►
From YouTube: (2018) 02-13 - Called Council Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
A
Means
a
lot
that
you
were
here.
Thank
you.
Yes,
sir
roll
call.
Just
looking
around
I
can
tell
you
everybody's
present,
move
to
the
approval
of
the
agenda.
We
need
to
amend
the
agenda
to
add
and
a
new
business
number
one
would
be
the
annexation
of
gene,
Bell,
Road
and
then
behind.
That
would
be
the
actual
reason.
A
So
we
would
renumber
and
make
item
number
three.
The
application
of
beer
and
wine
packaged
sales
in
amico
and
and
move
on
down
the
list
from
there
I
need
a
motion
for
approval
of
the
agenda
as
amended.
Please
so
moved
so
moved
mr.
Dickinson.
Second,
second,
mr.
Ross
Bradley,
all
in
favor
all
opposed
motion
carries
old
business.
A
We
have
two
committees
that
need
to
make
a
recommendation
to
the
full
cal
for
approval
of
the
bolo
items
at
the
last
meeting
we
motioned
and
seconded,
and
then
we
kind
of
all
agree,
but
we
didn't
actually
go
through
with
the
motion
or
with
the
vote
so
from
the
airport
committee.
I
want
to
refer
this
to
Logan.
C
A
C
C
C
E
C
H
C
C
C
F
A
A
C
K
L
Following
January
9th
2018
council
minutes,
January
1628
think
at
some
minutes,
January
24,
2018
planning,
encode,
Committee
minutes,
January,
16,
2018,
Planning,
Commission
minutes
January
11
2018,
develop
in
40
minutes,
January,
11th,
2018
convention,
Visitors,
Bureau
minutes
the
renewal
of
the
health
and
ancillary
insurance
as
approved
recommended
by
the
Finance
Committee.
Where
will
the
property
casualty
insurance
as
a
broker
recommended
by
PI
and
submitting
the
approval
of
change?
The
IP
transport?
L
The
gpw
has
approved
on
option
2,
as
recommended
for
cap
above
utilities,
can
move
committee
the
purchase
of
the
cisco
edge
routers,
two
of
them
from
contractor
megahertz
for
a
total
first
69
thousand
pounds.
What
well,
since,
as
a
recommended
for
approved
by
utilities,
committee
purchases
of
fiber
blower
from
Green
Day,
36
thousand
six
hundred
sixty
five
dollar
fifty
cents,
I've
recommended
committing
the
approval
of
the
F
of
T
TX
pricing
as
presented
and
recommended
to
council
five
utilities
committee,
as
well
as
the
two
new
items,
which
is
approval.
L
The
Airport
layout
plan,
as
recommended
to
capsule
by
the
airport
committee,
as
well
as
the
accrual
or
the
amendment
police
vehicle
lease
purchase
through
enterprise
lease
purchase
for
the
sixty
one
thousand,
fifty
four
dollars
and
84
cents,
as
recommended
by
the
Public
Safety
Committee.
That
motion
thank.
A
F
A
F
M
M
M
M
You
see
there.
You
know,
put
him
on
some
type
of
warning
or
something
because
you
know
the
things
that
I
hear
in
the
community
about
him.
You
know
I,
don't
like
that.
His
job
is
to
protect
and
serve
and
listen
to
people
in
the
community.
Not
police,
snitch
I
just
wanted
to
talk
to
him
because
of
a
magazine.
He
was
in
about
drugs
and
other
things.
You
know
because
I
wanted
to
see.
M
Could
he
be
a
middleman
for
me
to
get
an
article
in
the
magazine
about
being
addicted
to
drugs,
not
necessarily
because
you
killed
on
drugs
yourself?
You
can
get
addicted
to
drugs
from
the
doctor,
not
necessarily
yourself,
and
that
was
the
main
reason.
I
was
trying
to
talk
to
him,
but
I
kept
getting
the
runaround
of
how
I
should
have
brought
the
magazine
with
me
with
his
picture
in
it,
but
I
didn't
bring
it,
but
I've
got
it
at
home
and
I.
Don't
think
that's
right!
M
M
M
N
My
name
is
Bradley
Griffin.
My
address
is
35
10
Concord
Road
in
new
born
Georgia,
three
zero,
zero.
Five.
Six
great!
Thank
you
for
coming.
Thank
you.
You
have
five
minutes.
Perfect
I
actually
just
want
to
keep
my
remarks
brief.
I
wanted
the
opportunity
tonight
to
get
to
introduce
myself
to
each
and
every
one
of
you
council
members,
as
well
as
the
attendees
of
this
meeting
tonight.
