►
From YouTube: April 10, 2023 Planning Commission
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
Submit written comments about agenda items to: councilcomment@minneapolismn.gov or https://www.minneapolismn.gov/government/meetings/public-comment/online-comment
A
Planning
Commission
today
is
Monday
April
10th.
My
name
is
Alyssa
Olson
and
I'm.
The
president
of
the
Planning
Commission.
This
City
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
YouTube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
Public,
Access
and
transparency.
This
meeting
is
public
and
subject
to
the
Minnesota
open
meeting
law.
At
this
time,
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
please
call
the
roll.
C
B
A
A
A
D
A
Opposed
any
abstentions,
if
that
motion
passes
the
minutes
are
adopted
before
we
organize
our
agenda
this
evening,
staff
have
some
additional
items
for
us
to
consider
so
I'd
like
to
do
you
want
to
say
anything
about
them,
Jim
or
I'll.
Go
ahead.
Okay,
there
are.
A
Is
it
three
addendum
items
that
were
approved
at
the
committee
of
the
whole
that
normally
would
be
pushed
on
to
us
and
we
would
approve
without
discussion.
They
did
not
get
pushed
through,
so
we
are
adding
them,
we're
adding
them
now
and
we'll
add.
We
will
talk
about
those
when
I
go
through
the
agenda.
A
Thank
you
all
right.
So
our
next
order
of
business
is
to
organize
the
public
hearing
agenda,
which
again
is
available
at
limestop,
Minneapolis
mn.gov
I'm,
going
to
read
through
all
of
the
items
on
the
agenda
and
I'm,
going
to
State
whether
they're
slated
for
consent,
discussion
or
continuance.
A
If
you
would
like
to
speak
on
an
item
against
the
staff
recommendation,
when
I
call
out
that
item
just
raise
your
hand
and
we'll
put
that
item
on
our
discussion
agenda
so
with
that
we
have
the
following
items
on
the
agenda
for
this
evening.
Item
number
four
is
1714.
A
East
Hennepin
Avenue
staff
is
recommending
this
item
for
consent.
Is
there
anyone
here
who
would
like
to
speak
against
staff
recommendation
on
item
number?
Four:
okay,
we'll
put
item
number
four
on
our
discussion
agenda
item
number:
five
is
six
five
one
Nicollet
Mall
staff
is
recommending
this
item
for
consent.
Is
there
anyone
here
who
would
like
to
speak
against
staff
recommendation
on
item
number?
Five:
okay,
seeing
none
I'll
put
item
five
on
consent.
Item
number:
six
is
2426.
A
Inglewood
Ave
staff
is
recommending
this
item
for
consent.
Is
there
anyone
here
who
would
like
to
speak
against
staff
recommendation
on
item
six?
Okay,
we
will
put
item
six
on
our
discussion.
Item
number.
Seven
is
560
Humboldt
Avenue,
North,
formerly
465
Gerard
Terrace
staff
is
recommending
this
item
for
consent.
Is
there
anyone
here
who
would
like
to
speak
on?
Item
number?
Seven:
okay,
we'll
put
item
number
seven
on
consent.
Item
number:
eight
public
alley
adjacent
to
2840,
Chicago
Avenue
staff
is
recommending
this
item
for
consent.
A
E
A
Nine
is
600
Park
Avenue.
This
item
will
be
continued
to
the
May
8th
meeting
item
number
10
is
137
46th
Street,
West
Staff
is
recommending
this
item
for
consent.
Is
there
anyone
here
who
would
like
to
speak
against
stack
staff
recommendation
on
item
10.,
okay,
put
item
10
on
our
discussion
item:
11
is
3745.
Hiwatha
Avenue
staff
is
recommending
this
item
for
consent.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
against
staff
recommendation
on
item
11.
A
A
None
of
these
items
will
have
a
public
hearing.
Number
12
is
18
23
and
1839.
Bryant
Avenue
North
staff
is
recommending
this
item
for
consent.
A
Item
number
13
is
1301
West
Lake,
Tiff
plan
staff
is
recommending
this
item
for
consent
and
item
number
14..
A
So
to
review,
we
have
items
five,
seven,
eight,
eleven,
twelve,
thirteen
and
fourteen
on
consent,
and
we
have
items
four
six
and
ten
on
our
discussion
agenda
and
we
will
continue
item
number
nine
to
the
May
8th
meeting
could
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda
as
amended
all
right.
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second.
Is
there
any
discussion
seeing
none
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye.
F
A
All
opposed
any
abstentions,
all
right
that
motion
passes
and
the
agenda
has
been
adopted
so
we'll
move
right
into
our
consent
agenda.
A
B
B
Apologies,
oh
chair,
Olson,
I,
misspoke
I
thought
you
meant.
Did
we
need
to
do
the
addendum
items
separately
from
one
another?
Oh
because,
but
because
the
addendum
items
don't
have
a
public
hearing
just
for
clarity,
we
recommend
doing
them
separately.
Thank.
A
You
for
the
question.
Thank
you.
Okay,
so
we'll
move
on
and
we'll
vote
on
the
consent
items
that
do
not
have
a
public
hearing
so
items
12,
13
and
14.
could
I
have
a
motion
to
adopt
items.
12,
13
and
14
on
consent.
A
All
right,
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
is
there
any
discussion,
seeing
none
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye
all
opposed
any
abstentions,
all
right
those
items
have
passed
so
12,
13
and
14
are
done
for
today.
A
So
next
we'll
proceed
to
handle
the
public
hearing
for
the
consent
agenda
for
items,
five,
seven,
eight
and
eleven,
so
I'll
open
the
public
hearing.
And
if
there's
anyone
here
who
would
like
to
speak
on
items,
five,
seven,
eight
or
eleven,
you
can
come
to
the
podium
now
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
proceed
with
your
comments.
A
All
right.
Seeing
that
for
are
you
wanting
to
speak
on
items,
five,
seven,
eight
or
eleven.
G
A
D
A
Next,
we
will
move
on
to
our
one
item.
That
is
continued
item
number
nine
Commissioners
could
I
have
a
motion
to
continue
item
nine
to
the
May
8th
meeting.
A
H
Good
afternoon,
Commissioners
and
I
apologize
I've
been
in
training
this
afternoon
and
I'm
feeling
a
little
unprepared
for
this
presentation,
but
I'm
gonna
give
it
a
shot.
This
is
a
application
for
1714
East,
Hennepin
Avenue.
The
subject
site
is
located
at
the
southwest
corner
of
Hennepin
Avenue
and
18th
Avenue
Southeast
the
site
is
guided
for
quarter
four
neighborhood
mixed
use.
The
site
does
have
split
zoning
with
R4
and
r1a.
This
is
what
the
site
qualifies
for
the
exemption
in
the
zoning
code
that
allows
the
larger
percentage
of
zoning
to
cover
the
entire
site.
H
So
the
site
was
analyzed
using
the
R4
zoning
requirements.
The
site
is
just
one
about
one
third
of
an
acre,
a
little
over
13
000
square
feet.
The
site
is
shaped
like
a
flake,
with
property
lens
extending
into
the
right-of-way,
with
right-of-way
easements
over
Those
portions
of
the
lot
outside
of
what
looks
like
the
public
sidewalk,
and
so
only
the
area
not
covered
by
those
easements
was
included
for
the
land
use
evaluation.
H
There
are
the
property
lines,
go
to
the
middle
of
the
streets,
but
this
land
was
not
included
in
the
side
area
because
it
does
have
right-of-way
on
public
Transportation
easements
over
it,
and
the
development
proposal
is
for
a
four-story
residential
building
with
27
dwelling
units
and
23
off-street
parking
spaces.
