?
Are
you
willing
to
die
for
your
freedom?
Just
like
the
people
over
there
are.
When
I
saw
this,
I
was
just
totally
blown
away.
I
couldn't
believe
that
this
was
happening
again,
and
so
this
is
really
important
and
I
think,
as
a
city
as
a
state
as
a
country,
we
have
to
realize
what
we
really
have.
We
have.
D
A
F
Madam
president,
everybody
has
in
front
of
them
an
amendment
to
the
agenda
under
unfinished
business
and
it
is
to
clear
out
the
ethics
complaint
that
was
before
us
at
committee
of
the
whole,
I
move
that
amendment
to
the
agenda.
G
H
H
B
H
B
A
Thank
you
so
now
I
will
entertain
a
motion
to
adopt
the
agenda
so
moved
say
a
second.
I
B
Councilmember
chavez,
aye
councilmember,
ellison,
all
right
council
member
vita,
aye
councilmember,
rainville
aye,
councilmember
juans
le
warloba,
aye
councilmember,
goodman,
aye
councilmember
johnson
is
absent.
Council
member
osman,
aye
councilmember
payne
aye
councilmember,
koski,
aye,
councilmember,
shagtai
aye.
Vice
president
paul
masano
aye,
president
jenkins.
All
right
there
are
12
eyes.
A
That
carries
and
the
agenda
is
adopted
as
amended.
The
first
item
is
the
acceptance
of
minutes
from
our
regular
meeting
on
march
24th.
I
have
a
motion
to
accept
those
minutes.
B
Councilmember
chavez
aye
councilmember,
ellison,
aye,
councilmember,
vita,
aye,
councilmember,
rainville,
aye
councilmember
wants
lee
warlipa
aye
councilmember
goodman
aye
councilmember
osman
aye
councilmember
payne
aye
councilmember,
koski,
aye,
councilman
aye.
Vice
president
paul
masano
aye,
president
jenkins
aye.
There
are
12
eyes.
A
J
H
A
That
carries
and
those
matters
have
been
referred.
The
first
order
of
business
is
the
reports
of
our
standing
committees,
beginning
with
the
report
from
our
business
inspections,
housing
and
zoning
committee.
That
report
will
be
presented
by
its
chair,
councilmember
goodman.
G
G
Item
number
eight
is
granting
an
appeal
with
regard
to
the
demolition
of
a
historic
resource.
Item
number:
nine:
are
the
liquor
license
approvals
and
ten
of
the
liquor
license.
Renewals
item
number:
eleven
are
gambling
license
renewals
item?
Twelve?
Are
some
changes
to
our
home
and
nsp
program
income
appropriations
item?
Thirteen
is
a
rezoning
and
street
vacation
to
facilitate
positive
change
at
northrop
king
item
number.
14
is
the
reclamation
of
a
dock
at
the
upper
harbor
terminal
and
item
15.
G
Perhaps
our
most
notable
item
is
allocating
2.5
million
dollars
of
arpa
money
for
the
following
emergency
shelter
projects,
and
this
would
include
money
for
catholic
charities
people
serving
people
an
ascension
place.
This
will
be
leveraging
millions
more
from
hennepin
county
to
allow
these
organizations
to
expand
and
improve
their
current
facilities.
With
that,
I
am
able
to
move
items
1
through
15
for
approval
this
morning.
A
A
C
Thank
you,
mr
clerk.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
The
intergovernmental
relations
committee
has
brought
forward
for
approval
at
this
week's
council
meeting
one
item,
which
is
the
passage
of
a
resolution
expressing
unity
with
the
people
of
the
ukraine.
A
B
B
Councilmember
chavez
aye
councilmember,
allison,
aye,
council
member
vita,
aye
council
member
rainville,
aye
council
member,
wants
a
warlock
aye
councilmember
goodman
aye
councilmember
osman
aye
councilmember
payne
aye
councilmember
koski
aye,
councilmember,
shagtai
aye.
Vice
president
palmisano
aye,
president
jenkins
hi.
There
are
12
eyes.
A
That
carries
in
that
resolution
is
adopted.
I
do
want
to
just
reiterate
my
gratitude
to
councilmember
rainville
for
bringing
forward
this
resolution.
We're
collaborating
with
our
colleagues
to
ensure
that
the
city
is
addressing
the
humanitarian
crisis
in
ukraine
right
now.
So
thank
you.
Councilmember
rainville
and
next
we'll
have
the
report
from
our
policy
and
government
oversight
committee
given
by
its
share
council
member
ellison.
K
Thank
you.
Madam
president.
The
policy
and
government
oversight
committee
has
17
items
to
bring
forward
for
approval
at
this
week's
council
meeting
item
number
one
is
the
passage
of
a
resolution
for
the
2022
quarterly
donations.
Reports.
Item
number
two
is
the
passage
of
a
resolution
for
amending
the
2022
general
appropriation
resolution
for
rollover
of
unspent
2021
appropriations.
K
K
K
Item
number
eight
is
authorizing
contracts
with
enlight
dba,
gen,
x
and
gen
x,
slash
mitchell
for
workers,
compensation,
medical
bill
review
and
bill
payment
services.
Item
number:
nine
is
authorizing
a
contract
amendment
with
primacy
strategy
group
for
federal
representation
services.
Item
number
10
is
authorizing
a
contract
amendment
with
urban
ventures
inc
for
the
pathways
gun
diversion
program.
K
Item
number
11
is
authorizing
the
skyway
agreement.
Amendment
in
relation
to
public,
the
public
service
building
and
number
12
is
authorizing
the
issuance
of
a
request
for
proposals
for
water
meter.
Reading
software
hardware
and
software
services
item
13
is
approving
legal
settlement
for
a
worker's
compensation
claim
for
daniel
dick
item.
Number
14
is
authorizing
a
joint
powers
agreement
with
the
state
of
minnesota
to
provide
law
enforcement,
support
to
the
minneapolis
police
department.
K
Item
number
15
is
authorizing
a
contract
with
cornerstone,
interagency,
child
abuse,
evaluation
and
training
center
for
the
forensic
interview,
services
of
children
and
vulnerable
adults,
item
number
16
is
approving
an
appointment
to
the
2022
local
board
of
appeal
and
equalization
and
item
number
17
is
a
staff
direction
in
relation
to
the
public
safety
department
charter
amendments
and
I
will
move
the
move.
The
committee
report
and
stand
for
any
questions.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
ellison
and
councilmember
ellison
has
moved
that
committee's
report.
Is
there
any
discussion.
L
A
Thank
you,
council
member
koski,.
A
Mr
clerk
question:
do
we
need
to
take
up
that
motion
first
before
we
proceed
with.
A
A
All
right
so
council,
member
chuck,
tyne.
A
All
right,
so
we
colleagues,
we
are
going
to
pull
items
number
17,
14
and
13,
and
we
will
take
up
the
rest
of
that
committee's
report.
Now.
Is
there
any
discussion?
Further
discussion
see
none
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role
councilmember.
B
Chavez
can
you
please
clarify
the
vote
again.
Madam
president,
what
I
have
is
the
vote
now
is
on
the
committee
report
from
policy
and
government
oversight
items
1
through
12
15
and
16.,
excluding
items
13,
14
and
17.
perfect.
All
right.
Are
we
ready
to
proceed
president?
Please
call
them.
Council,
member
chavez,
aye
councilmember,
alison
aye,
councilmember,
vita,
aye,
councilmember,
rainville,
aye,
council
member
wants
leewa
laba,
aye
councilmember,
goodman
aye.
A
That
report
passes
and
the
first
item
we
will
now
take
up-
is
item
number
13
on
our
agenda.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
that
item.
N
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
I
you
know,
I
think
I
have
just
want
to
name
my
intention
that
I'm
going
to
vote
against
this
item.
I've
been
consistently
voting
against
these.
I
know
we
are
limited
to
the
discussion
that
we
can
have
as
as
employers
on
these
type
of
settlement
cases,
so
I'll
just
name
that
I'm
I'm
going
to
be
voting
against
it
and
we
can
move
forward.
B
H
A
And
that
item
passes.
The
next
item
is
item
number
14
and
I
will
ask
the
council
member
if
they
would
like
to
speak
to
this
item.
M
Thank
you,
president
jenkins.
I
am
voting
against
this
because
the
joint
agreement
is
essentially
using
the
bca
to
fill
a
gap
in
mpd.
That
gap
is
because
the
mpd
contract,
which
has
staffing
mandates
for
fulfilling,
beat
officers
at
the
cost
of
investigative
staff
and
other
roles.
M
This
is
also
one
of
the
of
many
lost
opportunities
that
we
could
have
pursued
in
the
recent
contract
negotiations
and
just
underscores
the
importance
of
using
our
upcoming
negotiations
to
address
this
and
other
issues.
That's
causing
chronic
problems
in
our
ability
to
recruit
and
retain
quality
and
ethical
employees
within
our
public
safety
department.
So
just
wanted
to
pull
that
in
and
lay
that
out.
B
Chavez,
nay,
councilmember,
allison,
aye,
councilmember,
vita,
aye,
councilmember,
rainville,
aye,
councilmember,
wansley,
barloba,
council
member
goodman,
aye
councilmember,
osman,
aye,
councilmember,
payne,
all
right,
councilman,
burkovsky,
aye,
councilmember,
nay.
Vice
president
paul
masano
aye,
president
jenkins
aye.
There
are
nine
eyes
and
three
nays.
A
That
item
carries,
and
the
next
item
under
discussion
is
item
number
17
on
the
pogo
committee
report.
Would
the
council
member
like
to
speak
to
that
item
council
member
koski.
L
L
L
If
we
move
forward
in
this
direction
and
bring
two
competing
proposals
to
the
finish
line,
neither
will
receive
unanimous
support.
We
all
know
that.
So
to
me,
this
isn't
only
about
the
underlying
issues
with
the
staff
directive.
This
is
about
whether
or
not
we
want
a
new
department
of
this
nature
to
happen.
L
M
Thank
you
as
councilmember
koski
has
raised
and
and
what
was
affirmed
multiple
times
at
our
last
pogo
meeting
on
monday.
Is
this
directive
is
reflective
of
what
the
voters
said
they
wanted
the
both
in
last
november.
M
So
this
is
again
another
opportunity
for
us
to
be
able
to
do
our
jobs
to
make
a
well-informed
decision
before
we
even
get
to
voting
order
ordinance
about
what
this
department
can
look
like.
That
is
not
any
duplication
of
anything
because
again,
voters
affirmed
last
november.
The
mayor's
sole
charge
is
maintaining
authority
over
mpd
council
has
the
ability
to
set
policies
and
to
help
shape
what
departments
look
like
and
the
staff
directives
just
builds
upon
that.
M
So
I
I
think,
we've
had
number
of
conversations
that
I
thought
crystallized
that
I'm
also
again
sensing
differing
shifts
on
monday.
There
was
the
question
of
mpd's
integration.
Now
it's
a
matter
of
duplication.
M
I
would
like
for
there
to
be
some
consistency
in
how
we're
addressing
you
know
as
council,
how
we
can
go
about
doing
our
our
basic
jobs
of
doing
the
staff
analysis
to
help
us
make
informed
decisions.
So,
for
those
reasons,
of
course,
you
know
I've,
I'm
supporting
this
staff
directive.
I
think
this
director
will
help
us
also
get
a
sense
of
whatever
the
mayor's
proposal
ends
up
being.
It
gives
us
fruitful
ground
to
make
an
informed
decision
so
I'll
be
supporting
this.
The
staff
directive,
as
it
currently
stands.
A
Thank
you,
council
member
nixon
q
is
council,
member
ellison.
K
Thank
you.
Madam
president,
I
want
to
just
thank
councilmember
wanza
worleba
for
bringing
this
forward,
and
I
I
want
to
highlight
that
you
know
we
all
get
elected
by
our
individual
base
of
supporters
by
individual
wars.
We
represent
our
wards
and
ultimately
the
city
council
is
the
legislative
body
of
the
city.
K
I
think
that
it
would
be
a
mistake
just
because
there
is
a
process,
disagreement
between
the
mayor's
vision
and
some
of
the
and
the
vision
that's
coming
before
us
today
to
say
that
we
are
going
to
sort
of
jettison
our
legislative
role
in
authority,
even
though
that's
not
what
the
law
says.
Even
though
that's
not
what
question
one
said
we're
going
to
let
go
of
our
legislative
authority
and
defer
it
to
the
mayor.
I
think
that
the
mayor
is
going
to
put
together
a
proposal.
I
think
it's
going
to
be
probably
a
fine
proposal.
K
I'm
excited
to
see
it.
I'm
excited
to
dig
into
it
to
give
him
my
feedback.
I
also
think
that
that
does
not
prevent
us
from
pursuing
a
proposal,
and
I
think
that
there
are
some
legitimate
concerns
about
the
culture
of
mpd,
the
the
the
speed
in
which
we
want
to
integrate
mpd
into
our
non-policing
public
safety
apparatus.
That
is
young,
that
is
forming
that
is
building.
I
think
that
this
is
an
appropriate
way
for
us
to
move
forward.
K
My
understanding
is
that
the
staff
involved
in
this
staff
direction
are
interested
in
doing
the
work
are
excited
to
do
the
work,
and
there
are
so
many
things
that
have
come
to
fruition
in
the
last
couple
of
years
that
wouldn't
have
come
to
fruition
that
have
had
the
mayor's
support,
but
wouldn't
have
come
to
fruition.
If
we
had
waited
for
the
mayor
to
come
forward
with
his
proposal,
the
office
of
violence
prevention
would
not
exist.
K
If
had
we
been
waiting
for
the
mayor
to
come
with
a
proposal
for
it,
the
the
the
the
the
mental
health
mobile
response
team
would
not
exist.
Have
we
waited
for
the
mayor
to
come
forward
with
his
proposal?
These
are
things
that
we
can
do
together
and
even
if
there
are
differences
inevitably
before
we
pass
a
policy
before
we
put
something
in
writing,
those
differences
will
have
to
be
reconciled.
They
don't
have
to
be
reconciled
right
here
right
today
in
this
vote.
K
So
that's
why
I'm
hoping
that
my
colleagues
can
support
this,
that
we
continue
that
we
can
continue
the
work
that
we
don't
sort
of
send
a
signal
that
we
think
our
ideas
are
invalid
as
council
and
that
we
don't
believe
in
ourselves,
but
we
do
believe
in
the
singular
voice
in
the
mayor's
office.
I
think
that
there
are
14
people
elected
to
represent
the
city.
I
think
14
people
should
represent
the
city.
A
Thank
you,
council.
Member
next,
thank
you
is
councilmember
payne.
O
Thank
you,
madam
president.
Yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
echo
some
of
the
sentiments
shared
by
council
member
onesie,
roloba
and
council
member
ellison.
This
is
about
affirming
our
role
as
a
legislative
body.
I
think
that
by
you
know,
moving
forward
with
the
staff
direction
coming
from
council.
O
We
are
doing
this
work
in
public
through
the
process
of
committee
and
council,
as
opposed
to
a
process
with
working
groups
where
we're
not
all
sure
what
the
process
was
for
selecting
the
members
of
those
work
groups
and
we're
not
entirely
sure
what
the
inputs
are
and
that
are
going
to
be
driving
the
outputs
of
their
recommendations,
and
I
think
that
by
putting
some
structure
and
direction
around
our
staffing
direction,
we're
helping
to
define
the
contours
of
what
this
might
look
like
in
the
future.
I
don't
see
it
in
opposition
to
the
mayor.
O
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
next
and
q
is
councilmember
palmisano.
F
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
do
appreciate
the
staff
direction
and
have
not
had
an
opportunity
to
watch
the
pogo
committee
separately.
Yet
this
week
you
know
we
are
going
through
a
systems-based
analysis
with
the
changes
to
our
city
government
and
it's
really
important.
We
do
that
thoughtfully
and
well.
F
We
need
to
do
better,
integrating
every
department
throughout
the
enterprise
and,
as
we
work
to
implement
the
recommendations
from
the
after
action
report,
we
need
to
actually
take
them
to
heart.
That
means
keeping
the
police
in
and
being
less
siloed
than
the
rest
of
our
whole
public
safety.
What
others
call
an
ecosystem,
the
biggest
takeaway
that
I
saw
from
that
after
action
review
was
that
our
police
department
needs
to
be
part
of
that
integration,
not
siloed
even
more
so
I
do.
F
I
will
be
objecting
to
this
today,
but
I
do
certainly
appreciate
the
effort
from
council
member
wansley
worlabah
that
came
into
this
and
also
councilmember
payne's
efforts
and
taking
a
look
in
a
very
thoughtful
and
and
careful
way.
We
can
do
that
along
with
the
rest
of
our
work
here.
Thank
you.
M
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
hope
council
members,
I
know
this
was
also
a
issue
on
monday
during
our
pogo
meeting.
I
hope
that
council
members
had
a
chance
to
thoroughly
go
through
the
staff
directive,
which
outlines
very
clearly
some
of
the
things
that
are
raised.
Council
member
pomosano.
You
mentioned
the
dynamic
of
mpd,
not
being
integrated
in
section
b,
part
c,
it
says,
evaluate
the
possible
integration
of
mpd.
M
In
addition
to
that,
as
you're
talking
about
alignment
with
the
mayor's
proposal,
it
actually
helps
to
strengthen
whatever
comes
out
of
the
mayor's
proposal,
because
the
departments
that's
listed
in
section
8
are
not
reflective
in
the
current
mayor's
proposal.
It
actually
pushes
us
to
be
in
a
place
where
we're
actually
delivering
more
comprehensive
public
safety
services
that
are,
we
already
exist
within
our
our
city
enterprise
and
something
else
that
you
named.
That
is
again
in
alignment
with
what
question
one
affirmed.
M
The
after
action
report
will
only
be
related
to
mpd,
which
again
this
body
has
no
authority
over.
Currently,
the
mayor
only
has
authority
over
mpd.
Currently,
the
mayor
only
has
authority
to
use
the
recommendations.
That's
going
to
be
coming
through
that,
through
the
likely
doj
investigations
through
the
department
of
human
rights
investigations,
it
is
solely
at
his
hem,
where
those
recommendations
can
be
implemented.
That
is
not
the
charge
of
this
body.
M
The
charge
of
this
body,
though,
as
councilmember
ellison
has
noted,
is
that
we
have
full
legislative
authority
to
say
you
know,
departments
that
we
do
have
shared
oversight,
let's
actually
look
at,
and
it
would
be
in
our
best
interests
as
policy
makers,
thoughtful
policymakers
to
actually
say
what
are
some
successful
metrics
of
integration
to
make
this
department
successful
and
to
actually
give
it
the
space
to
do
that
work
as
opposed
to
trying
to
balance
that
and
putting
mpd
simultaneously
in
there
when
we
know
like
we
are
not
going
to
sit
here
and
ignore
the
realities
that
mpd
has
a
lot
to
to
do
a
lot
of
work
ahead
of
itself
and
to
say
that
we
can
do
those
things
simultaneously.
M
I
think,
is
a
huge
disservice
to
our
residents.
It
is
completely
illogical
and
it
disregards
the
current
reality
that
faces
us
in
our
public
safety
system
right
now.
So
again,
I
hope
everyone
is
reading
the
same
staff
directive
that
I
am
because
it
is
fully
embodying
many
of
the
things
that
you
all
are
raising
and
allows
legislative
authority
that
we
have
to
actually
make
some
more
informed
decisions
before
we
have
to
take
a
vote
or
any
ordinance
that
comes
from
this
government
structure
around
our
public
safety
department.
M
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
weinsley
warlobar,
and
I
do
want
to
just
note
that
we
have
a
limit
of
two
speeches
per
council
member
per
issue.
I
put
myself
in
queue
to
speak
to
this
item
and
you
know
I
agree
that
we
should
have
as
much
information
as
we
can
to
be
able
to
make
the
decisions
that
we
need
to
make
on
this
council.
A
I'm
not
sure
how
we
can
ascertain
that
information
without
all
of
the
parties
involve
being
at
the
table
to
create
what
this
department
can
and
should
be,
and
so
I'm
I'm
just
concerned
of
leaving
mpd
out
of
the
equation
of
determining
what
this
department
is
going
to
look
like,
and
so
if
there
is
no
further
discussion-
and
I
do
see,
councilmember
payne
has
put
himself
in
cue
again.
O
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
the
staff
direction
is
not
precluding
which
departments
are
in
or
out
of
this
future
vision.
The
staff
direction
is
so
that
we
can
study,
which
departments
should
be
in
and
should
be
out
and
then
what
sequence
we
should
be,
including
them
and
integrating
them,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that,
as
you
consider
your
vote
today,
you
don't
think
of
this
as
a
excluding
the
police
staff
direction.
H
H
B
Madam
president,
and
to
councilmember
chavez's
question
there,
no
action
has
been
taken.
It
remains
on.
The
council's
agenda
has
been
referred
out
from
committee.
The
council
needs
to
take
some
affirmative
dispositive
action
to
either
refer
it
back
to
committee
for
further
discussion,
a
new
motion
to
dispose
of
it
here
at
this
meeting
to
continue
to
the
next
council
meeting,
but
until
an
action
is
taken
which
disposes
of
the
item,
it
remains
before
the
body
on
the
floor
can.
I
Council
president,
mr
clerk,
can
I
make
a
motion
to
send
this
back
to
pogo
and
to
have
my
colleagues
be
able
to
discuss
this
more.
A
K
Yes,
we're
both
in
eq.
I
am
thank
you.
Madam
president,
I
was
just
gonna
hop
in
queue
to
make
the
same
motion
that
councilmember
has
made.