N
However,
in
an
effort
to
keep
this
brief,
I
just
wanted
to
mention,
you
will
learn
more
about
me
at
Bradley,
Griffin
dot
us
where
I
have
key
positions
in
my
stances
on
those
position
listed,
you
can
also
follow
me
on
twitter
at
a
Gryff
for
Congress
again
I
wanted
to
thank
you.
My
door
is
open.
I
would
like
to
meet
with
every
one
of
you
if
you
wanted
to
have
a
discussion
about
different
issues.
N
A
O
Well,
let
me
get
to
the
right
thing
on
my
agenda
since
it's
a
PDF,
it's
a
little
more
difficult
tonight.
No,
it's
already
on
the
next
item.
Okay,
this
is
a
petition
number
one:
seven,
zero,
zero;
five,
seven
zero!
The
applicant
Lori
Volk
of
Georgia
Markey
Investments
LLC
requests
a
variance
to
allow
the
lot
size
of
arwen
a
zoning
to
be
less
than
7500
square
feet
on
a
four
four
lakh
development
as
she
wishes
to
to
do.
O
They
would
like
like
to
build
those
four
houses
on
point
six:
three
acres
with
a
lot
size
around
sixty
eight
hundred
and
eighty
square
feet,
as
I
mentioned
previously
last
week
that
that's
about
it,
it's
less
than
a
ten
percent
variance
from
the
7,500
square
feet
that
be
required.
Property
has
130
feet
of
road
for
energy,
on
North,
Midland,
Avenue
and
208.
O
Point
nine
four
feet
of
road
frontage:
on
East,
Highland,
Avenue,
132,
point
four
feet
of
road
frontage:
on
North
Madison,
Avenue
code
Department
recommends
approval
at
the
playin
zoning
committee,
Commission
recommended
denial,
but
let's
just
get
that
on
the
record.
Continuing
on
here,
extraordinary
and
exceptional
conditions
pertaining
to
the
subject:
property
because
of
size,
shape
and
topography
are
really
none.
The
literal
application
of
this
ordinance
does
create
an
unnecessary
hardship.
The
variance
would
not
cause
substantial
detriment
to
public
good
or
impair
the
purposes
are
the
intent
of
the
ordinance.
O
The
variance
does
confer
upon
the
property
of
the
applicant,
a
special
privilege
at
night
to
other
properties
in
the
district.
Actually,
that
should
say
does
not
sorry
about
that,
because
anybody
can
apply
for
the
same
variance.
A
special
circumstances
surrounding
their
quest
for
the
variance
are
the
result
of
acts
by
the
applicant.
The
variance
is
not
a
request
to
permit
a
use
of
land
buildings
or
structures
which
is
not
permitted
right
or
by
conditional
use
in
the
district.
The
zoning
proposal
is
not
consistent.
O
I'd
have
to
work
on
my
typing
and
reading
skills.
His
only
proposal
is
is
consistent
with
the
construction
and
design
standards
adopted
by
the
City
of
Monroe.
The
variance
is
a
minimum
variance
that
will
make
possible
an
economically
viable
use
of
the
land
buildings
and
structures
put
some
notes
at
the
bottom.
The
minimum
house
size
would
be
1,300
square
feet
on
this
infill
development.
The
materials
in
design
may
be
specified
as
conditions
of
the
variance
and
the
proposed
materials
and
designs
exceed
those
required
by
the
zoning
ordinance.
That
is
the
proposal
for
this
variance.
O
G
I
A
A
H
E
D
H
J
For
clarification
only
be
absolutely
sure
that
we're
talking
about
the
same
thing
to
me.
It
doesn't
matter
whether
they're
single
stories
story
and
a
half
I
just
want
to
make
sure
they
look
appropriate
because
what
you
presented
is
you're
gonna
build
these
historic,
floating
cottages,
steep
roof
pitches.
That
sort
of
thing
we
wouldn't
want
these
things
to
get
built
and
all
the
sudden
they're.
You
know
four
and
twelve
roofs
and
don't
look
anything
like
what
you
presented.
J
So
what
you're
assuring
this
is
those
illustrations
that
you
gave
us
that's
what
these
cottages
are
going
to
look
like,
because
this
is
an
infill
development.
That's
supposed
to
it's,
not
a
historic
district.
That's
supposed
to
look
historically
correct
and
look
very
much
like
the
house
that
you
constructed
across
from
the
school
down
the
street,
so
you're
assuring
us.
Yes,.
P
O
O
Minimum
square
footage
required
since
it's
a
business
zoning
classification
they're
not
asking
for
a
reason,
would
require-
are
one
a
minimum
house
size
standards
by
the
zoning
on
it.
So
you
can
build
a
house
in
practically
all
our
zoning
categories,
but
minimum
requirement
for
the
three
no
b2
would
be
the
r1,
a
standards
which
1,300
square
feet.
