►
From YouTube: January 12, 2023 City Council
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
A
A
This
morning
we
have
one
resolution
to
present
which
we
will
do
before
taking
up
our
regular
order
of
business
and
to
be
clear,
it's
a
resolution
recognized
in
January
2023
as
stalking
Awareness
Month
in
the
City
of
Minneapolis,
and
if
it's
okay
with
everyone
I
will
read
the
resolution
from
here
and
then
we'll
present.
The
resolution
once
it
has
been
read
so
and
I
do
want
to
acknowledge
that
we
have
Julia
hopemeyer
from
the
stalking
prevention,
awareness
and
Resource
Center
here
to
receive
the
honorary
resolution.
A
Whereas
many
stalking
victims
are
forced
to
protect
themselves
by
relocating,
changing
their
identities,
changing
jobs
and
obtaining
protection
orders
and
whereas
more
victims
are
stalked
using
technology
such
as
cell
phones,
text
messages,
social
media
platforms,
internet
posts,
emails
and
electronic
tracking
than
not
using
any
technology.
And
whereas
there
is
a
need
for
great
or
I
should
say,
greater
public
awareness
about
the
nature,
criminality
and
the
potential
lethality
of
stalking
and
whereas
criminal
justice
systems
can
enhance
their
responses
by
responses
to
stalking
by
regular
training
and
through
investigation
and
prosecution
of
the
crime.
A
A
And
whereas
the
City
of
Minneapolis
is
joining
forces
with
victim
service
providers,
criminal
justice
officials
and
concerned
citizens
throughout
Minneapolis
and
the
United
States
to
observe
National,
stalking,
Awareness
Month
and
thanks
U.S
senator
Amy
Klobuchar
for
co-authoring.
A
bipartisan
bicameral
resolution
designating
January
as
National
stocking
awareness
month,
which
was
approved
in
the
U.S
Senate
in
January
of
2022..
A
Now,
therefore
be
resolved.
That
the
mayor
and
city
council
do
hereby
recognize.
January
2023
as
stalking
Awareness
Month
in
in
Minneapolis,
and
applaud
the
efforts
of
the
many
victim
service
providers,
police
officers,
prosecutors,
National
and
Community
organizations,
legislators
and
Congressional
leaders
and
the
private
sector
supporters
for
their
efforts
in
promoting
awareness
about
stocking.
B
Jenkins
and
the
whole
city
right
yeah.
Thank
you
so
much
council,
president
Jenkins
and
the
entire
city
council
stocking
is
a
very
prevalent
dangerous
and
traumatic
crime
that
a
whole
lot
of
people
experience.
So
I
really
appreciate
all
of
you
supporting
bringing
awareness
to
this
topic
as
council
president
Jenkins
mentioned
I
work
for
the
stocking
prevention
and
awareness
resource
center,
but
I'm
also
just
a
resident
of
Minneapolis,
and
so
as
a
resident
I'm.
Just
really
thankful
for
people
learning
more
and
raising
awareness
about
the
issue
really.
A
C
A
E
A
F
Thank
you,
madam
president.
This
may
be
a
question
for
the
clerks.
There's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
about
one-sided
parking
and
I'm,
not
clear,
if
that's
a
council
action
that
needs
to
be
taken
or
if
that
would
be
an
operational
decision
by
the
mayor
and
I
was
just
curious.
If
we
need
to
add
any
new
business
on
this
agenda
for.
G
You,
madam
president,
and
I'm
just
happy
to
Quick
briefly
touch
on
that,
because
that
did
come
up
yesterday
in
our
Public
Works
agenda.
Setting
meeting
I
know
our
staff
and
Public
Works
leadership
continue
to
monitor,
monitor
this
they're
working
with
the
fire
department
to
ensure
that
vehicles
are
able
to
get
down
the
street
they're.
G
But
there's
other
parts
of
the
city
where
switching
to
one
parking,
one-sided
parking,
especially
in
high
density
areas,
does
have
a
really
significant
impact
and
so
I
think
they
are
are
trying
to
hold
off
on
having
to
to
do
that
as
long
as
possible.
If
It
ultimately
becomes
necessary
kind
of
given
the
snowfalls
that
we've
seen.
G
So
if
you
do
have
areas
in
the
ward
that-
and
this
applies
to
any
colleagues
that
you're
hearing
from
constituents
or
you're,
seeing
yourself-
that
there
are
clearly
issues
where
there
needs
to
be
some
sort
of
restrictions
on
that
particular
Street,
please
do
reach
out
to
Public
Works
about
it
and
they
are
I'm
sure
we'll
be
happy
to
look
into
that
and
if
they
find
that
there
are
issues
with
the
clearance
for
getting
vehicles
up
and
down
the
street,
that
they'll
put
up
parking
restrictions.
Hopefully
that
helps.
A
D
Clerk,
please
call
the
world
council
member
Johnson,
aye
council,
member
Osman,
aye
council
member
Payne,
aye
council
member
Koski,
aye
council
member
aye,
councilmember
Chavez,
aye
council
member
Ellison,
aye
council
member
Vita,
I
council
member
rainville,
aye
council
member
Goodman,
aye
councilmember
wansley
aye.
Vice
president
palmisano
aye,
president
Jenkins,
all
right.
There
are
13
eyes
that.
A
Carries
the
agenda
is
adopted
next.
Item
of
business
is
the
acceptance
of
minutes
from
the
previous
three
meetings,
which
were
the
adjourned
meeting
held
December
6
the
budget
adoption,
the
regular
meeting
of
December
8th
and
the
adjourned
meeting
held
December
13th
to
discuss
ccpo
ordinance
may
have
a
motion
to
accept
those
minutes
so.
H
A
D
Clerk,
please
call
the
wrong
councilmember
Johnson
aye
councilmember,
Osman,
aye,
council
member
Payne,
aye
council
member
kosky,
aye
council
member
aye
council
member
Chavez,
aye
council
member
Allison,
aye
council
member
Vito,
aye
councilmember
rainville
aye
council
member
Goodman,
aye
councilmember
wansley
aye.
Vice
president
Paul
massano
aye,
president
Jenkins
aye.
There
are
13
eyes
that.
A
E
D
Johnson
aye
council
member
Osmond,
aye
council
member
Payne,
aye
council
member
Koski,
aye
councilmember,
aye
council
member
aye,
council
member
Ellison,
aye
council
member
veto,
aye
council
member
rainville,
aye
council
member
Goodman,
aye
council
member
wansley
aye.
Vice
president
Paul
massano
aye,
president
Jenkins
aye.
There
are
13
eyes.
A
I
Thank
you.
Madam
president,
members
of
the
council,
the
biz
committee
is
bringing
forward
24
items
for
approval
this
morning.
Item
number
one
is
a
license
for
Hotel
Indigo
and
two
is
a
license
for
Maison
Margot
item
three
is
a
license
for
Millie's
Wine
Bar
item
four,
our
Planning
Commission
appointments,
the
mayoral
appointment
of
Chris
Meyer
and
the
mayoral
appointment
of
Bill
Baxley
item
number.
Five
is
a
variance
and
site
plan
appeal
from
the
north
side,
residence
Redevelopment
Council
for
a
project
at
1254,
Russell,
Avenue
North.
I
The
committee
voted
unanimously
to
deny
the
appeal
item
number
six
is
a
variance
and
site
plan
review
appeal
from
the
Northside
Redevelopment
residence
Redevelopment
Council
for
a
project
at
2309,
Plymouth,
Avenue
North.