I
really
do
think
that
this
is
work
that
we
should
be
all
hands
on
deck
on.
I
do
want
to
refer
folks
to
to
item
two
c
and,
if
folks
are
interested
in
making
amendments
to
this,
I
think
that
this
is.
I
think
that
that's
fine,
but
I
think
this
is
an
important
work
for
us
to
explore.
K
I
don't
think
that
there
should
just
be
one
discussion
happening.
I
think
that
there
I
think
that
we
should
be
utilizing
the
entire.
You
know
sort
of
brain
power
of
the
institution.
K
I
think
that
the
the
office
of
innovation
and
performance
is
is
is,
is
an
important
part
of
that
equation,
so
just
want
to
affirm
that
I'll
be
supporting
the
motion
to
refer
this
back
to
committee
and
happy
to
work
with
my
colleagues
on
any
changes
that
might
need
to
be
made
to
this
in
order
for
it
to
have
the
support
of
the
full
body.
P
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
really
want
to
see
I
just
had
a
conversation
with
councilmember
payne
about
this
just
very
short
time,
and
I
do
want
to
see
more
discussion.
I'm
not
a
member
of
the
bulgar
committee,
and
now
we
are
suggesting
sending
back
to
the
bogo
committee.
Is
there
any
I'm
asking?
P
B
Adam
president,
to
council
member
osman's
question
there
is
a
body
already
established
as
a
subcommittee
of
their
committee
the
whole,
which
includes
all
13
council
members
specifically
dealing
with
government
structure.
So
the
motion
that's
on
the
table
is
to
refer
this
back
to
pogo,
where
it
originated.
P
Yes,
yes,
I
am.
A
Thank
you,
council
member
thomas.
F
Thank
you.
I
just
had
a
brief
discussion
here
with
my
colleague
councilmember
chavez.
We
are
on
a
little
different
pages
here.
I,
like
council
member
osman,
do
you
see
the
importance
of
speaking
about
this
with
all
13
people
present
and
able
to
participate
in
a
scheduled
way,
not
just
showing
up
at
other
people's
committees,
though
I
certainly
have
appreciated
the
forum
that
council
member
ellison
provides
at
pogo
and
it
is
a
welcoming
environment.
I
do
think
that
this
would
be
best
matched
with
the
rest
of
our
work
in
the
government
structure.
F
Conversations
because
that's
what
it
is
and
mindful
of
things
that
have
come
to
light
over
this
past
year,
for
example
the
after
action
review,
which
was
absolutely
not
a
review
of
just
our
police
department,
but
of
every
single
department
across
our
city,
enterprise
and
that's
what
we
have
been
discussing
at
the
committee
of
the
whole
is
how
we
better
integrate
all
of
the
efforts
of
every
department
and
how
we
get
better
working
together.
F
I
feel
strongly
that
it
should
be
part
of
that
discussion,
not
in
a
separate
thread
from
that
discussion,
and
I
am
happy
to
double
triple
down
and
carry
through
on
all
of
these
detailed
questions
through
our
efforts
together.
Instead
of
in
this
separate
direction
through
a
separate
one
of
our
committees,.
I
President
jenkins,
councilman
osman,
I
was
just
going
to
make
the
comment
that
we
could
just
send
it
back
to
pogo,
where
councilman
edelson
has
made
it
very
clear
that
if
you
would
be
willing
to
consumer
ellison
to
have
committee
members
be
present
at
the
meeting
in
pogo.
That
is
the
work
of
the
body
to
do
oversight
on
our
work
and
policy,
and
it
would
be
a
good
opportunity
for
consumers
to
be
present
and
ask
questions.
M
Thank
you,
madam
president,
also.
I
absolutely
agree
that
this
should
be
referred
back
to
the
original
committee
of
pogo,
particularly
the
government
structure
again
under
question.
One
asked
for
structuring
proposals
around
the
government.
If
there
was
a
proposal
on
the
table
from
the
mayor's
public
safety
work
group
to
move
forward
with
this
department,
more
than
willing
would
love
to
see
ideas
come
from
that
work
group
that
is
now
on
the
table.
M
We
have
the
legislative
opportunity
to
move
forward
with
the
staff
analysis
that
can
be
amended
through
committee
members
on
pogo,
who
have
some
of
these
originating
concerns
to
form
something
in
which
we
can
have
some
consistency
around
and,
of
course,
bring
it
back
to
this
full
council
to
have
the
vibrant
conversation
that
we're
doing
right
now.
M
So
to
me,
it
makes
sense
to
refer
back
to
the
original
committee
where
the
you
know,
you
know
where
we
can
actually
sharpen
and
and
bring
a
shared
agreement
around
where
some
of
the
things
that
you
know,
committee
members
think
should
be
more
reflected
in
this
proposal
and
then
bring
that
back
to
this
body
to
discuss
at
full
council.
So
I
also
support
the
motion
to
refer
back
to
pogo.
K
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
just
wanted
to
to
say
that
I
am
I.
I
think
that
both
options
are
workable.
On
my
end,
obviously,
as
the
chair
pogo,
I
welcome
the
item
back
to
pogo.
I
welcome
all
my
colleagues
who,
in
the
past,
have
had
an
opportunity
to
show
up
to
pogo
and
speak
to
it.
You
know,
I
think
a
number
of
my
colleagues
noted
that
they
won't
be
able
to
vote
at
pogo
if
this
goes
back
to
vogo
and
but
we
can
always
vote
here
at
the
full
council.
K
So
I'm
happy
to
continue
hosting
this
item,
but
I
also
think
it
is
workable
to
bring
this
item
to
the
to
the
subcommittee
in
cow
as
well
so
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
you
know
just
because
I
know
that
I
I
hesitate
to
sign
up
other
chairs
for
work
because
that's
coming
out
of
my
committee.
K
So
while
I
can
say
yes
that
I'm
happy
to
take
on
the
work,
I'll
say
that
I'm
open
to
it
moving
to
another
committee,
if,
if
if
the
chair
of
the
subcommittee
is
is,
is
amenable
so
just
wanted
to
hop
into
you
and
and
give
those
notes.
A
B
Adam
president
would
need
a
second
to
the
amendment
offered
by
councilmember
ozman,
which
I
captured,
which
was
to
amend
the
original
motion
to
refer
back
the
amendment
offered
by
council
member
osman.
As
I
understood
it
was
to
refer
the
matter
to
the
government
structure
subcommittee
of
the
committee
of
the
whole.
I
heard
that
I
didn't
hear
a
second
to
that
motion.
Q
B
H
B
Councilmember
chavez
no
councilmember
ellison
aye
councilmember,
vita,
aye,
councilmember,
rainville,
aye,
councilmember,
wansley,
warlabah.
H
B
A
Item
number
17
will
be
referred
to
the
government
oversight
government
government
structure
sub-committee
of
council
subcommittee.
Thank
you
very
much.
Colleagues.
Our
next
report
is
from
the
public
health
and
safety
committee,
which
will
be
presented
by
its
chair
council
member
vita.
Q
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
The
public
health
and
safety
committee
has
nine
items
to
bring
forward
for
approval.
At
this
morning's
council
meeting
item
number
one
is
authorizing
a
contract
amendment
with
the
minnesota
bureau
of
criminal
apprehension
for
human
trafficking
investigations.
Crime
analyst
support
item
number
two
is
authorizing
a
contract
amendment
with
the
minnesota
bureau
of
criminal
apprehension
for
human
trafficking
investigations.
Q
Item
number
three
is
authorizing:
submittal
of
a
grant
application
to
the
minnesota
division
of
homeland
security
and
emergency
management
to
support
the
office
of
emergency
management's
mission,
areas
of
prevention,
preparation
mitigation
response
and
recovery
item.
Four
is
authorizing:
submittal
of
a
grant
application
to
the
centers
for
disease
control
and
prevention
for
the
public
health
emergency
grant.
Q
Item
five
is
authorizing
a
practicum
experience
agreement
with
saint
catherine
university
school
of
social
work
for
internships
item
6
is
accepting
a
minnesota
department
of
human
services
grant
for
naloxone
distribution
item
7
is
authorizing
a
health
department
master
contract
with
one
family.
One
community
item
eight
is
authorizing
a
health
department
master
contract
with
the
neighborhood
hub
and
item
nine
is
authorizing
a
contract
with
special
school
district
number
one
minneapolis
public
schools
for
violence,
interrupter
services
with
that.
Madam
president,
I
move
approval
of
items
one
through
nine.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
vito.
Is
there
any
discussion.
A
L
L
Amendments
have
been
distributed
in
writing
to
all
council
members
relating
to
items
number
10
and
11,
and
I'm
moving
to
refer
item
number
10
back
to
the
public
works
at
infrastructure
committee
to
allow
additional
feedback
from
a
community
meeting.
That's
happening
this
weekend
to
incorporate
those
comments
in
and
I'm
moving
to,
amend,
item
number
11
to
correct
an
error
in
the
annual
budget
for
the
lindell
lake
special
service
district.
These
budget
changes
are
highlighted
in
a
revised
rca,
which
has
been
added
to
the
lims
file
page
for
this
item.
L
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
koski,
councilmember
koski
has
moved
that
committee's
report.
Referring
item
number
11
back
to
committee.
A
10
and
an
amendment
on
council
on
item
number
11..
Is
there
any
discussion.
B
A
That
item
carries
and
that
report
is
adopted
that
completes
our
committee
reports
as
there
are
no
reports
from
special
committees
today.
Next
is
the
notice
of
ordnance
introductions
and
there's
just
one
item
today.
That's
a
notice
that
has
been
provided
by
councilmember
goodman
to
amend
the
housing
maintenance
code
to
amend
the
record,
the
regulations
related
to
interest
in
revoked
or
cancelled
rental
dwelling
licenses.
A
This
new,
this
notice
is
hereby
given
and
no
further
is
action.
I'm
sorry!
No
further
action
is
required
at
this
time.
Kylie's
next
on
our
agenda
is
unfinished
business
and
it
is
quite
a
lengthy
discussion.
I
am
anticipating
ahead
of
time,
so
I'm
gonna
ask
for
my
colleagues
indulgence
to
take
a
five
minute
break
so
that
we
can
prepare
ourselves
for
this
conversation
clerk.
Do
we
need
to
vote
on
that.
A
A
Thank
you
very,
very
much
and
colleagues
next
on
our
agenda,
then,
is.
A
A
A
We
are
all
aware
that
this
power
was
granted
to
the
city
under
a
ballot.
Question
referred
to
voters
last
november,
so
we
have
been
given
the
power
to
enforce
a
rent
stabilization
policy
now,
as
required
by
state
law.
We
need
to
draft
that
policy
and
then
be
prepared
to
submit
that
policy
to
the
voters
for
their
consideration.
A
I've
worked
with
our
professional
staff
as
well
as
the
mayor's
office,
and
all
of
you
to
get
ideas,
input
on
how
we
might
create
this
work
group.
I
think
that
this
draft
resolution
that
has
been
circulated
reflects
the
level
of
engagement
and
feedback
that
I
have
received
from
policymakers
and
professional
staff
polite.
A
A
A
A
I
also
definitely
appreciate
the
diversity
of
opinion
on
this
body
on
how
this
matter
should
be
considered.
It
is
appropriate
for
us
to
consider
all
options.
A
We
discussed
this
with
the
clerk
on
how
to
proceed
on
this
issue,
as
there
are
two
proposals
before
us.
A
Or
should
the
council
proceed
with
the
alternative
proposal
offered
by
council
member
chuck
thai,
which
would
have
the
council
finalize
the
draft
policy
and
submit
it
to
the
voters
at
this
year's
general
election
in
november
I'll
open
the
vote?
The
debate
on
the
first
question
by
recognizing
council
member
chuck
thai
to
offer
some
inter
introductory
comments
on
her
proposal
and
then,
after
that
we
will
take
comments
from
council
members
on
their
positions
on
the
two
proposals,
and
with
that
I
will
recognize
councilmember
chuck
tay
to
speak
to
this
item.
N
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
with
the
clerks,
I
think,
with
the
with
the
with
the
council
president's
motion
formally
in
front
of
us.
The
first
step
here
is
for
me
to
offer
a
substitute
motion
which
copies
are
with
our
clerks
and
they
will
start
handing
it
out.
Is
there
anything
else
that
needs
to
happen
formally
for
for
this
to
move
forward?
N
Okay,
great,
so
we
now
have
two
options
that
are
in
front
of
us,
one
that
allows
us
to
move
forward
with
the
work
group
and
put
this
policy
on
the
ballot
in
2023
and
another
that
allows
us
to
move
forward
with
putting
this
policy
on
the
ballot
this
year
in
2022.
N
You
know,
I
I'm
a
renter
in
the
city,
I'm
a
part
of
a
majority
of
the
people
in
this
city
who
struggle
with
you
know
finding
safe,
affordable
and
dignified
housing,
and
that's
something
I've
struggled
with
my
entire
life.
I
represent
ward
10
on
this
on
the
city
council,
and
so
I
always
think
about
the
80
of
my
constituents
who
deal
with
that
same
struggle
in
their
day-to-day
lives
and
are
at
risk
of
of
displacement
with
each
passing
day
each
passing
month
each
passing
year.
N
So
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
why
I
brought
forward
this.
This
substitute
motion
that,
hopefully
all
of
you
now
have
in
front
of
you
and
there
should
be
a
copy
for
the
public
to
view
at
the
end
of
the
the
diocese
over
there.
N
So
I
know
that
we
are
in
an
urgent
moment
in
our
city
and
that
voters
in
the
city
acted
last
november,
not
only
to
elect
all
of
us
but
to
also
give
us
the
authority
and
and
the
direction
to
move
forward
with,
with
putting
together
policy
on
on
rent
stabilization
or
rent
control.
N
This
is
what
the
people
asked
us
to
do,
and
we
are
here
to
act
on
their
will
and
on
their
behalf
and
make
the
best
decisions.
We
can.
N
I
know
that
there
were
multiple
ballot
questions
that
were
that
were
in
front
of
voters
this
year
and
in
the
same
way
that
voters,
you
know,
asked
us
to
change
our
the
structure
of
our
government,
and
I
have
seen
this
this
city
and
and
our
professionalized
staff,
our
enterprise
move
heaven
and
earth
to
to
move
swiftly
on
implementation
of
ballot
question
one,
and
I
don't
see
that
same
type
of
urgency
on
on
ballot
question
three
on
in
on
the
enactment
of
rent
stabilization.
N
I
also
know
that
there
is
an
active
movement
at
the
state
level
to
further
preempt
cities
from
being
able
to
move
policy
like
this
and
in
a
moment
when
we're
up
against
all
these
forces
and
many
of
them
we
don't
have
control
over.
We
have
to
look
to
what
we
have
control
over
and
that's
doing
our
job
and
and
being
the
legislative
body
and
writing
policy
and
moving
forward,
and
I
know
that
we
have
really
difficult
conversations
ahead
of
us
that
this
is
a
quick
timeline.
N
I
acknowledge
that,
but
this
is
the
work
of
the
people.
This
is
the
work
that
we
signed
up
for
and
it
it
matters
that
we
take
action
now,
while
we
still
have
the
opportunity
to
instead
of
waiting
longer
and
and
further
risking
our
ability
to
ever
take
action
on
this
policy-
and
you
know,
I
think,
the
the
piece
I
keep
coming
back
to
is
that
you
know
we.
We
want
to
be
thoughtful
and
we
want
to
be
deliberative
and
I
think
there's
a
way
for
us
to
do
that
with
this
proposal.
N
That's
why
there
is
money
set
aside
in
it
to
you
know,
contract
with
an
external
partner
that
can
help
us
with
this
research.
That's
why
we've
added
additional
public
hearings
and
public
comments
to
this
process,
because
we
want
to
gather
the
input
of
people,
I'm
willing
to
do
that
work,
and
I
hope
my
colleagues
are
too
in
in
moving
this
forward
and
the
reality
is
that,
regardless
of
how
we
move
forward
with
this
process,
ultimately
it
will
come
back
to
the
council.
N
We
are
going
to
make
the
final
decisions,
and
so
I
want
to
see
us
act
in
a
manner
that
that
is
responsive
to
the
needs
of
this
community.
N
Knowing
that
you
know
the
the
leading
causes
of
homelessness
in
in
our
city
and
in
our
county
right
now
is,
is
the
rising
cost
of
rent
and
that
once
a
person
experiences
instability
in
in
access
to
housing,
it
takes
a
lot
of
resources
for
us
to
move
them
back
into
that
stability
and
so
keeping
people
in
their
homes
keeping
people
in
the
communities
that
they
love.
That's
why
I
ran
for
office.
N
That's
why
my
community
elected
me
and-
and
I
really
hope
that
we
can
respond
to
the
urgency
that
people
in
this
community
are
feeling
and
and
move
this
move
this
substitute
motion
forward.
Thank
you.
A
A
Or
reiterate
that
I
moved
with
urgency
at
our
first
meeting
to
establish
a
work
group
to
to
deal
with
the
issue
of
rent
stabilization.
So
I
I
I
don't
know
how
much
faster
we
could
have
moved
on
that.
That
is
the
work
that
we
have
been
doing
since
the
day.
One
is:
how
do
we
craft
a
policy
to
ensure
that
we
can
help
the
most
marginalized
people
in
our
community
be
able
to
sustain
themselves
in
safe
and
affordable
housing?
A
At
the
hands
of
deplorable
landlords
who
are
taking
advantage
of
our
community,
and
so
we
need
to
craft
a
policy
in
my
opinion
that
addresses
that
specific
community,
and
so
next
in
queue
we
have
council
member
wisely.
Thank.
M
You,
madam,
thank
you,
I'm
going
to
be
voting
in
favor
of
this
motion
today
and
I
thank
you,
councilmember
chuck
ty
for
bringing
it
forward
as
I've
stated
quite
some
time
now.
I
believe
that
we
have
all
the
information
that
we
need
right
now
in
order
to
use
our
legislative
authority
to
create
a
rent
control
policy
right
now
and
to
put
it
on
the
ballot.
This
year.
M
In
just
a
few
weeks,
saint
paul
is
going
to
begin
implementation
of
the
best
rent
control
policy
in
the
country
will,
which
will
protect
renters
with
no
more
than
three
percent
rent
cap
is
going
to
be
applied
universally
to
all
units
and
it's
free
from
loopholes
like
vacant
cd
control
that
have
shown
to
weaken
rent
control
policies
in
other
cities.
This
is
a
gold
standard
of
what
it
looks
like
to
ensure
that
renters,
especially
black
and
brown
renters,
are
guaranteed
stability
and
are
no
longer
powerless
in
our
current
predatory
housing
market.
M
That
policy
is
being
implemented
right
across
the
river
and
we
need
to
take
action
now
to
ensure
that
our
renters
are
given
the
same
rights
and
protections
taking
a
regional
approach
is
the
most
prac
pragmatic
way
to
do
this,
and
voters
made
it
clear,
with
overwhelming
support
for
question
three,
that
they
want
us
to
move
forward
with
this.
M
My
war
is
similar
to
council
member
chuck
thai
is
majority
renters
and
they
include
some
of
the
most
egregious
recent
and
upcoming
developments
that
take
advantage
of
students
needs
for
housing
near
the
university
by
jacking
up
rent
to
levels
that
are
simply
not
affordable
for
working
class
people,
especially
students.
My
constituents
need
rent
control
to
be
on
the
ballot
this
year
and
they
need
a
three
percent
cap
on
all
units
would
know
they
can
see
the
control.
So
I
really
look
forward
to
supporting
council
member
chuck
ty's
motion.
K
Thank
you,
council
president.
You
know
first,
I
do
want
to
say
that
the
the
the
main
motion
by
council
president,
I
just
wanna,
commend
you
for
putting
this
together.
I
do
believe
that
we've
acted
swiftly
in
good
faith
to
create
a
process
that
is,
that
is
that
is
robust
and
meaningful,
but
there's
more
than
one
way
for
us
to
get
across
the
finish
line
here.
K
I
do
believe
that
that
waiting,
you
know,
I
ask
myself
the
question,
how
many
people
will
be
displaced
in
the
year
and
a
half
two
years
that
it
takes
for
us
to
put
this
policy
together
and,
and
while
I
really
appreciate
the
main
motion
by
the
council
president-
and
I
think
it
is
thorough
and
it
is
good,
I
will
be
supporting
the
substitute
motion
by
council
member
chuck
thai.
For
that
reason,
we
can't
sit.
We
we
we
have
to
act
urgently.
That's
my
belief.
K
Obviously
we
need
rent
control
eventually,
and
so,
if,
if
the
body
just
decides
that
hey
look,
we're
gonna
take
our
time
with
this
I'll
still
be
supporting
the
the
council
president's
main
motion.
But
I
wanna
explain
to
my
colleagues
that
that
question
three
had
a
long
road
ahead
of
it.
It
didn't
just
manifest
out
of
out
of
nowhere
and
happened
really
quickly
advocates
people.
K
You
know
that
we're
seeing
here
in
the
in
the
in
the
chamber
today
have
been
advocating
for
for
some
measure
of
rent
stabilization
for
for
decades
and
and
and
it's
been
a
really
tough
road.
The
state
policy
is
really
unclear,
and
so
I
think
that
that
is
why
past
bodies
have
not
pursued
this
policy,
but
we
were
able
to
pursue
in
a
really
important
and
urgent
way.
Last
term
and
voters
affirmed.
Yes,
we
want
the
council
to
be
able
to
pursue
this
policy
and
now
the
policies
before
us.
