►
From YouTube: (2022) 07-19 - Planning Commission Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
C
This
is
a
request
for
a
modification
to
the
monroe
pavilion
project,
they're
asking
for
the
rezone
to
be
from
pcd
to
pcd,
with
modifications
and
essentially
there's
four
changes
that
they're
requesting
inside
their
pattern
book.
That
is
included
in
this
request.
C
So,
first,
the
first
modification,
that's
included,
is
they're
asking
to
include
a
building
height
maximum
in
the
pattern
book.
Currently,
it
defaults
to
the
b3
zoning
within
our
ordinance,
which
is
a
35
foot
max,
which
is
a
little
prohibitive,
for
you
know:
potential
hotel
lots
which
are
defined
on
their
master
plan
as
being
a
use
on
two
of
the
lots
that
are
in
the
development
35
feet
would
be
a
little
bit
restrictive,
so
they're
asking
to
increase
that
to
a
height
maximum
of
five
stories
and
that
five
stories
would
be
a
flexible
amount.
C
C
Currently,
the
pattern
book
is
the
zoning
ordinance
of
this
property
and
there
was
no
provision
that
allowed
a
variance
from
the
parking
requirement
within
it,
so
they've
added
that
variance
feature.
And,
lastly,
the
modification
that
they're
asking
for
is
a
a
color
change
and
some
other
modifications
to
allow
certain
tenant
users
to
modify
for
their
corporate
appearance.
C
So
the
staff's
done
the
analysis
of
this
request.
We've
recommended
there
be
two
conditions.
The
first
is
that
the
zero
lot
line
subdivision
allowance
could
be
specifically
reflective
of
that
shopping
center
parcel
the
language
inside
the
pattern
book
is
for
the
out.
C
Lots
is
specific
to
being
one
structure
on
an
out
lot
and
things
of
that
nature,
so
I
think
it
would
be
appropriate
that
it
be
applicable
only
to
the
shopping
center
parcel
and
then
the
second
condition
we've
added
is
basically
the
summary
of
our
analysis
is
that
the
parking
calculations
they've
provided
we're
recommending
that
they
go
with
one
space
per
four
seats,
plus
the
one
space
per
400
square,
foot
max
of
150
150
of
the
minimum
required
spaces
in
the
development,
and
that's
all
that
I
have
mr
chairman.
B
A
That
being
said,
is
anyone
in
opposition
to
any
of
these
proposals
would
like
to
speak.
D
That's
great
evening
how
are
y'all
appreciate
y'all,
taking
time
for
us
this
evening,
john
argo
with
mab
owner
and
developer
of
the
shopping
center.
I've
got
a
number
of
folks
here
that
are
available
either
to
speak,
or
if
you
have
questions
I'd,
be
happy
to
help
you
to
respond.
Can
I
can
I
point
those
out
to
you
certainly
will
be
okay:
we've
got
rick
maxin
who's,
the
architect
for
the
project
here,
ryan
fritz
who's,
the
civil
engineer
for
the
project.
D
We've
got
two
gentlemen
from
mcallister's,
jay,
barringer
and
david
moon
that
are
available
to
answer
questions
specifically
about
the
restaurant
parking.
So
brad
we
had
a
couple
of
handouts.
Can
we
hand
those
out
absolutely
it'd,
be
better
to
hand
them
out
before
yeah.
D
D
D
D
D
The
five
stories
easily
gets
them
comfortably
inside
that
where
they
can
have
a
parapet
on
top
that
screens
their
rooftop
equipment
and
so
forth.
So
really
that
that
particular
limit
is
aimed
to
accommodate
a
particular
user
we've.
We
know
there's
a
big
big
demand.
I
think
brad
brads
and
others
at
the
city
have
told
us
about.
You
know
need
for
hotel,
and
this
is
a
name
chain
hotel.
It's
one.
I
stay
at
one.
A
lot
of
y'all
have
stayed
at
before
too
and
we'll
be
able
to
announce
that
shortly.
D
But
that's
that
particular
element
of
the
request
is
aimed
to
accommodate
the
hotels
that
want
to
be
in
in
in
monroe
there's
more
than
one
by
the
way,
but
we're
happy
to
have
have
the
one
and
bring
it
before
you
there's
a
color
change
to
the
shopping
center
rick.