The
committee
unanimously
voted
to
deny
the
appeal
item
number
seven
is
a
variance
appeal
from
Dan
Murphy
for
a
project
at
5009
beer
at
Beard,
Avenue
South.
There
were
two
portions
of
that
appeal.
The
committee
unanimously
decided
to
deny
the
appeal
on
item
number:
that's
a
rezoning
at
5009,
Beard,
Avenue
South.
The
committee
voted
to
approve
the
rezoning
item.
I
Number
nine
is
a
site
plan
review
appeal
from
Stephanie
Hawkinson
for
a
project
at
4
300
and
4312
Upton
Avenue
South.
The
committee
unanimously
decided
to
deny
the
appeal
item
number
10
is
a
site
plan
review
appeal
of
Ian
Harrison
at
4342,
4312
Upton,
Avenue
South.
The
committee
unanimously
decided
to
deny
the
appeal
item
number
11
is
a
liquor.
Are
the
liquor
license?
Approvals
and
12?
Are
the
liquor
license
renewals
item
13?
Are
the
Gambling
License
approvals
item?
I
14
are
rental
license
conditions
for
210
addresses
in
five
different
Wards
item
number
15
is
Hennepin
County,
giving
financial
assistance
for
a
couple
of
affordable
housing
projects
located
in
Minneapolis
item
number.
16
is
a
right
of
Entry
access.
Item
number
17
is
an
application
to
Deeds
Economic
Development
job
creation
fund
item
number
18
are
appointees
to
the
committee
on
housing.
There
I
am
going
to
move
that
item
with
the
deletion
of
Michael
Russell
being
appointed
item
number
19
are
the
Minneapolis
public
housing
authority.
I
Commissioner
appointments
that
I
will
also
move
with
the
amendment
to
delete
Jean
Harris's
appointment.
Item
number
20
is
a
comp
plan
Amendment
for
built
form
guidance
at
a
number
of
addresses
on
Van,
Buren
and
Summer
Street.
Item
number
21
is
a
comp
plan.
Amendment
built
form
guidance,
changing
the
built
form
on
a
number
of
parcels
at
20,
28th,
Street,
East,
Elliott,
Avenue,
10th,
Avenue
and
28th
Street.
J
A
H
In
particular
on
item
7,
9
and
10,
which
were
all
Appeals
for
development
projects
in
my
award,
you
know
I
I
support
these.
This
was
unanimous
at
committee
to
deny
these
appeals
and
I
support
that,
but
I
want
to
acknowledge
that
we're
all
getting
used
to
the
Minneapolis
2040
plan
still
and
one
of
those
is
the
variances
that
we
allow
to
it-
are
being
greatly
reduced,
but
they
haven't
gone
away.
H
We
still
do
need
to
consider
unique
things
to
different
properties.
For
example,
I
know:
we've
had
hundreds
every
year
come
through
the
Planning
Commission
in
years
past
this
past
year
we
had
under
100
I
think
around
75,
and
that
is
an
improvement,
because
it
shows
the
consistency
as
to
how
we're
reviewing
things
and
what
the
rules
are
and
how
developers
can
adhere
to
the
rules.
I
think
that
there
is
still
a
really
important
role
about
how
we
connect
new
projects
to
community
and
the
Planning.
H
Commission
has
really
seen
a
lot
of
controversy
about
that
this
past
year.
I
thank
them
for
sitting
and
being
part
of
all
of
those
meetings.
So
have
we
in
terms
of
appeals,
so
I
think
that
you
know
the
goal
is
still
to
connect
our
new
rules
on
this
into
the
broader
community
and
that's
going
to
take
different
kinds
of
conversations
with
developers
I'm
going
to
ask
developers
to
sit
in
those
kinds
of
conversations
with
Community.
H
More
often
this
year,
we'll
Embark,
broadly
all
of
us
on
next
steps
of
the
Minneapolis
2040
plan
with
land
use,
rezoning
work
and
in
particular
discuss
things
like
types
of
use
allowed
in
different
corridors.
I
think
that
that
work
will
be
available
soon,
maybe
even
today,
out
for
public
review
and
engagement.
H
K
A
D
A
J
If
approved,
this
amendment
will
not
only
be
a
president-setting
decision,
it
will
effectively
signal
to
other
blocks
and
neighborhoods
that
targeted
organizing
that
demands
a
revert
back
to
the
status
quo
can
be
successful
despite
the
current
and
future
needs
of
the
city.
We
saw
this
backtrack
happen
earlier
this
year
with
Hennepin
Ave,
when
a
small
minority
found
24
7
bus
lines
unacceptable,
despite
data
proving
it
was
a
superior
choice,
and
we
are
saying
seeing
this
play
out
again
with
this
amendment,
and
this
is
an
incredibly
concerning
practice
and
it
also
reinforced.
J
You
know
what
I've
said
for
several
months
now
that
the
legislative
department
is
very
needed
for
this,
a
legislative
body
to
so
that
we
can
have
our
own
nonpartisan
research
staff.
That
is
able
to
give
us
sound
recommendations
that
are
based
in
fact,
and
do
not
change
with
reactionary
pressure.
I
will
not
well.
I
will
be
the
first
to
say,
and
you
know
somewhat
Council
Vice
President
also
touched
on
this
a
bit
I'm,
not
the
biggest
fan
of
the
2040
plan.
J
It
is
by
no
means
perfect
and
I,
and
many
other
Working
Class
People
have
many
ideas
on
how
we
can
improve
it
and
one
common
concern
about
the
2040
plan
that
shapes
our
current
reality
is.
It's
made.
The
City
of
Minneapolis
essentially
become
a
playground
for
corporate
developers
and
have
made
them
the
primary
source
for
providing
affordable
housing
under
the
guise
of
trickle-down
affordability,
and
we
know
this
will
not
solve
the
housing
crisis
without
significant
advancement
of
other
rental
protections
and
how
housing
policies
aimed
at
supporting
working
class
residents.
J
This
Council
should
absolutely
be
focusing
on
how
we
can
advance
and
support
zoning
changes
that
not
only
address
Supply
but
affordability
and
I'm,
not
seeing
how
this
amendment
advances
either,
which
is
why
I
will
not
be
supporting
it
and
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
you
know.
Staff
on
the
executive
side
consider
the
implications
of
their
actions
and
this
the
the
impacts
on
their
professional
credibility.
When
this
amendment
is
given
the
appearance
to
be
driven
by,
you
know
special
groups
and
political
interests
rather
than
sound
policy.
I
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
want
to
correct
a
few
things
that
are
completely
false.
First
of
all,
let's
start
with
a
small
minority
of
people
objecting
to
Hennepin
Avenue.
That
is
just
substantially
false.
My
office
has
received
almost
1500
contacts
from
constituents
in
my
area,
so
to
suggest
that
that
was
a
small
group
of
people
is
false.
I
Second
of
all,
I
have
served
on
this
committee
for
my
entire
career,
I
think
I,
probably
know
more
about
land
use
law
and
decisions
than
anyone
on
the
council
and
I
can
tell
you
for
an
absolute
fact.
No
action
we
take
on
a
zoning
issue
sets
a
precedent
for
any
other.
In
fact,
we
are
denying
three
appeals
today,
as
it
pertains
to
a
number
of
development
projects,
none
of
them
being
brought
forward
by
corporate
developers.