K
I
think
that
we
owe
it
to
the
renters
of
the
city
to
to
move
with
some
urgency,
and
I
also
want
to
say
that,
should
we
not
be
able
to
meet
our
deadlines
for
one
reason
or
another,
there
is
nothing
that
would
then
prevent
us
from
changing
our
deadline
to
the
following
year,
and
so
why
not
take
a
shot
at
getting
something
on
the
ballot
this
november,
so
that
we
can
enact
a
rent,
stabilization
policy
as
fast
as
possible?
K
And
so
yes,
I
want
to
thank
the
council
president
for
the
urgency
that
that
we
have
acted
with
as
a
body,
and
I
think
that
that
that
that
that
we
deserve
a
lot
of
credit.
For
that.
K
I
also
want
to
urge
us
to
to
act
a
little
bit
faster
and
it
may
be
fast
for
the
enterprise
for
us
to
move
in
this
way,
but
I
don't
think
any
speed
that
we
could
move
at
would
be
fast
enough
for
residents
and
so,
and
so
we
may
as
well
move
as
fast
as
as
fast
as
possible.
So
that's
what
I
wanted
to
say.
I
want
to
thank
again
councilmember
chuktai.
I
will
be
proud
and
excited
to
support
this
motion
and
I
hope
my
colleagues
will
as
well.
P
Thank
you.
Madam
president,
I
appreciate
you
question
three
was
very
popular
on
the
ballot
and
obviously
we
need
a
rent
controlled.
My
resident
experience
rent
increase
every
year
and
I
completely
understand
we
need
to
put
something
forward
and
that's
what
the
resident
wants.
The
question
is
here:
how
are
we
doing
in
our
process?
We
need
to
make
sure
that
we
are
really
thinking
about
the
consequences.
Any
policy
will
be
forward.
P
P
P
P
I
want
to
deliver
a
policy
that
helps
printers
and
the
strong
policy
can
be
delivered
throughout
a
council
present
proposal
and
the
work
group,
as
you
have,
as
you
will
learn.
The
world
group
will
include
many
expertise,
renters
and
folks
that
that
have
a
knowledge
that
will
create
policies
for
our
future
of
renters.
P
So
I
do
want
to
thank
all
my
colleagues.
I
know
they
are
doing
everything
they
can
to
make
sure
to
ease
the
difficult
renters,
especially
minority
communities,
from
my
word,
in
other
words,
have
been
suffering,
but
let's
be
smart
about
it
and,
let's
really
put
our
you
know,
brain
to
it
and
make
policies
that
will
have
a
long-term
solution
at
the
problem.
We
have
so
thank
you
so
much.
F
F
You
know
the
difference
between
the
implementation
of
question.
One
and
question
three
is
that
question
three
gave
the
council
the
authority
to
write
a
policy
at
some
point,
whereas
question
one
laid
out
explicit
changes
that
we
need
to
make
now
in
order
to
be
in
compliance
with
that
new
charter
amendment,
we
have
a
responsibility
to
the
city
to
represent
our
constituencies,
to
act
as
responsible
fiduciaries
and
to
build
thoughtful
policies
that
both
address
real
challenges
and
also
mitigate
unintended
consequences.
F
We
also
owe
it
to
residents
to
put
forward
the
best
policy
we
can
make,
and
I
do
not
think
that
an
expedited
expedited
timeline
here
is
is
really
going
to
do
that.
I
have
I
it's
going
to
constrict
us
in
ways
that
are
going
to
prevent
us
from
being
able
to
leave
no
stone
left
unturned.
Here.
The
point
of
the
council
president's
work
group
and
council
member
osman's
work
group
is
to
convene
many
voices
and
expertise
and
build
out
a
robust
policy
or
set
of
policies.
F
E
N
Yeah,
I
think,
as
we
as
we
start
to
wrap
up
discussion
on
this
item.
I
I
want
to
bring
us
back
to.
I
want
to
bring
us
back
to
a
couple
of
things
here
and
that's
you
know,
I
think,
should
we
fail
to
put
this
policy
on
the
ballot
this
year.
There
is
nothing
that
stops
us
from
being
able
to
do
to
move
forward
with
the
process
like
you
have
described,
like
councilmember
osman
has
described
to
put
it
on
the
on
the
ballot
next
year.
N
N
To
do
everything
I
could
to
bring
a
little
bit
more
ease,
a
little
bit
more
dignity,
a
little
bit
more
respect
into
their
lives
so
that
people
could
live
and
stay
and
thrive
in
the
communities
that
they
love.
And
I'm
saying
you
know
I'm
new,
we
are
all
in.
You
know
functioning
in
this
new
government
structure.
N
So
I
think
my
my
hope
is
that
you'll
see
this
as
an
honest
attempt
at
responding
to
a
need
that
I
see
disproportionately
in
my
ward
and
that
should
we
fail,
you
know
I
want
us
to
find
a
way
forward.
I
I
understand
how
much
work
has
gone
into
this,
and
I
you
know
I
I
think
I
just.
I
would
just
ask
that
we
we
try.
A
Thank
you,
council,
member
chuck,
thai
next
and
kia's
council
member
wants
lee
woolabah.
M
Thank
you,
madam
president.
Thank
you
again.
Councilmember
checks
high
for
your
comments.
This
situation
brings
me
back
thanks
to
council
member
osman
comments
about
the
work
group
being
instrumental
in
the
passage
of
some
of
the
more
progressive
workers,
rights
policies
that
we've
passed.
For
instance,
you
mentioned
15
and
earned
sick
and
safe
time.
M
I
had
the
honor
of
actually
sitting
where
many
of
our
folks
are
right
now
on
on
the
opposite
side
of
this
diet
during
the
15
minimum
wage
struggle,
and
I
want
to
name-
I
was
also
there
during
the
process
of
the
workplace
advisory
group
and
to
say
that
it
was
through
those
means
that
we
were
able
to
arrive
at
a
strong
policy.
That
is
absolutely
not
accurate.
It
took
literally
thousands
of
working-class
people
for
more
than
four
years,
who
literally
said.
M
Working-Class
people
need
a
livable
wage,
thirty
thousand
dollars,
and
even
some
of
you
who
were
here
at
that
time,
there
was
constant
debates
of.
If
that
is
appropriate,
should
we
be
looking
at
12.50?
Should
we
be
exempting
big
businesses
from
it
having
the
same
conversation
that
we're
having
right
now
about
rent
control
and
it
took
working-class
people
who
were
working
two
to
three
jobs,
had
families
to
take
care
of
to
have
to
launch
a
ballot
initiative
to
be
sued
by
the
city
in
order
for
a
policy
to
be
passed.
M
Unfortunately,
during
election
year
it
took
consistent,
organizing
and
pressure
from
regular
people
who
elect
us
to
do
the
job
of
passing
policies,
that's
supposed
to
meet
their
basic
needs
and
it
took
over
three
and
a
half
years
to
get
to
that
path.
I
would
hate
to
see
us
move
down
the
same
path
where
we
had
76
000
residents
who
voted
in
november
and
said
the
rent
is
too
high
in
minneapolis,
and
we
know
that
other
renters
are
taking
up
similar
action
because
we're
seeing
again
pass
in
st
paul.
M
We
know
we
can
set
a
strong
president.
That's
already
been
established
by
our
neighbors
there.
We
have
the
opportunity
to
pass
that
same
president.
Here
we
don't
need
a
work
group
to
figure
that
out
and
I'm
glad
that
we're
wanting
to
make
an
informed
conversation
or
a
decision
about
this,
I'm
glad
that
we
spent
the
money
to
bring
in
cura
to
help
us
shape
an
analysis
of
what
this
looks
like.
M
This
is
the
time
to
take
that
that
information
that
you've
soaked
up
for
now
three
years,
because
four
years
ago
there
was
the
same
dynamic.
That
said,
you
know,
rick
control
cannot
happen
in
minneapolis
and
I'm
glad
it's
because
folks
like
who
have
showed
up
that
we're
even
discussing
it
now
and
saying
that
it
is
possible.
So
let's
make
it
possible,
do
let's
do
our
jobs
and
pass
a
policy
now
that
is
full
in
alignment
with,
what's
already
been
set
in
saint
paul.
A
Thank
you,
council,
member
lonsley.
Is
there
any
further
discussion.
A
Could
use
in
drafting
a
policy
for
minneapolis
to
be
referred
to
the
voters
as
early
as
the
general
election
in
november
2023?
That
proposal
receives
majority
of
support.
That
will
be
the
decision
of
this
body.
That
proposal
does
not
receive
majority
of
support.
Then
we
will
proceed
to
consider
the
substitute.
B
So
so,
madam
president,
just
for
my
clarity,
the
first
vote
we'll
be
taking
is
on
the
substitute
proposal.
That's
been
offered
by
councilmember
thai
that
we've
just
been
discussing.
If
that
motion
does
not
pass,
then
the
base
motion
on
the
resolution
you've
brought
forward
would
be
immediately
in
front
of
the
body.
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
I
understood
correctly
we're
calling
the
role
on
the
shug
tie
substitute.
A
Thank
you,
mr
clerk,
and
I
misstated
that
so
yes,
we
are
calling
a
role
on
the
substitute
offered
by
council
member
choktai.
B
All
right,
thank
you,
madam
president.
Councilmember
chavez,
aye
councilmember,
ellison,
aye,
councilmember
vito.
No,
I'm
sorry.
Q
R
B
Madam
president,
if
I
may
just
briefly,
I
know
that
the
base
motion
that
you've
offered
in
the
form
of
a
resolution
is
before
the
body
and
we've
received
in
the
clerk's
office.
Quite
a
number
of
amendments
that
have
been
offered
by
other
council
members.
B
To
that
and
with
your
permission,
I
have
had
the
clerks
prepare
a
consolidated
version
of
your
base
resolution
that
incorporates
all
of
the
amendments
that
we've
received
in
the
clerk's
office
prior
to
the
meeting
beginning
this
morning,
and
I
think
it
might
be
helpful
for
the
body
to
see
all
of
those
amendments
in
context
in
the
body
of
the
resolution
and
with
your
approval.
I
would
have
mr
daler
distribute
that
copy
to
the
member
so
that
they
can
see
that
as
we
consider
the
resolution.
B
I
understand
that
we
can
vote
on
each
of
those
amendments
separately,
but
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
for
the
body
to
see
in
total
the
amendments
and
how
they
affect
your
draft
resolution
and,
if
you're,
if
that's
acceptable
with
you,
we'll
go
ahead
and
make
that
happen.
A
A
B
Identified
within
the
body
of
the
consolidated
resolution,
I
have
color-coded
them
so
that
the
amendments
that
we've
received
from
council
member
won
sleep
warloba
are
preceded
with
her
initials
and
are
in
green.
Those
that
are
offered
by
councilmember
shaktai
are
shown
in
purple,
preceded
by
her
initials
a
c.
B
A
Aware
and
comfortable
on
how
we're
going
to
be
voting
on
the
proposed
amendment.
B
A
Yes,
so
colleagues,
we
are
now
voting
on
the
underlying
amendment
to
create
a
working
group
to
to
make
recommendations
around
rent
stabilization,
to
bring
forward
to
this
body
so
that
we
can
present
a
policy
to
help
our
residents
to
address
the
issue
of
rent
control,
rent
stabilization.
A
There
have
been
several
amendments
offered
to
this
resolution
and
the
first
amendment
is
being
brought
forward
by
councilmember
wants
lee
warlabah.
A
A
Are
there
any?
Is
there
any
discussion.
M
Yeah,
adam
president,
yep.
Okay,
I'm
on
cue.
Thank
you,
madam
president.
First
I
would
actually
like
to
get
some
clarification
from
staff
to
understand.
If
this
work
group
will
be
meeting
under
the
open
meeting
law
similar
to
how
our
boards
and
commissions
are
run,
will
they
be
open?
Will
the
meetings
be
uploaded
to
the
city
youtube
channel
for
residents
to
follow
along
and
will
the
agenda
amendments
be
documented
and
published?
So
if
staff
could
provide
a
answer
to
that,
first.
B
Madam
president,
I'm
happy
to
take
a
stab
at
that
if,
if
you
would
like
and
then
I
would
also
identify
that
the
cped
or
community
planning
economic
development
executive
director,
andrea
brennan,
is
in
the
chamber
as
well
as
her
staff
member
joey
dobson,
who
I
understand,
has
been
identified
to
be
the
lead
to
assist
and
coordinate
this
work,
and
they
can
certainly
add
to
the
comments
that
I
begin
with.
B
We
have
not
made
decisions
in
terms
of
recording
and
uploading
because,
as
we
transition
back
to
in-person
meetings,
we
don't
have
the
technical
capacities.
I've
briefed
all
council
members
to
make
sure
that
all
meetings
of
our
advisory
boards
and
commissions,
all
57
of
them,
are
recorded
and
uploaded
to
youtube.
Certainly
we
made
that
effort
through
the
last
two
years
as
we
were
operating
during
the
pandemic,
but
there
are
not
more
rooms
in
this
chamber
that
are
set
up
to
do
that,
recording
and
broadcast
and
those
types
of
things.
B
It
would
reduce
it
to
this
chamber
or,
I
think,
perhaps,
room
100
in
the
public
service
building
and
that
would
then
would
be
competitive
with
all
the
other
meetings
we
have
in
those
two
spaces.
So
we
are
intending
to
make
the
efforts
that
the
meetings
are
subject
to
open
meeting
law.
The
open
meeting
law
does
not
require
the
broadcasting
live,
webcasting
posting
to
youtube.
It
does
require
that
all
meeting
notices
are
on
the
calendar
and
published
no
less
than
three
days
before
the
date
of
the
meeting.
B
It
does
require
that
any
agenda
prepared
for
that
meeting
is
available
to
the
public.
We
post
that
through
the
legislative
information
management
system,
it
does
require
that
the
record
of
those
meetings
be
also
posted
after
the
meeting
to
limbs,
so
in
terms
of
public
access
notice
and
of
the
ability
to
trace
or
track
and
monitor
what
that
work
group
is
working
on.
I
think
we
would
be
compliant
with
the
open
meeting
law
fully
and
it's
the
same
level
of
compliance
we
enforce
and
ensure
for
all
of
our
appointed
boards
and
commissions
across
the
city.
M
B
We
as
a
city
have
limited
spaces
that
have
been
set
up
and
are
equipped
with
the
technology
to
do
broadcasting,
and
so,
if
it's
this
body's
decision
that
we
want
those
meetings
to
be
broadcast,
that's
going
to
impose
a
burden
both
in
terms
of
the
scheduling
and
availability
of
the
space,
but
also
in
terms
of
the
dates
that
the
work
group
could
meet.
So
how
fast
the
work
group
proceeds
with
its
business.
B
I
will
say
that
the
meetings
of
of
the
work
group
would
be
open
to
public
attendance.
Much
like
this
meeting,
so
we're
not
not
allowing
the
public
to
attend
in
person
those
meetings.
B
What
we
wouldn't
be
doing
is
live
casting
them
broadcasting
them,
as
we
are
broadcasting
this
meeting
right
now
as
it
happens,
live,
and
so
that,
I
think,
is
the
one
difference
I
heard
in
your
original
question
is
that
we
would
not
be
broadcasting
those
meetings
they
would
be
fully
compliant
with
the
other
requirements
under
the
open
meeting
law,
or,
I
should
say
the
requirements,
because
the
open
meeting
law
does
not
require
broadcasting.
M
Thank
you
clerk,
carl.
That
said,
I
actually
would
like
to
make
a
motion
for
this
to
include
broadcasting.
I
get
that
we
might
not
have
the
space.
I
think
it's
important
just
like
constituents
can
come
and
go
to
youtube
and
see
meetings
like
this
and
all
of
that
for
our
other
committees
to
be
able
to
know
what's
happening.
I
think
that's
important
around
this
process,
so
I
would
like
to
see
that
be
reflected
in
this
work
group.
So.
B
President,
just
on
that
point,
I
need
to
make
sure
the
body
is
also
where
that
has
a
budgetary
impact
that
has
not
been
assessed
to
broadcast
meetings
would
require
staffing,
not
just
the
scheduling
of
this
room,
but
also
staffing
who
make
it
happen.
We
do
provide
the
staff
through
the
communications
department
and
our
information
technology
for
these
meetings.
That's
budgeted,
it's
not
budgeted
for
work
groups
and
boards
and
commissions,
so
that
would
be
an
additional
cost.
We
would
need
to
assess.
M
I
do
want
to
have
that
be
recognized
as
a
motion
and
then
for
my
original
motion
around
the
regional
approach.
Three
percent.
It's
currently
the
regional
approach,
as
I
noted
earlier,
thanks
to
the
passage
of
rent
control
in
st
paul
back
in
november.
In
just
a
couple
weeks,
they're
going
to
be
implementing
a
strong
universal
rent
control
policy.
That
means
constituents
in
my
ward
who
rent
in
prospect
park.
M
M
It's
essential
that
this
work
group
consider
what
happens
if
minneapolis
move
forward
with
a
policy
that
diverges
from
st
paul's,
what
that
will
do
to
our
rental
market,
what
that
will
do
for
tenants?
I
think
it
will
be
very
challenging
to
imagine
that
our
policy
work
is
going
to
happen
in
isolation.
I
don't
see
the
logic
in
wasting
time,
it's
starting
from
scratch.
Well,
the
policy
is
literally
going
to
be
in
effect
in
just
a
few
weeks
with
our
neighbors
across
the
river.
A
Thank
you,
council,
member
once
we
were,
and
so
we
have
your
amendment
for
a
reasonable
focus.
B
B
I
think
that
goes
if
you're,
following
along
in
the
printed
copy
that
the
clerk's
distributed.
This
is
on
page
three
at
the
top.
Under
the
heading
shared
expectations
for
work
group
number
two
work:
group
meetings
will
be
accessible
for
the
public
to
attend
our
view,
but
only
work
group
members
will
participate.
We
could
certainly
add
here.
Meetings
should
be
broadcast
and
posted
to
the
city's
youtube
channel.
B
But
I
would
again
just
I've
captured
that
I
think
the
focus
is
on
the
additional
under
1b
on
page
1,
that's
shown
in
the
packet,
the
regional
focus
piece
that
councilmember
wansley
warlobo
was
bringing
forward
and
we
should
dispose
of
that.
First.
A
Thank
you,
mr
clerk.
So
colleagues,
we
have
the
lonsley
willowbar
amendment,
a
regional
focus,
including
analysis
of
potential
impacts
of
a
minneapolis
policy
that
diverges
significantly
from
saint
paul's
current
policy,
which
is
universal
and
capturing
to
no
more
than
three
percent.
S
Madam
chair
council
members,
the
my
understanding
is
that
the
saint
paul
ballot
measure
becomes
effective
on
may
1st.
However,
saint
paul
has
established
a
41-member
work
group
that
is
recommending
changes
for
the
saint
paul
city,
council
and
mayor
to
consider
that
would
modify
the
proposal
that
was
approved
on
the
ballot
and
that
that
proposal
has
not
yet
been
considered
by
that
elected
body.
A
Thank
you,
ms
brennan.
A
Okay,
so
colleagues,
we
have
the
wesley
world
of
our
amendment
in
front
of
us
we've
had
discussion.
I
see
councilmember
palmisano
in
queue.
F
Thank
you.
Madam
president,
I'd
like
to
speak
to
council
member,
wants
le
worlabo's
motion
this
first
one.
I
can
support
requiring
a
regional
analysis.
I
agree
that's
important,
but
the
rest
of
this
amendment
is
incredibly
prescriptive
and
it
appears
to
be
leading
the
work
group.
I
don't
think
we
should
be
directing
the
work
group
on
a
hyper-specific
level
in
getting
feedback
from
every
office.
I've
heard
numerous
colleagues
say
they
want
a
work
group
to
be
unencumbered
and
to
research,
a
broad
range
of
impacts
and
policy
options.
F
I
think
that
directing
this
work
group
to
focus
their
time
on
one
specific
example,
isn't
giving
them
a
chance
to
make
decisions
on
their
own.
A
regional
analysis
would
certainly
have
to
include
our
largest
neighboring
city,
but
if
we're
explicitly
calling
out
saint
paul,
then
why
call
it
a
regional
analysis
in
the
first
place,
I'm
supportive
of
a
regional
focus,
but
not
the
rest
of
this
language.
A
I
believe
q
is
councilman
mccoskey.
L
A
Oh
go
ahead
and
then
ask
the
question:
oh
I'm
sorry,
so
we
do
have
a
council
rule.
We
can
only
speak
to
an
item
twice
and
I
think
you
have
been
in
queue
twice
on
this
item.
M
I
know
councilmember
chuck
thai
will
speak
to
this
in
terms
of
being
very
explicit
or
construct
basically
prescriptive.
I
see
an
example
of
that
already
with
the
recommendation
for
part
two,
where
the
original
framework
says
that
it
must
not
constrain
the
production
of
affordable
housing
in
market
rate
housing.
That's
very
prescriptive
to
me
too,
so
I
look
forward
to
hearing
councilmember
drugstize
amendments
as
we
see
that
also
already
set
throughout
other
places
in
this
current
policy.
M
So
I'm
grateful
for
the
support
for
the
first
part,
but
also
note
that
that's
already
demonstrated
in
the
existing
policy
framework
that
we're
considering
right
now.
G
R
A
Item
fails,
and
the
next
proposed
amendment
is
by
council
member,
aisha,
chuktai,
and
it
reads:
the
policy
framework
must
not
constrain.
A
A
And
so
I
just
want
to
just
note
that
in
helping
our
majority
resident
renter
city,
that
it
is
going
to
take
a
range
of
approaches
for
us
to
address
this
issue.
A
And
so
I
I
really
believe
that
this
language
needs
to
to
stay.