If
you
want
to
come
up
and
perhaps
talk
about
that
brad,
are
you
able
to
put?
Is
there
a
slide
for
that?
One?
D
F
Hi
rick
max
in
I
was
the
architect
on
this.
So
we
have.
We
are
looking
at
a
tenant
right
here.
Verizon
they
have
specific
colors.
They
like
the
grays
in
there.
It's
a
dark
gray
and
a
light
gray
and
then
they're
changing
our
standing,
seam
awnings
to
fabric
same
color,
black
they're,
just
fabric,
the
color
gray
out
there
is
used
on
five
below
as
well
as
some
of
our
outlets.
F
B
D
And
I
think
brad
any
any
questions,
we're
happy
to
answer
as
we
go
so
feel
free.
Please
brad,
I
guess
zero,
the
zero
lot
line.
Do
we
have
any
questions
on
the
coloration
or
any
of
that?
Okay
and
then
the
zero
lot
line,
brad
that
condition
addressing
it
to
the
specific
to
the
shopping
center
tract
is
fine.
D
We
have
in
one
of
our
leases.
We
have
a
particular
anchor
tenant
that
likes
to
have
its
own
tax
parcel,
so
we're
trying
to
create
a
legal
platted
parcel
to
accommodate
that
and
that
way
the
tax
bill
for
that
parcel
can
be
tied
directly
to
that
tenant
and
not
sort
of
blended
in
with
the
other
30
that
are
out
there,
that's
just
a
particular
need.
So
again,
that's
a
that's
another
user.
D
Based
reason,
we're
in
front
of
you
is
to
allow
a
zero
lot
line,
so
basically
the
property
line
would
fall
on
the
common
wall
between
the
two
buildings.
I
guess
that's
is
that
a
good
way
to
describe
it
brad?
I
think.
C
D
Okay,
so
any
questions
about
that
one,
that's
okay!
Before
we
get
to
the
park-
and
I
I
I
think
brad
pointed
this
out-
but
I
want
to
our
this.
The
changes
we're
asking
for
here
are
purely
apply
to
our
zoning
pattern
book,
which
is
the
zoning
for
for
our
property.
So
any
change
that
you
might
can
see
tonight
is
appropriate
and
is
appreciated,
of
course,
but
also
it
only
applies
to
this
project.
It's
not
a
city-wide
change,
not
a
precedent
in
any
way.
D
The
other
the
other
element
we've
asked
asked
about
is:
we've
got
four
four
restaurant
users.
I've
lost,
unfortunately
already
lost
to
coffee
and
another
food
over
over
parking.
The
when
we
originally
did
the
parking
requirements.
This
was
all
adopted,
pre-coded
in
2019
and
and
of
course,
the
restaurant
restaurant
world
has
changed
since
then,
but
the
parking
request
to
modify
the
parking
maximum
in
the
table
is
to
provide
a
few
more
spaces
to
accommodate
the
needs
of
these
four
users.
D
And
a
whataburger
and
those
four
are
at
contract
with
us
and
talking
to
brad.
He
thought
it
would
be
best
if
we
kind
of
carried
the
ball
for
all
four
and
came
to
you
with
a
consolidated
request
is
how
best
to
modify
the
parking
table
to
provide
enough
parking.
So
these
folks,
these
folks
could
succeed.
D
G
Hello,
jay
behringer
with
mcallister's.
Thank
you
for
your
time
for
letting
us
come
here
and
come
before
you
we're
new
to
this
town,
actually
we're
new
to
mcallister's.
This
will
be
our
first
mcalester's.
Hopefully
you
know
we'll
build
some
more
in
the
future,
so
it's
still
a
mom-and-pop
business
to
us
we're
not
a
big
developer.
I
don't
have
20,
you
know
to
decide.
This
is
going
to
be
our
store
and
this
is
going
to
be
our
investment.
G
We're
going
to
be
there
every
day,
and
this
is
we're
putting
everything
into
this
and
we're
we're
eager
to
get
started
in
this
community.
We're
actually
a
member
of
the
chamber
commerce.
Already,
because
I
want
to
go
ahead
and
start
building
and
you
know
start
selling
sandwiches
as
fast
as
I
can
and
we're
ready
to
go
and
we're
so
eager
about
doing
this.