Now
you
can
make
it
a
condition.
P
P
G
H
G
F
A
A
Q
To
speak
in
favor
of
this
variance,
I
think
it's
a
good
use
for
the
lot
it's
been
on
the
market
for
a
while
and
I
think
it
works
better
with
four
units
than
it
does
with
three.
What
makes
it
work
so
well
is
the
shared
drive
coming
in
off
of
Highland.
So
with
the
space
you
gain
from
the
shared
drive,
I
think
you
know,
the
10%
decrease
is
justifiable,
so
I
very
much
like
to
see
council
grant
this
very
much.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
So
much
by
the
way,
we're
we're
looking
forward
to
the
development
beginning
over
in
front
of
mill.
Thank
you
for
coming
any
other,
any
others
who'd
like
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
variance
do
we
have
anyone
who'd
like
to
speak
against
the
variance
hearing.
Then,
let's
move
forward
to
have
a
motion
to
approve.
J
A
O
You
again,
mr.
mayor,
this
petition
number
one:
seven:
zero,
zero,
five
six,
eight,
the
applicant
Derrick
barrel,
Perry
request
a
rezone
and
annexation
for
property
located
at
three
eighty
nine
and
zero
gene
Bell
Road
address
assigned
by
the
county.
The
property
has
approximately
575
feet
of
road
frontage
on
gene
Bell
Road,
the
property
is
presently
zoned.
R1
County
requested
zoning
classification
is
r1,
a
city
requested
zoning
will
permit
a
use
that
is
suitable
in
view
of
the
use
and
development
of
adjacent
and
nearby
property.
A
change
of
zoning
will
not
adversely
affect
existing
adjacent
property.
O
O
The
Planning
Zoning
Commission
recommended
approval
of
some
with
the
listed
conditions
down
at
the
bottom
of
the
petition
page
in
front
of
you.
Coach
recommendation
at
this
point
would
be
to
study
the
issue
further
based
on
environmental
concerns
of
the
floodplain
and
also
to
potentially
recommend
that
we
we
do
not
approve
it.
O
Based
on
that
concern
and
and
the
fact
that
it's
been
before
us
before
and
and
was
considered
and
turned
down
at
that
time,
as
well
at
least
once
I
don't
know
if
there
was
an
additional
application
or
not,
but
the
recommended
conditions
are
that
it
be
a
55
and
older
development,
1,650
square
feet,
minimum
house
size
know
vinyl,
siding
except
friend,
the
soffits
and
overhangs.
You
know
the
property
does,
as
proposed,
does
meet
the
requirements
of
our
1a
zoning.
F
O
It's
kind
of
a
tough
question:
it's
a
property
and
it's
outside
the
city,
so
he
can
ask
for
both.
I
I
mean
I,
don't
know
what
what
criteria
you're
you
might
be
talking
about,
but
that's
only
to
correct
criteria.
You
need
to
request
a
rezoning
annexation.
This
be
outside
the
city
limits
and
want
to
change.
The
zoning
didn't.
D
E
E
D
E
O
You're
going
around
Carver
middle
school
from
the
city
limits
wherever
they
end
on
Church
Street,
which
has
been
extended
now
well,
actually
the
road
to
what
wasn't
a
next
on
Joe
Dixon's
annexation,
but
that
city
limit
would
be
somewhere
across
from
Carver
middle
school
and
then
go
around
all
the
way
to
this,
which
has
575
feet
of
road
frontage,
depending
on
where
they
put
the
driveway
that
one
that
changed.
The
total.
That.
A
R
R
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
say
thank
you
councilman.
You
know
mayor
for
listening
to
me
and
y'all
being
here
and
thank
you
for
what
y'all
doing
for
the
city
I
like
to
tell
you
thank
you
and
I.
Guess
I
like
to
start
out
and
say
you
know:
I
owned
this
property
for
approximately
twelve
and
a
half
years
and
I
have
been
in
here.
I
have
been
in
here
once
in
2015,
asking
for
annexation
and
I.
Think
miss
Malcolm
is
correct.
R
I
think
you
know
at
that
time
the
the
the
city
was
actually
the
the
line
was
back
further,
but
I
think
now
we're
only
like
a
you
know
that
she's
talking
about
going
out
of
the
city
I
think
we're
only
talking
about.
Maybe
an
eighth
of
a
mile
at
the
very
mother
said:
I
mean
it's
just
in
the
back
part
of
my
property
actually
actually
touches
the
city.
Now
you
can't
access
through
that
way,
because
that
subdivision
has
not
been
done.
R
The
sewer
actually
runs
straight
through
my
property,
and
you
know
with
the
sewer
going
through
there.