I
James
Archer
is
a
person
of
color
operating
in
the
Fifth
Ward
Brian
Woolsey
is
a
not
a
person
of
color,
but
an
individual
small
scale
developer,
as
is
the
project
in
Linden
Hills.
These
are
not
being
brought
forward
by
any
of
the
big
corporate
developers,
actually
they're
all
small
scale,
independent
people
looking
at
the
2040
plan
and
trying
to
take
advantage
of
the
additional
housing
that
is
being
offered
by
it
and
I
would
note
that
there
is
another
comp
plan
Amendment
on
this
agenda,
that
no
one
is
complaining
about.
I
I
Why
is
no
one
picking
on
that
seems
to
be
interesting,
that
there's
just
picking
on
this
one
and
so
I
want
to
note
for
the
record
and
I'm
sure
the
City
attorney
will
confirm,
although
and
she's
welcome,
to
do
so,
but
doesn't
need
to
no
zoning
action,
whether
it
be
a
variance,
a
conditional
use
permit
or
any
other
approval
or
denial
of
approval
sets
a
president
for
any
other
going
forward,
and
that
includes
comp
plan
amendments
as
well.
Lastly,
I
will
note
this
does
not
hurt
The
credibility
of
our
professional
staff.
I
It
only
hurts
The
credibility
of
professional
staff
when
council
members
call
them
out
publicly
and
on
the
dice,
the
professional
staff
working
on
this
comp
plan.
Amendment
support
it
they've
met
with
council
members,
including
the
council
president,
who
can
confirm
that
they
will
tell
you
that
they
support
it
to
suggest
that
their
credibility
is
questioned
by.
That
is
what
causes
conflict
amongst
us
and,
quite
frankly,
I'm
disgusted
by
it.
A
C
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
I
mean
speaking
in
favor
of
this.
This
is
my
ward,
and
this
is
a
very
long-standing
issue.
We've
talked
about
this
for
over
a
year
in
various
committees
and
at
the
Planning
Commission.
This
is
a
staff
recommendation
I
thank
the
staff
for
the
professionalism
and
for
their
wisdom
and
advancing
this
this
area
of
town.
As
we
know
a
previous
council
member
admitted,
it
was
a
mistake
to
upzone
it
top
to
R6.
C
It
should
be
interior,
three,
that's
what
he
promised
that
would
match
the
zoning
on
both
sides
of
the
street.
This
is
Van.
Buren
is
a
residential
street
and
there
is
no
other
area
in
the
city
where
this
type
of
mismatch
happens
on
a
residential
street.
It
is
not
a
corridor.
This
does
not
affect
the
two
apartment
buildings
that
have
been
approved
for
that
that
street
already
and
when
I
say
street
I'm
talking
about
two
city
blocks
this.
This
moves
from
us.
This
is
not
the
final
decision.
C
This
moves
from
us
to
the
mech
Council,
so
that
this
will
move
up
up
the
ladder
so
to
speak
for
them,
and
then
I
really
appreciate
Council.
Vice
presidents
offer
to
start
talking
more
about
this
2040
plan
with
with
developers
and
residents.
Something
is
not
right:
it
needs
to
be
fine-tuned
and,
in
my
ward,
we're
seeing
single
family,
affordable
homes
just
being
decimated
for
apartment
buildings
and
I.
Don't
think
that
was
the
intention.
C
A
F
Councilman
Payne,
thank
you.
Madam
president.
Yeah
I
want
to
speak
to
maybe
a
bigger
picture
about
this
particular
action
and
it's
it's
it's
the
myth
of
the
free
market.
We
don't
operate
in
a
free
market.
We
operate
in
a
regulated
market
and
Zoning
is
a
a
reflection
of
that
regulation
and
we
regulate
these
markets
because
we
want
better
outcomes
for
our
residents.
We
don't
want
polluters
right
next
to
single-family
homes
right
next
to
child
care
centers.
F
My
colleague
from
the
ninth
ward
has
a
lot
of
experience
with
polluting
Industries
within
residential
areas.
There's
a
valid
reason
that
we
do
zoning
regulation,
but
that
regulation
manipulates
the
market
and
reduces
the
total
supply
of
housing,
the
source
of
our
housing
crisis.
Right
now-
and
so
you
know
speaking
to
council
member
Goodman
I'm
against
this
amendment
and
for
the
the
other
Amendment,
because
the
other
amendment
is
up
zoning
rather
than
down
zoning,
and
we
need
to
address
our
housing
crisis
by
building
more
Supply.
F
So
if
we
want
to
be
serious
about
actually
addressing
our
housing
crisis,
we
need
to
increase
our
supply
of
housing,
which
means
we
need
to
have
a
bias
towards
up
zoning
when
we're
making
these
trade-offs,
and
so
we
I
am
recommending
that
we
vote
this
down
because
we
are
in
a
desperate
situation
as
it
relates
to
our
housing
crisis.
We
need
more
Supply
down.
F
Zoning
fights
against
that
goal
and
and
I
would
and
I
would
hope
that
as
we
go
into
the
future
and
we
think
about
how
are
we
going
to
put
our
thumb
on
the
scale
of
the
of
the
free
market?
Whose
interests
are
we
going
to
put
the
thumb
on
the
scale
for?
Are
we
going
to
put
the
interests
of
working
class
renters
or
the
interests
of
existing
homeowners,
and
we
are
joined
in
in
the
chamber
right
now
with
with
our
Uber
and
Lyft
drivers?
A
A
E
A
A
A
So
we
can
build
more
housing
on
that
site
than
what
was
then.
What
is
currently
there
now
I
think
all
of
our
projects
moving
forward
have
to
have
an
opportunity
for
us
to
to
look
at
it.
There
is
no
such
thing
as
one
size
fits
all,
and
so
that
is
why
I
would
be
in
in
favor
of
this
particular
motion
and
I've,
been
assured
by
our
attorneys
that
it
does
not
set
a
precedent
in
that
we
will
view
each
case
individually
as
they
come
forward.
Councilmember
Allison.
L
L
You
know
what
the
last
council
member
did
or
anything
like
that
I
supported
the
two
projects
that
are
going
to
be
going
up
on
Van
Buren
and
what
I,
but
there's
a
process
to
make
these
changes,
and
we
discussed
that
and
and
and
I
think
that
councilmember
rainville
here
has
followed
that
process
and
and
I'd
say
that
you
know
without
the
history
that
this
block
has,
without
the
without
the
staff
recommendation
to
coincide
with
this
future.
Changes
like
this
certainly
won't
get.
L
My
support
I
think
that
these
are
unique
circumstances
that
kind
of
apply.
Here
we
made
a
massive
overhaul
to
our
city.
That
means
that
there's
gonna
be
a
few
areas
that
maybe
have
some
imperfections.
I
don't
agree
with
the
statement
that
that
this
means
that
we
have
to
kind
of
look
at
our
whole
2040
plan.
I
think
that
we
have
a
good
plan,
I
think
that
it
is
a
really
solid
plan.
L
G
Thank
you,
madam
president,
did
I
just
Echo
your
your
statements
and
council
member
Ellison's
as
well
I
mean
you,
don't
update
more
than
a
hundred
thousand
Parcels
across
the
city
all
at
once,
without
having
to
go
back
and
make
some
tweaks
here
or
there
in
my
ward,
we've
up-zoned
as
well,
and
so
you
know,
I
am
a
proponent
of
density
and
I.
