►
From YouTube: (2022) 08-16 - Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
A
C
C
B
All
businesses
all
right
proposed
on
the
agenda.
C
B
B
Okay,
so
the
request
before
planet
commission
this
evening
is
for
a
reason
modification.
The
property
is
currently
zoned
pcd.
They
are
requesting
to
modify
that
zoning
pcd
with
modifications,
and
the
request
before
planning
commission
is
to
revise
the
development
pretty
much
in
its
entirety
to
a
mixed-use,
multi-family
and
commercial
development.
B
It's
a
big,
quick
snapshot
of
the
proposed
plan
before
you,
but
just
briefly
the
current
plan.
It
is
for
a
pcd
they
were
proposing.
This
was
seen
by
planning
commission
sometime
last
year.
They
were
proposing
to
subdivide
the
property
into
four
large
outlots
with
a
public
street
in
basically
the
center
of
the
development,
with
access
off
78
and
maycock
avenue,
and
that
was
approved.
I
believe
that
was
august
of
last
year
by
city
council
for
the
pcd
zoning,
so
that
was
the
current
plan.
B
The
permits
for
the
access
off
of
78
have
already
been
approved
by
gdot
and
they
were
limited
to
one
and
then
the
access
here
off
aycock
avenues
proposed
with
some
improvements,
including
runaway
dedication.
Some
turn
lane
improvements
and
that's
associated
with
a
proposed
traffic
signal
that
the
applicant's
already
been
approved
for
by
gdot.
So
some
of
the
highlights
of
the
development
here
just
statistically
the
multi-family
residential,
is
roughly
24
and
a
half
acres.
B
A
total
maximum
number
of
units
proposed
is
282.
they're,
proposing
the
one
and
a
half
spaces
per
unit
for
parking
which
is
standard
in
our
ordinance
for
multi-family
development.
It
comes
out
to
be
423
parking
spaces,
they're,
proposing
a
maximum
building
height
for
those
multi-family
buildings
at
three
stories
and
then
unit
sizes-
you
would
have
your
one
bedroom
range
would
be
800
square
feet.
Two
bedrooms
would
start
at
a
thousand
and
three
bedrooms
would
be
12
and
up
the
commercial
out
lot
was
only
one
out
lot.
B
It's
got
basically
1.85
acres
in
that
area
and
they're,
proposing
a
maximum
building
footprint
of
5
000
square
feet.
They
are
proposing
uses
within
our
zoning
ordinance
to
be
within
the
range
of
the
b3
district
they're
going
to
park
it
also
within
our
zoning
order.
Specs
the
max
building
height
for
that
building
will
be
25
feet,
so
you're,
basically
looking
at
a
one-story
structure
there,
and
then
they
are
proposing
some
20-foot
landscape
buffers.
B
Those
details
were
specifically
in
the
packet
that
was
provided
to
you.
I
didn't
cover
that
here
on
this
plan,
but,
as
you
can
see,
they've
illustrated
here
on
their
plan
a
substantial
amount
of
landscaping
to
be
associated
with
the
multi-family
project
here
adjacent
to
78
and
then
they're
kind
of
illustrating
that
20-foot
landscape
buffer
between
the
commercial
outlet
and
the
multi-family
development
itself.
B
So
the
staff's,
taking
a
look
at
the
request
and
we've
basically
recommended
two
conditions
for
the
rezone
modification,
the
multi-family
residential
development,
we're
making
a
recommendation
that
they
go
with
option
b.
I
didn't
present
that
on
a
slide
too,
so
I
apologize,
but
there
were
two
options
proposed
in
their
plan
book
one
was
option:
a
one
was
option
b:
option
b
had
a
more
of
a
parapet.
Wall,
look
a
classic
revival,
appearance.
B
We
were
favoring
that
from
the
staff's
perspective
and
then
the
second
condition
was
regarding
proposed
sanitary
sewer
location,
that's
on
their
site
plan,
there's
currently
a
sanitary
sewer
line
that
the
city
has
running
from
acog
down
here
to
jacks,
creek
and
they're,
proposing
as
part
of
their
development,
to
relocate
that
so
we're
just
addressing
that
in
the
condition
that
that
would
occur
at
the
developers.
Expense.
B
B
So
the
city
does
not
control
these
access
points
here.
This
is
obviously
within
the
realm
of
gdot's
authority.
They've
been
approved
for
one
and
one
only,
and
that
was
this
entrance
here
and
then
they
are
approved
for
the
traffic
signal
here
in
some
right-of-way
dedication
and
improvements
here
along
acog.
B
They
were
approved
for
those
under
the
previous
land,
disturbance,
permit
and
they're
actually
out
there
developing
those
improvements
now,
and
that
was
part
of
the
reason
from
last
year.
So
the
constraints
of
our
development
regulations
wouldn't
permit
a
third
entrance
on
acock
avenue.
They
would
need
more
than
600
linear
feet
of
furniture,
so
they're
only
going
to
be
allowed
one
entrance
per
300
feet,
and
this
is
roughly
600
square
600
linear
feet
along
that
frontage.
B
A
D
Any
questions
or
concerns
and
go
over
any
any
details.
We
have
our
team,
that's
here
from
our
land,
planters,
green
river
builders,
who
are
looking
to
purchase
a
property
to
build
the
actual
multi-family
itself
and
the
architect
and
pretty
much
anybody
that
can
answer
any
questions
that
you
have
we're
here
for
you.
A
I
have
one
question
about
the
the
I
guess
that
would
be
the
northern
or
eastern
access
point
on
aycock
and
they
called
acoc
aconc.