The
only
application
before
you
today
is
for
site
plan
review
for
the
new
building.
There
was
an
administrative,
far
increase
application
considered
in
the
application
and
they
do
qualify
for
the
premium.
H
H
I'm
gonna
go
back
to
the
site
plan
for
alternative
compliance.
There
are
four
items
that
need
alternate
compliance:
one
is
blank
walls
actually
I'm
going
to
go
down.
It's
on
the
first
floor
of
the
building
along
the
parking
garage
wall.
So
here
and
here
these
areas
of
the
building
are
over
25
feet
in
length
and
blank.
We
have
conditioned
that
they
add
Windows
into
those
locations
to
not
have
blank
wall
conditions,
ground
floor,
active
functions.
The
plan
on
the
right
side
is
the
first
floor
plan.
The
areas
in
blue
are
the
active
functions.
H
Gray
is
dedicated
to
parking
in
internal
circulation.
We
are
recommending
alternative
compliance
due
to
the
unique
property
lines
the
need
to
accommodate
parking
and
circulation
within
the
building
staff
has
conditioned
providing
the
fenestration
pattern
on
the
North
building
wall
is
show
an
unsubmitted
elevation,
so
we
want
to
ensure
that
these
Windows
along
Hennepin
Avenue
are
excuse
me.
That's
not
the
right
elevation.
These
want
these
windows
along
Hennepin
Avenue
are
provided.
H
A
Thank
you,
Hillary
Commissioners.
Are
there
any
any
questions
for
staff
before
we
move
on
all
right,
I'm,
not
seeing
any.
Thank
you.
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
and
invite
the
applicant
to
come
forward
when
the
applicant's
done.
We
will
open
the
public
hearing
to
the
residents
and
we
are
going
to
be
using
a
two
minute
timer
this
evening.
So
please
try
to
keep
your
comments
to
two
minutes
and
yeah.
Thank
you.
You
can
go
ahead.
J
Good
evening,
commissioner,
my
name
is
Pete
Keely
collage
Architects
with
the
applicant
and
I.
Don't
have
a
whole
lot
to
say
so,
I'll
be
here
to
answer
questions.
I
do
want
to
point
out
a
couple
things
about
the
site
that
may
be
a
little
bit
unique
one.
It
was
an
old
gas
station
site.
We
are
going
through
remediation
on
the
site,
so
there's
an
application
in
through
deed
to
do
the
environmental
remediation
on
that.
Because
of
that,
we
will
be
doing
some
excavation
on
the
site.
J
J
We
believe
it
was
built
at
the
time
that
the
site
was
lowered
for
minda
as
they
put
the
road
in
and
the
underpass
under
the
train.
So
we
are
trying
to
work
with
the
site.
We've
got
the
active
uses
on
the
front.
Everything
else
is
kind
of
per
I,
think
per
the
standards
and
we're
really
not
looking
for
anything
other
than
site
plan
approval
and
over
into
this.
So
with
that
I'd
be
happy
to
open
up
to
any
questions
that
anybody
might
have
and
maybe
answer
questions
later.
A
Thank
you
Commissioners
any
questions
for
the
applicant
I'm,
not
seeing
any.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
right.
If
there
are
any
residents
here
who
would
like
to
come
forward
and
speak
on
this
item,
you
can
come
to
the
podium
now.
You
can
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
proceed
with
your
comments.
K
My
name
is
Jeff
Haber,
h-a-b-e-r-e-r
and
I
live
at
1112,
17th
Avenue
Southeast
in
Minneapolis.
It
butts
the
back.
The
West
End
of
the
property
and
I
have
about
well
I
hope.
I
have
about
five
points
to
make
so
I'll
just
try
to
be
clear
with
what
I'm
trying
to
say.
The
first
point
I
want
to
make
is
I,
don't
have
much
grind
to
stand
on,
I
realize,
but
I'm
not
I'm,
opposed
to
all
this
density.
That's
going
on
in
this,
and
this
is
another
exam.
K
Yes,
it
literally
is
in
my
backyard
where
the
dance
is
going
on,
but
this
is
a
university
area
and
the
university
area
is,
maybe
you
know,
maybe
you
don't
know,
we
have
lots
of
students
in
the
area.
We
have
lots
of
issues
with
livability
issues
from
time
to
time
and
just
to
increase
more
density.
Just
means
more
and
more
of
that.
We
see
it
in
Dinkytown
all
over
the
place.
Now
on
huge
densities.
K
I
just
feel
compelled
to
at
least
put
out
a
resident's
Viewpoint
that
this
density
is
it's
hurting
this
neighborhood.
It
really
is
hurting
this
neighborhood
and
I.
Don't
know
what
the
intent
is
of
this
property,
whether
it's
intended
for
General
use
or
for
students,
but
if
we
have
more
students
in
this
in
this
type
of
dense
areas,
our
neighborhood
is
is
going
to
further
deteriorate
in
terms
of
the
livability.
K
Secondly,
it
relates
to
the
concern
about
the
excavation
that
might
be
done
because
of
the
it
was
an
old
gas
station
and
I
I
wasn't
around
at
the
time,
but
I've
lived
at
the
adjacent
property
since
1988
I
believe
that
was
when
I
we,
we
purchased
the
property,
so
the
street
was
widened
and
there's
there
is
the
concern
about.
K
This
is
an
old
peat
bog.
This
whole
neighborhood
in
Southeast
Minneapolis
is
a
peat
bog
essentially,
and
if
you
don't
build
down
to
the
sand,
you're
going
to
have
problems,
structural
problems
with
the
house.
There's
also
is
a
big
railroad
crossing
track
track.
There
that
happens
across
the
street
that
vibrates,
you
can
feel
it
every
time
the
train
goes
by
and
the
trains
are
very
frequency,
Burlington
Northern
wine.
K
K
I'm
concerned
about
stability-
that's
that
was
my
second
point.
I'm
also
concerned
about
this
fence
this
this
on
this
flag,
part
I
want
that
fence
to
stay
there
that
brought
to
my
property.
It's
what
keeps
my
backyard
up
if
that
goes,
I
have
a
big
problem
with
my
property
and
I'll
be
coming
to.
If
that
goes,
I
will
be
coming
to
find
out
how
we
resolve
this.
K
That's
three.
Now
the
fourth
one
was
I
think
referred
to
in
terms
of
the
Landscaping
issues.
There
needs
to
be
another
tree
at
least
a
shade
tree.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
happens
and
there's
there
is
no
lighting
plan.
I
want
to
see
what
that
lighting
plant
looks
like
it's
not
flooding.
My
backyard
with
with
biting
I,
think
that
there's
also
a
fence
on
the
the
west
side
of
the
property
that
I
have
another
neighbor.
That
also
is
concerned
about
that
continuous
of
that
fence.
K
If
we
could,
it
needs
to
be
repaired,
and
it
would
be
great
if
we
could
work
with
the
new
owners
to
repair
that
fence.
So
I
think
that's
that's.
My
point
was
density
stability,
landscape
issues,
the
lighting
and
then
fencing
okay.
A
L
Hello,
my
name
is
Helen
Torrens,
t-o-r-r-e-n-s
and
I
live
at
11
12
17th,
Avenue
Southeast,
which
would
be
looking
right
over
this
development
and
I
I
have
the
same
concerns
as
as
Jeff
who
just
talked,
and
one
of
my
big
concerns
is
because
of
the
peat
soil.
So
the
reason
it
vibrates
and
shakes
is
because
the
peat
soil
is
kind
of
a
acts
kind
of
like
a
jelly.