Also
look
at
the
contacts
in
this
particular
Street
and
I,
say:
yeah
I
personally
think
that
R6
wasn't
the
right
call
on
this
one.
G
So
I
agree
with
the
council
member
on
this
for
the
particular
context
on
the
ground,
and
you
know
also,
as
my
colleagues
have
noted,
the
density
was
increased.
This
isn't
really
in
my
mind,
a
down
zoning
because
it
was
increased
during
the
comp
plan
process
and
this
will
be
an
increase
over
what
it
was
prior
to
that.
So
I
think
we
all
knew
going
into
the
2040
plan
that
we
would
be
making
amendments
and
it's
an
ongoing,
continuous
living
document,
and
that's
why
we've
got
a
couple
items
today
before
us
on
that.
A
E
D
Councilmemberkowski
aye
council
member
council,
member
Chavez,
May
council,
member
Allison,
aye
council,
member
vitam,
aye
council,
member
rainville,
aye
councilmember,
Goodman,
aye,
council,
member
wansley,
nay.
Vice
president
Paul
massano
aye,
president
Jenkins
aye.
There
are
nine
eyes
and
four
Nays.
K
Thank
you,
president
Jenkins.
We
asked
the
police
to
take
the
role
of
mental
health
experts,
social
workers,
medical
workers
and,
with
this
the
role
of
public
housing
in
the
City
of
Minneapolis
I
cannot
support,
item
19.3
and
item
19.4
I,
don't
believe
the
lived
experience
of
a
former
police
officer
will
get
us
out
of
this
housing
crisis.
We
need
housing
experts,
public
housing
experts
here
that
are
going
to
make
assure
that
we
can
get
out
of
this
housing
crisis
and
build
more
public
housing
in
the
City
of
Minneapolis.
M
I
am
planning
on
voting
against
these
two
items.
We
had
our
longest
Biz
meeting
last
week
and
we
didn't
get
a
chance
to
to
speak
on
this.
This
is
the
last
item
we
got
to.
Everyone
wanted
to
wrap
up
and
so
wanted
to
share
a
little
bit
about
why
you
know
I've
been
a
public
housing
resident
in
the
last
seven
years.
M
I
also
know
that
we're
doing
two
residency
waivers
today
and
the
other
is
for
a
mayoral
appointment,
which
I
think
is
an
important
distinction,
and
it's
my
understanding
that
City
staff,
member
that
the
city
staff
member
being
appointed,
holds
a
title
in
our
city.
That
automatically
is
supposed
to
get
a
seat
on
the
mpha
board.
I
understand
that
and
just
want
to
voice
that
it
is
with
the
limited
seats
we
have
I'm
I'm
worried
that
we
are
over
representing
City
staff
on
it
and
then
I'll
end
by
saying.
M
I
want
to
just
be
very
clear
that
my
no
vote
actually
is
not
a
criticism
of
any
of
these
individuals.
It's
my
belief
that
the
people
on
the
Minneapolis
public
housing
authority
board
should
be
those
who
are
going
to
fight
fiercely
and
unapologetically
to
protect
and
expand
public
housing
and
that
those
decision
makers
should
be
people
most
impacted
by
those
decisions
which
at
minimum
should
mean
living
in
this
city.
Thank
you.
J
Wansley.
Thank
you,
madam
president,
in
regards
to
item
19.3
I
am
going
to
be
voting
no,
this
appointment,
along
with
several
others
that
have
come
before
it
has
made
it
clear
that
the
city
has
a
pattern
of
selecting
commissioner,
who
seemed
to
hold
political
status
or
are
well-known
political
insiders,
as
opposed
to
selecting
Commissioners,
who
are
actually
public
housing
Champions.
J
This
is
not
setting
us
up
for
the
kind
of
quality
oversight
that
public
housing
residents
deserve,
and
it
weakens
The.
Credibility
of
the
city
overall
effect
is
setting
us
up
to
have
the
same
thing
that
happens
to
most
public
housing
institutions
across
the
country
and
other
just
general
public
institutions.
J
J
Stability
in
our
city,
NPD
has
been
used
to
enact
brutal
and
violent
evictions
of
residents
and
unhouse
people
from
encampments
and
by
appointing
a
former
police
officer
and
someone
who
was
in
leadership
over
MPD,
while
mdhr
have
noted
it
committed
numerous
human
rights
violations
that
sends
a
very
playing
a
signal
to
our
public
housing
residents
into
the
public,
and
it's
not
a
good
signal.
It's
not
a
good
message.
J
This
city
is
under
a
consent
decree
with
the
state
because
of
the
pattern
of
racism,
misogyny
and
violence
that
mped
has
enacted
over
our
residence
for
the
past
10
years
and
I
had
hope.
You
know,
in
conversations
with
staff
that
this
was
considered
in
this
message
that
is
sent
to
the
majority
of
black
and
brown
residents
who
live
in
our
public
housing.
What
this
signals
to
them-
and
the
answer
is
clearly
no-
that
there
was
no
consideration
of
that,
and
that
is
the
problem
in
of
itself
and
why
I'm
voting?
No
today.
G
Thank
you.
Madam
president.
This
one
was
a
tough
one
for
me
with
item
number
193.,
and
you
know
some
of
the
concerns
raised
by
our
colleagues.
I.
Actually
don't
share.
I.
Think
that
having
somebody
with
a
public
safety
background
or
emphasis
or
focus
on
mpha
does
make
a
lot
of
sense.
I
think
that
that's
something
certainly
we
could
be
very
proactive
in
recruiting
for,
but
I
have
concerns
that
have
been
unresolved
around
the
leadership
of
our
former
Chief
that
eyewitness
firsthand
and
experienced
and
I'm
not
going
to
vilify
him.
N
N
You
know
the
individuals
that
we
picked.
You
know,
especially
that
someone
who
has
lived
in
public
housing
in
the
past,
who
brings
a
lot
of
experience
and
in
that
and
also
safety,
continues
to
be
an
issue
in
Minneapolis.
Public
housing
I
have
a
dozens
of
high-rise
building
that
deals
with
different
safety
issues
with
seniors
new
people
with
disabilities
and
having
someone
with
with
that
background
will
be
will
be
plus
so
I
will
be
supporting
item
19
individuals
that
are
moved
forward
just
want
to
make
that
comment.
L
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
I
won't
be
supporting
19-3
and
and
similar
to
councilmember
Johnson.
You
know,
I
think
that
it's
obvious
to
all
of
us.
We've
all
worked
with
former
Chief
Rondo
he's
a
beloved
figure,
he's
he's
well
known,
but
when
I
saw
his
name
appointed
to
this
position,
initially
it
seemed
very
random.
I
wasn't
really
sure
why
he
was
up
for
this
position
through
conversations
with
staff
and
some
of
my
colleagues.
L
It
certainly
made
more
sense,
but
but
if
ultimately,
some
of
the
concerns
from
public
housing
residents,
which
I've
also
heard
from
public
housing
residents
in
my
ward,
are
about
safety
I
think
we
should
develop
a
plan
to
to
address
safety
concerns
in
public
housing.
We
should
support
those
residents
in
addressing
that
I.
L
O
Thank
you,
madam
president,
so
I
am
in
support
of
1903.