B
D
You'll
be
turning
left
to
come
back
to
the
red
light,
so
that
you
can
turn
the
left
back
on
to
78.
the
way
that
g
dot
looked
at
that
back
up.
I.
D
You're,
fine,
the
the
when
we
went
to
gdot
about
getting
the
signal
approved
part
of
the
their
you
know,
stipulations
on
that
were
to
allow
people
to
come
back
to
the
red
light.
They
were
building,
so
they
can
turn
left
onto
78.
Once
the
bypass
is
complete,
all
the
traffic
that'll
be
pushed.
You
know
around
monroe
will
come
down
tunisia
and
then
they'll
turn
left
to
go
back
onto
78
up
to
highway,
11
and
then
go
north,
so
it
would
create
more
traffic
and
more
problems.
D
A
B
D
C
I
just
have
one
question
about
the
the
breakdown
of
units:
one
bedroom,
two
and
three:
what's
the
thinking
behind.
D
Eighty
percent
of
those
are
gonna,
be
one
bedroom
units,
and
the
purpose
of
that
behind
that
is
is
the
monroe
needs,
workforce,
housing,
professional
housing
for
folks
that
are
just
out
of
college
new
teachers,
new
lawyers,
whoever
is
coming
into
the
area
when
game
changers
did
the
study
they
went
down
and
interviewed
all
the
industry,
leaders
along
indonesia
and
one
of
the
biggest
concerns
that
they
had
was
that
nowhere
for
their
talent
to
land,
because
nobody,
nobody
wanted
to
go
ahead
and
spend
three
or
four
thousand
dollars
on
a
small
home
in
monroe,
because
the
price
point
entry
point
was
so
high
and
so
they're
having
to
live
outside
of
the
county
and
they're
having
to
find
housing
for
them
to
really
to
put
anybody
that
was
of
you,
know
certain
level
of
employment
at
the
industry.
D
C
D
There,
a
lot
of
that
will
lean
back
on
the
city
on
what
the
city
gets.
Many
calls
and
many
inquiries
from
different
businesses
and
there
I
believe,
they're
hoping
to
team
up
with
the
city
and
find
I
think
a
coffee
shop
would
be
perfect.
A
starbucks
of
some
kind
out
there,
a
breakfast
place,
something
that
you
have
30
000
cars
that
go
on
78,
currently
in
front
of
the
property.
That's
only
going
to
increase
when
the
bypass
comes.
D
B
C
With
the
reason
yeah
yes-
and
we
second
second
item-
was
the
variance.
C
This
would
be
on
the
variance
with
the
the
entryways
from
three
to
two.
That's
great.
C
C
B
Yeah,
thank
you,
mr
chairman,
so
this
this
property
is
on
204
falcon
street.
It's
a
part
of
a
property.
We
just
recently
approved
for
a
division
this
past
year,
so
the
owner
has
got
a
they
have
an
existing
dwelling.
Here.
I
use
the
pointer
over
your
heads
like
this,
but
there's
an
existing
dwelling
on
the
property.
Now
the
owner
wishes
to
renovate
and
as
part
of
their
renovations
they'd
like
to
add
a
garage
and
that
garage
is
going
to
be
forward-facing
to
felker
street
and
under
the
current
requirements
now
and
your
zoning
ordinance.
B
You
know
we
prohibit
basically
any
garage
that
isn't
side
or
rear
facing
on
a
new
dwelling,
and
that
includes
pretty
much
any
additional
any
addition
to
a
residence.
That's
going
to
have
a
garage
so
they're
asking
for
the
variance
from
that
specific
requirement
to
allow
a
forward-facing
garage,
and
I
think
because
this
is
a
you
know-
basically
a
standard
that
the
city's
been
standing
behind
to
promote
better
quality
construction
out
of
new
residential
subdivisions
and
new
homes
throughout
the
city
as
requiring
the
side
and
rear-facing
garage
instead
of
the
garage
forward
appearance.
B
I
think
this
particular
case
presents
a
challenge
to
the
city
and
and
looking
at
basic,
basically
our
requirement
and
that
the
design
of
a
garage
could
be
pushed
back
further
and
still
achieve
the
house
forward.
Appearance
would
be
the
best
way
I
could
describe
it
not
try
to
use
those
words
in
the
staff
report.
B
So
if
you've
had
a
chance
to
review
our
analysis,
we
recommended
approval,
subject
to
the
one
condition
that
the
garage
b
constructed
as
illustrated
on
this
building
plant
here
forward
to
that.
In
this
case,
the
verbiage
we
used
was
at
least
half
the
distance
of
the
dwelling's
length
and
that's
measured
from
the
front
to
the
rear.
E
The
homeowner,
but
the
thing
is,
is
with
that
home
existing
home.
You
can
only
put
the
garage
on
the
left
side
because
the
high
sides,
which
is
what
you'd
really
thumbed
about
building
a
garage
which
is
only
about
20
inches,
but
if
you
put
on
the
right
side,
you'll
be
about
four
foot
high
with
a
garage,
and
this
is
the
only
way
I'll
be
able
to
put
a
garage
on
the
house
is
on
the
left.
B
We
explored
this
in
a
number
of
scenarios
of
trying
to
achieve,
and
I
guess
compliance
with
the
side
rear
facing
and
it
was
problematic
to
turn
the
garage.
There
wasn't
adequate
room
for
car
vehicle
movement
and
driveway
spacing
and
things
of
that
nature
so
not
trying
to
make
his
case
for
him,
but
that
we
had
some
very
specific
discussions
about
compliance
and,
and
it
wasn't
able
to
make
it
work
with
them.
With
the
arrangement
of
the
house.
C
That
case
for
the
variance
we
need
a
motion
to
for
the
variance
to
be
made.