And
I
will
invite
my
colleagues
to
comment.
Council,
member
checktime.
N
Thank
you.
Madam
president,
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
explain
this
this
amendment-
and
you
know
I
feel
like
this-
is
the
least
spicy
amendment.
That's
at
the
table
right
now,
and
I
say
that
because
you
know
I
was
just
thinking
about
what
council
member
paul
masano
said
in
her
comments
that
she
offered
to
council
member
wants
lee
warloba's
amendment
saying
that
you
know.
Perhaps
we
don't
need
to
be
so
prescriptive
in
the
language
that
we're
using.
Let's
try
to
you
know,
keep
things
level-headed.
N
Let's
try
to
give
our
work
group
direction.
That
is,
you
know
that
that's
not
leading
them
to
a
specific
conclusion.
That's
that's!
You
know
very
that's
very
unbiased
in
that
way,
and
so
you
know
when
I,
when
I
read
the
when
I
read
the
initial
or
the
original
section
item
number
two
under
objectives
that
it
said
you
know
the
production
of
affordable
housing
and
market
rate
housing
which
would
impede
the
advancement
of
the
2040
goal.
N
I
honestly
feel
like
it
just
cleans
up
the
language
a
little
bit
by
saying
that
the
policy
frameworks
should
not
constrain
the
goals
of
the
minneapolis
2040
plan,
and
the
impact
of
this
is
the
same.
It's
just
about
you
know
not
coloring
the
perspective
of
our
work
group
and
and
not
being
overly
prescriptive
without
cause.
So
this
is
it's
just
a
it's
a
technical
change.
It's
not
a
it's!
Not
it's
not
like
a
it's
not
me
disagreeing
with
the
with
the
an
intent.
K
Councilmember
ellison-
I
I
agree
with
this
with
this
change
item
number
two
as
written,
and
I
and
I
have
strong
doubts
that
this
is
intentional.
K
But
when
I
read
this,
it
feels
to
fall
just
short
of
almost
accusing
rent
control
policy
of
resulting
in
the
things
listed,
and
so
it
sort
of
infers
that
we've
seen
from
the
presentation
that
we
got
from
the
u
of
m,
we
that
we've
now
gotten
twice
that
of
all
the
policies
that
they've
studied
of
all
the
disparate
impacts,
that
they
saw,
that
that
this
wasn't
one
of
them
right
and
so
to
sort
of
front
load
that
we
have
to
make
sure
and
place
such
large
emphasis
on.
K
We
have
to
make
sure
that
the
policy
doesn't
do
all
these
things.
I
think,
could
cause
somebody
participating
to
kind
of
walk
on
eggshells
with
their
ideas
that
they
might
be
coming
forth
with.
They
should
be
able
to
express
their
ideas
freely
and
then
analyze
you
know
are
we
are
we
impeding
as
opposed
to
feeling
like?
Oh
this
is.
K
This
is
what
we're
front
loading
and
and
sort
of
inferring
strongly
that
that
that
these
types
of
policies
inherently
result
in
these
kinds
of
outcomes,
because
I
think
the
research
that
we've
seen
disproves
that.
A
G
Thank
you.
Madam
president,
I
first
of
all
respect
very
much
the
fact
that
council
member
chug
thai
met
with
everyone
she
could
to
talk
about
her
amendments
and
went
into
it
in
great
detail.
I
am
not
the
biggest
fan
of
the
2040
plan.
G
I
voted
for
it,
but
I
have
very
serious
concerns
about
some
of
the
outcomes,
but
one
of
the
things
in
the
plan
I
actually
support
is
making
sure
that
we
can
build
as
much
housing
as
humanly
possible
and
this
debate
about
whether
or
not
rent
control
affects
the
building
of
housing
is
not
as
clear
as
council
member
ellison
said.
The
truth
of
the
matter
is
right
now
in
saint
paul,
most
projects
that
are
being
proposed
to
move
forward
are
on
hold
as
a
result
of
the
potential
rent
control
policy.
G
Take
a
look
at
what's
happening
at
the
ford
plant
as
an
example,
so
without
exempting
new
construction,
which
I
don't
hear
anyone
saying,
okay,
we're
given
on
that,
we
will
potentially
restrict
the
supply
of
new,
affordable
and
market
rate
housing,
and
that
is
one
of
the
pieces
of
the
2040
plan
that
I
actually
support.
So
I
think
that,
as
written,
it
is
more
intentional
to
be
consistent
with
the
goals
of
the
city.
Rent
control,
without
exempting
new
construction
will
definitely
have
an
effect
on
the
overall
supply
of
housing
overall
and
increase
the
cost.
G
P
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
president.
I
do
agree.
Consumer,
remember,
chuck,
thai
and
especially
council
member
alison's
last
comment.
We
can't
restrained-
and
you
know
the
work
group
and
the
work
they're
supposed
to
do.
Let
them
make
that
decision
and
we're
trusting
them
to
come
up
a
policy
that
will
go
a
long
way
and
be
helpful
to
our
residents.
P
Yes,
and
even
looking
at
it
a
new
construction,
you
know
I
I
like
to
imagine
that
we're
coming
up
a
policy
that
will
benefit
not
just
the
residents
but
also
really
the
developers,
the
future
investors
and
so
on,
and
we
just
kind
of
make
sure
that
we're
thinking
about
the
positive
way
of
hoping
that
this
is
a
greater
good
for
everyone,
either
investor
or
renter.
So
I
will
support
this
language.
A
Thank
you.
Consumer
rewards,
leeward.
M
Thank
you,
madam
president,
and
also
thank
you
for
your
comments.
Councilmember
osman.
I
absolutely
agree
that
we
need
to
be
letting
our
this
work
group
move
forward
in
a
place.
That's
not
directed
in
a
way
towards
a
specific
conclusion
that
was
just
confirmed
for
me,
as
councilmember
goodman
spoke
about
basically
looking
at
how
we
need
to
be
looking
at
exempting
new
construction
that
we
don't
need
that
color
in
or
brought
into
this
space.
M
We
need
people
to
look
at
all
options
on
the
table
and
not
in
a
way
that
already
says
that
you
know
look.
We
have
to
be
considerate
of
the
biggest
developers
who
are
so
threatened
that
you
know
working
class
people
said
we
need
to
regulate
a
cost
burden.
Housing
market.
That's
cost
basically
yielding
displacements
for
them.
That's
taking
their.
You
know.
Meager
coins
that
they're
earning
you
know
we.
We
should
not
even
be
looking
at
those
those
major
actors,
and
I
I
don't
agree
with
that
sentiment.
M
I
absolutely
support
councilmember
chuck
thais.
You
know
amendment
I
think
back
to
again
where
we
were
with
15.
It's
really
like
ptsd
all
over
here,
where
essentially
we're
doing
the
same
dynamic
of.
M
Should
we
be
allowing
space
for
exemptions
to
be
baked
into
a
work
group
process,
and
I
don't
think
that's
where
we
should
be
leading
this
work
group
towards
and
hopefully
again
allowing
them
which
existing
precedences
that's
been
set,
regionally
saint
paul,
whatever
the
case
to
be
also
on
the
table
and
guiding
how
we
pass
the
policy
in
the
most
urgent.
You
know
timeline
as
possible.
O
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
think
that
the
work
of
determining
the
appropriateness
of
exemptions
or
the
appropriateness
of
any
policies,
you
know
affirmation
of
our
2040
plan.
That
should
be
the
work
of
the
work
group
and
I
don't
think
we
should
necessarily
be
spelling
that
out
in
this
document,
and
for
that
reason
I
think
we
should
just
call
the
question
on
this
on
this
pretty
simple
technical
edit.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
payne,
and
you
know
I.
I
will
just
note
that
this
feels
like
a
reasonable
amendment
to
my
proposal,
and
so
you
have
called
the
question
and
I
will
ask
kirk
to
call
the
role
on
whether
or
not
we
should
call
a
question.
B
Madam
president,
did
I
just
understand
you're
asking
for
the
roll
call
on
a
motion
to
call
the
question?
Yes,
okay,
council
member
chavez,
all
right,
council,
member
ellison,
all
right
council,
member
vitom,
aye,
council
member
rainville.
All
right
councilmember
wants
to
huarla
hi
councilmember
goodman
hi
councilmember
osman
aye
councilmember
payne,
aye,
councilmember,
koski,
aye,
councilmember
thai
aye.
Vice
president
palmisano
aye,
president
jenkins,.
A
G
B
R
A
The
next
amendment
is
also
by
council
member
chug
thai,
which
indicates
a
fiscal
analysis
required
related
to
administration
and
cost
of
implementing
the
policy
taking
into
account
administration
of
existing
programs.
N
So
I'm
happy
to
explain
this
motion
real
quick,
so
you
know,
I
really
appreciate
that
one
of
the
things
that
this
work
group
does
is
place,
a
heavy
emphasis
on
on
the
policy
and
the
fiscal
analysis
of
whatever
policy
we
come
back
with.
Currently,
the
fiscal
analysis
has
a
very
narrow
scope
right.
It
says
that
as
written,
it
says
that
the
fiscal
analysis
has
to
take
into
account
the
cost
of
administration
of
our
existing
programs
that
address
housing
and
the
impacts
on
the
housing
market.
N
Those
are
the
only
two
things
that
we
do.
A
fiscal
analysis
on.
I
think
my
point
here
is
that
when
we
think
about
the
impact
of
this
policy-
and
we
are
measuring
how
much
it's
going
to
cost,
we
know
that
one
of
the
leading
causes
of
homelessness
in
our
like
right
now
is
the
rising
cost
of
rent
leading
to
evictions,
which
puts
a
person
in
a
seven
year,
bind
on
being
able
to
successfully
rent
again.
N
So
there's
there's
a
an
unseen
cost
that
we
are
not
taking
into
account
on
on
this
policy,
and
so,
if
we
are
going
to
be
thoughtful
and
we're
going
to
be
deliberative,
which
is
the
decision
that
we've
made
as
a
body
then,
let's
be
actually
thoughtful
and
actually
deliberative
in
the
fiscal
impact
of
this
policy.
N
So
what
I'm
asking
this
body
to
do
is
to
increase
the
scope
of
the
fiscal
analysis
that
we
do
to
include
the
cost
of
administration
of
existing
programs,
the
impacts
on
the
housing
market,
but
also
the
cost
of
evictions
to
our
city
and
to
our
state
and
the
cost
of
shelter
for
displaced
people,
because
those
are
also
incredibly
important
factors
in
how
and
whether
and
what
specifically
we
implement
with
this
policy.
And
we
should
have
all
of
that
information
in
front
of
us
in
in
the
name
of
being
deliberative.
A
Thank
you,
councilman.
Is
there
any
other
discussion.
K
I'll
keep
it
really
short
I'll.
Just
say
that
I
really
like
the
idea
that
we
would
incorporate
this
kind
of
analysis.
We,
as
a
city
have
gone
from
not
really
being
a
player
in
the
conversation
around
our
our
unhoused
neighbors,
to
playing
a
major
role.
We've
seen,
cped
really
and
we've
seen
our
the
entire
enterprise.
K
Sorry
not
to
single
out
one
department,
really
increase
the
amount
of
energy
that
they're
putting
into
addressing
issues
regarding
the
unhoused,
and
so
I
think,
between
the
investments
that
we're
putting
in
as
a
city,
the
investments
that
the
county
is
putting
in
this
is
a.
This
is
a
really
a
good
analysis
that
we
should
have.
Obviously
you
know
we
want
to
know
how
this
is
going
to
affect
the
market.
K
We
want
to
know
all
those
things,
because
that
affects
whether
builders
are
going
to
build,
but
also
we
want
to
know
you
know
when,
what's
that
ratio
of
rent
increase
to
people
on
the
street,
because
that
that
our
communities
and
we
as
a
city,
we
bear
that
cost
as
well.
So,
just
speaking
of
support.
S
Madam
president,
council
members,
this,
I
would
say,
falls
into
the
category
of
all
of
the
immeasurable
impacts
of
housing,
instability
which
we
know
are
incredibly
significant.
S
You
know
we
have
tried
to
to
measure
some
impacts
of
housing,
instability
and
and
housing
stability,
but
I
think
the
short
answer
is:
is
there
a
go-to
data
source
for
this?
No,
I
think
that
there
are.
There
are
different
ways
that
we
can
factor
in
this
kind
of
analysis.
S
S
You
know
the
rate
of
eviction
or
the
rate
of
homelessness
in
or
with
or
without
a
rent
stabilization
policy.
We
can
certainly,
you
know,
try
to
look
at
that
and
you
know
tried
to
to
come
up
with
some
proxies
of
measurement
for
that.
Another
way
to
consider
this
is
that
you
know
to
look
at
the
investments
that
the
city
is
making
in
preventing
eviction.
This
the
investments
the
city
is
making
in
preventing
and
ending
homelessness
versus
the
costs
of
implementing
a
rent,
stabilization
policy,
for
example.
S
I
mean
that
may
also
be
another
factor
of
analysis
that
could
come
into
this
based
on
this
language,
but
there's
no
go-to
data,
but
we
certainly,
you
know,
could
at
least
try
to
look
at
whether
there's
anything
that
we
could
identify
here.
H
S
Madam
president,
council
members,
I
I
think
that
we
would.
I
would
really
need
to
probably
consult
with
the
broader
staff
team
on
this
before
answering
that.
A
Thank
you,
director,
brennan.
L
Yes,
quick
question
director
brennan,
I
don't
know
if
this
will
be
directed
to
you
or
to
I'm
just
curious
to
know,
for
today's
sake
is
there
you
know
language
that
we
could
shift
to
make
sure
that
we
are
including
some
of
the
things
that
you're
talking
about,
or
is
this
something
that
we
need
to
pull
for
a
later
date?
I'm
not
sure,
I'm
not
sure
that
this
is
encompassing
what
councilmember
shangtai
is
trying
to
get
at.
S
Madam
president,
councilmember
koski,
I
I
believe
that,
with
the
previous
action
that
you
took
in
adopting
the
amendment
that
basically
just
directs
the
work
group
to
not
constrain
the
goals
of
minneapolis
2040,
that
this
analysis
would
would
cons
that
that
would
basically
require
us
to
look
at
things
like
housing
instability.
S
You
know
basically,
all
of
the
14
goals
of
minneapolis
2040
and
the
100
policies
that
fall
under
that.
So
I
I
don't.
I
think
that
the
analysis
of
you
know
whether
how
what
is
already
here
would
already
encompass
some
kind
of
consideration
of
the
effect
of
rent
stabilization
policy
may
have
on
evictions
and
homelessness.
So
I
don't
think
that
this
you
know
I
I
I
can't
offer
you
know
alternative
language.
I
would
just
suggest
that
it's
it's!
It's
not
needed
for
this
work
group
to
consider
those
those
things.
A
Thank
you
and
next
and
q
is
council
member
check
time.
N
But
we're
saying
that
there
are
very
specific
things
that
we
want
to
understand
a
fiscal
analysis,
an
impact
on
right
and
that
that
you
know
I'm
happy
to
take
out
and
make
a
quick
change
to
to
my
amendment,
to
say,
like
cost
of
evictions
to
the
city,
remove
and
state
and
then
and
cost
to
cost
of
shelter
for
displaced
people,
so
that
we're
really
keeping
the
scope
very
narrow
and
focused
on
the
state.
N
There
are
specific
things
around
around
people
being
displaced
from
their
homes
that
the
city
specifically
spends
money
on.
There
are
ways
in
which
we
specifically
spend
money
on
on
interacting
with
people
experiencing
homelessness
and
in
all
of
the
different
spectrums
in
which
that
happens,
and
so,
like
you
know,
I'm
not
I
I.
I
think
that
that
is
a
a
fair
thing
to
ask
for
fiscal
analysis
on,
and
I
I
don't
see
it
as
being
repetitive,
because
I
I'm
we're
not
asking
for
us
to
line
up
with
the
stated
goals.
N
Broadly
we're
asking
for
like
tell
us
how
much
it
costs
us
and
and
what
the
impact
of
this
would
be.
N
A
Thank
you
for
that
offer
council
member
chuck
thai.
I
do
see
councilmember
payne
and
q
to
speak
to
this
item,
so
I
think
we
should.
O
I'm
noticing
a
theme
of
a
lot
of
the
discussions
on
each
of
these
amendments,
and
one
of
these
themes
is
what
needs
to
be
prescriptive
and
really
detailed
out
and
what
should
be
just
left
to
like
generalize
towards
the
2040
plan,
and
I
really
like
this
amendment,
because
I
think
when
you
draw
that
line
of
what
really
needs
to
be
spelled
out
when
that
line's
not
drawn
you
go
to
the
default
and
when
you
go
to
default,
you
ultimately
start
representing
the
needs
of
people
who
have
influence
and
people
who
are
very
bound
to
this
institution
and
are
very
well
supported
by
this
institution,
and
I
think
that
the
spirit
of
this
entire
policy
is
to
address
the
needs
of
people
who
are
not
centered
and
a
lot
of
the
work.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
payne,
and
I
just
received
a
message
from
the
clerk
about
a
potential
amendment
from
council
member
chuck
thai.
Mr.
B
Clerk,
madam
president,
I'm
going
to
type
this
into
the
chat,
so
you
can
see
it
but
consulting
with
the
author
and
also
with
the
professional
staff,
possibly
a
middle
ground.
Given
the
previous
amendment,
which
passed
referring
to
the
minneapolis
2040
plan
would
be
to
say
a
full
fiscal
analysis
on
the
possible
impacts
of
a
policy
against
the
goals
in
minneapolis
2040
and
its
impact
on
housing,
stability,
homelessness
and
the
housing
market.
B
It
talks
about
homelessness
and
it
talks
about
the
housing
market
and
its
impacts
there.
So
the
professional
staff
felt
comfortable
with
that
as
a
sort
of
broad-based
statement
that
is
workable.
Councilmember
shagtai
had
a
brief
opportunity
to
consult
with
her
I'll
type
it
in
here.
So
you
have
the
words
in
front
of
you,
but
in
case
that
is
something
that
might
be
more
amenable
to
a
majority
of
the
body.
A
Thank
you,
mr
clerk,
and
thank
you
councilmember
chug
thai
for
that
shift
in
language
and
conferring
with
staff.
I
think
that
that
can
be
a
workable
amendment
to
this
resolution,
and
so
with
that,
if
there
is
any
further,
is
there
any
further
discussion.
A
N
Thank
you,
madam
president,
by
the
end
of
by
the
end
of
this
term,
I'm
sure
you're
gonna
get
tired
of
hearing
this.
I
represent
an
overwhelmingly
renter
community.
Eighty
percent
of
my
constituents
are
renters.
The
majority
of
the
residents
of
the
city
of
minneapolis
are
renters,
and
so,
if
we're
talking
about
something
that
is
going
to
have
a
massive
impact
on
the
residents
of
this
city,
then
our
voices
should
be
at
the
table
in
in
description
in
finalizing
this
policy.
N
You
know
frequently
I'll
find
that
I'll
have
conversations
I'll
have
conversations
with
with
people
who
rented
maybe
20
years
ago,
10
years
ago,
even
five
years
ago,
who
have
an
understanding
in
their
mind
of
what
renting
is
like
or
what
the
cost
of
it
is.
That
is
so
far
from
reality.
N
It's
almost
laughable,
and
so
you
know
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
bringing
people
who
are
going
to
be
at
the
table
thoughtfully
deliberating
on
this
decision
that
understand
the
reality
of
what
it
means
to
rent
in
the
city
of
minneapolis
in
the
here
and
now,
and
so
I
understand
that
there
are
two
sections
here,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
all
understand
the
impact
of
this
right.
So
there
are
two
sections
of
how
how
the
the
members
of
the
work
group
are
selected.
N
There
are
12
seats
that
are
appointed
by
the
city,
council
and
mayor
half
of
those
are
already
renters.
That's
excellent!
I'm
very
excited
about
that
in
the
second
section,
which
is
the
11
designated
organizational
seats,
you
know
so
nothing
changing
at
this
moment.
If,
if,
if
without
any
of
these
amendments,
this
was
to
pass,
we
would
have,
we
would
have
a
quarter
of
this
work
group
be
renters.
N
I
don't
think
that's
enough,
and
so
you
know
I'm
even
looking
through
some
of
these
organizational
recommendations
and
I
see,
for
example,
the
city's
housing
advisory
committee,
which
includes
a
full
spectrum
of
experiences
right.
There
are
renters
who
are
a
part
of
that.
N
There
are
property
owners
developers
who
are
part
of
that
housing
advisory
committee,
and
so
I
want
to
ensure
that,
even
in
the
organizational
section
where
we
have
the
ability
to
that
we're
we're
bringing
more
renter
voices
at
the
table
and
that
the
more
that
we
are
intentional
in
ensuring
that
that
experience
is
centered
in
the
deliberations
that
this
work
group
has.
The
better
policy,
I
believe,
will
will
end
up
coming
up
with.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
chuck
thai
next,
thank
you
as
councilmember
palmisano.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Thank
you
councilmember
chug
thai,
because
that
helps
to
explain
some
of
my
initial.
It
helps
clarify
where
you're
thinking
that
the
changes
in
the
makeup
will
come
from.
F
The
purpose
of
this
work
group
is
to
convene
a
diverse
body
of
experiences
and
thoughts
and
expertise.
I
believe
that
the
proposal
that
staff
brought
us
does
just
that.
It's
very
possible,
like
you,
said
that
these
other
11
seats
might
well
will
likely
have
other
renters
in
them.
You
know,
I
believe
this
proposal
that
staff
brought
forward
does
just
that.