You
know
it
when
I
actually
purchased
the
property
twelve
and
a
half
years
ago
we
felt
like
you
know
that
we
could
get
this
thing
zoned
and
annexed
and
I
wasn't
even
going.
You
know,
try
to
bring
it
into
the
city.
R
I
was
actually,
it
was
gonna,
be
a
County
thing,
and
then
we
found
out
that
we
couldn't
time
to
the
sewer,
because
it
was
not
in
this
in
the
city
and
what
I'm
asking
you
know
is,
you
know,
like
patrick,
said,
annexation
into
the
city.
I
want
to
build
55
and
older
homes
in
here,
I
think
the
the
code
for
the
city,
you
know,
I,
think
it's
1,300
square
feet,
I
think
most
of
these
homes
that
actually
that
we're
gonna
would
like
to
build
if
y'all
would
approve.
R
This
will
be
anywhere
from
1600
to
roughly
2,100
feet
square
feet,
they'll
be
all
brick
homes,
I
did
say
in
the
planning.
Zoning
that
it
would
be
I
might
have
to
go
in
the
soffits
with
some
vinyl.
But
you
know
if
you
I'd,
be
glad
to
put
take
that
out.
We
use
Hardy
plane,
but
it
before
side
break
I'm,
just
I'm,
just
not
down
here.
Just
trying
to
put
some
junk
in
the
city.
I
want
to
do
something.
That's
nice,
there's
55,
an
older
thing.
I
didn't
really
know
much
about
it.
R
The
last
time
I
tried
to
come
in
and
get
rezone.
I
didn't
have
that
in
there,
but
since
in
my
mother
and
father-in-law,
they
actually
live
in
55,
an
older
subdivision
and
it
works
out
very
good,
and
this
is
the
reason
that
I'd
like
to
be
in
the
city.
One
to
have
sewer
but
I
mean
y'all.
Have
everything
it's
like
a
one
stop
column
and
you'll
have
the
sewer
y'all.
Have
you
know
everything
you'll
have
the
electricity,
the
water
and
everything?
R
So
you
know
if
they
were
in
there
I
mean
it
makes
it
easy,
but
it's
55
and
over
community
that's
been
very
nice
for
my
mother
and
father-in-law,
it's
been,
you
know
having
smaller
Lots
they'll
all
be
all
these
homes
will
be.
You
know
single-story
homes,
you
know
you'll
have
somebody
cutting
the
grass
and
all,
and
you
know
provided
what
y'all
say.
R
You
know
it
would
be
a
gated
community
or
with
you
know,
I
didn't
know
how
the
access
would
be
that
for
the
fire
department,
but
I
mean
I
can
do
either
way
on
that
I
get
give
them
a
code.
You
know,
if
that's
what
we
needed
to
do
on
that,
and
the
other
thing
is
with
the
55
and
older
I
feel
like
the
the
impact
you
know.
As
far
as
the
schools
we're
not
going
to
impact
the
school
systems,
you
know
with
that.
R
With
that
community
they've
run
sidewalk
all
the
way
down,
I
think
Church
Street
to
pretty
much
the
school
down
there
now
I
mean
so
people
would
have
access.
You
know
where
they
could.
You
know
wall
I'm
I
want
to
build
the
you
know
the
the
homes
I'm
gonna
have
like
walking
trails
and
all
down
there.
I'm
walking
trails
course
we're
going
outside
walking
both
sides,
because
that's
the
city,
ordinance
and
and
I
mean
you
know,
like
I,
said
I'm
not
wanting
to
come
in
here
and
build
junk.
R
We
want
to
build
something,
that's
very
nice,
something
that
the
city
would
like
having
down
here
in
the
city,
something
that
that
older
folks
would
like
to
live
in
and
it's
going
to
be
a
little
upkeep.
You
know
no
yard
upkeep,
you
know
the
houses,
you
know.
Let's
say
we
go
with
hardiplank
or
you
know,
for
the
soffits,
all
brick
homes,
wood
windows,
we're
not
coming
in
here
with
some
cheap
vinyl
windows
and
all
that
stuff.
R
It's
not
gonna,
be
nothing
like
that
and
as
far
as
the
floodplain
area,
I
know
that
that
there
you
know
if
we
we've
got,
you've
got
32
acres.
Basically
with
the
land,
you
have
32
acres,
we're
asking
for
45
Lots
and
if
you
take
32
acres
and
you
figure
that
it
comes
with
about
1.4
Lots
based
on
the
32
acres,
all
right,
you
know,
if
you
get
two
or
one
a
zoning,
you
know,
I
could
be
five
lives.
R
I
have
lots
to
the
acre
if
I'm,
if
I'm
raiding
the
stuff
right
all
right
with
five
Lots
to
the
acre.
