►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
evening
everybody,
my
name
is
eric
hanson,
I'm
the
director
of
economic
policy
and
development
for
the
city
of
minneapolis,
and
I
want
to
welcome
you
all
to
the
virtual
upper
harbor
terminal
draft
coordinated
plan,
open
house.
This
is
the
first
of
two
open
houses
that
we'll
be
hosting
we'll
have
another
one
in
in
january,
and
we
are
starting
a
little
bit
late,
just
let
people
get
signed
in
and
give
some
time.
A
B
C
C
A
Okay,
next
slide:
please:
okay,
let's
go
over
some
meeting
logistics.
This
is
microsoft,
live
event.
Attendees
will
have
an
opportunity
to
submit
questions.
Presenters
will
answer
the
questions
in
the
q,
a
portion
of
this
event
for
both
the
web
and
mobile
versions.
If
you
lose
audio
check
to
see
if
you've
paused
the
live
meeting
so
just
check
your
equipment,
and
maybe
you
need
to
push
play
again-
tonight's
open
house
is
being
recorded
and
will
be
available
on
the
project
website.
A
Calling
users.
Please
again,
please
keep
your
phones
muted
and
we
encourage
you
to
participate
by
the
live
event
link
as
well,
so
you
can
see
what's
going
on
on
the
screen
next
slide,
please
you
have
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
on
the
web
version.
You
can
ask
questions
by
putting
the
clicking
the
ask
question
button
in
the
lower
right
corner
of
the
window.
You
can
submit
it
and
it
will
submit
a
question
to
the
project
team
and
you
can
do
that
at
any
point
of
this
presentation.
A
You
can
also
comment
on.
You
can
also
like
a
comment
or
question
in
the
featured
questions:
tab
on
the
mobile
version,
the
q,
a
is
in
the
upper
right
hand,
side
of
the
screen
and
view
the
question
box
in
the
same
steps
as
above
at
click,
ask
the
question
and
you
can
ask
anonymously:
okay
next
next
slide,
please.
A
There
is
a
possibility
that
some
of
the
questions
will
need
further
research,
but
all
the
questions
that
are
answered
today
will
be
uploaded
on
the
project
website
and
we'll
be
doing
a
frequently
asked
questions
as
well,
and
that
will
be
on
the
city's
project
website,
which
is
upper
harbormpls.com.
That's.
A
A
C
C
I
am
the
executive
director
of
mckinley
community
and
a
long
time
north
sider
I've
been
here
pretty
much
my
whole
life,
and
so
when
I
say
I
live
and
breathe
north
side,
I
mean
it.
So
it's
an
honor
to
be
here.
It's
been
an
honor
to
be
a
part
of
this
team
and
moving
this
project
along
to
make
sure
that
it
benefits
north
minneapolis.
So
thank
you
for
the
opportunity.
A
A
The
cpc
is
the
collaborative
planning
committee
which
is
established
by
the
minneapolis
city
council
to
be
to
work
directly
with
the
project
team
and
move
the
concept
plan
into
the
coordinated
plan
and
we're
very
appreciative
of
all
of
the
members,
the
15
or
so
members
that
are
on
the
collaborative
planning
committee
that
work
tirelessly.
You
know
multiple
times
a
week
and
with
a
lot
of
homework
to
get
to
us
and
we're
very
appreciative
of
you
being
on
the
call
today,
markela,
okay,
we'll
move
on
to
our
project
team.
Hillary
holmes,
who's,
our
project
coordinator
with.
D
D
F
A
G
A
A
Okay,
so
alyssa
will
hopefully
be
here
later
in
the
presentation.
Otherwise,
alyssa
is
one
of
the
project
managers
that
working
with
our
infrastructure,
public
realm
team
and
she's
with
formula
architects,
but
we'll
let
her
introduce
herself
as
well
when
she
gets
her
technical
difficulties
or
fixed
and
now
craig
vaughan
principal
from
srf
consulting.
B
Good
evening,
craig
vaughan
with
srf
consulting
as
there
he's
pointed
out,
I'm
working
as
an
extension
of
city
staff
on
the
public
realm
and
infrastructure
team,
alongside
lissa
washington,
one
of
my
colleagues
working
on
the
community
engagement
aspects
of
that
project,
which
we'll
share
with
you
a
little
bit
more
later
on
this
evening.
Thank
you
for
having
me.
A
Thank
you
craig,
so
the
the
presenters
will
have
this
evening
and
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please,
okay,
before
we
get
started,
I
just
want
to
remind
everybody
that
we
will
have
a
little
bit
of
a
lag
time
as
people
get
to
talk
and
if
you're
playing
virtual
meeting
bingo
and
your
card
only
says
you're
on
mute,
it
might
be
your
lucky
night.
A
So,
let's
see
if
we
can
throw
it
over
to
hillary
and
talk
about
the
project,
background
and
process
and
then
I'll
be
at
the
back
with
you
at
the
end
and
we'll
ask
some
questions.
So
please
do
look
at
that
question
and
answer
tab
and
answer
a
question
or
ask
a
question
when
you
would
want
to
we'll
take
them
throughout
the
throughout
the
evening.
Hillary
go.
D
Ahead,
hello,
again,
everybody
I
want
to
give
a
little
bit
of
background
on
the
project
site
for
those
that
may
not
be
familiar
with
it.
People
are
becoming
more
familiar
with
the
project
every
day
and
so
want
to
give
just
a
little
bit
of
background
to
bring
those
up
to
speed.
That
might
not
be
here
yet
and
then
also
on
just
a
refresher
for
those
that
may
be
familiar
with
the
site.
D
D
You
can
see
some
of
the
landmarks,
so
dowling
avenue
accesses
the
site
on
the
north
and
on
the
southern
end,
33rd
avenue
north
is
the
southern
access
to
the
point
the
lowry
avenue
bridge.
If
you
will
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
you'll
see
the
lower
avenue
bridge
towards
downtown
on
the
river
in
this
photo.
So
this
is
now
looking
south
towards
downtown.
It's
always
nice
to
have
a
different
view
and
you
can
see
there
the
riverfront.
D
This
is
a
slightly
older
image,
but
again
the
riverfront
park
still
remains
as
part
of
the
plan
and
again
just
to
give
you
a
different
perspective
across
the
river
on
the
east
side.
You'll
see
the
excel
power
plant
and
then
also
you'll,
see
the
the
site
and
I-94
again
to
the
right
in
the
photo
that
you're
looking
at
now,
as
well
as
the
neighborhoods
neighborhood
of
mckinley
in
north
minneapolis.
On
the
immediate
side
and
again,
the
mckinley
neighborhood
extends
to
the
river
here.
D
So
this
site
is
within
the
mckinley
neighborhood.
Next
slide,
the
site
was
formerly
operating
as
a
barge
shipping
terminal.
Those
operations
ceased
at
the
end
of
2014,
and
at
that
time
this
redevelopment
planning
phase
started.
There
are
some
current
operations
on
site,
so
these
are
some
photos
of
existing
structures.
D
D
D
But
again,
I
think
if
you
look
back
at
the
last
five
engagement,
where
we've,
where
we've
been
and
how
would
how
we
get
to
where
we
are
now,
and
so
this
phase
is
we're
transitioning
out
of
this
deeper
phase
of
engagement
through
the
uhtcpc
and
the
learning
tables.
We're
now
sharing
the
product
of
that
work.
D
Again.
This
is
not
exhaustive,
but
I
think
you'll
see
again
just
more
reflection
of
the
different
phases
and
who's
been
meeting
who's
been
a
part
of
the
process
because
it's
been
a
lot
of
people
a
lot
of
hours
and
very
appreciative
of
all
of
it.