I
I
appreciated
that
we
all
had
the
opportunity
to
provide
input
on
that
makeup.
F
I
think
this
proposal
does
a
good
job
of
reflecting
the
compositions
makeup
and
the
feedback
that
we
got,
but
I'm
concerned
that
some
of
these
other
amendments
that
try
to
change
it
a
bit
actually
strip
away
the
range
of
expertise
in
the
broad
knowledge
base
that
we
would
otherwise
be
lucky
to
hear
from.
F
A
Thank
you,
councilman
paul,
masano
and,
and
I
I
actually
agree
with
those
comments
that
you
know,
the
organizations
that
are
listed
here
over
half
of
them
are.
A
Advocacy
organizations,
I
think
for
us
to
prescribe
who
they
intend
to
represent
that
voice
on
this
work
group
should
be
their
decision,
and
so
with
that
stated,
I
I
just
don't
see
this
proposal
adding
value
to
this
conversation.
H
A
That
amendment
fails.
The
next
amendment
is
being
offered
by
councilmember
chavez.
It
indicates
that
half
of
the
seats
should
be
held
by
individuals
who
represent
black
brown,
indigenous
and
people
of
color
communities.
I
Yes,
council,
president
jenkins,
my
motion
ensures
that
we
have
representation
from
communities
of
color
and
immigrants
who
are
those
most
impacted
from
the
increases
of
rent
and
the
lack
of
action
from
our
council
and
our
state
to
support
renters.
It
ensures
that
these
seats
are
held
by
black
brown,
indigenous
and
people
of
color
and
immigrants.
I
As
a
city,
we
say
that
racism
is
a
public
health
crisis
and
it's
time
that
we
as
a
council
acknowledge
that
this
decision
can
help
uplift,
the
voices
of
those
most
impacted
by
that.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
get
to
vote
on
this.
L
Thank
you,
madam
president,
and
thank
you
consumer
chavez
for
bringing
this
up.
I
I
hear
you
and
understand
I.
T
T
T
Obviously,
there's
some
effort
later
on
in
this
proposal
that
uses
zip
codes
and
you
can
use
income
levels,
there's
ways
to
certainly
achieve
with
some
fair
certainty
that
you
get
the
representation.
I
think
that
council
member
chavez,
and
probably
many
others
on
the
council
would
seek
to
see
represented.
T
I
think-
and
maybe
in
this
opening
paragraph
for
this
section
of
the
proposal
you
could
state
if
you
so
desired.
You
know
an
intent
or
desire
that
the
membership
in
the
composition
of
the
work
group
reflect
the
full
diversity
of
the
city,
and
then
obviously
there
are
some
specific
things
again
back
to
using
zip
codes
would
be
an
example.
A
Thank
you
to
the
attorney
and
nixon
q
with
council
member
goodman.
G
Thank
you,
madam
president,
and
through
the
chair
I
just
signed
up
to
speak
because
of
the
comment
that
councilmember
chavez
raised,
that
the
city
has
had
a
lack
of
action
to
protect
renters.
G
Now,
I'm
sure
he
must
not
have
meant
the
massive
amount
of
work
done
by
the
previous
city
council,
led
by
council
member
ellison
to
put
into
place
large
numbers
of
policies
and
very
large
amounts
of
money
towards
protecting
renters
in
this
city.
Could
we
do
more?
Yes,
is
rent
control,
the
only
thing
we
can
do
no,
but
to
suggest
that
the
city,
the
exact
quote,
was
because
of
the
lack
of
action
to
protect
renters
in
this
city.
G
That
is
just
simply
not
true
and
is
actually
kind
of
insulting
to
our
staff
that
have
been
judiciously
doing
this
work
under
the
previous
council's
direction
and
the
council
before
that.
I
would
add
for
at
least
the
past
seven
years.
I'm
sure
that
you
don't
want
me
to
go
into
a
long
list
of
all
of
the
things
we
can
do
and
I
have
done
and
I'm
sure
council
member
ellison
could
speak
eloquently
about
the
renter
protection
work
that
he
has
led
over
the
past
six
years.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
goodman
and
councilmember
chavez.
I
Thanks
for
your
awards,
council
member,
I
would
just
go
back
to
the
city
attorney.
Maybe
the
clerk
and
clarify
would
it
be
an
intent
and
what
would
that
actually
mean,
because
we
know
that
over
40
percent
of
people
of
color
do
represent
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
when
you
add
immigrants,
it's
a
lot
more,
so
wouldn't
intent
just
be
a
check
mark
for
us
to
just
say
we
will
do
this
or
would
it
be
a
requirement?
I
B
I
believe
I'll
just
sort
of
jump
in
the
city
attorney
and
I've
been
sort
of
talking
back
and
forth
here
about
how
to
capture
the
intent
that
you
just
raised
council
member
chavez,
and
I
think
perhaps
that
we
could
insert
some
verbiage.
That
would
say
that
the
council
intends
for
the
composition
of
the
work
group
membership
to
reflect
the
diversity
of
the
community
yeah.
B
You
know
full
diversity,
the
full
diversity
of
the
community,
so
that
that
is
a
criteria
that
the
council
could
certainly
consider
in
making
its
appointments
and
that
we
could
use
that
to
weigh
against
the
membership.
Ultimately,
as
it's
approved
by
this
body,
without
potentially
getting
into
a
constitutional
challenge.
On
on
that
process.
So
I
mean
I
think
we
could
incorporate
that
language
if,
if
you're
comfortable
with
that
and
I'll,
try
and
type
that
right
now,
so
you
can
see
it.
I
For
sure-
and
we
can
probably
move
on
to
the
next
one
and
then
we
can
just
follow
up
with
that
the
next
two
and
I
would
just
say
that
our
city
staff
works
hard
every
single
day.
I
know
that
you
all
make
sure
that
our
renters
are
protected.
My
comment
was
mostly
regarding
that
our
body
needs
to
do
a
lot
more
and
better
when
people
are
facing
evictions
in
the
cold
weather,
when
people's
rent
continues
to
increase.
I
It
is
the
responsibility
of
this
body
to
protect
the
renters
of
our
city
and
if
people
lose
their
home
and
are
getting
displaced,
it
is
a
responsibility
of
this
council
to
make
sure
we
do
that.
So
I
appreciate
the
work
the
city
staff
does
and
his
responsibility,
including
mine,
to
protect
the
mentors
of
the
city.
Thank
you.
B
Madam
president,
if,
if
I
might
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt
but
to
councilman
berchavez's
point
director,
brennan
just
shared
with
me,
we
have
adopted
a
resolution
that
may
provide
an
example
for
us.
This
is
on
the
housing
advisory
committee
that
the
council
established,
and
it
does
provide
a
requirement
that
the
housing,
the
membership
of
the
minneapolis
advisory
committee
on
housing,
reflect
the
racial
ethnic,
socio-economic,
geographic,
gender,
diversity
of
all
minneapolis
residents
most
affected
by
the
current
housing.
B
I
I
think,
madam
president,
not
to
speak
for
council
member
chavez,
but
I
think
that
councilmember
chavez's
language
is
slightly
amended
to
say
that
the
composition
of
the
membership
must
reflect
the
racial,
ethnic,
socio-economic,
geographic
and
diversity
of
the
community.
B
Modeling
off
of
the
language
establishing
the
existing
advisory
committee
on
housing,
where
we
did
use
that
type
of
broad-based
diversity,
language
and
that
assuming
the
attorney
is
okay.
With
that
we
do
have
that
as
a
precedent.
We
can
incorporate
that
language
here
and
replace
what
is
in
the
printed
packet
in
front
of
you.
If
members
need
me
to
read
it
again,
I
can
read
it
again.
You
know
I
can
try
and
type
it,
but
I
can't
do
both
the
reading
and
the
typing
right
exactly.
A
I'll
just
note,
you
know
I'm
certainly
comfortable
with
that.
I
I
will
state.
I
think
we
are
a
majority
plc
council,
and
so
we
can
appoint
people
who
represent
a
full
range
of
the
diversity
of
our
community.
But
I
don't
see
the
harm
in
using
the
statement
that
establishes
the
housing.
A
Advisory
committee
in
in
establishing
this
rent
stabilization
work
group
and
seeing
no
further
people
in
queue.
I.
A
State
the
proposed
amendment
that
we
will
be
voting
on
offered
by
council
member
chavez
in
consultation
with
director,
brennan,
the
city,
clerk,
the
city,
attorney,
etc.
A
B
A
Next
amendment
is
being
offered
by
council
member
ones,
lee
warloba
states
within
the
context
of
this
resolution,
the
terms
rental,
property
owner
and
landlord
shall
be
defined
as
an
individual
who
is
a
resident
of
the
city
of
minneapolis,
who
does
not
have
any
current
building
code
violations
and
does
not
refer
to
a
corporation
or
limited
liability
company
council
member
weinsley
rolabar.
Would
you
like
to
speak
to
your
amendment.
M
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
president.
I
think
this
amendment
is
a
bare
minimum
for
making
sure
that
we
are
not
skewing
our
work
group
with
corporate
landlords
and
landlords
who
are
not
upholding
the
basic.
You
know
requirement
for
health
and
safety
of
our
tenants
and
landlords
who
do
not
have
a
social
investment
in
our
city
and
our
communities
in
minneapolis.
We
have
a
significant
problem
with
corporate
landlords.
M
One
great
example
is
haven
brook,
for
example,
and
the
cura
study
that
you
know
we've
been
hearing
about
and
have
listened
to
for
a
number
of
times
have
also
said
that
corporate
landlords,
as
well
as
llcs,
owns
about
70
of
rental
units
in
our
city.
We
should
be
prior
prioritizing
the
landlords
who
actually
live
in
our
community
in
this
work
group
and
has
not
been
you
know,
significant
significantly,
fueling
our
our
housing
crisis
that
we're
trying
to
reconcile
with
measures
like
this
rent
control
policy
and
a
whole
host
of
others.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
councilman,
goodman,.
G
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
do
believe
that
this
is
well
intentioned,
but
it
is
not
set
in
reality
about
how
housing
works.
Housing
overall
is
a
business,
whether
we
like
it
or
not,
and
individuals
who
own
housing
set
up
llcs
in
order
to
operate
their
housing
every
single
time
for
tax
purposes.
There's
I
can't
think
of
someone
who
owns
an
income
property
who
takes
the
risk
of
that
on
their
private
or
personal
insurance,
they'll
set
up
an
s
corporation
or
a
c
corporation
or
an
llc.
G
So
I
do
appreciate
the
fact
that
what
council
member
juanslair
roloba
is
trying
to
get
at
is
the
larger
organization
she
named
them.
I
won't
repeat:
I
do
agree
with
that.
We
probably
don't
want
someone
who
has
been
purchasing
400
houses
on
the
north
side.
I
believe
that's
your
intent,
but
the
blanket
language
surrounding
corporations
or
limited
liability
corporations,
perhaps
is
not
understanding
that
that's
how
almost
all
housing
is
set
up
even
by
individuals,
and
so
this
probably
could
be
further
massaged
as
well.
G
I
would
also
note-
and
others
probably
will
note-
there
are
very
simple
things
that
could
cause
a
housing
code
violation
and
so
all
housing
code
violations
are
not
equal
either
you
can
get
a
housing
code
violation
for
having
plants
overhanging
your
sidewalk.
There
are
many
other
examples.
Perhaps
director
brennan
might
want
to
answer
that
question,
but
I
do
believe
the
intent
is.
We
don't
want
tier,
two
or
tier
three
property
owners
to
be
on
the
committee.
G
Perhaps
council,
member
wansley
orolobo
could
massage
that
language
and
I'm
not
sure
what
I
think
about
it
has
to
be
a
resident
of
the
city
of
minneapolis,
because
there
are
plenty
of
very
good
property
owners
who
potentially
have
retired
and
moved
to
saint
cloud,
so
they're,
not
necessarily
corporations
but
they're
individuals.
They
might
own
their
home
in
minneapolis
but
live
permanently
in
hutchinson,
or
something
like
that.
So
I'm
not
sure
the
purpose
of
that,
but
the
other
two
without
question.
G
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
goodman
nixon
q
is
council
member
osman.
P
Thank
you.
Madam
president.
I
think
we
are
limiting
ourselves
with
to
to
get
well
qualified
volunteers
or
work
group
members,
as
council
goodman
say
that
being
a
resident
of
city
of
minneapolis
and
a
landlord,
I
don't
know
how
chance
you
know
how
much
chances
that
is.
I
mean
we're
limiting
the
selection
of
these
groups.
P
You
know
the
expertise,
the
people,
that,
with
the
knowledge
and
expertise
to
if
we
kind
of
limit
them,
they
have
to
be
a
resident
here
and
then
to
own
a
house
and
then
to
have
a
not
have
llc.
It's
really
kind
of
limiting
that,
and,
and
also
what
you
know,
building
code
violation.
P
You
know
I
like
to
ask
director
brandon
andre
brandon,
see
what
what
is
that
is
that
a
not
removing
you're,
not
blowing
your
snow
front
of
of
your
house?
I
don't
know
I
mean
how
technical
is
this,
getting
that
it
will
limit
us
for
our
goal
to
select
people
that
have
a
better
understanding
than
us
when
it
comes
to
the
experience
and
for
renting
or
for
owning
property.
So
what
violates
a
code
of
violation?
S
Member
osman
you're
right
there
are
many
things
and
councilmember
goodman
mentioned.
There
are
many
things
that
could
constitute
a
violation.
We
are
working
with
the
city
clerk
to
offer
some
proposed
alternative
language.
That
is
maybe
a
better
description
I
such
as
the
the
one
that
councilman
goodman
suggested,
maybe
looking
at
tier
classifications
of
properties,
which
better
captures
more
you
know,
takes
into
account
history
of
violations
that
have
not
been
corrected.
The
other
point
that
I
think
is
important
to
make
is
that
you
know
violation.
S
Their
violations
can
be
found
and
then
corrected
pretty
easily.
You
know
by
by
property
owners
who
you
know
didn't
even
know
that
they
had
a
violation,
for
example,
so
we're
working
on
some
additional
language
for
you.
A
G
A
G
Thank
you,
madam
president.
It
seems
like
we're
doing
committee
work
here
in
the
council
meeting.
It
is
12
30.
we
have
a
closed
meeting
after.
I
don't
know
that
this
is
ready
to
go.
Some
of
these
things
could
have
been
easily
resolved
through
conversations
with
staff
or
others,
and
I
feel,
like
everyone's
time
is
being
taken
up,
including
all
of
the
people
in
the
audience
and
in
the
overflow
room
over
issues
that
can
be
easily
resolved
in
a
positive
way.
G
So
I'm
going
to
move
to
postpone
the
entire
thing
one
cycle
until
these
issues
get
worked
out,
because
we
cannot
have
our
staff
constantly
colluding,
collaborating
or
working
with
mr
carl
to
come
up
with
something
amendment
by
amendment
by
amendment.
This
needs
to
be
vetted
in
a
better
way
than
in
doing
committee.
Work
in
the
council
meeting
and
I
am
concerned
about
time.
A
A
A
the
fierce
urgency
of
now
right,
and
so
I
am
comfortable
with
delaying
the
or
revisiting
the
amendments,
but
I
think
we
need
to
move
on
this
rent
stabilization
work
group
composition
in
order
to
to
really
try
to
move
with
delivery
speed
in
adopting
this
proposal.
A
So
if
my
colleagues
are
comfortable
with
withholding
the
amendments
and
voting
on
the
underlying
resolution
with
the
already.
A
Established
amendments
that
we
have
passed,
I
would,
I
would
be
comfortable
with
your
motion
to
postpone
for
one
cycle
the
consideration
of
the
amendment.
B
Madam
president,
I
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt
and
I
do
not
want
to
belabor
the
group's
time.
I
agree
with
councilwoman's
comment:
it's
difficult
to
do.
Committee
work
at
council,
which
is
why
we
try
not
to.
I
do
also
appreciate
that
this
is
a
very
time,
sensitive
and
important
subject
that
faces
the
entire
community,
perhaps
as
a
somewhat
slight
alternative,
not
trying
to
encourage
the
this
work
at
council
to
the
future
set
a
precedent.
B
Staff
are
already
in
the
middle
of
of
drafting
some
changes
that
meet
the
proposal
that
council
member
wants
a
warlock
had
brought
up
in
response
to
councilmember
goodman's,
very
good
feedback.
I
think
that
feedback
probably
ties
directly
to
the
next
amendment.
That's
before
us
in
queue
from
council
member
wansley
warlorloba,
which
I
I've
labeled
number
seven,
the
next
one
that's
shown
in
green.
B
There
are
some
minor
changes.
I
have
three,
maybe
four
more
that
are
very
minor
and
I
think
would
take
very
little
time
I
would
suggest.
Perhaps
we
take
this
entire
issue
in
its
current
state.
With
the
amendments
that
have
been
approved,
the
amendments
are
still
in
queue.
Push
this
to
the
end
of
the
agenda.
Move
forward
deal
with
the
rest
of
the
agenda,
do
the
closed
session
and
then,
if
the
body
wishes,
we
have
to
come
back
to
close
the
meeting
anyways
and
we
could
try
and
deal
with
it.
B
Then
it
gives
the
professional
staff
a
chance
to
do
some
work,
not
sitting
here
with
their
laptops
on
their
laps
in
the
middle
of
the
chamber
and
running
around,
but
it
would
give
them
because
we
know
we
have
three
items
fairly
big
items
in
closed
session
and
it
would
give
our
professional
staff
a
chance
to
you
know:
do
that
work
if
the
body
is
open
to
that.
So
that's
what
I
would
just
suggest
as
an
alternative,
is
to
move
this
to
the
end
of
the
agenda.
B
A
Thank
you,
mr
clerk,
for
that
suggestion,
and
I
think
that
makes
sense
and
can
help
us
to
accommodate
our
very,
very
full
agenda
today.
I
I
am
personally
missing
another
committee
meeting
as
well,
so
I
do
understand
the
need
for
us
to
move
on,
so
I
hope
that
colleagues
can
acquiesce
to
that
suggestion.
M
Yes,
I
it's
my
understanding,
I
know
councilmember
goodman
has
to
go
and
you
you
might
be
running
on
the
timeline,
but
this
I
respect
the
democratic
process
that
we're
having
well.
Yes,
there
are
things
that
can
take
place
in
committee.
I
think
there's
been
intentionality
amongst
all
of
us
to
bring
some
very
directed
amendments.
That's
actually
going
to
better
reflect
the
type
of
work
group
that
we
want
to
see.
M
That's
going
to
lead
to
more
just
inequitable
outcomes
and
whatever
policy
that
you
know
comes
from
this
and
that's
going
to
be
brought
back
before
this
body.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
rush
through
that.
This
is
a
significant
process
and
I
know
there's
people
here
who
came
specifically
renters,
who
want
to
see
us
also
spell
out
what
is
going
to
be
part
of
this
work
group,
and
I
would
rather
respect
their
time.
We've
fortunately,
have
done
loan
council
member
council
meetings,
we're
not
new
to
this.
M
M
H
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
wesley
wallabot,
councilmember
vita.
Q
Thank
you,
madam
president,
so
I
have
some
concerns
about.
You
know
the
context
of
the
landlord
should
live
in
minneapolis
and
should
not
have
violations.
Q
I
think
that
might
be
an
unintended
consequence
of
that
might
be
isolating
people
of
color
who
own
property
in
minneapolis
that
don't
necessarily
live
there
like
live
here.
I
for
one
know
someone
who
may
be
great
on
this
this
committee,
that's
a
person
of
color
that
owns
property
in
minneapolis
but
doesn't
live
in
minneapolis,
and
I
also
know
someone
who's
a
landlord,
a
person
of
color
who
lives
in
minneapolis,
but
has
code
violations
very
small
code
violations.
Q
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
choctaw,.
N
You
know
I
I
want
to
go
back
to
speaking
to
whether
or
not
when
we're
going
to
finish
going
through
these
amendments.
You
know
I,
over
the
last
few
weeks
have
heard
over
and
over
and
over
again
that
you
know
we
need
to
be
thoughtful.
We
need
to
be
deliberative.
We
need
to
ensure
that
we're
thinking
through
the
impact
of
our
decisions,
we
can't
rush
policy.
N
We
have
to
take
our
time
and
make
sure
we
get
all
of
the
information
in
front
of
us
before
we
make
a
decision
and
in
the
effort
of
doing
that,
we
have
to
make
sure
that
the
process
is
correct.
I'm
sorry
that
this
is
taking
a
long
time.
This
work
didn't
actually
happen
in
committee.
It
was
moved
through
cow
and
then
came
directly
to
council.
Unfortunately,
this
is
the
only
way
for
us
to
move
through
this,
and
so
I
know
that
we
need
to
move
through
the
the
council
president
has
already
delayed
her
motion.
N
A
A
We
get
all
of
these
amendments,
so
to
suggest
that
I
have
not
tried
to
get
input
from
my
colleagues
on
this
proposal,
which
has
been
incorporated,
is
simply
not
true,
and
so
I'm
happy
to
spend
the
deliberative
time
to
work
on
this
today,
however,
we
have
much
work
to
do
as
well,
and
so
I
am
suggesting
that
we
continue
that
we
move
to
our
closed
session
and
we
come
back
and
finish
this
work
on
our
rent,
stabilization
work
group
policy
and
I
would
entertain
a
motion
to
that
end.
F
So
moved,
madam
president,
we
also
have
the
second
item
under
unfit
finish
business.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
you
want
to
do
that
after
we
come
back.
F
B
H
M
On
public
record,
thank
you,
madam
president,
and
just
say
I
don't
agree
with
this.