You
know
you
take
five.
Thirteen
thirty-two,
you
know
a
that's
160
Lots
could
go
in
there,
so
I'm
taking
out
for
the
floodplain
in
the
floodplain
I
mean
you.
You
can
see
on
the
plans
here
that
we
have
all
that's
been
considered.
R
So
if
you
take
that,
if
you
was
getting
to
lots
to
the
acre,
you
know
if
you,
if
you
were
getting
to
lots
to
the
acre-
and
you
say
well
Harold
it
there's
only
out
of
32
acres,
there's
only
20
usable
acres,
okay!
Well,
if
you
do
20
20
times
five
based
on
y'all's
zoning,
you
know,
if
you
did,
they
25
five.
That
would
be
a
hundred
Lots!
R
Okay,
if
you
did
three,
you
know,
I
mean
you'd
have
sixty
Lots,
basically,
but
up,
but
all
I'm
asking
for
it
would
be
like
45,
Lots
and
I
mean
I,
think
the
impact
of
the
city.
You
know
I
mean
as
far
as
a
sewage
and
won't
be
any
impact
really
on
the
schools
and
I
and
I
just
I.
Just
think
this
would
be
a
good
thing
to
have
in
the
city.
R
I
mean
you
know,
and
you
know
I
know,
and
I
and
I'm
asking
for
y'all
to
really
consider
this
because
I
mean
I,
said
I'm
really
like
for
this
to
work
out
and
and
be
here
for
the
city.
I
mean
y'all,
got
a
beautiful
city
down
here
and
I'm,
certainly
not
going
to
come
down
here
and
put
some
junk
in
here
that
you
know
we
wouldn't
want
I,
wouldn't
want
to
live
in
myself
and
that's
that's
pretty
much.
It
and
I
mean
I.
Just
asked
for
y'all's
consideration
and
I
appreciate.
You
know
folk.
A
R
A
J
R
L
J
A
D
C
C
F
A
C
L
A
L
A
F
A
Hearing
none
all
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
all
opposed,
like
sign
motion,
carries
moving
to
the
appointment
of
the
tree
board
to
reappoint
miss
Susan,
Brown
she's,
very
active
in
our
community,
and
we
do
appreciate
her
service.
This
will
be
a
three
year
term,
expiring
in
March
of
2021
Ms
Brown
would
like
to
continue.
You
could
have
a
motion
to
reappoint
her.
My.
G
F
L
Brief,
this
is
mr.
Kelly's
ordinance
amendment
that
he
brought
before
you
to
amend
the
development
regulations.
I'll
refer
any
specific
questions
to
him,
but
I'll
provide
the
second
reading.
This
is
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
city,
the
code
City
Monroe
Georgia,
to
revise
our
development
regulations
as
follows.
L
916
access,
Mendon
driveways
following
standard,
shall
apply
to
land
subdivision
development,
except
for
single-family
dwelling
units
or
industrial
development,
where
the
primary
access
is
from
a
state
or
federal
highway
where
a
thoroughfare
classified
as
a
major
collector
or
arterial
in
the
City
of
Monroe
development
regulations.
These
standards
more
restrictive
standards
required
by
the
Georgia
Department
of
Transportation
nine-point,
16.1,
joint
and
cross
access
section.
G
O
That's
the
vision
and
planning
that
we've
been
having
on
those
items,
and
we
just
we
just
thought
it'd
be
right
now-
would
be
the
best
time
before
some
of
these
really
large
tracts
start
to
develop
with
a
pattern
that
we
no
longer
desire
and
similar
to.
As
the
example,
most
people
bring
up
the
Spring
Street
corridor
going
between
town
highway,
138.
O
O
O
G
O
Sir,
because
it
does
not
cover
single-family
residences,
so
if
you
have
a
single
lot
with
a
single
house
on
it
and
you're
on
a
road,
you
can
access
that
road,
because
that's
your
right
to
put
a
driveway
in
for
that.
For
that
property,
where
the
confusion
was
lying
last
time
we
discussed.
This
was
where
it
said
it
didn't
apply
to
subdivisions,
and
that
was
because
subdivisions
are
a
large
tract
and
they're
going
to
have
an
entrance
or
two
and
those
would
require
some
separation.
O
But
the
individual
house
is
inside
on
the
interior
of
that
subdivision,
as
they
develop
on
neighborhood
streets
would
all
have
a
driveway,
and
there
wouldn't
be
these
spacing
requirements
on
an
individual
house
and
to
be
perfectly
honest,
I
wrote
this
best.
I
could
I
know
100
percent.
Have
it
all
down
pat
yeah
either.
This
is
the
best
option
that
we
could
come
up
with
in
order
to
avoid
a
detrimental
development
pattern.