So
with
that,
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
process
to
get
from
the
draft
concert
or
from
the
concept
plan
to
the
draft
coordinated
plan
is
brandon
champeau
with
united
properties.
F
That's
on
this
call
and
countless
others
who
have
been
in
these
meetings
and
really
sticking
it
out,
as
we've
tried
to
work
through
this,
and
you
know
just
again
for
me
personally,
this
has
been
an
incredible
learning
experience.
It's
been
a
rewarding
process
and
and
has
made
me
recognize
that
as
a
development
community,
we
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do
in
particular
that
you
know
our
definitions
of
community
investment
and
revitalization.
F
Who's
who's
helped
shape
this.
So
we'll
get
we'll
jump
in
here
and
with
what
this
slide
is
showing
is
before
we
we
get
into
specifics.
I
really
wanted
to
point
out
a
couple
of
of
major
changes
that
have
resulted
over
the
last
18
months
and
in
particular,
when
we
had
the
concept
plan
approved
in
march
of
2019.
F
F
F
Who
said
there
should
be
less
park
and
more
places
for
jobs,
and
it
was
really
difficult
to
kind
of
bring
all
of
those
pieces
into
a
complete
plan,
and
so
the
march
2019
approval
gave
us
a
good
starting
point,
but
it
left
a
lot
of
details
to
be
figured
out,
and
I
think
this
chart
that
we're
showing
here
is
is
just
to
kind
of
show
a
couple
of
the
major
items
you
know
there
are
some
things
that
stay
the
same.
The
park
hasn't
changed.
F
The
park
layout
has
changed
slightly,
but
the
overall
size
of
the
park
hasn't
there's
still
obviously
need
for
right
away
for
utilities
and
streets
and
things
that
just
don't
exist
on
the
site.
Today.
A
major
change
with
the
music
venue
that
I'll
get
into
here
in
a
second
is
the
previous
plan.
Had
it
integrated
really
into
the
public
park
area,
and
there
were
a
lot
of
people
that
were
concerned
about
that.
This
plan
has
separated
it
from
the
public
park
and
and
really
separated
from
the
riverfront
by
the
parkway.
F
Another
major
change
regarding
the
development
parcels,
the
private
development
parcels,
the
overall
size
of
the
parcels
hasn't
changed,
but
the
ownership
has
changed
significantly
and
again
I'll
get
into
some
details
here.
Regarding
the
the
proposed
public
ownership
of
this
land
long
term,
and
then
again,
as
I
mentioned,
you
know,
the
the
the
concept
plan
provided
a
lot
of
ranges
and
kind
of
potentials.
F
So
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
just
to
point
out
a
couple
of
the
of
the
changes
that
I
just
mentioned
here
and
again.
I
know
you
know
some
of
this
since
we
haven't
dove
into
the
plan
yet
may
not
be
apparent,
but
just
to
kind
of
show.
You
know
in
particular
where
the
cpac
under
a
you
know,
the
seat
back
was
part
of
the
park
before
it
has
now
been
moved
out
of
the
park
and
onto
its
own
site.
F
Again
I
mentioned
the
riverfront
hotel,
which
was
fronting
the
park
where
we're
showing
b
has
now
been
replaced
with
mixed
income,
affordable
housing
and
then
another
plan.
You
know,
as
in
the
concept
plan,
we
we
what's
shown
as
parcel
c.
We
had
intended
as
a
future
phase
project
really
because
we
didn't
know
what
the
future
of
gaf
just
to
the
south
of
here
was
going
to
be,
that
you
know,
has
they're
a
private
property
owner
they've
intended
indicated,
they're,
not
going
anywhere
and
so
part
of
us
advancing
that
now
into
phase.
F
F
We
can
advance
this
slide,
please
so
another.
You
know
major,
as
I
mentioned
just
trying
to
get
people
in
2018
and
19
really
to
center
around
some
kind
of
conclusive
agreements.
Another
component
that
we
really
needed
to
get
through
early
with
the
cpc
over
the
last
18
months
was
defining,
who
is
community
in
this
project
and
the
the
definition
of
community
meant
a
lot
of
different
things
to
different
people.
Some
of
some
of
the
people
that
we
heard
from
earlier
said.
You
know
this
is
the
mississippi
river.
F
This
this
project
belongs
to
everybody
in
the
u.s.
This
is
a
national
landmark.
Other
people
said
this
is
a
regional
project.
If
the
you
know
the
community
and
the
you
know,
the
overall
region
needs
to
benefit
or
the
state
needs
a
benefit.
Others
said
nope,
it's
the
neighborhood,
that's
next
door
or
it's
you
know
people
living
closest
to
the
project,
so
we
really
needed
to
define
what
community,
who
who
community
is,
because
that's
really
where
we
to
start
the
conversations
of
who's
going
to
primarily
benefit
here.
F
You
can
come
back
to
this
definition,
and
this
was
a
real
key
key
moment
for
us
to
get
through
this
because,
as
I
said,
it
really
helped
set
the
stage
for
everything
that
came
after
that
you
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please
another
major
step,
besides
divine
defining
community,
is
really
was
really
determining
what
the
project's
value
should
be.
For
many
years,
we've
been
working
off
of
what
we're
calling
the
nine
characteristics
of
success
for
the
project,
which
you
know
in
many
ways
I
think,
are
still
relevant.
F
If
you
read
those
characteristics,
they
describe
a
place
that
I
think
anybody
would
love
to
be
a
part
of,
but
we
really
needed
to
bring
more
definition,
particularly
with
with
the
definition
of
community.
We
need
to
really
define
the
values
and
and
things
that
we
need
to
filter
every
every
part
of
this
project
through
and
so
six
values
were
identified
through
this
process
with
the
cpc
and
with
help
from
the
input
from
learning
table.
F
Events
as
well
as
the
city
and
we've
tried
to
summarize
some
of
the
kind
of
overarching
objectives
under
each
of
these
values.
Here
and
I'll.
I'm
not
going
to
read
these
right
now,
because
I'll
talk
in
more
detail
once
we
get
into
the
plan,
but
I
do
want
to
point
out
there's
a
link
at
the
bottom
of
the
slide
that
will
bring
everybody
to.
If
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
we'll
bring
everybody
to
the
more
detailed
matrix
decision
matrix
and
this
was
this.
F
A
lot
of
work
went
into
this
months
of
work
and
input
and
for
anybody
there's
way
more
to
read
on
here
than
we
need
to
right
now,
but
for
anybody
who
wants
to
really
understand
you
know
what
I
would
call
kind
of
the
product
or
I
won't.
I
didn't
coin
this,
but
one
of
the
cpc
members
did
the
project
report
card.
I
mean
this
is
how
we've
really
started
think
through
everything
and
how
we're
going
to
address
these
specific
objectives
and
metrics
next
slide.
F
But
well,
actually,
before
I
jump
into
the
specifics,
I'm
going
to
talk
about
the
the
vision
statement
here,
which
is
really
you
know,
was
it
was
an
outcome
of
the
the
three
things
that
I
just
talked
through.
That
again,
you
know
really
set
the
stage
for
what
we
hope
this
project
becomes
and
what
everybody
describes
this
project
as
in
the
future,
and
I'm
not
going
to
read
this,
but
I
just
want
to
point
out
a
couple
of
words
that
I
think
are
key.
You
know
one
is.
F
F
It's
also
an
incredibly
large
project
and
and
needs
to
be
a
community
building
asset
for
north
minneapolis,
and
in
particular
you
know,
as
we
mentioned
here,
grounded
in
you
know,
starting
to
try
to
create
some
frameworks
and
ways
to
write
some
past
wrongs
and
and
current
wrongs,
whether
it's
racial
injustices,
environmental
injustices,
economic
injustices-
and
you
know
through
all
of
that
meeting
the
needs
of
the
community.