I
want
to
just
start
out
by
saying
that
I
think
lived.
Experience
goes
a
long
way
and
this
conversation
has
really
been
about
our
former
Chief.
He
grew
up
in
public
housing,
as
did
I
I
mean
it's
been
over
30
years
since
I
lived
there
but
I
some
of
the
same
things
that
happened
when
I
lived
in
public
housing
are
happening
now.
I
will
also
say
that
he's
well
respected
when
it
came
up
that
he
was
going
to
potentially
be
on
this
board.
O
I
have
folks
who
live
in
public
housing
and
my
ward
reach
out
and
say
wow.
This
really
feels
like
they're
taking
Public
Safety
serious
by
having
him
appointed
to
this
board
and
so
I.
Take
that
serious,
the
people
of
Ward
4
who
live
in
Hamilton
Manor
that
reached
out
to
me
and
said
you
know,
thanks
for
listening
to
us
and
having
someone
who
is
going
to
work
specifically
on
Public
Safety
or
at
least
be
a
voice
in
the
room
to
keep
Public
Safety
on
the
Forefront
and
is
an
expert
trusted
Leader
by
these
folks.
O
That's
great
for
them,
and
so
that's
why
I
support
this
today
again,
I
just
want
to
say
lived.
Experience
goes
a
long
way
for
me.
That's
why
I'm
here
today!
That's
why
I'm
sitting
here
today
because
of
my
lived
experience
and
so
I
want
our
rooms
with
committee
members
filled
with
folks
who
have
lived
experience
and
who
are
willing
to
bring
that
to
the
table,
no
matter
where
they
live
so
again.
I
am
in
support
of
this
today
and
I
would
really
encourage
my
colleagues
to
support
this.
Thank
you.
A
A
Simply
because
you
know
he
understands
how
potentially
controversial
this
would
be,
and
so
anytime
a
resident
is
interested
in
helping
the
city
to
move
forward
on
its
Sports
and
commissions.
I
I
think
we
should
be
in
honor
and
in
support
of
those
types
of
offers
to
support
the
city.
I
have
watched
former
Chief
Aaron
Dondo
many
many
many
times,
Express
the
fact
that
housing
has
to
be
a
part
of
our
Public
Safety
initiative.
He
believes
strongly
in
providing
housing,
affordable,
housing,
public
housing,
all
manner
of
housing.
A
He
he
talks
passionately
about
providing
housing
for,
formerly
incarcerated
folks.
He
was
out
front
on
trying
to
assist
people
who
were
experiencing
homelessness
and
housing,
insecurity
and
so
I
again.
I
was
surprised
that
he
even
stepped
up
to
to
to
be
a
part
of
this
I
just
attended
a
meeting
on
Tuesday
evening
with
residents
from
horn
towers,
and
that
was
the
entire
conversation.
Public
Safety
and
so
I
know
that
our
public
housing
residents
are
deeply
concerned
about
Public
Safety
I.
A
K
P
Council
president
Jenkins
councilmember
Chavez,
you
know
it's
a.
There
are
some
sensitivities
surrounding
ethics
issues
as
you're
aware
in
terms
of
what
is
publicly
what
we
can
publicly
acknowledge
and
publicly
say
and
I
would
I
would
like
an
abundance
of
caution
to
defer
to
the
ethics
officer
in
order
to
answer
more
specifically.
I
do
know,
however,
that
to
the
extent
there
was
any
sort
of
finding
made
in
that
area
here
that
it
does
not
affect
eligibility
generally
for
service
on
a
city
board
or
commission
or
or
related
boards,
such
as
the
mpha
board.
A
K
I
think
council,
president
and
I'm
not
trying
to
say
that,
because
of
that,
we
can't
make
this
appointment.
My
question
is:
just
I
want
to
make
sure
that
this
body
is
aware
of
like
what
that
means.
Should
this
approval
be
made
today,
like
what
ramifications
does
this
body
have
to
take
into
consideration
if
it
gets
approved?
K
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
all
the
facts
in
front
of
us
today
and
if
that
is
something
that
the
ethics
officer,
if
they're
hearing
us
right
now
can
come
and
talk
to
us
before
we
take
this
vote
because
it's
something
that
we're
going
to
have
to
take
into
consideration
if
someone
else
fills
out
an
Ethics
complaint
again.
So
that's
not
my
reasoning
for
voting
against
this.
K
My
reasoning
I
made
it
clear
that
I'm
voting
against
this,
because
I
think
we
need
public
housing
experts
I
agree
with
councilmer
Johnson
that
we
do
need
Public,
Safety,
The
public's.
There
is
public
safety
concerns
of
public
housing
units
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
do
have
Public
Safety
voices
I.
Just
don't
think
that
this
is
the
right
choice
and
that's
it.
A
P
J
A
We
will
move
this
item
number
19,
essentially
point
three
and
four
to
the
end
of
our
meeting
and
hopefully
at
such
time
we
will
have
heard
from
the
ethics
officer
all
right.
So
we
will
now
move
to
our
next
committee
report,
and
that
is
the
report
from
the
policy
in
government
oversight,
committee
and
I
believe
today.
That
report
will
be
presented
by
the
Vice
chair
council,
member
wansley.
J
Thank
you,
madam
president.
So
the
policy
in
government
oversight
committee
is
moving
28
items
for
approval.
I
do
want
to
know,
for
the
public
record
that
we
will
be
deleting
I
believe,
item
13,
so
that
will
be
removed
from
the
consent
agenda.
But
first
item
is
authorizing
a
collective
bargaining
agreement
with
the
Minnesota
Teamsters
Convention
Center
custodian
unit.
The
second
is
accepting
a
bid
for
epoxy
grade
60,
reinforcing
bars
and
miscellaneous
material.
J
Number
three
is
accepting
a
bid
for
Target
Center
sanitary
piping
repairs
project
or
is
accepting
a
bid
for
Farwell
and
46
Avenue
South
Ada
pedestrian
ramp
program.
Number
five
is
accepting
a
bid
for
the
Minneapolis
Convention
Center
exhibit
Halls
ABC
and
D
door
replacement
project
number
two
six
is
accepting
a
bid
for
the
Target
Center
floor,
repair
and
coding
phase
two
project:
seven
is
accepting
a
bid
for
the
Target
Center
food
service
equipment.
Grab-And-Go
stands
number
8
is
accepting
a
bid
for
concrete
sidewalks,
curb
and
gutter
alleys
and
driveway
approaches.
J
If
Tina's
authorizing
a
contract,
Amendment
would
change
equals
opportunity
for
group
violence.
Intervention
services
number
16
is
authorizing
a
contract
Amendment
with
the
Minneapolis
downtown
improvement
district
to
provide
Outreach
Services
17
is
authorizing
a
contract
Amendment
with
a
tool
for
labor
standards.
Collaborative
enforcement,
Services
18
is
authorizing
a
contract
Amendment
with
cost
planning
and
Management
International
Inc
for
owners
project
Representatives
services
for
the
public
service
building
project
number
19
is
authorizing
a
contract
Amendment
with
Ram
Construction
Services
of
Minnesota
LLC
for
ramp,
B
waterproofing
and
structural
repairs.
J
20
is
authorizing
a
contract
Amendment
with
Michael's
Corporation
for
cleaning
and
lining
cast
iron
water
mains
21
is
authorizing
a
contract
Amendment
with
ma
Mortensen
for
construction
manager.