E
F
E
O
I
A
A
Have
a
motion
to
approve
sir?
My
name
is
Malcolm
a
second
by
mr.
Dickinson,
all
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
All
opposed,
like
son
motion,
carries
moving
along
to
the
disclosure
that
we
have
the
potential
of
conflicts
of
interest
for
the
2018
CDBG
application,
I'm
going
to
refer
to
mr.
Garrett.
First
to
read
his
conflict
of
interest
statement
as.
D
Required
by
the
Georgia
Department
of
Community
Fair
guidelines
for
conflict
adventures,
I
am
publicly
disclosing
that
I
live
at
1240
for
South
Madison,
Avenue
I
own
that
property.
Furthermore,
I
was
not
part
of
the
meeting
selection
process
to
choose
this
targeted
air
I
was
sustained
from
this
voting
matter
regarding
to
this
project
during
the
application
phase
and
if
fun,
if
it
is
funded.
D
L
You
mayor
as
require
about
George
Department
community
affairs
guidelines
with
conflicts
of
interest,
I
am
publicly
disclosing
here
tonight
that
I
am
the
managing
member
and
a
beneficial
interest
owner
of
old
Monroe
mill
LLC,
which
does
on
multiple
parcels
and
properties
within
the
proposed
target
area.
Furthermore,
I
am
declaring
and
publicly
disclosing
that
I
was
not
part
of
the
meeting
or
selection
process
that
shows
the
proposed
target
area
myself,
along
with
my
office,
will
stain
from
all
legal
council
matters
regarding
this
project
during
the
application
phase
and
if
it
is
funded
and
mr.
L
L
Please
Thank
You
Barry
I'll
be
happy
to
read
this
for
you:
City
of
Monroe
fiscal
year,
2018
CDBG
application
resolution,
whereas
the
Georgia
Department
of
Community
Affairs
established
the
Community
Development,
Block
Grant
program
to
assist
cities
and
counties
of
improvements,
public
facilities,
economic
development
and
housing
in
Georgia
and
whereas
there
exist
in
the
city,
need
to
provide
water
and
sewer
improvements.
The
city
Moroz
fiscal
year,
2018
CDBG
target
area
now,
therefore
be
it
was
all
about
the
mayor
and
mayor
in
Monroe,
City
Council.
But
the
city
supports
the
application
for
fiscal
year.
L
As
may
be
required,
via
FURTHER
RESOLVED,
the
mayor's
authorized
to
enter
into
an
agreement
for
engineering
and
grant
administration
services
relating
the
application
and
subsequent
grant,
if
funded,
and
to
execute
the
application.
The
other
required
documents
on
behalf
of
the
city,
including
the
grant
award
package
of
fun
to
be
it
FURTHER
RESOLVED,
the
city,
commits
own
operate
and
maintain
all
the
proposed
improvements
be
further
resolved.
The
city
hereby
adopts
the
citizen
participation
plan
of
the
Georgia
Department
of
Community
Affairs
to
ensure
public
involvement
in
the
CDBG
process.
L
The
further
resolved
the
city
hereby
acknowledges
that
the
proposed
project
is
subject
to
the
requirements
of
section
3,
the
Housing
and
Urban
Development
Act
of
1968
as
amended
at
12
USC,
170
L,
you
section
3
and
in
accordance
with
the
drawer,
Department
Community
Affairs
Section.
Three
compliance
plan
will,
to
the
greatest
extent
fees
will
comply
with
all
section
three
requirements.
The
further
the
result.
L
The
City
hereby
acknowledges
that
the
pros
project
is
being
is
subject
to
the
requirements
of
title:
eight
of
Civil
Rights
Act
of
1968
Fair,
Housing
Act,
as
amended
section
104,
B
2
of
the
Housing
and
Community
Development
Act
1974,
as
amended
in
section
105
B
3
of
the
National,
affordable
housing
act
of
1990.
The
city
hereby
commit
to
affirmatively
furthering
fair
housing
to
the
greatest
extent
feasible.
The
further
resolved
the
city
hereby
acknowledges
that
the
proposed
project
is
subject
to
the
requirements
of
section
504
of
the
Rehabilitation
Act
of
1973.
L
As
amended
title
2,
the
Americans
with
Disabilities
Act
of
1990
and
the
architectural
barriers
Act
of
1968.
The
city
hereby
commits
to
comply
with
all
section
504
requirements
of
the
greatest
feasible.
Be
it
further
resolved
that
the
proposed
water
and
sewer
improvements
are,
in
conformance
with
the
city
of
Monroe's
comprehensive
plan
and
are
not
inconsistent
with
the
city
service.