G
The
whole
process
we've
already
got
the
plants
drawn
up
but,
like
john
said,
we're
having
a
problem
with
the
parking,
because
things
have
changed,
we've
got
a
it's
a
you
know.
I
don't
know
if
you're
familiar
with
mcallister's,
it's
a
you
know,
basically
a
sandwich
and
deli
shop,
so
we're
gonna
have
you
know
sandwiches
and
salads
and
we
got
potatoes
and
you
know
different
drinks,
coffee
drinks
and
or
anyway,
sweet
teas
and
other
drinks.
G
But
we've
got
to
look
at
parking,
not
only
for
you
know
our
regular
customers,
but
we've
got,
we
got
curbside
service
parking.
We've
got
our
delivery
service.
You
know
grove
hub
those
different
delivery
services
that
are
delivered
to
different
persons
in
town,
but
also
you've
got
to
have
we're
looking
at
ev
parking
spots
because
electronic
cars,
you
know,
electric
cars
are
the
future.
You
know
I've
got
reviewing
even
looking.
You
know,
I've
got
different
things
coming,
so
we're
going
to
have
designated
parking
spaces
for
an
electric
car
hookup.
G
So
hopefully
that'll
pull
in
some
more
customers
into
this
shopping
center,
but
also
we've
got
catering
service
so
and
then
we've
got
employees
and
so
we're
trying
to
figure
out
how
we
can
contain
all
of
our
customers
or
all
of
our
you
know,
employees
and
all
of
our
services.
On
that
one
lot,
I'm
happy
to
say
that
the
lot
is
big
enough.
G
It's
I
think
it's
right
on
an
acre,
if
not
a
little
bit
more
than
an
acre,
so
we
do
meet
the
you
know:
watershed
guidelines
and
the
surface,
the
the
the
to
the
natural
service
ratio.
So
it's
not
over
pavement,
so
we
can
increase
our
parking
but,
like
I
said,
I
don't
want
to
go
nuts
and
we're
not
going
to
build
a
parking
deck
or
have
80
parking
spaces.
G
We
just
want
to
increase
it
more
than
I
think
it's
40
that
we're
allowed,
and
I
know
that
with
40
parking
spaces
that
we
won't
be
able
to
manage
our
business
to
the
capacity
that
we
have
to
to
stay
open.
You
know
looking
at
our
p
l
statements,
we've
got
to
be
able
to
serve
so
many
customers
throughout
the
day,
and
if
we
only
have
that
limited
parking
spaces,
then
it's
going
to
limit
to
how
many
customers
that
we
can
actually
serve
it's
going
to.
G
Basically
it
comes
to
our
parking
lot
is
going
to
be
like
I
call
it.
The
chick-fil-a
effect
where
I
don't
know.
If
you
notice
chick-fil-a,
you
like
I'm
going
to
go
by
there,
because
I
can't
get
into
inside
that
restaurant.
You
know
you
know,
and
I
don't
want
that
to
happen.
I
don't
want
people
to
go
by
because
they
can't
pull
into
our.
You
know
our
out
parcel
as
well
as
even
in
the
covenants
to
that
development.
We
can't
have
people
parking
outside
of
our
shopping
center
that
actually
and
then
come
to
us.
G
I
would
love
if
we
could
have
employees
and
walk
to
it,
but
you
know
we've
got
to
be
self-contained
and
to
do
that,
we
just
need
a
little
bit
more
parking.
Like
I
said,
I'm
looking
at
the
request,
and
hopefully
that's
just
enough.
You
know
I
think
that
can
suit
us
and
shoot
any
potential.
Other
businesses
that
are
coming
to
this
town
and
it's
going
to
be
just
to
this
shopping
center
and
not
the
city
just
like
he
said
so.
H
Yeah,
I'm
jay's
business
partner,
I'm
david
moon.
I
also
wanted
to
just
give
y'all
a
little
bit
of
background
one.
We
wanted
to
introduce
ourselves
because
we
are
excited
about
coming
to
monroe
and
serving
the
customers
and
the
guests
in
monroe.
Both
of
us
have
a
background
from
zaxby's.
I
was
vice
president
of
operations.
Franchise
operations
and
training
worked
for
zaxby's
corporate
for
19
years.