Yes,
you
have
made
efforts
to
get
feedback
from
council
members,
of
course,
in
our
council
chambers.
Here's
the
opportunity
again
for
democratic
input,
for
the
public
to
see
that
we
are
very
intentional
about
making
this
a
just
process
and
to
then
exclude
the
public.
I
know
these
folks
have
been
waiting.
M
These
renters
have
been
excited
to
see
us
have
this
opportunity
to
really
dive
into
this
proposal
and,
to
just
say
we're
going
to
walk
away
from
it,
because
some
people
got
to
go
because
it's
getting
too
long.
We
got
to
talk
about
close.
I
I
just
don't
think
that's
right,
so
I
just
at
least
want
to
go
on
public
record
and
say
I
don't
support
this.
This
is
the
time
where
we're
talking
about
rebuilding
trust
in
the
city
apparatus
in
council.
M
This
was
an
opportunity
to
show
that,
especially
through
one
of
the
ways
in
which
we
can
exercise
our
legislative
authority,
which
is
through
shaping
how
we're
going
to
pass
a
rent
control
policy,
that's
actually
going
to
have
material
benefits
for
working-class
people
in
this
city,
and
we
just
shut
the
public
out
of
that
from
your
decision.
So
I,
at
least
in
my
conscience,
want
to
let
folks
know.
I
am
not
supportive
of
this.
I
would
love
for
us
to
continue
and
having
democratic
conversation
amongst
ourselves.
That
is
the
function
or
baseline
of
democracy.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
weinsley
rolabar,
and
it
is
not
my
decision.
It
will
be
the
decision
of
this
body
if
we
move
that,
so
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
and
there
will
be
an
opportunity
for
the
public
and
whoever
else
wants
to
witness
democracy
in
action.
To
do
that,
we
just
have
other
work
that
we
need
to
get
done.
Councilmember
chavez.
I
I
do
appreciate
that
we'll
be
able
to
come
back
and
vote
on
this
after
closed
session,
but
I
do
believe
that
I
cannot
support
this
motion.
I
think
the
renters
in
this
room
deserve
to
hear
the
decision
that
the
council
is
going
to
make
a
lot
of
people
have
children,
people
they
need
to
go
back
home
to,
and
I
believe
that
it
is
the
responsibility
of
this
council.
We
signed
up
for
this
job,
it's
our
job
to
do
this
work
and
the
people
watching
us
today
should
be
able
to
go
home
after
this
vote.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
chavez.
Is
there
any
further
discussion
seeing
that
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
world
councilmember.
B
B
A
That
item
carries
and
we
will
suspend
our
agenda
until
this
time.
We
return
from
closed
session
and
I
will
adjourn
madam.
B
President,
madam
president,
just
on
page
10
of
your
script,
I
would
point
out
that,
in
order
to
move
under
the
state
open
meeting
law
into
a
closed
session,
there
is
a
process
we
need
to
go
through,
including
a
vote,
and
so
it
would
be
in
order
at
this
point
to
ask
the
city
attorney
to
please
provide
the
legal
basis
for
the
requested
closed
session.
Before
we
take
that
vote.
B
I'm
sorry
we're
ready
to
take
a
motion
after
the
city
attorney
explains
things.
A
Call
to
order
please,
colleagues,
we
have
a
request
for
a
closed
session.
This
closed
session
includes
three
topics.
First,
is
a
legal
briefing
on
briefing
on
the
claim
of
charles
christensen?
A
T
A
Thank
you,
mr
city
attorney,
and
with
that
I
will
move
that
our
public
meeting
be
closed
as
authorized.
G
A
No
thank
you.
I
appreciate
that.
I
also
missed
a
subcommittee
meeting
on
gun
violence
in
our
community,
which
is
really
disruptive
to
the
humane
humanity
of
our
city,
but
we
must
do
this
work,
and
so
with
that,
I
will
move
that
our
public
meeting
be
closed
as
authorized
under
the
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law,
specifically
minnesota
statute,
section
13d,
.05,
subdivision
3b
for
the
purposes
of
discussing
litigation
matters
with
the
city
attorney.
I
have
a
second
to
that
motion
seconded.
B
A
That
item
carries,
and
we
will
now
close
the
public
portion
of
this
meeting
and
convene
in
public
session
closed
session
for
the
viewing
public.
I
will
note.
A
Council
members,
please,
we
are
not
done
for
the
viewing
public.
I
will
note
that
the
broadcast
of
this
meeting
will
continue
and
the
council
will
reconvene
in
public
after
we
have
concluded
the
closed
session
so
that
we
can
continue
to
do
our
work
in
a
democratic
matter
where
our
residents
can
witness
and
view
democracy
in
action.
I
will
see
you
all
in
closed
session.
Thank
you.
Thank.
U
A
E
B
Member
rainville
president
council
member
wansley
warlow
president
councilmember
goodman,
is
absent.
Councilmember
johnson
is
absent.
Councilmember
osman
president
councilmember
payne
president
councilmember
koski
present
councilmember
shaktai
president.
Vice
president
palmisano
president,
president
jenkins
president,
there
are
11
members
present.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
and
I
gotta
just
share
with
you
all
that
this
is
a
confusion,
but
we
are
going
to
first
take
up
the
matters
that
were
presented
to
us
in
our
closed
session.
A
B
On
this
matter,
madam
president,
the
first
item
we'll
take
up
is
item
number
one.
This
is
the
settlement
claim,
as
you
noted
in
the
claim
of
charles
christensen,.
A
Thank
you,
mr
clerk.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
that
item.
A
Or
actually
better,
yet
I
will
move
that
we
approve
this
item
related
to
the
claim
of
charles
christensen.
Is
there
a
second.
A
B
M
B
A
J
H
A
Item
carries
and
our
last
item
from
our
closed
session
is
miss
samantha
wright
versus
the
city
of
minneapolis.
I
move
that
we
accept
the
city
attorney's
recommendation.
J
A
A
B
Councilmember
chavez
aye
council
member,
alison
aye
council
member
viton,
aye
councilmember
rainville
aye
councilmember
wants
leeward
lava
council
member
osman,
aye
councilmember
payne
aye
councilmember
koski,
aye,
councilmember
thai.
No
vice
president
palmisano
aye
president
jenkins
hi.
There
are
ten
eyes
and
one
nay.
A
That
item
carries
and
the
next
item
on
our
unfinished
business
agenda,
and
I
do
want
to
note
that
we
are
still
working
on
the
the
amendments
making
sure
that
we
are
including
all
the
language
and
printing
it
out
for
council
members
to
review,
and
so
we
will
take
up.
The
ethics
complaint
item
number
two
under
unfinished
business.
It's
a
motion
to
discharge
the
ethics
complaint
from
or
the
ethics
complaint.
We've
already.
B
Madam
president,
I'm
sorry
perhaps
I
can
assist
when
we
amended
the
agenda
at
the
beginning
of
today's
meeting.
We
did
the
motion
to
discharge
from
committee
the
whole
and
to
add
this
as
an
item
amending
the
agenda,
so
that
piece
is
done
on
the
piece
of
paper
we
handed
out.
The
clerks
were
saving
some
paper
there's
a
second
piece
down
below,
which
is
the
proposed
item.
That's
before
you
now,
so
the
ethics
complaint
that
was
presented
by
our
ethics
officers.
B
Excuse
me
to
the
committee
of
the
hole
at
its
meeting
this
past
tuesday
is
before
the
body.
You
will
recall
that
the
ethics
officers
presented
a
very
high
level
synopsis
of
that
complaint.
The
content
of
it
there
was
discussion
amongst
the
body.
At
that
time.
I
will
remind
the
members
that
the
body
is
charged
with
the
responsibility
of
determining
how
to
dispose
of
that
item.
The
ethical
practices
board
under
the
ordinance
makes
its
findings.
B
The
council
does
not
have
to
concur
in
those
findings,
agree
or
disagree,
and
so
the
proposed
action
that's
coming
forward
is
a
case
that
would
allow
us
to
administratively
close
that
complaint.
Take
no
further
action
and
indicate
that
this
council
is
neither
agreeing
nor
disagreeing
with
the
findings
made
by
the
ethical
practices
board,
and
so
that's
the
motion
that
councilmember
palmisano
has
suggested
for
the
body.
A
Alarms
to
dispense
with
the
unfinished
business
related
to
the
ethics
complaint
number
2021-52
offered
by
councilmember
palmisano.
Is
there
a
second.
M
M
Ethics,
yes,
claire
carl,
not
only
was
there
a
discussion
on
tuesday,
there
was
also
a
vote
to
delay
the
matter
for
a
cycle.
I
know
there
was
an
interest
in
other
council
members
and
I've
relayed
that
to
council
member
of
homicino
about
bringing
a
substitute
motion
that
I
think,
is
more
reflective
of
some
of
the
comments
that
were
raised
last
tuesday
around
the
social
media
policy,
because
with
what's
in
front
of
us,
if
we
approve
this
just
for
clarity.
M
B
Madam
president,
I
know
our
ethics
officer
is
here
and
that's
more
likely
a
question
for
her
to
take,
and
so
I
would
defer
to
ms
trammell
thank
you.
U
U
I
do
want
to
say
that
if
it
had
been
come
to
you
as
an
appeal,
then
all
those
rules
that
apply
to
quasi-judicial
matters
would
come
into
play,
and
so
any
ex
parte
conversations
and
decisions
that
you
have
made
could
create
conflict
of
interest
for
your
decisions.
So
that's
why
it's
really
important
to
recognize
that
what
we
brought
to
you
wasn't
quasi-judicial.
U
U
So
does
that
answer
your
question.
M
So
a
little
bit,
I
basically
the
decision
will
stand
and
I
couldn't
recall
on
tuesday.
This
is
why
I
think
there
was
a
discussion
to
delay
this
too.
If
there
was
intentions
from
cunningham's
representation
to
bring
forth
appeal.
U
U
In
my
opinion,
I
don't
want
to
get
into
providing
ethic
legal
advice
in
this
meeting,
but
I
could
provide
legal
advice
should
they
appeal
I
can't
guarantee
or
tell
them
that
they
can
appeal
or
not
appeal,
that
will
be
up
to
their
determination
and
then
a
court
would
determine
the
validity
of
the
appeal.
It's
not
this
entity.
A
U
The
ordinance
process
requires
that
we
bring
it
forward
to
you
for
the
final
disposition.
I
don't
for
practical
purposes.
All
of
the
ethics
complaints
need
to
be
closed
out
at
various
times.
There
are
various
different
times
of
closure
for
anyone
who's
been
on
the
council
in
the
last
four
years.
There
have
been
many
of
these
complaints
that
have
come
in
regarding
elected
officials
and
the
vast
majority
of
them
and
via
a
rule,
7.6
dismissal,
which
means
that
there
is
nothing
on
the
face
of
the
complaint
to
even
warrant
investigation.
U
U
A
Yes,
it
does.
Thank
you
very
much.
We
have
a
question
from
councilmember
ellison,
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
for
you
or
not,
but
councilmember
ellison.
K
Yeah,
I
don't
have
too
much
of
a
question.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
one
of
the
things
that
you
know
we
learn
pretty
early
on
in
council
is:
is
that
it's
not
only
about
you
know
whether
an
action
means
what
we
think
it
means,
but
sometimes
the
the
even
the
the
appearance
of
an
action
can
sort
of
have
the
same
effect,
and
I
did
not
want
to
be
in
a
position
to
to
be
sort
of
rubber,
stamping.
K
As
a
body,
you
know,
you
know,
a
decision
that
I
feel
at
its
face
is
is
rather
silly.
I
do
feel
like
the
way
that
this
amendment
is
written,
to
specify
that
you
know
this
actually
isn't
a
ruling
on
our
part.
This
actually
isn't
an
affirmation
on
our
part
of
what
the
ethics
board
is
doing.
K
They're
they're
they're
empowered
to
do
whatever
they
are
going
to
do,
and
we-
and
I
think
that
it
is
important
to
to
say
that
that
we're
that
we're
not
agreeing
or
disagreeing
to
the
findings
of
the
ethics
board,
we're
not
the
deliberative
body
in
this
situation,
and
I
I
understood
that
earlier
in
the
week.
I
understand
that
now,
but
I
also
did
not
want
to
give
the
appearance
of
affirming
that
you
know.
I
thought
that
this
decision
was
was
was
was
fair
or
just
so.
K
I'm
I'm
prepared
to
vote
for
this
today.
I
think
I
think
I
I
appreciate
councilmember
palmisano
wording
the
motion
in
this
way
and
and
and
and
making
it
clear
where,
where
the
council
stands
and
making
it
clear
that
one
deliberative
body's
decision
is
not
necessarily
being
affirmed
or
denied
by
this
council,
so
just
wanted
to
say
that
and
I'm
prepared
to
take
up
this
motion
today.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
ellison,
councilmember
of
promisana.
F
F
Doing
so
does
not
weigh
in
on
this
case,
but
our
entire
ethics
process,
while
it
could
be
improved,
cannot
be
stopped
unless
you
leave
this
case
forever
open
so
doing
further
study
on
social
media
policy
going
forward
might
be
warranted,
but
it
cannot
be
attached
to
this
action
today.
I
will
stop
there.
I
really
was
hoping
that
we
limit
conversation
on
this
matter
for
in
respect
for
everybody
involved.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
promisano,
councilmember
wesley.
What
about.
M
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
just
want
to
get
your
question
that
you
raised
to
director.
Turmoil
around
the
appeals
process
is
not
impacted
by
this
particular
vote.
If,
by
moving
to
close
it,
the
appeals
process
is
still
open,
just
knowing
for
the
general
public,
if
they
ever
decide
to
do
an
ethics
process,
and
it's
also
moved
with
a
decision
that
maybe
they
don't
agree
with
once
council
takes
action
on
it.
That
decision
or
the
the
right
to
appeal
is
still
a
option.
U
Okay
on
in
general,
if
a
subject
has
an
ethics
complaint
and
and
that
complaint
is
found
to
be
a
violation-
and
there
is
an
adverse
action
of
discipline
imposed
on
the
person
that
they
disagree.
With
the
findings
of
the
board
and
the
disa
imposition
of
discipline,
then
there
would
be
appellate
rights.
U
A
Thank
you
and
we
have
an
another
question.
Last
comment
from
councilmember
payne.
O
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
think
that
this
discussion
is
just
outlining
the
complexity
of
this
process.
I
don't
have
a
legal
background
and
I'm
also
not
you
know
a
native
speaker
of
latin.
So
sometimes
some
of
the
topics
and
concepts
in
here
are
things
that
I
just
need
a
little
time
to
understand.
O
A
Thank
you,
councilwoman
payne.
Is
there
any
other
discussion.
B
H
B
I'm
sorry
the
motion
in
front
of
the
council
yeah.
The
motion
is
to
administratively
close
the
ethics
complaint.
It
is
to
neither
weigh
in
support
or
against
the
findings
of
the
ethical
practices
board
and
take
no
further
action.
I
H
H
A
My
proposal
for
a
work
group,
which
generated
a
number
of
amendments
and
we
adjourned
our
meeting
early
so
that
staff
could
help
to
crack
some
amendments.
That
may,
in
fact
be
more
amenable
to
the
to
the
process
into
this
group,
and
so
I
don't
have
that
language
in
front
of
me.
B
A
All
right
so,
while
we're
waiting
for
those
five
minutes,
council
member
chavez
wanted
to
revisit
a
conversation
from
earlier,
and
so
I
will
call
on
councilmember.
I
Japanese,
thank
you,
council,
president
and
members
of
this
body.
I
just
want
to
go
back
to
the
vote
that
we
took
regarding
the
I
thought
we
were
going
in
the
order
that
we
did
discussed
it
in
close
session.
So
that's
how
I
determined
how
I
was
going
to
vote,
but
I
just
want
to
clarify
for
the
public
record
that
I
was
instead
of.
A
Council
member
chavez
is
changing.
His
vote
is
that
a
madam.
B
President,
I
had
recorded
councilmember
chavez
as
an
eye
on
the
claim
in
the
case
of
charles
christensen.
We
certainly
could
go
down
the
path
of
a
motion
to
reconsider,
vote
on
that
and
then
bring
the
matter
back
for
a
vote.
If
there's
no
objection
from
any
member
of
the
council
and
with
your
direction,
I
can
simply
change
his
vote
from
an
I
to
a
nay.
A
B
B
A
Oh,
I
do
want
to
note
that
councilmember
goodman
has
rejoined
our
meeting
after
representing
the
city
at
at
the
family.
Housing.
G
Plan
was
it
yes,
madam
president,
councilmember
ellison
and
I,
along
with
andrea
brennan,
represent
the
city
at
the
family,
housing
fund
and
council
and
ms
brennan,
and
I
were
able
to
be
there
for
part
of
the
meeting.
Thank
you.
B
President,
this
is
a
bit
awkward.
It's
a
bit
awkward.
I
will
just
go
ahead
and
fill
some
space,
perhaps,
and
for
those
of
you
who
have
the
original
resolution
with
the
original
amendments
in
front
of
it
just
so
we
can
level
set,
as
mr
daler
brings
back
new
copies
of
the
updated
amendments,
you
know
that
we
had
a
total
of
nine
amendments
that
were
reflected
in
colored
text
on
the
resolution,
as
we
handed
it
out
this
morning.
B
The
first
resolution,
which
was
number
four
from
councilmember
robin
wansley
worlab,
failed
the
second
amendment
from
council
member
shaktai
passed,
and
so
we
are
enrolling
that
into
the
new
version
of
the
resolution.
B
The
next
the
number
three
that
was
also
offered
by
council
membership
tai
and
dealt
with
the
fiscal
analysis,
language
that
we
debated
for
some
period
of
time
was
ultimately
approved.
We
are
enrolling
that
in
the
new
copy
of
the
resolution
that
is
being
printed,
the
fourth
option
that
came
forward
related
to
language
about
renters
that
failed
that
brought
forward
by
council
member
shagtai.
B
The
next
piece
was
amended
language
that
dealt
with
as
you'll
recall,
race,
ethnicity,
socioeconomic
status,
geographic
and
gender
identity
across
the
community
that
language
the
alternative
language
passed
and
will
be
enrolled
in
the
new
resolution
that
we'll
hand
out
and
that's
where
we
took
the
break.
So
as
we
come
back,
there
had
been
discussion
on
proposed
amendment
number
six
that
was
brought
forward
by
council
member
robin
wansley
warlabah.
I'm
sorry
to
keep
saying
your
full
name:
councilmember
wansley
councilmember
wants
to
brought
forward
the
number
six,
and
this
was
where
the
staff
worked.
B
Councilmember,
goodman,
brought
forward
some
good
points
about
the
interpretation
under
existing
codes,
compliance
with
building
codes
and
regulations,
and
so
director
brennan,
miss
dobson
and
others
worked.
While
we
were
out
on
coming
up
with
new
language,
I
think
all
of
you
have
that
in
front
of
you,
so
hopefully,
if
you're
on
the
second
page
now
you
can
see
some
of
that
changed
language.
I
will
go
ahead
a
step
further
and
say
that
the
next
amendment
that
councilmember
wansley
wurliba
also
brought
forward,
which
I
would
note
as
number
seven.
B
I
think
that
we
had
identified
there
might
have
been
similar
concerns
around
language
here.
So
there
might
be
some
alternative
language.
I
have
not
yet
seen
the
language
myself,
but
I
know
that,
as
we
left,
we
talked
about
number
six
and
number
seven
being
somewhat
familiar
or
similar
in
scope,
and
so
there
may
be
alternative
language
in
both
of
those
instances.
B
I
want
to
give
council
members
a
minute
to
read
for
themselves,
so
you
know
I
filled
the
awkward
gap
as
best
as
I
can.
I
will
be
quiet
now,
so
you
can
all
read
the
new
language.
That's
in
front
of
you.
We
are
also
making
copies
so
that
we
can
put
it
available
to
those
who
are
from
the
public
here
at
the
dyas,
and
we
will,
of
course,
upload
upload
this
into
limbs
as
soon
as
possible,
so
that
the
public
who
are
monitoring
can
also
see
the
revised
language
of
the
resolution.
B
Not
numbered,
madam
president,
you're
correct,
but
just
informally,
if
you
were
starting
on
page
one,
the
I
called
number
one
was
the
first
green,
which
was
adding
a
number
four.
You
probably
don't
see
that
on
your
copy,
because
that
proposal
failed
to
be
passed.
So
it's
not
on
the
new
version.
The
second
amendment
we
did
discuss
and
vote
on
was
offered
by
councilmember
shuktai.
B
It's
number
two
under
objectives
it
now
should
read.
The
policy
frameworks
must
not
constrain
the
goals
of
the
minneapolis
2040
plan
that
was
approved.
The
third
motion
that
we
voted
on
was
language
related
to
a
fiscal
analysis,
a
full
fiscal
analysis
being
conducted
based
on
the
impact
of
the
policy.
This
is
letter
a
under
number
three
at
the
top
of
page
two,
that
alternative
language
was
adopted
by
the
council,
so
it
should
be
enrolled
in
the
copy
in
front
of
you
proposal
number
four
that
we
voted
on
was
offered
by
councilmember
shugtai.
B
B
Several
more
came
in
right
as
we
were
in
the
middle
of
debate.
This
morning
we
had
a
few
extra
council
members
who
are
bringing
them
forward.
So
I
know,
as
we
took
a
break,
we
said,
there's
only
four
more
and
I
kept
shaking
my
head
saying
it's
a
few
more
than
four,
and
so
I
will
share
with
you
where
we're
at
right
now
is
on
page
two
in
the
middle
of
the
paragraph,
that's
headed
recommended
work
group
structure.