L
It's
and
it
goes
down
pretty
far
to
about
four
or
five
feet,
and
so
it
shakes
things
and
there's,
and
so,
when
the
trains
go
by,
so
there's
this
I,
don't
know
what
all
the
scientific
name
for
it
is.
But
basically
it's
like
a
resonance
and
really
concerned
about
pile
driving
during
construction
and
how
that
might
damage
all
the
homes
are
over
100
years
old.
L
All
three
that
will
be
the
most
impacted
and
I
want
to
make
sure.
There's
that
that
people
understand
that.
There's
excavation
that
this
needs
to
be
addressed.
F
L
A
J
Right
now,
the
fence
is
scheduled
to
remain.
There's,
there's
no
plan
to
take
that
fence
down.
It
is
here's.
Here's
the
issue
as
I,
see
it
fence,
sits
on
the
property
of
this
of
this
property
I
believe
it
was
built
by
MnDOT.
J
There
is
a
I
think,
there's
a
legal
statute
because
it's
been
in
been
there
for
a
long
time.
Maybe
50
years
I
checked
the
1988
aerial
and
it
was
in
place
on
the
88
aerial,
so
I
believe
it's
called
adverse
possession.
So
I
I,
don't
know
when
I
look
at
the
Civil
survey
and
I
see
this
the
fence.
It
is
on
this
particular
property
as
to
are
there
other
legal
instances
where
it
might
be
the
ownership
of
someone
else,
maybe
as
I
just
want
to
put
that
caveat
out
there
as.
M
Thank
you
for
the
clarification
and
then,
if
I
may,
is
it
in
a
state
of
disrepair
considering
the
age
yeah.
J
I
I
think
it
looks
pretty
good.
I
have
not
seen
the
neighbors
side
of
the
fence,
we
haven't
gone
back
there.
That's
that
fence
has
been
I
would
say:
there's
been
some
graffiti
on
that
fence.
There's
been
some
some
repairs
to
that.
There
are
a
few
areas
that
probably
could
use
a
little
bit
of
repair
to
it.
I,
don't
think
it's
structurally.
It
looks
out
to
me,
but
I
think
there
are
some
areas
where
it
could
use
a
little
touch-up.
So.
J
N
Marwa
I
have
a
question
for
the
applicant
or
staff
I'm,
not
sure
about
the
alternative
compliance
for
the
blank
wall,
the
windows
on
the
parking
garage
side.
What
sorry,
what
is
there
a
is
that
staff
is
okay.
Now
that
there's
the
windows?
Can
you
just
kind
of
explain
what
happened
with
that
I'm
trying
to
follow
it
in
the
packet.
H
We
excuse
me
the
condition
is
that
these
windows
that
are
shown
on
here
remain.
So,
if
there's
any
changes
internally
to
the
garage
or
the
bike
storage
area,
that
those
windows
would
not
be
eliminated
for
in
the
future.
If
that
space
were
to
be
converted
to
something
else,
you
know
if
the
parking
were
to
go
away,
and
it
were
to
be
converted
that
we
would
have
that
those
windows
providing
that
those
views
to
and
from
the
street
and
seen
into
that
active
function
space.
H
H
H
These
are
facing
near
west
and
south
property
lines,
and
so
what
we've
done
is
conditioned
that
they
not
have
blank
walls
and
simple.
What
seems
like
a
simple
solution
would
be
to
add
a
window
to
just
follow
the
window
patterning
down
and
put
a
window
in
here.
So
we
don't
have
a
blank
wall
over
25
feet
same
within
this
area
of.
N
O
Hillary,
could
you
just
go
over
from
the
neighbors
concerned
about
construction
activities?
What
is
the
process
once
that
is
underway
for
them
to
check
in
and
be
assured
that
their
property
is
going
to
be
all
right.
H
O
H
If
there
are
things
by
the
neighbors
during
construction,
I
would
encourage
them
to
call
the
city's
3-1-1
line
and
get
in
contact
with
the
city
about
Construction
concerns.
Okay,
but
you
know
there
are
hours
of
operation
that
construction
activities
can
happen.
There
are
noise
restrictions
and
So
within
those
hours.
You
know
the
construction,
Crews
construction
crew
excuse
me,
or
the
development
team
can
be
out
there
doing
that
work.
O
H
Yep
I'll,
let
the
developer
speak
to
that.
There
is
no
underground
parking,
so
this
is
slab
on
grade,
and
so
there
should
be
less
disruption,
given
that
they
aren't
Excavating
10
to
12
feet
down,
but
I
will
let
Mr
Keeley
thanks.
O
J
Yeah
thanks
yeah.
One
of
the
reasons
we
didn't
go
down
was
the
conditions
of
the
soil,
so
we're
essentially
Excavating
to
do
the
environmental
remediation
take
out
the
bad
soil
from
The
Leaky
tanks
and
then
we're
doing
engineered
feel
on
the
underside
of
that.
So
we're
going
essentially
to
get
a
good
chunk
of
that
peat
out
of
there
and
then
we're
doing
some
mixing
of
that
to
provide
suitable
soils
underneath
we've
done
Geotech
on
that
we're
comfortable
with
that
solution,
and
it's
actually
going
to
be
pretty
sound.
J
One
of
the
advantages
of
not
going
deep
for
the
foundation
is
less
less
impact.
Overall,
although
there
will
be
some
excavation.
Fortunately,
we
do
have
to
go
pretty
close
to
the
property
lines
to
get
our
slopes
back
in
order
to
kind
of
retain
the
stability
of
it
as
we
get
into
that
we
will
certainly
that
will
be
short.
If
there's
an
issue,
we
take
there's
photographs
that
are
taken,
there's
documentation
of
the
conditions,
the
existing
site
conditions.
So
we
know
what
happened
before
all
the
construction
started.
J
It
comes
back
if
there's
a
concern,
then
we
know
the
the
starting
point
and
we
know
essentially
what
would
have
happened
during
construction,
so
those
are
kind
of
the
basic
basic
items.
I
would
say.
Also
you
know,
there's
an
on-site
they'll
be
an
on-site
job
supervisor
that
can
be
contact
and
there's
a
lot
of
construction
coordination
that
happens
through
that
time.
But
we
will
set
up
a
contact
point
for
that.
J
O
J
Know
yet
no,
we
can
do
spread
footings
once
we
go
in
and
we
do
the
remediation
and
then
we
kind
of
bring
back
the
sufficient
soils
that
can
all
be
done
on
spread
footings.
It's
actually
a
pretty
lightweight
Building
without
the
parking
underneath
it
it's
it'll
fit
on
the
soils.
Just
fine
great
thanks.
Q
I
just
have
a
point
of
a
question
that
is
lingering
my
mind
for,
for
you
please
point
of
curiosity
really
is
why
what
what
do
you
gain?
This
is
from
keeping
that
little
tail
or
is
there
any
reason
you're,
the
fence
seems
like
such
an
issue.
J
Kind
of
came
with
the
site,
so
you
know
it's
I
think
it's
a
condition
that
we
we
just
kind
of
deal
with,
and
you
know
our
assumption
on
that
was
to
basically
keep
it
as
it
is.
D
B
J
Q
S
Foreign,
well
so
I
think
what
you
just
said
is
sort
of
the
beginning
of
my
comments,
which
is
that
I
want
to
I
I
know
that
this
process
may
seem
challenging
and
difficult,
but
we
really
are
thankful
for
you
taking
the
time
to
come
down
here
and
speak
to
us
about
this,
because
you
live
near
it.
You
are
dealing
with
it
and
it's
it's
a.
It
can
be
a
challenging
conversation
to
have
in
a
public
body
like
this,
with
many
different
rules
that
are
that
are
difficult
to
follow.