Delivery
strategy
be
further
resolved
that
a
true
and
dedicated
commitment
has
been
made
to
the
project
for
the
successful
completion
of
the
above
improvements
for
the
citizens,
especially
the
city's
low
to
moderate
income
citizens.
A
F
A
L
Be
happy
to
I'll
refer
any
questions
to
mr.
Probst
or
I'll,
be
happy
to
answer
myself
as
well
and
I
know.
Mr.
Kelly
will
be
happy
to
answer
them
as
well,
and
this
is
a
resolution
of
the
mayor
of
the
council,
the
city
Monroe
state
of
Georgia,
to
impose
a
six-month
moratorium
on
the
acceptance
of
applications
for
rezoning
or
annexation
to
r1a
zoning.
L
Whereas
the
city
Monroe
Georgia,
has
been
vested
with
substantial
power
to
regulate
the
use
of
property
within
the
city
for
the
purposes
of
maintaining
the
help,
moral
safety,
security,
peace
and
general
welfare
of
the
city.
And
whereas
the
city
has
the
legislative
power
to
adopt
reasonable
resolutions
or
regulations
relating
to
property
within
the
city
for
which
no
provision
has
been
made
by
general
law
in
which
are
not
inconsistent
with
the
Constitution
of
the
state
of
Georgia
or
any
charter
provision
applicable
thereto.
L
And
whereas
the
mayor
and
city
council
have,
as
part
of
planning,
zoning
and
growth
management
effort
been
in
review
of
the
city's
current
zoning
ordinances
and
studying
the
city's
estimates
and
projections
regarding
the
anticipated
type
of
development
within
the
city.
And
whereas
the
mayor
and
city
council
has
part
of
planning.
Zoning
in
growth
management
efforts
and
strategy
for
the
city
have
called
for
continued
city
staff,
review
and
overview
of
the
current
mix
of
housing
available
and
projections
on
the
future
mix
of
housing
within
the
city.
L
And
whereas
the
mayor
and
city
council
do
not
intend
to
frustrate
developments
that
have
been
recently
rezone
nor
to
affect
any
development
rights
that
have
vested
as
of
the
date
of
this
resolution.
And
whereas
the
mayor
and
city
council
recognize
the
need
for
zoning
classification
in
the
city
referred
to
as
medium
want,
residential
district
or
1a,
and
whereas
the
mayor
and
city
council
recognize
the
stated
goal
of
the
Arwen.
A
zoning
classification
is
to
provide
for
areas
of
medium
density,
detached
single-family,
residential
uses
to
recognize
and
protect.
L
The
moderate
lot
size
street
grid
based
and
highly
pedestrian
character
of
the
city's
turn-of-the-century,
neighborhoods
and
subdivision
subdivisions
to
reinforce
the
traditional
residential
development
pattern.
Characteristics
characteristic
of
the
historic
areas
of
the
city
to
permit
compatible
accessory
uses
which
normally
compliment
balanced
and
attractive
residential
uses
to
stabilize
and
protect
owner-occupied
housing
and
encourage
a
suitable
environment
for
family
life
and
to
protect
moderate
density,
single-family
residential
areas
from
encroachment
of
higher
density,
residential
and
incompatible
non-residential
uses.
L
And
whereas
the
mayor
and
city
council
recognize
the
recent
reasons
and
annexations
of
property
in
the
city
to
the
r-1.
A
classification
do
not
support
the
stated
goals
of
the
Arwen,
a
zoning
classification,
but
instead
lend
themselves
to
isolate
it
and
remote
tract
developments
that
do
not
promote
the
street
grid
of
the
city,
nor
the
highly
pedestrian
character
of
the
city's
turn-of-the-century
neighborhoods.
L
And
such
developments
will
not
reinforce
the
traditional
residential
development
patterns
characteristic
of
the
much
desired
historic
areas
of
the
city
and
where,
as
comparatively
dense
developments
associated
with
our
1,
a
zoning
not
centrally
located
in
the
city's
core
downtown
area,
potentially
impact
the
city,
resources
and
city
services
such
as
water
sewer,
traffic
and
public
safety
in
a
disproportionate
level
as
compared
to
other
forms
and
zonings
of
residential
developments
such
as
r1.
And
whereas
the
mayor
and
city
council
are
concerned.
L
And
whereas
the
mayor
and
city
council
hold
a
strong
belief
in
maintaining
public
objective
objectives
of
aesthetics,
conservation
of
the
value
of
existing
lands
and
buildings
within
the
city,
making
the
most
appropriate
use
of
land
and
other
resources,
preserving
neighborhood
characteristics.
Enhancing
to
protecting
the
economic
well-being
of
the
community,
facilitating
adequate
provisions
of
public
services
and
preserving
resources
of
the
city.