B
We
are
on
the
green
text,
that's
preceded
by
rw,
representing
council
member
wansley
warloba.
Within
the
context
of
this
resolution,
the
terms
rental,
property,
owner
and
landlord
shall
be
defined
as
being
an
individual
who
is
a
resident
of
the
city
of
minneapolis,
who
does
not
have
any
current
building
code
violations
and
does
not
refer
to
a
corporation
or
limited
liability
company.
That's
the
language
that
council
member
wants
the
world
had
offered
you
see
in
red
there
predicated
with
staff.
B
This
is
the
language
that
they
are
offering
in
lieu
of
the
language
from
council
member
wansley
warlobo.
Do
I
have
that
correct
staff?
Give
me
the
high
sign?
Yes,
so
the
language
that's
in
red
behind
the
word
staff
is
the
substitute
that's
being
proposed
to
meet
the
intent
that
councilmember
robin
wants
the
world
brought
forward
and
that
council
member
goodman
had
identified
some
issues
about.
A
Okay,
so
thank
you
very
much
and
thank
you,
council
vice
president,
so
I
think
we
have
first
and
q
is
council
member
lonsley
warlabah,
followed
by
councilmember
veto
and
council
member
goodman.
M
Yeah
just
a
little
context,
just
for
public
record
too,
before
I
dive
a
little
bit
into
this
amendment.
Thank
you
so
much
to
the
staff,
for
you
know
taking
the
time
to
make
these
revisions.
I
do
know
notice
that
now
there's
also
additions
of
what
staff
recom
well,
basically
is
not
in
favor
of.
Can
someone
share
why
that
was
added.
B
I'll
take
a
stab
here
and
then
the
staff
can
certainly
speak
to
it.
While
we
were
in
closed
session.
The
brief
amendment
of
consultation
we
had
was
that
the
the
original
language
you
brought
forward
comes
from
in
in
the
recommended
work
group
structure
and
then
specifically,
number
c
were
related
in
terms
of
talking
about
labor
violations
and
then
also
housing
code
violations,
and
that
there
were
potential
problematic
issues
with
that.
M
In
terms
of
the
amendment,
of
course,
like
again
thank
you
to
the
staff,
I'm
supportive
of
this,
I
hope
this
is
also
a
way
to
reconcile
some
of
the
concerns
raised
by
councilmember
goodman
as
well,
and
I'm
I'm
ready
to
move
forward
and
support.
This
amendment
sounds
good.
G
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
do
want
to
point
out
one
thing
and
I
don't
want
to
be
a
fly
in
the
ointment
of
staff.
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
there
are
individuals
who
own
rental
property,
who
have
a
housing
code,
violation
that
puts
them
into
tier
two.
They
then
correct
that,
but
the
tier
stays
with
them
for
the
entire
year,
and
I
I
do
have
to
say
I
don't
want
to
make
assumptions
about
who
more
often
gets
penalized
by
this,
but
I
only
wonder
out
loud.
G
If
perhaps
we
should
have
it
be
tier
three
and
as
we
vet
individual
names
look
and
see.
If
there's
someone
who
had
a
legitimate
tier
two
issue
or
not,
I've
had
this
issue.
In
my
ward,
I
think
others
potentially
have
as
well
a
perfectly
good
person
who
has
some
small
violation
that
pumps
them
into
tier
two,
and
it
could
be
one
violation
they
fix
it
as
according
to
they're
supposed
to
within.
It
could
be
12
days.
G
So
I
wonder
if
we
wouldn't
be
ruling
out
people
that
we
didn't
want
to,
because
of
that,
and
I
guess
I'm
okay,
if
you
just
want
to
consider
people
who
are
only
tier
one,
there's
many
to
choose
from
so
I'm
not
saying
we
shouldn't,
but
I
do
want
to
point
out
kind
of
in
this
analysis
that
sometimes
those
who
have
a
hard
time
understanding
the
rules,
whether
that
be
a
language
barrier
or
other,
get
caught
up
in
the
tiered
system.
G
But
then,
when
we
point
it
out
to
them,
they
correct
immediately,
but
they
still
have
that
target
on
their
back.
And
so
I'm
not
sure.
If
that
changes
anyone's
mind.
Hearing
that
explanation.
I
only
know
this
from
sharing
reg
services
and
understanding
the
tiering
system,
and
I
I'm
I
feel
like
we
have
a
lot
of
people
to
choose
from
we're
only
picking
three
landlords.
So
we
could
individually
look
at
their
record
and
see
if
there's
someone
who
had
a
problem
and
then
that
name
wouldn't
come
forward
anyway.
G
A
Any
further
discussion
seeing
none,
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role
on
the
wonsley
wall
of
the
amendment,
which
now
states
work.
Group
membership
shall
not
include
any
rental
property
owners
with
properties
designated
as
tier
two
or
tier
three
by
the
department
of
regulatory
services.
At
the
time
of
the
adoption
of
this
resolution,.
B
Council
member
chavez,
aye
councilmember
ellison
aye
councilmember
vita,
aye,
councilmember,
rainville,
aye,
councilmember,
wansley,
warlabah,
aye,
councilmember,
goodman,
aye,
councilmember,
osman,
aye
councilmember,
payne,
aye,
councilmember,
koski,
aye,
council,
member
chuck
thai
aye.
Vice
president
paul
masano
aye,
president
jenkins.
All
right
there
are
12
eyes.
A
That
item
carries
and
that
amendment
is
adopted.
The
next
amendment
is.
A
To
have-
and
I
think
this
is
by
council
member
wansley
worlapatu,
if
I'm
not
mistaken-
to
include
one
individual-
that
is
a
current
resident
of
public
housing
in
minneapolis.
B
Madam
president,
I
I
will
just
point
out
that
this
was
originally
brought
forward
by
council
member
wansley
warlabah,
and
this
I
had
added
it
under
the
11
seats
designated
by
or
chosen
by
the
cped
director
upon
a
recommendation.
B
I
think
staff
are
seeing
because
that's
not
representative
of
a
an
organization
or
a
represented
group
that
this
would
then
be
added
to
the
seats
to
be
appointed
by
mayor
and
council,
and
so
this
would
also
amend
behind
number
one.
Instead
of
12
seats
to
be
appointed
by
the
city
council
mayor,
this
would
make
that
13.
B
and
then
they're
adding.
I
am
assuming
here
an
additional
seat
that
would
be
an
individual
who
is
a
current
resident
of
a
public
of
public
housing
in
minneapolis,
and
so
in
order
to
retain
the
zip
codes.
I
I
think
maybe
we
should
think
about
saying
it's
at
least
four
three
seats
from
the
from
the
zip
codes
that
tie
to
the
strategic
race
equity
analysis
plan.
B
I
think
perhaps
I
would
suggest
that
this
issue,
an
individual
who
is
a
current
resident
of
public
housing
in
minneapolis,
should
be
a
sub
number
two,
the
total
of
four
seats.
I'm
sure
the
council
could
identify
somebody
who
happened
to
be
from
one
of
those
three
zip
codes
that
are
impacted
and
who
is
a
resident
of
public
housing,
but
because
we
have
committed
as
an
organization
that
those
three
zip
codes
are
the
most
impacted
across
the
city.
B
As
part
of
our
strategic
race
equity
action
plan,
it
may
be
easier
just
to
add
a
seat
and
provide
that
there's
another
person
who
would
be
a
resident
of
public
housing
in
minneapolis.
I
leave
that
to
the
body
of
course,
but
I
think
this
is
staff
during
the
break
merging
where
I
had
originally
stuck.
The
proposal
brought
forward
by
councilmember
wensley
warlopa.
S
Madam
president,
council
members-
I
I
would
just
what
staff
is
is
is
proposing
here,
wouldn't
be
to
add
another
seat,
but
it
was
just
clarifying
that
one
of
those
resident
seats
or
renter
seats
could
be
a
public
housing
resident.
However,
it's
not
staff's
recommendation
to
include
a
public
housing
resident
because
public
housing
residents
are
not.
You
know,
their
their
rent
is
based
on
their
income,
so
public
housing
residents
pay
30
of
their
income
for
rent
as
their
portion.
S
So
it's
not
it's
not
clear,
at
least
from
staff's
perspective,
the
rationale
for
including
a
public
housing
resident
on
this
work
team,
not
to
say
it's
not
a
good
idea,
but
we're
just
it's
not
clear
to
us
what
your!
What
your
intention
is.
A
Would
that
would
be
a
question
for
ms
garnett.
H
S
M
Okay,
what
was
on
the
the
chat
was
originally
1c,
so
we
end
up
skipping
ahead
if
I
knew
that
I
would
have
been
in
queue
to
lay
out
my
intentionality
around,
including
a
public
housing
resident.
So
if
council
member
goodman
is
okay,
if
we're
we
want
to
stay
on
this
particular
amendment.
If
I
could
proceed
you
to
share
some
context
on
that.
A
Okay,
councilmember
goodman.
Are
you
comfortable
with
that.
G
M
Thank
you,
council,
member
goodman
and,
madam
president,
as
we're
talking
about
the
much
broader
housing
landscape
which
I
think
you
know
councilmember
chuck
thai
amendment
got
at
earlier.
Public
housing
is
also
a
key
part
of
our
housing
landscape
and
it's
something
that
I
hope
we're
all
aiming
to
invest
in.
M
We
also
have
oversight
over
how
public
housing
operates
in
our
city,
because
we
also
appoint
the
commissioners
of
the
mpha,
but
nevertheless,
I
think
we
all
believe
housing
is
a
human
right
and
we
need
to
be
centering
how
public
housing
is
going
to
be
impacted
by
any
investments
or
regulations
we
do
to
the
private
housing
market
and,
furthermore,
I
absolutely
disagree.
I'm
sorry
director
brennan
about
this
idea
that
public
housing
residents
are
somehow
not
renters.
They
are
renters,
they
work.
They
also
pay
their
portion
of
rent,
even
though
it's
subsidized
they
are
still
renters.
M
They
often
also
transition
into
private
housing
or
or
affordable
housing.
To
basically
say
that
public
housing
resident
residents
are
not
part
of
the
renter
fabric
of
our
city.
I
really
find
that
very
disheartening
and
think
that
we
should
absolutely
not
be
leaning
into
accepting
that
notion.
They
are
renters
in
our
communities
and
should
also
be
very
much
reflective
of
in
this
process
of
shaping
rent
control
as
they'll
be
matriculating
into
whatever
new
housing
that
we're
creating
that
will
fall
under
these
guidelines.
M
A
And
you
can
certainly
appoint
a
public
housing
resident
that
that
is
the
right
of
this
body
and
and
yourself
as
a
council
member.
But
thank
you
for
that
explanation.
Councilmember
goodman,.
G
Thank
you,
madam
president.
That's
exactly
what
I
was
going
to
say.
I
don't
have
any
objection
to
the
group.
Picking
a
public
housing
resident
is
one
of
the
six
renters
I
want,
and
I
don't
think
staff
said
that
public
housing
residents
are
not
renters.
They
said
they're
not
subject
to
rent
control
and
they're,
not
subject
to
rent
control.
That's
not
really
debatable.
They
pay
30
percent
of
their
income
and
whatever
their
income,
is
they
pay
30?
So
if
their
income
never
goes
up,
their
rent
never
goes
up.
G
The
public
housing
authority
does
not
have
the
ability
to
control
rent
based
on
anything
other
than
income,
but
I've.
I
have
absolutely
no
objection
if
you
want
to
say,
as
it
says
here,
three
of
them
will
come
from
these
zip
codes
and
one
of
the
six
will
be
a
public
housing
resident.
That's
cool
with
me.
I
just
don't
want
to
add
another
position.
That
would
be
more.
My
objection,
I
mean,
I
think,
that
you're,
really
not
you.
I
don't
mean
you
personally.
G
We
would
be
really
narrowing
the
number
of
renters
we
could
have
by
prescribing
it
this
way,
but
maybe
we
could
find
someone
in
one
of
these
zip
codes.
That
also
is
a
public
housing
resident
and
that'd
be
cool
with
me.
So
I
don't
have
that
issue.
I
just
want
to
note
they're
not
subject
to
this
regulation
and
you
might
want
to
consider
we
all
might
want
to
consider
people
who
actually
would
be
subject
to
it.
A
Thank
you
councilmember,
and
is
there
any
further
discussion.
G
H
A
G
M
M
The
council,
the
balance
and
I
again
that
balance
will
not
be
jeopardized
by
one
out
of
how
many
thousand
public
housing
residents
are
that's
reflective
in
this
city.
So
I
would
say
I
would
like
to
take
up
both
amendments,
one
to
say
additional
and
then
one
to
say
of
one
of
the
three
should
be
a
public
housing
resident.
B
Madam
president,
I
I
am
going
to
apologize
profusely.
It's
been
a
long
day.
I
have
had
nothing
to
eat.
I've
had
about
three
pots
of
coffee.
I
confused
this
issue
for
the
body,
the
staff
who
did
the
work
while
we
were
in
closed
session
intended
and
I'm
looking
at
them
for
this
confirmation
director
brennan
right,
the
intention
was
not
to
increase
the
number
of
seats.
It
was
merely
to
say
that
one
of
those
three
would
also
be
or
could
be,
a
current
resident
of
public
housing.
B
M
For
the
purpose
of
this
conversation,
since
one
additional
seat
seems
very
sensitive
for
some
council
members,
if
we
want
to
just
take
up
the
staff
amendment
at
hand.
H
A
J
B
A
The
next
amendment
is
offered
by
council
member
wansley
volobai
provided
three
seat.
Sport
developers
provided
no
developer
or
representative
of
a
developer,
who
has
documented
histories
of
labor
violations,
be
appointed.
A
It
sounds
pretty
close
to
the
tier
one
issue,
but
I
am
going
to
open
up
the
floor
for
discussion.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
this
council
member
yeah.
M
Briefly,
yeah
the
the
reason
why
I
brought
this
floor,
and
I
saw
this
as
a
another
bare
minimum
and
one
that's
been
very
much
on
full
display
in
my
ward.
In
fact,
in
2018
there
was
a
building
called
prime
place.
That
was
a
gorgeous
example
of
labor
violations.
Contractors
were
subjected
to
awful
work
conditions,
including
violations
of
labor
standards.
It
also
created
poor
living
conditions
for
students
over
200
people
were
not
able
to
move
into
their
apartments
at
the
start
of
their
lease,
because
the
construction
of
the
building
was
not
complete.
M
So
students
were
scrambling
last
minute
to
try
to
find
alternative
housing
before
the
semester
started.
Then
there
was
this
ongoing
issue
of
toxic
building
materials
that
was
scattered
across
the
building
as
a
result
of
the
poor
construction
of
it.
Their
reputation,
prime
place
was
basically
damaged,
so
bad
that
they
end
up
rebranding
themselves
as
the
aero
apartments,
because
prime
place
was
seen
as
this
completely
toxic
and
untrustworthy
project.
M
Also,
as
this
related
to
my
earlier
amendment,
about
making
sure
developers
or
landlords
are
based
in
minneapolis.
This
project
was
also
led
by
a
kansas-based
developer,
with
a
documented
history
of
labor
violations
and
it's
those
type
of
actors.
Bad
actors,
who
absolutely
I
feel,
should
not
be
involved
in
the
creation
of
a
rent
control
policy
that
we're
hoping
to
get
through
this
work
group.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember.
Is
there
any
further
discussion.
S
Sure,
yes,
madam,
madam
president
and
council
members,
we
didn't
have
alternative
language
to
propose
here,
because
we
just
really
struggled
with
understanding
how
we
could
codify
the
intention
that
council,
member
wansley
wurlabha
just
stated.
I
think
it's
just
a.
S
We
think
staff
think
that
it's
a
problematic
thing
to
be
able
to
you
know,
be
able
to
actually
implement
this
as
it's
written,
and
I
will
re
defer
to
the
city
attorney,
because
I
believe
there
were
concerns
legal
concerns
that
were
expressed
as
well
as
in
in
our
staff
deliberations.
On
this
front.
We
just
think
it'd
be
really
challenging
to
actually
implement
this
understanding,
the
intention
and
understanding.
Of
course,
you
know
when
the
council,
when
you
all
and
the
mayor,
decide
who
you're
going
to
appoint
under
this
category.
S
Understanding
of
course,
that
that
that's
a
very
reasonable
thing,
for
example,
to
look
at
if,
if
that,
if
that
information
is
available,
but
this
language
puts
the
burden
on
the
city
to
go
out
and
make
sure
that
there
aren't-
and
there
are
definitely
instances
where
there
may
be
some
violations
in
someone's
history
that
we
wouldn't
necessarily
know
of.
So
our
our
concern
with
this
one
is
just
really
that
our
ability
to
actually
implement
it.
A
Well,
I
be
sure
before.
Yes,
you
can
certainly
answer.
That's
a
good
question
I
did
want
to
just.
I
think
there
are
mechanisms
to
deal
with
these
kinds
of
issues.
Clearly
we
are
not
enforcing
them
in
a
timely
manner,
but
is
is
that
right
that
we
I
mean
there
are
consequences
for
labor
violations,
consequences
for
shoddy
construction,
et
cetera,
et
cetera.
S
Madam
president
and
councilmember
wansley
wurlabha,
I
apologize,
but
I
I'm
not
the
best
person
to
speak
to
that,
and
I
wish
that
our
civil
rights
director
were
here.
Perhaps
our
city
attorney
could
speak
to
that,
but
I
don't
want
to
misstate,
and
I
again
I
just
seeing
this
language
for
the
first
time.
This
morning
we
weren't
able
to
loop
in
civil
rights
into
this
discussion.
A
Thank
you,
miss
bennett,
councilmember,
goodman,.
G
Okay,
we're
only
picking
three
developers
of
the
three
developers:
one
is
a
non-profit
developer.
One
is
someone
who
also
does
property
management.
That
only
leaves
one
I
think
we
can.
I
think
this
language
is
fine,
because
ultimately,
there's
many
to
choose
from,
and
we
certainly
can
choose
one
that
doesn't
have
a
history
of
labor
violations.
We
don't
need
to
be
rethinking.
Does
civil
rights
keep
tracking
it
or
what
are
the
attorneys
think?
G
Ultimately,
there
aren't
that
many
developers
in
town
and
there's
an
even
smaller
subsection
of
people
who
have
labor
violations
and,
of
course
we
don't
want
to
pick
someone
to
serve
on
this.
Who
has
a
history
of
labor
violation?
So,
let's
just
move
on
this
is
not
a
overly
complicated
situation.
If
we
were
picking
20
people
that
would
be
different,
but
we're
ultimately
amongst
this
group
of
people
picking
one.
So
I
think
we
can
find
one.
I'm
sure
you
know,
ryan
construction
would
qualify
so
and
that's
someone
we
would
maybe
be
interested
in.
B
H
R
H
B
B
This
is
dealing
with
the
designated
organizational
seats
and
council
member
ellison
has
asked
to
have
an
additional
seat
here,
specific
from
an
organization,
and
so,
with
your
permission,
I
guess
I
would
ask
councilmember
ellison
to
tell
us
what
that
organization
is,
but
it
goes
into
this
section
and
would
add
one
seat.
So
a
total
of
11
moving
to
12.
K
Councilmember
ellison,
yes,
my
apologies
to
the
clerks.
I
did
want
to
move
to
have
one
seat
for
inquilinus
unidos
porjusticia
to
the
designated
organizational
seats.
The
reason
is
because
I
I
know
that
we
can
always
work
with
incolinos
or
ix
as
they're
known
to
one
of
the
six
tenant
seats,
but
I
do
believe
that
their
function
in
the
city
and
how
they've
operated
in
relationship
to
the
city
of
minneapolis
has
really
been
at
an
organizational
level,
not
as
individual
tenants
and
so
that's
why.
K
I
thought
that
they
should
be
attitudes
to
the
organization
designated
organizational
seats
for
for
the
new
council
members.
You
may
have
heard
of
you
know,
issues
regarding
steven
friends
or
makboon
khan
and
importantly,
the
ways
in
which
ix
has
worked
with
tenants
as
a
tenant
organization
to
help
secure
housing
to
help
purchase
buildings.
K
The
city
has
been
in
a
great
relationship
with
ix
in
order
to
make
those
to
make
those
projects
happen,
and
so
I
do
feel
like
they
have
a
lot
of
expertise
in
terms
of
tenant
engagement
and
I
feel
like
they
have
an
established
relationship
with
the
city,
which
is
why
I
felt
they
should
be
added
as
an
organizational
seat
as
opposed
to
just
us,
selecting
them
to
the
to
the
tenant
seats.
K
So
I
will
work
on
getting
some
language,
but
essentially
it
would
be
me
moving
to
to
add
one
seat
for
inquilino
cenitos
porjusticia.
K
Alliance
is,
is
a
is
a
singular
organization
unless
I'm
confusing
yes,
the
alliance
is,
is
its
own
organization
and
not
an
and
not
an
actual
alliance
of
organizations.
So,
oh.
A
K
My
understanding
is
that
they're,
a
research
and
advocacy
organization-
that's
oh
yeah,
owen
duckworth-
is
a
member
of
that
organization.
He
we,
I
think,
we've
engaged
with
him
before
and
yeah.
K
Yeah
and
and
yeah
totally
defer
to
staff,
and
if,
if
if
the
motion
is
duplicative,
I'm
happy
to
hear
that.
But
I,
if
it's
not,
you
know
I'll
make
the
motion
all
right.
Thank
you.
K
S
Madam
president,
councilmember
ellison
and
counselors
were
researching
it
right
now,
so
apologies
for
the
delay
but
you're
correct.