S
I,
think
for
your
sake
and
for
the
sake
of
the
people
gathered
here
today,
I
think
it's
important
for
maybe
us
to
clarify
what
our
role
is,
which
is
really
as
a
checkered
balance
on
staff
interpreting
city
codes,
City
zoning
regulations,
a
variety
of
other
things
to
make
sure
that
they
align
with
the
comprehensive
plan
of
the
City
of
Minneapolis,
and
we
are
in
that
role,
often
faced
with
challenges
that
we
cannot
consider
as
part
of
our
overall
duties
as
planning
Commissioners
things
like
parking
things
like
oftentimes
shading
from
buildings.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Campbell.
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
is
there
any
discussion
seeing
non-alask
the
clerk
to
please
call
the
rule.
G
J
C
B
A
Right
that
motion
passes,
so
we
are
done
with
item
number
four.
Our
next
item
is
item
number
six
24
26,
Inglewood,
Ave
and
staff
is
mailing.
Smith.
T
T
This
is
these
are
some
pictures
of
the
existing
site
right
now
it
is
vacant
is
located
in
the
R2,
multiple
family
District,
as
well
as
the
Shoreland
overlay
district
and
the
interior
II
built
form
overlay.
District
The
Proposal
is
for
two
separate
structures,
so
they're
each
two
stories
in
height
and
each
contains
eight
units
there
will
be
seven
enclosed
parking
spaces
on
the
site
as
well
as
48
bike
parking
spaces.
You
may
may
remember
this
from
the
committee
of
the
whole
meeting
in
November.
T
This
is
this
requires
rezoning
from
r2b
to
R3,
also
a
conditional
use
for
a
planned
unit
development
they
have
proposed
about
16
or
exactly
16
points
worth
of
amenities,
a
variance
to
allow
development
on
a
steep
slope,
site
plan
review
and
a
plot
which
is
allow
is
required
for
all
planned
unit
developments.
T
T
And
here's
a
rendering
of
the
structure
yeah
as
you
can
see,
there's
Frontage
on
both
of
the
public
streets.
The
enclosed
parking
area
would
be
fronting
on
the
Thomas
side
and
our
recommendation
is
to
approve
all
applications
with
very
minor
changes,
but
mostly
making
sure
that
they
do
submit
a
lighting
plan
and
enclose
any
mechanical
equipment
that
ends
up
on
the
site
plan
and
to
comply
with
their
Planning
Development
amenities
and
I'm.
Here
to
stand
for
any
questions
thanks.
A
G
Of
the
process
of
the
project
yeah
here
for
any
questions,
it's
been
a
unique,
very
unique
site.
So
thank
you,
mailing.
It's
been
a
lot
of
work,
I
think
Jessica
and
Christian
have
done
a
wonderful
job,
designing
it
to
really
fit
into
the
neighborhood
and
oh
Jessica,
I.
Think
you're
from
here.
V
We
did
sort
of
shift
the
entrance
to
the
below
grade
parking
to
help,
bury
the
building
a
little
more
and
we
lowered
the
height
of
that
building,
so
that
we
would
comply
with
the
height
restrictions
and
we
separated
the
two
buildings
made
them
into
two
separate
structures.
Previously
we
had
connected
as
a
single
unit
so
that
now
we
comply
with
the
planned
unit
development.
A
A
W
You
hi,
my
name
is
Mark
Fox
from
I
live
at
320,
Thomas,
Avenue
North,
so
I
would
be
the
only
other
property
sharing
the
one
block
of
Thomas
Avenue
I've
been
living
there
for
13
years,
so
I've
seen
the
neighborhood
change
from
the
Glenwood
Englewood
water
Factory
to
abandon
everything
to
now
the
udupils
brewery
and
design
firms
and
construction
companies
and
Auto
Center
that's
across
the
street.
But
basically
my
concern
is
I.
Just
I.
Don't
understand
why
you
need
to
rezone
this
property
from
R2
to
R3.
The
entire
block
is
R2.
W
W
W
P
Thank
you
so
much
I
appreciate
your
time
today.
Commissioners
I
do
actually,
while
this
is
a
rendering
I
do
actually
have
video
that
was
taken
on
the
streets.
This
past
Thursday
April
6th
at
five
o'clock,
for
when
the
brewery
was
open
for
normal
business
hours
and
I.
If
you
would
be
open
to
it,
I
would
love
to
show
you
that
video
just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
the
current
traffic
for
the
residents
and
the
visitors.
P
I
do
have
some
public
safety
concerns
for
this
particular
area.
It
is
a
very
unique
residential
area.
It
is
a
small
residential
pocket
that
is
sandwiched
between
these
two
parks
that
visitors
enjoy
all
year
round.
There
is
the
two
major
city
bike
paths
that,
as
we
know,
are
actually
on
the
street
itself.
P
P
So
I
worry
that
if
we
have
all
this
additional
traffic
that
there
is
no
parking
for
the
current
residents
as
we're
currently
we're
already
over
capacity
and
that
it
deters
people
from
visiting
the
businesses
in
the
Parks
there
are
no
sidewalks
street
is
very
narrow
and
we're
currently
over
capacity.
So
unless
the
applicant,
you
know
can
show
that
they
have
concern
for
the
current
residents
and
businesses
and
are
planning
for
parking
that
would
accommodate
all
of
the
residents,
I
don't
see
how
that
would
support
it.
There
is
the
short
overlay.
P
It
is
on
a
steep
slope
towards
the
creek,
so
Water
Management
concerns
in
the
future
could
come
up.
So
I
just
believe
that
there
is
a
reason
why
it's
zoned
as
R2,
and
it
could
certainly
stay
as
R2
and
I'm.
Not
against
that
you
know
being
the
case,
but
if
I
may
is
that?
Okay,
if
I
just
show
a
video
I
mean
yeah,
is
that
all
right
yeah?
P
It
is
like
16
seconds
you
all
can
see.
That's
the
property
there,
and
then
there
are
cars
on
either
side
of
the
street,
with
people
walking
to
their
cars
and
there's
no
room
for
two
cars
to
go
by
side
by
side.
P
They
often
have
to
wait
for
a
series
of
cars
to
pass
before
before
they
can
go
through,
and
these
cars
on
the
right
side
of
the
screen
are
actually
currently
parked
in
front
of
the
bike
path
entrance
along
the
park,
so
bikers
do
have
to
bike
around
the
parked
cars
they're
parked
illegally.
P
So
that
is
the
current
amount
of
traffic
just
on
a
regular
Thursday
night
at
five
o'clock,
not
even
a
weekend.
So
thank.
A
A
Y
Hi,
my
name
is
Allison
Madsen
I
own
2424
and
2422,
which
would
be
the
duplex
that
it
will
be
just
to
the
east
I've
owned
it
for
about
five
years
before
that
my
parents
owned
it
for
about
45
years.
So
we
were
part
of
the
original
people
that
came
in
there.
As
they've
said,
it's
a
very
unique
Place,
its
very
nature.
Y
My
tenants
and
I
refer
to
it
as
the
town
or
the
tree
house,
because
we're
up
in
the
trees
and
we
Overlook
the
park
and
that's
looking
at
that,
rendering
I'm
afraid
we're
going
to
lose
a
lot
of
that
feel
to
the
neighborhood
I'm
also
concerned
about
the
parking
and
the
traffic
that's
coming
by
we've
got
as
you
could
see
a
lot
of
parking
or
issues
already.
