►
From YouTube: (2022) 02-15 - Planning Commission Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
C
Well,
it's
5
30..
Let's
call
the
meeting
february
the
15th
2022
of
planning
and
zoning
permission
to
order
roll
call
at
the
record
reflected
all
are
present,
except
for
rosalind
parks.
C
D
C
In
a
second
to
approve
the
minutes
for
january,
the
18th
2022,
all
in
favor,
say
aye.
A
B
C
B
All
right.
Like
I
said
this
is
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
application
for
wall
signs
at
703,
west
spring
street
staff
recommends
approval
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
request,
with
the
condition
that,
prior
to
the
issuance
of
any
sign
permits,
an
existing
non-conforming
pylon
sign
located
in
the
northwest
corner
of
the
property
shall
be
removed.
Actually
that
condition
has
already
been
met,
so
it'll
just
be
consideration
of
the
signage.
E
Yes,
sir,
I'm
john
raines,
the
owner
of
the
monroe
ace
hardware
and
just
like
to
request
that
the
sign
be
permitted
as.
E
Submitted
unless
there's
any
questions
in
regards
to
it,.
C
I
mean
thank
you,
john
appreciate
it.
At
this
time
I
asked
if
there
was
anybody
present
to
speak
in
opposition
to
this
request,
seeing
none
will
close
the
public
hearings
and
they'll
entertain
a
motion.
D
D
C
B
Yes,
sir,
thank
you.
This
is
certificate
of
appropriateness,
case
610
at
118.
North
broad
street
staff
recommendation
is
approval
on
the
cover
sheet.
It's
approval
without
conditions,
but
I
did
want
to
mention
in
in
preparing
the
cover
sheet.
We
did
notice
that
there's
two
parcels
involved.
One
of
the
parcels
actually
contains
a
non-conforming
sign,
the
pylon
sign
that
was
formerly
for
katie's
diner
and
the
coffee
shop
before
that.
And
what
have
you,
since
this
request,
is
sandwiched
in
between
two
requests
that
we've
conditioned
with
removing
non-conforming
signs
prior
to
issuance
of
permitted
science?
B
C
F
Hi
I'm
chris
evans,
I'm
I'm
with
e
plus
the
architecture
I'm
representing
chad
draper
the
developer.
I
just
want
to
say
thank
to
staff
and
you
all
for
reviewing
this.
I
have
maybe
two
things
one.
We
would
like
to
have
the
option
to
rotate
the
smoke:
shack,
90
degrees,
it
wouldn't
change
the
design
of
any
shape
or
form
just
we
just
want
to
maybe
rotate
it
90
degrees.
So
we
have
more
frontage
of
that
existing
building
in
terms
of
the
sign
the
non-conforming
sign.
It's
been
there
a
long
time,
so
I'm
I'm
not
sure.
F
C
F
Really,
just
I'm
sorry
yeah,
just
really
the
pull
it's
kind
of
been
a
a
conversation
piece
since
we
we
spoke
a
long
time
ago
as
trying
to
leave
it
as
part
of
the
landscaped
area.
I
mean
we
would
really
just
like
to
leave.
Just
have
the
pole.
The
box
frame
can
go
away.
I
think
that
would
be
fair.
F
Out,
that's
awesome!
So
can
you
point
to
the
little
white
box?
That's
the
shack
right
there.
We
just
want
to
rotate
it
90
degrees.
So
it's
so
you
see
less
width.
So
you
only
see
the
width
of
the
shack.
We
would
like
that
option
and
if
you
move
slightly
to
the
right,
there's
another
little
box
right
there,
that's
about
where
that
sign
is
all
right.
B
The
one
reason
why
we
want
to
condition
the
removal
of
non-conforming
signs
in
all
instances
is
because
that's
a
requirement
for
us
to
issue
new
sign
permits
is
that
non-conforming
signs
be
removed,
so
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
issue
permits
on
new
signs
until
the
non-conformity
was
removed.
Oh
it
makes
sense,
and
we
wanted
to
make
it
make
that
a
condition
of
the
approval.
B
F
C
The
condition
with
conditions
that
the
sign
is
removed
while
unsigned,
is
removed,
correct
second
and
a
motion
and
a
second
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye.
C
B
Yes,
sir,
this
is
case
6
6
11
at
7
30,
highway
138
is
co
application
for
redevelopment
of
the
site.
They
actually
are
working
on
complete
redevelopment
of
that
site,
including
demolition
of
the
existing
building.
So
they're
asking
for
approval
for
all
of
that,
they'll
have
to
come
back
again
for
signage.
It's
not
included
in
this
package.
That's
correct
and
they're,
aware
of
that.
B
G
Michael
toothacher,
lacroix
engineering
we're
the
the
civil
engineer,
landscape
architecture,
firm
for
the
project.
It's
a
proposed
2500
square
foot.
Starbucks
development
drive
through,
like
the
gentleman
said,
complete
demolition
of.
What's
out
there
today,
removal
of
the
building
removal
of
asphalt.
You
know
everything's
brand
new
ground
up,
beating
current
corn,
stormwater
ordinances.
G
G
G
A
Any
any
impact
or
change
to
the
exit
from
the
parking
lot
to
138.
It's
still
a
right
turn
only
at
that
at
that
position.