There's
the
the
alliance
used
to
be
called
the
alliance
for
metropolitan
stability,
which
is
probably
familiar
to
many
of
you,
and
it
is
a
an
alliance
of
multiple
organizations
and
so
we're
checking
to
see
if
ix
is
a
member
of
them.
S
K
B
And
so
I've
added
council
member
ellison's
proposal
into
the
chat
that
you
can
see.
This
would.
B
We
would
this
would
be
adding
to
the
total
number
of
organizations,
so
instead
of
11
designated
organizational
seats,
it
would
be
12
designated
organizational
seats
and
letter
11
or
I'm
sorry,
letter.
L
and
the
long
list
would
then
be
this
additional
new
seat
that
councilmember
allison
has
identified.
K
I'm
also
happy
to
move
to
swap
them
out,
but
you
know
I
I
feel
a
little
bad
because
I'd
I'd
probably
pick
the
realtors,
if
I'm
being
honest
but
but
yeah
but
to
add,
but
I'm
happy
to
add
them,
also
happy
to
entertain
any
discussion
of
swapping
them
out.
A
H
P
A
G
K
I
I
personally
would
be
amenable
to
that.
I
I
think
that
there's
you
know,
I
think
that
ix
and
has
has
shared
a
lot
of
rooms
with
the
multi-family
housing
association.
You
know
I
would
I
would
have
some
cons.
I
would.
I
would
want
to
ensure
that
whatever
member
of
the
multi-family
housing
association
was
a
part
of
this
did
have
some
belief
that
we
could
reach
a
policy
and
not
just
and
not
be
there
to
op
to
function
as
purely
a
roadblock
to
the
work.
G
That's
actually
what
I
was
also
going
to
say
is
that
we
get
to
pick
who
the
people
are,
so
they
can
put
a
name
forward,
and
if
it's
someone
like
you
know,
I
don't
want
to
say
them
all
out
loud
if
it's
someone
who
has
been
a
problem
in
the
past
and
has
spoken
out
against
it,
we
probably
wouldn't
agree
to
that
person.
But
there
are
plenty
of
people
at
the
minnesota,
multifamily
housing
association
who
are
collaborative
and
would
be
good
additions.
And
so
I
see
this
as
a
win-win.
G
K
G
P
Oh,
thank
you
counselor
president.
I
believe
that
I
was
in
line
for
constant
memory
goodman,
but
I
don't
mind.
I
don't
want
to
make
the
situation
a
lot
confusing
than
it
is
already,
but
I
was
going
to
bring
amendments
to
strike
or
the
minneapolis
area
realtor
from
the
list
of
of
the
11
organizational.
P
P
P
A
Osman
and
then
next
thank
you.
I
see
councilmember
chavez,
I
I
will
note.
I
mean
I've,
read
statements
from
inclinitas.
That
says
no
exceptions,
no
inclusion,
no
nothing.
A
A
That's
the
that's
the
message
that
I'm
getting
from
them,
so
council
members
shall
ask.
I
I
I
think
it's
important
to
have
a
diverse
group
of
voices
in
this
in
this
organization
and
this
rent
control
group-
and
I
don't
know
if
there's
ways
we
can
have
conversation
with
all
of
us
right
now.
If
we
keep
what
councilmember
goodwin
was
talking
about
what
councilmember
ellison
was
talking
about,
I
had
the
opportunity
for
rent
control
and
then
another
group,
maybe
that
has
a
different
opinion
control.
H
K
I'm
happy
to
speak
to
what
the
difference
between
ix
and
and
and
the
renters
united
right
like,
and
it's
not,
and
it's
no
disparagement
against
renters
you're,
not
like
you
know,
but
they
or
sorry,
I'm
forgetting
the
the
technical
name
of
the
org.
But
ix
has
worked
with
the
city
to
purchase
buildings
for
tenants.
They've
done
that
on
the
south
side
of
minneapolis.
They've
done
that
on
the
north
side
of
minneapolis.
K
The
official
stance
of
ix-
and
I
can
try
to
get
confirmation-
is
that
they
are
actually
they've
put
out
an
official
stance
that
has
outlined
some
of
the
compromises
that
that
they're
willing
to
make
and
they
haven't
been
overly
rigid
and
in
their
vision
for
what
this
policy
can
look,
like
that's
their
official
stance,
and
so
I
just
think
between
those
two
things,
there's
much
more
of
a
relationship
there
and
I-
and
I
feel
like,
for
those
reasons,
their
participation
as
an
organization,
wouldn't
necessarily
be
you
know
arbitrary
or
picking
favorites
or
anything
like
that.
K
A
Thank
you
and
then
so
now,
council
member
chavez
here
you're
suggesting
adding
an
additional.
K
A
K
B
H
H
A
That
I
am
carries
and
that
amendment
will
be
adopted,
and
so
I
am
not
clear
where
we
are
now
next.
H
P
No
ma'am,
madam,
I
brought
a
motion
to
remove
the
realtors
minneapolis
realtors,
but
considering
hearing
from
councilmember
allison's
ix,
I
think
it's
called
the
organization
and
trying
to
keep
that
out
of
even
number.
I
will
pull
my
motion
and
give
it
back
to
you.
A
M
Up
there,
thank
you,
madam
president.
I
actually
wanted
to
revisit.
I
spoke
with
just
not
too
long
ago
with
council,
via
vice
president
palmisano,
about
one
four
based
off
of
our
passage
of
item
for,
to
amend
well,
basically,
to
amend
it
to
just
include
the
regional
approach
and
to
get
rid
of
the
prescriptive
language
so
making
a
motion
to
bring
that
more
forward.
B
B
A
All
right,
thank
you,
mr
clerk.
I
mean
I
I
I
tried
to
bake
this
concept
into
the,
but
if
we
want
to
reiterate
it,
I
suppose
that's
okay,.
N
So
the
the
motion
motion
in
front
of
us-
and
I
believe
the
clerks
are
working
on
sending
you
the
specific
language
too,
but
the
amendment
I
wanted
to
make
was
to
the
recommended
workgroup
structure
just
adding
in
a
section
that
that
states
that
to
ensure
that
all
members
who
are
participating
in
good
faith,
no
individuals
who
are
appointed
should
have
publicly
supported
senate
file
3414,
which
is
the
proposed
bill
to
preempt
local
control,
to
address
rent
stabilization
in
direct
contravention
to
voter
support
for
question
three.
N
N
I
believe
we
are
amending
the
shared
expectations
for
work
group
section
that
states
that
states
that
the
city
of
minneapolis
believes
in
local
control
and
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
members
are
going
to
actively
participate
in
the
work
group
in
good
faith,
with
the
shared
goal
of
developing
the
suggested
policy
frameworks.
N
Thank
you
and
analysis
described
above,
so
that
is
the
kinder
way,
that's
inclusive
and
doesn't
violate
anyone's
potential
constitutional
rights,
while
also
ensuring
that
we
have
members
who
are
participating
in
good
faith
and
that
we
are
having
a
thoughtful
and
substantive
policy
conversation.
N
A
I
A
A
All
right,
councilmember,
goodman.
G
I
want
to
thank
council
member
chug
thai
for
the
language
change.
I
think
it's
really
important
after
talking
to
folks
on
our
intergovernmental
affairs
team
to
have
the
language
the
way
it
is,
and
I
support
it.
B
B
The
next
amendment,
which
is
number
11,
I'm
going
to
walk
us
through
it,
is
one
that
was
added.
This
is
from
council
member
once
worleba,
the
staff
have
added
some
language
here.
That
is
not,
in
my
opinion,
reflective
of
what
council
member
juan
zavulaba
had
indicated.
M
So
clarity
doctor,
I
mean
director
brennan
and
clerk
carl
you're.
Basically
on
this
language,
will
broadcasting
still
be
an
option
that
was
provided
by
staff.
B
I'll
step
in
here
and
say
that,
to
the
extent
that
we
could
offer
broadcasting,
we
do
not
do
that
for
our
advisory
boards.
If,
if
it
is
something
we're
wanting
to
take
up
and
talk
about
as
advisory
boards
and
provide
that
we
could,
if
you
specifically
want
meetings
to
be
broadcast,
then
this
body
would
need
to
give
that
direction
and,
as
I
had
indicated,
there
are
some
financial
impacts
related
to
that
direction
which
are
not
calculated
as
part
of
this.
B
So
if
that
is
the
intent
that
these
meetings
are
broadcast,
we
we
will
have
to
delay,
and
we
can
come
back
with
the
with
the
issue
of
the
fiscal
impact
for
that.
If
it's
to
ensure
that
the
all
of
the
meetings
are
consistent
to
the
same
level
of
openness,
the
same
level
of
public
access,
the
same
level
of
public
participation,
other
boards
and
commissions,
then
the
alternate
language
here
that
the
staff
provided
would
be
fine
for
that.
Okay,.
B
H
B
A
That
item
carries
and
that
amendment
will
be
incorporated
into
this
work
group
policy,
and
I
do
believe,
though,
council
member
chavez
is
not
in
cube,
but
no.
B
Her
original
motion
this
morning
that
did
not
pass
added
in
number
four,
which
said
that
a
regional
focus
of
the
policy
should
be
included
as
consideration
by
the
work
group,
and
I
believe
this
is
what
and
what
I
cut
her
off,
that
this
is
what
she
was
suggesting.
She
wanted
to
go
back
and
take
a
more
generic
approach
and
so
I'll
defer
to
you
for
the
specific
language
council
member,
but
that's
the
that's
what's
in
queue.
A
So
just
a
reasonable
approach,
yep
all
right
any
conversation,
any
discussion.
A
So,
to
be
clear,
council
member
wansley,
wallaban's
amendment
is
that
the
work
group
take
a
regional
approach
to
as
they
are
considering
their
recommendations.
A
That
item
carries
and
is
adapted
and
or
will
be
adopted,
and
next
there's
no
one
in
queue.
B
Next
is
the
chavez
proposal.
I
Council
president
jenkins
members
of
this
party,
I
did
want
to
put
the
memphis
united
foreign
control
into
this
group,
and
I
know
that
there's
concerns
about
adding
more
people
to
this
group
because
of
the
just
the
amount
of
people
in
the
work
group.
So
maybe
we
can
add
an
extra
c
for
a
developer
on
one
developer,
who
retains
their
performance
for
property
management
operations
and
then
create
a
seat
for
me.
Apple's
united
front
control,
just
to
make
sure
that
there
is
an
equal
balance
of
people
on
this
body.
A
Thank
you,
council
member
chavez.
This
is
this
is
my
my
proposal.
A
I
I
really
think
we
have
people
who
are
representative
of
renters
represented
on
this
working
group,
and
I
really
want
to
keep
the
balance
of
this
group
and
and
then,
if
we
try
to
figure
out
who
else
to
add,
I
I
think
that
becomes
problematic,
but
I
will
open
the
floor
for
discussion.
Council
member
wansley
wallaby.
M
Yeah.
Thank
you,
madam
president,
reason
why
I'm
supporting
this
motion
is
just
for
parity.
We
just
added
a
seat
for
the
multi-housing
authority
and
paired
that,
with
a
position
for
ix.
Also,
council
member
osman
pulled
his
motion
around
removing
the
metropolitan
area
area
realtors.
So
they
stay,
I
think,
for
parity.
It
would
be
ideal
to
add.
M
You
know:
minneapolis
united,
rent
control,
folks
in
alignment
to
us,
basically
having
two
groups
that
have
stated
publicly
publicly
as
well
that
they're
not
necessarily
all
the
way
on
board
from
our
control
and
also
two
groups
that
have
said
yeah.
We
would
like
to
see
this
move
forward,
so
I
support
this
motion
to
get
us
to
a
place
of
parity.
A
Thank
you,
councilman
wants
me
all
about.
Is
there
any
other
discussion.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
agree
with
council
president
jenkins
on
this
one,
while
I
don't
have
any
particular
thoughts
or
opinions
about
minnesota
united
for
rent
control,
I'm
seeing
that
this
is
getting
out
of
balance
in
a
little
different
way,
and
that's
these
12
seats
in
the
first
section,
and
now
the
13
seats
in
the
section
section
that
this
would
add
another
seat
in
the
second
section
or
perhaps
two,
and
I
appreciate
that
desire
for
balance.
But
I
mean
we.
F
We
want
there
to
be
a
significant
number
of
renters
of
rental
property
owners
and
of
developers
here
at
the
table
that
are
doing
work
today
and
have
have
a
history
of
doing
of
of
living
in
of
living
as
renters
in
minneapolis
and
of
being
property
owners
of
rental
property
in
minneapolis.
I
just
think
that
you
know
we
did.
I
Council
member
chavez-
oh
council,
president
jenkins,
thank
you.
I
would
just
say
that
the
reason
that
I
added
my
opportunity-
frank,
control
and
an
extra
c
for
a
developer,
just
to
make
sure
that
we
could
be
balanced
in
the
variety
of
thought.
I
I
would
just
say
that
miami's
united
foreign
control
was
one
of
the
first
groups
that
had
been
advocating
for
this
in
the
city
of
minneapolis,
and
in
order
for
us
to
come
out
good
and
in
good
faith
and
work
in
good
faith
with
our
community
members,
they
need
to
have
a
seat
at
the
table.
It's
going
to
be
very
difficult
to
come
to
a
conclusion
without
them
and
their
support.
So
I
would
just
urge
my
members
to
support
this
motion.
A
Thank
you,
councilman
chavez
are,
are
they
a
coalition.
H
A
Councilmember
goodman
has
called
the
question:
is
there
a
second?
Second,
all
in
favor,
say
aye.
E
A
Any
opposed,
say,
nay,
that
item
carries.
I
will
now
ask
the
clerk
to
call
laurel.
E
G
H
A
A
A
So
we
are
so
now
we
need
to
vote
on
the
actual.
We
need
to
vote
on
the
actual.
J
A
I
Member
travis,
yes,
I
do
have
a
question
for
director
brennan.
If
you
may
indulge
me
so
number
towards
the
last
page.
It
talks
about
the
federal
reserve
is
offering
facilitated
seminars,
workshops
and
rent
control
policies
in
the
coming
weeks,
with
a
potential
opportunity
for
work,
group,
members
and
city
staff
to
attend
special
sessions.
The
first
session
is
scheduled
for
april
11th,
so
one
I
know
that
they
reached
out
to
us
in
regards
to
attending
the
session.
I
I
wasn't
able
to
attend,
but
would
you
be
able
to
just
tell
the
body
what
was
discussed
in
this
session
and
what
is
the
benefit
of
our
members?
Being
a
part
of
that?
I.
S
S
To
whatever
is
your
pleasure
in
terms
of
reporting
back
to
to
this
body
for
updates
on
on
the
workgroup
process,
we
are
happy
to
comply
with
whatever
your
direction
is.
A
Thank
you
thank
you
and,
and
I
do
want
to
just
acknowledge,
I
think
we
all
want
to
know.
I
wasn't
able
to
attend
that
presentation
either
though
my
staff
did
attend
and
I
think
a
couple
of
council
members
did,
but
we
can
get
you
that
information
comes
from
your
job
with
us,
and
so
we
are
now
at
the.
A
I'm
sorry,
rent,
stabilization
work
group
and
I
think
that
the
additions
that
have
been
brought
forth
and
amended
will
give
us
the
most
efficient
and
best
opportunity
to
get
a
great
outcome
of
recommendations
from
this
work
group.
So
thank
you
all
appreciate
it,
and
with
that
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
wrong.
A
That
item
passes
and
we
can
now
go
about
the
business
of
establishing
a
work
group.
I
have
a
flurry
of
papers
in
front
of
me.
S
B
B
President
with
the
colleagues
please,
with
the
body's
indulgence
I
was,
I
had
asked
if
director
brandon
or
ms
dobson
would
offer
very
briefly
comments
on
next
steps
with
the
resolution
to
create
the
group
in
terms
of
bringing
forward
the
timeline
for
appointments
and
when
we
think
we
might
be
able
to
convene
the
first
meeting
of
the
work
group.
So
I
just
wanted
to
give
the
body
that
update.
S
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
president,
and
council
members.
We
are
excited
to
be
leading
this
work
and
cped
is
the
is
named
in
this
resolution,
as
the
lead
department-
and
this
joey
dobson
here
is,
will
be
the
lead
staff
working
on
this.
However,
I
really
want
to
emphasize
this
is
going
to
be
an
inter-departmental
staff
team
that
will
be
supporting
this
work.
S
Second,
so
we
will
be,
we
will
be
working
on
with
with
you
all
and
the
mayor
on
the
appointments
that
you'll
be
making
and
helping
to
facilitate
that
process,
as
well
as
making
lists
and
engaging
with
the
the
13
now,
organizations
that
have
been
named
specifically
we'll
be
working
with
them
to
identify
membership.
So
our
goal
is
to
have
the
membership
determined.
S
Hopefully,
as
you
know,
in
the
next
couple
of
months
and
start
meeting
in
a
couple
months,
I
can't
get
a
little
bit
more
specific
than
that
right
now,
but
we
will
also
be
working
on
the
orientation
materials
and
the
the
orientation
that
we
will
be
delivering
for
this
work
group
and
the
meeting
schedule.
And
all
of
that,
so
we
hope
to
be
able
to
report
back
in
the
next
30
days.
Our
progress.
A
A
This
morning
we
passed
this
referendum
to
establish
a
rent,
stabilization
policy,
and
we
just
want
to
ensure
that
we
are
working
with
deliberate
speed
to
bring
this
work
group
to
fruition
so
that
we
can
in
turn
craft
a
policy,
and
I
do
want
to
thank
you
and
your
staff
for
for
all
of
your
efforts
and-
and
I
want
to
state
thank
my
own
staff,
diva
siddhar,
as
well
as
mr
sean
broome
from
council
member
osmond's
office
and
council
member
osman,
for
his
support,
as
well
as
council,
vice
president
pamisano
and
her
staff
member
john
freudie
for
all
of
their
efforts
and
and
again
just
reiterate.
K
A
You
councilmember
allison
I'll.
K
Keep
it
super
short.
I
just
want
to
thank
director
brennan
and
your
team,
and
you
know
I
know
we
had
a
very
long
discussion.
You
know
me
and
councilmember
osman
are
basically
gonna
break
fast
right
after
this
meeting
you
know,
and
but
the
the
the,
but
I
don't
want
to
discount
the
the
the
tremendous
work
in
the
cped
team
and
joey
dodson
is
going
to
be
on
this,
and
that
is
that's
tremendous
for
folks.
K
That
don't
know
before
her
role
at
the
city
has
been
a
tremendous
advocate
outside
of
the
city
is
a
played
a
major
part
in
a
lot
of
the
the
tenants
attendance
rights
of
legislation
that
we
passed
last
term
and
so
to
have
somebody
like
that
at
the
helm
and
to
have
your
leadership
director
brennan
at
the
helm
of
this.
K
You
know,
obviously,
we
as
addressed
at
the
beginning
of
this
meeting,
we're
maybe
not
moving
as
fast
as
a
lot
of
us
would
love
to
move,
but
I
am
confident
that
we're
going
to
move
with
a
lot
of
integrity
and
that
we're
going
to
move
and
create
a
really
good
policy.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you
to
your
team
and
I'm
excited
to
get
to
work.
Thank
you.
A
Yeah
and
thank
you
councilmember
ellison
and
I
will
ask
my
colleagues:
are
there
any
announcements?
Oh
I'm
sorry,
council,
well,
councilmember
vito,
do
you
have
an
announcement?
I.
Q
Do
a
couple.
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
want
to
just
quickly
acknowledge
the
award
winners
today
of
the
public
health
hero
awards.
I
wasn't
able
to
make
it
down,
but
was
invited,
and
it's
one
of
the
activities
that
I
love
at
the
city,
some
youth
from
my
program
at
north
point
one
some
years
ago,
and
I
became
familiar
with
it
so
quickly.
Q
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
craig
hillberg,
the
cultural
wellness
center
eureka
recycling
khadijah
cooper
is
the
thriving
youth
and
young
adult
award
winner
and
then
in
honor
of
mark
john
again
and
barb
harris
are
the
winners
of
those
public
health
hero
awards.
So
thank.
H
Q
All
so
much
for
being
public
health
heroes
and,
lastly,
I
want
to
invite
my
colleagues
their
constituents
to
a
series
of
listening
sessions,
I'm
hosting
they
begin
next
monday
april
18th
at
falwell.
It's
our
first
session
and
this
these
sessions
are
I'm
a
member
of
the
search
committee
for
the
next
police
chief,
and
these
listening
sessions
are
going
to
help
inform
who
our
next
chief
of
mpd
is.
Q
A
G
G
Thank
you,
madam
president,
for
those
of
you
who
have
spoken
to
me
this
week.
You've
heard
me
say
that
this
is
a
very
unique
moment
in
religious
history.
G
This
week
is
the
first
time
in
72
years
and
this
year,
and
next
year
will
be
the
two
times
not
for
another
30,
where
the
holidays
of
ramadan,
passover
and
easter
all
converge.
It
is
a
unique
conveyance
because
of
the
way
the
lunar
calendar
works
with
holidays
and,
in
fact,
as
you
know,
jews
actually
add
an
additional
month
to
their
calendar,
whereas
muslims
don't
do
so,
which
is
why
ramadan?
A
A
With
that,
we
have
completed
all
the
items
on
our
agenda.
Let
the
record
reflect
that
it
is
3,
40
p.m
and
with
nothing
further
to
come
before
the
council
and
without
objection.
I
will
declare
this
meeting
adjourned.
Thank
you,
everyone
and
have
a
great
holiday.