Services
for
the
public
service,
Building
22
is
authorizing
a
contract
Amendment
with
mizinger
construction
co-ink
for
the
Minneapolis
Convention
Center
Corridor
ceiling
replacement
project
23
is
authorizing
your
contract.
Amendment
will
Pioneer
Power
Inc
for
the
cooling
coil
replacement
project.
24
is
authorizing
a
contract
Amendment
with
questions
and
solutions.
J
Engineering
Inc
for
consulting
services
for
the
public
service
building
project
25
is
authorizing
a
contract
Amendment
with
Welling
Event,
Staffing,
Services
Inc
for
buildings
and
event.
Security
at
the
Minneapolis
Convention
Center
26
is
authorizing
a
contract
Amendment
for
property,
maintenance,
Mowing
and
snow
removal.
Services
27
is
authorizing
contracts
for
building
automation
systems.
A
A
Is
there
any
discussion?
I
did
put
myself
in
queue.
I
just
want
to
comment
on
item
number
20.
The
contract
Amendment
with
Michael's
corporation
Michaels
is
a
company
that
does
a
lot
of
work
in
the
Twin
Cities
area,
particularly
with
our
utility
companies.
But
now
they
are
cleaning
pipes
Etc.
As
many
of
you
know,
Michael's
is
a
corporation
owned
and
operated
by
a
Wisconsin
politician
who
who
ran
for
governor,
who.
A
Denier
operates
a
very
racist
company
I
hear
from
my
colleagues
all
the
time
about
Michael's
employees
requesting
police
reinforcements
because
they
have
to
work
in
those
communities
or
ghetto
communities,
as
some
have
stated,
and
they
always
have
the
lowest
bid,
which
is
how
they
get
the
contract.
And
then
they
come
back
to
us
with
contract
amendments.
And
so
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
today
and
yeah.
F
E
E
A
A
D
K
Sorry,
council
president,
this
thing
about
to
put
my
name
on
the
Queue
is
not
working
so
I.
Couldn't
let
you
know
that
I
wanted
to
speak.
I
started
rewarding
just
on
item
number
20.,
so
I
made
a
mistake:
I
wanted
to
pull
that
out.
I
thought
I
want
to
vote,
no
one
number
20
and
I
and
the
rest
of
the
agenda.
So
I
made
a
mistake
by
voting
no
on
the
entire
thing.
M
D
A
O
O
One
is
authorized
in
the
submittal
of
a
Grant
application
to
the
Minnesota
Division
of
Homeland
Security
to
support
Emergency
Management
item
two
is
authorizing
the
submittal
of
a
Grant
application
to
the
Minnesota
Division
of
Homeland
Security
for
the
urban
area
security
initiative
item
three
is
accepting
a
grant
from
the
Minnesota
Department
of
Health
for
the
personal
responsibility
education
program
item
four
is
the
passage
of
a
resolution
appropriating
funds
to
the
health
department
for
biochar
production
item.
Five
is
accepting
a
grant
from
the
CDC
for
the
public
health
infrastructure
item.
O
Six
is
accepting
a
grant
from
the
Dave
Beaumont
foundation
for
Innovative
multi-sector
Partnerships
for
Community
transformation
and
public
health
item.
Seven
is
authorizing
a
Cooperative
agreement
with
Hennepin
County
for
the
youth
group,
violence,
intervention
initiative
item
8
is
approving
appointments
to
the
community
environmental
advisory
commission
and
item
nine
is
the
proven
appointments
to
the
workplace
advisory
committee.
I'll
move
for
approval
of
these
items.
A
A
K
D
Councilmember
Johnson
aye
councilmember,
Osmond,
aye,
council
member
Payne,
aye
council
member
Koski,
aye
councilmember,
aye
council
member
Chavez,
aye
councilmember,
Ellison,
aye
council
member
veto,
aye
council
member
rainville,
aye
councilmember
Goodman,
aye,
councilmember,
wansley
aye.
Vice
president
Paul
massano
aye,
president
Jenkins
aye.
There
are
13
eyes
that.
A
G
You,
madam
president,
the
public
works
and
infrastructure
committee
is
bringing
forward
five
items
today.
The
first
is
a
contract
Amendment
with
MnDOT
for
Signal
timing,
maintenance
for
the
traffic
signal
at
Industrial,
Boulevard
and
I-35w.
The
second
is
a
Grant
application
to
the
U.S
dot
for
an
open
data
approach
to
curbside
management.
The
third
is
a
Grant
application
to
the
U.S
EPA,
a
for
the
solid
waste
infrastructure
for
recycling
grant
program.
G
A
D
E
D
A
A
K
Officer,
thank
you,
council
president.
Thank
you.
My
question
was
mostly
directed
towards.
There
was
ethics
violations
that
were
filed
in
2021,
I,
believe
and
then
I
think
in
December
there
was
action
taken
and
I
just
want
to
see.
If
you
can
remind
us
what
happened
in
December,
so
we
can
have
that
knowledge,
and
what
does
it
mean
if
we
do
this
appointment?
Will
that
ethics
violation
come
back?
Is
it
going
to
be
filed
again?
What
is
that
process?
What
does
that
mean
for
the
City
of
Minneapolis.
Q
If
I
understand
your
question,
councilmember
Chavez,
you
would
like
to
know
the
process
that
is
involved
when
an
appointed
employee
has
a
matter
that
is
pending
or
was
pending
before
the
ethical
practices
board.
So
the
process
for
employees
is
different
than
the
process
for
elected
officials.
Okay.
So
initially,
when
a
department
head
has
that
ethics
complaint,
it's
the
process
is
the
same
as
in
it
goes
to
the
board
and
a
number
of
different
things
can
happen.
Q
There
are
various
reasons
that
something
would
get
dismissed.
There
is
also
a
potential
that
there's
a
finding
of
no
probable
cause
of
finding
a
probable
cause,
in
which
case
then
the
subject
of
the
complaint
has
the
opportunity
to
have
a
hearing,
or
they
can
take
advantage
of
a
solution
offered
to
cure
the
situation
pursuant
to
the
ethical
practices
or
rules.
That's
all
the
same
for
for
both
once.
Q
If
there
is
a
choice
for
a
hearing,
then
the
ethics
board
holds
a
hearing,
and
then
there
are
a
board,
makes
findings
and
recommendations
of
discipline
for
department
heads
those
go
to
the
appointing
authority,
which
is
the
mayor
for
now
all
of
the
department
heads
and
at
that
time
it
included.
The
police
chief
was
appointed
by
the
mayor,
so
any
recommendations
for
discipline
would
be
brought
to.
K
Q
Well,
yes,
the
mayor
did
take
some
action,
but
that
was
not
the
ethical
practices
board.
The
ethical
practices
board
matter
is
closed.
It
did
not
occur
in
December
because
the
board
does
not
meet
in
even
numbered
months,
but
that
this
only
information
I
can
provide
is
that
the
matter
is
status
in
existence.
There
was
a
complaint
and
that's
now
closed.
K
Thank
you
so
I'm
from
my
understanding,
I
think
it
was
closed
because
he
no
longer
was
the
employee
of
the
City
of
Minneapolis.
Does
that
mean
that
when
you
are
going
to
be
appointed
now
to
an
appointing
authority
that
the
City
of
Minneapolis
you
know
works
with?
Does
that
mean
that
the
ethics
complaint
is
going
to
be
revived.