Today,
the
priorities
of
the
community
today
but
being
balanced
as
well
with
aspirations
of
tomorrow,
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please.
F
We
identify
as
having
some
particular
uses,
such
as
manufacturing
and
or
food
production,
and
it's
our
goal
to
not
only
provide
places
that
can
provide
jobs,
but
also
to
work
with
industries
that
are,
you
know,
providing
career
pathways
and
and
not,
you
know
not
just
a
a
job
for
today,
but
but
creating
jobs
that
are
going
to
be
needed
in
the
future
and
that
we
can
work
with
other
organizations
to
bring
training
programs
and
career
pathway,
programs
and
whatnot.
But
there's
jobs
really
sprinkled
throughout
this
project.
It's
not
just
focus
there.
F
These
community
and
commercial
spaces
will
have
jobs,
obviously,
and-
and
so
it's
it's-
the
you
know,
the
goal
to
really
maximize
that
is
in
every
phase
of
this
project
and
I'm
going
to
dive
into
each
of
these
land
uses
specifically
next.
So
I'm
not
going
to
talk
about
some
of
these
numbers
because
I'll
get
into
them
here.
F
Typically
around
60
percent
of
the
area.
Immediate
income
we've
been
asked
to
provide
a
heavier
emphasis
on
units
that
are
attainable
to
north
side
incomes
here,
which
is
generally
speaking
for
those
making
thirty
to
fifty
percent
of
area,
median
income
and
so
phase
one,
which
is
I
apologize.
I
should
have
probably
showed
that
on
the
slide,
but
is
the
the
two
buildings
that
are
fronting
the
park
phase.
One
will
include
sixty-five
percent
of
the
units
being
delivered
at
a
thirty
to
fifty
percent
ami.
F
We
are
also
asked
to
to
provide
a
heavier
emphasis
on
housing
for
families
and
workforce
in
phase
one,
and
so
that
is
who
the
kind
of
primary
target
demographic
target
is
for
that
for
those
uses.
And
then
in
the
future
phase
there
is
a
a
particular
request
to
introduce
senior
housing
along
the
river
and
then
on
that
the
taller
site
that
you
see
in
the
back
there
we've
really
kind
of
left
that
undefined
right
now
this
is
it's.
F
It's
created
a
robust
discussion
at
our
meetings
about
what
this
housing
should
be
and
it
introduces
a
lot
of
different
trade-offs.
If
it's
unrestricted
or
market
rate,
it
could
create
some
significant
revenue
streams
that
could
come
back
to
the
community
which
I'll
get
into
in
a
second.
But
there's
concern
about
that.
You
know
accelerating
gentrification
nearby
and
so
what
we've?
F
What
we've,
where
we're
at
right
now
at
least,
is
to
kind
of
leave
that
a
bit
undefined
and
you
know,
get
through
phase
one
and
come
back
and
determine
what
the
right
approach
is
in
the
future
phases.
And
then
I
showed
a
few
of
the
kind
of
objectives
that
we're
really
hoping.
The
housing
will
hit
on
here
as
as
the
tied
to
each
of
these
community
values,
but
you
know
in
particular
just
to
hit
a
few
of
these
things.
F
The
goal
here
is
not
to
introduce
housing
that
will
accelerate
gentrification
and
displacement
in
the
area
is
to
introduce
affordable
housing
immediately
and
to
really
provide
the
most.
What
I
would
say
is
desirable
locations
for
housing
in
the
site
for
the
more
affordable
uses,
and
you
know
the
places
running
the
park
running
the
river.
F
Those
will
be
affordable
and
if
there
is
any
unrestricted
market
rate,
it
will
be
pushed
to
the
back
or
closest
to
the
highway,
and
then
you
know
really
what
the
overarching
goal
here
is
is
to
create
what
some
people
have
coined
a
see.
It
be
a
community,
a
place
that
has
a
mix
of
incomes,
a
mix
of
occupations,
families,
seniors
workforce,
and
you
know
really,
I
think,
the
kind
of
community
that
most
of
us
would
aspire
to
live
in.
We
hope
is
what
ends
up
being
delivered
here.
F
F
Spaces
of
these
buildings
offer
some
unique
opportunities
either
for
solar
or
solar
installation,
which
could
be
then
implemented
into
a
community
garden,
solar
garden
or
for
food
production
like
greenhouse
aquaponics
and
other
things
that
I'm
getting
up
to
speed
and
what
all
those
things
mean,
and
so
our
goal
here
is
to
hopefully
find
companies
that
fit.
You
know
fit
this
criteria
and
and
deliver
on
all
these
values.
You
know
the
next
slide.
F
This
just
gives
a
depiction
of
what
those
spaces
could
look
like
again
from
the
from
the
the
parkway,
the
future
parkway
or
the
walkway
along
the
river,
and
then
the
spaces
for
community
here
focused
on
again
the
most
publicly
accessible
spaces,
the
health
and
wellness
hub,
which
has
you
know,
really
a
lot.
We
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do
on
this
yet,
but
primarily,
that's
being
you
know,
it's
going
to
require
partners
it's
going
to
require
other
community
organizations.
F
That's
not
only
helping
create
a
healthier,
healthier
region,
but
also
as
a
place
that
could
be
for
community
gathering
events
and
revenue
generation
back
to
the
community,
the
ground
floor,
commercial
space,
that
you
see
very
it's
a
sliver
of
the
kind
of
red
areas
and
the
ground
floors
of
these
buildings.
We
think
really
needs
to
be
heavily
programmed
in
relation
to
the
community
hub
and
making
sure
that
we're.
F
You
know
we're
thinking
about
this
as
a
district
and
not
as
individual
assets,
and
so
our
goal
is
to
work
with
the
program
of
the
hub
and
make
sure
that
these
pieces
are
playing
off
each
other
and
then,
last
but
not
least,
the
community
performing
arts
center,
which
could
be
also
called
a
job
creator.
But
in
this
case
we're
referring
to
as
a
community
space.
And
you
know
this
will
be.
F
The
design
is-
is
has
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
work
to
do
and
we'll
get
started
here
shortly
now
that
the
community
that
the
state
bond
has
been
approved.
But
for
the
first
avenue
team
is
dedicated
to
figuring
out
how
this
this
music
venue
will
really
become
something
that
is
a
a
proud
place
for
north
and
a
place
for
community
to
come
together
a
place
that
can
also
create
opportunities
for
entrepreneurs,
whether
it's
food
entrepreneurs
or
management
of
the
of
the
venue.
And
so
you
know
this.
F
Will
this
will
be
a
place
that
will
generate
a
lot
of
activity
to
the
site
and
there's
a
lot
of
different
ways
that
we
can
start
to
plug
different
community
community
components.
Around
that
to
make
sure
that
they
benefit
next
slide,
please
this
just
gives
a
depiction
of
what
a
ground
floor.
Experience
could
be
along
dowling
avenue,
looking
south,
I'm
sorry
looking
east
towards
the
river
next
slide.
F
And
what
dana
frank
and
the
first
avenue
team
have
proposed
here
is
a
is
a
plan
that
would
deliver
750,
I'm
sorry,
three
dollars
per
ticket
fee
per
ticket
back
to
the
community
for
every
ticketed
event,
and
this
could
generate
you
know
approximately
750
000
a
year
depending
on
the
number
of
tickets
sold,
and
so
that
combined
with
the
ground
lease
revenue
is
a
substantial.