L
And
whereas
the
mayor
and
city
council
holds
strong
belief
in
developing
a
cohesive,
coherent
policy
regarding
land
use
in
the
city
intend
to
promote
community
development
through
stable
balance,
growth
for
the
prosperity
of
the
city
as
a
whole.
And
whereas
this
is
where
and
where.
As
the
mayor
and
city
council
are
directing
city
staff.
L
To
study
the
current
mix
of
housing
make
projections
on
the
future
mix
of
housing
and
impacts
are
the
same
and
to
make
recommendation
as
to
the
contemplated
pending
zoning
regulations
and
updates,
and
whereas
the
mayor
and
city
council
are
directing
city
staff
to
engage
a
well-qualified
land
planner
to
study.
The
current
mix
of
housing
within
the
City
of
Monroe
projections
is
the
future
mix
of
housing.
L
Impacts
are
the
same
and
to
make
recommendations
as
to
the
contemplated
pending
zoning
regulations
and
updates,
and
whereas
the
mayor
and
city
council
have
determined
that
it
is
in
the
best
interest
of
the
city
for
the
protection
of
the
health
and
public
safety
that
there
be
implemented.
A
moratorium
on
the
acceptance
of
applications
for
rezoning
or
annexation
within
the
city
for
zoning
into
the
r-1,
a
zoning
classification
for
a
sufficient
and
reasonable
time
to
allow
for
a
comprehensive
and
in-depth
review
and
modification
of
the
city's
comprehensive
future
land-use
plan.
L
This
moratorium
shall
have
no
impact
on
any
land,
development
building
or
construction
permits
for
any
property.
Currently
zoned
r1
a
at
the
time
of
the
adoption
of
this
resolution,
section
4.
This
moratorium
shall
have
no
effect
on
the
issuance
of
permits
or
site
plan
reviews
for
any
property
he's
owned
our
one
a
time
of
the
adoption.
His
resolution
section.
Five,
during
the
six
month
period,
the
city
staff
shall
study
the
current
mix
of
housing.
L
Make
projections
on
the
future
mix
of
housing
and
impacts
are
the
same
and
make
recommendations
as
to
the
contemplated
pending
zoning
regulations
and
updates
to
further
the
city's
interest
in
growth
management
so
as
to
promote
the
traditional
police
powers,
power,
goals
of
health
safety,
morals
aesthetics
and
the
general
welfare
of
the
city
section
six.
During
the
six
month
period,
the
city
staff
is
further
hereby
directed
to
engage
a
well-qualified
land
planner
to
study
the
current
mix
of
housing.
L
Make
projections
on
the
future
mix
of
housing
and
impacts
are
the
same
and
to
make
recommendations
as
to
the
couple
pending
zoning
regulations
and
updates
to
further
the
city's
interest
in
growth
management
so
as
to
promote
the
traditional
police
power
goals
of
health
safety,
morals,
aesthetics
in
the
general
welfare
of
the
city
section.
Seven:
this
moratorium
shall
become
effective
upon
its
adoption,
so
resolved
this
13th
day
of
February
2018.
That
is
the
resolution
there.
Thank.
A
E
C
I
think
six
months
is
long
enough
to
go
ahead
and
engage,
as
stated
in
this
resolution,
engaged
that
third
party
planner
to
get
the
ball
rolling,
we'll
go
ahead
and
bring
back
some
options
for
additional
zoning
classifications
to
you
at
a
later
date.
But
I
would
certainly
think
that's
that
can
be
accomplished
by
August
13.
G
G
In
please
the
one
the
way
it
talks
about
that
where's,
the
mayor,
City
Council,
recognize
the
recent
result
in
that
accessions
or
property
to
do
not
support
the
state
of
goals
in
the
sector
and
then,
after
that
believe
the
recent
or
when
Avery's
owns
the
next
section
property
would
instead
cream
or
my
block
I,
think
there's
two
paragraphs
has
written
a
very
critical
of
the
council
decisions
made
recently
and
I
think
they're
totally
inappropriate
to
put
in
a
resolution
at
this
point.
So
I
would
move
those
two
paragraphs
be
stricken
from
the
resolution.
I.
A
A
F
A
Like
sign,
motion
carries
great
meeting.
I
did
want
to
introduce.
We
had
a
couple
of
Boy
Scouts
who
were
in
the
the
back
of
the
room,
who
apparently
thought
we
were
long-winded,
so
they
took
off,
but
we
were
glad
they
were
here
could
have
a
motion
to
adjourn.
Please
tell
me
second
by
mr.
Malcolm,
a
second
by
mr.
Adcock,
all
in
favor
all
opposed
hearing
that
motion
carries
meeting
is
adjourned.