K
J
J
Did
you,
or
did
you
not
provide
advice
when
Chief
Rondo
at
the
time
was
active
when
he
pursued
doing
a
press
conference
using
public
resources?
Did
you
provide
feedback
to
the
chief
about
not
pursuing
that,
and
did
you
share
that
with
his
supervisor
the
mayor
from
my
understanding,
you
Pro,
you
do
play
advisory
role.
Not
only
to
this
body.
I
know.
You've
advised
me
on
a
couple
of
press
conferences,
so
I'm
assuming
you
have
also
extended
that
same
type
of
advising
to
the
mayor
as
well
around
some
of
these
decisions.
Q
So
councilmember
wansley
those
would
be
privileged
conversations.
The
discussions
that
I
would
have
with
the
mayor
I
can
tell
you
that
if
somebody
asks
me
prior
to
doing
something
that
they
intend
to
do,
I
can
give
them
ethics
advice.
If
someone
asks
me
after
the
fact
ever
after
having
done
something
already,
I
cannot
provide
advice.
Q
J
Is
this
a
common
practice,
or
is
this
documented
anywhere
because
I'm,
seeing
not
a
standard
practice,
I
would
say
from
your
office
around
this
and
I
will
know
a
recent
example.
Just
in
December,
when
I
participated
in
a
press
conference
with
the
number
of
Faith
leaders
around
the
posters
post-wars
decision
to
not
allow
cops
with
white
supremacist
affiliations
to
join
you
shared
advice
with
my
staff
encouraging
me
not
to
participate.
J
That
was
not
with
me,
so
I
would
say:
there's
not
a
standard
in
action
of
this
practice,
and
that
is
something
that
maybe
this
body
wants
to
take
up,
because
I'm,
seeing
some
discrepancies
here
so
I
think
it
lends
itself
to
make
sure
that
we
are
not
again
in
any
ethical
violations
by
having
someone
who
still
has
some
concerning
aspects
of
their
ethics
case
being
handled
by
you
or
your
office.
Those
things
are
not
fully
crystallized
right
now
or
it
might
be
better
to
have
mayor
fry.
Q
J
Will
know
for
the
public
record,
that's
false.
My
staff
was
never
asked
to
come
speak
with
you
about
that.
We
had
informal
Communications
that
I
love
keeping
receipts.
That
shows
that
you
were
not
asked
for
advice,
but
you
proactively,
provided
it
to
not
me
that
privileged
client
was
not
there,
but
to
my
staff.
So
I
will
note
that
for
the
record-
that's
not
true,
but
neither
here
or
there
I'm
ready
to
like
take
the
vote
on
this.
A
A
A
D
Councilmember
Johnson
no
councilmember
Osman,
aye,
council,
member
Payne,
no
council,
member
Koski,
aye
council,
member,
no
council,
member
Chavez,
no
council,
member
Allison,
no
council,
member
vetan,
aye
council,
member
rainville,
aye
council,
member
Goodman,
aye
council
member
wansley.
No
vice
president
palmisano.
E
D
Council,
member
Johnson
aye
council
member
Osman,
aye
council
member
Payne,
aye
councilmemberkowski,
aye
council
member
aye,
council
member
Chavez,
aye
council
member
Allison,
aye
council
member
vitam,
aye
council
member
rainville,
aye
councilmember,
Goodman,
aye
council
member
wansley
aye.
Vice
president
Paul
massano
aye,
president
Jenkins
aye,
there
are
13
eyes
I.
A
J
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
just
wanted
to
share
some
brief
comments
on
this
item
of
the
the
noi
for
the
transportation
Rideshare
worker
protections
ordinance.
Some
of
you
may
have
seen
and
I
know
and
I
appreciate
some
of
my
colleagues.
You
know
joining
us
this
morning
as
we
rally
with
dozens
of
workers,
many
of
whom
are
right
here
in
front
of
us
before
the
council
meeting
to
basically
talk
about
this
historic
opportunity.
J
N
N
As
we
talked
about
next
next
few
months,
we
want
to
come
up
with
a
policy
that
will
work
for
you
that
will
work
for
our
city,
and
you
know
I
I,
think
also
calling
out
the
state
to
take
some
action
and
put
protection
and
protect
your
rights.
You
are
you
wake
up
every
morning
trying
to
feed
your
family.
You
know
to
pay
your
rent
and
you
don't
deserve
a
corporate
company.
N
Just
you
know,
taking
your
wages
without
you
know,
without
your
knowledge,
deactivating,
your
accounts,
doing
all
kind
of
greedy
way
of
dealing
you
and
with
absolutely
no
protection
and
and
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
all
really
look
into
this
and
money
policies
we
made
in
the
few
in
the
past
to
protect
the
workers
of
City
of
Minneapolis
and
change
their
conditions.
We
can
all
come
up
together
and
work
this
all
of
us
together.
This
is
not
just
the
three
thousand
members,
that's
on
it.
It's
all
of
us.
N
G
Think
Madam,
president
and
I
appreciate
my
colleagues
bringing
this
notice
of
intent
for
it
I'm
only
speaking,
because
I
want
to
just
make
sure
one
thing
is
clear
about
some
other
work.
That's
going
on
as
well
in
parallel
to
this.
So
for
several
months,
I've
been
my
office
has
been
working
with
City
staff
and
with
folks
in
particularly
the
taxi
cab
industry,
to
on
these
chapters,
to
try
to
clean
up
and
basically
align
the
TNC
ordinances
with
taxi
cab
ordinances.
G
More
specifically,
we
have
more
stringent
rules
and
requirements
around
our
taxi
cab
industry
and
we
don't
think
that's
fair
and
we
want
them
to
be
able
to
play
by
the
same
rules
as
the
TNC
companies
and
so
especially
since
a
lot
of
these
taxi
cab
companies
are
owned
by
independent
individuals.
This
is
really
a
matter
of
equity,
a
matter
of
fairness,
and
so
we've
been
working
for
months
with
City
staff.
We've
done
multiple
public
engagement
sessions.
We
haven't
done
notice
of
introduction,
yet
on
that.
G
We're
saving
that
on
the
end-
and
that's
not
any
sort
of
criticism
over
my
colleagues
of
front
loading.
The
introduction
on
this
I've
done
that
as
well
with
my
notice
of
intents
on
other
matters,
but
I
did
want
to
make
it
clear
that
we
still
are
doing
that
effort
to
to
bring
those
goes
into
alignment
and
to
help
out
all
of
those
that
are
in
this
economy
that
are
participating
in
this,
and
so
I
see
this
as
a
complementary
effort.
G
It's
early,
but
I
I
will
say:
I'll
speculate,
they'll,
probably
come
forward
around
the
same
time
since
we're
touching
the
same
chapter
probably
is
is
two
packages
before
the
committee
and
so
we'll
continue
working
together
on
that
and
just
really
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
our
city
staff
who've
been
so
great
to
work
with
on
on
this
and
really
trying
to
continually
look
at
and
update
our
business
regulations
to
ensure
that
they're
fair
for
the
people
and
the
workers
of
Minneapolis.
Thank
you.
K
Council
president
Jenkins,
thank
you
I'll
make
it
quick,
just
want
to
say
that
I'm
very
excited
to
work
with
the
workers
here,
making
sure
that
your
rights
are
being
protected
first
and
foremost,
that
your
wages
are
being
predicted
that
you
get
paid.