You
know,
offers
a
substantial
amount
of
revenue
back
to
the
community
next
slide.
Please.
F
This
is
to
so
a
lot
of
people
have
asked
us
the
what
happens
with
this
revenue.
Where
does
it
go?
And
so
we
have
been
focused
on
creating
a
process
to
identify
a
community
partner
that
would
work
with
us
and
on
a
number
of
different
fronts.
They
could
become
the
fund
manager
of
the
gra
of
the
revenue
sources
that
I
just
talked
about.
They
could
also
become
a
partner
in
the
real
estate
on
the
project,
and
we
show
here
you
know
again.
F
Some
of
these
community
focused
spaces
that
we
think
a
community
partner
would
be
best
suited
to
work
with
us
to
potentially
be
either
an
advisor
or
potentially
a
partner
or
co
owner
on
these
projects
or
to
own
them
outright.
And
so
we
are
working
on
on
an
rfq
process
that
will
try
to
identify
who
this
partner
could
be
or
coalition
of
partners.
F
This
is
just
a
a
quick
description
of
of
what
this
entity
could
could
be
and
the
roles
that
they
could
play.
I
talked
a
little
bit
about
them
whether
it's
fund
manager
program
advisor
all
the
way
up
to
partner
and
owner,
and
you
know
there
are
multiple
types
of
organizations
like
this
that
exist
around
the
country
and
multiple
models
that
we've
looked
at,
whether
it's
cdc
models
or
community
trust
models
or
coalitions
of
various
partners
and
organizations,
and
so
we've
shown
a
few
of
them
here.
F
The
the
last
thing
I
wanted
to
kind
of
mention
here,
as
it
relates
to
the
different
community
benefits
here.
Are
you
know,
there's
multiple
ways
that
these
everything
that
we're
talking
about
here
will
be
legally
enforced,
whether
it's
through
a
redevelopment
agreement
with
the
city
that
are.
You
know
that
may
contain
the
things
that
are
more
focused
on
things
that
the
city
can
actually
legally
enforce
themselves
or
or
things
that
are
written
into
their
policies.
F
I'm
sorry
that
agreement
and
the
oversight
of
that
agreement
could
be
transferred
to
a
future
community
entity
and
last
slide.
This
is
just
a
continuation
of
the
previous
slide.
Thank
you.
Next
one,
please,
I'm
not
going
to
talk
in
detail
on
each
of
these
line
items
I
just
want
to
let
everybody
know
that
you
know
to
how
long
this
is
going
to
take.
F
Yet
we
still
have
some
work
in
front
of
us,
as
I
mentioned
we're
about
four
years
in
right
now,
and
we
we
still
have
a
couple
years
to
go
before
we'll
actually
start
to
see
dirt.
Being
moved,
assuming
we
get
approval
of
this
plan,
but
in
particular
a
lot
of
the
of
the
schedule
is
being
driven
by
the
city's
infrastructure
schedule,
which
is
what
we're
going
to
be
tackling
next
here
and
the
goal
of
the
phase.
F
1
projects
at
least,
is
to
try
to
time
as
best
as
possible
with
that
work
and
to
make
sure
that
we're
you
know
hopefully
constructing
these
these
projects
at
the
same
time,
so
that
everything
is
being
delivered
as
close
to
possible
at
once,
but
you'll
see
you
know,
there's
future
phase
parcels
and
projects
as
well
that
that
will
just
take
even
more
time,
but
we
knew
getting
into
this.
This
would
be
likely
a
decade
long,
if
not
more
project,
I
think
it
will.
It
will
end
up
planning
here.
F
H
H
H
H
We
also
have
33rd
avenue,
so
those
three
pieces
of
infrastructure
about
a
mile
doesn't
sound
like
a
lot
when
you
say
it,
but
a
mile
of
infrastructure
is
quite
a
bit
there's
a
lot
of
planning,
design,
work
and
then
ultimately,
construction.
That
goes
into
that,
like
I
said,
there's
been
and
brandon
talked
about
this
at
a
great
detail.
H
There's
been
over
five
years
of
engagement
around
the
upper
harbor,
there's
been
a
lot
of
collaborations
with
community
with
minneapolis
park
and
rec
board,
mississippi
watershed
management
organization,
hennepin,
county
minnesota
department
of
transportation,
to
reach
a
point
where
right
now,
where
we
have
preliminary
design
concepts
that
will
be
sharing
and
starting
engagement
in
january
so
next
month.
So
I'm
going
to
go
through
at
a
very
high
level
the
pieces
of
the
infrastructure
there's
a
lot
of
information
here.
H
While
I'm
still
on
this
slide,
just
wanted
to
highlight
a
few
critical
things
so
with
our
intention
with
this
is
providing
a
transportation
system
that
gets
you
to
the
site,
allows
you
to
travel
within
a
set
and
helps
you
safely.
Leave
the
site
provides
utilities
with
all
of
these
transportation
movements.
We
want
them
to
be
safe
and
to
prioritize
our
most
vulnerable
users,
which
are
pedestrians
and
cyclists
and
rollerbladers
and
skateboarders,
etc.
H
Transit
is
also
very
important,
as
well.
We've
been
meeting
with
metro
transit
to
ensure
that
as
service
is
provided
to
this
area,
that
that
we
make
it
that
our
design
provides
the
best
transit
service
possible
and
also
that
we
are
offering
a
very
riverfront
oriented
experience.
We've
been
collaborating
a
lot
with
the
minneapolis
park
and
rec
board
to
ensure
that
the
parkway
and
the
park
itself
are
a
very
pleasant
public.
Realm
experience.
That's
very
inviting
and
very
welcoming
to
the
general
public
next
slide,
please.
H
So
this
is
what
we're
calling
upper
dowling.
This
starts
right
around
dowling
and
lindell,
and
travels
east
across
I-94
and
then
along
dialing
into
the
site.
Our
proposed
design
for
upper
doweling.
You
can
see
in
this
picture
here
would
be
a
full
reconstruction,
so
we'd
be
ripping
out
all
of
the
street,
the
sidewalks,
etc
utilities
and
putting
down
brand
new
infrastructure
on
the
north
side
of
the
street.
We
would
have
a
typical
sidewalk
with
a
planted
boulevard
with
some
plantings
and
then
on
the
south
side.
We'd
have
a
two-way
multi-use
trail.
H
You
can
see
in
this
rendering
here
that
there'd
be
some
cyclists
on
here.
This
would
be
shared
with
pedestrians
as
well.
We
do
these
treatments
in
areas
of
the
city
where
we
have
very
constrained
space
and
they
prove
pretty
effective
and
it's
it's
a
design
model
we
like
to
use
like
I
said
when
we're
in
a
really
constrained
space
and
still
prioritizes
pedestrian
cyclist
movements.
H
Next
slide,
please,
as
we
transition
to
cross
the
darling
bridge
and
the
interstate
of
I-94,
we
are
still
in
conversations
with
the
minnesota
department
of
transportation,
since
they
are
the
legal
owners
of
the
bridge
to
identify
potential
treatment
options
to
provide
a
safe
experience
for
crossing
the
bridge.
The
bridge
is
not
slated
for
reconstruction
in
the
near
future,
so
we're
proposing
some
really
light
touches.
H
One
of
the
examples
here
the
bubble
on
the
far
right
is
from
plymouth,
avenue,
bridge
and
right
now,
there's
physically
separated,
ballers
and
two-way
bike
paths
on
the
bridge,
so
we're
considering
a
similar
treatment
like
that,
but
still
continuing
those
conversations
with
mndot
next
slide.
Please
lower
darling
and
brandon
shared
this
slide
in
his
presentation
piece
earlier
on.