H
Jay
was
actually
a
restaurant
owner,
so
he
opened
two
zaxby's,
so
we
have
a
lot
of
experience
in
the
restaurant
industry
and
those
stores
that
we
were
able
to
service
and
and
in
my
particular
case,
being
in
the
operations
department,
those
stores,
those
zaxby's
restaurants
that
have
40-something
parking
spaces,
they
really
struggle,
and
especially
with
the
way
that
the
world
has
evolved.
Now,
where
catering
curbside
call-in
orders,
all
that's
becoming
such
a
big
piece
of
the
industry,
you've
got
more
and
more.
H
You
know
cars
coming
in
there,
and
so
just
our
concern
is
being
able
to
service
this
community
the
way
we
want
to
serve
but
yeah.
I
just
want
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
information
on
our
background
and
who
we
are
like.
I
said
we
are
super
excited
about
this
venture.
We're
super
excited
about
this
community
and
we
want
to
you
know
what
he
and
I
are
going
to
do.
H
Moving
forward
is
we
are
going
to
be
out
meeting
with
the
people
in
the
community,
letting
people
know
who
we
are
and
what
we're
all
about
and
how
we
can
best
serve
this
community,
but
yeah.
We
just
feel
like
with
more
the
more
parking
spaces,
especially
having
to
have
the
the
increased
number
of
employees
with
these
different
sales
channels
that
you
now
have
at
covid.
It
would
just
make
make
for
a
more
efficient
operations
a
better
way
to
serve
monroe.
E
Good
evening,
ryan,
fritz
with
columbia
engineering.
Thank
you
guys
for
your
time
and
thank
you
to
brad
for
we've
been
working
on
this
with
brad
for
for
a
while.
Now
I
think
you
guys
in
your
packets
that
we
distributed
in
the
back
of
the
the
letter.
Is
that
same
table
that
you
see
on
on
this
presentation?
E
What
we
did
is
we
looked
at
kind
of
a
low,
a
middle
and
a
high
parking
calculation.
You
know
that
we
think
is
in
you
know,
is
close
to
what
monroe's
looking
for
right.
Monroe
may
not
be
the
jurisdiction.
Next
door
might
not
be
down
the
road,
so
we're
we're
trying
to
abide
by
what
monroe
is
has
in
their
current
parking
ordinance
and
updating
that
so
the
three,
the
three
columns
in
red
we
proposed
a
one
per
three
hundred
and
one
per
350
square
footage.
E
Maintaining
the
135
maximum,
which
is
current
to
the
pattern
book.
The
the
middle
one,
which
would
be
your
highest,
is
one
per
three
one
per
three
seats:
one
per
three
hundred
square
feet
at
a
hundred
and
fifty
percent,
and
then
the
staff
recommended
column
is
the
low
end,
which
is
the
far
right
and
that's
one
per
400
at
one
one
per
four
seats
and
150.
E
Ideally
from
talking
to
the
the
tenants
that
you
know
mab
has
under
contract.
Ideally
we
would.
We
would
lean
toward
the
the
middle
to
the
high,
and
you
know
we,
I
respect
you
know
brad's
opinion
and
how
brad
you
know,
the
calculation
that
he
sees.
But
if
you're
asking
me,
which
one
would
we
prefer,
I
think
we
would
say
we
prefer
the
middle
or
the.
D
E
E
So
mcallister's,
if
you
look
specifically
in
this
table
or
on
the
screen,
the
first
blue
one
on
this
screen,
it
would
be
mcallister's.
You
know.
Current
monroe
parking
standard
is
based
off
seating
and
square
footage
and
then
your
allowable
maximum.
E
So
in
our
current
pattern,
book
mcallister's
has
allowed
39
parking
spaces
as
david
and
jay
discussed
a
little
bit
earlier.
I
mean,
I
think
what
if,
if
there's
a
number
that
you
guys,
you
know
needed.
That's
probably
around
60.50.
C
Mr
chairman,
may
I
interject
sure
so
have
you
looked
at
the
requirement
that
that
ryan's,
describing
specifically
that
so
we're
recommending
that
there
be
56
potential
parking
spaces
on
your
site,
so
the
one
per
4
to
400,
with
a
hundred
fifty
percent
max,
would
get
you
56
spaces.