Y
So
that's
that's
my
those
are
my
concerns
is
that
it
was
if
it
was
if
it
was
one
level
that
might
be
one
thing,
but
the
fact
is
it's
going
to
come
up
all
the
way
up
and
that's
going
to
change
the
feel
of
the
neighborhood
completely
so
I.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
your
consideration.
Thank.
Z
Hi
I'm
Travis
segedal
I
own,
a
property
at
2511,
Glenwood
Avenue,
it's
currently
rental
property,
but
The
Alley
dead
ends
right
behind
us
behind
the
property.
I,
don't
know
much
about
the
plans
how
high
it
really
is.
If
it's
people
would
be
looking
into
the
backyards
or
not
from
up
high.
So
I
can't
really
tell
from
the
picture
I
like
that.
The
entrance
is
down
there,
but
obviously,
with
their
point
two
of
the
traffic.
It's
really
it.
Z
C
V
Really
you
know
like
this
is
a
really
interesting
site
and,
as
I've
described,
there's
a
lot
happening
here
and
we've
gone
to.
You
know
quite
a
bit
of
lengths
to
try
to
accommodate.
You
know
really
make
this
a
very
bike:
friendly
development,
there's
a
bike
room
as
part
of
the
plans.
There's
storage
lockers
for
skis
I
mean
we're
really
encouraging
this
as
an
active
place
for
people
to
live.
Who
might
not
want
to
have
cars.
V
There
is
no
actual
parking
requirement
for
this
building.
So
you
know
just
even
putting
in
the
parking
was.
You
know
something.
The
developer
felt
was
important
just
to
help
with
the
neighborhood
and
to
help
alleviate
some
of
this
and
yeah
I
actually
live
like
just
up
the
road
from
this
I'm
well
aware
of
the
impulse
traffic
and
the
concert
I
can
hear
from
my
house.
So
I
just
I
think
you
know
all
those
issues
with
a
bike
pass
and
UDA
pills.
AA
I
am
Christian
Dean
principal
architect
on
the
project
we
had
a
neighborhood
meeting
with
the
neighborhood
and
a
couple
of
the
concerns
were
safety,
and
this
is
just
coming
from
a
neighbor
saying
that
there's
you
know
crime
drug
use
on
that
site.
While
it's
you
know
nature,
and
it's
possibly
pretty
looking.
We
think
bringing
eyes
on
the
street
in
this
area
will
be,
will
help
crime
and
safety
in
the
area.
AA
If
you've
got
people
living
there,
we've
got
four
Town
Homes
looking
over
the
park,
so
I
mean
we
understand,
there's
a
lot
of
parking.
Uda
pills
is,
you
know,
obviously,
a
big
player
and
all
that
we've
been
going
to
this
site
for
years
and
we've
generally
can
park
there
during
the
day
find
a
spot
park
right
on
Inglewood
the
house
is
on
Inglewood
to
the
East,
are
sort
of
unique
I
mean
their
their
backs
of
homes
looking
over
the
park,
so
it
doesn't
feel
really
neighborhoodly.
AA
So
I
think
what
we're
doing
is
bringing
doors
on
the
street,
bringing
people
and
again,
as
Jessica
mentioned.
We
hope
this
caters
to
a
different
sort
of
demographic,
a
lifestyle
that
you
know
appreciates
being
near
theater
worth
skiing
biking
I
mean
we
thought
being
near.
The
bike
trails
was
a
big
amenity
for
us
and
so
we're
trying
to
profile
this
project
as
sort
of
an
alternative
lifestyle.
AA
People
like
to
bike
ski
and
bring
people
to
this
area,
and
we
love
this
sort
of
ex-urban
site
and
so
we've
sort
of
pulled
inspiration
from
the
industrial
buildings
nearby.
That's
why
you
see
the
Sawtooth
roof
and
sort
of
metal
paneling,
so
we
thought
this
was
a
great
example
of
a
sort
of
some
density
on
this
site.
It's
a
big
site,
it's
very
awkward
in
terms
of
the
slope
and
to
answer
the
question
about
what
the
back
looks
like.
AA
It's
really
meant
to
be
like
a
cloistered
space
for
the
residents,
we
have
storm
water,
Retention
Ponds,
we're
really
dealing
with
storm
water.
It's
all
been
approved
by
the
city
Engineers,
so
we're
really
going
to
improve
erosion
and
storm
water
as
well.
So
that's
our
hope,
we're
improving
the
site
and
hopefully
improving
some
level
of
safety.
Maybe
it's
you
know
the
bike
and
car
thing.
We
understand
that,
but
there's
gonna
be
people
living
here
and
hopefully
it
makes
the
site
more
safe.
Thank.
A
You,
okay,
I,
think
we've
got
Campbell
Alper,
Ford
and
Koski
in
oh
yeah,
okay,
Campbell!
First,
you
want
to
go
okay.
S
Sure
I
just
want
to
this
is
maybe
more
procedural
than
anything
else,
but
one
of
my
biggest
pet
peeves
is
when
we
have
developers
that
come
in
and
ask
us
to
design
and
problem
solve
from
the
dice
and
I.
Just
remember
this.
Coming
before
the
committee
of
the
whole,
it's
been
mentioned
here,
multiple
different
times,
how
challenging
this
site
is,
and
I
just
want
to.
S
Thank
you
for
really
thoughtfully
coming
to
the
Planning
Commission,
with
changes
to
the
design
that
more
seamlessly
fit
into
the
neighborhood,
but
also
are
easier
to
fit
in
with
our
city
code
and
I.
Think
this
is
a
really
great
example
of
a
design
team
coming
in
front
of
this
body,
taking
feedback
that
we
had
given
to
you
and
implementing
it
in
a
way
that
I
think
does
the
site
justice.
So
thanks
to
the
to
the
development
and
design
team
for
for
doing
that,.
Q
Yeah
thanks
so
I
hear
your
hearing,
concerns
about
people
driving
to
UDA
pills
and
I
I
feel
it's
important
to
say
that
one
of
the
biggest
reasons
for
why
people
are
dying
on
our
roads
today
is
because
of
things
like
drinking
and
driving
and
so
I
think.
That's
really
I
just
want
to
put
that
out
there
that
it's
concerning
to
me
to
hear
all
about
this
car
traffic
here
at
this
site,
and
also
this
is
not
I.
I
really
want
to
validate
your
concerns
about
safety
and
safety.
Q
Physical
safety
on
our
roads
and
I
would
hope.
This
is
a
question
for
staff
I'm
wondering
how
can
we
connect
the
dots
between
these
planning
projects
and
people
at
Public,
Works
staff
at
public
works
so
that
they
know
about
these
projects
going
in
or
do
we?
What
is
our
process
so
that
we
can
do
things
like
eliminate
parking
on
one
side
of
the
street
or
you
know
ensure
that
we
have
the
proper
signage
up
so
that
the
bike
path
isn't
blocked
thanks.
T
Commissioner
Albert
thanks
for
the
question
this
is
going
through
our
traditional
preliminary
development
review
process,
so
Public
Works
is
aware
of
the
project.
I
know
that
Public
Works
has
a
has
a
few
programs
like
the
sidewalk
gap
program
where
I
don't
think
this
is
actually
programmed
into
it,
but
I
could
I
could
just
bring
it
up
say
this
might
be
a
good
candidate
for
that
program
if
they're
not
tracking
that
already,
but
this
you
know,
we
also
have
recently
changed
our
travel
demand
management
plan.
T
We
don't
require
that
for
this
level
of
a
project
at
16
dwelling
units.
So
if
it
were
like
a
larger
development,
it
would
trigger
a
really
intense
review
from
traffic
and
planning
to
make
sure
that
they
were
integrating
all
sorts
of
pedestrian
safety
things.