This
is
that
kind
of
gateway
experience
as
we're
entering
the
site.
This
is
our
proposed
preliminary
design.
H
Okay
next
slide,
please,
okay,
so
there
I
promise
you.
There
was
a
slide
in
here
on
the
parkway
technical
difficulties.
It's
not
here
anymore.
Can
we
just
go
back
one
slide,
but
we
have
the
parkway
and
with
the
parkway
and
once
again
I
apologize
that
this
image
is
not
in
this
presentation,
but
it
is
in
the
coordinated
plan
and
there
is
a
the
the
way
we
are
proposing.
Design
in
the
parkway
would
be
a
two-way
traveling
for
vehicles,
so
vehicles
travel,
north
and
south.
H
So
that
way,
folks
that
are
in
the
site
can
safely
travel
through
it
and
really
just
activate
that
public
realm
and
then
the
last
piece
of
the
the
transportation
infrastructure
is
33rd
avenue.
33Rd
avenue
is
the
secondary
access
point.
It's
the
south
southern
piece
of
the
site
right
now.
It's
a
two-way
roadway
and
there's
not
even
sidewalks
there.
So
obviously
there's
a
huge
opportunity
for
improvement
there,
we're
proposing
putting
in
sidewalks
bicycle
facilities
as
well
and
there's
a
lot
there's.
H
H
H
We're
really
excited
about
that
opportunity
and
are
exploring
if
it
will
be
a
district
system,
meaning
we
would
just
be
treating
storm
water
that
is
occurring
on
site
or
a
regional
system
in
capturing
and
treating
additional
storm
water
outside
of
the
upper
harbor
terminal
area.
So
we're
really
trying
to
push
the
envelope
on
that
and
still
continue
in
those
conversations.
H
B
Thanks
much
thanks,
much
appreciate
it.
So
one
thing
I
want
to
with
the
next
three
slides
here:
I'm
going
to
go
through
these
relatively
quickly,
but
at
the
same
rate
I
want
to
make
sure
to
pause
and
honor
all
the
good
work
that
alexander
and
brandon
referenced
in
their
comments
on
their
slides
here
recently.
Regarding
the
engagement,
that's
taken
place
over
the
num
past
number
of
years,
so
here
what
we?
B
What
we've
heard
based
on
review
of
some
of
that
information,
this
by
no
means
captures
all
of
it,
but
is
for
to
design,
build
and
support
public
spaces
that
prioritize
not
only
inclusivity
but
also
community
ownership
for
north
side
residents,
connecting
them
to
the
upper
harbor
terminal
site,
but,
more
importantly,
the
river,
as
an
amenity
for
the
neighborhood
in
the
greater
community
and
overcome
the
I-94
barrier.
Alexander
talked
quite
a
bit
about
the
roadways
or
the
the
infrastructure.
B
That
is,
is
pleasant
and
make
sure
that
it's
an
inviting
travel
way
in
order
to
get
there.
So
we
want
to
ensure
that
project
information
throughout
is
readily
available
associated
with
our
transportation
infrastructure,
design
options.
We
want
to
ensure
and
lean
into
the
community
and
strengthen
our
relationship
between
the
diverse
demographics
of
the
north
minneapolis
community,
the
project
team
and
our
project
stakeholders
create
desirable
infrastructure
and
public
realm
elements
focusing
on
those
public
realm
elements.
B
Please
so
one
thing
we
haven't
mentioned
our
public
realm
and
infrastructure
project
is
a
relatively
quick
project,
so
to
speak
I
mean,
while
it's
on
the
order
of
a
year
to
you,
know,
14
months,
as
shown
in
this
schedule.
The
public
engagement
aspect
of
it
is
a
pretty
intense
three
to
four
month
set
of
activities.
We
also
are
want
to
be
respectful
of
the
activities
that
are
taking
place
as
part
of
the
coordinated
plan,
so
we've
been
doing
our
best
to
stay
abreast
of
everything.
That's
going
on
participating
this
evening.
B
We
appreciate
you
allowing
to
share
some
information,
we're
going
to
hit
the
ground
running
here,
as
alexander
pointed
out
in
about
two
weeks
from
now,
hitting
the
ground
running
with
respect
to
a
number
of
different
activities
from
january
through
that
month
of
march
next
slide,
please,
our
engagement
is
really
foundationally
based
on
four
key
components,
one
of
which
being
providing
information.
The
provision
of
information
electronically
through
the
upper
harbor
website,
that's
already
in
place,
as
well
as
other
social
media,
means
to
share
information
and
push
information
and
interact
with
the
community.
B
We
have
a
number
of
interactive
online
surveys
scheduled
to
roll
out
here
very
shortly,
one
regarding
visual
preference,
those
public
realm
elements
that
people
can
affect
change
on
and
have
a
voice
with
respect
to
what
could
be
implemented
or
installed
along
the
corridors
and
then
also
understanding
too
from
a
visionary
standpoint,
how
people
anticipate
arriving
at
the
site
or
to
the
river
through
various
mobility
options
or
routes
thereof.
We've
also
coordinated
with
five
different,
unique
community
groups.
B
E
E
E
We
will
be
working
through
the
city
council
process
for
the
coordinated
plan
approval
in
february
of
next
year
in
starting
in
january
and
moving
through
august.
We
will
be
going
through
the
environmental
review
process,
which
is
the
alternative
urban
area
review
following
that
or
concurrent
with
that
process
will
be
the
public
realm
engagement,
design
and
engineering.
E
We
will
then,
in
the
fall,
be
working
on
a
the
city
council,
approval
of
term
sheets
for
the
phase
1
developments,
as
well
as
approving
the
concept
plan
for
the
public
works
and
then
throughout
2021
and
2022.
We
will
be
working
on
design
and
land
use
approvals
for
each
of
the
phase.
One
developments
and
we
expect
the
construction
to
start
in
fall
of
2022
on
the
phase
one
infrastructure
and
the
park
next
slide.
So
the
public
comment
period
and
online
feedback
survey
is
open
through
january
15th
of
2021.
E
We
will
be
completing
draft
plan,
outreach
and
engagement
throughout
december
and
january.
The
public
comments
in
the
final
draft
plan
are
going
back
to
the
upper
harbor
terminal
cpc
in
january.
They
will
have
two
more
meetings
and
are
working
through
those
comments,
and
our
final
draft
plan
will
be
sent
to
the
city
council
for
consideration
in
february
of
next
year
and
then
I'll.
A
We'll
just
say
that
that
people
can
hear
me
so
we're
at
the
question
and
answer
section
as
you
can
see
in
the
live
q
a
event,
the
event
live
event:
q,
a
you
see
some
published
questions
from
people
who
have
been
asking
we're
going
to
go
around
and
answer
some
of
these
questions
now
and,
like
I
said
these
will
be
published
on
the
city's
website.
I
do
want
to
take
an
opportunity
to
remind
people
of
the
upper
harbor
mpls.com
website.
A
A
A
It's
with
respect
to
pub
to
the
housing
choices
that
were
made,
and
then
I'm
going
to
ask
after
brandon
can
respond
to
have
markela
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
conversation
that
the
cpc
has
had
with
with
brandon
around
the
housing
mix,
and
so
the
question
is:
why
isn't
public
housing
and
or
social
housing
part
of
this
plan
so
brandon?
Why
don't
you
remind
us
of
what
housing's
there
and
and
the
consideration
of
public
housing.
G
A
I
want
to
talk
about
one
that
I
think
has
been
coming
up
and
it's
it's
around
environmental
review,
there's
a
few
questions
and
I'm
going
to
try
and
answer
a
few
of
them.
One
is
around:
why
is
the
auar
completed
after
the
vote
on
the
con
on
the
coordinated
plan?