E
And
you
know
the
yes
thanks
for
pointing
that
out.
You
know
it's
there's!
No
there's!
No
perfect
calculation,
one
user
is
going
to
different
from
a
differ
from
another
user.
You
know,
and
what
we're
trying
to
really
do
is
not
make
15
potential
restaurants
out
here
all
come
in
asking
for
variances
if
they're
not
happy,
so
you
know
like
like
jay
and
david
described.
Each
of
these
outlots
was
designed
for
a
certain
amount
of
of
impervious
surface
allowable.
E
You
know
for
storm
water
detention
requirements;
they
can't
they
can't
come
out
here
and
build
70
parking
spaces
just
because
it
wouldn't
be
the
design,
wouldn't
work.
So
to
speak.
To
that
point,
brad,
it's
just
we're
trying
to
lump
in
as
many
of
the
tenants
that
we've
that
we've
spoken
with
and
the
numbers
that
we
have
align
a
little
bit
more
with
with
the
the
middle
calculation
than
the
the
one
per
400.
C
Yeah,
I
I
mean
and
ryan's
correct.
We
I
mean
we've.
He
and
I
worked
together
on
this
for
the
past
two
months,
trying
to
try
to
find
the
middle
compromise
on
what
would
be
best
for
the
city.
You
know
and
would
allow
for
adequate
parking
within
the
development
itself,
and
in
my
analysis
I
mean
I
felt
like
that.
The
one
for
four
seats
and
the
one
per
400
square
foot
parking
space
calculation
closely
aligned
with
their
tenant
requirement.
C
I
mean
there
are
a
few
spaces
short
here
there,
but
like
we
just
heard
that
the
you
know
one
of
the
applicants.
Future
tenants
is
okay
with
the
potential
for
there
being
56
spaces
which
would
allow
for
the
one
per
4
and
400
square
foot
calculation.
Would
that
work
for
all
of
their
potential
clients?
D
Just
just
in
commenting
further,
we
we've
got
mcallister's
here
tonight,
but
I've
also
interacted
with
panda
and
huey
and
whataburger,
and
we've
shown
them
the
same,
the
same
three
tables
and
they
seem
to
be
okay
with
the
the
middle.
What
I'm
gonna
call
the
middle
table,
which
is
the
fir
that's
the
first
one
with
the
two
first
one
with
the
with
the
two
star
asterisk
seems
to
be
that's
one
at
three
seats,
one
at
350
square
feet
and
staying
at
the
same
135
percent
cap.
D
That
seems
to
be
that
seems
to
be
satisfactory
to
all
four
and
avoids
a
flood
of
variances
coming
in.
So
I'm
trying
to
I'm
trying
to
do
this
one
time
and
take
care
of
as
much
interest
as
we
have
and
not
run
off.
Let's
say:
I've
lost
a
coffee
and
I've
lost
another
food
over
this
already
we
did
do
some
code,
research
looking
at
loganville
and
braselton
and
snellville
and
walton
county
in
madison
and
the
real
predicament
is
the
the
monroe
maximum
is
actually
less
the
real
maximum
in
the
pattern.
D
Book
is
less
than
their
their
required
minimums.
So
that's
kind
of
the
starting
point.
We're
so
far
behind
what
what
ordinary
the
rest
of
the
area
is
requiring.
So
it's
a
little
bit
of
catch
up,
and
I
and
I
hear
what
brad's
saying,
but
but
I
know
these
guys,
four
or
five
spaces
don't
seem
like
a
lot,
but
it's
literally
life
and
death
to
these
businesses.
D
D
So
I
think,
I
think
our
request,
even
for
the
medium
table
is
very,
very
reasonable
and
we
know
based
on
our
conversations
with
the
users
that
it's
acceptable
to
them,
so
I
don't
want
to
shortcut
them
four
or
five
spaces
and
then
lose
them
over.
Well,
you
tried
we're
out
of
here.
You
know
we
wanted.
So
that's
really,
that's
really
the
case.
I
just
kind
of
throw
myself
on
your
mercy.
We
we
think
we've
got
a
justification
for
it.