But
this
this
level
does
not
trigger
that.
So
I'm
not
sure.
If
there's
anything
else
I
would
want
to
add
I
would
defer
to
Mr
varak
if
she
has
any
anything
else
to
add
Hillary.
Oh,
do
you
have
that's
okay?
Q
I
appreciate
that
response,
I
think
what
I'd
love
to
see
is
a
like:
a
greater
tie
between
the
Planning
Commission
decisions
and
yeah.
You
know
making
sure
that
there's
somebody
like
a
human
behind
these,
you
know
direct
connection
and
public
works,
or
you
know
whatever
the
the
right
piece
of
the
city
puzzle
is
so
that
we
can
make
sure
that
these
these
projects
are
happening
in
tandem
with
our
city
goals
and
plans.
H
I
apologize
Charleston,
commissioner
Alper
I
was
actually
emailing
with
Public
Works
about
sidewalk
gaps
as
it
pertains
to
Upper,
Harbor
Terminal
and
the
new
ion
development
at
201,
West,
Broadway
and
I
added
Inglewood
to
the
list
and
I
was
just
forwarding
it
to
mailing
saying.
Do
you
want
to
join
me
so
I
apologize.
H
On
topic,
just
not
with
you
all
so
I'm
going
to
get
a
meeting
with
Public
Works
to
talk
about
sidewalk
gaps,
so
we
can
more.
So
we
can
better
inform
you
when
these
questions
come
up,
but
this
is
something
that's
starting
to
pop
up
in
a
few
developments
that
are
current
and
active
in
coming
tonight,
obviously,
is
one
of
them
and
then
some
future
developments.
R
Thank
you,
chair
and
I'm.
Just
actually
a
few
of
you
Commissioners
have
already
talked
about
what
I
was
going
to
ask,
and
so
I'm
just
going
to
emphasize
this
first
of
all,
I
wasn't
here
in
November,
so
I
can't
really
speak
to
you
being
here
coming
to
us
before,
but
I
am
grateful
for
you
making
some
changes
and
adjustments.
R
So
I
appreciate
that
and
then
also
to
the
community
members
that
are
here
to
speak,
especially
about
the
safety
issues
and
I,
hear
that,
and
so
that
was
kind
of
where
I
was
going
with
my
questions
is
you
know
in
the
rendering
here
we
can
see,
we
can
see
that
there's
cross,
you
know,
there's
some
Pathways
for
pedestrians
to
walk
across
safely
and
that's
a
rendering
and
I
am
just
that
was
kind
of
my
question
is:
is
this
part
of
the
overall
plan
that
public
works
so
I
think
what
I'm
hearing
from
everybody
is
that
that
work
has
not
been
done,
but
we
still
need
to
be
making
those
connections.
R
So
I
really
want
to
urge
us
that
when
we
are
planning
these
types
of
developments,
and
specifically
these
in
areas
where
we
have
you
know
high
traffic
we're-
this
is
pedestrian
residents.
I
mean
I'm
hearing.
You
say
that
you
know
these
bikers
can't
even
get
to
the
bike
path,
and
so
it's
really
important
that
we
have
it's
accessible.
And
you
know
this
is
a
beautiful
picture
because
we
can
see
it
wide
open
and
we
can
see
how
we
could
safely
get
across
the
street
here.
R
But
the
reality
is
I
I
believe
that
those
crosswalks
probably
don't
exist
today,
and
so
how
are
we
going
to
make
sure
that
they
do
so?
I
will
continue
to
follow
up,
but
I
just
want
to
encourage
us
to
make
sure
that
we
are
connecting
those
dots
and
making
sure
that
just
a
rendering
isn't
what
just
actually
appears,
but
there
is
a
whole
nother
Department
Public
Works.
That
needs
to
be
part
of
this
process
too.
So
thank
you.
S
I
just
wanted
to
pile
onto
that,
and
just
maybe
be
a
little
bit
more
direct
in
that
if
we
as
a
city
are
going
to
prioritize
density
and
promote
the
comprehensive
2040
plan,
I
think
there
definitely
needs
to
be
a
permanent
link
between
the
planning
teams
and
the
Public
Works
teams,
because,
as
the
as
neighborhoods
get
more
dense,
these
types
of
issues
are
going
to
continue
to
Bubble,
Up
and
I.
Don't
think
it
is
a
good
use
of
Staff
time
of
the
Public's
time
or
our
time
to
consider
these
types
of
questions.
S
We
don't
have
pervy
over
what
Public
Works
decides
to
do
at
this
location,
but
we're
the
ones
in
the
diets
taking
questions
from
the
public.
And
so,
if
we
can
have
a
more
formal
connection
between
the
two
departments,
I
think
it's
in
the
best
interest
of
everybody
as
we
move
forward
with
this.
Thank
you.
H
I
mean
the
only
thing
I
would
say
is
that
any
development
of
four
or
more
units
that
comes
before
Planning
Commission
also
goes
through
this
well.
Every
new
development
goes
through
Public
Works
review
for
some
kind
of
approval
before
building
permits
are
issued,
so
all
of
the
various
Departments
of
Public
Works,
sidewalks
water,
sewer
traffic,
you
name
it
they've
all.
They
all
have
eyes
on
these
plans
as
they're
going
through
and
we
send
them
through
before
planning
commissions.
H
So
we
have
their
initial
feedback
and
then
they
don't
get
final
approval
until
after
Planning
Commission
in
case
staff
or
the
Planning
Commission
adds
conditions
that
would
impact
those
final
plans,
and
so
after
the
action
is
taken
from
Planning,
Commission
and
Council
if
needed.
That's
when
the
applicants
come
back
and
then
finalize
their
plans
with
Public
Works,
so
there
is
a
connection
between
the
two
departments:
it
it's
just
some.
H
It's
we're
kind
of
mid-process
right
now,
if
you
will
in
the
public
works
process,
because
Planning
Commission
comes
in
in
the
middle
and
that's
designed
specifically,
so
we
don't
approve
something.
So
they
don't
so
the
city
plans
don't
get
approved
before
Planning
Commission
does
something,
and
so
that's
there's
our
checks
and
balances
between
the
two.
But
I
will
talk
more
with
Paul
Miller.
Who
is
our
primary
point
of
contact
for
Public
Works
on
PDR
and
just
ask
him:
we
can
have
some
brainstorming
about
different
possibilities
or
ideas.
H
O
Thanks,
commissioner,
I
I
think
you
know
it's,
it
is
an
interesting
discussion.
I
think
we're
all
about
safety,
but
as
our
city
grows,
you
know,
we've
been
talking
about
some
of
our
solely
single-family
neighborhoods
and
expanding
uses
and
types
in
there
trying
to
get
things
Beyond
residential.
So
here's
a
sort
of
the
flip
of
that
a
neighborhood,
that's
kind
of
growing
to
meet
a
success
of
something
kind
of
across
the
street
and
so
I
think
it
feels
really
appropriate
and
appreciate
the
solution.
O
If
you
you
know,
on
the
site
section,
there's
some
really
helpful
drawings
in
the
back
that
show
the
relationship
of
the
public
alley.
This
building
and
section
that
you
fact
you
can
see
over
top
of
the
roof
of
this,
so
I
think
I
would
encourage
you
to
take
a
look
at
that
and
understand
exactly
how
the
building
situates
on
site
as
I.
Look
at
that,
though
I
do,
there's
a
pretty
big
retaining
wall.
I
think
that's
kind
of
going
in
there.
That
sort
of
is
tucked
into
a
pretty
Natural
Area
there
here
and
I.
O
Don't
remember
what
our
requirements
are
as
built
as
code.