Another
one
is
reference
to
soil
mitigation
and
the
potential
of
an
environmental
impact
statement
and
the
environmental,
an
environmental
impact
statement
and
an
aur
which
is
an
alternate
all,
is
an
alternative.
A
Urban
area-wide
review
are
in
the
same
category
of
environmental
reviews
and
for
this
project
an
aur
will
be
completed,
the
form
of
environmental
review,
that
reviews
the
project's
environmental
setting,
the
potential
environmental
effects
of
the
project,
the
development
concepts
and
scenarios
and
then
produces
a
very
specific
mitigation
plan
to
that
development.
The
purpose
of
these
environmental
reviews
is
disclosing
potential
environmental
impacts
of
development
of
the
development
project
and
identify
ways
to
avoid
or
minimize
those
impacts.
A
This
is
a
planning
tool
that
we
will
use
to
understand
how
the
development
scenario
will
affect
the
environment
and
the
community
before
the
development
occurs.
The
process
is
designed
to
look
at
the
cumulative
impacts
of
these
anticipated
development
scenarios
and
in
it,
in
an
area
like
the
upper
harbor,
including
noise
traffic
impacts
or
cultural
resources.
A
The
coordinated
plan
approves
the
concept
that
the
property
owner,
which
would
in
this
case,
would
be
the
city
where
the
mayor
and
the
city
council
are
the
decision
makers
support,
so
the
coordinated
plan
approval
sets
that
development
concept
that
can
be
then
reviewed
on
the
auar.
So
there
are
mandatory
thresholds
that
trigger
these
reviews
and
they're
set
by
the
minnesota
environmental
quality
board.
A
There
are
multiple
opportunities
during
the
aur
process
for
public
comment
and
the
city
council,
as
the
responsible
government
unit
for
the
aur
process,
will
approve
the
scope
of
the
proposed
aoer
following
the
first
period
of
public
comment,
and
we
expect
that
to
occur
earlier
next
year.
So
sometime
in
the
first
quarter
and
once
the
aor
analysis
is
complete.
The
proposed
mitigation
strategies
are
identified
to
go
back
to
the
minneapolis
city
council
and
they
make
a
determination
if
the
study
was
adequate
and
that
will
also
follow
another
public
comment
period.
A
Development
process,
though,
so
that
once
that's
over,
we
can
see
you
know
the
normal
development
review
process
can
begin,
which
would
be
the
final
design
of
the
required
infrastructure.
So
the
roads,
the
storm
water
management
utilities
as
alexander,
talked
about,
and
then
the
site
is
in
the
building
design.
A
A
number
of
there
are
a
number
of
reports
on
that
upper
harbor
website
that
has
phase
one
soil
investigations,
phase
two
soil
investigations,
reviews
of
the
existing
structures
and
a
number
of
other
environmental
reports
that
we
have
conducted
over
the
the
past
few
years.
But
as
far
as
soil
management,
I
do
want
to
see
if
I
can
get
alexander
or
nathan
to
to
maybe
give
us
a
little
bit
of
overview
of
the
work
with
the
mwmo.
The
watershed
organization.
A
G
Thanks
eric,
so
the
minneapolis
public
works
and
the
park
board
have
been
working
closely
with
mw
mo
as
a
partner,
and
we
really
appreciate
their
collaboration
and
they're
willing
to
fund
and
partner
with
us
on
this.
So
as
a
part
of
this
project
with
new
development,
we
have
to
manage
stormwater
as
a
part
of
our
public
responsibility
for
having
right-of-way
for
transportation.
G
However,
in
partnering
with
the
watershed
management
organization
and
looking
to
expand
our
our
ability
to
treat
and
reduce
runoff
in
the
mississippi
river
they're,
helping
us
look
at
more
broad
district
and
regional
systems
that
use
bigger,
combined
spaces
to
treat
water
before
it
reaches
the
mississippi
river.
So
that's
something
in
flight.
We
don't
have
too
many
details
to
share.
A
F
65
percent
of
those
units
will
be
delivered
for
at
incomes
that
are
attainable
to
northside
residents,
which,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
is
primarily
you
know,
depending
on
the
source,
but
primarily
people
that
are
earning
between
30
and
50
percent
of
the
area,
meaning
income
which
the
area
immediate
income
is
over
a
hundred
thousand
dollars,
and
so
this
is,
you
know,
housing
that
will
be
available
for
people.
You
know,
roughly
speaking,
between
30
and
50
000,
so
I
have
your
emphasis
on
that
in
phase
one.
F
The
other
thing
that
we
are
are
doing
here
is
providing
the
affordable
housing
in,
as
I
mentioned,
the
most
kind
of
prime
locations
on
the
project
along
the
river
and
in
the
park
or
facing
the
park
and
making
sure
that
we
really
lead
with
with
affordable
in
those
locations,
and
so
the
you
know,
we
certainly
you
know
delivering
on
a
public
housing
model
where
the
city
leads
it
or
something
I
mean.
That
is
not
something
that
really
has
been
brought
to
the
table.
F
The
the
goal
has
really
been
to
create
a
a
mixed
income,
affordable
community
here
and
one
that,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
provides
a
diverse
range
of
housing
options,
targets,
a
diverse
range
of
occupations
and
income
levels,
and
also,
you
know,
emphasizes
really
creating
creating
mechanisms
to
ensure
that
northside
residents
are
the
first
to
access.
This
housing
and
are,
you
know,
are
prioritized
in
in
picking
the
residents
that
will
eventually
live
here,
and
then
I
think
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to
just
maybe
piggyback
onto
that
is
that
you
know.
F
As
far
as
social
housing,
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
different
definitions
of
what
that
could
be
or
what
social
housing
is,
and
you
know
I
think
there
still
is
some
potential
ways
to
incorporate
this.
You
know
whether
it's
enough
in
some
of
the
units.
You
know
if
there's
certain
demographics
or
people
that
were
targeting
there
were
there
was
some
discussion
early
in
in
our
process
about
the
housing
strategies
about
you
know,
bringing
we're
providing
some
units
for
at-risk
youth.
I
think
all
that's
on
the
table.
F
F
Yeah,
sorry,
that's
that
good
point
I
forgot
to
mention
that
earlier,
but
we
we
do
show
throughout
the
project
in
each
of
the
housing
each
of
the
housing
projects,
ground,
floor,
town
homes
or
ground
floor
home
ownership
opportunities,
and
you
know
that
was
something
that
was
intriguing
to
a
lot
of
people
as
we
started
to
think
through
how
we
could
deliver
this.
But
you
know
not.
F
The
the
goal
is
to
provide
affordable
units
for
those
that
need
it
most
and
then
get
people
on
a
path
to
eventually,
like
you
said,
being
able
to
earn
equity
and
invest,
and
so
we're
talking
about
with
these
home
ownership
opportunities.
You
know
potential
partnerships
with
multiple
organizations
there
that
could
maybe
deliver
perpetually
affordable
units.
F
The
final
strategy
there
is
still
something
that
we're
working
through.
As
far
as
you
know,
what
is
that?
What's
the
right
mix
of
incomes-
and
you
know,
there's
a
difference,
just
no
question
in
in
how
people
approach
things
if
you're,
renting
it
or
zoning
it,
and
so
we
will
need
to
you,
know
we'll
have
to
have
a
few
more.
I
think
focus
groups
on
what
how
to
get
that
mix
right
and
make
sure
that
people
are
comfortable
with
with
the
ultimate
ownership
of
their
units.