What
you
deserve,
I
think
that's
a
big
priority
for
us
here
in
this
body
to
protect
you
and
your
safety.
So
just
wanna!
F
F
We
don't
have
to
accept
the
terms
of
venture
capitalists
in
Silicon
Valley
when
it
comes
to
how
we
look
out
for
our
workers.
We
are
City
Council
Members,
making
policy
for
the
City
of
Minneapolis,
so
we
should
be
working
under
our
own
terms.
Not
the
terms
of
an
investor
in
in
you
know,
that's
only
interested
in
in
maximizing
profit.
So
thank
you
all
for
coming
for
your
advocacy.
A
Next,
we
have
an
item
under
new
business
that
I
am
going
to
move
postpone
to
our
next
council
meeting
a
resolution
amending
appointments
of
council
members
to
boards
and
commissions,
and
so
we
will
take
this
matter
up
at
our
next
city
council
meeting
and
colleagues.
We
do
have
a
request
for
a
closed.
D
A
Thank
you
Carl,
so
we'll
go
back
to
the
order
business.
Regarding
resolutions,
we
had
one
honorary
resolution
today
around
stalking
awareness
that
we
read
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
Are
there
any
further
comments
from
my
colleagues,
see
now
now
entertaining
a
motion
to
adopt
that
honorary
resolution
so.
H
I
A
J
Wansley,
thank
you,
madam
president.
So
council,
member,
Ellison
and
I
will
be
co-hosting
a
job
fair.
This
Saturday
January
14th
in
partnership
with
our
public
works
department,
Shiloh,
Temple
and
Fellowship
Missionary
Baptist
Church,
and
encourage
our
colleagues
to
share
with
their
constituents
and
we'll
be
getting
social
media.
J
Social
media
materials
of
the
flyer
of
councilmember,
Ellison
and
I
had
a
great
time
on
Monday
fly,
ring
all
along
West
Broadway
to
promote
the
event
and
got
so
much
excitement
from
a
whole
array
of
just
constituents
who
are
excited
that
we're
taking
initiatives
like
this.
So
just
some
logistical
aspects.
The
job
fair
will
go
from
11
A.M
to
2
p.m.
It's
going
to
be
located
at
Shiloh
temple
on
Broadway
Ave.
J
There
is
going
to
be
on-site
hiring
as
well
as
a
support
for
people
to
do
their
applications
on
the
spot.
So
again,
please
tell
your
family
and
your
friends
to
come
through.
We
talk
a
lot
about
the
challenges
of
of
the
workforce
within
public
works
as
we're
trying
to
lead
Innovative
Solutions
towards
a
whole
host
of
infrastructure
and
climate
matters
facing
our
city
right
now,
and
here's
the
opportunity
for
us
to
really
help
grow
and
nurture
that
Workforce.
J
A
In
addition
to
the
rest
and
relaxation
that
some
people
take
on
MLK
holiday
and
seeing
no
further
announcements,
we
will
be
moving
to
closed
session.
We've
completed
all
the
regular
items
on
our
agenda
and
we'll
now
consider
the
request
for
a
closed
session,
which
there
is
three
litigation
matters
listed
on
the
agenda
before
I
move.
To
close,
this
meeting
I
recognize
the
City
attorney
to
provide
a
legal
basis
for
the
requested
closed
session.
R
Thank
you,
council
president
Jenkins
members
of
the
council.
The
next
items
on
our
agenda
are
three
cases:
litigation
cases,
litigation
matter
of
City
of
Minneapolis
versus
Leo,
a
daily
and
Ice
Builders
versus
golden
industrial
Refrigeration,
LLC
stantec,
Consulting,
Services,
General,
Studio,
LLC
first
matter.
Second
matter
is
litigation
matter
of
Oni
UK
versus
City
of
Minneapolis,
and
the
third
is
litigation
Manor
of
my
yang
yang
versus
City
of
Minneapolis.
R
These
three
cases
are
in
active
litigation.
Your
lawyers
wish
to
discuss
with
the
council
litigation
strategy
and
or
settlement
possibilities
accordingly,
under
Minnesota
statutes,
section
13d,
.05,
subdivision,
3B
of
the
Minnesota
open
meeting
law.
The
council
May
upon
a
proper
motion,
close
the
meeting
for
the
purposes
of
attorney-client
communication.
In
considering
the
motion,
the
council
should
weigh
the
right
of
the
public
to
know
what
its
government
is
doing
against
the
need
of
the
city
to
preserve
the
confidentiality
of
its
discussions
with
its
attorneys.
A
Thank
you,
madam
City
attorney,
and
with
that
I
move
that
our
public
meeting
be
closed,
has
authorized
under
the
bridge.
The
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law,
specifically
Minnesota
statutes,
section
13d,
.05,
subdivision
3B
for
the
purpose
of
discussing
the
litigation
matters
of
one,
the
City
of
Minneapolis
versus
Leo,
a
daily
and
Ice
Builders
B
golden
industrial
Refrigeration
LLC
stand
Tech
consulting
services
and
Generator
Studio
LLC
item
number:
two:
oh
yinke,
V,
the
City
of
Minneapolis
and
item
number
three,
my
yang
yang,
the
City
of
Minneapolis
May
I,
have
a
second
to
that
motion.
B
D
Run
councilmember
Johnson
all
right:
councilmember
Osman,
aye,
councilmember,
Payne,
aye,
councilman,
burkoski,
aye,
councilmember,
aye,
council
member
Chavez,
aye
councilmember,
Ellison,
aye,
council
member
Vita,
aye
council
member
rainville,
aye
councilmember
Goodman,
aye,
councilmember,
wansley
aye.
Vice
president
Paul
massano
aye,
president
Jenkins
aye.
There
are
13
eyes.
Thank.
A
A
D
A
G
You,
madam
president,
I,
will
go
ahead
and
move
that
the
city
accept
the
offer
to
settle
claims
involved
with
defendants
Leo
a
daily
company
and
third
party
defendants,
golden
industrial
Refrigeration,
LLC
generator
Co
LLC
and
stantec
Consulting
Services
Inc
asserted
in
Minneapolis
daily
company
and
Ice
Builders
V
golden
industrial
Refrigeration
at
all.
Pursuant
to
the
terms
of
the
settlement
agreement
and
release
entered
into
the
parties
for
the
total
sum
of
800
thousand
and
nine
hundred
dollars
to
be
paid
to
the
City
of
Minneapolis.
A
D
A
O
They
thank
you,
madam
president.
I'll
move
that
all
claims
against
the
City
of
Minneapolis
in
any
of
its
named
or
unnamed
employees,
including
claims
for
attorney's
fees
and
costs
asserted
by
Chuck
munya
on
UK
in
the
matter
of
Chuck
munya
onuke
versus
the
City
of
Minneapolis
mdhr
case
number
73267
be
settled
in
the
amount
of
ten
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
payable
in
the
following
matter.
O
D
Member
Johnson
aye
councilmember
Osmond
aye
council
member
Payne,
aye
councilmember
aye
councilmember,
aye,
councilmember,
Chavez,
aye,
council
member
Ellison,
aye
council
member
Vito,
aye
councilmember
rainville
aye,
councilmember,
Goodman,
aye,
councilmember,
wansley
aye.
Vice
president
Paul
massano
aye,
president
Jenkins
aye.
There
are
13
eyes
and.