If
I've
got
a
big
drop,
do
I
have
to
protect
that
drop
from
somebody
kind
of
even
coming
through
the
wood.
So
let's
take
a
look
at
that
and
make
sure
that
we
haven't
created
a
a
precarious
situation
for
somebody
wandering
through
the
woods
to
drop
off
there,
but
otherwise
I
think
it's
lovely
and
I
I
appreciate
the
understanding
of
the
history
across
the
street
and
and
sort
of
meeting
that
with
this
project.
So
thank
you.
C
To
the
the
issue
of
the
process
that
was
just
raised
earlier,
I
think
the
the
coordination,
the
the
issue
of
having
these
projects
reviewed
by
the
by
the
public
work
staff
is
long-standing,
but
unless
I'm
mistaken
I,
don't
think
as
a
public
process
involved
in
that.
Is
it
I
think
it's
just
it's
the
staff
that
reviews
it
for
engineering
issues
and
so
forth.
There's
no
opportunity
for
the
kinds
of
concerns
we've
heard
today
to
be
raised
with
the
staff,
so
I
think
there's
a
need
for
some
improvement
with
this
process.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Ford
I'm
not
seeing
anyone
else.
I'll
just
say
you
know
we
heard
about
rezonings
parking.
We
heard
about
views
and
a
lot
of
these
things
are.
The
rezoning
is
simply
to
make
it
in
compliance
with
the
already
adopted,
comprehensive
plan.
We
don't
require
any
parking,
and
you
know
I
would
argue
that
maybe
the
commercial
uses
across
the
street
are
more
of
the
concern
for
parking
and
I
believe
the
park
versus
you
know:
16
residential
use
units
with
some
parking
underground,
and
we
don't.
A
S
X
C
A
E
E
The
applications
before
you
for
this
four
unit
development
is
to
rezone
from
r1a
to
R3
and
site
plan
review.
There's
no
variances
being
requested
for
this
proposal,
and
two
bedrooms
would
be
in
each
unit.
Vehicle
access
would
be
off
the
alley
for
three
off-street
parking
spaces.
Few
public
comments
have
been
submitted
today
and
I
passed.
Those
on
to
you
for
this
meeting,
so
CPL
is
recommending
approval
of
both
applications.
E
E
The
land
use
rezoning
study,
which
will
likely
be
in
front
of
you
at
the
next
Planning
Commission
meeting
the
recommended
zoning
district
is
un3
and
just
like
the
built
form
guidance.
It's
not
just
this
property,
it's
it's
those
properties,
all
along
46th,
Street,
West
and
once
again
that
R3
recommend
our
requested.
E
Zoning
is
in
line
with
that
un3
zoning
of
the
land
use
rezoning
study
and,
and
why
why
the
R3
and
why
the
un3
R3
and
the
corridor
3
guidance
446
street
is
typically
applied
for
areas
that
are
well
served
by
mass
transit,
a
Transit
Corridor,
and
that
is
the
case
in
this
situation,
to
allow
for
a
little
more
dense
density
than
what
R1
or
r2b
zoning
would
allow
the
this
project.
If
it
came,
it
was
brought
to
us
two
months
from
now
and
the
land
use
resilience
study
goes
forward.
E
The
only
application
would
that
would
be
needed
is
at
an
admin
site
plan
review.
So
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
that
the
applicant
wanted
to
get
a
head
start
or
to
to
get
going
on
the
development
a
couple
months
before
before
that,
so
that
that
was
that
was
brought
up
as
an
idea
of
suggestion,
but
but
they
they
saw
as
important
to
go
forward
now
to
hopefully
make
progress
on
the
on
the
development.
F
E
There's
I
would
say
two
months
from
now:
there's
some
it
gets
complicated
with
the
rezoning
that
I
would
say
two
months
from
now.
I
Good
evening,
the
Marisol
is
worth
the
architect
for
the
project
representing
the
developers
as
well.
I,
don't
really
have
much
to
add
just
to
make
a
mention
that
two
years
ago
we
came
to
this,
not
this
board,
but
a
similar
board
with
a
very
different
project
for
the
same
property.
It
was
a
three-story
five
units
and
the
neighborhood
was
really
strongly
against
it.
We,
then,
the
farmer
owner,
sold
the
property
to
this
new
developer.
I
Who
really
did
everything
that
we
have
heard
from
Community
reduce
the
scale,
reduce
the
number
of
units
and
remove
the
balconies
overseeing
the
neighbors?
That
was
a
big
deal
for
the
neighborhood
at
the
time,
so
I'm
here
from
questions.
If
there
is
any
for
me
it
from
from
the
from
the
board.
Thank.
A
X
Yes,
thank
you.
My
name
is
Kurt
Anderson
I'm
at
4618
Pillsbury,
a
half
block
south
of
this
development.
Madam
chair,
you
called
for
opposition.
Actually
I'm
standing
to
express
my
qualified
support.
I
think
I
can
I
can
only
speak
for
myself.
I
know
my
neighbor
as
well.
We
love
welcoming
new
people
on
the
Block.
We
are
very
interested
in
this
project.
X
We
appreciate
the
fact
that
compared
to
some
prior
proposals,
it's
appropriately
scaled
I
do
want
to
raise
a
few
issues
about
it,
though,
and
as
pointed
out,
some
of
those
are
going
to
be
outside
the
box,
but
I
want
to
raise
them.
X
Nevertheless,
first
and
I'm,
aware
of
the
time
also
so
I'm
if
I
sound
like
a
tobacco
Auctioneer,
that's
probably
why
all
right
so
first
of
all,
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
roofline,
the
roofline
requirement
kind
of
matches
the
residences
there
parking
again
public
works
right,
but
you
do
have
an
issue
there.
The
there
is
a
a
parking
Lane
across
the
street
that
has
a
single
family
residence.
X
If
that
can
be
moved
to
this
side,
these
new
neighbors
of
ours
will
not
have
to
cross
a
busy
street
or
their
visitors
will
not
have
to
cross
a
busy
street.
Those
are
two
minor
points.
Major
Point
way
out
of
the
box,
but
I
want
to
issue
a
challenge:
I've
I'm,
very
familiar
with
Minneapolis
2040.
I've
written
my
own
long
critique
of
it.
I
really
think
that
the
plan
is
kind
of
punting
away
the
question
of
social
Equity,
the
the
rhetoric.
It
doesn't
answer
the
rhetoric
about
about
redlining
and
about
covenants.
X
Are
we
really
building
social
Equity
through
property
ownership?
Here
I
would
ask
the
commission
and
our
elected
officials
to
I
would
challenge
them
to
look
for
ways
to
tie
this
to
home
ownership,
to
Building
Wealth
and
building
social
Equity
through
property
ownership.
I
realize
that
is
way
beyond
your
assignment
here.
X
You're
the
staff
person
has
pointed
that
out
to
me,
I
humbly,
acknowledge
that,
but
I
would
ask
the
court
I
would
ask
you
to
very
carefully
consider
tying
figuring
out
ways
to
tie
this
to
home
ownership
and
to
build
this
idea
of
social
equity
and
wealth
building
through
home
ownership.
It's
a
big
challenge.
I
realize
it's
hard
to
hand
it
to
you
right
here
in
this
context,
but
I
would
like
to
see
that
happen.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
A
U
Thank
you,
commissioner.
My
name
is
Carolyn
Costello
I'm
at
4611,
Pillsbury,
Avenue
and
I
agree
with
the
with
the
comments
that
are
submitted
by
Kurt
M
Anderson
to
this
panel
and
I
would
like
to
promote
some
home
ownership,
upward
mobility
and
actually
kind
of
meeting
some
of
the
social
disparities
that
that
we
have
and
as
well.