A
C
Yeah
absolutely
so,
this
housing
has
been
like
a
huge
topic
topic
of
conversation
at
our
meetings,
and
what
I
will
say
is
that,
throughout
the
whole
cpc
we've
asked
for
mixed
housing,
so
we
didn't
want
it
to
be
a
development
that
was
all
affordable
or
all
low-income.
We
wanted
it
to
be
mixed,
because
one
of
the
themes
that
went
around
the
meetings
quite
a
bit
was
that
we
wanted
our
children.
C
We
wanted
the
youth
to
see
different
types
of
living
right,
different
levels
of
income,
so
we
want
doctors
to
interact
with
teachers
and
interact
with
grocery
store
workers
like
all
of
it.
We
want
to
see
this
interaction
between
different
levels
of
income,
and
so
one
of
the
things
I
will
say
that
I
think
is
a
huge
win
is
that
65
of
this
development
will
be
at
50,
ami
or
left
right.
65
of
that
development
is
going
to
be
at
50,
ami
or
less,
like
that's
huge,
and
I
feel
like
that
directly.
C
I
really
envision
northsiders
being
within
this
development,
and
so
I
don't
want
to
go
in
too
much
into
that,
but
this
conversation
has
been
one
that
has
just
taken
off
and
taken
a
lot
of
time
in
our
meetings
is
that
we
just
want
to
see
a
diverse
group
within
this
development.
We
want
low
income,
we
want
the
30
ami.
We
we
fought
for
that.
We
pushed
for
that
the
50
ami
not
making
it
where
it's
like,
60
or
70
across
the
board,
because
sometimes
that's
not
attainable.
C
C
We'll
have
these
ground
lakes
groundless
payments
coming
in
that
go
directly
back
into
the
community
to
help
with
displacement
and
to
help
with
other
other
issues
that
may
be
happening,
and
so
having
that
mix
we've
got
the
low
income,
we've
got
the
mid
income
and
then
we've
got
market
rate.
I
think
it'll
all
end
up
working
very
cohesively
together,
but
just
know
like
as
a
committee,
we
were
fighting
for
that
30
percent.
C
A
So
for
those
hearing
ami
and
not
knowing
what
that
is,
that's
what
that
means
and
to
follow
up
about.
You
know
inclusion
with
north
side.
We
have
a
question
around
engagement
with
mckinley
neighborhood
residents,
specifically
with
respect
to
those
who
do
not
have
connections
through
the
internet
to
participate
in
this
meeting
or
others.
C
We've
got
an
open
house
on
the
20th
and
that's
going
to
be
kind
of
a
conversation
like
this,
but
focus
at
mckinley
it'll
be
via
zoom.
We've
also
got
one
scheduled
for
january
10th,
again,
it'll
be
a
conversation
where
people
can
ask
questions,
get
more
in-depth
answers
to
things
that
are
maybe
just
nagging
at
their
brain
a
little
bit
or
that
they
don't
understand.
C
C
C
Drop
us
a
phone
call
voicemail
text
message
612-524-960,
but
if
you
are
able
to
get
online
and
join
in
these
conversations
or
drop
us
an
email,
anything
like
that,
it
just
helps
us
keep
track
of
things
a
little
bit
more,
but
yeah
we're
trying
to
have
conversations
around
this.
I
take
a
number
of
phone
calls
and
emails
literally
every
day
about
this,
but
we're
here
to
listen.
We
want
to
get
your
input,
we
want
to
know
how
best
we
can
serve,
especially
the
mckinley
community
and
what
they
want.
So.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
markella,
and
I
also
want
to
encourage
those
that
are
on
the
call
to
also
share
the
word
that
this
is
out
here.
One
of
the
ways
that
we
get
the
word
out
is
through
community
support,
and
so
you
are
you've
made
it
here.
We
we
we're
very
excited
that
you're
here
and
listening
to
this,
but
we
also
need
your
help
to
make
sure
that
this
gets
out
to
the
broader
world.
A
D
Yes,
certainly
thanks
eric
and
thanks
markella,
since
we
transitioned
to
online
meetings
for
both
the
committee
and
the
learning
tables
and
then
the
park
board
cac
also
went
through
the
same
process
early
in
the
summer
late
in
the
spring
early
in
the
summer,
it's
been
a
bit
of
a
dynamic
process
without
ever
knowing,
quite
when
we'll
be
able
to
be
in
person,
so
some
of
the
in-person
things
we
thought
we'd
be
able
to
do
with
mckinley.
This
fall
proved
to
be
not
possible.
D
There
are
again,
I
think,
a
couple
of
other
radio
spots
coming
up.
We
are
going
to
be
on
kmoj
tomorrow
afternoon
with
anthony
taylor
on
his
minneapolis
360
show,
and
so
that
will
be
another
great
time
to
tune
in
that's
a
1
p.m,
show
and
then
more
events
coming
more
outreach
like
that
coming
up
in
january
as
well,
so
both
december
and
january
will
be
a
combination
of
print
media,
social
media,
online
events
and
then
also
radio
as
well.
A
D
Thanks
for
that
question,
I
think
this
might
be
around
you
know,
kind
of
what's
how
or
how
the
coordinated
plan
might
change
after
approval
and
then
also
maybe
a
little
bit
about
yeah.
I
think,
just
in
general,
what
happens
after
a
coordinated
plan.
So
we
had
touched
on
that
a
little
bit
as
part
of
implementation.
D
Since
phase
one
is
more
advanced
than
phase
two
and
those
development
parcels
will
be
advancing
to
design
and
land
use
approvals
later
this
year
after
getting
through
the
auar
review
process
term
sheets
and
what
would
typically
be
a
land
sale.
But
since
we're
not
selling
the
land,
it
will
be
a
different
process.
D
Those
would
be
advancing
as
part
of
phase
one
and
then
the
conveyance
of
the
land
to
the
park
for
the
park
would
be
advancing
as
well.
And
so,
as
far
as
changes
to
the
coordinated
plan,
I
would
say
there
is
a
bit
to
be
figured.
You
know
worked
out
still
through
the
design
and
land
use
approvals,
and
so
it
would
be
based
on
individual
parcel
process
for
each
individual
parcel
to
get
to
the
redevelopment
agreements.
D
So
I
had
mentioned
term
sheets
and
kind
of
ground
leases
or
land
transactions,
which
then
the
city
council
authorizes
the
the
city
staff.
To
then
go
it
eric.
You
can
get
get
me
here
because
you
might
need
to
bail
me
out,
but
I
don't
have
quite
the
right
phrase,
but
to
enter
into
redevelopment
contract.
B
C
D
The
with
the
development
entity,
so
if
that's
again
a
partnership
between
united
properties
and
if
it's
building
blocks
or
george
group
north,
whatever
the
entity
might
be
together,
then
the
city
would
be
authorized
to
enter
into
redevelopment
contracts
for
those
and
then
phase
two.
I
just
wanted
to
note
thanks
for
a
little
a
little
more
time,
phase
two
needs
more
needs,
more
refining
and
and
defining
so
as
brandon
had
mentioned,
with
the
community
health
and
wellness
hub
and
then
also
the
housing
project,
housing
development.
D
A
Okay,
thank
you
hillary
for
that.
So
I
think
you
know
when
I
think
about
this
process.
I
think
it
is
the
it
is
the
most
extensive
redevelopment
process
in
quite
some
time
in
minneapolis.
We
are
we're
probably
since
heritage
park,
where
we
expanding
the
mckinley
neighborhood
to
the
river,
and
so
there's
many
components,
and
this
is
a
you
know,
multi-year
multi-phase
development
process.
So
the
the
coordinated
plan
is
just
the
next
in
in
that
stage,
with
more
specificity.