D
We
wouldn't
be
here
to
ask
for
less
than
what
we
need
so,
but
we're
also
trying
to
say
we're
only
asking
for
what
we
need
we're
not
trying
to
create
a
you
know
an
excess
beyond
that
and
it
it
does
seem
to
relate
to
the
way
the
other
jurisdictions
regulate,
regulate
restaurant
parking.
So
I
guess
with
that,
any
any
other
questions
for
us.
D
B
C
C
At
one
time,
well
then,
this
brings
up
a
good
point,
and
this
is
something
that
I
identified
specifically
in.
My
staff
report
is
that
there
is
no
shared
parking
plan
for
this
overall
development.
So
the
fact
that
you
would
have
to
park
all
of
your
employees
and
your
customers
on
one
lot
is
semi-problematic
for
the
overall
development.
C
C
I
would
imagine
that
it
would
once
you've
passed
your
grand
opening
and
you've
got
you've,
probably
gone
through
some
employee
attrition
and
things
of
those.
Because
that's
what
happens
in
the
food
business
right
I
mean,
but
I'm
not
saying
you
need
less
parking
because
of
that,
but
I
did.
I
did
just
hear
the
youtube
gentleman
say
that
56
parking
spaces
may
be
okay,
I
mean
you
guys
have
a
takeout
window
in
your
business,
correct.
C
And
we're
encouraged,
we
do
occur
tv
parking
in
the
city,
we've
had
several
parking
spaces
in
the
city
that
have
come
down
and
switched
from.
You
know
traditional
parking
to
ev
parking,
but
there
was
no
increase
in
parking
on
the
site
to
accommodate
that
there
was
a
simple
transition
from
maybe
you
know,
regular
parking
to
ev
so
inside
the
city
we've
seen
that
in
fact
we're
couraging
and
the
city
is
going
to
be
pushing
some
of
this
parking
ourselves,
but
we're
not
adding
parking
spaces
to
make
that
happen.
A
Brad,
it
seems
like
we
close
to
a
compromise
on.
This
is
what
we're
recommending
is
the
number
56.
C
Yeah,
so
the
56,
the
I
mean,
like
that's
the
the
furthest
column
over.
So
if
I
were
to
point
to
it
on
the
screen
here
I
mean
it's
this
column
here
which
reflects
the
one
which
is
what's
written
in
my
condition.
That's
the
one
per
four
seats,
one
per
400
square
foot,
calculation
with
150
max
so
right
now,
your
current
ordinance
that
regulates
parking
within
our
city
is
what
they
have
inside
their
pattern
book,
which
is
one
space
per
five
seats
and
one
space
at
600
square
feet.
C
So
this
is
a
basically
a
compromise
from
our
zoning
ordinance
to
allow
for
more
parking
within
this
development.
So
I
just
felt
like,
in
my
analysis,
that
the
one
for
three
and
the
one
for
350
is
almost
doubling
what
our
own
ordinance
allows,
because
it
goes
to
135
max.
Ours
is
currently
120
in
our
code,
felt
like
that.
The
one
for
four
was
a
was
a
middle
ground
number
and-
and
it
closely
relates
to
what
the
tenants
are
actually
specifying,
that
they
can
actually
or
that
they
require
now
because
the
tenant
says
they
require.
C
C
I
guess
some
some
wiggle
room
there,
where
they're
going
to
have
to
make
accommodations
to
accommodate
local
ordinances.
In
this
case,
I
feel
like
that
this
accommodates
the
potential
users
on
this
site
and
doesn't
over
park
the
development,
which
is
what
our
current
regulations
are,
attempting
to
avoid.
D
That
particular
column.
No,
that's
not
our
recommendation,
we're
we're
we.
It
falls
short
for
at
least
three
of
the
other
users
and
maybe
a
lot
of
the
other
users.
I
mean
we
can't
forecast
every
particular
use,
but
it
falls
short.
It
underparks
the
other
three
users,
so
I
think
they
will.
They
will
go
away.
What
we've
recommended
is
the
is
that
first
red
or
pink
column,
which
is
the
middle,
which
is
the
middle
parking
it
does,
it
does
meet
mcallister's
and
it
will
get.
D
It
will
get
the
other
users
an
adequate
amount
of
parking
based
on
our
conversations
with
them.
Again
we
didn't
propose
the
column
furthest
to
the
right.