46Th
is
a
very
busy
street
and
I
I
would
like
to
see
in
the
part
the
parking
across
the
street
maybe
brought
from
the
even
side
to
the
odd
side
or
even
on
Pillsbury
Avenue.
U
Perhaps
some
you
know
just
dedicated
parking
for
the
residents
that
live
there
and
just
a
little
bit
more
consideration
for
the
for
just
that
extremely
busy
46th
Street
that
it
is
on
and
for
four
units
is
really
pretty
much
I
think
actually
maximum
for
for
that
space.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
E
AB
Wife
and
I
have
been
there
for
34
years.
I
will
have
an
amazing
view
of
this
property
because
I
have
a
huge
bay
window.
Probably
the
size
of
two
of
those
that
looks
right
at
the
property.
I
have
some
first
compared
to
the
first
built
building
that
was
going
to
go
up.
This
looks
like
a
house
that
was
a
building
so
I'm
very
pleased
to
see
this
house
instead
of
a
giant
building
with
no
balconies
or
anything
like
that.
AB
I
do
have
a
concern
that
there
is
four
very
mature
maple
trees
on
the
Boulevard
and
I
I'm,
a
construction
worker
myself,
I'm
a
union
construction
worker
and
I
know
oftentimes,
it's
easier
for
you
to
knock
down
the
boulevard
trees
and
so
that
it's
easier
for
you
to
build
your
building
in
a
timely
fashion.
But
for
the
rest
of
us
we
would
probably
prefer
to
look
at
those
four
mature
trees
instead
of
some
Twigs
that
are
gonna
I'll,
be
in
a
nursing
home
by
the
time
they're
as
big
as
they
are
now
so.
AB
I
hope
that
I
don't
see
the
trees
on
this.
Drawing
so
I
hope
that
they're
not
being
removed
I
do
another
issue
too,
is
like
you
know:
if
Washburn
High
School
is
right
there
and
so
there's
a
crosswalk
on
Nicollet
and
then
there's
a
stop
sign
on
Grand
Avenue.
So
if
you're
a
high
school
kid,
I
had
three
kids
that
went
through
Washburn
there's
nowhere
to
cross
here.
AB
So
as
far
as
like
you
know,
some
more
adding
some
crosswalks,
this
would
be
plus
it's
a
30
mile,
an
hour
road,
not
a
20
like
the
rest
of
the
city,
so
you
got
it
a
faster
speeds.
Nowhere
to
cross,
there's
kids
they're
always
trying
to
dodge
across
the
street
and
I
am
worried
too.
Is
this
like,
as
far
as
like
construction,
that
how
many
cars
will
be
parked
construction,
trucks
and
whatnot
that
will
be,
you
know,
parked
along
in
the
hours
of
construction
and
then
will
the
property.
AB
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
S
I
appreciate
everyone
being
here
today,
speaking
on
this
topic,
I
think
this
to
the
to
the
point
at
the
Top
This
is
a
relatively
standard
project
and
I
I
make
a
motion
to
approve
staff
recommendation.
A
We
have
a
motion.
Is
there
a
second
commissioner?
Marwa
has
a
second
okay.
Is
there
any
discussion,
commissioner
Conley.
M
No
real
discussion
I
was
gonna.
Second,
if
no
one
else
did,
but
just
I
wanted
to
ask
about
those
trees,
because
there
are
tree
canopy
goals,
both
with
Hennepin
County
and
the
City
of
Minneapolis
and
I'm,
a
firm
believer
that
trees
are
infrastructure.
So
I
was
wondering
if
the
developer
could
speak
to
those
mature
trees
that
were
there
that
are
there,
but
not
in
the
drawing.
E
M
You
and
just
gonna
point
out
that
this
is
another
good
example
of
the
Public
Works
partnership
that
we
could
potentially
have
I'd
put
a
couple
of
kids
through
Washburn
myself,
so
I'm
very
familiar
with
the
area,
and
it
is
quite
the
road
to
cross.
So
I
certainly
see
with
these
projects
that
we're
tasked
with
approving
the
parallels
with
needing
them
to
have
support
from
public
work.
So
thank
you.
O
I'm,
it's
great,
the
trees
are
staying,
I,
think
I,
wonder
if
they're
it
does
every
time
we
do
this
a
chance
for
us
to
kind
of
look
at
the
rules
around
how
they're
protected
during
construction
and
I
think
you
know
anything
we
can
do
to
make
sure
it's
not
a
lot
of
lay
down
area.
It's
a
pretty
tight
sight
for
construction
that
we
do
everything
we
can
to
preserve
that
infrastructure
for
sure
foreign.
R
Thank
you,
Tara
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
the
community
members
and
the
developer
for
being
here
and
specifically
I
understand
the
comments
about
trying
to
increase
our
home
ownership
amounts
here
in
the
City
of
Minneapolis
and
just
want
to
make
a
quick
comment,
yes
outside
of
our
purview
here,
but
also
agree
that
you
know
continuing
to
make
sure
that
we're
fostering
those
opportunities
as
much
as
we
can
is
very
important,
so
just
I
know
we'll
take
that
conversation
offline,
though
too.
Thank
you.
C
C
B
A
A
H
Okay,
just
a
few
things,
I,
don't
know
if
this
was
mentioned
at
the
last
Planning
Commission
meeting,
but
27
25
University
Avenue
was
appealed
that
will
be
going
to
Biz
next
Tuesday,
the
18th.
So
I
will
let
you
know
what
happens
after
that.
H
H
We
do
have
the
retreat
for
CPC
coming
up
on
the
27th.
Thank
you
to
everyone
who
has
sent
a
retreat
agenda
items
to
commissioner
Olson.
Her
and
I
have
met
and
discussed
that
she
has
forwarded
to
me.
H
The
list
I'm
working,
going
to
be
working
on
an
agenda
tomorrow
and
I
will
discuss
that
with
her
once
I've
gotten
that
completed,
we
do
have
Committee
of
the
whole
this
Thursday
we
have
one
project
and
then
the
land
use
rezoning
team
will
be
back
to
talk
to
you
in
advance
and
then
the
big
one
is
on
the
24th
at
Planning.
Commission
is
the
land
use
rezoning
team
I
know,
commissioner.
Charleston
is
not
going
to
be
able
to
be
there,
but
I'm
hopeful
that
everybody
else
will
be
able
to
attend.
H
I
will
just
preface
the
next
two
public
hearings
that
we
have
on
April,
24th,
I'm,
sorry,
I
can't
see
up
close
without
these
and
I
can't
see
you
guys
with
them
on
so
I.
Don't
know
I
have
to
figure
this
out
and
then
on
May
8th.
H
We
have
a
very
long
agenda
and
we
have
some
challenging
items
coming
up
on
that
agenda
and
so
I
just
want
to
encourage
all
of
you
to
please
bring
something
to
drink
like
water,
in
a
sealed
bottle
or
whatnot,
and
then
maybe
a
snack
or
something
because
I
I
do
think
that
the
next
two
Planning
Commission
meetings.
We
could
be
here
well
past
this
time
so
and
it's
almost
six
tonight
so
I
just
want
to
let
everyone
know
we
appreciate
you
staying.
H
H
Or
not,
so
those
are
my
only
announcements,
but
just
keep
that
in
the
back
of
your
minds
at
the
next,
the
24th
and
the
8th
could
turn
out
to
be
quite
long.
Okay
of
public
hearings,
so
please
be.
D
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
add
to
the
agenda
for
the
retreat.
The
travel
demand,
management
plans
and.