A
There
was
a
question
I
forgot
to
follow
up
on
around
the
soils
and
what
happens
to
contaminated
soils.
We've
done
some
research
on
the
property
and
have
found
that
the
site
is
relatively
clean.
There
aren't
a
lot
of
contaminants,
but
with
any
kind
of
redevelopment,
there's
also
there's
always
something
you
find
and
if
you
find
something
you
have
to
go
through
a
response.
Action
plan
with
the
minnesota
pollution
control
agency
and
the
soils
go
to
the
either
remediated
or
cleaned
on
the
sites
based
on.
A
What's
in
the
in
in
the
soils
or
they're
removed
and
they're
they're
brought
to
us
specific
landfill
for
that
contaminant.
So
it
depends
on
what's
in
the
in
the
soil
and
if
it's
really
really
really
really
really
really
really
dirty,
which
we
don't
expect.
Sometimes
you
just
have
to
work
on
it
for
a
long
time
where
it's
at
to
clean
it
up,
so
it
doesn't
move.
A
It
just
gets
clean
where
it
is
so
we're
not
expecting
a
lot,
but
we
will
find
that
out
as
we
as
we
go
along
and
you
can
look
at
those
reports
online
so
back
to
some
some
access
questions
so
a
lot
of
times
with
these
projects,
especially
this
one.
It's
hard
to
envision
what
the
road
is
going
to
look
like
coming
into
the
site
and
the
pictures
are
nice,
but
we
have
all
gone
across
dowling
avenue,
bridge
across
I-94
and
down
to
washington
avenue
where
the
site
entry
is,
and
it's
not
necessarily
all
that
welcoming.
A
So
can
we
nathan
or
alexander
talk
about
the
dowling
upgrades
and
you
know
just
general
access
to
the
site,
including
you
know
up
to
and
through
and
talk
about,
maybe
traffic
when
it
comes
to.
You
know,
big
events
that
might
be
happening
at
the
music
venue,
so
I
don't
know
I
can't
hold
on.
Let
me
go
to
my
so
I'm
going
to
pass
it
off
to
alexander
or
nathan.
Whoever
talks
first
gets
to
answer
the
question.
G
Thanks
eric,
I
can
take
this
one
so
in
regards
to
traffic
we're
taking
a
two-phased
approach,
so
we
are
looking
at
the
existing
traffic
as
well
as
projected
traffic
through
what
we're
expecting
through
the
court.
The
coordinated
plan
is
has
been
presented
today,
as
well
as
looking
what
it
would
be
under
a
if
it
were
to
be
ever
developed
under
the
2040
plan,
so
max
build
up
so
getting
like
a
worst
case
scenario,
so
we're
kind
of
covering
our
bases
from
that
perspective.
G
So
that
includes
looking
at
existing
conditions
the
year
of
opening,
in
this
case,
looking
at
projecting
up
to
2024,
as
well
as
looking
out
way
into
the
future
in
2040
to
get
a
better
understanding
of
what
we're
going
to
be
working
with
from
a
traffic
perspective.
So
we
do
have
that
information.
We're
looking
to
get
that
posted
to
the
upper
harbor
mpls
website
is
eric
highlighted
before
and
I'll
just
mention
from
the
city
of
minneapolis
perspective.
G
That's
a
good
guide
post
of
like
how
we
can
evaluate
and
understand
motor
vehicle
traffic,
but
another
perspective
that
we
are
taking
is
historically.
This
neighborhood
has
been
really
has
a
barrier
between
the
site
and
the
neighborhood
so
accessing
this
has
been
a
huge,
huge
theme
that
we've
been
hearing.
So
while
we
do
understand
that
the
traffic
generated
from
the
site
and
access
is
important,
we
don't
want
to
lose
sight
of
people
being
able
to
safely
and
comfortably
be
able
to
access
the
site,
whether
they're
walking
biking
rolling.
G
So
with
with
these
event,
management
plans,
there's
many
strategies
that
we
take
as
we
go
into
these,
whether
it's
looking
at
shuttling
services
doing
campaigns
as
far
as
making
sure
people
are
aware
of
the
many
ways
in
which
they
can
get
to
the
site,
making
sure
start
times,
don't
impact
some
of
the
peak
hour,
commute
periods,
promoting
transit
using
traffic
control
agents.
So
there
is
a
well
established
suite
of
activities
and,
as
many
people
imagine
whether
it's
through
twins
games,
vikings,
games,
super
bowl.
G
G
Yeah
thanks
eric,
so
we
are
actively
working
with
metro
transit.
So
this
is
more
of
a
three-pronged
approach
in
our
discussions
with
them
is
getting
an
understanding
of
the
existing
service,
whether
it's
the
local
service
on
lindale,
with
the
route
22,
as
well
as
some
of
the
express
server
that
service
that
had
traditionally
been
offered
in
precovered
times
to
the
site.
G
So
much
like
us,
they
want
to
get
a
handle
on
what
the
development
is
to
both
support,
existing
and
future
development
in
the
area
to
get
a
better
handle
on
what
their
service
would
support
and
how
they
would
make
adjustments
to
service.
So
that's
one
lens
we're
working
closely
with
them
on
and
what
makes
sense
as
far
as
adding
new
stops
and
adding
new
service.
G
A
All
right,
thanks
nathan,
I'm
reminded
that
we're
getting
close
to
seven
o'clock.
We
were
hoping
to
have
this
for
about
90
minutes,
but
I
think
with
the
technical
difficulties,
we're
rolling
rolling
a
little
bit,
but
I
want
to
remind
everybody,
we're
going
to
take
about
two
more
questions
and
I'm
going
to
remind
everybody
that
we're
going
to
put
all
these
questions
with
answers
on
the
city's
website.
D
Hi,
okay,
I'm
seeing
someone
nod
so
it
seems
like
you
can
hear
me.
That's
good
I'll!
Try
not
to
look
at
the
screen,
because
then
that
just
throws
me
off
okay,
so
the
northern
green
zone
task
force.
Yes,
also
convenes.
We
have
a
couple
of
important
connections
with
that
group,
namely
that
the
one
of
the
or
the
other
cpc
co-chair.
D
Miss
vanessa
willis
is
also
on
the
northern
green
zone,
task
force
and-
and
I
believe,
is
now
in
potentially
a
chair
position
with
that
group
as
well.
So
we
do
have
a
built-in
connection
there.
We
had
another
committee
member
that
was
also
serving
on
both,
and
so
that
was
a
connection
james
trice
with
the
learning
tables
and
public
policy
project.
Environmental
justice
coordinating
council,
also
known
as
ejcc,
has
been
working
with
that
group
as
well
and
then
also
on
a
staff
level.
D
A
A
For
too
long,
the
city
of
minneapolis
has
grouped
american
descendants
of
slavery
into
categories
of
non-white.
Individuals
and
the
cpc
has
been
very
deliberate
and
specific,
with
us
to
work
on
strategies
that
advantage
black
folks
in
the
north
side,
and
so
you'll
see
that
named
and
we're
going
to
be
working
on
strategies
that
look
at
those
that
are
usually
left
behind
when
projects
like
this
occur.
So
that
is
something
that
is
at
the
forefront
of
this
planning
process.
A
A
A
Community
focused
conversation
about
all
of
the
issues
that
happen
around
this
project
and
we're
talking
about
community
benefits.
Tomorrow,
night
mckinley
has
a
community
conversation
on
the
20th
of
december,
and
then
our
next
open
house,
like
I
said,
will
be
on
the
fifth
that
will
be
in
the
same
format
and
with
that
I
believe
we
have
come
to
the
end
of
our
our
time,
and
I
see
it
is
at
seven
o'clock,
and
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
sticking
around
and
be
well.