We
were
asked
to
include
it
for
discussion
here,
so
we
did
that,
but
our
proposal
was
to
bring
forth
something
that
we
know
will
satisfy
the
other
users
and
either
of
those
either.
Those
first
two
columns
will
but
we're
willing
to
to
do
the
lesser
of
the
two
and
it
it
does.
D
C
I
think
I
would
just
take
a
vote
at
this
point.
I
mean,
if
there's
no
opposition
to
what's
going
on
and
with
the
any
anyone
here
I
mean,
there's
not
really
a
negotiation
to
occur.
I
mean
you
got
my
staff
recommendation.
If
you
guys
are
comfortable
with
it,
you
can
vote
on
it.
I
I'm
not
willing
to
budge
that
we
go
to
the
one
to
350..
I
spent
an
inordinate
amount
of
time
reviewing
their
request
for
all
of
their
different
parking
and
in
order
to
keep
the
city's
policies
and
not
over
parking
a
site.
B
A
A
C
C
It's
a
one-for-one
change
on
all
of
the
wall,
signs
and
they're
going
to
remove
the
internal
illumination
of
the
existing
signs,
with
their
new
signs
and
they'll
be
halo,
lit
and
the
same
would
apply
to
their
proposed
ground
sign
here.
They're
also
going
to
remove
this,
the
freestanding
pylon
for
it
and
lower
it
to
the
ground,
and
so
we
essentially
were
agreeable
to
all
of
their
changes
for
their
sign
changes.
C
The
only
thing
we
asked-
and
I've
already
asked
talk
to
the
applicant
about
this-
to
make
sure
that
we're
clear
on
the
understanding
about
the
ground
sign
needs
to
have
a
monument
pedestal
around
the
base
of
it.
Essentially,
it
can't
have
a
little
a
freestanding
portion
of
it
and
I
think
they're,
okay
with
that,
but
I'll.
Let
them
speak
to
that
issue
specifically
and
then
the
proposed
law
signs
we're
just
asking
that
they'd
be
constructed
as
they
proposed.
B
I
I
I
Thank
you
again
for
allowing
us
to
present
today,
I'm
here
today
on
behalf
of
the
sign
manufacturer,
agi
and
local
sign.
Installer
bloodworth,
sign
service
to
my
right
is
joanna
hensley
project
manager
representing
bank
of
america,
I'm
here
to
humbly
request
the
planning
commission's
approval
to
allow
the
proposed
rebranded
signage
for
the
existing
bank
of
america
located
at
2020
west
spring
street.
I
This
project
is
zoned
to
b3,
the
parcel
size
is
1.35
acres
and
the
building
size
is
6460
square
feet.
The
key
factors
in
our
request
this
evening
is
for
the
planning
commission's
approval
is
as
follows.
The
signs
being
proposed
this
evening
are
replacing
existing
one
for
one.
The
proposed
signage
protects
the
public
health
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
and
others
within
the
county.
The
signage
reduces
traffic
hazards,
pedestrian
hazards
and
other
hazards.
I
The
proposed
signage
promotes
and
maintains
the
aesthetic
qualities
of
the
city
and
county.
The
proposed
signage
promotes
economic
development
as
signs
provide
an
important
medium
through
which
individuals
may
convey
a
message
to
the
public.
The
proposed
request
for
signage
is
compatible
with
other
businesses
located
within
the
south
surrounding
counties,
communities
and
developments.
I
The
signage
copy
and
sides
are
not
offensive
or
obsessive,
but
rather
aesthetically
pleasing
well
formed
and
balanced
to
the
building,
elevation
and
neighboring
businesses.
Again,
we
humbly
ask
the
planning
commission
to
please
consider
the
allowances
being
requested
today,
what
they
need
to
identify
all
elevations
visible
to
the
public.
We
thank
you
in
advance
for
your
consideration.
B
Hi,
I'm
joanna,
I
work
for
agi
and
I'm
representing
bank
of
america
for
this
signage
rebranding
project.
I
wanted
to
show
you
what
the
image
that
I
showed
brad
before
the
meeting
of
what
will
actually
be
installed
for
the
ground
sign.
We
are
going
to
be
taking
down
the
pylon
and
replacing
it
with
a
monument
and
per
brad's
request.
We
will
make
that
a
full
base
monument-
and
this
is
what
that
will
look
like.